Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[+]paradisepickles [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link
Where is that definition from? The publisher of whatever dictionary you're looking at needs to be contacted. If they get a lot of people calling/emailing from this post they may be inclined to change it. Info please! Also, if it is in print form, can you tell me the edition? There's a chance that the company has realized that rape is not gender dependent and updated their definition in newer editions. I don't want to call unless the current edition is incorrect.
Some good news: as far as I am aware, every state in the US defines rape using the word 'person.' We all know that the law treats rape in an inconsistent manner, but at least the letter of the law defines it in terms of humans and not gender.
[–]dropkickdog 2 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]rocketbears 3 points4 points5 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]pulleysandweights 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]paradisepickles1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[+]paradisepickles [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Thank you so much for the link. Dictionary.com, wtf? I hope more folks here read this and send a message.
Actually, do you mind if I make a post asking for people to write? Or would you like to?
[–]rocketbears 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]adamsfan42[S] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]paradisepickles1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nokonoko 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kabukistar -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]adamsfan42[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]kabukistar 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nlakes -4 points-3 points-2 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]adamsfan42[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lrdwhyt 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]paradisepickles [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link
lol what? You sound like an idiot.
[–]nlakes -1 points0 points1 point (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]paradisepickles [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link
Not too close to home, I just think that your original comment sounds ridiculous. You related a shitty definition (and nothing else) about a shitty thing to brainwashing feminist hypocrites. Have you seen the Daily Show parodies of Glenn Beck? Yes, what you said about feminists is true in some cases. Yes, the definition that the OP gave sucks. The two are otherwise loosely related and you sound foolish for saying anything but.
Also, why not look up rape in the dictionary? Let's fix the problem now that we are aware of it. In an above comment someone provided a link to contact dictionary.com with comments. You have an opportunity to be a part of the solution, I hope you have at it.
[–]nlakes -1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[+]paradisepickles [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
Again? Man. All I am saying is that your arguments had nothing to do with the original post. You ranted on about something that sometimes happens but that was not at all related to the post. That sounds idiotic to me. Hooray for opinions.
I never said that you were wrong. I was never arguing against you. I just thought what you said sounded stupid.
[–]nlakes -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]paradisepickles [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
Okay. One more time. The OP posted a definition. You posted about hypocritical feminist jerkwads. The posted definition did not mention anything that you mentioned. That is how what you said and what the OP said are not related.
Of course there is a problem with how rape is perceived in society, and the sorry dictionary definition that the OP posted makes light of that. The part about crazy bitches being crazy bitches is loosely related (unless you have inside info about the dictionary being run by a radical feminist group that thinks rape only happens to women).
If you still don't understand what I mean but for some reason would like to, please check out the Daily Show parodies of Glenn Beck. They're fucking funny, even if you don't see my point you'll get a laugh.
[–]nlakes -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]paradisepickles [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Dude. The brainwashing shit is what I'm talking about. Your first comment. The first reason I thought you sound like an idiot.
Your response to a bad definition was that it's "amazing" to you that feminists are "happy to reinforce the socialised-condition whereby women are victims and men, perpetrators." Unrelated because the only thing connecting feminists to the definition is that some of feminists don't think men can be raped. A lot of people don't think men can be raped. That attitude existed long before feminism began.
All I can say is that to me you still sound like an idiot. I hope you channel your frustrations into a way to help people and that this isn't your only outlet. You obviously care a lot about the sorry fact that a lot of people just don't understand the truth about sexual violence, and if you start talking about it instead of commenting this weird shit on the internet connecting it all to feminists I'm sure you will go far in making a positive difference.
[–]nlakes1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]paradisepickles1 point [recovered] | Copy Link