TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

agilecaveman Archive

View 2 posts and 125 comments by agilecaveman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Things to give up: Video games and video game related media Walking up late. need to be up at 9am including weekends Drinking coffee after 1pm Things to do every day: Meditation Blog daily (about the challenge or anything for that matter) Workout, even if it's just some yoga
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 03:29 AM
6

Who do you think lives longer? Men or Women? Who dies more from most types of accidents? Suicide? We have a culture that devalues men and their contributions, that treats them as disposable soldiers, replaceable fathers and ATM machines. Men are blamed for every ill that besets themselves, and every condition that could possibly exist. If a man works 60 hour weeks and comes home to a housewife, he's an oppressor. If the genders are switched, he's still the oppressor. We are blamed for merely exi…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:15 PM
53

The third floor is a gay marriage chapel
/r/TheRedPill27/08/13 07:56 PM
1

This made me laugh. It's a nice tough of humor, along with some acknowledgement of why it is this way: Ah, I’m being a dick. There are real bisexuals and of course they’d get fed up. Every message is from some couple, some horny pig of a man and his fake bisexual girlfriend desperate to please him. You are in a tough position. Trust me, I know. Getting pussy is hard. But I’m still one starring you, you cunt. Fuck you for not wanting me. I would have gone with live and let live, but whatever dude…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 03:39 AM
5

this is all dwarfed by suicide due to divorce
/r/MensRights15/08/13 07:25 PM
11

The question is like what OTHER social movements try to silence someone while claiming to be their allies? It literally never happens. It's not like the libertarian party is telling restorethe4th "we got this, we don't need you." Any social movement worth it's salt recognizes allies and at the very least doesn't get in the way. The VERY fact of saying Men's Rights has no place in society is a giant red flag. Also we don't need an equality movement. We need a human rights movement.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:09 PM
5

You are a human being. Your life has value. also: http://www.reddit.com/r/SuicideWatch
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:42 AM
1

well said
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:23 AM
-1

Have you considered becoming libertarian? All the cool kids are doing it.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:10 PM
2

facts are a tool of the patriarchy /s
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:11 PM
1

Generally there is SO much disagreement between MRAs and feminists that it is incredibly hard to find common ground, even with regards to whether "logic" or "free speech" are good. Having some point of agreement is necessary and we might have to go back to the basics here: "what is moral?" "how can we judge societies?". I took over /r/morality recently, which might be helpful in that.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 08:45 PM
2

While I can find problems with these beliefs, I do not think they are contradictory. I guess i forgot to include the last option: not thinking about a woman in a sexual way at all, may be due to being gay or other reasons is denying her womanly powers and is also bad. The point is that you aren't supposed to be thinking about sex This is the feminist position as well, which relates to another awesome 1984 concept (thoughtcrime). The strip club and islam was just two opposite sides of the spectru…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:39 PM
16

I feel that before you argue with any feminist you truly need to understand another concept from 1984: double think. "Doublethink is the act of ordinary people of simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct" here are some examples: feminism says that casual sex is ok and all sex is rape at the same time feminism says that islamic women covering up their bodies is a symbol of oppression AND that women in strip clubs uncovering their bodies is a symbol of oppression at t…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:31 AM
8

slaves in the deep south got "payment" in food and that didn't make it right. also just because the state claims somebody has done a "crime" doesn't mean shit these days. It could have been drugs or recording a police officer or exposing government corruption.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:06 AM
2

I remember taking a pole-dancing class at a split gender studio. Classes could be only men or only women, no mixing. It was fun and I feel like the double-standard is starting to go away.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:32 PM
4

Slavery was never ended. Slavery is only illegal if the private sector does it, prison labor for the state and the draft have never been illegal.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:28 PM
7

wimminz feels > men's life
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:26 PM
3

This could probably be solved by jury nullification, if the person actually had a right to a trial by jury.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:26 PM
26

This support system is just a way to get more excuses to get more money out of the populace. One thing the state doesn't realize is that if it keeps doing it, people will GTOW, leave the country, embrace minimalism and gray economies. Just what happened in Detroit. I see US Gov bankruptcy as both inevitable and good. It will stop the over-reach of power and allow us to create our own non-violent custody agreements.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:24 PM
0

Wait whaaat? If you disagree with someone all the time, that's when they and the rest of the world stops listening. This is not 5th grade anymore. We need to pick our battles, we need credibility. We are or at least should be about reality here. I'd rather not see violent images of either gender especially on Facebook.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:57 PM
5

Hey guys, i took a look at some of the stuff they didn't like and it's actually pretty bad: http://www.womenactionmedia.org/examples-of-gender-based-hate-speech-on-facebook/ We SHOULD be against this stuff whether it applies to men or women. If you see a page or image on Facebook that is similarly violent towards men, report it. If the report doesn't work, PM me with the link and i'll try to formally contact Facebook.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 03:51 AM
5

This reminds me of Bane's "you only adopted the darkness, i was born in it."
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:35 AM
1

Most likely it is because of a number of your "friends" have reported some of your posts. The automated system doesn't really care why. Even if you advocate non-violence and there is a number of people who disagree, this can still happen. On the plus side it's all temporary.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 12:30 AM
7

and society has failed
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 12:14 AM
3

To add to this excellent piece: Daisy has a kid and she is worried about her future as well. Tom's alpha is "reliable". He has family values, he cares about blood, etc. He will take care of the child with or without Daisy's help. Gatz is too unpredictable. What does his "love" mean? Does it mean he loves her child as well? Or does it mean he hates her because it is a sign that Daisy did, at some point, "love" Tom and therefore betray Gatz? She may want Gatz, but at the end of the day, he is the …
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 12:09 AM
5

Partiarchy ala 1950 and earlier: men have free will and women don't feminism today: men have free will and women don't
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 12:00 AM
2

Has your facebook account been restored since then?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 09:10 PM
3

As a libertarian myself, i also realize that this was happening before private prisons were a thing. The abolition of "Mandatory minimums, three strikes laws, the war on drugs, the criminalization of huge amounts of victimless conduct" MIGHT happen through the political process. It also might happen because the government runs out of money.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:35 PM
5

No child should be beaten, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:31 PM
5

When feminism stopped counting death as "inherently bad" is when it crossed the border from stupid to evil.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 04:42 AM
1

Although it seems that civilization didn't occur until a socially enforced lifelong component to pair-bonding became the norm. I agree that the timeline is highly related. I am not sure which one came first. Was it that pair-bonding unlocked the productivity of previously dis-illusioned lower status males? Or was it that agriculture made pair bonding an easier choice?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 08:12 PM
1

on a premise of long-term, committed male-female relationships for thousands of years. I would say slightly longer than thousands: http://bigthink.com/dollars-and-sex/the-origin-of-marriage-and-the-evolution-of-divorce?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bigthink%2Fmain+(Big+Think+Main) The first marriages were short (3-4 years), but appeared as early as 1.8 million years ago.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:51 AM
12

wondering bewilderedly what their role is supposed to be now Not wondering for long. Sit back relax and enjoy the decline
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:45 AM
2

Step 3: profit from child support payments
/r/askTRP13/04/13 09:49 PM
11

They prefer the term "african american"
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:40 PM
2

You know, i didn't interpret the study in the same way. What this study told me is two things: Overcrowding is a problem even with abundant food supply Ability of individuals to travel away from society is important to society's continued well-being
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 08:01 PM
6

Yeah, although i might agree with redpill, this is a meh statement. Lots of falsehoods stay at the first or second stage, so this is pretty bad "test of truth".
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 04:57 AM
9

I am ok with "husbands earn, wives spend" because you are at least getting sex out of it. Now you just funding the "strong and independent" wymyn lifestyle. The question is: when will all of this collapse?
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 01:13 AM
0

I don't buy the "women are socially minded". they may start out that way young, but men tend to work on themselves more in their 20's.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 06:09 PM
1

What? Do you understand how automation has worked in the past? Cheap manufacturing automation basically means you can move production away from factories and into people's houses. We don't need to ask a computer factory to generate some video game images for us and we soon won't need a clothing factory to generate clothes (it might just be printed at home. People donating ideas for free (open source) will be common place. The ability to separate yourself from the economy will increase and econom…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 05:58 PM
4

Relevant username :) Sure, if she JUST crashed in his place that may be ok. What if she also had sex and had a kid that is not yours? The question is not "freedom" or "no freedom". The question is: Should we get rid of sexually exclusive long-term marriage altogether? This idea has been falling apart for some time now. Do we allow it to fall apart or do we reverse course?
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 06:42 PM
1

Although i understand the opinion of worrying about things within your control and less about "should", there is a part of this which doesn't feel right: Qualms about hurting betas? One might say the cheating wife is at fault, not her lover. I think they are both at fault. This is especially true if the lover has his pick of women.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 06:33 PM
1

not necessarily. Taking care of kids you have with multiple women is super alpha. However, basing your own SMV on mainly your ability to take care of the kids is beta. This is better than being a complete doormat and taking care of other people's children. I don't mean to imply that beta is bad. On the contrary i just think PUA's think being beta is bad. You know, tribal leader from the prehistoric age talk. MRAs (and i agree with them here) think that being a beta has been a viable reproductive…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 06:28 PM
0

I disagree. There are certainly not many people who identify as one of the 4, however there are plenty of people who have heard about PUA/MRA and plenty of people who haven't but still feel something is off with our culture. Donglegate alone was a great "wait, what? really?" moment.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 07:43 AM
1

I'll put you down for world (b). How do you feel about cheating? Both cheating on your partner and being the person that somebody cheats with?
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 07:36 AM
50

Male "withholding sex" is DV. Female "withholding sex" is perfectly ok, you rapist fuck. /s
/r/MensRights27/03/13 10:06 PM
1

"Loveless" and "loveful" marriages are not a binary thing, it's a spectrum. The government - encouraged divorce destroys those that could've worked.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:12 AM
2

Isn't "not being stoic and strong" a gender role? Actually, don't answer that.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:08 PM
10

If you wanted to troll them, ask a male friend who is in a wheel-chair or blind to accompany you to the lecture. You will either be turned away at the door, giving some YouTube fodder or just poop on all their "oppression" and "privilege" talks. It will be awkward though.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:00 PM
6

How is babby formed? The myth that babies come from sex is tool of the patriarchy, as is this "theory" of evolution. /s
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:16 AM
13

Just like the children of slaveowners were "punished" by abolition.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:30 PM
4

There is a difference between personal and cultural. You might want to sleep with a lot of women, but the entire society will have trouble staying stable without stable marriages.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:34 AM
9

+1 for What do you think should be done to help men? (or at least not hurt them as much)
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:20 AM
-1

I think it's a bad strategy to try to make things worse for people, so that they will be "On your side". This breeds nothing but resentment. I am sure if this ACTUALLY passes, this will piss off a fair number of women. They will advocate ending the draft (for them) and (somewhat legitimately) hate us for bringing it on them.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:15 AM
1

Btw, this is ridiculously difficult. Props to her.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:59 PM
4

Although this is true, the table at the bottom makes this look like a reversal of a long trend of decreasing suicide.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:22 PM
2

Good article, however there is a lot more bullshit that goes on both the blog he is linking to and the tumblr itself. A couple examples: Some of the "nice guys of ok cupid" don't even mention friend zone, they just respond to ok-cupid question that does not comply with the feminist narrative. The most glaring contradiction is some guys how's only "fault" was thinking "there was such a thing as having too many sexual partners." At the same time, another guys only fault was "not remembering the na…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:18 PM
10

There is NO reason why this should be "almost like a contract". This should just be a contract. Alimony is decided in a prenup, that could be potentially be altered at a later point. No need to get the state involved ever. Forced alimony at gunpoint is the problem.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:57 PM
7

The communities which have more kids are generally ones who get married a little earlier, divorce less and keep extended family together. Sounds pretty smart to me.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:54 PM
15

I am going to slightly disagree with your premise. I feel that it's easier for women to display dissatistaction publically. A man being miserable is less accepted by society and that's why you don't see it as much. Just because a woman complains does not mean she is miserable. Again, if you saw a man or imagined yourself complaining about everything, you'd pretty much conclude he's far gone. For a woman finding faults in things is more of a past-time than a cry for help. Maybe it's just a subcon…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:07 PM
1

men are the main shoppers in almost one in three households
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:07 AM
2

if the system fails when the YOUNG can't afford the old, then it's a broken system. Completely agree. is it a woman's only purpose to have babies for the good of the nation? If she doesn't want to, she doesn't have to. But if everybody all of a sudden decides not to have children, society is not going to continue i feel that the decision of women to not have children is heavily influenced by the lack of men who who want to get married, which is a consequence of mr issues.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:20 PM
11

Apparently we didn't :(
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:57 PM
1

Good graphic, but it feels like it's missing a few factors here and there. What about soldiers with PTSD? What about divorced men? What about men who grew up with no father? I don't know the exact stats, but those could also be worth a look
/r/MensRights27/11/12 10:13 PM
5

Adding to the list: Prison labor is mostly men Men pay for dates Women are more likely to work for government I don't mid the "men=breadwinner", woman=spender, as long as it happens in a household, where you can attach strings to the money. All the other cases, men just get screwed and not in a good way.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:50 PM
1

You know it's at time like this that you start to appreciate the fast food industry for being so indiscriminate in their hiring.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:12 AM
40

I hate how the act of approaching a woman whether romantically inclined or not is basically treated as a crime that warrants theft or worse.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:21 AM
2

Sorry for your loss. We need to get our shit together and start taking care of our GOOD MEN HERE AT HOME!!!! What do you propose we do?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 09:32 PM
5

I doubt much will come of this, it feels like more of "cover your ass" statement than actual threat
/r/MensRights31/10/12 08:36 PM
1

The broader problem is that people's taxes go to things they don't like. We should change that, instead of some crappy eugenics scheme.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:38 PM
8

Oh god, we are misusing the word "right" again. There are "freedom"/negative rights and positive rights. (aka free speech vs "health insurance"). Having a child is a "freedom right", as in you should be able to have child if you want. Having a child is not a positive right. You can't demand a child, just like you can't DEMAND that the state give you a gun for free.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:36 PM
0

Well, to be fair, that's why there is no "men's history." What they seem to want is men's law and recent culture studies. However, i actually don't think we need much of that. Male/family law in law school - sure. Male anatomy in med school - sure. One or two courses here and there is good, but majoring in men's studies in undergrad is not going to get you a job. I'd much rather see student run men's centers, rather than something faculty-imposed.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:31 AM
3

This article makes me want to join Pinterest, as sound like a different take on fitness than /r/fitness's "Do you even squat?"
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:25 PM
3

So i like that as the backbone of the discussion, but it can be a little bit of a downer. To make things more optimistic i also don't mind some occasional heart-warming pictures of "I am a single dad and my kids think i am awesome" or "I am a woman and i support your cause" or "We are editing Wikipedia" etc, etc.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:37 PM
12

Some potentially valid criticism: True enough. There's a lot of stuff that gets posted on [1] /r/MR that's just basically "Oh look, this one woman did something bad this one time" and it really does nobody any good. But the good content outnumbers that kind of thing, generally. We probably want to have even more points of "men good", rather than "women bad".
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:44 PM
2

This is a good idea and i have been thinking about it a lot. My programming skills are decent, so i can help out However, if we are doing a new site, we need it to be significantly better than reddit. We need to seriously think about what features makes reddit such a gigantic circlejerk in the default subs and move away from it. Some ideas for thought: Make downvoting non-existent / harder it's ok to promote own links be able to upvote thing multiple times ( but you only have a limited number of…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:31 PM
1

The problem with this "obesity fix" is that feeding children too little good food will make them both weak and fat. If you eat a small lunch of fries and pizza every day, you will lose weight, however you will not lose fat. You insulin levels being through the roof will make sure that fat gets deposited again. You will lose everything else: bone mass, muscle mass, brain tissue and other vital organs. Teens of both genders of the other hand need to gain weight(not fat) by getting taller and stron…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:24 AM
6

there is already /r/Libertarian and /r/Anarcho_Capitalism, for general people's rights
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:43 PM
2

and if /r/keto is too intense, checkout out it's kinder cousin, /r/paleo
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:15 AM
6

What is the definition of totalitarianism? "Everything you do is political" (e.g. going to the bathroom, drinking 32oz soda, thinking, etc) What is one of the main tenets of feminism? "The personal is political" (it is taken from marx). No surprise that people who just want to be left the fuck alone really dislike feminism.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:55 PM
2

I am glad the mods stepped in. This was getting a bit out of control.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:09 AM
–

This may not be a popular position, but so what that so few men are in a university? For most people, university offers negative return on investment. Not only do you avoid the rape accusations just by the virtue of existing in the same room as a woman, you also avoid debt. Instead, you can start early on a career, maybe even get your own business going.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:30 PM
4

Wow this thread is making me sad. Both your story and all the violent responses. The thing to do is leave the country. Teach English in Korea, assemble cars in Germany, start an under the hood resale business in the former USSR. I've known people who have done all of that. You can still be with your children in spirit. There is Skype, there is money transfers. And for the rest of us: Leave California Don't get married Continue existing Profit!
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:03 PM
7

He's taking figures over the 11 year period. During that time, there were more than: 50 000 people killed in the drug wars in mexico alone (mostly men) 330 000 people killed in car accidents in the us alone (both men and women) 380 000 people committed suicide in the us alone (mostly men). Make a counter graphic and troll those fuckers .
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:50 PM
7

How are we growing as a percentage of reddit?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 11:30 PM
2

I agree and disagree in part: Agree: a) "I don’t need the government to pass laws against alimony. I simply won’t marry in the USA. I don’t need the government to pass laws promoting fair child custody laws. I won’t impregnate an America girl." We need to recognize that the government will never WILLINGLY turn towards men's rights. Democracy is slow even IF you have the opinion of a majority. Nothing we do can change that fact. The best chance for change lies outside the political systems. Disag…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:24 PM
40

Well, first of all, not all women "make babies". Some women are childless, are you/they saying that they have no rights either along with the men? Also, don't play the "privilege" game. This isn't the oppression olympics. This isn't a zero sum game. Men's rights are human rights. Injustice somewhere is a threat to justice everywhere. For example: shitty marriage laws means men don't want to marry. So a lot of good women cant find a husband.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:36 AM
5

Can we please start talking about human nature (male and female) in a positive light? Male sexuality is natural and so is female sexuality. Those two women did seem fairly hateful in why they did things. However, they weren't hurting anybody or being explicitly mean. This is somewhat of a small problem compared to the usual "wife stole the kids and drove husband to suicide " that shows up in the subreddit.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:57 PM
2

Looks, this is a cute post and has lots of nice stuff for men and women. In particular I like: "I want a world where my son doesn't have to fear being locked up with those who would do harm due to false accusations for angering the wrong person." "I want a world where the past is remembered, but past, and what matters is the present. I want a world where my daughter is not punished for the acts of women before her, and where my son is not punished for the acts of men before him." Though a bit to…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:29 PM
7

This article is soo full of crap. As a Yale student who spent 4 years there at the same time as the author, here is my take: What he is talking about are not classes, these are student run lectures for about 5 days in a year around Valentine's day. That's it. Students are the one inviting sex workers and PUAs on campus to speak. The administration doesn't even fund it and barely allows it to happen. Some hardcore porn was played at some point, but who cares. Just for comparison, during the other…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:34 PM
3

I think aisngirty's point is what you are describing as a meta-framework (co-existence of different philosophies) is exactly what anarcho-capitalists are advocating. The "other" anarchists want only "their" set of versions.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:42 AM
4

To answer the "how can society exist without government?" go to /r/anarcho_capitalism and read up on a lot of details. Long story short: everything is done by private actors. Police is replaced by DROs. Answering "without de facto government coming into being?" is an easy one: there might be small pockets of society which create a small government and as long as its not violent outside the group it will be allowed to exist. If it trying something sneaky then the far more effective private armies…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:45 AM
6

As an anarcho-capitalist, here is my take: The difference is in the definition of "voluntary" and "force". Ancaps define "force" narrowly as violence and threats of violence from one person to another (this includes violence between parents and children). An-everything else define "force" as above + any combination of the "being forced by the environment", "inequality", "S&M", "exploitation". Ancaps try to create a society that is voluntary, i.e. does not use person on person violence as a basis…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:37 AM
5

Full disclosure: I work for Facebook and I'll get on this. I'll do a very small run targeting single men in the US above 18.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 12:44 AM
3

What do you think of running ads on Facebook?
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:45 PM
2

Rich people still have rights. Just because he's career choice is not something you like or his financial skills are not top notch, doesn't mean he deserves to go to jail. If we keep being divisive based on class (only POOR men suffer from misandry or some bull like that), then we'll never succeed.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 04:16 AM
1

The groups of men that misandry affects the most: Soldiers Professional athletes African Americans (some) celebrities This is a fairly dangerous cocktail of people that the current system is pissing off.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:10 PM
3

I think you are being too hard on "Roosh" and others. His tweet was something about "i bet he gets no play". This is most likely a correct statement. Other true statements include that he had few friends, studied neuroscience and played Guitar hero. Your interpretation of that "had he been able to get some" he wouldn't have done what he did. Is that correct? Can we know? Don't shy away from something that's true, just because you don't want it to be true. To address your subpoints: This is a for…
/r/MensRights22/07/12 09:39 PM
2

that exists! i just had that idea a few weeks ago. They need a little website work, but it could be the non-government version of a sex-offender list.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:29 AM
1

Although lack oil and national debt are very damaging to the country, the destruction of marriage through divorce and the destruction of human capital is even more severe. My guess US will undergo Soviet-Union style collapse in 8-12 years.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:17 AM
3

It is meant for groups of people who enjoy similar activities, however what makes it good for dating are the following factors: a) Generic Social Groups (Single, 20's and 30's somethings). They generally meet in bars, but the atmosphere there is really nice compared to a normal bar because girls expect to be approached and are friendly when you do so. Source: met my girlfriend in one of those meetups. b) You don't have to craft long emails, just show up. (better than okcupid) c) if you actually …
/r/MensRights11/05/12 11:38 PM
1

There also a few blogs which are not exclusivey men's rights, but are aware of a lot of issues. One i like is cappy cap: http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2012/05/charting-manosphere.html
/r/MensRights11/05/12 08:46 PM
6

I'm your age, different area. I never pay for dates until relationship starts. You have the following options: a) Go to cheap dates and pay (coffee) b) Go to dates that are obviously Dutch (picnic with your own food) c) Learn the Game and pretend/act like SHE should be paying d) Meet more women. Online, meetup.com is the best place to meet women (and men). OkCupid is not even close.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:06 PM
1

And that's why so many guys want to go to engineering and math, where you are graded objectively.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:14 AM
0

Glad to see there is some overlap between my two favorite subreddits :)
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:01 PM
2

This seems like a more complex issue than the title makes it sound. She is 15 after all, which an age when people should understand the consequences of their actions, but she is still a minor. She is also a minority race in Australia. In general I feel that "blaming the system" can actually be true. The main issue is that if she was a boy, he would be in prison in no time.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:22 AM
–

Marriage is probably ok, if you super sure about your partner being a completely honorable person, who was no double standards, respects other's work, doesn't have a pseudo-victim mentality and is aware of differences between law and fairness. Still haven't a woman like that, so no marriage for me.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:32 PM
0

I agree, I should've been more clear in stating that "stealing from one man" is the case when he's not the father.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 10:23 PM
3

I feel like i am agreeing with both of you here. Here is my take on the issue: a) Stealing from all men who don't even know this woman through "taxation" is bad. It makes everybody just a little worse off. b) Stealling from one man through child support is actually worse. It basically enslaves individual men. Instead of a), which makes you poor, this makes you afraid and need to question the motives of every woman you meet.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:09 PM
1

Wasn't there a movie about this? I can't seem to recall the name, oh yeah it was: Abduction.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 09:51 PM
24

Welcome to the subreddit! I am a man, I am just posting here cause it's good to see more people become aware of men's issues.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:11 PM
12

This is fairly good article, thought it still keeps victimizing men. a) As other commenters have pointed out, women are too much in love with the idea of marrage. This would be ok, but marriage carries too much legal baggage for men. If divorce and child support laws weren't so drakonian, then maybe those "alpha" males in their 20's and 30's wouldn't be so "scared" of commitment. b) Women need to be willing to invest "early" into men. To be very cynical, picking men is a bit like picking stocks.…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 09:25 PM
2

I actually like this response, they could have gone further and issued a real appology. However they, at least acknoledged that a lot of readers, both male and female are angered by the article. It's a start.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:03 PM
1

If the Supreme Court upholds the "individual mandate", then indeed, all gloves are off. Really not looking forward to the following: Bachelor Tax Not donating enough to women's charity tax
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:49 AM
1

Similar realizations have led me to Mystery and whole pickup genre.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:46 AM
3

CNN is trolling. Like any other internet trolls, they need page views and attention. Should we even feed them at all?
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:53 PM
1

this article is 7 years old, is there any more evidence this practice is spreading?
/r/MensRights22/04/12 06:57 AM
2

i thought it was each child!
/r/MensRights21/04/12 11:18 PM
6

Being a potential swing vote is what gives you power. Commiting to one party is the real throwing away of ones' vote. I feel like that's true regardless of the issue
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:24 PM
5

i feel a lot of issues(almost all issues) that MRAs talk about come from bad laws and weird welfare redistribution from men to women by the state. The fact that this is state-related automatically makes this a political issue (unfortunatelly). This is exactly what i don't like in general as a libertarian and I presume that's why many libertarians (not conservatives) are drawn to men's rights issues. I am also willing, in many cases, to put aside differences with more traditional democratic/left …
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:22 PM
1

Good article. i also feel like there are other reasons that women actually get paid the same as men for the same job. Reason 1: If a wage gap exists, then i could start a company which catered to women "underpaid" in their current jobs, luring them away from their work and making big profits :) I have not seen anything of this sort anywhere. Reason 2: The way that people's wages get determined in many large companies is that their experience, previous pay and interview performance get thrown int…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:09 PM
4

epic analogy, demonspawn
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:55 PM
1

There are social/job consequences for being single. Married people have really good excuses for leaving work earlier than single people. This is true especially for one's with kids. Also certain companies offer super good health plans that extend to one's spouse. In this case, being married means that you are doing a favor to your spouse by providing her (or him) with free healthcare that you worked for. Of course, no good deed goes unpunished.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:34 AM
1

For some people, the legal benefits are far larger than you think. For example, an immigrant coming to the US can't take his girlfriend with him unless they are married. Similarly, an immigrant men marrying an american woman can the fastest way to get citizenship. For some people, who are a persecuted minority in their home country American citizenship can be worth more than half of thier income.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:49 AM
6

You forgot a few things: a. Schooling. More women are in higher schooling than men. They are getting cheap government grants. b. Alimony and child support (enough said). c. Female-only healthcare expenses covered by the state (abortion being the most hot topic). Just so that people understand me correctly, of course it should be a woman's choice whether or not to have an abortion. However, it's not business of the state to force men to pay for it. d. "Prison taxation" More men than women are in …
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter