TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

acadametw Archive

View 2 posts and 68 comments by acadametw on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

FIELD REPORT acadametw/r/FemaleDatingStrategy01/05/20 11:43 PM
6

RANTacadametw/r/FemaleDatingStrategy27/01/22 07:59 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Yes! Additional locations are almost always worse overall and specifically progressively less safe than wherever you go first--particularly if it wasn't presented as part of the original plan. My jaw literally dropped when I got to the pic and description of the warehouse.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy27/01/22 08:24 PM
25

I agree with the post that you should never tell the person you googled them and found x. There is very little that is truly red flag worthy that can actually be justifiably explained away--it should be a disqualification right then and there. You were lended a gift by the publicly available information gods. Do you have a type of information in mind that you think would be worth asking them about? The savviest (and most manipulative way) to go about it would be to ask about the subject generall…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy05/08/21 05:29 PM
12

Honestly I think this is a great place to be and it's NOT at all the same as being an incel because it's more situational and satisfied. Some people think you're literally like not a complete human if you're not paired up, so that if you're single you either have to be 1. getting over someone, 2. trying to get with someone, 3. something is wrong with you. That. is. bullshit. Liking your life as it is and feeling like you have more important things to do right now and that it's not one of your pr…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy02/08/21 10:49 PM
32

Okay so to add to all the shitty stuff everyone else has mentioned, in a follow up video she admits she had just come out of a hyper abusive relationship so obviously slightly less shitty bullshit smelled like roses even though it was still bullshit. She says she was analyzing him and looking for "any reason to drop this man" but we know that's not entirely how it works--I've been there and I thought that was what I was doing but when you're still so closely comparing someone to your ex you're b…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy30/07/21 10:51 PM
27

Country especially the weird land of "alt country" can be a great place for strong women and songs from strong female perspectives. Two of my favorites are "Man Up" by Nikki Lane and "New Ways to Fail" by Sarah Shook.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy30/07/21 09:57 PM
22

Yes. He thinks sex is use and he should be the one doing the sacred using. Women who have already been used are of course filthy and have lost their value to him. He's trash.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy24/07/21 11:34 PM
24

The thing with people like this is they'll say that shit like it's a dig at the inadequacy of his wife and as though it really has anything to do with her or anything she did when he's the one who decided he was mediocre and complacent enough to go through with it. He must have hated his life and himself and now he's going to go blame it on other people instead of taking accountability for his own mediocrity and emptiness.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/07/21 07:46 PM
74

People seriously did not pay enough attention to his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. He wrote it off as a couple dinners as if that's nothing when it's obvious they have so fucking much in common. Epstein was obsessed with the idea of seeding the world with his children because he thought he had superior sperm and deserved sex slaves and whatever. Elon Musk has SEVEN kids with at least three women, and all of them just happen to be boys. You know--so they can keep spreading seed. One set of twi…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/07/21 07:35 PM
5

Ughhhh "wHaT ThEy DoNt HaVe ThE CaPaCiTy tO dO" Then they should be fucking single and take care of themselves. Stop wasting your life on people who FUNDAMENTALLY LACK CAPACITY. They aint shit by definition. Jfc.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/07/21 07:13 PM
40

I've definitely had this conversation before and remember saying I felt like I was supposed to say "yes" and embrace all these things for the mere fact that doing it "consensually" is better than having it done against my will which is what might happen if I say no. They never ever have an answer. They just skip over it like I didn't say it and assure me that no, other women definitely don't feel like I do and actually enjoy it and that me, real life assault survivor, is judgmental.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/07/21 07:08 PM
30

Ia with this later on. I was in a relationship where it became long distance for a period and I specifically wanted at minimum good morning & goodnight acknowledgments and when that wasn't even happening I mean fuck--let's stop pretending that's a relationship anymore. He was vocally depressed and I wanted to know he was ok so I wouldnt get anxious after long periods not hearing from him but no. It wasn't doable.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy18/07/21 11:36 PM
5

This is so fucking true. Some guys act astounded and enamored that they pointedly enjoy our deep conversations. I'm like...really? Because I have those with everyone and I have to admit ours in particular aren't really standing out to me. I also don't need other external evidence to prove someone's intellect to me. Their job or education doesn't mean shit. I dated a fellow in the military who had actually dropped out of a not-that-prestigious state college to join, but was in SOF so evidently he…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy05/06/21 05:38 PM
30

Yeah--I've definitely seen the predatory argument and agree with it. Anyone claiming the issue is cheating is a child at heart and not paying attention (then again--idk why anyone pays attention to celeb drama so fair enough lol). Where sexist hypocrisy comes into play imo is that Jada is being held to a much higher standard of behavior than most men are, because yeah--men cradle rob and do predatory shit with "old soul" big titty early twenties pick mes all the time. Where I think Will's critic…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy24/09/20 05:40 PM
137

So I think what you should do in this case is...absolutely go with your friend and be there for your friend, but also be there to reel your friend back from the drama of the moment (it's addictive to the brain) and try to cut it as short as possible with as minimal confrontation as possible. If she really needs to see it to believe it this time, that's just how it is. For some people it is, and many of us have been in that place where we've been gaslit to hell and think we need evidence for anyo…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy10/09/20 07:58 PM
19

Why on earth don't dudes realize this just makes them look worse? It's so bizarre. Like dudes who want to be surrounded by women they openly mock as dumb and replaceable and it's like 1. that's who you bother to spend. your time with and 2. that's the best you can do? They literally just expose themselves as bottom feeders as if that's what makes them alpha. Like--fuck it. I hate the "alpha" shit but real "alpha" and "high value" men would want the highest value women, and getting the dopest wom…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy04/09/20 03:01 PM
3

Sorry about that--it was actually supposed to be IDD. Stands for developmental and intellectual disability/ intellectual and developmental disability.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy18/06/20 07:57 PM
7

Agree, though I'm not 100% opposed to the intention. Having it be a parenting course and not discussing it with her and presumably dropping contact reads to me like the dudes who say they're gonna marry you on the first date and ghost regularly lol. Idk if it counts as love bombing, but... It also may just be the way it's worded. I was a direct care provider for young adults with DIDs IDDs and there are indeed plenty of training classes available and many of them are geared towards both professi…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy18/06/20 04:33 PM
172

This reminds me slightly of one breakup I had where I was fed up with not just this dude's behavior but a string of stupid relationship bullshit that had shortened the stick I had to give him. It was my first real moment of being tired of still being walked all over and essentially "snapping" into having a backbone. He was being waffley and I didn't trust his way of apology at the time & felt like he would push back and be dismissive if I didn't roll over for it, so instead I diverted and asked …
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy13/05/20 03:18 PM
13

Absolutely. It's definitely a fine line to walk and I can readily admit I've done it before myself. And shoot, some specific individuals may warrant it at times lol. That said, I've noticed many women who are now part of this community admit to having once displayed many pick me and lvw behaviors, so I think it's a special shame when we forget that and disregard other women experiencing that same struggle as truly less-than rather than someone who's just hurt, broken, sad, probably lied to, prob…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy12/05/20 07:44 PM
39

Friendly reminder that it's unnecessary to bring other women down just to raise yourself up.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy12/05/20 01:27 PM
10

This pisses me off...she earned every one of those wrinkles.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy08/05/20 07:34 PM
16

I think one of the many things I've appreciated about this sub since I found it not too long ago was just how wonderful it was too feel less alone in some of my feelings and experiences. It seems like it's an important step on the way to realizing your own worth. LVM (and lvw) will spend an inordinate amount of their energy making you question yourself, your experiences, your thoughts, your feelings. If you think something seems wrong or are hurt by anything, they would rather explain to you how…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/05/20 05:59 PM
11

Great advice, and advice a HVM has given me before as well. You are not plenty of fish in the sea. You are not offering exactly the same thing others are offering. These are roles we take on in life. Relationships are obligations, whether LV people like to think of them that way or not. Think about it like a job application, in the sense of thinking what sorts of job openings get TONS of perfectly qualified applicants all absolutely equally suited to the position so it does not matter in the lea…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/05/20 05:52 PM
15

Wow. This is crazy and I wasn't familiar with it. I'm fairly certain Claire had a boy, too. A user above mentioned that Elon Musk and Jeffrey Epstein had multiple connections over the years and that somehow Musky boy ended up curiously unscathed...but all this together sounds not at all that different from Epsteins own delusion about "seeding the human race with his DNA." Perhaps they conversed about it over alcohol at one of the many parties they attended together? This seriously takes his cree…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/05/20 05:32 PM
22

This seems typical of the egoism endemic to LVM. People who are truly confident in their abilities know perfectly well what they know and don't know, and know they do themselves no favors by pretending to be experts in things they dont. People who are instead using their ego as their sail will project that incompetence and scheming into everyone else and especially anyone who threatens their authority. I was reminded of this dynamic just yesterday listening to a radio interview with Ashish Jha, …
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/05/20 05:20 PM
34

It's absolutely true that part of why older men prey on significantly younger women isn't because they are oh so more attractive but because they are literally just sort of stupid (like most 20somethings) and have less experience at living. They are by definition easy to manipulate and easy to please. Because they are only just getting used to paying their own taxes, any level of mastery of adulthood displayed by a middle aged man--even one on multiple bankruptcies, divorces, children, addiction…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy05/05/20 11:51 PM
61

I think another issue here isn't even "did it cause distress" because women talk themselves out of believing they were raped all the time and trying to go about their business like absolutely nothing happened is super common even if internally they were like !!!!
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy04/05/20 05:12 PM
9

I don't even know why this website isn't just flat out banned here or something. The article it recommended to me after is "The top 9 most amazing vaginas." There needs to be just one post in the handbook detailing how content creators like this are misinformed and dangerous, with some screenshotted examples of the ridiculous views and what type of thinking and behavior it encourages. Screen shotted because tbh we shouldn't even be giving them clicks for their advertising at this point...Just sc…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy03/05/20 07:43 PM
4

I think a lot of people fall into this trap because they are surprised by the notion that you can have a base level of respect and affection for your partner, and then it just escalates from there. It's like, I would rather hear someone say their partner is their best friend than be one of those people who talks about their partner as though they hate them as an individual and someone's holding a gun to their head to keep the romantic obligation afloat....but uh.....that doesn't mean the partner…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy03/05/20 06:30 PM
32

Thiiiiis. Once upon a time when I was on OLD it was my observation that I had the best experiences with people on Tinder (though still not the highest of bars so it's not at all an endorsement lol) which I attributed to the fact that it has the most users and allowed me to be more freely selective of who I responded to once we matched based on what they said and did from there. Bumble, which totally markets itself as the empowering feminist type app was by far the worst, because of how severely …
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy03/05/20 06:16 PM
0

No. And all of them are sluts. The only acceptable difference is whether they do or do not agree to sleep with me.
/r/askTRP29/06/14 07:07 AM
2

I don't think it ever aired on tv. Just independently released on Vimeo etc as far as I know. Might have done some film festivals.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 09:46 PM
8

They have Shy Boys: IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 09:37 PM
9

People who adopt kids are raising a kid that's not biologically their own (shocking, I know!). And that's exactly what a man who accepts another mans child as his own is doing. They do it out of love for their partner and the child. Not out of self interest. I know for people as mind numbingly self interested and self serving as most terpers that seems like an unfathomable lie, but its not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 03:30 AM
1

Ha like those random irrationals you threw in there.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 03:22 PM
10

Interesting seeing all these people saying it used to be worthwhile. Like. Show me one post from its beginning where the current problems weren't still problems. It's both a community problem and an ideology problem. There is no fucking way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/14 06:27 PM
1

Yeahhhh that's disgusting. I took a break from reddit for a wee bit and the casual prevalence of mouth breathing beliefs like that make me inclined to get gone again. Like, they need to go back to sixth grade and resocialize or something jfc.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 06:09 AM
6

You need to work on your reading comprehension if that's what you got from what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/14 12:44 PM
1

It's tricky. Battling normativity isn't necessarily about changing whether or not people think something happens as frequently but about removing the stigma that because something is more common or more widely adopted and displayed that its inherently more "right." It's a rhetorical reaction, again, and like most its not always well applied. It is what it is. But if you recognize it for what it is I don't know why there's an issue exactly. Edit also it gets into the subjectivity of norms. If we …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/14 12:14 PM
7

I think most people would be concerned about an accusation that something they're doing might be considered hurtful or violating to another person. Where as pretty much everyone except the special snowflakes in RPW would be put off at reducing 50% of the adult population to children/childlike. The language trp uses is foul--and it's purposefully foul. It's both accurate in describing what they believe and the tone in which it's believed. It makes the issue more transparent, honestly. The only th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/14 05:29 AM
5

Not quite but way to make it creepy. A+
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/14 12:11 AM
2

If the wife kicks it the husband would get it all too unless she was a harpy gold digging housewife which isn't actually very common at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 03:52 AM
2

Because you aren't obligated to take action every time a hypothetically suitable option presents itself. A good personality? That could mean tons of things. Someone just being nice doesn't mean it's the personality she would be attracted to. There are tons of little variables that go in to why we choose who we choose. Of course you lose if you use such a stupid interpretation of what all those things mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 09:53 AM
4

No, because you're missing the context. In some instances there's a moral argument that it worked when the person has low self esteem and is predatory. In others it's that the relationship started out nice and then the person's negative tendencies became more evident and relationship ended. Just because you date someone doesn't mean you are attracted to or condone all their qualities. Otherwise all the men in the red pill who complain about all the women they ever dated being cheating disloyal s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 09:43 AM
1

I'm a Sociologist, so... not quite. What aspect of my views would you like more of?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 07:36 PM
7

I have an issue with equating Sociology to generalizations. Pseudo-intellectualism is a problem that runs rampant in trp in particular and while the users typically seem to think of themselves as legitimizing their statements, it tends does the opposite for more measured minds. Group identification and polarization would be a good place to start.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 07:25 PM
3

What do you think of the people who argue that the particular language/rhetoric used in trp is something of a shibboleth in that if it turns you off or offends you, it means you "aren't ready" for trp.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 12:38 AM
5

Additionally, I'm a woman. So I really only need to know how I respond and have responded to being approached and treated the way advocated by trp. Your personal experience, meet my personal experience. I suppose yours is more valid than mine though because you're a logical scientific superior man and I have a tiny emotional female brain (=
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/14 05:12 PM
5

I never said it doesn't work some of the time for some people. I have other objections and feel it has other associations and implications. But thanks for your input!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/14 05:08 PM
2

I'm pretty sure he's saying that there's basically no such thing as real cheating because if you commit to a monogamous relationship and then find yourself in circumstance that cause you to be non monogamous, the relationship is then defacto non monogamous. It's like non-point point. Cheating has little to do with the action and everything to do with betrayal. It doesn't matter if you cheat on someone and then say "Well lol you see it wasn't a real monogamous relationship, it was more complicate…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/14 12:37 AM
4

Additionally, OP said "let her find out." This isn't something that's discussed. It is literally a planted betrayal. I have no issue with consensual non monogamy but this isn't it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/14 12:34 AM
10

I'm not sure it's marketed so much as simply their reality and a direct by-product of what sort of ideologies appeal to different demographics. Highly educated people are usually more egalitarian. They want to be with other highly educated people. Highly successful people want to be with other highly successful people--even if it's like Michelle Obama who ultimately quit her job to take care of her kids, she was still extremely accomplished in her education and career. This is based on having th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/14 12:10 AM
2

I know you don't. <sup>That's</sup> ^<sup>the</sup> ^^<sup>point.</sup> Happy Valentine's Day, everybody!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/14 04:05 AM
3

He looks like he has a low iq and possible mild permanent damage. And you brought up pajama boy as a physical poster child, but now you just want to complain about how he's an obnoxious liberal man child, which doesn't have anything to do with how he looks. You're also the one apparently obsessed with ranking people on a numerical scale. Imo anyone who does that with no sense of irony gets taken down a good 3 points. This entire "debate" is ridiculous but I'm glad you take your contributions to …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/14 03:57 AM
5

My only comment on this whole matter is that Hamm does not have fucking "rigid features." He has a bloated dough face. Pajama boy, in fact, has more "rigid" facial features than Jon Hamm. You just reject it because your opinion of him is shaded by your perception of what manly men men are supposed to look like. Not only that, but he's got to be at least 20 years older than pajama boy. Pajama boy will appear more grizzled when he's 45 also. And double lolz at your "for a scientific way of looking…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/14 03:42 AM
12

Yeah. Seriously. I hate that argument. Like if I see someone advocating basically manipulating and coercing someone into having sex with them and completely dismissing the idea that when someone says no once, twice, 30 times and then eventually says okay that doesn't actually mean they've been dying for it all along and do in fact even want it once they've said okay. Like it's impossible for you to rape someone if you think of your actions as harmless and just spreading love and affection. "Why …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 11:07 PM
13

"Im not sexist, I just believe men are superior to women in every way and women are basically only good as play things. We're just different. It's not sexist because it's true!"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 11:03 PM
2

Usually the longer form tests are more difficult to fool. They have ways of catching people up in their shit. They might ask a similar question 10 times, each time in a sliiiightly different way. Scale of one to ten, disagree to agree. I feel anxious. I feel uptight. I am worried about the future. I feel overwhelmed by things going on in my life. Anxiety is a problem for me at this time. Things are going well for me. Most people would answer each of those questions differently even though all th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 06:19 AM
3

I'm not sure that's an appropriate assumption. The sample of people who are actively participating in the blue pill and the red pill--essentially values based communities focused on how to treat yourself and other people-- are not representative of the general population. It's absolutely not a surprise that the scores aren't very evenly distributed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 05:53 AM
1

Narcissism: 1.2, 6th percentile. Machiavellianism: 0.6, 3rd percentile. Psychopathy: 0.3, 0 percentile. ~I feel it all~
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 05:42 AM
3

Yeah they pretty much completely ignore that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 03:23 AM
2

They also use very particular divorce statistics that are helpful to their cause. I basically do demographic shit for a living right now and the ~half of all marriages end in divorce percentage is highly misleading. I'll post more when I'm not on my phone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 03:21 AM
0

While I agree with the "only if she's not lying" portion, you all don't know if she's lying either. I don't know, you don't know. The school may know. They might. But it may just be more he said she said--there's no more evidence in support of one person's argument than the other. You have no idea exactly what caused the court to make their original decision, and considering that they aren't trained in these cases and generally only hear about one a year, there is absolutely no validity in makin…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:39 PM
0

Completely agreed. I appreciate your thoughtful contributions to my post, as well. Although I really do think accused in this sort of situation are deserving of much more privacy and respect (presumption of innocence, clearly stating what are merely allegations, etc), I also think posts like the original post for this thread are the MRA version of the Jezebel post on the same subject. Both relatively ill informed, both making sweeping and derogatory assumptions and statements. The thing both sid…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:46 AM
0

From what I've read, the primary complaints deal with violations of FERPA, the Beyond a Reasonable Doubt standard you mentioned (common in many of the lawsuits that lead to the DOE's Dear Colleague letter in the first place), and that an untrained (and insensitive) student court was handling the proceedings. All of these things are/could potentially be considered violations of Title IX. I believe there is also a section addressing the possible undercounting of sexual assaults by the university i…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:46 AM
0

I do care quite a lot about what happens to them. But truly the only things I've seen about this entire thing over the past week have been incredibly biased, poorly written and poorly researched takes on the situation. In my opinion, that helps no one. Not the guy who's being unquestionably called a rapist and abuser by the press or the girl who's being portrayed as a mentally ill attention seeking liar whose primary goal is to defame and drag this guy's reputation through the mud. On a very bas…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:56 AM
6

I've read everything related to this case. I go to this university. This girl was only put into the spot light because the university paper received confidential federal documents related to the lawsuit and published them, including the name of this girl and one other, without their consent. Their attempt was never to change the decision or seek further punishment or condemnation of the ex. It was to call legal attention to a myriad of weaknesses in the Honor Court's processes with regard to sex…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:13 AM
-33

Her statements were not about the actions of the ex, but the actions of the school. The guilt or innocence of her ex is not the story. Please stop trying to make it the story.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter