TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

agarybuseychristmas Archive

View 1 post and 119 comments by agarybuseychristmas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
51

agarybuseychristmas/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:31 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Cool, let the woman struggle and worry about how she's gonna feed the child. She can put it up for adoption. It becomes her choice to have a child. She does not have the 'right' to have children.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:24 PM
5

There is, quite literally, nothing I care less about on the face of this earth than the relationship between some lyrical hack and an 18 year old boy. Seriously, who the fuck cares?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 05:26 AM
3

No, traditionalism would be taking control and being overly assertive. What I am referring to is a new phenomena.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:28 AM
4

Not really. If we're being honest here, it's men who are told to behave in one fashion who grew up in a culture where any type of expression of confidence, sexual aggression, or even the expression of male sexuality is seen as lewd and undesirable, yet see women consistently going over the men who are the things they are told, generally, it's not 'good' to be. They have been raised this way, and it's reasonable to understand their frustration. So yeah, they then express frustration at the system…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:36 PM
9

Except the bulk of men who they label as 'nice guys' do not fall into this paradigm, and it's just rationalization of their contempt of unassertive men.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 10:09 PM
1

You can actually argue right now that you're creating a false dichotomy between a state and a non-state because you're prescribing for people whose experience is that there is not a difference between gender and gender identity and thus ascribing experience to where there is none.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:22 AM
3

You've given me some things to think about.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:35 AM
16

Okay, um, you are aware you can be a heterosexual trans person, right?
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:55 AM
6

The first quote I actually agree with. The trans 'movement' is mostly made out of a bunch of very, very unstable people, which is honestly expected, given how much they're shit on in society. The second I disagree with in terms of substance, but he's talking about his right of free speech, bigoted or not. He's not making grand-sweeping statements anything close to Suzanne Moore or Bindel.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 09:47 PM
4

I love how he's trying to make a 'point' by using his gangly, dorky ass in poses meant to be done by incredibly in-shape women.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:54 PM
7

Because they frame abuse as if its fisticuffs wherein women just simply lose. By doing so, it allows them to throw other red herrings and obfuscate the fact that most abuse victims merely 'take it'.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:57 PM
30

Prostituion is illegal because they don't want lower status men to get sex outside of the rules in which they are supposed to obey.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:17 PM
3

Uh, those of you who are downvoting him, he's not contesting the assertion. He's agreeing with it.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:32 PM
-1

As for gender identity, I honestly don't have the energy to delve into it, but I will just say that in cases with ambiguity I tend to take the side where, if I'm wrong, I've done the least amount of harm. This is fair, but poisoning the dialogue with false rhetoric can have unforeseen consequences. Now, I am not one to say to an individual genderqueer person outright that I believe that their conception of their gender identity is likely tied into conflation between gender expression and gender …
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:24 PM
-1

The vast majority of trans people identity themselves as MtF/FtM. Most would take issue with your policing of these terms. Gender identity being a spectrum is an incredibly dubious (and incredulous) position to take. There is ample neurological evidence to more or less prove that gender identity is an innate binary, and gender conflict in this regard is most likely psychopathological in nature. There is simply no evidentiary backing to it other than 'learned experience'. Gender expression on the…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:09 AM
1

I've theorizied that many women consider deeming an action taken by someone ill-thought out tantamount to placing a value judgement on the person who performed said action. I believe this may tie into the gendered disparity men and women have regarding locus of control, but I have not put together all the pieces yet.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:04 AM
2

Ah yes, because it's men deciding that submitting to men like Christian Grey and Edward Cullen is what makes a woman truly sexy.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:03 AM
-2

Because it's a pointless and banal racist joke with no real effect on the world as we see it. It's a troll subreddit, meant to rustle jimmies. Because we have a locus-of-control that isn't that of children or privileged rich kids.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:03 PM
7

http://circumstitions.com/
/r/MensRights14/01/13 02:20 AM
-1

"I need feminism because I get reminded that I live in a world where I can take an easy route to a cushy life on the basis of physical attractiveness" Yeah I'd need feminism too to help quell the cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 10:55 PM
2

Men do not seek marriage for the sake of being 'respected' like some pipe-smoking Ward Cleaver archetype. Respect is something that is just a tid bit, well, totally necessary for both parties in a relationship to even have it. Additionally, while sex is incredibly important in a marriage, it is not paramount to men above all else, like this article frames. Immediately the article frames this is the same gender essentialist terms as every other article on the Internet, wherein men are shallow and…
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:42 PM
11

Husbands and wives bring different strengths and desires to marriage. For women, feeling cherished and desired is vital. For a man, respect and sex are of utmost importance Hah, yeah, no, not really.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 05:46 PM
1

Holy shit that poster is insane. Check out the history. Fucking anti-fluoride conspiracy shit.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:10 AM
7

Gotta say that I'm disappointed with Farrell and this article, particularly his willingness to blame video games and online pornography for stunting mental growth, and arbitrarily assigning a 'healthy' label to girls' 5-hour-per-week habit of games, vs. the supposedly addicting '13' boys do. He has no evidential backing for this number.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:02 PM
5

The issue would be that this guy would have been strung up to dry were the roles reversed.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:21 AM
16

$160,000 worth of backers are more than one, though. GOTCHA
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:30 PM
24

I studied video game culture for a few months at a previous job. This came about due to Rock Band/Guitar Hero (also a game series called Sing Star and to a lesser extent Karaoke Revolution), as well as WoW. Women gravitate toward casual games much more frequently, and kick up shit storms because the games that don't cater to their sensibilities cater to male ones much more, and that's 'bad' because men are forgoing reality for trumped up fantasy. The only genre that women consistently get treate…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:29 PM
18

Anita Sarkesian and $160,000
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:21 PM
16

When I was in the 6th grade, my friends and I were bored as fuck at the monotony of recess, so we decided to figure out shit to do that'd entertain us. We eventually settled on playing a game for an entire week. Other kids noticed what we were doing and asked if we could join in. We eventually had twenty-five or so students in on it. We also liked to make up games. Our school was personally responsible for a bunch of games being created that are apparently still played almost twenty years later.…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:35 PM
12

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/women-cheating-men-study/story?id=13885519#.UENkZ1QcAi4
/r/MensRights02/01/13 04:33 PM
4

It's widely speculated that women may not cheat more 'often', but when they do cheat, it's via long standing affairs, v.s. men it's usually a one-time deal.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:14 PM
0

I actually agree entirely with you. Good show.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:26 AM
7

Think about your own issues. Women don't have a problem with circumcision, because they don't give a fuck and they don't have to. It's your job to give a fuck. That's honestly a disgusting sentiment, and if true, would legitimize misogyny as a valid position. Do you see anywhere at that protest any women, sitting around waiting for an MRA to give a fuck? Nope, but I see a bunch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0 Which then give allowances for similar crazies to fuck with policy due…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:16 AM
8

1) How is this relevant to OPs points? 2) Apparently Texas is providing services via its own programs? 3) Fuck Texas for this shit, regardless. If feminists do want to focus on anything, focus on real problems like this, not bullshit about birth control needing to be totally funded by governmental decree when services like this exist in every city in the country.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:00 AM
7

But You can get free condoms at a University/Planned Parenthood/Wherever! This isn't the issue at hand, here. The above being true for the Pill as well aside, the crux of the issue is that there is a governmental mandate forcing insurance companies to cover 100% of its cost (plus co-pay, probably). There is nothing stipulating this for men. The reason behind it not being covered is some insurance companies/companies purchasing insurance has issues with the concept of funding contraception. The p…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:38 PM
5

No one ever says something is 'strictly biology', and to think so is absurd. Biology is rooted in predispositions, and there are certainly living conditions that would overrule these predispositions. Survival is most paramount to a culture. Furthermore, we have proof that neonatal testosterone exposure heavily influences predispositions toward typical 'male' or conversely 'female' behaviour from birth. And in the most heavily egalitarian countries in the world (Scandanavia), men and women typica…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:11 PM
2

Exceptions that prove the rule, really. The Mosuo are also a feudal peasant class which had matrilineality essentially forced upon them by nobility.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:05 PM
3

It's Sean Faircloth, white knight extraodinaire primarily responsible for those awesome child support laws that enable debtors prisons. He's the media head for the Richard Dawkins Foundation. Dawkins was never a prosecutor.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:13 PM
9

Patriarchy theory suffers from a severe case of prescriptive linguistics. By virtue of equating a society in which men are more apt to pursue positions of direct enforcement of power as a 'patriarchal' society, you put a shit ton of ideas in peoples brains as to how society works. Keep in mind that men pretty clearly do have more political and more economic power (a.k.a. government jobs and money). So either society is set up in such a way that it's easier for them, or they're biologically more …
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:59 PM
1

Bonobos are not human. We are as close to chimps genetically as we are to bonabos, and we are MUCH more similar in behaviour to chimps.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:47 PM
3

The gender-specific rule that men shouldn’t hit women is caused by the misogynistic belief that women are fragile. The issue here is not that men shouldn't hit women, but rather, that women can hit men with impuninity, even maiming them. Now, could this be related to the perspective that women are fragile and weak? For sure, but the issue is primarily rooted in men being obliged to take whatever women can dish out due to things like modern gender laws and a whole fucking chunk of society being w…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 06:06 PM
7

Because the overwhelming response in this thread is people condemning the OP. It'd be like me pointing to radfems and calling the entirety of the feminist movement overtly racist and transphobic.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:59 AM
2

Probably that retarded "Sex at Dawn" book.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:56 AM
2

I think it shows a flaw in story telling and character creation, but is also predicated on (if the story is conventional): The main character being a woman There being, likely, no love plot within the story A secondary character being female and developed enough to the story that she converses to this character If it's a good story, a piece of dialogue being necessary enough that it warrants being said, but still excludes 50% of the population It being long enough to allow this The first is obvi…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:40 AM
3

lol American Pie.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:57 PM
2

... Okay, I can think of pretty much the following prolific pot smokers that are male: Seth Rogan Snoop Dog Willie Nelson Carl Sagan Afro Man There's a bit of a pattern with male pot smokers in that they are often seen as, well, losers by their own volition. If there is a 'stigma' against female stoners, it's that society at large cannot brand them as good-for-nothing deadbeat manchildren, but also cannot brand them as victims of a drug culture/rape culture/man culture/whatever, so there is some…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:48 PM
2

I don't agree with the damn law, but everyone here saying all this crazy shit about how if we decriminalize beating women will result in fewer cases of it happening (what?) to weird bullshit about not trusting studies that say women are subjected to more domestic violence (a pretty goddamn widely accepted fact). I don't know. Have fun circle jerking about how widely accepted statistics aren't credible because they say women experience more domestic abuse and have fun making outrageous claims tha…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:25 AM
2

prohibition of males to express any emotion other than anger. This isn't even true.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:40 PM
1

I've heard it said that this will merely enforce the male appropriaton of typical-feminine activities, and further undermine the culturally feminine as being undesirable. Even me, a huge anti-feminist, understands that no one except radfems would ascribe to this notion.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:22 PM
1

Rapists get lower sentences sometimes based on what the girl is wearing. Source this with anything beyond that retarded Italian too-tight-jeans controversy. Also, there is a serious problem with people desensitizing rape in general, what with the recent controversy over the "legitimate rape" comment. Which was met with outrage, and he lost his job. Do you see this sort of thing happening with theft? No one is blamed for leaving their car/house unlocked when they get robbed. Yup, I do. See, you j…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:34 AM
0

You have no idea how the burden of proof works. I assume you're religious.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:02 PM
9

This is just-so bullshit with no backing. Terrible points, practically on the same level as a banal Jezebel article.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:40 AM
1

Hey I'm going to take a quick look at my Facebook wall. Hmm, I found the following messages written by women literally fucking TODAY: "Another difficult night missing the most wonderful woman in the world. I love you Stephanie" "Omg I finally found the one for me. It took so long." "You're everything good in my life, you leave me breathless. I still can't believe that you're mine. You just walked out of one of my dreams, so beautiful you're leaving me breathless. ♥" SO PATHETIC AND WEIRD GAWD
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:07 PM
1

" Rape is a choice men make to use sex as a weapon for power and control. " Chalk it up to caffeine overdose and it being 5:00am, but this is just fucking disgusting. Here, let's see what happens if you change this up: " Rape is a choice Arabs make to use sex as a weapon for power and control. " HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, seems to be a bit more fucking contentious and offensive now, ain't it? For them to say that this campaign isn't tacitly (I'd say explicitly, but even so) targeting and painting m…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:43 AM
2

We call these 'just-so' statements. Were what he said true, well, he'd be right, but he hasn't done this, so whatever the hell he said is irrelevant. He hasn't even bothered to state what problems his white penis allowed his to skate through.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:46 AM
4

I have my own theories about this that will probably be in an article I write, shortly.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:15 PM
16

Chicken and egg scenario, but regardless, it certainly isn't rooted in 'being a girl is just disgusting' anywhere close in totality.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:13 PM
12

Female entitlement to sex.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:29 PM
6

His work is not peer reviewed.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:09 PM
0

Articles like these just reinforce the idea that women don't know their own bodies. Honestly, I'd say most people do not. How many men do you think would get off via prostate stimulation if they understood the process of doing so? Sex objectively sucks for a lot of men for a host of reasons, and I bet this would enhance the sex lives of many.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:47 PM
2

Fuck this is really bizarre to me. I've literally never had a partner who could orgasm from intercourse alone. As a side note, I'd be very curious to know as to whether or not women only being able to orgasm clitorally comes from a variation of the 'death grip' phenomena--as in, women acclimating their bodies to only orgasm to clitorally. Also this is interesting: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2127901/Put-away-road-map-lads-Scientists-present-new-proof-women-climax-intercourse-a…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:51 PM
2

I was just thinking about this while looking on Facebook. While my male friends may, once in a while, post a picture of some random chick in a slightly provocative and say something cliche and annoying like "Pure Perfection", the women go so far beyond this. Constant pictures of Ryan Reynolds shirtless, giant images about the best "Christian Grey" contender (it appears to be the dude from Thor), pictures of impossibly-chiseled men in nothing but white underwear, and often graphic descriptions of…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:45 PM
6

Because your ideology is based on terrible rhetoric that actively harms men. Do you not understand why this makes feminists different from MRAs? MRAs do not have any set dogma that they have to affirm or validate. Feminists, however, do.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:54 AM
13

'objectified and demeaned' ........ Apparently this is what we are calling 'have sex with' now. It's impossible to take this any other way other way; it's a throwback to Dworkin's 'sex is synonymous with rape' statement.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:48 AM
1

Men make more than women in the work place. When the recession hit, the focus was on recovering men's jobs. Yeah, uh, no. The original plan was this, then feminists whined and whinged that it was too focusing on men, then they changed it, and women got the majority of aid. The auto bail out was a drop in an ocean, if that's what you're referring to. Men got the majority of 'new jobs' because they lost twice as many. Furthermore, this is the result of an industry that women are not at all barred …
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:57 PM
2

Honestly, I cannot argue with much of what you say here. I pretty much agree with all of it at its core. I greatly admire this level of skepticism. While I am not ruling out the possibility, I am saying that we need to analyze the effects of these centers before drawing any conclusions. Agreed. The issue should probably fall toward getting men these types of resources, however. And they did for a while. The 'issue' was, however, they helped out men too much. I can take from that quite a few thin…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:19 PM
4

Right, that is your small town. That is not a general rule. And no, it doesn't create higher entrance qualifications for men - unless universities decide that the entrance requirement for a women is a 3.0 and the entrance requirement for a man is a 3.2, you can't say that men and women are held to different standards. It creates higher entrance qualifications for men because their ability to meet those entrance qualifications is not equal because of direct discrimination. If I give you a million…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:35 PM
4

Also, personally, I haven't received any grants or bursaries for being a woman. I'm sure some people do, but this doesn't mean that women are less competent than men or are held to lower standards than men, so it isn't really relevant in this particular conversation. It kind of does, actually. Women get financial assistance that men do not, thus allowing them greater security and time for schooling. Look at this page: https://www.google.com/search?q=women+held+to+lower+standards+engineering&ie=u…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:05 PM
7

The entrance qualifications for women in engineering are often lower, and you will often receive a number of grants and bursaries men will not.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:17 PM
35

I've been friends with many escorts, and all of them fucking hate feminism because it paints them as agency-less women with deep psychological trauma/drug addictions that should be pitied, thus pushing their line of work more into the underground, and making them objects of scorn by association.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:23 AM
5

Laws are largely one directional - They say what women cannot do, not what men cannot do. Yeah, uh, what about the whole "Men can't be legally raped" thing that exists in most countries? I'd say that's pretty fucking up there. Or how about: "Men do not have the right not to be circumsized" or "Men cannot back out of the draft" In countries like Saudi Arabia, things seem clearly worse for women What is 'worse'? Less free? Certainly. Better quality of life? Incredibly dubious.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:21 AM
3

This is an MR issue because it shows how people are willing to politically pander to voting blocs--in this case, women--and waste tax dollars doing so. It shows how feminism is well entrenched in government policy, and is willing to not only put men in expendable positions but also the entire well-being of society for the sake of ideological affirmation. How people cannot look at feminist policy and agenda as anything but the Temperance Movement 2.0 is beyond me.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:07 AM
3

Happens to a lot of men who get circumcised and get too much taken off compared to how their penises grow later on. It ends up stretching out the foreskin to such an extent that the skin is completely taut. You know the cliche about men having to 'jackhammer' women or whatever? Well it's probably pretty likely this came about because men don't feel much sensation otherwise.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:43 PM
10

I have a partial circumcision. I still retain 30% of it or so, and fuck yes I wish I wasn't circumcised. My glans is nowhere near as sensitive or pleasure-inducing as that supposedly 'useless flap of skin' I have. My friend literally cannot masturbate without copious amounts of lube because of his circumcision.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:02 PM
4

Prominent men's illicit affairs are usually with good-looking nobodies, women's are usually with often high-ranking officials.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:09 PM
1

Once a child is out of the womb, both parents have equal legal obligation to that child. If the father wants to keep the child and the mother doesn't, the mother has to provide child support. A man consented to sex. He does not consent to anything else, unless otherwise said. You see, the problem with this is that the 'rights of the child' are ill-defined. Why does a child have equal obligation to the parents, when there are so many examples to the contrary? It's a patently false statement. Ther…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:49 AM
5

One person claimed that a feminist author recently wrote a book on the dangers of masculinity that boys face. Definitely referring to Michael Kimmel's "Guyland". I want you to imagine a book that used women in their early 20s that did nothing but use their sexual appeal to manipulate men, cause drama and tension between others in order to get ahead in their social sphere, have rampant sex without any regard for the feelings of any who are involved, getting wasted on the dime of others every othe…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:52 PM
2

Yep, it's all white men. Black men sure aren't fucking the majority of prisoners or anything.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:57 PM
5

Lay your fucking foot down, man. "No. I am never taking that job in Afghanistan, or any other like it. I am getting a degree in CS, and that's what's happening." I take it your wife is not working, eh?
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:07 PM
6

Because the issues surrounding it are the same, yet there is a concerted effort by people such as yourself to say they are not equatable using disingenuous tactics like comparing circumcsion done in a sterile, hospital environment to a practice in a the bushes where they remove the entire labia with a piece of glass. The reason that your precious articles and issues is being 'appropriated' and removing your special-snowflake status is just that: YOUR SIDE IS TURNING IT INTO A ZERO-SUM GAME WHERE…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:37 PM
0

I, too, age backwards. What is this about us girls, where the end result of two people being together always has to be marriage, or kids, or both? Why can't they just focus on living their lives and not fucking WORRY about their biological clocks? Because women don't have the social imperative of success that men have, and so they cling to other things to give their lives meaning. I assume that type of mindset is what also makes men more likely to engage in hobbies etc.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:40 AM
34

Carleton is the University that had a big shitstorm related to charity funding of Cystic Fibrosis because it was primarily a white man's disease. Seriously.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:39 PM
2

I believe it comes from a life long experience of being raised as a dude that this phenomena can occur, when it does. Women see men who are capable leaders, and mistake assertiveness as overzealous aggression and condescension. I go to leadership conferences and managerial seminars as to better my skills on a consistent basis, and the few women we get there come in a few groups, and you observe quite a bit as to how women act in these things. Most go to extremes of treating an office like a frie…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 11:13 PM
4

The issue at hand is that few people on either side understands the science that says that if you pick any random man or any random woman and assign them any task in the world, there is nothing that says both of these people could necessarily not complete this task, save the obvious (i.e. childbirth). The likelihood, however, may often depend on the gender of one or the other.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:14 PM
16

You're young, and so I want you and your brother to consider something: do not let this shit consume your life. Take a break from it every now and then and just stop thinking about it. The human mind is very much prone to biases, and when you think about this shit all the damn time, you see the world through colored glasses, and it fucks with your priorities. I've had trouble in my relationship in the past because my fiancee and I will be talking about something, and I'll think of a difference i…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:14 AM
2

What's funny is that he doesn't take this to the logical conclusion like said in this thread and realized that, were this true, most societies wouldn't look down on women adopting masculine traits. Hmm..... but why is it okay in the west for women to do so... and why is it that society looks at men who have sex toys that they penetrate with disdain, but do not with women... Hey it's almost as if his argument is special-pleading bullshit, and the reason men are looked down upon being penetrated i…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:40 AM
3

One time at a particularly packed bar, I went past this drunk girl who used my arm as leverage so that she wouldn't fall down. She then started to say: "Wow, this guy is so fucking muscular! Come here [random girl party's name] and feel this dude!" After which I had like 4 different girls groping my arms and chest while I'm just awkwardly standing there not knowing what the fuck to do until I finally just walked away, after which one of them grabbed my ass. Switch the genders and see the differe…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:26 AM
2

She claimed a violent rape, not a rape based on alcohol consumption. That's also the UK
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:49 PM
1

This is because the University does not follow the law correctly due to feminist dogma ruling a huge portion of academia, especially those involved with the administration. Alcoholic intoxication by itself does not constitute a lack of consent, and all the whinging by social justice groups won't change that. You need to drink to the point where you are physically unable to consent or so drunk that a reasonable person can tell that you are not aware of your surroundings for it to be considered 'r…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:34 PM
-11

This isn't what this law says. Stop buying into feminist bullshit and realize that the legal system in terms of ratified law is at least mostly just. A person cannot legally claim rape on the basis of their drunkenness. This is not the law, will never be law, and if it was the law, expect it to coincide with prohbiition. The law in Canada is that I cannot rape someone and use 'well she clearly wanted it as she was getting drunk around me' as a defense. That's it. That's all this says.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:00 PM
5

Dawwwww someone from SRS is butthurt about a SPECIAL SNOWFLAKE
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:50 PM
1

Using blackmail to pressure someone into sex is sexual assault. Actually going through with the sex is not, however, rape.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:35 AM
2

The problem with these all are that they are so confined to the specific nuances of overarching problems both genders face, yet present them as something men do not have an analogue to. If I choose not to have children, my masculinity will not be called into question. This is patently not true. People will talk of your sterility, of your unwillingness to not 'man up. If I have children and a career, no one will think I’m selfish for not staying at home. No, but they'll think you're selfish if yo…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 07:13 PM
2

The tits in the shot thing was something magical. The video also spurned her to watch a few more of your videos. Above liking them, you have almost identical vocal patterns, and it's strange.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 06:52 AM
8

Science is a good one. Even when I was in school, dissection was all but gone. Less experiments, less hands-on interaction. The big one, however, is forsaking application and knowledge for communication. The amount of questions my younger sister had in the mid 2000s in high school relating to explaining solutions with word problems was insane. Another is reading choices. When I was in school, the most engaging book we had for 12 years of education was the Giver. Even 1984 isn't read much anymore…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 06:09 AM
2

My fiancee and I laughed our asses off, for the record.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:49 AM
13

Uh, is it just me, or are they dancing around the notion that his mother sexually abused him?
/r/MensRights09/11/12 11:08 PM
2

"Attention-seeking self harm"
/r/MensRights09/11/12 12:11 AM
7

It's very question begging. They've framed the argument in such a way that women experience oppression when women because when women go out of their predefined role, they're just breaking free of the chains of the patriarchy, whereas men when they do the same are just 'being like women', thus proving that women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 11:28 PM
2

Likening them to suicide attempts is disingenuous. They are not intending to kill themselves.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:31 PM
1

Yeah, this isn't true, because this statistic doesn't exist. The fact of the matter is that women benefit socially from 'cries for help', whereas men do not, so women utilize them more. It's really that simple.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:05 PM
1

Yeah, this isn't true, because this statistic doesn't exist. The fact of the matter is that women benefit socially from 'cries for help', whereas men do not, so women utilize them more. It's really that simple.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:56 PM
1

sigh - I agree with a lot of her policies, but damn why can't she do her research, and why can't she treat the genders fairly? Because women are a voting block that politicians believe must be pandered to at all costs, lest they spread disdain and unrest all throughout tumblr.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 04:19 PM
8

The amount of gay men I know who have been forcibly kissed and groped well outscores anything of the opposite. Most gay men find women's bodies quite gross. This article paints this is being rooted in male privilege and 'sexism', which is the issue that it gets wrong. It's not gay men supposedly being, but the cultural explanation wherein men are supposedly en-masse feeling as if they are entitled to the bodies of women, which is such bollocks I don't even know where to begin. How many of these …
/r/MensRights05/11/12 09:13 PM
14

The theory that society is totally centered around men's interests and proclivities at the expense of women's interests and vicitimization. Every sleight that happens to men as a group is actually rooted in the women's victimization. This is not a fringe view. This is the lynchpin in all of feminist theory.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:31 PM
9

Inanimate means not moving. Your sentence does not make grammatical sense.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:14 AM
-4

..... Oh come on people, read the fucking article. This is not bemoaning the lack of awareness behind ovarian cancer/breast cancer. This much is clear. Literally every damn paragraph talks about the ubiquity of pink shit, depressing looking middle-aged women in gowns checking for lumps, and just the faux-jovial 'inspirational' overcoming-of-adversity atmosphere surrounding it all. Is this woman being willfully-obtuse about the funding disparity? Perhaps, but she is addressing a real problem with…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:32 PM
1

I've heard it said that men externalize anger when no one is around, and internalize when they are.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:34 AM
1

I am debating going to the London one.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 02:09 AM
2

I guess I didn't get an edit in. The doctor won't tell your parents anything. He's bound by law not to. I've had similar scares with kidney disease when I was younger, and my mother was never the wiser.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 10:17 PM
2

How old are you, man? If you're worried about this, man, go to the doctor on your own, and just explain what's going on. The thing with this Regardless, the thing about cancer is that its symptoms are so fucking varied that you can look up any symptom and see "Cancer" as a possible cause. The chances of you having it are slim. I had the exact same symptom for months and finally went to the doctor. I had what is likely a bacterial infection, and was given powerful NSAIDs and antibiotics for a few…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 09:49 PM
-2

Hey asshole: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandra_Kollontai Women's liberation was seen by and large by even the people you fucking cite as the emergent effect. Don't fucking misrepresent arguments to justify your bourgeious views based off of the labour of proletariat men.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:41 AM
2

The line between drunk and buzzed is about 10 miles wide. You must be incapacitated in order for consent to not be valid. This means, typically, with a significant loss of motor function and being unaware of your surroundings in the present moment. This is the legal definition. As for your ridiculous car analogy, it's because the ramifications of drunk driving are that people fucking die in an explosive torrent of shrapnel if drunk driving occurs.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 09:30 PM
5

Feminism and woman's suffrage were actually not part of the same movement originally. Feminists of the time--circa early 1900s--were actually very similar to the second and third wave feminists in that the primary driving goal was rooted in a corruption of Marxism. In a nutshell, they were anarchists usually hailing from very privileged families.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 05:34 PM
13

By lesbians who don't like men, not lesbians, who are known for hating men. It's clearer in the video. And she's right, actually.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:00 PM
17

We have problems with divorce law, problems with child custody law, problems we can actually do something about without trying to change human nature. It is my nature to beat the shit out of someone who slights me. It's in my nature to simply be able to fuck, leave, without a hint of remorse. It's in my nature to fuck other men's wives behind their back and make them raise my offspring. It's in my nature to grasp at any and all chance at power and only care about my clan's survival, i.e. racism.…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:01 PM
5

Fun fact: women couldn't 'own' property, but they could inherit it. This is largely because it was unconscionable to subject a woman to potential debt and debtor's prisons.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 03:30 AM
1

I think a much larger portion of it than regularly stated is biological in nature, i.e. experiments being done showing male babies and chimps prefer toy tools and physical objects from a young age, vs. female babies and chimps preferring softer doll like toys.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:38 AM
2

Great, now, have a peer reviewed study repeat it. Preferably not done by known ideologues? Also, that 'preferred treatment' may well be access to education at a younger age, programs that encourage female literacy etc.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter