TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

all-round-good-egg Archive

View 1 posts and 688 comments by all-round-good-egg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Social Issuesall-round-good-egg/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:32 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

All the relevant information should have been in your The Patriarchy membership pack, if it's missing please contact your local chapter.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 06:20 PM
29

It's pure sales, nothing to do with medical necessity.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 02:08 PM
8

Yes, I am a PADI certified muff diver, but I'm not a fan of French kissing Chewbacca. To be fair she does mention stubble though so I doubt she's sporting a Wookiee.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:45 PM
16

What a strangely retarded imaginary alter ego this feminist author has created. Fortnightly 'visits' of fathers is parental alienation, he/she is conflating custody arrangements with visitation. Absolutely zero concern for his/her daughter's feeling about him/her either, almost like the daughter is a prop in a made up story. It's all about him/her. Hmmm. I too smell blue hair dye.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:28 PM
1

That would be the one claim that got investigated though. If it did really happen it would be a good idea to go down that route though for a couple of reasons.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:35 PM
1

Yes, my point is that a lot of attempted suicides aren't attempted suicides. I just strongly disagree with recording such events as attempted suicide. Calling them cries for help or parasuicidal events doesn't change that logic. The pretence and deception isn't with the person engaging in such - often repetitive - activity, it's with the people who record such events as attempted suicides.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 10:54 AM
7

What is the trans suicide rate? I see lots of mentions of between 41% and 49% of trans people attempting suicide, but anybody who has looked into the way cries for help are recorded as suicide attempts know that these stats aren't reliable.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:42 PM
1

Yes, I wonder about the damaging effect feminist rhetoric has on kids, especially boys. They've certainly done their best to purge him of his "toxic masculinity" after they bought/acquired/adopted The Experiment/it/him.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 11:10 AM
38

If by reversible you mean that a short, skinny man with a tiny penis who has never experienced being a teenage boy and the years of life experience how to be a man may appear out of the other side then you are correct. Saying this is reversible places absolutely zero value on masculinity or the journey towards becoming a man.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:36 PM
10

No acknowledgement whatsoever of a negative side. You need to be more honest about the side effects, which are that tiny little half men with tiny penises are produced on the other side. Never to reach their potential. That's me being afraid for their masculinity, not mine. Be more honest and you'll get more support. Do you agree that it should be a criminal offense, punishable by a very long sentence to push kids into this? Specifically taking puberty delaying drugs.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:21 PM
26

You need to stop pretending that hormone suppressants are harmless. Delaying puberty and all of the heady experiences that make us men: discovering girls, becoming broader and stronger, our voices breaking, our penises never leaving us alone (and vice versa), learning how to channel anger and strength etc etc. Hormone blockers lead to erasure of this at the time when it's normal to experience it. Going through puberty at college? Having a half developed micro penis for the rest of your life? Bei…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:49 PM
1

I agree. Plenty of opportunities pop up with kids and their friends to gently teach life skills.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 11:13 AM
11

There's no breakdown of male/female accidents in that link. There's a mention of % change of fatalities. Women have many more accidents than men, but men have more serious accidents.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:39 AM
4

My, what big eyes you have!
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:45 AM
8

So there is no nationwide screening program for men for any cancers relating to HPV. The last I checked the numbers were comparable to cervical cancer. So not only are boys/men not to be immunised against this, but there is also not a screening programme being rolled out to protect us either? Are cervical smears being phased out as part of this shift?
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:42 AM
2

I do think there's something evolutionarily sound about finding a woman with fewer sexual partners more attractive, wherever there is an obligation to look after offspring. Re the gay shaming (although it was funny) It's sort of heterophobia dismissing these elements of male sexuality. We are what we are... we are programmed to find women of child bearing age attractive too.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:40 PM
2

"Birth mortality" isn't accurate. There's more male embryo mortality in the few couple of weeks of pregnancy, there's then more in utero mortality for female embryos up to 20 weeks before it reverts to more male mortality in the 3rd trimester and birth. And every subsequent age bracket. More males than females die at every age bracket, including birth.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:20 PM
4

Everybody should upvote all of thrway_1000s archive posts, he's doing a stellar job!
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:23 PM
2

Yeah, you're probably right. I was channelling feminists but Peewee might have snuck in there. I'm not actually sure what the difference is though, coming to think of it.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 02:17 AM
3

Omigard you oppressive shitlord! 100% is a patriarchal construct, it implies 'full'.... like an ERECTION!!!! The correct percentage is whatever percentage we feel is correct on that day, not the day before because HIStory is oppressive and full of manthings, nor TOMorrow which is named after a <spit> manthing, but today as in hormones + lunar phase / feelings = equality.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 01:31 AM
2

Yeah, I'm not saying it's a crime or that he should have been suspended for two semesters, but it's morally wrong and a breach of trust.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:29 PM
4

So with undergraduates up till just before the age bracket of senior lecturers where men finally become a majority are mediocre women 'outperforming' outstanding men? What utter claptrap.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:59 PM
0

Hmm, I don't think publishing a private letter online is ever right unless it's written by you.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 02:15 PM
1

You know when death threats are involved, the police are there to help. What you were told is obviously a lie, since anybody can stab somebody in the back, slit a throat, firebomb a car, shoot somebody, run them down etc etc etc. Or get their boyfriends, fathers, brothers, cousins to do these things for them.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:09 AM
2

Well, they and Everyday Feminism seem to be joined at the hip.... https://goodmenproject.com/author/everyday-feminism/ The articles seem more like the Good Doggy Project. Have a look at the 7 Reasons Men Cheat article for one, all blaming men. The opposite article for women would also be blaming men, but for women cheating "he wasn't there emotionally" blah blah. Same old same old.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:04 AM
1

It looks like it's being morphed by feminist sites like the Good Men Project and Everyday Feminism into a white person thing.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 11:44 PM
0

It would be nice to to have included the Indian muleteers but it is hardly a crime to leave them out. Maybe they are in it? The complaint was that some people might have a problem with "no lead actors of color (sic)". e: where are you getting 1200 from btw?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 09:50 PM
5

My other half works in a female dominated environment, bullying is alleged to be taken seriously, but it has led to two situations: 1) People (women specifically) making up bullying complaints. 2) When accused of bullying, waterworks galore and counterclaims.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:48 PM
2

A woman has the right to maternity leave of up to a year. The father has the right to paternity leave of up to two weeks. There is Shared Parental Leave, but the father has no right to this. He must have permission from the mother, even though she might only want to take a few weeks of maternity leave.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:23 PM
129

All men are creeps unless we have: 1) Good looks 2) Six pack body 3) Lots of money 4) A large penis I fall into at least one of those categories so I'm not viewed as a creep. But... shhhh... I'm really creepy as fuck.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:21 AM
56

They average 520 hours a year on their computers, and 60% of that is spent on gaming. So on average that's 6 hours per week gaming. 51 minutes per day. You can do that commuting from work and back, let alone when you get home from work. I am sure a significant minority of guys have given up and game as a substitute for real life, but this is really putting the cart before the horse.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 11:49 AM
1

No, they say that the additional difference is in maternity and prescription drugs, for women of child bearing age. So for that age bracket, there is close to 70% difference, vs simply massive overspending in every other age bracket apart from children, where the additional spending on boys accounts for 0.8% of total spending. But still more boys die than girls. Actually more males die than females in every age bracket from birth until death. Yet healthcare is still massively skewed in favour of…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 10:48 AM
1

No, I'm not an ideological feminist - I would love to encounter evidence that challenges my views or assumptions. I'm from the UK, so you naming channels from other countries doesn't change the view that I have from living here that the core tenets of feminism are not robustly challenged.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 09:59 AM
5

I am not familiar with Fox News as a viewer, perhaps somebody could verify whether or not the pro/agnostic/anti feminism ratio is in any way balanced there. I'd love to think that there was a channel that regularly dissected the alleged pay gap etc - perhaps there is a prime time series on it. Could you provide a link?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:52 PM
2

There's an enormous disparity in healthcare spending between the sexes already, in favour of women. Excluding maternity related costs. Are you against equality in healthcare spending?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:46 PM
4

No, you replied to "it's about the mainstream media never once criticizing feminists or feminism, the way they do every other idea". And you referred to a Huffy Post article proclaiming the wonderments of feminism as evidence that this is not the case. The fact is that feminist ideology is treated with kid gloves in the mainstream media. It's not viciously dissected in the same way other political ideas are, not in the slightest. This is with private institutions, as well as public ones - like t…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:27 PM
8

In your opinion of course, my opinion is that their uncritical acceptance of feminist hypotheses makes them feminists, who are part of the problem. I would welcome a heavily moderated version of this place at some point, but menslib - unfortunately - is not that.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:14 PM
10

The criteria was "legitimately critical of feminist ideas". The Huffy Post's article with the title of your search terms, "The Problem with Feminism" for example - since you brought it up - isn't a critique at all, it's "the problem with feminism is that people don't know how amazing it is" clickbait. There probably aren't zero, but the ratio of pro-feminist articles and articles critical of feminism in mainstream media will certainly be incredibly lopsided. Then we have the issue of subsequentl…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:52 PM
10

eadala mentions egalitarianism though, not a desire to find a pro-feminist sub/site. Menslib appears to be fully subscribed to damaging and divisive feminist hypotheses such as The Patriarchy or 'toxic masculinity', so are clearly feminist, not simply "pro-feminist". Might as well join f/Feminism and cut out the middle man.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:36 PM
3

He isn't a source and it isn't insulting highlighting a TV program (which it essentially is) with 55M+ viewers that has content which debunks feminist myths that form the basis of opposition to MR. It's news that the news is spreading... very relevant indeed.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 12:52 PM
1

You are quite correct, I shall hand myself in for re-education immediately!
/r/MensRights12/07/17 03:37 PM
19

If toxic masculinity is to blame for male suicide then an increase in rates of female suicide indicates that toxic femininity is on the increase and feminism is failing.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:30 AM
3

It's because they cost a lot less than a girlfriend.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:52 PM
7

In the UK, men pay the same taxes and National Insurance as women, but die younger (less pension, less elderly care costs) and use healthcare services a lot less. In exchange for this, I would like equal investment in and focus on male and female health issues.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 03:41 PM
16

Women consume more healthcare than men even after excluding maternity and maternity related issues. Facts. They are important.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 10:40 AM
1

I listened to a podcast a while back featuring an F->M transsexual. He was completely taken by surprise when, post transition, he became interested in - and understood more easily - science and technology. e: reading this back, it looks like I might be joking, but I'm not. I'm sure the podcast was posted here at some point.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 07:18 PM
4

I don't get the red flags part either - is that a jiu jitsu style? A gun-slinging technique?
/r/MensRights06/07/17 10:19 AM
15

The feminist campaign against this must be reaching fever pitch by now. /s
/r/MensRights06/07/17 08:52 AM
15

Feminists have successfully campaigned over the years for an increasingly broad definition of domestic violence. So aside from the traditional physical definition, there is now coercive and controlling behaviour. Since the power behind this type of behaviour is far from being physical, their own definitions include more female behaviour than male now. It's only because they are fully subscribed to their feminist ideology which portrays all men as oppressors and all women as victims that this lev…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 04:33 PM
15

I found "The Health of the 51%" report title, considering the source, painfully ironic considering the fact that the only reason there is a female majority in the first place is because so many more males of every age group die. There are more boys born than girls, so it's not even starting at 50/50.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 10:02 AM
10

I feel sorry for them. I hope Red Squiggle #3's son's suffering isn't as horrific as it can be and that there are no life threatening complications. He'll hopefully get by just fine, just as women who had their clitoral hoods and/or labia removed when they were young tend to.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:25 PM
1

Your chances of visitation will go way down if you plead guilty to any kind of threatening behaviour though. It sounds like you have time to get your lawyer to request whatever information they need from YouTube to prove your innocence.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:22 PM
10

Good advice. It would be very easy for this alleged evidence to be validated, or not. This isn't a he said/she said. This is a situation where what both of them are saying can be confirmed or invalidated a lot more easily than it is for a man to spend years behind bars.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:18 AM
1

I don't think they do that, it seems as though they balance sections where one sex does better (eg spatial awareness vs language) to equalise the outcome.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:07 PM
3

I wonder what the difference would be if they used IQ tests that hadn't been massaged over the years to appease feminists. Here's an interesting article on the subject... http://www.sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-equality/sex-differences-general-intelligence/
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:28 PM
6

Come on, it's the BBC.... they clearly travelled to Indonesia and adopted a disabled kid with no face.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:49 AM
4

The only way to do this is to refuse hungry homeless men food until the stats are 50/50. Or stop favouring women with welfare and housing until their food bank needs match those of men. Which one is it, feminists? We need an equal outcome here!!!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:43 AM
3

It's a bit tragic, you can always create another account and post wherever you want. The use of "you" is therefore as inaccurate as the reasons for banning.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:51 PM
2

Yes, that's what I am saying. With the cases I've read the catalyst for it being portrayed as rape can also be association with feminists gripped with rape culture hysteria. Amongst many other reasons. A cheat shield being one of them. Last year's UK report into Violence Against Women and Girls had males sexually assaulted by females count as "women and girls" for the stats, because sexual assault has been defined by feminists as part of the male oppressor/female victim fantasy they have. I can'…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:52 AM
2

It's very sad, it makes me want to arm wrestle feminists for money.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 12:01 AM
9

What help though? Take an acrimonious divorce involving false allegations where a man's kids have been kidnapped from him, he's lost his job and the government is looking after his ex-wife and kids and hounding him for money. As well as everybody else hounding him for money for the debts he racked up for his family. Could situations like these be responsible for the difference? If the sexes were reversed, would the former wife's "toxic femininity" be blamed for her eventual suicide?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:53 PM
1

What they are saying is that if Esther Vergeer hadn't retired that she would be the best tennis player in the world. Although I think that categories would be used quite happily if that was the case.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:33 PM
3

Did he not say that he held back a bit so as not to embarrass them too much?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:09 PM
7

Notice that the metric is "getting a foot in the door", getting an interview. A lot of the males, for a lot of the jobs, will still have a 0% chance of getting the actual job because diversity targets/drive.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:07 AM
9

You should watch the first debate for International Men's Day from the UK parliament to see how mainstream feminist indoctrination manifests itself in politics. The political stage is THE most relevant. The WEP is promoting the wage gap, quotas, VAWG... all of the manipulated stats and lies that, when believed, seriously damage any effort towards achieving equal chances to get justice/jobs/promotions for our sons in the future. And since when, in the name of Sweet Fuck, is bashing a political pa…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 09:47 AM
3

Intentionally getting somebody paralytic or giving them drugs to induce a coma and having sex with them is completely different from two people getting drunk and having sex. The kind of drunk where you can't remember anything is extreme, but well done you for using the apex fallacy. Contact sports should be illegal too because I don't like watching people behead each other with chainsaws.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 09:37 AM
2

I agree that watering down the terms 'sexual assault' and even 'rape' to include unwanted kisses or drunk sex is something that needs addressed. It's made pretty much everybody a sexual assaulter and rapist. It's just that couples don't generally report each other when they've had sex after a night out. But they could. Is attempting to hold a woman's hand sexual assault yet?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 06:55 PM
3

For the other two to get 12 and 9 years respectively is ridiculous. He wouldn't have been tortured to death if it wasn't for their roles. They could have stopped it at any point. They'll only serve half of their sentences, so will be out in a few years.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:36 PM
0

This might seem harsh, but I'd like to hear what alleged non-binary people think when they are 35 or 40 years old. People are very impressionable when they are young, especially when it comes to fashionable causes. Look at all of the anarchists of the 1970s. They are bankers and architects now. Anarchists miraculously retain an average age of 21.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:40 AM
7

There was the example of the Canadian women's hockey team coming dead last in a league of junior male teams too.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 11:33 PM
10

Early stages of pregnancy produces performance enhancing hormones, so I don't know why they are highlighting this, since the other woman was at a disadvantage. It obviously has nothing to do with men either.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 08:42 PM
1

Yes, you are quite right pointing out the forgiving interpretation, which I'd expand to some also simply not being aware of what a lot of influential feminists in the often conveniently amorphous, wider movement desire. The de facto feminists, as I was.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 04:47 PM
2

My point is that just because some followers of a belief system like feminism or Wahhabism are not bigoted, it does not follow that the bigoted tenets of their religion are not responsible for inducing bigoted behaviour in the rest. Separating the two is therefore arbitrary and absolving these institutions of responsibility is dangerous.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 04:03 PM
2

Of course I acknowledge that there are many feminists who are nice people who aren't bigoted in the slightest. I also acknowledge that there are many nice Wahhabis out there too. It's the institutions and philosophies they support that are the problem. To be fair on Wahhabis, they are generally born into such a restrictive society and penalties for opposition are severe. The silent majority of lovely feminists have no such excuse.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:19 PM
1

You are making a very arbitrary distinction.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:54 PM
3

Not really true, because of the oppressor/victim model employed by fundamentalist feminists. It's impossible in their view for the victims to oppress their own oppressors. Since all men oppress all women in their view, it's open season on men and boys. But no other group, because that would be discriminatory and mean.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 10:33 AM
1

They are good levellers... it stops the thing of some kids coming to school in £1000 of brand new clothes whilst others wear hand me downs. Keeping consumerism out of schools is a good thing. Making kids wear winter clothes in the summer is stupid.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:17 PM
1

"It is common for us to point out the many ways in which women suffer as a result of men, through sexism, chauvinism, violence, hegemonic masculinity, institutionalized patriarchy, and on and on, but it is also important for us to realize that boys and men are harmed by these structures as well. Rigid definitions of identity based on gender are just as limiting to little boys as they are to little girls." Unfortunately that's more harmful that the tweet. This is the opening statement used in the…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 09:44 AM
1

I disagree. The more people realise that influential feminists lie and deflect more than even the most scandal-laden politician the better. Influential feminists are the establishment, they are mainstream politics. So they should have an opposition, as should every political group in a democracy. Non-Creationists don't have an issue with opposition to Creationists infiltrating politics. Same here. People are free to believe whatever they want, but the minute money, power and influence are in the…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 09:39 AM
13

Because buyers are predominantly male and sellers are predominantly female. They've decriminalised the female part.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 06:41 PM
8

Hitperson and personatee too.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 08:26 AM
3

I don't think you are correctly prioritizing the beauty product opportunities here. Also removing any male organs that enable production of natural moisture is the socially acceptable - at least in the US - and therefore optimum solution.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 12:03 AM
8

I feel sorry for him, he's doing everything wrong.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 05:15 PM
11

They should remove them at birth along with the foreskins. Having no eyes prevents conjunctivitis, glaucoma, macular degeneration etc after all, and nobody will miss eyesight they've never had. Blended human eyes can almost certainly be used as an ingredient for hand lotion or similar too.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:35 PM
3

As a father of single figure boys I sincerely empathise with you.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 05:52 PM
3

I don't know why this is being downvoted, because these are the kinds of 19th century values feminists are projecting with their ideology.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 05:50 PM
1

It's really only feminists (male and female) who say those things about the MRM. Which is why you had to consciously reject that and satisfy your own curiosity. Which is good. "Feminists" is shorthand for the powerful feminists who lobby for VAWG/DV policy and guidelines, the Istanbul Convention, closing women's prisons, increasing sentencing and reducing due process for crimes only men can be convicted of (eg rape) whilst decriminalising the antithesis (prostitution, but only selling, not the p…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:16 AM
2

I think you are putting words into my mouth, I do not expect things to change quickly and I know full well that women aren't against me/us. Feminists do lobby against male-friendly policy and lobby for ostensibly female-friendly policy which can and does vilify and disadvantage males though. It's part of the problem and 3rd wave feminist ideology is fundamentally incompatible with a world in which my two little boys are not to be viewed as toxic oppressors who need re-educated.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 12:17 AM
3

I disagree, feminism has been the establishment for a few decades now. I don't think you realise how much influence the feminist lobby has and how this is used to stifle change that would benefit males or prevent change that would further demonize us. The oppressors of all women, the people responsible for everything bad in the world.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:01 PM
3

Women could vote and men were generally not excluded by class alone. Depending on what timeframe, political arena and country you are talking about. If you want to cherry pick from variously suitable singularities then I could too. The situation has always been more nuanced than one sided feminist history classes would lead you to believe. Men and women were often shackled in different ways. Please read The Privileged Sex, where a historian looks for evidence of oppression of women and not men, …
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:34 PM
2

No, a majority of the men (at least in Britain) who fought and/or died in WWI could not vote. Feminists were not fighting votes for all, just for their upper middle class friends. Initially they didn't even care about working class women, they reluctantly engaged with them and for them when it became politically useful. Their actions were indeed "fuck men's rights".
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:46 PM
1

Do you accept that you might have this 'flaw' you are attempting to reify?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:16 PM
1

Men have a suicide rate far in excess of women... are men flawed? White people commit suicide far in excess of black people... are white people flawed? Listen to yourself.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:07 PM
2

Suicide and depression do not happen in a vacuum, there are usually events leading up to them. If you can't accept that being jailed for 3 years for not doing anything could be a factor in that then you are devoid of empathy. Do you have the same opinion about POWs who kill themselves years after coming back home? What about POWs who were drafted after committing a couple of crimes back home growing up? Fuck them, right?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:52 AM
4

That's a stupid argument, the only reason he wasn't out because of a random accusation. The probation time should be added on top of a sentence when convicted - men who have served their time should not have their freedom subject to the whim of one of the millions of mentally ill, malicious or simply mistaken masses.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:03 PM
2

Yes, there used to be signs in pubs in the UK that said: "No blacks, no dogs, no Irish."
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:27 PM
2

Maybe the teaching wasn't holistic enough then, because when given an overview of how variables point to pieces of memory you can read from or write to, immutability becomes (correctly) an abnormal assumption. Six characters on a whiteboard or whatever explains the more abstract concept too. I don't get it. :)
/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:16 AM
1

I will give an example from an intro class that was very common. When explaining the concept of variables men often had no problem understanding how variables worked in the concept of a = b and then a = b throughout the program. Where men had a problem was explaining that a could also be assigned another value later. They did not understand the concept of the variable in the whole of the program. They thought very linearly to the point where things were constants. You used a and gave it a value,…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:04 PM
1

There's already talk of AI being sexist, coming from feminists of course. Unless something shows that women are better at everything, it's sexist.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:54 PM
10

I agree, she's a despicable woman but her appearance should be left out of this. I'd like the conversation to be directed towards possible sentencing.... at the very least the amount of time the man spent in prison plus an amount for limiting and jeopardising the freedom of the second man, as well as wasting police time. Having mental health issues wasn't taken into account when believing her bullshit, so it shouldn't be taken into account with sentencing. It's one or the other.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:50 PM
1

The core tenet of modern feminism is that a Patriarchy of men oppresses all women and that all men need to repent and change their inherent 'toxicity'. That's nowhere near the core message of egalitarianism or male rights. It's quasi-religious mumbo jumbo.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:11 AM
3

Feminism started as a backlash against a wider rights movement because they thought women's rights were being side lined. This meant "upper class" women though because - at least until it was politically untenable not to - they didn't give a flying one about working class women. This was at a time when the ordinary man could not vote. As far as The Patriarchy is concerned, in Scotland only 0.3% of men could vote around 1800. In England it was slightly more, but even after all of the reforms thro…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 06:00 PM
1

STOP
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:17 AM
6

Must have been awful for him, it can't get any worse than being a police officer and alleged child molester in prison. Such a sad story, you can see in the video how the girl was pressured into regurgitating stuff she'd been told to say.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:09 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvLsslFEv7k&feature=youtu.be&t=3m10s "Google Play, Vimeo..."
/r/MensRights11/06/17 08:00 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvLsslFEv7k&feature=youtu.be&t=3m10s "Google Play, Vimeo..."
/r/MensRights11/06/17 07:59 PM
2

Yes, I hope it never goes 6 feet under. e: do you need to say it like 8 foot long?
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:25 PM
13

That kid looks about 2 - 3 years old though, which is a geriatric baby. :)
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:05 PM
10

Is that not something mostly to do with very young babies?
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:01 PM
1

It's funny, because some more blinkered feminists would have an issue with what you say. At the same time most of them wouldn't bat an eyelid at statements such as "she left him because he didn't fulfil her anymore, he didn't listen to her needs, he wasn't there emotionally etc etc". It's a two way street.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 01:24 PM
16

Explain the suffragettes not being interested in the ordinary man getting the vote then. Let alone, initially, the ordinary woman getting the vote. Feminism has a history of being driven by blinkered idiots, a proud tradition it carries on to this day.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:40 PM
1

Yes, that figure is arrived at using the same abuse of statistics that says only 4 - 8% are false allegations. The reality lies somewhere in the middle, and it's important to note that you are not saying 97% are false. e: sorry, that wasn't accurate. The statement you make is accurate, the abuse of statistics would be to say that 97% are false. Which you are not saying.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:48 PM
1

I know that the current generation of kids, at least around me, cut their teeth on tablets at a very early age and so move onto advanced stuff much quicker. You'd be amazed what even my four year old does with redstone, and he does indeed install automatic doors with pressure plates. I'm not a gamer, him and his brother's interest in this didn't come from me, except if you include me advising Santa to get them Nintendo 3DSes. But yes, a bunch of boys around the age of my eldest (he's only a coup…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:26 PM
6

I know parents that tried to get their girls to play with anything that wasn't traditionally girly. Their daughters rebelled and they ended up letting them play with what they liked. ie dolls etc. Look at the Minecraft 'epidemic' too... from my experience more boys play than girls, and when girls play it they tend to not get into it as much as boys. It's not marketed to boys, the default character is a female and Sqaishey's videos are just as accessible as Stampy's. Maybe boys and girls are inte…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 09:25 AM
2

Since he is completely agreeing with the reasons then he should be first to be dropped. It would be a shame to drop speakers that have an issue with being dropped just because they are male.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 07:31 PM
7

I prefer Bitbucket... they have unlimited free private repos. And free teams (up to 5). SourceTree is by far the best Git/Mercurial front end I've used too.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:23 AM
4

Thanks for the link, but... http://archive.is/Ijedp The Grauniad don't deserve the clicks.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:55 PM
6

http://archive.is/mtv7n
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:43 PM
3

I got a "Healing from Toxic Whiteness" popup advertisement when I went there. Say no more.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:08 AM
2

It is food for thought, male value being more intrinsically linked to earnings than that of the average female would be my intuitive conclusion. They aren't making more money for the same job, but for gravitating towards the locations, niches and roles that pay more. Re your assertion that women are unable to break into high-paying professions, if you could give examples of this I would be more than willing to listen.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:01 AM
3

So drug addict/spurned lover points at a man and he goes straight to jail? Is human behaviour not taken into account in any small way before imprisoning men on the whim of crazy people?
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:34 PM
1

Here's the parent company/underwriters in Oz... http://hollard.com.au/ They originated in South Africa, but have branched out globally. They also provide services to brokers, so you might not know you have insurance with them. “People from the US have threatened us with legal action and all kinds of things,” he said. “They’re not going to get very far." They can always cancel any insurance they have that are underwritten by Hollard. The thing is with insurance that you can almost always get a be…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:42 PM
23

The recording they sought, however, ended up being a video file with no discernible images. Police described it as "very dark" and "more of only audio." So not a video in terms that anybody would relate to. And if "child porn" is a teenager recording a duvet whilst his girlfriend of roughly the same age and himself are making noises then we might as well scrub all penalties for it. Or maybe make the logical distinction between teenagers of roughly the same age doing stuff together and predatory …
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:25 PM
3

No worries, I'd hate to think that anybody was trying to distil these stories of blatant discrimination down to one generic meme-like thing. As somebody has previously pointed out, you only have to look as far as a myriad of general discussions on the internet asking what's bad about being a man for these types of experiences to surface.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:10 PM
6

So by "it" you meant "a story I saw awhile (sic) ago on 4chan" and not the link that polaryzed posted. And by "shortened" you meant that the scene was a park and it involved people who all did completely different things, but with similar motives fuelled by the feminist-frenzy against males we see in the media. Do you post in threads about street robberies involved different shapes, colours and numbers of assailants and circumstances that it's exactly the same story you read somewhere else. But …
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:56 PM
7

"Exact" as in completely different but similarly sexist, feminism-enabled attack on a child.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:27 PM
57

Yes, that poor girl witnessing a violent mob descending on her father and blocking her from getting to him. It's the mob who are the child abusers here. And what kind of paedophile openly takes videos of kids in parks ffs?!?! It's the 21st century, there are so many different hidden cameras and gadgets available that it stands to reason that anybody openly filming their kid in a park is not a paedophile!
/r/MensRights30/05/17 04:33 PM
10

I upvoted you. It's not that nobody here can take a joke, it's that there are crazy people who take any and every comment made in the "manosphere" that, without context, can be used to demonstrate how eeevviil we are. It's tragic, but there's an army of pathetic, passive aggressive ideologues out there who don't realise how brainwashed they are. Who form mobs in real life like the one described by the OP. And which, yes, we should punch our way through to rescue our children from psychological a…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 04:25 PM
1

Cassie Jaye started The Red Pill documentary as a fully blown feminist, not sceptical at all. She actually intended/expected the film to expose the MRM for what she believed as a feminist it to be - ie hateful and without basis. It was openly Crowdsourced with free speech advocates mostly funding it. The free speech advocates and anyone else who donated had zero editorial control... something that feminist funders refused to give up when she was looking for funding from them.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 02:42 PM
2

I always think of organised crime when it comes to violence between the sexes. Size is irrelevant, it's all about power. Whether that power comes from a big gang, a violent family or a willingness to destroy somebody's life by telling lies about them and making sure they never see their kids again is irrelevant. Of course most gangster have enough scruples to not kidnap other people's kids.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 02:28 PM
5

Is this including people on diets?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 02:14 PM
1

I wonder what the food and drink sales would be like in a female only viewing compared to a normal one?
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:43 AM
1

You accused people of not being aware of history, when in fact - as subsequent information resulting in moldyxorange's gracious edit demonstrates - you should not have done so. Apologies for the snarkiness, which was relative date awareness related.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:38 PM
3

Having and exercising the right to vote vs who got to choose custody of a child seem like two different things, are they not? Of course, and piar wasn't the one who brought voting into the discussion - he is just responding. Also, if both father and mother lacked a say, then who did judges side with more often in custody cases? Lacking a vote is not lacking a say. I don't know who judges sided with more going on 200 years ago.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:14 PM
3

Yes, I would agree with that. I don't know what year the law assuming paternal custody was enacted though, it would be safe to assume that it was a relatively short blink of the eye away too. I'd be interested if anybody had a date for that.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:02 PM
5

Do you guys really think that women had any say in where their kids went before they even got the right to vote? Look up the Tender Years Doctrine. All women in the UK could vote in 1928, 10 short years after all men could (although men had to fight in WWI here to get suffrage for the ordinary man on the table (the suffragettes were only interested in women, a bit like feminists today)). So women had a say since 1839 in England and maternal custody was actually presumed since 1873. Did the ordin…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:31 PM
24

piar is responding to moldyxorange there. All men being able to vote is a relatively recent phenomenon itself and very relevant in terms of moldyxorange's comment. In the UK the ordinary man could only vote in 1918, after 4 years of gruelling warfare. All women got the vote in 1928. So the logic used by moldyxorange can be broadly applied to men. And 1928 minus 1839 or 1873 does not result in a negative number.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:21 PM
5

What about basic arithmetic? It's pointless teaching history if somebody can't look at two dates and tell which one comes before/after the other.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:06 PM
1

Actually that's exactly the case.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:03 PM
3

In the one of the cases it seems the guy was defending a woman that the Fair told to "fuck off and go to hell". I notice that she didn't dox her for whatever she said, but instead doxed him. "You live by the sword and die by the sword" is a two way street, Does the woman she insulted have a moral right to dox Fair? I don't think so, it's incredibly immature and potentially harmful beyond having semi-private opinions shared with employers and potential employers. I'd imagine that anybody with a s…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:24 PM
1

I do find success and ambition to be attractive traits in men, but I want my partner to be equally drawn to my ambition and my achievements if that makes sense (as well as finding my (future) mothering skills attractive). I have to say that you guys being attracted to confidence, ambition and the fruits of those traits - success - is a big driver of male behaviour. You have to at least consider the possibility that what feminists call "toxic masculinity" is merely a by-product of something that …
/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:41 AM
3

Aw thanks very much, I try my best and he'll be alright in a couple of days! I have to say that the only reason I became interested in MR issues is my sons.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 11:09 PM
36

I'll have to be brief, because I am typing this one handed whilst holding my unwell and sleep 4 year old. Which is topical, since I view the mono-faceted, death by a thousand "girls are great, male = privileged/toxic!" messages in mainstream, feminist-prostrating media and institutions as incredibly harmful as it relates to him and his slightly older brother. I am not exaggerating when I say that I view it as a form of psychological child abuse.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:29 PM
1

I was talking about a female gang member. But I actually agree with you... I think societies that sentence children to incredibly long sentences are getting things completely backward. I'm glad that you are consistent.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:35 AM
2

What about a 14 year old gang member who shoots your wife/mother/brother dead? What sentence should they get?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:21 PM
3

So you wanted custody and she didn't object. What if she had demanded equally strongly that she had full custody This is the issue in hand, not one parent saying "yeah, no probs" to the request of the other to have main custody.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 09:42 AM
2

(Just to be clear: fem as in feminist, not as in female.) Yes, it's a tad ambiguous, I prefer brainwashedmuppetsplaining.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 09:24 AM
2

What's the context to that?
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:53 PM
6

Such an amazing amount of money being spent on planning, implementation, construction etc on account of 267 prisoners out of a population closer to 7,500. This is the patriarchy hypothesis in action. It's pathetic.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 01:07 PM
8

Men can learn a lot from being stabbed by a woman, remembering that women are the primary victims of them stabbing men.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 11:36 PM
52

When men who have been accused of violent crimes have their pictures in the papers, they should take them from a choice selection of personal pictures involving smiles and puppies too.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:03 PM
3

I've noticed that it tends to be feminists who attempt to portray any random misogynist they can find as an MRA. See the Red Pill subreddit vs The Red Pill Movie conflation for a great example. Another tactic is attempting to portray anything said against feminism (the political movement) as misogyny. Or anything criticising any individual woman for that matter.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:58 PM
26

I think the OP misinterpreted the term "blacked out" as "passed out". The linked article does not. A blackout can mean loss of consciousness in some contexts, but also loss of memory - as is the case here. Either way, a female experiencing a blackout (or few) after drinking effectively means that anybody consenting (or not) to her riding them like Seabiscuit is committing rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 10:55 AM
1

She mentioned the specific policies the WEP have on males in teaching... Equal opportunities in teaching and school leadership Nurseries and primary schools are overwhelmingly dominated by women, building an expectation among young children that looking after and educating them is not work for men. At both primary and secondary school level, men are far more likely than women to be in senior leadership roles, embedding the equally troubling assumption that men should lead and women follow. While…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:17 AM
4

I disagree... feminism these days is "we need money/legislation/quotas because women are the primary victims of X". Countering that position requires pointing out that they are not. Unfortunately simply by doing this can give some people a misleading impression. Not countering their spurious arguments, backed by billions in public money around the world, is allowing them to stand. How would you counter "women are the primary victims of war" for example? Remembering that these statements have the…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 09:07 AM
45

I suppose this demonstrates one of many reasons why young men who take Women's (aka Gender) Studies courses are setting themselves up for debt and failure. Actually that applies to young women too, but to a slightly lesser extent. I mean when the factual accuracy of your coursework takes second place to the ideologies and feelings of your instructor, it's just a course in how to be a compliant sheep.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 08:25 AM
1

C+= is hilarious, I hadn't seen that before - thanks! I've came across somebody bleating on about master/slave before on GitHub, sad really. No doubt they think electrical connectors are oppressive too.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 10:19 PM
2

I wonder how long it will be until somebody develops a media article creator. Perhaps four fields of input with the program accessing a knowledge base maintained by a company in India or somewhere else that isn't London, New York or Paris. Subject(s): robots; ai; machine learning; Conclusion(s): bad; racist; sexist; Reason(s): white men; patriarchy; Writer(s): Laurie Penny It could spit out 1015 articles in the space of a few seconds and (possibly human) editors could pick from a few that were s…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 09:07 PM
1

Yes, it makes it difficult coming up with gender neutral class and object names because output varies between three possibilities. With C++20 onwards there will be infinitely variable output because there are infinite genders at which point programs will cease to work. But it's all for a good cause.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:55 PM
21

She does not understand why there are separate men’s and women’s sports teams, why women earn less and why they don’t run our country. So it's okay to indoctrinate the poor girl with the majority of your SJW crap, but not the transsexual stuff. M'kay.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:30 PM
1

Percentages between two cherry picked data points tell us very little about overall trend. And nothing about reality when you are comparing a much larger set of numbers with another set.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:08 PM
3

It's not accurate, the rate for women has increased by less than males. Looking roughly at the biggest increasers - the American Indian and Alaska Native - we see at increase in rate of around 3.5 for women vs 7 for men. The increase in rate for men alone is roughly equal to the entire number of suicides for women (in that group). Massaging percentages from cherry-picked data points does not change this. It's like comparing two towns. One had 100 murders last year. The other had 2. This year one…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:51 AM
2

Shame on those parents who complained about him trying to return to work. Shame on the school for taking their hysterical, evidence-devoid views into account over a member of staff.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:40 PM
1

Nobody is saying that most housewives in the 18th century lived a life of luxury. Speaking of being intellectually dishonest. It is fair to say that some did though, whilst their husbands went out to work long hours in different jobs.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 09:37 AM
9

Which would you prefer, black lung, or joint damage? What are you on about? It isn't an either or. Miners got every weight bearing and joint beasting injury in addition to black lung and the chance of getting crushed to death at any moment or dying in an explosion. I was in an old mine the other day, I couldn't even stand up straight in parts of it. It was a humbling experience. In the deepest shafts, it would take the men a couple of hours per day being transported up and down to the seams. Unp…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 12:21 AM
8

Stooping to the levels of changing the meaning of artwork on a whim, he could remove the bull and replace it with something that completely changes the meaning of the girl standing there. The bull has to be worth a couple of million now too, so there's that.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 02:29 PM
2

So prenups are legally enforceable in one direction only. Limit money, no. Guarantee money, yes. Is that it?
/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:37 AM
1

Indeed. I think also that existing customers face enough quotas and diversity nonsense in their lives to be bothered paying for more of it in a place that is supposed to be an escape.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:57 PM
6

Are you saying there are no lesbians in Chechnya?
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:58 PM
3

In this study domestic violence included injuries caused by street crime. Wow, they have no shame.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 10:02 AM
3

I saw a documentary on false accusations in Israel recently Do you have a title/link to the documentary?
/r/MensRights02/04/17 06:56 PM
3

And a repository of bunny boilers.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:05 PM
2

That could be covered by insurance, although I see that a lot of insurance backed claims are settled before court too. I still think paying out for frivolous claims is a terrible long term strategy.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:03 PM
7

Why in the name of Fuck any company would settle in that case is beyond me. Crazy times.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 11:33 AM
2

Another probable woozle uncovered - thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights31/03/17 09:39 PM
4

Those male suicide rates everyone quotes only refer to successful suicides. All it means is that men choose methods that are more likely to lead to death. No, it means men commit suicide in much greater numbers. It's been estimated that 95% of recorded attempted suicides are not attempted suicides, but are in a separate 'cry for help' category. It would be interesting to see a breakdown of real attempted suicides to see how they are divided between the sexes. We may well see that men continue to…
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:02 PM
2

I notice that xe points us in the direction of xer "Toxic Masculinity" feminist indoctrination course though. So that's alright then, men can discuss male issues under feminist supervision. They should set up a club and meet off-campus, as Mike Buchanan suggest. Preferably in a pub. Any Plymouth landlords around that areas who are willing to offer big student discounts in the name of freedom and democracy?
/r/MensRights31/03/17 07:25 AM
1

Good stuff. Please check all of the figures yourself if you have any lingering doubts.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:38 PM
2

The 655 includes all civilian casualties, as well as industrial accidents. The total of around 16,000 civilian deaths includes 14,661 from the male merchant navy. The rest is divided between men, women and children. And the British have always been fastidious about record keeping. Since children died in near equal numbers, I think it's pretty horrible erasing their suffering to score feminist points. But such is life. You might not think the drip drip of history revision is important, but you ne…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:54 PM
3

I notice that intelligent articles such as this in MensRights don't get mysteriously catapulted in short order onto the reddit front page. It's just the borderline silly ones.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:28 AM
3

No, thousands of women were not massacred/slaughtered in WWI. Young women did not fight and were not targeted, and children died in roughly equal and comparatively minute numbers.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:44 AM
13

Hmmm. The state should have to pay compensation for people wrongfully put behind bars whether they are convicted or not. It would make them much more careful about who they remand in custody for lengthy periods of time.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:34 AM
1

I think the alt-right has a natural alt-left. Look up "Global Trumpism" for a nice insight... the sides are closer than you'd think, the left having been overtaken by identity politics and the right having been taken over by (different) corporate interests.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:32 PM
4

655 women of all ages, including industrial accidents in the jobs they assumed whilst men risked their lives in different and much more imminent ways. From that total figure, 411 women of all ages were killed from airship raids, aeroplane raids and bombardments from the sea in Great Britain. 295 children died during these attacks too. How many of those 411 women were "young" is up for debate. But it's nothing compared to 800,000 mostly young men. The vast majority of whom could not vote. Not tha…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:06 PM
1

Oh yes, use of the "very likely" statement will become obvious if you ever do get around to putting a bit of effort into following a lead. What is 100% certain is that the numbers of "young women" killed is close to the number of children killed, so putting young women next to young men as if there is any equivalence without including children is incredibly untruthful. But the phrase doesn't work with the historical revisionist intent when you add children into the mix.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 08:00 PM
5

I've provided evidence, you might have a slow internet connection though. But please feel free to provide simple evidence of your case, that a single woman died in combat on the battlefield in WWI rather than asking me to prove a negative. Do you believe there to be hundreds? Thousands? Billions? Please share your beliefs with the world.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:48 PM
1

Yes, you are correct... good shout.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:16 PM
1

I'm not playing your "actual juvenile game", go and read my post history to get a link to an easily digestible tome. Did you know that it's very likely that more children were killed in WWI than "young women"? Almost certainly more underage boys were killed in combat in WWI than the few hundred women who died (amongst children and yet more men) in attacks on British soil.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:14 PM
3

Have a look at the actual records to see where the deaths of men, women and children occurred. It's 100% accurate. You have unfortunately been misled, whereas I have read the actual records.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 06:32 PM
2

Zero British women were slaughtered on the battlefield in WWI.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 06:25 PM
10

I think it's sweet. It makes me want to pinch their chubby cheeks and give their blue mops a quick ruffle.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:06 AM
1

Please point out the shouting and screaming in these replies. The down votes are one thing, but they have been applied because the logic of the poster does not apply to a modern democracy where the alleged oppressed have been a democratic majority for going on 100 years.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:25 AM
6

Technically true, but blacks and "coloureds" in South Africa did not have the same voting rights as whites, and the daughters of white people where not white if both parents weren't too. Completely different story from feminism.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 10:09 PM
60

Unless it's for a "protected class", for example women - who are incidentally the majority of the population.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:15 PM
3

That's hilarious really, a group of post-modernists who don't believe in facts editing a repository of facts. It would be possible for enough people to completely wreck Wikipedia (more than it already is) by replacing or supplementing facts with subjective feelings. Go feminism, bring on the Dark Ages II!
/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:51 PM
1

Far too much crap in there about standing up for women and girls, as if that's something new. Here's a new one - how about standing up for boys?
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:24 AM
2

No it isn't, feminism has been shoehorned into modern left wing politics, but it's an unnecessary appendage. It's really easy to focus on the betterment of all without having a specific section of the population getting special treatment.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:00 PM
11

Yes, I've been amazed at how uneducated even some alleged medical professionals are about the function of the penis. Those doctors who feel some need to rip foreskins back on intact boys is a symptom of a distinct lack of awareness and education. No wonder feminists are confused about basic male bodily functions if some doctors are like that.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:30 PM
9

I couldn't agree more. Divide and conquer has been used for millennia and - let's face it - sex is the ultimate divide.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:14 AM
7

I'm a left winger and I do see the infiltration of the right in the MRM. I actually think the right has been infiltrating the left for some time too, hence the train wreck we are witnessing. Look at the UK, the first actual left wing leader (Corbyn) being savaged from within (spearheaded by feminists) as well as from the mainstream media. Makes you think. So let's talk about periods and the number of fortune 500 companies run by elves.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:42 PM
8

Unbelievable... he missed out the children. 411 women died from airship raids, aeroplane raids and bombardments from the sea in Great Britain during WWI. 295 children died during these attacks too. It has to be pointed out that the women weren't necessarily young either, so the number of young women killed during attacks on Great Britain was probably under both the number of children killed as well as the number of men executed as a result of courts-martial during WWI. https://ia800502.us.archiv…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:06 PM
1

At'll do pig, at'll do.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:13 PM
3

There can often be little difference between a 22 year old and a 17.9 year old in terms of maturity and you are demonstrating this admirably. Thanks for your input.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 02:37 PM
5

It will matter very much to you if you accidentally hook up with a 17 year old in a state where the age of consent is 18 and there are no Romeo and Juliette laws. Then you, having banged some non-greasy hot chick you met in an over-21 nightclub, would fit your own definition of a paedophile. At that point, you'd probably be very willing to concede that actually paedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent kids and you are not a paedophile. Hence why the word is so bad, because that is truly fucked…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:54 AM
25

So not all women would take this for period related illness, because not all women have troublesome periods. But all women have the option of taking paid leave amounting to ~15% of their working lives? Do men get the option of a fully paid year off every 8.5 years to compensate for this disparity in rights and our ignored medical predicament that gives us shorter lives? Not everybody would take it, same as with the period law. And are feminists really saying that a lot of women can only do a job…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 11:50 PM
1

So if we assume for a moment that he was not wearing some pretty snazzy makeup, are the police powerless to take him away somewhere for a while to see how he is?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 06:13 PM
4

I don't get it - are people of questionable mental stability allowed to walk around with swords in Virginia, but not makeup?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:46 PM
7

I don't understand what counts as concealing the identity. He hasn't put on fake eyelashes and isn't wearing hair extensions or a wig. It's just makeup. So are heavily made up women and goths illegal in Virginia?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:34 PM
8

Do men not have the right to wear makeup?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:08 PM
17

Jeremy Putman was charged with wearing a mask in public, a felony that could land him in jail for up to five years, the Winchester Police Department said in a statement. But he wasn't wearing a mask. They need to start rounding up goths immediately!
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:14 PM
2

I can't help wondering about the influence of the pharmaceutical lobby on this narrative. Constantly drumming the message that "affordable birth control" is a basic human right has a subtext that it isn't affordable. I know that Microgynon 30 is available for £1 per month (£3 for 3 months)... http://www.totalpharmacy.co.uk/microgynon-tablets-months-supply-p-3419.html I'll concede that in the UK these new pharmacy suppliers are competing with the government, who give the things out free of charge…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 11:14 AM
4

Here's the original paper the article is embellishing upon if anyone is interested... https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/6_casedeaton.pdf I wouldn't be so quick to absolve technology and globalisation, both of which have resulted in new jobs in the west, but also a lot of job losses. There's also consolidation to consider, for example with farming and related businesses or with retail which has been dependant on advances in technology itself and which have destroyed untold numb…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:23 AM
1

That's just the her internalized misogyny though - so all that bad stuff is still the fault of all the men who have interfered with what would otherwise have been her pure lived experience.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:08 PM
4

I'm not watching it, I've heard of this one before. Is the baby a boy by any chance?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 12:49 PM
4

force of automation has met its match in the forward march of education and feminism No, it's only just begun. It just so happens that the low hanging fruit was in traditionally male industries. There really aren't many sectors that cannot be transformed/decimated by a combination of technology and outsourcing. Right now, let alone in a few years time.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 03:50 PM
1

It doesn't sound like they only employ women, it does sound like a nightmare of a place to work at though.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:29 PM
7

Not if you are just daydreaming and they are interpreting the general direction of your eyeballs as staring at them.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:07 PM
5

You should look into a remarkable women called Erin Pizzey, who opened the world's first shelter for women who were victims of domestic violence. She allowed men in her shelters to normalise having non-abusive men around. They also mentored the kids. Feminists had harassed her incessantly (feminists, the likes of whom had attempted to get her involved in a bombing campaign), and subsequently one of her dogs got shot. There is no smoking gun, no confession, but the police were worried enough at t…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:18 AM
1

I read that in the UK it's estimated that there are approx the same number of female prostitutes as there are male prisoners. So prostitution is giving a lot of women a way of making money that really doesn't impact society to anywhere near the extent that forcing them all to turn to other forms of crime would.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:14 PM
12

... profit...
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:24 PM
13

No, if you look at Figure 3 and surrounding info in your link to the stats, the 18% is for total "correctional population", which includes non-custodial probation and parole, as well as local jail and prison. So the 99% bit of hyperbole re prison population isn't too far off the actual ~94% figure. edit: here's a more blindingly obvious source for anybody who can't be bothered reading the other source... https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inmate_gender.jsp We could massively reduce …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:45 AM
6

You said there were waiting lists at 2 out of at least 4 shelters "women can stay at". Ordinarily when people don't answer simple questions directly there is a reason.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:27 PM
2

In my area there are shelters for everybody and there are women's shelters. Are there male only shelters where you are?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:48 PM
2

Why are there waiting lists when there are empty beds - are those facilities of better quality?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:13 PM
6

Yes, but that's the US and the article was using world figures because they look better for the feminist point they are making.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:00 PM
91

These reforms are based on the premise that the accused is guilty and therefore that the complainant isn't lying. This is insulating false accusers from the reality of their actions and women do not need the same protection as children in the first place. Because they are not children.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 04:09 PM
45

Of all the people murdered in 2012, half of them were women killed by their partners or family members, but only one in twenty men were killed by partners or family members. No. The figure is half of women murdered in 2012. 'Only' 5% of murdered men being killed by their partners is so disingenuous because the actual direct comparison is that 1 in 3 domestic violence murder victims are male. That's less of a difference than in suicide rates, yet feminists don't want that being looked at in a non…
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:16 PM
3

Archive: http://archive.is/mwb85
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:31 PM
3

I'm not sure it's accurate to say (from the Dallas study) that "women were hit much harder than men by the disappearance of middle-skill jobs" on the basis of percentages of workers. Since there was roughly a 2 to 1 ratio of men working vs women in the 1970s, we'd expect double the percentage of women to be affected, assuming that skill level was not female dominated in the 1970s - which is unrealistic. It could actually be that 3x the number of men worked in middle-skill jobs, meaning that the …
/r/MensRights18/03/17 10:20 AM
2

No no no!! :) Embrace the generic! It's been my non-tampon related experience that there are some crappy products out there, but there are also ones that match or get close to top brands. Which makes sense since a lot of differently branded products are made in the same factories. But yes, those are in the cheapest category and 32 tampons might not be enough for everybody. There's still £1 left in the budget for spending on more, or fancier, but still non-branded products though. :)
/r/MensRights17/03/17 11:13 PM
2

No worries, I did a bit of Binging... Tampons: https://www.tesco.com/groceries/Product/Details/?id=268347899 https://groceries.asda.com/product/tampons/asda-protect-super-nonapplicator-tampons/910000301440 Pads: https://www.tesco.com/groceries/product/details/?id=258279522 Contraceptive pills: http://www.totalpharmacy.co.uk/microgynon-tablets-months-supply-p-3419.html
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:34 PM
1

Yes, I went to school with somebody similar. When we were 11 in primary school the female teacher came into the showers after swimming to get us to hurry up and I'll never forget how flustered she got at seeing a naked 'man' in there with us. In high school that same guy and one of his friends used to go down to the pub at lunchtime for a pint, obviously in broad daylight at a time where publicans would be on high alert. I'd hate to think of any woman getting into trouble for having sex with the…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:14 PM
11

If by "gender norms" they mean "lobbying positions taken by powerful feminist organizations like NOW" then I agree.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 12:30 PM
21

Adoption is voluntarily taking on responsibility for a child other than your own.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 09:01 AM
1

Sex - not just rape - can damage male and female genitalia. For men, a torn frenulum or penile fracture are two examples. If she's saying this, she's being either naïve or disingenuous. Ask her if her dildo has a frenulum.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 04:58 PM
17

News Flash: BBC Cherry Picks Data Points and Time Frames To Construct A Feminist Article Shocker!
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:12 PM
2

That's not technically true though, there are alternatives - meaning there is no need for a specific product at all - and in any case the cost is £2 per month (or £0 when on the pill, which can cost around the same per month (if you shop around)). But I'm not going to argue against a human desire for optimum comfort and for keeping all wardrobe choices available for the entire month. So I would agree with the OP that the basic additional needs of the average man to avoid malnutrition costs more …
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:33 AM
2

I was going to mention that, good research and rebuttal of Mr Meyright's diabolic position.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:59 PM
1

Unfortunately, things in the UK are not as rosy as you think. Look at this sentence for singing a song... https://stv.tv/news/west-central/313607-scott-lamont-jailed-for-singing-sectarian-song-before-old-firm-clash/ I would have to cast light on your train of thought that "we do not have any evidence that her sentence was influenced by any inappropriate bias on the part of the judge". Since there is standing judicial advice not to imprison women I wouldn't be so quick to say that it isn't inappr…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:17 PM
2

We're mostly on the same page, but she was indeed charged with a racially aggravated crime, plus it was multiple officers assaulted, not just one... as well as the fight and ensuing assaults on staff that got the police involved: She admitted three counts of assaulting a police officer, three charges of racially aggravated public order offences, one count of assaulting an accredited person, and one charge of common assault. There are two ways of spinning her behaviour. As I say though, I tend to…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:37 PM
5

There are examples of people going to prison here (in the UK) for hate speech, let alone assaulting members of the public and the police as well as hurling racist abuse. So it's a lenient sentence compared to some. There's standing judicial advice to think twice before sending women to prison and in Scotland they are in the process of closing all but one locations where females serve prison time. That having been said I don't personally think she should have gone to prison because we all made mi…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:44 PM
1

There are only a tiny minority of homeless women who are sleeping on the streets. So yes, the dry and comfortable majority need sanitary products but it's not a big issue since I'm sure they'd rather raise the £2 per month themselves than swap places with a guy living under a bridge.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 04:54 PM
4

I know, it must seem petty but it's part of a larger pattern. This poster is quite clever in that it makes homelessness look like a near 50/50 that affects women more. Which is the opposite of the truth. It's a reoccurring theme, it just happens to be about tampons this time. So my opinion of this is based on the bigger picture, which is why it might seem like nit-picking.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:07 AM
5

No, the rabbit in the hat is focussing on the near 1/3 of women mostly in warm, but temporary housing (and rounding it up, but that's relatively minor piece of spin) instead of the people on the street. And one of the reasons so many men are actually homeless is because they are denied the warm, but temporary (and also permanent) housing given to women. If I want to help the homeless, I want to give money to somebody not in warm, but temporary housing since their needs have been met aside from h…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:30 AM
6

Nothing's wrong with that. What's wrong is the attempt at making homelessness a near 50/50 when for overall homelessness women make up just over a third, and only around 1/20th of people on the street. You know, the actual homeless that people think about when they visualize homelessness. But getting sanitary products for the minority of homeless who need them is a great idea. There's just no need to spin it.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 08:25 AM
11

Unfortunately "peer review" when it comes to fake 'science' like gender studies or creationism means that it's looked over non-critically by fellow believers to check that it confirms their existing beliefs.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 04:43 PM
3

Yes, and in the UK all men got the vote in 1918 (after WWI) and all women got the vote in 1928. Feminists here weren't actually interested at first in getting working class women the vote and working class men, many of whom died in WWI without ever having been able to vote, weren't even on their radar.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:21 AM
1

I'm so far left I sometimes see communists when I look to my right and there's not a lot to like there, since I am not a radical feminist. It seems she has been pushing that agenda her entire working life. Courtesy of the tax payer.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:53 PM
4

because in UK law only penetrative sex with a penis = rape I am aware of that, but forced to penetrate should = rape too, if we are going to be equal about it. And there is a less serious crime she could have been charged with. Are you in favour of "too drunk to consent" only applying to women?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:29 PM
15

The real issue is why she wasn't facing charges - he was clearly inebriated to beyond the point of throwing up. A.k.a. the beginning of alcohol poisoning if we want to be dramatic about it. Going by feminist doctrine applied equally, she accuses him of rape, he says that he was too drunk to consent, makes a counter allegation and the police charge her as well.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:01 PM
2

In Denmark, parents have the right to a total of 52 weeks' leave with maternity subsistence allowance. The mother is entitled to four weeks' maternity leave prior to giving birth and 14 weeks after; the father is entitled to two weeks' leave after the birth; and the remaining time can be divided according to individual wishes. Does anybody else know what "according to individual wishes" means here, as it applies to Denmark. I know that in the UK converting maternity leave to shared parental leav…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:38 PM
10

Farrar is currently serving her 11th term as state representative for District 148. She works on issues that include women's health, sexual assault, reproductive rights, discrimination, juvenile justice and domestic violence. Does she do any other non-feminist work or does she teach gender studies on the side too?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:35 PM
20

The good news is that juries are still capable of seeing sense about “date rape” — a term, incidentally, that is rarely used these days on the grounds that all rape is rape and thus equally abominable. No it isn't, there's a massive difference between being too drunk to give consent (as the young man was in this case) and being dragged behind a bush at knifepoint on your way home from work. In one case you wanted it, even though you were drunk and so may not have really wanted it if put in the s…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:28 PM
2

Hopefully you'll concur that modernisation of the Middle East has been hindered by Western-led interference and siding with regressive/controllable monarchies such as the Saudis. It wasn't too long ago that our countries were a lot more puritanical than they are now and people were being executed for blasphemy and even now in some places marrying somebody of the "wrong" Christian sect is a no no. It would be relatively easy for a superpower to have scuppered our elections and hindered our econom…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:04 PM
1

The Bible is backwards and does not fit in with modern society either.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:39 PM
2

That's a misquote that changes the meaning of what I said. So it's not an example of truthfulness.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:06 AM
1

I'm not so sure. There are lots of people who take days off regularly, come in late regularly, do Z regularly. Getting fired on that particular day ostensibly for taking an unauthorised day off tells us nothing about employment history.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:13 AM
2

Ask them for evidence.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:20 AM
15

Just picture yourself in late 1930s Germany telling people that the evidence points towards Germans not being the master race and Jews being generally good guys. Or in the early 17th century telling people about Galileo's exciting, evidence based work.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 09:14 PM
7

That reminds me of The Island in the UK (another survival program/competition) where the female team got ill a bit into the series by drinking stagnant water from some infested swamp. The medical team was called in. They saw what the problem was, stopped them drinking the water and treated them (as well as giving them water). The female team went on to win the series. Even though they should really all have been dead. Now they mix the sexes after a few episodes. I don't know if the incidents are…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 08:58 PM
30

It's easy to say as a non-Swede, but a great experiment would be just to give feminists exactly what they want somewhere. So all men resign from government. Then nothing can be blamed on men as a group any more. Although we all know that The Patriarchy would still be responsible for each and every thing that goes wrong, so there's really no point.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 03:32 PM
28

Yes, WTFF indeed! 2009 child endangerment, 2013 attempted murder, 2014 murder. What happened in 2013 if witnesses saw her driving the f-ing vehicle over her tied up kids?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 01:02 PM
1

I remember commenting on this the first time around. I really think the guidelines about women's sentencing (ie, don't send them to prison) are completely out of kilter with the public. But - and I fully expect down votes for this - there is an element of Murder in the First about this, where women are getting lenient/no sentences where they think they are free before a public outcry sends them to prison for time/more time. That's not right, and what makes it not right is feminist policy in acti…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:31 AM
4

"I think we have been turning a blind eye, making excuses, calling it underground or a minor extremist movement or pathetic," the women's studies professor said. How ironic that the women's studies professor, somebody who spreads a religion that encourages its followers to seek out positions of influence in society, has a problem with this. It's not as if the "infiltration" is deliberate - it's just alternative viewpoints getting around. She should get back to us when there are hundreds of MRA S…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 10:13 PM
1

Here's a good paper on the subject... http://www.lse.ac.uk/website-archive/newsAndMedia/news/archives/2010/08/CatherineHakimRenewal.pdf
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:39 PM
1

You're tripping balls amigo, tripping balls.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:33 PM
9

In the UK, women are the majority of STEM undergraduates. Yet there is still a drive to "get more women into STEM" because the majority isn't big enough and there's a couple of subjects that have mostly young men studying. Check the figures in your own country, you might be surprised there too.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:32 PM
2

Also I find it strange that they talk about "women and girls", when the police estimate of 400 (if we take that as representative, and there are many, many more non-paedophiles than otherwise) was for women. There must be a few girls in there, but we have to suspend our disbelief to imagine that there are no sexual predators targeting boys there too. I personally find the change in language from "women and children" to "women and girls" we are increasing seeing as pretty disgusting and typical o…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 12:17 PM
5

Yes, you'd think a feminist would have a basic grasp of the terms. "I'm a man, and I need a dictionary."
/r/MensRights09/03/17 11:52 AM
12

Taking Bihar state as a example (because it is in those articles), it has a population of 119 million and there were 400 rapes attributed to this issue according to the 2nd article (the BBC is not reliable btw). Adjusting per capita, the USA has 13x the number of murders as Bihar has rapes due to this issue and the UK has 37x the number of reported rapes. I fully accept that there is still a risk there and that addressing it is very worthwhile. However perhaps the reason for this relatively low …
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:42 PM
3

Yes. I don't know why this is getting downvoted. He did say "good apart from..." so there's an acknowledgement of some progress there. There is an element of blaming men with the "men don't talk meme" as Imnotmrabut says, aka "toxic masculinity". In other words, men kill ourselves because we are somehow "toxic" and need to act more like women. Maybe we simply kill ourselves much more often because we are more naturally doers and are better decision makers?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:50 PM
5

It sounds as though it's the mother/board member you should have a problem with for over protecting her princess and abusing her position of authority. For all you know the girl could have been attracted to you and the mother disapproved and split you up. It sounds as though your boss was placed in a very difficult situation because of this woman. In cases of dismissal, contact with the former employee is pretty much off limits because of potential litigation. I understand the feeling of betraya…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:28 PM
12

Of course, but the murder wouldn't take place if it wasn't requested. Hence why people who employ the services of hitmen are guilty of a crime.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:53 PM
12

Is that the same with employing the services of a hitman who does a freebie 'cause you go way back?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:35 PM
11

Yes, every day is International Women's Day in the media.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:06 PM
9

Yup, I'd steer my sons away from such institutions of indoctrination. It's seems as though they'd be happier with an all female student body anyway.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:03 PM
10

Wikipedia never gets an annual donation from me any more because of this.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:28 PM
8

Yet the picture of the slim built man who necked the best part of 37 units of alcohol and who was raped before he finally succumbed to alcohol poisoning is plastered all over the papers. Again.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:10 PM
1

Do all related things have to be in one article for it to be true?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:25 PM
2

Or maybe both of them now, since he has now been cleared. I feel sorry for the daughter too, being made to believe for her entire life that her dad molested her. And for the son for his lost childhood with his father, who he now knows to have been just an ordinary good dad, looking out for his kids the best he could. So sad for everybody involved.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:03 PM
2

Are there any studies showing how women and girls stand to be most affected by the sun turning into a red giant?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:46 AM
1

So she laughed heartily and fell asleep? https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/aa28.htm
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:08 AM
1

Alcohol poisoning isn't necessary as serious as it sounds. It's the "throwing up" stage of drinking. Here's a calculator that estimates BAC, based on weight/sex and number of drinks... http://mcwell.nd.edu/your-well-being/physical-well-being/alcohol/blood-alcohol-concentration/ Roughly .24bac is roughly 6 pints of 5% beer for a 180 pound man. Which is 6 pints over 4 hours. Which makes sense because 2 pints is risking a DUI charge. A rough guide, that doesn't take into account tolerance, which in…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:05 AM
2

First, all subjects performed the task and were informed of their performance (the number of problems they solved correctly). Subsequently, two subjects were selected randomly to be candidates; the remaining ones were to act as “employers,” hiring one of the candidates from the pair to perform a second arithmetic task of the same type as the original. Although the employers chose candidates from pairs representing any combination of genders, including same-sex pairs (e.g., two women), we analyze…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 03:41 AM
6

Fuck me, look at this from the article... The Red Heart Campaign, a platform for survivors of domestic violence and familial child abuse, has also taken to its Facebook page to encourage people to think twice before donating. Wtf... hopefully the backlash will encourage him to spill the beans as to what exactly happened. Put it this way, if she drowned her f-ing kids then the chances are she was twisted in other ways. Disgusting that a charity against child abuse would take sides against the fat…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:27 PM
1

Does anyone have a link to the GoFundMe page?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:18 PM
3

To be fair, in a fire evacuation she would be more than a bit of a health and safety issue.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:37 PM
5

Before I started reading up about it, I didn't think of the fact that the foreskin is fused to the glans in boys. So the procedure isn't 'just' cutting off a bit of skin, it's tearing it from the glans and then cutting it off. Without anaesthetic in 40% of cases apparently. Some doctors/nurses can't do it because of the cries/screams the poor baby boys make during it. No fucking wonder.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 12:33 PM
1

Why not? Who is to say that she didn't get in the cab, phone her friend/husband before taking her panties off and making eyes and a move at the cabbie? She was drinking, right? Some women do occasionally do things like this whilst drinking, right? Since unfortunately sexual history cannot be used in most rape trials (well, the man's can, but not the woman's) the jury cannot hear evidence about the specific woman, but blaming all possible scenarios on the guy is sexist. Note that it seems as thou…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 11:35 AM
1

Do you know many taxi drivers? The next time you speak to one that's been working for a few years, ask them the phenomenon of fully awake women pissing on their seats whilst chatting to them or their friends. Bladder control, or lack thereof, is not evidence of anything. Being asleep is not evidence of how you were when you were awake either.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 11:19 AM
7

I drunk a full (70cl) bottle of whiskey one night over Xmas and my friends genuinely said they'd never have guessed. I felt like total shit the next day and couldn't remember stuff that happened etc. Another way of saying that would be <prosecution style dramatic voice> that I had a blood alcohol level that indicated serious poisoning, which made me repeatedly black out before becoming unconscious and not revivable for hours afterwards. But I came across as totally cool to everyone. I just think…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 11:01 PM
33

The unnamed 26-year-old's blood-alcohol level was three times the legal limit... ... for driving you retarded dipshits! Only 3 times over the limit at which you can drive a multi-tonne WMD at 70mph... in driving rain/snow/tornados. Muppets. Since when has "asleep" been referred to as "unconscious" too? I fall asleep easily after a few beers too, especially if I've been up for 20 hours beforehand. And definitely after having a late night kebab. edit: so, just to be clear - we are talking about th…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 07:24 PM
16

Always archive the BBC: http://archive.is/Le8ML
/r/MensRights04/03/17 07:12 PM
3

I've never understood that. It's completely pointless apart from putting another thing on their criminal record, but for that they could just give a 0 year prison sentence to run consecutively, so no punishment.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 02:14 PM
2

I like the "the following is a funny news section" tone in the presenter's voice. /s
/r/MensRights01/03/17 12:33 AM
2

That's wonderful confirmation of the prevailing sanity of the masses.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 11:02 PM
3

You get much more propaganda value from an attractive woman being burnt alive though.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 03:42 PM
4

Including layoff times of course. And holidays. And pensions.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 02:13 AM
2

Ms Aguilera disagrees, apparently.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 02:09 AM
9

Here we go... the Istanbul Convention opens the door for a whole load of government funded feminist propaganda. Pay day for the feminists, I bet there are a bunch of middle class white women chinking champagne glasses tonight.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 07:21 PM
1

The Scottish National Feminist Party has lost the plot, they are infested.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 04:58 PM
5

They publish an occasional article like this when they start feeling a bit guilty about their endless anti-male propaganda.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 01:08 PM
1

Please remove that, we don't want any crazy feminists sending her their usual rape threats and then blaming the MRM for publishing (her admittedly publicly available) contact info.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:35 AM
1

“She admitted that she made up the allegation of sexual assault against (the football players) because it was the first thing that came to mind and she didn’t want to lose (another male student) as a friend and potential boyfriend. She stated that she believed when (the other male student) heard the allegation it would make him angry and sympathetic to her,” according to the affidavit. Evidence of the myriad of complicated emotional reasons women can make false allegations of rape for.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:02 PM
2

Conversely, sisters of widows had more options than brothers of widowers who could not marry their former sister-in-law, the bill befitted women by allowing them to marry their dead sister's husband, thus finding security. It's a two way street.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 06:31 PM
3

No, my position is that marriage was mutually beneficial - back to the strange original point you made that a woman being able to marry her dead sister's husband was only beneficial to him. Your position is that there was zero benefit to a woman getting married in 1907. Which is clearly false, since the man would a lot more often than not go out to work to provide a home, money and a lifestyle for his wife and kids. Then when he gets killed a few years after the wedding in WWI, his wife would be…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 06:11 PM
2

Tell me is the year 1907 between 1600 and 1800? Please illuminate us on the changes that were detrimental to women post 1800.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 04:40 PM
2

For starters, the right to receive a war widow pension when her husband gets burned to death or otherwise ripped to shreds on the battlefield in war. There was one a few years either side of 1907, including ongoing military presence and conflict in other part of the world. Do you believe there to have been no legal or financial benefit to marriage for women in 1907?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 04:33 PM
3

Please explain how there was no benefit to women from getting married in 1907 England. Oh, and also please explain how a man not being able to marry his brother's widow is less discriminatory than a woman not being able to marry her dead husband's brother.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 11:53 AM
9

Yes, they can make Donald Trump appear very monk-like by comparison. Personally I don't care about any of it though because I'm not from the 18th century.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 11:44 AM
3

The Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act appears to equally benefit the prospective brides and grooms. Actually, considering that making an "honest woman" of the sister would entitle her to the legal and financial protections of marriage, it would appear to benefit the woman more.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 11:40 AM
9

I'd say that the majority of seemingly low value posts are a reaction to the feminist narrative that all women are helpless victims with no agency. So more like "one woman did a bad thing... they are not all helpless princesses." Perhaps it would be helpful if posters could indicate which part of feminist doctrine the posts challenge when posting, to avoid confusing people? But in any case I think it's important to acknowledge that without the Women Are Wonderful (which an awful lot are, just as…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 02:33 AM
4

Bits of intestines don't just fall out of people after getting stabbed a couple of times for Fuck's sake!
/r/MensRights17/02/17 07:05 PM
2

It's equality of outcome, except in the cases where outcome currently numerically favours women. And by equality they mean a 70/30 split or "more work must be done" to achieve supremacy equality. Then when that has been achieved men will be blamed for everything anyway.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 02:59 PM
1

Out of interest, where are your sources for estimates of the numbers involved?
/r/MensRights17/02/17 12:41 AM
5

Most women who care about their jobs and/or are in a position of responsibility for others won't go on strike to fulfil the wet dreams of ideological feminists. I'd like to see whether the BBC or Guardian shuts down for a day though. I suppose if feminist talking heads are taking the day off, it would be the ideal time for male rights focused interviewees to take centre stage on TV.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:03 PM
6

So I take it that you are in favour of female circumcision?
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:00 AM
4

"Feminism let me down!" Well, that's what you get for listening to the ramblings of radicalized lesbians with daddy issues.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:55 AM
6

"Statements like 'torturing babies is wrong' is why nobody takes MRs seriously." Oh, you were talking about the sexual assault comparison Obviously mutilating the genitals of a new born is much, much worse sexual assault, ie 'simply' touching them. Nice "statements like X are why nobody takes MRs seriously" spin though. It seems to be appearing quite a lot.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:44 AM
6

If the number of applicants was anywhere near 50/50 then ending up with 97.5% female recruits with a total of 82 cannot be chance. A side note is that I have thought about the near half of testers on that day/slot being an anomaly though or that maybe the test was part of the recruitment process for a range of jobs. I doubt in today's job market that there were not far more than 2.5% male applicants though. Incidentally, I wonder if the two males ticked some form of minority box?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 02:13 PM
7

It's not one woman though. This incident involved two for starters, but there have been many similar stories shared over the short time I've been interested in male rights. Read the supportive comments from the members of the public you cite sharing their experiences of men getting dirty looks simply for taking care of their babies for example. And lots of people will come out in support of anybody having been treated badly for being who they are, it doesn't mean that there isn't an underlying p…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 08:08 PM
3

That 90%+ female intake is similar in the UK. I imagine in Australia the demand in terms of time for rural vets is a lot greater too. I've read that the problem is that there aren't as many females interested in being rural vets and too many go part time or leave the field anyway.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 01:29 PM
6

Gearhart also founded the first gender studies program in the United States. Interesting, I wonder if that would be globally too or if any other extremists had set up training camps in other countries?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:09 PM
2

Speaking at a diversity event in Edinburgh, the first minister said: "My ambition for all our young people is that they will have a fair chance to succeed, and if they work hard and have the ability, there's nothing to stop them realising their dreams. Except quotas. Well, there's nothing to stop them leaving the country and working hard for another economy.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:13 PM
2

http://archive.is/MkWMW
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:07 PM
2

Yes, and as for the "teens are bombarded with unattainable airbrushed images that confirm they can never look ‘good enough’". It's much more difficult to get the (airbrushed) male bodies posted all over magazines than it is just not being fat. Not being fat literally just requires not eating like a pig and doing a bit of strenuous exercise three of times a week for a couple of minutes a time (yes, literally). Getting ripped requires that, plus orders of magnitude more exercise and commitment. An…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 12:52 PM
6

I think they are confusing "astronaut" with "astrophysicist" too. I have all the respect in the world for air force pilots, biologists etc, but being in space automatically makes you as much of an expert in it as being in France makes you an expert in the French language, medieval French history or boules.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 12:01 PM
3

Search engine bias aside, I wonder how many lives would be saved if the courts weren't biased against fathers - particularly in cases where false allegations lead to full custody being given to the mother. It would make heated/vengeful statements like "I'm leaving and you're never going to see your kids again" less 'murdersome' since we are all only human and somebody threatening to kidnap your kids for you never to see them again could tip the average Buddhist monk over the edge. I very much do…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 11:20 AM
4

Sorry, it was late when I wrote that - I've edited it to be more accurate. You can find the stats and how they are calculated here... http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/pdf/fatalinjuries.pdf?pdf=fatalinjuries You can see the deaths of residents is not included in the headline figure, but are part of the overall workplace fatality stats. What aren't included at all are accidents on a public highway, either commuting or whilst driving as an unavoidable part of your job. Since the vast majority of jo…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 10:28 AM
13

In the UK, injuries and deaths of residents from accidents in nursing homes are included in workplace fatality statistics. There are a lot more very elderly women than men and therefore this can be used to skew the stats.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 12:40 AM
3

I don't get these cases of memory bingo. Drunk person A says they can't remember, drunk person B (and C here) has to prove their innocence by accurately recalling things from a time when they were in the very drunken state that was apparently the sole issue they are being questioned for in the first place. Where are the studies where drunk people have to gauge how drunk or sober another person is anyway, where physical and mental challenges are undertaken and memory of the events are tested? Is …
/r/MensRights18/01/17 12:28 AM
2

http://archive.is/XVKuv
/r/MensRights17/01/17 12:48 PM
7

She explained that, in reality, it is transferable maternal leave, which fathers have no automatic right to, and few met the conditions. Typically BBC-esque obfuscation. What this actually means is that the choice to share parental leave is entirely down to the mother... To start SPL or ShPP the mother must end her maternity leave (for SPL) or her Maternity Allowance or maternity pay (for ShPP). If she doesn’t get maternity leave (but she ends her Maternity Allowance or pay early) her partner mi…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 02:00 PM
2

Yes, but at the same time women get the same from pensions after paying in less and being projected to live longer because apparently it's discriminatory to use actual numbers to calculate things. So in the same la la land neither mileage nor driving a faster car should matter.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:08 PM
706

Yes, the message is that women are children and men are their babysitters.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:58 PM
19

Why is swinging at somebody's head with an axe that size not attempted murder?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 10:55 AM
2

Wow, the laws need changed there if an 18 year old can't engage in sexual activity with a 17 year old without it being a criminal offense. That's criminalizing humanity.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 10:41 AM
6

Is it not feminists that are driving quotas for politicians and board members then? Not feminists driving bodies like Athena Swan and accompanying government bodies to deny grants to companies and institutions who are not demonstrably increasing female representation (not just talking about it)? Can I join you under your rock, it seems relaxing in there?
/r/MensRights09/01/17 07:07 PM
1

It's such an interesting subject right now, I think ARM are going for performance without sacrificing power consumption whilst Intel are in the process of sidelining/matching performance in favour of power. I have no idea whatsoever about whether the increased number of instructions needed to be piped into a RISC processor outweighs single complex instructions like SSE but I see that the decoding is not enough of a hit to mitigate the advantages of piping in 16bit THUMB instructions with ARM. My…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 06:55 PM
35

The scouts in the UK are open for both sexes, but the Girl Guides are still just for girls. It looks as if the NOW over there are gunning for a similar arrangement. Eliminating all male spaces, but keeping all the all female ones.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 12:58 PM
1

I think it's been more a matter of the priorities of the different chip manufacturers over time leading to different implementations rather than inherent, unsolvable problems. Here's a read I found interesting about it.... http://research.cs.wisc.edu/vertical/papers/2013/hpca13-isa-power-struggles.pdf It will be interesting to see what AMD come out with in the mobile space since it seems as though they have gone back to the drawing board with Zen. And personally, as a predominantly Windows user …
/r/MensRights09/01/17 12:19 PM
1

I thought he was talking about macOS/OSX/macOS. :) It's more likely that a faulty piece of hardware is to blame with regular OS crashes these days. Perhaps memory.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 08:39 PM
3

I think the picture is more that they can use similar amounts of power when doing the same processing load until the processor is doing almost nothing which is where ARM has traditionally done better. I agree that the difference isn't that great these days with Atoms.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 08:28 PM
5

AMD Zen is looking promising, check out the Ryzen tests here... http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-zen-cpu-benchmarks-official/ Also, all Ryzen chips will have unlocked multipliers.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 05:18 PM
11

Something that Philip Davies MP revealed from his research was that often women are given light (ie no) sentencing because they are single mothers or otherwise primary caregivers when the reality is that the kids are actually looked after by somebody else already. Maybe it's just be, but she looks like a toothless alcoholic. I wonder if there is instant social work intervention to get a handle on the truth of home life in these cases?
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:56 PM
1

Is unlicensed ticket scalping illegal in your state? http://www.wisegeek.org/is-ticket-scalping-illegal.htm
/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:34 AM
1

If men need to be purged of their "toxic masculinity" to reduce the suicide rate, what do women need to be purged of to stop them trying to kill themselves more often? Or suffer from more mental health issues?
/r/MensRights05/01/17 11:37 AM
7

This is the same university that gave female staff a pay rise last year because vagina.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:10 PM
5

That's not an archive... http://archive.is/nGhiQ
/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:53 PM
1

It has a different minimum sentence though, meaning it's obviously not as serious. Minimum sentence for rape (including penis in mouth) is 4 years, minimum for full on F-M rape is 1 hour community service or suspended sentence (= no sentence).
/r/MensRights02/01/17 11:40 PM
2

A discrepancy which could be easily remedied by expanding Rape to include being forced to penetrate. Sentencing guidelines could also take the serious nature of F-M rape into account by including an equal minimum term where subsection 4 applies in Causing a person... and where it involves what would be classed as rape if the sexes were reversed but do not. Would you be in favour of either of these amendments? edit: obviously I am saying "and where it involves what would be classed as rape if the…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 02:48 PM
1

Ah, okay I see from the law in question that the imbalance isn't quite as severe as I thought... http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/4 So rape (an offense only a man can legally commit) has a minimum sentence of 4 years, but "Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent" has a minimum of a community order (1 hour cleaning graffiti (?)).
/r/MensRights02/01/17 01:57 PM
1

From that page, it's max life sentence (19 years in custody) only if penetration is involved but max 10 years with no penetration. Since not a lot of heterosexual sex involves a woman penetrating a man, but practically all sex involved a man penetrating a woman there's a disparity there. Man sex = max life (19 years + rest of life on license) Woman sex = max 10 years.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 11:54 AM
4

I can see a lot of competing businesses being started by men who otherwise would be absorbed into the upper echelons of their current company.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 11:33 PM
3

It still takes the same amount of strength to lift 50kg as it did 100 years ago. Whether or not that is less often (or not, there are situations where the technology involves more lifting by fewer men) is beside the point.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 07:58 PM
5

Neither is crying.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 07:20 PM
5

You've never worked in construction I assume? The machinery means that a lot more work can be done with a lot fewer men, but strength is still a massive requirement in a lot of construction jobs. We don't have magical flying robots lifting every single thing you see in a building around you know.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 07:03 PM
4

And there's this article that says men get hired more often than women do... http://www.aauw.org/2015/06/11/john-or-jennifer/ I should become a data scientist...maybe that's what I'll do in 2017. The article does not make this statement, neither does any of the research linked. You might be confusing the study that sent CVs explicitly for the purpose of relaying feedback back to the applicant with something involving numbers of hires of either sex, which isn't mentioned at all.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 01:35 AM
14

Or would the SJWs have uttered a peep if the sexes had been reversed?
/r/MensRights30/12/16 01:22 AM
2

“She was”, wrote Bruce Collier, one of Babbage’s biographers, “a manic-depressive with the most amazing delusions about her own talents, and a rather shallow understanding of both Charles Babbage and the Analytical Engine…I guess someone has to be the most overrated figure in the history of computing.” https://www.1843magazine.com/intelligence/cracking-coder
/r/MensRights29/12/16 01:32 AM
3

My understanding is that it is not the capability of the device, but what it is used for. ie you do not need a TV license if you only watch (non-BBC) on-demand material, even if you are watching it on a TV with an aerial plugged into it.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 12:44 PM
17

But... but.... women in warm temporary housing are just as homeless as men sleeping in shop fronts and under bridges!! /s
/r/MensRights25/12/16 12:58 PM
5

The author misses the point that women - in general - love shopping and Christmas is an excuse to go a bit mental. The women in my life go into some form of combined social box ticking and shopping frenzy whilst the guys couldn't really give a shit - apart from making it cool for the kids (which is easy).
/r/MensRights23/12/16 10:07 PM
24

Hate is a strong term, there's nothing wrong with strongly disliking the actions of ideologues though - whether they be scientologists or feminists. It's okay to have your beliefs but it's not okay to ram them down people's throats... often using public money.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 09:48 PM
8

Where's the usual X Factor-esque sad background story about the guy that you get when women get convicted of similar offenses? Where's the happy go lucky shot of him smiling whilst out and about instead of the evil mugshot? Reporters write stories to elicit feelings of empathy for female offenders but vengeance for male offenders. Aside from that, what's the lifetime sentence all about? So in 20 years time he happens to say something that makes some gender studies graduate feel all triggered and…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 07:00 PM
11

where 70% of separation and child contact cases involve some form of domestic violence. Yes and 99% of them are false. At least 100% of the ones I am aware of personally. It's sort of standard legal advice for women these days.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:43 PM
3

The future of robotics and automation is concerning for more serious reasons than sex dolls with moving parts and built in Cortana/Siri/Echo. Is it not in fact the case that feminists over the years have tended to revel in the short term view of robotics replacing the need for male strength and traditionally male skills in the workforce and indeed the world in general? I think the imminent loss of practically all driving jobs is of infinitely more pressing concern. Then the loss of an undefined …
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:41 AM
7

Cool, another "girls rock, boys suck" article based on anti-science for our sons to read about.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:40 PM
1

http://archive.is/WZFjD
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:22 AM
3

This is a good read re the scienceification of diversity... http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/20375/ It's worth reading the original paper too, if only for lessons in obfuscation... http://www.pnas.org/content/101/46/16385.full I've seen it cited a few times anyway, so being familiar with the limitations of the study would be beneficial in case it comes up.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:05 PM
2

I was raised in a small conservative town, where at the school I worked at we had separate math textbooks for the girls that taught their geometry through quilting patterns. This was this decade, and it wasn't particularly unrepresentative of attitudes towards women there. Interesting, that sounds like what feminists are doing with physics classes in the UK. Maybe that school was just ahead of the feminist curve?
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:46 AM
6

Same here, recovering de facto feminist actually. My personal voting strategy is now voting for left or right wing parties where appropriate to end up at a place in between both of their immediately preferred destinations, much closer to where the traditional left would dock though.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:00 PM
9

So you are in favour of a disabled, black lesbian couple having one of their eggs fertilized by an LGBTQI soul mate and none of them having any rights when the straight white surrogate decides to adopt the baby to strangers!?!? The world does not need misogynistic, racist, ableist, homophobic shitlords like you.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 11:02 AM
4

He didn't have his trousers down or fly undone and would have been tested at the police station with swabs etc. I'm beginning to believe those paedophile accusations some people have made about you.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 01:59 PM
37

Remember the footballer Ray Parlour who has to pay 37% of all future income to his wife of 3.5 years. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1466447/Footballers-ex-wife-wins-a-third-of-his-future-income.html
/r/MensRights10/12/16 01:54 PM
21

Wow, that's almost the exact same sentence Brock Turner got for getting drunk and touching a vagina.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:39 PM
38

Not really, there's a drive to keep women out of prison so "muh vagina!" is the new Chewbacca defense and it's a much easier delivery.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:04 AM
1

That'll be the "toxic femininity" then, right? /s
/r/MensRights08/12/16 03:08 PM
3

This is where the religion is most easily exposed. The radical feminists in charge of pushing the narratives really do put their fingers in their ears when it comes to the accepted science that we are actually pretty different... including our brains.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 01:12 PM
1

Yes - it throws bodily autonomy out of the window. This advert should come with a trigger warning in case any feminists are hopping in and out of alternative realities in which they could encounter the opposite you describe. It's like sooo pandimensionalist to not do that.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:02 PM
9

By people you mean men and by consent you mean not to rape?
/r/MensRights05/12/16 11:34 AM
3

Any thoughts? It's not 2 hours though. The 2 hours is the time you would take to go to the ferry terminal and back twice. The time he spends getting to your house also includes 4 ferry trips. How long that takes depends on how in sync the rest of the journey is with the ferry times. I know that some can be hours apart. I suppose the real question would be that if he had custody would you view the journey in the same way?
/r/MensRights04/12/16 12:13 PM
1

You are assuming that the "dealer" wasn't an addict himself? In any case, the woman had the choice to abort, drop the kid at a safe haven, have it adopted, give family members custody etc etc. So let's not for one single moment blame a man for the murderous actions of a woman he happened to have sex with.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:18 PM
3

Research on rape shows that a majority of convicted rapists (perhaps going into the 80%+ range) have been abused by at least one woman whilst growing up. Normal people with healthy, happy childhoods don't go around raping women or torturing puppies. We don't have to sit our kids down and teach them not to torture puppies... people who do shitty things tend to have had a "toxic childhood".
/r/MensRights02/12/16 10:40 PM
1

Yeah, it's like reading the Onion.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 10:15 PM
2

I agree with BDMR_lurker that there is a big difference between somebody who tries using an effective method but fails - like the woman in his story - and somebody who swallows 8 paracetamols and two glasses of Lambrini. Only one of them actually wanted to kill themselves and throwing the cries for help in with actual attempted suicide is massaging the stats and diluting the additional suffering of the former.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:49 PM
3

This deserves more upvotes.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 07:06 PM
7

I'd perhaps ask for written clarification from the dean of precisely which subjects are approved for discussion by the re-education committee, preferably with officially sanctioned positions that students are permitted to take in order to avoid confusion in the future. It might also be prudent to ask whether there are any incantations or sacrifices that can be performed in order to alleviate any lingering suspicions among teaching staff and students that you are not a believer.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:51 AM
2

Good point. Also that - depending on the study you cite - up to 80%+ of actual predatory rapists were sexually abused by at least one woman whilst growing up. Perhaps tweeting that women should stop abusing children would do more for consent going forward than telling reasonable parents to do what reasonable parents would do anyway.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 01:26 PM
1

No, women's rights is a great cause... feminism is an ideology that morphed from women's rights into a quasi-religious cult that is incompatible with everything apart from itself.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 01:23 PM
3

This tweet is a result of ideological feminism - there's no point pretending that this statement happened in a bubble, devoid of all external influence. Yes, it is a good idea. It's also a good idea to promote positive messages about boys and to not treat them all as potential sexual predators who need to spend their lives ridding themselves of their "toxic masculinity" and inherent tendency to rape in this imaginary "rape culture".
/r/MensRights29/11/16 01:11 PM
13

The issue though, especially for us who have young sons and have been paying attention to the pattern for longer, is the endless negative message being sent to our boys. This statement seems innocent enough, but it is a brush stroke that stems from the feminist school of "toxic masculinity" and perpetual female victimhood at the hands of "the patriarchy". Taken in isolation I can completely see your point, but please think back to the last headlines about girls being better at X, Y or Z etc and …
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:29 AM
1

I have an issue with the workplace deaths statistic. In the UK the stats include members of the public that are killed as a result of work taking place around them and also accidental deaths in nursing homes. The latter skews the figures since more women are in nursing homes because they live longer. From here... https://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/fs10r_homes.pdf ... at least in the US only 18% of residents aged 85+ are men.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 11:24 AM
9

This is a ridiculous premise.... if you take any corrupt department and replace everybody whilst stating that you are coming down hard on corruption then of course the next anti-corruption educated batch with no experience or connections with corruption is going to perform better. It doesn't even matter what the results are in 5 years time. They could have employed people from any other nationality and then said it was all Mexicans that were corrupt.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 02:20 PM
2

Source?
/r/MensRights26/11/16 01:47 PM
1

I absolutely clove it.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 01:46 PM
2

I think part of the problem is the type of feelings that are socially acceptable and the way in which you express them. For example it's perfectly okay for a female to collapse in a heap and cry about something, but removing yourself from the same situation can be framed as anger management worthy when the 'big bad man leaves making angry noises'. There aren't crying management classes as far as I am aware.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:30 AM
6

Or costing less, if you just don't buy them.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 12:39 AM
4

99.9% of Gender Studies students have been sexually assaulted in the last 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 04:31 PM
2

I think it's important to have an honest discussion about men's mental health issues outside of the feminist framing of "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights25/11/16 10:20 AM
6

http://archive.is/Z1akz Please let's not give this feminist propaganda rag any clicks.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 10:10 AM
1

Exactly, he is not a convicted rapist.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 10:57 AM
7

Sexist law or sexist application of supposedly 'gender neutral' law. They haven't even ratified the Istanbul Convention yet. Oh dear.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 12:19 AM
8

Yes, it's just tough reading about the false accusation culture we live in affecting young boys like this. It's reminiscent of the false accusation epidemic against black men by white women during the slavery days too. Extra relationship sex == rape - throughout the ages (in both senses of the word) it would seem.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 12:10 AM
-14

Technically neither of them are rapists because it's not legally possible for a woman to rape a man and Turner only touched that woman's vagina with his fingers, at least a hundred yards away from any dumpster - which also doesn't meet the legal definition of rape. Although proximity to dumpsters is also legally irrelevant. I fully expect Turner to start suing media outlets in the next couple of years if they are not going to let the false accusations rest. I would if I were him and I am sure he…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 11:59 PM
22

That poor boy, I feel so sorry for him. And his parents. And for that matter for the girl and her parents for the lie getting so out of control at an age (for her) where no words or actions really have ever had lasting consequences at the boundary between utopian childhood and teenage confusion. But the person wretched from the age of innocence with zero regard for their well-being and zero control over the timing and destiny is that poor boy. Zero empathy. What kind of sick world is this where …
/r/MensRights23/11/16 11:52 PM
1

Here's a good write up of it... http://mra-uk.co.uk/?p=892 ... it seems like ratifying the Istanbul Convention would be ratifying radical feminist myths.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 01:52 AM
1

Be careful though, that figure is for "sex attacks" which includes more non-rape than rape.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 01:48 AM
15

http://archive.is/vGQWn
/r/MensRights20/11/16 12:16 PM
2

What part of the "rules of femininity" prevent them from seeking help to avoid them attempting suicide more often than men? Oh, that'll be patriarchy.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:58 PM
1

Yes, a uniform identifier would be convenient. If only to know when to start filming to avoid false accusations of sexual assault by gazing or talking. And to be able to answer appropriately when questioned... "Excuse me, do you know where X is?" "Blue haired human of unknown sex - knowledge is clearly a patriarchal construct, simply use your feelings to find your destination or reframe your lived experience of your current location to suit."
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:50 PM
6

I don't think it's necessary, but it appears that some feel it helps to fend off patriarchal mind controlling radiation or something.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:41 PM
4

Meh, I'm not watching it... the world doesn't need UrbanCrap.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 04:07 PM
13

I've thought for a while that some claims of sexual assault etc could be politically motivated actions by the blue hair brigade.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 02:47 PM
3

1 in 3 people killed by their partners are men. That's what's wrong with it... these same lunatics who think that 3+ men for every one woman killing themselves is not a gendered issue but intimate partner murder is. The duplicity is unbearable.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:36 PM
1

That's the point though, they should change their name to the Scottish Feminist Party and forget about the independence thing, because it's not going to happen now.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:29 PM
5

Yes, using the debate to soapbox feminist ideology is kind of proving the point that male issues cannot be openly discussed without attempts at silencing or deflection. I'd like to think that most impartial observers would see the irony. As for her comment that "we are 36% women but 100% feminists on these Benches", I'd like to think that a party I would vote for would not have such a striking lack of diversity of opinion regarding an ideology that has nothing to do with their raison d'etre. Whi…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 05:22 PM
3

Yes, this has full and official Ministry of Excellent Comebacks approval.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 12:16 PM
3

I don't know why this is being downvoted... apart from the equivalent being "toxic femininity" of course, but this isn't an english class. Even just the placement of the words "toxic" with "masculinity" so often is sending a message. It wouldn't be acceptable to have a "toxic femininity" thing existing anywhere, even though it's just as valid (ie invalid) a concept.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:51 PM
8

... the mother, identified as 34-year-old Nurgul, who apparently took the video to try and blackmail the father to get more money from him. What are you on about? Serial killers are people "with problems" too.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 03:58 PM
6

Thanks, I'm not going to watch it.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 03:56 PM
34

So this type of fraud is a civil, not criminal, matter? Also... Judge Deborah Taylor told the hearing that Annette was guilty of 'deliberate fraudulent misrepresentation', but stopped short of ruling that all the maintenance should be repaid as Jonathan had experienced the benefit of having Timothy in his life. "Benefit"? What about punitive damages for her having been a fraudulent sociopath?
/r/MensRights16/11/16 09:17 AM
6

Wow, a feminist making a false accusation against a man. Who'd've thought it?
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:27 PM
7

The number of deaths from dementia are pretty evenly matched up until the age of 80, beyond which many more women are alive than men to get the age related disease. The bulk of the dementia deaths seen were among women - 41,283, compared to 20,403 dementia deaths in men in 2015. The difference between the number of 80+ deaths is 18416, 12943 of that number is for people aged 90+. Women over 90 outnumber men by around the same ratio as the excess number of deaths for that age bracket. Between 80 …
/r/MensRights14/11/16 11:20 PM
1

No worries, thanks for looking into it.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 12:39 AM
3

Thanks for the link, I'd like to see some data on that though because people saying something isn't the same as you being actually more likely than a woman to be hired.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 11:32 PM
1

Data?
/r/MensRights13/11/16 09:51 PM
1

Tell your other brain cell I said hello!
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:20 PM
1

I think Trump's a non-left breast. It's just not as much of a loss as it could have been in my opinion. I was more concerned about averting WWIII in any case, so this gender stuff took a massive back seat. Now we can be look to a future where millions more Muslims are not killed in the name of freedom and democracy (even if it's the most peaceful and arguably best governed countries 'we' have been invading). That's a good thing, even a right tit realises it. But please don't take me or anyone el…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:09 PM
3

If she'd just appeared on the scene and I'd said that without every having heard her talk then you might have a point. I'm glad that I gave you an opportunity to reinforce your confirmation biases though. Merry Christmas!
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:02 PM
9

Sexist against women for concluding that one woman's views and actions indicate that she would not act in the best interests of boys? If you say so.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:37 PM
8

May I politely suggest that saying that a single person has blinkered views is wildly different from accusing everybody who has legitimate concerns about the effect those views and actions has on boys of being sexist.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:26 PM
8

Interesting, I'm personally not a fan of throwing around accusations like that but if it makes you feel bigger then on you go.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:06 PM
9

Could you elaborate on that please?
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:09 PM
4

To be fair on the campaign, 'minorities' make up the vast majority of US voters when you include women. It's good to see so many refusing to throw their sons (and therefore daughters further down the line) under a bus just because somebody honks "equality" related buzzwords out every minute. I suspect that many are tired of war mongering too.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:32 AM
12

She gives a pep talk to all the little girls watching too. I'm quite sure that many parents of boys find her blinkered views quite off putting.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:11 AM
2

I lol'd. Thanks!
/r/MensRights06/11/16 12:28 PM
3

Under "house arrest" - is that in the house that the husband signed over to her before she tried to have him whacked?
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:03 PM
1

Great idea.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 10:47 PM
14

Yes, if they are going to be as much of a slave to special interest groups as corporate media then I'd rather not pay for it.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 12:23 PM
2

From https://archive.is/wnZgA However, scientists stopped enrolling new participants into the study in 2011 due to the rate of reported side-effects. Of the 1,491 incidents, 39% were found to be unrelated to the treatment. This included one suicide. One man experienced an abnormally *fast and irregular heartbeat when he stopped receiving the injections. The cause of the suicide was eventually found to be unrelated, although that seems unlikely since depression is a side effect of the female pill…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 08:27 AM
2

Men - on average - travel further to work too, which should be counted as part of the working day. It's important not to look at the commute time only though, to get the full picture we need to look at travel to temporary work sites.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 01:41 PM
0

Strangers don't know about other people's arse tattoos and an ex confirming your Hilter-like sexual proclivities doesn't link back to the person (who may be a man) who knows or who has had a conversation with another ex. Who would also know about your inny/outy navel, apparently rare non-bendy cock etc. Knowledge of intimate areas offered by a person who the other party is denying all knowledge of knowing is actually taken as evidence suggesting intimacy. You are tripping yourself up with inaccu…
/r/MensRights28/10/16 12:29 AM
5

Meh, I think Vasalgel is the way forward. It's interesting that there are announcements about the male pill and now the male contraceptive injection now that Vasalgel is hopefully coming to fruition. Better off with Vasalgel and an occasional shot of testosterone without any other hormones if you want a man buzz.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:48 PM
7

"Victim"? There isn't a victim in a false rape claim. There is however a slippery slope down which we are currently traveling which stacks the cards in favour of false accusers. We need to protect innocent people from criminal activity, which includes false rape allegations. Your example falls apart when the woman in question who you don't know describes the way your penis leans to the left when erect and the "Feminism FTW" tattoo on your right bum cheek. Then since your sexual history can be us…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:29 PM
9

What if you were at the party in question? Who is a stranger to whom? Say a good friend of somebody who is out to get you (think bunny boiler, somebody after your job etc) was also there and accuses you of some form of sexual assault. Unless you knew what all acquaintances of said nemesis looked like you would have no way of joining the dots for motive and further investigation. How far would protecting the identity of the accuser go - preventing knowing who they contacted immediately before and…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:39 PM
1

Or you might not be allowed to know that she's your bunny boiler ex-gf's equally crazy BFF.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:25 PM
1

http://archive.is/l9Wh4
/r/MensRights27/10/16 12:40 PM
1

I'm perplexed that some black people are going along with the feminist call for safe spaces from the eviiiiil imaginary patriarchy. They are literally calling for segregation - I'd imagine it would make Dr King turn in his grave.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:22 AM
18

While acknowledging that SWA’s articles include a commitment to reflect the diversity of Society, Ms Scott said they were also clear that membership is only open to groups staffed and managed by women. Typically selfish view of diversity then.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:13 PM
18

The Icelandic government have pledged to close the gender pay gap by 2022. Interesting. I wonder what shenanigans will be involved there?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 03:33 PM
1

Good point, the innocent until proven guilty assumption is jeopardized by this use of language. "Always believe the victim" means guilty until proven innocent for the accused, who is a de facto perpetrator. Just calling somebody a victim has the same effect. On top of this we have the denial of the level of false rape allegations, which means that the de facto rapist is still a rapist even if - in the unlikely event there is a trial beyond social or other media - they are acquitted. There is als…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:18 PM
3

I think somebody who is also a member of the Red Pill reddit should try to get some form of disclaimer/redirect from there since mainstream media is misrepresenting the movie as being inspired by that reddit.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 08:22 PM
1

Why are they needed though? What is the necessity rather than desire about it? To leave the upper echelons for a moment and focus on a job that falls within the illustrious STEM fields (although perhaps not one that feminists like to talk about), why should there be 50% male midwives instead of a figure that rounds down to 0%? Why are male midwives needed?
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:38 PM
5

I notice that visiting the grave every day was a factor in the sentencing. It wouldn't have been if it was a man because he'd probably be remanded in custody for trial.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 09:18 PM
3

http://archive.is/dHnLw
/r/MensRights23/10/16 01:22 PM
8

It's a play on the light sentencing that females get in general and especially when they commit serious crimes like this but use the tried and tested "murder in self-defense" defense. In fact the sentence that I jokingly (you know, with a sense of humour) describe is harsher than some husband/boyfriend murderers have received in the past. But congratulations for trying to inflate something simple and actually light-hearted into a stereotypical assault on male rights activists. Do you have blue h…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:51 PM
1

Well, it sent a message to the guys that were there too. He wasn't just defending himself against her but against the fallout of white knights trying to score points.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:08 PM
3

Do you have a link to the full video?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:55 PM
9

She'll get 3 weeks of feminist dance therapy and a holiday to the Maldives to get over the trauma of the guy daring to die in her presence.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:37 PM
2

ISIS will be very pleased if Clinton gets elected - they'll know their contracts will be renewed. I'm not a fan of Clinton or Trump, but at least Trump isn't leading anybody towards WWIII.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 11:43 AM
2

He seems like a good man to have on side in the battle for recognition of male issues in Canada.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 11:52 AM
2

That's actually a really good example, because most people associate automation with less white collar jobs. I don't think many appreciate just how many jobs can and will be assimilated by increasingly advanced systems.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 02:28 AM
2

More men were killed than women for anti-religion related tomfoolery during that period of history. If you take a specific time frame from the middle ages then female victims outnumber men though. This is the thing that feminists quote. Cherry picking data points to suit an existing argument is what feminism survives on these days. Side note: in the UK all men have only been allowed to vote for 10 years longer than women. I lived my entire life without knowing that before I encountered the Male …
/r/MensRights16/10/16 02:42 AM
14

Yup, this is phase I lunacy. Give them an inch....
/r/MensRights15/10/16 07:24 PM
2

This will surely be easy to object to on religious grounds. As a Jedi, this goes against the very grain of my beliefs.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 07:20 PM
5

Vera Baird QC told the BBC that the case had set things back "about 30 years". Depends on which perspective you see it from. This is a clear case where sexual history is extremely relevant - also if this wasn't as highly publicised the chances of the other men being able to testify would have been slim to none. So there is actually an argument for publishing the identities of the party making the allegation. It's not as if sex is shameful these days, you can't pick and chose which Victorian prin…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 02:03 PM
1

Whenever I hear anti-science talk like this I wish people would ask them to put their watches, bank cards and mobile phones in a bucket for destruction or charity.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:44 PM
0

I agree somewhat with ThirdTurnip... most normal women are quite happy that their other halves go off and do stuff. I'd hazard a guess that many would prefer male-only spaces since there's no temptation/worry there. I think testosterone-fueled lesbian feminists might feel excluded and if they weren't so happy with preserving women-only spaces I'd concede the point to them. As it stands there's a double standard and that's not okay.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:39 PM
43

It's a perfectly reasonable criteria to have. I wouldn't want to get involved with somebody who thought people of my sex and/or colour were inherently toxic. At that level it doesn't matter if they make an exception for me with the old racist's "you are cool, but the rest of the people of your sex and/or colour are toxic" thing.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:05 PM
1

Sorry, thought this was a time travel related topic. Moving along...
/r/MensRights14/10/16 10:51 AM
1

It just goes to show you that the stories these feminists tell are largely a product of their imaginations.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:34 PM
13

I'd like to see a report done on the job security gap. Comparing jobs where people can get laid off several times in one year to permanent employment with great benefits and holidays is just silly. Then there's the accidents, daily painful events and long term affect on the joints and spine.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:57 PM
13

This is pure child abuse... I wonder what percentage of these kids have feminist mothers drenched in this "gender is a construct" crap?
/r/MensRights10/10/16 12:18 PM
16

To be fair a lot of time has passed since 1991, she's had time to see male love ones be mistreated by judges like her former self and to realize how brainwashed she was back then.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 04:23 PM
13

Sometimes I just want to punch C# in the face.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:16 PM
2

Everything to do with being a particular type of feminist though.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:11 PM
2

Interesting comment in the Daily Mail... I, too, was let go (made "redundant") by a femínazí manager from the company that bought us out. She installed untested and untrained female workers in our stead. The consequence of her actions was a complete disintegration of a global distributor support organization. 18 months later, the new company, led by another femínazí, had to fold the business.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:09 PM
1

So you think that reading books written by academics is crazy. Thanks for clarifying your position of complete ignorance.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:57 PM
0

Please consider looking for the proportion of men who are charged with these types of crimes compared to women. Laws extend beyond the letter into various other systems - all of which feminists can and do have significant influence. So not only is the new law in part specifically targeting males in at least one of the categories, but the influence of it will disproportionately affect males being sentenced. I can recommend a book called "Legalizing Misandry" that explains the infiltrating process…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:41 AM
2

The list is... rape, sodomy, penetration with a foreign object, or oral copulation ... you looked up the first. The second is... (a) Sodomy is sexual conduct consisting of contact between the penis of one person and the anus of another person. Any sexual penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the crime of sodomy. http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/286.html Note the attempt at gender neutrality.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:37 PM
2

Everybody here is very aware that who is affected by this law is entirely dependent on the definitions of the noted crimes. So if those laws are weighted against one sex then so is this one by the dependent nature of it. Without the other crimes this law would be meaningless so it's ridiculous talking about it in isolation.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 04:54 PM
1

So the law says that if a person inserts their penis into a vagina, anus or mouth then it's not sex specific? Women don't get off (usually) on sticking their fingers or foreign objects in a guys anus so the only one there could be is oral copulation, but copulation is another word for sexual intercourse, which is penetration. I'll never cease to be amazed at how naive people can be about the careful selection of words by lawmakers.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 02:27 PM
6

Yes, Bridget Jones says so.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 11:25 AM
5

Interesting, thanks for sharing. In Scotland teachers get £34k after 6 years or £41k for after the same time for being a "Chartered Teacher". With 12 weeks holiday. Good pension. Different (= more) for private schools. Chartered Surveyors (for example) here earn about the same as the latter, only with 5 weeks holiday being standard. For all the talk of bankers earning fortunes, the median salary in the City of London (the area with most of the banking) is £48k. With no job security by comparison…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 10:16 AM
3

Yes, I don't know why in cases like this... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3404990/Civil-servant-partially-blinded-pensioner-row-equal-pay-women-tennis-players-girlfriend-looked-on.html ... the female is not charged too. That man would not have been hurt if she hadn't started the aggression. There is so much trouble started by females with power trips and there are enough ignoramuses in the world to carry out their wishes. In the same way that the people that get hitmen to kill people a…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 08:28 AM
3

Timmy!
/r/MensRights04/10/16 08:00 AM
1

Sadly a lot of men don't report it due to fear of being seen as weak.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 07:54 AM
4

Yes, I'm with you here. I think the witch (but mostly wizard (and yes, there are male witches too (but witches aren't real insofar as they don't have any real powers (only wizards do, shhh)))) hunts need to fuck off back to the middle ages. (btw, the "poor children" involved would have been 17 or 18 if they were in 6th year) Let's not disappear up our own arseholes like the feminists, mkay?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:04 PM
4

You should read "Why Men Earn More". An interesting tidbit from it is a survey of graduates where the young men were searching for jobs in a much wider area. Whilst feminists focus on various and relatively weak excuses, they tend to ignore the process that led to people being there in the first place. They only focus on the earnings gap too, not the same job wage gap. Somebody moving a thousand miles away to fix machinery in the middle of a desert/ice sheet is going to earn more than somebody l…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:26 PM
33

“I don’t know that there’s ever been a large faction of feminists that has ever thought men were the problem,” said Jodi Davis-Pacheco, Ph.D., full-time lecturer in the Women and Gender Studies Program and Queer Studies Minor at Cal State Fullerton. Okay, we believe you. Toddle off now to bleat on about toxic masculinity to your blue-haired class.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 11:59 AM
8

The author is a gender/women's studies professor so she's a professional feminist.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 06:34 PM
3

Never mind the fact that having a hissy fit over words like "bossy" and "drama queen" and wanting them banned is both over-dramatic and bossy.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 03:58 PM
4

Did they control for physical activity in jobs either? This explains the arthritis for men overworking and the more stable heart disease.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 10:46 AM
30

And what's more, I totally understand and agree with all things BAME [Black Asian and minority ethnic] and Lenny Henry and Ofcom boss Sharon White's call last week for 'harder quotas and diversity targets Oh well, fuck him then. The conclusion of diversity targets is that people must get sacked to maintain percentages. I see that the BBC want a 50/50 sex split in all roles by 2020. That's 3.5 years away. That means in a lot of cases that men and women just need not bother applying for jobs and t…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 09:39 AM
3

Sorry, that's wasn't particularly accurate. There is/was currently one female-only prison, but... http://www.sps.gov.uk/Corporate/Information/Women-In-Custody.aspx So they are building a brand new feminist dance therapy prison for the most serious offenders and opening several community based centers for the child murderers who don't torture children (/s)... http://news.scotland.gov.uk/News/New-plans-for-women-in-custody-announced-1a61.aspx
/r/MensRights02/10/16 09:29 AM
8

He is implying that there are countries in Europe where child killers are released on weekend leave at the beginning of their sentences and this isn't true. This is... an uniformed post about a common practice in European penal systems ... to use his own words about another imaginary situation (there is no day release or weekend release here, 'just' two child murderers meeting up for kissy time and being mollycoddled by a feminist legal system).
/r/MensRights01/10/16 08:05 PM
25

I think you are confusing integration programs at the end of sentences with "day long or weekend long furloughs" for child murderers close to the beginning of their sentences.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:36 PM
226

Don't be ridiculous - in Scotland they are closing all but one women's prison because of the feminist movement's drive towards only imprisoning women for the most serious of crimes. This is all part of a big picture, whereby men actually are getting the raw end of the deal. And think about the end result on comparing stats in the future.... "Of women imprisoned, they received 50% longer sentences".... yes, that's only because 1% actually got imprisoned in the first place relative to men, down fr…
/r/MensRights01/10/16 05:30 PM
19

Welcome to the Scottish feminist justice system!
/r/MensRights01/10/16 04:51 PM
39

Pepper spray. Whenever your personal space is invaded by a feminist it's increasingly likely you'll get spat on or otherwise physically assaulted.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:33 PM
5

I open doors for everybody, but it's almost invariably women who think they have precedence on an equidistant open entrance when I'm trying to shepherd myself and two toddlers through it. Fatherhood + male rights awareness = eye opener.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:24 PM
15

But they say that punishing false accusers makes it less likely for real victims to come forward. In their la la land they'd like false accusers (if they admit that they exist in the first place) to be given cuddles and therapy for making something up that could have sent a man to prison for life.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 12:59 PM
9

I hadn't seen this before, but they measure the "sexism" of the participants in the study using the Modern Sexism Scale... Discrimination against women is no longer a problem in the United States. {more strongly agree is more sexist} Women often miss out on good jobs due to sexual discrimination. {more strongly disagree is more sexist} It is rare to see women treated in a sexist manner on television. {more strongly agree is more sexist} On average, people in our society treat husbands and wives …
/r/MensRights01/10/16 12:50 AM
15

Here is the study... http://www.pnas.org/content/109/41/16474.full ... note that the staff given the papers thought that they were giving feedback to the students. They was no job. You see, giving negative feedback is a positive. Constructive criticism is better than no criticism. So perhaps all this reveals is that more care and consideration is given to females, who - if they existed - would have had more motivation to refine their applications for an actual job. And, as with all of these soft…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:19 PM
2

Yes, I saw the bit where one of the honoured guests attempted to say that more women in STEM would increase productivity because science. Unfortunately the 'science' in question has been thoroughly debunked here.... http://www.ams.org/notices/201409/rnoti-p1024.pdf What that paper misses out though is the slimy manner in which the original paper.... http://www.pnas.org/content/101/46/16385.full ... cites difference in ability of 60% - 90% (whatever that means) as diverse, whilst the different in…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 02:59 PM
5

Yes, in 20 years time when a bunch of female politicians are accused of some random crap they can't defend themselves against it will get overturned. Then it will be safe to visit.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:46 PM
2

Unless men are dying at at least 4x the rate females are from any specific cause it's a crisis that needs to be funded/solved/actually just funded.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 12:30 PM
2

I've gone back to 2012 with the data, 2015 is the only year where the suicide rate for 15-19 year old females has increased, in 2012-13 and 2013-14 they fell. So the increase from 2014-15 is the very definition of a random blip. As is the increase in male 15-19 suicide rate between 2012-13 of 54%. That's a 54% increase in a one-year period, 20% greater than the cherry picked data point here that apparently warrants "good investigation." The 45% they talk about is 18 young women... in a populatio…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 11:47 AM
3

No, because there wasn't an existing set of numbers and so obviously there were no data points to pick. You're not very good at being pedantic.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 11:55 PM
8

It's illustrating the cheap political statistics-related party trick in the most obvious manner. Using the actual numbers is pointless anyway since it's trend/change over time that needs to be taken into account, not year on year variances with small sample sizes. The real issue is the difference in total numbers, not cherry picking stats to suit. It's possible to take any set of numbers, take pretty much any position and pick data points to match your argument.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 11:05 PM
5

At'll do.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:07 PM
14

Yup... 5000000 men killed themselves in 2014 and 4999999 in 2015. 3 women killed themselves in 2014 and 4 in 2015. We have to address the female suicide crisis, which has seen a 33% rise in a single year!!!!!!
/r/MensRights28/09/16 06:55 PM
1

You're the person reading intent that was not there in my choosing the most apt words to describe a young male. I'm perfectly calm too, please stop projecting. Oh and "demonstrating my distaste" is an alliteration. Good luck with the pissing all over poor boys in developing countries thing.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 09:27 PM
1

It's a symbolic reference to victim blaming that happens to use a noun that starts with a 'b'. However I am flattered to be part of a linguistic conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 08:27 PM
1

Remember you have a sporran in front of your nuts too. Plus you have a knife attached to your leg, ready to disembowel anybody who would attempt to kick your nuts in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:36 PM
2

Yeah, I don't have much of a problem with the app thing. I don't see the difference between a mobile app and an app running on a desktop (or tablet) at the clinic. It's not as if they flick through paper files and it doesn't sound like pictures or other identifying information is available on the app.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:04 PM
32

Hmm.... The suicide rate in England is rising, and that increase is being driven by the number of women who take their own lives. According to official annual figures for the UK, in 2014 the male suicide rate was more than three times higher than the female rate. However, the female rate increased from 4.8 to 5.2 deaths per 100,000 people while the male rate decreased from 17.8 to 16.8. -0.6 isn't an increase unless there are around 60% more women than men in the country. Nice cherry picking of …
/r/MensRights25/09/16 02:51 PM
7

It sounds like collecting one-sided stats to me. The end result, if the questions asked are vague enough, is that 80% (say) of female mental health patients have experienced some form of mild domestic abuse. Never mind the fact that 100% of male respondents may have produced positive results too. Start with a myth (patriarchy, male are all perpetrators, women are all victims) and collect data to suit. Rinse. Repeat.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 02:43 PM
1

The figure is more like 7% or so. If you remove the handful of countries where women are expressly forbidden from education then the percentage in the rest obviously drops further. Whatever the percentage may be, < 7% is not an extreme issue. I strongly reject your evidence devoid point that "boys don't want to" go to school in any greater number than girls or that girls have different environmental or geological obstructions. Pure drivel, pure boy blaming and girl sanctifying. I'm all for focus…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 01:28 PM
6

There are some women who would be great at leading the camping trips etc, but then they can go and volunteer at the all female Girl Guides. It's the usual pattern of removing boys only stuff whilst leaving girls only stuff alone (Harvard backfire aside).
/r/MensRights25/09/16 08:58 AM
2

Perhaps the "Global Citizen Festival" should be renamed "Global Female Citizen Festival" then. If you look at the education stats that are rolled out with (from memory) the tragedy of 70 million girls being out of education worldwide being an issue that absolutely has to be solved, they fail to mention that there are less than 10% more boys in education. And btw, I would be supportive of the drive if they talked about the 5 million, but the minute they start lying by omission it becomes a politi…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 08:39 AM
5

Although maybe they are pointing out that so many men die in every age group from baby to pensioner that men go from a slight majority in population to a more sizeable minority. Thus proving patriarchal oppression because women are the real victims when anything bad happens to a man.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 08:18 AM
2

1,000,000 virtual upvotes for you sir. I find it worrying that anybody would think that this isn't a gendered issue after 30 years of propaganda - with roots in feminism - has engineered society toward this end. There is so much talk of making engineering/computer science and similar a 'safe space' for women, with the focus on how the industry can change to increase female participation and reduce leaving rates. With teaching, men are supposed to change. Paying more money (to mostly women) will …
/r/MensRights24/09/16 11:29 AM
11

Senior roles overall being occupied by a majority of men who graduated 20 years or more ago has nothing to do with the overall gender balance of undergraduates today. We have to remember that these jobs are very secure and so it takes time for change to filter through.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 06:13 PM
-1

If I was him I'd sue every publication that called me a rapist or that alleged that I did anything to anybody behind a dumpster.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 08:08 PM
10

Yes, it's okay to marry a 17 year old pretty much everywhere. I do wonder what psychological impact a bunch of professionals coming in and telling somebody they've actually not been in a relationship that enormous parts of the world find normal and have instead been seriously abused. The girl was a student at another high school. This is important, it's buried in the article. Anybody would think reading the headline that she was in his school. Pretty much all 17 year olds are students. I can't b…
/r/MensRights17/09/16 07:56 PM
7

Anything less than silence or full prostration is mansplaining, so they've been doing it to her since they could say "I want dada".
/r/MensRights17/09/16 04:09 PM
0

Thanks very much for the detailed reply. It's crazy that these people are being paid, often with public money, to indoctrinate young people with anti-science and butchered history under the guise of mainstream education. I'm glad you managed to resist the hysteria, although there are many who are less fortunate.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 06:11 PM
2

Interesting, could I ask whether you believed the material being taught at the time and, if so, what was the key point where your mind was changed?
/r/MensRights16/09/16 10:32 AM
35

He got nude pics of someone underage. He then showed them off to others. He didn't show them to others, that was another boy that his girlfriend sexted who took a screenshot of the Snapchat and he sent it/them to others. He isn't being prosecuted, only the guy who didn't share anything is.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:32 AM
1

They mention that it might work with other types of cells though.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 11:52 AM
3

Very interesting, it would seem as though this has been hastily assembled at least in part as a counter to the increasingly publicised fact that working class boys are the most disadvantaged section of society in the UK. They could have saved the time though and just released a press release stating "Yer but no but yer but girls", which at least wouldn't have seemed as desperately disingenuous. The poodle-like media may still have published it, with much serious discussion about the implications…
/r/MensRights13/09/16 09:05 AM
2

Several maternal blood tests are performed during pregnancy after 10 weeks so this could be done without any additional samples.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 08:01 PM
3

Crazy stuff indeed, the 17% difference is getting close to the 23% in deprived areas of Glasgow. I wonder what the male suicide stats are for those areas.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 05:58 PM
2

They need to stick with "screaming" because they are an anally retentive joy hoover.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 11:12 AM
6

By "screaming" they mean "laughing", which is a completely different thing. Tickling your kids is great instant fun, so is tickling your other half. Tickling somebody who isn't laughing would be weird, but let's not disappear up the joyless feminist rectum in the sky people.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 08:24 AM
9

At least the boys are getting some recognition for the hell they are being put through. No mention of an untold number of boys being sliced up, shot or burned alive though.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 07:54 AM
4

That was a very interesting talk, thanks for sharing. I wonder what effect this type of open discrimination against men will have on male academics leaving to enjoy a career in industry... possibly in another country.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 10:32 PM
45

The Guardian need to have the occasional piece like this to avoid looking like a supremacist feminist brochure. Fair play to Ally Fogg for writing the piece though. The very fact that a boy being abused by a woman is counted as Violence Against Women and Girls is morally outrageous.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 06:55 PM
1

Very true, I forgot for a moment that American Ninja was a TV show first and competition second. The Williams' story is a good example of the mismatch, although to be fair they thought they were being quite realistic with their challenge. I wouldn't have expected that result either before coming to learn about the true extent of the Performance Gap in sports.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 03:41 PM
5

De-segregation will never happen. The elephant in the room is that fully grown female athletes compete at a level not equal to even male under-18s, sometimes under-16s. Re American Ninja, it's great that Jessie Graff did what she did, but I'd be willing to bet that if the age restriction was lifted we'd get a couple of 15 year old boys doing it too.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:27 PM
3

... come on, it's not as if I'm using Safari or anything and Bing is a very capable search engine ;)
/r/MensRights05/09/16 11:04 AM
1

No worries, thanks for listening and having a look into the details yourself.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:30 AM
1

Interesting... I've just changed the default search engine in Firefox to Bing.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:10 AM
8

He didn't shove his penis anywhere. People are calling him a rapist when he didn't rape anybody: he was drunk, she was drunk - they kissed and fooled around. No sex took place. No penile penetration took place. He is not a rapist. If I was a member of his family I would sue every single media outlet that asserted this woozle. It has led to the lynch mob we see outside his home.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:02 AM
0

That's okay, we have a difference of opinion... I think I'm coming from an angle of this being influenced by wider issues in society, whereas you are judging the incident in isolation. If fear of litigation was tempered by a fear of a walk out or a boycott then employees would be more protected. If every time a company reacts to the hissy fit of a snowflake they lost a couple of million in revenue they wouldn't react any more. In the same way that - if money was no object - it's logically better…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 07:22 AM
1

I agree that litigation culture has led to this situation. Also the automatic victim status of any female who feels violated by Hawaiian figures and pretends to be upset about it. Maybe she cried on the phone? I'm not actually bothered specifically because it was a man who got sacked too, I'd be equally pissed off if it was a woman after taking the shit he took. I think it's obvious though that more men work as taxi (etc) drivers and other solo jobs and are therefore in a more vulnerable legal p…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 11:43 PM
2

I agree with your assessment of the reality of the situation. However if the incident was not taped then would he have got his job back? Sacking or imprisoning people (mostly men) on the mere word of people of questionable intelligence, maturity, sanity, integrity etc is wrong. So fuck Lyft and any other company that acts like this on the basis that the next guy won't have exonerating video evidence.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:58 PM
11

That's not good enough, they shouldn't be firing people and banning passengers at all based on the whimsical fancies of crazy passengers. Fuck Lyft.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:17 PM
118

Good point, in the absence of a reference it has to be a wildcard. So... transport worker transformer, robot in disguise transylvanian transient self-identifying female transcendentally confused
/r/MensRights04/09/16 01:48 PM
14

tldr; guy minding his own business gets accused of a bunch of stuff.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 09:53 AM
2

'Toxic' just means any non-female behaviour or reaction. Most women don't care though, they think these gender studies students and professors are nuts too.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 04:15 PM
3

Indeed, that was my point - thank you for clarifying.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 04:02 PM
22

Yes, but my point is that the entire process is a waste of money and time if, as those feminists say, it doesn't matter whether a child has your DNA or not. Everybody can just adopt. This would actually be a good thing for older kids who often cannot get adopted and an older child would be a better fit for people who leave having kids until their late 40s or 50s.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 01:06 PM
25

Interesting... look at the amount of public money poured into fertility treatment so that those who cannot conceive naturally may do so. If it is irrelevant whether or not a child is biologically yours then all funding for this should be stopped. Or are they saying that women can't bond with and love adopted babies as if they were their own?
/r/MensRights02/09/16 12:32 PM
0

It's important to note that not all paedophiles actually rape their victims. So the distinction is quite arbitrary since there is no non-penis pass for men who abuse children but don't rape them. edit: strange downvotes for clarifying the fact the the only major factor in the shock in the comments on the acrticle over this sentencing is the sex of the perpetrator. If somebody can point to a single example of a man being excused of molesting a child (not that he should be, but this is the entire …
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:53 PM
7

Yes, gobsmacked at the comments. Almost as if there is no such thing as paedophilia or child abuse unless there is a penis involved. Or that it's harmless or something. Either way it's truly messed up and I'm amazed people feel that way about child abuse. My guess is also that pretty much the only reason she got an equality based sentence is because the abuse was taped. Nobody could stick their head in the sand making excuses when they saw the abuse.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:52 PM
1

I think this ad agency saw that other ad agency giving all their female members of staff a raise and have come up with this to generate publicity.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:40 PM
-2

It's 3rd wave feminism that has led to the drive to close women's prisons and keep women out of jail at all costs because they are precious snowflakes (unless they want to be CEO of a prison, then they are equally responsible/capable). Every time you see a disproportionate sentence like this, have a think of the billions of tax payer money around the world given to the feminists who have lobbied for exactly this.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:12 PM
1

Penile cancer too...
/r/MensRights29/08/16 11:22 PM
3

Anal cancer too... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/active/mens-health/11467138/HPV-vaccine-should-boys-get-it-too.html ... re archiving, The Telegraph seem to be mostly okay. I disable my adblocker on friendly articles like this one anyway.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 11:17 PM
4

Yes, I fully support police not gunning down random black men. It's obviously wrong, has roots in the horrible racial history of the USA and it is indeed that black men are disproportionately affected by this. It's should be called Black Men's Lives Matter because the issue is about black MEN being shot by the cops. So my eyeballs popped out of my head when I read the website. Please everybody read it, it's just a standard feminist pamphlet with no mention of men in the principles it the last I …
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:00 AM
3

I'm not going to watch it, I watched a video of animals getting skinned alive once and thrown on a big pile and skinned alive animals gasping for breath in agony and found that difficult enough. I'm not going to watch a baby having skin ripped from his little body.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 01:11 PM
1

That's interesting - thanks very much for sharing your story. I think public employers are too protective of disruptive members of staff. One sacking could have sorted that out. I'm disappointed but unsurprised that you weren't given the support necessary to perform your role as effectively as you wished to.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 11:17 AM
1

I thought it was funny and I think her doing that and him posting about her being "psycho" shows that they can take the piss out of each other. What would have been nice would for this one to go under the radar, then for him to make a T-shirt and rules for her for next year and for the feminista to go bananas in the press over it.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:35 PM
2

Okay, what happened? :)
/r/MensRights27/08/16 08:51 PM
12

I don't think that is the reality for women working in STEM. There may be a few examples, as there will be examples of harassment when men work in mostly female environments, but I think you are citing a woozle here. An interesting tactic employed by organizations behind these woozles is that they will put all sorts of lower-skilled or manual jobs into a STEMish bracket, whilst discounting jobs that are officially STEM jobs to make up their stats. Then they'll use any example they can find to ma…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 11:52 AM
2

He's been exposed to the same onslaught in the media as everybody else. Forgive brother JohannReddit.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 11:31 AM
2

Unlike some feminists, we pride ourselves on hanging onto our senses of humour, which encompasses having our fancies tickles by clever quips by respected intellectuals to laughing at funny sounding farts. That post was somewhere in between.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 11:29 AM
3

You can give a general overview without revealing the details of the parties.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 11:21 AM
3

Bubble wrap the students and place them in individual anechoic chambers with armed guards at each entrance. Play gentle music of their choice and repeat their own views, collected in a previous questionnaire, back to them also at a non-threatening volume level. Combine this with showing them soft focus images of teddy bears playing ping pong with clouds repeatedly for four years and give them all a degree with the highest possible grade at the end. Job done.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 01:47 AM
1

No worries, yes it sounds like a good time to move on. Good luck with your journey!
/r/MensRights27/08/16 01:40 AM
1

You could just change "women" to "men" in that sentence, probably without the biting. There are still dangerous male and female criminals out there and we shouldn't shut down all male and female prisons because some people shoplift.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 01:03 AM
1

Well said, I'm glad you found through this and - as you can tell - I strongly disagree with Lethn about the (ir)relevance of your case to male rights so getting your story out there is important. There are a bunch of upvotes for your post and only one dissenting voice, so don't read too much into that. Also none of us guys should underestimate the effect of exercise and getting physically stronger on mental well-being btw. It takes time, but it's worth it. On the subject of helping people in the…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 11:40 PM
1

I agree that there is a lack of equality here. Hope Solo and her team mates play at the standard of 15 year old boys so should be treated in the same manner. A 15 year old boy would have been kicked off the team for the DV accusations (without being found guilty, or even having any evidence against him). Conversely the 15 year old boy would have been given the benefit of the doubt for being a sore loser.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 12:32 PM
2

My point is that this is a failure of teaching staff and the police, it actually has little to do with the bullies who lit the fire that could have been extinguished pretty easily. Let's not forget that this behaviour is illegal too. The reason for that is indeed partly due to feminism, all girls being victims of evil boys, with the empathy gap being in clear view in this case. Bullying is a very serious problem and it is a male rights issue that the authorities are failing boys to this extent. …
/r/MensRights24/08/16 06:44 PM
4

It is a male rights issue, because the "victims" were female and the male "defendant" was not assumed to be innocent when the only evidence was a spam account, I assume using his name. 2.5 years of bullying followed this. Had it been a girl sending pictures of her private parts then I guarantee you her complaint that it wasn't her that sent them would have been taken seriously. It's actually a massive failing of the police, because who in the name of f*ck sends pictures of their penis to multipl…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 02:28 PM
9

That is tragic. Poor kids being separated from their loving father and each other like that.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 01:39 PM
2

Except women get suspended sentences or fines for the same crimes men go to jail for. This is institutional sexism. This is privilege.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:28 PM
6

Yes, it sounds like she found out that modern computer science isn't just "another subject" and is up there with physics in terms of requiring commitment to succeed in. This is why the latest drive to push more kids into studying subjects they would not be interested in were it not for diversity campaigns will end in tears for many, as it has always done. Yes, there will be an increase in numbers, but also an increase in people switching subjects and having short-lived careers. Men will be blame…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 06:26 PM
6

Err, they went from being profoundly deaf to having a deteriorating condition to jusst having tinnitus in the article. Next time you get a slight ringing in your ears, rob a bank - it's a much less serious offence than child molesting so you should get sent on a cruise or something. Unless you are a man, or a dog.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:07 PM
5

I think the author needs a biology lesson, he's been watching reruns of Buffy the Vampire Slayer or some of the other wall to wall media showing 9 stone girls knock out a bunch of big guys with ease.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 12:28 PM
3

“When I get paid as much as you do for doing the same job, and I don’t have to trail-blaze or fight an uphill battle to make a name for myself in a man’s working world, then we can talk about true equality.” She must not have heard of the myriad of grants, mentoring programs, fast track promotion paths etc available to women and the fact that the wage gap isn't about the same job. Are these people all lying or all stupid?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 12:19 PM
1

Fair play to them for not taking the article down. Feminism isn't about facts though, it's about feelings so it's okay to ignore facts and just stomp feet.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 12:13 PM
5

Indeed, I was especially disappointed to read the following article on hequal: https://hequal.wordpress.com/2015/10/09/bbc-has-never-reported-a-single-suicide-caused-by-false-rape-allegations/ This can't be accidental. There could actually be an argument to stop paying the license fee on the basis that the Charter is being systematically ignored. Of course my evolving conclusion on these matters is that feminism is now a trojan horse that is being used to astroturf globalist friendly change arou…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:13 PM
5

Yes the BBC and the Guardian truly are taking advantage of the unique way in which they both are funded. Shame on them for being purveyors of propaganda when they could be so much more.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:43 PM
6

Because if there are a million guys with Affliction X and more than one female suffering the same thing then there as a Crisis of Women Suffering Affliction X. Essentially this is because so much public money is being poured into finding women's problems that they have to keep making things up or funding will be cut.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:37 PM
23

Kids are smart, but when even children know how easy it is to ruin a guy's life by making false accusations something has to change. It's very lucky she based the situations on a book and had a change of heart or he might well be spending lots of time in prison. Only luck kept this guy out of prison from a false accusation and that's not justice.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:31 PM
3

Yes, I was actually amazed to read the BLM Guiding Principles. http://blacklivesmatter.com/guiding-principles/ It's just a feminist bible. The reason BLM exists in the first place is because unarmed black MEN were getting murdered by police. Fucking tragic. Shameful that they can't even use the word "father" in the Black Villages section.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:03 AM
19

Yes, we are back to the days of the witch hunts - a period of history where more men were executed than women and where women were the main accusers of other women. If I was a nefariously minded billionaire I'd pay fuckloads of people to cry rape against all of the biggest supporters of this medieval crap. Let the beast feed on itself.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:52 AM
3

It looks like Movember is doing some great work, good on them.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 02:58 PM
1

No, it's a job for people who enjoy solving problems for prolonged periods of time. Separate from introversion, related however to having a penchant for systemizing and there is indeed research that indicates that more male than females are systemizers. There's still plenty of time to hob knob at lunch times, work dos, out of office experiences and in home life, by the systemizing itch is scratched in work. If you don't have that itch then you don't have that itch and should maybe not let people…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 11:08 AM
1

The Chinese boys will have scored more highly than boys in most other countries too. It's all part of the blinkered reporting on gendered issues. Just as there are a few percentage points of difference in the number of unschooled boys in the world vs number of unschooled girls, but the focus is on a "girl crisis" in education in the developing world. Still, women are much better consumers than guys so it's all clearly part of a plan to get more consumers on board. And yes, you do have to zone ou…
/r/MensRights22/07/16 03:46 PM
1

That's looking at it from the wrong angle though. Primary and secondary school subjects are studied to a fairly simple level and so there's little in the results to differentiate between a fairly intelligent kid putting in lots of hard work, the incredibly bright kid who just does it without trying without being particularly interested in the subject and the kid who absolutely loves the subject and is a mixture of the former two. Choosing subjects for further study for lots of kids is largely do…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 02:20 PM
2

Apparently so... there will be one for the most hardcore prisoners and special programs for the rest that let them be close to home with lots of therapy and stuff because only women have troubled upbringings that lead them to a life of crime (/s). It's pure institutionalized sexism.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 08:09 PM
25

What happens after the ~£100M makeover of the Scottish prison system for women where all but one prison will be left open? Renewed action to reduce the number of women being sent to prison will start immediately through enhanced support for, and promotion of, community based alternatives. The new national facility and community units will be in place by 2020, with other changes taking place gradually thereafter. http://news.scotland.gov.uk/News/New-plans-for-women-in-custody-announced-1a61.aspx
/r/MensRights06/07/16 10:13 PM
9

I think she's onto a winner with this one... I'll be buying it for sure. Let's all make this a roaring success to show producers that there is a market for material that doesn't bow to the church of feminism.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 01:00 PM
1

"only two percent of girls in a survey conducted in the UK identify being prime minister as their career aspiration" A survey of girl guides. No data for the boys then.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 10:51 PM
1

Mindless drivel.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 06:50 PM
1

Not the crime of rape, since this sentence wasn't for rape. They are pushing for minimum sentencing for sexual assault, which includes unwanted kissing or grabbing a derriere. In combination with the global push for light/no sentencing for female criminals this is dangerous. Also if we step back for a moment and consider misread signals and specifically an unwanted kiss. There is a massive difference between going up to a women or man in the street/alley and planting the lips on them and being d…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:43 AM
5

It's pretty much zero percent of the time. I'm going to do a study on it right after I complete my study on the mating habits of cloud dolphins.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:37 AM
9

If you include minor injuries and general pain into the equation then the stats would go through the roof. The fact is that the majority of incidents that would easily make the (mostly empty) accident book in an office go unreported because they are so insignificant in a hardy job.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 12:24 AM
1

The thing is that violence and ruthlessness is an attitude - it's mindbogglingly stupid to link body size or sex to culpability and capability in this way.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 09:11 PM
2

What's hypocritical is a lifetime of silence on the issue when it only affected others.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 04:30 PM
1

Roll on RISUG/Vasalgel etc. I'll be strongly advising my boys to get it when they reach the danger years.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:58 AM
1

I found this subreddit ironically via the comments page on The Guardian newspaper feminist pamphlet. My only wish is that it was called Male Rights, since I'm more interested in the effect toxic femininity is having on my boys.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 10:35 AM
1

With these articles, I'm more interested in what is not being said these days. It's easy to spin anything if you only tell one side of a story. Notice the anecdote put before the 95% of girls in the slum not getting an education that implies that 100% of boys do. The reality is that life is shit for pretty much everybody in slums. Since they didn't mention it, there's nothing to say that 94.999% of boys don't get an education in the slums either. Or 90%. Or that there's other issues faced by boy…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:18 PM
3

Indeed, complete and utter blinkered waffle. Most of the issues discussed can be applied pretty equally to male offenders... it's not as if many PEOPLE with secure upbringings and blissful pasts and presents become drug addicts and repeat or serious criminals. This is the very definition of institutionalised sexism.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:04 AM
1

At a startup cost of the best part of £100M.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 11:59 PM
82

Seems inappropriate and disrespectful.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:48 PM
1

By that definition, men can't be raped by women. Not the way I worded it, but you are correct that legally this is the case in some/most places. You might as well stick "of a minor" on top of the rape allegation too if you care more for pitchforks and personal definitions of words than accuracy.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:09 PM
-1

No, rape is unwanted sex involving a penis and a vagina (or mouth, or anus)... hence why there are different laws for "penetration with a foreign object" or sexual assault. If you want to go with pop culture definitions of words and crimes then feel free, but don't expect the rest of the world to comply with whatever your national feminist lobby or localized media outrage has led you to believe.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:22 AM
-1

No it wasn't, he touched her genitals with his fingers. It's not rape, even if the entire feminist lobby wants it to be. Let's face it, they are absolutely f-ing desperate for evidence of "rape culture" to be accepted as true so will seemingly apply the term to all sexual assault - and you guys are all buying it.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:26 AM
-1

She fell asleep after contact was initiated with an inexperienced young drunk guy who couldn't tell the difference between heavy breathing whilst aroused and heavy breathing whilst asleep? There are a lot of explanations in between her pursuing him and falling asleep mid fumble to him being some kind of sexual predator somehow deserving of life imprisonment without parole. It's pretty awful that so many people are just going with the worst case scenario like a bunch of puritanical witch prickers…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:51 AM
-3

There was explicit verbal consent given in this case to finger her. It looks like they were both very drunk and tired and she fell asleep during the drunken fumble whilst he was seriously assaulted by two passing strangers who apparently had an ask questions later policy. The fact that he ran away from the assailants is being used against him.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:06 PM
5

No, in the UK rape is defined as penetration of vagina, anus or mouth with a PENIS. There was no such penetration in this case so he was not charged with rape, nor convicted of rape. ie, he is not a rapist. Please read the details of the story and not random headlines.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:02 PM
8

No. He was not charged with rape or convicted with rape. Please read the various stories on the case rather than the incendiary headlines.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:14 PM
2

He didn't rape anybody. I can think of a lot more horrible crimes than fingering somebody while you are both drunk and one of you happens to pass out. I prefer to save my outrage for actual dangerous predators or people who condone that behaviour and not stupid college kids who are getting demonized in the press for a drunken fumble (that he was given explicit consent for before they left the party) gone wrong.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:40 PM
1

Finally, 3 or 4 drinks less and she could have legally driven a car. The use of the legal driving limit in this case is quite disturbing actually.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 12:41 AM
24

I love this comment from the linked article... Universities should be more honest with young men from the start. Instead of telling them that women are their peers and equals they should inform these young men that their relationship with female students is more like a babysitter/child relationship when alcohol is involved. Men will be responsible for the actions of the women as well as their own, much like it is when looking after a child who can't make decisions on their own. This might help c…
/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:35 PM
3

There is no mention of gender because... The 2016 Homeless Count – a 24-hour snapshot conducted by 450 volunteers March 9 – identified 1,847 people living either on the streets of Vancouver (539) or in its shelters (1,308). They would necessarily have to break those figures down. I'd be willing to bet the house on there being less than 23% women sleeping on the streets and that the proportion of aboriginal men and vets sleeping rough is significantly higher. The subheading for the picture... Ped…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:40 AM
2

Women commit 0% of sexual crimes yet sexual abuse is 3x higher in women's prisons? Something's wrong with the measurements then.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:59 PM
3

She's certainly an good example of a brainwashed idealogue.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:31 PM
1

This is torturing a tiny, helpless little boy to death and torturing other kids. There's no sentence that's appropriate, not even the death sentence if that was an option.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:50 AM
24

I have to say that I do sympathize with the position women have been put in by feminism and marketeers gunning for the "pink pound" as we say in the UK. They do have a smaller window of opportunity for finding a soul mate to have children with but the dreams they are sold raise their bars so high that they probably disregard many guys they could otherwise have fallen head over heels in love with. I get that hypergamy is part of nature, but we have never been exposed to celibrity decadence to any…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 07:04 PM
1

Yes, you make good points. Apologies if my post did not seem supportive of your comments.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:32 PM
1

Please have a look at the competitors of the companies they do work for and use them in future. Premier Inn - Travelodge Dominos - your local pizzeria unicef - any other charity that has similar, but non-sexist values JD Sports - any other shop zopa - use RateSetter (better rates anyway) Fila - any other brand you like 192 - the internet
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:29 PM
1

The sexist says that promoting more women is the easiest solution and that giving away free money is the viable alternative. What would also work is employing a bunch of extra men at the lower end of the salary spectrum. They could get a few personal trainers or similar, which would boost the health of the organisation as well as bring down the abitrary figure they seem concerned about. How quickly they forget that the average is where it is because of the LOW earners. But they are a marketing c…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:21 PM
6

That's not institutional bias, since I haven't been allowed into council run gyms for decades on certain nights because I am a man. I don't get a discount on membership and there is no male-onle time in exchange. There are more female-only golf clubs in Scotland than there are male-only too. There are many women's organisations that I cannot become a full member of. The institutional bias is that it's okay to have female-only spaces, but not male-only spaces.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:04 PM
1

It's not the event per se, but the lack of feminist spin and furory surrounding it. This is a place where it's okay to point out the irony. In the five comments outside of your own there is no mention of "insisting on equal treatment for female students", just Tmomp's quoting of a question about what would happen if sixth form boys did this, with the answer that they would be expelled. In fact Machnow said.. very true, 25 yrs ago...we'd never hear of this, nor should we. .. and has been duly upv…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:35 PM
6

I'm a very recent redditor and I have been pushed towards voting (though not actually aligning with) more conservatively, not because of reddit/YouTube/social media - but because of the unrelenting onslaught against boys in the media. In Whacko PC World it's okay to say that girls are faster developers and better at X, Y and Z (which may indeed by true, depending on what we are discussing) but not that boys are faster at or better at anything at all. This is mainstream media and the volume is mu…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 01:30 PM
3

Thank you sibling of needlessly undefined gender, I now recognise my microgression against exfoliationphobes the world over and shall endeavour to check my privilege in future.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 10:04 AM
4

My other half is obviously a closet paedophile because she prefers my face clean shaven - like that of a prepubescent CHILD... the monster! Thank you feministcurrent for your insight, I shall grow a beard immediately to stop this predator in her tracks!
/r/MensRights28/05/16 09:02 AM
6

But putting the onus on boys to choose HEAL careers with simple encouragement as the key is ignoring the fact that the society and the justice system make such a career choice unwise. Especially with caring roles, where spurious allegations from troubled or mentally ill people they come in contact with can end their careers. Obviously there are many men doing excellent work in these sectors, but the fact is that it's much, much riskier in terms of no-fault situations wrecking your career than wo…
/r/MensRights27/05/16 05:02 PM
9

Have you met the internet?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 09:01 PM
3

I do see some of that, but if we can't laugh at this in the aftermath of all of the jibber-jabber about equal pay with non-equal gate receipts, sponsorship, TV deals or even ability then something is wrong with the universe.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 07:42 PM
15

Yet they get "minority" status. A minority that is a majority.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:47 PM
10

There were boys sexually exploited in Rotherham by the same gangs... they've been airbrushed out of the picture though.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:26 PM
5

Actors complaining about not getting paid the same as their more famous/liked co-stars is like complaining you're not getting paid the same as Beyonce when you are one of her warm up acts. Of course Beyonce and probably even male music acts are still free to tell anybody who dares to accuse them of sexism by paying them less in this way to piss off. It's a shame that more people don't have the balls/ovaries to do the same in other fields.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 05:27 PM
41

I love this, thank you.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 10:22 AM
3

It looks like the firm is going to go through the same process next year. I hope the guys involved are quietly putting their feelers out for jobs in other companies or will start their own. Here's an archived page detailing their major clients... http://web.archive.org/web/20160324033220/http://www.brainlabsdigital.com/clients I think the best way to remedy this kind of blatant sexism is to boycott companies that support it.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 11:57 AM
2

http://web.archive.org/web/20160524114004/http://www.brainlabsdigital.com/blog/pay-gap/ This one is archived, best not give the sexist marketing company more hits.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 11:46 AM
1

Here's an archive link to the page detailing the decision on the website of the sexist firm in question... Here
/r/MensRights24/05/16 11:45 AM
5

All men and women are potential war criminals. To single out men in this way is blatantly sexist.... I'm reminded of testimony of Aushwitz survivors who said the female guards (around 10% of the guards) could be the most sadistic. They never could tell which of the fresh-faced SS guards posted to Aushwitz would retain a modicum of humanity. To attribute such barbarity to maleness is to ignore history and circumstance. An "Is There a Sadistic-Jew-Torturer-In-Waiting in Every Woman?" in response w…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:50 AM
1

The only exceptions are where the prosecution has external evidence that one or more parties was drunk beyond consent, or there is solid physical evidence of violence. "drunk beyond consent" appears to be open to interpretation. I notice that you use a convenient metric of being at or beyond the point at which a male can maintain an erection. Do you have a source for this?
/r/MensRights22/05/16 10:00 PM
1

Relative incapacitation is irrelevant. Which leads to the situation where two people are drunk and enjoying consensual sex but are both technically guilty of raping each other. So having any sexual conduct after consuming alcohol must be made illegal in the same way we have drink driving laws. If detecting incapacitation was a superhuman feat and they went ahead anyway then they are open to a charge of rape, because they did not have good reason to believe their partner was consenting. I'm not a…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 09:56 PM
3

The problem is that having sex whilst drunk is legal, whereas driving a car whilst drunk or murdering somebody drunk or sober is not. So in the case of a man and woman both being drunk, both of them are being asked to perform the superhuman feat of ascertaining how much another person has had to to drink and whether they are more incapacitated than the other.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 11:33 PM
13

The Guardian is just a propaganda rag - the hypocrisy is just par for the course (pardon the pun).
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:29 PM
1

Yes, I agree... the law is not right here... surely this should just be a breach of contract with the school? Making her sign for life as some form of deviant as well as losing her teaching license is just holier-than-thou f-ing nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:56 PM
1

Yet another "girls are better than boys" headline. Yawn.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 01:40 PM
3

I really need to stop reading this subreddit... it's not good for my blood pressure. I hope prospective maths students in Melbourne realise that there is a big, wide world out there and that most universities still employ their teaching staff based on merit.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 04:15 PM
3

My goodness, do any of them have functioning irony detectors?
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:12 PM
1

In Rotherham, UK there was organized sexual abuse over many years in the community by people of Pakistani origin. The press consistently reports this as "abuse of girls" when some victims were boys. Since abuse of boys is more underreported by the victims it's pretty heinous that it's being swept under the carpet by the media/establishment too.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 12:08 PM
2

12 years is the headline sentence which is 6 years with good behaviour. There's a chance it'll get reduced on appeal too. I'd be surprised if she served more than 2 or 3.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 12:00 PM
2

My experience exactly. Men need to buy clothes that we would never wear anywhere but the office, whereas women in many organizations are largely free to buy wardrobes that they can mix and match with for any occassion. Thanks for highlighting the Climate Control Wars. Clearly the temperature should be set where guys don't have to risk indecent exposure charges to stay cool and where the odd chilly female can put on a cardigan and/or wear thermals. Loved the article btw... Men have the same issue…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 12:37 PM
2

Yes, I laughed at that myself. "You say that there are more male prisoners, but I've been in prison my whole life and ALL of my cellmates have been women so you are wrong."
/r/MensRights12/05/16 09:53 PM
3

They don't get paid more for doing the same job with the same responsibilities and the same experience. That's ILLEGAL.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 08:52 PM
2

Addicts inject each other though. If she wasn't an addict then the situation would have been different. It's beyond stupid locking addicts up for doing something virtually all addicts do. With the logic employed here, every time an addict injects another it's attempted murder. They are not medical professionals and most don't have testing kits to test purity, so every time is indeed Russian roulette. Or maybe they are just lost individuals with addiction issues? Maybe injecting each other theref…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 12:07 PM
1

Do you have a source for that?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:56 PM
1

Wtf. There's new evidence in the testimony of the other women who can verify that the story is the same one she heard at the sleepover with the actual victim of child abuse. That supports the recanting of the story, which is not something in isolation here, no?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:03 PM
1

You used the word in the context of excusing her actions. Please apply the same logic to any unfounded attack you find yourself at the receiving end of in future.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 11:49 AM
6

The history I was taught at school and the media I have been exposed to since never mentioned the general suffrage movement. That part of history has been whitewashed and I was not aware until last year that all men in the UK only got to vote in 1918, after millions sacrificed their lives or physical and mental wellbeing in defence of the country. There's a difference of a couple of decades here and there in other parts of the world, but it really was an eye-opener. I would say that most people …
/r/MensRights02/05/16 11:33 AM
3

Oh, that old chestnut. Don't you know that's how a lot of bullying operates... with completely random accusations? If you didn't spend so much time stealing stuff from all of our grans you'd realise that. Oh yes, it's true - MizterUltimamam broke into YOUR grans house. Get him!!!
/r/MensRights02/05/16 09:30 AM
2

I don't think this thread has a misleading title, it's quite an accurate representation of the sexist waffle contained in the article. An article that is framed with some cosy examples of offenders for whom their only real crime was apparently letting themselves be led astray by men. Classic tactics. There are tragic stories behind a lot of criminal behaviour, but that this framing in sympathetic tones is reserved for women when the real crisis in the prison system is the number of men inside (n…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 01:48 PM
4

What makes you think that?
/r/MensRights30/04/16 01:38 AM
2

Fair enough, but do you believe the victim in this case would have received an equally lenient sentence, had the tables been turned?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 03:05 PM
3

The comments there are interesting. The "why is the focus always on violence against women" is met with "violence against men is by men." Somebody pointed out that 54% of child abuse is carried out by women. They should also point out (I'm not on Facebook) that up to around 80% of imprisoned rapists surveyed were abused by at least one female in the past. Babies aren't born violent criminals, they are created. If we as a society really want to address violence against women (apart from the incre…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 03:03 PM
1

True actually, thanks.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:14 PM
4

"It could be argued", if you were her defense lawyer. The official story is that he was stabbed in the back as he walking away. Whether or not he actually hit her is a different matter. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't but it's not self-defense if they're walking away. At least not if you are a man.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 01:58 PM
-2

Please refrain from using genered insults, may I politely suggest that a suitable replacement for "cupcake" might be "you self-absorbed embarrassment to humanity."
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:50 AM
5

The article is the Empathy Gap and propaganda machine in full display. In a couple of hundred years time historians will be amazed looking back at this attitude.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:05 AM
2

Indeed.... the feminist movement have managed to officially make the health of women trump that of men, even though we start off as the majority of the population and end up as only 49%... The Health of the 51% If their health was really an issue, they would be the ~47% (since they start off lower). So many men die younger than women (at every age) that the Chief Medical Officer writing such a report is evidence of just how unashamedly blinkered and sexist ideological feminists have become.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:48 PM
7

It appears that there is some effort going into "de-genderfying" the issue by focusing on female suicide rates. I noticed this in the UK parliamentary men's rights debate last year. IIRC, the greatest increase is in middle-aged white men, the least cared about of all demographics. I do think that female suicide rates will increase as the feminist movement slowly ensures that more women will be unable to live up to the expectations that "society" places upon them. That it is possible to be an abj…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 12:13 AM
3

Well said.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 05:17 PM
1

When was that taken? Surely they got charged at a local police station before they were charged/the news broke and have been remanded in custody ever since... no? It's a murder charge ffs.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 04:29 PM
1

When I say "feminise", I think that a more accurate decription would be "adjust", since it's always males who are expected to conform.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:05 PM
1

I'm troubled by this, I didn't actually know that boys were banned from the guides whilst girls were allowed in the scouts. I think that boys are in equal need of "safe spaces" where there isn't enormous pressure from all angles to feminise their behaviour.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:03 PM
6

As a father of two young boys, I am pretty disgusted with this advert. I am acutely aware of the bombardment of "girls are better than boys" in the media. It's all very well seeing this from an adult perspective, but what effect would being exposed to this have on the average young boy?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:23 PM
4

People wouldn't be able to take the study out of context if the subject of the study wasn't framed in such a politically useful manner. The fact that the scientific method should prevail in the long term does not prevent science of intentionally limited scope being used as a propaganda tool in the short term. So I am not so willing to let the authors and paymasters off the hook here, since they should be aware that the current landscape does not allow for research to balance out through diversit…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:00 PM
1

"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen." - Albert Einstein.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:44 PM
3

It seems as though Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions is engaged in a media campaign, using celebrity to keep the crime of sexual assault at the forefront of public discourse. Regardless of the strength of the cases against the (almost invariably, contrary to stats) men who are having their lives dramatically affected by her actions.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:40 PM
-9

I have to say that I agree with women objecting to this. They are not all ideological feminists by a long shot and have been swept up in a power game played by those privileged, mostly white women who would never see a day of service even if WWIII broke out tomorrow. I do agree with compulsory national service in war zones for Women's Studies graduates and feminist journalists though.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:35 AM
17

I think using the term "rugby players" or "women" instead of "girls" is better, but other than that I completely agree.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:25 AM
1

Notice that the mother rejected a job offer in a booming industry (software/tech) in order to hold on for a job offer in the post-crash, rapidly shrinking industry (construction). The article skips over the fact that taking that great job offer would have meant sacrificing a most of her time with the children and that she might well have been laid off from her old job anyway. Construction is like that, you're here today and gone tomorrow. She is underemployed by choice. Pure and simple. I feel r…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:06 AM
3

Those will be the times they had sex after drinking.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:18 PM
5

One study Also, have a bingoogle for the OECD report 2015, it was widely reported. Finally, this well-researched and referenced post
/r/MensRights05/02/16 01:16 AM
5

That's all very nice, but it ignores the reality that boys get their coursework marked down by female teachers for example. That is a specific problem that the boys, parents and teachers need targeted action to solve. Sexism in the system has been identified and it needs to be addressed. It's actually not hard to imagine that working class white boys are being marked down further for similar reasons.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 12:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter