TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

angryman22 Archive

View 3 posts and 203 comments by angryman22 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

you don't like my source or what dude? I couldn't do it in an hour cause I wasn't on at that time.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:49 PM
1

the sexual victimization in prisons and jails report by the DOJ estimates 4% of federal inmates and 3.2% of jail inmates reported experiencing one or MORE instances of sexual victimization. Those estimates have been critisized for under reporting the number of instances especially among juveniles too. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svpjri1112.pdf
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:21 AM
-4

I read it in an article, they are DOJ figures. They are just estimates, probably close the the truth since men are raped more than once in jail which these figures don't take into account. There are so many men in jail in America that is makes pretty good sense.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 12:10 AM
8

makes me sick how whenever somebody wants to talk about how men could be getting hurt crazy bitches want to make it all about women. They just can't empathize with men.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 06:23 PM
2

im not reading that wall of shit.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 07:36 PM
2

Keep up the good work man!
/r/MensRights28/09/13 04:24 PM
10

"Hello police? There's this man..." "STOP RIGHT THERE, GUILTYYYYYYY!!!!"
/r/MensRights28/09/13 04:23 PM
13

Oh shit, it's not OK to commit rape? So that's what I've been doing wrong all this time.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:55 PM
2

Go Sweden!
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:47 AM
2

This is definitely true. Men who are seen as complainers are seen as weak and irritating. Women who complain are seen as natural victims anyway so it fits more.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:41 AM
3

doesn't make a diff yo. Men or women can be haters. Nam sayin.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:47 PM
2

I thought scandanavian countries were worse because of feminism but they seem to take mensrights more seriously than we do as well, which is great.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:11 PM
3

this is great news, I can't wait to see more women working in mines and on construction sites.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:07 PM
8

worth it.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 06:00 PM
59

POS all of them. I'd like to meet them irl and tell them them what I think.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:09 PM
2

their feelings.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 12:11 PM
2

what a horrible bitch.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:11 AM
6

i guess the higher rate of black men being killed doesn't matter since it's mostly other black men doing it.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:40 AM
1

You should think over why it's such a sore spot, perhaps you have some deep seated fears over needing your religion to always be right or perfect.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:36 PM
1

But why does your religion say it is right? What's the moral justification? You should never believe in something because it's from religion. I don't see any good reason why circumcision should be legal except in cases where it's medically necessary. It causes harm to the child, does something irreversible to their body (or at least very difficult to reverse), risks causing them infections (which they can die of at times) all the while without the child's consent.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:24 PM
3

This should be obvious but just because something has been around for long time doesn't make it okay. What health benefits are there exactly? You know if people just wore condoms the supposed health risks would completely go away. I know of lots of people who regret it having FORCIBLY done to them. I think piercing ears of children too young to understand what it is should be banned. Did you know under 16's can't get their genitals pierced but a baby boy can have his foreskin cut off?
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:00 PM
4

If people are allowed to cut off the foreskin of baby boys then why not make it legal to cut off the clitoris of a little girl? Heck why not make it legal to cut a finger off them? All you have to say is it's my religious belief, and shazam, it's okay. Religion is not an excuse for wrong behavior. If somebody has a medical reason for doing it then fine, but they must demonstrate that first. And adults can do it to themselves if they want but not to children who are too young to agree.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:35 AM
6

nobody should be allowed to circumcise children too young to have a say in it. It's immoral.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:55 AM
8

why? If it's wrong, it's wrong, no matter what religion the person is. We can't say having sex with girls under 16 is wrong except for Muslims because Muhammad did that.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:17 AM
3

talk about popular culture and how it portrays men as homer simpson types. Talk about how it is unfair of feminists to come up with this notion of patriarchy which all men must atone for when in reality it's just biology and survival interacting, men aren't at fault for it as a group. It was no luxury either. With those "rights" came responsibilities of doing the dirty and dangerous jobs women never had to do (still don't do). Talk about gynosympathy and how our culture has more empathy for wome…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:31 PM
4

tbh when I went to uni the guys could be pretty scummy. The girls weren't angels but it was the guys mostly behaving badly. "No parents, lets turn into stupid animals!!" was the attitude.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 10:48 AM
15

don't apologize and don't explain yourself to these insane people.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 05:53 PM
2

That's retaliation not self defense. I think retaliation for the sake of it is wrong, because it's stooping to their level and could escalate things.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 05:33 PM
-1

if the hit is in self defense, then I agree. But if she walks away after hitting you there is no need to run up to her and smack her. Also her hit is going to be a lot weaker than yours would.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:06 PM
-12

not necessarily hit, but he has the right to defend himself. It's not hard to restrain a woman, they are much weaker than men. Two might be quite hard though, I'd just get out of there.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:00 PM
2

avoid blame, avoid blame, evade, evade.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:36 AM
1

he's not telling her what she should do, he's paying her a compliment. If she looks great without make up to him then that is very high compliment because most girls wear makeup to make themselves look more attractive. It's her interpretation that is wrong, not necessarily what he said. I don't like make up just cause I can't stand somebody having chemicals caked all over their face. I prefer natural but I wouldn't make a girl feel bad if she wanted to wear it.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:31 AM
2

I don't think gender is important at all. Being yourself and growing up is important.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:27 AM
1

Lets turn a small problem into a reason to shame all men!! You go girl!
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:23 AM
2

Oh I see, I thought it meant doing paternity tests to make sure men always knew if they were the biological father or not. This could be terrible if it is what you say.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 07:34 PM
7

Switzerland is a great country but this is wrong. Either make men and women both do it, or don't make it compulsory. Clear case of discrimination and think all that time the men miss out on that women get.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 07:31 PM
2

"My relationship was terrible therefore all relationships must be this terrible."
/r/MensRights22/09/13 07:18 PM
-5

This is good news, I'm happy for Norway.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 05:00 PM
30

you don't get your check from the government every week for being a man? Dude you need to write to them, I love the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 03:46 PM
2

To think of all those men out there being objectified for their money. How is it any different to prostitution?
/r/MensRights21/09/13 12:08 PM
8

http://imgur.com/B9pjaiU
/r/MensRights21/09/13 09:15 AM
8

there's no need to get physical with someone unless it's in self defense. The guy sounds like a complete twat tbh but glassing him was extreme. I would have given this girl a fine or some community service.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:51 PM
2

wow, they really missed the boat on that one.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:26 AM
0

I think misandry affects all males in all cultures. The gender stereotypes exists everywhere. It will be mostly white males on here I imagine because feminism has taken hold the strongest in the west bringing equality and gender issues into the light. I think it's really on a individual basis as to who it affects more. I would say fathers going through child custody process, male rape or sexual abuse victims, men violently abused by their partners, all the boys getting bad grades in schools and …
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:21 AM
8

living well is the best revenge.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:08 PM
2

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view1/3205559/david-mitchell-laugh-o.gif
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:56 PM
0

Very sorry. I'm going to move to America in the future if the EU keeps sliding into totalitarianism like this.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:32 AM
1

Seriously, it's embarrassing how these people don't understand what free speech is considering all that Europe has been through. They are control freaks and only understand force.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:30 AM
1

How absurd! You can't ban people from criticizing a political movement. There is a difference between hate speech and inciting violence, and expressing opinions about things. People should be allowed to think and say what they like! You can't outlaw people's thought. The author is exactly right, the EU is becoming like 1984 with a new thought police division in the works. This document is dangerous to the core of human rights. I claim those rights for myself and will never respect a document lik…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:28 AM
0

surprise, surprise.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:59 AM
1

you're in the wrong place bud. Or the right place if you do some research.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:58 AM
3

This is great news! I hope more countries wake up to obvious fact that circumcision against baby boys is a CRIME since the baby cannot choose to have it done against them. Thank you for going along and posting this here for the people on mensrights.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:56 AM
1

ah sorry I wasn't sure if you were being real or sarcastic so I went with real.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:39 AM
2

WHAT? I'm saying it's pointless because it makes no difference to the strength of the relationship. The reason marriage exists is because a long time ago women never had any rights they were considered property that would belong to a man. In exchange for providing her security he got children and a clean home. Women have equality SO MARRIAGE IS POINTLESS. They can go earn their own money.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:37 PM
4

there shouldn't be any
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:31 PM
21

exactly OP is trying to communicate to sociopaths.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:50 PM
8

we should lower all entry standards to the fields as well to make sure more and more women get in.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:33 PM
5

you can do that without marriage if you want
/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:19 PM
5

Who is she to be evaluating a man every 3 months like he is her pet poodle. And can't I tell a woman I am committed to her without giving her a ring? Is that possible please? Or is money the only thing some women understand?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:50 PM
6

Marriage is a bit of paper how can it possibly make the relationship better or worse?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:41 PM
18

there is no point. Marriage is an outdated institution and doesn't belong in today's more equal society.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:37 PM
1

I think the article you sent me is stupid. I have no problem with somebody owning the majority of the media outlets if they win those audiences fairly and squarely. There is nothing to debate with you. You think government should step in and limit companies and I think that is wrong because I support a free market and people achieving their best. End of. The free market and the price system comes up with the most efficient allocation of resources. If a monopoly develops so what? It just means so…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 06:35 PM
1

so under your rules nobody is allowed to own a majority of the market no matter how successful they are? What kinda rule is that? You are being silly because you don't like murdoch and his medias opinions and the fact that lots of other people like them. If majority of the press was owned by a liberal company you wouldn't complain. Murdoch started small and grew his business. He is allowed to say climate change is bullshit, it's his paper and YOU don't have to buy it. Freedom of speech. It's not…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:29 PM
12

cutting little girls clitoris off = abhorrent, cutting little boys foreskin off = hygiene Have people gone fucking mad?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:34 PM
1

well it's both.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:30 PM
1

because of the people who buy papers, most buy his. If you don't like Murdoch being so successful then be angry at the people who buy his papers. Free market means it's free for anyone to try and compete but don't be mad if people are not buying the same newspaper as you. That's like being mad at democracy for electing the guy you didn't vote for.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:40 PM
2

the media works in a free market, people drive the news. I don't know what's wrong with it? because it will either help him or hurt him, he want public support and he wants to do a good job.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 11:17 AM
5

You are telling me it's not acceptable that cabinet members can be majority male? What number is acceptable exactly? 50/50? 40/60? How do you decide what is acceptable and what isn't and why does it only apply to politics and women? You know their are lots of professions that are completely male dominated I could point to. Maybe the women just weren't as good as their male counter parts or have you ruled that out on what basis? You have no evidence of sexism so do not accuse him of such. Men do …
/r/MensRights17/09/13 10:57 AM
7

exactly, you can't tell and you don't know. You are speculating about things. This is why the phrase "benefit of the doubt" exists.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 10:28 AM
3

If he discounted women who knew would be better for the job because he is sexist then what's more startling about that is his stupidity. Why would he trade competency for his own sexist beliefs. That's just dumb. He doesn't seem that stupid to me so I believe he chose his cabinet members not out of sexism but because he thinks they are the best people for the job. Why would he bother hiring one woman if his views are all colored by sexism. Are you suggesting he did that to show he isn't sexist?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 10:00 AM
2

did blacks lose their shit cause they weren't represented? What about aborigines? This whole notion that it's a crying shame women aren't represented more is insulting to tony abbot since your calling him sexist and it's insulting to women who you apparently see as nothing more than tokens that must be used in order to make other women happy. Whatever happened to somebody getting the job solely based on merit?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:17 AM
2

exactly these feminists don't see how insulting they are being to women. Basically just hire women cause they have vaginas. That's objectification defined. And if we really did get into this quota business why stop with women? What about blacks, arabs, jews, mormons any other group you can think of could complain they weren't represented. It's terrible logic.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:14 AM
1

Maybe it's the truth and besides he was elected so he can choose who he likes. Either way it help him or hurt him, I don't see why he would pass the opportunity to hire women that would be better for the job. Unless you want him to just hire women because they are women? That is an awful thing to say since it implies the women are nothing but tokens not earning their place on merit.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:11 AM
11

what you're saying is there are better female politicians than the male ones he selected. Why would he pass the opportunity to have a stronger team that would benefit him more? You don't have any evidence he did this for sexism so don't jump to conclusions.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:07 AM
3

if child support is for the child why is it a different amount for every guy the richer they are?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:02 AM
9

I made a thread about this the other day. I believe in situations like this children should get priority not women. Age and frailty matters, gender does not. Women like this need to get off their pedestals and high horses. Their entitled attitude pisses me off.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 08:48 PM
16

absolutely, marriage is really stupid contract to sign.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:46 PM
13

guys who think they are enlightened by the truth that all males are either alphas, betas, gammas, deltas etc, something they just fucking made up. Basically they suck with girls so they resort to ridiculous theories and explanations for what women actually want. It has nothing to do with mensrights since they reinforce all the gender stereotype bs and don't see men and women as being treated equally.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 09:25 AM
1

really? If a woman slaps me I just have to take it? I can't slap her back? What an entitled bitch.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 09:16 AM
3

remember those eqyptian women protesting? What brave souls they were saying their brothers will die for them. "drag me strip me my brother's’ blood will cover me". Aren't women so selfless when they're sacrificing their brothers? I mean rape is thousand times worse than murder we all know that.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:26 PM
1

ok I didn't know your boss and her were friends, that sucks. If it happens again you can go to the police.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 08:06 AM
4

gynosympathy
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:29 PM
18

somebody just tried to chop my head off but since they weren't successful it doesn't matter. Deborah Orr is an irrational loon.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:24 PM
1

I understand that but we really must have the courage of our convictions or people won't change. Who cares if others think badly of you? Would you ever want to be friends with people like that anyway?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:48 PM
-10

That's a lot of self identifying NAZIS. It's not about feelings it's about not associating with or giving oxygen to horrible people. Your username is meant to be mocking of jewish peoples names just like pol morons do. Gtfo you dumb pleb.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:43 PM
-9

I am an adult too which is why I don't pay attention to the childish jabbering of nut cases on pol. If they were serious, they'd be serious, but they aren't. It's a big troll fest of guys trying to out do each other in terms of edginess. But it's also more serious than that at times, supporting nazism is supporting fascism and killing innocent people. We didn't have any luck debating hitler, we had to go and destroy him. Not that I take them super seriously, they all remain anonymous cowards sin…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:50 AM
-11

most posts on pol are nazism and conspiracy theories. There are better websites to go to discuss libertarian stuff and mensrights than that sewer pipe.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:56 AM
-34

i'm not comparing them to nazis, they are literally nazis.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:31 AM
-14

We can tell the time ourselves fine without consulting a shit clock that is literally a nazi, to use your analogy.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:29 AM
1

You should have reported her to HR for sexually harassing you. Don't do nothing about it then complain.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:10 AM
-49

don't ever post 4chan pol stuff here. Holy fuck, it's like posting something from the KKK or a Nazi organization.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:07 AM
-8

what relevance is it to mensrights what you and some internet bloggers think all women are attracted to? Are you wanting to help us get women or something? I don't have issues attracting women or being attracted to them and I would never put on an act of dominance, confidence, aggression or strength like some pussy worshiping monkey neurotically trying to please them. That said I don't know what OP's link is about since it doesn't work.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:46 PM
1

Good Germany!
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:35 PM
-9

this isn't the redpill. Take your PUA bullshit elsewhere.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:29 PM
2

awww it's ok you're forgiven, we'll skip the law today for you.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:56 PM
1

not really the same situation. They already knocked him out what else could she do? She couldn't run they'd just get her. My point is in situations like this the majority of the time it's men taking the bullet for women. Feminism goes out the window when shit hits the fan. Most women would never sacrifice themselves for a man, yet it's almost expected of men to do so for women. Let me think of another example of men taking the bullet for women. Oh yeah, every war in history ever.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:43 PM
1

yes but that doesn't mean we should be slaves to our biology.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:18 PM
0

or the aurora shooting. 3 guys dived in front of their girlfriends and took bullets for them. One of them had only been dating for 3 weeks. Have you ever heard of women doing this for men?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:15 PM
-1

he is saying that women are seen as more useless and panicky in a bad situation the ship men are trying to fix.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:13 PM
-1

that's a good point but I am talking about the time after the ship could be saved. Who stays and who goes? I'd say the youngest upwards should get to go but none of this "I'm a poor woman let me go with the children!!"
/r/MensRights13/09/13 05:33 PM
1

yah I can just watch me.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:08 PM
1

why not their fathers?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:21 PM
2

I think we are pretty good at calling out misogynist people on here. Much better than feminists ever are at calling out man haters.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:46 AM
2

I love how people unconsciously put women and children together as if they are one in the same. Quite telling.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:44 AM
6

it's amazing they were found guilty on the words of a woman alone. I guess you're just guilty for being a man in sweden.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 07:56 PM
9

fixing things is rape
/r/MensRights12/09/13 07:46 PM
1

not all women are like you believe it or not.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:14 PM
0

guys acting all tough by scowling constantly and never having conversations without using racial insults or curse words. SUCH MANLINESS!! You support a phony bullshit version of manliness. There's really no such thing, somebodies character isn't related to their gender. You're so dumb you wouldn't even think that though. You have to go around defining everyone by their gender. "my boyfriend is a man, your'e not bla bla bla" Grow up lady.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:12 PM
11

haha so true.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:31 PM
0

don't debate or can't? I put to you that you are coming to mensrights and telling us about what a real man is by citing the film gran torino. This is fucking gender stereotype bullshit and you should fuck off with it. Don't ever tell me I should be such and such or I'm not a real man you little witch. Now be gone.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:18 PM
0

lost argument so you attack my psyche, that's a favored tactic of bitches like you isn't it?
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:07 PM
-1

haha that's a typical old man is it? So you are a sexist and ageist.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:53 PM
-1

hahaha gtfo with your two brain cells.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:44 PM
-1

OOGA OOGA clint eastwood real man UG UG he fit stereotype of manly man by being short and racist with people OOOOOO. You are a stupid cave woman, you don't belong in mens rights.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:44 PM
0

she is trying to tell men they are a problem if they every rely on somebody else when women do it all the fucking time. fuck her.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 12:42 PM
-1

you think it's a good movie because you have a childish, dumb view of men.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:50 AM
-1

rofl have you seen women lately? They call daddy government and uncle censorship every time they feel victim of anything! There's no such thing as a self sufficient person, people are getting free help from others all the fucking time you delusional bitch. You women have a group and government program for every issue and you claim you don't need help. Not to mention most of you are living nice lives off your husbands salary.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:49 AM
2

Gran Torino is a shit film. It's basically 90% clint eastwood scowling into the camera and calling other men names like mick and polak. WOAH SO MANLY they called each other racist names. It's portrays men as emotionally unintelligent thugs all out to prove how tough they are. It's fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:41 AM
19

marriage is a big scam.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 10:20 AM
14

says the guy with over 100,000 karma. Get the fuck out moron.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:42 PM
8

They will try to use straw men arguments and shame you because they are scared you have good points and they don't have a good argument against you.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 05:15 PM
4

isn't that called perjury?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 05:11 PM
-2

"I wouldn't be surprised if just a few participants in this study fundamentally affected their data because it is a small study," said Aluka, describing the findings as "a stretch." this is the point about 70 being too low a number. There are so many unchecked variables involved in matters like this that if just a few men changed your error margin would increase a lot completely changing the reliability of results. Repeat this experiment over and over again then I will take it more seriously.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:22 AM
-3

that doesn't change the fact that 70 is a tiny number of randomly selected people. I thought studies like this were supposed to be in the thousands before they were taken seriously.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:34 AM
5

this has to be trolling
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:50 PM
-2

How do I know how big my balls are relative to other mens? 70 participants is too small for anything meaningful to be correlated anyway.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:48 PM
0

I don't applaud it I think it makes the problem worse. They just confuse people and frustrate themselves. I doubt they find any happiness in treating women like childish objects to be manipulated.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:02 PM
-1

i said why and i can't be bothered going into lots of detail, don't be offended cause you like it.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:19 PM
2

fucking idiot I hope she is jail for a long time.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:00 PM
-1

any good points they have are things we are already saying on mensrights. The rest is bullshit. Their name really annoys me too. As if they are all special snowflakes who have stumbled across the real truth everyone else is blind to. They think they are all fucking neo in the matrix, it's retarded. I don't know how much I can read about alpha omega gamma delta males and hamstering women and how they are all alphas because they took the red pill. I bet if you saw these guys irl they would have te…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:33 PM
-1

I've read enough of their comments and posts to realize they are a massively negative force for mensrights. They reinforce all the stereotypes of what it is to be "manly" with their use of alpha and beta all the time. Not to mention they treat women like dumb children. They are horrible.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:04 PM
0

exactly, they're punishing the many for the faults of a few. It's totally wrong and sexist.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:57 PM
10

Well said. They punish and deride all men for the wrongs of a few. If we did this for all groups we would have quite a horrible mess on our hands.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:36 PM
3

I love how they completely over react to a small problem. The number of men groping women is probably very small yet that justifies women being afforded their own special carriages? Can you imagine if society reacted this way to every group. White guys gets murdered by black guy, better separate white and blacks out. Red haired person gets made fun of at school, red haired only schools now. This is sexism, pure and simple.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:33 PM
8

this is so stupid. I hate how laws are used and abused.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:18 PM
7

the red pill is a joke. I hope we aren't affiliated in any way with those neanderthals.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:26 AM
2

they will never stop trying to pathologize us, it just shows how weak their arguments are.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:18 AM
-4

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:33 PM
0

I love bbc documentaries too and sometimes they have good programs on bbc 4. That makes sense that they all read the guardian the most. They are practicing for their own journalism which just reinforces all the standard left wing point of views. Plus the bbc has deliberately being trying to employ more women over the years for the feminist "reasons".
/r/MensRights08/09/13 04:37 PM
-1

there are way worse crimes than rape, I think the reaction is so strong and emotional because woman empathize more strongly with other women since she see's it as it could have been her. I will go out on a limb and also say I think it might have something to do with the fact that rape is taking control of a woman's sexuality by force. A woman's sexuality is one of her most prized things, it's something she wields great power over others with. If a man ignores that and ignores her choosing him or…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 04:12 PM
2

if there were no men we would still be living in caves.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:59 PM
3

the bbc is filled with left wing types and anti-male feminist women, it pisses me off we are forced to fund it just for owning a tv.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:59 PM
-1

wow, I have huge respect for richard dawkins but he is badly wrong here.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 08:47 PM
6

poor kid looks very uncomfortable about this beast ripping his clothes off. This is definitely sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:20 PM
0

not having men take care of them, make men pay them through the government. Are they retarded?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:47 AM
2

are you shitting me?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:58 AM
24

unless you're really hot, it's not abuse then.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:09 PM
1

You are missing the point, it is a parody. What annoys me about feminist's who get mad at thicke is I never hear them complain about all the black rappers who write songs much more misogynistic than this. I suspect they don't because they see blacks as fellow victims but white men on the other hand should be shamed whenever possible.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:07 PM
0

good on Andy!
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:25 PM
1

Maybe they'd be more careful before moving in with a guy for his money if it wasn't assured she would get half in a divorce. Maybe then rich men and women could feel more comfortable that their relationships are genuine.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:38 PM
0

you may think it's worked out fairly for yourselves but most of the time it's no where near fair. It's better to avoid the quandary all together and let people decide things among themselves like adults. If I am in a relationship with a woman then I want to be helping her. I don't need a court to tell me to. And if I want to keep all I earn that should be my right and if she doesn't like it she shouldn't be in a relationship with me.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:09 PM
0

not seen it but I will look it up.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:04 PM
0

I said he or anyone has the right to incapacitate the guy, but once you've done that you don't have the right to kill.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:31 PM
0

It is possible for him to beat the guy off and beat him up (incapacitate him) but the guy must have made decision to kill the man. That's what I find morally wrong. He knew he had stopped the man and it was over but he continued beating until he died. It's also better to let the guy rot in jail and live with his crime than die.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:12 AM
0

oh i dunno who she is
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:47 AM
2

I found out why it is bullshit. Her score of 228 is an adjusted score for her age at the time(her mental status) whereas adult scores are measured by standard deviations in which case her score would be 185 which is smaller than a lot of men.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:38 AM
1

when they all sit down together and take the exact same tests then we can compare people. Also most researchers say anything past 160 should be taken with a massive grain of salt. To pretend she has the highest IQ and is therefore the most intelligent person is nonsense to believe.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:25 AM
17

it's like they are trying to ruin the economy.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:57 AM
1

how dare you mess with that delicate flowers FEELINGSSS!!
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:02 AM
3

except it's false.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:01 AM
3

women really don't like being shown wrong, they get very emotional and defensive. This has been my experience with women in the past. They will try to make you feel guilty as if you are personally attacking them, or they will try to shut you up any way they can. They make you hear their point and then run away before you can return one. I've never had this while arguing with men.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:00 AM
-2

What's the point of living in a lawful society if you just take it into your own hands. He should have stopped the man and then called the police. You shouldn't get away with murdering someone unless it's in self defense no matter how awful it is.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:53 AM
16

I'm sorry but I think you are entitled to what you own and that's why I disagree on marriage. If we could get rid of the marriage contract or change it to pre-nup only men would keep what they own and not get screwed over. I don't think anyone is entitled to the wealth of another just for being in a romantic relationship with them. You saved that money, it's not fair he gets some of it.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:30 AM
28

of course at the end of the day we want everyone to be treated fairly regardless of how they happen to be born. You are correct that human rights for everyone should always be our focus but feminism or mensrights doesn't have to contradict that. Some feminists have mistaken the positive goal of fighting against discrimination of their sex into one in which men are the enemy and cannot be victims in their own ways. I don't know about you but I have a suspicion that some women don't like hearing a…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:41 AM
-1

haha what liars.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:54 PM
7

basically people can't distinguish between attacking feminism and attacking man hating bigotry. It's like when people confuse criticizing Islam with being a racist. People love jumping to conclusions so they can call others names that make them feel morally superior.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:30 PM
1

this is shocking. I knew sweden was a very left wing country but I didn't know they were that comfortable with extremists like this. And nobody called them out? That is cowardly and self deprecating. I would never accept sexist abuse against myself, I have too much self respect and I won't apologize for being born male.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:22 PM
5

just lol, who takes these clowns seriously in their purple tutu's screaming like children during a temper tantrum?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:17 PM
18

but that would require actual hard work for no money, it's better if we just get government to help us and call men sexist.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:46 PM
0

you got that right, Islam is a disability.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:37 PM
0

so we agree the law is wrong.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 08:18 PM
0

and both of them should be charged right? since they both initiated according to YOUR swedish courts? Not just the man right??
/r/MensRights31/08/13 08:00 PM
0

by that logic all consent in to violent acts should be illegal, boxing, rugby, judo etc. Some people like playing with fire so let them.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:58 PM
13

i was thinking the same, how about "she wouldn't shut up, so I gave her an uppercut" feminists would have a field day.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 07:26 PM
-1

u wot m8? fite me irl
/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:46 PM
-1

when did I make excuses for radical feminists? I am a feminist in the sense I support equal rights for women, that's it. You can't even read properly, idiot.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:36 PM
0

except they have ufc there and probably do lots of martial arts as well like judo and tae kwon do.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:14 PM
-1

What I meant is that the radical feminists have gotten louder as a result of the more mainstream ones getting quieter. I said a lot of mens rights issues stem from patriarchal ideals not all of them so pointing out one or two examples doesn't refute what I said. Most mens rights issues are legal ones, policing ones, cultural issues, politics all of which are produced mostly by men.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:13 PM
0

rugby? should that be banned? should extreme sports be banned too since they are dangerous? You are trying to live in a cotton wool society, just let people consent to what they like and they will have to accept the risks of their behaviors.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:49 PM
0

what the hell are laws for if not to represent our morality. And btw this woman was also considered as initiating the choking since she agreed to it so why is she not also being punished by the courts. You logic is contradictory, and I'm done with you until you start making sense.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:45 PM
0

so if it's organized it isn't as violent? you are being silly.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:39 PM
0

ya sure, what about other contact sports where men brake bones etc.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:14 PM
1

by that logic euthanasia is wrong, bdsm is wrong, boxing should be illegal, ufc fighting should be illegal.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:01 PM
0

in a bar fight somebody has to initiate and that person is the one who should be charged. It was NOT consensual, you got attacked and you defended yourself. If you use excessive force to defend yourself that may be cause for an arrest. But in this case both people agreed to the choking beforehand knowing what all the consequences could be. I am sure this woman does not want this man locked up or getting community service.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:38 PM
0

my bad, assault then, still stupid as they consented to it.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:25 PM
0

I am not ready to be a parent yet but I would teach her no differently I would a son. Just try to raise them as good human beings with a moral sense, open minds and skepticism. I would hope that would lead her to not have a sense of entitlement just because she is a woman. I guess I would like her to be down to earth, and not feeling superior to others or narcissistic.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:01 PM
-3

on the internet they may be more radical, but come on it's the internet, everyone is trying to be as provocative and outlandish as possible. In the real world feminism has achieved most of it's goals and so now the women who are still actively feminist tend to be the less sensible, more radical ones. A lot of mens rights issues aren't the fault of mainstream feminism but actually the patriarchal attitude that women are delicate flowers that need to be cared for and men are disposable work horses…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:53 PM
-5

no, radical feminism which is a small minority of the feminist movement that happens to be stronger in sweden.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:33 PM
1

I wouldn't hold your breath.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 07:09 PM
2

fucking people like this piss me off. In their heads women can only ever be victims and are never responsible for their own actions. They are guilty of the exact same sexism they detest by treating women like children with no agency of their own.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 07:08 PM
0

don't be afriad, we are all for equality fairness here and if you are to then we have no issues.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:48 PM
24

yup scandanavian people are extremely brainwashed into a radical form of feminism and other politically correct dogmas. Sad really how there education system basically indoctrinates extreme left wing views into their children.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:35 PM
-1

why the fuck did he take that? SMACK HER BACK, omg this makes me so angry he didn't hit that cunt.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:29 PM
0

this is so stupid it is insulting to mensrights to even acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:21 PM
6

it's just something try, it might bring the issue to more people's attention.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:34 AM
12

absolutely, perhaps we should start a government petition for this?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:49 AM
0

good point
/r/MensRights15/08/13 09:44 PM
1

what about all the men killed in homicides or gang violence or work place deaths? no fuck it men don't matter.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:12 PM
-1

why does location matter? violence is violence, it's wrong no matter where it occurs or against who.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:11 PM
2

Why is domestic violence called what it is? Why not simply call it violence? Is violence against women worse than against men or something? Violence is an issue to tackle for everybody and every living thing. Women are not special. That's what I would have said to her. Feminists like her are so self focused they don't even think objectively about things. Everything is just about helping women and to hell with men.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:10 PM
7

for feminist's like her things can never get better for women otherwise what would she have to moan about? Victim-hood is a lifestyle for these idiots.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:06 PM
2

a quick jog could beat that guy.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:31 PM
0

oh ok, can I ask why?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter