TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

alebruto Archive

View 14 posts and 724 comments by alebruto on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
214

Question For Womenalebruto/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 06:36 PM
163

Debatealebruto/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:00 PM
126

Debatealebruto/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:48 PM
100

Question for BluePillalebruto/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:44 AM
97

Social Issuesalebruto/r/MensRights16/09/24 06:48 PM
30

Question For Womenalebruto/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 06:31 PM
10

Debatealebruto/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:39 PM
10

Discussionalebruto/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 06:51 PM
9

Question For Womenalebruto/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 10:07 PM
8

Question For Womenalebruto/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 11:33 PM
7

Debatealebruto/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 11:11 PM
3

Debatealebruto/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 07:58 PM
0

Debatealebruto/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:32 AM
0

Debatealebruto/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:10 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
119

I would answer: "My country is underdeveloped, and I married a woman from it, and she was much more educated than you, so you are talking shit"
/r/MensRights31/12/24 03:04 AM
–

You're simply lucky with your family, while at the same time you're terrible at making choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 08:25 PM
–

I married for life. On the other hand, I had friends who are no longer my friends. I don't think you know what "marriage" means. And I highly doubt all your friends are never gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 08:23 PM
2

Taking tests doesn't make you safer, many STDs are incurable, there's no point in discovering them
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:32 PM
11

I don't think so. These same guys complain about being called relationship material. I had problems with this myself, the only women who were interested in me were single mothers or were traumatized by ex-boyfriends. I didn't have trouble getting a generic relationship, but rather one with genuine love
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:56 PM
1

How would a man spend more money on a prostitute in one night than on his own wife? The wife is the winner of his money here, not the prostitute who won R$200.00 and left.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:54 PM
–

Chadfishes are fake profiles. If a date is arranged and the profile creator shows up, it will be a turn off for the woman to see that the man who arranged to meet her is not handsome like the one in the photo, but ugly, and then there will be no opportunity for real interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:42 PM
1

O equivalente masculino do feminismo, é o machismo.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 05:00 PM
–

Chads are often loved unconditionally. Many Chads are good men, but they don't have to be, because those who are bad also have women, and they accept everything bad to be with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:57 AM
17

It's a compliment when it's not said by a conservative churchgoer looking for a virgin. That is, 99% of the time it's said. If women considered fuckboys to be bad, fuckboys would be incels, and "virgin" would be a compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 08:25 PM
30

A lot of women see a virgin man as a Red Flag. In addition, "virgin" and "incel" are words used to insult men. Women also praise men who have a lot of casual sex as "fuckboys." It is common to find women who would not get involved with virgin men, even here in the PPD comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 07:44 PM
10

You've added too many variables beyond "lifestyle". If you want to know how much someone's lifestyle affects their level of attractiveness, you should do both with the same height and the same income, the same age, the same education
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 01:55 PM
-6

I would probably be a lesbian. And I disagree with these definitions
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:28 PM
1

> And WE ALL KNOW before we know anything about race, religion, culture? We can count that it's a man who did the crime. * Polícia Civil prende babá por abusar sexualmente de criança de 8 anos - SSP * PJC * Professora recém-casada é presa após abusar sexualmente de aluno: 'Vou perder o meu marido' * 'Segredos de um Escândalo': o caso da professora que teve 2 filhas com aluno e que virou filme da Netflix - BBC News Brasil I could continue posting news of women, including mothers and teachers, who…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:03 PM
1

Brazil is the country with the most Japanese people after Japan
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 07:42 PM
1

Brazilian
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:06 AM
-7

For the overwhelming majority of men, the lower a woman's count, the better. Being unique and special to the woman you are going to marry is the desire of almost any man. Of course, some men may renege on this preference to get a chance or because of other attributes, but he would prefer it that way. And they will never admit it because it would offend the woman they are with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:42 PM
0

The only way to get away with induced abortion is to not have a slutty mother. But this is not a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 08:59 PM
2

What do you mean by "high standards"? Is a pedophile Chad who physically attacks his girlfriend a high-standard boyfriend according to your assessment? I don't think it makes sense to classify patterns as "high or low", but the right thing to do would be to classify them as "shallow or deep" Personally, I think that many women have superficial standards, which are too high in some criteria and non-existent in others. But they usually adjust these standards as they get older, although in essence …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 08:47 PM
1

> it’s men who I hear say that most I think that even if this were true, it is irrelevant, the speech remains invalid and hateful. > most women have experienced some sort of unsavory violence or violative harassing behavior from men she’s encountered throughout her life from childhood to present, so the above unfortunately reaffirms their own experiences A woman deals with dozens of men during the day, all it takes is for one of them to treat her badly in a week and she will judge all the others…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 08:13 PM
1

Are women things for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 08:08 PM
4

Exactly, there is overlap. If I were to describe the social hierarchy, at least in my country, I would say, in order from most privileged to least privileged: * Chad; * Tyrone; * White woman; * Asian woman; * Indigenous woman; * Black woman; * White man; * Asian man; * Indigenous man; * Black man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 07:58 PM
16

I know it's like that for white men too. But ethnicity is still a weight, although much less than the gender of those involved. I added ethnicity as a variable to represent the 2 extremes of people with lower inherent social value compared to those with higher inherent social value. White men are still worse off than black women in this sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 07:08 PM
1

Exactly. Divorce brings many more problems than it proposes to solve.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:51 PM
2

I would prefer if my parents hadn't split up. In fact, even in adulthood we have problems with this, for example, a legal fight over the death of a stepfather in relation to his adult children. My brother and I are fine, but we would be better off with parents who were united in the same purpose, as many good things in our lives could have come sooner, and many current and future problems would have been avoided. Your mistake is thinking that divorce and toxic family are dichotomies. Family toxi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:49 PM
1

Not really, because they are more likely to get divorced, cheat, go to jail, among other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:44 PM
12

It's true for women of all ethnicities, but it's most impactful for white women. I specified ethnicity in my post because it is more extreme and more evident. I believe that several human characteristics give you social points a priori: * Being a woman; * Being white; * If you are a man, be tall; * Be recognized as someone who has money. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:30 PM
12

Honestly, I don't think this is a good thing. I mean... I could go around agreeing with everyone if I were a fake person. Maybe this is some kind of cowardice. In my work I disagree several times, and this is valued, sometimes disagreeing makes us make better decisions. Furthermore, when my opinion doesn't win, I simply do what was decided by the team in the discussion to the best of my ability, even if it is an action in the opposite direction of what I advocated. Verbalizing my disagreement ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:27 PM
53

The "Women are Wonderful" effect. I'm a black guy and I was born poor, when I was young I wore shabby clothes, I'm also 3cm shorter than average. I always had to "prove myself" to receive some kind of basic human treatment, that changed when I gained some muscles and some money. Women have much more than that simply because they are women. If I have a disagreement with a white woman, I will be considered the wrong one until I prove otherwise, and if there is a 1% chance that I am the wrong one, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:18 PM
-5

Some women who just say stupid things and try to micromanage their partner would interpret it that way. But women who have constructive things to say and do wouldn't think that's the case. The interpretation depends on what you have to offer. If all you're good at is being beautiful, then that's really all you should do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:08 PM
-7

Leave the final decision on important matters in the man's hands. Help him carry out important tasks that he is responsible for, such as repairing the roof. And honestly? In my experience, women like this. If there are 2 twin brothers, in which one of them has leader characteristics, while the other does not, the "leader" brother will wet more panties than the other, even among the most staunch feminists. Women like men who make decisions. Of course this is not absolute, a short, poor, bald man …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:00 PM
-2

They are not dichotomies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 05:54 PM
6

Your comment is very underrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 02:39 PM
1

1- I think that we can all agree that men tend to get more angry than women (and they act on it to a greater extent). Anger is also an emotion, which I rarely ever hear anyone bring up for some reason. I don't think so. In fact my anecdotal says the opposite of yours, and I think many other people agree with me on this. 2- Men commit most violent/irrational crimes. (Not saying that most men are criminals, obviously, but the majority of criminals are men.) How many female mass shooters/serial kil…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 02:31 PM
1

I don't think that covers my point very much. And you look really good for a 35 year old in all the photos. The point is that in general, the "equally beautiful" women who go out with their "equal" man on casual dates have spent more time and money getting ready than they have, whether it's makeup that looks natural or not. It may not be your case, but it is the most common. I mean... A woman spends 30 minutes on makeup and goes to a special event, while her husband doesn't spend even 1 second o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:21 PM
1

There is a huge effort to do makeup without looking like you are wearing makeup. There are countless tutorials on YouTube with women teaching how to do makeup that looks natural, and many of them have N views and N comments. Makeup courses have entire chapters dedicated to teaching makeup that looks natural. Also, for the one night stand, a guy doesn't care if a woman has "obvious makeup on", he cares about what he's seeing in the moment, and when a woman judges how pretty a stranger at the bar …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:38 PM
1

Men are attracted to women of different body types, while women are attracted to the same body types as men. It is very difficult for a woman to understand men who prefer chubby girls, because they themselves reject chubby men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 09:07 PM
1

I think women don't understand that men's taste is more varied than their taste. I have a friend who likes very skinny women, while I like "curvy" women much more, and sometimes even "chubby". Of course, I've never met a guy who preferred a woman with anorexia or morbid obesity, as there is a point at which too little or too much fat is unattractive to almost any man, but still the range of men's preferences is quite wide. greater than the range of women's preferences. Women don't understand thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 08:46 PM
3

When I was young, I was "best friends" with a girl, in which I always made my intentions clear, she never gave me anything more than a small kiss on the lips in one day. However, she was with unknown guys. When I understood a little about how women work, I gave up on her and shortly afterwards I found a girlfriend. I introduced my girlfriend to my social circles, and she decided to defame my girlfriend to anyone and everyone, she definitely hated my girlfriend. My female friends say she did it b…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 08:30 PM
2

I also think they should both be punished. My mother was the opposite extreme of that, she was so afraid of it that she waited until my brother and I were adults before getting a boyfriend, and in her case, it was the right thing to do, because her first boyfriend was a crazy person who I knew how to hide his madness well, suspicious that something wrong was happening, I invaded my mother's privacy and read the messages on her cell phone, there was a death threat from him to her, I collected evi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:33 PM
0

I think it's sad when a father doesn't care about his daughter and doesn't warn about how bad intentions some men can be. I say... I've seen women cry over the Ghost the men they chose gave after they got what they wanted (sex). A father who genuinely cares about his daughter will warn her instead of leaving her to fend for herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 05:53 PM
4

In a Whatsapp conversation, he was talking, in a work conversation, about a case of a girl who was constantly abused by her stepfather, in which her mother knew about the abuse The stepfather was arrested, but the mother was not convicted, he apparently got frustrated, because arresting the stepfather is just a temporary solution until the mother puts another pedophile in the house and the child has to deal with all this again, and how does he saw this situation happen several times with other f…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 05:45 PM
5

The men who abuse children, he put them in jail. The mothers who were these men's accomplices in abusing their own daughters, he only criticized, because he had no power to arrest them. In fact he was wrong, because he realized too late that he didn't even have the power to criticize them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 05:35 PM
10

Bad mothers Here in Brazil, a delegate lost his job for criticizing the "stepfather rotation", when talking about a situation in which a girl was abused by several stepfathers, and unfortunately it is a common situation. The biggest child abusers are stepfathers. He was fired. It's worth mentioning that a delegate is a very prestigious position of power here, to the point where they get away with some big shit, a delegate has the power to incarcerate for a specified period, even without evidence…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 04:38 PM
6

Truth. Here in Brazil, this also happened with the words "Nazi" and "Fascist" in political discussions. Kind of like "Everyone who disagrees with me is a Fascist or a Nazi"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 04:04 PM
7

No. I'm suggesting that people who sexualize my father-in-law's intentions the way you do are the same people who would call the police if they saw a black man watching his white daughter play in the park. They fantasize that everything a man does has an underlying perverted sexual motivation. I wouldn't mind having a white son, but I would definitely fear having a white daughter, I thank God that there are black people in my wife's family. My brother had 2 white male children, and I thank God t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:31 PM
19

It seems to me that there is a wrong view of how beautiful men and women are. A man goes to a bar and leaves with a woman who appears to be as beautiful as he is. However, she has makeup on, he doesn't, she spends 4 or 5x more than he does on clothes and haircuts. There are usually 1 or 2 men who look as good-looking as the guy in the room, and there are 10 or 15 women who look as good-looking as the girl in the room. A woman being "as pretty as" in a bar is not the same as "being as pretty as" …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:22 PM
8

If you watched "Everybody Hates Chris", know that I can identify Miss. Morello on a bunch of progressive women I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:08 PM
9

Summarizing things the way you do, it sounds like you're one of those people who puts "father and daughter" among one of the popular categories in pornography. I'm afraid that one day I'll be walking with my future daughter in the park and come across people like you, as I'm a black man, know that people like you make me fear having a white daughter.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 02:51 PM
18

Gosh, thanks, pervy dads, for protecting your daughters from Good Sex and Orgasms You are truly mentally ill, there is no way that this is a genuine conclusion. If it is, I fear for you, and for anyone close to you, for your mind is very perverted.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 02:40 PM
19

“women just sleep with chads who won’t settle for them” is another revenge fantasy of incels. I'm married and I realize how much this happens, so it's not an incel thing. Men are much, MUCH LESS picky about casual sex, I can easily see which women I would have a relationship with and which I would just sleep with if I were single, one of my wife's father's concerns, before we started dating, was that I only wanted to sleep with her, are you going to tell me that her father had a revenge fantasy …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 02:19 PM
2

Man If a woman's life starts with Easy, the 10/10 Man's life starts with Very Easy. Besides, I want to have children, and being a lesbian would be more difficult
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 12:54 PM
8

Every? No. A lot? Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 06:15 PM
8

The norm is for women to approach men they are attracted to. This is not an outlier
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:46 PM
5

I have a friend Chad, who is bisexual. Women approach him all the time. He's a bit of a misogynist, so he has more serious relationships with men, and the women he only uses for sex. Women don't approach men they don't find sexually attractive, that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:45 PM
5

You are stupid! And I'm not saying it to "be offensive", it's a diagnosis, and you should analyze it within yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:18 PM
12

I didn't understand your point. There are guys who try, there are guys who don't try, guys are not a monolith.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:14 PM
0

Are you stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:10 PM
6

He will stop waiting when he finds a girl who doesn't love him, and marry her.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:05 PM
5

Por que você não ajudou a mulher? 2 reasons: Self-preservation: Burglars would tend to use more women than men for a type of scam like this, in addition, anything she said that occurred inside the car would be considered true by the population and the judiciary, basically, helping her would leave me in trouble her hand. Other people already help women anyway, so she would be less dependent on my help than a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 03:06 PM
2

Hold the door I haven't taken many elevators in my life, nor have I ever tried to stop one from closing, but I have seen a few videos of people getting stuck in elevator doors. I don't know if it's possible for me to simply hold the door, especially when this depends on a quick reaction. I also think that there are no elevators in public areas in the city where I live. So under normal circumstances, you would be less inclined to help a woman out? Yes. Especially with the broken ankle. In the mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 02:47 PM
8

Assuming these are all genuine situations, no scams, are you more inclined to help a stranger out with something if it were a man, than a woman? It's kind of difficult for this to be realistic. I'm going to answer based on this assumption, but it's worth pointing out that this assumption is not realistic, because I don't run the risk of being called an abuser for helping a man bench press. A stranger is doing a benchpress with a bit too much weight than they can handle. The bar falls on them, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 02:20 PM
1

Yes, and coelenterates are aquatic animals, predominantly from salt water; diblastic; radial symmetry; and generally poorly mobile or sessile, medusae and polyps, respectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 10:20 PM
1

What you say doesn't even make sense. In fact the pro-life position is the pro-woman position. The one-child law in China meant that many female children were aborted. Also, the scenario I put about the burning building doesn't add a third person like you did, you solving the dilemma by changing it is pure dishonesty. You would have been more realistic if you said that the person would put out the fire in the snap of a finger.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:53 PM
0

I doubt an ugly, immoral guy like George Carlin would turn down sex with pretty conservative women if he had the opportunity. By saying such nonsense, he is simply rejecting a priori those who would reject him. And you have to be a fool to believe it's genuine. I did the same when I was a teenager, but I grew up after I was 20, while he stayed that way until he was old.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:41 PM
0

A foetus cannot be considered a child, certainly not legally. Depending on the jurisdiction, a Jew is not a human. It's a good thing I wasn't born before 1830, because at that time, a black Brazilian would also not be considered a human, but rather property.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:32 PM
0

I don't know which is more wrong, "parasite" or "unwanted". It's basic biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:30 PM
-1

Ethical dilemmas are complicated. But the example I cited is "mother and child die, or only the child dies". If the child is in a burning house, should the mother risk it to save him? She can let him die, she can succeed in saving him, she can try to save him and both die. It's not up to me to judge what the right decision is in this case. Because it is very different from child sacrifice, moreover, it is an exception. 99% of the time, abortion is mere child sacrifice
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:24 PM
-7

You have no nuances. It is quite obvious that he is only referring to induced abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:18 PM
-4

Yes. There are exceptions, for example: "If the pregnancy is maintained, mother and child will die", so abortion is done to spare the mother. But like I said, these are exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:17 PM
3

If you have social skills but don't have the right skin, you will be merely friend material when you are young, and husband material when you are older. If you have the right skin, you don't need any social skills, and people will accept you as socially skilled anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 06:20 PM
2

Uma namorada infiel não é uma boa namorada. E acho que a maioria dos homens aceitaria uma namorada infiel, por causa da sede (ou desejo sexual).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 03:51 PM
5

Brazil
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 03:18 AM
-2

I have never used a male sex toy, and I am unable to orgasm with my hands. So I would say it's exactly the opposite of what you said. Maybe the toy would work for me, who knows. However, I have made women reach orgasm with their hands, and if I can do it, they can too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 03:18 AM
7

In 1950 life was more difficult for everyone, men and women. > Had to cook and clean - modern day slavery > Child care - all on you! It doesn't do more than it has to. Today this is still necessary. "All on you" is false
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 02:48 PM
1

Someone here accused me of being turned on by women breastfeeding. I still chose examples that are completely outside of any gray area, but they always distort everything to talk as if the problem were the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 05:57 AM
1

and argentinian by choice. Pele is better than Maradona [<o>] After the sentence above, you certainly already know where I'm from jajajajajajaja.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 05:25 AM
1

I based it on the image. And what I called "American football", I should have called "United Statesian football" And what you are calling "Soccer", is not American, it is global. I know real football, but I don't know anything about United Statesian football"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 04:55 AM
1

I've met many women who earn as much as I do, or more, and that doesn't change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 01:45 AM
1

You didn't even click on the links. It's as if you're saying that there's nothing written on the paper, while you close your eyes and don't look at the paper. It's like covering your ears and saying there's no noise
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 01:26 AM
2

I don't know much about American football, but I understand your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 01:24 AM
2

They never provide shit from that woman saying she thinks that I talked about anecdotal situations and posted 2 example videos, and I also chose videos completely outside the gray area to avoid strawmen, and even then it was useless, because you are still defending. I've seen women wearing shorts smaller than my underwear in the middle of winter and showing their ass while going to shows, but ok, it's because they were hot, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 01:22 AM
1

I mean I don't honestly expect a woman like that to be super interested in me. But the way it seemed like my dollar value mattered was insane. I definitely don't like the interest in me from low-value women like this. That's why if I got divorced, I would remain single. I don't earn $100 thousand a year, but I earn $11 thousand a year, which is much more than the Brazilian average, I'm only with my wife because she was faithful in little (when we started dating I earned the Brazilian minimum wag…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 10:19 PM
0

Violence against women would increase absurdly if women turned into men, and men into women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 05:22 PM
0

I would fully believe and support my daughter but want any punishment that he gets to be with strong evidence. This is contradictory
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 02:21 PM
-1

It's interesting how the tone of the responses are different for daughter and son. About the daughter, a blind belief. About the son "ifs"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 02:19 PM
-1

If your daughter lies in this situation, you are an absolute failure. If your daughter lies in this situation and you believe it, then you are a double absolute failure, if there can be such a thing as "double absolute".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 02:18 PM
2

How would you feel, internally: Very, very unhappy. Because either my daughter is a victim of a very bad crime, or she is a liar who accuses someone of committing a very bad crime, and in both cases, it is very sad for a parent. How strong would you lean towards believing her? It depends on her history, and the history of the accused. What factors would most strongly affect your judgement? Their history of lying, and also an analysis of the information I have about the circumstances. How would y…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 02:11 PM
9

Demisexual women are rare, and most who say they are demisexual are not actually demisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 12:14 AM
3

Sure
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 09:06 PM
0

(2) is one of the causes of (1) There is no dichotomy there. If a woman is very sexually attracted to someone, she will naturally develop a deep emotional connection. (1) can exist alone, but whenever (2) exists, it also entails (1). Therefore there is no (2) without (1), since (2) creates (1). So the real choice is not between [(1) or (2)], but between [(1) or (1 and 2)] and in this case, I obviously choose (1 and 2).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 09:05 PM
0

you believe men and woman should have equal rights, choices and freedoms then you are a feminist This is the opposite of feminist
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 02:00 PM
2

English learning is divided into "Reading", "Listening", "Writing" and "Speaking". And I'm barely able to read. My writing in English is terrible (I write in Portuguese and use a translator), and I can't understand spoken language, unless the speaker speaks very slowly. And my English speech is incomprehensible hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:39 PM
–

Height is a good example because it is easier to measure. You can find a woman who prefers short men, but that doesn't say much about the overall picture, because next to her there are a hundred other women who prefer taller men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:35 PM
4

I don't watch the video because I don't understand English in spoken language, only in written language. So my answer is completely based on your post this type of message suggests that you as a woman are basically WORTHLESS if you don't meet the criteria. False. Reduced relationship value is not the same as being useless That it's wrong to have a loud personality and opinions Strong personality and opinions are not the same as having casual sex and having a tattoo That you're not worthy of love…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:12 PM
–

I only realized this when I improved my appearance and then reviewed my life in retrospect. I was very skinny when I was a teenager, and I wasn't respected, and women didn't tolerate anything I did lol I'm not Chad, but the difference I felt between "Sub5" and "Normie" was huge, even in banal disagreements. If I disagree with a Chad, women tend to side with him, but if I disagree with an ugly guy, women tend to side with me. Appearance plays a huge role in how your words and actions are seen and…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 05:51 PM
–

It's quite simple. The more attracted a woman is to a man, the more shit she will tolerate from him. I've seen women who were humiliated in every way by their handsome ex and were still crazy about him. She was always complaining about the betrayals, the lack of attention, the lack of hygiene, etc., but all he had to do was call the guy and he would run to serve him. Then she got married again to a nice guy who wasn't that good looking, and anything the guy does is misinterpreted and turned agai…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 04:42 PM
5

I don't hate them, and my friends don't hate them. My married friends married conservative women, and so did I. My single friends don't get involved with them. Except for one who gets involved casually. (but he doesn't take them seriously for commitment). Generally speaking, we don't hate them, we just reject them, we just don't put wedding rings on their fingers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 07:46 PM
-5

Wanting to force women to give birth to children they don't want isn't nice.... Are you using a euphemism for infanticide? It's a genuine question as I may not have understood
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 06:15 PM
1

You are wrong for taking conservatism into account by half. Yes, the conservative man undertakes to guarantee several things for the woman, but this comes with demands, and none of these demands are modern women capable of fulfilling. Leave your criticism to the feminist and the white knight. I'm conservative and my wife was a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 05:46 PM
36

It's better to be chosen than to be with someone who tolerates you because they need you
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 01:12 AM
1

Men are chosen mainly for their appearance and resources.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 08:02 PM
1

In other words, the vote would be based on lookism and money (which is often inherited) It's strange that in a men's rights sub, you think only men that women approve of (and based on superficial criteria) can vote.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 06:08 PM
–

Evidence should never be enough to convict someone, convictions should only be when proven beyond a reasonable doubt. And yet there are innocent people in jail, since no judge can resist a white woman crying while accusing a black man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 12:35 AM
1

ok feijoada I'm flattered. Thanks Feijoada is great!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:01 PM
4

Sometimes I leave Reddit's translator on, and it made me forget that I was on an English sub. Normally I respond in the language I read it in.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 04:09 PM
0

A parte de "transa como um deus" é negligenciada também. Vejo com uma certa frequência de mulheres reclamando que alguns homens só transam pelo próprio prazer. O cara legal ainda iria tentar dar prazer a mulher, impressioná-la, mesmo assim ela escolherá o mais bonito e mais alto de qualquer forma, independente disso. Há uma boa razão pelo qual muitas mulheres não tem orgasmo em sexo.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 03:41 PM
0

Você verá pessoas discordando de quanto é 3 + 3 * 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 11:22 PM
1

The fact that the author of the video included himself in the filming does not make the filming any less problematic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 06:06 PM
1

I don't know which country is free. But most of the films based on true stories of people wrongly imprisoned are from the USA. It is in this same country that Republicans fought against slavery, and today it is governed by a Democrat. So it's definitely not the USA you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:51 PM
0

It's interesting that your daughter's example is quite similar to mine, it's almost a "Reverse the Genders" situation. But surely the people who are opposing me in this debate would not side with the men who filmed your daughter. It seems that filming men without consent and making derogatory comments about them is ok, but doing the same to women is absurd. I think both circumstances are absurd, but not everyone is like me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:49 PM
1

Predators who have never been charged are those who have never been discovered. They didn't stop being accused because other men want to protect them, they stopped being accused because no one has any idea who they are. The example I gave fits this too. Innocent men being accused of something they didn't commit also makes it easier for real predators to get away with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:45 PM
0

Which is presumptuous itself. Perhaps it would be best to refrain from assigning pronouns to people, yeah? You are presumptuous. I say one thing, you assume I said something else, and then you assume things about me based on what you assumed, based on your straw man women shouldn't film themselves Therein lies the presumption. I didn't say "themselves", I said "themselves AND the men". And I also talked about publishing the men they film and making derogatory comments. Mind you, I didn't condemn…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:43 PM
3

This is not a tit-for-tat situation. Looking at someone is something banal that we do every day. Filming a person exercising, posting it online and making derogatory comments is a far cry from being the equivalent of looking. You look at many people every day, you would definitely not agree if each of them filmed you, published it on the internet and accused you of some crime, let's stop pretending that the situations are the same and that you are not biased. "An eye for an eye". It doesn't fit …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:28 PM
-1

Or perhaps situations differ by country, and the example I used is more unusual in your country than mine. Hardly anyone here would support a woman setting fire to a car because of a message to her cousin Better examples are not universal, they are contextual
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:26 PM
1

More presumption and bullshit to avoid what is being addressed and feel like "I came out on top" Go to a therapist
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:20 PM
1

It's a lot of presumption and nonsense to avoid dealing with the real point being discussed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:12 PM
3

I'm sure you wouldn't agree if a man filmed a woman exercising, posted it online and made derogatory comments about her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:11 PM
3

This is simply false. I live in a city where an innocent man had to flee because he was accused of murder and rape. There was semen that wasn't his on the victim's body. There was a huge campaign against the 5 boys from Central Park, even though they were innocent, they were arrested and convicted, in addition to being hated by public opinion. Many men and many women believe that a woman's word is enough to convict someone of sexual crimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:06 PM
9

You set a great example
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:03 PM
3

Men are often biased in favor of women as well. I've seen men being attacked by other men for retaliating against female aggression, or for being accused of harassment without it having been proven. There is a man in my city who had to flee the city because of a murder/rape that he didn't commit, DNA tests proved his innocence (the rapist left the sperm). The man who fled was innocent, but he would be murdered by other men if they remained here. And the killers would not be "members of factions"…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:02 PM
-2

You say context is important, which I agree with. And then he says: Couldn't you just.... leave women alone and perhaps stop trying to blame victims of sexual harassment? This ignores the entire context and is presumptuous. The context described by me is very different from your version. What you did is contradictory. It was quite a juggling act to make "looking at someone" wrong and "filming someone" acceptable, and then accusing me of advocating harassment based on the context of your juggling…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:59 PM
2

Looking at someone is not harassing. When I go to a place and the attendant is a woman, I don't keep my eyes closed. And if you want this control over men, you should want the same over women, apologize to every man that passes before your eyes. If you want to use equipment, look and there is a man, close your eyes, go to him and apologize.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:52 PM
5

It's the opposite. If men are wrong just by looking (sight being a basic sense), then definitely the woman filming the man is even more wrong. It's a matter of degree. It's as if you said: "It's wrong for men to greet women with handshakes, but it's okay for women to suddenly appear to greet men by slapping their butts."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:49 PM
1

I may not agree 100% with what you said, but I know how to recognize what is a genuine and unbiased opinion, even when, in parts, it is contrary to mine. I imagine you would answer the same thing if I reversed men and women in the post, unlike many here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:46 PM
8

Looking at your flair made me think that I should write "People shouldn't defend women who are obviously in the wrong", I was very specific writing "Women" instead of "People", as obviously many men, like you for example, also do this .
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:43 PM
8

Anyone has the right to look wherever they want. A man should not fail to check whether the equipment he is going to use is already being used, just because there is a half-naked woman using it. Nobody needs any kind of license to look anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:39 PM
3

There is nothing personal in what I said, you are very presumptuous. Deal more with reality and less with presumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:36 PM
1

I also think that filming in gyms should be banned. However, gyms would lose a lot of customers if they did so.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:29 PM
0

You realize that my example is not just about that, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:28 PM
8

But they are controlling the eyes, and they are not doing anything wrong. They can look wherever they want, the eyes are theirs. Apparently you want the opposite, you want to control their eyes. And if men are wrong for looking at anything, then women are extremely wrong for filming men. If we are going to make a moral assessment of this, filming a person without consent is much worse than looking at someone (the latter not even being wrong in fact). You would certainly call a man going to the g…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:25 PM
-10

the woman is not wrong for wearing clothes that "violate modesty", whatever THAT means. If you don't understand what it means, how did you make a value judgment? "I don't know what it's about, but she's not wrong."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:21 PM
4

Yes, but defending a woman who is obviously in the wrong doesn't help anyone. It doesn't help the right women, or the right men. Women should be more interested in opposing this kind of attitude rather than encouraging it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:18 PM
2

The point is to be willing to use violence, but not use it if it is not necessary, that is a protective nature, and a nice guy can be like that. Confusing occasional aggression with protective capacity is what can make a woman "accidentally trip and hit her eyes on the sink". I think it's been more than 10 years since I got into a physical fight, and that says a lot more about my ability to resolve things peacefully than my inability to resolve things violently if necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 11:09 PM
2

This is false. There is a difference between being nice and being passive/cowardly. I'm a good guy who protected my wife (at the time girlfriend) from 2 guys, these two guys were bullies who had the initiative to attack the weakest, but they didn't have the same initiative to confront me. By the way, after that day my girlfriend was no longer pursued because people said I was crazy and so it would be better to avoid me (and in this sense they were right, as I made it clear how far I would go to …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 08:45 PM
1

I'm going to be honest, most of the questions in your OP have obvious answers to anyone with a shred of social insight. I agree, just because I'm asking doesn't mean I don't have the answer. I seek feminine answers, not mine, because I already have mine
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 08:25 PM
11

Yes, I know that. But I want to read what women have to say about it. Because it seems so unrealistic to say that they have personality problems when the only thing they have difficulty with is dating. It's obvious that what these guys lack are a few centimeters of height and broader shoulders. I would like a female explanation of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 07:01 PM
1

I don't know if this says anything about the AI's more than about the tests. I say this because these tests often consider "left-wing" things that are not left-wing, at the same time they consider "right-wing" things that are not really right-wing. I agree with women having autonomy over their own bodies, and that would be considered left-wing in one of these tests, as they use it as a euphemism about "killing your own child"
/r/MensRights01/10/24 09:45 AM
0

Narcissists are more likely to earn more I think you are reversing cause and effect. I believe that those who earn more tend to be narcissists. Men who are born with money grow up spoiled and become narcissists, and this is not enough to drive women away in adulthood, as their personality takes a backseat. I've had to deal with many incompetent directors who are treated like gods by employees, and this type of treatment comes from childhood, so that they end up being convinced that they really a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 08:50 PM
2

You don't know it, you just have a strong desire for it to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 08:42 PM
5

I wouldn't do anything. If God doesn't do it, it's because there is some reason not to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 08:28 PM
-4

Yes. I wonder how these people would think I was crazy if I said something stupid like: "Women think they are rejecting 'hookup' status because they are not good enough for 'wifey' status, they were never qualified for 'hookup'". It would be the opposite absurdity. We know that a woman's power to get sex is much greater than a woman's power to become a wife. Just like many men are rejected for casual sex, but not as husbands. Just like those we see in those posts that say: "My girlfriend will on…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 10:05 PM
8

You are being presumptuous, this is simply false, and I speak from experience. Of course you will deny it, I can say that I hold a pencil now and you can indefinitely say that there is no pencil in my hands, but any man who has had to deal with the non-genuine attraction of women like me knows that you are wrong anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 09:23 PM
2

I have enough female friends to see how women are able to get turned on by certain men just by their physique. Many women are turned on by actors from Bridgerton, 50 Shades of Grey, as well as actors from other series and films without them knowing them, all they know is that they are Chads and that they work as actors. They don't get turned on by ugly actors, which means that looks are their only turn-on variable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 08:55 PM
3

A case like this is very sad. The guy had two jobs and paid for the house alone, as well as the car. His wife, with his money, opened a company, which took a while to make a profit, but when it grew, she started earning more than him, and so she started to see him as of lesser value, combined with the fact that she is delicious. She belittled him, they divorced, she kept the company, car, house and custody of the child, and she still complains to him about the amount of alimony and having to tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 05:00 PM
16

Men are not a single entity, our minds are not unified in such a way that we are a single individual with a single opinion about everything. Different men believe in different things and consume different services. The men against it aren't the ones consuming it. The ones consuming it aren't against it [u/krackedy]
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 04:21 PM
13

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 01:30 PM
1

Do you say this to someone who plays the lottery, gets a tetanus shot and pays for insurance that includes something that is highly unlikely to happen? The chances of a baby being switched at the hospital are much higher than many things that normal people consider reasonable, including the 3 examples I mentioned. A man has less chance of not getting tetanus without getting a vaccine than of having his child switched at the hospital; The chances of winning the lottery are 1 in 50 million, and ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 01:07 AM
2

False. A positive paternity test says absolutely nothing about marital fidelity. A positive mammogram test for any disease whatsoever tells you that there is a disease in the breast. The false positive for the paternity test is rare, but it is for PATERNITY and not for FIDELITY. Your analogy was terrible, most parents of children with unfaithful women would test true positive for the paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 12:51 AM
–

If my wife earned 10x more than me and maintained the same personality, I would be very happy. Now if this turned her into someone who behaved with false superiority, the relationship would be doomed to failure. It is never a question of how much she earns, but rather a question of measuring her husband's worth based on that, the woman sinks her own relationship when she does this, and since these women are unable to recognize their own mistakes, they simply project "insecurity" on her husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 12:37 AM
21

I met women who called their husbands insecure for this reason, but over time I realized that these same women, every minute felt the need to degrade their husbands and had no respect for them at all, and this "castrated" them. One of these cases ended in divorce. On the other hand, I also met a woman who earned more and didn't see her husband as insecure, and ironically she didn't say that all the time, she didn't have the need to put him down. This makes it clear that the man is not inherently…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 12:35 AM
1

Your point was about me on a personal level, so the scope was yours to define. You are free to rephrase it, but it is wrong to treat it as if your rephrasing was what you were really saying all along, because it is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 09:40 PM
1

i think the vast majority of men would disagree with you But I said: My wife and I casually go through each other's phones. I don't think men who have never seen me in their lives could disagree or agree with anything about my relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 09:12 PM
0

People are putting the alternatives as "extremely rare", but that's not true. For example, the IBGE estimate for babies exchanged in the maternity ward in Brazil is 500 cases per year, that is, the couple has a 1/6000 chance of having the baby exchanged. It is worth mentioning that these are conservative estimates, as we cannot estimate cases in which this happens and we will never have news, where people were born and died without anyone ever knowing that paternity is not biological. It seems l…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 08:47 PM
0

I work as a women/neonatal nurse in a maternity unit and I can guarantee, we have the parents double check identifying bracelets and apply them in front of the parents before leaving the delivery room. We even apply identifying bracelets to newborns who need to be brought out of the room for advanced resuscitation or as we're transferring them to the NICU. This is true for the hospitals you work at, not for others I don't know if/why they don't follow best neonatal identification practices in Br…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 08:35 PM
1

"how common are babies swapped in hospitals" People are putting the alternatives as "extremely rare", but that's not true. For example, the IBGE estimate for babies exchanged in the maternity ward in Brazil is 500 cases per year, that is, the couple has a 1/6000 chance of having the baby exchanged. It seems like an absurd number, but it isn't, after all: The chances of winning in the mega-sena are 1 in 50 million, and even then people consider it reasonable to play; We pay for insurance that cov…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 08:25 PM
5

It is reasonable when a man wants to know if he is the father of his supposed child
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 08:08 PM
2

have no reason to question it? The reason is the certainty of paternity. If the person already knows whether or not they are the biological father, then I would advise against the test, it would be a useless waste of money.If the person is already certain of paternity, then I would obviously not agree. As I am constantly reminded dudes on this sub, a straw man is not simply an argument you don't like. Maybe if you start responding to what people actually write, you'll stop having to say it const…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 08:07 PM
0

It's easier to have your child changed in the maternity ward than to win the lottery alone, yet people constantly play the lottery dreaming of becoming millionaires.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 08:04 PM
-2

IBGE estimates say that almost 2 changes of children in the maternity ward occur per day in Brazil, and this estimate is conservative. I've never been to a maternity hospital since I was born, my wife and I don't have children, so I don't know what the procedure is, but regardless of what it is, there are about 2 unlucky couples a day in the country or even more. It is likely that more people have children exchanged in the maternity ward than win the lottery alone, literally the lottery accumula…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 08:02 PM
0

I agree with what he supposedly meant, but I disagree with what he actually said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:55 PM
0

Your entire argument is based on the concept that if a test is not perfect for all situations, it cannot be considered a test, which is ridiculous. Wrong. Fidelity tests also fail to validate fidelity, but they are still tests. My argument is that the test is functional for what it is proposed. I don't know if your interpretation of the text is bad or if you're using a straw man, but it's obvious and clear what I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:53 PM
-1

But is it often a fidelity test at the very least by proxy? Yes At no point in my post do I disagree with this, but this is no counterpoint, other men mistakenly using paternity tests as if they were fidelity tests does not imply that a man wanting to be sure of paternity wants to do the same. If I had any doubts about my wife's fidelity, I would investigate her fidelity, especially since we don't have children. Different things have different objectives and require different examinations, other…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:51 PM
-3

People pay much more to insurance companies for things that are difficult to happen, and without the guarantee of receiving the benefit from the insurance company due to the legal uncertainty that exists in many countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:37 PM
1

Nobody gives a fuck about the fidelity aspect of the paternity test. False. In all the posts about this here on this sub, women and blue pills use the paternity test as if it were synonymous with the fidelity test. Even in the responses to my post you will see comments defending the idea that taking a fidelity test is accusing your wife of cheating, and other comments indicating the mistaken belief that a paternity test is synonymous with a fidelity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:30 PM
1

This is irrelevant to what we are debating. The debate is about what the test really represents and not about rights to take it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:28 PM
1

If a mixup at the hospital is the concern, then the mother can get tested. Yes, but that's irrelevant unless you meant that the mother must necessarily take the test. And if you think it must necessarily be the mother rather than the father, then there really seems to be an intention to hide infidelity there.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:27 PM
-6

You realize you put too many ifs in your comment to call it semantics. Furthermore, the baby in your house is not necessarily conceived by your wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:24 PM
-1

why not swab the mother? I don't know what that means
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:23 PM
2

My wife and I casually go through each other's phones. What's your problem with that that you put it as a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:22 PM
-3

It's not being neurotic. There was a show on "Programa do Ratinho" that showed reunions of babies exchanged in the maternity ward every day, the same happened on "Programa do Gugu" and some other high-profile audiences. Furthermore, the "João Kleber Program", which was also very famous and had a very high audience, passed LOYALTY tests every day, although these were armed (but in the 90s no one knew that) In any case, the person wanting to be sure doesn't make them useless, you're just trying to…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:18 PM
1

The ladies of the rings
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 11:29 PM
-14

Many men are in the situation: "Having a chance at a relationship" or "Staying single" It's VERY different. There is no option to "CHOOSE BETTER".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 05:21 PM
-10

Similar thing like for women: learning to be content single instead of heading into a toxic relationship. Women do not suffer from this choice. They can stay single if they want to. Women's options are between good relationships or bad relationships (in a gradient, it's not 0 and 1). Or staying single.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 05:06 PM
3

A significant portion of those who raised their standards would be single. So the dilemma would not be "vet better" or "no", but rather "stay single" or "have a chance"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 05:03 PM
5

I don't sleep around, but even if that were the case, that wouldn't make me a hypocrite. Just as a thief can be against murder, an unfaithful husband can also be against murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 07:27 PM
3

Simple because I didn't know that "son" is male. In Portuguese, masculine nouns are used for neuter gender. "Filho" is used for both masculine and feminine depending on the context
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 07:25 PM
6

In recent years, only with my pro-life wife. I don't understand what this has to do with the subject
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 06:25 PM
-1

I didn't understand the question. "Son" is male?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 06:22 PM
7

If she wanted to abort in this scenario I would definitely divorce and raise alone. I wouldn't sleep with someone who wanted to kill my son, much less let her get close to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 04:57 PM
9

False. A Paternity Test is not a Fidelity Test, because: Your wife can be faithful and still have a child with a different DNA than yours; Your wife can be unfaithful and still have a child with the same DNA as yours. I will write a post about this later.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 12:56 PM
1

This is a bad analogy. A paternity test is not a test of fidelity; the result of the paternity test is not used to conclude whether a wife is faithful or unfaithful. On the other hand, hiding money from your partner is a clear sign that you do not trust your partner, and in Brazil there is the concept of "patrimonial violence", which applies to these cases (although Brazilian law only recognizes this against men, since "women are wonderful").
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 01:20 AM
-2

There is no sexual exclusivity without sex. It's a question of definition. You place your presumption and your ideology above reality. Also, don't marry someone you won't have sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 01:42 PM
1

People in a monogamous relationship are sexually exclusive. When you enter into a monogamous relationship agreement and leave your partner without sex, you break the monogamy agreement, as sexual exclusivity depends on: Having sex with your partner; Do not have sex with other people. It is not something that needs to be explained, as that is what the word means.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 01:27 PM
0

Does that not sound at least a little irrational to you? This is definitely irrational, I point out who said this and I will refute it for you
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:26 PM
1

No woman here will admit it so explicitly like this. Hatred against men is not explicitly stated in this way, and to admit something like this would be to denounce one's own superficiality. Hatred against men is perceived when a woman: * Generalizes all men based on the bad actions that men they like do; Defends ideas that harm men, such as: "a woman's word is enough to condemn men for harassment", "Men should not have the right to certainty of paternity", "The father should not have a voice to …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 03:35 PM
2

I know it's off topic, but the example of the Big Bang Theory was really good, I use it a lot when they say that the non-literal interpretation of Genesis is an adaptation of Christians to modern science, when in fact both the scientific method and the theory more accepted about the origin of the Universe emerged in the church. I'm not even Catholic, but I need to recognize that. It is interesting that The Big Bang Theory was a jokey name, which was often used by opponents to discredit "church s…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:20 PM
4

This they already know. But there is a difference between hearing about it and going through the experience. It is also worth highlighting that the causes that make a man single tend to create other adjacent negative consequences in other aspects of life, for example: Being short and ugly makes it difficult to get into a relationship, get a promotion at work, the way you are treated socially is worse, etc. Eternally single men are unhappy due to a series of bad consequences that the causes of be…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 01:00 PM
33

If I recall correctly there were studies showing that single women without children were among the happiest demographic contrasted to single men who were mostly unhappy. False. These "studies" contradict other studies that say married women are the happiest female democratic group. https://ifstudies.org/blog/marriage-and-babies-really-do-make-women-happier ------ And in my experience, the most unhappy single men are those who have never been in a relationship, they idealize how a relationship wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 12:15 PM
2

You have an excellent point. I think women also run the risk of having a guy say "it doesn't matter" when in fact he really does care. I've seen men say "her sexual past doesn't matter" to win a woman over, but after the relationship is established the guy shows himself to be bothered by her sexual past.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 01:27 AM
1

You don't know much about female anatomy, even though you are a woman; You need to improve your friendship circle or influence it more positively, because 14-year-old girls having sex is not healthy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 12:17 AM
3

I married a virgin woman and we have an active sex life. She was 19 when I met her. Most of my married friends got married as virgins or had sex when they were dating, but they were virgins when they started dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 08:46 PM
2

I would make my own judgment as I get to know the woman's personality. Whether it is a lie or the truth would be reflected in her expression of moral and political opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 06:10 PM
0

You would be right if it were among his friends. But "workplaces" and "universities" are hardly like that because they have so-and-so as a common denominator. These things happen even when he is not there.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 06:00 PM
-1

That was the most balanced female response here
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 05:55 PM
1

Why do men believe sex is degrading to women? We don't. Or they want it to be? Whe don't And before you say, "If it were your daughter." If I had a daughter, I would be very happy if she had sex within a healthy marital relationship, gave me grandchildren, etc., etc. My father-in-law doesn't think I degrade his daughter when we have sex, and he often asks when the grandchildren are coming. What really surprised me was not the fact that those men had absolutely zero respect for this women "Sarah"…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 05:38 PM
2

I didn't know it was different, because both in Portuguese are "Gênero" and people mistakenly use "Gênero" instead of "Sexo (Sex in Portuguese)", it always seemed to me that you did the same there. I didn't even know the word "Genus" existed
/r/MensRights15/09/24 05:25 PM
14

A wife who loves me but won't have sex with me is a unicorn, unless she is physically incapable of having sex. There is no such thing, if your wife loves you, she will have regular sex with you. In this case I would choose the first, simply because the second does not exist
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 08:08 AM
2

For these women, I can agree with you. These are the women who want you to pay for the food on a date because that would be "the man's role", but if you want a sandwich, they won't make it because "they are not their partner's mother", because "he has hands and can make a sandwich for himself".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 01:17 AM
5

You are precisely the example of the behavior that the OP is reporting.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 12:20 AM
2

It's no different than someone who expects their partner to handle the majority of housework and childcare when they're splitting expenses evenly. In both cases you're expecting something without giving anything in return. You're being subsidized because you both use the home and utilities equally yet you're paying less than them. A real marriage does not distinguish between “my things” and “your things,” so there is no way for anyone to “pay more” or “pay less” since everything belongs to both …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 11:49 PM
1

Unless they're no longer having sex I'm never going to understand why people get so bothered by their partners watching porn I would say it's kind of the opposite of that. If you are no longer having sex, you should be more understanding if your partner seeks refuge in pornography.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 09:17 PM
1

But that's basically monogamy, it's putting restrictions on each other not chest. You are wrong. This is not monogamy. Monogamy is sexual exclusivity, which the OP proposes leaves room for forced abstinence. Forcing someone to abstain from sexual pleasure is not monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 09:13 PM
1

You only have the right to demand this when you satisfy your spouse's sexual needs. If you are withholding sex from your spouse and criticizing him for masturbating, you are a hypocrite who is taking offense to a problem that you contributed to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 09:10 PM
3

Yes. However women should not marry someone they do not want to have regular sex with. Definite and deliberate denial of sex is a breach of the monogamy agreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 09:06 PM
2

I think this must be rare. Maybe it's common in your friend's bubble, but uncommon for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 08:15 PM
0

If we are to be really strict about this, there are only 2 sexes, and there are tens of thousands of genders, with all people being the gender "homo". Humans are homo; Cats are Felis; Dogs are Canis; Etc.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 06:21 PM
5

Here in Brazil, women who give birth take 6 months of maternity leave. A woman took maternity leave for 6 months, and a man worked in the same position while she was on leave, he had to cover for her, as a result of which he received a salary increase and therefore started earning more than her. When she found out about the raise, she said it was sexism and that he earned more than her because he was a man.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 06:16 PM
-1

because they're likely deficient in something that made others not attracted to them. I don't think there's room for "probably," because most of the time, the reason a man is a virgin is determined by looking at his appearance, age, or religion. If he's ugly, that's why; If he's handsome but young, he'll eventually lose his virginity; If he's not ugly but is a devout Christian, he'll lose it when he gets married anyway; There's not much room for assumptions here, anything beyond that is an excep…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:01 AM
13

Military enlistment is mandatory for men in my country. Unless your father is influential. Luckily my country does not have a culture of war, so it is unlikely to happen, but as in all countries, when it does happen, most soldiers are men. The same goes for the police. And speaking of careers, the physical tests to join the police are made easier for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 11:48 PM
13

All of these advantages are for women. It's not that men think that "dating" is a greater advantage than "security." The fact is that women both have an easier time dating and are more secure. All the data shows this. Men die more; They are the biggest victims of urban violence; Men are the biggest victims of work accidents; Men go to war, women don't; Etc. The same thing happens with health. Public investment in women's health is much greater, and government health campaigns are almost entirely…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 11:32 PM
1

"First Biggest" can be contradictory. If Mary fell in love with Steve, Chad, and John respectively, but Chad was her biggest crush, should she answer Steve or Chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 11:17 PM
1

* Women who date younger men are considered empowered; * Men who date younger women are considered manipulative, perverted, etc. Such considerations are usually made by women in the same age group as these older men.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 10:46 PM
1

Because the man who interferes in the couple's fight will always be presumed to be the aggressor until proven otherwise. I have police officers in the family who deal with this, and when trouble occurs, very often the husband and wife accuse the white knight of being the aggressor, and any injuries the woman has fall on the white knight. There is the mentality that the strange man is presumably evil. This becomes worse when the interference occurs within the couple's home, as the white knight wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:15 PM
1

I believe that the OP's view promotes a false sense of security while making society worse for women in general because of the point you raised. I myself, and many other men, do not directly interfere in husband and wife fights because we fear being labeled as "bad guys." The OP's thinking does not promote a healthy society because it creates an extra motivation for "bad men" as well as an extra risk for "good men."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 02:11 AM
3

That was a terrible false equivalence. A study is much more substantiated than some anonymous online comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 01:59 AM
0

Most logical guys A really logical guy will tell kids of either sex to be wary of any stranger, but not to be neurotic because of some arbitrary characteristic like gender, race, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 01:46 AM
2

This bias against men is very strong and leads to circular reasoning. * Men are worse, so I interpret their actions as worse. * Since men's actions are worse, therefore men are worse. This is circular reasoning. * As you exemplified, a female thief who devises a plan that results in the death of the witness is not seen with the same severity as a male thief who kills the witness with a rock to the head. * Women cheat because of circumstances, men cheat because they are inherently bad; * Female a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 01:43 AM
2

I don't know if you're actually safer because of this. A sense of security doesn't necessarily mean greater security objectively. For example, it's because of statements like yours that people like me won't defend you if your boyfriend ends up abusing you. So even with the feeling of security, you've actually become objectively more insecure. This thought process of yours makes defending a woman from an abusive partner a lose-lose game that many men don't want to play. After all, if: * Strange m…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 01:34 AM
1

I wouldn't break up with her, but I wouldn't have sex with another woman while she was watching.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 05:59 PM
10

Reality does not depend on our knowledge. And anyway, she knows
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 06:37 PM
7

When a woman conditions sex with money, it is prostitution, this includes when a woman says: "I would have had sex with him that night, but I rejected him because he wanted to split the dinner bill." She made sex conditional on paying for dinner, so it's prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 06:03 PM
7

So keep debating against your imaginary opponent, because I am only responsible for what I say and not for what you understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 08:15 PM
–

What I said is definitely not right.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 08:14 PM
–

Do people who write things like this also take the so-called "Brown Pill"? The fear of AF/BB is really about insecurity and validation. : r/PurplePillDebate (reddit.com)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 08:13 PM
3

every woman is a Christian when she makes a guy wait for sex English is not my first language, but I am sure that I did not say that, and that what I said does not support that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 08:11 PM
1

Much more than zero
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 08:07 PM
–

I agree with you, and probably much more than you do, without irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 08:04 PM
3

"anytime" is a very strong word. There are Christian women who get married as virgins and then have great sex lives. Especially when they have a high libido and have had to hold back until they find the right guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 08:01 PM
8

If she's a virgin and makes me wait? Yes. If she just makes me wait until I introduce her to my family, put a gold ring on her finger and take her on a honeymoon when other guys don't have to? I'm sorry, but I don't want to, because she clearly doesn't desire me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 07:48 PM
2

The left is much more intolerant than the right. Not to mention censorship. I am black and the left does not tolerate me not being on the left, because according to them, black people should have the ideology they want them to have. The left blocked X in Brazil because they wanted a representative of X in Brazil to arrest, just because X is not blocking people who are not ideologically aligned with the left. Both in Brazil and in the USA, slavery was defended by left-wing parties and overturned …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 04:09 PM
–

It's hard to get this through their heads, and you're right. Men who say they DON'T CARE: Insecure men, who tolerate what they don't like for fear of being alone; Men who just want to use you for sex, but won't take the relationship any further; Men who say they CARE: Secure men who have standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 01:52 AM
6

I'm not angry, I just made an observation. And it would be very good if a man were not morally or legally condemned for what others can freely do. If you consider it wrong to have a high sexual desire, you should consider it wrong for everyone indiscriminately, otherwise you are just a hypocrite. This is true for any moral or legal judgment on any issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 01:35 AM
28

I don't see any guys losing their jobs or getting canceled because they are having too much sex, unless I am wrong? The guy who needs to worry is the guy who has desire but can't have much sex. Or the guy who people assume has desire and is ugly. Chads who have a lot of sex don't need to worry about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 10:41 PM
1

I don't agree that it's a euphemism, but this seems to be a US thing, so I'm going to assume that it is. I think this is not the ideal situation, and without my past rejections I wouldn't be with the incredible woman I have by my side today. However, women already do this anyway, but they hope to fail in life before giving the nice guy a chance, in which case it would be better for both of them if the woman gave the nice guy a chance while she was still young, without children of other men, no d…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 08:08 PM
1

Thanks. I imagine how much confusion this caused in other debates. It's because in Portuguese, both words are the same thing, that is, "traição"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 02:38 PM
-3

Any breach of agreement is cheating, whether an implicit or explicit agreement. English isn't my first language, but it seems to me that's what the word means. But maybe you prefer "betrayal"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 02:32 PM
-4

Because it's a breach of contract. Marriage, as a rule, includes an agreement (implicit or explicit) of sexual exclusivity, the deliberate and constant denial of sex is a betrayal of this agreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 01:56 PM
–

The men in this sub already recognize this, you would be wasting your choice
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 01:52 PM
–

As mulheres não são melhores que os homens As you asked me to choose just one thing, so I wrote a generic fact, but the denial of it is the root of most female opinions on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 01:48 PM
-4

Deliberately and constantly denying your spouse sex is abuse and cheating, regardless of whether they had sex before marriage or not. If you intend not to have sex with someone, don't marry them, because marriage presupposes sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 01:31 PM
3

Is there any research that identifies how women and men define cheating? In my experience, women's definition of "cheating" is very flexible, being more narrow when it comes to cheating on the part of the woman or more broad when it comes to cheating on the part of the man. Without taking this into account, the margin of error in this type of research becomes very high. The same woman who says: * "I didn't cheat on my husband, it was just an innocent kiss" Also says: * "Stacy's husband is cheati…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 02:00 AM
2

Então você é poliglota? Isso é bem legal. O meu principal objetivo aqui no Reddit é treinar o Inglês. Depois que eu ficar bom talvez eu aprenda Japonês. Mas não sou tão ambicioso nessa questão quanto você kkkkk (ou jajajaja se preferir), mesmo assim parabéns
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 10:20 PM
2

O seu Português é muito bom.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 10:11 PM
7

I'm trying to understand what you said has to do with what I said. I didn't say anything about "good or bad", I just made objective statements like "true or false"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 10:09 PM
3

All I am saying (in response to your comment) is that it's not hypocritical if a woman has a laundry list of preferences/requirements and goes out with someone who seemingly doesn't meet these preferences/requirements. The woman who says she prefers men with A, B, and C, but instead dates men with X, Y, and Z (and doesn't have A, B, and C), is simply lying about preferring A, B, and C. If I said I was only heterosexual while only sleeping with men, I would be equally as untrue. If you met my wif…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 09:55 PM
2

This is almost a tautology
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 09:09 PM
21

Apps are a reflection of society's dating dynamics and not the other way around. An application like you described would not be successful. If you ask any woman her dating preferences and requirements, she will tell you 1 million attributes that correspond to a good personality, but when, outside of an app, the woman finds a man who has all these attributes, but is not hot, she tries to make him a friend, then she goes on to date hot guys who don't have 1/3 of the qualities she described that sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 08:52 PM
7

It works in Brazil. And from what I've been reading here, the dating culture is the same in both countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 10:06 PM
3

I don't know any of the influencers you mentioned, but I've heard one thing and another about Andrew Tate because of Reddit. None of the Red Pill influencers I know, as far as I know, defend these idiotic positions like "prohibiting daughter from going to college", if you want to check for yourself, search for the "Manual Anti Otario", or for "Junior Masters", they are the the only ones I know. Anyway, Red Pill has no leader, it's just a bunch of guys sharing what they see about the world
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 09:40 PM
14

Irrelevant. Killing is not the unique evil of the world
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 02:50 AM
4

It's interesting that misandry is cultural, it's the default social norm, you literally have people being persecuted in academic settings for not being misandrist. On the other hand, misogyny is more of a niche thing, something "from the internet underworld". There are misogynistic bubbles, however society itself is misandrist, that's why t-shirts like the ones you showed are common.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 02:43 AM
27

Men are also biased towards women. If a man hits back at a woman in public, he will be attacked by other men. This is why many women feel safe hitting men in public; a woman slapping a man is socially considered humorous rather than violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 02:38 AM
1

There are extremists in every group. Seen feminist that even want to kill newborns if they are males. This is no more extreme than abortion. And abortion is the default position of feminism. A feminist wanting to kill a newborn is just a normal feminist, only less hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:39 PM
–

I don't know if you don't know what faith is, or if you don't know what logic is, or if you don't know about either of those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 06:53 PM
–

Your standards are reasonable if they are really those, considering your age. Keep it up, many women wait until they get older or have children to supposedly have the standards you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 06:51 PM
1

This is the right answer. The OP is wrong. They say men are crazy, this or that, but it's just reality. A woman who is used and discarded by men "8" is definitely not an "8"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 02:35 AM
3

Yes. I am married to a woman who slept with me quickly, we kissed a lot on the first few dates and it didn't take long for us to have sex. She was a virgin before that (although she did have a "girlfriend" before). But if it were the opposite, that is, if she had slept with several guys easily but refused to sleep with me, then I would not have a relationship with her at all, I would not have made her my girlfriend, nor my fiancée, and much less my wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 02:10 AM
0

all i care about is that the man has an n count of greater than zero If he is a virgin, pay a prostitute for him and your problem of N Count greater than zero will be solved, this is something super simple for you to "fix" in your man
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 05:07 AM
2

Paid sex is consensual
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 01:01 AM
1

"Every" committed man has the chance, even the "least attractive" ones, for two reasons: Pre-selection: Being married or having a girlfriend makes a man more attractive to other women than the same man when he was single. If he was able to attract a woman when he was single, then he would be able to do the same when he was married. Prostitution: Pay R$300.00 and have sex with a prostitute in secret, who will probably be more physically attractive than the wife of a man with below-average looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 12:49 AM
2

Reddit rules do not allow us to give more details about
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 11:02 PM
2

I don't know if it's sexist or not. I just know it's impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:34 PM
1

This conversation was never about Brazil. It was about America. This is contradictory. It sounds like saying: "It was never about France, it is about Europe", or "It was never about Congo, it is about Africa". Brazil is in America. Furthermore, the OP did not specify the scope. About Carnival it's the same thing. I've never been able to stop for a week to go to big Carnival parties and I would have to travel many hours to do something like that. Carnival is not a national holiday and most people…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 04:53 PM
1

I was in Rio de Janiro in the Copacabana. I can see the ocean from my airbnb and I can walk down there. The whole expense of the experience was dirt fucking cheap. It's not cheap, it's the USA that has a strong currency. 1 dollar is worth 6 reais, the cost of living here is very high, but you don't feel that because the USA is very rich. The salary here in Brazil isn't even 300 dollars a month, I earn the equivalent of 900 dollars a month and I have a lot more money than most people here. Furthe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 04:20 PM
1

You are wrong, you don't understand the reality of Brazil. I'm Brazilian and I need to drive 7 hours to get to the nearest beach, which is precisely why I've never been to the beach. Furthermore, you made a false dichotomy between Brazil x America, since Brazil STAYS in America, Brazilian territory occupies half of South America
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 03:43 PM
4

I particularly like people who are independent, so an adult who still lives with their parents is quite the opposite. False. The man who takes care of his parents while living in the same home is much more independent than the man who lives in another house, but lives begging for parents's money or lives off inheritance that generates passive income.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 06:39 PM
1

This post should be "Question for Men" Why do we men have to lie about loving the way she is? We don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 03:20 AM
1

There are government benefits exclusive to single mothers. And we have a tax burden of 80% in Brazil. In other words, all of us workers are harmed by taxes, but men are more affected.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 02:09 PM
1

Not sure where you got this IFS unmarried women are the happiest subgroup of people False
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 02:15 AM
0

Definitely not all women should get married, and this is especially true for those women who are already married, and this is especially true for those women who are already married and live in countries where polygamy is not allowed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 11:43 PM
0

The IFS has already found that to be true. I don't know what you mean by "universally," it sounds like you're trying to point out exceptions to say it's false. A general statement doesn't have to apply to 100% of individuals to be true. I can say, "Men are taller than women," and that's still true even if there are some women who are 200cm tall and some men who are 150cm tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 11:06 PM
-3

A married woman is happier than a single woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 10:49 PM
5

Some of the children who are aborted or abandoned are male. Defending both is against men's rights.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 03:05 AM
–

He just told the truth. Women moralize a man's sexual attractiveness. Hot man = good; Ugly man = evil
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 04:09 PM
1

I became friends with my wife before we started dating. For me, being friends first has always been a prerequisite, because dating is a step beyond friendship, just as marriage is a step beyond dating. Ironically, she was my first girlfriend and we are still together today. Part of what makes relationships fail is thinking that dating and friendship are opposites, women do this all the time, but the truth is that your boyfriend should meet all the requirements that a friend should meet, ignoring…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 03:50 PM
1

he went all nice guy He isn't nice
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:31 PM
3

Why are you mad when women accept your no? I don't A guy I'm not this guy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:20 PM
1

Yes, it is true, but they are not dichotomies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 10:37 PM
0

My wife checks all of these boxes (but we don't have kids) and I consider her my best friend, but we don't share exactly the same hobbies, but we are happy to support each other's hobbies. But even friendship doesn't have much to do with "liking the same things" for me, so it's hard to answer your question, I have friends with completely different hobbies than me, some like books and others like going to clubs, while others like both and others like neither. I don't think sharing hobbies is the …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 09:34 PM
7

What you consider "poor" is probably not what I consider "poor." Someone "poor" in the USA seems to have a better standard of living than mine, and I earn more than double the Brazilian average, here in Brazil
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 07:48 PM
4

Some bad boys aren't even really powerful, they're just guys who have nothing to lose. I mean... If I had my family, I would avoid a fight with these guys as much as possible, however I'm the one who would be more willing to take the fight to the extreme if I can't help it. Bad boys in general have more will than power
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 07:20 PM
10

Bad girls are girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 07:07 PM
–

Exactly. It's as if I said that I don't like very busty women, while I imagine women with breasts the size of watermelons, and then I said that I prefer women with breasts that are just a little big, like melons.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 06:09 PM
59

I believe that a minority of women specifically like bad boys. However, it seems that for most women, being bad doesn't disqualify a man as much as being ugly and poor. If a man a woman is attracted to turns out to be bad, she will still be attracted to him. Bad men who are handsome enough or rich enough will have as much sex as they want, and it won't just be with "'teenagers'" but also with adult women who are considered conventionally normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 05:31 PM
–

They prefer six-pack abs When they say they like "dad bods," they're picturing Jason Momoa. It's like when women say they don't like very muscular men, but get wet when they think of Henry Cavill, and then say he's "not very muscular" when in fact he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 05:24 PM
1

Then Black Pill is Blue Pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 02:36 PM
7

I don't know what "grape culture" means
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 09:08 PM
–

I think this must be the men you are involved with. Because the wife's possible pain is a cause for concern for other types of men, I believe that women who like it are with men who do it carefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:58 PM
–

I've only met two women who I knew I didn't like. Everyone else that my wife or I have had this kind of conversation with said they liked it, but that's not a very representative number either.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:36 PM
–

There are men and women who like it, so I don't understand why your post specified "men." And I don't know of any men who have become bitter about it, but I've seen men on Reddit who have become bitter because their wives denied them what they easily gave to other men (including anal), and I think it's completely normal for a man to become bitter in this situation, because it's one thing for a woman to reject anal on principle, and another thing for her to reject anal specifically with her husba…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:34 PM
-2

Am I talking about all women here? Stop assuming what people say and respond to what they actually said. And stop assuming what life is like for anonymous people on the internet. For someone who claims to be married to give me this advice is hypocritical and ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 05:22 AM
5

Being alone is better than having a bad relationship. Some men who are always alone just don't know it. It is worth mentioning that a person desperate for water would drink pee, which seems crazy to someone who has access to clean water.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 03:08 AM
1

Ironically, most of the time the "real men" these women end up with later on are someone with a profile they would have rejected before becoming single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:17 AM
1

My wife is bisexual. Threesomes are out of the question. It's something we've both thought about and wanted, but when the opportunity came up, we both jumped ship. It's just not worth it, it's nice in idea, but probably not so nice in practice (like a lot of other things in life). Besides, we're not hedonists and that's a sin.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:14 AM
2

I don't want to. I'm married. You assume too much while ignoring what was said. You add subtext while ignoring the text.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:12 AM
1

I know it's frustrating to you to assume all women are hoes that can be bought... but right now there are women in your city that are rubbing the shoulders of their beloved who "justs" works at the grocery store. Because she likes HIM. I didn't assume anything like that, you're the only one assuming something here. I was earning minimum wage when I started dating my wife, and now I earn a lot of money and I'm still with the same woman. If I assumed something like you said, I would stay single. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:11 AM
–

The problem with this with human beings is that human beings cannot choose their own cover. There are limited changes we can make, but there is a limit. So what you said might make sense for books, but not for people. The publisher can change every aspect of the book, but a man cannot add a single cubit to his height.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:39 AM
2

But 10 is not a number that represents all men very well. I think there must be 3 billion men in the world or something like that, so "10" is not enough to say anything about men in general
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:36 PM
3

A bad woman is still a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:54 PM
8

The average is low. The average Brazilian IQ is 2 digits, being "above average" is not a big deal. In fact I would say if you assume these men are above average because of their looks or something else, it's just the Halo effect affecting your judgment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:37 PM
5

Suddenly, many women who have "always been interested" in the guy confess this repressed love.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:19 PM
14

In other words, the most handsome man you know has had several girlfriends, even though he is stupid. I know intelligent men who have never had the opportunity to have a girlfriend, and they are very far from being "the most handsome man I know"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:09 PM
2

Personality is not useless, but it is highly overrated. Because if you're really bad at other things, a good personality won't help you, on the other hand, if you're really good at other things, a bad personality won't stop you. The same for mental health. Personality is so overrated to the point where people without any information deduce "it must be personality".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:24 PM
9

If everything you said is true, this man can find a woman this year, if he wants to. If he remained single after you, it's because he wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:19 PM
-1

Yes. These are contradictory things. It's funny that in both contradictory situations, the way of speaking is in a way that shames the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:18 PM
11

Yes. It's a lot like "if you're poor, it's because you're lazy." I've seen this said to people who worked long, long hours a day and when they got home they had to take care of their younger siblings.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:16 PM
5

I don't know. All I supposedly know about this guy is his testimony. But I guarantee that he is not a lottery winner, nor the president of a country, nor is he as handsome as Chris Patt.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:15 PM
10

You have a good point. My post criticizes the view that a supposed bad personality prevents someone from getting a woman. I say that in the same way that a good personality does not guarantee a woman, a bad personality is not a deterrent, and therefore deducing that a man is single because of a bad personality is flawed. There are many factors that matter most before we get to "personality"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:13 PM
5

I'm not saying that personality is irrelevant. I'm saying it's unnecessary. A good personality, in conjunction with other things, can get you a girlfriend, however a bad personality alone will not stop you from getting one. Personality alone does not guarantee or prevent someone from having a girlfriend or wife. I am criticizing the view that personality is a hindrance.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:11 PM
4

She was not an outlier. All men powerful enough had one or more wives. If Eva Brown had died 10 years before Hitler, he would have died alongside another woman if he had wanted to. Lula himself remarried a woman who was already with him before he was a widower.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:06 PM
3

At best, your personality will receive indifference if you don't meet the minimum levels of appearance, money or power. It is worth mentioning that such minimum levels are not achievable by all men, a certain amount of luck is required.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:02 PM
7

It still isn't an impediment. What stops them is the lack of money, appearance or power. When one of these men wins the lottery, they quickly get some pretty woman pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:00 PM
-3

Hitler was married to Eva Brown until death did them part
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:59 PM
1

We don't do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:50 PM
1

I don’t think fathers have any say whatsoever in their daughter’s sex lives? This is something where it doesn't make sense for you to ask anonymous third parties. The person who should know what you think in the first place should be you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:37 PM
7

nihilist, atheist, anti-theist, and apolitical I know a lot of guys like that who also say they're not like other guys. It seems like a desperate attempt to be "different"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:35 PM
5

It's a strategy for having sex. A bad strategy that tends to fail is the result of desperation
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:32 PM
7

They are not necessarily doing something wrong. In most cases they were just unlucky, whether in looks, money or something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:00 AM
–

This is false in both dating and job interviews, and I live in a country that is more difficult than the USA If what the company offers is not interesting to me, I will go to another company, simple as that. It's worth noting that companies are announcing that they need employees, but I'm not announcing that I need to be hired. Furthermore, nothing you said is a duty, the fact that it works normally asskm does not impose duties on anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:12 PM
1

Just don't date them Just don't jump into Leonardo Di Caprio or Henry Cavill's lap if they appear in front of you, don't get involved with these "old predators".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 11:41 PM
-1

It's just resentment and nothing more. Younger women are more competitive and this infuriates some older women to the point of trying to denigrate them, but as admitting this is socially damaging to oneself, they wear the mask of "protecting young women". And the insults are also disguised, instead of calling young women stupid, they call them immature, and so on. It's all resentment because the younger one is prettier, nothing more than that. The 45-year-old woman who criticizes the "predator" …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 11:31 PM
4

This is the correct answer. The women on this sub keep saying that men are "autistic" and don't understand "nuances", but what you said is so simple to understand that I don't know how there are questions like the OP's, plus there are many women with good marriages successful and over 40, what they did was choose right in their youth. There is a difference between: Meet a 40-year-old woman today; Meeting a woman at 20, being chosen by her and choosing to love her for the rest of your life. I thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:38 PM
6

True
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:23 PM
1

This is the point. It's not always the same woman, most of the time it's a very similar woman, who rejected other guys with a profile close to yours, while dating your opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 04:36 AM
1

How common is this scenario really? You were unnecessarily specific in your scenario to the point of making it more unusual than it actually is. It happened to me, but I live in Brazil, I've never set foot in the "silicon valley", and therefore my experiences don't fit, since you added irrelevant details to the question. That being said, women who in the past would reject me, showed interest in me after my 30s, they never directly rejected me in my youth, but only became involved with men comple…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 04:20 AM
5

I've been mocked by women who thought I was a virgin, and I wasn't even 20 years old, imagine if I were 32 like today. I've seen a group of single mothers leaving a church, making fun of a member of the church because he was a virgin, they did it behind his back, I almost dated one of them and that was one of the reasons why I didn't want to do it anymore (ironically she married a virgin man and had children with him later), they are the type of false Christians who go to church to reset their m…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:36 PM
2

"pro-choice" of what? Choosing between killing or not killing? I am in favor of innocent people living, but sometimes for that to happen, someone who threatens innocent lives must be killed, such as a criminal armed and holding hostages or someone trying to murder an innocent baby.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 03:50 AM
2

money is not controllable, rich men are heirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 02:39 AM
–

I need to make sure that you haven't cheated on me Paternity test not is fidelity test. The fact that the child is the husband's does not mean that the wife did not cheat on him
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:56 PM
2

I want to have children, my male friends want to have children and my female friends want to have children. I think what you said must be a characteristic of your social circle, it must be common in the men you let be part of your life
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:51 PM
2

You are right
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:10 PM
1

I've seen women wanting to "save" misfit men, and I've seen it often, but I don't attribute it to any "savior complex" because all the men in question were very handsome. I believe that a "real savior complex" would not be so restricted to handsome men. I know a lot of ugly men with problems that aren't self-inflicted, but the woman with the supposed "savior complex" would rather worry about the handsome thug who needs saving from himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 07:41 PM
3

I used to tell my wife that she is much prettier without makeup. However, she likes to put on makeup and when I see her putting on makeup, she seems to be very happy, so I stopped saying it, as it clearly doesn't seem to be a question of "getting prettier". Talking to her, she says that when she's feeling pretty, she wants to put on makeup, to me it's strange, but it makes sense if I consider her actions about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 03:42 PM
2

I don't agree. Because usually the man in question is too young to know enough about these issues. You don't often see 30-year-old men complaining about the "friend zone", but rather 16-year-old teenagers who were sold a lie. I'm 32 years old now, but I was in the "friend zone" when I was young because I believed that the world worked differently, my father and mother never gave me any guidance about relationships and I had little contact with my father because my mother had custody. All the adv…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 12:55 AM
2

The hatred and contempt of this sub is for all of them. Basically, the term "friendzone" is simplified by bluepill women, always with the interpretation that attributes the most vile motivation possible to the man: "a man who dehumanizes women and pretended to be friends with a woman to get sex"; "a man who wanted to trade kindness in exchange for a blowjob, but then got angry when the blowjob was denied"; What all these men have in common is that they are not physically attractive enough, hence…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 11:54 PM
5

I think people need to stop confusing "high" with "superficial". A Lamborghini that has a good chance of exploding when you turn the key is a low standard, but a superficial one; A Uno Mile that never fails and is 99.99% safe is a very high standard; When women say they only want the minimum, it is actually a frustration they feel, because the men they are attracted to and have been in relationships with are not offering even the minimum, they are the exploding Lamborghini. So they say: "Just do…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:56 PM
0

I have no preference. In general, men's lives are more difficult, my adolescence was really bad compared to girls from the same environment. However, most of my difficulties in adolescence were due to a lack of guidance and information, and I believe I am capable of supporting my children in this matter. I see men's suffering in general as a lack of power to deal with external problems, while women's problems are usually self-inflicted, so boys should be counseled and supported to "gain power", …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:49 PM
6

Men are the majority of victims of violent crimes. "dangerous world" is a criterion that would make someone choose a girl over a boy
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:35 PM
2

Staying with a woman who was part of a betrayal is bad. She doesn't respect other people's relationships and will probably be unfaithful in her own, perhaps she will still continue to get involved with the man she really wants
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:04 AM
1

In absolute terms, I agree that it is not enough. However, society is more tolerant of a woman who literally murders her own child against the father's consent than of a father who abandons the child without killing him. Therefore, in relativistic terms, there is an exaggeration of emotion regarding paternal abandonment. Therefore, the more society disapproves of paternal abandonment, the more hypocritical society becomes, and this is also socially bad. Society should want the best interests of …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:21 AM
1

Before a child is born, it already exists. A woman is already a mother when she is pregnant, and the man who impregnated her also participated in this choice. Of course, legally the mother can execute the child while the father cannot, but seeing things from this perspective is not what a healthy society should do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:12 AM
2

What society should do is crack down on biological baby daddies that walk off. This already happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:09 AM
12

One problem should not be solved by creating another, and the solution to the problem should not be to encourage the kind of behavior that led to the problem. I wish all boys were with their fathers, and that those fathers were men whom their mothers genuinely loved, but as I said, the solution to this is not in my hands, and people should have freedom of choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:03 AM
0

I don't know what 5 ft "N" means, so I'm going to ignore that. Mary: Overall, Mary is the best by far, but the low sex drive and the $50 a month is a turn off, especially now that $1.00 is worth R$6.00. And this "low sex drive" thing is a stereotype of the Christian woman who marries a virgin, the Christian woman who manages to marry a virgin doesn't have a "low sex drive", but rather "high moral fiber to resist offers of sex". I'm also assuming that she's a genuine Christian, and therefore the …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:54 AM
16

Rewarding bad behavior is the same as encouraging it. If, even recognizing the risk of having to raise a child alone, many women neglect character and good personality when choosing a partner, it would be worse if this risk did not exist because of the abundance of good men wanting to be stepfathers. In addition, it is unfair to potential stepfathers, who are also part of society. This would only place more burdens on those who carry society on their shoulders. If a woman does not want to be a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:36 AM
4

I can agree. But remember that SIMPS men are also men, and I think that if you don't exclude them from the group, what you called the "majority" probably becomes the "minority". It's as if you said, "Most men (who are athletes) have strong bodies."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 01:22 PM
1

You're right, although my anecdote is different (I also have a friend going through a divorce, but our friends' dynamics aren't exactly like that). But outside of my circle of friends I notice a tendency for men to side with women, especially single men, so I believe there are ulterior motives when these things happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 01:12 PM
0

Because they feel upset and insulted. They want a partner but they don't get anyone's attention to a certain extent, so when they do get some attention, they are not the first choice and it is not genuine love It's as if there were several people at a party you weren't invited to, you wanted to enter and they didn't let you. But the next day, after the party ends, they ask you to clean up the mess alone and therefore feel like you have to consider yourself lucky for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 12:49 PM
1

I simply omitted the obvious, because writing in English is difficult. It's obvious that age range matters, but a 60-year-old woman was once 20, and by the way, the Japanese woman you mentioned as ugly was very attractive at 20. I really didn't think I needed to be so explicit, in fact I still don't think I need to be, anyone who doesn't understand the existence of nuances has problems with interpretation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 06:58 PM
4

Your examples are terrible, you chose to compare two women in which one is half the age of the other. Furthermore, the older woman is facing serious health issues at the moment. What I said is general, being true 99% of the time if we respect the age and health of those involved. After all, a 90-year-old survivor of a terrible fire will never look like Salma Hayek in "From Dust Til Dawn," but the vast majority of 20-year-old women don't need much to look attractive to men their age, Likewise, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 06:27 PM
3

I would agree with the criticism "men are undemanding when it comes to women's personality", but the problem is that this post is a comparison between men and women, and in reality, when it comes to personality, women are equally undemanding. demanding, or even worse. Handsome shitty men are still very successful with women. The reasons why "it's easier for women" are not personality patterns, but: Men are less demanding in superficial standards: A woman's height doesn't matter as much, nor does…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 01:12 PM
–

I really don't know if you have bad intentions or if there is some detail of English that I'm not catching. As it's not my first language and I've never set foot in an English-speaking country, I can't answer you properly, all I can do is ask you not to get attached to this level of precision in the language, if you're going to get attached to that, then it depends on your intention.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:44 PM
–

In my experience, older women who are single tend to shame younger women and call them immature and other derogatory adjectives, especially when the younger woman is being successful in relationships. But this isn't "in the last few years", I'm 32 and to me it seems like it's always been like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:03 PM
0

Which men? Because here I have seen the criticism of Beta Bucks directly. No man wants to be beta bucks, he wants to be chosen by the woman in her best years, which is the opposite of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 06:30 PM
–

A man should definitely pay attention to this, especially if she is a student. I'm married. But if I were single and didn't pay attention to these details for an adult woman, I would probably just miss a flirting opportunity, now if I don't pay attention to this for a 17 year old student, I run the risk of going to prison. You're not a man, so you're not in a position to underestimate what a girl with raging hormones can do to your freedom and your career to the point of saying "you shouldn't pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 06:22 PM
13

I think a lot of them don't end up alone, but they "settle for less than" and that's really bad for men. Personally, I would never get involved with a woman who sees me as her failure, a woman who looks at me and feels "I was the one who was with Chad and Tyrone and failed and ended up settling down with this guy."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 06:08 PM
–

Who here said this is attractive? At what point did I say that this attention is desirable?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 05:20 PM
–

I don't have the power to decide people's interest in me, it is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 05:18 PM
–

I'm 32 and I'm a teacher. I get attention from women from 17 to 36, never above that, so in my experience this is false. Women want men their own age, or older, or even a little younger. And younger women tend not to want nice guys, but older women do. The Friendzone nice guy is typical husband material after he hits 30, so a lot of nice guys feel like they're more attractive after 30 than they were in their 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 03:11 PM
24

Look on the bright side. This happened during the dating period, imagine if it was after getting married or after having children. Things like this in dating are actually a blessing, dating is a period for you to get to know the person you're with, and well... that's what happened to you
/r/MensRights09/07/24 01:43 PM
1

It's interesting how specific you are in saying "in the basement." Basements are not places made for living, but for storage. Couldn't she live in the rest of the house like a normal human being? I wouldn't even put an animal to live in my basement. If you have to put the woman in the basement to give her the equivalent loser status you would give to a man living with his parents, it indicates that you have noticed the difference between how society views both situations. Is a man who lives with…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 06:20 AM
6

It's because to our society, the things that make a woman "amazing" are just a Monday to a man. What they see as a "plus" in women is "the minimum" for men. It's interesting that they do this while arguing that men and women are equal, or that men are unnecessary. To exemplify: A woman who lives with her parents is just a woman, while a woman who lives alone is "strong and independent" A man who lives with his parents is "a failed loser", while a man who lives alone is just a man
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 05:31 AM
1

I like both, but I like the original more because of the nostalgia (I was a kid when I played it). And since the games were in English (I don't understand spoken English, and when I was a kid I didn't understand written English either), the original one seemed to me like someone who didn't even have a personality (because I didn't understand the characters' lines). The newer trilogy comes with dubbing and subtitles in Portuguese (I'm Brazilian), so it's easier for me to get attached to its perso…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 07:57 PM
2

I don't have a problem with that. Some games I usually create female characters in, like Skyrim and Oblivion There are others in which I usually create male characters, like Fallout, PoE, Dragon Age, etc. I also really like Lara Croft. In Diablo 2 my favorite character is the Sorceress, but the second is the Paladin. In Mario Kart my favorite is Daisy In Bomberman, I only play with male characters It all depends on me.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 07:38 PM
0

I am more cautious around women than I am around men. My second job is as a teacher, and I don't mind being alone with a man in a closed classroom, but with a woman I always keep the door open and choose the computer closest to the door. Besides, 2 wrongs don't make a right. Men who are more cautious around men are simply wrong, and their mistake doesn't justify yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 04:40 PM
-1

If you need to spin the situation against the man, turning it into "have sex with me or this is the end of our friendship," then you don't have anything real to condemn the guy against. This just means that you are incapable of having a legitimate, damning question about the guy who is in the Friendzone. It's quite simple, if you need to interpret someone in a vile way, it's because you don't see real evil in that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 02:20 PM
15

My issue with the claim that sex is a psychological need is that it places pressure on the person who is denying sex This is a bad criterion. Things are what they are, regardless of whether the result of this puts pressure on it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:17 PM
4

Bezzos is not a good example. His family has always had money. He went to college at a time when very few people had the opportunity to do so. In practice, Bezzos never had to run; many financially successful people have less wealth than Bezzos' family had when he was born. One of his family's estates, from before he became a billionaire, is 25,000 acres of land. Most financially successful people will never reach that point. Not to mention that he was born in the United States.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:22 PM
1

He is not talking about rejection. There are more serious things at stake, such as reputation assassination, public humiliation, among other things. Nowadays, for the sake of his own safety, men should even be concerned about not looking at women in the "wrong way."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 04:07 PM
6

tbh saying that you're romantically interested in someone you're newly acquainted with feels really uncomfortable and way too early cause you just recently met, idk how you guys do it without making it look like you're taking things too fast. If you are handsome and have enough money, by doing this you will appear to be a man who is clear about his intentions, who knows what he wants without fussing around, an assertive man who goes straight to his real goals. If you are not handsome or do not h…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 04:04 PM
8

Don't confuse "need" and "driven" Sex is necessary for survival. Without it, humanity will end in 100 years. The motivation that leads to sex is not the same thing as the need for sex; throughout your text you treat them as if they were the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:59 PM
9

Exactly. Let me make an analogy with exaggeration to clarify the feeling that this type of female behavior causes in me. Boy: "How about we buy this land together and plant corn, pumpkins and other things?" Girl: "I'm not interested in that" So the boy struggles alone, grows up, becomes a man, buys the land, starts raising some animals and planting some crops. The girl, aware of this, approaches a table full of everything that was collected and says: Girl: "How about inviting me for dinner and m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:56 PM
1

How do you reject women who friend-zoned you? One of them simply called me a few years ago and said that she had changed her mind and that I should just leave my girlfriend (who is now my wife) and start what we should have started before. The other one simply tried to destroy my girlfriend's (who is now my wife) reputation in every way possible. She never directly admitted to me that she wanted a relationship with me, but her hatred for my wife and the fact that she talked nostalgically to othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:49 PM
13

* Personality is a big influence on potential; * Character is what defines whether someone will abandon you because they achieve success in what they seek. And it has nothing to do with "you liking them", it has to do with "being better" You can like people with bad personalities and characters, and they have no potential for growth, and if they do achieve it, they will not remain loyal to you. At no point did I talk about "liking"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 01:17 PM
14

More reasons why dating men “with potential” is stupid: 1. Could be a bad investment. 2. Will upgrade to a different lover when he moves up the social. Being someone’s Day 1 means nothing if you two grow apart or you meant nothing to him. 3. Its Quasi-Golddigging. Why not want a woman to love you for who you are instead of a woman who only wants you because you MIGHT be successful? 1 and 2: It can also be a good investment, which is why women should have higher standards for personality and char…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 01:00 PM
–

Involuntary celibacy has a cause. And this cause also has other problems as a consequence. When I was a teenager, in my technical school class, there was a very ugly boy who was bullied. Everyone has been bullied at one time or another, but no one was bullied as badly and dehumanizingly as he was, and since he was small and weak, he had no way of defending himself. In addition, physical attractiveness is not "only" important for sex, but also for getting a good job and being treated decently in …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:34 AM
–

Actual incel culture and the community has existed for like 15ish years maybe more. There absolutely are things that single them out. All the other dudes who want to get laid but are failing or whatever, the name fits but they aren't in the community. In fact, incels have always existed. There have always been men who have failed to get sex, and this has nothing to do with any community on the internet. The looks thing is a pointless discussion so I'll skip that. Ignoring "looks" when talking ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:15 AM
–

People are trying to create their own monsters. If person "A" treats person "B" as if he were a monster, person "A" should not claim victim status if "B" decides to act like a monster.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:05 AM
–

Incels are not "evil", they are ugly. But to attack them without sounding superficial, you need to attack their personality, which is why they are called bad, misogynistic, etc. There is no such thing as "incel ideology", "incel ideas" or "incel subculture". There are incels who believe in the black pill, incels who believe in the red pill, incels who believe in the blue pill, incels who don't even know anything about "any pill", etc. The only thing they have in common is that they want to have …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:00 AM
1

It depends: If the "almost incel" is in this condition because he weighs 50kg and is 190cm tall, muscles will definitely make him quite attractive, even with an average face; If the "almost incel" is like I was (172cm tall and 50kg), muscles will make him reasonably attractive, in fact this worked completely for me, who now weighs 80kg and is quite strong. My face is also average If the "almost incel" has a strabismus, a weak chin, and is 150cm tall, then muscles will not help much. Look at "bef…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 01:41 AM
1

Things that men think women care about, but actually don't: muscles (at the most, it's a bonus) Absolutely wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 06:09 AM
–

Here in Brazil, women tell men that it's about personality when it obviously isn't. You have to be very close to a woman, as well as being out of the game for her to say it's because of looks and money. I'm out of the game because I'm married, so when I'm with my partner, single women who talk about their supposed suitors emphasize money and looks, but when they talk to men who struggle, they say it's personality or "chemistry", I guess. which in the US they call it "spark", which is a vague and…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:51 AM
–

I'm Brazilian and i live in Brazil. And when we say "America" it is an entire continent, in fact it is the entire West, geographically speaking
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:43 AM
–

It's more about them lying about it. Women overestimate the real value they place on personality, hygiene and things like that. It's women who minimize the importance they give to appearance, when in fact they judge how appearance even defines how a guy's personality is seen. Height, eyes, and chin could be the features that determine whether a woman will see a guy as creepy or confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:36 AM
2

In a difficult period of my life, when I was young and had terrible mental health, I hired a prostitute, it's legal in Brazil. But at the time, I gave up on having sex, and I was also impotent, so we just talked a little and became "friends", as we sometimes talked online. She said that they constantly test for STDs, because they are very afraid of catching something, and they do not serve clients who insist on doing it without a condom, on the other hand, she said that "civilian" women who have…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 09:14 PM
1

We are starting from the hypothetical scenario created by the OP. And if she is concerned about STDs, then the scenario proposed by the OP would not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 04:27 PM
-1

Many women only became "interested" in Joe after they had children and gained weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:29 PM
0

He could simply hire a prostitute. Everything you seek with casual sex, you can get with prostitution, and even more. These things are not capable of replacing marriage, which is the real good here, but one is capable of replacing the other, which is satisfying sexual desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 11:16 PM
12

No. It would be better to stay single, so I could do the same things, but without the responsibility of a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 11:14 PM
0

A man has the right to do what has to be done to save his own son's life
/r/MensRights02/07/24 01:47 PM
2

She (I'll call her J) rejected me for many years, so I gave up on her, and at a certain point I decided to dedicate myself to finishing the college I had started, so we also stopped going out for a few years. On the college bus I met a younger woman, we got along well and started dating, one day when I was going out with my girlfriend, we met my "friend" (J) and talked normally, and then the next day another friend (G) in common sent me a message saying that I was being defamed by my girlfriend …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 01:07 PM
3

my ex-female-friend only started seeing me romantically after I had a girlfriend, and she hates my girlfriend (now wife)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 12:34 PM
3

Resisting the urge is different from choosing. And I said it more in the sense of "it is very likely that" than "it necessarily follows", when in doubt it is better not to risk it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 12:42 AM
3

A promiscuous past is an indication of a lack of self-control. I am married, and my wife is not blind and there are definitely people who turn her on visually and in other ways, just like I do, and she is also bisexual. She resisted the urge to get involved with other hot men and women before me, which is an indication that she is not driven by her own sexual impulses. She may feel sexually attracted to other men and women besides me, this is inevitable and part of instinct, just as I feel sexua…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:20 PM
4

The quality of people is not measured by their salaries. There are terrible men earning a lot, especially in countries with low social mobility. In addition, women earn less because they work less and worse, they take more sick leave, they take more time off work to deal with personal matters, they give up more careers to take care of children, that is, it is by choice and not by "structural machismo". If I open a store, is it better to hire a recently married woman with a high chance of getting…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 02:34 AM
7

some men can't handle being with a woman who makes more From the problems I've seen with this, the man's problem is never about the woman earning more, but rather about her behavior changing when she earns more. It's about creating opportunities to either point out that she earns more, or stop respecting the husband. It's never about "the wife earning more" but rather how "the wife starts to act when she earns more." In fact, there's a couple of friends of mine where the husband was the sole bre…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 02:28 AM
4

It's no use, people just aren't very smart. People call me an incel when I sympathize with them. Since I am married. They just use "incel" as an insult, but they are not able to realize that it is possible to have empathy with someone even without being in the same condition. There are many evil presumptions about you that will be made by others whenever you speak truths that people are too shallow to recognize.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 03:27 AM
–

What is the most common insult a woman hurls at you when she gets rejected? Gay
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:13 AM
–

Sexual attraction is not a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 09:56 PM
1

Voluntary celibates are Christians who save themselves for their future partner. Mgtows remain single but not necessarily celibate
/r/MensRights15/06/24 02:57 PM
1

I understand what you mean. a hairy, 2m tall, muscular man with a huge scar on his face and an eye patch covering an empty eye socket will still be attractive to women in some way, while a skinny short guy with a weak chin but no deformity some won't attract anyone
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 09:23 PM
11

Each person draws a line of "ugly" in different places.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 09:14 PM
1

There are a lot of boring women out there and men will tolerate them for a while if they are pretty. This is when it comes to romantic involvement. What I'm going to say is anecdotal, but I see that boring women, if they're ugly, stay single, if they're pretty, they get several relationships that don't last long.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:51 PM
2

Appearance always matters more than personality, and this is often denied because women perceive a man's personality. through appearance. A Chad and an Incel can tell the same dark joke in exactly the same way, the Chad will be seen as funny while the Incel will be seen as scary. If a Chad is imposing in a conflict, he is seen as "protective", if an Incel is imposing, he will be seen as "violent" The Halo effect is very strong, when a woman says "I like his personality", she should really say "I…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 07:28 PM
–

are there really men who want to cheat and can't? There is none. "Any" man who can get a woman can cheat, but an average man would have to make more of an effort than saying "yes" to a random person like an average woman would. Having a girlfriend makes a man more attractive to other women, and getting married amplifies this effect. A man who is a single 5 is a dating 6 and a married 7, because of pre-selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 11:14 PM
2

You can cheat on your partner occasionally. But you can't do it all day long. The more times you cheat: The more you leave traces; The more careless you are with the traces (it's a proven psychological phenomenon); The more your behavior will change towards your husband, which will generate distrust. Not to mention that you can't hide a possible pregnancy and if the father is very different from your husband, then he will find out or be very suspicious on the day the child is born. And a series …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:03 PM
1

I said you need, not want. If that's how you view men, then the men you're hanging out with are definitely terrible and you need an environment with healthier male figures. It's an obvious deduction, but it still leaves room for a few other possibilities other than "there's a hidden evil motive behind the good things men do."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:50 PM
2

If women wanted to cheat as much as men, many more men would be getting laid "As much as", or "more than". We don't know. Women could cheat all day every day if we wanted Women can't do that. A woman who cheats on her husband every day will eventually be discovered. There are many risks in cheating every day. It's not just a question of "demand," but also of "ability to hide."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:44 PM
5

Whoever is "concluding" that men are more likely to cheat because of this is wrong. The platform's target audience is men, so obviously the customers will be men. If 90% of the male accounts were fake Chads, we might have a different result, we would only know by testing. In any case, I doubt that the women who fall for Chadfishing are all single; Women don't need any specific platform to cheat, any social network will do. In fact, Instagram is even better because you can't justify to your husba…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:40 PM
9

"women don’t want to cheat as much as men" is different from "women don't need an app to cheat"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:30 PM
0

If this is true, then it should be no secret to his wives that they do this. Married men who send dick pics to other women are in a relationship where their wives are somehow okay with it, because eventually some woman will report this behavior to the man's wife. I find this funny, because I have never seen a woman break up with her husband over the argument that he sends dick pics to other women on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:25 PM
9

Women don't even need to go out on the street. If my wife wants to cheat on me, she just needs to unblock someone on Facebook and say "yes".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:09 PM
–

......but what if I don't want to be persecuted? become obese or anorexic, and throw your money and wealth away
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:59 PM
1

It's interesting how you try to turn a good thing for a man like "making your partner laugh" into something bad just to criticize men. Not everything men do for their partners has an underlying selfish motivation, and I suppose you need to review what kind of men you're dating so you don't get involved with men like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 05:50 PM
4

Search on google images
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 05:06 PM
-1

Toxic, abusive women and downright assholes also have exponentially more success with men than genuinely wholesome women. This is false. It turns out that mentally healthy women don't stay on the dating market for long and so you don't notice them, plus there's the whole issue of your social circle. Men who have some power of choice prefer mentally healthy women, but troubled women can achieve something with men who don't have many options, but this is not the same as being successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 04:55 PM
3

All the abusive men I've met were either very handsome, or the woman was financially dependent on him, or he had significantly more money than the woman. Most women are superficial and would tolerate bad men for the sake of beauty or money. You won't often see a financially stable woman with an abusive, ugly, poor man.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 04:50 PM
14

Strong jaw, "predator eyes", skin color, lots of money, height, etc. When standards are limited to things like this and everything else is ignored, they are shallow and not high. I know a woman who married a virgin and a man who was also a virgin, he is tall and financially stable (but not rich), but he is not handsome (or ugly), he is also very ethical, he treats her well and everything indicates that He will be a great family man. From my point of view she has a high standard, a much higher st…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 04:45 PM
45

I'm a man and I completely disagree with this. Most women do not have high standards and are not demanding, but rather have superficial standards. If you meet these superficial standards, you can treat women like disposable fleshlights and still be persecuted. If you are a 666 man, you can do everything incels are wrongly accused of doing and you will still be fine. If women had high standards, just looks or money shouldn't be enough, it would also be necessary to have a good personality/moralit…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 04:28 PM
1

Most 20yos look 16... This is impossible by definition. If you think most 20-year-olds look 16, you have the wrong picture of what 16- and 20-year-olds look like.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 02:01 PM
1

You are right
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:57 PM
–

This can lead to jealousy in some guy for the reasons described, but you need a logical leap to say that this is a general rule. Most guys are simply disgusted by women with high N Counts. Even those who also have high count
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:54 PM
3

I'm a teacher and I don't meet "the wrong people", I just end up meeting "too many people". My students range in age from 17 to 70 and when they discuss these things among themselves (So-and-so saying he can't find someone) it's always the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 07:16 PM
1

I used quotation marks around "Forbidden" because I don't know a more precise word for what I want to express in English. My language is Portuguese. And that's not really what matters in this question. The quotation marks should be enough for you to know that it's not literal, at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 07:00 PM
20

Exactly. This "experiment" occurs naturally from time to time, there is no need to plan anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 06:03 PM
2

You are thinking the opposite of reality. Those who need an experiment like this are precisely those who do not trust their partners; If I did this type of experiment with my wife, I would break her trust in me. I would also lose trust in her if she did a test like this with me; Married people are not blind, they feel attraction to others and are constantly tempted. I am not Chad, but pre-selection makes me attractive to some women and I reject them (even though I feel physically attracted). In …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 05:42 PM
0

In the lesbian relationships that I know personally, there is always a woman who has masculine mannerisms (in one case she even wears men's clothing). And the "masculine woman" ends up doing roles traditionally associated with men, like paying the bill
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 02:33 PM
3

I'm not an incel. However, whenever I saw a seemingly ideal family, I felt inspired. If I were an incel, maybe I wouldn't feel inspired because I wouldn't have any hope of having a family, either because I would be too short or my face would be crooked, I don't know. I would probably try to ignore it, but I don't know if I could. The feeling wouldn't be good either way, it could be jealousy or frustration. An incel, In order not to have any negative feelings from this, an incel has to be somewha…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:02 PM
4

Yes, and men certainly choose their behaviors. Which the woman is then blamed for It is you who chooses your boyfriend, not me. So the person responsible for the consequences of this choice is not me or "men", but you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:25 AM
4

The same thing happened with the Brazilian football player, Kaká Your answer was very complete, I wish I could give 900 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:18 AM
9

Woman: "Be better" 150cm man: "Thanks, that was great advice, I'm going to grow up now and be 190cm"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:15 AM
0

There are women who like bad guys and there are women who like good men. Despite this, most of the time, looks and money are what matter most, and personality is more of a tiebreaker, in which some women will choose the bad guy while others will choose the good guy. But in all cases, personality is only considered important after passing the criteria of appearance and money.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 08:48 PM
1

I find it interesting how common it is for people to pay so much attention to their worst opposition, but any sensible opposition that factually shows where the OP is wrong tends to be ignored, and when it is answered it is through some strawman
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 08:43 PM
3

And I don’t just mean looks, money, or status. Their personalities and social skills are often subpar If he has looks, money and status, then any bad personality will be ignored by a significant portion of women. A hot, millionaire Nazi would still be a hit with a lot of women, and I'm not talking about Nazi women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 08:39 PM
2

How they interpret it is up to them, the question is clear, but anyone can distort the meaning. The question is also very direct.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:56 PM
7

All my female friends chose better, they are with good men who also became my friends. And I'm not even going to talk about my wife, after all she chose me and that would be exactly the situation in the post. Sorry, but obviously it's not hard to find better men than this example, denial of this is just a way of trying to validate choosing a shitty man
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:49 PM
9

It's funny that the post assumes you want an incestuous relationship with your sisters. I've already had to threaten my own mother (I said I would kill her boyfriend and then hand me over to the police), so that she would make a better choice and obviously I didn't mean myself. She listened to me, left her idiot boyfriend and found a good man later, unfortunately the good man died in a boat accident, but he was good to her while he was alive. The publication assumes ulterior motives in men who g…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:44 PM
8

I'm married and when I tell a woman to choose better, I'm definitely not telling her to choose me. In fact, I would be a bad choice, despite the pre-selection making some women choose me. I would say "choose better" to any woman who would choose me or some other married man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:38 PM
1

I think both could be true, but the frequency with which I see supposed maturity accompany the decline of one's appearance indicates that the majority of cases in which this happens is the situation dictated by the manosphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 06:40 PM
18

The times I rejected a girl, I was accused of being gay, stupid or slow. I'm heterosexual and married, but it's interesting that I've "suffered" homophobia, after being called "viadinho" by these women ("viadinho" is a pejorative way of saying "gay" in Portuguese).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:34 PM
1

In court it matters, the judge (or jury) is not a robot and he also judges based on his own prejudices
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:48 PM
1

Here in Brazil, if a woman has sex with you because you persuaded her to believe that your income is higher than it actually is, you run the risk of being arrested for "rape by fraud."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:10 PM
5

I believe you, without irony. But I think you are a minority (I am Brazilian, maybe it is different there) Every man I have met with options, including myself, eventually got married (except those who are too young, I am only talking about those over 30/40, I got married this year, at 32). Those with many options got married later, those with few options got married earlier and those without options didn't get married. Some men didn't have many options, but got better after getting married and c…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 12:37 AM
3

This is very relevant to the question you raised, and given your refusal to answer it is presumably what you meant by "superficial standards". And a man who prefers an average looking high value woman to a hot shitty woman has higher morals than he would if it were the other way around. Which contradicts your post. If you were talking about real "high standards" then you would be right, there are very few men who can get a genuine Christian woman, that is only for high value men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 12:06 AM
3

Are you talking about really high standards or shallow standards? I see people confusing high standards with shallow standards all the time here. And having really high standards (and not shallow ones) can indeed be a consequence of high morals, so please define what you mean by "high standards"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 11:55 PM
1

I didn't say you have to be Chad to fuck, That's a straw man. Even Beta Bucks fucks up every now and then "Enough" is different from "necessary," and my comment clearly implies that being Chad is "enough."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 11:31 PM
3

While you're saying that, Chad is out there fucking women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 11:23 PM
15

I don't think any woman with good sense would trade it. Basically, this would mean losing a series of female privileges in exchange for eliminating the risk of something that, although serious, is already small.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 11:00 PM
3

I don't understand the relationship between one thing and the other. I am a heterosexual man, I value body count for several reasons that have already been discussed here, I have sex frequently with my wife and her body count is 1, including me, and depending on the time of the month she is quite sexually active. I have a friend who got married as a virgin, but she really liked the idea of ​​sex, and I'm sure her husband must be having a lot of sex. On the other hand, I see men who complain abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 10:35 PM
1

Good relationship > Single > Bad relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 10:15 PM
25

No. Sex is not synonymous with happiness, yet married men have more sex than single men. I am married and have sex more often than any Chad. I like being married, even if I were Chad I would get married eventually. A tendency of a hedonistic life (going out having sex is a hedonistic characteristic) is that pleasures are very short-term, and hedonism tends to sacrifice the long term. Married men are happier and happiness in marriage is greater the fewer different sexual partners they have. Conse…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 10:15 PM
2

They shouldn't, at least not with these women. Prostitutes charge cheaper, so the choice is between abstaining from sex or having sex with a prostitute, even then it won't be the same as enthusiastic sex
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:23 PM
9

It's interesting how you alternate between conservative women and modern women in your argument, but without saying it directly, while at the same time generalizing
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:17 PM
3

Who the fk are we to say who a women sleeps with? A potential partner. And we must make these judgments before becoming one flesh with someone. I've already dismissed women for this reason. Men want to be desired and be with women who party with them, not with women who use sex as a bargaining chip, like someone who implicitly says, "Be good to my kids, and take them to dinners, and take care of me, and you'll have sex, but not as good sex as those who didn't give me any of that and left me with…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:14 PM
–

Can have sex is not equal have sex. I can have sex with other woman, but i have sex only with my wife; We can have sex every day, but we don't
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 09:31 PM
–

0.01% is an exaggeration. 5% is a more realistic number. These men can have sex with a different woman a week just by existing, they don't need any talent, talk or personality. Even if they are few, they attract many women. And the women who are disgusted by casual sex are the conservative ones, but they are a minority, they go to church and not to clubs; Modern women fight over guys like this, I've seen it happen a lot. Those who fail are the ones who look for "Brad" later.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 07:59 PM
–

Exactly For Brad to have sex, it requires emotional connection, dinners, commitment, etc.; For Chad, nothing is needed; It's not about red flags, it's about sexual attraction, simply Chad is better looking than Brad, simply Chad is who the woman genuinely wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:47 PM
–

It actually all has to do with how hot the woman thinks the guy is, and that's more about looks over anything else, and then it's about money, status and power. And only then comes personality, which is more of a tiebreaker. If the guy is handsome enough, the red flags don't matter, if he isn't, then he will get the woman's leftovers or not even that. Of course I'm talking about modern women and not conservative women who seek to marry virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:36 PM
1

B.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 05:32 PM
5

Most incels are incels because they are ugly, and I don't see how being a single mother makes your child born ugly
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 08:59 PM
1

Almost all men who start going to the gym do so after the age of 20, at least that's how it is at the gym I go to. And almost all the young men there are either overweight or underweight, while the men over 30 or 40 are fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 06:56 PM
1

Your comment contains some errors. OP did not specify the US, but your data is from the US; Your data is pre-pandemic; Men tend to inflate their sexual options; Having regular sex with a woman is not the same thing as having "sexual options", because having only one person to have sex with is not having "options". I am married and I have no sexual options, as I am morally restricted to having sex only with my wife. There are also guys who have sex with a woman because she was the only one he cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 06:53 PM
0

Being optimistic, I would say around 50%. The majority of them are between 27 and 30 years old. Under 25, most men have no options, but they can still take advantage of some opportunities From 30 onwards there is a significant improvement because many of these men will begin to improve financially, at the same time that many women in the same age group will be more desperate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 05:33 PM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 08:37 PM
1

Both can feed off each other, so there is no difference in importance. Money can buy status, and with status you make money.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 09:40 PM
4

True Any man who can have women of 20 can also have women of 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 02:50 PM
1

Anedotic;
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 02:26 PM
3

Being attractive is about looks. Being the sort guys want to date is about offering more than that. True.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 02:22 PM
3

I'm not from USA And BMI is inaccurate
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 02:21 PM
9

Physically yes
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 01:50 PM
5

It should be rare, probably some cases involving: Prostitutes (The guy has sex with the woman because she is paying for it) Closeted gays; Virgin men who need to lose the stigma of being virgins, and that's why they don't miss the opportunity. I think it must be rare because most women are physically attractive to a certain extent to men
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 01:30 PM
3

The only women that are threatened by prostitution are the ones who's biggest contribution to the relationship is between their legs I can see reasons why a conservative woman who is saving herself for her future husband would condemn prostitution. Honestly, an answer like: "Prostitution is a sin" is perfectly coherent when it comes from a woman whose only sexual partner is her husband. My point is with women who have casual sex, there is nothing reprehensible about prostitution that is not repr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 12:56 PM
-6

In Brazil, prostitution is legal, but it is not regulated. Many deputies and senators even defend regulation. I am against it, as this would result in prostitutes being taxed like all regular workers already are, which would definitely be sexual exploitation by the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 12:19 AM
-10

Prostitution is one thing, trafficking in women is another. They advertise on their own on a website in the same way that a restaurant advertises on IFood.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 12:04 AM
1

These women earn more in 1 hour than many people earn in a day. And "a lot" does not mean that it is necessarily so in all cases. If you want a prostitute go find one and stop trying to get every woman to agree with your decision. No presumptions please, this is idiotic. I'm married and I'm here analyzing the hypocrisy of women who have casual sex when they are on the same level as a man who hires prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 12:02 AM
3

No. I think women like that are disciplined. However, they tend to like super masculine men. So I don't think they are red flags, however they want high value men (I mean real high value, not the superficial values that are commonly called "high value")
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:25 PM
1

interest and hobbies is not the same thing interest include: hobbies, values, propurses, objectives, intentions etc
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 05:39 PM
–

Leftist women are a turn off for me. To be left-wing in Latin America you have to be stupid, bad character or both, especially being neighbors with Venezuela, Argentina and Bolivia. Any woman who supports Lula and Latin American dictatorships is not suitable for a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:15 PM
1

Those 80% of divorce filings are not from women married to Chad Thundercock.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 03:02 PM
1

I don't know who Rich Cooper is and I've only seen a Red Pill person use this argument once and it's about a guy I don't even know the name of (and if I posted the link here it would be useless to most of you because the video is in Portuguese) That said, I've often seen this argument as a straw man of, "Women are okay with sharing men they consider to be of high value," and it does happen often and a man who is viewed as being of high value is often able to marry a woman. woman who will wait fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 03:00 PM
0

Men typically give good advice, and most of the criticism here of men's advice is straw men
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 01:02 PM
1

This is neither benevolent nor misogyny. this is misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:34 PM
0

Severe rejections are mainly for sub-5 men Normies typically receive polite rejections
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:43 PM
–

Right. Most women aren't so stupid as to choose the bear over the man in a real situation just to prove how men men are more dangerous. Even if men were that dangerous, then they would do just the opposite, they would choose bears if they were in the forest, but they would respond that they would choose men in the interview, after all, if men are that dangerous, it's better not to speak ill of them. I'm sure a Muslim woman who is beaten by her husband would say that she would choose to have her …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 05:56 PM
–

You couldn't even read the first paragraph of the OP's text?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 02:48 PM
–

By choosing "bear" you signal the supposed moral inferiority of men, as the female ego is fragile, they are expected to answer "bear" in a survey within civilization. However, outside of civilization the situation changes, and survival starts to matter more than an ego massage, so in a forest women would choose the man 99.999...% of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 02:41 PM
-1

"has great chemistry" This term means nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 07:14 PM
4

It's a pragmatic way to increase your relationship success. Christians already defended this, and then statistically it was proven that it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 02:59 PM
5

This post is wrong for specifying it as harmful to men, when pornography is actually harmful to both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 12:10 AM
1

Yes. At least here in Brazil
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:39 PM
3

If she is a feminist or capable of killing a child in the womb, that doesn't matter either. In fact, any of this woke crap is a complete turn off, the only one I would tolerate is the horoscope or some other harmless thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:00 PM
–

They are stupid enough not to know what they themselves would choose in this situation. Close to zero introspection capacity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:41 PM
24

Suddenly the feminist, atheist woman would kneel to all the gods and thank God if a man appeared, and the better armed and potentially dangerous the man, the better. Damn, I'm a man, and if I were alone in the forest and a bear appeared, I would thank God if a group of unknown and well-armed men appeared, the more potential for violence they have, the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:38 PM
15

Women genuinely wouldn't choose the bear. But the mere fact that they say yes says a lot how their minds are dominated by woke culture. They respond that they choose the bear to feel morally superior to men, and to say how men are "monsters". However, in a real survival situation, "no" woman chooses the bear. It's easy to choose the bear by answering a stupid survey, it's difficult to choose the bear when you're in the middle of the forest and have had no food for 2 days. The woman who answered …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:32 PM
1

It is dishonest to blame someone for the expectations you have of the wrong things they would do. A person is to blame for the injustices they do, not the injustices you would like to see them commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:26 PM
2

* Traditional women tend to have higher standards; * Modern women tend to have more superficial standards; The problem is that people use "high" and "superficial" as if they were the same thing, but they aren't. Then communication becomes complicated. Shallow standards place appearance and money requirements far above any personality requirements, while high standards are balanced (and bad personality becomes a turn off) A traditional woman wouldn't be catfished with ChadFishing, on the other ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:22 PM
10

Rules is for normies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:32 AM
1

Anything. Prostitution is already legal in most countries in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:16 PM
6

All biases against men, including conservative men, disappears in the face of the uncertainty of life and death. The survival instinct tends to be stronger than the ego when survival is all that matters This is not the same as when you can say "I give up" and immediately be seen by doctors, nutritionists and the like.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 04:54 PM
1

It is not. When I was a skinny guy, my BMI was normal. No woman wanted anything with me other than friendship Today I am a guy with muscles and fat, but with an overweight BMI, and I am considered more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:59 PM
1

I had much better luck with women after I gained some muscle and fat. I was a skinny sub5 guy, but after I gained weight and gained muscle I became a 6/10 or something around that. I've always heard that women don't like muscles, but in my experience it's a lie, and in the experience of my gym colleagues (who are much more muscular than me) it's also a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:56 PM
7

A reality show is not a real survival situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:49 PM
6

In a survival situation, you prefer a man who will fight for shelter and food. There is a difference between answering this question in the comfort of your home and answering this question in the middle of the woods without having had a good meal for two days.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:46 PM
1

romanticized AF/BB It has already been widely discussed here that it is bad The best man a woman can get, she will get at her peak and not in her decline, so the time to look for the man who respects and values you is at your peak, because after that you will have to sacrifice some qualities that you would like the man to get. your partner had and lowered standards
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:36 PM
2

I find it ironic that many women consider hiring prostitutes to be repulsive at the same time they have casual sex, this is hypocrisy. I understand when a traditional woman says this, but a woman who has casual sex is doing exactly the same as the man who hires a prostitute, the only difference is that she doesn't have to pay, which is irrelevant to the moral issue
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:21 PM
2

Eu quero 2 filhos A boy and a girl A biological and an adopted Idk explain why I want
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:17 PM
1

The reality is that very few women would actually choose the bear if it were a real situation. The answer is given to shout feminism, but in real life the woman would want a very conservative man by her side, and would still obey him. It's very easy to say nonsense like "I'd choose the bear" while you're comfortable having everything you need to live, it's hard to do that when you're actually in the woods while you need shelter and food.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:13 PM
2

I often see women behaving in such a way all the time that if a man acts the same way, he will be lynched or arrested. So I don't think most women would do well
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:50 PM
1

I believe that if I were a woman, it would be easier for me to have remained a virgin before marriage (If I were a straight woman, which is difficult to imagine, as it is easier to see myself as a lesbian) The times I had sex when I was single was due to the fact that I took advantage of an opportunity that I believed would be unique, something like that wouldn't happen if I were a woman. Probably if I were a woman I would be better off economically, due to the social advantages, I wouldn't even…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:44 PM
12

Most women don't do this either.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:33 PM
–

So is it simply feminine exaggeration in response to women hitting the wall?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:30 PM
7

This is very true. When women generalize men because of the negative behavior of some, it becomes clear that these men are precisely the ones they notice and everyone else is invisible, which is ironic because this further encourages these specific men to act as they do. I think female outrage against certain behaviors is completely false, and a lot of what women often criticize, they like or at least tolerate depending on who the man is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:29 PM
3

It doesn't have to work most of the time. If the man makes 3 attempts and succeeds on the third, then it worked for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:20 PM
17

Men don't do that. For every man who did this to you, there were hundreds of others in the room who didn't. You are at a party with hundreds of men, one of them does this and you mistakenly conclude that men do this, ignoring everyone else who didn't even notice you in the place And in fact there are some men who do this, and if they continue to do it it must be because sometimes it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:12 PM
–

Oh yes. Here in Brazil this is common too, I know several 30-year-old guys whose anabolic steroids have left them bald. In that aspect, what you said makes sense, which is ironic, because the disadvantage of becoming bald did not make the man less attractive in general, yet it is pointed out in this sub as "You will be less attractive because you will become bald ", when in fact the reason a man becomes bald is the same thing that makes him more attractive (and makes him stop being invisible and…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:14 AM
–

If this is true, saying that men go bald at 30 is an exaggeration.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:10 AM
–

What is "PED"?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:09 AM
–

Ok. Thank you
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:07 AM
–

I find it difficult to analyze this, because cameras weren't very accessible 30 years ago, so I can't say if the bald men I know started to look like that at 30. All I can say is that today it doesn't happen at 30, at least here in Brazil, when it does happen it's an exception. I tend to believe that when they say this, it is true for the USA. Since I don't see anyone disagreeing or talking about revenge fantasy in the comments. I doubted it, but I'm starting to believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:02 AM
–

So it seems to be something specific to the USA
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:00 AM
–

Most guys you know or most bald guys you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:59 AM
4

This is incongruous, if you didn't care, you wouldn't continue with it. But I'll stop here, and this is my last comment on this conversation, because I've lost interest in what you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:46 AM
–

Is this also true for most men in your age group that you know? (About losing your hair specifically) If it happened to me, I would also choose to be 100% shaved
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:40 AM
–

Wouldn't that be the average age at which men who go bald start going bald? I mean, the process of a bald man may have started at 30, but only became noticeable at 45, for example. Besides, most men over 40 still have a lot of hair, at least in Brazil.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:38 AM
5

Anecdotal is great against general statements (which is what you decided to do), but not against other anecdotes. After all, when a person hears "women do this" at the same time as they look around them and realize that this is not real, they have every reason to doubt it, changing it to "I specifically don't do it", is not a good idea. response. It would only be if you referred to yourself from the beginning. But ok, like I said, English isn't my first language and I might be missing some nuanc…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:36 AM
2

I realize that most people who preach the non-existence of the wall have a very wrong understanding of what the wall would be. They define the wall as if from the woman's 30th birthday onwards, all men vomited when they looked at her, but that's not the case. They ignore the nuances, as well as the fact that some women preserve themselves more than others, as well as that the issue is more about the quality of men they can attract rather than the quantity. In short, they are against a strawman v…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:18 AM
0

I think if you were talking specifically about yourself, you would use a more specific way of speaking. English is not my first language, but it sounds like you wanted to generalize to all women, but now you go off on a tangent saying you were referring specifically to you, as if saying: "I'm not attracted to older men"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:07 AM
1

You care enough to invent otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 11:59 PM
2

And yes, it's not in a woman's best interest to date older men. They forgot to tell my wife and my friends that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 11:52 PM
4

I'm trying to understand the relationship between one thing and another. What does the man's age have to do with this? If the woman hit the wall, then she hit the wall, she is less attractive to any man of any age, whether younger or older. I wouldn't date a woman with 2 children, one from each parent, even if I were 100 years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 11:23 PM
–

I once had an objectively attractive friend and women often approached him. When he had an accident, the nurses literally fought over who would take care of him. Detail: He is bisexual, and men did not approach him. Women do this all the time, even though I'm an average guy, since I started dating women have happened to approach me 0 to 1 time a year, but with my friend it was all the time. Including the wife of a mutual friend we had (and they had sex, so we're no longer friends)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:28 PM
–

Being unable to murder someone because you lack strength is not a virtue. Women abort defenseless babies, and these women would also kill an adult man if the adult man were defenseless. For a woman not to kill a man who is twice as strong as she is after being rejected is not a virtue, it is a weakness. Virtue is being able to do evil and not do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:19 PM
–

This approach is ridiculous. She should offer to buy him a drink
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:11 PM
–

Nice guys don't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:10 PM
–

In my experience, subtly rejecting a woman will get you called "slow" or even "autistic" for not realizing she was interested in you. Rejecting it outright will result in you being called gay, including by women who say they are against homophobia and the like. And it has happened twice that women I rejected acted in a hateful way towards my wife. I haven't rejected many women in my life (and most of them were only after I started dating), but only two of the women I rejected didn't behave like …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:07 PM
3

I don't think it's a good reference, because then you'll have images of many women who are disheveled and sweaty from dancing and exercising.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 08:18 PM
1

I think my wife is maks.li without makeup, but I won't post her photo here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 08:17 PM
-2

I don't think this power would be very useful for women because lying men walk around with lies tattooed on their foreheads. Just ask a good man what his plans are with her and problem solved, if the purposes are the same the relationship will work out. Now for the scoundrel, no answer he gives matters
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 07:54 PM
4

It depends on the woman and the dog, if it were to be a random individual for both I would choose the woman. Let's be honest, even the most feminist woman would surrender to traditional gender roles at these times and therefore would be collaborative, woke women only feel empowered when everything that is basic for survival has already been guaranteed by men, which is not the case of the scenario proposed in the post
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:35 PM
3

because nice girls are desirable
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 08:12 PM
0

It's like choosing between raping or not raping
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:01 PM
1

The murdered child is an abortion victim, who can be either male or female. Despite this, some parents abort female babies, in these cases it would be a double standard against women. But indiscriminate abortion that victimizes both boys and girls is not a double standard, except when based on the illusion of abortion being pro-woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:46 PM
0

Homicide is a crime, regardless of whether the perpetrator is male or female. Furthermore, people of both sexes have abortions or are victims of abortion. Any anti-abortion legislation is not a double standard, although pro-abortion legislation is full of double standards due to the illusion of being pro-woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:28 PM
–

This was an honest answer based on personal experience. I'm sorry about this and I hope that one day you will be freed from the hurtful feelings caused by these events.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 07:05 PM
–

Masculine thirst makes men tolerate things they shouldn't. And this thirst is so pervasive that it has become the expected pattern of behavior. The man who does not have tolerance for these behaviors will do better, as it works as a good filter
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:39 PM
2

What you said is idiotic. Being faithful because you want to is better than being "faithful" because you can't cheat. Being able to cheat, but choosing not to is a virtue
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 12:18 PM
–

This supposed sixth sense used against nice guys is a lie and does not exist. Attributing a bad personality to good men that a woman rejects is just a way of not appearing superficial. When the nice guy looks like Chad, there is no presumption of a bad personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 12:22 PM
–

Gay
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 01:41 AM
0

Your outburst is not irrelevant. I'm so sorry you had to go through this and I hope it never happens again.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 12:44 AM
5

In my experience, they tend to suffer. What I'm going to say is anecdotal. I'm a 32-year-old recently married man whose wife just turned 26. When I was a teenager, I had little money and was very thin, but I was never ugly enough to drive women away, as a result I ended up being, by some women, used as emotional trash, the typical "nice guy", the Girls said they wanted to date a guy who was "just like me" but not exactly me. However, these same women were always going out with Chads or guys who …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 12:42 AM
-4

It's rare that you personally meet someone who says that the rape victim deserved it because of the clothes she wore, even when commenting on the situation. It is much more common to find someone saying that some behaviors can turn rapists on or make it easier for them (usually followed by safety tips), and then that person will have their opinion distorted so that it is interpreted as "the victim deserved it"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 10:21 PM
-9

The world has 8 billion people so it shouldn't be difficult to find. It's just something extremely rare. But the internet is there for us to find rare things easily, if you type "diamond" on Google you will find several.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 09:19 PM
2

No, because men and women can rape and abortion
/r/MensRights24/04/24 05:56 PM
-4

It depends on how attractive the man is. I've seen women defend absurdly terrible feats when carried out by Chads
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 01:05 PM
1

No. After all, men also have abortions. Both men and women abort and rape
/r/MensRights24/04/24 12:34 PM
3

"Nope. You make it sound like women do not rape" It is false
/r/MensRights24/04/24 12:33 PM
9

No uterus, no opinion about abortion, sounds like: No penis, no opinion about rape.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 03:33 AM
–

Most of what makes a man attractive is genetics, so it's not as flexible as you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:37 AM
2

Excluding the reproductive issue, we do not need women on a social level; However, most men need women on an individual level, especially on an emotional level. I'm sure that if there weren't women, men wouldn't have so much impetus to develop civilizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:36 AM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 09:12 PM
1

Keep debating with the subtext you try to put in my text while escaping from reality. If you were really well off, you'd hardly be doing this I stop here
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 08:12 PM
-4

Anecdotal. And I got married this month (04/06/24), my wife isn't crying, but that doesn't mean she's blind about what she sees in her college or in her family, and neither am I blind Whether what you said is real or fictional, you are not the only woman in the world, nor is your husband the only man. Do you realize that you can see other people crying even when you are not supposed to be? If I can do it, why can't you? If you were right, Chadfishing wouldn't even work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 08:08 PM
1

You can lose even when playing on easy mode
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 08:03 PM
-2

And with that kind of thinking there are who knows how many women crying out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 07:55 PM
-4

Often the guy who complains about women's "high standards" is expressing himself badly and meaning "superficial standards" In this sense, saying that women should choose better is not contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 07:45 PM
3

Don't confuse "love" and "passion" My wife and I love each other, but we don't feel passionate about each other. Passion is a feeling and it tends to end quickly. I do not recommend anyone to marry out of passion, because if passion is what holds your marriage, the marriage is destined to fall apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 07:39 PM
2

I am married. I earn enough to go out with a different prostitute a week. So the answer is that it wouldn't change much for me. I married to form a family and not for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 07:30 PM
2

The issue of men not wanting a woman who earns more than them is not because of pride, it is because wives who earn more than their respective husbands tend to resent and disrespect their husbands. If you look at the statistics, you will see that there is a relationship between a woman's increased income compared to her husband's and divorce. It is also more common for women to divorce when they are promoted at work or win elections. If women maintained the same behavior earning more, this would…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 12:04 AM
4

Hahahahhaha What a fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:25 PM
3

It already happens that many women share the same guy, but informally. And many of the guys aren't billionaires or football stars
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:24 AM
0

Gender is biological. We are all of the gender "homo", just like the Neanderthals. Dogs are canines and cats are felines. Forgive me for my linguistic imprecision, but English is not my first language
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:29 PM
1

The responsibility is with the child and not with the sexual partner. Neither the father nor the mother should be exempt from their obligations towards the child. Using abortion as a justification for paternal abandonment is wrong, because two wrongs do not make a right, especially against the same victim (the child) If it were legal for women to practice pedophilia, should they legalize the practice for men too?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:07 PM
5

I've had enough female friends in my life to know that's a lie. And it's also a lie to my wife's friends. This is also the issue that nice guys object to the most and are shamed for, even though they are certain that it is a lie. Any aspect of compatibility matters only after the issue of physical attractiveness. I've met very handsome men who have been approached by completely unknown women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 05:50 PM
–

Rape is crime and wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 06:50 PM
–

The fact that sound can be proven even if it cannot be heard weighs against you and not against me. It's a prove that "If I haven't heard it, it doesn't exist" is false. And it's you who defends this here, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 03:06 PM
–

Attractive men who easily have casual sex. My English is not very good
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 02:47 PM
1

Attractive people could be good and ugly people could be mean. But if the pillers admit that, they have to confess that dating is chaotic for women. I "admit" that there are good and bad people at all levels of physical attractiveness In fact, I don't even know why this would actually be an "admission", as it just seems like an obvious observation to me. What doesn't make sense is you saying that from there it follows that the scenario is chaotic for women. This is non sequitur
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:11 PM
5

True
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 06:22 PM
21

Women do not deal with loneliness better than men. What happens is that it's rare for a woman to really need to deal with loneliness. Furthermore, much of what women often call loneliness is not real loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 05:15 PM
14

The man wouldn't have to lie. If he is attractive, what he does or says will be seen with the best of intentions. It's the nice guy who will be seen as the guy who "is only nice because he wants to take me to bed." Bernie doesn't need to lie because women will lie to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 04:49 PM
2

Thank you
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:47 AM
3

Congratulations on 22 years. I haven't even completed 22 days of marriage yet hahaha. Complete 11 days today
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:30 AM
1

The word "supposedly" is very important in your comment......
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:16 AM
2

If that is the issue, all the man needs to do is hire a prostitute. Going to a website and hiring a prostitute is much cheaper than paying for 3 or 4 dates, plus the prostitute is hotter, more experienced and uses condoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:15 AM
5

It's not "any woman." There are women who actually save themselves for their husbands, they have a high libido, they want to have sex, but they also have self-control and are capable of making this decision consciously despite their emotions. If the woman had sex with other guys without them waiting, they make you wait, then the variable is you. But in the case I mentioned, the variable is the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:11 AM
2

I would not change a thing. Strong men are more attractive to women. Women treat me much better today that I have gained muscle and fat than when I was skinny and looked like a pin.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 10:26 PM
1

I wouldn't change it. If a woman feels threatened by my presence, that's a problem she should have to deal with, not me. Furthermore, my strength is useful in protecting my wife, including against other women if necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 10:22 PM
7

If he's as attractive as the ones you mentioned, he won't have any problems with it. But if he is ugly, he will be accused of being a predator and a pedophile.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 07:51 PM
3

I don't know what "amab" is, English is not my language. In any case, there are only two sexes, and exceptions are rare and based on the two sexes that exist, for example one whose genetics made him intersexual still navigates between being a man, a woman or both. If you're talking about dysphoria, it doesn't change whether someone is actually male or female. Since people are what they are..
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:06 PM
–

I have, but none of them have said that to women. Usually they ghost without telling them why, or make up some politically correct excuse because society doesn't consider it acceptable to reject a woman for that reason. But among male friends and co-workers they tell the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:51 PM
1

What is PIV? I have several different ways of making my wife have an orgasm, however with her it is easy because I already know her well. Not if it would be that easy with unknown women. Furthermore, I had phimosis surgery, I suspect that this makes it take me a while to have orgasms, and when I do, she has already had one or two times. And in my experience, usually men who have easy sex are also the type who don't care if the woman is okay or not, so I think it's more "they don't care about the…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 08:32 PM
1

If the argument "he didn't hear, therefore he doesn't exist" were true, deaf people would live in an imaginary world. They wouldn't even exist, since they don't listen to themselves. Bragging about bad arguments is not being smart
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 08:03 PM
-1

I have a bisexual friend who prefers men, she says women are complicated. And I have a lesbian friend who regrets being a lesbian and has RP thoughts
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 07:40 PM
5

Do you have the study link? English is not my first language and therefore I have a bit of difficulty researching this type of thing
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 07:25 PM
3

Well, if you haven’t heard it then it must not exist It also seems like a very common way of thinking among atheists.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 07:09 PM
4

I've never seen this argument for God come out of any theist's mouth. On the other hand, I've seen many anti-Christians saying this as a straw man for the moral argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 07:05 PM
1

I've been called gay for rejecting promiscuous women just because they were physically hot. The number of men who would fuck anything may not be the majority, but it's not negligible either. I still think the generalization is stupid, but there is a basis
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 07:04 PM
–

I'm friends with some women on levels that are definitely not superficial. However there are obvious barriers to relationships, I am married and friends with their husbands, and they have also become friends with my wife. I can say that between men and women I have good close friends My only single friend is bisexual, not physically attractive, but she is rich and interested in threesomes, which neither my wife nor I want, but because she is not pushy, the friendship remains normal. That being s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 05:38 PM
1

Most rich people were born rich. Economic mobility in Brazil is 7.5%. Including rich people who became poor. And Brazil is in America. The countries with the greatest mobility reach 15%, which is still very low and I think it is difficult for the United States to be significantly above that. Wealth is hereditary most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 04:08 PM
1

You are wrong, because any man can cheat whenever he wants, there are two basic reasons for this: Pre Selection: it is easier to get a second woman than the first. I can attract women today who didn't look twice at me when I was single. Prostitution: Just go to a website like fatalmodel and hire a girl in secret. Even so, many men are faithful to their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 03:40 PM
1

I've been married for 1 week and my answer is "no" I will not and do not intend to cheat, so there is nothing to be stopped. However it can work with men who cheat due to lack of sex at home, although every day may be overkill. I personally wouldn't like to have sex every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 03:33 PM
1

When a young woman doesn't want
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 03:15 PM
–

However, among those who practice casual sex or serial monogamy, they all choose the same type of guy, and that often differs from the answers given.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 02:30 PM
3

This is false. Because they could solve this by hiring prostitutes, but they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 02:52 PM
-8

You are being sexist. Women can also be intelligent and have some sense of reality, no matter how much you think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 04:55 PM
14

The point is that this is true for most cases. A man's appearance has a very strong influence on how his actions will be interpreted, in many cases it is what will differentiate between being seen as a rapist and being seen as a man with attitude. * Introverted attractive man: Mysterious; * Introverted ugly man: He is hiding something nebulous; * Extroverted attractive man: Confident; * Extroverted ugly man: He's trying to compensate, or "he doesn't see himself" (I don't know what the English ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 04:38 PM
18

Cold approach works if you are warm enough; If you are average you will be considered a nuisance, a bore; If you are ugly you will be considered a creeper or harasser
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:28 PM
6

There's no reason to date someone who doesn't value experiences together. It would be a break for me. Dating serves to validate compatibility for marriage, and if she doesn't value quality time enough, it isn't useful for
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:13 PM
5

No: Conversion for such a reason is not genuine and therefore cannot be characterized as conversion; Christian women are traditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 08:02 PM
–

Women's standards tend to be superficial rather than high. A Nazi Chad doesn't have a high standard, but he has no trouble getting women, just look at Chad Fishing. On the other hand, a good personality and no looks will put you in the Friendzone, and third parties will make fun of you as a nice guy, however older women will see you as "husband material"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 11:44 AM
2

Looks or Money >>>> Charisma If you are ugly and poor, your charisma will be seen as something negative (if you are very ugly) or neutral (if you are just a little ugly)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 02:50 PM
–

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 09:50 PM
–

The body does not belong to women
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 07:01 PM
4

Wealth and success are different things. A person's success is not measured by the money they have. There are billionaire fetuses, would you say they are successful people? Brazil is a country with social mobility of 7.5%, which means that the tendency of those born poor to remain poor and those born rich tend to remain rich. General trend and success are different things. The best countries in this sense are around 15%, which is still very little. Furthermore, it is common for men who become fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 03:26 PM
1

Those who realize this truth most are the men who are not invited to the party, but are invited to clean up the mess. Guys who do casual usually don't complain about it, so it has nothing to do with "feeling special for doing casual"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 11:39 AM
3

Woman A
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 11:16 AM
1

In Brazil, conservatives tend to be liberals (who defend freedom), while the left defends the government's power of control over the population. So this question sounds strange to me. I can answer that I prefer a Christian woman, a virgin, who does not vote for the left (especially Lula and PT) and who defends individual freedoms. However, my wife who I'm going to marry tomorrow was a virgin, she's going to be baptized the day after tomorrow in a Christian church and she hardly cares about polit…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 01:07 AM
3

Your definition of a traditional woman is not the same as that used by those who want a traditional woman, there was a distortion there. But that's just an observation that doesn't matter much for what I'm going to say. My main point is that men are not a monolith. Although most (or all) men prefer to marry traditional women, not everyone has enough moral fiber to be traditional men, as this requires responsibilities and above-average emotional intelligence. Fighting hedonism is difficult and ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 06:01 PM
2

No
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 04:58 PM
1

Starting studies, bodybuilding, Friendzone, dating high-value girls, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 03:49 PM
2

Yes. It's not about quantity of men, but about quality and their interest in them. I'm sure a milf can even get 18 year olds to have sex with her. But getting a successful man to put a ring on her finger and introduce her to his family is more difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 02:50 PM
1

Because people are expected to evolve and learn over time and experience. A woman who has a great father and creates the expectation that her boyfriend will be better in addition to comparing, is wrong. If she demands this she will be even more wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 06:08 PM
3

I don't think this is unpopular, as no one associates it with fun. But definitely this is quite useful and quite safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 09:50 PM
1

Yes, I consider myself a high relationship value man because: I was born poor (a descendant of slaves in less than 3 generations), but I have relatively high assets and income in a country with very low social mobility and in a city without opportunities I have good appearance achieved through effort; I have a high-value bride; I'm christian; I am physically healthy; I am good at solving problems, including within myself; I am charismatic and I have some valuable friends of both sexes; I have a …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 07:55 PM
3

If you are dealing with real gangs the situation is not at the level we commonly call "bullying". In these cases you have no power to escalate a confrontation unless you buy a gun and start shooting, but that will only make things worse, after all, even with unlikely success in erasing the criminals, the authorities that until then were silent will emerge in defense of the "victims" to condemn you. (And if you fail, it's for you) The only alternative is to stay away as much as possible. However …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 05:59 PM
2

If it doesn't work, it's because not enough violence was used. You won't trade punches with a bully twice your size, you have to act when you have an advantage and do something that you can't say on Reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 05:07 PM
4

Confronting the bully with enough violence tends to work, as long as you have the balls to confront school authorities publicly when they try to crack down on you. The consequence will be social isolation, which is better than being bullied
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 05:03 PM
-4

So should a man of high value lie or remain silent about it? Does not make sense. Part of what makes someone of high value is the value they place on the truth, whether male or female.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 04:56 PM
1

Most men who reject women don't do so because they are "strong and focused", but because they have options, and this usually happens when the man in question is hot. It's more about appearance than mentality. Throwing a bottle of dirty water when you have a lake of drinking water is not proof that you resist thirst well when compared to the dehydrated man who drinks dirty water for lack of options.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 04:52 PM
18

I see no problem with being a provider for a traditional, submissive woman. But for relationships with modern women, it's 50/50 from the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 09:27 PM
7

Red Pill is not a ideology
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 07:44 PM
5

And who doesn't sign these things deserves it then? How will they do it? Do you sign up for a government program and your girlfriend comes by post? One thing has nothing to do with the other when it comes to "deserving", but you're talking about having rights for women
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 06:20 PM
5

Santa Catarina
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 06:16 PM
10

"Aim lower" wouldn't change anything. Even 40-year-old women have less libido, so if you are not physically attractive enough for a 23-year-old woman, you will be even less so for a 40-year-old woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 06:07 PM
17

You did a good question
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 06:00 PM
2

The incentive for women not to be toxic is the quality of men, not quantity. In general, there are only two types of men who tolerate toxic women: Those who only use them for sex don't care about their personality and after they get tired of using them for sex, they will discard them. They are men of low relationship value. Those desperate, who cannot attract any woman and therefore end up tolerating toxicity due to emotional, affective and sexual lack. They are usually physically unattractive m…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 04:18 PM
3

I really don't think women see a man with 3 failed relationships that way. I notice that the man with failed relationships is seen as "more experienced" and someone who has been "successful with at least 3 women". While the virgin guy is seen as someone who "definitely has something wrong with him."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 03:59 PM
2

That should be the rule, I believe. A 60-year-old man has a duty to be better than me, who is only 32 years old, if she thinks it's bad that way, then there is a very serious problem with her that must be resolved.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 04:08 AM
3

For both men and women, it's bad to sleep around, this is something that everyone here who is already familiar with studies on marital fidelity, happiness in marriage and the like knows, so I won't go into details. And the "double standard" does not exist because of the supposed difficulty that men have in sleeping around, as Chads do not need to do anything to have sex and yet it is men who are treated better. The double standard exists because women pre-select. They tend to prefer men who slee…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 04:06 AM
1

I'm 32. My fiancée just turned 26, she's pretty and her family has money. When we met and became friends I was 26 and she was 19. Interestingly, when I was 20 I didn't attract any women. In my group of friends women tend to be 3 to 10 years younger, the smallest age difference is 3. When I see feminists saying these things against older men I believe they live in a parallel reality and it sounds like jealousy, after all, I'm 32 and I reject 32-year-old women (and I would even if I were single)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 07:03 PM
1

I hope it's true and I'm happy for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 01:30 PM
1

I don't have children, but I see many reports of men being victims of prejudice in these circumstances. It tends to be worse when it comes to black men with white daughters
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 01:13 PM
1

You are right
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 08:34 PM
1

My fiancée did this, simply because I'm trustworthy and worth it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 08:32 PM
2

Not having children with these men is a good start
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 05:32 PM
16

You are right
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 01:30 PM
2

Different men get different bars. Some men need to jump through fire hoops and still fail, others just need hygiene and others don't even need hygiene. The "minimum" a woman demands varies from one man to another.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 12:54 PM
12

Different men get different bars. Some men need to jump through fire hoops and still fail, others just need hygiene and others don't even need hygiene. The "minimum" a woman demands varies from one man to another.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 12:53 PM
0

It's not the easiest option, and most women in places like this are low value. The best women are in the church, and the best men too
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 01:56 AM
1

Ironically, the Red Pill has its origins in the phrase "You will know the truth and it will set you free" People who identify as Red Pill are so different from each other that your post becomes meaningless in its generalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 01:50 AM
1

I prefer a woman who genuinely wants me than a woman who is satisfied with me, I could only guarantee that by betting on a younger woman, at the time I met my fiancée she was 19 and I was 25. For me this is non-negotiable, because as a teenager I was always the "nice guy who will make a woman very happy one day" and as an adult I became "husband material" for women traumatized by fuckboys and single mothers who needed to "be saved." That's why women wanting to settle down with me has always been…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 03:36 PM
0

I'm a 32-year-old man and a lot of women saw me as this "great guy". I can imagine this guy being in the friend zone if he had met her 5 or 10 years ago. I think what your friend does to him is unfair, luckily I didn't fall for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 01:50 PM
0

I didn't "implied" anything I am responsible only for what I write and not for what you "understand"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 02:00 PM
15

If my fiancée did this I would still be sure of myself But I wouldn't be safe from her. She would be the insecure object in the relationship, not me. This type of attitude doesn't change who I am, but it would greatly change the view I have of her.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 11:49 AM
-1

Who said anything about forcing something?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 11:45 AM
-1

Your advice does not follow from the premise. Single mothers tend to be someone who does not value this premise of the importance of two parents, otherwise they would not be a single mother. Furthermore, relationships tend to be more successful the fewer sexual partners someone has. Furthermore, relationships tend to work out better with someone who chooses you because they genuinely want to be with you and not with someone who just wants to settle down. Being with a single mother goes against h…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 11:38 AM
-1

My parents separated early and I had a terrible childhood with two parents who hated each other, as well as suffering from parental alienation. A lot of the problems I had as a teenager, I wouldn't have had if they just stayed together and resolved their differences the way they should. In fact, even today at 32 there are consequences of this, such as inheritance disputes with the previous family of my mother's new husband, who died and had other children. Anyway, staying together and resolving …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 11:33 AM
15

Is it a woman's choice to marry a man who ends up dying before her? Most widows didn't want to be widows
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 11:28 AM
3

Everyone knows a guy who, when he was single, no one wanted, but when he found a girlfriend, he became desired by women. This is my case and that of others I know. In my case, two women who rejected me became interested in me and harbored deep hatred for my fiancée, one of them left me in the Friendzone for years and when I started dating my fiancee, she suddenly turned 360° and started chasing my fiancée. Women like pre-selected men, today women are at least extremely nice to me and on some occ…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 12:23 AM
11

Volcels are also exceptions and they tend to have very high standards
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 06:52 PM
1

The friend zone exists because the blue pill is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 09:30 PM
1

Women are repulsed by physically ugly men and that's all. If the man is hot enough, he can get away with all these defects, while if he is ugly enough, the absence of these defects will not attract women. * There are a lot of guys who are like you describe and will never have a girlfriend; * There are other guys who are the opposite of this and will never have a girlfriend either; * There are other guys who are as you describe and date and even have casual relationships; * There are other guys w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 09:30 PM
2

it is relatively easy to get into a bad marriage It's not that easy for women. Almost all women who are in bad relationships have some nostalgic stories to tell about nice guys they rejected. This also appears to be true for some single women in their late 30s. It's actually much easier for a woman to get into a good relationship than a bad one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 05:43 PM
0

It's a good rule
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:01 PM
1

love and passion are different things and passion cannot be the basis of a relationship. If you have passion, you shouldn't even get married, because one day this feeling disappears and takes the relationship with it. While love is essential that it exists from the beginning of the relationship until death separates them. Love is not a feeling, but a choice. English is not my first language, so it's not clear to me what you mean by "in love", does it refer to "love" or "passion"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 12:58 PM
2

I see that many women apparently "lower" their standards when they become single mothers or when they pass a certain age. women who wanted men who were 180cm tall, but started getting involved with men who were 170cm tall, women who were only with fit men, but started getting involved with men who were shorter or overweight. However I don't believe they are being genuine, and a woman's true standard is the one she chooses at her peak.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:19 AM
-3

I don't think women have a genuine fear of men. The same woman who is supposedly afraid of the short bald man who sent her flowers, gets involved with a handsome man who has a history of violence. Much of this supposed fear seems to be associated with unattractiveness, which is why an action by an ugly man can be considered scary and the same action by a handsome man is considered romantic. Even if you dare mention the lack of care women are taking, you are accused of blaming the victim. It is m…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 12:59 PM
2

Solution for men: Understanding that being single is better than being with a bad woman, this must be done before making the mistake of accepting a bad woman and ending up with irreversible damage such as socio-affective pension. Solution for women: Choose a good man while you still can.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 05:15 AM
2

Chads don't need anything to be respected when they have a lot of sex. The real reason women are shamed and men are praised for having lots of sex, and the opposite also happens with virginity, is because women pre-select, while men value female fidelity. While women value promiscuous men, men value chaste women
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 01:41 AM
13

Men are bigger and stronger; If a man goes to the police station to report sexual violence suffered, the police officer will laugh at him and the crime will not even be recorded. Knowing this in advance makes man not even try; There is a police station specialized in serving women, but not men; Many will consider the male victim to be lucky. Many men are accused innocently. It is not possible to have accurate data on who commits the most crimes when the data is wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 04:26 PM
1

It's not a crime in Brazil and we have the same dating problems. We copy a lot of US rubbish here
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:39 AM
0

If he's scum, then she's not the girl of my dreams. A good girl doesn't like scum. And I'm not friends with scum either. This question doesn't make sense to me, because such a thing is impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:34 AM
2

Feminism depends on women being in a bad situation to function. The more women are traumatized, despised and raped, the better for feminism, after all, the discourse of feminism is about defending women, so the more they need defense, the better for the movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 12:57 AM
1

My biggest problem with this is the insult of being desired by these women when they are old, traumatized and tired. It is better to be rejected all your life than falsely desired. Nice guys have to be careful, because the guy who ends up in the friend zone today is the same guy who will be seen as husband material in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 12:06 AM
1

"nice guys are not nice at all." It is a contradiction
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 11:33 PM
1

Nice guy is better. Being a nice guy you have an automatic filter for problematic girls, because girls who prefer thugs, fucked up boys, etc. They are not good girls to have a relationship with, LTR tends to be problematic with them. Being a nice guy and finding a nice girl is the best option; The second best option is to be single.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 10:35 PM
3

Men are not a monolith. Different men may have different opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 12:07 AM
2

Religious people don't want to merge with the red pill. In fact "You will know the truth and the truth will set you free" comes from Christianity, which in turn is the principle of the red pill in The Matrix that emerged 2000 years later, which in turn is the principle of the red pill of "The Red Pill" In practice, many self-declared Red Pill people try to use the Christian principle in their distorted way, which is the search, recognition and acceptance of reality as it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 12:06 AM
4

The best strategy is not to be a betabucks. Being single is much better
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 02:59 PM
4

Financial level, just hire a prostitute, in the fatal model there are very beautiful women for less than 400 BRL depending on the region. For those less demanding, 100 BRL is enough; Social level, just get married, you will be able to have sex with your wife, and being married makes you considerably more attractive to other women; Appearance level, it has to be Chad, depending on how Chad you are, you can have more than one girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 01:27 AM
3

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:48 PM
–

Here comes someone Chadfishing with a hot pedophile Nazi and gets lots of matches with lots of women. Any moral or charisma weakness a man has can be compensated for with good looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 05:20 PM
–

Sorry, English is not my first language, i edited my comment
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:18 AM
–

The men I know who say women are sluts are sleeping with a lot of them
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:09 AM
–

If women genuinely hated fuckboys, they (the fuck boys) would be incels. But they(women) hate incels, and attribute to them(incels) the same evil intentions that fuckboys have.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:06 AM
12

I don't think there are many. But a 7/10 looking man can do it with two 3/10 looking women if he wants, even without him being a Chad Also, I never said this was the only reason, it is at least the most obvious to everyone, as anecdotally we have all seen things like this happen. Of course, if we investigate further we will find other causes, some even more impactful than this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:39 PM
19

It's simple. Chad is dating 3 girls and none of them consider themselves single, while he who is dating all 3 considers himself single. You go into the 3's Facebook and you will find in the statuses that they are in a relationship, then you go into Chad's Facebook and the part where it shows the relationship status will be hidden.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:12 PM
17

I felt like a lot ot PEOPLE have undiagnosed neuro conditions. No needs to specific
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 01:41 PM
1

O problema que eu tenho quando uma mulher faz isso é que não dura para sempre. Basta dar à luz um filho "sem pai", ou envelhecer e ir atrás de "seus iguais" com quem eles sentem nojo. E alguns desses "iguais" infelizmente aceitam
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 12:49 PM
–

TRP does not defend AWALT. When they say "men this", "women that" it is just a generic statement about what is true for the vast majority of cases, which makes sense to increase success rates. As for masculine women, I know very few cases, and they are dating men even bigger and more muscular than themselves "bodybuilders". Except for a single case, but this one in question is a single mother, so I don't know if the stepfather is the type of man she really wanted, and I've never seen her son's f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:36 AM
8

It's obvious when you haven't been conditioned since you were a child. for many obvious things are said unnecessarily. Many times a woman will say what she finds attractive like this: "He has to be a nice guy and have hygiene." If the "obvious" is really omitted, then she shouldn't have even said "nice guy" and "hygiene", as these things should be minimal and obvious. And so they reject clean, nice guys and date men who are not nice or have hygiene, but have height or a strong jaw. It's obvious …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 08:49 PM
15

You're right. I would never say, especially in a professional environment, many truths that I believe in and that are associated with pills, especially with the label. And when I have to talk about it, I use more politically correct language, but without lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 08:16 PM
35

Many men recognize many Black Pill or Red Pill truths without recognizing the labels. Such men believe in whole or in part in many of the ideas stated by one or both pills without ever associating the ideas with the pills.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 08:04 PM
1

A liar that make false accusation is not a victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:45 AM
–

And the father in question would be right to be against such a thing. It's not even "fundamentalism", it's just good sense
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:41 PM
8

Giving in to hedonistic desires is a demerit and not a merit. And there is no merit in being born a woman, but there may be some merit in earning the money used to pay for sex
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 12:39 PM
3

Quite common among women with children from other men or among women who already appear to be of a certain age
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 04:50 AM
1

A woman left me in the friendzone for a few years, but I gave up on her and moved on with my life, while taking care of my own things I started dating a better woman. As a result she began to morally persecute my girlfriend, spreading many lies about her to everyone she could, and also tried to get close to me again. This made me very angry at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 04:46 AM
4

Yes, they got married before 35
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:47 PM
5

Women 35 years old: Where are all the nice guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:47 PM
-1

At what age? At age 20, women deal with this better than men, for the reasons already mentioned; At age 40, men cope better
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:28 PM
127

If she said that while trying to settle down with me, I would feel insulted.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:00 AM
21

Something like: "I'm better than you, because your problems is easy to me"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 03:44 PM
22

It's virtue signaling
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 03:42 PM
1

What is "date" exactly? Does it mean make her my girlfriend? My fiancée has a pretty nice personality, but if she had a bad personality, she wouldn't have become my girlfriend
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:27 AM
-2

For me, the female personality is essential. If a woman's personality is bad, no matter how hot she is, I would never put a ring on her finger and show it to her family. And personality is seen through history (whoever says that the past doesn't matter is wrong), and not through words. That said, single women with a good personality are rare, as they tend to be highly desired for relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 09:50 PM
1

Don't confuse being a "provider" with being a "beta provider". It's okay to be a provider for a woman with traditional values who feels love and sexual desire for her husband. The problem is being a provider for a modern woman who only wants to use you financially, while in her heart there is longing Chad Thunderdick kicked her. Men who want to be providers want to be providers for traditional women and not post-carousel women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 09:42 PM
1

The issue is not "deciding not to have children". ​ But "deciding not to have children because you don't have a 100% guarantee that they won't die and being okay with that." ​ People suffer with the death of their children, the consequence of their advice would be the end of humanity
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 05:23 AM
-1

And having children is necessary for the survival of humanity. And definitely an insignificant amount of people wouldn't grieve over a dead child, especially if he was killed by his own mother. If people followed his advice, no one would have children anymore and the last people alive would be some children of psychopaths who would not represent 1% of the amount of people alive today, and this would only last until they died without children too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:54 AM
3

That's like saying: How do you know there is a 100% chance that if you go out on the street you will not be sexually violated? If you don't have the resilience to deal with a violation, don't go out on the street.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:42 AM
29

In order of importance: ​ Have high standards when deciding which woman you will have a child with; Paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:39 AM
1

Average men have options to cheat. For an average man, it is very difficult to attract a woman, however once he succeeds, others will naturally be attracted to him. I know this from being an average man with a 6 year relationship in which I have attracted more women in every quarter of those 6 years than I have in my entire single life. For a man who has got one woman, it is not difficult to get two, three or four. The pre-selection effect is very strong and increases a man's attractiveness by a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:32 AM
1

Taylor Swift is not your average woman, she is definitely in the top 0.1% of the richest people in the world. ​ And the question was never about quantity, but about quality. Any woman can get involved with a man at any age, but the quality of these men decreases as her age and the number of her children increases. Literally a woman I was deeply in love with when I was young has no chance with me today, while today at 32 I'm dating a woman 7 years younger than me (and only then did she show inter…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:23 AM
–

Men are not a monolith Men who knowingly date gold diggers and men who complain about being scammed by gold diggers are different men. A man who knowingly dates a gold digger does not complain, in the same way that men who hire prostitutes do not complain about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:11 AM
3

Two reasons for this accusation: ​ 1: Men who fail in the dating market, 99% of the time it is because of their appearance. A man's personality for relationships doesn't matter when he's handsome enough or when he's too ugly. It only has some relevance for men of average appearance; This is why a "Hitler Chad" will do much better than a "Jesus Quasimodo." ​ 2: Women tend to be poor communicators about what they really want or like, from deliberately lying to avoid appearing superficial to not be…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:09 AM
1

Men are not attracted to mentally unstable women, men are attracted to hot women. Many men tolerate women's mental instability depending on how hot they think they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:44 PM
3

Men with a violent character would hardly protect a woman in the face of a real risk. A common characteristic in violent men is cowardice, they only act violently when at a great advantage regardless of the need. If you get two friends together and attack a man like that's wife, he will run away
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:24 PM
4

Guys,if you want a woman who enjoys sex then she’s out there having sex Don't confuse "enjoying sex" with "being a hedonist" My fiancée loves sex and was a virgin. And many people in the church too. Not everyone is a slave to their own desires. in women who were taught sex is bad This is an absurd simplification of what is actually taught and I definitely 99% of people don't teach that "having sex is bad"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 02:34 AM
1

When I was 18, I was making $7.75 an hour. I'm 31 now and I'm retired. How sad to be born poor and live in Brazil. I earn a lot more money than the Brazilian average, and even more when we only consider the city I was born in, and that's less than what you earned at 18. I currently earn R$5,500/month, which is around US$6.26/hour
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 01:31 AM
-1

Good for Billy, glad he found himself a mature woman who knows what she wants, that's great. Many times this supposed maturity is inversely proportional to physical beauty and age, and also proportional to the number of children of other men. In these cases it is not genuine maturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 01:24 AM
11

More or less. I met my girlfriend when she was 19F and I was 25M. We started dating when we were at 20F/26M. Today she is 25F and I am 32F She is my first girlfriend and I am her first. When I was 20M, I could never attract the interest of a 19F year old girl, whereas today I have had students as young as 17F interested in me. On the other hand, the more time passes, the more attractive I become to older women and single mothers. I understand that they are doing AF/BB, but eventually I bump into…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 01:16 AM
–

There's definitely a difference in appearance between the guys too. This "game" matters and you're right, but sometimes I think it's very overrated, because appearance and money matter much more, respectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 12:55 AM
1

I agree with the general idea of what you said, but not with your examples. Women's standards tend not to be high, but superficial. Moral values are more important than 6 digits and 195cm tall. Furthermore, these women are often not okay with being single, kissing a lot of people at the club and then crying in the shower because they feel lonely is not genuinely okay. Just see how these standards supposedly change when a woman has a child with a supposedly high-class man or when the woman gets o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 12:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter