TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_snoo Archive

View 4 posts and 111 comments by _snoo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-12

LMAO. You're so cute. Politicians serve da peeples!
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:41 PM
-13

This is sad and pathetic and stupid and designed to appeal to you pathetic rubes. Never-mind people who steal billions, let's go after the stupid bitch who yelled at a cameraman.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:33 PM
0

It's bad all right. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUxjG4VBTag
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:48 PM
-1

Well, I have done exactly that. Nuclear fissh-eion. Now what? Stumpwater salad, that's what. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUxjG4VBTag
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:33 PM
-1

You make me sad :( Will ALWAYS BE zero? What if I discover nuclear fission? And what about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtSgWZbL_kE
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:22 PM
-4

"so feel free to imagine me in a flowery dress too." I'd rather not. But thanks for putting the image in my head, asshole.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:17 PM
1

I would never throw GWW under the bus. She's awesome. But everyone makes mistakes. As for your silly "beta" analogy, there's always stumpwater salad: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUxjG4VBTag
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:14 PM
2

/u/girlwriteswhat
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:11 PM
-2

And yet, this post sits at zero. So I can only assume that "Men's Rights" likes this bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:59 PM
1

It's a disgrace.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:37 PM
11

"It is there, where they burn books, that eventually they burn people." Heinrich Heine
/r/MensRights05/01/16 10:22 AM
2

There used to be "Eugenics studies" in the US. The Rockefeller, Kellogg and other foundations poured tons of money into these "disciplines." Before long there was a Eugenics program at every major university in the US. WWII revelations put a stop to it. In the late 70's/early 80's, gender and ethnic studies became the new thing. Also founded by elite foundations. Very different, but same effect: divide and conquer. You do the math.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 10:19 AM
3

You fucking beta. I'm alpha 45 and counting. I got laid by a snaggle-toothed hottie last month. Granted she was on Meth but still...
/r/MensRights05/01/16 10:15 AM
2

Want to learn something chilling? She has two sons.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:01 AM
1

I wonder if the likes of Sarkeesian or Valenti are genuinely serious about the ridiculous ideas they propagate or if they're opportunistic cynics riding the wave of gullible idiocy to make a quick and easy buck. I can understand the latter position, at least. I suspect that it's a combination of both, but it's very difficult to tell the difference because psychopaths tend to be very good actors -- or actresses, as the case may be.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:19 AM
2

Feminists often refer to the "sisterhood." Here's what it actually looks like: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:29 AM
5

You raise another important factor which I neglected to mention: unattractive women can become spiteful and naturally gravitate toward feminism. The same is arguably true of some MRA's and MGTOWS. Rush Limbaugh, whom I consider a fascist clown, did get one thing right when he talked about feminism as a power play by unattractive women. HL Mencken memorably wrote: “The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely a…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:19 AM
6

A few do, I suspect. But most of them really do seem to believe the stuff that they say when they say it. Well, I did say in the back of their minds, which would indicate a sort of repressed understanding of female privilege. But you're right that most ideologues tend to believe what they say. Cognitive dissonance is difficult to live with. I'm actually quite curious about what motivates feminists beyond the standard explanation of "female oppression", which is obviously false; or the legitimate…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 01:46 AM
14

There are three different, overlapping explanations: Feminism is redundant in the West -- women already have more rights than men with none of the responsibilities -- so feminists have no choice but to draw societal attention to "problems" that aren't actually problems. Feminists hate men so much they want women to have the ability to throw us in jail for life for any reason. Since "affirmative consent" is basically impossible (no one, anywhere, has sex in this fashion, ie asking for consent at …
/r/MensRights02/01/16 12:53 AM
5

The middle school analogy is certainly apt. They come across like snarky teenagers. I wouldn't take them too seriously. Butch of bitter manhaters who have nothing better to do than whine about men trying to achieve equal rights. I mean what kind of a sick freak would be opposed to things like male genital integrity, helping boys in school and allowing fathers to spend time with their children? Coffee shop feminists are one thing, but AMR posters are well aware of the issues. They apparently don'…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 12:19 AM
0

Til Albert Einstein was a dumbass. Also Stephen Hawking. And Noam Chomsky. All socialists (Chomsky is a libertarian socialist, still a socialist). Even Von Hayek admitted that the vast majority of people with very high IQ's are socialists. This does not make them right, however. Personally I agree with Chomsky -- unless there is a very strong libertarian component, socialism/leftism can easily become tyrannical, just like any other political philosophy.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 12:01 AM
4

Galloway doesn't seem to disagree with her, or at least not strongly. He's actually one of the few politicians that has supported men's rights in the UK. He sponsored a shared parenting bill that was unfortunately shot down. http://www.fathers-4-justice.org/2015/08/jeremy-corbyn-opposes-equal-rights-for-dads/
/r/MensRights01/01/16 09:48 PM
4

Nor I. That's what the MRM is for. Obviously the tongue-in cheek idea that scores of men would become house-husbands while the wife toiled away at work didn't come to pass. She also failed to predict that hypergamy would not allow for women to date down. However the overall idea that men were the real "slaves" under traditionalism and that "women's liberation" has made women's lives much more harsh and difficult is certainly true, at least if polls about female happiness levels are any indicatio…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 09:35 PM
7

Refreshing to see an MRA article from a leftist point of view. Kudos to AVFM.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:10 PM
5

All make variations on the claim that feminism, anti-racism, and other forms of “political correctness” have siezed the strategic heights of cultural production and tastemaking, and are intent on belittling, diminishing and disenfranchising white men. Once upon a time the left tried to support white men. Especially working class white men. And black men. And red, yellow and brown men. Thanks to feminism, white men are now portrayed as the "enemy." Not a very good strategy for the left considerin…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:49 PM
9

What about the founding mother of feminism in the United States? “We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men, and if we were free and developed, healthy in body and mind, as we should be under natural conditions, our motherhood would be our glory. That function gives women such wisdom and power as no male can possess.” Elizabeth Cady Stanton
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:36 PM
2

LMAO. Great post.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:46 PM
1

It's horrifying. There's no doubt about that. Simply horrifying.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:47 AM
1

"Fuck women." I'm not sure if you're a feminist troll or serious, but the reality is that MOST women are good people. Only 20% of women even in the US identify as feminist. Most MEN do not fight and die for their beliefs. Women are just fine as God/evolution made them. Women, as a whole, are indeed wonderful; the problem feminists make is that they place ALL women under their umbrella. It doesn't work that way. Some females are psychopaths too. And when the law encourages immoral behaviors like …
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:18 AM
1

Don't forget "greys" aka aliens.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 03:27 AM
8

Couldn't agree more. We seem to prefer the term "social justice warriors," because that denotes a fearsome foe, but the term just lends them a veneer of respect. Cry-bullies is the perfect description. Also, "cupcakes" and "buttercups", according to the irritation level of our friends at "Against Men's Rights." ;)
/r/MensRights01/01/16 03:26 AM
1

One thing is clear: this guy had an awful lot of sex. I mean like Genghis Khan levels of sex. My aunt worked at a hotel where he stayed while filming a movie in Vancouver. Long before these allegations came to light she said he had three prostitutes visit him at the same time every night, always different women and always of different ethnicities. It's also clear that he's a gigantic asshole. That doesn't make him a rapist, however. Obviously the MRM should not automatically take the side of a m…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:16 AM
2

I certainly don't think I can call them egalitarian. Fair enough. Though it's also worth remembering that we have been "egalitarian" for 99 percent of our time on planet earth. By egalitarian I do not mean matriarchal. In hunter-gatherer bands the males are typically afforded slightly more social status than the females because they bring in the meat (though this status may be largely symbolic, as the paper on female power argues). Institutional hierarchy may well be just a blip in human history…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:38 AM
5

deliberate confusion The very idea that a woman would say such a thing is pretty fucking chilling if you think about it. It's like something out of a torture manual. Keep the enemy combatant in a state of deliberate confusion.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:00 AM
3

I don't think any topic should be off-limits, including the issue of female suffrage. However you will probably be downvoted because that is definitely not a popular MRA argument unless you add the qualifier about conscription. I have a somewhat different view of voting: I agree with Emma Goldman's position on the suffragettes that if voting changed anything they'd make it illegal. There was a fairly extensive academic study performed recently that more or less proved what we should already know…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 11:43 PM
2

I love the X but Y demands of women. Strong but sensitive Rich but not a snob Muscular but not "bodybuilder muscular" Handsome but not conceited Confident but not egotistical Supportive of my needs but not a doormat Willing to take the lead but not overbearing Treats me like a princess but also as an equal Etc. Etc.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 10:55 PM
3

"White males" have basically made white females the most privileged group of humans to have ever existed. We even freed them from their biology by inventing reliable birth control and safe abortions. They have responded by blaming us for all of the world's problems in a campaign that increasingly resembles an outright hate movement. How's that for fucking gratitude?
/r/MensRights31/12/15 10:32 PM
2

Feminism: creating discrimination where none previously existed.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 10:28 PM
10

In other words, "alphas" are especially susceptible to the "women are wonderful" effect. Hence the astounding success of feminism vs. real dissident movements. Not only do powerful men not set out to "oppress" women, they cater to them at every opportunity. Feminism got it exactly backwards. I would go so far as to say that the only reason feminist "theory" is taken seriously at all is due to so-called "benevolent sexism." Take a look at feminist predictions and you find that they almost always …
/r/MensRights31/12/15 10:06 PM
1

Wow. A compassionate and fair feminist. I feel like I just spotted a unicorn.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:43 PM
4

Half of the comments are blaming the men for having the audacity to pick up a younger woman, "pick up" in this case meaning drugged and robbed.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:26 PM
5

The clown who wrote this is getting absolutely recked in the comments. Awesome.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:22 PM
15

Wow. Amazing to see it admitted for once.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:10 PM
-1

Piss off misandrist.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 06:02 PM
17

I suspect that false rape accusations have always been much more common than most criminologists assume. I mean just look at the history of lynching. It may just be that investigative techniques are finally catching up with the truth of the matter.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 04:57 PM
7

Yep. We can gauge the growth of the MRM by the number of hit pieces against us. They occur about every week now. However the hit pieces don't work. People become morbidly curious about our alleged "misogyny," then when they look into the issues, find that they have been lied to by feminists. The MRM has existed in some form since the late 19th century. But grotesque feminist overreach, combined with men sharing their stories on the internet, has created the first real opportunity for success. "N…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 04:54 PM
6

I need a man who is striving for excellence financially because I don't need a financial burden. I need someone who is sensitive enough to understand what I go through as a woman, but strong enough to keep me grounded. Lol.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 03:47 PM
10

I can't imagine the sort of mindset that would project this sort of hatred onto little children. Absolutely disgusting. Also, we now know that poor white boys are the most disadvantaged group in the UK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/34667100/poor-white-boys-get-a-worse-start-in-life-says-equality-report
/r/MensRights31/12/15 03:42 PM
1

Against Men's Rights is one of the most toxic subs on reddit. It's like the now-banned Coontown except instead of hating on blacks they hate on men and boys. Utterly loathesome group. I will give them points for honesty though: they are adamantly opposed to men having equal rights to women and say so right in their name.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 03:39 PM
2

Was that so hard?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 04:56 AM
2

You're pretty awesome, chavelah. I frequently disagree with you but you kick ass :)
/r/MensRights30/12/15 04:23 AM
10

fuck Mattress Girl For newbies, I would NOT advise doing that.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:27 AM
1

"First off, you are having to use abductio ad absurdem to make a point. No one said hyper muscles. How about, in decent shape and not fat? Oh no, then you can't make that point. Oh well…" First, learn how to spell. "Hence, again, abductio ad absurdem. How about stable job with a house and car? Nope, then your point is equally retarded." Actually I know plenty of men who have wives. You're just retarted. "I'm not on a quest to get laid." Jee, I never would have thought that. "Most, if not all pri…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 09:51 PM
-3

Black women are not favored by men of other races. There are individual exceptions, obviously, but every study and survey ever done places Black women firmly at the bottom of the sexual totem pole. Sorry Chavelah, but racism doesn't fly here. How Dare You. HOW DARE YOU!!
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:48 PM
1

I'd be far more comfortable with one experienced person leading the group than any number of books. In a moderate climate, I'd be willing to trade most gear for one person who knew what they were doing, if the goal was survival in the actual woods rather than recreation in a relatively controlled environment. Yes agreed. As to whether the person with the training is male or female - I could not care less. Really? I'll never get an honest answer out of you. But I'm guessing that if you really had…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:07 PM
2

Cheers. :)
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:00 PM
1

I agree with you. But I also think "birds of a feather flock together." So there is probably a slight preference on the part of women for members of their own race. Men? Well...let's just say when I was a teenager I was all for equal outcomes...
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:56 PM
1

Oh sure. I just beg for pussy all the time I suspected as much. twenty percent of the guys, will get eighty percent of the girls. Do you know what "war" is? War is when most of the men and boys are killed off. Hence that ratio. It has nothing to do with your silly Red Pill theories. Women are shallow and like muscular alpha males. Up to a point. Interestingly, the vast majority of women do not like hyper-muscular males. They consider it declasse. Women are much more concerned with social status …
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:52 PM
2

No offense, but you are making a lot of assumptions here. They may prefer white men, but why? I would guess it has to do with smv. Black men are more likely going to be living in poverty. That's a good point. Ultimately I'm just saying that -- based on what I've read -- women tend to prefer men from their own race -- especially white women (which is rather ironic considering that white women constantly demonize white men). I'm not sure about men. Men are probably much less choosy because they ha…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:31 PM
0

I'm gonna hit the gym now. You sound like a pathetic pussy beggar.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:12 PM
3

I dont know if you have traveled to other countries and suffered a severe culture shock. That is about what would happen if you put some of these people in the woods with a book, knife and nothing else. I agree. My argument is basically predicated on having a group of men rather than a single individual and a detailed survival guide focused on local conditions. It would be an interesting experiment, actually, since most wilderness "survival" stories focus on people who don't have access to the k…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:57 PM
3

I get it. But are you telling me that a GROUP of city slicker men with a detailed survival manual couldn't make a go of it in the woods? I may be overestimating the average man's capacity due to my upbringing but men are pretty fucking heroic and ingenious when it "comes to the pinch," as Orwell wrote. I am NOT saying that a group of city men with no knowledge could survive in the wilderness.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:18 PM
6

From the article: In a typically solipsistic feminist article, Straight Outta Rape Culture, appearing in the Huffington Post, Sikivi Hutchinson censures NWA’s fostering of a supposed “rape culture .” But here’s the elephant in the room: Mention of the daily fratricidal meat-grinder black males are subjected to — and NWA’s relation to it — is conspicuously omitted from the narrative. This is true with both Hutchinson and the larger ongoing debate. This is why the discourse and rancor vis-a-vis po…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:04 PM
23

There WAS a time when women couldn't vote There was also a time when men couldn't vote. In fact, propertied women could vote before propertied men in both the US and UK (propertied women could vote in New Jersey at the time of the Constitutional Convention). Over HALF of the men who died in WWI did not have the right to vote. And besides, what's so great about voting? Especially if you have to die in a fucking trench? The smart women from the time period recognized that is was mostly an exercise…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:53 PM
5

Jesus Christ. Have you ever been in the woods ever? I was a boy scout and continue to spend three months of the year in the great outdoors (in British Columbia). I may be overstating the ability of the average man to learn survival skills, but I don't think so. Notice I used the word "they." A single man in the wildnerness with no training and no knowledge is obviously asking for trouble. But a group of men with a how-to manual? Like I said, no problem.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:30 PM
28

Is it any wonder that heterosexual feminist women are so miserable and angry? It’s because their political beliefs about gender boil down to being a house that was not built for them. The modern feminist dogma is a house built by lesbians and political lesbians, for lesbians and political lesbians. A terribly un-PC thing to say, but true nonetheless. I have nothing whatsoever against lesbians, but what business do they have telling straight people how to live? Why are the outliers -- masculine w…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:24 PM
16

Milo has referred to himself as a troll on his Twitter feed. I don't think you need to worry about him having hurt feelings :P He doesn't strike me as the sensitive type.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:17 PM
1

All they'd need would be a single "survival" book and they'd be fine.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 02:34 PM
2

If you can't see the difference between your comment and a typical feminsit comment, you need to seriously reconsider your survival instinct. I don't speak "drunk." Did you mean to say, If you can't see the difference similarities between your comment and a typical feminsit comment... [?]
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:50 AM
2

There are no similarities whatsoever between MRA's and feminists. Feminists have a powerful lobby and have successfully defeated legislation that would give equal rights to men -- such as equal parenting. MRA's have never passed, let alone advocated, legislation that would curtail female rights. Feminist campaigns are funded by groups like JP Morgan and the Council on Foreign Relations; MRA's have zero voice in government and hold meetings in broken down buildings in Detroit. Feminism does not c…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:17 AM
5

the definition of women's rights advocate and feminist are almost the exact same, so if you consider yourself one, you pretty much have to belong to the other. Not necessarily. While the number of people who label themselves "feminist" continues to decline, an increasing number of people are calling themselves egalitarians. Indeed the same polls demonstrate that a strong majority favours equal rights but disavows feminism, which they rightly understand to be a man-hating female supremacy movemen…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:42 AM
5

That isn't what I said at all. The problem occurs when you try to act like these insane feminist agendas apply to every single woman who has the slightest interest in women's rights. Like pretty much everyone here I'm both a WRA and MRA. I'm definitely not a feminist, however, because I don't subscribe to batshit crazy ideologies that fly in the face of reality. The follow up post extends that this isn't just current feminists, but all feminists from the beginning of feminism. Feminism has alway…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 02:55 AM
10

a lot of hating men on tumblr Should read "a lot of hating men in mainstream foundational texts of feminist theorists, as well as codified laws."
/r/MensRights29/12/15 02:47 AM
3

New Zealand: A group of North Shore schools, in refusing to accept a small number of boys’ challenging behaviour as ‘the way of the world’, has become an example of how sector-wide partnerships can be powerful in bringing about positive change. http://www.edgazette.govt.nz/Articles/Article.aspx?ArticleId=9049 There was also a story about the UK human rights body accepting arguments that males could be victim of human rights abuses due to their sex. Can't seem to find link. Also: this should be s…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 01:58 AM
1

kid get
/r/MensRights27/12/15 12:50 PM
1

meth
/r/MensRights27/12/15 12:48 PM
29

"Male feminist allies be like..." Followed by degrading imagery about men on par with cartoons about "niggers" in the old South. This is unbelievable. Do they want male "allies" or not?
/r/MensRights27/12/15 08:39 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:33 AM
4

Think about the original sin in the bible that is basically saying that humans are out of paradise because women suck. Recommended reading: "Sanctifying Misandry: Goddess Ideology and the Fall of Man" https://books.google.ca/books?id=y8rI7snipZcC&pg=PA217&lpg=PA217&dq=misandry+bible&source=bl&ots=B8wNa7z2L9&sig=akDL5Nu7tVzd0y9CDur65DCQzPE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjpqfTlivvJAhWGbSYKHblcCAYQ6AEIRzAH#v=onepage&q=misandry%20bible&f=false Apart from the loony matriarchy theories of feminists, most villa…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:29 AM
2

Do you have any idea of the sort of hatred and abuse levelled at not only Muslims but Christians (and Jewish women for that matter) in Ultra-Orthodox communities in Israel? Does that mean all Jews are evil? How do you feel about this story from 2013? Muslims forming a human shield to protect a Christian church: http://www.christianpost.com/news/viral-photo-shows-muslims-protecting-church-in-egypt-as-congregants-attend-mass-amid-threat-of-attack-102592/ ...Or this story from a few days ago: http:…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:18 AM
2

Libya, despite its many many faults, had a standard of living on par with the Scandinavian nations before it was bombed to smithereens by Hillary and co. Now it's a third world hellhole. It seems likely that the Islamic world would have modernized in similar fashion to the West if we hadn't insisted on defeating reformist movements and propping up the most extreme backward fanatics to prevent Arab secular nationalism (ie Muslims controlling their own resources -- specifically oil). The first maj…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:56 AM
3

Obviously I think it's perfectly fine if Muslim women want to fight for more rights in their particular cultures -- not that it's any of my business -- but I don't think feminism and "patriarchy theory" is the answer. The West is a testament to this fact. Indeed the West provides a perfect example of what not to do. Women's rights need to develop side by side with men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:44 AM
4

Nothing sells quite so well as "those bad men are oppressing their women." Propagandists have understood this since forever, which is why most war propaganda focusses on atrocities against women and children. All sides do it. The Soviet Union claimed that women were oppressed in the United States. The US claimed that Germans were mass raping women in WWI. Islamists claim that women are oppressed in the west because they are sexually exploited and have to work rather than engage in their natural …
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:36 AM
7

This is absolutely outrageous. Where are all the anarcha-feminists complaining about creeping state totalitarianism brought about by their fellow ideologues?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 10:22 AM
2

It's tough. Coming out as an anti-feminist or even non-feminist on the left is like coming out as gay at a Westboro Church meeting. To say there are social pressures involved is an understatement. Most of the leftist criticism of feminism occurred in the late 19th and early 20th century (Belford Bax, Mother Jones etc.). Articles like the above are a positive sign, but they tend to focus on the scourge of identity politics, political correctness, authoritarianism, elitism, lack of class analysis …
/r/MensRights26/12/15 09:27 AM
29

I looked it up. Can't believe you were banned for this. Yes, I'm a men's rights activist. Men, just like women, have problems we face everyday. I am working to prevent it. Do you have something wrong with that? [–]tomrodxNothing Yes; everybody has rights, and it doesn't matter if you're a man or a woman. Fighting against the opposite gender is not positive, and does nothing to help humans as a whole.* I agree entirely, as I am not fighting against the other gender. Though I cannot say the same f…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 09:14 AM
4

I was just informed that Disney owns 10% of Vice. Might be more effective to write them.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 06:05 AM
2

Links to some sort of Catholic website.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 01:27 AM
1

Sometimes, I feel like a sociopath for voting conservative. I would have no problem voting conservative if they offered anything for men and boys. But they don't. They claim to be anti-feminist but don't support men's rights. And in many cases they are even worse than self-described feminists, cutting budgets for Veterans and the homeless, attacking unions, shutting down crisis centers for male victims of rape, and so forth. So pox on all their houses.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 08:38 AM
2

They want a return to how they imagined the 1950s were How they imagined being the key. Unfortunately quite a few feminists seem to think that "Mad Men" is a documentary.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 08:35 AM
9

For 500 years, they've exploited their fellow man and plundered the planet. These idiots do realize that white men did not create exploitation, slavery or colonialism, right? I mean, civilization (and all primary states were slave states) was born in what we now call "Iraq." I'm pretty sure those people didn't have white skin. What the fuck are they teaching kids in school? I hate to say it, but in a way this may be related to Americo-centric and Euro-centric education. Time was we heard all abo…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 08:21 AM
11

After having read this sub for three months I've found that there is a large percentage of gay men in the MRM. Which makes sense, since gays men are not "honorary females" but, you know, men. The honeymoon between gays and feminists is rapidly coming to a close. It's only matter of time before fembots start whining about "gay misogyny" as they did in the past.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 07:56 AM
10

The constant whining about alleged "misogyny" online; combined with feminism's zero tolerance policy for criticism of their ideology; combined with the UN's support of Anita Sarkeesian's call for making the internet a safe space for feminists; combined with the Canadian guy getting arrested for disagreeing with a feminist online; seem to indicate that feminism's next major target will be free speech on the world wide web. And I don't just mean banning people from their hugboxes or eliminating co…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:50 AM
12

The consequences of such male-negativity are not clear, but such negative affirmations seem likely to have, and to have had over the decades, a negative impact on both sexes: self-loathing and/or a resistance-generated misogyny among men, and contempt for men among women. Feminists seem hell bent on creating misogynists where they didn't previously exist. It will become a vicious cycle, "justifying" the existence of feminism due to the increased misogyny that they themselves cultivated. Silence …
/r/MensRights23/12/15 05:05 AM
16

The "ironic" misandry thing is a canard. It's just a means of plausible deniability when they get called out for being bigots. Feminists wouldn't say such horrible things about men and boys if they didn't hate them.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 04:55 AM
2

but the left here is obsessed with domestic violence as "terrorism". Feminism has largely destroyed the "left". An FBI agent predicted it back in 1969: "The Women's Liberation Movement may be considered as subversive to the New Left and revolutionary movements as they have proven to be a divisive and factionalizing factor.... It could be well recommended as a counterintelligence movement to weaken the revolutionary movement." This was from an August, 1969 report by the head of the San Francisco …
/r/MensRights23/12/15 04:50 AM
2

I think the whole MRAs are right wingers cliche I don't think the majority of MRA's are right wing, just the majority of the most visible faces in the movement. I think that we need to address policy positions on key issues as the gaps between parties has narrowed to such an extent that the differences are in style and spin rather than substance. I agree. I think this is the reason everybody is so obsessed with identity politics. It's a great way of dividing a population and keeping the focus of…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:57 AM
1

Great job. There is an ongoing problem with the MRM concerning non-Western men and especially Muslim men. Since most of the leadership of the MRM is right wing, they are only too happy to support feminism when it comes to "those savage darkies over there" who are "coming to rape our women." This, in turn, gives pseudo-justification for the feminists at home. This is not to say I support current immigration policies, but I object to dishonest propaganda. To their great credit, a few voices like K…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:32 AM
0

Are you arguing that prostitution is safe I literally just said it "wasn't without its own dangers." That's why, unlike most feminists, I support full legalization, as sex workers themselves desire. firing people for getting married is perfectly fine I'm skeptical of your claim, to be honest. But assuming it's true, she evidently valued getting married more than keeping her job. She made the choice. Not saying it's fair, but most men, throughout history, have not had the luxury of such a choice,…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:06 AM
1

They could have just as well have written an article titled, "Everything that straight men do their women partners, straight women do their male partners." It would have been equally true. But male victims don't count because...privilege?
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:02 AM
1

she was forced to retire when she got married. She was forced to get married? Or did she choose to get married? As a side note prostitution has never been a less dangerous occupation. Of course it was. More men were maimed and killed in the first 50 years of the American coal industry than any battle of the civil war. And female textile workers, though their profession wasn't anywhere near as dangerous as typical male occupations in eg mining, construction, and steel, had to inhale dangerous par…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:57 AM
0

Those jobs were for white veterans. Except for the "white" part that seems only fair. They just risked their lives to defeat fascism. Today many veterans end up homeless. Recently, feminists lobbied against efforts to help male blue collar workers under Obama's stimulus. Forced to fight/die vs lower paying job = males still got the short end of the stick. However since I'm not a capitalist I won't defend the overall treatment of female workers and certainly not blacks. Also, is it really true th…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:53 AM
12

One of the reasons I became interested in men's rights was what happened to my cousin. The guy married a woman and they had a little girl. According to him the wife seemed perfectly normal for the first several years (I'm guessing there were signs he missed) but became more and more abusive over time. She started calling the police and making up domestic violence stories. None of them stuck. They divorced, naturally she got custody. After he moved out, he started getting phone calls from his lit…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:35 AM
15

WTF? Shouldn't she be happy that it was a ridiculous hit piece? The charming folks in Against Men's Rights loved it. Just another example that feminists will complain about literally anything, even when their white knights bend over backwards to please them.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:23 AM
12

Ironically the real Mother Jones was a hardcore anti-feminist (and anarchist/socialist) who called the suffragettes plutocrats, believed a woman's place was in the home and spent most of her time organizing and defending male coal miners. She spent 18 months in prison during the Paint Cabin creek strike where she came down with pneumonia and nearly died (now that's a "strong, independent woman"). Meanwhile first wave feminists were treated with kid gloves.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:19 AM
2

Was this article published in the UK or Canada? Because I'm pretty sure they have hate speech laws. If this doesn't qualify nothing does.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:15 AM
0

were forcibly removed from the factory floor and relegated to lower-paying jobs when the GIs came home. Wait, you're saying these women wanted to work in factories? Rather than being housewives? I thought the whole "stepping up and working in the factories" thing was supposed to be a sacrifice? Which is it? I worked in a factory for five years and would have loved nothing more than to stay at home and raise kids. For upper class women I can certainly see why "careers" looked appealing, but not a…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:11 AM
2

I disagree. Women are very much concerned about status and power in their sexual relationships. That's why hideously ugly old rich men can date models, whereas the most thirsty of males wouldn't touch someone like Madelign Albright with a ten foot pole. Women even project these attitudes onto men when an older man dates a young woman, describing her as a "trophy wife" even though the man is clearly not interested in any status she may afford him but her sexual attractiveness. There is no status,…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:59 AM
1

Comment section is awesome. Try as they may to stop the sexbot/VR revolution, feminists are no match for horny Japanese technicians ;) I'm no futurologist but I can't imagine "Ex Machina" type sex bots becoming a real thing for at least several decades. However immersive virtual reality with touch-sensation seems quite feasible in the short term, unless I'm mistaken.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:40 AM
19

Awesome post from the comments: Let's make a deal female feminists. You let me sit at home and take care of children, while you go to work everyday to earn money. Also, you cannot withhold any money from me, otherwise it will be spousal abuse and neglect. You always must have a job, no matter how demeaning, dangerous, or little pay. BTW, if it pays very little, then you will be a deadbeat woman that does not take care of your family - no government welfare - you have the ultimate responsibility …
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:10 AM
36

Misandry, 2015's rich, bitchy, delicious evidence suggests, is not a fad. It's in your music and on your television; it's at the movies and in your Twitter stream. It's shaping culture and it's influencing women. If your #MasculinitySoFragile that you've got a problem with that, let me refer you to Hillary Clinton's near-audible eye-rolling at the Benghazi hearing, to Ex Machina's sweetly homicidal Ava, or to New York City's 2015 manspreading misdemeanor. Misandry's here to stay, boys. Get used …
/r/MensRights22/12/15 06:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter