TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

___Rhand___ Archive

View 1 posts and 72 comments by ___Rhand___ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Discussion___Rhand___/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 08:08 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What I find more impressive is your blind faith in the assertions that your ideology makes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 01:22 AM
1

If I asked the Jezebel staff their opinions on virgin-shaming, no doubt they would oppose it. If I asked Trump if he was a racist demagogue, no doubt he would deny it. I don't care about empty words.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 01:13 AM
1

My point is that if Bluepill is a staunchly feminist place, can we not expect them to agree with what major feminist publications write?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 01:08 AM
1

I don't think you can separate the two. Bluepillers seem ideologically united in their support for feminism and social justice. They are, at least, much more united ideologically than Redpillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 01:04 AM
2

That's some cute rationalization you got there. Except it falls apart when you realize that Bluepillers pathologize virgins just for the lack of sexual experience: just see the last sentence of this post, which makes generalizations far beyond the "terps." It's par for the course, though. Feminism talks a big game about a sexual revolution and ending shaming based on partner count, and yet, massive feminist publications...shame people based on partner count. They can call it internalizing patria…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 01:02 AM
2

Ultimately, TBP is a pretty small place though. Its readership is a rounding error compared to the size of massive feminist publications like Jezebel, whose staff frequently attack the sexual prowess of men who have nothing to do with TRP. I've posted a link below in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 12:51 AM
27

But your analogy reveals the OP's correctness. TRP attacks the woman's chastity because TRP thinks it's important, not because the woman thinks it's important (she clearly doesn't). Similarly, TBP attacks the man's sexual prowess because TBP thinks it's important. It's not just Bluepill that attacks people based on sexual prowess, though. Other feminists do it too, and they target people who have nothing to do with TRP. That defeats any argument that states "we're just attacking Redpillers on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 11:17 PM
1

When women talk about how "big muscles are gross," they're usually thinking of Ronnie Coleman. You ask these women to give examples of what they find attractive (and I have), and that kind of body can only be achieved through years of training and dieting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 06:54 PM
1

Call it "PoCSeduction." Use an SJW buzzword and the SJW Admin team won't care. Also talk about being a "safe space" for PoC men disempowered by white supremacist currents in seduction communities.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 09:28 PM
3

Feminism has always argued for the "blank slate," and would rather mock people than have any semblance of a discussion on evolutionary psychology or innate behavior differences. There's a reason that they always mock "biotruths." I think anyone outside gender studies sees a pure blank slate argument as what it is: fringe lunacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/15 04:31 PM
1

Speaking as someone in medical school, nobody here, white/asian/indian/black/hispanic, is really out to help people. You could do that as a nurse or a case worker anyways, so I always found the "I want to help people" claim to be spurious at best. Agreed that physicians don't make a lot of money after you account for loans and the opportunity cost of 7+ postcollegiate years of education. We have it much, much better than the lawyers though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 05:41 PM
1

I don't look down on them, I'm just not interested in marrying them. Ho's gonna be ho's, and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 06:17 PM
1

"Will not listen"? I used to share your viewpoint before I listened to The Red Pill. As for Evo Psych, well, Redpill tends to go overboard with it a lot. I think it's an important discussion to have though, and not one that feminists, with their obsession with a blank-slate environment-focused view, seem interested in having.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 06:09 PM
3

Lol, where do you come up with this stuff? I'm not interested in reactionary politics, all I care about is scoring serious pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 06:04 PM
1

No, I think it is relevant. I've read the occasional feminist writing on the matter, and while I disagree with some of the points they make, I'm happy that that feminists (and even some Asian women!) at least discussing the issue. I think my main point of contention is when feminists attack Asian men for joining up with PUA (not TRP) or acting "macho." Feminists get angry at Asian men for not trying to create "a new masculinity" (they are super vague about what this actually means) and being "mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 03:21 PM
2

Agreed. Heartiste has gone full white supremacist. I don't know what's wrong with him, he used to write nice articles about PUA and scoring pussy, but then he went crazy or something. Roosh always was crazy. I'll probably stay around /r/AsianMasculinity, as they are directly focused on Asian men's issues, but aside from that, I think it's time to close the book on the manosphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 12:50 AM
1

That is a valid point. I'll grant that feminism is orders of magnitude better on the anti-racist front than the manosphere is. I think one issue I have with your argument is that black feminism is now an acknowledged part of feminism as a whole. bell hooks is one of the most prominent writers in feminist academia. Outside academia, Beyonce is a black woman who proudly promotes feminism as part of her brand. I know there are definitely feminists out there with objectionable views with regards to …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 12:32 AM
1

I think the hypocrisy irks me more than anything. It's easier to ignore Manosphere racism because it's a place full of weirdos and racists and conspiratards that don't pretend to be anything else. Furthermore, the manosphere is full of different groups of people with their own agendas, so you can separate out the racists from the rest. But on the other hand, feminism and social justice talks a big game about how anti-racist it is, which makes racism like the stuff I linked to even more shocking.…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 11:59 PM
1

https://www.np.reddit.com/r/China/comments/3h75xw/tiexue_chinese_fathers_ultimatum_backfires_ends/cu5we0m Apparently it's a sign of "thinking incorrectly" to date an Asian. Substitute any other race and watch leftists scream. https://np.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/3k8hab/i_wonder_if_your_typical_asian_women_has_enough/cuvlh7h "Most Asian men" are "racist and patriarchal." A massive generalization the likes of which, if made about any other race, would have leftists up in arms. Are you s…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 11:03 AM
1

Very well then. https://www.reddit.com/user/AznGrlThrowaway93 An open anti-Asian racist has somehow accrued over 8000 link karma while posting primarily to feminist and social justice communities. Feminism has nothing to offer me as an Asian man. It is poison from root to fruit, and we need only read its seminal work, "The Joy Luck Club," which casts Asian men as the patriarchal oppressors while absolving white men of everything, to see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 03:29 AM
6

Redpill isn't entirely predictive on everything, (and humans are so complex that nothing will be), but it's miles better than the alternative (feminism). Tbh, the moment I learned about "alpha fucks beta bucks," and realized how well it correlated with and explained my life experiences, I knew Redpill was the best and most accurate way of looking at matters of romance. Redpill explained what I had seen, feminism tried to deny it. As for your second point, I agree. I imagine this must be how the …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 07:43 PM
5

Yeah pretty much. I mean, I came to Redpill because I wanted to read about scoring serious poon, not about some weirdos making up words and phrases to rant about the supposed fall of western civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 06:16 PM
3

Gawker has already been writing about TRP for a while, people don't really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 05:49 PM
10

Haha, I see what you did there. I like Redpill because it teaches me about what women are actually attracted to, and how to achieve it. That has nothing to do with making invidious comparisons between men and women on things like IQ or whatever. I realize that the harsh truth about women may sound "misogynistic" to you, but that's just because it clashes with your preconceptions. As for me, I see nothing worse about "Alpha fucks beta bucks" than "Fat chicks are like scooters..." Both use humor t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 05:36 PM
1

Actually this is a pretty beast idea. I'll make a throwaway and write an FR of my experiences navigating the arranged marriage marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 02:37 PM
1

Agreed, but with respect to romantic success, the sub focuses mostly on how an Asian man can go beast in bars and nightclubs. There's less focus on optimizing your performance in the arranged marriage game, which disappointed me a bit (I will have an arranged marriage in a few years).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 02:14 PM
7

Ok ok, no offense meant. By "white supremacist," I mean he spends all his time ranting about stuff like "white dispossession," "cuckservatives," "ethnomasochism," and about how non-white people are ruining the country and the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 02:00 PM
1

There already is a spinoff sub in /r/AsianMasculinity
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 01:43 PM
23

I've noticed a kinda disturbing rise in white supremacist sentiment on Redpill-related places. Heartiste is a good example of this: he used to post mostly about game and occasionally an anti-immigration rant, but last I checked he seems to now write mostly for a reactionary, white supremacist crowd. As a person of color, it bugs me, so I usually stay away from the comments sections where that kinda crowd lurks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 12:30 AM
5

Telling Ramesh to go to bars and nightclubs and compete against white alphas is like telling Irelia to all-in Renekton at level 5. Either way you're playing the other side's game, and you will lose and suffer. Ramesh presumably has a decent upper middle class career, given that he is an Indian man in America. In the arranged marriage market, he can leverage that to achieve some measure of success. And then, maybe Redpill can give him some relationship advice, and then everything's fine. Every se…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 10:44 PM
12

I know a lot of Redpillers talk about how "liberal" places like San Francisco and Seattle tend to hate on men of color, but tbh, it's hard out there for everyone because the technology, aerospace, finance, etc industries turn the cities into sausagefests with a lot more single men, and women can be choosier there. And they choose whites. It has nothing to do with type of girl or political leaning. At least there's no evidence for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 10:26 PM
1

I don't care as much about "offensive" as much as "derailing" and "unproductive." I have no problem with you saying whatever you want about Redpillers on your sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 03:24 PM
0

Well, my "swipes" are just my personal story of how I came to TRP. If the mods dislike it they can remove it, that is fine with me. If you would like to discuss it, I will provide evidence and detail. I'll be the first to say TRP has a ton of crap. I tune it out and focus on the good stuff. I expect "PC," civil discussion here because the mods have made it clear they dont put up with circlejerking Redpill bottom feeders that inhabit said subreddit, or their opposite numbers on the other side. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 04:50 AM
0

If you think TRP is so terrible and irredeemable, why are you on a subreddit whose purpose is to debate it? Surely you can go to TheBluePill, which sounds more to your liking?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 04:32 AM
0

Right, that's why I put it in quotes, to indicate that I do not endorse the word.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 04:00 AM
0

To start this off on the right note, I would appreciate it if people could keep comments like "lol triggered" and "u mad bruh" to themselves. The funny thing is, though, that you can't criticize me, as a man, for being emotional without vindicating what TRP says: for if even feminists support the ideal of a stoic man, why should I trust anything you say about changing "toxic" masculinity?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 03:24 AM
1

Actually, judging by stickied posts I've read, Redpillers by and large disdain this place. They think we're cucks, morons, sellouts, etc, for talking to you guys. I care about a civil discussion, which is the stated purpose of this sub. I think that usage of terms like "twerp" and "bloop" doesn't facilitate a civil discussion. Nor do rants about women or whatever you're talking about. Thus, I am in favor of banning both from PPD. You and Redpill both have a place for name-calling and ranting, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 03:19 AM
0

That logic fails because I also don't care about what TheBluePill says about me in their subreddit, and it certainly doesn't have anything good to say. As for your post, congrats, you found an /r9k/ tier shitpost. As I've said, I would support censoring it should it be in PPD. If you would like to find feminist equivalents of it, I'm sure TumblrinAction will be happy to accommodate you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 02:35 AM
0

Well, if he did it here, then I would support censoring him. This is a space for debate and discussion. Redpill and Bluepill have their own purposes that are less about discussion and more about other things, so I don't care what terms they use. To answer your question, I challenge you to find me one group or cause that does not have people saying and doing objectionable and sometimes terrible things. You don't dismiss a group because of a few bad apples. For example, a reason I dismissed femini…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 02:14 AM
0

Why not "RPers"? "Terper" implicitly sends a message that the other person's viewpoint isn't worth discussing, mostly because for years, Bluepillers have been using it with derogatory intent to describe people who, in their subreddit's view, are only good for circlejerking about. In any case, I know it's cliche to reference Orwell, but he made a good point when he discussed how language is used for political intentions. In the example he gave, the word "Comintern" creates a very different image …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 01:04 AM
1

Zyzz WAS a roidmonster.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 12:04 AM
0

If your predictions ever come to pass, I will eat my hat.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 11:53 PM
2

At some point you have to ask why the preferences of women (and men) always lead to racially unequal outcomes and mimic societies' racial stereotypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 11:38 PM
2

No no no, Redpill is about taking advantage of the changes feminism brings, not trying to reshape the world into what we want (and Redpillers can't agree on what they want).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 11:30 PM
2

They agree that it's bad for the world. But here is where DarkEnlightenment and TRP diverge. The former says: it's bad, so let's stop it. The latter says: it's bad, and let's take advantage of it!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/15 08:35 PM
1

Not really. I would say TRP is accurate, and I'm agnostic on right or wrong or "discriminatory." Women are the way women are, no point complaining about it. Lions kill things and eat them, and yes, killing is unfortunate and bloody and messy, but lions gonna lion. Women freely jump into bed with alpha guys and file betas under "free dinner," only grudgingly doling out sex after investment has been obtained. Yes, it's a double standard and can seem unfair, but no point complaining, women gonna wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 07:40 PM
3

What is it with you social justice types and constantly pathologizing people who disagree with you? Here's a radical thought: people on TRP are not dupes and, for the most part, have no obvious psychopathology. They are everyday people like you and me whose life experiences have led them to sincerely hold divergent opinions. As far as who created the rulebook, well, if we're talking about sexuality, women did. Women are the arbiters of who is or isn't successful in dating. Women decide what is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 07:38 PM
1

I think the difference is that there are significant Indian communities in former British Empire countries, but not in the US, so people see us as some sort of alien people, and react accordingly in racist ways. I think this will slowy change as more and more Indians come here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 05:03 PM
0

TRP is about optimal sexual strategies, which are tested against high quality women. Let's put it this way. In LoL, anything works in Bronze III. I could play AP Udyr and carry Bronze Elo games. But AP Udyr won't work in high level play. I want to learn optimal strategies so I can succeed against high level opponents. TRP fulfills that role with regards to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 04:41 PM
8

Yeah, I look down on them, and I like to make fun of them. I have absolutely no respect for someone who lets another man fuck his wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 02:17 PM
1

Wait wtf. How come you're completely different from all the Tumblrinas I've met (online and IRL)?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:44 PM
3

If I had to guess, I think your indoctrination told you stuff like: "Male privilege is categorical and absolute, even in first world countries." "Pornography and prostitution are wrong because they promote violence against women." "Men are the cause of much of the world's violence and suffering." "Always listen and believe a woman who claims she was hurt by a man, disregarding things like the presumption of innocence." "A woman's sexuality, or the sexuality of a group or subset of women, cannot …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:25 PM
1

I'll raise my kids with the Red Pill. I'll teach them to be skeptical of things like 1/5 or 4 or whatever number the feminists are on now. I'll teach them to question narratives that society puts forth about women, cut through the bullshit, and to see the truth. For example: The lie: "She was just 'exploring her options' for years on end when she was younger, but that doesn't matter! She chose you now!" The truth: "U gettin played brah"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:15 PM
3

Interesting. I've not thought about how feminist-raised kids would act. I always thought that kids were pretty much apathetic to feminism until some of them came across Tumblr, but I guess it is possible that people would be raised as feminists, much as kids can be raised as religious conservatives. (I despise feminists and I see the ideology as just as dogmatic as any organized religion. Sorry, I guess we're enemies for good, haha).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:09 PM
2

I wonder why the leftists decided to throw away the presumption of innocence. The funny thing is that I remember when the Left was the side arguing for the presumption of innocence when Gitmo came to a head. Furthermore, they were arguing that the alleged terrorists should be tried in the civilian court system rather than military tribunals! And now, the Left is the side calling for similar agenda-driven tribunals and the denial of due process and presumption of innocence...to Americans, no less…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 04:33 PM
13

I'm saying that I do not factor the presence of internet extremists into my assessment of an ideology. I rejected social justice for reasons other than association with the "#KillAllMen" or "expropriate the capitalists" crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 08:16 PM
6

I watched the videos and I feel dumber for having watched them. Just another example of feminists strawmanning and pathologizing dissent rather than looking for reasonable discourse. Believe it or not, SJWs aren't the purveyors of the truth of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 01:02 AM
5

False equivalence. Democrats have nothing to do with basketball. Feminists discuss sexuality extensively.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:54 AM
1

Seems more like black people and women dominate political narratives right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 11:51 PM
5

They're not looking out for me. Nobody looks out for middle class Americans. The difference is that they aren't trying to shit up my life like the liberals are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 10:53 PM
2

Libertarianism (and Conservatism) does help me get laid though. I'm middle class. Liberals want to leech money from me to "help" lower-class people. Conservatives and Libertarians are fine with me keeping my money. Keeping my money means I'm richer, which makes my SMV relatively higher. Thus it's easier for me to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 10:49 PM
1

This statement assumes they can find the "geek pussy" hidden beneath the monstrous rolls of fat. Attractive women care nothing for "geeks" or geeky interests. They associate such things with low SMV (given that the media has been shitting on geeks for decades at this point, this is understandable), and thus they disdain them. The few reasonably attractive women interested in such things are self-promoters looking to leverage their sexuality to advance their careers (Booth Babes, Fragdolls, Felic…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 12:55 AM
1

Nah, never saw that happening in high school. College is a bit different because there are so many women in college that the grossly skewed ratio benefits men, especially the alpha males, to whom most females accrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 12:39 AM
3

I dunno, given the sheer level of cuckdom that many beta men exhibit, I found it believable. Poe's Law, I guess.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 02:42 AM
10

20 guys at 19? Damn ho, is this shit yo job?
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 11:42 PM
4

Right, I agree with what you said. Reddit is free to do what it likes, as it is a private company. Talking about how awesome acts of terror are is also protected under the first amendment (some people on the super radical left do it as polemic). But for better or worse, the Enlightenment ideal of Free Speech is one that a lot of Redditors like, so they hold Reddit to the same standards as they would hold the government. Is it justified? Well, in itself, probably not. But then you get into the fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 01:54 AM
6

Free speech doesn't protect the latter ("imminent lawlessness," as defined in Brandenburg v. Ohio). The former is suspect as well on those grounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 12:43 AM
5

I have a better chance of seducing Margot Robbie than Bernie Sanders has of winning the Democratic nomination. He's an internet superstar, much like Ron Paul was back in 2008 (I still remember the hordes of Ron Paul threads on forums I used to frequent), but he doesn't really have much mainstream appeal. On a similar note, if I could choose the President, I would pick Rand Paul.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 05:48 AM
2

Why :( . Being in a swing state is fun, because your vote actually counts. What specifically do you dislike about Republican policies that would compel you to vote for the Democrats?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 05:40 AM
4

Voting straight Republican (for President, House, Senate, and State offices). I hate SJWs and Feminists, and the Republicans seem to share my disdain for them, even if they hold batshit insane views on things like Abortion, LGBT Rights, Science, etc. Thank God I live in a swing state. EDIT: I'm partial to Rand Paul. If I could choose the President it would be him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 05:33 AM
2

2) Hair Dye of an unnatural color. No better way to signal your allegiance to radical feminism than to wear that abhorrent crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/15 08:09 PM
15

I post somewhat regularly in Fempire subreddits, but your first statement is why I have always disdained "mockery subs." Doesn't matter what side of the political spectrum they are, doesn't matter if it's SRSSucks, TiA, GamerGhazi, ShitRedditSays, Bluepill, wtev. The issue with any of these subs begins with the fact that they cherrypick the worst out of whatever they want to mock. And that's not in itself a bad thing. But over time, perhaps because of that, all these "mockery subs" tend to becom…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 08:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter