TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_pluto_ Archive

View 23 posts and 482 comments by _pluto_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
262

False Accusation_pluto_/r/MensRights20/05/15 10:09 PM
233

_pluto_/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:20 PM
163

General_pluto_/r/MensRights25/04/15 12:35 PM
101

General_pluto_/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:04 AM
97

Social Issues_pluto_/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:54 AM
61

General_pluto_/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:04 PM
58

Question_pluto_/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:33 PM
37

Analysis_pluto_/r/MensRights09/04/15 07:03 PM
34

Social Issues_pluto_/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:17 PM
32

General_pluto_/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:14 PM
27

Anti-MRA_pluto_/r/MensRights22/04/15 07:09 PM
24

Social Issues_pluto_/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:36 PM
22

Anti-MRA_pluto_/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:29 AM
22

Feminism_pluto_/r/MensRights08/05/15 09:31 PM
19

Analysis_pluto_/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:49 AM
18

Feminism_pluto_/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:47 AM
13

General_pluto_/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:19 PM
8

Story_pluto_/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:32 PM
5

General_pluto_/r/MensRights07/06/15 11:46 PM
4

_pluto_/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:05 PM
4

Feminism_pluto_/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:53 PM
2

Anti-MRA_pluto_/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:58 AM
0

Social Issues_pluto_/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:10 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

I think you're wrong. I think women can be taught to empathize. Currently they are being taught that the opposite sex wants to rape them. Naturally they are hostile.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 05:57 AM
4

It's garbage. Feminists love it because it demonizes men. Etc.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 05:54 AM
-22

Karen once again schools feminists and other would-be detractors. But damn Karen. What ever happened to pig tails? - and other overly feminine sexual indicators? That shirt is not becoming. Next time wear a sundress or something. ;) Awesome video as always.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:47 PM
7

Insufferably smug coked up effeminate hipster dork who uses words like "vector" to sound smart while making no sense whatsoever. This guy is like the quintessential male feminist. Another good beat down by Akkad.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:25 PM
14

I seem to recall Karen Straughan saying that 60% of male rapists were sexually abused by women as children. However, I was unable to find a source. If true, the denial of female pedophilia also has a harmful effect on women. It's an interesting example of how feminists (and society generally) seem to be more concerned with demonizing men than solving issues that affect both sexes. Domestic violence is another obvious example, since children who are abused often grow up to become abusers, perpetu…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:33 PM
6

Men will be relegated to menial jobs that women don't want and do the manual labor grunt work I'm pretty sure that's already the case.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:53 AM
11

Good summary. The ironic thing is that the men who DO feel "entitled" to sex are usually obnoxious assholes who ALREADY get laid on a regular basis. Most "nice guys" who are sweet, caring and supportive are treated like trash by the opposite sex. It's not that being sensitive and caring is a fault; it's just that it's not a benefit in and of itself. You need something else. I've never had a problem getting laid, but it wasn't because of my sensitivity, it was in spite of it. I can totally see wh…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:08 AM
29

This is great. Yeah, being raped is horrific, but so is getting your penis chopped off, or being beheaded, or being thrown out a window. The fact that so many feminists zero in on rape in GOT while ignoring other horrific violence against males is yet another indicator of the empathy gap. Frankly it comes across as narcissism.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:57 AM
1

what I take issue with is the dismissal of problems targeting other groups. Well, just to be clear, I absolutely do not dismiss the problems of "other groups," including Trans people, African Americans etc., and yes, women, in areas for example involving attempts to curtail female reproductive rights. One of the biggest problems with privilege theory is that it denies female privilege, reframing it as "patriarchy backfiring" or some other nonsense. If people insist on using privilege theory they…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:36 AM
1

You're now officially claiming that systemic racism disadvantaging blacks and favoring whites did not exist in 1850. He didn't claim that. He said that "the Irish slaves in america at the time, for instance, often had it as bad, or worse than their African counterparts." This is objectively true. The fact that you are willing to dismiss the Irish-American experience so cavalierly because blacks usually had it worse is a perfect example of why privilege theory divides people rather than encouragi…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:10 AM
2

Setting aside the implication you're making that class is a "real" privilege and others are not I am of the opinion that class is BY FAR the most important metric of gauging "privilege." Feminists tend to list class as just another box on the privilege checklist. This is absurd. A billionaire black lesbian woman is infinitely more privileged than a straight white male coal minor. It isn't surprising that feminists are trying to erase the importance of class, since most of them come from middle o…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:05 AM
1

you do. Or are you arguing that, say, not getting kicked out of your family is not a benefit? So you're saying that people aren't entitled to not being kicked out of their families. See the problem? I think I've been quite clear about my meaning. You have. And I understand it. I don't agree with it but I understand it. The more important point, which you continue to ignore, is that accusing people of being "privileged" is not an effective way of helping trans-people. I think you think this is so…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:25 PM
2

I think you misunderstand what 'privilege' means in this context. It doesn't mean you're universally better off. It means that you are not targeted with a specific kind of systemic discrimination, and as a result are less situated to see said discrimination. I understand exactly what it means. The problem is that people DO interpret it as meaning "universally better off," or more specifically, "having benefits that I did not earn and am not entitled to." It is not my fault that you have a lousy …
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:25 PM
1

I'll ask you again: have you faced any of the listed difficulties for being cis? Irrelevant. I may have faced the same or worse difficulties for different reasons. And irony. The demographic breakdown is pretty consistent. Feminists themselves talk about it frequently. Conversely, the majority of "straight white males" are not well off ie privileged. I am not accusing every feminist of being privileged, just those from well-to-do backgrounds. The more important point is that accusations of privi…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:55 PM
3

Privilege theory is horseshit. Even if it's true in certain contexts it just comes across as an accusation. It puts people in boxes according to sex/race/gender etc., it makes implicit assumptions about the kind of life a person has lived and the hardships they may or may not have suffered, and ultimately it is ineffective in encouraging empathy toward disadvantaged people. Class privilege is by far the most important kind of privilege, yet also the least discussed by feminists. That's probably …
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:16 PM
19

Some brutal truth here: As women get older, they start to be treated like men. Not like special snowflakes, but mere men. A lot of women become understandably upset over this arrangement; they assumed that the reason they were treated like princesses was due to their (ahem) wonderful personalities. Amazingly, old celebrity women don't put 2 and 2 together; they don't realize that they have been coasting on privilege their entire lives. Instead, they blame (who else?) men, for being naturally att…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 03:39 AM
4

Genocidal scum, or more properly androcidal scum. And to think that some of these feminist lunatics are raising boys. It would be like a member of the KKK raising a black child. Horrifying.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:21 AM
11

Availability of pornography is positively correlated with diminution of rape/sexual violence. The Taliban wasn't very fond of pornography. If feminists actually cared about reducing sexual violence against women they would laud pornography. If feminists actually cared about the safety of sex workers they would demand legalization of prostitution. Feminists are supposedly divided between "sex positive" and "sex negative." However, "sex positive" feminists didn't make much of a fuss when feminists…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:35 AM
3

I upvoted the submission because it shows that feminists are occasionally capable of critical thought. In this case, the author questions the feminist dogma that "work shall make you free." The "escape from patriarchal oppression" via slave labor doesn't actually appear as emancipatory to poor women -- rather it replaces the supposed "patriarchy" of the family with a brutal form of exploitation. Only bourgeois feminists who have the luxury of wasting time on gender studies courses could possibly…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:57 AM
23

Excellent article. Religious extremists have nothing on feminists when it comes to policing sex. One major error: And police seem unlikely to just seamlessly adopt new standards. It wasn't too long ago that neither cops nor anyone else took rape seriously unless it involved a sort of perfect victim and violent force. There is zero evidence for this. Rape has always been considered a serious crime.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:51 PM
2

Excellent deconstruction.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:35 AM
6

As far as negative institutional sexism goes, I can't think of a single one. White Western women are honestly the most pampered and privileged creatures to ever walk the planet. They're also the women who yell the loudest about their supposed oppression. Strange that.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:48 AM
4

... Among the reasons these women were originally attracted to their husbands—sex appeal, sense of humor, charisma—earning power may not have been high on the list. But that could be because it was a given. Unfortunately, the other qualities start to fade over time if the husband isn’t adding something tangible to the equation. ... “An academic person might get a ‘waiver,’ ” he adds. “Or a serious, published writer. A primary-school teacher wouldn’t get a waiver. How shallow can you get? Accordi…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:01 AM
0

When I google "Reddit men's rights" I get "Against Men's Rights" right below the link to this sub. Then a link from Time magazine titled "the toxic appeal of the men's rights movement."
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:12 AM
4

There's nothing wrong with "social justice" per se. Martin Luther King could rightly be described as a "social justice warrior." The problem is that today's SJW's are mostly spoiled rich kids who believe that activism consists of attacking straight white males and creating new sexual identity terms to add to the ever-growing LGBT acronym. I work in construction and I've never met a poor white straight male who considered himself "privileged" compared to these ridiculous feminists, some of whom a…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:06 AM
1

Women are more apt to use proxy power. Don't think that just because males usually (by no means always) hold/held putative power, rich women were essentially powerless. Obama is allegedly our "leader." But he more closely resembles a puppet. His job is to appease various power centres, including the military industrial complex, the intelligence complex, corporations, VIP's at the CFR etc., and powerful lobbies like the oil lobby, the Israeli lobby, the feminist lobby etc. "Ordinary" people play …
/r/MensRights28/06/15 01:53 AM
7

Indeed. What you refer to is called "black propaganda" by the spooks. An example would be to create an "MRA" group and have members spout misogynistic bullshit. If I were to learn tomorrow that Return of Kings was funded by feminists, or that the Westbaptoro church was financed by gay rights groups, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:00 AM
2

I never had the types of male relationships that feminists claim I should have had. My male friends have always very supportive. Masculinity is a good thing. We not only encourage strength amongst each other but offer support when necessary, and we don't wallow around in victimhood. Praise lad culture!
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:48 PM
28

There are a few possible explanations: brainwashing/ignorance. College boys are generally not very well informed. They look to their professors to educate them, not grossly mislead them. "It won't happen to me because I'm not a rapist." Ties into brainwashing/ignorance. Fear of ostracization. Nobody wants to be called a "misogynist" or "rape apologist," which are the go-to insults for feminists. white knighting impulse/"one good man" Honestly I think ignorance is the biggest factor, which is why…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:38 PM
10

I saw this a couple years ago. As I understand the filmmaker is especially attracted to teenage girls and set out to decouple said attraction from actual pedophilia. "Teenage girls" is of course a rather broad category, including very immature 13 year olds who are barely out of elementary school and relatively mature 19 year olds. If memory serves he argues that pedo hysteria is harmful and that men are naturally attracted to nubile young women. The film makes a major error in claiming that fema…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:21 AM
2

Is it just an "attitude" or is it some sort of deep seated hypergamous instinct?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:21 AM
2

Brutally accurate. The empathy gap is real.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:10 AM
32

TPP is basically the end of national sovereignty. It's a new, more streamlined and less overt form of fascism. Any politician who supports TPP is a traitor to their country. Censorship in the US and other Western nations is different than under totalitarian regimes. We suffer censorship by omission, as well as the "bury you in bullshit" technique (look! another celebrity scandal!). It doesn't need to be enforced by the state (though often is, as with whistleblowers). As Orwell wrote: The siniste…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:03 PM
8

Women who are asked if about being genitally mutilated say the same thing. I myself am circumcised. I don't stay up at night thinking about it. It doesn't really bother me. I don't blame by parents. Women don't care. But the practice needs to stop. Protecting your ego is no excuse for mutilating babies.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:54 PM
0

I agree with you for the most part. But I admit to finding this work intriguing (not for the Freudian stuff, but the correlation): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._Unwin
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:59 PM
1

Not my area of expertise -- but do we know that for a fact? Couldn't the 80/40 ratio be explained by the fact that (under civilization) men have a bad habit of dying in wars?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:52 PM
3

I agree. The framing is all wrong. MRA's do not believe that men should be "paid more" due to their sex; we simply believe that women should not be paid more for LESS WORK. Still, it's somewhat refreshing to see the pay gap debunked on the BBC.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:42 PM
10

Hannah Wallen just posted this in the comments to her recent blog. Assume she won't mind a repost here: You're up against female solipsism in addition to feminist monopolization there. Not only do they refuse to discuss the two in tandem, feminists - especially female feminists - who call discussing the male experience an invasion feel entitled to respond to men discussing male genital mutilation with "but women have it worse." In Germany, women's groups responded to laws restricting male circum…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:33 PM
10

Wrong. "Yet when researchers survey men and women about the different kinds of unwanted pursuit tactics they used, without taking into account the level of fear experienced by their targets, the gender breakdown looks very different. Women are just as likely as men to engage in a number of common stalking behaviors—and even more likely to resort to certain kinds. In one study, about one-third of women reported using “mild aggression”—threats, verbal abuse, and physical abuse—after a breakup, com…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:20 PM
8

Ok. But personally I find it disturbing that she brushes off Milo's points about the serious structural disadvantages and discriminatory policies facing boys without so much as a word. She is a teacher after all, and presumably has male pupils. It makes no difference how many women are involved in STEM, most women aren't interested in those fields anyway, and self-esteem issues with girls and math hardly compares to the massive, ongoing war on boys. Edit: few words
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:29 PM
1

I agree. By "no means no" I meant a verbal no. Men can't read minds. One of the problems may be that women are generally better at reading non-verbal communication/emotional cues, and they assume that men are exactly the same. This leads to frustration when men don't pick up on their "hints." Honestly, I don't think it's too much to ask that women say "no" if they don't want something. If men have to be the "pursuers" and escalate, then women should have enough backbone to express verbal disagre…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:12 PM
12

What good points did she raise? She basically agreed with the scientist that women are delicate flowers who need to be coddled, while simultaneously accusing him of being a sexist pig. You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 10:57 AM
8

It shows that most of these "rapes" aren't actually rapes. Men are expected to escalate sexual encounters, so they do. Women need to be adults and say "no" if they aren't interested. "Affirmative consent" places all of the responsibility (what a surprise) on the man -- both for escalating the sex and, apparently, reading the woman's mind. Since no will ever have sex in the manner that feminists demand (asking for explicit verbal consent for each micro-escalation of a sexual encounter) the only s…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:19 AM
4

The feminist motto is "if it feels right, it is right." Logical consistency doesn't enter it. When something is seen to harm men, it "feels right" because they believe (absurdly) that they are "punching up." They don't even really seem to care about the long term effects on women. They just want to harm men ("the oppressor") as much as possible.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:34 AM
5

Yeah, he's basically a tradcon and has said as much. Does a helluva of a job taking the piss out of feminists and ID politic types though.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:17 AM
2

This is from a gay conference in 1976. "Dangerous Trends in Feminism." http://paganpressbooks.com/jpl/DTF.HTM Feminists have been hostile toward gays for most of their history. They tried to co-opt the gay rights movement in the 80's, framing homophobia as a symptom of "patriarchy." Now that gay men are starting to express support for the MRM they are retreating to their old habits.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:07 AM
10

Comments are very encouraging. A lot of gay men are VERY pissed off about this. There are also a lot of left wingers saying things like, "I never thought I'd find myself agreeing with Barbara Kay," etc. If feminists lose the left they are toast, and it's happening as we speak.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:05 AM
9

'There is only one party in the United States, the Property Party … and it has two right wings: Republican and Democrat.' - Gore Vidal
/r/MensRights23/06/15 12:46 PM
82

She's a scam artist who bilks people out of money to demonize male gamers, then acts like a damsel in distress to get more free cash.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 05:02 AM
10

You missed the point. Oliver just went on a rant about horrible men sending mean things to feminists like Sarkeseesian. He supports the "damsel in distress" gender role for females, but has the exact opposite ("man up") advice for males who receive mean messages online. Feminists support gender roles when they appear to hurt men/benefit women (they're actually more interested in hurting men than helping women, but I digress). They are hypocrites of the highest order. Edit: sentence.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:55 AM
2

Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 02:33 AM
6

Ordinarily I wouldn't really care, we should be able to joke about anything, but the fact that this is being upvoted in a police forum is pretty fucking disturbing. Additionally, the fact that male prison rape is ROUTINELY portrayed as a joke is wrong, wrong, wrong.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 02:31 AM
2

Quite a few authors specializing in political dystopia have identified as libertarian socialist, including Aldous Huxley and George Orwell. Personally I think right-libertarianism is utopian. It would work fine if human beings were angels and didn't try to create monopolies and use sate power, but that's not the way humans work. Moreover, the word "utopian" indicates "impossible." Most of our history was arguably "libertarian socialist" in the sense that the individual was prized, most land was …
/r/MensRights23/06/15 02:23 AM
43

Hahaha..owned. Well done op. Who are the real sexists here? MRA types who argue that women are capable of being treated like adults, or white knights like John Oliver who think women are delicate little flowers who need to be protected from hurt feelz?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:56 AM
-3

I find it amusing that people are surprised. Certain clowns on TV are de facto employees of the Democratic Party; others (Fox) work for the Republican party. If you get to appear on TV with any regularity you are an establishment sucker.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:09 PM
-8

Right wing douche bag who thinks a non-living-wage is just fine vs. a nutty feminist professor. A marriage made in hell, and you can have them both.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 12:39 PM
-8

Wow, you're really brave. Do you think workers should be able to have an 8-hour-day, you piece of shit?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 12:37 PM
29

I didn't bring it up, Lena Dunham did. Are you aware that Dunham made a skit for SNL mocking MRA's? It showed a decidedly untalented individual, not to mention a scurrilously dishonest one.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 07:37 AM
31

He wrote a film, and a rather saucy one at that (Russ Meyers). By all means, tell me some of the ways in which Lena Dunham has been "oppressed".
/r/MensRights22/06/15 07:29 AM
50

Rich girls born with silver spoons in their mouths whining about their "oppression" rubs some people the wrong way, apparently.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 07:24 AM
9

Comments are now littered with deletions, proving once again that feminists simply cannot and will not tolerate dissenting opinions. Dissenting opinion = "harassment" and "making me feel unsafe." A lot of the comments are quite disturbing. They basically argue that "harassers" need to be tracked and arrested, followed by a comment reading, "unfortunately that would be extremely difficult" due to VPN's etc. "Strong empowered women" my ass. I learned to deal with snotty insults when I was about fi…
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:58 AM
34

There are a couple things happening here. Women are used to being given preferential treatment. In cyberspace they are often treated like men, and some women frankly aren't tough enough to deal with it. It's a whole new experience. Equal treatment appears as discrimination. Feminists use the terms "harassment" and "misogyny" to refer to people disagreeing with them. Feminists can't handle debate because they are wrong about practically everything. They really have no choice but to censor their o…
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:28 AM
2

Perhaps. On the other hand... "This came as no surprise to me. In my own long-term study of married couples, and from the many studies I've read on romanticism among the genders, it appears that yet another gender myth can be dismantled: Men, typically, are more romantic than women." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-terri-orbuch/are-men-more-romantic-tha_b_796099.html My own research and that of others shows that men tend to believe that love should be more passionate than women generally do. It…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 10:31 PM
4

Are you kidding. Radical Feminism is on the left, and it's only recently that people on the left started speaking out against it. This is false. If you read the literature of first wave feminists you will find a great deal of misandrist/female supremacist ideas. A lot of these women were otherwise "right wing" -- supporting white supremacy, eugenics and corporatism. Critics of the first wave were found on both the left and the right. In fact the most extensive critique was written by the Marxist…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:48 PM
1

Perhaps this is how feminists developed their ideas about "objectification." It was an act of projection, sorta like their crazy patriarchy theory.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:32 PM
161

I read a past article by this freak. She is an extremely disturbed person who frankly needs professional help; instead she has been given a platform to spew hatred against men and boys. Very weird.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 06:58 AM
8

I grew up as a boy and never once heard anyone try to excuse bad behaviour by boys. What year were you born? Edit: I can't believe you have 11 up votes! Amazing.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 06:45 AM
0

Within the last couple decades, peaceful revolutions in Serbia, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, Georgia, and Belarus toppled dictatorships using the Sharp model. The 2009 movement that freaked out the Iranian regime also used Sharp, although less successfully. Alas, there is a crucial difference. Unlike the MRM, the movements you cited were financed by the CIA and various American NGO's. Doesn't mean some of the tactics aren't effective, however, so I up-voted your post. To be brutally frank, I think the o…
/r/MensRights20/06/15 11:13 PM
2

Both.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:11 AM
2

I agree, but the whole "privilege" thing needs to go. It puts people in boxes, and actually discourages harmony between the sexes/races. Many white people supported black people in their struggle long before "privilege theory" took centre stage; today, SJW's seem to be doing their best to divide people rather than unite them.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:39 AM
0

The poster's intent is irrelevant. Fact is, certain aspects of feminism do indeed disproportionately target poor males, especially blacks.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:36 AM
1

At least you could not downvote me while offering an opinion of your own. Lemme guess: feminist.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:51 AM
2

You should read up on the studies of male bike riders. I'm guessing that you're a privileged male feminist who doesn't take the subway.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:21 AM
0

You're making an ass of yourself kid. Just stop already.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 03:56 AM
6

poor funding of mental health services Mental health services can't do much for a man who has lost his home and his family, or lacks employment. We don't need more money for shrinks. We need money for things that will actually help men who don't happen to suffer from severe mental illness. I assume you're aware of the term "situational depression." Men don't need someone to talk to. They need resources -- resources that they are fully entitled to by virtue of their labour and taxes. The reason "…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:46 AM
12

The incredible thing is that the crime of "manspreading" was conjured up by feminists due to a bizarre belief about "micro-aggressions." These lunatics literally believe that men spread their legs while sitting down due to hostility against women and a desire to assert dominance and patriarchy. In fact, all they had to do was ask a doctor. Males are comparatively top-heavy (we would fall over while riding trains/busses if we didn't spread our legs somewhat), have differently shaped hips than wom…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 01:42 AM
2

The harpy at 1:01 is yelling at an anarchist, Kristian Williams, who wrote a fascinating book about the history of the police. He is a strong supporter of women's rights, and is being castigated for no particular reason except that the lunatic woman felt the need to act out emotionally.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 11:58 PM
16

You said, "I am against feminism and men's rights in equal measure." So now you're just lying. While I appreciate your critique of feminism I don't think this sort of rhetoric helps. It's dishonest, and seems like a weasily attempt to distance yourself from the false media portrayal of MRA's as tradcons. I say this as an egalitarian who is not opposed to every aspect of feminism. Edit: instead of saying "I am against Men's Rights," you could say, "I don't agree with some of the ideas propagated …
/r/MensRights07/06/15 10:57 PM
15

I agree in principle. The problem is that feminism is an enormously powerful movement whereas MRA's have conferences in broken down buildings in Detroit. By saying, in effect, "MRA's are just the male version of feminists," you are disempowering the only group of people fighting for these issues. You are also acting as a propagandist, since it is a false equivalency; unlike feminists vis a vis men, MRA's have never fought against female rights. Traditionalists? Some of them have, but not MRA's. …
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:14 PM
10

It boggles the mind that so many women think they have the right (let alone the expertise) to pontificate authoritatively on the male experience without ever having lived it. Talk about entitlement!
/r/MensRights07/06/15 08:09 PM
6

I'm curious to know why you are "against Men's Rights." Seems like MRA's and a tiny number of dissident feminists are the only ones drawing attention to these issues. Few (if any) MRA's would argue that women have never suffered their own forms of oppression. Is there some sort of core belief routinely expressed by MRA's that would make you disavow the movement?
/r/MensRights07/06/15 08:01 PM
8

You need to read up on the history of feminism -- opposition to male DV shelters, opposition to male rape victims, opposition to shared parenting etc. The real feminist movement is toxic. Period. "stepping on men's toes?" Fuck you, degenerate.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 04:04 AM
3

Imbecile given a talk show by plutocrats to mould the opinions of other imbeciles. Nothing new here.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 02:23 AM
3

"Monopolies are only obtainable by government intervention and preferential treatment." Are you sure? There were privatized company towns in the late 19th/early 20th Centuries where the state played virtually no role. In fact at one point the Pinkertons (a private army funded by the robber barons) had more "troops" than the US army. Everything was privatized: police, schools, courts etc. Workers were essentially slaves. As for monopoly, do you not see the problem? In the words of Proudhon, "Comp…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:09 AM
1

The term "capitalism" was coined by Karl Marx. The term began as an intellectual epithet. I think there are other ways of organizing ourselves rather than capitalism or communism. Both systems suck. I'm not sure what difference there is between capitalism and plutocracy (rule by the rich), to be honest. Capital accrues to particular individuals and they take advantage of their advantage. Monopoly results. It would be nice if communists looked out for the "proletariat," and it would be nice if ro…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:57 AM
5

Read up on the history of the commons. It's not exactly mysterious. Peasants used to live on communal lands. The first capitalists stole their lands, killed the dissenters and made men, women and children work for 16 hour days in the new industrial factories. Jone Locke advocated putting poor children to work at the age of three. Again, none too mysterious for anyone who has read a history book.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:47 AM
2

Both systems are based on the same principle: lazy rich people leaching off the labour of others.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:40 AM
-2

Right. That's why the commons were stolen from the peasantry by the first capitalists and they were turned into wage slaves. It was all "voluntary" lol.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:39 AM
12

Tl; Dr: Capitalist swine make up excuses for why working class males are having a hard time. Instead of drawing attention to gynocentric systems, offshoring off jobs, Wall Street degenerates, plutocrats robbing the public purse, they conclude that males are lazy and "weak" (lol). Theses spoiled brats are playing with fire. The guillotine awaits.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:23 AM
-1

Yep. Anarchist here. Capitalists and feminists are peas of the pod: they all want others to work so they can sit around leaching off people's labour.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:18 AM
-1

You just described capitalism to a T. Capitalism is based on the idea that the fruits of people's labour ("surplus") should be robbed by plutocrats sitting on their fat asses.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:16 AM
6

Women have problem -- Society must fix the problem! Men have problem -- Men suck! Man up you losers! Women suffer minor inconvenience -- we must pass laws to prevent this travesty! Men suffer massive institutional disadvantage -- Erm, Smash the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:45 PM
7

What is it with feminists and sandwiches? By the way they carry on you would think making a sandwhich was one of the most arduous tasks in existence. Is it just because they hate the idea of a woman doing something nice for a man?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 02:58 PM
11

The fascists at AMR are currently trying to get CAFE banned from the event. Utterly despicable.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:28 PM
1

hahaha, actually I find this exchange highly amusing. You take life way too seriously kid.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:30 PM
29

While the policeman told her he was ‘sorry’ for her ordeal, he added that monkeys are ‘wild animals’ and cannot legally commit a crime. “And if they could, do you think you could pick out your attacker in a line-up?” added the officer, evidently struggling not to laugh. Hahahahahaah. Monkey rape culture -- tis real. Edit: Ape culture?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:57 PM
0

completely misrepresents the history of the life of medieval peasants. What the hell do you know about medieval peasants? There are places in the world where you can still live that lifestyle. Really? 150 days off per year? Sign me up! I'm being facetious. But I think it's important to recognize that "progress" can be something of an illusion. Emerson: “Society never advances. It recedes as fast on one side as it gains on the other. It undergoes continual changes; it is barbarous, it is civilize…
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:30 PM
0

"Rands positions on other issues don't delegitimize her position on these issues." Of course not. Hitler was a vegetarian etc. etc.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:23 PM
3

Most women aren't feminists. Most women who call themselves feminists have never read a book by Gloria Steinem. They just believe in the abstract "equal rights."
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:19 PM
1

Norm MacDonald on Hitler: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjtkwGy6M5g
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:18 PM
2

Did you make an argument? I didn't see it. You said, "go play in the street" to someone who accurately described Ayn Rand as a psychopathic degenerate. Where is your argument?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:52 PM
6

You failed to counter the argument. Perhaps you should go play in the street, douche bag.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:38 PM
8

Rand was an enthusiastic supporter of the genocide of indigenous peoples. She also praised psychopathy. The pedophile psychopath Edward Hickman kidnapped and dismembered a 12-year-old girl. Rand praised him, writing: "Other people do not exist for him, and he does not see why they should”. Hickman had “no regard whatsoever for all that society holds sacred, and with a consciousness all his own. He has the true, innate psychology of a Superman. He can never realize and feel ‘other people.’" All i…
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:36 PM
1

Watch Human Resources http://metanoia-films.org/human-resources/ Explains the history of schooling. It's not pretty.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:33 PM
2

Wrong. Numerous studies demonstrate that the "mob" has no power whatsoever. "Representative democracy" is oligarchical. "Average" people have close to zero say in the running of affairs. Corporations pull the strings. "Identity politics" is the garbage they feed us to keep the population divided.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:03 PM
1

Kabuki theatre.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:00 PM
4

India seems to be at the forefront of Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:45 AM
2

This artist is a rising star. Awesome.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:43 AM
3

makes me feel sad. It shouldn't. Egalitarianism will replace feminism, and both sexes will be better off for it. There is no need for sexist movements.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:41 AM
2

Brutal honesty is welcome. Good post.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:40 AM
1

Islam allowed for divorce prior to Christianity. Radical Islam is funded by the West. Sharia punishes rape with the death penalty. All societies are gynocentric. Remember that. Much of what you've heard about Islam is war propaganda.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:33 AM
2

And while the wage gap is again increasing, and the buying power of workers incomes has been on the downswing, it is not as bad as it was back during the "guilded age", and a far cry from high imperialism (or even worse, medieval) economies. False. http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/08/29/why-a-medieval-peasant-got-more-vacation-time-than-you/ "Why a medieval peasant got more vacation time than you"
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:13 AM
3

I disagree. There are numerous female-supremacist and racist comments by first wave feminists, including Cady Stanton; and it is useful to examine the rights minus responsibilities aspect of the ideology.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:03 AM
1

Not at all. Like I said I have no problem with R/P. But to the extent that people embrace "right wing"/"left wing" all sorts of problems emerge. Also, to quote me just type "> " before whatever you quote and then reply beneath it. It looks way better.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 01:55 AM
3

"There's a RP army brewing and when it's ready, some serious shit's gonna go down." I welcome that. Hopefully it won't entail the traditional right wing techniques of torture, assassination, rape etc. I'm not accusing you of advocating for such techniques -- but you have to look at the history. Chile, Argentina, Guatemala, South Africa. Hopefully we can move beyond the left/right stuff and use logic as our weapon.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 01:39 AM
9

Karen conducted herself admirably. Truly impressive. I especially liked her comment about her sons, and the need to allow children to roam free. On the slightly negative side, there was one post that stuck out: "I can't really guess how much of the attention the MRM is directing at TRP is due to your growth. There seems to be a certain admiration for the competence of some red pillers here and on YouTube as far as message delivery, and I think most terpers (is that the right term?) would be surp…
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:36 AM
2

Honestly, you can't control people. People are obnoxious. It's right there in the DNA;) I wouldn't worry about it.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:32 AM
0

Marx condemned racism and sexism. Conservatives welcomed racism and sexism. And continue to do so. Liberals also welcome racism and sexism -- why else would someone vote for a Democrat over a Republican? It's Kabuki theatre. You're being played.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:26 PM
-1

Brilliant retort. You're a typical R/P clown: a "beta" masquerading as an "alpha." You have no argument, so you resort to juvenile insults. You're the male equivalent of a feminist.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:55 PM
-1

"Alpha males control themselves, not worry about dominating others." Have you ever seen a Silverback Gorilla? Alpha males control others. Period. Alpha males were crushed when our ancestors developed weapons. You should check out Christopher Boehm's "Hierarchy in the Forest." It provides a basic introduction to hunter-gatherer bands and human social organization. So far as I can see we have two options: we can continue worshipping people like Donald Trump, or we can survive. Survival will entail…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:52 PM
0

"Why don't you guys ask bigger questions like, "What is it about human nature that stops people from caring about our studies?" "What is it about us that lets feminism exist at all and what does that mean for men both as individuals and as a group?" I think if you spend any time on this sub you'll see people asking those very questions, and coming to logical-albeit-disturbing conclusions. Like I said, I have no problem with the Red Pill insofar as it helps men understand sexual attraction and im…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:39 PM
0

Bin there done that. I'm interested in the macro game. We have a false sense of security. Numerous intellectuals, from Hawking to Chomsky to Dawkins, have suggested that near term human extinction is a real possibility. It is juvenile ("beta", if you like) to pursue pussy while ignoring or downplaying the broader issues. We can disagree about solutions, but we should at least acknowledge the problem.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:03 PM
-2

Misandric? Lol. Millions of people (mostly men and boys) die in wars due to the machinations of psychopaths. I'm not gonna lose a lot of sleep if some genocidal individual gets "pushed off the ice," as it were.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:55 PM
21

Homolka was an honest-to-goodness "battered spouse." Bernardo beat the shit out of her. There are photos of Karla where her entire face is almost entirely purple. This raises some interesting questions. According to the theory of "battered wife syndrome," a woman can become so terrified of her partner that she turns into a virtual Manchurian Candidate. She is entirely under the spell of her abuser. I'm not buying it. While I certainly sympathize with battered women/men, and understand that these…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:43 PM
-4

Sexual attraction is amoral, on that I agree. I have no problem with males attempting to cultivate traits that females find attractive (why would I?). But there are larger issues at play here. Domination was "the first behaviour to be proscribed and sanctioned as early moral communities formed" (Boehm). The "Alpha male" is a throwback to our great ape ancestors. He was displaced when our forebears created weapons (brains over brawn). Hunter-gatherer bands are universally egalitarian; "Alpha" beh…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:45 PM
-3

"Should men aspire to become the alpha male in the status sense? Sure, absolutely." Sounds like insecurity masquerading as confidence. The quintessential "alpha male" is the psychopath. We used to deal with these douche bags the proper way. And that way will return, unless nuclear war gets us first. In a 1976 study anthropologist Jane M. Murphy, then at Harvard University, found that an isolated group of Yupik-speaking Inuits near the Bering Strait had a term (kunlangeta) they used to describe “…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:02 PM
1

Karen Straughan discussing "alpha" and "beta" males? This can only end badly.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:08 PM
0

Anything political has to be weighed against the 55% female majority in voting rights and the moral hazard it represents. And yet... http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:32 AM
1

Um, no. Read an actual study by an actual anthropologist/archeologist.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:06 AM
4

Have the watched the first 20 min. It's definitely must see so far...
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:40 PM
1

Sounds like a good Twilight Zone episode. My favourite show.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:58 AM
0

"It's altogether likely that the rules of western monogamous marriage were ways of molding the circumstances in order to mitigate women's hypergamy--to essentially reduce the "choice=I'm not haaaappy" factor, and the "I want to be married to someone of higher status than me" factor." And yet you neglect to mention that for 99% of our history, "hypergamous instincts" were kept under wraps via actual egalitarianism, enforced by both men and women. Honestly Karen, I think you need to study up on an…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:53 AM
2

I get it. The problem is that different men [and women] have different opinions. But I don't think men and women should be competing against each other. Neither sex can "win." The whole thing is an absurdity.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:22 PM
1

I agree. From what I understand, Karen is an anti-feminist first and foremost and is interested in evo-psych, so I can see why she would be supportive of TRP. I do find it disappointing that she apparently supports the noxious cretins at Return of Kings, but she's her own person and can do whatever she wants. At the same time, I fail to see how these groups have anything to do with Men's Rights. There is overlap between the readers of Cosmo and Gloria Steinem, that doesn't mean one has anything …
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:20 AM
15

It's not often that I disagree with Karen Straughan. But I think she makes a couple of errors here, unless I'm misunderstanding her. She attributes the lack of co-operation between MRA's and RedPill/ other manosphere sites like ROK to some sort of innate competitive tendency between men. In her words, it's "part of the male psyche." She goes on to say that women change/exacerbate the dynamic in these spaces, creating more competition. I agree with the second point but not the first. Example: whe…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 11:51 PM
5

I'm aware of the study. I just don't think women are as one-dimensional as being claimed.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:16 PM
1

"Then continue to fail because you ignore the biological differences between men and women." I don't ignore the differences. I just don't think they are as severe as RP makes out. Women are perfectly capable of empathizing with men. Most women are not feminists. edit: just out of curiosity, what tactics do you think the MRM should be employing?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:15 PM
1

Be careful you don't die for geopolitical machinations of which you apparently have no understanding. Pentagon report predicted West’s support for Islamist rebels would create ISIS Anti-ISIS coalition knowingly sponsored violent extremists to ‘isolate’ Assad, rollback ‘Shia expansion’ In a strikingly prescient prediction, the Pentagon document explicitly forecasts the probable declaration of “an Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria.” Nevertheless, …
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:58 PM
6

Great videos, though the messages contain some major problems. *Boy Meets Girl and find out that they're the same apart from minor differences in downstairs plumbing. Nice sentiment but false. Boys and girls are very different. Different but equal. Treating boys like girls is cruel. *boo to girly girls and chivalry I have no problem with girly girls. I do have a problem with chivalry unless it is reciprocated. Feminists dislike girly girls but love chivalry. *William Wants a Doll and that's perf…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:21 PM
6

You're basically arguing that women are psychopaths. More Red Pill silliness. Women are taught that men have been oppressing them throughout history and that they have a one in four chance of being raped. It's no wonder they're angry and frightened. They're also taught that MRA's are misogynists, mainly due to the juvenile rantings of the menchildren at The Red Pill. If anything I think the MRM needs MORE appeals to emotion. We spend most of our time arguing with facts. That will sway a lot of m…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:43 PM
5

Right now, one of the biggest issues with the MRM is that we keep getting lumped in with the teenage boy "alpha males" at the Red Pill. For these kids to turn around and criticize our tactics is a tad rich.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:06 PM
6

Red Pill silliness. Virtually none of the claims about MRA's are even true.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:45 PM
-11

So he's a bigot. Big deal? Has nothing to do with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:40 PM
1

Long post but I enjoyed your reply so decided to answer in depth. "Then I swear I will never come on MRA again." I would encourage you to keep posting. You seem like a reasonable person. My initial response was a tad hostile. It becomes tiresome hearing a constant stream of feminists telling men how they should behave, what motivates men etc. when they have never lived as men. "the problem of class oppression and the difference between economic and sexual privilege." I would argue that one of th…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 11:38 AM
7

Most (all?) of the people who self-flallegelate over their privilege are indeed privileged -- not due to their sex but their class. They're mostly spoiled rich kids trying to make brownie points in their social circles. Poor men -- which includes the majority of straight white males -- have no illusions about their supposed privilege. They were not born with silver spoons in their mouths. They have worked their assess off their entire lives. Females are clearly the more privileged sex; all of th…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:41 AM
2

"I'm getting the picture that it's not that plausible to you probably that hegemonic masculine ideals are going to feel oppressive to men if they don't meet them." I enjoy doing masculine things and always have. I was also a sensitive boy. Men aren't like women. We are not valued simply for existing. We need to have a role. Feminists have casually thrown away the male role with apparently no regard as to how this would affect society. Currently, the biggest problem facing boys is not "toxic masc…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 08:32 AM
2

I certainly don't know what it's like to be a man. But none of these claims require a person to know what it's like to be a man. Evidently they do, because you just got through claiming that "male gender roles" are primarily enforced by men. This is silly. If being sensitive was sexually desirable to women then men would be competing over sensitivity rather than strength. There would be men on every street corner bawling their eyes out. Feminism is one of the biggest promoters of male gender rol…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:39 AM
1

Yes, I'm not a man. However, I am puzzled because I don't think it has anything to do with feminism. It does promote a set of masculine ideals You're not a man, yet you have the unbelievable audacity to tell men how they should think and feel. Have you have stopped and considered how narcissistic and patronizing you are? Perhaps we need to start having a conversation about toxic femininity. You could be exhibit A. I would also add that those horrible masculine traits of courage and stoicism are …
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:10 AM
25

please do not go back to disregarding all women who come forward and say they have been raped. This has never been the case. It's a feminist myth.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 05:42 AM
5

They really do seem to believe that male children should have more responsibilities than female adults. I'm not sure if feminists even realize how misogynistic and infantilizing some of their ideas are. Crazy stuff.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:11 AM
2

Feminists are a tiny minority worldwide and a minority even in the West. Feminists may have massive institutional power but most people don't hate men and boys and therefore disavow feminism.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:30 AM
1

The term has come to mean (a) people who value civil liberties and (b) people who believe that capitalist free markets are non-coercive absent state intervention. Anarchists tend to believe in (a) but not (b). "Propertyist" is a term sometimes used by critics of libertarianism, who argue that they value property rights above all else (and sometimes to the exclusion of other rights). I see no problem in using the term libertarian, just pointing out why Chomsky has critiqued the ideology. edit: gr…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:22 AM
4

The word libertarian was first used in the United States by the French anarchist Joseph Dejacque. "Libertarianism" developed in Europe as a means of distinguishing authoritarian Marxists and "libertarian" socialists who rejected both capitalism and statism. The term was (ahem) appropriated by far right wing capitalists, hence Chomsky's critique. There are lots of examples in American history of free market capitalism. For example, the privatized mining towns of the late 19th/early 20th Century, …
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:54 PM
1

The Columbia case sparked nationwide attention due to the endurance art piece, and the accused was never identified. Still, there is no outright proof of this being a false accusation; only two interpretations of an FB chat log. Lol. You feminists are unbelievable. Absolutely shameless.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:56 PM
2

The first major critique of feminism was written by a Marxist. So sure.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:12 PM
36

Finally someone calls it like it is: He added: 'She tried to destroy my client’s life, and she should be punished for it.' Mr Kenniff also told The Daily Mail Online: 'The conventional wisdom is that there's a sexual assault epidemic in this country, I don't know if that's true or not. what is certain, though, is that there is an epidemic of false accusations of sexual assault taking place everyday. 'In case after case we see the names of otherwise upstanding individuals forever tarnished by the…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:57 AM
16

Of course you can. End thread/
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:44 AM
3

It's a fair complaint and I chuckled. But I can't agree. Internet. The Internet has been described as the most revolutionary communications technology since the printing press. Men and women can now learn about a wide range of issues that would have been more or less invisible in the early 20th C. Knowledge. We now know that there are significant biological differences between the sexes beyond physical prowess and genitalia. The science is clear. People are beginning to question the "women are w…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 03:16 AM
31

Coffee shop feminists? Yes. AgainstMen'sRights? No. AMR posters are deeply disturbed individuals. It takes a special kind of psycho to read about these issues on a daily basis and dismiss it all with nothing but juvenile snark.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:29 AM
2

"However, I don't believe I would be willing to do them for women if I were a man." You have no idea what it's like to live as a man. Acknowledging this is the first step in your education.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:53 PM
3

"Exactly right." "Feelz right," you meant to say.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 10:55 AM
16

R/feminism is a fact free safe space for children pretending to be adults. That's really all there is to it.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:38 AM
1

I was literally on the way out the door for my daily rape sesh when I heard this message. I had my ski mask, my duct tape, everything. But this video touched my heart, and I have decided never to rape again.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:21 AM
1

Good points. Feminists (who represent a multi-billion dollar industry) are faced with a real and present danger. All of the most severe forms of gender oppression in the West now occur on the male side of the equation, and rape has been steadily declining for decades. Short of disavowing their absurd but highly lucrative philosophy, and short of embracing a modicum of integrity, they have no choice but to redefine "rape" and in so doing turn virtually every sexual encounter into sexual assault. …
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:18 AM
4

Ordinarily I would not advocate for punishment of a false accusation if there is no specific target. No harm done, right? The problem is that these claims DO have a target -- MEN. Feminists have insisted on blaming the actions of a tiny percentage of male deviants on the entire male sex. In the case of a false accusation against a specific target there should be severe consequences. In this sort of case there is no need for harsh punishment but there needs to be some sort of attempt at redress; …
/r/MensRights24/05/15 08:11 AM
1

Indeed. These types of posts should probably be removed.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 08:04 AM
2

Would you be willing to date/marry a man of significantly lower socio-economic status than yourself? Would you be willing to put your life on the line to protect the men-folk? Would you be willing to work as a garbage woman while enforcing quotas allowing men to work in more comfortable office jobs? Let's not stop with opening doors. If we want an end to chivalry we need to go all the way...;)
/r/MensRights24/05/15 07:24 AM
8

The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange protein; it rejects it. P. B. Medawar Unfortunately this tendency is common amongst ideologues of all stripes. People tend to reject information that contradicts their worldview rather than doing the logical thing and altering said worldview. Feminists are particularly egregious offenders because (1) their worldview is based on cultivating a victimhood complex and (2) their theories are demonstrably false.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 04:26 AM
47

You argued well. Never debate a hardcore feminist unless there is an audience. You can't "win" a debate with a person who doesn't accept logic. It would be like trying to convince a paranoid schizophrenic that (s)he isn't being persecuted by dark and mysterious forces. However if there are reasonable people listening they might be swayed. Feminists cannot win these arguments so they simply censor opposing views. Ironically, their go-to-insults (REAL MEN support feminism, you can't get laid, you …
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:59 AM
10

Yep. The same things happens with issues involving class. They will admit that poor men have huge problems due to class, but refuse to allow for the possibility (even when it is utterly obvious) that maleness can also be a factor in terms of "oppression," being disadvantaged etc., and that there are ( to use their language) intersections between gender and class that frequently favour females over males.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 01:26 AM
5

It's a fun sub to gawk at in a "this is your brain on feminism" sort of way. But I don't think people here should be validating their shitty existence by debating them. We should give them as much attention as they deserve -- zero.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:30 PM
3

It's an apt comparison.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 07:00 AM
8

If you're like me you are sometimes too lazy to read articles posted here and just skip to the comments. But I think this is an important one. The similarities between modern feminist rhetoric and past Ku Klux Klan rhetoric are shocking. Here's another excerpt: 2) Saving women from cross-examination One of the key claims of today’s non-racist crusaders against rape is that the cross-examination of rape claimants is too tough and we need softer, less combative ways to establish the guilt of rape …
/r/MensRights23/05/15 04:35 AM
3

(see proudhon's definition of property) Outstanding.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:17 AM
2

I agree with you to an extent. According to the rules of the era she consented to sex when she said yes to the marriage. It hadn't occurred to me that feminists are expressing outrage over the scene precisely because she had technically already given consent. Adding to the absurdity of the whole thing, apparently the actress who plays Sansa has a sado-masochistic streak and "loved" doing the scene. Sophie Turner, who plays Sansa in the hit fantasy TV series, admitted last year that actually, she…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:23 PM
16

Her parents are both rich NY psychiatrists. Not sure if that has anything to do with the controversy. This non-event was seized upon as a means of propagating a narrative -- rape culture.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:44 AM
1

It's a great idea. Good luck in your efforts.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:46 AM
5

Yeah me too.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:26 PM
10

"Emma: Why can’t he just only love me" This was after her "rape," and probably the reason she made the accusation in the first place; she was enraged over being pumped and dumped (a lot of women probably feel that being pumped and dumped is the same as rape or sexual assault -- it FEELS that way). Also, lots of people (especially sociopaths) are perfectly capable of maintaining outrageous lies. They simply don't care how their behaviour affects other people. This young woman has been made into a…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 10:45 PM
6

I assume the twitter feed will be removed shortly, so here are a few tweets by the artist/provocateur: Emma Sulkowicz (#mattressgirl) and #fakerape @fakerape both working together for a new genre of art: it will be known as Slander-Realism. Columbia used to challenge the man; now it is the man. End the patriarchy. Share our work There's nothing harassing about art. Art should challenge the powerful & defend the weak It's heteronormative & sexist to assume I'm a man. Reporters who spend more time…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:31 PM
12

If the following article is any indication they will simply go on lying: http://www.takepart.com/article/2015/05/20/rape-hoax-mattress-columbia "Sexual assault on college campuses is of widespread concern. Activists report that one in four women will be raped during her college career. A new study calls sexual assault on college campuses an “epidemic,” after surveying first-year students at an undisclosed New York university in which 18 percent reported assault. Sulkowicz is one of many students…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:16 PM
3

I checked out the comments on the Jezebel article for kicks. They are going absolutely ape.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 08:10 PM
74

Holy shit. That comment thread is surreal. Short of a confession or video evidence you really can't get a more clear cut case of a false accusation. The emails clearly indicate that there was no rape. Yet virtually everyone in that thread believes mattress girl has been denied "justice." They also support arresting the people who put up the posters because it is "slander." If calling someone a liar is slander, what the hell is calling them a rapist!? This is your brain on feminism...
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:20 PM
6

When a man get's his legs blown off in war, he is a "veteran" or "war victim." When a woman gets allegedly raped, she is a "survivor." Even when her account is completely debunked, we're still supposed to call her such. Survivor? Piss off.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 10:18 AM
1

You can also check out eg Richard Lee's work on the !Kung. There really is no controversy, you just haven't taken the time to read anything on the subject, save perhaps Steven Pinker, so you're basically in the dark and lashing out due to a failure to understand science. Congrats, you're a dummy.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:41 AM
0

No, I just think you're full of shit. Poor little women who is forced to eat caviar and Lobster every night. Fuck right off. You are a perfect example of what is wrong with the so-called "left." It used to be about class. Now it's about identity.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:15 AM
1

Even though Jamie threw a boy out a window. But he's so hawt! Martin actually commented on this in one of his twitter exchanges. Women were going about hawt Jamie was. Martin stated that he wasn't supposed to be an attractive figure but a rather evil and dangerous man. Women responded that his dangerousness was part of what made him sexy, and by saying to Martin "you're such a man" (ie you have no idea what women find attractive).
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:32 AM
4

This is not mere "harassment." Harassment is when (e.g.) a boss sexually harasses an employee and threatens to fire them if they do not put out. According to feminists, harassment also consists of an ugly dude hitting on a woman, or a blue collar worker catcalling a woman, or (increasingly) presenting facts to women that make them feel uncomfortable. This is something infinitely worse. By falsely accusing this man of rape, she has tried to destroy his reputation, expel him from school, make him …
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:11 AM
0

If anything, GOT overly panders to feminists. Female warriors overpowering male warriors etc. Everyone knows it's fantasy but I'm not sure it's a good idea to be teaching girls that they can win fights with men. We see this in Hollywood all the time now: the "strong empowered" woman who weighs 110 points beating up on dozens of full grown men. I studied martial arts in my youth, there were girls in the class. I had no problem beating them even when they were more skilled than I was. Feminists do…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:49 PM
1

She's saying that relative to their husbands they are less powerful and they are in some ways at the mercy of them. Yeah, I call bullshit. The husbands have to work for a living. In a slave-master relationship the slave does not spend the money of the master. The same principle applies.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:18 AM
2

Despicable.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:14 AM
5

So...even when a woman doesn't have to work, and her life basically consists of spending her husband's lavish earnings, she is still "oppressed." Proof positive that feminists are completely out of touch with reality. Go work in a sweatshop for a week and tell me how oppressed you are eating caviar and shopping at Tiffany's. Un-fucking-believable.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 02:16 AM
6

From the comments: "if some group produced a paper called ‘the end of black people’, arguing that, since they are not ‘needed’ for non-blacks to survive and prosper, would the guardian be writing a headline ‘the end of black people, if only’?! why is is ok to denigrate men in such a way? arguing inferiority in the context of race is (rightly) considered abhorrent, as well as deeply flawed. but when it comes to sex, specifically the male sex, it’s perfectly acceptable?" And the inevitable feminis…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 02:00 AM
6

Proper response: "oh noooos, feminists are upset about something? Who gives a shit?"
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:44 PM
4

We've moved beyond misandry to eliminationist rhetoric consistent with campaigns prior to genocide. Despite popular belief, the misandry inherent to second-wave feminism a la "SCUM" (Society for Cutting up Men) did not originate in the 70's. The original grand dragon of feminism, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, wrote: "We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men." She was also a racist, stating, “The enfranchisement of women would insure immediate and durable white supremacy." Feminism is a hate cult. …
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:35 PM
1

A Tl;dr would be appreciated. I'm sick to death of these attacks against "white cis gender straight males."
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:48 PM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:25 PM
3

That's an interesting point. Violence should be meaningful. So many Hollywood films portray violence as a cute joke. Eventually the overwhelming violence/explosions etc. become boring. Compare your average action flick to a film like the original "The Vanishing," or "Funny Games." Only a few deaths in both films; yet they are infinitely more affecting than the typical 1000 males-slaughtered gore fest.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:05 PM
3

"When it's time to create a new generation, the males of a species often contribute nothing but genetic material to the mix." Nothing but genetical material. The stupidity. It hurts. We need to create a "misandrist hall of fame" for these disgusting creatures. Feminists are feeling all giddy because they are currently on top. They attack males with sadistic glee (men have never behaved towards women in this fashion, I should add). But they should realize that they are being funded by elites, and…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:28 PM
45

This woman is a hero and will be remembered as such in the future.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:17 PM
12

Wow. Hundreds of comments condemning "MRA's" for a nonexistent boycott.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:48 PM
7

The price is scandalous and should have been revised a long time ago. But "white nationalist" groups? fuck off.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:25 PM
0

Uh, yeah, really clever. "Anthropology 102" oh god that's obnoxious. Just read the books I listed :) I wish you well.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:52 AM
0

The point is that assholes rule, in case you haven't figured that out yet. Darling. The British conquered the Belgians before the Belgians concurred the British, but also vice versa. Long and short is that people shouldn't pay so much attention to the TV.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:42 AM
-1

In case you didn't realize, the British have massive claims to the Congo. You truly are an idiot. "Gender differences" I just got through saying that "primitive" cultures embrace gender roles. Again, pure idiocy.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:36 AM
1

Country is what is now known as the Congo. Book: http://www.amazon.com/The-Forest-People-Colin-Turnbull/dp/0671640992 You can probably find a free download.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:52 AM
-1

"Give me a specific example of an extant forager society that is 'egalitarian'." Personally I like "The Forest People" by Colin Turnbull. "Address my underlying point, which is about how pregnancy, childbirth and nursing influence the division of labour in such societies" So far as I'm aware, all hunter-gatherer bands have division of labour. This is one of the many reasons why feminism is so silly. Men are better at killing animals, women are better at breastfeeding children. "Define the sense …
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:43 AM
-5

*
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:54 AM
6

I reckon that a half-lick is too dangerous. A quarter lick, or better a micro-lick (the opposite of a micro-aggression, though the two are sometimes interchangeable), and ideally telepathy, in which a man, recognizing when his lover is about to change her mind, takes appropriate measures, although this is also potentially problematic, because micro rape oppression privilege problematic inter-sexuality harassment MRA's -- *glitch Sorry, I made the mistake of creating a feminist robot. http://imgu…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:19 AM
-1

Again, you have it backwards. "Noble savage" theory was ultimately a product of dehumanization, and the failure of war-like nations to recognize the humanity of "primitive" cultures.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:49 AM
1

Yes, that's an interesting point.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:48 AM
-2

Hunter-gatherer culture was EXTREMELY inefficient Actually, we work far more than hunter-gatherers, so the opposite is true. What you meant to say was that "hunter-gatherers are EXTREMELY inefficient in enslaving human beings." Corrected. Now read a book, kid.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:47 AM
-1

"there is nothing to support any such statement." Actually, the entire body of anthropological study supports Boehm's contention that hunter-gatherer bands were/are egalitarian. The fact that you apparently haven't read any papers/books on the issue yet is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:37 AM
0

Hi Karen, No, that's not what I'm saying. There's nothing intrinsically "wrong" with hunter-gatherer bands, that's how we have survived for 99% of our history, and if you are a true darwinist then you should at least acknowledge the utility of the "primitive" lifestyle. I am not a primitivist, but I do recognize that it's worth gauging eg how much people work now vs. then, how much war there is now vs. then and so forth. To say that X scenario was or is "inevitable" is to embrace the "only game …
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:34 AM
8

The real problem arises when a woman has her (ahem) mouth full. How is she to ask if the consent is ongoing? Clearly everyone needs to learn sign language. We already have jazz hands, why not make hand-movement truly meaningful?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:17 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:05 AM
9

At the risk of being crass, I would like to see the makers of the linked video "go all the way" in their next production. "Can I suck your b*lls?" "Can I put a second finger into your p*ssy?" "Can I lick your ass*ole? Etc. Etc. Incredibly romantic stuff.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:54 AM
5

I find it hard to believe they don't require surplus. It's not my opinion. It's the opinion of every anthropologist who has studied the issue. "Also, being killed off at any given time by a predator wouldn't exactly be problem free lifestyle." Hence my statement that these societies were/are not utopian. We don't really know how much danger there was from predators (certainly less than being hit by a car under modernity), but if extant hunter-gatherers are anything to go by it wasn't that big a …
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:27 AM
5

My main complaint with this article is that it overstates the idea of "male dominance." It is true (and this has already been known for decades if not centuries) that hunter-gatherer bands live in peaceful egalitarian societies with relative equality between the sexes. Once agriculture and complex social organization emerged, we devolved into hierarchies similar to our great ape ancestors. The "alpha male"/psychopath returned to the scene and the rest is history. However, it is simply incorrect,…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:50 AM
3

Hunter-gatherers don't "just survive." In fact there is a large body of data indicating that the norm in such groups is "luxury." See eg "The Original Affluent Society." From Wiki: "Through knowledge of their environment hunter-gatherers are able to change what foreigners may deem as meager and unreliable natural resources into rich subsistence resources. Through this they are able to effectively and efficiently provide for themselves and minimize the amount of time spent procuring food. "[T]he …
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:41 AM
48

For anyone curious about how feminists believe people should have sex, here is a "feminism for bro's" educational video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UU8h-zImKfDO1ssJ7ocOuFMw&v=bVHYvUpeqKI Quite possibly the most awkward "sexual" encounter ever filmed. It's also noteworthy that the female actually commits "sexual assault" at one point when she escalates without the consent of the male. The are a few possible conclusions to be drawn: Virtually everyone in the world is a rapist. Or A lot of …
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:22 PM
2

Yes. There's no controversy. This is anthropology 101 stuff. There appears to be a lot of confusion among laymen because stationary chiefdoms are sometimes conflated with bands. But the defining characteristic of hunter-gatherer bands (ie the way we survived for 99% of our history) is egalitarianism. In the words of Boehm: "One of the great mysteries of social evolution is the transition from egalitarian society to hierarchical society. Extant foragers seem to be invariably egalitarian, as long …
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:36 PM
3

Anthropologists are in agreement that hunter-gatherer bands are egalitarian. There's no controversy.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:59 PM
1

Hear Hear.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:51 AM
1

You'll have to provide some evidence of "rampant cuckolding" in hunter gatherer bands.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:32 AM
1

There's no "supposedly" about it. Egalitarianism is the defining characteristic of hunter-gatherer bands. "Alpha" behaviour is considered socially deviant. Check out "Hierarchy in the Forest" or some of the excellent ethnographies like "The Forest People." As for "men amassing wealth" after the creation of agriculture, it wasn't just men. Both men and women participated and participate in hierarchical structures.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:43 AM
1

No, I don't. We can see the feminist commitment to honesty and integrity in the current brouhaha over Mad Max. These people are perennial liars.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:50 AM
6

Did you read the article? Seems like a perfectly fair characterization.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:48 AM
3

You may be right. Either way feminists throughout the media are gleefully lying about supposed MRA hostility toward the film.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:11 AM
1

I'd like to think that, but the reality is that most people have come to associate MRA's with Elliot Rodgers and now, complaining about Mad Max. If it wasn't effective to associate the MRM with spree killers and misogynists then feminists wouldn't be doing it. Most people don't take the time to study these issues, they just parrot what they hear in the dominant media.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 11:50 PM
3

The media is running with this story in a big way, presumably to drive up ticket sales by creating a fake controversy. Unfortunately MRA's are the patsies. A proper title would be "anti-MRA website calls for boycott."
/r/MensRights14/05/15 11:44 PM
1

AVFM (and ROK for that matter) should really publish an article clearing the air. Unfortunately AVFM made the bizarre decision to put out several articles praising Roosh V. But that doesn't change the fact that ROK is clearly not a men's rights website and in fact frequently publishes anti-MRA material. ROK/Red Pill could be described as traditionalist or "masculinist" or some such but they do not represent the Men's Rights Movement. Most of the lying feminists publishing these articles are awar…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:38 PM
8

What a piece of shit. This guy would have been stringing up black men in trees during the 19th century.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:24 PM
5

Horrifying.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:46 AM
1

Just don't vote for a Democrat or a Republican and you're doing the right thing. That's right, whether you vote Libertarian, Green, Socialist, Yoga transcendental party, John Birth party, Stalin-Hitler-Mao party, and other excellent parties, you're doing God's work. Why? Because only suckers vote for D's or R's.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:41 AM
1

What if the dodge ball team cheered on the fat kid while he was attempting to lose weight? Do you think that sort of social encouragement would make a difference? Why insist on the negative? Anyway, even if I concede that kids should be forced into performing certain sports, there's also track and field and even fun individual sports. Give the fat kid an actual chance to compete before he ventures into Dodge Ball territory (admittedly my favorite sport in school, along with capture the flag). Ed…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:58 AM
6

Do you not see the problem with the slippery slope? Exactly how many shots of tequila by the woman does it require for a sexual encounter to become "rape"? Do you think that a drunk woman should be absolved of culpability if she gets drunk, drives a car and kills several children? Why should women not be expected to take responsibility for their actions? Why should the nearest man in her vicinity be punished for her own irresponsibility? Like I said, if a drunk woman has sex and regrets it the n…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:07 AM
6

Again I disagree. 99% of these false rape accusations are going to be targeted at men. We all know this even if we pretend otherwise. There was a study on "drink spiking date rape." It found that 100% -- you heard me -- 100% of claims by women that their drinks had been spiked and that they had been raped were false. Their toxicology reports indicated no "rape drugs." This does not indicate duplicity by women. It indicates that a lot of women don't understand black-outs or alcohol tolerance. A p…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:21 AM
0

It really depends on your standards of 'wasted'. In this context, I describe it as unconscious. If not, then this doesn't apply." Agreed.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:10 AM
5

Obviously someone has to be sentient enough to give proper consent. If they're too drunk to do that (like passed out) it's always going to be assault. Yes. That is already obvious.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:10 AM
4

we have more people then we can adequately feed. No, we don't. This isn't even controversial. "People keep breeding, making us more food poor." It's counter-intuitive but you have it backwards. Poor people breed more because they are poor. Why? Because they rely on children to augment their incomes, and because many poor people do not have access to birth control or are otherwise restricted from birth control by eg the Catholic Church. Again, this isn't really controversial. There is a ton of sc…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:01 AM
11

I disagree. If someone decides to get drunk and consents to sex then the sex was consensual. It's not men's responsibility to take care of women like they're children. If women want to go back to the whole chivalry thing where they have chaperons etc. and are denied certain rights then fine. But rights come with responsibilities -- if women can't accept responsibility for their actions and demand that men take care them like they're babies then no, they should not have equal rights. A better sug…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:59 AM
8

Shrug. Do you have a better solution? There have been quite a few studies on overpopulation and they all come to the same conclusion. Poverty CAUSES overpopulation because, in the words of Frances Lepay, "children are poor people's source of power." This creates a vicious cycle in which one begets the other. Solution: end poverty (perfectly achievable if we stop wasting so much resources on frivialities, gargantuan military spending etc.), provide birth control for all, and given women [and men]…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:45 PM
4

You're a troll. "Rape in Saudi Arabia has been considerably investigated by various observers. In 1988, sexual offences stood at 2.19 rapes per 100,000 population.[1] Under Sharia law, a law generally enforced by the country's government, punishment imposed by the court on the rapist may range from flogging to execution. However, there is no penal code in Saudi Arabia and there is no written law which specifically criminalizes rape or prescribes its punishment. If the rape victim first entered t…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:01 PM
2

Derp.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:21 PM
14

Oh goodie, a fascist.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:20 PM
5

"we (women) should be allowed to show our nipples whenever we want, BUT you (men) can't look at us sexually when we do", And yet, that seems to be exactly what they end up arguing. They combine slut walks (hey, if you wanna be a slut, no one's stopping you) with "stare-rape" and "micro-aggressions."
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:18 PM
11

We can't really expect teenage girls or boys to behave with a great deal of rational thought. It is the responsibility of educators to teach young people to behave ethically and to consider all points of view. The failure of academia to criticize and rebut feminist doctrine, and the willingness of the elite class to promote feminism and all its attendant horrors, has created a frankenstein monster. Entitled young girls are encouraged to embrace victimhood and demonize the male sex. It's only goi…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:12 PM
3

I honestly think she's just trolling at this point. Either way she is obviously a deeply disturbed woman. It's sad that she's being employed by the once reputable Guardian.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:37 PM
1

"I'm serious when I ask you to elaborate." Google "The Privileged Sex," "Myth of Male Power" and "The Second Sexism." All of these books discuss the issue in depth. If you're looking for a brief summary of male expendability, here are a few videos: Karen Straughan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA Lindy Beige: Sex Power - why women were different and men were expendable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSX7iT0n65Q Lindy Beige: Woman Power in History: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xr…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:29 PM
3

You're going to have to elaborate on what you mean by "male disposability," because if you're citing the army, then I would point out how that issue has almost always come down to class. No. It has come down to sex, with class an additional factor. Androcide is the most common form of genocide, and has been since Alexander the Great. Men and boys are forced to fight in wars and are the primary victims of war. Class is also a factor. Thus, JP Morgan and Jay Gould bought their way out of the Civil…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:10 PM
3

"I like making a mockery of social conservatives." At least half of the people here are on the left side of the political spectrum, and probably about 90% support abortion rights etc. You should probably read a little bit more about the subject before continuing to make an ass of yourself.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:04 PM
3

It's not my opinion buddy. The most recent study on the subject indicated that a minority of both men and women identity as feminist, and the percentage continues to shrink. Notably, like MRA's most people believe in equal rights between the sexes but reject feminist theory because it is fundamentally misandrist and harms men and boys (and females too). Not sure where you're getting this "stormfront" nonsense. Feminism has always been a rich white woman's movement, and its theories are fundament…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:59 PM
-1

Doesn't hypergamy refer to mate selection according to wealth/power/social status rather than mere physical attractiveness? While the OKcupid study is interesting I'm not sure it is wise to draw far-reaching conclusions from it. Females are naturally more picky when it comes to mates since they bear the biological burden of reproduction. But I don't think women are truly rejecting 80% of men in practice. Having said that I do think the feminist silence on hypergamy is damning. Clearly it needs t…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:34 PM
3

I've never seen a post here linking to r/australia. Sounds like you're the one pushing unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. Also, Google doesn't "think" anything. It's a corporation. An increasing number of men and women are concerned about male issues, while a decreasing number of people are identifying as feminist. Short of censoring people who disagree with you you're gonna have to suck it up, kiddo.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:24 PM
30

Interesting. Bunch of Left wing MRA's in the comments. If feminists lose their left cover they are toast.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:25 AM
1

Guy seems like a douche bag. What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:02 AM
12

Don't have a link handy but I'm pretty sure a study showed that men who realize they have been cuckolded suffer a similar degree of trauma to rape victims. The fact that feminists think paternity fraud is no big deal tells us all we need to know about their empathy towards men.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:14 PM
0

Wow, you're so "alpha." Let me guess, you're about 15 years old?
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:00 AM
1

Well said and I agree that kids need to be challenged and sometimes coerced into doing things that make them feel uncomfortable and scared. Life isn't all unicorns and butterflies and kittens, however many safe spaces feminists attempt to create. However, you missed the second part of the sentence, after the semi-colon: But the impoverished fat kid being raised on processed food should be allowed to skip dodgeball if he so wishes; #there are other ways to get exercise. Fat kids have enough probl…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:12 AM
2

Kids are naturally inquisitive. If anything, current educational models discourage learning by making it so fucking boring and stultifying. Boys will not suddenly decide they don't want to learn how to read because teacher doesn't assign them a letter (which may reflect the teacher's own bias) for their current level of competence.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:43 AM
43

Actually that does change my opinion regarding this particular experiment.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:41 AM
50

Late to the party but I'm gonna go ahead and be the sole dissenter here. Background: I was the most athletic boy in my elementary school and one of the most athletic in my highschool. I won several tournaments in Tae Kwon Do and Jiu Jujitsu and received A's in all my physical education classes. I say this to demonstrate that my negative opinions about this method do not derive from sour grapes. I don't think boys should be forced to compete, I think they should be ALLOWED to compete. If boys wan…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:17 AM
2

Number 2 is interesting and something I hadn't considered.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:35 AM
6

The problem is that women can gain a great deal of attention and power by perceptions that they are being neglected/oppressed/victimized. Despite what patriarchy theorists claim, men have a great deal of sympathy for women and generally try to please them. Feminism is now a billion dollar industry. It can't go on existing if there is no threat narrative. There is already a big divide between "sex positive" feminists and "sex negative" feminists. Sex-negative feminists recently allied with the ri…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:01 PM
4

There are two reasons for this. One, as noted by RunawayGrain, is that older or unattractive women are jealous of attractive women. This was also noted by H.L. Mencken: “The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire. She likes masculine admiration, however violently expressed, and is quite able to take care of herself. More, she is well aware that very few men are bold enoug…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:18 PM
6

During the Clinton administration, Summers was a major player in the deregulating of banks/derivative contracts. He has caused more harm to the global population than any number of politicians and plutocrats. He also thinks unemployment is caused by laziness and that the third world is "under-polluted." The man is a massive douche bag and borderline criminal. Feminists claim that women have no power and that men are a privileged class. However, Summer's role in the financial crisis -- which disp…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:05 PM
3

Completely agree with the article. A couple of minor criticisms: Probably not a good idea to reference the wisdom of the "founding fathers" -- almost all of whom were slave-holders -- when addressing the issue of race in the United States. Additionally, the bill of rights was imposed on the federalists by the anti-federalists as a compromise in ratifying the constitution. Most of the founding fathers were highly elitist and didn't even think a bill of rights was necessary due to the superior cha…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:44 PM
0

Wow. That's not a very nice thing to say to someone who is trying to educate you. I will do as you say and leave you alone, but remember that there is a whole world of information out there. Sometimes improving yourself requires swallowing your pride, putting aside your ideology and hitting the books.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:06 AM
-2

Vietnam was a proxy war against the communists. Believe it or not, they aren't very nice people. (they've murdered 2 million people a year for the last century) More people died in capitalist India between 1950 and 1980 than all communist countries in history. The fact that you're proud of the mass butchery in Vietnam (and presumably the mass butchery in Latin America during the same time period) is despicable but not surprising. You're a product of Cold War propaganda. As an antidote you should…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:52 AM
0

tens of times more dead Iraqis I agree with your overall point but the number is much, much larger. Unworthy victims: Western wars have killed four million Muslims since 1990 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41491.htm
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:48 AM
3

State and corporate media outlets focus on identity politics and hot-button social issues because they are divisive and don't really affect the bottom line. You'll notice that media outlets are not in the habit of featuring people like Noam Chomsky or David Graeber. Elites don't empower academics who focus on fundamental issues of hierarchy, class and war. To do so would be insanely self-destructive to their interests. Elites empowered certain branches of academia via eg the Ford Foundation, spe…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:33 AM
2

Indeed. Which is strange. Considering that females have sexual power over males. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bateman%27s_principle
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:38 AM
1

"I don't know if I agree with this. You could potentially argue that female characters are given sexualized outfits not out of empowerment, but in order to appeal to men." Appealing to men? The horror!
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:29 AM
1

the overarching theme is that they were considered property of their husbands and/or fathers" The property analogy is even more ridiculous than the slave analogy. I'm about done here.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:13 AM
1

This precedent far predates the modern feminist movement." I realize that. And I was being perfectly serious. If women today are terrified of "stare-rape" and such then it seems reasonable that women in other times and places may have expressed similar concerns. Short of poking men's eyes out, prohibitions on female dress may well have been introduced to "solve" the "problem." Feminism is not a new movement. There have been feminist movements throughout history. They occur before civilizations c…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:12 AM
2

"being a housepet is a good life. You get taken care of, never have to work a day in your life, and are protected from being abandoned or abused. That doesn't make you any less property of your owner." So we've moved from slave to house pet. That's progress I suppose. Funny thing though, women exercised enormous power in the family, the church and the general the social sphere (and behind the scenes in politics), certainly more than men. Susan B. Anthony said as much. You should check out this v…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:29 AM
1

If I had to guess it probably evolved due to complaints by women over "harassment" and "stare-rape," as we see in the modern feminist movement.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:25 AM
2

They were unable to just leave the marriage, unable to work for themselves, etc... They were also, to a certain extent, treated as the will of their husband dictated. There may have been societal pressure on the husband to treat them well and protect them, but there certainly wasn't much done to look into a husband abusing his wife or children. Men could not just "leave the marriage" either. In fact abandonment was a crime. If he refused to support his family he could be jailed. Women certainly …
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:08 AM
1

*whoosh. The point is that if men in the 19th Century considered women "property" then they would not have passed laws that privileged women over themselves. The whole idea is ridiculous. Do you consider your mother "property"? Do you think it remotely plausible that men have ever viewed women in such a fashion? Oh well, I tried...
/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:32 PM
1

All I'm saying is that they were treated like slaves in that they were considered property of another human being. That's where the comparison ends. I don't see how the tender years doctrine has anything to do with that. I'll try to make it as clear as possible. People who are considered "property" (slaves) don't have their feelings catered to at the expense of their owners. If a slave walked up to his master and said, "it makes me unhappy to be whipped; I want to whip you instead," the slave is…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:04 PM
1

US soldiers don't conquer towns and take women as their war prize, because we don't view women as objects of their husbands (well, at least not as much as we used to). That's the kind of behavior I'm talking about. Actually, US soldiers very often commit rape in occupied nations. Rape is common in war. Obviously there would be no utility in "stealing" women. The practice you are talking about occurs when two poor groups are engaged in genocidal conflict. It has nothing to do with Islam. Religiou…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:00 PM
2

You might say that they were treated like slaves as well. That's an interesting view of slavery. Do you know why the tender years doctrine was implemented? Because it made women "unhappy." That was the justification for taking away rights from men and giving them to these supposed "slaves." The slavery analogy doesn't make any sense for the simple reason that it fails to take into account female privilege and gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:29 PM
1

"I think, when people refer to women as being treated like slaves in these areas, they mean in that they are viewed as property rather than individual human beings." Not only are Muslim women not considered "property" but their lives are valued more than males. Do you know why 70% of college students in Iran are female? They are still suffering the fallout of androcide from the Iran/Iraq war. Similarly, Rwanda has more more female politicians than male. Muslims also have divorce and child suppor…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:27 PM
1

"They take women and young girls as sex slaves, for god's sake." So did CIA contractor Dyncorp in Serbia. That's a war issue not a "Muslim" issue. "where women can't drive, show their face in public, work for themselves, manage their own finances, live on their own, etc, etc," I'm not buying it. There were restrictions on women's behaviour in 19th C America as well, didn't mean they were "slaves." The commentator points out: "Outside of the house, the man is 'in-charge', there was a tendency for…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:44 PM
39

Don't forget the fact that baby male foreskins are used for female beauty products. I feel like I woke up in an episode of the twilight zone.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 04:44 AM
8

The answer to this question is yes. Female sexual selection plays a huge role in male behaviour. Women are attracted to strength. That strength may be healthy, or it may be toxic (violent, anti-social etc.). Given the choice between a shy, kind-hearted nerd and a domineering bad boy, most women would rather have sex with the latter. It is the height of hypocrisy for feminists to condemn men for seeking power and domination when women are clearly attracted to these characteristics. Neither sex sh…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 07:33 PM
6

Anyone who thinks slavery is a "white people's problem" should not be teaching anything, let alone racial issues. As noted by the anthropologist James C. Scott: "…all ancient states without exception were slave states. The proportion of slaves seldom dropped below 30 per cent of the population in early states, reaching 50 per cent in early South-East Asia (and in Athens and Sparta as much as 70 and 86 per cent)…slaving was at the very centre of state-making." The only reason we (wrongly) associa…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 07:14 PM
8

Yep. Reality is: "winner didn't acknowledge Mike," that's it. I wish him success, but this post is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:38 AM
5

We treat grown women like children (less than children, in fact, in light of "enthusiastic consent") because males are suckers for females. We want to please them. And despite feminist doctrine, the men in power have no interest whatsoever in helping men at the expense of women; on the contrary, they seek to disempower other males, whom they rightly regard as a threat. The idea that feminism is "fighting the man" is a joke. Feminism is supported by Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan because plutocrats …
/r/MensRights09/05/15 02:40 AM
4

Makes sense. As in adult life, social power is controlled primarily by women. Even the original suffragists acknowledged this, and indeed used it as a platform to encourage their movement (women would tame the violent nature of men etc.)
/r/MensRights09/05/15 02:32 AM
1

Good on Dan.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 02:18 AM
31

Unless I'm mistaken, studies have shown that girls do better in mixed schools, while boys do better in single-sex schools. I may be wrong...would be happy with a correction. Seems to me that if we want mixed education, which seems to be the ideal according to progressives, then we should also take into account the different ways in which boys and girls learn. Yes, there are very real differences, according to a little thing called "science." We can't go on pretending that boys and girls are exac…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 02:11 AM
5

It's very important to download and archive feminist statements. Feminists are nothing if not dishonest.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:46 AM
5

Piss off mangina. You may feel comfortable doubling up on labour, but most men are rational. Go cook food at a feminist camp, prick.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:07 AM
0

And yet, nary a coherent thought. You're just like a feminist, kiddo.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:40 AM
4

Yep, I got banned from AVFM for criticizing the ideas of a regular author. No ad hom. Just criticism.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:29 PM
9

This isn't just a person who doesn't understand statistics. She has been caught putting "anti-feminist" remarks in the "pro-feminist" column and vice versa. Yet another reminder to NEVER trust a "study" conducted by a feminist.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:43 PM
4

Vikings were not hunter-gatherers.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:17 PM
19

Deplorable. If this guy was alive in the 19th C he would have been a Klansman. Make no mistake SJW's: we are coming at you, with facts. You will be recognized as the bigots you are, within your lifetimes. You will be regarded in the same manner as old KKK members. Don't say I didn't warn you.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:03 AM
-1

So you're okay with feminism as long as it's used as a justification for bombing and occupying poor countries?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:48 PM
3

There was a thread about this the other day...here's a repost: The best way of improving the situation for women in Saudi Arabia would be for the American government to stop supporting the regime and selling it weapons. Feminists should focus on that strategy if they wish to be effective. The Saudi government would have been toppled a long time ago but for American, British and Israeli geo-strategy in the region. Moreover, radical Islamism has been consistently supported by the West as a means o…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:39 PM
6

Great to see Karen getting some airtime on the CBC.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:50 PM
1

Sorry to hear about your experiences. "there's no way to reduce it." I disagree. Miseducation (feminism) is a big factor here, and people can become more empathetic when they are shown new information and encouraged to put themselves in other people's shoes. People will probably always be more empathetic toward women, but we can also make people much more empathetic toward men. Sooner or later we'll get some powerful documentaries on men's issues.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:21 PM
1

The best way of improving the situation for women in Saudi Arabia would be for the American government to stop supporting the regime and selling it weapons. Feminists should focus on that strategy if they wish to be effective. The Saudi government would have been toppled a long time ago but for American, British and Israeli geo-strategy in the region. Moreover, radical Islamism has been consistently supported by the West as a means of preventing Arab secular nationalism. That's why these regimes…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:22 AM
-1

If you the think the American government is "Marxist" you are delusional.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:08 PM
3

Ok. So now we know that joint custody is in the best interests of the child. NOW can stop its opposition to shared parenting. Right? Best interests of the child? Feminists? Hello?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:52 PM
5

LMAO
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:26 AM
9

Men tend to regard child-bearing and child rearing as an absolutely essential "job," and absolutely respect this task. Feminists apparently do not; indeed, feminists at NOW opposed educating women about fertility due to fear that it would encourage women to enter "patriarchal" families and not become wage slaves. After all, men and women should be fighting one another, not working together. Men have always respected women for the hard work of motherhood. Look at de Tocqueville's comments in the …
/r/MensRights05/05/15 12:57 AM
33

I was about to make a post about this very topic: the earnings gap is not evidence of female oppression but female privilege. Luckily Janet spared me the trouble. It's counter-intuitive but it makes sense if you think about it. Women work less than men because they are the privileged sex. Male labour is mostly necessary labour (the counterpart for women is child-birth, the most necessary labour of all). If women stopped working there would be major issues with the bureaucracy and in some vital a…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:18 PM
2

Excellent.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:48 PM
1

Quite honestly I think the terms "left" and "right" are ridiculously simplistic. For example, the Democratic party would be considered "far-right" in many European countries. We can't divide all people into "group A" and "group B." Most people have more sophisticated views. At the very least we need to distinguish between authoritarian and non-authoriatiran. There are plenty of leftists who reject centralized state power, and there are plenty or rightists who support centralized state power (pro…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 02:06 AM
3

Not a bad article. It's nice to see a woman acknowledge that feminism has robbed men of their identity. It's also nice to see some acknowledgement that women are now in the driver's seat. However, by saying "women need to allow men to take the lead" she is missing the point. Men CANNOT "lead" on this subject. A small number of men are willing to risk their reputations and livelihoods by speaking out against feminism, but the majority are understandably reluctant to do so. When I talk privately w…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 09:07 PM
10

I was the only man in an all-female office workplace. Also had a female boss. She was great, very nice person, not a feminist. However the work environment was basically hell. There was constant vying for social status, constant bickering, backstabbing, passive-aggressiveness etc. I lasted about two years before I quit. I couldn't stand it anymore.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:10 PM
3

Not only Luxuembourg but Mother Jones, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Lucy Parsons and other prominent early American socialists and anarchists. In fact the first major critique of feminism was written by a Marxist (Ernest Bax). The suffragettes were mostly rich conservative women. It is incredibly juvenile that right-wingers on this website can't go five minutes without attacking their boogeyman "the left." I don't see it happening in the other direction. We get it, righties -- you think "leftists" ar…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:09 AM
5

The World Socialist Website has condemned the reversal of due process rights for men on college campuses. I wouldn't expect much from liberals. Their whole schtick is identity politics. It's incredibly ironic that you think "terrorists" and "illegals" (is that before or after the trial or drone strike?) should be denied due process rights. This sort of attitude is EXACTLY why liberals are not supporting due process for supposed rapists. You are willing to abandon your principles out of group thi…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:19 AM
13

Russel Crowe spoke out against circumcision. Whoopi Goldberg spoke out in support of male self defence. Dave Foley and others have criticized divorce laws. Bob Geldof has criticized custody laws. I'm sure there are other examples. However it will be a long time before any celebrity is willing to label him/herself an MRA. We might see more celebrities calling themselves egalitarians in the next few years. Ultimately labels aren't important. It's the issues that matter.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:01 AM
-4

If the cunt who downvoted me would like to actually address my arguments, great. 4 million is a genocide, incidentally. I hope you're comfortable with that.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:08 AM
-1

Didn't read the article but the title is silly. People with power abuse people that are less powerful. /end
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:06 AM
-4

Anyone who supports "nuking the middle east" is a cunt. Plain and simple. I don't care if she said it to be notorious. Upwards of 4 million Arabs have been killed due to the "war on terror." There are many eloquent voices speaking out against feminism. Anne Coulter is not one of them.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:00 AM
1

What a shocker...
/r/MensRights28/04/15 01:29 AM
23

God bless the people behind the Innocence Project.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 01:26 AM
1

You nailed it. It's a matter of faith. Most of these people probably don't even realize that the term "capitalism" was coined by Karl Marx. As I stated at the outset I'm not a communist. It seems absurd to me that so many people have convinced themselves that there are only two ways of organizing human society. We have how many hundreds of flavours of ice cream? But apparently our socio-economic-political systems only come in two forms. Madness.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:34 PM
1

I agree. Well said.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:53 PM
4

I think the main difference today is that men are no longer treated with even a modicum of respect. Men seem happy enough to protect the womminz even at the expense of their very lives but when we're constantly harangued and vilified even as we do the dirty work...more and more men are saying "enough." The internet is a relatively new phenomenon, and we're only now beginning to collate all this information. We've already completely debunked feminist theory. In the old days Joe Sixpack would have…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:49 PM
2

OH MY GOD! Someone whistled at her. Muh oppresionz! Call the cops! The average feminist has the mental maturity of a five-year-old.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:30 PM
5

You may be right. Certainly I agree that we haven't reached "Peak Feminism." But they have some serious problems: They're wrong about practically everything; none of the science or data supports their worldview Mothers with sons Men are required as workhorses to prop up the economy, and men are starting to get tired of being abused
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:17 PM
2

Actually, there was a much greater degree of market liberalization in India during the great famines than is true currently. There were virtually no government protections against predatory capitalism. Nevertheless, India's government continues to favour capitalists over the majority population. India's hunger 'shame': 3,000 children die every day, despite economic growth http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/02/16/10424930-indias-hunger-shame-3000-children-die-every-day-despite-economic-growt…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:02 PM
5

The fems also use many of the same tactics (indoctrination, intimidation, censorship) sans the violence If we include proxy violence by the state then feminism is indeed a violent movement. Nothing to compare with a major war, but then feminism is less than 200 years old and is only now achieving major institutional power. Personally I think feminism will peak in a few years and then begin a rapid decline. Short of censoring the entire internet I don't see how they can keep the truth under wraps…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:55 PM
3

The point was not to say that communism was or is a swell system. Just that vastly more people have been killed under capitalism than communism. Indeed, as documented by Nobel Prize winning economist Amartya Sen, more people died in a 30 year period in capitalist democratic India than all communist countries in history. You should read up on the glorious capitalist governments funded by the United States during the Cold War in countries like El Salvador, Nicaragua, Chile, Guatemala etc. At least…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:32 PM
3

Communists, then again, hated the "class enemy" or "the enemies of the people" so much that they killed hundreds of millions of them. I'm not a communist. But the most "generous" number is about 100 million (more likely around 67 million). Which means more people died in capitalist India between the years 1950 and 1980 than all communist countries in history. The number of people who have died from the structural violence of capitalism, the direct violence (death squads etc) of capitalism, as we…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:01 PM
2

Congrats Akkad. :) It's a terrific channel.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 04:06 AM
2

Also, men are masculine by nature. So that's a big "problem." Another "problem" is that women continually favour masculine males over feminine males. We all know it. We all went to highschool and College.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:24 AM
5

Are you a man or a woman? Just curious. Honestly, males are quite capable of being sensitive etc...it's just that that's not attractive to the opposite sex, and men receive not positive but negative results from emoting. So males stop emoting. We're not stupid. We're human beings. The entire idea of "toxic masculinity" is utterly absurd imo.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:19 AM
5

Hillary has been an enthusiastic bomber of brown people everywhere. Now she speaks of "women of colour." LMAO. She has Zero chance of being elected. Everyone hates her. She used to sit on the board of Wall Mart. What sort of idiot would vote for this bitch? Republican, Demorat or otherwise?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:10 AM
2

The only way Hillary will win is via vote fraud. That's a fact. Feminism is on the decline. People on the right hate Hillary for good reason. People on the left hate Hillary even more. She's a war-mongering corporatist psychopath.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:35 AM
2

This is the "courtship" section of BBC Life story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7LGHf3ooIo Here's a hint: if females desired feminine men, men would be feminine.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:21 AM
2

Why do males want to "prove" their masculinity? Just curious about your viewpoint.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:14 AM
2

There is simply no need to affix "masculinity" to this problem. End of/
/r/MensRights26/04/15 01:40 AM
2

I happen to think this post is great. How should you celebrate? Well, if I had to choose, my celebration would consist of steak -- ideally a bison steak, rare -- mashed potatoes, mushrooms and asparagus. And a lobster tail with lots of butter. And Canadian Whisky. A Tequila Sunrise and some Amoretto to wash it down. Maybe some pistachio ice cream. After that, the world is your oyster.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:26 AM
1

Regardless of whether those are Karen's views, even the paraphrase is essentially correct. Voting is a minor affair in the history of social and political change, and women already had enormous social power prior to the vote.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 04:54 PM
4

All of them. Seriously. Here are two to start with: Me, a feminist? No way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqEeCCuFFO8 Feminism and the disposable Male: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:58 PM
6

I encourage you to share Karen Straughan's videos with your partner. They're about 20 minutes each, and utterly devastating to feminism.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:35 PM
5

Excellent piece. There's a website that charts female mass murderers and serial killers throughout history -- I seem to have forgotten the name (I think the word 'misandry' is in the title). Anyone have a link? Another important point: women are much more likely to engage in proxy violence (the eternal cry of the highschool girl: "my boyfriend is gonna kick your ass!"). Today, the "boyfriend" has become the state. And there is nothing more violent than governments.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 12:17 PM
3

off to a good start. Could be an amazing resource.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 10:39 AM
7

Disrespectful little prick, is the phrase you were looking for.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 08:03 AM
6

Utterly despicable. I look forward to Karen's reply to this snivelling weasel.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:15 AM
3

Feminists are perverting anarchism just like they are perverting everything else. Most of these idiots are college girls who haven't even read a book on the subject. They look around for what appears to be a currently trendy group, move in, and commence their whining about muh oppressionz and muh feelz. These girls would happily call themselves fascists the very next day if it suddenly became hip.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 09:12 PM
2

Controversial no doubt but it would be a good idea to have these endless rape hoaxes archived in one place.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 05:01 PM
2

That's the biggest feminist circle jerk I've ever seen. And I've seen quite a few. Hopefully some MRA's will chime in. Unfortunately I'm off to work.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:24 PM
7

Women now achieve social status by portraying themselves as victims. If a woman claims to feel "threatened" she will receive comfort and support and validation for her feelings. Naturally a great many women are going to abuse this power. Indeed, women actually ACHIEVE power through the perception that they are powerless. I can't imagine this ending well...
/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:30 PM
6

"twitter’s new measures to control bad behaviour are a good start in tackling the abuse that is driving women away from speaking out online." The anarchist Bob Black predicted back in 1982 that feminism would eventually become a totalitarian movement to rival history's most oppressive tyrannies. Most people find this idea absurd due to gynocentrism, "women are wonderful" and neoteny (and frankly, male vanity). However Black made the point that feminism -- since its arguments are completely illog…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 07:19 AM
6

Holy shit. That needs to be on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 07:12 AM
3

I honestly don't think that would help much. Men are less interested in talking about their feelings than having practical solutions. If we want to solve the problem of male suicide we need to look at what is causing it (employment is a huge issue, for example).
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:05 AM
1

"Accordingly, and for the reasons stated above, Columbia’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the Complaint is dismissed in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 34 and to close the case." And so it goes...
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:11 AM
1

It amazes me that these women -- having never lived as men -- think they have the right to explain masculinity to boys. It's really just child abuse.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:02 AM
3

What is this patriarchal bullshit? Women are supposed to be fighting men, not trying to give them pleasure or receiving pleasure in turn. /s Nice article Janet.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:00 AM
6

Best way to prevent such abuses would be to legalize. Lonely men are not going to magically stop using prostitutes. Let me guess: you think the war on drugs reduces drug use and crime?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:18 PM
3

The idea that BBC is "left wing" is completely laughable. If you mean "embraces diversionary identity politics in order to divide the population" then sure. By that measure the US Democrats, who are mostly funded by bankers and other plutocrats, are also "left wing." But it's not as though they routinely feature people who advocate work co-ops, living wages, taxing the rich, nationalizing industries, ending British imperialism etc. etc.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 09:03 PM
3

what should I click on at the link? Can't seem to find the segment.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 09:00 PM
16

This story is actually really sad. We have to remember that a boy grew up in this house.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:21 AM
3

Petty squabbles. Egoism. Factionalism. In dissident movements. Yep, that's worked really well in the past. Grow the hell up and stop it with these silly personality wars. No one fucking cares except the people involved. It's just annoying.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:13 AM
3

...So we can put an end to the idea that males and females are "equal" in the UK.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:21 AM
6

Ouch.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:07 AM
30

College has become a "safe space" for feminists. Which means they're unsafe for men.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:06 AM
49

Enough of this separate tournament bullshit. If the ladies are up to scratch they should play with the men.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:03 AM
0

And now more down-votes -- any of you want to be honest?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 01:10 AM
0

I'm not a comfan. But I enjoyed it. She has more balls than all of you combined.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:59 AM
1

I can sense the empathy...
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:28 AM
2

Good lord. I sincerely hope you're being paid by the Democratic Party.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:24 AM
3

Great post.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:16 AM
1

I notice the down-votes have started. If you disagree with something I wrote, please respond in the comments.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:52 PM
9

Laziness is a virtue. We work too much. Bertrand Russell: In Praise of Idleness: http://www.zpub.com/notes/idle.html Marshall Sahlins: The Original Affluent Society: http://www.primitivism.com/original-affluent.htm Bob Black: The Abolition of work http://www.primitivism.com/abolition.htm The solution is not for women to work as hard as men. It is for men to work as hard as women, ie less. Ideally, we should do away with the entire concept of work. When the Jesuit proto-anthropologists encountere…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:35 PM
8

Pannel celebrating equality and female empowerment censors empowered female who advocates equality and opposes censorship. Nope. No irony here.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:17 PM
4

There's an error in the title. Women can't rape men. According to feminists.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:49 PM
2

The sly minx!
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:48 PM
2

"One thing you can do to make yourself less threatening is take out a book and read it. Readers aren't scary." Un. Fucking. Believable.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:25 PM
1

Excellent. I like this one even better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZTt6sZtvqU I would comment further but I'm late for the local Patriarchy meeting. See ya there!
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:18 PM
2

Somewhere inbetween I guess. I honestly bought into patriarchy theory, mostly due to apex fallacy. As soon as I bothered to study the issue I became an ex-feminist.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:11 PM
3

AVFM has a nice video roundup: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/expogate-video-roundup/
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:59 PM
11

This. Feminism is the social/political equivalent of a nagging/abusive wife. There will NEVER come a time when feminists admit success. If you listen to the old-timers like Gloria Steinem, they do not say, "We did it!" They say, "We still have a LONG way to go" or "Feminism is needed now more than ever." People who think feminism is trying to achieve something are missing the point. Bitching IS the point. Reminds me of McLuhan's quote "the medium is the message."
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:57 PM
6

I disagree. At least with the part about it being conscious. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny Human beings are hardwired to want to protect women. I used to be a feminist. It wasn't because I wanted to get laid. I was already getting laid. It was because I was (a) misinformed and (b) unaware of my biases toward the female sex. Karen Straughan snapped me out of my stupor. All it took was one video. Are SOME male feminists motivated primarily by the desire for sex? Sure. But it's more complica…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:51 PM
2

I'm pretty sure the interview lasted longer than this.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:28 AM
1

"I'm pretty sure Anna Cherry gives no fucks if men enjoy looking at her body" I disagree. If there's no audience why bother to show off your body? Nothing wrong with that of course. "When I think of "empowered, independent women", I think of the Anna, Alison, Karen and the other badgers." I agree with this.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:16 AM
4

Actually, people hate you, and people who share your opinions are also hated, and rightly so. Only a small percentage of women -- let alone men -- identify with the hate cult known as feminism.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:04 AM
1

I'm rooting for this guy. But if he keeps talking about Margaret fucking Thatcher he's going to turn off most of Britain.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:50 AM
6

No fair, you deleted your original ignorant comment.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:46 AM
6

Are you getting paid for this garbage? I hope so. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:09 AM
5

"a Gamma wants to play" Lol. You guys are so cute.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:06 AM
5

As soon as you have a coherent thought, please feel free to reply.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:23 AM
2

Shouldn't this post come with a trigger warning? ;)
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:22 AM
5

Are you a feminist false flagger by chance? If not, why not just post on the red pill? You're obviously more concerned with getting laid and promoting right wing ideology...
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:17 AM
5

Karen Straughan understandably gets most of the press in the MRM but Alison is also a brilliant and compassionate woman. I agree -- her videos are awesome and deserve to have a wider audience. That goes for all of the Honey Badgers. I have a sneaking suspicion that Anna Cherry on Top will not have a difficult time attracting an audience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Pnip7HbY1Q Lest we "objectify" Anna by finding her attractive (Oh No's! The thing that keeps the human race going!), she's also…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 04:59 AM
9

This should be the top post on this sub. Especially for those who support the death penalty and the prison industrial complex. If you think the FBI is an upstanding and neutral law enforcement agency whose primary purpose is to fight terrists and serial killers look up "COINTELPRO" and/or "The Terror Factory." Right-wingers can simply look up "Waco." I am appalled by all political oppression whether it be targeted at the "left" or the "right." There is a strong desire amongst human beings to pun…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 04:55 AM
15

so "could be interpreted as rude" is now justification for banning and censorship? Here's an idea: get a fainting couch. Just because you're terrified of having your feelz hurt or your worldview challenged does not mean that the rest of us should have to abide by your child-like standards. Hell, I know lots of children who have a much thicker skin than you feminists. Grow the hell up. Edit: reminds me of this quote by Robert Heinlein on censorship: "The whole principle is wrong; it's like demand…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:08 AM
14

CalgaryExpo is now deleting previous tweets, including: "they raised nearly $10,000 from MRAs to pose as gamer's and were caught immediately lol" http://imgur.com/vlvWpDP It would be great if attendees wore Honey Badger shirts to show their support for free speech.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 12:12 AM
3

A lot of this is latent anti-communist hysteria from the Cold War. Despite popular belief, capitalism is the American religion. The communist boogeyman is similar to the patriarch boogeyman of feminism. It doesn't seem strange to these people that there is maybe one socialist in the entire US government, or that socialists themselves are often in the biggest critics of identity politics, or that the first major critique of feminism was written by a socialist.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 10:36 PM
2

I do not consider myself "left" or "right." These terms are primitive and simplistic, and a real example of "divide and conquer." ;)
/r/MensRights17/04/15 06:08 AM
5

Nothing wrong with complaining about not getting laid or trying to improve yourself so as to increase the likelihood of getting laid, or supporting legalization of prostitution etc. I only said that the desire to get laid is not primarily what motivates the MRM, and that it is dishonest of critics to conflate us with the red pill. Yes there's some overlap, but there's also overlap between women who read Cosmo and women who consider themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:28 AM
5

I never said that I thought most people here are "left wing." I merely said I don't support far right wing ideology. That means I have no interest in expressing solidarity with certain elements of the "manosphere" that you apparently find compelling. At minimum you should acknowledge that it's dishonest of critics to conflate MRA's with far right wing groups, considering that said groups frequently malign MRA's and considering that at least half of this movement is made up of people who do not s…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:23 AM
20

I disagree. I fully support men's rights, I am opposed to feminism, but I find a lot of the stuff on places like ROK and Red Pill toxic. ROK for example is stridently right wing, even crypto-fascist, so you can count me out of that nonsense. That doesn't mean I don't find some of the material on The Red Pill accurate, but they engage in their own forms of reductionist thinking (alpha/beta). They remind me of feminists. Anyway, conflating a group of people who are interested in self-improvement a…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:36 AM
3

That was indeed a very telling -- and disturbing -- quote. And people wonder by Bob Black titled his essay on the subject, "feminism as fascism."
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:03 AM
21

Insane. Just. Insane. I honestly think that people need to start making complaints against these feminist campaigns in line with sexual discrimination laws. Make no mistake: these are hate campaigns against men.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:15 PM
1

Just checked and it works for me (Canada).
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:17 PM
7

I agree that "misters" is quite charming. I also laughed at a comment, made in mocking reference to male hardships in history, "again with the fucking coal mines!"
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:39 AM
8

Great post. Edit: you should repost this as a new entry.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:23 AM
2

"Moderate" and "far" left -- these are oversimplifications. Identity politics arose to counter the left. It was a way of co-opting and enervating movements that focussed on class. Liberals are not "leftists." They support capitalism. No one in power actually cares about the fate of "cis gendered white men." Or abortion. Or "diversity." It's classic divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:59 AM
3

Yep. I'm pretty sure most people here would like nothing more than to be able to stop bitching about feminism. The problem is that it is impossible to discuss gender issues without the F word. If there is an over-emphasis on feminism in this sub it is only because it is the dominant paradigm. In any case, I wish OP luck.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:56 AM
6

Fair point.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:49 AM
2

lol
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:51 AM
7

It's a fascinating sub. Really gives us a glimpse into the dark heart of feminism. These people hate men and boys with a passion. Most were probably abused as children or something, and have become utterly deranged as a result. I would encourage people NOT to post there. Let them wallow in their filth and hate. They remind us what we should not become.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:47 AM
3

Everyone needs to make sure they download these types of videos. If feminists are good at anything it is censorship.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:40 AM
1

So he's wrong about just about everything except this one issue?
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:37 AM
14

WOW. Yet more evidence that males are the more empathetic sex.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:35 AM
1

I see the point you are making about vulnerability being power, but again that is simply passive power, or passive-aggressive power, and not direct or egalitarian power. I can sorta see your point, but I think you may be under-estimating the profound power of women. Throughout history. Think of it this way: do the "men behind the throne" advertise their power? No. They prefer plausible deniability. As Cornelius Vanderbilt put it: "What do I care about law? Ain't I got the power?" And this is ess…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:00 AM
1

< the question still remains whether it is in result of biology, nurture, or even biology influenced by nurture. I think the answer is "all of the above," however feminists remain steadfast in their obviously fallacious view that gender is simply a social construct -- except when science demonstrates that women are better at something. Did you watch the video I linked? <On top of that, the multiple types of gender identity must also be taken into account I agree, but we also have to remember tha…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:04 AM
2

<Please don't bring biological determinism into society. I'm not a biological determinist. But I am a biological realist. We can't simply pretend that science doesn't exist. <There are even people saying no gender differences exist. Those people are wrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5LRdW8xw70 <Not all women want bad boys, or masculine men. No. Just the majority. Similarly, not all men are attracted to nubile young women. Just the majority. It's great that society has become more accepting…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:15 PM
11

"i just hate being born male. i feel inferior and hate everything about it." Men have always had the short end of the stick. It's almost unbelievable, if you stop and think about it, that feminists were able to convince society that men are the privileged sex. In any case, don't let anyone tell you you are inferior. Much of the hostility toward men by feminists derives from envy. Men are superior in many respects, which unfortunately means that we have to taken on the burdens of society. There's…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:51 PM
2

You know all those funny little double standards? They hurt men too. Yes. We're well aware of that. < You know societies current pressure on men to be masculine? Men are masculine because we are born that way. Most women are attracted to masculine men in the same way that most men are attracted to feminine women. It's called biology. Studies consistently confirm this: "If you think women are initially attracted to men that are open and concerned about their feelings, you're wrong. At least that'…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:34 PM
1

Nice little video on the subject. Woman-Power in the Past https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrgovSZ32Yg
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:08 PM
2

Seems like there are more shelters for dogs than human male victims of DV/sexual assault.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 05:36 PM
16

Stewart is a snivelling little rat. I say that as one of those "far-leftists" that many here so despise. His show was less terrible under the Bush administration. He's a democrat, so when Bush was in office he rightly pilloried Republicans, took the mainstream media to task and came across as a good upstanding fellow. Under Obama he has behaved in the same manner as Michael Moore -- with extreme cowardice. The same criticism levelled by Moore against Bush Jr. in Fahrenheit 9/11 could just as eas…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 05:04 AM
12

It is indeed legitimate. This has been recognized since the early 20th Century and presumably well before. “The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire. She likes masculine admiration, however violently expressed, and is quite able to take care of herself. More, she is well aware that very few men are bold enough to offer it without a plain invitation, and this awareness m…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 04:31 AM
3

To top it all off, "talking about your feelings" with women may actually make matters worse. If females were attracted to emotive men then boys would learn from a young age to share their feelings and "let it all out" and cry in the same manner as women. There was an article posted here a few months ago in which a feminist actually admitted that she was not attracted to "overly feminine" men while simultaneously complaining about "toxic masculinity." She was completely oblivious to the role of f…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:41 AM
3

"Central to radical feminism is the belief that the patriarchy (not capitalism or sex roles or socialization or individual sexist men) is the root of all forms of oppression; that all men benefit from and maintain it and are, therefore, our political enemies." Celia Kitzinger, Professor of Gender and Sexuality at York
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:05 AM
1

Maher is a monumental douche bag.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:05 PM
1

Major blunder by Tl;Dr. I enjoy his irreverent wit and biting commentary but he fucked up on the subject of "Neo-liberalism." Same way Sargon fucked up last week about economics supposedly being a "science." The term neo-liberalism does not refer to classical liberalism a la Thomas Jefferson or modern liberalism a la Sean Penn but an economic doctrine that stresses deregulation of "free market" capitalism. Markets become "liberalized," resulting in increased profits, decreased wages and a wonder…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:10 AM
2

This is an important point. We all know that in the feminist catechism, the straight white male is basically satan. This rightly causes a great deal of hurt and anger amongst white males, especially poor white males, who work and suffer ten times more than your average female. Affirmative action aka reverse discrimination also causes anger when a white male is passed up for a job. At the same time, how many of these bourgeois white feminists actually seek to help poor and minority communities as…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:21 PM
2

You're being down-voted but you're right. It's not because "America is evil!", it's simply real politik.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:01 PM
2

"we have to acknowledge that there was a time that fathers always received sole custody." This is true. But why were these laws changed? Because it was argued that the policy was making women "unhappy." Seriously. Could you imagine a group of men getting together, saying that a law made them unhappy, and having an all female legislature change the law to the disadvantage of all women? Me neither.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:37 PM
5

The point is that women didn't NEED the vote to exercise enormous power. That's how powerful and privileged women are compared to men. Seriously, think about it.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:35 PM
5

"Duh, because only men could vote." You seem to be unaware that most men during the time period didn't have the right to vote either. Indeed property holding women had the right to vote in new Jersey from 1776 -- before non-property-holding men. Wyoming allowed women to vote in 1869 and California in 1911. Susan B. Anthony herself stated that women were fairly apathetic about the issue, and indeed often hostile to the suffragists. This is probably because voting made about as much difference the…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:19 PM
3

As a follow-up, here's a much better comparison in terms of gender oppression. Would you rather be dead or not have the right to vote? If you were a poor male living in the late 19th Century you had a very good chance of dying at work. A report in 1899 for the railroad industry lists 29,000 deaths. In one industry. In one year. Personally I would rather skip the vote (voting doesn't seem to accomplish much anyway) and take the comparatively privileged lifestyle of a house wife. Most women appare…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 05:15 PM
5

"separate was not equal." Indeed. But you're failing to recognize that women had other privileges and forms of power that were not available to men (and are still not available). You note that you would rather be a 19th century housewife than a house slave. So it's good that you acknowledge that women were profoundly privileged compared to male or female slaves. The problem is that feminists DO often attempt to compare the "oppression of women" to racial oppression. Sorry, but the analogy is rid…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 04:36 PM
9

Here's a quote from Sommers that will help you understand how women viewed the voting issue in the 19the Century: "Because the vote was associated with individualism and personal assertiveness, many women saw it as both selfish and an attack on their unique and valued place in the family. Feminist historians denigrate what they call the “cult of domesticity” that proved so beguiling to nineteenth century women. But they forget that this “cult” freed many rural women from manual labor, improved t…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:46 PM
15

"The indifference and inertia, the apathy of women lies the greatest obstacle to their enfranchisement." -- Susan B. Anthony, 1902 It wasn't just apathy. There were huge numbers of anti-suffrage groups comprised of women. The one in New York had 20,000 female members. Many women actually considered voting (and manual labour) "beneath them." One pamphlet stated: ""Holy scripture indicates for women a sphere higher than and apart from that of public life." They understood that they had enormous so…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:36 PM
7

Sure. That doesn't change the historical facts.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:30 PM
14

Most women didn't want the vote. All the polls from the time period reflect this. The suffragists organized a referendum in Massachusetts and only 20,000 of 600,000 eligible female voters showed up. Susan B. Anthony admitted in 1902 that women were the primary obstacle to female suffrage in the US. Women from the time period believed that males and females had their own "spheres". They knew that they had enormous power. When a majority of women came to the conclusion that they should enter the m…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:16 PM
0

Sorry, drunk.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 11:32 PM
-4

Meh.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:58 PM
6

Enjoyed this. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 07:54 PM
4

I would rather be viciously threatened than have parts of my genitals cut off.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:44 PM
11

"Spears carefully planned, moving her son from state to state, doctor to doctor, to get treatment for conditions he never had. In the final days of the child's life, his mother sneaked him into a hospital bathroom to deliver a fatal dose of salt through his feeding tube, prosecutors said." Brenda Bursch, a California psychologist who has treated patients with factitious disorders, is convinced that it is a psychiatric condition. "I don't have a doubt in my mind that psychopathology is involved,"…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:33 PM
1

It doesn't get any more cruel than this. Call it Munchausen by Proxy or whatever else you'd like. I call it evil.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:15 PM
2

Male death privilege.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:00 PM
1

Actually, we lived in egalitarian societies for 99% of our history. Good reading on the subject: http://www.amazon.com/Hierarchy-Forest-Evolution-Egalitarian-Behavior/dp/0674006917
/r/MensRights09/04/15 11:40 AM
7

"That wealthy men also have class privilege (and probably race privilege) ON TOP of male privilege does not mean that poor men hold no male privileges (indeed that’s probably why poor men fight harder to hang on to the ones they do have). That class privileges give wealthy white women more social advantages than male privileges give to poor black men does not mean that those poor men hold no male privileges: just that there is an intersectionality of class/race /gender oppressions under patriarc…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:43 AM
6

Men are simply better at chess. That much is obvious. What's the problem? Women are apparently better at multi-tasking and other skills, so why deny men their place atop logic mountain ;)?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 10:48 AM
1

Reason: most of us understand that men, unlike women, do not have in-group preference. It wouldn't make any sense. I mean, watch a nature video and get back to me. Women have always had enormous power. Sometimes, rarely, a good man or woman gets into a position of power and has empathy for the majority. Men are apparently more individualistic than women. Perhaps that's a good thing. Perhaps women provide the necessary counter-balance, and vice versa. Perhaps it's like Yin and Yang. But feminism …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 10:31 AM
1

lol. You're the perfect stereotype. I hope that was cop'd and pasted.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 09:54 AM
3

Can't think of any routine factual errors. But there seems to be an over reliance on evo-psych and biodeterminist theories. Not saying there's anything wrong with evo-psych but there is a danger of embracing the same reductionism as "blank slate" theorists. Common error: Men and Women are X because pre-history consisted of constant war. This is false. Steven Pinker's theories on the subject have been soundly discredited. http://www.livinganthropologically.com/2013/02/12/war-peace-human-nature-ev…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:13 AM
8

Interesting. The maturity level on that sub seems to be on par with Against Men's Rights and other feminist hangouts. When "historians" are using words like "totes" you know you're in for some deep learnin'. Here's one thread: http://np.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/1zs9c4/the_western_world_once_had_genuine_equality/ Scroll down and find: K, message the mods when the MRA's show up and/or this gets SRD'd. Then: /r/badhistory slag off /u/girlwriteswhat for a solid 100 comments, mods run for the…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:54 AM
6

I generally like Sargon but the idea that economics is somehow comparable to physics is laughable. If economists were judged on the accuracy of their predictions we would have to fire the entire lot every six months. It's about as scientific as astrology, and for the most part consists of people attempting to justify the predations of the rich.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:58 AM
10

This is the neat thing about feminism. The less women are oppressed, the more feminists scream about oppression. There is no "end-point." It's akin to a wife that will never stop nagging, no matter how absurd her complaints. It wouldn't even matter if all of the current theoretical "oppressions of teh womynz" were fixed. Feminists would simply create new forms of imaginary oppression, or indeed portray reforms intended to help women as themselves oppressive. If feminists demanded that every fema…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:47 AM
9

In virtually every conceivable area men and boys are disadvantaged compared to women and girls. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2xmm3p/i_cant_believe_people_think_we_dont_need_a_mens/ The fact that men STILL die younger in "patriarchal" countries should probably have given you a clue that your worldview is absurd. Oppression? I'm not talking about "someone hurt my feelings," I'm talking about employment, violence suffered, genital mutilation, sexual abuse suffered, state resources de…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:37 AM
4

Sorry douche, but here are the stats: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2xmm3p/i_cant_believe_people_think_we_dont_need_a_mens/
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:35 AM
5

"women don't take things personally" LMAO.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:38 AM
2

Indeed. Feminism is and always has been a movement for over-privileged middle class and wealthy white women. All the recent nonsense about intersectionality doesn't change that.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:59 AM
20

So did they apologize to the victims? Ie College men?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:12 AM
1

There is a way for AVFM to come out on the upside of this fiasco: lower ticket prices, and invite a bunch of people not affiliated with AVFM. Seems obvious.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 08:54 AM
6

I don't care if Elam makes a profit. A man's gotta eat. But the prices do seem exorbitant, and though I like most of the speakers, they're basically just AVFM regulars. It's funny, well darkly funny: recent feminist campaigns have been funded by the likes of Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan. Meanwhile, men's rights conferences are relegated to broken-down buildings in Detroit. And we're supposed to be living in a "patriarchy". And feminists are "fighting the man." Uh-huh.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:33 AM
3

Another educated idiot. "Of the 100,000 years humans have been on Earth, women have been excluded from power only for the last 12,000." Except, you know, women HAVEN'T been excluded from power. They have been (often, not always) excluded from positions of overt power. But as anyone who has studied politics should understand, there are "rulers behind the throne," as it were. Powerful women had the added benefit of plausible deniability. Families like the Rothschilds don't advertise their power. T…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:08 AM
2

Sometimes they'll even kill their own children for sex... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Downs
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:46 AM
12

Feminism has become a form of terrorism against both men and women. They create these ridiculous studies in which "sexual assault" is redefined to include any mildly uncomfortable interaction between men and women, then scream that X number of women will be sexually assaulted every year! News outlets republish the "dramatic findings" of female victimhood. Women become terrified of men; men become terrified of being falsely accused. Male-female relationships become more and more toxic. When peopl…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:18 AM
35

If, by some act of magic, every front line combat unit in the world could be made 50% female, war would disappear over night. Same with the dangerous jobs. Make them 50% female and safety standards would become top of the line in every industry (at least for nations that could afford it -- I wouldn't expect much from a country like Bangladesh). Don't believe me? Look at the varying responses to the treatment of workers in late 19th/early 20th C. America. For decades, men were being slaughtered b…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:48 AM
8

I'm pretty sure it's deliberate in most cases.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:13 AM
1

So state a fact otherwise.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:40 AM
1

That's a pretty fucking grim view. I disagree. Take the shitiest situation in history and you'll find a person who values doing the right thing.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 06:00 AM
3

Used to be an attractive young woman on Vancouver Island...then she went to the big city. It was all downhill from there...
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:28 AM
1

Cheers.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:06 AM
2

Aside from the last paragraph this is a terrific post. Edit: just realized you didn't say anything negative about women as a group, just your "friends." Anyway, nice post.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:38 AM
55

On the one hand, women have in-group bias that men lack. An attack on one is often perceived as an attack on all. They aggressively pursue laws that benefit women over men. At the same time, women are arguably more competitive and hostile with one another. It's much more passive aggressive but it's clearly there. Have you ever worked in an office full of women? I have -- and it's fucking hell. They are obsessed with social status.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 12:21 AM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:55 PM
1

Do you know of a good suffrage timeline for the US? Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:25 PM
1

Would you able to provide a detailed timeline of suffrage in the US? Ie one including property qualifications and being subject to conscription?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:26 PM
12

You're all looking in the wrong place. Rich men continue to get married because they can afford it. A man who has $100 million dollars can afford to lose half and still eat lobster for dinner for the rest of his life. A man who has $50,000 dollars and owes $10,000 to the bank, may not be able to lose half without destroying his life. Therefore, marriage has become a luxury, that most men can't afford. Rich people will continue to form alliances and wealth transfers via marriage, but let's not pr…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:14 AM
8

The whole "spiking drinks" thing appears to be a myth. A myth that is nevertheless reinforced by this add. There IS no "date rape epidemic." Women simply have too much to drink and forget everything the next day. Just like men -- though women have a much lower tolerance for alcohol. If anything, we need a campaign on the dangers of drinking too much alcohol. People can become "black-out" drunk, seem sober, have sex, and remember nothing. Females wake up and think, "Oh my god, I've been date-rape…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:20 AM
26

"99 per cent of sexual violence or sexual assault is committed by men, male-on-female." Holy shit. I can't believe that figure was actually sent out in an official response.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 12:39 AM
10

This guy's a real activist, as opposed to these humourless feminazi losers who spent all day scouring the internet for something to be offended by, then proceed to ruin people's lives. He took the right approach in refusing to apologize. Feminism is creating an atmosphere of social terrorism in which people can lose their livelihoods for the most trivial of perceived slights against the fairer sex. The only proper way of dealing with these lunatics is to stop indulging them with apologies. Femin…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:21 PM
2

Wow. "According to the current theory, while women are fully equal to men in capacity for government, administration, etc., and hence, while justice demands that these spheres should be accessible to them, they are so inferior to men in the capacity to control their actions and to distinguish right from wrong, that it is not to be thought of that they, poor weak women, should be treated with the same impartiality or severity by the law as is dealt out to men." "Feminists well know that the most …
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:23 PM
6

"we feel this isn’t the best image for the IBT brand going forward." Sniveling cowards.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 04:52 PM
3

Chris Hedges should speak with sex workers, not for them http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/views-expressed/2015/03/chris-hedges-should-speak-sex-workers-not-them I generally enjoy Hedges' material but he has some weird hang-ups about sex. Possibly owing to his time in the seminary.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter