TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

adamsfan42 Archive

View 17 posts and 120 comments by adamsfan42 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
601

Storyadamsfan42/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:37 PM
97

adamsfan42/r/MensRights23/01/16 06:34 PM
97

adamsfan42/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/17 01:55 AM
90

adamsfan42/r/MensRights24/09/10 05:04 AM
60

adamsfan42/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:40 AM
42

adamsfan42/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:48 AM
40

adamsfan42/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:33 AM
19

Social Issuesadamsfan42/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:53 AM
18

adamsfan42/r/MensRights06/06/10 02:23 AM
8

adamsfan42/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:20 PM
8

adamsfan42/r/MensRights14/02/11 05:53 PM
7

adamsfan42/r/MensRights28/12/11 11:53 AM
3

adamsfan42/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:07 PM
2

adamsfan42/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/17 08:53 PM
1

adamsfan42/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:33 PM
1

adamsfan42/r/MensRights04/02/16 02:33 AM
0

adamsfan42/r/MensRights10/12/10 07:14 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Excellent point, it's great however that her face is plastered everywhere. let's hope she has some civil lawsuit
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/17 12:41 AM
2

Why make it a race thing... This isn't r/whitemensrights
/r/MensRights19/07/17 06:36 PM
9

the elephant in the room for once isn't the ease with which false rape allegations can ruin a mans life.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/17 01:47 AM
0

no one should not lose their job because of a DUI
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/17 07:45 PM
0

I'm not your buddy and I'm not running a fools errand.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:57 PM
-3

I'm not a feminist and nor do I subscribe or participate in those subs. I've been involved in promoting MR's issues for many years and I don't want to see legitimate issues get tied down by the racist/fascist extremist ideas that im sure people like you try to push on our sub.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:21 PM
-5

not a good representation of MR's. She is more of a fascist/racist. I would not like to see MR's get hijacked by extremists in the same way that feminism has.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 10:42 AM
2

Correct, #20
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/17 10:58 AM
1

No issue, she just had mental problems.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/17 10:58 AM
3

Its a woman trust me
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/17 06:17 AM
2

Yeah it was an older lady
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/17 06:09 AM
6

What is the source for her calling him a nigger and spitting? I only see her shove him and then maybe attempt to choke.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/16 02:18 AM
-20

maybe you and everyone that upvoted you are confused and should read the sidebar. PPD DOES NOT MEAN THAT A WOMAN NEEDS TO REFER VERBALLY TO HER GENDER.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/16 07:25 PM
1

so hard to watch.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 04:07 AM
3

i just want to point out that we should consider giving her what she wants. she thinks marriage keeps women down, but in fact it is a tool used to transfer wealth from men to women.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 05:30 AM
1

this is a great story, but published in 2013? lets try and stay a little more up to date.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/16 02:52 AM
1

what agenda? the only agenda i have is that people be treated equally regardless of race, religion or gender. (why i support MR's) ...the leading candidate of the republican party is running on a platform of banning all muslims from entering the US. if that is not discrimination based on religion i have no idea what is. islamaphobia is real and it is a problem.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 10:26 PM
0

people are only called militant or terrorist when they engage in violence. Oh really
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:08 AM
1

its all a matter of perspective. typically the words used to describe those who hold anti western / anti christian views are militant or terrorist. if a group of people in pakistan burn an american flag that is no different than than a group of people holding a sign that reads "all muslims are terrorists"
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:28 AM
1

you are right, racism was a bad choice of words, however, Islamophobia is real and on the rise. all religions are equally man made nonsense. they are only as dangerous the people who believe in them. I would argue that calling islam barbaric is not helpful. the west or christian world is equally as capable of causing human suffering and i am not talking about some abstract history lesson, i am talking about today. I would rather be held by isis than in a US prison where men are brutally raped ev…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:06 AM
2

ill concede that racist was not the right adjective, just replace it with islamophobic.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:33 AM
-2

you need to re-read what i wrote. the argument you are making to me should be directed at the maker of this video.I agree with you, but from the other end of it. it IS racist to assume that all of the islamic world share the same view of women as say saudi arabia or daesh.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:39 AM
-4

I want to support this guy, but he is off on two key points. 1: islamic world has not oppressed women for 1000 years any more than the west. it would take an extremely long post to explain why at best this was a lazy argument and at worst racist, but the major problem with his comment is that islam has many branches that change drastically in practice by region and over time. it was only a couple of hundred years ago that women in the west were even allowed to work outside of the home. I assume …
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:09 AM
1

It depends, this is a complicated issue. lets say a couple is trying to conceive and the dad just decides at the last minute to bail. in that case there is a double standard for a reason. we don't have to bear children and most reasonable people would say the man has to a least pay child support. i think that is a fair trade off. Its true however, that their is an unfair double standard in other cases. for example if a woman gives a kid up for adoption she is seen as brave or a wounded victim, b…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:34 AM
1

i don't know why guys are still surprised by this kind of stuff. the sweetest most innocent looking girl will cheat on you eventually. and guys are no better, its just that most of us have less opportunity.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/16 05:14 PM
4

to be fair he is not known for his logical consistency
/r/MensRights24/01/16 01:39 AM
0

The judges also referred to the “disquieting” fact that the police had failed to respond to the woman’s several calls for help in dealing with her estranged husband’s “reign of terror.” is there more to the story? not to say that just because she may have called the police on him prior to the attempted hit, he is guilty of it, but it does make me wonder why it wasn't mentioned in the linked story.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 04:25 PM
2

for the record i hate cops, but i see nothing wrong with what they were doing. in fact, i would say they didn't use enough force.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 02:40 AM
3

at least two things are wrong with this article and pointing out facts is not one of them. 1, it claims that chief among the motives for mass shootings is a lack of access to womens bodies and or success in life. this is a wildly self serving statement that has no basis in fact. why people commit mass murder is varied. financial-bulling-mental illness- etc... 2, the entire article paints men as being the problem. men this men that. it is the same lazy bigoted writing that you would here coming f…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:46 AM
-4

As far as this article itself is concerned, ask the stupid bitch who wrote it if she is ok with men who are police officers shooting violent criminals, in order to make society one big gigantic safe space for her. Ask her also if she is ok with all the men with guns who keep her entire national border system safe from the many enemies in the world who would attack us without them. hey "stupid bitch" what about all those evildoers in other countries trying to get you, aren't you glad us men are h…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:03 AM
1

Congratulations on a meaningless statement
/r/MensRights16/12/14 10:34 AM
1

incapacitated is a fancy word for very drunk. so let me guess who is going to be in charge of deciding which young men are rapists and which are not. as i said before this creates a grey area. rape should not be a grey area. you should not be sort of charged with rape. you want to live in a society where women can walk around without any sort of responsibility for their actions. totally insane
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:15 AM
1

I disagree. It's all about personal choice and taking responsibility.It's not anyone's responsibility to be inside your mind to see if you are too drunk or not, that's all on you and it's an unfair burden on everyone around you. Im not here to babysit full grown adults. I will always assume that whatever you do while your drunk is what you want to do unless you say otherwise. Again the main point is participation. Participation is consent
/r/MensRights13/12/14 02:13 AM
1

I don't see it as rape if both parties are willing participants
/r/MensRights13/12/14 02:01 AM
0

level of intoxication is irrelevant. if you participate in the sex you do not get to wake up the next morning and cry rape. sorry. participation is consent.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:28 AM
3

the quiz was given without any lesson/summary of the policy. every person being employed with or attending the university is just supposed know that all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:22 AM
1

i don't know if you are reading a different quiz but that is the farthest thing from clear i've ever seen. in fact, that is the most infuriating thing about it, is how unclear it is. Also, I don't see how it suggests that only women can be raped. to me, it is more about blurring the definition of rape. if a girl is drunk and has sex on her own free will i would not call it rape, but in this question it makes it seem as though if she was too drunk it could be... whatever that means.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:11 AM
1

if its such a grey area then it shouldn't be rape. you can not sort of be charged with rape or sort of be on the sex offenders registry. it ruins your life forever. so if you want to label someone rapist you better damn well be sure that that is what they are.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:01 AM
1

let me be clear. if you get drunk on your own free will and participate in sex it is not rape. the key word is participate. if you are so drunk that you are unable to participate that means you are passed out/unconscious. that is rape. if you are shit canned hammered drunk and can barely say the ABC's or walk straight but still want to try and have sloppy drunk sex and your throwing up on the guy and everything is wrong with the world but you still manage to give him a blow job or whatever, but …
/r/MensRights13/12/14 12:57 AM
1

participating the act is implicit consent.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 12:02 AM
1

not at all. I am 100% against that. what I am talking about is something all together different. giving someone a drug without their knowledge with the sole purpose to have sex with them is unquestionably rape. I am talking about a woman who acts on her own free will decides to get wasted and actively participates in sex. if she is passed out its rape, but if she is kissing you back and whatever else goes on it doesn't matter, but as long as she is participating its not rape. I don't care how dr…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 11:58 PM
3

the problem is there is no way to determine what "sufficiently drunk" is without being arbitrary. using the word rape should not be arbitrary. you should not be able to sort of rape someone and that is exactly what you want to do.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:22 PM
0

incapacitated means really drunk, you need to own up to your own backward beliefs and stop backpedaling. just say what you mean. you want to draw an arbitrary line somewhere between drink one and rape. I want women to take responsibility for their own actions. you think so little of women that they should be treated like children without any agency. men are just here to protect and guide them through life. I think women can make their own decisions and have their own free will.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:12 PM
10

All I want is for women to take responsibility for their actions and not ruin mens lives because they regret something they did while drunk. its the lowest form of cowardice in my opinion. I want the law applied equally. no reasonable person would suggest that if drunk woman came into a store and shot someone in the head that they would somehow be less guilty of murder so why then is being drunk an excuse for them to avoid the responsibility of accepting that they actively participated in sex wi…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:48 PM
2

in the vast majority of rape cases the federal government does not even have jurisdiction, but if it makes you feel better to think that every time a girl gets drunk and has sex the man should be prosecuted for rape, then i sure as hell hope you never have a son.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:35 PM
9

http://i.imgur.com/yFi56EP.png
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:22 PM
6

actually no, wrong on both accounts. one, it does matter how drunk you are (thats what a breathalyzer is for) and two, i never said in any of my posts that being drunk negates a rape. I said clearly that it doesn't matter how drunk you are it doesn't make consensual sex rape.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:16 PM
1

you are right and you are wrong this is something that has come up only recently. the original definition of rape “the carnal knowledge of a female, forcibly and against her will.” in what I use. allowing feminists to change the language and then buying into it is part of the problem. i choose to define rape the same way it has always been defined. making something illegal and changing words around doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:06 PM
2

sorry poe's law.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:41 PM
7

for anyone interested in making a complaint to the university: http://www.ou.edu/eoo.html
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:29 PM
8

http://www.ou.edu/eoo.html
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:27 PM
10

drugs and alcohol are not the problem. feminists trying to make drunk-sex, rape is.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:20 PM
5

you are creating a grey area where there is none. rape is when you are forced to have sex against your will. it doesn't matter how many shots you had. no where in the text was it suggested that the woman was forced to do anything. it simply said she was passive. well that could mean a million things, but it doesn't matter. the ONLY exception is when the person is passed out. simply being drunk and slurring your speech does not qualify
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:17 PM
3

I don't know about that. it may or may not, but that is still besides the point. the point is action. if you take action and participate in an act of your own free will you are responsible for that action.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:11 PM
25

answer: no one is guilty because nowhere in the reading was there an indication of any crime committed
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:00 PM
6

they did give details. they said she was slurring her speech and is off balance. to me that is besides the point. I don't care how drunk she was or if he had nothing to drink at all. rape is when you are forced to have sex against your will, not when you get drunk and do things that you other wise wouldn't.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:42 PM
49

it shouldn't have to. if you are a willing participant you are responsible for your actions no matter how drunk you are. if i get drunk and go run over some kids in my car no one is going to suggest i get a lighter sentence because i was too wasted to know right from wrong. if you participate you are responsible. its called agency and you don't loose it just because you are drunk. no where in the questions was she forced to have sex. sex is not an act preformed by a man onto a woman. it is a mut…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:34 PM
5

sorry i know a screen shot would have been better, but i wasn't thinking.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:39 PM
3

you are naive if you think that there is not a large block of the modern feminist movement that thinks men should not have the right to express their opinions on female reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:15 PM
0

That is the whole point of this image. wrong. it says nothing about republicans rich or white people. it only mentions if you have a penis. everything else is just an assumption on your part.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 01:52 PM
2

I don't see any "over" reactions, just opinions. I am pro choice, believe there should be little to no barriers to abortion and think it's ultimately a women choice, however, i would hope if i were to get a women pregnant that she would take my opinions into consideration. also telling someone not they are not allowed to express an opinion simply based on their sex is clearly sexist and hypocritical since the entire feminist movement is supposed to be based on equality of sexes.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:22 PM
1

i thought about saying this in the reply and making a thoughtful argument against but instead i agreed and said it should apply to other things as well like cooking and cleaning or the ellen show (men should know their place)
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:12 PM
1

"i... have... no... time... to... do... your...education." from natty dread. words to live by.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:41 AM
1

you seem to assume a lot. like for one that i have taken the time to review your previous comments. I am responding directly to what you say to me without any context. from my point of view its implied that if your saying things would fall apart without us there that we are obviously doing good. so then please explain how afghanistan would cease to exist without our presence.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 06:57 PM
1

your entire argument is based on the premis that the US is doing good in Afghanistan. stop trying to defend your argument and genuinely look at what you are saying and if it is true. what good is the US really doing? now measure that against how much damage and instability it creates daily.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 04:43 PM
1

delusional? i have know idea what you are even basing your assumption on. did Vietnam or any other country we've occupied need the US to rebuild? The ONLY thing that happens as a result of the US sticking around is the funneling of resources away from the country in question and into western investments. a school here or there that get shown on CNN a hundred times is not improvement is the delusion/illusion.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:26 PM
1

, of course, cause undeniable problems in the occupied countries, yes of course because self determination is undeniably a huge problem. and without us breaking into their homes raping and murdering people at random who else would be bringing the great stability we provide
/r/MensRights18/06/12 01:14 PM
0

WRONG where did you hear this garbage. not only will she get half of his shit but since he is working and she probably isn't or in school she will get a good chunk of his income for years to come through alimony.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:52 PM
2

we can only dream.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 02:19 PM
-2

i can think of a couple more attractive things. like being skinny for starters, but i guess im just a shallow ass hole
/r/MensRights01/06/12 08:15 PM
1

I agree 100% legal marriage is a complete travesty. We have done our best to live together as a committed couple but keep our finances separate and no one seems to respect our decision. I am very very lucky at this point that she did not decide to take advantage of this situation, but I believe many women would have. Thanks for the great advice
/r/MensRights02/03/12 03:35 AM
3

Even if I don't get any advice in MR I still think this is a MR issue and someone could benefit from this story being out there, possibly prevent this from happening to someone else. Also if I could get some ideas about who to report this to or other ways of holding them accountable it would make the people responsible think twice before signing off someones personal property.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:39 AM
4

you really don't get Mens Rights do you?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:16 PM
3

especially if he was a teacher
/r/MensRights22/01/12 03:34 PM
1

thats the one, thanks!
/r/MensRights28/12/11 11:11 PM
7

Sweden has affirmative actions?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 12:36 PM
1

says you. i was extremely offended.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:28 PM
2

i agree. its obvious that i am the most offended and therefore won the battle. as the victor i demand an angry asian women to sit on my face for full release.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:44 AM
1

do you understand the word retarded is very offensive or are you just trolling
/r/MensRights01/11/11 09:36 PM
-5

i thought asian women were submissive
/r/MensRights01/11/11 01:58 AM
18

i dont know if its because mensrights is getting more attention or what but it seems like as of late this sub reddit has been attracting a lot more than the usual hatred.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 07:53 AM
-2

i wonder what would happen if this was posted in r/feminism BTW i like her 3 reasons why its not worth it to spread false statistics and why it doesn't save lives
/r/MensRights04/06/11 02:30 PM
3

"they literally tore my pants to shreds" "they were tearing all of my muscles and literally trying to tear my scalp off my scull" "there is no doubt in my mind that i was in the process of dying" "a torturous death that is going to go on for ever and ever and ever" these are just a few examples. im pretty sure her muscles are fine, she still has her hair and she is still very much alive. like i said before i don't doubt that she was assaulted, but i think the jury is still out on whether or not …
/r/MensRights07/05/11 04:02 PM
1

you are stating your opinion as fact. you did not witness this event. you have no information other than what she has reported, which is not only inconsistent with what i have personally witnessed on the ground but also with the egyptian culture. i do not say with 100 percent certainty that i know what happened but i can say that her story if true is very very very isolated.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 05:51 AM
1

egypt is a very safe place considering its pop is close to 80 million. much safer than many american or european cities that is for sure. i think you bring up a good possibility with the men being government thugs, but at the same time i would say she had every right to be here as a reporter and i dont blame her for what im sure was a very traumatic sexual assault. my only point is i think she exaggerated her story out of fear. if you are right and they were government thugs who came out with th…
/r/MensRights07/05/11 05:00 AM
6

As someone who was in Tahrir square on the same day at the same time as her i can tell you her story doesn't add up. many many non-veiled attractive women were all over the square that day and almost every other day of the revolution.how is it that she is the only case of rape that ive heard of if there was in fact a mob of rapists running around the square? although sexual harassment is a very real and big problem in egypt i would not call what happened to her rape. i believe that she freaked o…
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:52 AM
3

im going to get downvoted for this, but being attractive is a double edged sword. yes of course attractive women get huge advantages early on, but... they also set themselves up for failure in the long term. the happiest people ive ever met are normal/or below average looking. also most successful couples i know are the same. the thing is that beauty only lasts on average till you are about 35-40 by that time they have set themselves up with a ton of shallow relationships and have almost no life…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 03:42 PM
1

my problem with this scholarship is that the mother only has to be single. single just means that you got a divorce or had a child out of wedlock. not that those things are bad, but they should not be something that qualifies you as a candidate for scholarships. I think instead it should be for a single parent who has taken sole custody of the child.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 07:48 PM
1

i've noticed this subreddit has a ton of resources but not a way of putting people in this situation in contact with or recommending a good lawyers. do you think there is a reason for that? BTW im looking for a lawyer in the OKC/ norman area.
/r/MensRights25/01/11 10:08 AM
2

what the fuck are you talking about, sensational? nothing about this title is sensational. you sound like a psycho with an axe to grind and you want this forum to be your own personal army. im a strong supporter of mens rights and its "core issues" but i also have a sense of humor as im sure most others on this forum do. as long as the post is relevant, which it most definitely is, then it belongs here.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 03:11 PM
-1

its obviously not a major concern (its ok to be lighthearted sometimes, even in mens rights) but i would disagree that this is completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 02:18 PM
2

that hair is unconscionable the extreme disciplining is a bit wacko but thats just because she is a bitch.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:43 PM
2

you are without any doubt the funniest troll around
/r/MensRights25/09/10 05:36 AM
-1

thank you for that well thought out post, you guys are both a couple of geniuses...
/r/MensRights25/09/10 05:23 AM
0

that is hilarious... you lost, just give up and go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights25/09/10 05:21 AM
0

...no hope for humanity.
/r/MensRights24/09/10 03:04 PM
2

I said (1) our jury system is archaic, (2) the jury called her the mastermind. I didn't say the former followed from the latter. Again, you fail at reading. this is an example of you attempting to split hairs. its not me who fails at reading. you fail at writing and comprehension. if you cant see the relationship between those two statements then i dont know how in the hell you were smart enough to turn on your computer. you are a small minded person. you would prefer to argue about details that…
/r/MensRights24/09/10 10:43 AM
6

ok since you want to split hairs. you called her retarded (she is not) she is just close and in any case that's not an excuse you said the article didn't mention that fact, it did you said the jury system was archaic because it called her the mastermind. you are suggesting that because she is so stupid she couldn't be the "mastermind" (in this context the word means she came up with the plan it doesn't mean that she was smart about it or even that it was a good plan because obviously it wasn't. …
/r/MensRights24/09/10 09:28 AM
6

5-10% of all death row inmates in the united states suffer from SEVERE mental illness. citation
/r/MensRights24/09/10 08:33 AM
10

i don't know if you are aware of this or not, but death row is full of stupid people (ie actually retarded, not just almost retarded) the vast vast majority of which happen to be men. so to answer your question is the media "bias as fuck?" the answer is yes, because the focus of the story was her gender. thats exactly why men in the same boat dont get the same kind of sympathy or media attention as this "lady" As for you shifting all the blame from her for her crimes onto the men, all i can say …
/r/MensRights24/09/10 07:05 AM
10

how many men in the same or worse mental condition are executed every year for lesser crimes yet do not receive an international outcry of sympathy, over 7000 appeals, and a pass on the fact that she arranged for sex with a 16 year old? This is not a rhetorical question I would like an answer from you. Also I don't even believe in capital punishment... I am only pointing this out to show the hypocrisy of people who sympathize with her purely because of her gender. The issue here, i thought, shou…
/r/MensRights24/09/10 05:24 AM
1

no pictures no upvote
/r/MensRights22/09/10 05:06 PM
1

i really hope youre trolling otherwise you are one dumb mother fucker.
/r/MensRights18/09/10 01:12 PM
1

thank you Edit: i can't believe I got down voted for saying thank you.
/r/MensRights17/09/10 02:22 PM
7

if that was the case it would have been included in the report. a girl like that does not make a report and then leave a detail like that out. in any case even if he did make a "straight beeline" so what? what is the end result... what can you do with that information. start questioning men, detaining men that fit the description? where does it end and what other benign activities are going to warrant the same over reaction?
/r/MensRights17/09/10 02:04 PM
1

and she is ugly
/r/MensRights17/09/10 10:52 AM
-1

well you have to admit then its a pretty solid strategy. fucking your enemy out of existence sounds a lot more fun than draining your economy to set up bases all over the world and fighting losing wars, but i guess if you are an insecure xenophobe with a propensity for inbreeding like yourself its probably all you got going on.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 12:45 AM
6

that video is outrageous. he says swedish people will not exist in 50 years because muslims are coming in and fucking their women!?!? i thought the complaint was they weren't integrating... which is it? don't blame muslims because you can't get laid, asshole
/r/MensRights17/07/10 10:25 PM
3

unbelievable.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 02:34 AM
1

i was looking up how to spell the word raping because i wanted to use it figuratively. i thought it might have two p's
/r/MensRights06/06/10 02:38 PM
1

New Oxford American Dictionary it comes stock on all macbooks
/r/MensRights06/06/10 02:36 PM
3

New Oxford American Dictionary it comes stock on all macbooks
/r/MensRights06/06/10 02:36 PM
-6

fags
/r/MensRights17/05/10 02:46 AM
0

this is exactly why i said this is not a mens rights issue in the first place, you are trying to drag me and others into the abortion issue and like most pro lifers you have based your arguments on a false dichotomy. (a fetus is either a person or its not) at what point sperm turns into a "person" is an abortion issue not a mens rights issue. on your point about consequences you need a serious reality check. women whether you like it or not have been given the biological duty of carrying the bab…
/r/MensRights27/04/10 01:22 AM
1

if there is a mens rights issue that needs to be addressed, that implies there is some form of unfair/unequal treatment to a man. if a man doesn't want his child aborted or because he is pro life, that does not give him the right co-opt the mens rights banner to fit his personal needs. reproductive rights after conception belong solely to a women because it is her body. this is a matter of the rights of an individual to decide what to do with their body. i am aware that some have tried to make t…
/r/MensRights26/04/10 04:47 PM
-8

This is not a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 07:31 PM
0

1 should be don't have sex with him.
/r/MensRights04/04/10 07:57 AM
5

Let me untangle this web of shit. he says cheating is about believing monogamy and love aren't real. OK fair enough, if thats what you believe... everyone questions those things from time to time, but its how he chooses to respond to this belief that makes him a low life. if you dont believe in love or monogamy then why the fuck are you married in the first place? dont get married or at least not to someone who doesn't know. There are plenty of people in open relationships. cheating is a huge be…
/r/MensRights19/03/10 05:24 AM
4

here here
/r/MensRights20/01/10 01:39 PM
6

or this gem.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 07:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter