TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

apeironman Archive

View 2 posts and 483 comments by apeironman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
31

Social Issuesapeironman/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:19 PM
1

apeironman/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:25 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I agree. Frankly, I don't think the woman should have the child in the first place, nor should she be allowed to but forcing abortions is not really a place I want to go. So yeah, unless the father chooses to help support the child, I think it's on the mother to do so and if she can't support the child without state assistance, the child is put up for adoption. How fucked up is that?
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 08:31 PM
1

You really believe that that’s fair to the victim? Not at all, but I also don't think it should be a burden on the taxpayers of the state she would be applying for assistance in. I sort of agree that maybe the child should be taken from the mother but it's a fucked up situation all around and I think the child of the rape gets it the worst.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 07:03 PM
0

Maybe? Adopted and/or foster children generally do worse in life than children who stay with their biological mother (ones who engage in statutory rape I'm not sure of) so it seems like another punishment for the child. Cases like this are rare though, so it's not like it would affect a lot of children. If it were known that a woman who conceives a child through her raping someone, man or child, does not get to keep any child of pregnancy from that rape, that might be a deterrent.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 05:03 PM
3

Here are my thoughts on this: While it's seriously fucked up to go after child support from the victim of a rape, should the state (the taxpayers) have to foot the bill for this child if the mother is in need? If the answer is no, it seems unfair to punish the child for the actions of the mother. Unless we push for abortion in cases of rape unilaterally, we will have cases like this: unfair for the victim of rape if he has to pay, and unfair to the taxpayers if they have to pay. It's a fucked up…
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 03:54 PM
2

I have been known to dabble.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:53 AM
3

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/12423-alopecia-areata Hair loss in women is not medically serious and other than the potentially temporary hair-loss, has no affect on a person's physical well-being. Jada is not a sick person, at least not from this condition.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/22 01:09 AM
3

To add to this, WS is worth a lot more than his wife and has been married for going on 25 years. This man will lose half of all his money and belongings, and would probably be paying Jada for the rest of his/her life.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:16 AM
–

We can add student debt to the pink tax and the gender wage gap as another example that if a feminist can't find proof of oppression, they will claim they are oppressed by their own choices.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 01:53 AM
3

So, the best you can come up with is a 230 year-old book written by a woman who was arguing for more education for women. I'm not going to read the thing, so if you can point to a passage in the book where MWS argues that women should face the same hardships as men or that they should be eased, you haven't given me anything but the "No True Scotsman" argument, and it doesn't prove anything. ​ I dont care for random political movements that obviously have their own agendas. I'm not referring to "…
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/22 10:44 PM
5

Name one feminist organization that argues against sentencing disparities between men and women, or argues for punishing false rape accusers.
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/22 09:41 PM
21

Number 7, at least in the US, is bs. Women are just as likely to win elected position as men, they just don't run as often.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:02 PM
1

Though I voted Yes I would never get married again, and I don't recommend it. Both my exes took my name without me asking them to and then bitched about it after the divorce. Seriously, don't get married, guys. You are marrying her and the state, and the state don't care. If you absolutely have to, make sure she makes more than you and continues to during the marriage. It's the best way to make sure you don't have to pay alimony after the divorce. And if you have kids, make sure you are part of …
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:04 AM
15

I was about to say this was a rare example of The Guardian writing an article that didn't follow the feminist screed of demonizing men and was even sympathetic to men until I noticed it was 10 years old. Still, credit where credit is due. Until we change society's idea that men are inherently perpetrators and women are inherently victims, men's sexuality is going to be seen as predatory and something to be feared and shamed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 03:34 PM
2

People in power want to keep their power. That's not tinfoil hat, that's de rigueur and has been since our ancestors picked up the first sharp stick. Unfortunately, it's easy to keep us divided by gender, race, country, class, hair color, etc, etc, as we are still just tribalist apes with big brains. Frankly, sometimes I'm amazed we've made it this far...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/21 09:35 PM
2

Just anecdotal, but I have had a couple women tell me that using a vibrator too much makes it harder for them to get themselves off with their fingers, fwiw.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 02:37 AM
3

Definitely not a high point for the English justice system.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 11:17 PM
7

Strange. Rape convictions drop right around the time Alison Saunders let her contract lapse. She was under some scrutiny as several rape cases were thrown out because evidence was being withheld by the prosecution. Might have something to do with it. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jan/26/urgent-review-of-all-cases-as-digital-evidence-is-withheld
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:04 PM
5

Boys do better in all boys schools Do they? I would argue they do. Classes would/should be designed to keep boys more engaged and interested i.e. more interactive learning, more hands-on, and more competition. Also, there wouldn't/shouldn't be any gender bias in grading that goes on in coed learning environments. https://www.tes.com/news/teacher-stereotyping-means-higher-marks-girls-says-oecd.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 06:04 AM
10

Isn’t it something like men are more likely to be raped by another man than be falsely accused... Men are more likely to get raped in prison. That's where the term "rape culture" was coined. As far as whether that's more likely than to get falsely accused of rape by a woman, it's a huge gray area.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:49 AM
1

Don't want to piss of the mods by linking it. Just google "a voice for men bash a violent bitch month". It's a satire piece.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 11:40 PM
9

Thanks. About the only entitlement I see is coming from this woman. Her asking about rights as a woman employee certainly smacks of asking for special treatment. Also, her use of the word "creepy" to describe men (or old men) is just odd. What's creepy about a guy asking you to try on a jacket as you are the same size as the person he wants to buy it for? Would she say Chris Hemsworth was "creepy" if he did the same? Or would it be okay for him to ask as he's younger and attractive? (And a succe…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 11:27 PM
39

How is any of this entitlement? Worked as a front desk, an old creepy man asked me to try on a coat of the souvenir shop inside our hotel because he told me that his mother has the same body type as mine, I thought I was being helpful but the moment he demanded me to take off my vest, it’s just the feeling of disgust overwhelmed me and I had to walk away and feeling bad about myself at the same time. Uh, say no? Does she feel the entitlement is in asking or demanding in the first place? If so, E…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 07:37 PM
1

It would be nice to see, but until we get rid of the legalized bribery influence of corporate and private donations that our elected officials require to get elected and stay elected, that will never happen. Academically, I wonder how it would play out if it did come to a vote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/21 09:11 PM
5

https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-constitution-amendments/proposed-amendments/ Oops, I got the year wrong. According to this it was 1916. Never made it through either House or Senate. There was another in 1936 apparently, but it wouldn't have made aye votes sign up or go to war.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/21 08:51 PM
15

I don't feel like there should be a draft for men or women. Back in 1936 an amendment was proposed that wanted to implement a national vote to decide if we as a nation would go to war, and whoever voted aye was automatically volunteered to go. Not sure if it included our representatives or not, but I would have supported it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/21 07:43 PM
6

Strangely enough, using the term toxic masculinity is displaying toxic femininity, as it shifts blame to the man and removes accountability of the woman. But try getting people like these to grasp that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/21 12:46 PM
2

I stand corrected. It should be "members of a group representing one gender".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/21 07:37 PM
8

Yarp. I said it earlier in the post, and I'll say it again. Feminism couldn't survive without hypocrisy and double standards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/21 05:01 PM
9

Sure. But only members of one gender have organized around the idea that the other gender is the root cause of the majority of their gender's issues, ignoring their own culpability and oftentimes their own biology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/21 02:57 PM
14

This could be an unfair assessment of the situation. His wife was there at the beginning and worked at the company for years during the startup. It's quite common for startups to give shares out to people who shared in the difficulties of growing a company. I don't know how much his ex helped, so I don't know how fair this payout is. I can say from experience that the American divorce courts are absolutely f@cked, and she would have gotten a lot of money from him even if she hadn't helped at all…
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/21 02:44 PM
9

I feel that both terms are ultimately divisive. Both men and women share the same traits, just to different degrees. Women can be controlling and violent as well, so to say these are only traits that men can go too far with i.e. "toxic masculinity", is feminists trying to make it something only men can do. "Internalized misogyny" implies that misogyny is so deeply set in our culture and society that women just kind of absorb it subliminally. Are there certain societal expectations based on gende…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/21 02:23 PM
12

Right? And if "toxic masculinity" can exist, "toxic femininity" can too. Clean up your own house before you criticize others, feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/21 02:08 PM
13

I feel exactly the same. It's a common term for shitty behavior. Gendering it implies only one gender is guilty of it, and takes accountability away from the other gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/21 02:04 PM
13

Feminism couldn't survive without hypocrisy and double standards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/21 02:02 PM
1

A new game show idea. My previous entry was "Satire or Psychopath". The new one is "Satire or Snowflake". You heard it hear first.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/21 10:37 PM
41

And that "raped every 7 minutes"? That should be "a man is accused of rape every 7 minutes". The actual conviction rate is around 1500, if my online search skills are working. But we all know, if a woman accuses a man of something, he must have done it. Fortunately, the courts ask for more evidence than just an accusation.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 11:33 PM
4

This just gave me an idea for a gameshow: Satire or Psychopath? I really hope this is satire.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/21 05:42 PM
4

I would if I haven't already been banned. They really, really don't like people questioning the dogma. It upsets the echo in their Chamber of Immaculate Victimhood. Ok, that was unfair. If I'm going to influence anyone on the other side I've gotta tone down the sarcasm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/21 05:39 PM
-4

It's horrible that this young woman died. You should never blame the victim for something out of their control, but the world is not entirely safe and probably never will be. No matter how many laws are passed or safeguards put in place, bad people are going to find a way to do bad things, and it's everyone's personal responsibility to at least try to avoid them. I know this sucks and is unfair but it just is.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 05:09 PM
13

Amen, brother. What's really infuriating is these people seem to think bad behavior is entirely one-sided and refuse to even admit to or address their own complicity. Men and women have their differences, but we ain't that different. We ALL can be good and bad in equal measures.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/21 04:49 PM
5

I keep trying to come up with a way to deal with situations like these but they all would be counterproductive and draconian in the long run. Unless the mother has the resources to raise the child on her own, then she becomes a burden on the system and everyone in the country has to pay for the child, and that's not fair to everyone else. The best idea I can come up with is run a paternity test on all children when they are born. They are ~$100 if you do it yourself, although I'm sure a hospital…
/r/MensRights11/01/21 05:08 PM
15

Welcome. Loved your quote about the serfs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/21 12:22 AM
1

https://www.pnas.org/content/112/17/5360 This study shows it favors women. I linked to it above, as well, as I didn't see this question until after.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 09:37 PM
1

Here's a more recent study with a larger study group that shows the opposite. https://www.pnas.org/content/112/17/5360
/r/MensRights19/12/20 09:36 PM
7

The age of consent in the UK is 16. This woman didn't have sex with the boy, she raped him.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 03:16 AM
18

I've never understood this argument against gender-neutral laws coming from feminists and feminist groups. If their argument against gender-neutral laws is because women don't or rarely commit the crime being discussed, then women won't or will rarely be affected by it, depending upon the proportion of women who commit the crime. The only logical reason feminists would be against a gender-neutral law is because they don't want women to be held to the same accountability as men. "If you don't do …
/r/MensRights28/11/20 08:15 PM
1

That's alleged statutory rape of a 16-year-old boy. Age of consent in CA is 18. They keep spelling it wrong...
/r/MensRights04/03/20 02:50 AM
4

Women think they are entitled to men's bodies, just for different reasons.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:48 PM
2

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/08/01/are-women-paid-less-than-men-for-the-same-work Here's one that gets it a lot closer to an 'apples to apples' comparison. https://www.forbes.com/sites/avivahwittenbergcox/2018/09/23/gender-paygap-uber-case-study/#57878b5b555b Here's a study that might explain the small percentage difference left from the study mentioned above.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 02:53 AM
23

Where are women taught that their societal value is in their breasts? Was that when they segregated the boys from the girls that one day in sex ed? Is she not aware that female breasts are mostly 'lumps of fat' as well? This post isn't up to 'shame women', it's to shame the support group for breast cancer survivors, which this guy is. The fact that they deny men access thereby making it a women-only thing is their fault. Typical reply from pinkpillfeminism.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 08:32 PM
12

Pretty sure it was menslib where I read a mod post stating they were a feminist and that they wouldn't allow any posts with an 'anti-feminist' message. So much for dealing with men's issues...
/r/MensRights29/02/20 07:48 PM
6

Not really enough information here, really. If she isn't contributing a dime to rent, food, utilities, etc., then I don't think her doing his laundry or making food for him is too much, by any means. It's not that hard to wash someone else's clothes when you wash your own, or make an extra helping of something when you are cooking for yourself. Having had to work and go to school full-time in the past, I can tell you it's no fun. I would have gladly quit working if I had had someone to pay the b…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 07:41 PM
1

Even if everything you are saying is exactly true, what's your point? Everyone knows PEOPLE get raped, and that it's illegal. Are you arguing for stiffer penalties for those who rape teens? Or just female teens? Again, where are you going with this?
/r/MensRights29/02/20 07:27 PM
1

Thanks for the laugh. I'm gonna go get me some unwilling sex then, since it isn't rape. Get back under your bridge, troll.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 06:38 PM
4

You said it. We all, men and women, have our burden to carry. I'm done hearing from feminists how it's only been women carrying it.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 02:03 AM
1

While I'm not sure why this guy is even commenting, what he said was not objectifying in the least. If he had said: "Nice tits!", that would have been mildly objectifying. But she's wearing summer clothes in a summer climate, and the bike riders are wearing tight, breathable gear as well. I guess the answer should have been yes, it's cool in Argentina. Total non-issue.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 04:11 AM
6

You're not. Or at least not evil merely based on your race or sex. Don't get me wrong, I don't know you and you may very well be evil. but it's not based on what race or sex you were born as. Substitute any other race and sex and you will realize how sexist and racist claiming 'white men' are the cause of evil in the world is. Women aren't paragons of virtue, and all other races have had members do shitty things in the past and present. We just seem to be a convenient 'whipping boy' to take the …
/r/MensRights04/02/20 04:01 AM
6

Ima have to read up on JA. Absolutely brilliant, timeless quote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/20 12:59 PM
2

Call it 'emotional labor' then.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:53 AM
7

That's it. It's misdirection. "Maybe if I insult them, they will get off the topic I want to avoid because it doesn't help my case". They aren't interested in finding truth, they just want to win the argument. It's frustrating, to be sure.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 01:41 AM
2

Well, if they made the definition of misandry and it's application as broad as they make misogyny then yeah, feminists would have something to worry about. Most of the times I've seen the term 'misogyny' used, it's been because someone disagrees with a woman, or treated a woman equally. Hell, I wish they would pass something like that here in the states. The discrepancies in the unequal treatment of men and women in education, healthcare, and the judicial system might actually be addressed in so…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 01:06 AM
13

I wish I could say I were surprised to find that #MeToo has been used to ruin men's lives, but we've all seen the stories. I would be curious to know how many incidents of #MeToo abuse don't make the news.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 12:16 AM
12

When someone starts the ad hominem stuff, I know they have no game. It's weak stuff, and I usually just disengage if they continue to do so.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 12:05 AM
9

It's a lot closer to 50\5O in reality.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 11:49 PM
22

More like "toxic maternity".
/r/MensRights30/12/19 06:41 AM
3

No, the next Labour leader should be competent.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:34 AM
9

No shit. By SPLC standards, if applied equally, r/feminism is definitely a hate group. It's getting it applied equally that's the problem.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 11:19 PM
2

Exactly. We can't know how many accusations are false. 'Anecdotally', it could be anything.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 03:09 PM
5

*The fear of false accusations rippled through almost every conversation I had about this topic, so I think it bears repeating that the numbers suggest the risk of false allegations is very low. In the workplace specifically, these numbers are confirmed anecdotally by professionals. In 2018 the Employment Law Alliance, a global human resources legal solutions firm, conducted a survey of nearly four hundred employers from all fifty states. The survey found that harassment claims were rarely fabri…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 06:44 PM
5

Relationships aren't jobs, Lee. Your two masters don't mean shit if you are a lousy partner who doesn't want to take care of family.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 04:29 PM
7

So...you just came here to make a claim based on anecdotal evidence, and then refute all scientific studies to the contrary as delusional, without providing any corroborating evidence of your own. Do you apply that logic to everything, or just things you find uncomfortable to consider?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:31 PM
2

20,000 nerve endings in the foreskin. Equivalent to the female G-spot. Sure, you can orgasm without it, but I really wish I'd had a chance to try sex with my foreskin intact, and had the choice whether to remove it or not. Also, circumcision has not been proven to reduce STI's. The only 2 studies claiming that also educated African men how to avoid STI's, and more importantly handed out condoms.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 07:02 PM
2

As soon as I read this: The findings add to the already well-established health benefits favoring MC I knew it was a bullshit study.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 12:24 PM
1

Don't get married, guys. It just ain't worth it.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 11:53 AM
1

Lester Burnham from "American Beauty". I know he's a fictional character, but his attitude, ability to let things go, and enjoyment of life at the end is worth striving for.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 01:15 AM
5

0 points · 4 comments · r/MensRights Posted by u/M007zzz Posted byu/M007zzz1 hour ago Well, if it's like it is in the States, you pay extra per child and extra when you are not the majority custodial parent. If you don't have a lawyer, I would talk to one now. See if there is any way to get them back in the school system you are close to.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 01:08 AM
2

Yawn. Yet another feminist claiming that all men don't deserve pudding because some men do bad things, all the while ignoring bad things women do.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 02:39 PM
5

No, the article claims women are doing a better job. Evidence, please. Doing better at raising children? Again, evidence please. Just because women are generally the child-raisers by default does not mean they will do a better job. Which gender do you think is going to do better from the start: the one that faces grading discrimination, stiffer penalties for acting out in school, and has fewer scholarships, or the one that has those advantages along with positive discrimination in fields where t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/19 10:37 PM
1

Notice how almost everything in this list is about something man is providing to others, not about man's inherent value.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:56 PM
2

https://www.forbes.com/sites/avivahwittenbergcox/2018/09/23/gender-paygap-uber-case-study/#5431dc6cb555 https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/08/01/are-women-paid-less-than-men-for-the-same-work
/r/MensRights16/11/19 03:18 PM
3

That's from Titania Mcgrath, a satire account. Apply Poe's law judiciously.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 09:40 PM
1

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 02:00 AM
1

I disagree on much that you have written here. You make entirely too many broad speculations based on anecdotal evidence. The reasons why I am anitifeminist is because feminists are anti-men. Everything from the gender pay gap, to domestic violence, to toxic masculinity, are lies spread by feminist propaganda organizations to demonize men. I have been hearing these lies for decades. From Mary P. Koss continuing to spread the '1 in 5' statistic about rape, to Julie Bindel recommending culling the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/19 01:28 PM
2

Does anyone know how well that issue sold? I would imagine it might have sold well, as curious men would like to see what a penis turned into a vagina looks like. But I could also imagine viewership flagging if they continued the trend.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 08:36 PM
7

I recall a study that claimed only 3% of heterosexual men would be willing to have sex with a transexual. Catering to 3% vs.~90% is not a good business practice unless you are trying to serve a niche market.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 06:00 PM
2

No problemo. I googled 'fatherless homes and crime'. Might be some other useful sites there.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 03:13 AM
5

http://marripedia.org/effects_of_fatherless_families_on_crime_rates Lots of links in this one. Tbh, I did not look too deeply at it so i can't swear to it's veracity, but it's a starting point.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:54 AM
3

If you only address one group's issues while ignoring another's whose detrimental impact is more profound, you should feel guilty.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:19 AM
1

Thanks. I was wondering, as well.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:08 AM
2

What studies are you referring to?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 07:48 PM
3

Jeebus, this is fucking horrible. If there can be any bright side to this at all, at least the child survived it. In the U.S. over a 100 boys a year die from circumcision. No idea what that might be in Brazil. https://circinfo.org/USA_deaths.html
/r/MensRights02/11/19 07:29 PM
4

Poe strikes again!
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:51 AM
40

Well put. My answer is shorter: who said you owe us anything?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:49 AM
24

I was called a bigot for arguing against the Jewish 'heritage' of circumcision. By a Jew, I assume.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 03:08 PM
54

The article doesn't say, but should I assume this is sexist because the girl who assaulted first did not get suspended?
/r/MensRights31/10/19 12:38 PM
3

I'm with you on that. I'll vote for anybody who will get money out of politics as it is the single largest impediment to the American people actually getting representation from their elected officials. The party they are a member of is secondary. That being said, Trump was easily the dumbest, most insecure candidate on the republican ballot in 2016. His lack of verbal skills and constant assurances that he has the bestest people, the greatest plan, and he is the greatest candidate all struck me…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 06:31 PM
2

How is this a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:54 PM
1

How dare they be comfortable with their sexuality! The outrage!
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:16 PM
1

It's almost as if they created that sub to prove TRP right, with the same blanket statements about the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:15 PM
2

Each court uses a formula comparing income and custody between the two at the time of divorce and set the payments from that. It is up to the court whether payments will be lowered in cases like mine, but there is no guarantee they will lower them if they think you can make more $. Something called 'potential earning'. They applied that to me but not my ex. Since I wasnt able to pay for awhile I accrued child support debt. My daughter is now old enough I don't have to pay CS for her(and she live…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/19 05:33 PM
8

...so-called “intactivists,” are trying to scare parents with wild hyperbole like equating circumcision to female genital mutilation — which is about like equating an appendectomy with an amputation. No, Brian, it's equating cutting off parts of male and female sex organs. In other words Brian, they are the same thing. The latest research involved 3,393 HIV-negative heterosexual adolescent boys and men from Uganda who were part of the original HIV study. About half were randomly selected to unde…
/r/MensRights29/10/19 04:59 PM
3

If you aren't married, don't.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 02:52 PM
15

If, like feminists are taught, you believe in a patriarchal society where women have been and still are oppressed and controlled by domestic violence and even rape, it might be hard for you to view relationships as a reciprocal arrangement.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 02:45 PM
34

Don't forget the anti-male attitude in high school, and the gendered grading bias.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:29 PM
3

FYI, doesn't matter who, but if anyone starts urging you to kill yourself it's time to ghost them.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:26 PM
10

Or, instead of one incessantly asking if permission is still granted, you voluntarily and of your own free will state clearly and audibly your revocation of consent for whatever reason. Pick a fucking safeword beforehand. I don't know. Take some responsibility for fuck sake.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 04:12 AM
1

...and now I know what moid means.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 04:01 AM
18

This is horrible. How many boys must be mutilated or even die before we stop this ridiculous custom?
/r/MensRights29/10/19 03:57 AM
6

Amber Heard may as well put the millions she won in the divorce to use. Amber Heard is a millionaire in her own right as an actress, but California divorce court decreed that Johnny Depp must pay her several million for a marriage that didn't last 2 years. Ain't that a kick in the head? Stay away from marriage, guys. If you must, make sure your spouse makes more than you do.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 03:48 AM
16

Anyone wishing to take up the option at the restaurant, part of boutique hotel Nira Caledonia on Gloucester Place in Edinburgh's New Town, is able to let staff know while booking their table over the phone or online. This is something you could do with any restaurant if you are calling ahead. You could also show up early (if meeting there) and make this arrangement with your server. Me, I own it. I don't act apologetic or ashamed as I ask for separate checks, and if we as men want to make this t…
/r/MensRights28/10/19 05:29 PM
3

Yarp
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/19 04:48 PM
1

True, but you still would have to waste your time going on the date before you found that out. Or waste your time talking to them before finding that out, unless you want to lead with that which probably won't go over well, even if the woman believed in splitting the bill. It's kinda catch-22.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 04:47 PM
2

Now if only women who think this way would be this open publicly so we would know who to avoid.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 03:52 PM
2

Yeah, this is a made up shitpost to garner sympathy and attention. In another attention-seeking post OP claims to be 19. So either she is lying about her age to create outrage or this happened 4 years ago which means it didn't mean much to OP then if she waited this long to post about it. And I would think her recall of the details would be suspect after that amount of time. Grow up, OP
/r/MensRights28/10/19 03:44 PM
5

This exact thing happened to me. Had shared custody, but ex worked a part-time seasonal job while I worked full time and paid her alimony and child support. Lost my job, got another that paid considerably less. Went to court to change payments and the judge wouldn't lower my payments nor instruct my ex to find full time work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/19 01:18 PM
1

Stockholm?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/19 02:03 AM
1

I'd rather it just be people take out of the marriage what they put in, and it doesn't matter if a name is taken or not. I'd take a woman's name if she were rich enough. It's not that hard to change your name back to what it was.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 02:30 PM
3

Like it matters what the last name of the person who takes half your shit in a divorce matters. How is this a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:45 PM
3

Nice one. If you pronounce it with a long e it will sound like ultracreepidarian. Feminists will love that.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:33 AM
3

I assumed you were a feminist. Even if you are but believe differently, I will retract my accusation.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:17 AM
3

Yeah, 'bris' is the term for the Jewish rite of male genital mutilation. God told Abraham that if he wanted to be part of the gang, he had to cut himself, and any others of the tribe who also wanted to be part of the gang, and if they didn't do it they wouldn't be part of the gang. Paraphrasing, of course, but this is the general story.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 08:10 PM
121

She will certainly be allowed to continue her lucrative smear campaign there.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 04:32 PM
2

That latter allegation is not supported by any evidence, I like how when it's an allegation against a woman, suddenly evidence is important.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 04:29 PM
2

I like the term "feminese".
/r/MensRights26/10/19 04:27 PM
6

That's one brave dude. As history has taught us, speaking against deeply ingrained and long-held beliefs can be dangerous. Especially when your groups god told you to.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 03:47 PM
6

Please stop. You want men to show more emotions? Maybe try some empathy and stop shaming them when they do. The reason men are taught to be stoic is because we are aware we are treated like second-class citizens and we know complaining about it will just get us ridicule. Almost from the moment we are born we receive less attention from our parents than girls, get graded more harshly in school than girls, and are generally judged more by what we provide than who we are as people. More men than wo…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 03:17 PM
1

Nice.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 04:59 PM
9

Poe's Law. It's nigh impossible to tell truth from satire with feminism.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 04:42 PM
3

Heck, I think an upvote and downvote button could be useful on dating apps.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 02:53 PM
2

Well congratulations! You survived your circumcision. According to the site linked below, over 100 boys die each year in my country from circumcision complications. Is this the price we are willing to pay? Some of us must die so that we don't have to wash under the foreskin? http://www.cirp.org/library/death/
/r/MensRights25/10/19 02:40 PM
9

Did you read that woman's testimonial? She both stated a catcalling incidence was 'out of the blue' and that it happened regularly. Which is it? Also, how is this gender inequality? Are women not allowed to catcall? How is saying something to someone violence of any kind? Do they not realize women catcall, too?
/r/MensRights25/10/19 02:23 PM
2

Yet another reason. I can only surmise that they had a some time on their hands, and doing a gender check on some two million museum exhibits was deemed a worthy endeavor. All in the interests of equality, of course.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 10:17 PM
1

Actually, we are about 51% women in our population, about the same as yours but genders reversed. Yeah, we have the same problem with our court system and media complicit in destroying men's reputations just on an accusation. In fact, it's impossible to expose a serial rape accuser in court, as that evidence is forbidden under rape shield laws. Men here are sent to prison at a greater rate than women, and serve an average of 60% more time for the same crime.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 06:21 PM
1

I'm from America, where we have a balanced gender ratio and we are biased toward women, overall. Are there a lot more women than men in India?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:17 PM
83

While I think it good that it's out in the open, it's also difficult to change. Men in Victoria are in for some discrimination.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:15 PM
1

All of them that don't, really. Why shouldn't we have representation, no matter where it is?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:11 PM
5

Men should pay more to make up for the fact that you work less and choose lower paying jobs. But yeah, we don't like it not because it's unfair, but because our masculinity is fragile. That's what it is.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:06 PM
2

Nice. How does one wear lesbianism? Draped over the shoulder? Is it ok for formal settings?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:03 PM
365

Just...wow. They don't even try to hide the bias.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 02:02 PM
1

That's right! I forget the exact timing, but I think it turned out David didn't need to, ultimately. May have to watch again.
/r/AntiFeminists24/10/19 12:56 PM
1

Edit: wrong post.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 06:13 AM
1

To be one of the first joining a homogenous group could be daunting for anyone, sure. And at least it was ultimately a good ending, with acxeptance for all. Guess I'm just getting tired of it always being men who have to learn this shit, as if women aren't as insular and clique-ish. Truly, have you ever seen a video that seems to be trying to teach women to be more accepting?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:36 AM
2

Certainly in Alien the fix was in, with Ash being the corporate quisling who overrode Ripley sticking to the quarantine reg's. But in Prometheus, you had one scientist open his helmet in an alien environment, and another scientist who was a zoologist I think, just reach out his hand to the first alien, with no thought as to whether it might be aggressive or venomous or carrying space rabies. Sheer stupidity. Covenant, same thing: "we tested the air from space and it's totally safe. No alien-engi…
/r/AntiFeminists24/10/19 05:26 AM
2

Being a feminist and a proponent of equal rights, can you name a feminist organization that has spoken out for men where men face inequality? Sentencing disparities? Healthcare spending? Scholarships? Domestic violence?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 03:43 AM
1

Wait, he has to pay her? So England is going to incentivize women to report every encounter with a man that they deem uncomfortable? Great. This will turn out well... The victim, then 17 and due to sit her mock A-Level exams, burst into tears during the second encounter and went to police. Her mother said Griffiths would have touched her breast had she not moved away from him. The teenage girl later described how her school work had suffered, she was unable to sit her mock exams and said the unw…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:49 PM
6

"And you do the same, you parasitic woman."
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:34 PM
30

The vast majority of horror movies have this trope:'if they just listened to X, this wouldn't have happened'. The Alien franchise survives on people not following protocol, i.e. breathing alien air without testing it, and taking a 'petting zoo' approach to xenomorphs they encounter. You could argue it the other way, that she was an inhuman bitch that was going to let a crewmember die in quarantine. As unstoppable as the alien was in this movie, it wouldn't have changed the outcome one bit.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/19 06:14 PM
3

Jeebus, help us. Why don't we just pass a bill making it illegal to make people uncomfortable in any way, shape, or form. Even better, let's let the 'victims' decide what those ways, shapes, forms are at the moment of their 'victimhood'. No wait, I've got it! Lets just make it illegal for people to communicate with each other altogether, for fear of inadvertently offending someone. Sounds good to me. That being said, I fear I've offended someone already, and will now move to a cave in the forest…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:45 PM
2

If if were the other way round, feminists would be complaining about interspecies misogyny, 'because we all know most hunters are men'. Its funny, they even printed the most likely reason, that males of a lot of species are the more colorful or eye-catching. Which might be why they were hunted more frequently, because they would look better on the mantle. Or maybe because its often the male that hunts while the female looks after the young. Or maybe its because hunters dont hunt the females of a…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:36 PM
3

Yarp. It's more hypocritical when you realize it comes from someone of a sex and race that might arguably have the most 'positive' discrimination going for them in my country, which of course brings into question whether they attained a position through merit or are just filling a quota.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:15 PM
2

Where? While I will agree with you that some posts are really stretching to be relevant to MRM, most are at least on-topic to varying degrees. Did you miss this one?: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/dl251e/ncfm_selective_service_case which shows the NCFM (pretty much men's sole organization with any political clout) actually addressing something dealing with women in the military.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:53 PM
1

Then that's a pretty hard 'disagree' from me. Do some posters say some sexist shit? Sure. I've said stuff, as well, mostly tongue-in-cheek. But the vast majority of posts on this sub are on-topic and backed up by evidence. The mods are pretty quick to stop appeals to violence and brigading, on reddit and elsewhere. I'm sure if you dug you could find some posts that support your position but I'd be willing to bet that they are less than 1% of submissions. I defy you to find that same level of pol…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:33 PM
42

Huh, Where's the video of the yarn man nurse who joins a nursing department of all women who look nothing like him, wear a uniform that he is not (just like in this video) and, of course, eventuall being accepted willingly and enthusiastically after changing into the uniform and speaking up? I'm kidding. Odds are he would get stink-eyed, ostracized, and treated like a pack animal (could you carry this, anyone?) and forced to quit after 6 months if he didn't completely give into every demand for …
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:26 PM
3

And the most dangerous place for men is everywhere else.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:15 PM
1

Cllaims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 03:08 PM
10

Stating the obvious, sexist edition.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 02:56 PM
28

Parasites need subs, too
/r/MensRights22/10/19 02:16 PM
2

Exactly. You might get someone sympathetic to your cause, and then fuck it all up by speaking against the party they identify with. The fact I've already gotten a downvote proves my point, just for posting a link that someone disagrees with presumably because they identify as Republican.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:38 PM
1

Don't you know? Non-verbal clues are for 'no' only. Just ask Aziz Anzari.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:07 PM
6

Let's not get political here, because we have a hard enough time showing people the double standards in feminism without insulting an entire political party. Democrats don't hold a monopoly on shitty or weird behavior. while I will readily agree with you that most of these double standards appear to come from the Dems when it comes to 'women's rights', every group has good guys and bad guys. Shit, it's almost become a trope of Republicans to speak for anti-gay legislation and then turn out to be…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:05 PM
34

Didn't you know? Women are incapable of taking advantage of young, impressionable people who they are in a position of authority over. Only men. But we are all the same. Until we're not. Get it? "Double standards for thee, but not for me."
/r/MensRights21/10/19 04:21 PM
1

One might think they would like to keep that option open.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 04:00 AM
10

However, even “active consent” has its problems since “verbal consent does not necessarily mean that a partner is freely engaging in sex.” WTF “verbal consent does not necessarily mean that a partner is freely engaging in sex.” So, even a 'yes' isn't good enough. What else are we supposed to go on? Non-verbal clues? Mind reading? Edit: I'm referring to the article within this article that this article is referencing. Make sense?
/r/MensRights20/10/19 03:14 AM
3

Man 1: What's a subtle way to ask a woman if she has large labia like beef curtains, without sounding impudent? Man 2: And if you find out she does? Man 1: Encourage her to have a labiaplasty. ​ Nope, no sexism or entitlement shown here. Move along.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:47 PM
3

Pretty much. You could throw circumcision up there, as well.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:41 PM
2

Well, if you were circumcised as a baby, you obviously survived it. Circumcision kills over 100 boys a year in the US. While it might confer a slight (<1%) benefit in not catching yeast infections, are we really going to argue for it if yeast infections can be treated with pills? Are we willing to sacrifice so many children just on the off chance we might not clean under the foreskin? It's kinda like advocating to remove your scalp to prevent the possibility of shingles. Sign me up for treatment…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:38 PM
12

I challenge you to name a single feminist organization that has actually addressed a single issue that men face. When Florida was going to implement a default shared parenting plan in family court, with data to back it up as better for children and 70% of the electorate behind it, the governor vetoed it under pressure from NOW and the family law lobby. Mary P. Koss, along with the Ms. Foundation and our own government, has been instrumental in keeping resources from male victims of rape and sexu…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:01 PM
3

Yay! Sanity.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 03:10 PM
1

Grilled or fried?
/r/MensRights19/10/19 03:39 AM
2

So, women can wear what they want, unless it's to please and/or help men?
/r/MensRights19/10/19 03:36 AM
1

If you are interested, check out the sidebar for information about men's rights. And you can certainly google on your own. Check out Karen Straughan, Christina Hoff Sommers, Camille Paglia, Cassie Jaye on youtube. Read up on feminism, as well. I will readily admit once I explored patriarchy theory, rape culture, and the feminist hypothesis of domestic violence being used to oppress women, I felt I was entering cult territory and didn't go any further. Good luck. Keep an open mind.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:52 AM
2

Conviction quotas are probably the closest thing to evil I can think of. Ok, I'm sort of exaggerating. But if you put pressure on the prosecution that they MUST win or may face punishment, you will get a prosecution that will cut corners and break rules to avoid that punishment. INNOCENT people can, will, and have gone to prison when the prosecution holds a "win at all costs" attitude, as we saw with this waste-of-skin Alison Saunders' edicts.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 12:48 AM
0

It depends. Whats the age cutoff in FL for leaving a child at a hospital, fire department, etc? I am assuming that a man has the same legal standing to abandon a child in this way...and assuming the boy and his family don't want the child. If he and they do good for him, I guess.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 12:13 AM
3

Wow. What a fucking cunt. I've said before and I'll say it again: it's not that women lie about rape and etc that bothers me, for there are shitty people everywhere and women don't hold a monopoly on shitty behavior. What bothers me is that it is legal for the media to just print a man's name on the most flimsiest of accusations and the social and economic repercussions that follow from that, regardless of whether the accuser even went to the police or if there is sufficient evidence to prosecut…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 12:06 AM
6

Bet you he will be paying child support.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 11:12 PM
1

Women have several agencies that speak for women and women's issues: https://www.dol.gov/wb/otherfedagencies.htm We need some, as well. I don't think men have a single agency anywhere in the government that deals with men's issues.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 10:26 PM
14

Wow. When the old '1 in 5' statistic was thoroughly debunked, they didn't change the survey questions or how they interpreted the data. They doubled down on that shit.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 08:22 PM
8

Sources, please.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 07:56 PM
6

Depends. Here in the US, we have the Bradley Amendment which removed the statute of limitation on child support owed, for any reason. Does Australia have anything like that? Obviously, you'll be showing some official your passport. Does Australia have a hard-on for going after people who are behind in CS? You might be flagged at the border.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 07:51 PM
10

Can't have an echo chamber if someone goes off-script.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 07:31 PM
13

No shit. It could easily have been written the other way around. All you would have to do is use percentages. "Men's soccer teams only make 9% of the take, while women's soccer takes 13%. Men's soccer is a massively popular, global sensation that makes billions a year, while women only take in millions. Is this the way we reward success?"
/r/MensRights18/10/19 07:29 PM
2

I would think maybe a separate registry for convicted false accusers. That way you could vet a woman before dating/meeting her, and decide whether you want to take a chance on a known false accuser. Said it earlier, they also need to remove proven false rape accusations from rape shield laws.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:37 PM
3

I can think of several reasons why she wouldn't tell you. I'm curious why you think anyone would divulge that information if they didn't have to.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:33 PM
2

Well, factory work is generally indoors, climate-controlled, has a set number of hours/shifts so I see that appealing to women more than men. In this case, smaller hands might be an advantage.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:09 PM
1

JFC. "some women in a particular occupation aren't as good as men in the same occupation at getting followers on a social media site not particularly suited to discussing ideas based on their occupation. Many unfounded opinions will ensue. We'll also porkbarrel this article to include disinformation about online harassment. Sexism! Patriarchy! Argle Bargle!."
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:04 PM
27

Feminist propaganda on a school reading assignment. Can't say I'm surprised.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:58 PM
4

I like how they threw in 'women face disproportionate levels of harrassment compared to men' without a source, right before they linked the study about twit followers. Gives it an air of truthiness, don't you think? Too bad it's false. Men face more harrassment online. https://www.pewinternet.org/2017/07/11/online-harassment-2017/
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:34 PM
5

We would have to know the proportion of women and men who applied at this factory and their individual suitability for the position applied for before assuming discrimination. Is the high number of women a possible indicator? Maybe. Need more evidence, tho. I say the same thing to feminists when they use the ol' "the vast majority of CEO's are men" argument to claim discrimination.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:18 PM
6

Only for what you own up to the signing of the prenup. Everything after is 50/50. And prenups are up to the court to uphold and can be overturned for many reasons, mistakes on the form or failing to include all assets being a few. One woman got one overturned by claiming it was coersive, and she felt like he wouldnt marry her if she didn't sign. Uh, duh?
/r/MensRights18/10/19 04:48 PM
3

Alleged. 75% of alleged sexual assaults are not reported. And of those alleged 75%, how many are allegedly false? That <10% is only what could be proven false. The majority get dropped for lack of evidence. How many of those cases might not have sufficient evidence because they didn't happen? We may never know, but its foolish to assume none or all.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 04:04 PM
1

Also, prior false rape accusations by a woman should not be hidden behind rape shield laws.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:50 PM
1

Anything to stop the madness.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:52 AM
6

The odds are likely that there are no resources available for men in the area i.e., a dv shelter or helpline. They can't tell you to call someone if there's no number to call.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 08:44 PM
3

Jeebus. If this were a debate class, I could forgive the question. This is almost like being asked who your favorite sibling is, or your favorite child. Sure, in your mind you might have a preference but to say it out loud will most likely cause grief and ill-will. Maybe you should protest the question. Say you are a firm egalitarian and that questions like this will only serve to divide us as people. I mean, if you pick men, it will seem like your biased toward your own team, and you don't want…
/r/MensRights17/10/19 05:51 PM
2

Funny, I was just talking about that with my daughter the other day. She said the same thing: she'd rather see more sizing information and standardization before she would complain about pockets.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 04:19 PM
5

This. While it depends on how long shes been without income, her not being employed could definitely affect the outcome of the divorce. Do what you can to get her employed again. Do not let her unemployment go on for any length of time or it will count against you and the settlement. Don't let that stop you from leaving this woman if she stays unemployed, however. If she'll cheat once, she'll cheat again. Edit: Oh yeah, and talk to a lawyer right away. They will know what the laws are in your st…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:51 PM
3

So, should this woman not be allowed to buy flammable liquids or furniture? https://www.foxnews.com/us/alaska-woman-gets-60-years-for-setting-couch-ablaze-with-boyfriend-on-it
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:45 PM
3

Its like that catcalling law they passed in a town in England. Just for men. When asked why, the author stated women hardly ever catcall. Well, if they hardly ever do it, then the law will hardly ever affect them, but still should apply. Who knew the legality of a thing hinged on the frequency of use by gender?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:40 PM
2

Ikr? If this will include women who commit ipv as well, then why call it the boyfriend act? And if it doesn't, why not? Are they claiming women dont kill their spouses? I mean, if women never killed their spouses, keeping it gender neutral will never affect them anyway.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:30 PM
4

As they say, equality looks like oppression to the priviliged. Edit: spelling error
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:10 PM
6

Get fucked, Hannah. The reason why men have to have their own sense of confidence and drive is because nobody cares. You claim men need more empathy when you are the gender that gets the most and rarely return the favor. Where was your empathy when NOW lobbied against equal parenting in FL? Where is your empathy when men keep pointing out that men are going to college less now than ever and you feminists keep calling for more scholarships for women? When was the last time you personally pointed …
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:07 PM
22

Well, if they want to gender it needlessly, why don't they just add a 'Girlfriend Act" and forbid any woman abuser from using knives or poison, as those seem to be their weapons of choice when murdering their SO. Honestly, are guns the main way men kill women? Or is this just another way to whittle away at gun rights?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 03:44 PM
4

Forgot the link, if anyone wants to read. https://www.mic.com/articles/133948/the-weird-complicated-sexist-history-of-pockets
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:38 PM
1

No, the Torah is a book of fables and anecdotes written by Bronze Age tribesmen, and not very well written at that. Bigot? That means a lot, coming from such an open mind as yours. I do so often hope for rational, reasoned responses to these lines of discussion and am frequently disappointed. You, sir or ma'am, are a disappointment.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 03:02 AM
1

Hey, we'll leave you alone when you leave innocent children's junk alone. Nobody is saying you can't believe what you want no matter how ridiculous. But when your beliefs tell you to harm others, we have a problem. You, as a Jewish person, should know that. In fact, I'll help you out: God just told me to tell you he doesn't want Jewish people to cut off parts of their dicks anymore. There, now you can stop doing it. If you want to tell me how Abraham has more veracity than me, I'd love to hear i…
/r/MensRights15/10/19 09:38 PM
6

The word is pogroms. So, the basic story is God wants to start a gang. He's been talking to Abraham about what sort of initiation they should have in order to join the gang and prove they are members. God says, "Cut off some skin from your dick". Abraham, being a low-key sexual sadist, says, "Hell, yeah! I can't wait to tell the boys!" Sound about right? Guess I should be glad my gang initiation only required some dunking in water...
/r/MensRights15/10/19 07:08 PM
29

This is the world we live in, these days. Be careful out there.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:53 PM
5

Thumbs up from me. Not his best stuff imo but definitely not his worst, and relevant to current events.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:27 PM
1

You stole my answer. This irks me to no end hearing the claim that women are held back because there are only X% representation in a particular job (always the really good ones that pay well and/or have influence like CEO's and politicians, never difficult, uncomfortable and dangerous jobs like sanitation, construction, etc.). You might ask how many women actually run for congress every voting cycle and compare that to how many attain a political position. I would bet they win as often as men to…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:45 PM
5

Most people don't like to admit they are wrong. Feminists are people too, no matter how misguided we think they are. Couple that with feminist organizations that make money by claiming oppression and discrimination and you've got a recipe for constant denial, misdirection, and outright lies.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:35 PM
1

Uh, you mean other than generally it's the women who are expected to take care of the home and the children and men are generally expected to pay the majority of the bills and take care of the outside of the house and general maintenance? What issues are being discussed? Gonna need more info to give a better answer...
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:18 PM
2

Dayum. Well struck, sir. Let peeps be peeps.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:56 PM
1

Sanity gained.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:17 PM
5

If you are looking for rebuttals to feminists' claims of historical oppression, yes. The author did his homework.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:55 AM
17

It worked, didn't it? That's the whole point of these pointlessly gendered terms: to shame and silence the ones they are used against.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:46 AM
8

What are you talking about? she, as a woman, has been indoctrinated into the vain attempt of emulating a man as much as her willpower can muster. You know this woman personally? What sort of male-emulation indoctrination has she been through? Speaking as a single father, this woman can take her whining and shove it up her ass.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:35 AM
6

Spoken like someone who isn't a man, and doesn't know what the societal expectations of men are. Keep those blinders handy, Azul!
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:29 AM
1

https://info.legalzoom.com/can-child-decide-live-other-divorced-parent-washington-state-law-24721.html
/r/MensRights14/10/19 03:42 AM
7

Once I read this: Federal laws says that after 15 months in the system terminating parental rights can be fast-tracked and the states receive federal funds for each child they adopt out of foster care. This is seen by many as an incentive to terminate parental rights. I knew I didn't have to read any further why this child is being kept from her father.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 08:49 PM
7

I feel ya, man. Sometimes I feel like I live in Bizarro world.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 08:33 PM
2

Yeah, your ex should have told your son when he called that it's your time for visitation, and left him there. And then not to tell you when she picked him up? No lack of parental respect, there. /s You should try to get him back, if possible. You can't let either your son or his mother think that it's acceptable for him to leave just because he's not getting his way. It will only get worse for both of you if you don't. Obviously, have all pertinent paperwork handy, and check the minimum age lim…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 08:36 PM
2

On that we can agree. Subjectively, I see this 'study' and this article trying really hard to insinuate that there is some discrimination going on, much like the ol' wage gap myth, by not delving too deep into the minutiae. As I mentioned before, they even disclose in the abstract that the women overall were less experienced than the men by a sizable margin, and yet somehow that's not relevant?! Seriously, wtf? I 'suggest' that the authors do a more diligent job in making comparisons with the sa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/19 07:28 PM
1

I disagree. If, similar to the 'wage gap myth', this 'study' didn't ignore several pertinent data points, then I could perhaps call it a hypothesis vs. an accusation. While I don't think attaining a college degree, even to a PhD level, is indicative of high intelligence, you do have to have a certain minimum to acquire one, and the authors of this study should know better. Given that the 'study' shows that the women on average had over 6 years less experience than the men, and that they never me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/19 05:41 PM
5

It sucks to be poor, no matter where you live. Jeez, it sounds like the evidence was just there waiting to be presented in defense of this man. Kudos to the lawyer who stepped up and gave this man a cogent response to the allegations.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 07:06 PM
19

To be fair, I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that a majority of male soldiers fail the military fitness test, as well. Edit: never mind. After reading this article, it claims only 30% of men fail the test. I might have been reading something about how the typical guy on the street couldn't pass a military fitness test.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:33 PM
53

That's probably the main reason why most people have a problem with feminism. Even at the beginning of the feminist movement, they have been asking for 'privileges' that men had, without the corresponding responsibilities that men had. Certainly, that's why I don't 'buy' feminism, I'm allergic to hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:22 PM
3

I concur. I think she has the most well-researched responses to specific claims made by feminism, and ties it together well. Don't get me wrong, there are many others I respect as well, I just think her delivery has the right blend of facts and intangibles.
/r/AntiFeminists11/10/19 05:13 PM
5

Yarp. Bill Burr had a good skit about it, likening feminists arguing for certain freedoms but not the corresponding responsibilities to choosing items from a buffet: "Yes, I will take voting, but not conscription. Yes, I will take the children, but the father can continue to pay for them", etc, etc.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 08:28 PM
1

Trolls be trolling. I can't believe that person actually believes what they wrote about men. Unless they are a psychopath, maybe?
/r/MensRights10/10/19 07:29 PM
4

Busted!
/r/MensRights10/10/19 07:17 PM
5

Ah, the mournful cry of those who know they are losing an argument: "I don't have time or care to read your reply, but here's a parting shot that answers to nothing you and I were just talking about."
/r/MensRights10/10/19 07:11 PM
12

Yarp. I already get enough subtle male-bashing in my day-to-day life not to want to pay money to see a movie that's going to give me another heaping helping of it.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 07:03 PM
5

Well stated.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:18 PM
10

Probably, yeah. And they will be a caricature of sexism, to boot.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:11 PM
26

Right? Like, I feel Carol Danvers only motivation in Captain Marvel was because she was angry at that one pilot who they kept flashing back to saying: "You know why it's called a cockpit, don't you?". Shit, even her dad (in the movie) is low-key painted as a bad guy because he's trying to protect her. I mean, I get that it's supposed to be about men holding her back or some shit, but I find the OTC boot camp scenes to be particularly bad. When I was in the military, we might have given each othe…
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:09 PM
1

I really take exception to his assumption that only a college degree makes a man a worthy partner in a relationship. So, even if a man is mature and supporting himself, yet has no degree, he's out of the running? Or is the author just low-key saying that the man must make lotsa bucks before they can date his daughters?
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:56 PM
1

Wtf. I can see they wrote the rule so you wouldnt have employees hitting on the customers, but this is two people who shared vows to be together. Any reasonable people would make an allowance for that no matter what the rules say. Sounds like they wanted to get rid of him.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:33 PM
1

While I believe that if a message is true it doesn't matter where it came from, in this case that is incorrect.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 04:12 PM
1

No, me saying that there should be a men's history month because there is a women's is arguing for fair and equal treatment. I wouldn't call it oppressive, but it does smack of discrimination. Why should only women get extra recognition for their achievements? Because they make fewer of them? Is that really your argument? If I were a woman I would be vaguely insulted by it, like getting a "Participation" badge for coming in 5th in the race. I know, I know, women historically have been held back …
/r/MensRights10/10/19 04:05 PM
3

Because women's achievements, no matter the proportion, were also in those history books in your high school and university classes. That's equal treatment. Giving an entire month of recognition to one sex's achievements and not the other is obviously unequal treatment. I think the OP would agree that was sort of the reason for posting...
/r/MensRights09/10/19 03:38 PM
1

Oh, I'm aware that when people make statements using the term 'male privilege' and arguing equity economics, I'm not going to get any kind of reasonable response from them. But I kid myself that maybe they or somebody following the conversation might question the veracity of their claims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/19 03:27 PM
0

I'm pretty Spartan, myself. I feel either the mother or father can kill the infant up to a year old. It would make men pretty certain they want to be a father, and women would be much choosier in who they get pregnant with. ​ joke
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:45 PM
11

Well, we heard "Annie's" side of the story, I'd like to hear "David's". I'd also like to know how a woman, on her own, moves in with a guy for awhile and suddenly loses the ability to move out? "I didn't have anywhere to go" this woman says. Did she quit her job? Sell her car? If she had the freedom to get up while he was sleeping she had the freedom to get out of the house while he was sleeping. Are there no domestic shelters for women in Australia? Is there no assistance available? Does she ha…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:22 PM
3

I wish I could say I'm surprised by your revelation.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:58 PM
10

I see nothing wrong with this, provided they allow the same exposure to men's achievements.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:30 PM
3

While I still think I would like Ewan McGregor as a person I've lost a bit of respect for him using the term 'mansplaining'.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:16 PM
1

I think it's more that he comes prepared and calm, and displays divisive opinions on posters to evoke an emotional response from people who disagree with him. So they look like emotional kooks, screaming and crying while he calmly tears their (mostly) emotional appeals apart. Not the most open and honest way to have a debate, but it does make his opponents look dumb. I'm an "issues" guy so I can agree with him on some things, others not so much...
/r/MensRights08/10/19 05:56 PM
9

You and me both, brother.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 05:41 PM
6

We already have an example in Title IX cases, with their "panels" of chosen people meting out justice. No bias there, of course. Do I need to put /s on this?
/r/MensRights08/10/19 05:39 PM
3

But is it, though? While I continue to read stories like: "Women can't be butchers in Kyrzykstan" ( I am just making this up as an example), they don't ever compare it to what men can and can't do in that country. In fact, I don't recall any comparisons in these stories at all. For all I know men have it worse in Kyrzykstan, regardless of women's desires to handle meat.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 05:26 PM
1

So, is that just any women? To be at the top? Do they even need education or experience in the position they are taking, or is it good enough just to have a woman there? While I won't disagree with you that incompetence can be found anywhere, there are certainly women who have made it to the top who were incompetent at their job, as well. I challenge you to prove that it would get better for having more women in place, and you will also have to show that women are actually pursuing these positio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/19 04:33 PM
2

No, we need competent people at the top of every field including business. It matters not whether they are male or female.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/19 06:44 PM
7

Where did I claim equality? What do you mean by "male privilege"? Please explain.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/19 05:51 PM
27

Yet again, an affluent white woman claiming women are oppressed. She wouldn't know oppression if it bit her. She uses the fact that there are few female CEO's to claim women are held back, yet quit her job that could well have led to a CEO position to concentrate on family, and doesn't see the hypocrisy. Melinda, google "apex fallacy".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/19 10:11 PM
5

How about: don't get married, and you won't have to worry about alimony. That, or make sure you marry someone with more money than you.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 04:03 PM
4

Dr. Dossa suggest one reason may be that women choose or are pushed into less lucrative specialties, and less lucrative procedures within specialties. She also said female surgeons likely get fewer referrals over all than their male counterparts, and those they do get tend to be on the lower-paying end. “It looks like women are having fewer opportunities to do the more higher-paying procedures,” Dr. Dossa said in an interview. “There’s often this [view] that women are choosing these things. Wome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/19 05:31 AM
42

Forget who said this, but if you can rescind consent after the fact, then consent means nothing.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 02:02 PM
4

The rapper Zuby gave a pretty good explanation of majority privilege on the Triggernometry YT channel. I really like the premise of the show, "We don't claim to be the experts, we ask the experts."
/r/MensRights09/09/19 05:47 PM
5

Probably. It's not white privilege if you are white in a country that is predominately white, its majority privilege. People generally prefer other people to be from their clan, tribe, group, etc, and it's more apparent in countries where one clan, group, tribe, etc are the majority. Can that lead to racism, sexism, groupism, etc? Of course. But it's become apparent as the world becomes more global and homogeneous that it's improving over time. Now we just have to fight the pendulum, as it is sw…
/r/MensRights09/09/19 05:25 PM
50

Don't forget racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 04:37 PM
1

Despite feminist protestations to the contrary, the vast majority of men aren't violent enough for option C.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:48 AM
4

That is one brave dude, there. Kudos to him.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:21 AM
2

A man can dream, can't he?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 03:44 PM
7

We need more feminists like CHS. A lot more, apparently.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 03:28 PM
33

"Women who won't put out are hurting American men's marriage prospects." Hey, if we can be resource objects they can be sex objects. Seems fair to me. It's just galling that they can get away with being so overt about it. Gotta admit, I'm kinda envious.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 03:06 PM
7

You never know, a phone call to the right person might make all the difference. Teachers shouldn't let their personal beliefs get in the way of teaching all the facts.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:45 PM
9

The way she's moving, I'd say she's near blackout drunk. That, or she's fronting.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:42 PM
17

That's why I can't support it, people say one thing but the doctrine says another.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:48 PM
3

Or, at the very least don't name anyone until they are charged with something. I also don't think the media should be allowed to print names just on an accuser's word. Some women have just gone to the press, not the police.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 03:39 PM
9

There are bigots everywhere. I'm a mens rights "chud" and I am nowhere near alt-right. Probably closer to classic liberal, actually, but I'm an issues guy and don't follow any party line 'just because'. How the f*ck would this guy get your post history unless you told them you browse Reddit? PSA: don't tell employers about any social media you are on that doesn't have your name on it. Just asking for trouble...
/r/MensRights02/09/19 03:24 PM
14

"And this, gentlemen, is the American White Knight. Notice the plumage which, when aroused, signals virtue."
/r/MensRights02/09/19 03:10 PM
7

I was debating the wage gap with a male feminist once. I asked him if he truly believed that women were getting paid 77 cents for every dollar a man makes at the same job. He said yes. I then asked him: "Then why do you have a job?" Why would they hire you if they could hire a woman to do the same work for less? Hell, why does any man have a job, if that's the case?" He didn't have an answer for that. This is actually a funny article by the Onion, but I fear most people are really going to get i…
/r/MensRights30/08/19 10:13 PM
21

Right? Though that won't really work if the incident is violent enough. I'm not going to go back to a person that raped me or beat the shit out of me so I can record it happening again. I'm going to hope my wounds and words are enough.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 06:24 PM
67

I don't agree with the argument that if false accusations are prosecuted, that people won't come forward with their stories. To my thinking, it only makes it easier for an unscrupulous person to use a false accusation to punish someone that they have issue with. If something TRULY happened to you, you have nothing to worry about other than proving to others that it happened.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 05:34 PM
1

I want to believe.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 01:33 AM
4

So, winning an award only counts if you are non-white? Are people unaware that the US is over 2/3 white these days, and the percentage was higher in the past? I mean, if they could prove some cheating was going on, I could understand. If I were a descendant of any of those whose picture was taken down, I'd be pissed.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 01:21 AM
1

Yarp. One article I read said over 100 boys die every year due to circumcision. But if that's the price we've got to pay to have an easier-to-clean penis... ​ /s
/r/MensRights29/08/19 10:40 PM
30

Dr Agarwal said a better gender balance will lead to improved student outcomes and better buildings and design in the wider world. Since when does lowering standards lead to better outcomes outside of dating? Australian girls are doing better than Australian boys on nearly every academic level: grades, college admissions, college degrees, etc. Will "equality" be achieved when girls are doing better at EVERY metric?
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:47 PM
2

Well, that just shows the ignorance of the respondent. It protects the glans, is a natural lubricant during sex, and most importantly, has about 20,000 nerve endings for increased sexual stimulation. It's the equivalent of the female G-spot.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:34 PM
5

Yarp. I had my first and only wet dream when I abstained from masturbation during basic training. Longest dry spell in my life.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 11:56 PM
1

Please forgive my tardiness, I can't review academic journals in minutes as you seem to able to. You did look at the article I sent you, yes? Right off the bat, we have a problem with the methodology of the two studies used to determine whether circumcision reduces infections and STI's: The two trials, which were conducted concurrently, had identical protocols. At each visit, all subjects were offered free HIV counseling and testing, *health education**, and* *condoms**.* Does it seem reasonable…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 11:28 PM
1

Jeebus. This is a weird mutation of the "tree in the forest" philosophical question. "If a man ejaculates in the forest and no woman is around, can she get pregnant?" Is this woman unaware of how pregnancy happens and a woman's part in the process?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 10:01 PM
8

You are not alone and there is plenty of solid scientific evidence to support your decision. I applaud you for doing the right thing despite what others want you to do.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 10:03 PM
2

A refreshing rebuttal, to be sure. Ad hominem attacks don't really strengthen your case though, sad to say. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?
/r/MensRights27/08/19 09:48 PM
6

I just watched the video below today. I am still a little salty about what is happening to boys in our country. The other link is info in a list form for easy/fast consumption. Either one will stiffen your resolve, no pun intended. ​ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCuy163srRc https://thenurturingroot.com/facts-about-foreskin-circumcision/#targetText=The%20foreskin%2C%20containing%2020%2C000%20nerve,part%20of%20the%20male%20anatomy.&targetText=When%20the%20foreskin%20is%20removed,making%20it%20m…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 08:36 PM
2

For your edification. Check out #6. https://thenurturingroot.com/facts-about-foreskin-circumcision/#targetText=The%20foreskin%2C%20containing%2020%2C000%20nerve,part%20of%20the%20male%20anatomy.&targetText=When%20the%20foreskin%20is%20removed,making%20it%20much%20less%20sensitive.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 08:19 PM
3

Hmmmm. As of 2019, 90% of the United States's media is controlled by five media conglomerates: Comcast (via NBCUniversal), Disney, Viacom & CBS (both controlled by National Amusements), and AT&T (via WarnerMedia).
/r/MensRights27/08/19 08:01 PM
6

Yeah, I can' think of any other reason. In this particular example, I would feel a female dating sub would welcome input from men. Or is this a lesbian dating sub?
/r/MensRights27/08/19 07:39 PM
2

I disagree with you, sir. It has all the markings of a religion: a deeply-held belief system based on unproven yet unassailable tenets (patriarchy, rape culture, systemic oppression) that are taken on faith and treated as dogma. And just like many religions, feminism brooks no dissension in the ranks and will actively suppress it. While I might agree with you that similar religious beliefs among a group of people could definitely help create a society, societies are created by like-minded people…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 02:40 PM
16

I happened to be looking at a paper addressing that very issue. https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/6958
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:57 PM
2

C'mon, buddy. Let's not trade one dogma for another.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:21 PM
68

I would also add make it illegal for the media to print the name of anyone accused of anything til a charge has been leveled against them.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:09 PM
3

It's a valid question, though. Where is the motivation to work harder when the courts will force one parent to pay the other regardless of whether they are working full-time or not? I had a similar experience. When my ex and I divorced, she had a part-time, seasonal job(school bus driver). I was ordered to pay her alimony and child support for our daughter. We had shared custody, my daughter with me one week, her mom the next. A few years later, I got laid off from my job and couldn't pay her. M…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 07:54 PM
6

This article is crap. They obviously want to spin this a certain way. I'll let you guess which way that is. With phrases such as " and another eyebrow-raising revelation that men log more hours at work than women" and blanket statements such as “And trust me,” she says, “every man does this. Every man negotiates.” Why would I possibly think I'm going to get a fair assessment of the situation from the WP? The same outlet that actually printed Suzanna Danuta Walters grand opus: "Why Can't We Hate …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 07:02 PM
4

That Atlantic article you referenced " generally tends to overestimate. " only gave numbers from one study that did not even prove that men are "overconfident", just that men, in general, are more confident than women. The women rated themselves more negatively than the men did on scientific ability: on a scale of 1 to 10, the women gave themselves a 6.5 on average, and the men gave themselves a 7.6. When it came to assessing how well they answered the questions, the women thought they got 5.8 o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 03:41 PM
5

Yarp. As much as I would like to freely discuss these issues in public, I'm a small business owner and I couldn't afford the loss of custom that would surely follow. Of course, that's also why I refrain from discussions about politics, religion, and sex unless I know that customer well.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 02:51 PM
3

The medical industry makes billions in MGM in the US. I imagine they would lobby against such a law being passed.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:09 AM
19

Yarp. Still, with the gender pay gap. If you keep repeating stuff long enough, no matter how many times it's debunked, and people will start to believe it. It really is a religion.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 04:26 AM
1

To be fair, I hate having something I believe in proven wrong. My first impulse is to deny it, just like this person has done. Who knows? Maybe it will have an affect on them, over time. I like to be positive.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 02:08 AM
7

Kinda makes you grit your teeth, don't it? I will say this is a textbook example of how to handle debating someone who won't even listen to what you say. It's not about convincing them, it's about convincing people who witness the exchange. Calmly and politely countering the argument with reason and evidence.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:43 AM
3

So, no sources to refute those statistics, then. That 'propaganda' looks to have come from a Trans Rights organization if you see the icon in the lower left, so if you have an issue with their veracity, again I say "do you have a better source?". While I will readily agree with you that the numbers could change with new evidence, we have to go with what information that's available. I'm not just going to believe " “...but these estimates are likely conservative because of the limited amount of s…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:04 PM
4

True. We have no idea how many rape accusations are dropped by police due to lack of evidence are false. I can only go with what's verifiable.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:32 PM
2

I also don't want to sleep with men, does that make me homophobic, as well? The graph the OP quoted says 2% of men would date transwomen. Do you have another source that refutes that? And according to Gallup, transpeople make up 0.6% of the population. Again, do you have another source that refutes that, or are you just going to make blanket assumptions and call people names? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States#targetText=A%202017%20Gallup%20poll%20concluded,U.S.…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 07:57 PM
23

I like to use statistics to determine whether I should be worried about things like this. If the FBI stats are correct about false rape accusations and the number of rapes that happen, then men are roughly as likely to get murdered than to be falsely accused. Do I worry about being murdered in my day-to-day life? No. Do I take precautions in situations and places where it is more likely to happen? Yes. I think the truly scary thing about false accusations is that there seem to be few repercussio…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 07:22 PM
7

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I recall reading that transpeople make up 0.6% of the population. If that's true, than if 2% of the population is willing to date you, your cup runneth over.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 06:39 PM
1

"Normal" people are sexually attracted to sexually mature-looking people. There are 14 year-olds of both sexes that can look like they are 8 or 24. If I saw a woman that had all the signs of sexual maturity (breasts, hips, etc) wearing adult clothing and makeup and she was attractive, I would find that appealing. If I discovered she was 14, I wouldn't ask her out or try to have sex with her or anything, but I would still be physically attracted to her. That's not a switch that can be turned off …
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:48 PM
55

I'm with you. I work to live, I don't live to work.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:12 PM
1

No worries. I wouldn't even say I was half-serious about it. I'm not really into "tit-for-tat", 'cause that shit never ends.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 07:09 PM
2

Seriously. Do they really think people rape others because no one told them it was wrong?! Reminds me of that Bill Burr bit on DV.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 10:00 PM
6

Yeah. If she honestly believed it was a statue, no harm no foul.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:57 PM
1

There's a bronze statue in Manhattan of a topless woman. Shiny tits, too.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:56 PM
12

And ultimately, it's her place to do with what she will.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:53 PM
0

https://www.entitymag.com/female-heroes-who-risked-life-and-limb/ Here you go. I would agree it happens much more frequently the other way, but blanket statements such as yours don't help anybody.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:46 PM
2

I suppose I should amend that to "could" reduce the ambiguity. Frankly, I'd like a law like that just to cut down on people claiming they were assaulted or raped because the other person didn't pick up on "non-verbal" clues. Obviously if a law like this were put it place it would have the condition that a person has the ability and opportunity to say 'no'. Edit: this article shows an egregious case of a man getting into trouble for not being able to read minds. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/e…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:33 PM
2

She said she gave him a condom and went to the bathroom. While there, she said she had a flashback to a time she was assaulted and from then on, although she did not tell the Liberal member, she was not consenting “in her mind,” to the sexual activity that followed her return from the bathroom. Later, she said this encounter amounted to sexual harassment. Jesus fucking Christ.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:53 PM
3

Thanks for that. I get uptight reading some of these posts and it's nice to read something positive for a change.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:44 PM
2

Well, it's not obvious to a lot of feminists, or they are just ignoring it, as it doesn't fit the narrative of "women=opressed". I agree with your assessment, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/19 12:15 AM
44

I believe it's because the court doesn't want the kid to know yet. Poor kid. And poor guy. Nothing like finding out you've been lied to for 8 years.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 10:33 PM
7

Does nobody know what 'misogyny' means, anymore? Jesus, the number of posts that accuse the OP of being a misogynist for having hair preferences for women is ridiculous. ​ Edit: shit, do you think it's because feminists want anything a man does that they don't agree with to be equated with hatred of women? Fuck, I think I just answered my own question. If anyone has something to add, I'm all ears.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 10:12 PM
5

Thanks. I was going to say something along these lines. Shitty people exist and if you let them influence your life choices that's on you, don't use it as an excuse not to do what you want to do.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 09:04 PM
1

Thanks for the lulz
/r/MensRights22/08/19 08:38 PM
1

If you owe more than $2500 in CS they take your passport away.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 07:56 PM
2

That's quite an interesting hypothesis about homosexuality.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 07:36 PM
12

Ikr?! What's this guy's favorite podcast, "Two Hours of Silence"?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:46 PM
4

That was a pleasant read. Wish there was more out there like this.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:16 PM
4

According to their fb page, they are claiming they don't do what this article states they do, and that it's fake news. I've only just started perusing it, but I haven't seen anything to disprove their claim yet.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:04 PM
1

We should start a C*nt Advisors fb page and post the exact same stuff.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:46 PM
2

Shit, I never thought of that. May have to give it a try.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:13 PM
3

Can't wait to see Benjamin Crocker cake mixes, and Uncle Joshua and Mr. Butterworth syrup 'cause you know, flavor has no gender. They could even donate to Boys Inc.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:00 PM
1

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/topic-pages/tables/table-1 Here it is. My bad. I was quoting 2017 numbers. They don't have 2018 numbers yet, apparently, but you get the gist.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 02:52 PM
31

Well, as far as producing offspring, she may be correct for a lot of men. However, she is wrong about producing nothing, and if she were even remotely aware of how our world works she would realize that all these "little men" and others keep the lights on, the water flowing, the toilet flushing, the roads driveable, the internet doing its thing, the toilets flushing and all without fitting her definition of an eligible man. Fuck this deplorable piece of shit. Men, we need to stop giving women li…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 05:54 AM
1

No, it was posted on this sub. It was a good summation of what we would like to see addressed as men's rights advocates.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:25 AM
1

Huh. I got my numbers from the FBI stats, which is apparently the same thing. I look for what can be proven, and without looking it up again, I'm pretty sure I saw 135k rape convictions for 2018 which would put the number of proven rape somewhere around where that graph put it, per 100,000 people. Did I read that wrong?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:32 AM
3

Misandry much?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 12:07 AM
2

I said something similar on TrollX right before my ban. Something along the lines of: "If you see sexism where it doesn't exist, you might be the sexist one." Second or third to the last post, trying to get a member of trollx to tell me why she thought an image was sexist. I seriously wonder about that person's sanity. Never got an answer, they just kept parsing what I wrote, and misquoting it or assuming I meant something I didn't. Frustrating.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 12:00 AM
1

Are you kidding me?! Every car is the Men's only car for the privileged class. Oh wait
/r/MensRights21/08/19 11:49 PM
4

Hey, you're preachin' to the choir. They don't believe it though, and it's a fundamental tenet of their dogma. I feel it's best to treat feminism like a cult or religion (and feminism basically is), and you don't convert someone by telling them God doesn't exist, you ask them for proof that God exists and go from there. Just like christians, a lot of them are going to stick their fingers in their ears and go "La La La!" when you try to get somewhere with them, or just attack you. Even if you sta…
/r/MensRights21/08/19 11:41 PM
1

I'm pretty sure you have that backward, u/lasciate. That statistic is convictions per 100,000, not reports per 100,000. The number of reports is much higher (12x higher? Anyone?) and the number of unreported "rapes" is even a multiple of THAT number, and that is the number that a lot of feminists use when they claim rape is rampant, and why they seem to lose their shit when you throw stats up like these. I mean, I would agree with them that they can't ALL be made up, but I certainly ain't gonna …
/r/MensRights21/08/19 11:28 PM
5

Ok, that is a provocative title. Might have just posed it as a question: Have any of you seen this graph? What do you make of it? It would not surprise me if some of them just dismissed it out of hand, or gave you some anecdotal evidence that it's not true because "out of all of my friends I don't know a single one that hasn't been raped or sexually assaulted!"
/r/MensRights21/08/19 11:06 PM
22

Someone else on this sub suggested a "No means No" law, and by that I mean anyone who does not want to have sex with someone must make it known to the other person verbally and in no uncertain terms that they do NOT want to have sex. Not hints, not non-verbal signals or facial expressions, but a clearly understood statement of non-consent, and if none was given, no rape has occurred. It wouldn't stop false accusations of rape or rape itself, but it would certainly reduce the ambiguity.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 11:00 PM
8

Italy? Oh. Well. Ok, then. NIMBY ​ ​ /s
/r/MensRights21/08/19 09:37 PM
162

Jeebus, who wrote this? The president of Future Psychopaths of America?
/r/MensRights21/08/19 09:31 PM
30

Hey, if Christina Blasey Ford can come outta the woodwork 30+ years later... But yeah, if it really has been years and years, it probably won't accomplish much. Closure?
/r/MensRights21/08/19 09:28 PM
1

If this ain't a good argument to make legal parental surrender a thing, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 08:04 PM
1

Do I agree with what the guy did? No. Do I condone his actions? Again: no. Does he have the right to say what he wants, as long as he's not inciting violence? Yes. Somebody else's comfort doesn't trump my right to free speech. If this man keeps it up, he will face the penalty of loss of business as he makes more and more people unwilling to return to said business. It's socially self-correcting, but hey, maybe he should just go to jail for speaking.../s.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 05:04 PM
32

Because their narrative is that rape and sexual assault are getting worse, not better. They can't keep getting that phat government funding if the problem goes away.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 04:36 PM
39

Evil stepmothers use coma-inducing poisons and indentured servitude.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 03:52 AM
4

Yarp. Intelligence is definitely a turn-on for me. The last woman I dated could beat me at Trivial Pursuit and I found that incredibly attractive.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:44 PM
2

There could definitely be some bias that bleeds in from upper management/ownership, sure.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 07:51 PM
36

I feel it's mostly due to the in-group bias for women by women, and the out-group bias for women by men. There's also the empathy gap, and the "women are wonderful' effect. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 07:14 PM
1

Doh! But seriously, it doesn't matter too much who wrote it, other than to keep that in mind when you read another article from such an upstanding "news" outlet. I'm sure they'll print that study with reversed genders aaany day now...
/r/MensRights19/08/19 09:53 PM
5

Yawn. Yet another one-sided, low sample size study from the hallowed halls of feminist academia. Anyone want to bet if they did a study that reversed the genders they would find that women were even MORE likely to take another woman's side in this scenario vs. a man? And of course, no link to the study, no numbers, no graphs, no questions, etc, etc. Slow news day for the Guardian, I suppose. Really lazy reporting, though.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 02:47 PM
2

Well said.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 06:23 AM
1

The FBI puts the number of rape convictions at 135K for 2018 (they changed the definition of rape in 2013 and the numbers went up), and the false accusation rate at 8%, giving a statistic of around 11,000 men falsely accused annually.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:33 PM
5

Welp, guess I gotta stop dumping dem babies in da dumpsters now... Thanks for tellin' me. Who knew it was wrong?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 02:39 PM
45

Yarp. According to FBI stats, there were almost 3300 female victims of murder last year, putting them at slightly more than 22% of all murders. The FBI puts the number of rape convictions at 135K for 2018 (they changed the definition of rape in 2013 and the numbers went up), and the false accusation rate at 8%, giving a statistic of around 11,000 men falsely accused.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:49 PM
1

Valid prenups have been overruled by judges in the past. In fact, one prenup was overruled by the woman claiming it was coercive in that she didn't feel the man would marry her if she didn't sign it.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:19 PM
48

You know a man is more likely to get falsely accused of rape than a woman is to be killed, right?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:33 PM
8

I'm certain I've seen "Titania's" posts ridiculed on this sub. But, as it's been mentioned, Poe's Law makes it impossible to tell that it's satire because we've seen such extreme feminist views being printed as if they hold some merit. Compared to hits such as "Is it ok to hate men?", and "we should kill 90% of men and put the rest in camps", and "kill all men", Titania is rather tame.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:37 PM
8

This is just as mind-boggling as the "Pink Tax". Are women not aware that they don't have to buy anything they don't want to?!
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:04 PM
1

Thank Effing God
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:57 PM
2

Exactly. We aren't likely to change the mind of someone as close-minded and willfully ignorant as this. But we might get someone on the fence to start listening to us.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 02:52 PM
2

Condoms are 98% effective, per year. This means that 2 in 100 women whose partners use a condom will get pregnant in a year.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:02 PM
2

If the reactions I've received when discussing with other men how men are disadvantaged in western society are any indication, I'd say the reason those books aren't on the shelves of bookstores is because they aren't popular and don't sell well. I don't think women will buy those books for the most part, and few men, if my experience is any indication. Until a guy has experienced the double standards and hypocrisy for himself, he won't be very receptive to being told he is actually the one that …
/r/MensRights13/07/19 01:59 PM
44

Thereby preventing men from manspreading sitting comfortably. Any business that tries to implement these chairs is going to lose business. Must have been a *really* slow day in chair design for that to win a prize.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:11 PM
7

I would assume that Switzerland has the same problem we do, a media system that won't share this information. Controversy sells copy, amirite?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:55 PM
-1

As long as the D.A. isn't up for re-election, you should be ok. Along with everyone else here, I agree you should consult a lawyer before talking to anyone else about this.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 03:03 AM
5

So, the author asks to travel with Foster on his campaign, he refuses on the grounds that 'trackers' might take a pic that could be compromising, she then gives an example of another female politician actually having trouble because of something one of these 'trackers' do, ...aaand then goes on to say how sexist it is to refuse her coming along without a male chaperone. Move along. No hypocrisy here. Move along.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 01:52 PM
19

Ha ha. Reminds me of that scene in the first episode of Rick and Morty, when Beth says: "you're not a hot girl, Morty. You can't just bail on life and set up shop in someone else's."
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:44 PM
2

But...but...women do more unpaid labor in the house! ​ Jeebus, if I hear that one more time...
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:38 PM
22

I was raised by a single mom. I can say without reservation that I wish my dad had been a greater part of my life growing up. You don't get to pick your parents and they rarely get training, so why the fuck would you want to cut your chances in half of getting a good one? This woman is pissing on us and telling us it's rain.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:14 PM
1

Agreed. If our politicians won't make a law to protect the accused from media attention, at least until a charge is made, this may be the only way to slow them down. Unfortunately, only people with considerable resources can afford to hire a lawyer for cases like these.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:39 PM
1

Doh! Guess I should read the sidebar more often.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 02:36 AM
1

Did it get dark in here?
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:33 AM
1

Oh, I don't doubt there is some mental cost to having to pretend to be calm and happy in the face of anger, and sure I suppose "emotional labor" is as apt a term as any. But for women to hijack the term and use it in interpersonal relationships with men, men who they CHOSE to be with and who they could CHOOSE to leave if they wished, and to make it sound like it's something only women have to put up with? Just so much whining, imo.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 07:06 PM
3

Right? I might have changed a male feminist's mind about the "wage" gap when I asked him why he even had a job over any woman if his employer could actually get away with paying a woman less for the same work. Hell, I would hire only women if I thought I could actually get the same work done for less. Employers pay for work done, they don't give you extra $ just for owning testicles.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:45 PM
12

So they are using polling data to come up with the numbers? How was the data collected? How did they ask the questions? What questions were asked? How many of those rape claims are false? How many of those would be disputed by the "rapist"? I could claim I've been raped, and I would be added to the numbers. What one can claim without evidence, one can reject without evidence. And evidence is what is needed for the police to pursue rapists and convict them.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 12:44 AM
5

I'm curious how they came up with the "1 in 5" number. Even with the FBI's 2013 revised definition of rape increasing the number of rapes per year, there were 135K rape convictions in 2017, which breaks out to 41.7 per 100,000. Even if a woman lived to be 100, her chance of being raped in her lifetime is less than 4.2%, at that rate. And I'm not sure, but I think the revised definition now includes men? Source: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/topic-pages/tables/t…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 12:15 AM
3

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/netflix-five-second-staring-rule/
/r/MensRights06/07/19 11:52 PM
9

1 in 5? Could you please include a source for those rape statistics?
/r/MensRights06/07/19 11:40 PM
6

It has a name! Never even thought of it that way. But yeah, I'm totally familiar with it. I used to repair equipment at customer's facilities', and some customers just didn't like me or my organization. Yet I still had to talk to them, have meetings with them, listen to their b.s., and not do anything to upset them and lose a service contract. If I had a choice, I would have dropped them in a heartbeat, but I had to put up with them. I hated that job. And yeah, it took a toll on me. But to use t…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 10:40 PM
9

I've only ever read about emotional labor in women's comments (complaints?) about how they had to be sympathetic to their BF's/husbands emotional needs and how it was draining and they should be compensated. Of course, the hypocrisy being that men do that for their GF's/wives and no mention of it. I did not realize it was actually an employment term until you said that and I wiki'ed it.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 10:13 PM
8

At least they were mindful of his fragile ego. They waited til they were out of sight before they ran...
/r/MensRights06/07/19 10:03 PM
24

I love how the assumption is that the women are also still doing most of the housework, etc. Don't get me wrong, they may very well be doing so, but I just love how they will add that sans proof, or any mention of what the man's work hours are/ what else he might be doing to support the household, and so on so forth. And don't forget that old chestnut: emotional labor. That one really kills me. Supporting your S.O. with understanding and sympathy is the worst. \s
/r/MensRights06/07/19 09:50 PM
1

Was that satire?
/r/MensRights06/07/19 03:24 PM
3

Nice rebuttal.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 08:32 PM
12

Jeebus. What vitriol. And what bigotry. I now understand the dirty looks I've gotten in the past, apropos of nothing, from some women. They just hate men on sight. But yeah, I prefer a knife out in the open then one hidden behind kind words.
/r/AntiFeminists04/07/19 01:35 PM
1

About goddamn time. We need to start one in the U.S.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:01 PM
1

I hear so many negative things about us men that it's nice to hear a compliment.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 01:17 PM
16

I've seen a study that had evidence that women expect a certain amount of benevolent sexism, and equal treatment was actually viewed as sexism.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 01:35 PM
5

Don't women know we men let them go first so we can check out their ass? \s
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/19 01:28 PM
4

https://i.redd.it/zsdincuw1jz11.jpg this has some info that might help. I forget if the links work...
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:21 PM
2

/For 24-year-old Romy, the tipping point in her relationship came during a family dinner when she saw 15 text messages and 27 missed calls on her phone in the space of 20 minutes./ /"I literally thought, 'I cannot do this anymore'," she said./ ​ Wtf is she talking about? She can't use the "Block Number" function on her smartphone? I use it all the time for robocalls/telemarketers/ghosting/etc. I am making an assumption that she has one, as she is receiving texts.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:07 PM
0

And how are they supposed to do that? Kick her in the belly? Force a miscarriage? Last I read, that's illegal in Canada. Assaulting a pregnant woman and forcing a miscarriage may not carry the same legal penalties as the murder of an infant, but good luck getting a job or keeping friends and family after doing something like that. Personally, I think attacking a pregnant woman is more reprehensible than rape, unless it's in self-defense.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 05:53 PM
1

I agree that certain things can be more difficult for the poor. However, this bill does increase the amount of resources now required to obtain an abortion, which will proportionately affect people with fewer resources more.
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/19 05:20 PM
2

She's not wrong about this bill affecting poor women more than others. Kinda hard to drive to another state to have an abortion if you don't have gas money or a car to put gas in. But I doubt the bill was passed just to keep poor women down.
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/19 02:42 PM
3

Right? Punish children for what someone else may or may not have done in the past. Nice one. Very biblical.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 01:09 AM
5

And they forgot the word "alleged" many times.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 04:30 PM
21

Because controversy sells copy.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:30 PM
1

Right? Paraphrasing here: She said it 'appears' that the her press corps is overwhelmingly white and male. What does that mean? Is that 51%? Is that 90%? How many journalists has she met? Are women, WOC, gay women, and trans women getting journalism degrees at the same rate as men, proportionate to their presence in society? I've said this in other posts, but generally if the percentage of women getting degrees in these fields isn't close to 50%, how do you expect to get close to parity? Even if…
/r/MensRights26/04/19 07:04 PM
2

I feel that way about trollxchromosomes. The 'troll' part leads me to believe they want posts that are contrary for contrary's sake, you know, in the vein of 'trolling' each other about women's issues, etc. But a good portion of the posts and their reactions don't really follow that format. Just seems to be the typical male-bashing, man-blaming, victim mentality that goes on in your typical feminist sub...
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:33 PM
6

IMO, this sub has been doing a bang-up job of not letting it get too randomized and/or misogynistic, especially compared to the posts that will get you banned in certain other subs, *cough* r/feminism *cough*, or *cough* r/TrollXChromosomes *cough*.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 09:58 PM
13

Awesome. We need more positive messages for boys these days.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 06:19 PM
4

Well, right now it's a 'he said, she said" moment. I don't think having a college tutor, no matter how much older, following you around while you hand out flyers is much of an intimidation tactic and certainly didn't curtail anyone's free speech.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 05:40 PM
1

Welp, that takes away another of the few reasons to get married. There really is no upside, unless one likes the idea of the state getting involved... ​
/r/MensRights28/03/19 07:22 PM
1

To be fair, a committed relationship between two people who love and respect each other can be a great thing. Getting married is just inviting whatever state you live in to decide who gets what, if and when you get divorced. Other than a tax credit and the ability to add your spouse on a family health insurance plan, marriage is absolutely not worth it for a man.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 07:12 PM
2

The War Against Boys, by Christina Hoff Sommers (sp?), has some evidence that boys do better in school and life with an active father/male role model.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 08:37 PM
23

The hypocrisy is mind-blowing. When asked what they find attractive in men, women often mention what a particular man is wearing, or a muscular set of forearms, or when a man pulls his shirt off. That's not objectifying at all. /s. We all, men and women, objectify each other when only visual clues are available. Being a gynocentric world tho, it only matters how women feel about it.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 08:32 PM
1

I hate to be the guy who says "this", but "this". It seems to me as if most arguments decrying oppression of women with examples of jobs unavailable to women, or the lack of a near equal proportion in the higher status jobs totally ignore our biological drives and evolutionary roles.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 07:32 PM
4

Pretty sure you gotta get consent for the hug as well, just to be sure.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/19 12:46 PM
22

Nice one. Was totally expecting another story about boys being singled out to be told not to be bad because, you know, all boys are bad unless taught otherwise, amirite?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:22 PM
5

Right? If she'd done it in GB, it's possible nothing would have happened to her. At least some countries hold women accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:39 PM
7

Actually, she did say that cutting off the clitoris was equivalent to cutting off the penis. And while the clitoris is a huge part of female arousal, I would argue that it's not the only erogenous zone for women. And you can still bear children without one. Not the same, but arguably worse than circumcision. I've heard circumcision affects sexual pleasure. Anybody here get cut after being sexually active? Care to share?
/r/MensRights06/02/19 11:49 PM
14

...Aaaand there's the sexism. Knew she'd get around to it.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 11:29 PM
1

-By preschool, children believe it is normal for boys to be angry, but not girls. ​ Citation, please.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 09:03 PM
5

It is hard to take feminism's claim to be working for the benefit of women AND men when feminists don't condemn sexist statements like these from their spokespeople.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/18 05:44 PM
6

Daisy Cousens has mentioned a study that shows conservatives have a more satisfying sex life. Who is right? ​
/r/MensRights13/12/18 06:45 PM
17

The amount of time (or lack thereof) that you spend with your children is often taken into account at custody hearings.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 06:28 PM
3

What?!? Actors act like people they are not?! Shocking!
/r/MensRights02/12/18 05:57 PM
6

...aaaaand it's still a choice, pressure or not.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:48 PM
2

What did you say?
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/18 02:49 AM
0

Woah, pump the brakes a little. #NotEveryWoman has equal application.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 10:55 PM
1

Hey, maybe this woman has a memorial somewhere, who knows. Certainly we have plenty for WWII vets and survivors. I don't worry too much if feminists want to show us a brave woman. And they don't come much braver than this one. ​
/r/MensRights02/11/18 10:03 PM
1

Preachin' to the choir...
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/18 07:44 PM
1

Enquiring minds want to know...
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/18 07:55 PM
1

That's rather vague. Can't manage what, exactly?
/r/MensRights24/10/18 10:58 PM
4

1989
/r/MensRights24/10/18 10:39 PM
6

Yet another horror story brought to you by The Bradley Amendment.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 06:01 PM
15

It's amazing how many people don't get that. Or excuse it with some "eye for an eye" kind of justification.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:43 PM
29

In this particular case, where's the misogyny?
/r/MensRights21/10/18 04:03 PM
3

No shit. He can't remember a 3 o'clock appointment?! How the fuck did he make it through life to even have kids if he can't do that?
/r/MensRights15/10/18 08:10 PM
11

Very well put. He said what a lot of people are ignoring or covering up with 'just believe' or spouting really low numbers on false rape accusations. I keep arguing that even if the number of false accusations was zero, investigation of the claim is still necessary.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 02:13 PM
2

Jesus, they need to pass something like that here in America.
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/18 08:19 PM
2

Shit, I'm in my 50s and I still get hit, slapped, and pushed. Most recently by a 20-something woman who decided to slap me during a conversation in a bar. I don't remember what it was about, but I do remember thinking "If I slap her back I'll have at least 3 guys in my face defending her. Better just get away from her as quickly as I can." Frankly, I kinda wonder if that was her immature way to show she liked me. In any case, I'm not into that kind of thing, so I just try to avoid her now.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:52 PM
2

Yeah, some of us are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:22 PM
1

Actually, the author (Gabrielle Blair) says " If we’re talking about the pill, it requires consistent daily use and doesn’t leave much room for mistakes, forgetfulness, or unexpected disruptions to daily schedules. And again, the side effects can be brutal. I’M STILL GRATEFUL FOR IT PLEASE DON’T TAKE IT AWAY." It kinda sounds like she makes it harder to deal with than it is...but maybe that's just me. ​ Edit: she does actually say " I’m just saying women’s birth control isn’t simple or easy. "
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:25 PM
3

That's not what I'm referring to. The author implies that taking a pill daily is complicated and difficult.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:56 PM
4

Seriously? Taking a pill daily isn't simple or easy?!
/r/MensRights24/09/18 04:42 PM
3

Jesus Christ...so it's okay for a child to get pregnant but not an adult, by that logic.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:06 PM
5

So...only alt-right nazis study biology and evolution?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:53 PM
5

It's this part of her statement that really bothers me: ​ “It’s not just something for the women in this country to care about,” she said, “it’s for all of us. That’s why I’ve said to the men: ‘Just shut up and step up.’ And you know, for the men who are offended by this, you should ask yourself: Why are you offended by this? Why don’t you ask yourself: What about this offends you? We should all be holding together. We should all be treating each other like human beings.” ​ I'm offended by the a…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:30 PM
4

Apparently our organizational skills are only good for oppression...
/r/MensRights07/09/18 07:07 PM
5

C'mon, guys. We gotta have more self-respect than this...
/r/MensRights21/08/18 10:18 PM
1

From the little bit I've heard, yes. Pretty much an echo chamber over there. Edit: You might get some feedback if you are polite, but I'm sure your karma will suffer.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/18 11:12 PM
4

It's amazing the separate standards that are applied to men and women for the same behavior by a group that strives for equality between the sexes. It's almost like they say one thing and then do another, as if that isn't really their goal at all, but female supremacy. Sorta like a hate group. Southern Poverty Law Center, where are you?
/r/AntiFeminists04/07/18 05:38 PM
10

Sure, it's a man's fault for not committing. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with a woman not being worthy of commitment. I mean, they're all just wonderful, right?
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:47 PM
5

Well said, rebel scum. /s
/r/MensRights16/06/18 12:25 AM
1

It all depends on what state you live in when you divorce. Generally, they lean toward custody going to the primary caregiver at the time of divorce. Anyone have any anecdotal evidence of this?
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:46 PM
1

What!? You mean forcing men who don't rape to attend classes on not-raping didn't lower the rape numbers? Shocking!
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:23 PM
2

Yes, believing in equality of opportunity and not equality of outcome is a liability, sure. By all means fill your company with less qualified people to make sure your diversity quotas are matched. See how far that takes you. But hey, you do you.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:15 PM
12

I know what you mean. Sometimes it feels to me like I am questioning religious beliefs when I challenge some aspect of modern-day feminism with a feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/18 02:04 PM
2

This one is interesting: "Renata Salecl The Fear of Being Ignored: From Incel to Imposters This lecture will address the question of masculinity in light of neoliberal ideology of success and failure. First, it will question why it seems to be harder for men to deal with sexual rejection and lack of social recognition. And second, it will look at violence against women in the context of the neoliberal ideals of masculinity. " Of course it's a woman giving this presentation. Any man could tell yo…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:04 PM
7

So she has them roughly 85% of the time and still can't schedule an appointment around that? She's trying to get you to pay for the copay and/or any other costs associated. Also, it's more free time for her. Sounds like my ex.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:28 PM
2

She's not wrong. For example, many feminists believe that the dearth of women in say, executive positions in business is due to sexism, without looking into whether a proportionate number of qualified women are even attempting to get these jobs. So they would rather instill a quota system or even change the laws to get more women in these positions, rather than actually do the work required. Which basically is them saying "let us join the team, whether we are qualified or not."
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:10 PM
1

And, for most guys she's preaching to the choir. Most men already know any woman can claim we treated them wrong and men (often in uniform with guns) will come and take us away against our will, at the very least. And in the of #MeToo it's been made abundantly clear to any women who weren't clued in.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:56 PM
1

It sounds like they just don't like each other. However, he shows it by being rude and she shows it by trying to get him fired for misogyny.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:51 PM
9

Yet another woman who conflates dislike of herself with hatred of women. Not saying I know if he does or not but how do you make that connection? Certainly not the first time I've heard this.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 03:39 AM
9

Marriage certainly didn't do me any favors.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 01:48 AM
25

Seriously, wtf? Why would I date someone I'm scared of?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:00 PM
2

Men raised by single mothers might. My female cousin's sons were taught to wipe after urination. I wasn't raised that way. Anyone know if guys with fathers learned to wipe?
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:30 PM
2

I agree. Besides, if we want to show people that we have legitimate issues as well, we would be best served by addressing the issues here and not using ad hominem attacks, no matter how much the person in question appears to deserve it. We aren't going to convince this person of the validity of our claims but anyone observing this will be more likely to listen to what we have to say if we sound calm and approach it rationally. That being said, this woman sounds deranged and should get help.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:54 PM
1

By rape culture, do you think feminists really mean, it's thoroughly investigated and in cases of guilt the perpetrator is soundly punished, maybe?
/r/MensRights07/06/18 12:41 AM
1

Doh! Didn't read to the bottom.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 11:51 PM
1

Where did you find this information: 30% of young American women believe that a male co-worker asking them to go out for drinks qualifies as sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 11:47 PM
10

That's why we need to band together and change the divorce laws concerning alimony and retirement.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:50 PM
2

Lots and lots of women are guilty of false accusation and men are sick of it. Sorry.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:44 PM
8

I'm glad I knew this during my last divorce. My (soon-to-be-ex) wife was angrily and loudly kicking me out of the house. I was willing to leave and get a hotel room for the night as I knew if I stayed it would just get worse. While I was getting a bag together she was following me around yelling, pushing me, pulling me toward the door and breaking stuff. I really wanted to call the cops but I was afraid I might be the one arrested and I had to get my daughter who was out of the house at the time…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:31 AM
9

Quick answer: No, they haven't and they're not going to.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:22 AM
4

Fuck... " Personally, at 33, Womack has been slapped on the arse, grabbed in a club, and threatened with violence after a man told her to smile and she “gave him a dirty look”. These are her personal examples of misogyny?! I hate women so much I wanna grab 'em? I mean, I disagree with the behavior, but it certainly isn't hatred that makes men wanna touch women, it's attraction. Even the threat of violence doesn't imply hatred of women, but certainly could be an indication of dislike of her "dirt…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 07:30 PM
2

I don't get it. Is the artist trying to say that white knights don't actually want to help people, just men?
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/18 12:12 AM
3

Sounds like she just liked the attention/validation from you and once you tried to move it forward (at least in her mind) she wanted nothing more to do with you.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:12 PM
2

I have handcuffed myself to the bed in and am in the starfish position, blindfold on. ...Wait. Am I supposed to have a woman in the room first? Or will they just appear, now that I have shown my readiness for sexual congress?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:04 PM
1

Well, it's simple really. The "wage" gap is merely comparing all income for all men vs. all income for all women. Really, it should be called an "earnings" gap as it has little to do with wages. If you drill into the numbers you find that women earn less than men mainly because, in general, they work fewer hours, take more time off, and choose lower paying jobs overall.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:18 PM
6

In general, yes. For example, if you take away the facts that women in general work fewer hours, take more time off, and choose jobs and careers that pay less there isn't much left to explain the gender wage gap.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 07:22 PM
2

I would like to see sources for all those percentages thrown out early in the article. Edit: I mean, those are some seriously high numbers...
/r/MensRights07/05/18 04:44 PM
4

That, and any jobs that are hard/ uncomfortable/gross, etc...
/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:15 PM
1

Fucking idiot. I thought they stopped all the incest in the royal families...
/r/MensRights17/03/18 11:53 PM
3

Dude absolutely crushed. Overkill ain't in it.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:08 PM
6

I'm no expert here other than being born with a penis, but what guy here was raised with the idea that it's okay for men to use liquor and coersion to get in a girl's pants like this guy "Dave"? This isn't what I was taught being a man was. I was taught that courage, honesty, integrity, and standing up for yourself and others weaker than you was the hallmark of a man. The author just takes one guy's story and thinks that's how masculinity is??
/r/MensRights12/03/18 07:29 PM
2

Love Janice. She's a straight shooter.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 07:08 PM
2

Slow news day? I mean, if cleaning isn't the woman's job I could see a slight problem but if it is she's doing exactly what she should be doing.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:59 AM
20

Not to be (too) rude, but fuck your version of equity. This is the same argument as white guilt. "Oh, we've got to treat POC's gently because some of our ancestors didn't play nice." Well, I don't own slaves or condone violence against anybody who isn't harming me. I don't see why I have to suffer for something someone else did way back when. So some guys don't get jobs cuz women got a lousy deal in the past? Again, fuck that.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:10 PM
3

Did it say just men? I don't recall reading that but I was kinda skimming it. All around, it's a shitty thing, tho, getting punished for just being suspected of doing something. And I take particular issue with May's statement that most of the 2 million domestic violence victims are female. Once again someone with an agenda ignoring facts...
/r/MensRights08/03/18 08:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter