TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_pH_ Archive

View 8 posts and 301 comments by _pH_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Trump is the President who said there were fine people on both sides when literal neo-Nazis rammed a car into the people protesting them. This is aside from his failure to explicitly reject white nationalism after every white nationalist attack since the beginning of his presidency, when he took away funds for monitoring and preventing white nationalist domestic terrorism and put it all into Islamic terrorism prevention. Democrats aren't commenting on private companies banning users who violate …
/r/MensRights15/07/19 03:56 PM
1

The "great" times that conservatives want to go back to, and the times of greatest economic expansion in US history, have had a top marginal tax rate of 70-90% with strong unions. Democrats are not creating state censorship, banning conservatives from e.g. YouTube or Twitter are actions taken by companies of their own volition. Oklahoma had a complete Republican supermajority in 2008, instated all the tax cuts and deregulation Republicans advocate for nationally, and their economy disappeared co…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:06 AM
-1

I'm sorry if I was unclear; I intended that to mean that I don't believe that the candidates are truthful in the primary debates because they are pandering to the base, and I'm not going to waste time on that. It has nothing to do with their extremism or lack thereof. The original comment I was criticizing was suggesting that the democratic candidates are advocating for white replacement policies, which is a white nationalist scare tactic that I pointed out as being equivalent to treating all Re…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:47 AM
1

You say that like virtue-signalling doesn't appeal to the Republican base. Something something 2nd amendment, tough on crime, kick out the illegals, Christian family values, abortion bad, etc. are all conservative virtue-signalling.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 02:44 AM
-4

The Democratic base is hilariously centrist, you have absolutely no concept of what extremist leftism looks like if you think they're extreme about anything.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 02:19 AM
-1

I think Hillary lost because of several reasons; Russian interference, the electoral college, and most of all because she assumed she would win and called it in for most of her campaigning. As it is though, Democrats will vote Democrat, Republicans will vote Republican, and independents decide the election.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:11 AM
0

Or, I'm more interested in how politicians try to convince the moderates and actually win an election, rather than how they convince their own party that they're the Most DemocratTM but you believe what you want.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:42 PM
-3

What would you call Republican politicians promising conservatives everything and then delivering nothing then? They follow the exact same pattern in primaries, that's how you get elderly actors yelling at a chair.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 08:18 PM
-20

Intentionally. Until they get to general debates it's going to be virtue-signalling to see who can circlejerk the hardest to the base. I ignore everything they say until they get to general, when the promises actually matter and are made to appeal to the moderates.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 07:17 PM
-41

Pretty much everything you just said is a view held by extremists only, it's like saying the MAGA Bomber is representative of all Republicans.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 07:14 PM
14

I think it depends on whether this is an entry test or an exit test; if it's an entry test it's not a big deal, and changing it to an assessment tool makes sense so you can target and fix weak points during training. If it's an exit test though, that's a problem.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 09:26 PM
21

Its my small token act against them, that becoming mass murderers will not make me remember them.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 06:13 PM
244

The first modern school shooter was a girl in 1989 (I make a point of not remembering shooters names, sorry), who, when asked by reporters why she did the shooting said, "Because I hate Monday's" (approximately). She later added that she liked the way the kids squirmed when she shot them.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 12:39 PM
3

That's not a judgement of the value of victims lives in any way, it's a statement on which one is easier to fundraise for and as a result, which one gets more fundraising.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:32 PM
1

That's more of a marketing problem- research costs money, and "awareness" tends to dictate who gets funding. Especially when you consider that breast cancer effects younger women whereas prostate cancer effects older men, you can see which is easier to "sell" to the public- topless college girls vs older male ass cancer.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 08:56 PM
1

There we go, I was looking under the EEOC only
/r/MensRights29/05/17 11:11 PM
1

What's the actual specific violation here? I tried looking it up but I could only find a blatant title 7 violation, that men can't work that night based on their sex alone
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:28 PM
9

I think the female superiority/benevolent sexism depends on whether or not they're trying to say they not only recieve, but also "deserve" the benefits
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:06 PM
90

Easy, if men have an advantage it's sexism against women; if women have an advantage, it's benevolent sexism against women, which is somehow totally not just sexism against men.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 05:00 PM
4

Their "it's not because I'm gay, it's because I'm an asshole" skit seems to suggest that they support social justice (which we all do) but they aren't quite SJWs
/r/MensRights12/05/17 11:37 PM
95

Right, it's just that the upper end of healthy weight, bmi 24-24.9, historically has been called "fat" whereas now we might not even call someone fat until they're borderline obese.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:09 PM
328

Generally when people refer to other societies that liked "fat" women, you have to remember how skewed our concept of "fat" is. Easy example is by looking up the world's fattest man, 1900, who looks like a normal day at Wal-Mart. Past societies liking fat women translates into modern society liking the kardashians.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:46 PM
2

To be honest, I don't think that's the way to make change happen; ironically, I think we need to take a note from early feminists, and focus on other men, supporting men. Being abrasive with women, or acting as if we need women to give "permission", prevents men from making progress.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:54 AM
24

Don't forget, men are disposable objects and can't be compared to humans, e.g. women.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:41 AM
4

I fundamentally don't like the phrase "toxic masculinity" as a shorthand for social standards that harm men, unless it's also acceptable to say "toxic femininity" when talking about social standards that harm women. That said, the difference in funding for prostate cancer vs breast cancer is one of marketing- it is way, way easier to get a bunch of 20-something college girls to go topless to "save the ta tas and fight breast cancer" and raise a big pile of money than it is to figure out how to g…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 01:39 PM
8

There's a high chance of feminist organized protests. In the past, men's shelters have been protested into oblivion.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 01:50 PM
3

Why are psychology and sociology different disciplines if groups of people are just a group of individuals? Different effects happen at the individual and group levels, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:27 PM
4

You're having two different conversations- RavenousRabbit was talking on a social, general, "males as a population" level, but you're talking on an individual interaction level.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:09 PM
3

while women rate men worse, attractiveness is actually a much lower factor for women than it is for men. You could also conclude that women on OKCupid have low self esteem and only aim for guys they feel they're prettier than to avoid rejection, but without more data we can't make any of those conclusions with any certainty. All we know is that women rated 80% of men on OKCupid as below average attractiveness.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:07 PM
6

Right, but most people are raised being told feminist = "equal rights for women" and they don't think of it much past that, so the fact that someone calls themselves a feminist doesn't really mean they support what NOW does, or even know what NOW does.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 04:18 PM
13

It does show sarcasm, and people use sarcasm to state a view they don't personally hold in order to mock it
/r/MensRights14/08/16 01:32 AM
21

/s to show that they don't personally hold that view
/r/MensRights14/08/16 12:52 AM
3

Absolutely. Well-written with a distinct lack of hero armor.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 07:41 PM
7

Mug shots are part of arrest records which are very reasonably public record- not because you deserve to know Bob's history, but because you don't want the government being able to lock someone up without a publicly stated reason, which makes all mug shots public with good reason.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:53 AM
3

That's because everything happens in terms of race and gender to her. It isn't possible in her mind that they considers her and his housemate people, who he is balancing relationships with- no, this can only have happened in a vacuum where only their race matters, and to a lesser extent their sex.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 08:34 PM
10

Cosmo makes perfect sense. Think from a business perspective: Who is your demographic? Sexually frustrated, single women in their late teens to late 20s. What service do you provide? Advice on sex and dating for younger, possibly inexperienced women. If that advice works, doesn't it take them out of your demographic? Yes. Solution? We give advice that sounds good if you haven't been in a relationship before from a place of authority on these issues, that actually makes you terrible in a relation…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 12:38 AM
6

Silly man, everyone knows women can't be abusive or sexist, which is exactly why this poster is neither inaccurate nor sexist! /s
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:39 PM
7

Libelous but not slanderous in this case. Both libel and slander are forms of defamation, but libel is specifically written and slander is specifically spoken.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:16 AM
3

As a better example, say I have a store that bans offensive clothing or slogans. I can tell the dude wearing a neo-Nazi shirt to leave if I find it offensive, I can tell a guy wearing a meninist shirt to leave, and I can tell the chick in a feminist shirt to leave. All of these are legally equivalent.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:43 PM
-6

What she did is 100% legal and its called "enforcing a dress code", same as requiring shirt and shoes. Edit: saying it's legal isn't saying it's justified. You guys are getting way too oversensitive to anything that looks even slightly like dissent.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 12:27 PM
3

If you don't want to go into technical work, sure.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 06:58 PM
3

All of my college classes specifically banned any calculator more complex than a basic 4-function
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:47 PM
3

You can also make weird units happen
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:06 PM
3

Sure, until it's on an exam and you can't Google it.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:05 PM
3

as long as they have a hand in who wins, its all good
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:11 AM
11

Way to be a condescending prick. Now, if you actually spent time in an English class, you would know that "and are no more or less oppressed than western men" means "equally oppressed". That is what "no more or less than" means- it means "equally" or "the same". /u/specterofthepast contradicted him and said in fact, women are less oppressed than men, meaning they are "not equal", a.k.a. "contradicting what /u/Revoran said". Now, I'll introduce you to the Dunning-Kruger effect
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:07 PM
3

Actually you're looking for otherkin, people who believe they are an X trapped in a human body. This includes sincere dragonkin, fariekin, deitykin, and angelkin. There are also fictionkin, who believe they are literally a fictional character from some form of media trapped in a human body. Look at otherkin in /r/otherkin Mock them in /r/TumblrInAction
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:16 PM
45

"I never would have divorced him if I knew he'd be rich!"
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:24 AM
57

Studies have shown that the vast majority of STEM majors are male. Clearly, men are simply smarter. Oh wait, its almost like I didnt take all variables into account resulting in a sexist and incorrect conclusion!
/r/MensRights28/09/14 12:41 PM
18

Not even, they only look at history through their version of events. Historical women would be offended at how modern feminists take away their agency and treat them as victimized children.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 02:21 PM
22

Women have no agency according to feminism. They might as well be helpless children.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:36 AM
78

He recommended exactly what feminism promotes- dont even suggest sexual contact with a drunk girl, protect poor weak drunk women from all contact with males, and send them home if they're getting too drunk. But because he's suggesting women are a threat to fraternities, gotta go.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:35 AM
19

Ex. Any time politicians mention that 60% of college grads are women, its promoted as "equality" and they encourage the funding of female-restricted scholarships.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:32 PM
3

There was actually a CMV post about this. It boiled down to the argument that the censored word still conveys the meaning of the swear, albeit muted, and there for it isnt inherently different seeing as both the censored and uncensored versions carry the same meaning and intention.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:28 PM
5

I would argue that the use of "may" rather than "might" could be a regional/dialect difference more than a sign of education. I've known a lot of very uneducated people who spoke very good, grammatically correct English just because the people around them did.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 11:41 PM
1

Especially considering their boss is director fury, hardcore black guy with an eyepatch
/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:41 PM
3

As an aside, for women gym is still required to get the fit, toned look- it's that women can't pack on muscle like men do. Most supermodels are actually ridiculously strong compared to how they look.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:58 PM
3

Whats wrong is that they use "trigger warnings" at all. Triggers are related to PTSD, and generally have to be way more visceral and real than reading some words on a page. For example veterans have to actually hear something sounding like gunshots, or smell rotting meat and trash to be triggered into a PTSD attack. Only the most extreme cases can be triggered by something as minor as reading about it. If these people are genuinely this severely effected by PTSD, they need to be in therapy and f…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 08:13 PM
1

Thats dumb, but there isnt a way to block it without causing problems elsewhere that would be of equal or greater harm overall.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:59 PM
-7

Actually what they're doing is doxxing and is illegal by its on the guy to bring charges about it.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:53 PM
-6

Doxxing is just publicly posting stuff like the address, phone numbers, place of work, etc. Of a person without their permission
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:51 PM
12

Thats messed up. Are they at least liable if the guy gets injured as a direct result of them posting his address?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:09 PM
38

Im fairly certain this counts as doxxing and is illegal
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:36 PM
4

I see it the same way as I see /r/atheism virile hatred of theism- its a safe space for them to vent and complain to like-minded people. I would read the stories to see that this does in fact happen, but keep in mind theyre likely angry at the time of writing and their writing will reflect that.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:01 PM
8

Go to /r/childfree and read a few posts. Happens daily
/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:05 PM
1

States that allow ladies nights use your argument as justification. States that do not allow ladies nights say that profit margins do not justify sexual discrimination.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 08:26 PM
43

Sweet I'll start up a club with White People Night where white people get in free and have discounted drinks- same difference. Ladies nights are illegal, its discrimination based on a protected category. It doesn't matter if you want to encourage more women to come to your club or more white people, it is discrimination based on a protected category. Different states have different court rulings, the ones that allow it do so in the name of the dollar, the check, and the holy profit margin.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 09:33 AM
26

Its discrimination based on a protected category (race, sex, nationality, religion, etc.) and its just as illegal as if it were "white people get in free with half price drinks".
/r/MensRights16/12/13 09:28 AM
0

I think the government paying for birth control indirectly is something to talk about but not oppose. For example, without referencing religion (can't support the view of any particular religion) and without saying "I just don't like it" in some way, can you provide a reasonable argument as to why the government should pay $50, 000 for uninsured ER visits from pregnant women rather than $20 a month or less depending on the type of contraception?
/r/MensRights12/11/13 12:13 AM
12

Most American high schools are the pinnacle of low level bureaucracy- its slow, reacts poorly, more concerned with image than efficacy, tends to be petty, a lot of the small but important bits get overlooked, and everyone was long ago promoted to their level of incompetency.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:30 AM
20

Not even that. Say kids come on campus at 700am and bomb threat is at 11 am. You sit down and get one image of every individual who entered and exited that bathroom in that 4 hour period, and show it to all the teachers. Someone must recognize them, meaning they can limit it to just a few dozen people. At that point something effective can be done. For example, if it was handwritten, compare the writing to past writing of all the students. If it was printed, all printers leave a particular ident…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:13 AM
1

Think this way: Private business (bank) has private security. Public figure (politician) has public security (secret service or police). Public school therefore should also have public security- in this case police. It makes sense to keep at least one officer on campus because a) deterrent, b) immediate response, and c) direct contact with 911 dispatch
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:09 AM
6

What kind of fucked up place puts police in banks and around politicians but not around their children? Most schools I've been to have a school resource officer. Usually either a young cop learning the ropes or an old cop waiting to retire.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:11 AM
8

Like that time in new york a few years ago when two cops shooting at one (iirc unarmed) perpetrator managed to hit I think 11 bystanders.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:05 AM
43

If they have security footage leading up to the threat... Why cant they narrow it down a bit from "all male students"?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 12:54 AM
1

"Be honest about why you have a boyfriend- you want his money! So do the logical thing, and treat your relationship as a constant job interview!"
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:15 AM
43

Ever notice that its always "we need more female STEM majors In college" and never "we need more female miners, fishers, and loggers"?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 02:22 PM
2

In the US, contraception only became legal for single unmarried people to purchase in the 70s.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:05 PM
2

The divorce rate also spiked when religion began to have its special privileges taken away and when contraception became legal for unmarried people.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:20 AM
5

If they're anything like people at my high school, this would more likely convince girls that "You mean you would have gotten away with it if you didn't admit it??" more than it would convince people in general that false accusations are bad.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:09 AM
2

Right now. /r/wicked_edge. Buy a dual edge razor. 10 blades, 4 uses each, for $1.25 USD. If you shave every day and change razors regularly, its about $13 a year for blades. Buy a straight razor, strop, and block (~$65 USD at whippeddog.com) and you're set for decades.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 06:47 PM
20

She's a 3rd wave feminist- patriarchy if it hurts her, excuses if it benefits her. Your girlfriend is a 2nd wave feminist- equal means equal.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 06:44 PM
50

Based on OkCupid surveys, males find women attractive in a nice bell curve with the majority as average and the minorities being particulalry good or bad looking. Women however find 80% of men to be far below average looking. So thats not too far off.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 06:41 PM
8

No, men can feel depressed- they use it to oppress womyn by forcing them to take care of the lazy ass "depressed" men!
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:03 PM
20

Im fairly certain I actually saw this argument being made, but with men dying in war, a la "men go out to fight and die in war as a way to oppress women by being gloryhounds and then dying, leaving the women the financial burden of the family plus guilt".
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:01 PM
1

Seeing as encyclopedia britannica has an average of 3 errors per article and wikipedia has an average of 4, yes it is wikipedia and yes it is arguably reliable. That said, sociology is a science. It might be a soft science as opposed to hard sciences like physics, but it is a science nonetheless.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:14 AM
2

clapping with one hand Nope, clapping with one hand is from a zen koan. They'd have to be peaceful and detached for that to happen. It's more like the old chess against a pigeon saying.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:08 AM
9

Yes it is. Sociology is the scientific study of human social behavior and its origins, development, organizations, and institutions.[1] It is a social science which uses various methods of empirical investigation[2] and critical analysis[3] to develop a body of knowledge about human social actions, social structure and functions. A goal for many sociologists is to conduct research which may be applied directly to social policy and welfare, while others focus primarily on refining the theoretical…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:03 AM
1

Even then, what if "dont enroll me In any sports" ends up as "I wish I had tried sports", or for school "push me hard" ends up as "let me have more freedom"?
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:31 AM
3

Not even for a facial- its just that during a female orgasm in porn, the focus is on her face in a way that it paints a portrait of her orgasm being something you want to watch. When the male orgasms, usually only his penis and legs are in the shot- he's just a prop around the female orgasm.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:29 AM
3

That would screw a lot of things up. "When I'm 10, don't get the clown for my party." So they don't get the clown. Later, parents arrive to talk to the adult child who now didn't have a clown at their party- without that warning, they do get the clown. Leading to a warning not to get the clown. Which removes them having got the clown, preventing the warning. Etc.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:53 PM
2

The worst bit is that humans are not capable of abstract thought until the age of 12-13. So, a child is literally incapable of comprehending the concepts of male and female until they are 12-13. For that reason, I don't believe any genders, political ideas, or religious ideas are validly held by an individual until they're over the age of 13.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:49 PM
2

Oppression! Patriarchy! Reducing women to baby-making machines! Telling them to shut up and take it! Rape apologists! This is the reaction I see if we were to get that going as a campaign.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:44 PM
2

Poe's Law in action. I can't tell if you're a dedicated troll or a fundamentalist.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:41 PM
2

That's because socially, men aren't told to love or explore their bodies sexually. It sounds weird even typing it, because it is that all-pervading, and it only reinforces the idea of male sexuality being less valuable or dirty.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:40 PM
7

Look at it this way- During orgasm, what is most often being looked at? The womans face and the mans penis.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:35 PM
3

Most of the women I know have high-level martial arts training. My only bragging rights are that I did parkour for two years, got out of shape, and am currently getting back into shape. Most guys I know don't have any martial arts training. I'm pretty sure high level taekwondo beats kinda-athletic.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:05 PM
38

I can pee my name in the snow. ooooooo
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:30 PM
0

Go to /r/AskHistorians and ask them yourself. The phrase is older than that and uses "prove" to mean "test".
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:18 PM
1

Nothing at all. She said it was an accident
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:11 PM
-2

Exception that proves the rule is an old phrase that actually means tests the rule. Think "proves" as in the military proving grounds, or proving yourself. So, you being an exception tests the rule, and show the rule to be false.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:20 AM
1

That's why it's a "study".
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:18 AM
8

My sister threw tantrums. I have a 4 inch scar on the inside of my right arm because one time she got annoyed and stabbed me with a pair of scissors.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:10 AM
5

If it werent for modern medicine, 80% of pregnancies would naturally abort and the majority of babies would die in the first year. The vast, vast majority of children would not survive wkthout modern medicine. However, the important bit is bodily autonomy. The child can not survive outside the mothers womb. This is life support. Even if the child could survive, it is life support. If I can not legally require you to give up control of your body for 9 months to save my life, we can not legally re…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:33 PM
12

I would argue it doesnt matter when life begins, and ill explain why. You have to sign a waiver for us to use your organs after you die. This is because you have bodily autonomy- no one can use your body without your permission, even when you are dead. This is important because pregnancy is life support for a fetus. Since its commonly known that the parents of a child have evry right to take their child off of life support and allow them to die, It makes no sense not to extend this right to preg…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:43 PM
2

I'm guessing at the full meaning he hadn't put into words.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:56 PM
0

Anarchists are by definition radical left wing. I think you've got your politics confused here. As an aside, go on /r/anarchism and ask about ancaps. No other group of anarchists considers them legitimate anarchists. The absolute most basic idea of anarchism is an-, without, -arch, rulers. No rulers. Literally what the word means. Authoritarianism is the opposite of anarchism- dictatorships, worship of the state, all power in one or a few individuals. If anarchism is radical left, and the polar …
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:11 PM
0

Anarchists are left wing. Fascists are right wing. Democrat and Republican are not "left" and "right" in the proper sense, they're both weird center-right clusterfucks. Please dont believe that America defines political theory for the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 09:32 PM
2

What /u/ahora was getting at is that feminism not only claims to be for equal rights, they claim to be the only group for equal rights.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 09:04 PM
-1

Seeing as feminism promotes state controls to enforce unwarranted benefits for women over men, that kinda directly contradicts "left wing" which are political ideologies that want less state control of everything.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 08:57 PM
1

Apparently I just deeply offended some unattractive guy for ignoring his unwanted advances. Why would I act flattered by comments when I think you're ugly and don't want to deal with you while holding myself in high esteem and taking an opportunity to brag to my friends? Learn your place and stop believing that I could like someone for something other than their looks.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 08:54 PM
31

Equal responsibility
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:21 PM
5

Because feminist organizations have money and social capital. Senators and US Representatives care about reelection- therefore they must support anything feminist, or risk being called misogynist and losing reelection. On top of that, supporting feminist stuff can mean money from feminist groups, as well as help campaigning. Male Judges tend to give lighter sentences to women. Male police officers are less likely to be violent towards women and more likely to be violent towards men (don't hit la…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:34 PM
-2

The point I was making is that both groups face discrimination- white men due to laws, and transgender people due to assholes with power.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:02 AM
4

I'm actually not. I thought it was "de jure" = in law and "de facto" means in fact.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:52 AM
0

De jure discrimination, not de facto.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:43 AM
6

I stopped reading when I got to "the face of poverty- single mothers and children." No. 79% of the homeless are single males.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 06:34 PM
4

What the fucking fuck. They are the KKK of gender politics, sexist and proud of it.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 08:10 AM
4

Whoops, I'll remove them
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:55 AM
6

Oppressed by the fact that they are treated as sexual vending machines, insert friend token receive sex. I've heard it multiple times in different ways.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:42 AM
6

The type of feminist who cause the issue that OP is referring to don't use common sense and sound judgement. I'm specifically referring to the college-age feminists who just took a gender studies course and think they know everything about male-female interactions, and are out to find a way that they are oppressed so that they can champion the resistance. It happens a lot.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:33 AM
1

Actually you really can. NYC and San Francisco are liberal leaning cities. Houston, Dallas, Mobile, and Charleston are conservative leaning cities. They have a diverse population, but there is always a majority on one side or the other. OP's mad that feminism either says a man is demanding sex for his friendship coins when he tries to build a relationship first, or says that a man is an objectifying pig when he's open about just wanting sex. In a liberal city, this happens a lot.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:31 AM
0

Nothing. It has to do with "Why feminism isn't compatible with modern relationships and sex". Feminism tends to treat men as eternal aggressors, rapists, and sociopaths. This is a major part of it.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:28 AM
1

Feminists will tell you that if a girl is drunk and a man has sex with her, she was raped and he is a rapist. Some feminists take that so far as to include people in committed relationships. Therefore, if you go to a bar to try and meet women... they're likely to be drunk and you're a prowling potential rapist to feminists.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:16 AM
5

Have you never been to a liberal leaning city?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:14 AM
14

Right- but if a college girl gets drunk and has sex, she was raped. If a man gets drunk and has sex, he raped the girl because he was drunk. I don't support victim blaming and rape is a terrible crime, but we can't say a drunk man is responsible for who he has sex with while a drunk girl is not responsible for who she has sex with. Either both are or neither are. Of course, feminists aren't after that type of actual equality under the law.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:11 AM
4

Which feminist movement are you parodying? I mean, I knew they got extreme, but are you serious? Does this exist?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:50 AM
7

Anita Sarkeesian. She raised something like $180,000 approx. $156,000 to buy and play a bunch of video games so that she could then review them and point out all the sexism against women in video games (like most military games are all male protagonists, "female armor" is basically an iron bikini, women are all hot) while completely ignoring the sexism against men (like all men are ripped muscular beasts and die in the hundreds in games. I think we're currently on like month 8 of crickets out of…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:47 AM
32

I'm willing to bet some feminism 101 courses already use her as an example of modern feminist activism in the US.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:43 AM
1

MRAs point to prison rape to show that society doesn't take the rape of men seriously.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:46 AM
24

What they mean is "Oh you have self control and it shows by the fact that you can control your weight, I need a way to prevent this from pointing out my lack of self control around sweets. It must just be that your body is weird and you're lucky!"
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:39 AM
1

Thats what I do. Poster campaigns on my uni campus about what is and is not something MRAs believe.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 11:41 PM
1

Actual activism against radfems. Poster campaigns even. Something more than lip service.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:51 PM
1

Thats good! Step two, do they do anything past openly state that they hate radfems?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:26 PM
6

Adrea Dworkin.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:38 AM
8

Talk to feminists and ask them what they think of radical feminists, for example the feminist movement in Sweden. I remember a well-known feminist with political power in Sweden said "All men should spend at least a year in prison for sexual misconduct against women." Most mainstream feminists will make excuses for her and work to justify her rather than say its sexist bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:07 AM
10

No, thats more of a radfem thing. However, mainstream feminists tend to defend radfems.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:06 AM
2

Women should have the freedom to make any choices they want without being shamed! As long as they dont choose to wear a veil, pay attention to fashion, work to change their bodies in a safe way, get married, be submissive, or do anything else I dont approve of! /s
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:02 PM
12

Candid means blunt, open, and uninhibited speaking, not videos
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:14 PM
3

Rachel Maddow, based on her email, is from the msnbc network. Thats all I known but I recognize the name.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 07:28 PM
1

Approval from her audience yes, but that audience has the same internal justification. The fact that the writer has a way to justify it does not mean there aren't plenty of others who don't also justify and support it.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:06 PM
1

Their narratives tend to be internally consistent, but the issue is her "PhD thesis" was an undergrad thesis -- they might give a Dr. the power to throw out applications but definitely not an undergrad -- and that thesis might not even be hers (blog calls the advisor a she, the actual thesis calls the advisor a he). However, the blog has too many correct things that match up and too long of a posting history to just be fake, so more likely than not its exaggerated.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 01:43 PM
1

Other comments and digging further in this thread seems ro imply that the blog is most likely fake or exaggerated due to inconsistencies and some things not making sense.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:47 AM
77

You forget, I would bet money she doesnt believe it is possible to be sexist against men. If she's okay openly discriminating based on gender and skin color, she has a way to justify it to herself.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:11 AM
2

'Murica
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:13 AM
15

The prosecutor and defense also select the jurors and will remove anyone who is an engineer or science-based profession because they're more likely to demand actual evidence and facts. They'll also try to stack the jury by race and sex.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:05 PM
1

The hard part is that you would have to create a fake active female account. It would likely need at least a few weeks of existence as a female, a certain threshold of friends, and a history of posting and commenting and liking things. For the guys, its name and then location based. Bob might have more than one page, but only one in each area, which prevent clutter. Furthermore, its linked through the girls facebook to her friends list, so she can import info from there and link it to his facebo…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:14 PM
-1

The marxist class based world view that you're referring to only divides the burgeouise and the proletariat. The rich and the poor. It has no effect on or relevance to gender issues, unless you're trying to throw in political dogma for some reason to try and call feminists communists, which sounds like McCarthy era 1950s and achieves nothing in terms of furthering rights for anyone.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:28 PM
2

LuLu has a variety of stuff in place to prevent this. If your facebook account is new, or recently changed gender to female, or doesn't have enough friends on it, it gets rejected. Source: Throwaway facebook account experiments, none worked.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:15 PM
5

Because silly, women aren't creepy perverts and it's not sexist because you can't be sexist against men! We all know that if it's a group of women talking about guys, it's totally innocent and positive, but if men do it, clearly it's just because they're sex obsessed creepy stalkers! /s
/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:14 PM
1

A class based view of the world doesn't change anything.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:07 PM
16

Post this article on your facebook. Email it out to people you know. See what their responses are. I guarantee most will find it funny, and/or make fun of the victim.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:54 AM
3

I think its more useful to blame both. The all-pervading nature of the media makes it as unavoidable influence as your parents, but I dont think theres a way to figure out how much each one influenced you.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:39 PM
17

Natural benefit of maleness #1: I can pee my name in the snow. Seriously though, equality is about ensuring that people arent restricted or discouraged from doing things that they would enjoy and do well at on the basis of their sex, not pretending that literally the only difference between men and women is their genitalia. Ask any transexual if you don't want to believe me.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:48 PM
12

Women get unrealistic fantasy expectations of relationships from books (like twilight) and romantic comedies (80-90% of them) in the same way men get unrealistic fantasy expectations of sex from porn. A solid rule is that if she's expecting you to be a romantic comedy, but she thinks its ridiculous or sexist for you to expect her to, in returm, be a porn fantasy, then its probably not worth it. It'll end in resentment from her because you aren't a fairytale, and that'll make you feel like crap b…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:41 PM
6

Because manlovingfeminist, who I see to be a troll after noticing 13-day account at -96 karma, was upholding the notion that there are only gender-based insults for one gender.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 04:49 PM
14

Like men aren't ever labeled things for being men... ever heard of dick, prick, asshole, womanizer, rapist, creep, ...what am I missing?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:43 PM
3

The issue isn't that yes, women probably do dress to outdo other women, but rather the fact that we are offended by women outdoing women for men but not by men outdoing men for women. We're all competing with each other for each other, but for some reason it's sexist if we admit women are competing for men.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 06:51 AM
5

Because of the popularly held notion that men are staring at women's bodies constantly and objectifying them. This shows that no, actually it's women staring at women and men apparently have less of a problem with the whole "My face is up here" thing.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 06:42 AM
11

Patriarchy is male privilege! In this case, Patriarchy<sup>TM</sup> oppressed womyn by giving men the Privilege<sup>C</sup> of dying for the sole purpose of ruining these independent womyns lives!
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:11 PM
15

Totally! If you believe in equality, you're a feminist! /s
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:07 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:45 PM
2

I'm not trying to justify the threats- I'm saying those threats, and any legal threats, will do absolutely nothing productive.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:29 AM
5

If they are, I dont support it. People are convinced by talking to them and being kind, not by public shaming and hate.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 05:52 PM
2

Not a big deal in a legal sense, but it is a big deal in the sense that it's solidifying their belief that they are Eternal Victims<sup>TM</sup> and will likely lead them to do IRL activism of some kind
/r/MensRights17/03/13 05:50 PM
6

Because any man that dares to disagree with the dogma of feminism needs to be outed and broken to protect the ideology. It cant withstand criticism, so it prevents anyone from being able to criticize it. On top of that, feminism holds the power of "misogyny"- people are afraid of being labeled a "misogynist" if they question what the feminists are doing, so they let the feminists go unchecked, technically doxxing people; I believe thats a federal crime, not to mention how easy it would be to sue…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:45 PM
0

Ha! Look at all of his privilege!
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:42 AM
4

The result of poor welfare systems, wages that are flatlining while there is inflation, and heavy marketing that makes fast food and unhealthy processed shit the "best" option for a huge number of americans. Poor personal choices are a major factor, but there are just as many who are screwed by the system, working 60-80 hours a week for pittance.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:38 AM
2

Actions speak louder than words. You can tell me whatever you want about feminism. What feminism actually does is enact laws and policies to give benefits to women and women only, while pretending they care about men as anything more that cash cows to be used and then disposed of.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:38 PM
2

Heres the issue with patriarchy Patriarchy is created, supported and perpetuated by men according to feminists Yet patriarchy is inherently harmful to both men and women accoeding to feminists But patriarchy is also giving men priviledge according to feminists So feminists dont even know what patriarchy is, its just something to shout when they run out of excuses.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:32 PM
1

I kept waiting for the bragging and the flimsy story. I didn't see it.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:27 AM
5

It's like being a hipster but with how you identify yourself. Anything that gets too common is actually "privilege" and therefore uncool/bad.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:01 PM
28

Along the lines that if a lesbian enjoys any form of penetrative sex then she's not a real lesbian and she's actually straight but pretending to be a lesbian.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:58 PM
8

Because, if you don't fit neatly into my system of categories and labels -- and even worse, if you do fit in but in the wrong spot -- then there's something wrong with you! /s
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:57 PM
2

Of course, but atheists usually wave the flag of "rational, logical, and evidence-based" which is what bothers me about specifically leftist atheists
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:04 PM
4

She would label you a misogynist, slander you publicly, and you'd lose all credibility to question her, because you actually just hate women. I may be a leftist atheist, but damn sometimes I don't want to be associated with secular zealots.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:15 AM
4

My expectation: "You see here in call of duty, there are no female soldiers! All it says is men hold all the power in society, and that they are the only ones capable of combat- this leads to a feeling of male dominance that promotes the harassment of women in game chat and normalizes it! In fact, I was harassed..." and so on.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:01 AM
3

That's a tricky one. I would say you didn't consent to the sex- technically that would make it rape. However you were also in a committed relationship and had had sex before- it could also be argued that it was sex that, while you weren't "into it", was for the good of the relationship. Lastly, I think the most important part is you had a fight and then you gave up and let her have her way. This would be the part that I would say pushes it into rape/assault territory. You were intoxicated, you a…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:02 AM
45

This is just fucked up. "Women can't rape you dipshit attention whore! We all know you really wanted it!" Damn.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:54 PM
2

Has... has he never been through puberty? Has he never experienced the random hard-on out of nowhere for no reason? That's the only way I can think of a male believing you only get hard when you feel like having sex.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:45 PM
2

Based on my experience, the experience of those in this subreddit, and the evidemce in the sidebar, I would argue yes, they definitely do. A simple example is the fact that most people unfamiliar with gender issues scoff at the very concept of mens rights- the very idea that men could be disadvantaged has never occurred to them, or is balanced by all the "benefits" of being male, (which are usually grass-is-greener benefits) in such a way that theyll find it laughable or offensive to suggest it.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:45 AM
1

They want to be empowered to the percieved level of men. Do they want equality? If you ask them, yes. However, their definition of equality is distorted, by accident or on purpose I don't know. I like to believe that at its core, feminism is about equality, but it gets distorted by the fact that they accept patriarchy and act as if it is an indisputable fact of life that men are better off in every situation by virtue of being male. So, to specifically answer your questions: Their core values do…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:24 AM
2

Work on convincing him to tell the truth. Get him to tell CPS "mommy told me to say that daddy hit me but he didn't". Focus on truth and honesty and always be honest with him; he'll grow up trusting you and not his mother.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:40 PM
7

I cant remember the word for it, but you can sue her for abusing the legal process by accusing you of piles of false stuff for years, which basically bans her from trying to accuse you of anything anymore
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:38 PM
1

I didn't say it made sense; just that that's how it works.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 04:15 AM
2

They have those Edit: found it, blatantly nsfw
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:38 PM
7

That's because the insurance company is not there to help you, they are there to make a profit off of you and avoid paying out by any means necessary.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:40 PM
10

"People didn't do exactly what I wanted without complaint? Those damn men sabotage everything! I'm such a victim of men! "
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:22 PM
1

Mexico doesn't, that's the main one I know
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:02 PM
4

The goal of the article is to list everything they possibly can so that a woman can accuse you of being abusive when you dont give her money and the she can accuse you of stalking her when you buy her flowers to make her feel better- so now you're an abusive asshole stalker that she can sue, so she can get her money!
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:27 PM
38

Do the Netherlands extradite to the US though?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:13 PM
2

I should start doing this, my family can trace us back to Germany before the American Revolution.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:49 PM
10

It was assumed to be the same person
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:50 PM
136

The man is described as being white, aged early to mid 20s, 5ft 10ins tall with a slim build and had short dark hair. He wore a navy hoody/jumper and dark trousers. Nope. Average white guy in a hoodie.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:01 PM
0

I love you. I've been looking for this stuff forever, and you put it all in one place.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 05:32 PM
3

You're in Dresden?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:43 PM
3

Elsewhere in this thread, someone posted the actual stats for Canada: 0.8% of women experience sexual abuse/assault. 50% is blatantly lying. Furthermore, why only do a campaign against physical and sexual abuse of women when all reliable states from accredited organization show the rates to be about the same for men and women?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:18 AM
3

It's widely believed that men and boys suffer no sexual abuse "because men are always horny", and physical abuse against men is considered funny- watch TV or movies, Bob gets kicked in the balls? Hilarious! I would be happier if it was gender-neutral and included correct and clear statistics.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:01 AM
6

This is what's bad: Go out and find an equivalent ad talking about the risks males face- one that gets put on buses, TV, billboards, something on that scale. Go ahead, I'll wait right here. Thing is, you won't find one, and this ad is a perpetuation of women being eternal victims, plus ridiculous and false/misleading statistics.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:57 AM
3

Look at it like this: If a woman does something that men are expected to do, it's a big achievement. This is setting the bar lower for women because they are treated as victims. By perpetuating "woman = victim", they keep the bar low for women.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:55 AM
3

Actually, by specifying one they necessarily exclude the other. aka, by specifying girls are at risk of sexual abuse, they necessarily are saying that boys are not at risk.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:53 AM
6

Hell, if you can afford date rape drugs, you can afford to hire a prostitute for rape role-play, and you're far less likely to get arrested for that.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:39 AM
101

This is a wonderful example of how feminism supports itself: Terrify women from a young age, and convince them that all men are just waiting to rape them Tell men nothing about their risks Point out that women are terrified of rape and men aren't, act as if it's proof that men are evil rapists and women are eternal victims
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:16 PM
0

Here's proving them wrong: I'm attending UCF. 60k students, approx. 60% female = 36,000 females. Assuming 25% get raped, that's 9,000 rape victims. Assuming 90% go unreported, that's 900 reports of rape. The actual reported numbers: 17 Working backwards from 17, there would have been 153 unreported rapes Lastly, that would come out to 0.4% of college women being raped, or 1 out of every 500 women- a far cry from 1 in 4.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:59 PM
1

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3204506.html http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Students/elb9501.html http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/03/gender-and-biology/ Please stop confusing "abused by feminists" and "made up by feminists", it's not like I'm screaming patriarchy or something.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:03 AM
1

Let me rephrase this, because "vary across cultures" didn't make it clear: Please give me sources that show that this is nature as opposed to nurture, furthermore studies that don't refer to elevated testosterone or estrogen levels, as both of those studies did.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:44 AM
1

Sources please? I'd love to see the research that shows how two specific hormones cause a wide range of specific behaviors... that vary across cultures.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:32 AM
1

Traditional feminine traits- submissive, emotional, subversive/passive aggressive (as opposed to openly aggressive), better at understanding and relating emotion, etc. whereas traditional masculine traits are dominance, logical, open aggression, better at understanding and relating social status, etc. The "prisses" you're referring to are a product of the feminist training that men are to be servile cash cows, giving girls no reason to mature and learn to be useful- after all, you can make your …
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:16 AM
1

Is the goal equality or specific gender identities then? The idea of masculine isn't one that should only be allowed to men, just like the idea of feminine isn't one that should only be allowed to women. The goal of separating "masculine" and "feminine" from male and female is to remove this discomfort, feeling like a "feminine male" means a girly man rather than an intuitive, submissive male as opposed to the traditional masculine male, e.g. logical, dominant male, which is what I mean.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:10 AM
1

That's the whole "separating feminine from female" idea. "Feminine male" =/= "Male who acts like a woman", it would mean "Male who is more submissive than dominant and more intuitive than logical", just like "Masculine woman" would mean "Female who is more dominant than submissive and more logical than intuitive". If you've ever watched the show Warehouse 13, Pete and Myka would be respectively a feminine male and masculine female.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:08 AM
1

I'm not arguing in favor of developing males along feminine lines, but rather that we recognize masculine and feminine personalities- e.g. women who are strong, leader individuals, or men who are more emotional and submissive.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:39 AM
3

Okay, lets look at risks here: Youre saying women are underprivileged because they aren't allowed to do incredibly dangerous risky things, and that its bad because they feel bad about themselves because they're seen as inadequate. On the other hand, men aren't underprivileged because they're expected to do incredibly risky, dangerous things, and are ridiculed as less than men if they don't willingly do it What was your point again? That women are disadvantaged because they feel undervalued while…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:34 AM
9

Statistically, violent crime is more likely to happen in predominantly black neighborhoods- that means blacks are statistically more likely to be involved in violent crime! Lets see how many feminists are willing to say "Blacks can stop violent crime!" though.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:27 PM
1

Nothing stranger than a bright green penis. Unless you're in Japan, in which case you hope it's just a bright green penis.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:11 AM
2

Women can buy condoms. Men can also refuse to use them. Women can refuse to have sex without one. There are also female condoms, which the woman would be in control of, which are equally available.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:08 AM
1

I think the point being made is this: As a female, these are your current options: Female condom IUD Diaphragm Tubal ligation (tubes tied) Birth control (pill) Birth control (shot) Abortion Lastly, you can require your partner to wear a condom- something you can externally verify, so that you know it is present and being used correctly. As a male, these are my options: Condom Vasectomy The point being, while you're concerned about the hormonal regulation benefits, you do have access to birth con…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:06 AM
1

Feminism relies on the concept that women are perpetual victims. Admitting that misandry exists would be giving up their eternal victim status- and in America, you want to be the victim, because then you get all the benefits.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:53 PM
12

"Men Can Stop Rape!" is hardly different from "Blacks Can Stop Violent Crime!" One gets you $300k, the other gets you called an asshole racist and possibly accused of a hate crime of some sort though. Welcome to America...
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:27 AM
3

That doesn't really make it "better". Men, you care because women you love are effected by this! Okay, that's good. Because men are leaders coughpatriarchy!cough it is your responsibility to work to protect frail, innocent women! You men have to make sure that your specifically male friends and relatives don't beat up on us poor women! Furthermore, in our innocence, you'll never have to worry about women being violent- that's why we specified males attacking women! Now, its up to you men to figh…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 03:40 PM
1

Okay, lets make this objective: Is person A doing potentially risky behavior in a regular environment equivalent to person B doing potentially risky behavior in a more dangerous environment? No.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:41 AM
7

A non-PC, blunt version of that site: "Hey men! Did you know: You are actually uncontrollable violent animals! Similarly, you are also actually uncontrollable sex monsters! Therefore, you should be treated as violent rape-pigs who need to be controlled and civilized by us women! Now then, promise you won't give in to your sex-craving aggressive bestial nature to protect the innocent and civilized women!"
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:13 AM
64

"I brutally murdered a woman in cold blood, but I've been good otherwise, I admitted I did it, I'm really sorry and I promise I won't do it again!" "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA DEATH."
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:42 PM
10

Death by exile.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:40 PM
4

Only on reddit do cats get involved with gender politics
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:21 PM
1

So the only thing that matters is physical danger? How about being put in a situation where you did nothing wrong, but you're now in prison and labeled a sex offender because your ex got mad that you dumped her and cried rape?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:16 PM
4

Anarchosyndicalist
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:33 PM
12

Next up, using anthropocentric climate change to argue about racial tensions.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:14 PM
5

Oh I'm well aware, that shock you refer to is what made me hold transcendentalist and anarchist beliefs.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:00 PM
1

Not at all.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:01 AM
5

Oi. I'm an anarchosyndicalist, "left wing" doesn't mean "hyper-PC radfem". That said, playing loud music in a religious space is not in any way a hate crime, its no more than a misdemeanor that's getting an excessive punishment. People want them to walk free not because they don't deserve any punishment (a risk they accepted by pulling this very successful stunt) but because the punishment they were given is so disproportionate.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:17 AM
5

I have a Jew, two Mexicans, an Asian, two Canadians, and I'm a German. It sounds like I'm setting up a joke.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:24 PM
4

Yup. My 42 year old mom plays WoW because my 45 year old aunt plays WoW.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:25 PM
53

Its irritating. "Look, a community where vulgarity and non-PC insults are common! I want to play too!" 10 minutes later "Why are they so vulgar and mean to me?? Lets start a movement making them feel bad for acting that way to us women! But who gives a shit if they act that way towards each other? I'm special!"
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:40 PM
2

Anarcho-syndicalist here, definitely others in the MRM that are farther off into the wild, wild left than you. My general approach is just to start out by asking them if they feel that we should blame victims- then mention 90% of homeless people being men. It usually gets them in a situation where they can't blame the men for being homeless -- now linked in their mind as a form of victim blaming -- but they also have the startling realization that when I ask, they can't think of a single organiz…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 07:19 AM
-1

The traditional view of gender is "man is breadwinner, woman keeps house and raises kids", not "men are a disposable commodity for women to use and throw away". I point to feminism because it is the group that has systematically pushed laws -- at first genuinely to help women -- that are gradually beating men into a state of socially enforced slavery. I point to feminism because it is the group that calls for equal rights by saying women are always the victim, and therefore get benefits by law a…
/r/MensRights21/07/12 06:40 AM
0

I'm equating the lack of any response to the two female hosts on E! News to the power of feminism. It would be more like putting a misogynistic rapper on national television, have him talk about how women are useless baby-makers, and then have no outcry because a male group made it socially acceptable to treat women as non-human things. That's the power and voice of feminism this points out to me.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 06:21 AM
1

My understanding is that it isn't amazingly common, you'll have to ask for lightweights who smoked way too much.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:30 PM
3

Stuff like this should be in the sidebar for people like me.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:35 PM
9

Shockingly enough, yes, I have the same reaction when women are objectified. I'm not pretending I have a right to not be offended, I am however saying that as a male I have the right to be treated no differently than a woman would be, and the fact is that I will not be, this joke making it blatantly clear to me that I'll be treated as a disposable commodity, and overall, society just says "Okay have fun!" and if anyone complains, "Man up! You're too sensitive! Men aren't supposed to have emotion…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:28 PM
3

The difference being that Daniel Tosh was forced to publicly apologize for his joke, and women saying men should be a disposable commodity got nothing. The thing that hit me wasn't the joke itself, it was the fact that it was "okay" for women to make an insensitive joke about men when the inverse would have a massive outcry. It doesn't matter what the joke was, its the double standard and the fact that my sister is okay with it, without even thinking about it, because of the pervasive thought th…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:23 PM
10

"Them blacks should be silent, hard-working and disposable to be most beneficial to whites!" Tell me it would be overreacting for a black to be disturbed by two whites making that joke on national television with no repercussions or outcry, then I'll believe you.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 12:49 PM
6

Oh yes weed produces those effects. I had a [10] once, externally I went completely unconscious for half an hour, internally I was on a trip, part of that night totally blacked out (no memory of going inside or getting into my bed). That night was 100% weed, no alcohol at all.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:58 AM
42

I said the "Imagine if those were men talking about women" bit and my sister complained that I "ruined the joke", my girlfriend hugged me and agreed (with my sentiment, not my sisters).
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:43 AM
1

"if she wants to put it up for adoption" is the problem there. You, based on the fact that you are male, are given no rights to the child. Second, celibacy is not an option. It is completely unreasonable to say "You are not allowed to have sex with anyone unless you want to run the risk of paying ~$86,000 for it because you are male" and then turn around and say "Ladies go right ahead, you will have complete control over whether or not you're a mother."
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:27 PM
3

Sure, accept consequences. Except, in the current situation, there are heavy consequences for men (You get to pay $400-600 a month for the next 18 years!) and none for women (You get total control over whether or not you want this child, plus free money from that guy if you keep it!)
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:54 PM
1

That's why I specified in some states- in most states, that is the case. In several, for example Florida and Texas though, it is illegal to record someone with the intent to use it as evidence against them without informing them that they're being recorded and receiving implied consent.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:44 AM
5

Careful about recording, in some states it is a felony to record people with intent to use it as evidence against them without their consent, defined as telling them that you're recording them and not having them say "don't record me"
/r/MensRights15/07/12 08:11 PM
3

Legally fembot is correct. That's how the law is fucked up. If a woman is drunk, and she forces herself on you, legally you are considered a rapist because she was under the influence of a drug (which is what legally invalidates any and all consent, even a signed "fuck me now" contract) no matter what. However, if you are drunk and force yourself on her, that makes you a rapist because you were under the influence of a drug and committed a violent act (even if it wasn't violent and she consented…
/r/MensRights15/07/12 07:58 PM
12

Dodged a five-year-prison-lifetime-sex-offender bullet of regret there.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 07:53 PM
2

He has complete rights to joke about rape. Does it make rape seem any less bad? No more so than making a joke about death makes death less scary. Now, does that mean it was in good taste to joke about rape? No, but it doesn't mean anyone has the right to make it illegal for him to joke about rape. Lastly, the number one thing feminists overlook when trying to outlaw speech they don't like: enforcement. It's just not practical unless you can record every conversation you have.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 09:28 PM
4

Don't call yourself a feminist. Call yourself an egalitarian. As soon as you call yourself a gendered noun -- feminism obviously having a focus on supporting women, the same problem exists in calling yourself an MRA -- you no longer can honestly say you want equality between sexes. The fact that feminism tries to proclaim it is the route to equality and MRA has no part in that is what causes hostility- "only the female-oriented group can fix inequalities because those stupid male-oriented groups…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 09:19 PM
2

As a nice atheist, I apologize for the asshats making fun of the biblical basis.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 06:40 AM
6

I like you. (anarchosyndicalist)
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:36 PM
6

My main question, and one of my only problems with feminists such as yourself- if you recognize that both men and women are an oppressed class, why identify as feminist, which is a gendered noun implying a support of female over x? It would make more sense to say a Marxist egalitarian, which would then be redundant.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 10:52 PM
6

The word you're looking for is "egalitarian"
/r/MensRights29/06/12 10:49 PM
0

Men are more openly aggressive about seeking sex in Western cultures. Women are just as aggressive sexually, but social standards make them pretend it isn't there.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 09:32 PM
1

In the US he have "oppositional defiance disorder", if a kid is disobedient and gets in trouble at school they can be diagnosed and medicated to be obedient. Diagnosing ADHD when it isn't there isn't surprising at all.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:32 PM
2

UCF?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:25 PM
6

All students must watch the videos before being allowed to sign up for classes, my girlfriend finished the series yesterday.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:47 PM
1

I didn't mean to say it's justified, just that it's common and legal. The fact that it's wrong has little to do with it being profitable, just like slavery- in the same way, it won't stop unless its banned, and it'll go down kicking and screaming.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:24 PM
37

My general statement: Make them choose between equality and chivalry. They want chivalry? Alright, they're on a pedestal, I'll do everything for them, but they have no power over me and must be obedient home-makers. If they want equal rights, I'll treat them exactly the same way I'd treat a man. They don't get both, period.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:17 PM
2

Its a profit based thing: clubs will generally only allow attractive women in easily/cheaply. There was an AMA a while ago from a Miami club bouncer, he said this is how it works: Attractive women get in easily, cheap/free Less attractive women pay significantly more or get turned away Men get in for a moderate fee as long as they're well-dressed and not douchey to the bouncer. Its entirely based around keeping a certain club image- its not "fair", "equal", etc. But it's profitable. I'm not real…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:00 PM
2

The rape accusations: she will face no penalties, regardless of the impact it has on your father. There would be a shitfest if she got penalties, under the banner "If we penalize false rape claims, actual rape victims will be afraid to come forward for fear of penalty" Physical and Mental abuse accusations: she has VAWA on her side, and again, even when proven bullshit, she will face no penalties for the same reason as above. Can he get reparation for damages to house? Not unless you can definit…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 02:04 AM
13

You'll find that there are a few significant things that feminists will claim as victimizing women, that really don't. The one that always gets me is child support & alimony- regardless of who earns how much, after a divorce there is a near guarantee that the woman will recieve alimony and child support from the man, with no oversight as to how she spends it (a while ago on here was a picture of a woman who used a $500 child support check -- supposedly to help raise the kids -- to buy $400 shoes…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 05:12 PM
27

I have to agree entirely with this, particularly the "Who's a bigger victim" fight. Ironically it likely came from the "support the underdog to beat the big bad guy" mentality that we show in movies, military efforts, social interaction, etc. which led people to think, "Hey! If I'm the underdog, everyone will rally around me!" On the other hand, it seems like a negative though logical progression from victim protection- if the victim gets all the benefits and protections, you want to be the vict…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 05:05 PM
9

Just like reporting violence against blacks in the 50s eventually made them realize it was a problem. No, I say take a page from history and take it to the media. The only way to get stuff done is to put it on national TV and cause a mass outcry, otherwise it'll continue to be ignored.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 04:55 AM
3

Did you read what I wrote, or are you trying to troll? I said "can recognize and nope right out of there", not "those women are all trying to just screw with your head, man." I never generalized.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:42 PM
2

Not mad, trying to tack an explanation on the end before it gets downvoted to oblivion, for the love of karma
/r/MensRights28/03/12 08:39 PM
7

A magazine stating a double-standard that hurts both parties involved is promoting sexist practices that don't help anyone. Directed at a specific sex =/= sexist.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:49 PM
17

18, girls have started trying to play mindgames much earlier, already can recognize and nope right out of there. Luckily I found a girl who doesn't want to jerk me around like a marionette, and actually acts as an equal.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:46 PM
9

I can't remember who said it, but "You can't use logic and reason to argue with someone who reached their position without it."
/r/MensRights26/03/12 01:29 PM
-2

And that, of course, is the issue. Assuming we get LPS for men, what if its the father who wants the child? I don't think that question could be answered with a blanket, it would have to go case-by-case because I would argue that there are situations when a father should be able to force the mother to carry to term- say, a couple is trying for a baby, the father is the breadwinner, and both agree they want a baby, but the mother gets scared after getting pregnant upon realizing the reality of it…
/r/MensRights19/03/12 01:29 AM
-4

Better, my qualms: Still, the mother has the first choice of whether or not to carry the child, regardless of the fathers wishes. Excepting rape or non-consensual sex, if the father wants the child and the mother doesn't, it doesn't seem fair that the mother could abort or terminate the pregnancy against the fathers wishes. Second, putting a monetary burden on the "uncapable" parent after divorce seems not well thought out. First, what defines "uncapable"? Second, if they are incapable, how can …
/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:56 AM
2

I think the point Demonspawn is making is summed up by your second sentence: "good and equal rights" If I'm understanding correctly, Demonspawn means the focus should be on who has responsibility and how much of it at what time, allowing the rights to be implied. Because of the 9th amendment, you ironically get more rights by only outlining what responsibilities you have than by listing out what rights you have.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:47 AM
8

How is it a mockery of men exactly? The point of the pregnancy empathy suit thing isn't "har har you look fat Bob", it's that it's hard to understand different weight distributions and restrictions without actually experiencing them- especially when they are pregnant, thereby making them more susceptible to injury, along with the baby. That said, I'd repeat the idea from earlier in the thread- article 15 them for making themselves unfit for duty. If they weren't raped and weren't on the pill, th…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:15 PM
3

So then you'd also be condescending to people supporting rape victims because they empathize with a victim, if though they aren't one.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:09 PM
8

what the fuck is wrong with people
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:07 PM
2

That's actually the trick to seemingly ridiculously fast long-distance running- start with that steady pace for a long time on a treadmill, pick a pace you feel comfortable jogging at for ~30min, and the next day, increase the speed by 1-1.5mph and try to hold it for 20min, keep working until you can do it for 30min, repeat until satisfied.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:05 AM
1

Women have piles of distinct and specific advantages. Men had the advantage 50-80 years ago. Yes. There is no downside. It depends on what you mean by "rape/sexual harassment". By my definitions, the threat is equal to both sexes. (Rape = sex against the will of one of the participants, by force, blackmail, extortion, etc.; sexual harassment is continuing blatantly sexual behavior or advances after the harasser has been informed that the behavior/advances are unwanted or unwelcome) I've felt mil…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:00 AM
1

It depends on what you define as "strength" Because males have more testosterone, it will be far easier for me to get large muscles that can move a large amount of weight a few times. Because you have estrogen, it will be easier to get dense muscles that can move a smaller weight for much longer. Essentially, you'll have to work a lot harder to get the same brute-force strength as a male, but you'll be far more capable in endurance- running, swimming, etc. "Average man strength"- Based on myself…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 11:43 PM
13

While that's completely true, to generally quote a comment earlier here: If I have 100 sticks and only one is dynamite, I'm going to treat all of them as if they're dynamite for fear of for the one that is So the concern is with the 1% "stick of dynamite" that screws over the 99% rational "sticks"
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:52 PM
10

Here's a test; go onto r/feminism, post saying that some guys from work were avoiding you for a long time, then they invited you out. They took you to a restaurant, had drinks, and you were worried that they were planning to rape you, because there was a lot of alcohol, they were all men, and they hadn't included you for say, the first three months you worked at the office. Ask for advice on what you should do, and play the part of the victim. If you do this btw, I'd love for you to link the the…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:41 PM
11

While that's true, for every rational woman like you, there's another who's an entitled gold-digger looking to get rich quick by suing for sexual harassment because Bob invited her to come out with the guys and they had alcohol so obviously they were planning to rape her, etc. etc. And when it gets down to it, I'm not willing to risk my job.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:22 PM
-4

No. Not really. That's "I want to feel validated by people complimenting my body, but I want people to value me for something other than my body" I can guarantee that only an idiot would post a picture of their ass in order to take a satirical vengeance upon people who objectify them.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 04:25 PM
1

It would be reasonable for your friends to expect you to give in-depth insight and factual evidence
/r/MensRights21/02/12 04:22 PM
2

Unless you actually checked on Facebook (because I haven't, so I really don't know) I wouldn't be at all, even slightly surprised by certain women I know doing this.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 04:20 PM
5

Because it's easier to raise money by selling pins to women by saying "help save women, because us women have to stick together- we're even more likely to die because we're women! Quick, buy a pin and feel marginally safer!" than if you were to say "Help us raise money for heart disease!"
/r/MensRights21/02/12 03:25 PM
-3

This shit (OP) is why there's such a shit about gays- sex without constant fear of crazy secret pregnancy attempt = jealousy from heteros
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:54 AM
2

I keep falling back to a Plato's Cave -like worry that I'm missing out on something sexually (even though orgasm is internally produced via chemical reactions and pleasure has nothing to do with how sensitive your penis is, though erections do). The main point that gets me is the foreskin providing more sexual pleasure for the woman, but I'm caught between whether the extra ridges give pleasure to her vs. my lowered sensitivity allows me to last longer. I'm not too concerned with size, as every …
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:44 AM
9

That's a true statement, but sex isn't really lock-and-key. Its more like "Bob wants to do something mutually enjoyable with five different women? High five brah!" "Sally wants to do the same thing with five different men? What a whore." It's stupid, it demonizes sex (not just women) and it results in fewer people getting laid. Universally bad.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:13 AM
2

What. The. Fuck.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:04 AM
10

Saw a documentary on sex a few months ago Can't say about position, but making her have an orgasm is actually interesting- when a woman has an orgasm, her cervical muscles contract and expand in a rippling motion for ~10-20 seconds, creating a remarkably effective "vaccuum" effect that literally sucks the sperm in. The more you know /shootingstarrainbow
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:00 AM
2

Cuckoo Theory Because cuckoos lay eggs in other birds nests, then leave and let the victim-bird raise the baby cuckoo. And cuckoo is a synonym for "crazy" Doubly fitting.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 03:51 AM
11

This. $500 vasectomy, or $500+ a month for the next 18 years
/r/MensRights19/02/12 03:46 AM
0

That's a simple negative though- prove now that blue crayons don't exist and you have a problem. Also, proving that there are no blue crayons in this box shows that you have knowledge of the entire box. Expand this to god-scale, and it would require absolute knowledge to prove that god definitely doesn't exist. However, there's nothing to imply that a god does exist, and that's where the conflict comes from.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:06 PM
0

Correlation is not causation. Is it a remarkable correlation? Sure, but was any kind of research done to show that they can do it because they're African? For example, in America, 80% of the death row population is Black, but hardly half of the US is Black- does this mean blacks are more inclined to murder? Another example, east-asian countries have far higher social importance attached to education, and mysteriously they have noticably higher grades/test scores than Americans. Does that mean th…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:03 AM
2

Gender has clear and documented biological differences, I've seen nothing relating to race that was 100% based on biology, and the point I'm making is that male-breadwinner female-nurturer is a social construct, along with a good number of other facets of society
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:01 AM
1

Irrelevant because it's mixing studies without taking into account overlap, as well as abusing statistics to make a favorable argument rather than an honest one.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:37 AM
2

One bit of ironic correction, and some agreement: Militant atheists write books, give speeches, argue, and make people angry. In order to be called a militant-anything-else-ist, you have to try to legislate your beliefs, kill people, commit violence, etc. People don't get that simple distinction. A-theist, "without god", means they are "without god". No belief in a diety. Saying specifically that there is no god does indeed require faith, for the simple fact that it is impossible to prove a nega…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:36 AM
3

I am an atheist I am an anarchist Gender and race are heavily effected by associated social constructs, which cause the attached social stigmas, which allowed women to get laws passed that are blatantly misandrist. You're demonizing people whose beliefs you don't share in the same way that communists were demonized during the Red Scare, to the point that I read that post in a redneck accent with an American flag flying in the background. That is not backed by science and/or logic.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:32 AM
3

Please tell me what gender equality means to you. As a woman, are you willing to sign up for the draft? All that comes to mind at the moment, interested to see what comes of this
/r/MensRights16/02/12 11:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter