TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_Kita_ Archive

View 4 posts and 86 comments by _Kita_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

baseless sexism Ha ha ha ha!
/r/MensRights22/09/11 04:21 PM
-2

lolforever. And that, coming from someone in a "movement" that spends 90% of it's time simply hating on women or another movement?
/r/MensRights22/09/11 03:38 AM
-2

Yawn. If you want to really learn how to troll, 4chan can give you some great pointers.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 01:34 AM
-7

Oh, it's good to know that don't advocate violence against feminists because they're useful. Do you advocate violence against the mentally handicapped or children because they're not useful to you?
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:22 PM
-8

I figured, just looking out for you, and making sure you correct your spelling errors!
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:25 PM
-11

Your username is so perfect! Don't forget my blog, we love r/mensrights over there!
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:04 PM
-12

hypocrisy
/r/MensRights20/09/11 07:52 PM
15

You are so cute when you're mad (and make no sense at all)!
/r/MensRights19/09/11 07:02 AM
12

Didn't do the reading, did you, my dear? The author is listed.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:15 AM
10

Actually, there are lots of feminists who aren't making jokes about killing men. edit: Yeah, right, I'm just doing this to be critical of the MRM, it has nothing to do with the fact that AnnArchist actually said those things.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 03:17 AM
30

Whooooooooooooooooooops! For a more detailed list of why this is a spectacularly bad idea, simply click the link above. There's absolutely no way r/MR can continue with the "we're not misogynists!" charade.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:44 AM
-12

Yay! You just proved my point!
/r/MensRights15/09/11 05:21 AM
-11

No, I just have more important things to do than waste my time with those who don't want to engage. If they were interested, they'd do it somewhere a lot less hateful.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 04:44 AM
-8

My dear, instead of getting overexcited yourself, perhaps you should consider the fact that I read the responses here, and due to the fact that no one here cares to hear what I have to say. My responses have been downvoted so far that I can only respond every ten minutes. I have no interest in a dialogue in a place like that, I'm not going to sit around thinking OOOH, WHEN CAN I POST ON R/MR AGAIN?
/r/MensRights15/09/11 03:17 AM
-8

Nope, not a bit. That's not even close. I'm dismissive because it's completely pointless to engage, I've realized that reading the other comments here. She's trying to derail AND drown me in words, a pretty typical thing around here and I'm not interested.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 03:07 AM
-9

Essentially what you've said is: there is no way for me to win here, so I stopped trying to talk. And so I'm done :D I wish you all the best with your nonsense!
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:52 AM
-20

And you're a bit of an idiot! :D I'm reminding myself why I don't post here, there's actually on interest in dialogue. C'est la guerre!
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:33 AM
-15

Feminists feel otherwise. As a feminist, you're trying to put words in my mouth. Do you not recognize that you're apparently doing what you say you hate so much? Again, I'm going to have to say that feminists are not a monolith and that one person doesn't speak for a movement. To my knowledge, the person who joked about a man being emasculated doesn't even self-identify as a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 10:25 PM
-11

First, sigh feminism isn't actually a monolith, no more than the men's rights movement is a monolith. I'm a pretty radical feminist, and don't know any other feminists who believe that no feminist has ever done anything wrong in the name of feminism. That'd be absurd.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 10:14 PM
-8

Okay, sorting through your sarcasm... You do know that I did actually address her question? Quite succinctly, in fact.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 09:57 PM
-16

I know its frustrating that your word is not taken as the gospel in every area of your life that feels unfair, I'm sorry. Aww, your patronizing is so adorabs!
/r/MensRights14/09/11 09:45 PM
-10

I think it is extremely difficult to constructively criticize anyone without them becoming offended or defensive. Which is kinda why MRAs get a little pissed when feminists "womansplain" to them about how their issues are not really issues, or not as important as women's issues, or actually women's issues at their core, or how a feminist approach is the answer for them. How is that not denying another person's right to define their own life, identity and experience? Now that is an extremely comp…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 09:26 PM
-10

Hey, thanks for the link. I'm the one who put that post up. Did you actually read it? The point was that it's an extremely difficult thing to criticize a marginalized person from a stance of privilege, not that it can't be done.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 09:10 PM
8

Hello there, I'm a feminist (as well you know) and although I believe this is just a sarcastic response to that woman being dumb about a "demand" on her husband, and I seem to be the only one who bothered to do anything about it. So I emailed the writer asking for a response and linking her to the hubub here and on r/wtf. I will be happy to post her response.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:18 PM
3

You don't know shit about women.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 04:40 PM
1

Only time will tell, right?
/r/MensRights11/04/11 12:19 AM
0

And you, too, of course :D
/r/MensRights11/04/11 12:03 AM
1

My darling, you seem to be talking yourself in circles. You didn't make very much sense to begin with, and now you're positively silly. Hateful? Moi? The only thing I hate is ignorance :D
/r/MensRights10/04/11 10:12 PM
0

I know you are, it just confuses me when you do it in the subreddit you claim you really support.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 09:53 PM
-1

Do you know what paranoia is? Who, exactly would I be spying for'? Ze feminists? What secrets would I reveal to the bigbad org I'm spying for, especially considering this is a public subreddit? I think you might have an over-inflated sense of your own self-worth, aside from your nonsensical paranoia. If it comes from a genuine mental illness, I do apologize, I certainly try to be understanding when speaking with those who might have disabilities.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:51 PM
-1

Wow, so much vitriol for one comment. As you may have seen, I received a huge number of comments yesterday which I was replying to. I apologize if I made a mistake, I am only human after all. I'm so glad you were able to read my mind and determine my actual intent using...your psychic abilities? I'm awfully tired of saying "yes indeed I love men, but I hate misogyny" so I think I won't be repeating it any longer. So misogyny is only misogyny when it's "really bad"? And you get to decide which is…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:24 PM
0

My dear aetheralloy, are you playing hard to get? Or are you simply, finally, realizing you can't possibly have an answer to that question that makes any sense at all? If you are indeed psychic, James Randi has one million dollars he'd like to give you. I'd love to see a fellow redditor get it, so please, apply right away!
/r/MensRights10/04/11 08:34 AM
1

I've already addressed that comment here.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 08:09 AM
-1

Thanks for the civil conversation, I look forward to talking to you in the future :)
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:36 AM
-5

Well, that comment is certainly interesting, however, you can't know my mind better than I do. So, oppression isn't hatred? It doesn't indicate hatred? Slavery didn't indicate any bad feelings on the part of white people towards blacks? I'm never pursuing policies that hurt men, does that mean I'm "no true feminist"? Awareness raising in reddit at large, and within this subreddit. I don't think r/mensrights is without redeeming qualities, and that everyone here is incapable of recognizing misogy…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:25 AM
0

I'm not some "luminary casting light" - I'm one person pointing out problems. Major problems. I don't claim to be more pure or correct than anyone, I just know everyone deserves to be heard. Not linking to the text, I was trying not to invite a downvote brigade (which is unfair, and unacceptable) but instead, someone linked to it anyway. The "full" truth is just that. If you feel I'm unfairly representing them by providing a screen capture instead of a link, I'd be happy to provide a direct link…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:08 AM
-1

People are exceptionally rude, aren't they? If only everyone followed reddiquitte.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:57 AM
-2

If that's the case, please tell me if I'm wrong. I thought I was doing it because sunlight's the best disinfectant.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 05:53 AM
-1

I believe that commenter believes Fatalistic to be "hopelessly daft" to say something so easily falsifiable, which is how I addressed it. And my comment was more to the "why are you posting here?" That seems to go along with "why are you making your blog" which is that I believe sunlight is the best disinfectant. The response to majeric was that I was agreeing with the subreddit being flawed and that you have to sift very hard to find information relevant to men's rights (not reactionary or not …
/r/MensRights10/04/11 05:42 AM
0

Really, what are they? I didn't know that you were psychic.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 05:24 AM
-2

I couldn't agree more with your second statement. Just because you're unhappy with what I have to say, it doesn't mean I'll go away.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 05:02 AM
-4

This is a cyclical argument, and has been addressed elsewhere. Also, our commenting policy is posted on the blog, so if you're afraid of censorship, read it first.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:51 AM
0

Heavens, "called in a downvote mob" with the last post? I think not. I actually redacted the title of the post AND the commenter's name. The only place it was revealed was here, in r/mensrights. You don't have to believe that, I was simply stating my personal reasons for posting.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:41 AM
-4

Thanks, I'd be replying to Fatalistic now, but unfortunately, enough people on r/mensrights have reported my comments as spam, so I can only comment once very ten minutes. It's pretty effective censorship. I am of the second opinion. I have absolutely no problem with the men's rights movement as a whole, my problem is with the subreddit, and with things that are misogynistic getting upvoted. You can read through my comment history and learn that I am always willing to earnestly engage.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:29 AM
-4

I have no desire to "convert everyone to feminism" or shame anyone out of their movement. However, I am doing just what I've said I'm doing, pointing out obvious misogyny. Why do lots of posters on r/MensRights critique feminist blogs? Same reason. Because maybe, somewhere, the truth will be found. And raising awareness is always a good thing.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:10 AM
-2

See our moderation policy, we post everything but trolling (and we're pretty lenient with that) and personal info. So, your comment is up :)
/r/MensRights10/04/11 03:59 AM
0

I did comment on that thread, see my other comments here :) I'm posting here because I received a huge number of supportive posts and comments last time, it encouraged me to post again! How is it out of context? This time I posted the entire post title and even the first response.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 03:44 AM
-2

I did end up posting directly to Fatalistic's comment and this is how zie responded. It appears to be very little fact and a lot of opinion.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 03:12 AM
-1

Just to clear things up, I don't want to get caught up in semantics, but subhuman in the way I referred to it is "less than normal" or less than. Sadly, there were a whole lot of people who believe that women are less than men, dating back from the ancient Romans to families in China that commit female infanticide. Legal personhood was denied to all sorts of groups for all sorts of reasons, and yes, women were in one of those categories. Whenever we denied someone legal personhood it was for som…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 02:54 AM
-3

I'm not the author of manboobz, but I can provide at least some answers. I haven't met women who're upset when people are proud of what they've accomplished. I'm a pretty radical feminist and I say awesome, good job. However, when someone tries to dismiss the accomplishments of others, or to say that their accomplishments are the only ones worth discussing, I take issue with that. No, I don't think women should be mad at not stepping up earlier. Women throughout history were breaking rules and t…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 02:43 AM
1

So being seen as subordinate or subhuman isn't categorically worse?
/r/MensRights09/04/11 11:20 PM
-1

Thanks for your enthusiasm :D
/r/MensRights09/04/11 11:10 PM
1

Wrong enough to say this comment is hands-down ignorant. My favorite part of this statement, besides it’s hostility towards women, is that it is factually untrue. I feel that Fatalistic may have missed a few history lessons, so I’ll clear a few things up. All of this info is found with just a few minutes of Googling, and some of it’s direct quotes from Wikipedia. Women didn’t receive the right to vote in the United States until the Nineteenth Amendment passed in 1920. For those of you who are ba…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 10:56 PM
2

Good point, I believe I will!
/r/MensRights09/04/11 10:46 PM
0

I know, right?
/r/MensRights09/04/11 10:19 PM
0

Who's asking anyone to apologize?
/r/MensRights09/04/11 10:09 PM
2

I figured I'd save someone the effort and go ahead and crosspost this here.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 08:03 PM
1

Sure thing, thanks for your response. It looks like we'll agree to disagree, as I believe voting is a scalable reflection of your users. I think very rarely do people say outright things that are open to no interpretation, that's not really how an atmosphere is constructed. However, I'll continue to point out misogyny when I see it. Thanks again, and I hope to talk with you again some time.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 08:24 PM
-2

Man you have no idea how humorless we can actually get :D Haven't been reading manboobz lately, I guess.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 01:01 AM
0

\o/
/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:41 PM
-2

Aww, I guess I'm just another humorless feminist!
/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:19 PM
-1

Again, this? http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#sensitive http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#theinternet And I'm so glad we've found a final arbiter for what is and isn't misogyny, will you be available for consultation at all times?
/r/MensRights07/04/11 06:17 PM
-1

Hooray! Another fan :D I love that you're spending so much time and energy thinking about meeeee!
/r/MensRights07/04/11 06:04 PM
-8

No, we found lots of examples in ten minutes, this was the most egregious example.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 07:20 AM
-1

Then until tomorrow! Sleep well!
/r/MensRights07/04/11 06:16 AM
-1

Wait, I thought that kloo believed in a vast worldwide feminist conspiracy? So doesn't that mean that reality believes "feminist bullshit"? Right, so if enough people believe something, it's totally okay. Like at the time of integration, the majority of people were against it, that must mean that integration was wrong too.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 06:05 AM
-1

I completely disagree with the Godwin's law regarding misogyny. I feel like we're losing the basics of the argument: if joking about beating women isn't misogynist, what is? Actually beating women? Why else would someone say something as terrible as what that commenter did other than to joke in a way that was hurtful to women, and to garner support from other people who believed it was okay to joke about doing violence to women? Thanks for your thoughtful response, I'm more than glad to continue…
/r/MensRights07/04/11 05:34 AM
-3

lol that's not how it works :D
/r/MensRights07/04/11 05:24 AM
-4

There's so much here, I'll just respond with this. Start reading where it says "Despite feminists'..." I'm not dismissing your argument, I'm saying it's already been addressed. Misogynistic jokes are still misogynist.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 04:53 AM
-3

Not an acceptable argument for misogyny. Gallows humor? Still not okay. If I'd made a misandrist remark about slapping a man in r/feminisms I'd expect it would have been removed and downvoted into oblivion as would be appropriate for people who think misandry is disgusting.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 04:23 AM
-1

Is it possible for you to sound like a poorly mannered asshole and troll? Hugs and kisses.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 02:20 AM
-4

Thanks for your honesty and clearing that up.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 01:35 AM
-12

Just wait :D This may be a series of misogynistic comments...I haven't decided. Maybe I'll make it manboobz style! It was what I "dug up" in about ten minutes of looking.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 01:25 AM
-2

Hm? I'm not being victimized by anyone, don't put words in my mouth. I don't mind apologizing at all :)
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:55 PM
-9

What do you mean "people I'm trying to impress?" I edited the original comment and admitted I made a mistake there, as well as here, and in that thread. Shall I publicly commit seppuku?
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:47 PM
-10

I have no idea wtf this off-topic nonsense is all about?
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:33 PM
-1

I totally understand, thanks for being understanding :) I have absolutely no problem with admitting I'm wrong when I am.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:06 PM
-12

I do no such thing, my brother is a subscriber and frequent reader of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:04 PM
-7

In that case, I do apologize, someone linked me to a post that was celebrating Hitler's achievements and appeared to be from kloo. I'm more than happy to admit I was wrong and will edit my comments. Edit: original comment has already been edited.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 10:47 PM
-6

There's nothing private about where you post, you simply go to the person's history.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 10:35 PM
-16

I did no such thing, I merely pointed out that he has, in the past, posted to white rights more often than to ask them to remove the link. If he had said he'd never otherwise posted there, I'd have taken that comment down and apologized. edit: In fact, if I was incorrect, I pre-apologize. I said what I believed to be true.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 10:32 PM
1

Here's hoping!
/r/MensRights18/03/11 07:04 PM
-3

I couldn't agree more here. I'm a feminist and someone linked me directly here. So much of what I've read on this thread is extremely odd, and very little of it makes much sense.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 02:50 AM
2

Actually, it was also posted to OneY (as you can see) and was supposed to be posted here yesterday. That has been corrected, thanks for your concern. Perhaps you should have PM'd the OP?
/r/MensRights06/01/11 05:32 PM
2

Thanks ahead of time for your submission. There was a bit of a delay posting this as the Men's Rights Activist who promised they would failed to do so. Either way, it doesn't close for some time and they appreciate your participation.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 05:28 PM
15

I actually wanted to say that sounds inaccurate. I've worked with expense reports and reimbursements and it's incredibly time-consuming and expensive, and the burden is on the company. Doubly so when the types of expenses have to be examined carefully and must conform to a very limited budget. The reimbursement system for child support would also be terribly complex, and difficult to legislate. For example, how many extra square feet per child should be needed in an apartment? How much extra sho…
/r/MensRights22/08/10 06:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter