TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_WutzInAName_ Archive

View 27 posts and 1,213 comments by _WutzInAName_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
668

Health_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights04/08/25 11:39 PM
607

General_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights22/07/26 08:11 PM
289

Progress_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights08/01/26 04:01 AM
280

General_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:22 PM
240

article_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 08:22 PM
236

Progress_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights03/10/25 11:04 PM
190

General_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights30/01/26 09:33 PM
182

General_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights05/12/24 03:23 PM
178

media_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/24 03:26 PM
162

General_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights08/03/26 06:24 PM
161

health_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/25 11:46 PM
151

legal rights_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 01:47 AM
142

Edu./Occu._WutzInAName_/r/MensRights31/01/26 12:58 PM
139

General_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights31/07/25 01:56 PM
135

misandry_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/25 02:25 PM
126

Discrimination_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights24/07/25 01:45 AM
109

legal rights_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 06:05 PM
98

article_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/25 11:55 PM
92

resource_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/24 09:02 AM
59

resource_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/24 05:53 PM
57

Activism/Support_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights11/11/24 05:52 PM
55

Activism/Support_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights01/01/25 03:55 PM
54

misandry_WutzInAName_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/24 06:29 PM
41

General_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights17/01/25 04:08 PM
38

General_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:57 AM
27

General_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights13/10/24 09:54 AM
8

Legal Rights_WutzInAName_/r/MensRights27/07/25 01:38 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,213 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
32

The criminal “justice” system is extremely sexist, extremely racist, and extremely classist. No other system locks up as many of its own people. Most Americans don’t trust it, nor should they.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 07:13 PM
15

Definitely. Good on you for doing this. I’ve noticed the same thing from NPR. More of us should tell them things like this.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 02:13 AM
51

It’s a cherry picked stat, probably presented by someone who expects gender equality when it comes to privileges, but not when it comes to responsibilities or risks.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 12:14 AM
27

Don’t let toxic, dangerous women like this keep getting away with murder—literally. Had the genders been reversed, you know they would have thrown the book at the guy. Complain about double standards as often as you can, and demand that women be held accountable for their actions the way men are.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 04:56 PM
14

Neither getting married nor having kids is worth it for men today. The courts are rigged against men, and divorce is a leading cause of male suicide. Almost all alimony and child support is paid by men to women, and the penalties for non-compliance are stiff. And when a marriage ends, it’s almost always the man who’s going to be blamed, regardless of who’s actually at fault. The parasitic system will keep running if men keep paying into it. Men, don’t sign a contract that rewards the other party…
/r/MensRights08/07/26 06:28 PM
67

UN Women promotes gynocentrism but calls it “gender equality.” It’s a propaganda arm of the female supremacist movement.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 05:24 PM
2

Way to go, Czechia and Turkey!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 08:55 PM
1

This was only a sampling of countless studies demonstrating the prevalence of false rape accusations. Where there’s that much smoke, there’s fire, and unscrupulous women have been weaponizing gossip, lies and relational aggression going back to the Salem Witch Trials and beyond. It’s laughable to cite criticism of a study’s methods from VAWA, which itself is incredibly sexist legislation. Of course the biased sources you read and cite are going to find and exaggerate “flaws” in any study that do…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 12:18 AM
12

That’s how their business model works; they hype female victimhood, create male victimhood, then deny male victimhood is real or significant—even though most of those who are worst off are men. These feminists don’t hold themselves accountable, and instead try to shift blame onto “the patriarchy.” Then they complain about misogyny that results from the pro-female and anti-male double standards and biases they implanted into society. They cover up the evidence. When you present the evidence of th…
/r/MensRights13/06/26 08:13 PM
10

No good deed goes unpunished. By the way, Kansas is the same state that forces boys raped by adult women who get pregnant to pay child support for their own victimhood, or go to jail. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support/amp
/r/MensRights24/05/26 07:00 PM
129

And all of the other top replies are calling the UN out for its misandrist “women most affected” BS, which is also progress.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 11:54 PM
43

Looks like some biased Wikipedia ideologue already undid all of your changes and locked the entry so only the party line prevails. They also inserted criticism of the men’s rights movement from the (discredited) Southern Poverty Law Center—a group that Wikipedia editors call reliable, despite its record of hypocrisy, lies, and promoting hate. Never, ever donate money to Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 09:51 PM
22

For decades, they’ve been saying that male birth control pills are right around the corner. Hasn’t happened yet, at least in America. The people at the top always come up with lame excuses to block their release (like side effects, even though plenty of other medications are released with side effects). I suspect the real reason is control. They block birth control pills for men for much the same reason they want to take away abortions for women: a deranged and greedy “be fruitful and multiply” …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/26 01:34 PM
7

You've made a false claim that is unsupported by the evidence. My statements about the National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority Foundation, and Duluth Model were factual, and anyone can verify them. Numerous studies have shown that women perpetrate domestic violence at least as often as men do. You have no proof that men commit more domestic abuse than women. In fact, women are MORE likely to perpetrate the financial, social, and digital abuse you've described against men than men are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 08:07 PM
53

Anti-male and pro-female biases in education have been demonstrated over and over, from the greater prevalence of female-only scholarships to entrenched discrimination against boys in grading. The educational system is run primarily by women educators to benefit girls. Christina Hoff Sommers wrote an entire book on how this has worked in America, called The War Against Boys. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09645292.2023.2252620 “Contrary to the general belief that teachers may be bi…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 04:29 AM
48

So whenever somebody starts shouting “MAN BAD, WOMAN GOOD” nonsense at you, you share that link and several others to counter their disinformation. Examples: Women are more likely than men to perpetrate domestic violence: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386189016_Bidirectional_and_Unidirectional_Intimate_Partner_Violence_A_Comprehensive_Review Women are more likely to endorse political violence: https://www.city-journal.org/article/women-political-violence-digital-online Women rulers ar…
/r/MensRights27/04/26 12:53 PM
82

Good find. Save and share it each time one of those dumb misandrist comments shows up claiming that feminists care more about male victims than other men do. And remind them that the National Organization for Women replaced gender-neutral DV legislation with the Violence Against Women Act, feminists came up with the Duluth Model to arrest male victims of abuse, and the Feminist Majority Foundation has said DV is all perpetrated by men against women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 04:49 AM
1

My statements are valid and backed by evidence, unlike yours.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 03:56 AM
1

That was 100% me. Unlike you, I actually know what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 03:55 AM
3

That's another hopelessly biased, poorly informed take with dubious cherry-picked claims. You cherry pick by hyping supposedly disproportionate violence against women from IPV. But overall violence against women comes nowhere close to the level of violence against men. The vast majority of all homicide victims are men. Yes, your stats are bogus and misleading--recall that "Female arrestees are also significantly likelier to avoid charges and convictions entirely." https://repository.law.umich.ed…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 03:46 AM
4

Pot, meet kettle. Perspective is something you could benefit from. What you have read about the law has been tainted by decades of anti-male feminist propaganda. Court-ordered alimony and child support payments can be ruinous, especially when paired with predatory interest rates. Many of those who can’t pay go to jail, and are trapped in a vicious cycle of poverty they can’t break out of. More than 10% of South Carolina inmates are there because they couldn’t afford those payments. Even men who …
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:45 AM
79

Make no mistake, most of the articles we see in the media about how “marriage only benefits men” are a psyop. They trick men into thinking they’re getting a good deal out of this scam. In reality, men take on much more risk than women when getting married. About half of marriages end in divorce. It’s almost always men who get stuck with paying alimony and child support, even when women cheat or end the relationship. It’s almost always men who get jailed if they can’t afford post-divorce payments…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 04:31 PM
60

Exactly. The feminists who lead the movement are man-hating female supremacists, and have been for decades. Anonymous randos on the internet who say they’re feminists in favor of men don’t have anywhere close to the clout of the feminists who have actively harmed men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 04:43 PM
18

Accounts of experiences like yours are important, because they are reminders that marriage is a scam. Society is extremely misandrist now and preys on men via marriage and divorce. As many men as possible need to be warned to not fall into these life-ruining traps. Misandrists are trying hard to block messaging like that, including documentaries like this: https://youtu.be/F0FMCd6WYmE?si=cs2RCoFKxiyxwFSD
/r/MensRights20/04/26 06:36 PM
20

Another example of the double standard: Watch Madonna’s music video “Open Your Heart.” She meets a young boy at a strip club, kisses him on the lips, dances with him, and runs off with him. Now imagine the hysterics if the gender roles were reversed.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 06:07 PM
4

I have definitely seen social media blow up with some of these. But I don’t have links of all of them to share, for the same reason that I don’t have lots of bags full of garbage to share.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 03:07 AM
8

Here are the stats to show misandrists that most of the demand for violent porn comes from women, not men. Copy and share findings like these: https://www.vice.com/en/article/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn/ https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-apes/202207/who-likes-violent-porn-new-research-upends-expectations/ https://www.psypost.org/new-study-sheds-light-on-womens-attraction-to-aggression-in-pornography/
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:20 PM
12

OP has been aggressively trolling this sub lately with false, misandrist propaganda. As far as her false claims about rape, murder, and domestic violence are concerned, the stats are fudged in many places so it’s not considered rape when a woman does it. FBI crime stats show men are more often victims of homicide than women. Most workplace and combat deaths are men. The U.K. even reclassifies abused men as abused women! And women commit MORE domestic violence/intimate partner violence than men d…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:20 PM
135

Remind misandrists that most of the demand for violent porn comes from women, not men. Copy and share findings like these: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-apes/202207/who-likes-violent-porn-new-research-upends-expectations/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn/ https://www.psypost.org/new-study-sheds-light-on-womens-attraction-to-aggression-in-pornography/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 07:09 PM
27

EDIT: It’s critical to share specific numbers and citations whenever possible, as widely as possible, because there are so many fake claims and figures out there. So copy and paste info like what’s below into exchanges on this topic when appropriate. Yes. The claim that false rape accusations are rare is itself a false claim, and there should be harsher penalties against these. People lie a lot. Dating apps like Tea are full of false allegations, including screenshots of women admitting they’re …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 01:42 PM
67

It’s not your imagination, this is very, very real. Misandry has been picking up steam during the past 10+ years. The trend has been especially noticeable in entertainment, like movies, TV, and social media. Think about the majority of the shows you’ve watched that were made during that time frame, and how they’ve portrayed men and women.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 05:25 PM
6

For someone who claims to be a data scientist, you’ve made comments that reflect no understanding of relevant data. Your comment “violence against men tends to be more seldom” was a complete lie that I disproved with actual data from numerous studies in the links above. You don’t speak for feminism. You’re a rando on the internet with nowhere close to the influence over the feminist movement as those I’ve mentioned.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 11:13 AM
3

What you think is NOT representative of feminism as a whole. Leading feminists have been doing exactly what I said, but you keep making excuses because you’re allergic to accountability. Women have been committing comparable levels of abuse as men for decades, and leading feminists were covering this up long before the Violence Against Women Act was passed. The preceding legislation was gender neutral (the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of 1984) but the National Organization for Wom…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 10:22 AM
3

Wrong. You are repeating feminist propaganda. Feminists have worked hard to cover up evidence of women’s wrongdoing while denying men equal rights and equal access to help. For 50+ years, feminists have been attacking those like Erin Pizzey and Murray Strauss, who showed women perpetrate a lot of domestic violence. We’ve actually reached a point where women commit MORE domestic violence/intimate partner violence than men do. Despite that, almost all of the DV/IPV aid goes to women instead of men…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 09:46 AM
16

Many leading feminists pretend female abusers don’t exist. For example: Director of the Feminist Majority Foundation and editor of Ms. Magazine, Katherine Spillar, who said of domestic violence: "Well, that's just a clean-up word for wife-beating," and "we know it's not girls beating up boys, it's boys beating up girls."
/r/MensRights16/04/26 08:35 PM
34

Ideally, nobody gets drafted. Only volunteers of both sexes should serve in the military. However, if there is a draft, it should be applied equally to men and women. Women have more rights than men, so should be subject to equal responsibilities under the law too.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 10:43 PM
1

Foundation for Male Studies sounds pretty close. https://www.malestudies.org
/r/MensRights14/04/26 01:03 PM
2

Contrary to popular belief, there’s a lot more misandry than misogyny that plays out in real life: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-misogyny-myth
/r/MensRights13/04/26 01:58 PM
40

OP nailed it in his post. The media is pushing the moral panic button about a “manosphere” that’s really just a decentralized jumble of disparate ideologies—a boogeyman to be used in the service of man-hating propaganda. Misandrists lump anything and everything they don’t like about men’s spaces, communications, and activism into this artificial construct. Then they hype the threat way out of proportion to what’s happening, while ignoring the much bigger problem of systemic misandry. Their real …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/26 12:11 AM
116

“The manosphere” is much like “the patriarchy”—it doesn’t really exist. It’s a nebulous bogeyman conjured up by misandrists, who use it in their propaganda to destroy or weaken as much as they can related to men. Notice how many negative terms like “mansplain” and “toxic masculinity” they’ve devised—these are all part of a broader effort to manipulate public perceptions and turn them against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 07:38 PM
12

I’m amazed this question keeps coming up. Mass defamation, doxxing/privacy violations, posting of minors, gender-based access restrictions, stalking, illegal data collection, and copyright infringement are some of the offenses associated with such platforms, among many other violations of state and federal laws.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 06:03 PM
229

You don’t even have to be on a dating app to get posted to one of those groups. If you have ever had ONE bad interaction with ONE mentally ill, vindictive woman, and she has photos and other info about you, that’s all it’ll take to get posted (and defamed). The people behind these groups who claimed to be motivated by “safety” really unleashed the crazies, made people less safe, and wrecked dating. They broke a lot of laws too. The good news is that some of them will likely get bankrupted by the…
/r/MensRights10/04/26 04:31 PM
23

Showing misandrist content to those active in men’s rights is probably common and intentional. Many social media company executives deliberately incentivize inflammatory content via their algorithms and try to stir up fights between people. This can boost engagement, user time on the platform, and thus ad revenue from clicks. So for years they’ve been showing users things that will piss them off. Of course, this has made society much more toxic. But profit is what they care about most, regardles…
/r/MensRights09/04/26 01:42 AM
12

I believe his “bash a violent bitch” comment was in response to content from the feminist publication Jezebel, which was encouraging women to beat their boyfriends. The backlash against Elam was much worse, which illustrates the longstanding double standard—these “kill all men” feminists get away with promoting anti-male violence all the time, but Elam didn’t get away with a softer version of the reverse even though his comment was in response to much behavior, encouraging men to defend themselv…
/r/MensRights05/04/26 01:16 PM
15

In reality, feminists infiltrated and subverted Wikipedia, and have rewritten much of its content to be pro-feminism and anti-men’s rights. Wikipedia is extremely biased and unreliable for anything related to gender issues. This is immediately apparent to anyone who spends a little time reviewing its content. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/lmlOL76eoq Women’s and Gender Studies departments have filled Wikipedia editor roles with their students, who control these narratives and selectively …
/r/MensRights05/04/26 01:04 PM
98

I hope he retracts his simpy “believe all women” comments now.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 10:31 PM
1

You claimed that rape has nothing to do with sex, which is false. The fact that rape decreases when sex becomes more readily available via decriminalized prostitution proves that sex is indeed a contributing factor to the incidence of rape. Rape is NOT only about power, as you falsely claimed; libidos vary between individuals, as does access to sex, and some individuals will illegally take what they cannot obtain legally. So some people argue that consensual prostitution should be decriminalized…
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:29 PM
0

Your first sentence is disinformation. If it were true, the findings I cited wouldn’t exist. More than 100 studies corroborate the findings I cited above. As sex becomes more accessible, rape rates decline. The pattern holds up across time and space. This shows that rape isn’t only about power—sex is in fact a big part of it.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 05:15 PM
6

I’m sorry, but you are the one promoting a rape myth if you claim rape has everything to do with power and nothing to do with sex. The desire for sex is a basic human need. Some of those who cannot get it by legal means will take it by illegal means. Rape rates increase substantially in countries that take repressive approaches to sex, such as criminalizing prostitution. Countries that decriminalize prostitution see a reduction in rape rates. Finger-wagging prudes don’t like it, but it’s a fact …
/r/MensRights02/04/26 04:43 PM
16

No, don’t listen to her, she’s a feminist troll (probably from Africa) who hates men and doesn’t understand Western society. Women here are the majority of voters, women control more than 80% of consumer spending, and women have more political and reproductive rights than men do throughout the West. Women can vote without signing up for Selective Service, but men cannot. A child who is born male is exposed to much greater risk than a child born female, through no fault of his own, and that’s a f…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 08:35 PM
43

This article is full of great examples of how society is much more biased against men than women. https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ Men are “more likely to be incarcerated, to be shot by the police, to be a victim of violent crime, to be homeless, to commit suicide, and to die on the job or in combat than women. Furthermore, they have a shorter life expectancy and are less likely to be college educated than women… women receive more help than men, those who harm wo…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 05:55 PM
29

You lost all credibility when you claimed “there is no female privilege”. The world is an unfair place, and it’s better to recognize that and work to make it better. Your spin and strawmen won’t work on me or the other rational people around here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 01:25 PM
32

Would you care to share links to similar articles (that highlight female privilege and demonstrate that misandry outweighs misogyny, citing loads of data and studies) in leftist publications? Or do leftist publications not print those findings, because liberal feminists on their boards censor the release of such findings?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 08:39 PM
23

It’s not just about persuading the misandrist, though. It’s also about persuading the audience that’s watching.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 07:42 PM
45

Female privilege is real and pervasive, and the authors below explain it with a boatload of sources and studies. Denying the existence of female privilege is a laughable assertion, like denying the existence of water. Misandry outweighs misogyny by a substantial margin throughout our institutions and culture. https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-misogyny-myth
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 07:40 PM
106

When your arguments against misandrist terms and in favor of equal treatment are downvoted, you’re being downvoted by misandrists. Remember: when you’re accustomed to female privilege, equality looks like oppression.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 04:38 PM
22

The real problem is the people (like Theroux) who cherry-pick that hyped controversial stuff on the fringes and say it represents the whole. This is after the rest of the men’s rights movement (which has strived for equal gender rights) has been sabotaged for ages. Basically, the sensible people have been censored. If you want to see an accurate film about the men’s rights movement, watch The Red Pill by Cassie Jaye.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 03:18 PM
69

Agreed. Cancel these misandric clowns like they’re The Acolyte. Good post. I like to see action-oriented stuff like this that actually helps the movement, instead of posts just crying about how unfair life is to men.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 01:59 PM
1

Think about how often you see movies about victimized women getting away with the murder of bad, oppressive men. Compare that to the number of movies about victimized men getting away with murdering bad, oppressive women. The propaganda becomes clearer when you take a bird’s eye view of what’s going on. I’m sure a lot more people saw the critic’s review I mentioned above than the review from you—more evidence of the propaganda I’m talking about.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 02:51 AM
1

As one critic put it, “The moral to the story? Don’t disrespect, ridicule, or look down on the Linda Liddle’s of the world. They’ll only take so much and, when they finally decide to fight back, there will be justified hell to pay.” Gynocentric, misandric Hollywood types keep looking for excuses to let women get away with everything from cheating to murder, while scapegoating the “bad man oppressor” caricature.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 02:20 AM
1

The reviews track with what I said, with critics making excuses to justify her actions because she was a woman who was a victim of the bad man oppressor. Typical storyline from Hollywood these days to brainwash the public... “Kill the bad male oppressors who have it coming for victimizing women, and those poor women should be protected, excused, and avoid accountability.”
/r/MensRights27/03/26 01:28 AM
1

Your ignorance is blinding. From the get go, you have argued in bad faith. You have made up claims, moved goalposts, and ignored real-world data. Your logical fallacies and strawman arguments don’t fly with me. I believe in pursuing equal rights for men and women. People like you get offended by that and imagine it and so many other things are “misogyny”, because when you’re accustomed to female privilege, equality feels like oppression.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 11:35 PM
2

What’s really crazy is thinking that women are playing “catch up” when women outlive men in EVERY country. In America, it’s been like that since the late 1800s. And even so, women’s health is still the priority here for funding and attention even though women have better health outcomes. You’re parroting feminist delusions instead of evaluating real facts and numbers.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 11:22 PM
1

I just provided you with plenty of facts and figures that back up my judgment. You didn’t bother to read the evidence and rejected it out of hand, because it doesn’t align with feminist propaganda that exaggerates female victimhood and downplays male victimhood. From healthcare to many other sectors, we live in a gynocentric society, not a patriarchy. https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/
/r/MensRights26/03/26 11:12 PM
1

What I said was 100% accurate. Your comment is guesswork that ignores the overwhelming body of evidence demonstrating that women’s health has been valued more than men’s health throughout the Western world for a long time. That evidence (with sources) includes but is not limited to the following: • ⁠"In 2020, the federal government set out its public health goals for 2030. They include 42 goals for children, 29 for women, and 18 for LGBTQ+ people. For men, there are four... There are 44 preventi…
/r/MensRights26/03/26 10:52 PM
34

The U.S. has conducted more female-only than male-only medical trials and spent more money on women’s health than men’s health for 30+ years. Don’t believe the feminist propaganda that claims women’s health has been undervalued—it’s been the priority for a long time. https://jameslnuzzo.substack.com/p/there-is-still-no-womens-health-crisis
/r/MensRights25/03/26 09:51 PM
23

Yeah, and the gender gap is less than 3 years in Iceland. A truly egalitarian society that eliminated gender-based discrimination entirely would have a life span gap of only 1-2 years. We know that from studies of controlled environments with nuns and monks, though I don’t have citations handy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/26 10:24 PM
2

Netherlands seems like it would be safer and more respectful of individual liberty right now, but I haven’t taken an in-depth look at life in both countries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/26 10:20 PM
14

Denmark is pretty close to that. Edit: Netherlands too, and it’s freer in some ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/26 09:10 PM
8

Appreciate the effort, but this is too soft and ignores much bigger issues, like systemic misandry, gynocentrism, and gender disparities in outcomes throughout society. It reads like “controlled opposition” language. An elevator pitch about the MRM shouldn’t immediately center women. It’s too vague and focused on norms. Instead, I’d focus on how laws, institutions, and norms all actively discriminate against men and in favor of women, driving many of the disparities in outcomes that disadvantage…
/r/MensRights24/03/26 04:20 PM
91

This is why the laws need to be changed to punish false rape accusers more severely. If we do nothing, unethical women are going to keep coming up with more ways to weaponize the laws against men. Feminists have been doing this for years. The comments in this thread are full of learned helplessness, empty complaining, and excuses. There’s very little below that’s helpful in fixing the problem. More people need to get organized and lobby officials, candidates for office, and other influential peo…
/r/MensRights23/03/26 01:26 PM
3

Good question, and good thinking! Haven’t used it myself, but the PaternityLab DNA Paternity Test Kit is supposed to very good. It ships to the UK. You can order it on Amazon. Look around on the site, because there are many other test kit options at many price points. Every father-to-be should get one. Paternity fraud is real. The cost of a test is a drop in the bucket compared to paying 18+ years for a kid that isn’t yours.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 02:28 PM
16

Men’s reproductive rights should be a priority, and there are others who think this way too. https://www.newsweek.com/give-men-reproductive-rights-too-opinion-1883336 https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna11731580 https://nationalcenterformen.org/our-issues/ And they should be linked to women’s reproductive rights. Those who value “a woman’s right to choose” and women’s bodily autonomy should show the same respect to men. I’ve had enough gynocentrism, and won’t support a policy related to the first wit…
/r/MensRights21/03/26 06:31 PM
9

It is definitely sexist, because women are not doing the buying in anywhere close to the numbers men are, and men are not doing the selling in anywhere close to the numbers women are. Those laws are fundamentally misandrist because of this gender imbalance. They make as much sense as punishing drug users while letting drug dealers off the hook. The policy is the way it is because of the genders most involved in each act. The entire two-tiered justice system emphasizes persecuting men and being l…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 12:41 AM
1

Yes. A partial list with sources follows, focused on the U.S., but other Western countries have also introduced men’s health strategies during the past year. https://aibm.org/commentary/a-pivotal-year-for-boys-and-mens-issues/ "Gov. Wes Moore used his State of the State address in February to take this issue head on. He was, he said, “Directing my entire administration to begin implementing targeted solutions to uplift our men and boys.”... He’s already launched programs to increase the share of…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 11:19 PM
87

In some countries and states, it’s only rape if a man does it. A boy who is raped by and impregnates an adult woman must pay child support with back pay upon turning 18, or go to jail. Men who don’t register with the Selective Service become felons. Women don’t have to register at all. Male victims of domestic violence from women are often arrested for reporting it, because of the feminist-designed Duluth Model that law enforcement uses. In some countries and states, it’s illegal for a man to bu…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 06:49 PM
47

Your experience isn’t unusual or new, and lots of other people are taking legal action against such apps and the people behind them. A lot more people should be involved. You’ll find plenty of background and resources on the AWDTSGisToxic sub. If you and other men don’t fight back against this kind of sexist oppression, the oppression will get worse.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 07:50 PM
10

Call it out. Saying and doing nothing makes problems like these much worse. Men who ignore it are part of the problem. Don’t let misandrist women walk all over you.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 03:10 AM
4

Good question. Politicians want to get elected. Those who are savvy figure out what people want to hear, and say it. So one barometer of support for men’s rights comes from statements by elected officials and candidates for office. Five years ago, hardly any of them were speaking up for men. Within the past year or two, there’s been a big change, with far more public statements supporting men and denouncing misandry. Feminist-controlled media don’t always like to report on it, but it’s definitel…
/r/MensRights17/03/26 09:30 PM
15

OP's comment accused me of being a toxic man-hater, among other things . Nothing could be further from the truth. It's pure projection, because u/0CupofMilk has a long track record of doing exactly what they accused me of doing. You can see it even in this very thread. OP has done this many times in other spaces.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 05:33 PM
13

That's a nonsensical word salad of misinterpretations, strawman arguments, and goalpost moving. Others around here recognize it too. I won't waste further time on tangential, insincere questions like these, so you can go waste someone else's time now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 05:28 PM
17

I know the definition of "patriarchy"--a system of governance in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it--and that this is an exaggerated, mythical bogeyman often used by dishonest actors to promote women at the expense of men. Those who believe in it don't understand the apex fallacy. The men who are overrepresented at the bottom of society are invisible to those believers. Just as you've used cherry-picked, misleading examples to misrepresent society, you've used cherry…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 05:06 PM
16

My characterization of OP is accurate. Your characterization of me as a grievance merchant is inaccurate. I have supported others who have described the ways that men are adversely affected by society, raised some of those issues myself, and helped to identify ways to tackle those problems. Have I celebrated certain things the Trump administration and Republicans have done? Yes, and that includes their efforts to restore due process for accused men as well as the damage they've done to a few mis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 04:44 PM
13

EXACTLY. You nailed it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:34 PM
35

OP is a well-known concern troll over on the men’s rights sub and used to post there, got found out and deleted their posts, and has migrated over here to keep trashing the men’s rights movement. Don’t trust what 0CupofMilk writes. Make no mistake, this is a bad actor who pretends to support men while actually working against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:32 PM
4

And men will stay second-class citizens unless they speak up for themselves and get more involved in real activism. Don’t just tell them there’s a problem. Tell them how to overcome those problems, as often as you can. I know you know. There are way too many people on this sub who wallow in self-pity, show learned helplessness, and complain about how hard or unfair things are, without actually doing anything outside of echo chambers.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 01:22 PM
2

Sure. Here’s a list of men’s rights organizations: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/155H3Spada Edit: DAVIA and ICMB are a couple of others, and there are more.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 01:05 PM
15

You have my condolences for going through what sounds like a terrible ordeal. It could have been even worse. On 2 and 3, I would suggest becoming more active with men’s rights organizations and lobbying elected officials to change laws that treat women criminals with kid gloves. There are too many women who have gotten away with weaponizing false rape and sexual assault accusations against too many men. It’s time to hold more of them accountable.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 03:14 AM
49

When feminists accuse men’s rights activists of being a threat, they’re projecting. From its “kill all men” messaging to its weaponization of laws to harm men via the Duluth Model, false accusations, and other mechanisms, it’s feminism that’s the violent hate movement. Feminism has promoted female supremacy in word and deed, while spouting lies about gender equality, for years. More people need to wake up to its true nature.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 10:48 PM
33

That’s exactly what they’re doing with articles like this one—trying to shame and blame men into subordination or worse. In the United States, a large percentage of prisoners are there because they could not afford to keep paying ruinous child support payments enforced by misandrist courts. If you don’t pay, you go to jail. Women have lots of reproductive rights and choices, men have very few. STOP incentivizing and legitimizing systems that prey on men by falling for their traps. Don’t get marr…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 04:30 PM
6

Think back on the number of men killed. Then think back on the number of women killed. Think about the story’s portrayals, and the broader patterns we’ve alluded to. Not everyone sees it, because propaganda isn’t always obvious. It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them they’ve been fooled.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:40 PM
6

Others around here have pointed out that modern media trends have exacerbated misandry and gynocentrism dramatically, especially within the past 10-15 years. Contrast modern advertisements that often portray men as stupid and toxic with the relatively favorable ads of the 1950s. Contrast the constant “men are useless”, “call men stupid in as many ways as you can,” “the future is female,” and “kill all men” messaging from top media and entertainment personalities today with the dearth of such sta…
/r/MensRights14/03/26 01:29 AM
10

Don’t Worry Darling, Woken, Blink Twice. The portrayals and body counts illustrate that pattern very clearly. Judging from your tone, you’re going to look for an excuse to dismiss them anyway and move goalposts because the evidence doesn’t fit your preferred narrative.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 01:08 AM
30

Your observations are spot on. Recent action movies from The Accountant 2 to Superman track with what you’re saying, and are part of Hollywood’s agenda to manipulate the populace into supporting male disposability and female supremacy. Some feminists had the nerve to complain about Game of Thrones being misogynistic. You can sum up the plot of most movies since ~2015 as: “MAN BAD OPPRESSOR, SHOULD DIE. WOMAN GOOD VICTIM, SHOULD LIVE.” One notable exception to this pattern is the recent film adap…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:29 PM
14

Not necessarily. Some of those states have a terrible quality of life, grinding poverty, and poor governance and healthcare. I recommend looking at the big picture.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 06:30 PM
24

Hard to say. Each state offers a different grab bag of misandric policies, and the way they apply to you varies depending on your personal circumstances and choices. Dating these days is a shit show for the most part because of significant doxxing and defamation against men on women-only apps. I wouldn’t recommend getting married and having kids to any man right now because of the way the courts screw men over. I’d argue that factors like cost of living, healthcare, things to do, crime rates, in…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 06:11 PM
42

From coerced financial obligations and the expectation of responsibilities without rights to the threat of false accusations, I don’t blame any man who wants to avoid single moms and associations with children. Divorce court preys on men. Having kids or entering a profession that involves kids creates major vulnerabilities for men. I wouldn’t reward or legitimize institutions that treat men as second-class citizens, walking ATMs, or worse.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 03:01 PM
9

I hear you. The moderating on the leftist version of this sub is really something. There’s a lot of very heavy handed censorship of anything that doesn’t align with mod biases and their standards for ideological purity, and a long lag time for posting while they conduct review for this. For example, I recently made a post there to celebrate some of the women who have advocated for men, and encouraged other people to weigh in with more examples. They removed that post, smearing nearly all of the …
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:34 PM
20

The claim that feminism is “a fight for equality” couldn’t be more wrong. Feminist ideology—not “patriarchy”—is the root cause of much misandry. Besides hateful rhetoric against men, it’s been responsible for anti-male policies like the Duluth Model, denial of due process to accused men, and the eradication or weakening of many programs meant to help men in need. A few quotes from notable feminists follow, which other feminists often try to downplay with No True Scotsman logical fallacies: “I’m …
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:35 AM
2

Women’s health overall is valued and funded more than men’s health, and women perpetrate more domestic violence than men do. Some of the evidence is below. • ⁠"In 2020, the federal government set out its public health goals for 2030. They include 42 goals for children, 29 for women, and 18 for LGBTQ+ people. For men, there are four... There are 44 preventive health-care interventions (excluding vaccinations) that are fully covered under the Affordable Care Act, a major public health advance of t…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 01:45 AM
31

Yes. The psychology sub is similar—it’s often weaponized to disparage men. Just check out the reactions to my comments there regarding the same article a little earlier today.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 12:19 AM
3

Right. And people here shouldn’t just parrot what they think public opinion is, or complain on Reddit about her getting a slap on the wrist. Tell lawmakers to get a lot tougher on these false rape accusers for ruining the lives of innocent men and harming actual rape victims who won’t be believed.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 05:59 PM
19

Reports like this one and associated studies need to be circulated widely and frequently to counter feminist propaganda that we should “believe all women” and “false accusations are rare.” Remind those propagandists of these points too: The claim that false rape accusations are rare is itself a false claim, and there should be harsher penalties against these. People lie a lot. Dating apps like Tea are full of false allegations, including screenshots of women admitting they’re lying to get back a…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 12:28 AM
54

Women live longer, but women’s health still gets more funding than men’s health. Women perpetrate domestic violence at least as often as men do, but almost all domestic violence resources are reserved for female victims instead of male victims. Women have reproductive rights, while men do not. Women who are raped can opt out of unwanted parental responsibilities, but boys who are raped by women are forced to pay child support when pregnancy occurs (and imprisoned if they don’t agree to pay for t…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:08 AM
45

If I were a German, I’d be contacting Parliament to vote against this sexist anti-male policy, and mobilizing others to do the same. Silence implies consent, and power concedes nothing without a demand. If German men do nothing to protect their rights, they will lose a lot more of them. No matter how much feminists get or steal, it’s never enough for them.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:56 PM
76

Boys have fallen behind girls in education because the educational system discriminates against boys. Women have been getting more degrees than men for decades, yet nearly all gender-specific scholarships are STILL reserved for women. Teachers consistently give boys lower grades than girls, even when they turn in the same quality work. There’s an entire book on the educational system’s biases against boys, called The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:58 AM
1

All of the things I listed are interrelated, and no one should see a constitutional amendment as a sure thing. The actions I listed are of value as stepping stones, and are much better than staying silent and hoping the people in power will just happen to make the decisions we want. Democratic/partially democratic governments do in fact pay attention to public opinion and shift policy and commentary from time to time in response to it. There's ample evidence of this from the news and history. Th…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:33 AM
60

Uber and Lyft deserve the lawsuits they’re getting hit with for promoting blatant gender-based discrimination. “For Uber, it’s time to get either new lawyers or new executives, because its new “Women Preferences” policy is obvious sex discrimination that violates the law.” https://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/commentary/ubers-new-women-preferences-program-violates-civil-rights-law
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:38 AM
14

This post reads like more concern trolling, but it might simply be misinformed by feminist propaganda. Your post whitewashes the history of feminism, which includes the blatant female supremacist writing of Elizabeth Cady Stanton in the 1800s to the British feminists who repeatedly attacked Erin Pizzey for revealing that women perpetrate domestic violence too. The fact is that the men’s rights movement has never done anywhere close to as much damage to an entire gender as feminism. It’s feminism…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:33 AM
3

All of the things I listed above are worthwhile, as each does not exist in a vacuum. Each has spillover effects, and we don’t want to put all our eggs in one basket. Intense, prolonged public opposition was key to the U.S. ending the draft, and that opposition took many forms. Governments do pay attention to public opinion, so it pays to speak up on the issues that matter.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 09:56 PM
18

Call and email your elected officials to complain about it. Write opinion pieces for and leave comments on media outlets. Support one of the lawsuits against male-only conscription, like this one heading to the Supreme Court: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/0y22QXaiAU
/r/MensRights09/03/26 05:06 PM
128

That policy is an outrageous double standard based on bad information and feminist propaganda. The claim that “women and girls are more likely to be victims of hate crimes and online bullying” is false. In fact, men and boys are subjected to more attacks—digitally and physically. Look at the millions of feminists supporting slogans like “kill all men”. You don’t see comparable support for “kill all women”. Yet these people go hard after misogyny while ignoring the much bigger problem of misandry…
/r/MensRights09/03/26 03:10 AM
9

Doing the right thing for the wrong reason is still a lot better than doing nothing or the wrong thing.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 06:37 PM
40

You’re doing the right thing when you stop watching obviously misandric content, because producers (like Netflix) will discontinue shows that many people don’t finish. Also write negative reviews of misandric movies and shows online, and positive reviews of those that are more respectful to men. Send messages directly to Hollywood objecting to misandry in entertainment. Keep doing this until they get it. This has worked before (look at the termination of The Acolyte) but we need to do a lot more…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:55 PM
3

It wasn’t. I’ll refrain from any real spoilers, but the feminist screenwriters were sure to work in some jabs at how stupid men are, from the play (“all men are fools”) to paternity fraud to some of the background music. Plus there’s the messaging about male disposability. Feminists and simps have to ruin everything they touch. Edit: And gagansid projects his own stupidity below by himself obscuring and misinterpreting the rest of the play (“all men are fools.. where women are concerned”) and ig…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:44 PM
1

Twitter is no worse than Facebook, which created tons of women-only groups that doxx, defame, and arrange cyberstalking of men under the guise of “safety.”
/r/MensRights08/03/26 04:25 AM
39

Some people refer to feminists as “feminazis”, and it makes sense, given the parallels between both ideologies. The main difference is that feminism is a much more insidious and successful hate movement.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 04:05 AM
6

There’s an endless number of things that can be done to help with men’s issues. People around here have done some or all of the following, but we need more people to be doing these things and consistently. Keep the pressure on. Join men’s rights organizations. A partial list is linked below, but there are many others. Find the issues you’re passionate about and advocate for them with others who are likeminded. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/155H3Spada Communicate with your elected officia…
/r/MensRights07/03/26 04:35 PM
4

“Nothing ever happens.” What an ignorant comment. Do you think America is the same place today that it was in 1800? Laws and lawmakers change all the time, and the future is what people make it. Edit: And PlimpusGakster blocked me immediately after commenting below, because it’s another useless troll.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 12:27 PM
35

Our deeply flawed healthcare system overwhelmingly discriminates against men. Women’s health has been taken more seriously than men’s health in the U.S. and the rest of the Western world for decades, even though women have long had better health outcomes overall than men. The evidence (with sources) includes but is not limited to the following: • ⁠"In 2020, the federal government set out its public health goals for 2030. They include 42 goals for children, 29 for women, and 18 for LGBTQ+ people.…
/r/MensRights07/03/26 12:09 AM
23

There’s a lot of unconscious internalized misandry out there, including in the justice system. They won’t fix these problems if we don’t speak up. Expose misandry as much as you can and pressure those in charge to reform systems that discriminate against men. We are starting to see some positive change, but people need to be more vocal.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 11:17 PM
9

Nobody should have to hide their posts and comments in support of men’s rights. Doing so also makes it harder for us to learn from each other.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 11:14 PM
17

Those who participate in this MensRights sub have been automatically banned from participating in some other subs. However, I’ve heard (but can’t confirm) that Reddit is going to remove the ability to ban users based on sub participation soon. Not sure I can link to it, but there was a post about this on AWDTSGisToxic.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 10:11 PM
80

The healthcare system discriminates heavily against men. There are a lot more offices and funds for women’s health than men’s health. Many men’s health issues are neglected. Don’t just complain to us. Contact your elected representatives and tell them you want to see progress toward equality in healthcare.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 07:35 PM
66

You’re in luck, because there’s a growing appetite to fight these women only programs in court. The lawsuits against them are growing. Talk to an attorney and document everything. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2026/02/23/coca-cola-sued-over-women-only-networking-event/ https://www.newsweek.com/trump-admin-encourages-white-men-to-claim-discrimination-money-11235826 https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2025/11/24/male-uber-and-lyft-drivers-sue-over-women-only-ride-options/
/r/MensRights06/03/26 05:06 PM
1

I knew you wouldn’t provide that list. Just more deflection, excuses to avoid accountability, and “No true Scotsman” fallacies.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 03:07 AM
1

There’s nothing fringe about that list; it contains commentary from major, influential feminist thought leaders—much of which has received widespread acclaim from their audiences—and it’s not even close to being comprehensive. You most certainly cannot construct a list comparable in length, hate, and impact from MRAs about women, and you cannot find a derogatory hashtag aimed at women with the popularity and hostility of the “kill all men” and “men are trash” hashtags. People around here see you…
/r/MensRights06/03/26 01:44 AM
11

Excellent news! It’ll be interesting to see how the Supreme Court reacts. Hope they’ll finally do what’s right and stop the gender-based discrimination under the current Selective Service system.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:43 PM
1

The answer depends on which countries you can get to. Google the names of those countries and “vasectomy.” Research doctors who have experience with the procedure and a good reputation from patients. Contact them and ask about their approval process and fees. You can make an informed decision based on that. Good luck.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 09:49 PM
55

This happens all the time (another link below). Instead of just saying it’s wrong or making unhelpful defeatist comments, people here can DO something about this by pressuring lawmakers to change the laws. Stop requiring boys who cannot consent to pay child support they cannot afford. Start granting reproductive rights to men and boys too. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support/amp
/r/MensRights05/03/26 09:40 PM
5

You’re not alone. Others have been doing the same thing for years. One problem is that we don’t have sufficient numbers of vocal activists yet. We need to keep recruiting and advocating as often as possible to reach critical mass, so we can see bigger changes toward equality.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 08:18 PM
5

Exactly this. All of us need to contact politicians and remind them regularly to pay more attention to men’s issues. They need to recognize them and take action to fix a lot of the problems facing men. Do this with Democrats, Republicans, and third party candidates. They’re much more receptive to hearing these messages now than they were a few years ago, and more likely to take these messages seriously. They won’t fix these problems if they don’t hear from us.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 06:06 PM
33

The ILO is part of the United Nations, and policy briefs like that one show they deserve the crippling budget cuts and financial collapse they’re experiencing now. Institutions that promote gynocentrism and misandry should be dismantled.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 02:13 PM
3

Patriarchy doesn’t exist. It’s “a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.” The fact that most people at the bottom of society are men disproves the existence of patriarchy, because those men have the least power. Anyone who believes in patriarchy theory doesn’t understand the apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 12:16 PM
0

Who had the institutional power to design those systems? A small subset of elites who don’t reflect the interests of ordinary men. The majority of voters are women, women control most consumer discretionary spending, and the women’s lobby has more power and resources than the men’s lobby, so stop trying to blame men for everything and avoid accountability for women.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 12:10 PM
3

Who told us that? Feminists have told us that. Stop playing dumb and making excuses for the man-hating feminists who lead the movement. A few examples of their comments and policies below, and there are many more: "Kill all men... the coronavirus isn't killing men fast enough." - Clementine Ford "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." - Sally Miller Gearhart “Kill men now, ask me how.” - Julie Bindel “I’m actually not at all concerned abo…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 12:04 PM
19

How you’ve felt “as a man” doesn’t change reality. Society has massive biases against men and in favor of women, including in military conscription, education, healthcare, domestic violence assistance, criminal sentencing, reproductive rights, and much more. A man faces much greater risk, responsibility, and accountability than a woman. There’s a lot more help offered to women than men. Lots of evidence below: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ https://www.city-jour…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 02:51 AM
1

And I’m not going to, because I’m not going to keep rewarding Hollywood’s misandrists or make excuses for them like you have. I’ve had enough of the “MAN BAD OPPRESSOR, WOMAN GOOD, LET WOMAN VICTIM GET AWAY WITH MURDER” narrative they’ve been pushing on us. You don’t know how you’re being manipulated, obviously.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 10:16 PM
1

That is the movie really if the moviemakers saved her life but not his, and suggested he deserved it and she doesn’t have to be held accountable for wrongdoing because she was a poor woman victimized by an oppressive man. Read between the lines. Some of us understand the way Hollywood brainwashes us. But it’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them they’ve been fooled.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 05:41 PM
21

Robert Garza is doing some tremendous work reforming custody laws to be more fair to fathers (and everyone, really). Look him up. Support proposed bills to change the system, and get more lawmakers on board. Unfortunately, there are too many men who ignore the anti-male problems in the system until they get burned by that system, and then they act helpless. The mainstream media try to suppress information about these biases too. Hope is not a strategy. Denying problems doesn’t make them go away—…
/r/MensRights04/03/26 02:54 AM
13

Society has massive biases against men and in favor of women, including in military conscription, education, healthcare, domestic violence assistance, criminal sentencing, reproductive rights, and much more. Read and share these evidence-rich sources with your sister and anyone else who doubts the reality of systemic discrimination against men. https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-misogyny-myth
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:12 AM
27

No, men aren’t the only violent ones. That’s feminist propaganda. For example, studies have shown that women perpetrate domestic violence at least as often as men do. From “Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence” “women’s greater perpetration of violence was reported by both women (female perpetrators=24.8%, male perpetrators = 19.2%) and by men (female perpetrators = 16.4%, male perpetrators = 11…
/r/MensRights03/03/26 02:41 PM
32

Tell the people circulating this that they should have no problem supporting equal opportunity military conscription for both men and women. They say things like, “Women can do anything that men can do, but better!” Then draft ‘em.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 02:36 PM
19

OP is a feminist who has repeatedly engaged in concern trolling on this sub and smeared the men’s rights movement. This is yet another example of it. OP has deleted content that other users correctly called out as concern trolling. For example, the post “The men’s rights movement, likewise, isn’t about criticism for the sake of criticism” from several days ago, which victim blamed men and the men’s rights movement and wildly exaggerated perceived problems with them without recognizing the far gr…
/r/MensRights03/03/26 05:13 AM
11

Yeah. It’s too bad there are so many people who look at a problem like systemic misandry and think, “I’ll stop caring about this major societal problem now that I’m feeling better and it doesn’t affect me right now.” It’s shortsighted.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 10:50 PM
37

It’s a stupid argument because women have reproductive rights and men do not. A woman can get out of responsibility for an unwanted pregnancy with an abortion or adoption. A man cannot, and must pay for it for 18+ years if a woman tells him to (he goes to jail if he doesn’t comply). She can control his future but he cannot control hers. Tell lawmakers to support equal reproductive rights for men and women.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 04:46 PM
97

Yes, and it’s not enough to recognize the sexist double standard. We need to DO more to fix the problems like these that feminists created. People need to contact their elected officials and tell them directly that these laws should be changed. Stop treating men like criminals and women as victims when both have drunken sex—we should have equal rights and equal treatment under the law for the same behavior.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 04:42 PM
13

What you should have done was lay the blame squarely where it belongs: feminist ideology, not the men’s rights movement. Implying that both movements have similar levels of radicalism is utterly absurd, as the evidence presented above and elsewhere clearly shows. It’s like saying “The Nazis are bad, but the people living in the concentration camps are doing bad stuff too that we have to recognize.”
/r/MensRights27/02/26 02:40 PM
9

No kidding. OP says “we cannot stoop to their level, when feminist ideology is on top and feminists got it there using every dirty trick in the book.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 02:13 PM
16

Stop victim blaming men and the men’s rights movement. Your post misses the big picture and conveniently ignored the fact that feminists have been undermining and shutting down moderate men’s rights organizations and causes for decades. Of course the men’s rights movement faces challenges, because it’s constantly under attack from feminists. The men’s rights movement has never come close to inflicting as much harm on a gender as feminism has. In case you’re not aware, u/MounatinGoat did a good j…
/r/MensRights27/02/26 01:42 PM
0

And other politicians have actively worked against men’s rights and are looking to restrict men’s rights further. Those are worse than the politicians who publicly speak in favor of men, and the latter should be encouraged and helped to formulate the right plans. When it comes to men’s rights, the “Do more harm” approach is worse than the “Do less harm” approach. If a specific plan right now is so important to you, why don’t you write to politicians outlining what such plans should include and w…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 05:14 AM
11

Anyone who’s been paying attention knows there’s a lot of variation between politicians in how they speak to men, ranging from friendly to hostile. Misandric policies are more likely to follow from misandric rhetoric than egalitarian or pro-male rhetoric. What authorities say also sets an example that many others act on. I haven’t seen any anti-Men’s Rights policies endorsed by Lowe, which is not something I can say about every other politician.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:11 AM
22

Backlashes and counterrevolutions do happen, especially against those who overplay their hand. UK MP Rupert Lowe is saying some good things: “There is NOTHING wrong with being male. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.” More people need to follow suit and speak out against misandry.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:31 PM
1

If you genuinely care about equal rights, the way to help is by advocating for it with others in government, business, and civil society. Discredit feminist ideology, which is a hate movement that actively works against equal rights. For decades, feminists promoted women’s rights at the expense of men’s rights. And what happened? Men have withdrawn much of their previous support for women’s causes. So Roe v Wade is gone, abortion restrictions are increasing, women’s programs are being defunded, …
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:24 PM
2

This post is suspicious. It also reads like something concocted by a feminist or brainwashed Uncle Tim pretending to be an MRA, and attempting to trick us into agreeing with what feminism has done and surrendering. “Hey fellow brothers, wouldn’t you be doing the same thing we are—uh, I mean they are—if you had the power and edge? We’re just one step away from total female domination!” Read between OP’s lines. I wouldn’t be surprised if OP’s account was created very recently for this kind of trol…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:46 PM
1

Good stuff! Thanks for reminding everyone of what the UN really is. Defund misandric institutions.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 11:47 PM
34

Wikipedia is notorious for being anti-male and pro-female. Women’s and Gender Studies departments have filled Wikipedia editor roles with their students, who control these narratives and selectively apply rules in support of their agendas. They remove content and editors they disagree with. Wikipedia editors violate their own rules all the time when they feel like it. Even Wikipedia’s cofounder Larry Sanger says Wikipedia is untrustworthy and out of control with its bias nowadays. Go ahead and f…
/r/MensRights24/02/26 11:45 PM
1

Lots of projection in this post. Who would voluntarily give up power and their edge for a greater good? Read a history book. Cincinnatus did it. George Washington did it. The British have done it. Men have done it. Whistleblowers have done it. And so on. Some people do in fact have the wisdom, maturity, and foresight to strive for a fairer way of life for all even at personal expense. Giving up immediate gains can help secure a better and more stable future for a greater number in the long run.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 11:24 PM
41

It’s not just about convincing “these people.” It’s also about convincing the broader audience for such comments. Undermine feminist ideology by pointing out its bigotry, hate, contradictions, greed, and double standards as often as you can. Anything that seems really powerful can be weakened or destroyed if people work at it for long enough in the right ways.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 08:27 PM
2

Ignoring a problem doesn’t make the problem go away. In fact, ignored problems often become bigger problems. A more productive approach is lobbying elected officials and others early and often to shut down or regulate platforms that promote anti-male hate.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 05:52 PM
37

100%. Archive links or screenshotted excerpts only for that kind of content. Stop giving revenue to man-hating feminists. Don’t give them clicks, sales, or favorable reviews. Reward the writers and creators who treat men better.
/r/MensRights23/02/26 02:24 PM
19

Right, feminists are hyper fixated on info about men abusing girls. But when it’s women abusing boys? Crickets or denials. Feminist ideology exaggerates female victimhood and erases male victimhood. Where was their outrage about all of the women abusing boys in juvenile detention centers, which has been going on for years? https://www.propublica.org/article/boys-in-custody-and-the-women-who-abuse-them
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/26 08:39 PM
1

At best it’s unhelpful. A call to action calls people to action. It doesn’t claim the movement doesn’t stand a chance. Tell people to change the way things are instead of passively accepting the way things are. Be the change you want to see.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 07:34 PM
35

Feminists have taken over lots of institutions and media outlets that now proclaim criticism of feminist myths to be “misogyny” and “extremism.” The good news is that we are now seeing some backlash to them overplaying their hand, as more of those institutions and outlets are getting defunded.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/26 07:22 PM
3

Being an extreme pessimist is worthless. It wastes time and energy that would be better spent building on the things I mentioned. You say “no one is saying we should do nothing”, but that’s basically the message that’s being conveyed with statements like “men’s rights doesn’t stand a chance because feminist conditioning is too deep.” Those who actually support men’s rights will challenge gynocentrism and feminist ideology instead of trying to convince themselves and others that things can’t get …
/r/MensRights22/02/26 06:27 PM
-1

When someone starts off with “I don’t think men’s rights stands a chance” and “feminist conditioning is too deep” it’s most likely that there’s a malign agenda behind that message. Your comment ignores notable successes in suing companies that discriminate against men, reforms related to custody and paternity fraud, dismantling of DEI programs, growing policymaker recognition of misandry and men’s issues, and more. It’s a lot more valuable to actively build on these successes than to cry about h…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 05:40 PM
34

Don’t assume it’s always from men, or that such comments represent most men. You never know someone is who they say they are online. A more productive course of action than blaming men would be to lobby your elected officials to reform our courts. Stop forcing boys who are raped by women to pay child support when those women get pregnant. Raped girls don’t have to pay for their victimhood for 18+ years, so why should boys? https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 05:32 PM
2

Yeah, feminists are constantly trashing men, reinventing definitions so they can turn anything into “misogyny” or “harassment”, and even endorsing false accusations against men. Then they have the nerve to cry, “Why aren’t men approaching women anymore?!” Zero awareness that they create so many of their own problems.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 05:23 PM
73

Stop saying things like “why is it always men who say this?” It’s not true, and it also reinforces the misandry that the feminist propaganda machine keeps pumping out.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 05:13 PM
5

From time to time we see posts like this one (with a narrow-minded, passive, defeatist tone) from people who pretend to care about men’s rights, but are most likely trying to undermine them. We are making progress on men’s issues (as those who have been paying attention lately know), but we need to do more. To all—the future is what we make it, and the world is constantly changing and presenting new opportunities. The defeatists and concern trolls who come here and say it will never become mains…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 04:17 PM
2

You’re still not getting it. Everything you typed up confirmed my suspicions about the movie’s misandric propaganda, which is common to Hollywood now. Flip the gender roles—a victimized man gets stuck in a bad situation with an oppressive woman, kills her, gets away with it, and lives happily ever after. How often have you seen that in movies during the past 5-10 years? Nowhere close to as often as in the plot of the movie you just described, I’ll bet. Edit: And you said nobody sees her actions …
/r/MensRights22/02/26 02:15 PM
48

Being allergic to accountability is a fundamental part of liberal feminist ideology. They shame and blame men to do what they want, and when that doesn’t work, they shame and blame men some more, and it still doesn’t work. These feminists live in a fantasy world, and blame everything they don’t like on men and a non-existent patriarchy. Their insistence that Kamala was going to win in a landslide is another example of their delusional thinking. They’re still not ready to grow up and accept respo…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 02:00 PM
2

That’s a very detailed synopsis, and it confirms exactly what I suspected above. I don’t mind the spoilers because I won’t pay to view such content anymore. The movie creators are telling the audience, “Here is a bad oppressive man who is going to get what he deserves. Here’s a relatively good woman who was his victim, so we’ll just let her get away with whatever she wants to do with zero accountability. BAD OPPRESSIVE MAN DIE! GOOD VICTIM WOMAN LIVE!” That’s the message they’re trying to convey…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 05:40 AM
3

Let me guess—they kill the man and let the woman live. Because that’s the kind of misandrist content I’m talking about that’s been all over Hollywood lately: “MAN BAD OPPRESSOR, MUST DIE. POOR WOMAN VICTIM OF BAD MAN, SHOULD LIVE.” We see this pattern over and over. Wake up to the social programming that brainwashes people into thinking women are better and should be more valued than men, without women being subject to the same accountability that men are.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 04:13 AM
20

Because when you’re accustomed to female privilege, equality feels like oppression. Keep calling feminists out for their double standards on equality whenever you can.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 10:26 PM
7

There’s no real gender pay gap when it comes to the same field and number of hours worked. The discussion of this issue is often misleading because men are under more pressure—especially from women—to be the primary breadwinner. Men do make more money, but are more likely to take (or be forced into) jobs they dislike, that are dangerous and dirty, that involve longer hours and less flexibility, and so on to make that money than women are. Women control most of the actual consumer spending though…
/r/MensRights20/02/26 01:46 AM
371

Never sign a contract that rewards the other party for breaking it.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 07:19 PM
29

EEOC is suing Coca Cola over the anti-male discrimination of this event, and this should be no surprise. Remember, the tide is slowly turning. EEOC has openly encouraged men to take legal action against employers that demonstrate anti-male bias. Spread the word, and speak out against misandry. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-admin-encourages-white-men-to-claim-discrimination-money-11235826 "The EEOC is committed to identifying, attacking, and eliminating ALL race and sex discrimination — includin…
/r/MensRights19/02/26 05:01 AM
115

He’s either very ignorant or he’s pandering to man-hating feminists. Those who have done the actual research have shown repeatedly that female rulers are even more likely to go to war than male rulers. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4454964/Female-rulers-27-likely-wage-WAR-males.html# Call out feminist propaganda and disinformation as often as you can. Edit: And male simps need to stop making excuses for women who behave badly too.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 02:03 AM
9

Sounds like an existing sub called MensVenting
/r/MensRights17/02/26 11:35 PM
22

Here’s a list of men’s rights organizations: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/155H3Spada
/r/MensRights17/02/26 06:53 PM
8

Well, I guarantee it’s going to be a lot easier for them to deny and trivialize any memes you show them (“We didn’t do that!” “I never saw that, nobody did!” “That was just a joke!”) Actual quotes from famous and powerful people published in major news outlets carry more weight.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 03:23 AM
24

If you want to show them proof, you don’t need to depend on memes. The National Review, The New Republic, The Guardian, and Politico have all run articles explaining at great length how the left alienated men and drove them away. What about the endless supply of anti-male and gynocentric quotes from feminists and Democrats? They’re everywhere and impossible to miss in the mainstream media and social media. A few examples below that anyone can verify with an internet search: “I’m actually not at …
/r/MensRights17/02/26 03:08 AM
135

The UK is an example of how a country should NOT approach gender issues: maximum privilege and minimal accountability for women, minimal privilege and maximum accountability for men.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 09:09 PM
30

Contrary to popular belief (a belief manufactured by feminists), the majority of domestic violence perpetrators are actually women. That’s according to reports from both men and women, and numerous studies that feminists have attempted to bury. Despite that, almost all of the funding for domestic violence assistance goes to victimized women instead of victimized men. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/ “In fact, women’s greater perpetration of violence was reported by both women (f…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 07:57 AM
22

Companies, individuals, and products rise and fall all the time. Don’t fall into the trap of lazy defeatism. If you want the world to be better, start working to make it better. Be the change you want to see.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 08:17 PM
68

When you see a corporation engaging in misandry, the way to respond is to contact the corporation, object to the treatment, and tell them you’ll take your business elsewhere if they keep doing it. Don’t keep giving money to misandrists. Encourage others to do the same and put a dent in their profits, because profit is what they care about. This has worked against especially egregious misandry, but we need to do more. It’s a missed opportunity to just complain on Reddit—actually do something in t…
/r/MensRights13/02/26 08:07 PM
24

That’s the usual thinking from feminists and cowardly men who simp for them: hype male wrongdoing and excuse or deny female wrongdoing. There’s been a pattern of this for a long time. Where was their outrage over adult women forcing boys they raped to pay child support? That’s been the outcome of every such court case—boys who are raped must pay for their victimhood by paying child support. Those who can’t pay go to prison. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when…
/r/MensRights11/02/26 02:25 PM
142

Yep. Men get less help, but feminists keep up with their lies about how women are the oppressed minority. They rig laws and policies throughout the educational system to benefit girls and harm boys. Women have been getting more degrees than men for 40+ years, but more academic scholarships continue to be reserved exclusively for women than men. https://www.thecollegefix.com/92-percent-of-sex-specific-scholarships-are-reserved-for-women-study-finds/
/r/MensRights11/02/26 03:00 AM
52

Female supremacists use all kinds of bogus arguments about “safety” and outright lies to gain special privileges for women and girls that they deny to men and boys, even in areas where women and girls are much better off. Never forget that feminist ideology always strives to give women the rights of men, the special privileges of being women, and the accountability of children. No matter how much of this they get, it’s never enough. The feminist business model depends on exaggerating female vict…
/r/MensRights11/02/26 02:49 AM
92

No. Don’t run from terms like men’s rights or MRA. Man-hating feminists demonize ANY term that catches on for people who value equal rights for men. They even try to stigmatize anything related to men or masculinity—consider “mansplaining”, “mankeeping,” “toxic masculinity,” “male rage,” “male fragility,” and so on. If you run any time they stigmatize what you are or what you do, you’ll be running forever, and you’ll encourage them to keep using the same dirty tactics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/26 04:21 AM
130

It’s a reasonable way to push back, given how much the deck is stacked against men in dating, marriage, custody, and divorce. When more men do this, it also sends a message to elected officials, and pressures them to reform laws so they’re more fair to men. For instance, MGTOW/declining marriage rates contributed to Kentucky reforming child custody laws to be more fair in how they treat fathers. This has lowered divorce rates.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 08:25 PM
10

Definitely. Just look at the world of difference in how party leaders have talked about men: “Now women, I just want you to know: You are not perfect, but what I can say pretty indisputably is that you're better than us [men]". - Barack Obama “The future is female.” - Hillary Clinton Vs “For far too long, the health, happiness, and well-being of our Nation’s men have been neglected… This neglect has been compounded by a vicious campaign against masculinity. I make a solemn pledge to honor the me…
/r/MensRights09/02/26 07:52 PM
28

Don’t support political parties that pull man-hating stunts like that with your vote or money. Condemn them for misandry. Encourage others to do the same. Make them lose votes during elections. Prominent Democrats pushed similar misandrist messaging for years. Look where they are now.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 05:45 PM
75

Exactly. The women who wouldn’t stop demanding more for women while neglecting and vilifying men have set themselves up for failure. Of course, they don’t admit this because they’re allergic to accountability. More men are realizing that they’re getting a raw deal from a gynocentric and misandrist society, and are less willing to advocate for or protect those who hate them. Women will lose more of their rights if more of them aren’t willing to work with men to establish laws and policies that ar…
/r/MensRights09/02/26 04:48 AM
6

The way this post is framed is misleading, and appears aimed at subtly undermining confidence in equal rights for men. Defeatists and traditionalists used similar arguments in attempts to defend monarchy and discredit America’s strides toward democracy in the 18th century—“It hasn’t been done before, so it can’t work!” But pioneering advancements without historical precedent do happen. Men’s rights is primarily about securing equal rights, a goal that reasonable men and women can agree on. Promo…
/r/MensRights09/02/26 04:39 AM
11

That’s a great example of what we all should be doing more of—telling elected officials to come up with legislation that treats men better. But I’d note that abolishing Selective Service entirely is going to be next to impossible, and it would be much more realistic and provide similar benefits if he takes the position that male-only Selective Service should be abolished. Open it up to both genders. America will be less likely to get involved in frivolous wars if it has to risk both sons and dau…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 09:38 PM
35

I saw the trailer, and it looked like another one of those “MAN BAD OPPRESSOR, WOMAN GOOD VICTIM” movies, so I’m not planning to watch it. In general, I try not to reward misandrist content creators or companies with purchases, subscriptions, or clicks. Doing so incentivizes more of the bad behavior. When I do so by accident, I write bad reviews to discourage others from giving them money. I write good reviews for those who treat men fairly. This approach will help to promote men’s rights over t…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 01:56 AM
3

It is not old news to most people outside of this echo chamber. Publicizing such studies helps to erode the wrong beliefs and policies created by feminist victimhood Olympics. Passivity and defeatism don’t help at all.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 07:22 PM
10

Today we enjoy rights and benefits that people a thousand years ago didn’t have. That’s because the people who came before us had the courage to fight for those, not because they were afraid of being mocked. If people care more about being mocked than having rights, those rights will disappear. “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be…
/r/MensRights07/02/26 04:40 PM
30

Stop looking for excuses to shame and blame men, and try something more constructive. Internalized misandry affects both men and women, and that cultural programming needs to be recognized and reversed. People need to be reminded that boys cannot consent, have zero reproductive rights, and are forced to pay child support when this kind of rape results in pregnancy. These policies need to be recognized and reformed in ways that are more fair to men and boys. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blo…
/r/MensRights07/02/26 03:57 PM
14

Stop with the learned helplessness, and be the change you want to see. Contact elected officials, join men’s rights groups, make some noise.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 03:47 PM
3

Yes. Have you been paying attention to the bigger picture, and do you understand the broader implications of circulating studies like this?
/r/MensRights07/02/26 05:42 AM
17

Yes. We should all be calling out the hypocrisy and double standards of the people who continue to demand special privileged treatment for women who are largely better off than men. Put them on the spot and make them defend their biases against the facts. The silent majority is watching and listening. The majority of the people at the bottom of society are men. Most gender-specific aid programs continue to emphasize helping women. Studies like this one prove there are strong biases in favor of h…
/r/MensRights06/02/26 10:32 PM
97

This is additional evidence of an important truth that too few people (outside of subs like this one) understand: our society is gynocentric, not a patriarchy. It needs to do better by men. That message needs to get through. Studies like this one should be circulated as broadly and as often as possible, to counter the lies of the man-hating feminist propaganda machine.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 07:52 PM
30

They do. And they need to be circulated as broadly and as often as possible, to counter the lies of the man-hating feminist propaganda machine.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 06:43 PM
76

And for something much more recent, see this large 2025 study, showing women are less willing to help men in need: “The Cappelen et al. study included 35,000 adults in the US, and found they tended to favour women over men. The study found a tendency for people to be more accepting of males falling behind in work performance, more likely to see it as men’s own fault, and less willing to let them be helped. In most of the research questions this bias was larger from women than men, and for some r…
/r/MensRights06/02/26 04:17 PM
13

You are right to be concerned, because it is definitely a minefield for boys right now. More people are recognizing these issues and doing something about them though. Right now I would not encourage any young man to get married and have kids, because the deck is heavily stacked against men. A substantial portion of prison inmates are men who simply couldn’t keep up with child support payments. Something to think about with the job market being what it is, and what the future will hold for it. I…
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:40 PM
17

Look up “jury nullification.”
/r/MensRights05/02/26 01:53 PM
91

Two words: jury nullification. Everyone should look it up and keep it in mind.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 01:50 PM
2

That’s a great idea. You could point out that most of the people at the bottom of society are men, but we still have a lot more social assistance programs to help women than men. These disparities should be corrected. Give him a copy of a book like The Boy Crisis, Men on Strike, or The War Against Boys, which lay out the problems very well.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:23 AM
4

Everyone reading this needs to tell politicians that we expect them to do more to help men, and that they need to acknowledge and confront systemic anti-male discrimination if they want our votes and hard work. That message has to be repeated as often as possible, from as many people as possible, and delivered to as many people as possible.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 01:42 AM
15

Bravo. You can and should set up a club like that one, especially if your school’s leadership has already approved a Feminist club. They did not provide you with an answer for rejecting the Masculinity club because they don’t have a good answer. Explain to them that allowing a feminism club but not a club for masculinity is a double standard, discrimination, and a violation of equal rights. Rejecting it outright is literally prejudice. In addition, you can point out the need for such clubs by no…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 08:14 PM
6

Yep, so you call them out for cherry picking and explain that women get away with a lot more than men do. You’re not just arguing to persuade them, but others who are silently reading.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 03:35 PM
11

The criminal justice system reflects structural misandry, not structural misogyny. Keep reminding them of this with the actual data showing that men are more likely to be arrested, charged, convicted, and sentenced than women for the same conduct, and receive much longer sentences for the same offense. https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/57/
/r/MensRights04/02/26 03:13 PM
5

There’s growing willingness from politicians to advocate for men. A few examples with sources below, but there are more than these: https://aibm.org/commentary/a-pivotal-year-for-boys-and-mens-issues/ "Gov. Wes Moore used his State of the State address in February to take this issue head on. He said, “Directing my entire administration to begin implementing targeted solutions to uplift our men and boys.”... He’s already launched programs to increase the share of male teachers, boost apprenticesh…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 12:18 PM
41

All true. There are far more scholarships and other assistance programs reserved for the exclusive use of women. Men are disproportionately forced or tricked into taking the most dangerous professions, with feminists contributing to this (look up the white feather campaign). Women have a lot more freedom in their employment (and unemployment) choices. Men are far more tolerant of unemployed wives than women are of unemployed husbands. And men get deterred from going into teaching and other carin…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 01:06 AM
64

Google “lifecycle of male spaces” for a graphic that breaks down how male spaces are set up and then invaded by women who demand that those spaces cater to them instead. We see the same pattern over and over. Also here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TimeToChange/s/u7b7Jjy9Hx
/r/MensRights03/02/26 01:45 AM
65

Exactly. Every time there’s an article about male birth control pills, morons come out of the woodwork to whine about how men can’t be trusted to take them. Nothing would prevent both men and women from taking pills. I suspect that some women argue against it because they secretly want to preserve the option of baby trapping unwilling men and suing them for child support. Other opponents of the male pill want to keep growing the population of disposable wage slaves they can exploit. It’s about t…
/r/MensRights02/02/26 10:47 PM
0

Your claim is irrelevant to OP’s question, which is about which countries have the most gender-equal laws. I answered it by recognizing where Israel gets it right and where it falls short under the law. Everything I wrote above is accurate. You have provided disinformation and moved goalposts.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 10:00 PM
-4

Both Israeli men and women are subject to conscription, and Israeli combat units include a substantial and growing percentage of female soldiers. My point stands. This is a much more egalitarian approach to military service than what most other countries have.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 09:10 PM
37

That’s probably why the life expectancy gap has narrowed so much in Iceland—only about 3.5 years. Contrary to popular belief, most of the life expectancy gap reflects culture instead of biology. If gynocentric and misandric cultural biases were eliminated entirely, there’d probably only be a difference of about 1-2 years in male vs female life expectancy. We know that from a handful of studies, including those of nuns and monks.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 07:35 PM
17

On military service yes, on retirement age and custody no.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 06:51 PM
16

No country is perfect, but Denmark and the Netherlands are relatively fair on gender-equal laws.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 06:47 PM
2

Looks like you’re right. So you and Texas both win additional points for that.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 06:31 PM
33

That’s what happens when feminists are allowed to have too much influence in a society. Feminism’s vile maxim: all for women, nothing for men.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 03:44 PM
1

Texas is a mixed bag. I don’t doubt what you’re saying about therapy and SA. On the other hand, Texas judges have also declared that male-only Selective Service requirements are unconstitutional and imposed caps on the duration and amount of alimony that must be paid. I’ll give them credit where it’s due, including on this latest women’s studies development.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 02:37 PM
2

Regardless of what their intent may be, the result is that weakening anti-male programs helps to create more room for men’s rights to grow. You don’t get far on the path to equality without first removing the obstacles on that path. Those who shut down misandric programs and those who promote men’s rights need not be one and the same.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 02:26 PM
5

"He who lives by the crystal ball will eat shattered glass" I don’t put much stock in predictions, especially defeatist ones, because the future is what we make it. There’s no need to surrender in advance. Many of the things going on in the world today would be shocking or even unrecognizable to people 50 years ago. If you were to go back to the year 2000 and tell people about what’s happened in the years since then, it would sound absolutely bonkers.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 01:44 PM
68

Once again for those who are unaware—a few reminders of the UN's documented anti-male biases below: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346521168_Bias_against_men's_issues_within_the_United_Nations_and_the_World_Health_Organization_A_content_analysis https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/comments/1ltpjn6/how_the_un_have_failed_men_and_boys/ https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/comments/1m5dyjc/how_the_un_have_failed_men_and_boys_part_2/ https://www.icvanetwork.org/uploads/2022/04/Action-Sheet-Ha…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 09:35 PM
11

Twitter is also where a lot of really good MRAs/men’s advocates post though.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 05:18 PM
199

Yes, and the victim mentality is something feminism cultivates among women. Any time a woman doesn’t get exactly what she wants, it’s “misogyny.” No matter how much is done for women, it’s never enough. They overplayed their hand, and that’s why we’re now seeing a lot of backlash against DEI.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 05:16 PM
7

Yeah, that’s fairer than some other states. It was a Texas judge (Gray Miller) who also declared that male-only Selective Service requirements are unconstitutional. We need more judges like that.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 03:45 AM
1

The answers to your questions can be found in my replies and links above.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 02:05 AM
2

Yes, my commentary reflected my years of personal observations from work and academia. Those have not been consistent with the distorted feminist narrative you alluded to.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 01:33 AM
6

You asked whether we “regularly see women not being taken as seriously as other men are by male colleagues.” My reply was no. I have not seen that. I have seen women receive more help than men, and I have heard more derogatory comments about men than women. But personal anecdotes don’t count for as much as big data sets over time, which is why I provided the sources I did. My personal observations track with those findings.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 01:11 AM
7

No. Work and academic environments are usually more friendly to women than men. Feminist ideology completely distorts a believer’s perception of the world. Feminists see it through the lens of a “patriarchy” that does not exist. They’ve also been rewarded for complaining about perceived victimhood for too long, so they keep grasping at straws to keep that gravy train running. That’s how their business model works—they use distortions, half-truths and lies to exaggerate female victimhood and male…
/r/MensRights29/01/26 12:45 AM
6

There are examples of men who have successfully sued women to recover child support payments, for financial damages, and emotional distress for paternity fraud. That article mentions a woman who was charged for it. However, this doesn’t happen nearly as often as it should. People need to lobby elected officials hard to support harsher penalties against women who commit paternity fraud, and to support reform of courts so they’re more fair to men. Avoiding marriage and avoiding having kids also se…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 11:18 PM
22

I second this, change therapists. We all need to stop giving money to radical feminists who hate and undermine men. Before hiring another therapist, ask them for their thoughts on feminism and men. If they’re pro-feminism and misandric, don’t hire them. An ounce of prevention…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:13 PM
47

Man-hating feminists cannot be reasoned with, and look for excuses to rage against men no matter what men do or don’t do. Remember, these are the people who yell at men to “open up” and then “shut up” (stop mankeeping!”) in almost the same breath. They say “Misandry doesn’t exist” then “Kill all men! Men are trash!” They cry about sexual harassment and creepiness when men look at women the wrong way, then scream “Why aren’t men approaching women anymore?!” Feminism is a hate movement intended to…
/r/MensRights27/01/26 09:15 PM
1

Yes and yes. More and more government officials are publicly recognizing the importance of advocating for men. A partial list with sources follows. Even if there weren't, that's no excuse for people to be silent and passive. People need to keep lobbying lawmakers to do more to support men's rights. https://aibm.org/commentary/a-pivotal-year-for-boys-and-mens-issues/ "Gov. Wes Moore used his State of the State address in February to take this issue head on. He was, he said, “Directing my entire a…
/r/MensRights27/01/26 06:25 PM
36

Check out the rebooted Hercule Poirot murder mysteries from the past few years: Murder on the Orient Express Death on the Nile A Haunting in Venice Edit: Leave positive reviews for films that meet your criteria, so Hollywood gets the message. This helps men’s rights.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 12:55 AM
81

They’re responding to demand from misandrist women and the silence of men who won’t stand up to it. So don’t tolerate it. Complain to the producers of misandrist content loud and often. Write negative reviews. Stop giving them money. This can work and has worked, notably against Disney and Gillette, among others. And reward the content creators who treat men and boys more fairly.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 08:44 PM
25

Good job doing this research. We should all keep reminding people of how anti-male and female supremacist the United Nations is. It doesn’t deserve funding for promoting sexism against men. Reform or replace the UN with something better.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 05:16 PM
25

That’s a really good point. The media won’t shut up about how bad men are when men are overrepresented in something people don’t like. But men are overrepresented among good Samaritans, firefighters, first responders, snow plowers, bystander interventions, etc—and not a peep about how those things are done almost entirely by men. It’s taken for granted. Lots of gendered recognition when a man does bad, virtually none when a man does good. Can’t say I blame people like OP who have had enough of t…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 02:48 PM
13

Not if you help feminists, who are generally allergic to reason, charity, and accountability. Almost all bystander rescues are performed by men, but you almost never hear feminists acknowledge this. Society has bent over backwards to help women, so much so that women are now doing better than men across the board. But it’s never enough for feminists, who keep demanding more and more for women, and hate men more than ever regardless. Anyone who’s paying attention to the media knows what I’m talki…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 02:28 PM
26

The response isn’t bad, and it’s a lot better than what the feminist propaganda machine puts out. It gets a few things wrong, though. Women do not face a much higher risk of domestic violence. Women and men perpetrate this at comparable levels, but there’s a lot more help for female victims and male victims are more likely to be arrested: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/ https://www.acrosswalls.org/separate-unequal-domestic-violence-victim-services/ Women are not worse off in re…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 03:28 AM
2

There’s a lot of ignorance and denialism out there from men who think, “It won’t happen to me.” Divorce and its aftereffects from our rigged, anti-male courts are a leading cause of male suicide, but the mainstream media seldom cover it. As many of us as possible should raise awareness of how risky and ruinous divorce and children are for men in this misandric age. Don’t sign a contract that rewards the other party for breaking it. Here’s a reminder of where things are and how bad a deal this is…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 01:17 AM
2

Assigning blame correctly is part of strategy. Those who have actively sabotaged our efforts and continue to do so must be recognized and discredited to reduce their negative influence. Blaming men for being victims of systemic misandry takes us in the wrong direction and echoes the propaganda of man-hating feminists. It’s the wrong approach and should be called out as such.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 01:46 PM
5

I’ve got no problem calling out adversaries of the movement, including feminists and concern trolls. Others around here recognize you for what you are, GuyWhoTalksShit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 05:13 AM
8

More comments from prominent feminists below: “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations,” "If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I am absolutely willing to pay." – Emily Lindin "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." - Sally Miller Gearhart "To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 04:58 AM
10

Your claim that “feminism has nothing to do with misandry” is dead wrong. We have heard an endless torrent of anti-male and female supremacist comments from leading feminists over the years, and their actions track with their rhetoric. Here are a few examples: From u/MounatinGoat: Misandry Kills I’m a scientist. I build arguments from evidence, not ideology. So when I say misandry kills, I’m not being hyperbolic - I’m counting bodies. 49,000 men died by suicide in the US last year (www.cdc.gov/n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 04:56 AM
8

I already did, it’s better than your “blame men” approach, you’re moving goalposts, and no one should expect immediate results. You’ve demonstrated your ignorance again with the false claim that we have “nothing” to show for our efforts. You’re not actually here to help, though. You’re here to troll. Others here who have called you out for your uninformed comments should take note of your name and hidden post history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 04:43 AM
10

Not any form of criticism, but your form. And we don’t get anywhere without first recognizing and countering the obstacles in our path. That includes feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 04:18 AM
9

Your post is most definitely victim blaming. It goes on and on with comments like “men are terrible at advocating for themselves”, “men are very bad at…”, etc, while ignoring the many ways that feminists and elites have sabotaged men’s rights and brainwashed the public. Those misandrists are the ones who deserve the most blame, not ordinary men. I’m not demotivated, and have the track record to prove it. You have misunderstood my comment, other informed comments on this thread, and the history o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 03:06 AM
34

Instead of focusing on victim blaming men, your post would have been better had it recognized how feminists and elites have suppressed and undermined the men’s rights movement. Both groups have benefited from oppressing the mass of ordinary men. They have worked hard to manipulate public opinion, keep a lid on us, and attack individuals and organizations that work for equality. Whether you’re aware of this or not, your commentary reflects much of their propaganda—when women are behind, it’s the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 12:02 AM
28

Lobby lawmakers to give men reproductive rights too, including greater access to contraceptives like male birth control pills and the ability to opt out of paying for unwanted parental responsibilities via paper abortion (financial abortion). Right now Safe Haven laws only protect women, allowing them to give up responsibility for unwanted kids penalty-free. Let’s have those laws protect men too. More info on this below: https://nationalcenterformen.org https://www.newsweek.com/give-men-reproduc…
/r/MensRights22/01/26 12:36 PM
3

Some of the top MRAs are women. Andrea Lucas is directly encouraging white men to speak up and report discrimination. Your chances are low if you complain. Your chances are zero if you don’t complain. There’s strength in numbers. More men need to have the courage to take action against misandry.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 03:44 AM
7

Filing a discrimination complaint is an uphill battle, and those who were discriminated against years ago might have no recourse. But disbanding EEOC and related institutions would mean losing the battle before it’s even fought, and also depriving recourse to those who are discriminated against now and in the future. Things are slowly improving for men, and the comments we’re seeing are helping us to move in the right direction, but they won’t keep improving if men give up in advance.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 11:38 PM
21

A reminder to all: You can file complaints about anti-male discrimination in the workplace with EEOC and in education with the National Association of Scholars. Copy and share to raise awareness. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-admin-encourages-white-men-to-claim-discrimination-money-11235826 https://www.nas.org/blogs/press_release/schools-still-have-illegal-dei-tell-us
/r/MensRights17/01/26 11:08 PM
108

Exactly. There are so many Democrats and leftists who are still oblivious to the fact that misandry played a big role in getting us where we are today politically. They went out of their way to belittle and alienate men for years, and what happened? Men abandoned the left in large numbers. Lots of people won’t fight for or vote for people who hate them. If “progressive” man-haters think lots of men will step up to help those who very openly want to treat men as second-class citizens or worse, th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/26 10:12 PM
7

Welcome aboard. Here are a few reading recommendations to get started: TheTinMen Blog: great, clear infographics about men’s issues. The Red Pill: the best documentary about the men’s rights movement so far, available for free on some streaming services. The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny: shows with numerous studies how society is biased in favor of women and against men. The Misogyny Myth: similar to above. Browse the websites of National Coalition for Men, International Coalition for Men and Boys…
/r/MensRights17/01/26 02:07 PM
56

DEI is about empowering certain groups and disempowering others, but calling it what it really is reflects poorly on those who benefit from the rigged system. So they put a positive-sounding spin on what they’re doing. At every step, the educational system is rigged in favor of females and against males. Most teachers are women. Boys get worse grades than girls for turning in the same quality work. Boys are disproportionately punished and suspended. Almost all gender-specific scholarships are st…
/r/MensRights17/01/26 04:52 AM
14

Those of us who have been paying attention to what feminists say and do aren’t fooled. We’ve got lists of their misandrist, female supremacist quotes. We’ve seen them shut down programs to help men. We’ve seen them promote programs that jail men based on false accusations. We’ve seen them infiltrate the media to drum up hate against men. Each of us needs to publicize the misconduct of feminists as often as we can to discredit them and their man-hating agenda. From u/MounatinGoat: Misandry Kills …
/r/MensRights16/01/26 06:21 PM
10

Law and the media. They’ve weaponized both against men.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 02:37 AM
9

This is a troll post that disparages men and violates subreddit rules.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 10:14 PM
11

Of course they are. We have to keep pushing for men’s rights with everyone as often as we can. No party or leader hangs onto power forever, but they all make concessions from time to time that they disagree with to try and stay in control as long as they can. With a feminist government, you can frame your men’s rights petitions in ways that show they help women too (they often do anyway), because feminist governments focus on obtaining and maintaining female privilege. And you keep supporting th…
/r/MensRights12/01/26 02:01 PM
13

Sounds like a good project, please share in as many places as you can when you’ve gathered them. That 10% quote is from another feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart, I believe. Feminists say anti-male and female supremacist things all the time, but aren’t even honest enough to admit how common this is or their own contradictions (“Misandry doesn’t exist!” “Kill all men!”) Here are a few more: “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harass…
/r/MensRights11/01/26 05:23 PM
95

Yes, the belief is stupid. It’s called the apex fallacy. And the claim that “patriarchy” exists is obviously nonsense, because most of the people at the bottom of society are men.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 08:40 PM
8

Yeah, the deck is stacked heavily against complainants and only a tiny, tiny percentage have ever won at EEOC. And it’s a long process. The more realistic outcome that one can hope for is a settlement, but to get that the complainant has to have all their ducks in a row, adhere to deadlines, document everything, etc, as you and I have pointed out above. It’s very important that more men educate themselves on how these things work and push for reforms to counter misandry in the workplace and else…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 02:19 PM
74

Also, while I do not endorse the Republican Party or the Democratic Party, I give credit when and where it’s due. The Trump admin has consistently recognized the problem of discrimination against men at work and other areas, and is taking some steps to reverse it under EEOC, Title IX, and elsewhere. The Democratic Party often doesn’t recognize this problem, and has instead mostly claimed that men ARE the problem. They did it for years. And look where it got them.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 01:48 PM
76

Sorry to hear about what happened to you, but the whole system is rigged against complainants of all stripes. Companies have lawyers and HR not to help employees, but to defend the company against employees. The name says it all—Human Resources. The employee is a resource to be used. Complainants rarely prevail at EEOC, but settlements sometimes happen. Thorough documentation, and having a paper trail that clearly shows wrongdoing and confirms that what you say happened are essential to a strong…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 01:30 PM
7

Your question is a dishonest one that disregards the evidence already posted in this thread. For many years, the UN has actively promoted anti-male bias and harm from the Balkans to Haiti. The UN’s programs and guidance have emphasized helping women and ignoring men after disasters. You can read more in the links above. Some have urged the UN to support equal treatment, but the UN ignored such calls for reform and continued to promote female supremacy and hatred of men. Time’s up. Defunding UN W…
/r/MensRights09/01/26 01:25 PM
181

u/MounatinGoat did a good job explaining some of what we’re upset about (because of feminists) below: Misandry Kills I’m a scientist. I build arguments from evidence, not ideology. So when I say misandry kills, I’m not being hyperbolic - I’m counting bodies. 49,000 men died by suicide in the US last year (www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/suicide.htm). That’s one every 11 minutes. Men die by suicide at four times the rate women do, and that gap keeps growing. Here’s what nobody wants to talk about: when …
/r/MensRights08/01/26 05:05 PM
87

Reminders of the UN's documented anti-male and anti-men's issues biases below: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346521168_Bias_against_men's_issues_within_the_United_Nations_and_the_World_Health_Organization_A_content_analysis https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/comments/1ltpjn6/how_the_un_have_failed_men_and_boys/ https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/comments/1m5dyjc/how_the_un_have_failed_men_and_boys_part_2/ https://www.icvanetwork.org/uploads/2022/04/Action-Sheet-Handbook-for-the-Protec…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 04:03 AM
121

It’s unfortunate that so many Democratic politicians still haven’t figured out that trashing men is directly responsible for the party’s loss of power. People stop supporting those who hate them.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 03:44 AM
58

They’ll support hashtags like #killallmen and complain about “toxic masculinity”, then say “misandry isn’t real” in almost the same breath—without recognizing the contradiction.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 01:09 AM
15

The fact that the aforementioned double standards can be found on Reddit proves my point; this is an issue broader than your experience on that one sub. We are aware of numerous instances of users having their access restricted because they weighed in on men’s rights or simply for being male, but we see no instances of users having their access restricted for weighing in on women’s rights or being female.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 01:35 AM
87

Some people mistakenly think that men’s rights = misogyny. Because when you’re accustomed to female privilege, equality feels like oppression.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 01:11 AM
45

The next time somebody claims Reddit isn’t anti-men, point to this. Many subs ban people automatically for commenting on this MensRights sub. Some (like AskWomen subs) automatically ban anyone who identifies as male. You won’t find any Reddit subs that ban people for commenting on women’s rights or for identifying as female. Reddit is biased against men and in favor of women.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 01:07 AM
35

Adding that the UN in general has a record of being extremely anti-male, as shown in the following infographics by TheTinMen: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/WKwULokRXc https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/ypqNJlctqZ
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/26 02:57 PM
6

The UN in general is extremely anti-male, as shown in the following infographics: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/WKwULokRXc https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/ypqNJlctqZ
/r/MensRights04/01/26 04:18 AM
8

Unethical elites have been promoting race wars and gender wars for decades. When the masses fight each other, they’re distracted from the wrongdoing of those elites. The name of this game is Divide and Conquer. "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." - Lyndon Johnson
/r/MensRights02/01/26 10:31 PM
7

Liberty isn’t won by people who passively wait for it. Liberty is won by people who actively fight for it.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 05:20 PM
20

You can (re)sign up at the link below. You could also call the number on that site and ask them to check whether they have the form you submitted. https://www.sss.gov/register/
/r/MensRights02/01/26 02:48 AM
8

Yeah, this is gross sexism and no one should tolerate this. That book needs to be rewritten or removed. Complain to school boards, Congress, White House, etc about taking action against this.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 06:51 PM
12

What’s the exact language they used? Can you attach a photo of it? If the book actually suggests this, I suggest that everyone reading this write negative reviews of this sexist book everywhere they can. Then contact the publisher and elected officials to complain and have the book rewritten or removed from academia. Don’t just complain on Reddit. Do something in the real world that will actually make a difference.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 06:39 PM
18

The big point to reinforce is that women perpetrate IPV against men at rates similar to men perpetrating IPV against women. Feminists have tried to deny and suppress this truth for decades, but there’s a mountain of research that proves it from Murray Strauss, Erin Pizzey, Martin Fiebert, and others, which can be found in posts on Reddit from TheTinMen too. From “Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Viol…
/r/MensRights31/12/25 02:46 PM
31

Any kind of criticism or negative outcome for any woman is often mislabeled as “misogyny” in liberal circles. Promoting equal rights for men is also often mislabeled as “misogyny.” Liberal feminists love to redefine and misuse words to suit their agendas.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 01:03 PM
32

Agreed. OP, tell the shelters that are helping only women directly that you object to them practicing gender-based discrimination. Then report them to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division plus your State Attorney General for gender-based discrimination, as they may violate civil rights laws for federally funded programs. Their contact info is online. Everyone reading this should do the same with any and all organizations they encounter that discriminate against men. The mor…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 01:47 AM
3

You nailed it. All of the above. Never underestimate how wicked, selfish, and greedy our leaders can be, or how many people they’ll screw over tomorrow to get their grubby hands on another dollar they don’t need today. And when you let people like that get away with it, they become even more deranged. Whenever you see an enduring problem you don’t fully understand, ask yourself who benefits from that problem.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 05:12 PM
21

Men don’t have reproductive rights, and have to pay for kids they don’t want even when they were victims of paternity fraud. Men get less help from social programs (fewer scholarships, charities, healthcare programs, etc devoted to men) Most military conscription/drafts affect men only. Men are more likely than women to be charged, arrested, convicted, and punished for the same crimes that women commit. Some of the exact same behaviors from men and women (rape, drunk sex) are considered crimes o…
/r/MensRights25/12/25 04:03 PM
3

Sorry you’ve been going through a tough time. EEOC only has jurisdiction within the United States. If the problems you faced happened in Canada, I would suggest you lobby your elected officials hard to extend civil rights protections to men too. Recruit other Canadian men to help get the message across. Be a squeaky wheel. Things CAN change when dedicated people speak up. Good luck! Edit: Canadians and other nationalities working for U.S. employers are also protected by EEOC.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 12:33 AM
25

Copy, paste, and share the link below. Tell any and all white men who experienced discrimination in the workplace in the U.S. to file formal complaints with EEOC. It’s about time. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/12/18/trump-anti-dei-eeoc-discrimination-white-men/87830694007/ “Are you a white male who has experienced discrimination at work based on your race or sex? You may have a claim to recover money under federal civil rights laws,” Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Chair Andr…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:33 PM
14

First, the statistics don’t capture all homicides or abuse committed by women for the reasons I stated above. The feminist-influenced justice system is notorious for being more lenient with women. Women are less likely to be charged, arrested, convicted, or sentenced for doing the same crime as a man. https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/57/ The Duluth Model assumes male guilt, which is wrong. Some countries are doing away with female imprisonment altogether. Second, a lot of male-p…
/r/MensRights04/12/25 11:52 AM
15

I cited the Duluth Model—developed by feminists—as an example of feminists weaponizing the law against men. That model assumes male guilt in domestic violence cases, even when men are the victims of abuse. Those men can be arrested and imprisoned for being victims, and have been.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 11:41 AM
295

The claim is 100% false, and one of many examples of how men’s concerns are trivialized. Men and women perpetrate domestic violence at comparable rates, but men get far less help when they’re victims. Feminists have shut down assistance programs meant to help men in need. And thanks to feminists weaponizing the law and false accusations against men, male victims are also often punished for being victims. Anyone who’s unfamiliar with these facts can look up the Duluth Model and a number of relate…
/r/MensRights03/12/25 06:59 PM
65

And remind them that systems are not set up by men—they’re set up by elites. And the majority of voters are women.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 10:29 PM
43

One of many examples of systemic misandry. And sometimes when men and women behave in exactly the same way, it’s a crime for the man but not the woman. Don’t just accept this. Contact your lawmakers and civil rights organizations and insist on justice reform and fair treatment for men. Do this frequently. Keep the pressure on.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 10:07 PM
23

One way is by opposing feminism, which is responsible for much of the internalized misandry that permeates society today, and the social problems that result from it. Feminists have waged war against everything related to masculinity for years, and their efforts have turned much of the law, media, and other institutions against men. This feminist-driven misandry has done major damage to gender relations, partly by contributing to breakups and exacerbating the fallout that men experience in court…
/r/MensRights30/11/25 05:57 PM
22

We all need to be more vocal in protesting against the double standards and feminist propaganda alleging that women have it worse than men. They don’t. Women have more rights and privileges than men, and fewer responsibilities (as many male-only draft/mandatory service policies show), but feminists keep spouting their nonsense about “patriarchy.” Keep pushing back and encouraging others to push back against anti-male double standards everywhere you can, for as long as it takes, to get more fair …
/r/MensRights30/11/25 04:44 PM
49

A lot of those concerns are projection. They worry that men’s groups will do to women what women’s groups regularly do to men. They want to dish it out, but not take it.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:27 PM
1

As Madeline Albright said, if you think the world would be a better place if it were totally run by women, you don’t remember high school. And female rulers are even more likely to go to war than male rulers: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4454964/amp/Female-rulers-27-likely-wage-WAR-males.html
/r/MensRights28/11/25 10:44 PM
79

Feminists want women to have the rights of men, the privileges of women, and the accountability of children.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 02:28 PM
54

Whenever we see a blatantly misandric movie, we should write negative reviews of it on IMDB, Rotten Tomatoes, and elsewhere so Hollywood and others get the message that we’ve had it.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:25 PM
45

The people who oppose paternity testing include cheaters, people who are covering for cheating friends and family, and governments that want men to pay for the misconduct of cheating women.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 12:31 AM
3

A few more below. Feminists have been very open about their hatred for men, and don’t let anybody tell you otherwise. Keep copying and sharing such anti-male feminist quotes until everyone understands how much of a gynocentric hate movement feminism really is. Feminists have told the world over and over how they really think about men and women: “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations,” "If some innocent men’s reput…
/r/MensRights25/11/25 03:37 PM
9

I second The Red Pill. Also, check out the excellent infographics and interviews done by TheTinMen, which frequently cite important studies, books and other info.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 06:17 PM
152

Your cousin’s opinion doesn’t change the fact that Uber and Lyft are practicing blatant gender-based discrimination that needs to stop. Replace “women” with “white” in their selection preference programs, and the bigotry of these companies should be obvious to all. Both racists and sexists like to justify their discriminatory policies with BS arguments about safety. Just as we shouldn’t allow people to deny service or employment to others on the basis of skin color, we shouldn’t allow people to …
/r/MensRights23/11/25 02:37 AM
10

You let feminists off the hook when you made statements like “I will continue supporting feminism… This subreddit just supports the image that a lot of feminists have of the Men's Rights movement”, and criticized this sub and the MRM without similarly criticizing feminism in your introductory comment. So if you criticize those connected to men’s rights but not feminists, as you did in your initial comment, that’s letting feminism off the hook. Fortunately, you subsequently admitted that there ar…
/r/MensRights22/11/25 11:26 PM
7

You keep disagreeing with me, but offer no compelling explanations of why. And you displayed the same problematic double standard that’s present in society. You went out of your way to criticize those who advocate for men while letting feminists off the hook, and proclaiming that you will continue to support feminism.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 11:13 PM
10

But you singled out this subreddit for criticism, without saying anything about the much more egregious bigotry on feminist and women’s subs. You said “I will continue supporting feminism” despite the fact that that feminism has done far more harm to men than the MRM has done to women. Patriarchy doesn’t exist in the world today, and I explained why with evidence.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 11:04 PM
8

I don’t disagree, but keep in mind that almost anything meant to help men gets criticized and attacked. That includes men’s rights subs, which have been shadow banned and have been undermined through heavy handed moderation, extra scrutiny, and removals of content.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 10:57 PM
17

Any misogyny on this relatively small sub comes nowhere close to the misandry present in feminist and women’s subs, which have millions of users. Some of those women’s subs ban the participation of anyone who identifies as male. I challenge anyone here to find a functioning Reddit sub that has an outright ban on all female participants. Feminism is basically a female supremacist movement that promotes hatred of men and equality almost exclusively in areas that benefit women, not men. This select…
/r/MensRights22/11/25 10:47 PM
15

^ This guy gets it. The right messages have to be delivered, in as many places as possible, as often as possible. And we can’t be discouraged by temporary setbacks. Every successful movement has had to deal with the challenges you mentioned above, for a long time. This is a marathon, and we have to be persistent to succeed. “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” Mahatma Gandhi
/r/MensRights22/11/25 07:25 PM
4

You’re welcome. Feel free to copy and share the link as widely as possible to raise awareness of what’s really going on.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 01:29 AM
8

That’s right, you have to persuade the audience, not the lone misandrist. And ban the obvious trolls.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:22 PM
10

If you do not engage, they win, because their narrative drowns out yours among the spectators. It’s the audience that has to be persuaded, not the individual you’re arguing with.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:08 PM
11

Shame on you for the delusional simping nonsense you typed up. Men are victimized at far greater levels than women, as I showed above and in the link you didn’t bother to read. Man-hating feminists have rigged the laws in many countries and states so it only counts as rape if a man does it. When women do it to men, it isn’t counted in those places—those are the cases that don’t make it to court. Women frequently get a slap on the wrist for behaviors that land men in prison. Men who are victims o…
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:04 PM
20

That’s great! Contact the organizer(s) and let them know you appreciate them doing that, so they’ll keep this up every year. Ask your friends to do the same.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 08:56 PM
37

There are so many ways to counter that lie, and we need to do that as often as possible in as many places as possible. Look at the huge number of anti-male quotes from prominent feminists. They say “misandry doesn’t exist” and “kill all men” in almost the same breath, while churning out endless anti-male slogans and terms like “toxic masculinity”, “mansplaining,” “mankeeping,” and so on. Misandry is built into our legal system—innocent until proven guilty for women, guilty until proven innocent …
/r/MensRights20/11/25 05:13 PM
3

Exactly, good on you for identifying the problem and identifying a solution. That’s what this sub needs more of: activism. Moaning about how unfair something is in echo chambers accomplishes nothing, but action like this can make a difference.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 03:43 PM
15

One of the many disgusting, weaponized false accusations/MeToo money grabs. She deserves both prison and the fine. Good job Daily Mail for reporting on this, when feminist-controlled media outlets would have buried the story.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 03:37 PM
17

These problems get worse when people do nothing. So don’t do nothing. Stand up to the misandry by giving these LLMs negative feedback on it. Do it regularly. Get others to do the same thing.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 11:08 AM
120

Few (outside of spaces like this one) really grasp the truths you speak of, and even fewer have the courage to speak those truths. Thanks for your understanding and your message.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 12:21 AM
6

To be fair, the strategy does acknowledge systemic shortfalls with “services that are not responsive to men’s needs”. I like that in addition to raising awareness it actually allocates additional resources toward men’s health too, including for those who are at greatest risk. It offers some decent proposals like developing home prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, which may help men who have work commitments or other challenges that keep them from seeing doctors. The strategy is still very n…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 08:16 PM
5

Excellent news! We need to see more countries doing things like this.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:24 PM
23

More of us need to speak up. We should be squeaky wheels. Make it harder for them to ignore this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 04:45 PM
26

YES! Everyone should contact Google to correct this double standard. Great idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 04:28 PM
24

Don’t just accept it, make some noise. We should all complain to Google in its feedback forms about the double standard of recognizing Women’s Day but not Men’s Day. Edit: u/SpicyMarshmellow provided this contact email for Google to correct this: [email protected]
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 03:44 PM
4

This is a post about marriage and the risks of marriage to men. According to your very own source and many others, including sources I provided, women are more likely to end marriages. Attempting to move the goalposts of your claim toward relationships doesn’t change that. The fact that lesbian marriages are more likely to end in divorce than straight marriages is additional evidence that women are more likely to pursue divorce, because a lesbian marriage has two women and a straight marriage ha…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 11:56 AM
17

I referred to well-known findings that include but are not limited to those cited below. Like I said, women are more motivated to divorce. Men who are thinking about marriage should be aware of that risk and others, which is what this post is all about. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4460604/ https://www.metroweekly.com/2020/12/lesbians-much-more-likely-to-divorce-than-gay-men-according-to-data/ https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2021/13/20-years-of-gay-marriage-in-the-netherlands-20-thousa…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 05:49 AM
17

Men and women do not end marriages at the same rate; women end them more often, as I and others have showed. The claim that women more often file the paperwork doesn’t change that fact—it’s a reflection of women being more motivated to divorce.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 05:17 AM
22

Women on average are less likely to be satisfied with marriage and tend to fall out of love faster than men do. Divorce rates are even higher for lesbian couples than for straight couples.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 05:03 AM
1

No, the most likely outcome of men not following the approach I outlined is that no reform of the corrupt anti-male system takes place. The majority of marriages eventually become unhappy and are deeply unfair and costly to many men when they end. Boycotts combined with calls to reform have a long track record of success, regardless of whether you want to admit it.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 02:12 AM
7

Sounds like they paraphrased the quote from the movie Traffic: “Why are hurricanes named after women? Because when they arrive, they're wet and wild, and when they leave they take your house and your car".
/r/MensRights18/11/25 01:58 AM
6

I said this already, and I’ll say it again: “With things the way they are, those who are unmarried need to boycott the institution of marriage and message those in power to reform divorce court and reproductive rights to be fair to men. That’s how you get the message through and see needed change.” The deck is stacked against men very badly. I’m recommending that more men go on strike, and combine that with simultaneous demands to reform the courts so they’re fair to men. Starve the predatory sy…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 01:52 AM
9

Re: “plenty of women still want marriage and kids”—they do until they don’t. When they don’t—and that’s about 40-50% of wives—the husband is probably going to get raked over the coals in divorce court and custody, because the game is rigged. Like another person here said, would you take your chances with a parachute that has a 40% chance of failing? I wouldn’t recommend it. But you do you. Re: “If men boycott both, the future simply belongs to the children of those who didn’t opt out and you'll …
/r/MensRights18/11/25 01:26 AM
86

Well said! The current rigged system gives women all the cards—heads she wins, tails he loses. A number of parasitic government institutions take a cut from divorce proceedings too, at the expense of multitudes of men. With things the way they are, those who are unmarried need to boycott the institution of marriage and message those in power to reform divorce court and reproductive rights to be fair to men. That’s how you get the message through and see needed change. The only way to avoid losin…
/r/MensRights17/11/25 07:55 PM
34

People lie a lot. Dating apps like Tea are full of false allegations, including screenshots of women admitting they’re lying to get back at men they don’t like for one reason or another. Read any recent book about how the criminal justice system, mass incarceration, and for-profit prisons work to see how ghastly and prevalent false accusations are. There have been many, many studies going back decades, replicated over and over, that show large percentages of women admitting to and justifying fal…
/r/MensRights15/11/25 03:18 AM
1

The patriarchy doesn’t exist, as demonstrated by the greater number of men than women at the bottom of society. Those who use it as a scapegoat don’t know the definition of the word and don’t understand the apex fallacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/25 08:15 PM
18

When they’re negative about men, say some positive things about men that they take for granted. The people who do the most dangerous and disgusting jobs are usually men. Men are responsible for almost all bystander interventions. Those older women get to live in relative comfort because their electricity, clean running water, A/C, housing, tech, roads, etc were set up and are maintained mainly by men.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:43 PM
28

That’s a big increase from the findings of a Harvard study about 10 years ago, which itself was an increase over prior studies. The Harvard study said women were 33% more likely to divorce a man who lost his job, and the number had grown a lot since 1975. https://time.com/4425061/unemployment-divorce-men-women/ So if more than half of women would now divorce a man who lost his job, it sounds like women are becoming more demanding and less tolerant of men who don’t measure up to their expectation…
/r/MensRights14/11/25 12:12 PM
3

Yeah, no group or person likes to lose their extra privileges. When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression. But they need to understand that in the long run, greater equality is what’s best for all, because it reduces tension and conflict. That’s true when it comes to conscription too—a country is less likely to get involved in a frivolous conflict if everyone has to pay a price for getting involved. People are more averse to putting both sons and daughters in harm’s way …
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:16 PM
4

This sounds similar to what went on in the movie Starship Troopers: “service equals citizenship.” The society didn’t discriminate based on gender or race, but on whether someone did public service. Those who performed military service got extra rights, like voting rights, that others did not.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:06 PM
9

The majority of military positions are non-combat positions. The difficulty of creating a 100% fair arrangement should not dissuade people from working toward an arrangement that is more fair. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:58 PM
38

If a country is going to have conscription, applying it fairly is the right thing to do. The argument is stronger if similar countries are doing that. Germany and Denmark are neighbors and allies. A small but growing number of countries in the region are conscripting both men and women, and it can be helpful to remind others of that.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 04:06 PM
35

No conscription is of course ideal. But governments will implement it if they don’t get enough volunteers. If conscription exists at all, it should be applied to both genders.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:53 PM
170

Coordinating complaints to German political parties, insisting that the male-only conscription policy is sexist and should be expanded to both genders, and pointing to countries like Denmark that have already done that might get the government’s attention and help change things for the better. But rolling over and doing nothing will change nothing.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:39 PM
1

Just as I suspected, you couldn’t point to a single thing you’ve done for men’s rights, because you’re a troll.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:01 AM
36

Next door in Denmark, they’re now conscripting both men and women. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/denmark-expands-military-service-include-women-2025-07-01/
/r/MensRights12/11/25 11:09 PM
37

She feels icky because she’s starting to understand that the feminist propaganda machine has fed her a bunch of lies about the patriarchy and greater female victimhood. It’s tough to realize your belief system is garbage.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/25 05:17 PM
4

I agree. Stop feeding the rigged anti-male marriage and divorce industry. Tell elected officials directly that they need to reform the courts to be fair to men. A strike combined with calls for reform is how to get the message across.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 01:27 PM
1

Whooosh. You’ve missed the big picture entirely. I do plenty to support men’s rights and have the record to prove it. How exactly have you advanced men’s rights? Or are you just going to ignore this question and the other questions I posed earlier because you’re a concern troll?
/r/MensRights12/11/25 04:00 AM
10

Now this is one of the more useful posts around here. Although I’ve not gone through this kind of situation firsthand, this looks like a great list of best practices that are consistent with what I’ve learned about the law. Many men don’t realize how badly the deck is stacked against them when it comes to divorce law until they go through it themselves. I appreciate you taking the time to reflect on your experiences and share these lessons learned with others who may benefit. Glad things worked …
/r/MensRights12/11/25 01:57 AM
1

I’ve been active in this sub for a while now, and it’s an accurate reflection of the thinking and reactions I’ve seen here some of the time. And my point stands—that hopeless and helpless way of thinking does nothing good for men’s rights. Your refusal to answer the questions or offer anything constructive and your concealment of what you post and comment suggest you don’t do anything good for men’s rights either.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 01:50 AM
17

Patriarchy is “a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.” That system doesn’t exist. The majority of the people at the bottom of society—prisoners, homeless, conscripts, slaves, etc—are male. Our society is overwhelmingly focused on supporting women, and misandry outweighs misogyny. Men are victims of systemic misandry, not patriarchy. Read this: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/
/r/MensRights11/11/25 05:38 PM
3

That’s still not what I asked you. Certain people around here seem determined to come up with excuses to trash any proposal aimed at helping men from the get go, instead of engaging any such proposal constructively or offering better solutions. And that’s part of why we see the problems for men that we do. Nature abhors a vacuum. Passing premature negative judgment, sitting on the sidelines, and discouraging others from useful action allows feminists to take over and ruin these things.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 04:27 PM
2

And we cannot expect to see any real progress if every initiative aimed at helping men gets shot down before it gets off the ground. What prevents the naysayers from contacting and getting involved with this council constructively? Wouldn’t that be better than wallowing in hopelessness, helplessness, and cynicism, and letting feminists take it over? I’d say so. Fairness isn’t going to be served up on a silver platter—people have to fight for it. Sitting on the sidelines and moaning about how bad…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 03:46 PM
-3

And you didn't answer the questions either. Here's the problematic thought process I sometimes encounter on this sub: "They're saying bad things about men? This won't help men." "They're not saying anything about men? This won't help men." "They're saying good things about men? This won't help men." "They're not making government bodies to help men? This won't help men." "They ARE making government bodies to help men? This won't help men." "They don't have good ideas to help men, and I don't hav…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 01:14 PM
-1

You didn’t really answer the questions. Regardless of whether Newsom is sincere, California has done some positive things for men in recent years, this council may still be around after he leaves office, and it can be molded. Would you prefer nothing—no council on men and boys at all? What are you doing to get government to tackle gender-based gaps across the board that’s better than this proposal? What I’ve read about this doesn’t sound any worse than what’s going on in states that ignore men’s…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 04:06 AM
-1

So even though we have examples of California ruling in favor of men who were discriminated against on the basis of gender, and Gov. Newsom has publicly spoken up for men repeatedly, you automatically assume this council is going to be bad? I don’t know of many other states or governors that have bothered to make even a halfhearted effort for men along these lines. Would you prefer that there not be any councils for men and boys, despite the many councils for women and girls? What more effective…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 02:47 AM
7

That is not the only issue the article is about, and not the issue of this comment chain I started that you replied to. The article touched on these points (among others), which I provided additional evidence for above. Thompson said Gen Z men now "second-guess every word or message, wondering how it might be judged, shared, or mocked"... each side is suspicious of each other and doesn’t have empathy. In these divided spaces, interactions become games of defensive accusation and people grow untr…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 06:14 PM
4

Good on you for your open-mindedness and being willing to change your mind in light of the evidence. Thanks for your message.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 06:01 PM
6

I don't fall for strawman arguments, and am not the only one around here who's appalled by the ignorance of your comments. There are innumerable false accusations and other examples of bad behavior enabled by such apps, that most targets are restricted from knowing about or defending themselves from because of their gender. The r/AWDTSGisToxic sub has been full of examples for months. And I know what OP wrote. I provided additional justification for men's valid concerns about dating today. Tell …
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:59 PM
26

I can’t repost removed posts, because they’ve been removed. But it’s obvious to everyone who’s spent much time on these subs—and paid attention—that good posts with useful content have been removed repeatedly on bogus grounds or with no justification at all. Your implication that this kind of heavy handed moderating is necessary to avoid the sub being banned ironically supports my statement, because it shows how high up the problems with moderation go. Subs like these face more scrutiny and cens…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 02:50 PM
1

https://www.dadsrights.com/fathers-rights/ https://mensdivorce.com/resources/ https://cordellcordell.com/resources/fathers-rights/ Good luck.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 01:53 PM
76

Both that sub and this one have been infiltrated by mods who are anti-men and anti-men’s rights. Whether your post gets reviewed by one of the good ones or bad ones is a matter of luck. Keep posting anyway.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 01:41 PM
16

You’re ok not because of what you claim, but because you have been relatively lucky. So far. I spoke of false accusations, and you twisted my words around to make further insinuations about me. That’s consistent with the intellectual dishonesty and solipsism you’ve shown in this exchange. What’s sus here is not my reaction, but your inability to recognize that legitimate problems exist outside of your own personal experience, as well as the blatant gender-based discrimination, double standards, …
/r/MensRights10/11/25 04:33 AM
9

I have no reason to think that doctors would treat men with complaints of pain more seriously than women with the same complaints. Especially considering that the healthcare system overall devotes more attention, resources, and bureaucracy to women’s health than men’s health. You’re right to be skeptical of feminist statistics, because so many of them are fabricated (such as Feminist Majority Foundation Director Katherine Spillar’s claim that men are responsible for all domestic violence).
/r/MensRights10/11/25 03:14 AM
9

In most cases, living in poor health is better than not living at all. The claim that women are generally in worse health than men sounds like disinformation. Feminists often exaggerate female victimhood and erase or downplay male victimhood.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 03:01 AM
16

There is a gender gap in healthcare, and it heavily favors women. Good on you for having the critical thinking skills to question feminists, because much of feminism is based on lies and distortions. Not enough people have called them out on it, but more people are waking up. Here’s some of the evidence, with sources, on gender health gaps. • ⁠"In 2020, the federal government set out its public health goals for 2030. They include 42 goals for children, 29 for women, and 18 for LGBTQ+ people. For…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 02:47 AM
38

That’s some serious gaslighting, dismissal, and fallacious reasoning you typed up there. You being fine despite people saying horrid things about you doesn’t mean others necessarily will be fine. False accusations can be ruinous. People have lost jobs and have even been jailed and executed based on false accusations. I’m sure the accused under the Salem Witch Trials, people like Brian Banks, or those who lived and died under Stalin’s purges would agree with that, and wouldn’t think too highly of…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 02:12 AM
52

Last I heard, Apple was implementing some serious restrictions on Tea accessibility. What do you mean there’s no lawsuit? I’ve heard of a bunch of lawsuits. And the wheels of justice usually take a long time to move.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 01:54 AM
411

Yep, and all it takes is one bad interaction with one petty, vindictive, unstable woman. A man can get defamed and doxxed before an audience of millions of other women on one of the women-only dating apps, then lose his job or reputation because of it, and not even have a chance to defend himself or be aware of it. Those apps shouldn’t be allowed to exist. The people using them should know better. Sue the worst offenders connected to those apps into oblivion.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 09:29 PM
24

It’s not enough to silently walk away, because then you let misandric feminist women control the narrative and invent their own self-serving reasons for what you’re doing. You MUST tell the world over and over, as loudly and as often as you can, that you’ve had enough of society’s misandry and gynocentrism. That you’re not going to make sacrifices for or defend a world that treats men like shit. The strikes/boycotts you’ve suggested are good ideas, but only if accompanied by this explanation so …
/r/MensRights09/11/25 03:16 PM
0

You showed that you did not understand how it works. Overstating the problem without offering any solutions and calling it “nuance” doesn’t help anybody.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 11:38 PM
11

That’s EXACTLY what they did in the segment. They decided to defend gay men at one point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 11:04 PM
13

Prisoners, conscripts, the homeless, slaves, and child laborers are all examples of people who have been treated badly for thousands of years. The majority of the people at the bottom of society are male. Of course, male victimhood is often invisible to feminists.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 08:34 PM
15

You implied that 95% of websites can’t be wrong about feminism. I showed you that 95% of people can indeed be wrong. Feminism has a long history of anti-male commentary and policies, and I provided some of the evidence of that from people who identify as feminists and are widely recognized as feminists. Feminism has not promoted true gender equality, as anyone familiar with its history knows. Your statement that “women before 21st had no rights” is 100% false.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 08:27 PM
16

First of all, your implication that 95% of Googled websites are correct is nonsense, because the majority is sometimes wrong. There may have been times in history when 95% of people thought the Earth was flat, that witches existed, and that the Sun revolved around Earth, but that didn’t mean they were right. Second, I am very well acquainted with the history of feminism and know that much of its history has been whitewashed. The claim that feminism is just about promoting gender equality is a li…
/r/MensRights08/11/25 08:14 PM
0

You’ve basically shifted your stance from “no” to “yes and no,” but you’re still overgeneralizing and none of what you’ve written should dissuade others from doing what I first recommended—telling AI companies to work against double standards when it comes to responses on gender issues. In some cases, engineers have programmed biases into how these models operate. People on this sub and others have shown how AI models will respond to the exact same question in radically different ways if the sub…
/r/MensRights08/11/25 08:04 PM
19

Considering that Wikipedia’s editors currently have a notorious pro-feminist bias, I don’t see the point of sharing a Wikipedia entry about feminism that makes one-sides claims.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 07:50 PM
30

Patriarchy is “a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.” It doesn’t matter if the president or king happens to be male. The majority of the people at the bottom of society—prisoners, homeless, conscripts, slaves, etc—are male. Patriarchy doesn’t exist, and the people who believe in it don’t understand the apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 03:02 PM
35

No, I don’t (unless it’s someone—female or male—who’s disabled or carrying something heavy). I’ve seen women openly mock men who do this or stand aside to let women go first. Other women will treat it with casual indifference and not even acknowledge the gesture. You’re right, it’s a highly misandric atmosphere. So don’t reward it.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 02:56 PM
46

Feminism is a man-hating female supremacist religion that has convinced its cultists to believe in something that does not exist: patriarchy. Much of what they say and do stems from this delusion. We should all do what we can to support politicians, organizations, and media outlets that are willing to curb feminists’ toxic influence.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 01:58 PM
46

The man-hating feminists who host The View recently ran a segment that went on at length, calling men useless and inferior to women. A couple of them spoke up for men, but basically only as useful tools to serve women. That sums up their attitude toward men and the guests they will permit on the show. We should be pushing back against these attitudes and the programs that welcome them in as many ways as we can, including complaints to the people responsible for them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 01:38 PM
16

Instead of just saying you’re done with it, I suggest you send feedback on the results to Google AI. Encourage others to do the same. Don’t just complain about a problem on Reddit, do something about the problem by raising it with the people who have a real say. Action (and inaction) make the world what it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/25 01:14 PM
2

How many other states have an equivalent to the Unruh Civil Right Act on the books, or as many past rulings against businesses that discriminated against men? Certainly not the majority. No guarantees the plaintiffs will prevail of course, but I said the case has a better chance of succeeding in California than in most other states. That’s a true statement based on the current laws and legal history of California.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 01:51 AM
18

The case actually has a better chance of succeeding in California than in most other states. California has the Unruh Act and a history of siding with men who were discriminated against. For example, California judges have penalized businesses that have given discounts to women, but not men, citing that act.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 11:13 PM
53

Excellent!!! I hope Uber and Lyft both pay dearly for promoting blatantly sexist policies against male drivers and passengers.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:34 PM
15

Or just a screenshot or two of the big points from an offensive article.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 03:23 PM
72

I’m not going to reward another feminist publication by clicking on it (because that gives them more revenue), but yes, gynocentric and misandric policies have been put in place by both men and women. Internalized misandry is a major problem that feminists have helped foster for decades. It doesn’t matter what the gender of Congressmen and Hollywood directors is, the policies are too anti-male and pro-female, and need to be revamped to be more fair.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 02:12 PM
6

Women perpetrate domestic violence at least as much as men do, and a large body of research that includes huge global meta studies proves it: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/UXhY1lH0Uv EmpathyGap.uk [1] https://www.fact.on.ca/Info/dom/hors191.pdf [2] https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20110218135832/http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs10/hosb0110.pdf [3] https://abusedmeninscotland.org/wp-content/uploads/final-what-we-know-litrev-june-2013.pdf [4] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peopl…
/r/MensRights05/11/25 12:38 AM
11

Women perpetrate much more violence and abuse than they’ve received credit for, and are responsible for at least as much domestic violence as men. Men are less likely to recognize and report abuse than women are, and less likely to have their reports taken seriously when they do report it. In addition, the criminal justice system has long been notorious for being biased in favor of women: “This paper assesses gender disparities in federal criminal cases. It finds large gender gaps favoring women…
/r/MensRights05/11/25 12:32 AM
9

HR isn’t there to help the complainants. It’s there to help the company and the managers, which is why they created HR. More often than not, HR will try to invalidate or discredit any complaint made.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 08:03 PM
138

The in-group bias among women is 4x stronger than among men. Women often cover up the wrongdoing of other women. When a woman tries to deny the reality of paternity fraud and shames any man who wants a DNA test, she’s covering up her own infidelity or the infidelity of her female friends and relatives. Always call them out on this.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 06:46 PM
23

Madeleine Albright said that anyone who believes the world would be a better place if it were run totally by women doesn’t remember high school. Female rulers are at least as likely as male rulers to go to war. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4454964/amp/Female-rulers-27-likely-wage-WAR-males.html
/r/EverydayMisandry04/11/25 11:46 AM
6

What’s bad is that these gender-walled apps are filled with dishonest, disgusting, and unaccountable women who lie about men they dislike for petty reasons or haven’t even met. They’ve even slandered AI-generated men, who obviously don’t exist. But many of the women who use these apps and the greedy shits who developed them pretend it’s about women’s “safety.” Those lies have ruined careers and lives. Such apps have no place in a fair and just society and should be shut down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 05:24 PM
18

Feminists made it up. Much of feminism consists of fabrications intended to benefit women and discredit or harm men, like their lies about “The Patriarchy.”
/r/MensRights03/11/25 03:47 PM
16

These companies are capable of designing this functionality into AI and altering programming code/algorithms. Musk has been very open about the tinkering he’s doing with Grok. AI doesn’t automatically have to reflect what the majority of people say.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 03:16 PM
245

Send feedback to Google AI and other AI companies calling out the double standards. Insist that they treat both genders equally. Keep reminding them of this over and over until the message gets through.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 01:45 PM
14

The only real differences are the groups the movements concern themselves with, and the fact that the female supremacist movement has gotten more traction and less criticism than racial supremacist groups. This should change. We need to stop giving female supremacists a pass for their bad behavior.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 01:24 PM
52

We should call UN Women what it is—an extremist, female supremacist organization. There needs to be greater awareness that these female supremacist organizations are not very different from white supremacist organizations, other than they are promoting and erasing different groups. The female supremacist movement has gotten more traction, and needs to be condemned broadly.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 11:40 AM
6

That’s not how DEI works in reality. It’s enforced selectively. DEI promotes certain groups like women when they’re underrepresented in desirable professions. It doesn’t really help men when they are underrepresented in desirable positions. And when men are overrepresented in dangerous and disgusting professions, it does little to recruit more women into those. DEI, like feminism, promotes double standards. That’s why the people here understandably don’t trust what DEI and feminism proponents sa…
/r/MensRights31/10/25 01:07 AM
21

^ ^ This. If you believe they’re serious about banning misandry, I have a bridge to sell you. Of course they’re not going to have “misandry” on their sub, because it’s full of feminists who deny the existence of misandry. Point out misandric comments, and they’ll just deny it. It’s like how feminists claim feminism supports gender equality. It’s just dishonest PR. Don’t take anything that sub or feminists say at face value.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 04:57 PM
66

Frankly, it’s absurd to keep seeing excuses made for feminism when the movement on the whole has had a net effect on men that is VERY negative. “Feminist” is not a word that someone who cares about gender equality should use to describe themselves. Feminists have relentlessly trashed and blamed men in the mainstream media outlets they’ve seized, have weaponized the legal system against men via the Duluth Model and other mechanisms, and dismantled, blocked, and undermined many programs meant to h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 11:51 AM
44

On paper, DEI is supposed to be about diversity, equity and inclusion. In practice, it’s about promoting women and other selected groups that DEI ideology prefers, and subjugating/excluding groups its practitioners dislike (like men). On paper, feminism is about gender equality. In practice, it’s about promoting female supremacy and misandry. Don’t take anything that DEI people or feminists say at face value. Call them out on their double standards, and challenge them in as many ways as you can.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 12:50 AM
29

Right. A buffet-style approach to equality, where feminists pick only desirable areas to increase women’s representation, is not real equality. They don’t care when women are underrepresented in dangerous, dirty, backbreaking professions—they’re happy to leave those to men they take for granted. Call them out on their bs whenever they claim feminism is about gender equality.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 09:25 PM
7

The mainstream media, social media, and Hollywood keep hammering the same message to viewers in their content: “men are bad, women are good.” “Men are abusers, women are victims.” “Women and children first, men are disposable/should fend for themselves.” Over and over, we keep getting exposed to the same man-hating, gynocentric propaganda. This messaging has adverse consequences. It’s part of why there’s so much internalized misandry and so much pro-female, anti-male bias everywhere, from educat…
/r/MensRights29/10/25 06:51 PM
1

That’s awesome. That’s how you make a difference.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 07:49 PM
2

I propose that you and others reading this communicate reform proposals like these to lawmakers and media outlets regularly. Ideas don’t become reality without that kind of dedicated activism from lots of supporters.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 06:07 PM
6

Exactly. Well-written edits with reputable citations have a better chance of succeeding than assuming failure in advance and doing nothing. Lots of people doing this, complaining to Wikipedia about bias and withholding donations, etc can make difference over time.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 01:23 PM
4

And another thing for anyone who’s downvoting me: Wikipedia articles are the way they are because these man-hating gender studies majors worked long and hard to make them that way, and they installed people favorable to their biased agendas in key places. Hard work makes a difference. Inaction and half measures do not. A just world is not going to be served to anyone on a silver platter. If you want fairness on Wikipedia or elsewhere, you have to fight for it.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 01:16 PM
0

Are you frequently correcting propaganda and lies on Wikipedia with edits and sources? My original point stands—don’t make the jobs of bigots easier by giving up and obeying in advance.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 04:13 AM
9

Even if your claim is true (and I would not assume it is), you’ll just make their jobs a lot easier by surrendering and obeying in advance. Complain to others inside and outside Wikipedia about bias. Make Wikipedia donations contingent on fair coverage. There are many ways to resist.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 03:03 AM
41

I think more of us should dispute feminist propaganda on Wikipedia and set the record straight with sources as often as possible.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 02:09 AM
3

There’s misandry reflected in the church’s approach, of course—but it’s not there for its own sake. The overarching goal that I first mentioned is very real, and has been for centuries. People shouldn’t lose sight of that motive either.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 10:53 PM
2

Good, you see the anti-male sexism clearly. Help others to see it too. You’ve posted about this on this sub, which is a good first step. Other options to consider would include consulting with attorneys who support men’s rights. Consult with politicians, organizations, and media outlets who are sympathetic to men’s rights. The UK even has or had a party dedicated to men’s rights, I believe—Justice for Men and Boys. Write articles complaining about the unfairness of it. Keep asking for advice on …
/r/MensRights27/10/25 09:13 PM
6

Are women underrepresented in education in the UK? If their argument is that free educational courses for women in construction are justified because women are underrepresented in construction, is there an abundance of free courses for men who are underrepresented in other fields? If there are many free courses for women who are underrepresented in certain fields, but few or none for men who are underrepresented in other fields, that doesn’t look like “equality” to me. It looks like a sexist dou…
/r/MensRights27/10/25 08:45 PM
6

It’s gender-based discrimination to offer female-only educational courses without male-only equivalents, and should be challenged openly and in court. When people take the easy way out and say nothing, this kind of gender-based discrimination gets worse. So speak up and challenge it. Recruit others who feel the same way to help you.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 07:26 PM
13

Traditional types usually assign more agency and accountability to men, and expect men to pursue women, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 05:23 PM
19

Because those pastors want single men to instead get married, and help make babies who will grow up, join the church, and give it more money and power. THAT is what they really care about—money and power for the church and themselves, even if the marriage and kids game is totally rigged against men.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 04:22 PM
17

Instead of passively accepting defeat in advance, why don’t you and others upvoting you defend the truth there and elsewhere? Edit and write more of those articles, file complaints, etc instead of meekly submitting to feminists.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 01:23 AM
21

Agreed. It has raised more than $800 million would be accurate. I’ve seen elsewhere that it’s over $1 billion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 05:38 PM
109

I appreciate your persistence in raising awareness of this important issue, despite the efforts of dishonest feminists to censor or discredit the considerable evidence of their wrongdoing. Movember is a men’s health initiative, and its resources should go toward men’s health. They shouldn’t be stolen by feminists who use them for their own agendas while spouting lies about how men don’t care about their own health. Whenever they do this, they should be called out and condemned instead of being g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 04:38 PM
9

Good info, thanks for raising awareness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 04:08 PM
12

And it’s gotten much worse in recent years. Harvard prof Richard Wrangham even said the world would be a better place if men were eliminated entirely. Can you imagine what would happen if he said that about any other demographic group?
/r/MensRights21/10/25 10:49 PM
5

The small number of men who do not know their own medical history or their own medications are not very interested in their own health. By your own admission above, I have already supplied evidence that answers your question about why some men are not taking interest in their own health.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 07:21 PM
4

What’s interesting is that you’re continuing to ignore the root causes that I and others have already supplied ample evidence for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 07:04 PM
4

Yes, it does. Again—men, women, and society have not sufficiently valued the health and well-being of men. Internalized misandry seeps into everything, and most people aren’t even aware of how such biases affect their thinking and behavior. The claim that both male and female healthcare professionals have made disparaging comments about men not knowing their own medical histories or medications isn’t relevant. They too reflect the systemic misandry that I and others have revealed, but that many …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 06:54 PM
6

I’ve explained this too. Internalized misandry means that even some men are undervaluing their own lives and well-being in our “women and children first” culture. Men’s health isn’t anywhere close to the priority that women’s health is, as the findings above and elsewhere show.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 06:24 PM
7

Feminists love to keep repeating the claim that men abandon sick wives, because it supports their “man bad/oppressors, woman good/victims” talking points. But they conveniently ignore or suppress the research that shows women initiate the majority of divorces and are much more likely to leave men who lose their jobs than the other way around. That kind of data doesn’t fit their agenda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 06:07 PM
15

And this gets back to the systemic misandry problem I alluded to earlier. Women do seek medical care more often in our gynocentric society; women on average have more rights and privileges than men. The messaging says it’s “women and children first,” “believe all women,” “a woman’s right to choose,” “the future is female,” etc. The media is FULL of pro-woman and anti-man bias—really pay attention to how movies, TV, and news portray men and women, and you’ll see it. The message between the lines …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 03:26 PM
16

Unfortunately, some men can’t lower their threshold for medical assistance as easily. Those who are the primary breadwinners, who live paycheck to paycheck, and who have to work all day when doctor’s offices are open are going to be more likely to put off seeking medical care out of necessity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 02:38 PM
34

Yeah, it’s not like some of the women’s subs that explicitly practice gender-based discrimination by banning the participation of anyone who identifies as male. It’s too bad they get away with it, when Reddit would never allow a sub with the genders reversed. That’s one of many sexist double standards in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 02:32 PM
24

The root cause of the problem you describe is systemic misandry. For too long we have put the lives of women first and men last, and this misandry becomes internalized by both. Keep telling people that men are disposable, and some people believe it. What you are describing here is a symptom of that much bigger problem that needs to be tackled and dismantled across our institutions and laws. Instead of acknowledging this reality, man-hating simpletons usually resort to something like “blame men! …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 02:27 PM
7

Look up attorneys who specialize in men’s issues and see if you can get free consultations on a pathway out of this. Even if there’s no good path forward, get involved with men’s rights organizations, share your story, and lobby elected officials to change the laws so they’re more fair to men. Carnell Smith was responsible for some important and positive changes to paternity law because he did exactly this. He’s the exception though. Way too many men (even on this sub) don’t do anything and just…
/r/MensRights20/10/25 10:23 PM
79

Write to the White House and your elected officials to complain about the sexist double standard of it. Support men’s rights organizations and lawsuits against sexist systems like these.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 07:51 PM
12

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” Arthur Schopenhauer
/r/MensRights19/10/25 12:40 PM
1

65 upvotes now. Spread the word, and don’t let feminists gaslight people into thinking men are the problem. The real problem we need to fix is systemic, internalized misandry.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 12:02 AM
26

The feminist claim is 100% false. Men and even boys who are baby trapped by women are compelled to pay child support and are sometimes imprisoned for being unwilling or unable to do so, even when they were victims of contraception fraud or paternity fraud. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support/amp Women can avoid unwanted long-term parental responsibilities easily and legally via abortion or Safe Haven laws. S…
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:34 PM
16

The planet has more than 8 billion people. We don’t need to keep churning out more and more kids to reward a Ponzi-like economic system that’s rigged against regular men and for misandrists.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 03:52 PM
1

The few minor parties dedicated to men’s rights set a good example for others that we should support. Even when they lose, they can pull the major parties in the right direction to pick up more votes. Every movement starts off small before it picks up steam. Christianity and the American independence movement looked like silly fringe movements to many others in their early stages too.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 08:12 PM
13

I’m sure it drives feminists bonkers. Of course, anything that doesn’t serve women looks like misogyny to them. When you’re accustomed to female privilege, equality looks like oppression.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 07:14 PM
16

I think the UK had or has a men’s rights political party called Justice for Men and Boys.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:08 PM
4

“All the people I know who use “incel” as a slur are worse than actual incels. People like you are why misogynists and Tate fans exist. But it never occurs to spoiled princesses that they’re part of the problem.”
/r/MensRights17/10/25 02:07 PM
18

If more men opt out of the corrupt system, the people in charge will take calls for reform a lot more seriously than they are now.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 01:43 AM
25

Sorry to hear this. We are living in deeply misandric times. Don’t get married again, and warn as many other men as you can to NOT play the rigged game of getting married and having kids. There’s a giant parasitic divorce industry that preys on innocent men like you and many others, and we’ve got to starve it of resources by discouraging more men from getting married. Don’t feed corrupt systems.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 12:41 AM
2

You fail to recognize gender-based discrimination, and misunderstood and misrepresented the actual policy. Your comment is laced with misandry. You are either a troll or have serious trouble with reading comprehension. Either way, further engagement with you serves no purpose.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:38 PM
25

This too is linked to the systemic misandry of which I spoke. Reduce anti-male bias in our culture, and there will be fewer of those men who don’t have friends or family, and more assistance programs aimed at helping men. A lot of initiatives aimed at helping men have been dismantled by misandrists, which contributes to the problems we currently face. Call out and condemn the feminists who have spent so much time and effort vilifying men and blocking programs that help men. Lobby lawmakers and o…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 01:48 PM
72

Systemic misandry is the main driver of male suicide. Our biased, anti-male courts mean that men are much more likely to get ruined by devastating child support payments, false accusations, paternity fraud, and a host of other issues that feminists have tried to censor and downplay for ages. The solution is not “therapy” or “opening up,” it’s fixing a system of laws, institutions, and norms that are unfair to men. Most of our assistance programs are focused on helping women, and they need to do …
/r/MensRights16/10/25 01:38 PM
19

Every once in a while when a feminist speaks up for actual gender equality instead of gynocentrism, that call gets ignored, mocked, or attacked by the man-hating female supremacists who dominate the movement. If they want men to support women’s rights, they need to get women to support men’s rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 03:14 PM
28

Feminists have fought much harder against domestic violence abuse shelters for men and shut down many initiatives designed to help men. Feminists have attacked people like Erin Pizzey, Earl Silverman, and Murray Strauss who defended male victims of abuse and showed that much DV is perpetrated by women. https://medium.com/@alexandermoreaudelyon/erin-pizzey-the-story-of-the-feminist-who-was-threatened-for-acknowledging-male-victims-a5a810964857 https://thetinmen.blog/man-cant-experience-abuse/ Fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 01:18 PM
38

“The corrupt system benefits people like me and oppresses people who aren’t like me, so why don’t you all support it?” That’s the problem with feminist thinking right there. An utter disregard for men’s issues. This is a big part of why Roe v Wade is gone and the Democratic Party is out of power everywhere—men have left the party in droves, because there’s no point supporting a party that treats men like second-class citizens at best. If you want to do good for women’s issues, tell your feminist…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 12:59 PM
47

100% agree. Even their catchphrase, “a woman’s right to choose” is sexist. For fifty years, feminists ignored or ridiculed giving men a say in their own reproductive futures. Men had only the right to go along with—and in many cases, pay for—whatever women decided. Safe Haven laws protect women in all 50 states, but don’t protect men in any state. I was once a supporter of Roe v Wade, but no longer. As abortion rights are rolled back, women can finally have a taste of what it’s like to be a man.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 11:31 AM
10

I haven’t watched it, but it seems to me that not watching the most egregiously misandrist films is a better way to go. Don’t send streaming services the message that you’ll reward such content with your views. It’s better to contact those streaming services and others in the entertainment industry and tell them directly that you want LESS misandrist content.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 01:39 AM
6

Whenever and wherever you see anti-male discrimination, call it out, condemn it, and find allies who will do the same. Advocate for men regularly with elected officials and other key decisionmakers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 01:31 AM
53

Feminists have been waging war against men and men’s rights for ages. The public’s negative perceptions of the men’s rights movement are a reflection of that—they’ve worked hard to smear it while making false claims about how innocent and just feminism is. Below are a few examples of how malign feminism has been. If you really support equal rights and responsibilities, you can call out and condemn feminists who say and do the things below. “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men lo…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 10:55 PM
40

Try replacing “feminism” with “a movement that promotes female supremacy and the persecution/subjugation of men.”
/r/MensRights14/10/25 04:12 PM
7

Feminists do this all the time. No matter how much they get for women, it’s never enough. They lie, cheat, and distort to exaggerate female victimhood and male oppression (while sweeping male victimhood under the rug), so they can get more resources for feminist causes (and deny resources to men). They’ve been rewarded for this bad behavior for too long, and it’s gotta stop.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:04 PM
2

On the contrary, I’m focused on achieving positive outcomes. That’s why I’ve recommended that people work actively toward a fairer world and identified specific steps toward that end. That’s the more important thing to concentrate on. If I were truly giving off pessimistic negative energy, I’d be telling people there’s nothing they can do and it’s hopeless because of biology.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 10:35 PM
121

Feminists like the ones who supported the Duluth Model have brainwashed a lot of people into thinking that the only abusers are men, and the only victims are women. Don’t let them get away with it. Speak the truth about how common female-perpetrated domestic violence is and how little support male victims get.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 08:46 PM
18

Whenever somebody says an ad like this isn’t discrimination, tell them to replace the word “women” with “whites” and read it again. And the people who are most concerned about underrepresentation of women when it comes to good jobs are NOT concerned about underrepresentation of men when it comes to good jobs. They also don’t care when women are underrepresented in dangerous and undesirable professions. A buffet-style approach to equality isn’t equality.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/10/25 06:33 PM
3

Nature and nurture influence human behavior. But your reply, with language like, “the reasons for male underreporting are just too wide ranging and entrenched in our evolutionary biology” was unduly pessimistic. It’s the wrong tone and focus, especially since there have been too many defeatist people around here lately moaning about how hard things are instead of working toward solutions. Learned helplessness happens. Successful people set their minds to goals and work hard to achieve them, inst…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 05:44 PM
6

Nah, in my experience people like to cite evolutionary biology when they want an excuse to do nothing or when they’re trying to get someone else to accept a rigged situation. A lot of people are too lazy to take action and they demonstrate learned helplessness, when they should be actively working to change the system instead. Lots of people thought democracy was impossible, that royalty was the natural order of things, that kings had divine right, and all sorts of nonsense. Beliefs and systems …
/r/MensRights13/10/25 01:37 PM
10

Why bother? Because if men say and do nothing, the problem doesn’t go away. It often gets worse. When the laws and norms aren’t fair to men, men need to work harder to change those laws and norms. Expose the truth about female perpetration of domestic violence and feminism’s war on men. Learned helplessness doesn’t help anyone. “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 01:23 PM
1

Start filming them on your phone while asking them, “Our personal lives aren’t your business. Why are you harassing us? Jealous? What’s wrong with you? What’s your name? We’re gonna make you a star!” Keep the pressure on. Find creative ways to embarrass them.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 11:48 PM
6

100%. The educational establishment has put its thumb on the scale for decades, with the actions you cite and more, and that’s why boys and men have fallen behind girls and women in education. Red shirting boys would be ineffective at best, and more likely to exacerbate existing disparities between boys and girls.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 08:54 PM
2

You and your girlfriend should tell those older women that your personal lives are none of their business, and walk away. They’re misandrists who are also probably a bit envious that they don’t get as much attention from men anymore.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 06:20 PM
22

That’s the point. These man-hating feminists want to demonize men no matter what they do or don’t do. “Men are having emotional problems? They should open up more! Toxic masculinity and the patriarchy hurt men too!” So when men open up more, what do they say? “Men are causing more burdens for women! It’s mankeeping! Don’t do it, ladies!” When men gave women a lot more attention? “Men won’t leave women alone! It’s creepy. It’s sexual harassment. Men need to stop cat calling women!” So what happen…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 01:46 AM
9

They can’t honestly deny it right now. They’ve been promoting these double standards for years, and have even published articles in major newspapers in which they say we should stop putting women in prison for anything. More persecution of men, no accountability for women. That’s what they want.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 01:19 AM
19

This thought process is also responsible for laws that criminalize the purchase but not sale of sex work. Virtually all buyers are men, who get punished, and the sellers are mostly women who get treated as blameless victims even when it’s consensual. Feminists use this lawfare to arrest and imprison more men. They also propagated the Duluth Model of law enforcement, which assumes male guilt even when men are victims of domestic violence, so they can jail more men. Feminism is a big part of why m…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 12:18 AM
64

Here’s how their thought process works: “I don’t like men. Men like porn. So I will say porn is bad. People will say men are bad for liking porn. That will make those men unhappy. I’m happy when men are unhappy.” Never forget that feminists are always pulling these kinds of psyops to disparage and discredit men. That includes all the words they’ve invented like mansplaining and mankeeping to link men to anything they say is bad.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 11:41 PM
4

You must have missed the concrete actions mentioned in the first paragraph. In addition, words matter. Those quotes taint everything, including the workings of the justice system, especially when spoken by influential women in leadership positions. They amplify the effects of misandry. Obviously feminism cannot argue that “misandry doesn’t exist” or that feminism stands for gender equality in light of so many statements like these. They’ve announced their intentions in front of the whole world. …
/r/EverydayMisandry10/10/25 06:36 PM
2

Posts here need to be about at least one of these things: Discrimination against men Issues that disproportionately affect men Problems that prevent men’s issues from being addressed Edit: Ideally, a post will also identify a fix for any problems it brings up.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 02:37 PM
22

Here are a few. These criminal justice policies are deeply sexist and reflect gross double standards. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-no-longer-places-girls-in-young-offender-institutions https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c243650gj07o.amp
/r/MensRights08/10/25 02:58 PM
2

Both are necessary, because many prominent and influential feminists have been extremely hostile to men in their rhetoric and actions. They’ve denied the existence of systemic bias and discrimination against men, while exacerbating it. They’ve dismantled and blocked the passage of many initiatives that would help men. So they have to be called out and their influence lessened too if we are to make much headway toward gender equality. There’s no single tactic that’s going to be effective in overc…
/r/MensRights07/10/25 11:35 PM
3

The 95% stat is indeed a lie, because there’s no reliable data to support it, and much of the data we do have is tainted in ways indicated by the sources. Such a precise figure based on info that is plainly wrong is an erroneous figure. Huge meta studies have shown that women perpetrate domestic violence at least as often as men do, and both men and women have reported this, so the 95% male perps claim is 100% bogus. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/ “women’s greater perpetration…
/r/MensRights07/10/25 10:12 PM
51

That’s blatant gender based discrimination, and you can and should sue a business that does this sort of thing. Lawsuits against businesses like these have been successful.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/10/25 08:38 PM
8

Outrageous. Any Brits reading this need to complain to their elected officials early and often. Feminism is an anti-male hate movement that promotes double standards, and they’ve been saying this for years. “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” - Sally Miller Gearhart “We should stop putting women in jail. For anything.” - Patricia O’Brien
/r/MensRights06/10/25 07:27 PM
6

I highly recommend to all the book Men on Strike by Helen Smith, who talks about related issues and things we can do to push back.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 07:29 PM
7

Be the change you want to see in the world. Contact TV and movie producers and let them know you don’t like all the misandry in recent content. Sometimes this works against the most egregious stuff like The Acolyte. Reward the programming that’s more fair to men. Stop watching the stuff that isn’t fair to men. Complain about it to advertisers. Complain on review sites like Rotten Tomatoes or IMDB too, but you’ll need to talk around certain things because feminists sometimes censor mentions of th…
/r/MensRights03/10/25 01:27 AM
52

A while back I got into debates with the mods over at GuyCry, who insisted that misandry isn’t real. That sub is pathetic and I don’t visit it anymore. Sounds like MensVenting would be a better choice for you.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 12:33 AM
8

The show revolves around women and portrays all men as some combo of bad, stupid, or weak. That’s typical of shows run by feminists. You’ll see the same pattern in some other shows, but it’s really egregious in The Acolyte.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 10:28 PM
25

You’ll find less misandry in content that was released prior to around 2014 or so. Contact TV and movie producers and let them know you don’t like all the misandry in more recent content. Sometimes this works against the most egregious stuff like The Acolyte. Complain about it on review sites like Rotten Tomatoes or IMDB too, but you’ll need to talk around certain things because feminists sometimes censor mentions of the word misandry on those sites. EDIT: Rotten Tomatoes censored a lot of the n…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:54 PM
30

The future is what we make it, and the world is constantly changing and presenting new opportunities. The defeatists and concern trolls who come here and say it will never become mainstream don’t know what they’re talking about, and are trying to sabotage the men’s rights movement by getting you to give up. Men need to become a lot more vocal in standing up for their rights and organizing. Expose and discredit hypocritical feminists for attacking men and harming society. Lobby key decision maker…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 11:33 AM
35

A number of countries and states have rigged legal definitions so that it’s only “rape” if a man does it, or it’s only rape if the perpetrator engages in “penetration.” That’s what happens when people allow man-hating feminists to taint the workings of the justice system. Feminists were also responsible for the adoption of the Duluth model of law enforcement, which assumes male guilt in domestic violence cases. So there have been many instances of women abusing men. But men who reported this abu…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 10:42 PM
27

The best way to respond is by helping to get these apps shut down. They promote doxxing, defamation, gossip, cyberstalking, and other unethical/illegal activities, without letting innocent victims defend themselves. You and everyone reading this may be posted at some point as long as those apps thrive, and have to understand that removing a post itself will never be enough. These apps MUST be shut down, or we will be at risk forever. Fight back: https://www.reddit.com/r/AWDTSGisToxic/s/Yk13JTX4h…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 11:33 AM
46

I used to have a lot more sympathy and respect for teachers, who perform a critical function for low pay and little respect, until I saw the relentless shaming and blaming of boys by grown teachers in that sub. They complain about boys and their misogyny all the time, while ignoring the years of misandry from adult educators. And when you show them the evidence of this, they hysterically deny all of it and downvote it to hell. It’s all the children’s fault, it couldn’t possibly be them…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 08:42 PM
67

Boys are struggling because of the educational system’s entrenched misandry. It’s a system run mostly by women for girls. Teachers grade boys more harshly for doing the same quality work. Teachers punish boys for not acting like girls, including via suspensions for trivial offenses. Women have been receiving more degrees than men since the 80s, but almost all gender specific scholarships are still reserved for women. Many educators hate boys and men, like Harvard prof Richard Wrangham who public…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 08:07 PM
2

If we don’t convey the message that men’s rights is a priority issue, no one will treat it as a priority issue. There have to be consequences for ignoring this and incentives for taking us seriously. Otherwise, they will ignore us forever.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 02:38 PM
2

What “the crowd” feels has changed throughout history. What’s right at one time is wrong at another time. So it’s up to people like us to change what the crowd feels for the better, instead of passively accepting circumstances that are unfair.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 01:14 PM
7

Yes. And both have been attacked by misandrists. Watch the movie The Red Pill to see recordings of this happening.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 04:52 PM
1

Feminism didn’t have institutional power either, until it did. Feminists got there by being very vocal and action-oriented for a long time. Saying “it’s going to be hard” for male advocacy to succeed and using that as an excuse to be passive doesn’t help. Doing the things I mentioned above regularly does help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/25 04:16 PM
47

Men have been organizing to protect their interests. There have been many men’s rights organizations and programs. The problem is that those efforts are frequently sabotaged by those who benefit from abusing and exploiting men. The saboteurs include well-funded feminist groups and corrupt politicians. That’s why I frequently advocate for taking action and pushing back. It’s easier for our opponents to steamroll us if we are quiet and compliant. The squeaky wheel gets the oil. Focus on action and…
/r/MensRights25/09/25 02:48 PM
6

I did not identify a “main issue” because there isn’t one—I provided examples of issues where men have been treated unfairly. Different people have different priorities. The men’s rights movement has already spent a lot of time identifying and talking about problems. There are numerous groups and initiatives that work on particular issues that people can find and support, or create themselves. At this point, the action-oriented approaches I laid out in pursuit of fairness trump endless academic …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 02:17 PM
14

Fair and equitable treatment for men under the law and in our institutions. It’s very easy to find instances of discriminatory treatment against men throughout society, from women-only scholarships and aid programs to men-only conscription. Whenever you see it, call it out. Enlist others to do the same. There’s no need to wait for consensus—focus on action, getting results, and getting others on board.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 01:49 PM
24

Focus on action and solutions, not vague academic discussions of the problem. You and everyone reading this should be pressuring policymakers, media outlets, workplaces, civil rights organizations, academic institutions, and others to do more to promote men’s rights and men’s issues. Do this regularly via email, phone, meetings, coordinated campaigns with others who agree, and so on. Let them know that the ones who do more to help men will get your support, and the ones who neglect or abuse men …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 01:28 PM
3

It is precisely because of the left being divided ideologically—and its recent crushing defeats in elections—that we have opportunities to make inroads in men’s rights. Find the candidates who are receptive to men’s rights, and support them. And if the left wants to remain slavishly obedient to man-hating feminists, withhold your vote. Let leftists keep getting wiped out and marginalized until they figure out the cost of misandry.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 05:36 AM
4

We should be lobbying both rightwing and left-wing politicians to support men’s rights, instead of blindly picking one side. Encourage both sides to treat men more fairly and vote for the candidates who do this.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 03:33 AM
1

I’ve done my homework, and so have the people I cited. Every claim I made was well-supported by evidence and research that has been replicated many times. You have provided disinformation throughout this thread. You continue to make dishonest claims when you say you’re leaving, then come back to troll some more. You’ve done this several times now.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 02:41 PM
4

Don’t just complain about it on Reddit; work to make the real world a better and fairer place. You and everyone reading this should be pressuring policymakers, media outlets, civil rights organizations, and others to do more to promote men’s rights. Do this regularly. Let them know that the ones who do more to help men will get your support, and the ones who neglect or abuse men won’t get your support.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 01:15 PM
1

You are projecting, because you accuse well-informed others of ignorance while displaying your own ignorance. I provided evidence, you provided fabrications and distortions.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 10:34 PM
1

Just because you cite an article written by an uninformed bewb, doesn’t make it fact lol..there’s nothing of fact cited in that article. You obviously didn't read the article, or you would have noticed that it was written not by "an uninformed bewb", but by TWO PhDs who meticulously researched the topic and cited numerous studies going back many years. Your accusation is projection. Why did women need social assistance programs in the first place, which men of govt gave? We have less... Women do…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 10:20 PM
9

The mainstream media and Hollywood are also dominated by liberal feminists, and it shows in the content they’ve released during the past 10+ years. They are relentless in glorifying women and vilifying men. Just look at the Emmy Best Director nominees—for Adolescence, Dying for Sex, The Penguin. All of those emphasized the “women are good, men are bad” mentality. These misandrist attitudes have real world consequences, because they infect the public consciousness and corrupt how our institutions…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 06:20 PM
2

We live in a gynocentric society, and our social assistance programs, laws, and norms heavily favor women at the expense of men. Women have it better than men in just about every quality of life metric. The overall level of misogyny comes nowhere close to the level of misandry, as this comprehensive overview citing dozens of studies shows: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/
/r/MensRights23/09/25 05:54 PM
7

It’s a small study and would have been more credible with a larger sample size. I’m not sure the article comes to the right conclusion either—is focusing on mental health the right way to approach the increased likelihood of fathers committing suicide? Or does it stem from the unfairness of the legal system, which is more likely to force men than women to take on unwanted parental responsibilities? Women have reproductive rights, but men don’t. If the latter, the way to solve that is through ref…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 11:18 AM
5

Very few people are going to wade through the wall of text above to get to this. I would add a TLDR up front laying out the problem, how to complain, and who to complain to in one short paragraph. Or repost with a very brief summary of important points and the call to action. People tune out when someone takes way too long to make their point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 05:01 PM
7

One complaint is easy to ignore. Lots of complaints are hard to ignore. The best way to combat discrimination is to mobilize lots of people to support a position and get them to send complaints to the people in charge of the platform, the people who regulate such platforms, and the people who fund it. You can do that more effectively with a shorter message that focuses on the most important points and has a clear call to action.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 12:57 PM
22

You and others absolutely should complain to the people running these AI platforms about reducing gender bias in their responses. OP, this is an important issue, but the post and comments are so long that many people won’t bother to read it. Just convey the most important points and what people should do to fix it briefly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 12:34 PM
13

But it’s not a joke to the people who are targeted, it IS hateful and dehumanizing, and it has real world implications for men who are wrongly persecuted by our criminal justice system and denied needed assistance far more than women. Calling it women’s “lived experiences” doesn’t excuse that rhetoric, or similar rhetoric we’ve had to deal with for years. A woman who says “I’d rather run into a bear than a man” is not really different from a white person who says “I’d rather run into a bear than…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 06:04 PM
3

Cool. Do you know who said it first?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 04:40 PM
24

Congratulations on building a good life for yourself and being smart enough to recognize that getting married and having kids is a huge scam for men under the current rules. Not everyone is perceptive enough to see beyond the gynocentric matrix. More of us need to lobby the people in power for marriage and childcare laws that are more fair to men. Until they listen, don’t legitimize the corrupt systems by supporting them.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 03:18 PM
10

Find the politicians who support abortion rights and a woman’s right to choose. Let them know that it will be easier to gain enough popular support to bring those rights back if they’re tied to paper/financial abortion rights for men too, so they can opt out. Give more men a reason to support it and get involved—it has to be more than the right to just agree with what a woman decides. Lobby to get judges and justices who are friendly to abortion rights for both genders appointed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 08:07 AM
36

Flip the script: everyone should start saying, “When you’re accustomed to female privilege, equality feels like oppression,” whenever people mock men’s rights. For example: Them: “We need to support a woman’s right to choose!” You: “What about men’s reproductive rights? Shouldn’t men also be able to opt out of unwanted parental responsibilities, like women can?” When they argue back, reply, “Well, when you’re accustomed to female privilege, equality feels like oppression.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 07:23 PM
55

Agreed. The National Center for Men is a big proponent of male reproductive rights and has been working on a film on the topic. I think it’s important that as many of us as possible tell policymakers to start supporting men’s reproductive rights. “A woman’s right to choose” isn’t good enough—men should have choices too. Support the political candidates and organizations that support those rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 07:15 PM
57

Wow, it’s nice to see that Latvia values gender equality and fairness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 03:01 AM
7

Well said—a victim is a victim regardless of the sex of the perpetrator. And many feminists will apply double standards and cherry pick their arguments to make men look as bad as possible. So they’ll trash all men for the violent actions of a small subset of men (while ignoring or censoring data that show comparable violence perpetrated by women), but they won’t praise men for the crucial things done almost entirely by a subset of the male population—bystander interventions, firefighting, constr…
/r/MensRights18/09/25 06:07 PM
43

The violence stat is a complete lie. Women are less likely to be reported, charged, convicted, or punished for committing the same crimes as men, and it’s been proven over and over. https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/57/ In addition, women commit domestic violence at least as often as men do. Feminists have been trying to suppress this truth for years. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/vJZZPCMAwI https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/oPoBRonf4b https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen…
/r/MensRights18/09/25 05:57 PM
3

And don’t forget about the giant predatory divorce industry—attorneys, judges, government offices and departments, committees, special interest groups, NGOs, and more—that profits off of victimizing men and incentivizing women to initiate divorce. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/xnRNYfrAY3
/r/MensRights18/09/25 02:12 PM
2

Scary stuff. But it’s better to be aware of the danger than to be blindsided and crushed by it. Thanks for showing how the corrupt system preys on too many men. Don’t feed the beast by participating in the marriage and children scam until it’s reformed to be more fair to men.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 09:36 PM
1

Yep. Feminism has long been a lobbying movement for women’s interests, and it often seeks to tear men down. Elizabeth Cady Stanton was one of the most famous feminist leaders early on, and was obviously a female supremacist with remarks like these: “We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men.”
/r/MensRights17/09/25 12:36 PM
17

Good point. Some women will criticize men who “just want one thing, and it’s disgusting,” but they won’t say a word about the women who expect and demand EVERYTHING.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 12:23 AM
4

Like most of the people here who actually value men’s rights, I have no interest in protecting the right of someone to call for the extermination of all men, or any other demographic group, freely. As I said before, he got a pass because of double standards. That’s clear to anyone who saw what Harvard did to Larry Summers for relatively innocuous comments about differences between men and women. EDIT: Responding to your comment below. Free speech isn’t absolute and it shouldn’t be; the governmen…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 05:37 PM
8

Double standards when it comes to hate speech do bother me. You know he would have been punished for saying anything like that about certain other demographic groups, but he’s been given a pass so far because the target of his hate speech was men.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 03:07 PM
2

Don’t just accept it, complain to the people in charge when you see something that’s locked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 03:03 PM
5

Obviously you have reading comprehension problems, because I said up front “This is obviously really bad”, which is not a defense.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 03:01 PM
8

Kilmeade’s comment might have been an accidental one off, but Wrangham is 100% intentionally malicious toward men exclusively. He has been demonizing males for decades, and has gotten more extreme over the years because not enough people have stood up to him. A Harvard prof and his bosses should know and do better.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:39 PM
17

This is obviously really bad, but Harvard professor Richard Wrangham is even worse and said very plainly that he wants all males eliminated. Complain to Harvard and the White House using the info below: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/VR0VBPVugU
/r/MensRights14/09/25 12:56 PM
1

In addition to collecting signatures, how about sharing a template letter and contact info for decision makers on this weaponization of child support issue? That way, people who don’t want to share a lot of personal info but want to support you can still do so individually.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 10:49 AM
16

You’re again victim blaming men and illustrating my earlier points.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 04:16 PM
16

You’ve just reinforced my points by victim-blaming men and not acknowledging the pervasive misandry in society that helped create men like that.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 04:04 PM
13

I referred to the current and most widely accepted use of the term, and made a judgment about it and people who use it based on many observations over time. You’re trolling and/or having trouble with reading.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 03:51 PM
14

And I explained the motives of the people who changed the meaning of the term, and I called them out for what they are doing with their current usage of it.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 03:20 PM
40

The people who use “incel” as an insult are usually worse people than actual incels. First, because they’re mocking victims who can’t get something they want (like making fun of poor people for being “involuntarily unhoused”). Second, because it’s a form of shaming, abusive control —if you’re not having sex, you better do even more for women to get sexual favors in return (that can trap you). That way, you can be more easily manipulated and exploited by a system that puts men subordinate to wome…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 01:59 PM
25

Meh. This is a biased and misleading article from a liberal feminist. It leads with the claim that “men want children”, then presents stats that show the majority of men do not identify children as a top priority. (I can’t blame them, since getting married and having kids is a scam for men given how our unjust courts work). She claims female Harris voters value independence and flexibility and oppose barriers to advancement, while male Trump voters want dominance and to control the cultural narr…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 01:07 PM
8

That’s why I’m saying we need to keep the pressure on. The tide is starting to turn, and a lot of DEI programs have been wiped out, but this is just a start. We still have a lot more work to do to counter misandrist DEI proponents and to reverse the damage of their war on men.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 01:47 AM
17

Government agencies, states, and companies started dismantling and scaling back DEI programs all over the country earlier this year. The misandrists overplayed their hand, and now they’re seeing some blowback. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-radical-and-wasteful-government-dei-programs-and-preferencing/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2025/04/11/ibm-reportedly-walks-back-diversity-policies-citing-inherent-tensions-here-are-all-the-companies-rolling-back-de…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 01:35 AM
10

Don’t forget about the costs of being a man in a relationship that a woman terminates. Almost all alimony and child support is paid by men to women, since most women insist on marrying “up”. Women are the majority of divorce filers because they get incentivized to do so. Don’t sign a contract that the other party gets rewarded for breaking.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 01:17 AM
28

I’ve noticed that, and it’s good that an insider like you is confirming it. Misandrists have been especially active in taking over mainstream media outlets and academia, where they regularly shame and blame men. Thankfully, DEI has taken some hits this year, but not nearly enough—we have to keep the pressure on against all the man-hating aspects of it.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 01:12 AM
89

Re: “the “true misogynist” community is almost nonexistent, while the misandrist community has millions of active users daily... everyone believes misogyny is more widespread, when in fact misandry is just as rampant—if not more.” Yep. Misandry is MUCH more common and normalized than misogyny. This well-researched article provides a lot of the evidence for it and cites dozens of studies: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/
/r/MensRights11/09/25 11:59 PM
17

Richard Reeves is pretty close to being feminist controlled opposition. His policy recommendations are a mixed bag, and at least one or two would further disadvantage men if enacted. He’s been funded by feminists and won’t hold them accountable for their years of wrongdoing. He looks the other way when women do bad things. Reeves doesn’t hate men like radical feminists do, but it’s clear from what he says and writes that he wants men to be healthy, productive, second-class citizens who serve wom…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 06:30 PM
105

Sorry to hear about what you’re going through. Document everything in detail. Keep written, time stamped factual records of what has happened, including the false allegations. If your career suffers any adverse consequences as a result, you will need these records to take legal action. Seek legal advice if and when the need arises. Whatever you do, don’t take discrimination and false accusations silently and passively. That will only embolden man-hating feminists who will think they can get away…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:27 PM
88

The article is fake af and misses important points. Women have swarmed by the millions this summer to dating apps like Tea that allow them to doxx and defame men for any reason. It’s men who have become more distrustful of dating apps because of that blatant gender-based discrimination and mistreatment. Men have pulled away from the left because the left has become much more overtly hostile to men during the past 10+ years. But spoiled liberal feminists aren’t honest enough to admit their own ro…
/r/MensRights08/09/25 01:03 PM
14

The Kentucky legislation favoring 50/50 custody that went into effect several years ago, and the Shared Parenting Day that followed shortly after, is a good news story and a reminder that we can win victories for men’s rights. Winning takes patience and grit. Don’t let the defeatists and concern trolls bring you down. Also, I would suggest correcting Wikipedia articles that clearly have a biased, anti-men spin on them. They can be edited.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 01:16 AM
4

The best time to fight back was decades ago. The next best time is right now. The longer people wait without acting, the worse the problem gets. That’s the bigger point I’ve been making that some people seem to have trouble with, probably because of learned helplessness (and some concern trolling). They need to snap out of it and wake up. Making excuses about how now isn’t the right time just means people end up putting resistance off forever, so the problem gets worse with passivity and silence…
/r/MensRights06/09/25 09:25 PM
8

You’re missing the forest for the trees. The fact remains that it is much easier to overcome a problem when it is new and developing than when it is established and pervasive. That’s true in many domains of life, from fascist regimes to cancerous tumors. Sitting passively and silently in the face of a growing threat doesn’t make the problem go away and often makes it worse.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 06:36 PM
17

Your Nazi Germany example is the perfect example to support the case I made earlier, because if more people had spoken out more forcefully against the Nazis earlier, they wouldn’t have come to power. By the time enough people did, the Nazi Party was a formidable foe. The longer people wait to confront injustice, the harder it becomes to win. The trouble with saying now’s not the right time to fight back is that this excuse can be used to delay forever. The time is always right to do what’s right…
/r/MensRights06/09/25 04:32 PM
67

You and other men need to speak out against this kind of sexist behavior when you encounter it, because silence only encourages it and implies consent. You and the other guys should get the professor in trouble by filing a complaint about this discriminatory commentary. If the professor retaliates against you, file more complaints about retaliation.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 03:48 PM
28

Women like Erin Pizzey, Helen Smith, Christina Hoff Sommers, Karen Straughan, Sara Eaton, Cassie Jaye, and a number of “honey badgers” absolutely care about men’s issues. They’ve taken a LOT of flak and incurred significant costs from feminists and male simps for doing the right thing. No one should doubt their empathy for men or dismiss their contributions to the men’s rights movement.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 11:40 PM
37

This is a good reminder of why we should not “believe all women.” False accusations by women against men are common and rarely punished, and there really ought to be stiffer penalties for false accusers to deter this kind of behavior.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 08:07 PM
37

It’s possible, but exceptionally rare to find a person who is both. Christina Hoff Sommers is a legit MRA who also calls herself an “equity feminist”, but legit equity feminists make up a TINY subset of feminism. On paper, feminism is about equal rights for men and women—which I agree with—but in practice it’s almost always about giving more benefits to women and minimizing benefits for men, even when men are obviously victims of discrimination. If you say you’re both, you risk not being trusted…
/r/MensRights04/09/25 04:43 PM
222

Yeah, feminists usually support female-only spaces and initiatives, but violently oppose male-only spaces and initiatives. Feminism is mainly about maximizing advantages for women and minimizing advantages for men.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 02:56 AM
8

The tactics of the female supremacist movement are very similar to those of the white supremacist movement. The main difference is that the female supremacist movement is more harmful because it’s more accepted by the broader public, and has been more successful in concealing itself with nice-sounding but dishonest labels, like “feminism”. Feminism in reality isn’t what the dictionary says it is. That’s why everyone reading this needs to do more to call attention to the malign influence and hypo…
/r/MensRights04/09/25 01:11 AM
28

You cannot assume these tactics will backfire or that anything is inevitable. Be the change you want to see. Don’t let man-hating feminists control the narrative on Wikipedia, online dictionaries, or other online sources to make men and men’s rights look bad. Push back by correcting the lies they write about men’s rights, feminism, and so forth. Misandrist propaganda has been poisoning the well for too long, and it’s time to set the record straight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 01:00 AM
7

Why are so many of you just going along with it instead of actually doing something about it and encouraging others to do so too? Learned helplessness and defeatism don’t help anybody. Call out the double standards and complain loudly and often against those double standards to those directly responsible for perpetuating them—advertisers, TV and movie producers, elected officials, and so on. Write bad reviews of shows that do this. Don’t give them your money. Have a bias for action instead of ju…
/r/MensRights02/09/25 03:36 PM
7

The quote, “No-fault is actually barbaric in the way it’s been implemented” is the part I focused on. As another person said, the implementation of “no fault” has usually been “man’s fault”, allowing a woman and the courts to asset strip a man who wasn’t at fault of anything especially bad. Divorce nearly always results in the transfer of wealth from men to women. I’d never sign a contract that rewards the other party for breaking it, but the system incentivizes a lot of women to initiate divorc…
/r/MensRights02/09/25 02:39 AM
28

Good, I hope he wins. The men who are choosing to not date or get married right now are smart to do so, considering how badly the deck is stacked against them. If the game has been rigged against you, you should either not play or you should change the rules of the game to be fair. Playing a rigged game only legitimizes it and perpetuates the injustice.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 05:14 PM
23

I second this. The Red Pill is the best MRA documentary I’ve seen. There are more in the works.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 12:14 AM
59

It’s important to recognize and speak out against the ways feminism has created a lot of this internalized misandry by disparaging men for decades. Call out the people responsible for it directly. Tell misandric politicians, businesses, and organizations that they won’t get your support. The more people who do this, the better, and over time it will result in less anti-male commentary and policy, which will reduce internalized misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/25 03:31 PM
14

So many contributing factors to this. More male than female combat fatalities in major wars like WWII, Korea, and Vietnam. More men affected by PTSD and associated drug and alcohol dependency. Men overrepresented in the most dangerous and stressful jobs (and as a result more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol as a coping mechanism) Greater discrimination against men in divorce court and family court (also with higher rates of suicide and substance abuse as a result). Greater discrimination agains…
/r/MensRights30/08/25 01:06 PM
1

You're moving the goalposts, and doing so doesn't change the facts I provided, which were supported by robust evidence including links and screenshots of actual UN documents. If you dispute the fact that the UN prioritizes women over men in its disaster relief and other programs, show me your proof of that. You can't. That's why you're trying to reframe the discussion away from the actual written policies that clearly emphasize protecting the lives and health of women over men. A gender gap in s…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:52 AM
8

Feminism on paper is about gender equality. Feminism in practice most certainly is not. You don’t have to take my word for it. Take theirs. They’re all more widely recognized as prominent feminists than you, an anonymous Redditor. “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations,” "If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I am absolutely willing to pay." …
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:01 AM
1

You’re the uninformed bullshitter here who ignores the evidence of women being prioritized for rescue and assistance. It is a fact that the UN has long prioritized women over men in its disaster relief and other activities—it’s written into their policies, which you are clearly ignorant of—and your attempt to rationalize it in the case of Haiti does not change the fact of the UN’s anti-male sexism or your own. You’re a traitor to your own kind who has been looking for excuses to deny the reality…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 12:21 AM
124

She and her man-hating feminist ilk conveniently ignore the ways in which men are overrepresented in looking out for others, including the fact that over 90% of bystander interventions are performed by men.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 08:40 PM
1

Ah, a concern troll who pretends to be interested in men's rights but doesn't know much about the topic and completely misses the forest for the trees. The calls for women and children first came from passengers. Yes, and that is an example of the “women and children first, men last” bias I mentioned. There are numerous accounts of what happened when, but they generally show that a number of passengers were indeed putting women and children first as they got the life rafts set up. The fact that …
/r/MensRights28/08/25 06:15 PM
7

It’s not “either or.” I and many others do both. We have to, because the fact is that there are a lot of people who keep trying to tear down anything that helps men, because they see such efforts as a threat to their own privileged status. It’s much harder to make positive changes happen when there are so many feminists who dehumanize men, who cover up the facts, or falsely claim that “men did it to themselves” when men are in fact victims. That has turned public opinion against efforts to promo…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 05:03 PM
43

The teachers sub is like much of the educational establishment—filled with misandrists who ignore or deny their own misandry while putting women and girls first. The sub puts up posts criticizing misogynistic boys all the time, but there’s little recognition of all the misandry from grown adults who are educators. A lot of them can’t see it even when you throw the evidence in their face, or they make excuses for it, and downvote anyone who speaks the truth about this.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 09:48 AM
4

Everyone survived the crash, and that doesn’t change the facts of my comment; they rescued women and children first, and the news coverage of the incident at the time showed that clearly, regardless of what you may want to believe. That’s not the only example of this happening—the UN regularly puts women first in its aid programs in the wake of disasters, as it did in the aftermath of the earthquake in Haiti in 2010, when it prioritized food assistance for women. That’s the kind of sexism we obj…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 09:13 AM
7

Thanks. A lot of this anti-male hate happens on dating apps that only women are allowed to see, like Tea and AWDTSG. Defamation and doxxing go on all the time there, and lives, reputations, and relationships have been ruined as a result. You can help fight back against these man-haters by taking some or all of these actions: https://www.reddit.com/r/AWDTSGisToxic/s/G4q8UlJeUQ https://www.reddit.com/r/AWDTSGisToxic/s/xx18ArX9WO https://www.reddit.com/r/AWDTSGisToxic/s/gRc1WxllMO
/r/MensRights28/08/25 03:22 AM
44

Men’s rights groups are interested in gender equality. This is deeply offensive to feminists, because when you’re accustomed to female privilege, equality looks like oppression. Feminists have spent decades trying to smear men and men’s rights to protect women’s privileged status. That’s why we have to do more to call out feminism as a hate movement devoted to female supremacy. Don’t be a shrinking violet. You and everyone reading this must continue to advocate for men as often as you can and as…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 01:24 AM
1

That doesn’t mean we roll over and give up. It means we keep fighting for justice and fairness until we get it. I’m not a pushover.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 09:33 PM
33

Re: “According to one expert, in modern-day evacuations people will usually help the most vulnerable – typically those injured, elderly or very young – to escape first.” That’s the way it should be because it’s more fair. But I’ve still seen “women and children first” applied in recent disaster situations, such as the 2009 crash of a U.S. Airways flight. They rescued women and children first. So it still happens, and we should object to that kind of sexism.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 06:17 PM
9

An even better approach is to support lawsuits against male-only draft registration. Open up Selective Service requirements to both men and women. The country will be less likely to get involved in frivolous wars if it has to risk the lives of both sons and daughters than sons alone. But it still has the option to conscript if there truly is an existential threat to the nation at some point in the distant future.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 01:45 AM
80

The article is right to note that unemployment is a problem that affects young men to a greater degree than young women (unlike a lot of women’s lobby groups that always put a “women have it worse!” spin on any development, so they can hoard as many resources as possible for women). The article would have been better had it shown that for many years now, more educational and work assistance programs have been reserved for women instead of men, and this accounts for much of the employment level d…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 10:49 PM
9

Hear hear! It’s outrageous that so many of the newer TV shows, movies and games go out of their way to denigrate men and portray women as infallible or saintly victims. We all need to speak out against this as loudly and as often as possible, and withdraw financial support from those responsible for these twisted, biased portrayals. Send hate mail to Disney, Marvel, Democrats and others responsible for this. Write negative reviews online. Call out their anti-male bias DIRECTLY and tell them you …
/r/MensRights26/08/25 05:01 PM
20

Yeah. Much of the feminist-dominated media will say women are ahead because they earned it, not because women were given a disproportionate share of the resources in education, social, and career assistance programs. They will claim men are behind because they did it to themselves, and something something “patriarchy”, while denying or ignoring the reality of discrimination against men. The feminist media will also cherry pick a few small, niche fields where men appear to be doing better, and it…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 01:34 PM
34

Dating, sex, and marriage are all rigged against men. Dating for women is like shopping, while dating for a man is like a job interview he has to pay for. And he can get doxxed and defamed on women-only apps at any time by any woman, for any reason. When it comes to sex, it’s “a woman’s right to choose” and “my body my choice,” but for men it’s “his body no choice.” Women have lots of options to get out of unwanted parental responsibilities. Men who try to get out of them become slaves for 18+ y…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 02:14 AM
35

Cool. Don’t let feminist or white knight mods infiltrate it and censor legitimate grievances, as they do in many places. They often try to destroy or at least weaken anything related to men’s issues.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 04:36 PM
15

Bettina Arndt showed how feminists took over the men’s health program Movember, then diverted its funds away to support women and anti-male programs. Read all about it below: https://bettinaarndt.substack.com/p/movember-rips-off-mens-health-dollars “Little do they know that this huge enterprise, run by a feminist and supported by mainly female staff, is increasingly committed to diverting men’s health dollars away from real male health concerns towards woke projects promoting anti-male ideology.…
/r/MensRights24/08/25 09:31 AM
79

The OKCupid study also showed that women usually rated men MUCH more harshly than men rated women. And a Bumble study showed that only 30% of women were willing to date a man who is 5’11” tall. Only 15% of women were willing to date a man who is 5’8” tall. https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/only-15-women-interest-58-men-dating-apps-according-survey There’s a neverending list of requirements many women have for men, and women still initiate 70% of divorces and often get financially rewarded for do…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 10:43 PM
18

Yeah. They’re happy when they can make men unhappy. Anyone who really listens to what they say knows this. We need to keep calling them out for it, and expose feminism for the hate movement it is.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 10:35 PM
188

Feminists/female supremacists who infiltrated Disney chased men out of Marvel and Star Wars. This is typical behavior from them; they see something that men like or that helps men, they seize control of it, then they blow it up from the inside. Like they did with Movember. They never take responsibility for their own actions either. When things go south, they just blame it on men and their favorite bogeyman, “patriarchy.”
/r/MensRights23/08/25 05:36 AM
3

Not only have you failed to understand the valid points and recommendations raised in this thread, you have also failed to understand the mission of this sub, which states, "A male advocate is someone who wants to address various issues that disproportionately affect males. A left-winger is someone who advocates reducing inequality through social change." I am both of those, as defined by the creators of this sub, and I've proved it many times. You don't get to redefine this sub's definitions. Y…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/25 06:17 PM
1

It’s clear that you like to criticize “the wrong way to go about things” while completely failing to identify any right way to go about things. You have provided absolutely nothing of value to this conversation, unlike the other people here who are doing their best to make lemonade out of lemons.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/25 04:32 PM
1

And the president of Harvard is at: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/25 02:15 PM
6

It's not enough to boycott Uber, because other services like Lyft are doing the same thing. Call out these services for illegal gender-based discrimination, report it to the authorities, and demand that the discrimination stop. Contact info and a template letter follow. Department of Justice: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ House of Representatives: https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative Senate: https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm I am concerned a…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 12:45 PM
7

Seriously. There's a video and audio recording of him saying "I think it'd be a very good idea if there are no Y chromosomes" and "It would behoove us... for the Y chromosome to be put into a test tube like smallpox and for it not to be manifest." And Wrangham literally demonized males in his book, "Demonic Males." But Gorgonzola over there pretends like none of this happened, won't provide any useful input, and is actively trying to discourage people from advocating for men against notorious mi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 12:34 PM
4

If you're not going to provide a better course of action to counter the years of misandry from this Harvard professor, then you're not advocating for males. You're tolerating this longstanding abusive rhetoric against males, or worse. Wrangham's own writings and recorded commentary have been egregious in vilifying men for many years, and Harvard did nothing to condemn this on its own for all those years. You'd know about all of that if you had bothered to educate yourself on this issue before op…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 12:23 PM
3

You haven't bothered to educate yourself on this issue, so I'll explain where your comments are inaccurate and uninformed. The trump administration tried multiple times to control and demonise the universities like Harvard They don’t have the “willingness to condemn misandry”, they don’t even care about misandry. And the White House's previous willingness to confront Harvard AND misandry show that it's worth appealing to for help against a Harvard professor who has been calling for the extermina…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 12:09 PM
3

That’s another intellectually dishonest comment. Don’t put words in my mouth. I’m pretty sure you’re not a male advocate, or you would have come up with something constructive to help defend men against this genocidal rhetoric by now. EDIT: If you have an alternative proposal that will compel Harvard to take action against this kind of misandry, let everybody here know. If you don’t, get out of the way of those of us who are actual male advocates and are doing something to help. Appealing to the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 12:04 AM
3

Even if your comparison were an honest one (which it wasn’t), nothing you wrote refutes my points about appeasement being a bad course of action that leads to failure. Go ahead and name another institution with the same ability and willingness as the White House to compel Harvard to denounce this kind of misandry, if you can. EDIT: Your comments throughout this thread have been unhinged and nonsensical. Nothing you’ve said here is of any value to those of us who believe men should be treated as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 12:01 AM
6

Yes, those statements should disgust everyone. That kind of misandry from all over the left was a big driver behind the exodus of men from the left in recent years. People stop supporting those who openly hate them.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/08/25 11:39 PM
11

First, you didn’t answer my question. You provided no alternative path forward and nothing of value. You only wagged your finger at people who are actually working to do something about misandry. Second, besides saying the right things to men, the current White House has rolled back anti-male DEI policies and Title IX policies that denied due process to men accused (often wrongly) of sexual misconduct. Under Obama, if a drunk man and drunk woman had consensual sex, the man was guilty of rape. On…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/08/25 11:27 PM
11

Professor Wrangham has been making anti-male comments for decades, but Harvard hasn’t done anything about it. External pressure is a must. Can you name any institution that has as much clout as the White House and is definitely able and willing to do something about this kind of misandry? The White House isn’t friendly to Harvard and it is sympathetic to concerns about misandry, so we should ask for its help: “For far too long, the health, happiness, and well-being of our Nation’s men have been …
/r/EverydayMisandry20/08/25 10:30 PM
17

Again, great job finding out about this and letting everybody know about this unacceptable conduct. Thank you OP and thanks to everyone who is helping to speak out against misandry. Anti-male behavior like that has been tolerated for too long, and it’s time to hold misandrists accountable. Everybody, please share posts like these broadly and continue to call out misandrists like this. Recruit more people to condemn Wrangham and others who are like him. Keep the pressure on.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 09:18 PM
9

It’s a lot easier to deal with a problem when it’s new and small than when it’s established and pervasive. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty, and liberty is always in danger.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 07:36 PM
9

If you are genuinely committed to equal rights for men and not trying to sabotage such efforts, why don’t you share the names and contact info for major donors and alumni who are definitely willing to condemn Wrangham and whose withdrawal of financial support would make a real difference comparable to that of White House pressure?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 07:29 PM
19

I disagree, because you haven’t identified a better course of action. Name another institution that has the willingness and the clout to compel Harvard to condemn this kind of misandry in case Harvard itself is unwilling to take action. If you can’t provide a good solution, stay out of the way of those who are advocating for men’s rights. Staying silent makes the gender war worse because it emboldens misandrists and makes them think they can get away with even worse misandry. Anyone familiar wit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 07:14 PM
19

The next time someone asks why men don’t like feminism, remind them of what feminists have been saying and doing since before we were born. Copy, paste, and share any or all of this. Most of feminism revolves around promoting female supremacy, double standards that favor women, and tearing down men and programs that help men. They’ve stolen money from men’s health programs like Movember, shut down DV shelters for men, relentlessly attacked men’s rights organizations, and promoted female-only ass…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/08/25 05:51 PM
50

Great post. Thank you and thanks to everyone who is helping to speak out against misandry. Anti-male behavior like that has been tolerated for too long, and it’s time to hold misandrists accountable. Share posts like these broadly. Recruit more people to condemn Wrangham and others who are like him. Keep the pressure on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 05:45 PM
4

Thank you for doing this and to everyone who is speaking up to protect men’s rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 04:40 PM
4

Harvard should fire Professor Richard Wrangham for demonizing and supporting the eradication of all human males, because that kind of bigotry is unacceptable and has contributed to the ongoing vicious campaign against masculinity. If Harvard fails to act, it should be held accountable. Write whatever you want along those lines, just don’t let people like him get away with this kind of man-hating bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 10:32 PM
4

The more people who say something, the better. It’s harder for those in power to ignore a lot of people who complain.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 10:22 PM
7

Freedom of speech isn’t absolute, and doesn’t extend to protecting those who call for the extermination of an entire gender. Many institutions have had no problem getting rid of people who denigrate other demographic groups. That includes Harvard, which forced out Larry Summers for simply speculating that innate differences contributed to different levels of male and female representation in STEM careers. I don’t support double standards. I don’t support protecting Wrangham. And I don’t support …
/r/MensRights19/08/25 07:45 PM
6

Feminism harms women too. Never forget that feminism is a hate movement that promotes female supremacy, but in the long run harms both men and women.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 01:08 PM
10

You don’t hear “misandrist” or “misandry” as much because feminists work very hard to deny its existence or to downplay its damage whenever and wherever they can, even as they routinely bash ALL men. Meanwhile, they pretend that any criticism of any woman or feminism is “misogyny.” In reality, misandry is much more common and harmful than misogyny. Read and share this excellent article: The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 12:43 PM
31

Here’s why you complain not just to Harvard but to the White House too: “For far too long, the health, happiness, and well-being of our Nation’s men have been neglected… This neglect has been compounded by a vicious campaign against masculinity... This National Men’s Health Week, I make a solemn pledge to honor the men in America: we will always have your back… We will always lift you up rather than tear you down.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/06/presidential-message-on-n…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 10:10 AM
48

Everyone reading this: Email and/or call Harvard today and tell them that Professor Richard Wrangham should be fired for his comments supporting the extermination of all males and his book denigrating all males. He’s the worst kind of bigot and traitor. https://college.harvard.edu/contact-us Complain about this to the White House too, which is openly hostile to Harvard and sympathetic to our concerns about the vicious campaign against masculinity. https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Copy, paste,…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 10:05 AM
20

Note that I also recommended flagging this for the White House, which is definitely not friendly to Harvard, and also says: “For far too long, the health, happiness, and well-being of our Nation’s men have been neglected… This neglect has been compounded by a vicious campaign against masculinity... This National Men’s Health Week, I make a solemn pledge to honor the men in America: we will always have your back… We will always lift you up rather than tear you down.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/br…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 03:42 AM
16

You’re welcome to add my text above to your post and reshare to subs like MensRights, everydaymisandry, Pro Male Collective, antifeminist, and AskMenAdvice. People can complain about this to the White House too, which is sympathetic to such concerns about the vicious campaign against masculinity. https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Add that everyone should copy, paste, and share as widely as possible to spread the word. Thanks for bringing this to everyone’s attention—there’s no excuse for that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 08:33 PM
62

Email and/or call Harvard today and tell them that Professor Richard Wrangham should be fired for his comments supporting the extermination of all males. He’s the worst kind of bigot and traitor. https://college.harvard.edu/contact-us Harvard fired Larry Summers for much less—he just wondered aloud whether innate differences contributed to differing levels of representation of men vs women in math and science careers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 08:14 PM
46

What we really need is a subreddit that doesn’t get infiltrated by feminist mods who remove valuable content about the reality of anti-male discrimination and effective ways to counter misandry. Every mod should be thoroughly vetted to ensure that they actually support equal rights for men.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 02:59 PM
10

People. What’s missing from this discussion is a response to all this woman-on-man violence on screen. If you don’t like it, complain about it to the makers of these shows and movies. Complain to the advertisers that support them. Write negative reviews of those shows and movies, complaining about how they glorify women abusing men and men accepting that mistreatment. Don’t just identify problems on Reddit, identify solutions in the real world.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 12:29 PM
2

Good call. Even though the internet has more feminist sources, ChatGPT can and should be reprogrammed to see through all the bias and propaganda that’s out there and deal with gender issues in a more evenhanded way.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 12:16 PM
6

Remind people of this: Discrimination against men increases societal tension, decreases productivity, and makes men less willing to work hard for or defend the system. That hurts everybody eventually. “The child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth.”
/r/MensRights15/08/25 04:35 AM
17

Upvoting for visibility, and to remind everyone that complaining to government bodies like FTC about illegal and unethical dating apps CAN make a difference. Match Group is being forced to pay a $14 million fine. Don’t let Tea or AWDTSG off the hook for what they’ve done to victimize men—keep the pressure on. And don’t let anyone ever tell you that fighting for men’s rights is hopeless.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 05:16 PM
41

And from a feminist director of a university’s Women’s Studies program: “So men… Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power… We have every right to hate you. You have done us wrong. #BecausePatriarchy.” - Suzanna Danuta Walters
/r/MensRights14/08/25 12:49 AM
28

Feminists love to claim that feminism isn’t a monolith and that they’re not guilty of wrongdoing, but time after time they’ve treated ALL MEN as a monolith, denied assistance to men, and displayed overt hostility to men in word and deed. Copy, paste, and share these quotes. Keep reminding the world of what feminists actually stand for: “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations,” "If some innocent men’s reputations hav…
/r/MensRights13/08/25 03:44 PM
56

Re: “I know the answer isn't silencing anyone's experiences. But it also isn't creating parallel systems of harm.” What are they recommending then?? It sounds like they’re talking out of both sides of their mouth. I’ll speak more directly: shut down all of these illegal, unethical, gender-walled dating apps that are rocket fuel for doxxing, defamation, vengeful gossip, and other problems. They never should have been allowed to gain as much popularity they’ve got now, and they’ve done serious har…
/r/MensRights13/08/25 02:59 AM
54

Anything that helps men is guaranteed to draw a crowd of complaining, man-hating feminists. Even if it’s in an area where every sane person can tell that women have benefited far more than men. The cruelty is the point. They are out to persecute men and withhold assistance from men whenever they can, and we need to call them out for it and condemn them for it as often as we can.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 02:52 PM
2

The claim that "healthcare in itself is men's healthcare" could not be more wrong, as it ignores the overwhelming body of evidence proving it isn't so. That evidence includes but is not limited to the following: "In 2020, the federal government set out its public health goals for 2030. They include 42 goals for children, 29 for women, and 18 for LGBTQ+ people. For men, there are four... There are 44 preventive health-care interventions (excluding vaccinations) that are fully covered under the Af…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:47 PM
18

True. The divorce rate is also higher for lesbian couples than it is for straight couples. And in straight couples, it’s women who initiate divorce 70% of the time. Throw these facts at the people who claim men are the problem.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/08/25 10:10 PM
24

Yep. Men are also less likely to recognize and report IPV, and when they do so, they’re less likely to be taken seriously by police. The police are also much more lenient with women. Another key point from the study you cited: “women reported both greater victimization and perpetration of violence than did men (victimization = 19.3% vs 16.4%, respectively; perpetration = 24.8% vs 11.4%, respectively). In fact, women’s greater perpetration of violence was reported by both women (female perpetrato…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/08/25 08:55 PM
5

You are the one who is deluded if you cannot recognize the considerable evidence and reality of anti-male bias throughout our criminal justice system. I provided sourced evidence of that, which you disregarded. Conviction statistics are of little value when so much of the system is rigged against men: from the Duluth Model that is based on false assumptions of male guilt and female innocence, to rape definitions manipulated so that only men can commit it while women cannot, to much lower levels …
/r/MensRights10/08/25 12:03 AM
6

The findings you have presented are not reliable because they failed to take into account the proven biases against men and in favor of women throughout the criminal justice system and in the UN, which were demonstrated in the sources that I provided and that you did not read. Huge global meta studies have demonstrated repeatedly that female perpetration of IPV is at least as common as male perpetration.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 11:40 PM
7

You’ve cited the UN numerous times, which is notorious for being anti-male and rigging statistics with a pro-female and anti-male bias, including in its gender equity indices. Its claims are not credible. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/cY18E1007V https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/lxa3iJwPzv You’ve also alleged that men make up the overwhelming majority of IPV and abuse convictions, without acknowledging the enormous biases against men and in favor of women baked into our legal system. T…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 11:20 PM
43

Dating for a woman is like shopping. Dating for a man is like a job interview. That he has to pay for. Applying means he can have all of his personal information posted online, and he can be defamed and doxxed so that his reputation is ruined even if he does nothing wrong. And even if he gets the job, it can take most of his assets from him down the road if it gets “bored.”
/r/MensRights09/08/25 08:20 PM
1

This is not an endorsement of Trump, but it is incorrect to claim that he opposes men’s rights entirely. Under Obama and Biden, Title IX policies meant that men falsely accused of SA were often denied due process (instead, “believe all women”) and they implemented policies that allowed the man to be charged with rape if a drunk man and drunk woman had consensual sex. The Obamas and Hillary Clinton have made derogatory comments about men repeatedly. Trump rolled back some anti-male Title IX and D…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 08:09 PM
9

Yup. It’s very, very easy for us to come up with lists of the ways that feminism has harmed men. Ask feminists to provide a list of the ways that feminism has helped men. They can’t do it. Men have fallen behind women overall in most ways that matter (largely because of anti-male and pro-female biases). But feminists’ talk about gender equality is just that—talk. In practice, they focus on empowering women and disempowering men.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:16 PM
6

Great points, thanks for sharing. There are a lot more women’s health centers than men’s health centers, too. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5730713/ “A considerable disparity exists between the prevalence of gender-specific health services, with WHCs being much more numerous than MHCs. All but one leading institution had WHCs compared to less than one-third having MHCs. Our findings also highlight the heterogeneous nature of men's health programs, as they exhibit great variability in …
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:26 AM
2

Women are the majority of the voters who put lawmakers in power, and yes, those laws kill more men than women: https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/57/ “This paper assesses gender disparities in federal criminal cases. It finds large gender gaps favoring women throughout the sentence length distribution (averaging over 60%), conditional on arrest offense, criminal history, and other pre-charge observables. Female arrestees are also significantly likelier to avoid charges and convict…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:11 AM
12

Yeah, she’s a troll who spreads a lot of disinformation around here. She makes things up and doesn’t bother to read or understand her own sources, or she’d realize they don’t even support her claims.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 03:57 AM
5

Well said. Evil does win when good people do nothing. And we should always remember that our debates with feminists aren’t really to persuade them; we’re trying to persuade the silent majority that’s following the interaction. Failing to respond implies to everyone else that they have the better arguments, and we all know they don’t. The facts are on our side and our cause is just. We want equal rights. And in the long run, getting closer to gender equality is better for everyone, because it red…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 03:33 AM
16

They say men need to show their emotions. But when men show their emotions, lots of women get “the ick” and we see tons of man-hating feminist articles about “man keeping.” There are too many feminists who hate men and will criticize men regardless of what they do or don’t do.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 04:09 PM
14

A big driver behind male suicide is anti-male discrimination throughout our legal system, especially when it comes to divorce court and family court. OF COURSE men are more likely to commit suicide after they’ve lost the house, car, kids, and a lot of other assets to women under a rigged system that encourages women to file for divorce. “When it comes to male suicide, we have solid data showing relationship breakdown is critical - coroner’s report data published by the Australian Bureau of Stati…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 04:06 PM
19

Spaces or programs that help men are constantly under attack by feminists. See this lifecycle of male spaces graphic and a recent example of what feminists did to Movember: https://www.reddit.com/r/memesopdidnotlike/s/I4YZoQjS5e https://bettinaarndt.substack.com/p/movember-rips-off-mens-health-dollars
/r/MensRights08/08/25 04:01 PM
2

That’s why we all have to keep reminding the world that we’ve had enough of anti-male bias and discrimination. We’ve had enough of our concerns being ignored or trivialized and being blamed for the ways we are victimized. That’s why we are not going above and beyond the call of duty for ingrates anymore. Kick a friendly dog too much and it becomes an unfriendly dog.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 01:26 PM
2

Don’t risk your neck for spoiled people who treat you as a disposable tool or a second-class citizen. They don’t deserve your help.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 01:05 PM
62

The UN has done a lot of harm to men, as TheTinMen has shown. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/cY18E1007V https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/lxa3iJwPzv
/r/MensRights07/08/25 08:03 PM
3

You’re welcome, I’m adding another link to a large study on the sentencing gap right now.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 05:39 PM
5

You are correct on both counts, and some of the evidence to back up both of your statements can be found in the links below. Most people don’t understand that women abuse men at about the same levels that men abuse women, but most of the discussion around the topic is incredibly biased and one-sided against men. https://bettinaarndt.substack.com/p/movember-rips-off-mens-health-dollars https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/K0L086pUtu https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/57/
/r/MensRights07/08/25 05:23 PM
25

That’s why so much of feminism is garbage—it revolves around the myth of “patriarchy.” Anyone familiar with the dictionary definition of it knows that it doesn’t exist. Men do not have all the power if the vast majority of people at the bottom of society are men. Women are not excluded from power. The very few people at the top of society are not all men, and the ones who got there did so with the votes or support of other men and women.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 02:27 PM
5

Check it out: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/eYCXse9giz https://bettinaarndt.substack.com/p/movember-rips-off-mens-health-dollars “Little do they know that this huge enterprise, run by a feminist and supported by mainly female staff, is increasingly committed to diverting men’s health dollars away from real male health concerns towards woke projects promoting anti-male ideology.” “It’s the weirdest thing that these women don’t see it as inappropriate to boast of taking over a men’s charit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/25 12:54 AM
3

Leaders set examples that others follow. What they say does have an impact on how at least some of their followers behave. Some listen and adjust how they act accordingly. So it is a step forward when more leaders change their tone and commentary from promoting female supremacy and misandry to acknowledging that we need to do more to help men and boys. Some have even denounced the “vicious campaign against masculinity” and pledged to do more to honor and look out for men. OP’s list of quotes isn…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 06:54 PM
4

It’s a step forward when more people publicly acknowledge a problem. I’d rather goad people into ramping up the pressure on those in power to say and do more, instead of giving them the impression that it’s all wishful thinking and virtue signaling. The future is what we make it, and history is full of examples of tough, smart people prevailing against long odds.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 05:56 PM
3

But it’s not just rhetoric. You didn’t mention any instances of successful opposition to discriminatory practices against men, like the torching of certain DEI and Title IX policies that were anti-male, the destruction of the LuLu app, or the ruining of businesses that gave price discounts to women, to name a few. Even if there were no such examples to name, there’s no good reason to discourage people from taking action where it’s needed. When people fight back, they may lose. But when they roll…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 05:33 PM
20

This is a good sign, and there have been a lot more statements than these recognizing anti-male bias and discrimination. People won’t fix a problem until they admit there is a problem, and there’s growing awareness now. The defeatist attitude that nothing will ever change doesn’t help any of us, and it disregards the successes that others have had when standing up to injustice. Instead, we need to keep calling out misandry and keep reminding the people in power that they need to do better in pro…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 05:18 PM
6

From the neverending torrent of anti-male commentary and policies that I’ve seen throughout the mainstream media, social media, and most institutions. The people who neglect and abuse us have gotten away with it for too long, and they won’t even admit to their wrongdoing. Calling them out and pushing back is the right thing for all of us to do.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 12:58 PM
6

We need to keep speaking the truth, as often as possible, and in as many venues as possible. Counter the disinformation out there and set the record straight. Be a squeaky wheel, especially with elected officials. We cannot afford to stay silent, or our oppressors will win. “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 09:32 PM
1

You have been trolling this sub excessively with erroneous and misandrist content. Your comment is disinformation that you like to post everywhere, and you and we know it. People have already explained to you that your claims are false because the legal system is rigged heavily in favor of women and against men, so women get away with a lot more criminal activity than men and men underreport women’s crimes because men are not taken as seriously and are more likely to get victim blamed. Sources: …
/r/MensRights05/08/25 04:17 PM
1

You have been trolling this sub excessively with erroneous and misandrist content. Your comment is disinformation that you like to post everywhere, and you and we know it. People have already explained to you that your claims are false because the legal system is rigged heavily in favor of women and against men, so women get away with a lot more criminal activity than men and men underreport women’s crimes because men are not taken as seriously and are more likely to get victim blamed. Sources: …
/r/MensRights05/08/25 04:17 PM
1

You have been trolling this sub excessively with erroneous and misandrist content. Your comment is disinformation that you like to post everywhere, and you and we know it. People have already explained to you that your claims are false because the legal system is rigged heavily in favor of women and against men, so women get away with a lot more criminal activity than men and men underreport women’s crimes because men are not taken as seriously and are more likely to get victim blamed. Sources: …
/r/MensRights05/08/25 04:16 PM
1

You have been trolling this sub excessively. Your comment is disinformation that you like to post everywhere, and you and we know it. People have already explained to you that your claims are false because the legal system is rigged heavily in favor of women and against men, so women get away with a lot more criminal activity than men and men underreport women’s crimes because men are not taken as seriously and are more likely to get victim blamed. Sources: https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_e…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 04:05 PM
48

Feminists typically view men as disposable tools (or worse) to serve women, which is why entitled feminists like Hillary Clinton say “Women have always been the primary victims of war” and “The future is female.” Call them out on their BS whenever you can.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 03:26 PM
23

I look out for my health and the health of others. Stop implying that men are to blame for being victims of the pervasive discrimination they face in healthcare and throughout society. https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/xGm9Hd9nhM https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/i8DPu73QMj EDIT: The comments below are irrelevant distractions from the massive problem of internalized misandry throughout our institutions, and they disregard th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 01:19 PM
22

TheTinMen has also demonstrated very clearly how overwhelming the bias is in favor of women and against men throughout the healthcare system: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/xGm9Hd9nhM So has James Nuzzo: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/i8DPu73QMj
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 11:20 AM
33

Women now get more than 57% of the degrees, but 92% of gender-specific scholarships are still reserved for women. When boys show the same aptitude as girls, they still get graded lower. Grading bias against boys has been documented in numerous studies for years and all across the world.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 11:11 AM
50

We are not fooled by your feminist propaganda and cherry picked points here or elsewhere. Anyone who has been paying attention and studying the actual evidence knows that women are the more privileged gender, do better in nearly every quality of life metric, live longer, and have more rights and privileges than men. https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ “men have worse outcomes in many domains. For example, they are much more likely to be incarcerated, to be shot by th…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 11:07 AM
15

I haven’t seen evidence to back up your claims, which appear to be cherry picked and not representative of all healthcare or all countries in the developing world. Furthermore, the initiative targets areas affecting women in both high- and low-income countries, and women typically outlive men by significant margins in both. So again, it ignores the gender that’s worse off and favors the gender that’s better off. EDIT: GAVI reports that at the global level, there is no significant difference in i…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:59 AM
56

Great comment. And this is so typical of how feminist organizations work—they fabricate a “crisis” for women or girls, throw out a bunch of lies, half-truths, and propaganda, and then steal as many resources as possible. That’s exactly what they did with the “crisis” affecting girls in education decades ago, and what they’re still doing today. Even though girls outperformed boys overall in education then and still do today because of widespread bias against boys and in favor of girls. EDIT: hotc…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 01:48 AM
94

That’s true, she gave a billion dollars to women’s organizations. Rewarding the most privileged with additional privilege. These billionaires truly are out of touch with reality.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 12:50 AM
51

LOL, I was wondering if this move was connected. “Don’t pay attention to mentions of me in the files. Look at all the billions I just gave to women!”
/r/MensRights04/08/25 11:57 PM
87

To be clear, it’s men’s health that has been ignored far more than women’s health. Women outlive men in every country on the planet. Throughout the developed world, you’ll find far more offices, organizations, initiatives, and charities dedicated to women’s health than men’s health. Men more often get stuck with society’s most dangerous jobs and make up more than 90% of workplace fatalities, more than 90% of bystander interventions, and the vast majority of suicides. You’ll see that commentary i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/25 11:47 PM
102

To be clear, it’s men’s health that has been ignored far more than women’s health. Women outlive men in every country on the planet. Throughout the developed world, you’ll find far more offices, organizations, initiatives, and charities dedicated to women’s health than men’s health. Men more often get stuck with society’s most dangerous jobs and make up more than 90% of workplace fatalities, more than 90% of bystander interventions, and the vast majority of suicides. You’ll see that commentary i…
/r/MensRights04/08/25 11:41 PM
31

This is just another example of how man-hating feminist propaganda has infected most of the mainstream media, and it’s enabled by spineless simps. Feminists will toss the civil rights of all men out the window, citing bogus misandrist arguments about women needing to feel “safe.” Feminism has worked very hard to undermine and subjugate men since before we were born and it continues to do so today. We need to do a better job calling it out for being a hate movement dedicated to female supremacy. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/25 12:40 PM
17

I’m sorry, but you are mistaken. First, both quotes are drawn directly from her books Pornography: Men Possessing Women and Mercy. Those who want to make excuses for her may argue that even though she wrote those words, she didn’t really mean the second one, but the fact remains that both quotes are consistent with a vast number of derogatory statements she made about men, and anyone familiar with her work knows this. If you have serious doubts about all these quotes before even looking them up,…
/r/MensRights03/08/25 07:46 PM
33

Yes. Bettina Arndt is one of the good ones. She has also said, "we need to start calling out feminism which is a really destructive force in our society" and "radical feminism, where men are presented as violent and sexist, is guilty of manshaming and destroying what should be a bond of mutual acceptance and respect between the sexes"
/r/MensRights03/08/25 01:28 PM
25

Everyone needs to wake up to the fact that on the whole, feminism is a hate movement directed against men and in favor of female supremacy. This Movember situation is what happens when feminists are allowed to take over initiatives meant to help men.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 01:24 PM
5

The best way to combat this is to shame and blame man-hating feminists frequently, withdraw support from politicians and businesses that align themselves with feminists, and provide more support to politicians and businesses who support men and men’s rights. File complaints and lawsuits against those who discriminate against men. Stand your ground and fight back. Don’t withdraw from society entirely, or you’ll lose leverage.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 11:04 PM
1

As I’ve explained there and elsewhere, people connected to the female-only Tea App are about to get hit with a bunch of lawsuits. Those may do some serious damage. So if that happens in connection with a female-only app, you can bet the risk will be at least as high (and probably higher) for those who create an equivalent male-only app later on. It’s terrible that apps like Tea have discriminated against and victimized a lot of innocent men, but I don’t think the right way to respond to that is …
/r/MensRights02/08/25 05:14 PM
5

That’s why all of us have to keep reminding the world of the truth, as often as possible and in as many venues as possible. Feminists have buried the evidence for far too long. The more of us who speak up and the more often we do it, the harder it becomes for feminist propaganda to work. Never stop calling out the lies and hate of feminism. They’ll look ridiculous and harmful to others.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 02:39 PM
152

Feminism has worked very hard to undermine and subjugate men since before we were born and it continues to do so today. Don’t stop calling it out for being a hate movement dedicated to female supremacy. Copy, paste, share. Remind the world of what they say and stand for: “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations,” "If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is …
/r/MensRights02/08/25 02:21 PM
13

You’re most welcome. I like to share this resource broadly and I’ve seen a few others do so too. It’s good to keep sharing it to raise awareness of how the world really is. It’s a devastating rebuttal to the “misandry isn’t real” and “fight the patriarchy” nonsense, because it reflects decades of meticulous research and studies demonstrating pro-female and anti-male bias. Most of the time people who are confronted with this say nothing. Once in a while they resort to name calling, which obviousl…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 01:32 PM
11

These are good resources: The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny TheTinMenBlog National Coalition for Men National Center for Men International Council for Men and Boys EDIT: Adding the books The War Against Boys and Who Stole Feminism, both by Christina Hoff Sommers, and Men on Strike by Helen Smith
/r/MensRights02/08/25 01:06 PM
18

100%
/r/MensRights02/08/25 04:12 AM
62

There are only about a million other studies cited in here that show pretty much the same thing. They can’t deflect it all without looking ridiculous: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/
/r/MensRights02/08/25 03:56 AM
38

Silence implies consent, and appeasement doesn’t work. If you try appeasement with bullies, you’ll just end up getting bullied more. Man-hating feminists will hate men no matter what men do or don’t do, and their lies, misdeeds, and hate should be advertised for all the world to see instead of giving them a pass. When you argue back, you’re not trying to persuade them. Try to persuade everyone else who’s listening. “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over fals…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 03:54 AM
-1

These apps are a legal minefield. And they make lots of people really, really angry. Those angry people will look for other people to blame. Some might decide you’re to blame if you develop such an app. They might come after you in court. I am not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. But think very carefully about the legal implications, how well you could defend yourself against one or more lawsuits, and whether you want to.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 12:33 AM
5

If the people connected to a female-only app get sued hard, would you want to be one of the people connected to an equivalent male-only app that gets sued hard next? That’s the thing—a lot of people see apps that discriminate on the basis of gender to be illegal and unethical.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 12:19 AM
4

If an app that discriminates on the basis of gender has better security practices, it is still an app that discriminates on the basis of gender. Many would call this both illegal and unethical, and those who are associated with it can be targeted by lawsuits. Apple is wealthy enough that it may decide it will take on the risk of a legal battle for at least a little while longer. But not everyone has Apple money. So those who don’t have Apple’s deep pockets should ask themselves whether it’s wort…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 12:12 AM
13

Considering all the flak they’re taking over Tea, they probably don’t want even more complaints and headaches from signing off on the creation of more such apps right now. Read my longer comment in this thread and ask yourself whether you or they would want to take on that risk.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 11:59 PM
2

There are no doubt lots of such discussions underway right now all over the country. I didn’t even come up with the language above.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 11:53 PM
1

Yeah, it’s weird that some people actually downvoted guidance on how to proceed with a class action lawsuit against an app that discriminates against men on the basis of gender alone. You can’t really argue against a female-only app and then argue in favor of a male-only app. The law should protect the civil rights of both, and the potential for abuse is significant with any kind of app that’s exclusive to only one gender.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 11:25 PM
6

It would be better to shut down gender-specific apps instead of creating more of them. There's been more and more talk online about class action lawsuits against the women-only Tea App. If you believe you've been wronged, legal action is possible even if you don't know whether you've been posted. Read the following guidance from ChatGPT and contact a law firm to discuss if you're interested: Yes—a man can bring a lawsuit even if he doesn’t yet know whether he’s been posted, and in fact, the very…
/r/MensRights01/08/25 10:36 PM
5

Info about a class action lawsuit against Tea below, from ZealousidealLet234: Yes—a man can bring a lawsuit even if he doesn’t yet know whether he’s been posted, and in fact, the very fact that men are categorically excluded from access is itself a legally actionable harm. Here’s why. ⸻ ⁠Exclusion Alone Creates Standing Even if a man hasn’t confirmed whether he was “doxxed,” the denial of access based on sex—while allowing women to use the app freely—is itself: • Gender discrimination under stat…
/r/MensRights01/08/25 05:10 PM
8

No. The future is what we make it. That’s why we need to keep showing the world that feminism is a hate movement dedicated to female supremacy and that it should be resisted. If you fight back, you might lose. But if you meekly roll over and accept injustice, you’ll definitely lose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 04:58 PM
14

TheTinMenBlog (which everyone should read) also just showed how the gendering of the male sex to anything and everything bad has been done in the following words: “Toxic masculinity”, “male violence”, “male rage”, “the patriarchy”, “male entitlement”, “mansplaining”, “male privilege”, “the manosphere”, “manteruption’, “man keeping”, “male fragility”, “man spreading” We’ve all heard these from feminists, but very rarely any acknowledgement or appreciation of the good and important contributions t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 02:51 PM
2

TheTinMenBlog (which everyone should read) also just showed how the gendering of the male sex to anything and everything bad has been done in the following words: “Toxic masculinity”, “male violence”, “male rage”, “the patriarchy”, “male entitlement”, “mansplaining”, “male privilege”, “the manosphere”, “manteruption’, “man keeping”, “male fragility”, “man spreading” We’ve all heard these from feminists, but very rarely any acknowledgement of the important contributions that men make.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 02:49 PM
31

Other slogans that feminists like to use to turn public opinion against men, trivialize the problems that men face, get extra female privilege, avoid accountability, and deflect attention from the harms that feminism causes to men (and the rest of society): “Misandry doesn’t exist.” “Misogyny kills; misandry annoys.” “Not all men, but always a man.” “Men did it to themselves.” “Believe all women.” “Kill all men.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 12:45 PM
5

Other slogans that feminists like to use to turn public opinion against men, trivialize the problems that men face, get extra female privilege, avoid accountability, and deflect attention from the harms that feminism causes to men (and the rest of society): “Misandry doesn’t exist.” “Misogyny kills; misandry annoys.” “Not all men, but always a man.” “Men did it to themselves.” “Believe all women.” “Kill all men.”
/r/MensRights01/08/25 12:44 PM
16

Yes. It’s also called zero-sum thinking. That’s part of why you see so many feminists who block helping men who obviously need help; those feminists see anything that helps men as taking away resources from women. And they have trouble seeing male lives as being as important as female lives. In reality, they’d be much better off pushing for greater fairness, because a more equal and just society is a more peaceful one. Instead, demanding that women should get it all and men should get scraps wil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 12:06 PM
10

An example of feminist thinking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/25 11:25 AM
52

Feminist ideology revolves around female supremacy and misandry. So in their minds, men don’t deserve to rise to the top but do deserve it when they’re stuck at the bottom. They think women who get to the top have overcome the odds, and women who don’t were oppressed by men and society. Women are only accountable when things work out, and it’s someone else’s fault when they don’t. Their thinking makes no sense, because “patriarchy” isn’t real.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 11:22 AM
32

The problem is that feminists, who have infiltrated our media and institutions, keep telling people that masculinity itself is toxic: “It is masculinity itself that has become the problem… The problem is not toxic masculinity; it’s that masculinity is toxic… simply not compatible with liberty and justice for all" – Lisa Wade Feminists are responsible for so much of the discrimination that men and boys face today. Remember that feminism has been waging a war against masculinity for years.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 11:15 AM
7

Don’t run or hide. Stand your ground and push back. Complain loudly and often to your elected officials and decision makers whenever and wherever you find misandry.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 06:45 PM
106

I’ve seen exactly what you’re talking about from IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes. When people complain about misandry in entertainment, they purge most of those reviews. Feminist attacks on men are everywhere, and they try to silence us when we complain. For example, feminists tried to destroy Star Wars with shows like The Acolyte, which portrayed men badly and women as super humans. When lots of male reviewers complained online, Rotten Tomatoes purged/blocked the creation of new reviews for a while.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 06:10 PM
17

You are worth a lot. Don't let the misandrists get you down.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:26 PM
16

Oh, good point. Yes, everybody keep adding to this list with additional quotes!
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:10 PM
52

Everybody reading this: Tell them to stop attacking men, stop pretending that this isn't happening, and stop excluding men from social assistance programs. Of course young men aren't going to support people who talk like this: “Now women, I just want you to know, you are not perfect, but what I can say pretty indisputably is that you are better than us [men].” - Barack Obama “… men have been getting on my nerves lately. I mean, every day I read the newspaper and I just think like, ‘Brothers, wha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/25 02:04 PM
30

^ ^ ^ This is correct. The left doesn't just favor women in its assistance programs, much of the left has gone out of its way to neglect and abuse men. It doesn't even pay lip service, and consistently treats men as either toxic or useful (and disposable) tools to serve women: “Now women, I just want you to know, you are not perfect, but what I can say pretty indisputably is that you are better than us [men].” - Barack Obama “… men have been getting on my nerves lately. I mean, every day I read …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/25 01:24 PM
23

Ask them about whether things would be different if the people in charge were all women. Ask them why they're ignoring the female leaders backing male-only conscription in Europe. And show them this: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4454964/Female-rulers-27-likely-wage-WAR-males.html
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:58 AM
17

100%, and men are still expected to pay to be subjected to all of these risks and more. Yet all of these truths get buried or downplayed by those who profit the most off of the men who get exploited by these rules and norms. So we get all these messed up articles in the mainstream media playing dumb about why men aren’t approaching women anymore or withdrawing from dating, and some even have the gall to blame men for the current state of affairs.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:52 PM
28

Even if you’re not interested in dating, you can be defamed and doxxed on these apps by any unstable woman who has a grudge against you. These groups and apps pretend to care about safety, while making all of us less safe through defamation and doxxing. Help to shut apps like these down. If we fail, we will be at risk forever. You can take action against AWDTSG, the Tea App and other apps that violate civil rights by using the resources below and complaining to elected officials in Congress, at …
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:32 PM
81

The few benefits of dating are outweighed enormously by the risks. Those risks keep piling up, as anyone who has followed the Tea App and AWDTSG saga knows. The risk of you being subjected to life- and career-ruining false accusations, harassment, and doxxing for millions of others to see (which you aren’t allowed to find out about if you’re male) are higher than they’ve ever been, and it’ll get worse if more of us don’t step up to fight for civil rights.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:18 PM
14

As all of these resources have demonstrated, the apps made for women aren’t genuinely about their “safety” either. These are a lot of sexist double standards based on faulty assumptions out there, and apps and policies like these that should be opposed. I hope you’ll take some time to study and think about these resources and understand how much trouble they can cause for many others and yourself, if you and others reading this don’t join in the fight against this injustice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/25 02:09 PM
16

Do you believe in free speech for women but not for men? Because that’s how these apps have been set up—they are for women only and men are banned from using them, so men aren’t even allowed to know they’re being defamed. Similar apps for men to use were immediately shut down. That’s a gross double standard and gender-based discrimination. That sexist discrimination problem alone is enough to object to it, but add in all of the defamation, vile gossip, fabricated stories to ruin reputations, cyb…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/25 01:41 PM
23

Apps like these are causing very serious harm to others (examples below), and they have exploded in popularity this month. Even if you haven’t been harmed (yet) and don’t care about what’s happening to others, at least care about yourself, because the illegal activities facilitated by these apps put all of us in danger. The vile gossip, defamation, doxxing, and other civil rights violations going on in there can cause you to lose out on opportunities without you even being aware of it. It’s temp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/25 12:31 PM
59

The solution is to fight against apps that violate our civil rights. These groups and apps pretend to care about safety, while making all of us less safe through defamation and doxxing. Help to shut apps like these down. If we fail, we will be at risk forever. You can take action against AWDTSG, the Tea App and other apps that violate civil rights by using the resources below and complaining to elected officials in Congress, at the White House, FTC, DOJ, and more. https://www.reddit.com/r/AWDTSG…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/25 11:11 AM
4

Agreed, keep the pressure on. The press and ridicule are a sign of progress, as counterintuitive as it might seem. We’ve seen this pattern throughout human history. “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” Arthur Schopenhauer
/r/MensRights29/07/25 12:55 AM
60

A+, everybody keep the pressure on against these apps that are facilitating defamation, doxxing, and all kinds of civil rights violations.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 12:49 AM
7

I’m from the U.S., but I fully support this initiative and am upvoting and commenting for visibility. Editorials or interviews with sympathetic media outlets and contacting elected officials about this might help too. Good luck.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 04:15 PM
8

I would frame it this way: we value equal rights for men and women, and feminism threatens both men and women. Feminism never ceases in demanding more for women at the expense of men. It neglects and abuses men. This is ultimately dangerous for women too, because if feminists get their way, society becomes completely gynocentric. Men won’t defend or work hard for a society like that, and may turn against it, leading to its decline and collapse. As the African proverb says, “The child who is aban…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/25 12:45 PM
10

Agreed, thanks. You and others are doing great work to protect everybody’s rights. I recommend revising “the app’s primary (and seemingly only) purpose is to harass and endanger the individuals listed” to “the app allows others to harass and endanger the individuals listed”. And removing “has been created solely for the purpose of doxxing private individuals”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 03:12 PM
18

Thanks very much for putting together what is overall a great resource that I’ve shared. However, I STRONGLY encourage you to revise it immediately and remove statements about it being “created solely for defamation”, “solely for the purpose of doxxing” and “primary/only purpose” because those statements will weaken any complaints or cases when they bring up other purposes. It’s better to state that this app encourages or enables defamation, doxxing, gender-based discrimination, etc. You’re only…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 02:15 PM
6

More steps we can all take against the Tea App here: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/dhuq0O6BMS
/r/MensRights27/07/25 01:44 PM
1

Highlighting this point, you don’t have to have access to the app to report its violations to Apple: Lastly, since the tea app is in clear violation of apple app store policies, anyone can send an email to [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) without having to install the app EDIT: I edited the original post to remove things like “solely created” and references to documents that you might not be able to provide. Also Mods, I’m aware of the Tea App Megathread but there was …
/r/MensRights27/07/25 01:40 PM
10

This is the evidence that female supremacists try to bury. Great job collecting and presenting it. A+
/r/MensRights27/07/25 12:49 PM
12

“The fairer sex is the unfairer sex.” Great quote that sums up a lot of the research.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 12:46 PM
9

Everyone reading this needs to help shut down apps like those, because as long as they exist, we are all in danger. Even if you find out who posted you and remove it, that person or someone else could do it again months or years from now. You can take action against AWDTSG, the Tea App and other apps that violate the civil rights of men by using the resources below and complaining to elected officials in Congress, at the White House, FTC, DOJ, and more. You can be defamed or have your privacy vi…
/r/MensRights27/07/25 12:04 AM
2

Yes. Very, very few people saw that because the mainstream media ignored it almost entirely. It generally trivializes misandry (while producing it) and/or blames men for the problems they experience. Most of the media (in both the U.S. and UK) and many political figures have been promoting the “vicious campaign against masculinity” that the press release denounces.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 09:07 PM
52

Folks, if we try to run from gender-based discrimination, we’ll be running forever. Don’t run—fight back by filing complaints with the authorities about these illegal practices. Several ride-sharing companies have done exactly what Uber is planning, and this sexism will continue to spread if left unchallenged. No man should have to identify as a woman to get full access to public transportation. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/WA0uMoxJnp
/r/MensRights26/07/25 06:43 PM
6

C’mon, man. He’s done so much more than that—he’s spoken up for men’s rights repeatedly and written scathing critiques of misandry, feminism, and the Barbie movie. He’s been doing this for years. Just a couple of examples below: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6406739/amp/PIERS-MORGANS-ADVICE-WOMEN-INTERNATIONAL-MENS-DAY-Dont-let-radical-feminists-ruin-men.html https://nypost.com/2023/07/24/if-i-made-a-movie-that-treated-women-the-way-barbie-treats-men-feminists-would-want-me-executed/
/r/MensRights26/07/25 12:49 PM
9

That’s why I explained my logic, unlike you.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 01:19 AM
13

Piers Morgan is another advocate for men’s rights and a critic of radical feminism.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 12:48 AM
11

Your argument doesn’t follow, and women’s restrooms aren’t involved in the slew of aforementioned legal violations you conveniently ignored. Furthermore, men are allowed to have their own restrooms but aren’t allowed to have male-only equivalents to this app without them being shut down.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 12:07 AM
23

It’s better than nothing. Talking about problems precedes fixing problems. And the Democratic Party has noticed how many men it’s lost to the Republican Party in recent years, so commentary like this pressures Dems to back off on some of their misandry so they can win back male votes. We want both parties competing for our votes to make more progress on men’s rights.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 11:47 PM
16

The app is for women only and bans access to men solely on the basis of gender. That’s gender-based discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 11:38 PM
24

This is not an endorsement, but Donald Trump and JD Vance have at least SAID some good things along these lines. And that’s a lot better than the shaming and blaming we’ve gotten from other high profile figures. Excerpts pasted and linked below. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/06/presidential-message-on-national-mens-health-week-2025/ “For far too long, the health, happiness, and well-being of our Nation’s men have been neglected, contributing to a troubling reality: men in …
/r/MensRights25/07/25 11:36 PM
14

I’m concerned about the app’s blatant gender-based discrimination and numerous reports of defamation, privacy violations, cyber bullying, and other legal and ethical problems enabled by this app and apps like it. I welcome further investigations into what’s going on there, and value the protection of civil rights for both men and women.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 11:24 PM
8

Yeah, that’s typical lazy thinking from a lot of people—everything’s fine (until it isn’t) so they didn’t take security seriously. And we can’t even trust anything those managers say now. They’re not above lying if they threw the civil rights of half the population under the bus.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 07:51 PM
6

100%. There are lots of people out there who can’t understand actual risks or problems until they themselves become victims. Those who treated men maliciously on that app deserve what’s coming to them.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:28 PM
31

LOL, the ones who defamed and violated privacy rights can sleep with one eye open now, considering the lawsuits that are coming.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:13 PM
145

Reads like more than selfies were compromised—thousands of public posts too. Evidence that can be used in lawsuits, perhaps. I hope that those who have been wronged get justice in court against the perpetrators and the decisionmakers who so blatantly violated the rights of men.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:10 PM
20

This is good news. The leaked info can be used as supporting evidence by law firms in the flood of lawsuits against those who engaged in illegal activities including defamation and privacy violations via that app. Karma’s a bitch.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:03 PM
1

That’s a nonsensical response that reflects a poor understanding of our legal system and the real world. Just as kings and queens have gotten away with wrongdoing that peasants couldn’t, rich and powerful entities often do get away with screwing over poor victims who don’t have the means to fight back. Justice is never guaranteed, and can take a lot of time, effort, and money to obtain. And in the case of the Tea App, the deck has been stacked against victims from the beginning because of how ha…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 03:59 PM
1

If you’re “sure” that wrongs automatically get made right, you’re even more clueless than I thought, because there is plenty of enduring injustice in the real word today. It usually takes a lot of hard work from a lot of good people to overcome it. That’s yet another basic fact you can’t seem to grasp. And more of this injustice persists and grows when self-centered, delusional people who can’t understand a world bigger than their own lived experience stand in the way.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 03:19 PM
1

You did overlook that basic fact and others, because your comment reflected no understanding that “good” and “crazy” are not immutable characteristics. You didn’t comprehend how vast the reach of this app is compared to what was available in the past. And now you’re trying to backtrack. More than a MILLION women downloaded the Tea App in just the last week, so the problem with false accusations and privacy violations has been amplified enormously. The scale of the potential damage via this viral…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 02:33 PM
6

Great comment ^ . This is the right way to raise awareness and take action against this injustice. We need to keep circulating messages like these and keep the pressure on, as often as we can, as loudly as we can, with as many of these people as we can.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 01:38 PM
9

We know about it and oppose that too, we’re just talking about Tea here because this is the Tea App Megathread. You have been doing great work raising awareness of these problems and how to take action against them, thank you!!
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:34 PM
29

Good article from Poppy Sowerby at The Times exposing the horrible things the Tea App enables. https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/tea-app-dating-men-women-hsdwms7f9 “One man laments that it’s “a place where hurt women can … tell a one-sided story about men and damage their name without any context or proof”; another worries about a future destroyed by “surveillance by our peers”. women post pictures of their partners while they are sleeping to find out if other women recognise him. t…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:05 AM
20

Here are Medium articles describing the specific legal violations going on under the Tea App and AWDTSG, with screenshots of comments. https://medium.com/@healthy_tech/a-gender-based-data-broker-violating-ca-delete-act-or-vt-tx-registry-and-state-privacy-rights-a6f208e43f58 https://medium.com/@healthy_tech/understanding-your-abusers-women-committing-cyber-domestic-violence-on-awdtsg-tea-app-and-b6a1ba9fbbf7 Send these to your elected officials, FTC, DOJ, and others when complaining about the ill…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 05:10 AM
56

The Tea App has enabled dangerous and illegal defamation of the innocent and privacy violations. Here’s info on how to raise concerns with the authorities from sciencehoe70-1: 🚨🚨 To Everyone Affected by AWDTSG or Safe Tea: Here’s How to Fight Back 🚨🚨 If you've already sent an email—send it again. If you haven’t, now is the time We’re done playing this insane game. These apps are doing real harm. The fastest way to shut them down is cutting off their payment processors. 🧨 The Harm These Apps Caus…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 03:34 AM
17

Ah, so you’re one of those people who thinks that if you haven’t been personally affected by a problem, then the problem doesn’t matter. Well, I’ve got news for you. People change over time, and people we think are “good” can and do go bad. I’m sure there are plenty of divorcees who can attest to that. And there are plenty of innocent people getting unjustly defamed on apps like Tea with no ability to defend themselves. Conducting your life thoughtfully and responsibly is no guarantee of protect…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 03:25 AM
29

How can you date comfortably with all the false claims and defamation going on in these apps? You can’t. At least not right now. I’m sorry. What you CAN do is report these apps for enabling illegal defamatory activities, privacy violations, and violations of App Store policies to help shut them down. Doing so will help you and many others. Search “tea app” on this sub and on AWDTSG subs for info on how.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 02:41 AM
1

You say you don’t need assistance researching, but you couldn’t think of even one example of a policy that’s unfair to men being eliminated when there are many. And I said the Dems backed down on some of their misandry, not all of it, and you’d have known about that too had you kept up with current events this year.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:30 PM
1

To clarify, there have been biased policies connected to Title IX and DEI that have been dismantled by the courts in response to complaints about those discriminating against men. There are plenty of other examples, but I’m not your research assistant. Fighting bigotry with even more bigotry is the wrong way to go. We’re all better off focusing on countering gender-based discrimination instead of perpetrating more of it. Eye for an eye, and the world goes blind.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:10 PM
0

You disputed the existence of even one example, so I gave you one. There are many others, and the Democratic Party has backed down on some its misandry in response to complaints. Those who are unfamiliar with these issues can find such examples if they have even basic research skills. I support equal rights for all, in line with civil rights legislation, and oppose policies that promote misandry, misogyny, and discrimination that restricts pay and services on the basis of gender.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:54 PM
1

Yes, and I also believe in promoting equal rights under the law instead of promoting sexism in either direction. In response to your question, there are many examples. In one case citing the Unruh Civil Rights Act, a court found that gender-based discounts on drinks for women were unlawful because bringing more women into a bar was not a sufficient social benefit. There are plenty of others related to Title IX, DEI, etc. that have helped men who faced injustice.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:33 PM
2

We’d all be better off fighting for equal rights for men and women, consistent with civil rights laws. Don’t protest the mistreatment of men by mistreating women. Do it by pushing to make the policies fair and just for both.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:19 PM
5

Report both Uber and Lyft to the authorities for promoting gender-based discrimination against men in their service provision and employment policies. It’s not enough to just boycott the ones who promote misandry, we need to get them to change their policies so all of us get equal opportunity when it comes to services and pay.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:08 PM
100

100%, the defamation against men on that Tea app is out of control. Everyone reading this MUST push back, because it can be used to persecute any or all of us. And in addition to Apple, complain to the White House, Congress, FTC, FCC, and others. Keep the pressure on. Use these links and look up Tea App on this sub for info on how to respond: https://www.reddit.com/r/AWDTSGisToxic/s/HhWoDOCU4J https://www.reddit.com/r/AWDTSGisToxic/s/9pzEMQQuqR https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Va58RHOnii ht…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:03 PM
59

Folks, it’s not enough to identify the problem on Reddit—we must expose and complain about these illegal and defamatory practices loudly and often with the people in charge, like the White House, Congress, FCC, FTC, Apple, etc. and others who can help, like law firms. If you stay silent in the face of oppression and injustice, IT WILL GET WORSE FOR EVERYONE. Use these links for more info on how to respond: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Va58RHOnii https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/sIp…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 07:58 PM
12

^ Nice work. All who are reading this, please spread the word. Don’t stay silent in the face of oppression or injustice.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 07:35 PM
74

The defamation against men on that app is out of control. Everyone reading this MUST push back, because it can be used to persecute any or all of us. This has been covered many times. Use these links and look up Tea App on this thread for info on how to respond: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Va58RHOnii https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/sIpvDt97pi report it: https://reportaproblem.apple.com/ From GrandHandle1716: If you’re emailing Apple, include this. These are direct violations of A…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 10:26 AM
19

The policy and commentary surrounding it take the discrimination further, by explicitly encouraging and facilitating gender-based selection and filtering. This can adversely affect incomes and wait times for men. Any policy that explicitly allows people to filter out “blacks” or “Jews” would be widely and rightly perceived as discriminatory, as this policy that enables filtering out men should be.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 03:33 AM
18

Uber’s policies are not the law of the land, and the Civil Rights Act and many state civil rights laws prohibit preferential treatment based on sex and gender identity in employment and customer service. A male should not have to identify as a “woman” to get full access to pay and service. Take your defeatism and excuses elsewhere. Blatant discrimination against men can and should be called out and challenged.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 03:14 AM
52

I want to add that I'm very concerned about the recent growth in the number of service providers who are banning or heavily restricting access to men solely on the basis of gender (in transportation, housing, education, healthcare, software, etc). We MUST speak out against misandry and gender-based discrimination whenever and wherever we see it, or it's going to get worse. Support the people and institutions that support equal rights, and oppose those who oppose equal rights.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 02:03 AM
14

Denying services to male clients and employment opportunities to male drivers. It’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. Don’t let this slide. Complain to your elected officials, and if you experience damages as a result of this anti-male policy, consult an attorney.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 09:11 PM
6

She’s one of a number of female advocates for men and boys. I’m deeply grateful to all of them for their efforts and recognizing that we make everyone better off by promoting equal rights for men.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 02:26 PM
8

The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny The Empathy Gap - William Collins The Myth of Male Power - Warren Farrell The War Against Boys - Christina Hoff Sommers
/r/MensRights23/07/25 12:09 PM
15

We’re seeing both. It’s a reflection of our lobbying efforts, and we all need to keep the pressure on both political parties to do right by men in their rhetoric and policies. Remember how the Democrats used to have a page talking about how they serve women (but not men)? They took it down after lots of us complained. So keep messaging them to recognize and address our grievances. https://democrats.org/who-we-are/who-we-serve/
/r/MensRights22/07/25 07:29 PM
23

He and his advisors at least say some good things about men that Democrats are unwilling to. For example, take this White House press release from last month: “For far too long, the health, happiness, and well-being of our Nation’s men have been neglected, contributing to a troubling reality: men in the United States have a life expectancy five years shorter than women. This neglect has been compounded by a vicious campaign against masculinity. This war on manhood has left many American men in a…
/r/MensRights22/07/25 06:43 PM
48

Awesome work. Thanks for sharing. And maybe people can modify this template and notify them as a preemptive measure—tell them you do not concur with the sharing of any selfie of you or review of your name on copyright infringement and defamation grounds, now or at any future date. If they don’t comply, some good attorneys might be able to use this as the basis for a class action lawsuit on behalf of the many complainants defamed on this app. And keep complaining to your elected officials, FCC, F…
/r/MensRights22/07/25 05:11 PM
93

It’s good to see Obama FINALLY changing his tune (both he and Michelle Obama have made lots of derogatory comments about men in the past). And I liked what I heard from Robby Soave afterward, who rightly criticized the anti-male Title IX policies of the Obama administration. This is good news, folks. We’re seeing greater recognition of our issues, and both political parties are taking steps to court the male vote. PS: If anybody tries to deny the reality of the Obamas’ misandrist comments (and t…
/r/MensRights22/07/25 04:55 PM
1

It's certainly unreasonable to complain about a man not doing 50% of the housework if he's risking his neck performing a more dangerous and stressful job. Especially when the complaint that "men don't contribute as much in the household" reflects biased, made-up standards.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 03:02 PM
2

In addition to missing the forest for the trees, you've been wrong about many things that I've already pointed out. Which is why you keep pivoting.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 09:29 PM
2

A drop in the bucket for a cause they know won't go through. The focus of feminist organizations is overwhelmingly toward helping women (including in areas where women have surpassed men), and not toward promoting actual gender equality.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 08:16 PM
9

You are 100% correct. Where are the feminists pushing to get women drafted or registering for Selective Service? Where are the feminists who want women to be equally represented in coal mines, on oil rigs, in construction, doing sewer or roof maintenance, or doing all the other dangerous and dirty jobs where men are overrepresented? Where are the feminists pushing to narrow the life expectancy gap or the sentencing gap? We have more educational programs for women only than men only, but feminist…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 01:39 PM
5

The main problem with the complaint that “men don’t do enough of the housework” is that the complainers fail to look at the big picture and use cherry picked observations to support their biased, anti-male takes. They don’t take into account the many other important ways that men contribute to the household and the functioning of our entire society. And more often than not, the responsibility falls on men to do the most dangerous jobs, which are far worse than the housework those women complain …
/r/MensRights21/07/25 12:36 PM
6

Those studies are garbage. They typically don’t take into account the man’s more demanding job, yard work, auto work, or the man’s preferences for how often or thoroughly household work should be done. There’s no objective standard for the amount and frequency of household tasks that should be done, so the complaints about men not doing enough of the housework reflect the arbitrary preferences of complaining women.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 10:32 AM
6

Study this: The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny. It’s full of studies demonstrating the many ways that society is biased in favor of women and against men. Yet feminists ignore their female privilege. They always want more and more privileges for women without responsibilities or accountability. Their commitment to gender equality is a lie, because 99% of the time they’re only advocating for what benefits women. They regularly tear down initiatives and spaces meant for men while building up initiativ…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 10:25 AM
7

For a boatload of counterarguments, just show them this: The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 01:11 PM
111

“Across the political spectrum, men under 50 are in even greater agreement that “men should be respected and valued more in our society” — a belief held by 65% of younger Republican men and 60% of younger men who are Democrats.” Of course. We’ve had enough of feminism, which is at its core a female supremacist movement that only pretends to care about gender equality. Feminism takes a buffet style approach to equality, arguing for greater female privilege while perpetuating male disadvantage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/25 10:53 AM
13

As soon as I saw that graphic, I thought, “That looks just like a graphic from TheTinMen!” Watermarking your slides sounds fine to me. It’s your work and should be recognized as such.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 10:46 AM
27

When men approach women, women complain. When men don’t approach women, women complain. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. That’s the trap most feminists try to set up for men, so that men always look bad. Like another person said, it’s Schrodinger’s catcalling—both too much and too little at the same time.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 06:32 PM
10

They complain about men disengaging! That is EXACTLY what they’re doing now. Look at all the influencers screeching “Why don’t men approach women anymore?!” or the articles bitching about men disappearing. Damned if you, damned if you don’t—that’s the framework that feminism sets up for men.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 06:42 PM
8

It’s a reminder that on the whole, feminism is a hate movement that aims to promote female supremacy and harass, subordinate, or attack men regardless of what men do or don’t do.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 03:15 PM
1

Yeah, it’s an African proverb. Congratulations on taking the red pill, and welcome to the men’s rights movement! Speak out against misandry and try to promote equal rights for men wherever and whenever you can. The more of us who do this, the better off everyone will be.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:40 PM
17

Bingo. It’s the public audience that we’re debating for, not the individual feminist. Win the crowd, win your freedom.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:04 PM
12

It’s not enough to complain on Reddit—it’s important to mobilize action against unjust policies. Don’t just identify problems, identify solutions. How about making another post in which you share contact info for relevant Australian decision makers so people of all nationalities can object to this policy, and possibly refuse to do business with or visit Australia? Show proof that the eSafety Commissioner thinks criticism of feminism = terrorism. Authoritarians will make life much worse for every…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 01:04 PM
12

This has been covered many times on this sub already: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Va58RHOnii
/r/MensRights14/07/25 01:19 AM
43

That’s a step in the right direction for the UN, which has long treated men as second-class citizens and excluded men from their assistance programs, leaving them to starve or be killed after crises while prioritizing the rescue of women. Contacting the UN to recognize International Men’s Day is a good opportunity to remind them that they also need to give equal regard to men in all their aid programs. If they don’t, they don’t deserve our tax dollars; let others who recognize the humanity of me…
/r/MensRights13/07/25 01:47 AM
2

There are numerous examples of this posted on social media and in reviews of the app from current and previous users on the App Store. However, I cannot access the content directly because of the app’s sexist female-only user policy, which is in itself another problem.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 05:05 AM
5

Copied and pasted from one of the (many) earlier discussions of this: These anti-male apps and forums that enable baseless accusations, ban male participation, and persecute the innocent with no penalty for the accusers smack of the witch trials and Inquisition. Write to the White House and your elected officials to complain and expose this sexism and wrongdoing too, because the misandrists will be emboldened and can persecute any of us if we stay silent. https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Cons…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 04:31 AM
14

Around the mid-2010s I noticed a big uptick in misandry, and it became so pervasive in the 2020s that I figured I’d have to do a lot more to advocate for men’s rights. Doing so not only helps men and boys, but all of society. Anti-male discrimination ends up hurting everyone. As they say, the child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 02:33 AM
30

For a pithy retort to this gynocentric view: “When you’re accustomed to (female) privilege, equality looks like oppression.”
/r/MensRights12/07/25 02:24 AM
1

We live in a gynocentric society that treats men as second-class citizens. Men overall have to endure greater hardships and get less support than women. Lots of really good data for you in this article: The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 03:31 PM
6

Don’t just complain on Reddit; complain to the people who can do something about it, like your elected officials, government agencies, and businesses. Stop supporting businesses that promote misandry and tell them that’s why they won’t get your money. https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ https://reportfraud.ftc.gov https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/obscene-indecent-and-profane-broadcasts
/r/MensRights11/07/25 03:05 PM
3

It doesn’t matter. Wrongdoing is wrongdoing regardless of the perpetrator’s gender.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 11:46 AM
2

There have been LOTS of people on social media and on the app’s reviews saying there’s some serious defamation going on in there, the app bans male participation entirely so men often don’t know they’re being slandered and can’t defend themselves, and equivalent apps and pages for the use of men get shut down. Sounds like discrimination and misandry to me.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 11:44 AM
7

Re: #2, the answer is yes. It’s a female-only app. All males are banned from using the app, and they have a verification process to ensure it stays that way. Sounds like sexism to me, and that’s just one of its many problems.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 08:50 PM
20

Folks, I see waaay too many complaints without concrete recommendations for action. When we see misandrists using apps like that one to make baseless false accusations, ban male participation, and ruin the lives of innocent men, we need to actually DO something about it (like contacting the people in charge) or nothing will improve. Write to decisionmakers: the White House, other elected officials, FTC, etc. to expose anti-male sexism and wrongdoing whenever you see it, whether it’s the Tea app …
/r/MensRights10/07/25 06:40 PM
19

“The Patriarchy” doesn’t even exist in the developed world. People who think it does don’t understand the definition of the word or the apex fallacy. For a fantastic article giving many examples of misandry and pro-female and anti-male bias, read and cite this article in debates with misandrists: The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 10:57 AM
2

You have my sympathies for your situation, and it’s good that you’re helping others become more aware of this kind of problem. Nothing is going to change unless more of us speak out against these unfair laws that allow men to become victims of women this way and continue paying for their victimhood for years. Contact your elected officials to complain and insist on equal rights for men that allow men to opt out of financial responsibility for unwanted pregnancies, especially when it comes to SA.…
/r/MensRights10/07/25 10:40 AM
5

I’m sorry, but your comments aren’t making much sense and you do not appear to understand the meanings of some of the words we’ve been using. Good luck to you.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 09:31 PM
3

My statement is 100% true because growing misandry and false accusations against men dampen enthusiasm for dating men even among heterosexual women, and bisexual women will also tilt toward women, as you rightly pointed out. Not all people are slaves to their sexuality. So the total pool of enthusiastic women will indeed shrink if these kinds of anti-male behaviors and apps spread unchecked. The more important point is that the sexist double standards and potentially life-ruining defamation enco…
/r/MensRights09/07/25 06:29 PM
5

You have my condolences for what you’re going through. Asking for help and advice is absolutely the right thing to be doing. You may wish to consult with experts in the field of divorce law for men, such as the resources below. Divorceformen.com Mensdivorce.com Check with specialists in divorce law for men in your area too. There’s also a Reddit sub on divorce for men that I cannot link to here because of this sub’s rules, but it’s easy to find. Good luck with the damage control. Don’t remarry b…
/r/MensRights09/07/25 06:23 PM
15

Unfortunately, if that app is used to defame innocent men, the pool of women who are enthusiastic about dating men will continue to shrink. That’s why we need to counter the misandry and double standards associated with these things. They enable baseless accusations, they completely ban male participation, and they persecute the innocent with no penalty for false accusers so far. Write to the White House and your elected officials to complain and expose this sexism and wrongdoing. https://www.wh…
/r/MensRights09/07/25 12:25 PM
13

When some of those Tea app users are just out to ruin guys they dislike, what about the safety of innocent men? These anti-male apps and forums that enable baseless accusations, ban male participation, and persecute the innocent with no penalty for the accusers smack of the witch trials and Inquisition. Write to the White House and your elected officials to complain and expose this sexism and wrongdoing too, because the misandrists will be emboldened and can persecute any of us if we stay silent…
/r/MensRights09/07/25 10:57 AM
9

In the U.S. there definitely have been changes to the educational system aimed at benefiting female students without providing comparable assistance to male students. We see that in the rise of far more female-only vs male-only scholarships (a 10:1 ratio) and in standardized testing during the past several decades; since boys tended to receive the majority of National Merit scholarships based on test results, the U.S. revamped the SAT and added a Writing section in an effort to divert more of th…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 11:16 PM
8

Education isn’t a monolith. There’s a lot of variety in educational systems, learning styles, and teaching methods. The ones that give too much weight to subjective assessments, emphasize memorization instead of critical thinking, and seek to do away with standardized tests are problematic, and they allow biases to creep in and shape outcomes, often to the detriment of male students. Essentially, boys who are as intelligent as girls often get punished because they don’t act like girls. There’s a…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 09:49 PM
9

It’s been shown over and over that when boys and girls are of equal aptitude/intelligence, that teachers generally give higher marks to girls anyway. Boys do at least as well as girls on objective standardized tests though on average. The educational system overall doesn’t reward intelligence as much as it rewards sitting quietly and obeying teachers, and the pro-female bias is even more obvious when one looks at all the female-only scholarships and assistance programs relative to those availabl…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 08:38 PM
5

Good on ya for raising awareness of this problem and how to push back against false accusations. These anti-male apps and forums that enable baseless accusations, ban male participation, and persecute the innocent with no penalty for the accusers smack of the witch trials and Inquisition. Write to your elected officials to complain and expose this sexism and wrongdoing too, because the misandrists will be emboldened and can persecute any of us if we stay silent.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 12:34 PM
38

All, it may be worth reporting this app to the FTC and FCC if it’s being used for witch hunts/persecution of men through false accusations. They might shut it down if enough people complain. Also post negative reviews of the app and how it’s being used to support false accusations that ruin lives and promote anti-male discrimination. https://reportfraud.ftc.gov https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/obscene-indecent-and-profane-broadcasts
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 09:50 AM
123

No, the female supremacists who run the UN are alarmed over actual gender equality endorsed by the men’s rights movement and its threat to omnipresent female privilege. When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality looks like oppression.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:43 PM
6

Great post, thanks for sharing these. As others have said, feminism is about giving women the rights of men, the privileges of women, and the accountability of children. It lies and distorts facts to perpetuate gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 01:48 AM
17

There’s so much internalized misandry corrupting our legal system, and you’ve provided even more evidence of it. The system needs to be overhauled. Lots of other studies show the same pattern: https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/57/ “It finds large gender gaps favoring women throughout the sentence length distribution (averaging over 60%), conditional on arrest offense, criminal history, and other pre-charge observables. Female arrestees are also significantly likelier to avoid cha…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 10:05 PM
22

Like much of feminism, their argument is delusional. The women’s rights movement is celebrated, the men’s rights movement is persecuted.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 09:39 PM
15

There is always something we can do. Keep speaking out against injustice whenever and wherever we find it, and especially where it really matters: workplaces, education, and the most important institutions and laws. Winning takes time and grit. Be a squeaky wheel. The people who don’t confront bullies directly will always be bullied.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 02:16 PM
5

You say you had a really bad cold, full sick mode. That may be why they didn’t want to be near you. They didn’t know whether you had Covid, which has disabled millions of people and continues to disable more. I move away from sick people when I see them too regardless of whether they’re male or female. Anyway, hope you feel better soon. I recommend wearing a mask to avoid getting yourself and others sick.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 05:01 AM
2

Seems like a long time for a good bill like this to be stuck in subcommittee. I guess the misandrists are trying to kill it.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 01:31 AM
22

Yeah, I hate the hypocritical double standards of those entitled women and the simps who grovel for their approval. If there’s criticism of even ONE woman they complain about misogyny, but they think they should be free to make grotesque comments about ALL men and get away with it without it being called misandry because it’s their “lived experience” or some other bullshit. Keep calling them out for misandry. And it’s even more important to call out unfairness and bias against men in institution…
/r/MensRights27/06/25 10:10 PM
78

No one who truly understands history or human nature believes in the lie that the world would be a peaceful utopia if it were ruled by women. That myth has been thoroughly debunked, but the erroneous pacifist stereotype keeps getting perpetuated by female supremacists who want to see more women in charge. Power-hungry people of all stripes will lie to get and maintain power, and power tends to corrupt the recipient regardless of their gender. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-44549…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 03:53 AM
31

Exactly. We keep seeing this garbage that blames men for not doing enough of the housework (while the yard work, auto work, and hours of paid work men do are often conveniently omitted from those complaints). But there’s no objective standard of how much housework is “enough” or how quickly it has to be done. It comes down to subjective personal preferences. It is indeed deeply unfair for obsessively neat women to shame men who are simply different in their approach to housework and have other r…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 05:53 PM
42

Tell management clearly and in writing that you object to this pattern of harassment and expect it to stop immediately. Describe the incidents in detail. Document everything. When they try to steer you to verbal or phone conversations, write up recaps that you send back to them. Document, document, document. This will be extremely important if you need to take legal action. They will be afraid of negative press if this escalates. Don’t listen to any cowardly defeatists who tell you to suck it up…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:16 PM
45

More evidence of what we already know: “Feminism consistently overcomes the others in terms of hate… misandric communities express more negative sentiments than misogynistic ones.“ And the misandrist pattern is clear beyond the handful of subs the study looked at (and why didn’t they look at the 2 chromosomes one?) It’s all over social media and mainstream media. The fact that there are far fewer studies that look at misandry than misogyny is itself even more proof of how entrenched misandry is,…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 12:48 PM
37

Giving a man some say over his reproductive future is only controversial to those who believe in female supremacy and want to deny equal rights to men. When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality looks like oppression. Contracts actually do exist to protect men and women from unwanted parental responsibilities. Both sign it and agree not to force the other to take on those responsibilities if they don’t want to. Some men’s rights organizations have pushed these. More of us need to speak up wit…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 11:04 AM
38

Misandry is a lot more common than misogyny, and Facebook is a cesspool of misandry.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 12:25 AM
14

Exactly. They oppose paternity tests because they themselves have cheated on their men and/or they’re covering for female friends who have done the same thing. And women under the age of 30 are even more likely to cheat than men under the age of 30, with far greater negative consequences for the men who are cheated on, because they often get unwittingly forced into paying for kids that aren’t biologically theirs.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 12:23 AM
10

Welcome! National Coalition for Men and National Center for Men are a couple of other good men’s rights organizations too.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 07:50 PM
32

Thanks for flagging this. It’s also good to see another organization pushing for equal rights for men. I hadn’t heard of ICMB before.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 12:23 PM
13

Both she and Barack have made lots of anti-male comments. Examples below. Anyone who doubts that can look them up. “Time is short. Change is needed. And women are smarter than men. And the men can’t complain because they are outnumbered today.” - Michelle Obama “Women, I just want you to know, you are not perfect, but what I can say pretty indisputably is that you are better than us [men]." - Barack Obama
/r/MensRights22/06/25 01:41 AM
2

She’s been making misandrist comments for years. Another example: “Time is short. Change is needed. And women are smarter than men. And the men can’t complain because they are outnumbered today.”
/r/MensRights22/06/25 01:38 AM
2

I’m not an expert on Maryland law, but there are resources like divorceformen.com and Maryland-based attorneys who specialize in helping divorced fathers. Reddit also has a subreddit specifically dedicated to divorced men that you might want to post this on (I can’t link it here because of the rules, but it’s not hard to find with a search). Hope things work out for you, good luck.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:59 PM
7

Unfortunately, child support laws tend to be extremely unfair to fathers and extremely generous to mothers, who aren’t legally obligated to spend all that tax-free money they get (for up to 21 years) on the child. Many do spend a lot of the money they get on frivolous purchases and vacations, as she admitted. Men often get hit with heavier child support payments over time, and can be imprisoned for failing to cough up that money. I’d encourage everyone reading this to contact their elected offic…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:45 PM
1

Yep. And as history has shown over and over, collaborating with oppressors just means the oppressive system can be turned against the collaborators too later on. That’s something these white knight simps should be reminded of often.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 01:28 PM
5

The National Coalition for Men and National Center for Men do some really good work advocating for men’s rights. TheTinMen is another really good one.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 03:25 PM
9

Same. Thanks OP for raising awareness and advocating for the equal treatment of men and boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/25 11:43 AM
5

If people assume nothing will change, and do nothing, nothing will change. OP did some great work putting this together. As many of as possible need to be as vocal as possible in confronting anti-male discrimination and prejudice whenever and wherever we find it. That’s how things get better. Be a squeaky wheel.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 10:51 AM
100

Whatever state you live in, contact your elected officials and tell them you want equal rights for men when it comes to legal issues like these. Support men’s rights organizations. And keep speaking out against the unfair treatment of men and boys whenever and wherever you encounter it.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 11:50 PM
6

Thanks very much for this excellent and comprehensive post with sources. It’s a useful reference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/25 10:28 AM
29

Yes, misandry is indeed much more pervasive and insidious than misogyny. Besides the social media examples you’ve cited, there are numerous studies going back years that back this up. Some of them are cited in an excellent article called The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny, which I often recommend to others to dispel the nonsensical belief in patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/25 10:18 AM
20

Tom Swiss had the best response I’ve seen to the anti-male bigots choosing the bear: “To quickly and vividly illustrate the problem: if we asked racists if they’d rather encounter a bear or a black person in the woods, their answers would say more about racists than about the threats either meeting poses… Just as the idea that black men should be treated as predators until proven otherwise is a form of bigotry called “racism”, the idea that all men should be treated as predators — or are somehow…
/r/MensRights19/06/25 12:38 AM
50

Hate movements gonna hate. Call them out directly for promoting harmful gynocentrism, double standards, and misandry. Their anti-male bigotry is likely to create even more problems for everyone. Like the African proverb says, “The child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth.”
/r/MensRights19/06/25 12:25 AM
2

Basically looking up and down. Which is ridiculous, and one of many blatant examples of misandrists trying to weaponize rules and laws against men over minor issues.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 11:40 PM
24

Yep, lots of liberal media outlets and Democratic Party officials love to scapegoat men, while taking zero responsibility for the years they’ve spent actively driving men away from the left. Plus, the majority of white women in America voted for Trump—another inconvenient truth. Ordinarily, I don’t endorse Fox News, but some of the points in this piece are spot on: “Gen Z guys aren’t confused about why we’re walking away — we’re walking away because the modern Democratic Party has spent years de…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 08:34 PM
2

Wow, sorry to hear about that first attorney flaking out. Maybe he got swamped with other cases for a while and had to scale back. If that avenue doesn’t work, I hope you find another lawyer who will take your case for a reasonable cost. Legal action against the ones who wronged you is probably the only way you can get justice and make them accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 06:03 PM
1

Employment attorneys who find out about a strong case are sometimes willing to represent clients for free and then take a percentage of any winnings. At the very least, filing pro se might pressure Aldi to offer you a settlement, especially since you’ve got a paper trail. You and everybody else know that she and management engaged in wrongdoing. Edit: If I were in your shoes, I’d fight it—not just for yourself, but for others who may face the same situation in the future. Just walking away would…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:31 PM
6

“It's not the patriarchy, but the oligarchy.” Exactly. Patriarchy—a system where men have all the power and women are excluded from power—doesn’t exist in the West. I’m not sure it exists anywhere. Thanks also for the link to The Myth of Patriarchy, which looks good and which I plan to read later. Any plans to publish it more widely?
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:24 PM
1

This comprehensive article, The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny, thoroughly debunks a lot of the female supremacist propaganda out there:
/r/MensRights18/06/25 04:09 PM
1

Sounds like you might have a good case against Aldi. I hope you documented everything, which is critical for anyone who experiences unfair treatment. Those involved in the internal ethics system you mentioned almost certainly rig things in favor of the company that employs them. Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 01:27 PM
22

A fitting analogy, and great points, especially this one: “A woman expressing her sexuality through fashion or art is celebrated as empowerment. But when a man notices, reacts or shows appreciation, his response is labeled as "objectification" or even harassment if it's unsolicited.” Back when DEI was more of a thing than it is today, I was aghast when they brought in a speaker at my workplace who told us that it was sexual harassment for a man to even look at a woman the “wrong” way. Absolute g…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 12:47 PM
2

Great initiative. Kudos to you for raising awareness of an important cause and for making it easy for all of us to take action by including contact info. I reached out to almost all of them (but couldn’t find the New Jersey info either).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/25 07:19 PM
52

Progress! These are encouraging first steps, but don’t get complacent. Keep the pressure on. Email or call the DNC, lawmakers, and other decisionmakers. Tell them they must do more to help boys and men and counter misandry if they want our support and votes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 07:44 PM
48

Yep, that sub regularly gets brigaded by toxic women who want to talk over what men say, tell men they’re wrong, and dismiss any men’s problems as either trivial or caused by men.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 04:01 PM
5

Great points, thanks for sharing these. And I’ll add some supporting evidence below. Female violence is more common than most people think because the legal system is rigged in favor of women, who are more likely to avoid charges and convictions for their bad behavior entirely. https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/57/
/r/MensRights29/03/25 07:18 AM
16

Agreed. Some people are becoming much more hostile to men’s rights because we are making progress against gynocentrism and for greater equality. The push for equality is a threat to female supremacists. But we have to keep the pressure on against misandry and not ever grow complacent.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 07:04 AM
19

Anti-prostitution laws that punish buyers (all male, of course) are just thinly veiled misandry. The Nordic Model is misandry. Legalizing voluntary, consensual sex work does the greatest good for the greatest number of both men and women. This is completely separate from trafficking, and the two should not be conflated. In fact, studies have shown that decriminalizing voluntary sex work even reduces the overall rate of sexual violence. “…liberalizing prostitution decreases rape rates whereas pro…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 09:22 PM
5

Men’s health isn’t a priority in the United States either, unfortunately. Delusional feminists keep alleging that healthcare favors men, but the actual data and outcomes show the opposite is true. Speak up to promote equal treatment for men’s health! https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/08/27/men-health-crisis-gender-gaps/ “The life expectancy gap between men and women widened from less than five years in 2010 to nearly six years in 2022…Men have a higher mortality rate than women in 13 …
/r/MensRights27/03/25 08:22 PM
6

Well, I talk to people. I complain about anti-male discrimination to elected officials, the mainstream media, and other institutions. I donate to men’s rights organizations, a few of which have filed lawsuits for bias against men. The thing is, we have to be tenacious. Don’t expect immediate, major results. We are making (slow) progress. If enough of us keep doing this, we’ll see improvement. Keep at it, because the worst thing we can do is stay quiet. Silence implies consent.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 08:31 PM
82

There are way too many women who set impossibly high standards that almost no man can meet. The very few men who do check all those boxes get bombarded with interest by lots of women, so there’s no way any woman is going to get a man like that without sharing. The single moms especially need a reality check on the kind of man that’s attainable to them. They are not going to be able to pick and choose with all the baggage that comes with parenthood.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:05 PM
26

There have been many reports of unscrupulous women using those Facebook groups to smear and make false accusations against men. Some of those accusers are mentally unstable and/or vindictive. An increase in defamation lawsuits against perpetrators (I’ve heard of at least one so far) would help to reduce this kind of online harassment.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 05:53 PM
18

Yep, that’s even more evidence to corroborate lots of other findings that show how research and public perceptions are biased in favor of women and against men. Additional sourced evidence below: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ “Participants evaluated the female-favoring research more favorably than the male-favoring research. Specifically, participants found the female-favoring research more important, more plausible, and more well-conducted and found the male-f…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 08:37 PM
147

Disgusting. Just goes to show that when the UK government promotes “women’s equality”, what they actually want is “gynocentrism and misandry.”
/r/MensRights21/03/25 06:20 PM
14

It would be great to see a party like that. Some priority issues would be: ⁠More investment in men’s health. The lifespan gap is large and growing, but there are far more resources for women’s health. ⁠Reproductive rights for men. Let men opt out of financial responsibility for unwanted pregnancies. Develop male birth control pills. Implement universal paternity testing. ⁠Reduce anti-male discrimination in education. ⁠Reduce anti-male discrimination and double standards throughout the legal syst…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 09:49 PM
1

Good job flagging this. I think if we want to make a real difference in men’s rights, we need to do more activism like this. Explain the issue/problem, the message that needs to be sent to decision makers, and most importantly—provide the contact info for readers to use. Everybody’s busy, so make it easy and fast for people to take action. https://www.governor.virginia.gov/communicating-with-the-governors-office/
/r/MensRights17/03/25 04:46 PM
173

The first claim is correct—women are 51% of the population. The rest of it is make believe feminist propaganda. Look at the bottom of society and you’ll see a lot more men than women. In the United States, 68% of the homeless population is male, and more than 90% of the incarcerated population is male. Sources: Statista, Federal Bureau of Prisons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 10:13 PM
37

This is actually good news and a sign of progress, though it may not seem like it. They’re terrified that more men are waking up and are pushing back against female supremacist propaganda and gaslighting. So they’re attacking the truth telling MRAs, because they want the slaves (men) to get back to obediently working the plantation. “All truth passes through three stages: first, it is ridiculed; second, it is violently opposed; and third, it is accepted as self-evident” - Arthur Schopenhauer
/r/MensRights11/03/25 08:21 PM
13

If anything, one could argue that porn in general is the opposite of misogyny. Most men who watch it do so because they like seeing the female form. Is there gross and violent porn that demeans women out there? Yes. But it’s absurd to demonize the entire industry because of outliers, just as it’s absurd to demonize an entire race or gender because of its worst examples. It’s funny that so many of the people who say “believe all women” will also flat out deny that the women who say they do porn v…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:07 PM
37

She has the nerve to say this as countries all over the world are preserving or reinstating male-only military conscription, and as more and more men face the prospect of getting sent into the meat grinder in Eastern Europe. She is oblivious to the countless ways society has been far more violent to men than women. Your note about feminist contradictions also reminds me of another author from The Guardian who wrote an article complaining about men catcalling her. When they stopped, she wrote ano…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 03:21 PM
1

Outcomes matter a lot more than attempts. That goes for suicides and so many other things. And death is irreversible.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 03:07 PM
3

Voting with your feet is an option too, and it sends a message. Best of luck to you in your new home.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 09:19 PM
1

If you quietly go along with injustice and obey in advance, it will only get worse. You will only encourage man-hating feminists to take even more away from men so they can give even more to women. “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or …
/r/MensRights07/03/25 08:44 PM
14

OP, your assessment sums up the real issue better than anything in the article you linked to. The article says, “Like Ken in the ‘Barbie’ movie, men are struggling to figure out their own place.” No, that’s not the problem—the problem is Hollywood relentlessly vilifying men as some combination of toxic, stupid, and weak over and over for years. Anyone who’s been paying attention to movies and TV for the past 5-10 years knows this. On top of that, Hollywood’s DEI crowd has gone out of its way to …
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:54 PM
67

Making false accusations of rape and sexual assault against the opposite sex. Those may not be widely recognized as real crimes yet, but they should be, and the legal system is finally starting to move in that direction.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:25 AM
2

The accusations that I’m ok with people being fired because they’re black or women and that I’m ok with racism and sexism—those are wild distortions of what I said. As I stated and OP reiterated, it’s hard to sympathize with these biased DEI programs getting burned to the ground for the reasons I gave earlier.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 07:39 PM
1

Exactly. I wish I had a nickel for every time I’ve had to say “Don’t put words in my mouth” to someone who distorts my message to discredit it and doesn’t know what a strawman argument is. The commenter clearly didn’t read our statements, but inadvertently reinforced the problems that we mentioned. I’ve had enough of the double standards, hypocrisy, and wild accusations coming from too many DEI program defenders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 05:54 PM
14

Silence implies consent. If the public hears only the feminist perspective, that’s the point of view that will win. We have to keep speaking out against misandry and gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:07 PM
27

OP, thanks for all these detailed readouts and for doing your best to engage the DEI officials constructively. Yours was one of the best efforts to do so that I’ve seen. Unfortunately, your latest update shows that this is probably a lost cause, as the DEI folks showed their true colors here. They admitted that they see men as the enemy, single out/allege unqualified white males get positions because of their race and gender, and are oblivious to how DEI has been used to benefit the demographic …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 06:38 AM
2

“Russian disinformation is present on this subreddit.” Not all over Reddit or all over social media, but this sub in particular is being called out. When someone says something like that about a sub that’s already in the doghouse, what lots of people hear is, “The men’s rights sub is full of Russian trolls! Can’t trust those MRAs.” That’s the message that’s delivered, even if it’s not intended. And it makes things even worse for those of us fighting an uphill battle for equal rights, because it …
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:34 PM
11

There’s no good reason to single out this sub, one of the few relatively safe spaces for men’s rights online that hasn’t been shut down (and even this one is heavily policed and shadow banned). The content I’ve seen on this sub isn’t anywhere close to as offensive as what’s posted all over the rest of Reddit and other social media platforms. The subs that encourage blatant misandry—with the backing of mods who promote double standards and believe women are a protected category but men are not—ar…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 09:37 PM
10

Way to go Sean, standing up for fairness. If there’s a Commission on Women and Girls somewhere, there should be a similar Commission on Men and Boys, especially since it’s males who are getting the short end of the stick in so many ways and account for most deaths of despair. I hope the lawsuit succeeds and that we see similar results nationally to reduce anti-male discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:00 PM
2

People are going to get together long enough to have kids regardless because of their hormones. What I described above does happen. Elites stoke gender wars, race wars, and actual wars all the time, and make substantial profits off of those at the expense of everybody else. Just look at their statements and policies. For a few examples, look at who benefits in the divorce industry, the prison-industrial complex, the military-industrial complex and so on. Gender wars and race wars keep people div…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 08:39 AM
4

Yes, it’s probably Bill Burr. He also gave an SNL monologue recently in which he railed against white women for hijacking the woke movement to make it all about themselves. He also criticized them for sneaking off to cheat on their husbands with black men and then falsely claiming they were raped when they got caught.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:01 AM
6

Elites have been stoking misandry/female supremacy to keep men and women angry at and distrustful of each other. When they’re distracted and at each other’s throats, they aren’t paying as much attention to the elites who are screwing everyone else over. They did the same thing with white supremacy to keep whites and blacks angry at each other so they wouldn’t unite against elites again after Bacon’s Rebellion. It’s a very old playbook. It’s called divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 10:17 PM
16

Not bad. Whitmer might be one of the few Dem leaders who has the intelligence and courage to recognize and address the party’s alienation of men. Also, I remember watching her grimace years ago during a debate when Andrew Yang made disparaging comments about men. These are decent first steps in the marathon the Democratic Party has to run to win men back in large numbers. “The last thing any of us wants is a generation of young men falling behind their fathers and grandfathers,” Whitmer said.“ “…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 07:10 PM
11

It’s nice to see some good news! Thanks for flagging this, and I agree with you that false sexual assault claims are a form of harassment that should be penalized. Such false allegations have ruined the lives of many men. Hopefully even more will take legal action against those who file or enable false sexual assault claims to deter this reprehensible behavior.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 09:14 PM
56

They’re blatantly encouraging the financial exploitation of men. A lonely man like that probably worked a long time to build up that wealth. And now he’s supposed to give it all up to a woman who will spend a little time with him now that he has a foot in the grave, but wouldn’t have given him the time of day when he was younger and wanted companionship? Disgusting, and it probably happens a lot.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:33 PM
26

Yet another example of a gynocentric society covering up the victimization of men and treating men like second-class citizens. Keep calling it out and objecting to sexism.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:11 PM
4

You did the right thing and I think it will make a difference. The person who made the misandrist remark is now on notice and will probably be more reluctant to make similar remarks in the future. If she does, report her again. She’s going to look bad if complaints about her start piling up.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:14 PM
15

A lot of people have been brainwashed to believe in a double standard—when a woman has a problem, it’s someone else’s fault. But when a man has a problem, it’s his own fault. Lots of people are indifferent to the suffering of others because they (incorrectly, in many cases) think “It can’t happen to me.” Think about all the world’s problems and how many people are indifferent to those problems. They selfishly think that the problems of others aren’t real until they themselves are affected.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:47 AM
35

Demonizing men who are involuntarily celibate is like demonizing the poor who are involuntarily hungry and homeless. It’s victim blaming, basically.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:36 AM
79

A good article that outlines the many ways that men are victimized by society. Kudos to Toni Airaksinen for speaking truths that most in the mainstream media censor.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:16 PM
2

They wouldn’t allow me to post this exact article. First, they claimed they wouldn’t because the sub isn’t American-centric. I pointed out that they’ve released many posts about America and other individual countries. Then they claimed they wouldn’t because it was about politics. I explained that men’s rights is inseparable from politics, and pointed out that they’ve released many other posts about politics. Then they claimed it wasn’t directly connected to men’s rights. I pointed out many posts…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 12:41 AM
18

Facebook is disgusting and openly encourages misandrist comments like the ones you’ve mentioned and the men v bears crap. The misandrists are just blaming the victims of our gynocentric society, which treats men like second-class citizens. They blame “toxic masculinity”—itself a sexist term—without acknowledging the ways that men are persecuted by both men and women when they show vulnerability, and the relative dearth of support services for men who are struggling. The misandrists blame men for…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/25 11:43 AM
1

I’ve already stated my position on this matter. Your assurance that this vaguely worded proposal would meet my ideal is insufficient. Why are you so insistent on winning support for this DNA registry?
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:39 PM
1

I’d want to review any such proposal carefully before deciding whether to endorse or oppose it.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:29 PM
2

I’d want legal protections for both men and women in place first. As far as a DNA registry is concerned, any such proposal would have to come with appropriate safeguards in place before implementation to prevent abuse of it.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:22 PM
3

Paternity matters. I’m sure many women would get upset about being forced to care for babies that aren’t biologically theirs if hospitals mix them up. Likewise, it’s understandable that many men are upset about having to pay for kids produced by cheating wives—nobody wants to be victimized multiple times, and for many years. A bigger reproductive freedom issue for me is this: no one—man or woman—should be forced to assume unwanted parental responsibilities and pay for those. Both should be able …
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:14 PM
3

Excellent! Let us all know when the update’s ready. Yeah, it’s the luck of the draw—a lot depends on which mod reviews a given post. Some mods believe in advocating for men, and some mods are strongly opposed to it. The latter don’t always admit it though, so they come up with a pretext to justify their censorship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/25 05:25 PM
13

Yes, you have. You wrote a fine book about this, and I’ll buy it again if/when you update it. I liked your letter to the DNC too. Try not to get discouraged, because we are making progress, even if it doesn’t always seem that way. We need to keep the pressure on so that more of these media outlets and decision makers recognize how problematic anti-male discrimination is for everybody. You’re an influential voice, and we’re glad to have you with us. PS: I tried posting this article on the MensRig…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/25 05:09 PM
68

It’s not just that the Democratic Party has largely ignored men—its leadership has often been openly hostile toward men. Other Democrats are mostly silent in the face of that hostility, which implies consent. The party is so blinded by gynocentrism and an anti-male mentality that it cannot even recognize its problem with men is self-inflicted, which makes solving that problem so much harder.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/25 10:14 AM
4

Welcome! Thanks for your interest. Here are two men’s rights groups for your consideration. The National Coalition for Men The National Center for Men
/r/MensRights18/02/25 01:21 AM
183

Because bringing up men’s issues decenters women’s issues and moves us closer to equality. Equality is a threat to the gynocentric society that female supremacists want to preserve and build upon. When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 12:41 PM
1

Misandry ends up harming everyone, including the misandrists themselves. It degrades the trust and mutual support necessary for a society to thrive. Those who are unfairly maligned get less help, so they give less help too. All end up worse off. Like the African proverb says, “The child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth.”
/r/MensRights16/02/25 11:31 AM
17

Absolutely, and good on ya for reminding us how important it is to do this. I’ve recently sent several similar letters to elected officials objecting to misandrist policies and those that exclude men from getting help. All of us need to keep it up and be squeaky wheels.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 08:27 PM
2

L’s take is disgusting and thoughtless. He fails to consider the fact that a boy who is raped by an adult female teacher can also be forced to pay child support if the teacher gets pregnant and has the baby. That is a life-ruining situation that penalizes the raped boy doubly, and for much of his life.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 08:10 PM
17

Yup, I’m glad to see that NCFM is so active in fighting for equal rights.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 12:26 AM
1

An erroneous take that robs women of agency and accountability and pins undue blame on men. There are many drivers behind conflict, and women most certainly initiated some of these conflicts—for example, it’s easy to see this during the reign of Catherine the Great. Don’t underestimate the influence that some women have had behind the scenes in driving policy either, and watch out for the “women are wonderful” bias.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 12:37 PM
23

Write to and call your elected officials. Tell them you want to see more assistance programs for men and boys, and want to see less anti-male bias and discrimination in our legal, educational, and healthcare systems. It’s pretty clear that men have fallen behind women in important ways because of neglect and discrimination.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 07:44 PM
2

Makes sense. I’ve always been suspicious of the usual mainstream media narrative claiming that men should get married because they will be better off than they would be avoiding marriage. Not necessarily, especially in the 2020s, and with a legal system that incentivizes women to divorce men. The majority of marriages either end in divorce or turn into unhappy marriages. A happy marriage that lasts a lifetime is probably the best outcome of all, but that’s a minority of outcomes. People change. …
/r/MensRights10/02/25 10:35 PM
66

Women are just as likely to go to war as men (perhaps more so) when given power. A ton of data back this up, and here’s a good example: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4454964/amp/Female-rulers-27-likely-wage-WAR-males.html In addition, look at the Western female leaders of the 21st century (Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, etc) who support/are bringing back male-only conscription.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 08:18 PM
69

They could win back white men by treating men as actual human beings instead of second-class citizens at best and toxic predators at worst. They could promote equal rights for men instead of gynocentrism. They could stop trying to build up women by tearing men down. That’s not what they do. They target most of their assistance programs at women and deny similar assistance to men. To top it all off, they can’t stop reminding everyone of how much they value women and don’t value men. So I am going…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 11:13 AM
18

It’s not just biological; there’s a strong cultural component as well. The media these days often focuses on reinforcing harmful stereotypes about villainous (usually white) men, who must be stopped by women. You’ll see the same pattern in most everything that Hollywood has produced from the past 10 years or so. This contrasts sharply with more favorable coverage of men in the 20th century, when heroes were often men. The hostility in the mainstream media and social media against men has grown e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/25 11:38 PM
55

They want to empower their own kind (women) at the expense of others (men). Female supremacists aren’t that different from white supremacists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/25 10:48 PM
0

Aqua Tofana MATGA looks very dangerous and may be linked to 4B. Both should probably be on the radar of law enforcement. MATGA has advocated for the mass poisoning and murder of men, and I would not be surprised if there are many 4B supporters of their agenda. https://www.newsweek.com/what-matga-anti-trump-women-deadly-new-trend-giulia-tofana-1983610 https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/your-body-our-choice-matga-movement-emerges-in-us-what-is-anti-trump-womens-deadly-new…
/r/MensRights08/02/25 10:12 PM
1

There are many ways to fight back constructively, and many oppressive movements have been defeated through the right mix of organization, grit, and collaboration. We need to speak out against misandry wherever we see it and enlist allies whenever we can.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 09:06 PM
1

I know it’s frustrating, but we have to fight back. Silence implies consent. “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them…” - Frederick Douglass
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:22 PM
5

Heck, it’s not just there, but all over. The mods of the GuysCrying space (not the actual name of it) flat out denied the existence of misandry and even banned the use of that word for a while. They posted about how misogyny is not allowed, but refused to do an equivalent post condemning misandry, even though it’s a lot more common. Just sticking their heads in the sand, it’s ridiculous.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 06:37 PM
44

Great job. I’m impressed by how well you handled this—it’s an exemplar in how to get the DEI crowd to acknowledge men’s issues. Thanks for sharing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 02:42 PM
8

Gosh, I’m sorry you were treated like that, bro. Sounds rough. They were way out of line. I hear you about those women who say that only women get judged by their looks. Those women don’t see beyond themselves—they probably wouldn’t even make eye contact with you or me if we passed them on the street.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 02:04 PM
22

The professor is mistaken if she assumes that there’s pressure only on women to have a pleasing appearance. Age discrimination in the workplace is very real, and applies to both men and women. Furthermore, height and wealth matter a lot more in how men are judged than in how women are judged. Being short and poor isn’t a disadvantage for women when it comes to dating, but a short and poor man is going to be at a huge disadvantage trying to find a woman.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 12:34 PM
40

Yet another example of entrenched misandry. You don’t get people to do what you want by shaming and blaming them. The Democrats lose elections in much the same way by either ignoring or trashing men who would otherwise vote for Democrats.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 06:55 PM
6

Yeah, I was browsing through a government-drafted list of charities last year and saw the same pattern—tons of charitable organizations for women, next to none for men.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:53 AM
24

It’s the best major media outlet I’ve seen so far from the UK when it comes to gender issues. Other British publications can’t seem to get enough of pushing the “woman good, man bad” narrative.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:04 AM
43

Write to the originator of the newsletter and ask that question. Ask them why female lives matter more to them than male lives. I do this from time to time in feedback forms when I notice big disparities in resources for women’s health vs men’s health. They might not do anything if we speak up, but they definitely won’t do anything if we stay silent.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 10:22 PM
94

Yet another example of grotesque misandry and gynocentrism from the “justice” system. It’s no wonder there’s so little trust in it.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 07:29 PM
61

Anti-male and pro-female biases in education have been demonstrated over and over, from female-only scholarships to entrenched discrimination against boys in grading. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09645292.2023.2252620 “Contrary to the general belief that teachers may be biased against female students (Ceci et al. Citation2014; Tiedemann Citation2000), most of the studies have found that the gender gap is against male students. Teachers’ pro-female bias has been documented in seve…
/r/MensRights03/02/25 04:23 PM
174

Like the African proverb says, the child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth. The left has gone out of its way to disparage men and boys for years. Self-respecting men don’t stick around with movements that actively hate them. Even the liberal Guardian figured this out. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/08/young-men-donald-trump-kamala-harris “What men heard from the right was: you’ve got problems, we don’t have solutions. What they heard from the l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 07:05 AM
19

Not saying I endorse it per se, but crowdfunding really won’t be necessary. Just like internet porn, this industry is going to take off and become explosively popular and profitable in a matter of years without needing any extra help. Think about where robotics and AI will be 10 years from now. Demand for it will be off the charts, so there will be lots of companies that invest in it. I suppose there may be positive implications for men’s rights if fewer men feel compelled to enter into and stay…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 11:00 PM
25

I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again. Patriarchy—a system in which men hold the power and women are mostly excluded from power—doesn’t exist in the West. It just doesn’t. The majority of people at the top of society may be men, but that doesn’t mean men are in power, because most of the people at the bottom of society (prisoners, homeless, etc) are also men. The people at the top got there with the support of men AND women. Many people have a really hard time processing this. They don’t u…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 07:04 PM
10

Great job doing the research and putting this together. The findings track with what I suspected about Reddit, and it’s obviously consistent with most of the recent movies and TV shows in our heavily misandrist media. Always good to have more proof like yours, though. Thanks for sharing. I’m going to save it to cite the next time someone makes a BS argument about how much worse misogyny is than misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 02:37 PM
36

The whole men vs bears thing was contrived so that man-hating feminists could have another excuse to trash men for the millionth time. It’s pure sexism, as this guy shows. “To quickly and vividly illustrate the problem: if we asked racists if they’d rather encounter a bear or a black person in the woods, their answers would say more about racists than about the threats either meeting poses.” https://www.patheos.com/blogs/thezenpagan/2024/05/deconstructing-the-bears-vs-men-memeplex/
/r/MensRights01/02/25 02:20 PM
0

It is absolutely unfair, and more of us need to speak up for men’s reproductive rights. Consider doing so by supporting the National Center for Men, one of the leading advocates for men’s reproductive rights via a Roe v Wade for men. https://nationalcenterformen.org/our-issues/
/r/MensRights31/01/25 08:05 PM
3

And then look at all the Tik Tok videos of women ranting and railing about men who won’t approach them (Sara Eaton does a good job criticizing those videos). Man-hating female supremacists want to blame men for anything they do or don’t do. It’s damned if you, damned if you don’t.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:10 PM
2

Nice! Thanks for flagging all of this. Can you add this and the governor’s contact info (pasted below—the governor can veto a bill) to the original post? They’ll hear a lot more of our voices if you do. https://governor.mt.gov/contact/
/r/MensRights31/01/25 03:05 PM
1

Excellent. You might want to edit your post (or repost) with email addresses of the Montana House, Senate, and governor. Maybe include a few points about why this is a bad bill (how it violates men’s rights, would increase fatherlessness, adds to financial exploitation of men before paternity is even confirmed, etc) and recommend that readers say we won’t support tourism to their state if they discriminate against men. Make it easy for readers to act, and it’s much more likely that you’ll get a …
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:18 PM
4

These are good points that should be emphasized in emails and phone calls to legislators when objecting to this bill.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:07 PM
8

First, stand and fight against legislation that threatens men’s rights, raise awareness, and vote those people out.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 01:11 PM
1

OP, can you post contact numbers and email addresses of people voting on this so we can object to this bill?
/r/MensRights31/01/25 01:06 PM
13

We should ALL fight this—regardless of whether we’re fathers or Montanans. Let them know this is an outrageous abuse of men’s rights, paternity isn’t even known, and that we object to it.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:38 AM
32

Red shirting is a terrible idea. Many feminists love it because robbing boys of another year of education will leave them even further behind girls, especially when combined with all of the female-only scholarships and entrenched bias against boys in grading. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09645292.2023.2252620 “Contrary to the general belief that teachers may be biased against female students (Ceci et al. Citation2014; Tiedemann Citation2000), most of the studies have found that t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/25 08:54 PM
22

Well said, bro. I couldn’t agree more. If they want my support again, they’ll have to earn it by treating men as equal partners instead of trying to shame, blame, and trick us into supporting their gynocentric agenda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/25 05:10 PM
65

“The Democratic Party is the women’s party.” - that’s an exact quote from Democratic strategist Anna Greenberg. And this month we heard Nancy Pelosi telling the press that women are more ethical than men. The Democratic Party leadership still doesn’t get it. It is detached from reality and is seemingly incapable of recognizing its own anti-male bigotry and double standards. They just double down on the rhetoric and policies that cause them to fail. They aren’t getting another dime from me until …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/25 01:27 PM
17

I think misandry also got a big boost around the mid-2010s. Social media algorithms made men a constant target for rage bait. Misandry started showing up everywhere in Hollywood’s content—the negative depictions of white men (contrasting sharply with the much more positive depictions of women) pervade just about every movie and TV show that comes out these days, which is a big difference from 10-20 years ago. There seems to be a similar pattern in British entertainment, at least in the British s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/25 03:49 PM
33

Some good points that outline the problems of misandry on the left below. Unfortunately, it hasn’t really occurred to the Democratic Party to treat men as humans too, who deserve attention and resources for their needs and problems. Instead, the Democrats largely ignore or vilify men. Or at best they treat men as servants or walking ATMs for women. “Republicans often claim that men are demonized unfairly, while Democrats insist that as long as women are suffering, men and their problems can wait…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/25 02:16 PM
29

I agree that leftist man-haters throughout the media played a role, but the Democratic Party has also gone out of its way to build women up and tear men down for years. It’s not just that their assistance programs are overwhelmingly targeted at women while ignoring or downplaying the problems and needs of men. It’s not just that their platforms and rhetoric always focus on women and girls. The Democratic leadership usually ignores or disparages men and has consistently treated men as second-clas…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/25 02:01 PM
11

This is a great example to cite (among many others) when feminists wrongly claim “misandry doesn’t kill men.” It does kill men. Men need more calories than women to survive, but this feminist deliberately starved them to death by granting food only to women. “The executive director of the WFP was Josette Sheeran – a committed feminist. Soon after starting at WFP, she issued a new policy on Gender Equality that mandated “focusing on women”. In Haiti, she put that policy into practice, announcing …
/r/MensRights25/01/25 10:02 PM
5

Remind them that men do not have the power. The majority of the tiny subset of people in power may be men, but they are there because of other men and women. This is an important distinction. The majority of the people at the bottom, who have no power, are men. Western laws and policies disproportionately benefit women over men overall, and women typically live longer and better lives.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 06:33 PM
73

Good segment overall, and I agree that it’s a positive development to see the growing awareness of men’s issues in the mainstream media. Reeves was incorrect in absolving feminism of wrongdoing, because feminism has definitely played a big part in demonizing men and dismantling assistance programs for men. But his criticism of the progressive left for saying that “men don’t have problems because they are the problem” is spot on—it’s an example of how the American left has been relentless in its …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/25 10:40 PM
21

There’s growing recognition of this and some bills in work to make this happen. As long as it’s between consenting adults, it sounds reasonable to me. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are inalienable rights. Consensual sex work should not be erroneously conflated with trafficking in persons. Check this out: https://decriminalizesex.work EDIT: In addition, legalizing consensual sex work has been shown to reduce sexual violence, as one can see from Europe. https://www.cato.org/research-…
/r/MensRights24/01/25 06:39 PM
1

Thank you, this really opened my eyes to the scale of abuse against men. This also shows how the system incentivizes women to make false accusations against men—false accusations of SA are a huge problem in the United States. It will definitely help the next time I hear feminists try to minimize the problems men face and make erroneous claims about how “misandry doesn’t kill men.”
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:24 PM
2

Here’s a very good article about discrimination against men and in favor of women in healthcare by Richard Reeves. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/08/27/men-health-crisis-gender-gaps/
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:12 PM
23

What he truly believes is that all should be equal, but that some (women) should be more equal than others. See people like him for what they truly are.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 04:32 PM
15

You are most definitely correct that the system overall is biased in favor of women and against men. Below is a good resource that some of us have shared—and that we should keep sharing—to raise awareness of systemic anti-male discrimination. People need to be aware of problems to fix them. The Myth of Pervasive Misogyny: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/
/r/MensRights22/01/25 03:39 PM
29

Patriarchy—a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it—doesn’t exist in the Western world. It’s a bogeyman conjured up to rally women against men and acquire more exclusive privileges for women. If the majority of the top 1% happen to be men (and got there with the support of men and women), but the majority of the bottom 20% are also men, it’s not a patriarchy. If the laws, institutions, and norms are overall more favorable to women than …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 11:31 AM
7

To the NYT. I agree that the odds of publication aren’t great (for any submitted op-ed), but in my experience most mainstream newspapers will publish constructive, thoughtfully written op-eds that present a point of view different from that of the original article. Even if they don’t publish it, it may have some effect on those who receive it. The odds of making progress are always better when we speak up than when we stay silent. Totally up to you of course.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 03:24 PM
12

Good points. You might consider writing an op-ed drawing from some of these, and emphasizing the points the article should have made about the realities of anti-male bias and discrimination and the damage this does to men and society.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:36 PM
22

Yep, those feminists conveniently ignore the fact that that the majority of white female voters voted for Trump. They don’t like to acknowledge facts that are inconvenient to their “blame men for everything“ ideology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/25 09:31 PM
21

Yes. In fact, “man” comes from “mann”, the Old English word for human being. All human beings were “menn”.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 09:18 PM
10

Patriarchy—a system in which men hold the power and women are mostly excluded from power—doesn’t exist in the West. It just doesn’t. The majority of people at the top of society may be men, but that doesn’t mean men are in power, because most of the people at the bottom of society (prisoners, homeless, etc) are also men. The people at the top got there with the support of men AND women. Many people have a really hard time processing this. Blaming men for everything is just misandry and female su…
/r/MensRights20/01/25 12:43 PM
1

You could be right. It would still be a grave mistake though. Democratic Party leaders went hard against men, and it blew up in their faces. Look where they are now. If Reddit’s leadership is smart, it’ll learn from their mistakes.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 10:07 PM
1

The criticism of misandry and feminism exists, but it is not rampant. The criticism of and discrimination against men are most definitely rampant and vastly overshadow any misogyny here. Advertisers also won’t like it if some of us take our business to other social media platforms that are more tolerant of men.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 09:18 PM
1

Sorry, I just don’t buy it—I’m with Mr. Douglass on this one. Criticism of misandry and feminism do occur—in fact, it’s growing in some ways, and we are already seeing that in election results and reform of some policies related to Title IX. Capitulating like Neville Chamberlain just emboldens oppressors, and others have overcome worse oppression than this with time and grit. Also, shutting this sub down would reduce engagement (and thus profits from ad revenue) from those of us who use Reddit p…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 08:53 PM
2

It just goes to show that you and others here have legitimate grievances about pervasive misandry and double standards. It ain’t right that you got banned. Female supremacists say far worse and far more frequently on Reddit without persecution. Keep speaking out against injustice, because silence implies consent. “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and …
/r/MensRights19/01/25 06:02 PM
1

Self-censorship is NOT a solution. It’s capitulation. When the rules are wrong, object to the rules. “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” - F…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 05:03 PM
5

It would be unwise of Reddit to shut a men’s rights sub down while allowing blatant anti-male discrimination in other subs to persist, as doing so might invite legal challenges. Regardless of what the terms of service and mod guidance might say about women being worthy of protection and men not being worthy, those may not matter if they are inherently discriminatory. Many other biased rules and policies have been struck down throughout history. Reddit is a U.S.-based platform. There are indicati…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 09:35 AM
5

Reddit has imposed too many double standards that favor women and oppose men. Time after time, I have seen egregious misandry and discrimination against men being permitted or even strongly supported on this platform. But men’s rights are constantly under attack here and elsewhere if there’s even a faint whiff of misogyny. The female supremacists offer no compelling justification for their double standards—as with other supremacist movements, its ideology and about tearing down our groups. Withi…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 09:13 AM
32

The Democratic leadership clearly hasn’t figured it out yet—they just keep on going out of their way to insult men and portray them as second-class citizens. Constantly. As Nancy Pelosi said just last week: “See, for women, they always- they always- women are known to be more, shall we say, ethical, than men... But I think that women have proven that they are- are more ethical, and that they- they are, well, maybe they’re not more ethical, they’re all ethical, but that they can- then withstand t…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:52 PM
19

Unfortunately, there’s plenty of this coming from domestic actors inside the West too. Social media execs have stated openly that they design algorithms with inflammatory rage bait in mind. Hollywood’s content has been full of misandry and female supremacy for the past decade. And our own leaders regularly throw gas on the fire with anti-male comments and policies.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:11 PM
22

God, you’re right—Apple News+ is filled with man-hating filth. The editors seemingly go out of their way to feature stories that disparage men. BuzzFeed, The Guardian, and Huffington Post are egregious.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:03 PM
86

Yeah, TikTok got that vile men vs bears memeplex started too, as I recall. I don’t feel bad at all about the U.S. moving forward on banning it. Serves those misandrists right. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 08:24 PM
7

And as the article I linked to states, “The White House acknowledges the action won’t have the force of law... Biden’s assertion may amount to little more than an expression of his opinion, with the White House acknowledging that it has no immediate force of law — and the National Archives telling POLITICO it has no plans to formally add it to the Constitution.”
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:21 PM
7

It’s nowhere close to as clear as you think, which is why I asked. ERA wasn’t formally ratified. “Archivist Colleen Shogan and Deputy Archivist William J. Bosanko stated that they lack any legal power to carry out such an order, saying that the Equal Rights Amendment “cannot be certified as part of the Constitution due to established legal, judicial, and procedural decisions.” https://www.cato.org/blog/equal-rights-amendment-isnt-part-constitution
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:10 PM
14

It takes a lot of courage to do what you did. Great insights, and I think you’re right that now is a better time to be raising these issues with the DEI crowd. These kinds of efforts are absolutely essential to make progress. I salute you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 05:52 PM
18

Sad findings below, but thanks for flagging an important read. “Half said that if they became pregnant by another man but wanted to stay with their partner, they would lie about the baby’s real father.” “Forty-two per cent would lie about contraception in order to get pregnant, no matter the wishes of their partner.”
/r/MensRights16/01/25 01:18 PM
35

Yep, boys tend to do better than girls on objective tests, but teachers’ subjective biases against boys when it comes to grading have been demonstrated over and over, in study after study, in country after country. The real elephant in the (class)room is anti-male discrimination. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09645292.2023.2252620#d1e123 “Contrary to the general belief that teachers may be biased against female students (Ceci et al. Citation2014; Tiedemann Citation2000), most of t…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:11 AM
4

There are some really good findings in the links below that show how the official stats about crimes committed by women are significantly undercounted because of entrenched anti-male and pro-female bias in our legal system: https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/57/ https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ Here’s data about anti-male bias in education: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09645292.2023.2252620 Here’s an article about how the healthcare …
/r/MensRights15/01/25 05:10 PM
87

Fortunately, we’re starting to see more media coverage that recognizes the pendulum has swung too far against men. We need to keep reinforcing this and objecting to anti-male bias and discrimination wherever we find it. Feminists complain about everything, and look at how successful they’ve been. We need to complain more too instead of quietly and stoically accepting the ways society screws men over. It’s a bit more challenging for us because the media and other elites often try to disparage men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/25 11:42 AM
89

You did the right thing by turning your back on those gynocentric cultists. Sounds like they never even thought to consider that men are humans too before you asked your good question and made your good points. Don’t help misandrists and female supremacists. Do help those who support fairness and equal rights.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 11:30 AM
19

This is exactly right. Amazon Prime constantly shoves awful misandrist content in my face. Look at Rings of Power, American Horror Story, Don’t Worry Darling, Barbie, Fall of the House of Usher, etc. All of them and more consistently portray straight white men as stupid, evil, oppressive, and/or cowardly who have to be taken down by women who are intelligent, good, victimized, and/or courageous. It’s disgusting. And now Amazon is demanding that James Bond be recast as a woman (!) and/or that the…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 11:24 AM
52

The anti-male sexism in the UK is appalling. It’s another example of using bogus, cherry-picked findings to justify a female supremacist agenda. Of course they don’t bother to say anything about all the men who are punished because of false accusations, or the hypocrisy of the campaign to get judges to be more lenient on criminal women just because they’re women. This really shows how much more female lives are valued than male lives. I hope any Brits reading this will complain to their elected …
/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:21 PM
4

You’re right, the system is rigged and extremely unfair. I’m sorry you were victimized by it, but I applaud you for admitting it and speaking the truth. Good on ya, bro. These problems can’t be fixed until more people recognize them and put them on the radar screens of decisionmakers. Politicians want our votes. The more of us who speak up, the better our chances of rolling back anti-male policies and creating a more fair system.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 03:11 PM
26

And the courts are very biased in favor of women and against men, especially if children are involved. Especially unlucky men who are victims of paternity fraud have even been forced to pay for kids that aren’t theirs. If you don’t like anti-male bias in our legal system, be sure to write to or call your elected officials and let them know you want the laws changed to be more fair to men. We’re starting to see some improvement re: men’s rights, but we have a lot more work to do.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 07:14 PM
37

Related to the forced labor point—much of the prison-industrial complex is basically slavery. Obviously, men are disproportionately victims of that system. Many of them end up in prison because of false accusations, victimless crimes, and misandrist laws that target men specifically and treat men much more harshly than women. Those men get stuck for years in the system and corporations and the military benefit from their exploitation and cheap labor.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 03:06 PM
74

Several of the women’s subs are openly hateful toward men and will immediately ban anyone who identifies as male or who visits men’s rights subs. Much of feminism is a hate movement, and some feminists have worked hard to deny that men are victims of abuse and to shut down such assistance programs for men. They will also deny how much damage feminists themselves have done, and will instead project blame onto men for the actions that feminists took against men. There are many examples of what I’v…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 07:12 PM
2

Yep. These are like modern witch hunts that target men. The female supremacists want the freedom to persecute even innocent men whenever they wish without being held accountable. Fortunately, public opinion is starting to turn against the evil feminists who have overplayed their hand. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/L7SzvbNx7o
/r/MensRights10/01/25 01:21 AM
69

Looks like progress to me. There’s growing awareness of the staggering scale of life-ruining, false accusations by women against men. Due process is coming back, along with innocent until proven guilty. As it should be. “The bloodthirst and fanaticism of ideologies opposed to due process on the basis of sex—MeToo, extreme feminism, and their various offshoots—are increasingly falling out of favor, meeting harsher and more public opposition, and finding defeat (one way or another) in court. Since…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 11:07 PM
51

“Believe all women” is the silliest thing I Amber Heard. (Stole that from another platform, ha) Seriously, false accusations by women against men are a huge problem, so it’s good that more people are raising awareness of this.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 12:18 PM
19

I’m glad everyone here is pointing out this was blatant misandry, which is a growing problem that the mainstream media has encouraged even as it denies or suppresses the reality of misandry and its role in promoting it. The irony. Reminds me of how the media tried to cover up the blatant misandry of Wisconsin shooter Natalie Rupnow, even though it was obvious from her own writings. “Apparently the recent Wisconsin female school shooter, Samantha Rupnow was known to spew hatred towards men and to…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 11:57 AM
3

This could be a very worthwhile project, but potentially overwhelming. So I’d recommend thinking carefully about how to scope it. A few suggestions on areas that could be included and tracked over time: Contrast the number and funding levels of women’s health initiatives vs men’s health initiatives. The White House has announced multiple multi-billion dollar programs focused on women’s health while all but ignoring men’s health (even though men keep losing ground to women in life expectancies). …
/r/MensRights08/01/25 10:31 PM
6

Thanks for telling it like it is. You’re a good woman.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:51 PM
3

Thanks, all of these add up to an extremely strong argument against “believe all women” and accepting accusations against men at face value. Study after study shows double digit percentages of sexual violence claims are false, and nearly half of surveyed women even endorse fabricating such claims! False (and often life-ruining) accusations by women against men are MUCH more common than most people realize. There really needs to be greater awareness of this.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 06:15 PM
26

It’s amazing that the Democratic Party establishment is still seemingly oblivious to its years of misandrist and female supremacist rhetoric and policies. I posted a list of their anti-male statements a while back. I wonder if the Pelosis of the party secretly want to keep losing elections (to get tax cuts for the wealthiest?) because that’s what happens when they go out of their way to alienate half of the population.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 12:15 PM
7

Similar findings about how widespread false accusations are, courtesy of the National Coalition for Men: “In a nine-year study of 109 rapes reported to the police in a Midwestern city, Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin reported that in 41% of the cases the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred. In a follow-up study of rape claims filed over a three-year period at two large Midwestern universities, Kanin found that of 64 rape cases, 50% turned out to be false. Among the fals…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 12:08 PM
10

Do NOT “believe all women,” because there’s substantial evidence of many women weaponizjng false accusations against men. From the National Coalition for Men: “In a nine-year study of 109 rapes reported to the police in a Midwestern city, Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin reported that in 41% of the cases the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred. In a follow-up study of rape claims filed over a three-year period at two large Midwestern universities, Kanin found that of 64 …
/r/MensRights06/01/25 12:04 PM
19

Even Jon Stewart ripped into her hard on The Daily Show for her defense of insider trading in Congress on the episode “Jon Stewart Gives Sen. Robert Menendez a Corruption Lesson”. Watch starting at 10:38. https://youtu.be/5udtSQ-LtM0?si=aDHMsSJbJfbkKE91
/r/MensRights06/01/25 11:52 AM
1

Another option to consider is requesting confidential counseling and advice from the National Center for Men, which is familiar with such issues and can provide attorney referrals. Good luck to you, young man. https://nationalcenterformen.org/counseling-enrollment/
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:45 AM
7

Nice job putting this together. It’s especially exasperating to me that men’s health is so underfunded as life expectancy gaps have continued to grow between men and women. Feminists often scoff and blame men for this instead of acknowledging systemic discrimination against men (that feminists contributed to). Say what you will about him, but Richard Reeves did a pretty good job addressing gender-based healthcare disparities here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/08/27/men-health-cri…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:52 PM
2

Agreed. We have no choice but to convince people, raise awareness of men’s rights, and counter the arguments of the misandrists. Silence implies consent, and just hands the misandrists victory. There’s a long history of oppressed groups eventually prevailing against their oppressors. We can win too. It takes time, effort, and teamwork.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 12:04 PM
5

Countless men have lost fortunes and their freedom to women and rigged, anti-male court systems, especially after becoming fathers. Men can and do get sent to prison for failing to make court-ordered alimony and child support payments for kids they didn’t even want to have. Miss Perfect can turn into Miss Perfect Storm very quickly. Regardless of whether you’re a rich or poor man, the best things you can do to protect yourself are: Don’t get married If you must get married, get a carefully writt…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 04:44 PM
6

Even if you pick the “right” woman, she can turn into the “wrong” woman down the road. People change. That’s why marriage and kids just aren’t worth it—it’s too easy for a man to lose everything.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 04:29 PM
17

Sorry to hear about your situation—it’s outrageous that some men are forced into this. I agree with equal reproductive rights for all. The National Center for Men has also been advocating for the paper Roe v Wade you mentioned: https://nationalcenterformen.org
/r/MensRights04/01/25 12:11 AM
1

Sorry, I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking—but feel free to reach out to them with any questions!
/r/MensRights02/01/25 12:22 PM
3

Thanks for the suggestion!
/r/MensRights02/01/25 12:21 PM
2

I’m not a spokesman for either of them, just a supporter—please feel free to reach out to one or both and ask. Thanks for your interest!
/r/MensRights02/01/25 12:47 AM
6

Here are just a few examples of the work both of these organizations are doing: The National Coalition for Men has been challenging sexist Selective Service laws, advocating for the establishment of Commissions on the Status of Men and Boys (to match longstanding Commissions on Women and Girls), and opposing anti-male discrimination in scholarships and other educational initiatives. https://ncfm.org/2024/05/activities/national/ncfm-press-release-ncfms-lawsuit-against-the-selective-service-system…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 07:37 PM
2

Just posted! https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1hr5l65/supporting_mens_rights_organizations/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights01/01/25 06:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter