TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

asmoos Archive

View 4 posts and 63 comments by asmoos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Essentially what this is doing is saying "we give up on these people" - it'll be harder to hold a job, get married, live in certain areas ("no woman-beater is allowed in my backyard"). They will be second-class citizens, and most will probably just be a drain on society.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 06:01 AM
11

We shouldn't have these registries though - once you've served your time/paid your fine, the legal system shouldn't follow you around afterwards. Prison should be about reform, not bullying people.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:54 AM
33

Even if women were to be included on this register I'd oppose it. Once you've been convicted and served your sentence, as far as I'm concerned that's it. AFAIK we don't have a "murder registry" or a "general violence registry" and nor should we. Domestic violence isn't some special crime that means society gets to take a shit on you forever after.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:41 AM
4

This is from a national TV channel's morning show. Here's a link to the article (I think): http://www.9news.com.au/National/2015/03/06/03/39/Libs-to-let-NSW-women-check-partners-past
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:34 AM
8

Probably for saying to man up. Some could interpret them saying we should get ourselves killed, given the context.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:13 AM
-4

The thread in /r/Australia has a few comments about how this isn't OK though, and I'd like to make it clear what i think is and isn't OK about this.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 07:44 AM
2

Politicians always use their family for point scoring. I'm not saying its right, but Abbott didn't do any more that any other PM has done before him hadn't (barring Gillard, who seemingly wanted to keep her private life private)
/r/MensRights22/07/14 07:06 AM
-1

You know what? I think its OK that she said this. Someone's sexual preferences are not 'wrong' if it's consensual. If Lambert wants a 22y/o hung like a donkey - fine. If Palmer wanted an 18 y/o with massive tits and was a virgin - fine. But this story shouldn't be 'news'. A person's sexual preferences should have no bearing on their abilities as a politician. In saying that, if a male pollie had said that he wants a girl with a tight pussy, he would've been crucified. That's what's wrong here.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 07:04 AM
2

The issue was with your framing: you said that 1) the people who do these bad things are men. This is (mostly) true, but irrelevant. The gender of people who make bad laws doesn't make them any better or worse. 2) These bad men were given power by other men. Either you mean that women don't vote for bad men, or that the bad men were put forward as political candidates by other men. The first is false, the second is sort of true, but again, the gender of a person doing a bad thing doesn't make th…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:28 AM
7

Many of the idiots responsible are men placed in the seat by men with shaky records on women's issues. They're people placed in the seat by people with shaky records on people's issues. Which is why I keep hoping the MRM will go after conservative gender traditionalists as much as it goes after the 2nd wave styled radfems. But it never seems to happen. You apparently don't think it's important either, or you wouldn't have written the above. Here's why I don't (pointedly) call out the conservativ…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:09 AM
5

Typically the SBS publishes news at least, this isn't news.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:56 PM
1

I guess it's at least in "comedy". ABC is good too. Ten/7/NBN are terrible though, sometimes I watch The Project and try to figure out why they're even presenting a story because they spend 5s talking about the 'news' part of it, then a minute making some stupid joke tangentially related.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:38 AM
17

How the fuck did this get published by the SBS?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:01 AM
20

Every time I see the phrase "men are raised to hate women" I want to slap the person that said it with a huge sign saying "citation needed". When and where is this happening?
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:53 AM
1

If you are not a US citizen but are retired to sign up for selective service, do you get to vote?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 07:06 AM
1

Do you get to vote?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 06:43 AM
1

You're basically speaking out against traditionalism. You want to erase the roles of the past and the expectations and I SHUDDER TO USE THE WORD the priveleges. I don't want to erase them at all. I want to recognize the differences and understand that men and women have always had a social contract with both pros and cons. Feminists to me seem to interested in keeping the contract one sided in their favor. Breaking from traditionalism should also not be seen as a bad thing. If a man wants to be …
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:54 PM
1

1500+ in some of my larger courses, split into three classes. Not that everyone turned up...
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:37 PM
8

By challenging gender roles and trying to make all jobs inclusive of people of all genders. Feminism has a long history of opening up the workplace. And how is feminism doing that? Is it anywhere near like the 'campaigns' are like for getting women into tech?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 09:51 AM
8

That's a superfluous problem. There's nothing inherently wrong with having few women in tech. If you could demonstrate that the industry is suffering financially/technically/whatever specifically because there are so few women in tech, I might agree with you. (Furthermore, if having few women in tech is a problem, is it also a problem that there are so few men in nursing, or HR, or teaching? What is feminism doing about those problems?)
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:57 AM
8

So what's wrong with the tech industry that women can fix?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:44 AM
5

It's "just as bad" because in both cases you're violating a person's rights. The argument is that if I break your leg but someone else breaks your back, them breaking your back doesn't make what I did "OK".
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:30 AM
1

Abbott is a huge religious conservative, and very much in favour of gender roles. He's spoken of how a woman's role is in the home (particularly the kitchen), of women's "special gift" (their virginity), of one of his party member's sexual appeal during last years election campaign, and (this memory is quite vague and I might be mistaken) how a woman's job is to support her husband (as in not work herself). I don't really follow politics all that closely or I might have some quotes about his sta…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 08:42 PM
4

I don't think that he hates all women. Only that he views women as less capable than men. In saying that though I'm still waiting for him to make abortions illegal so that Gillard said something right in her "men in blue ties" speech /s
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:30 PM
1

So how do you propose we 'balance' male disposability? Removing women's right to vote won't work, men will still sacrifice themselves for women.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:15 PM
3

Come to /libertarian and we can argue it. It's not suitable here. I think it's perfectly suitable here. Why do you think that the super rich control the government?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:12 PM
5

That's a terrible idea. Class warfare anyone?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:33 PM
3

Ironically, a group called the Heavy METAL (Men's Education Towards Anger and Life) Group offers workshops for women "looking for help to control their anger"
/r/MensRights05/03/14 11:23 AM
16

Here's one: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-26338041 Gender only seems important if it conforms with "man bad, woman good". It's a shitty situation, but by not mentioning that the boys were killed while the girls were allowed to leave is falsely presenting the idea that boys and girls were treated equally shittily.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:54 PM
12

Do you have a source on this? I'd read an article saying that the girls were allowed to leave but can't seem to find it. Also Srebenica was a big one too.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:09 PM
1

The Red Pill recognizes the reality of the day, and seeks coping strategies to eke out whatever benefit men may still have from being alive. You're still relying on the assumption that we cannot overcome the natural and societal influences that sustain gender roles/male disposability. Frankly, on this issue MRAs are no different, at all, from the RadFems calling for men to find butch, fat, bitchy women just as attractive as Jessica Alba. Maybe I'm the minority, I don't know, but here's my take o…
/r/MensRights27/02/14 11:29 AM
3

This is actually a really interesting question, and (I think) the biggest difference between the MHRM and The Red Pill. TRP sees gender roles and embraces them. For TRP, gynocentricism in society is simply too powerful to overcome, and to 'balance' it out, gender roles (which both harm and help men and women) should be maintained. On the other hand, the MHRM is all about removing gender roles (for men, but I'd seriously be surprised if anyone could explain why it would be fair that men have no g…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:38 AM
13

Pretty sure it's illegal for an employer to discriminate like this. Even if you not want to pursue it legally, they might change it themselves, or someone else might and then you can choose to step forward too Edit: VIC equal opportunity act Part 2 Section 12 deals with lawful discrimination (IANAL)
/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:35 PM
22

Apply anyway
/r/MensRights25/02/14 11:52 AM
18

It is for men to not take advantage of women who are bereft of their faculties, no matter the state of their own. I guess the next time I'm passed out I'll try not to take advantage of women while they're having sex with me
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:10 PM
2

IANAL but as far as I know, paternity is a state-level law in Aus. Get some legal advice, if you want some idea of what's going to happen before you do that, either post what state your ex is living in and I'll do some research, or google it yourself
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:14 AM
3

was this one of the stories that was in Mx recently? (that a 17 y/o girl had been raped)
/r/MensRights29/01/14 08:12 AM
3

Not all anti-feminists are MRAs, but continue living in your binary fantasy land.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 12:54 PM
1

And don't get me started on how much shaming of male sexuality is being done here.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:07 AM
6

oh dis gon' be good Did you even know there are female gridiron teams I didn't even know we had male gridiron teams. Camera angles captured bikini-topped flesh and skimpy undies in reports that failed to even mention the score [of the Legends Football League] hey look, a quick search on google news for legends football league australia only shows one article on the front page that is not complaining about the skimpy costumes - and it just happens to have been printed before the game. Australia n…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:35 AM
9

Really though, the idea that women can do no wrong is sexist towards women, or something
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:38 PM
1

Does anyone have a link to the SA university's page on the course?
/r/MensRights24/12/13 10:20 AM
1

Just Australia. The article is using stats from the recently released Australian Bureau of Statistics' Personal Safety Survey 2012
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:34 AM
2

In all fairness, feminists probably view us as doing the same - no implicit trust of allegedly battered/raped women, no affirmative action, presumption if innocence...
/r/MensRights14/12/13 02:29 AM
16

And it's perfectly reasonable for you to be jealous - there are consequences for you but not for your boyfriend. What is unreasonable is saying "I'd like the guys to experience the side-effects that we've been putting up with since our teens" because reasons.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 02:25 AM
2

Which job are you referring to?
/r/MensRights14/12/13 02:15 AM
25

Men aren't allowed to have something good without having associated consequences, that's only for women!
/r/MensRights14/12/13 02:08 AM
2

To me, male disposability is the primary driving factor to most of the problems men face today. RoK consciously champions male disposability as the 'solution' to male issues, because they believe that real men don't have issues. To me, it's bullshit of the highest order: Man up, stop complaining. Real men don't have problems. And if you do have a problem and can't deal with it, you're scum.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:39 AM
4

For some reason I think that RoK doesn't belong here...
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:20 AM
6

Up to 120 women are killed by their male partners each year in the UK. 90% of all violent crime committed here every year is by men (hence the prison stats), much of it against female partners. If I walk home alone at night, statistically I am in far, far greater danger of sexual assault than my husband is. When we've sported these small matters out, I'll start trying to worry about this, okay? Men don't die. Violent crime is the only form of crime (and I honestly wouldn't be surprised if that 9…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:42 PM
11

To argue that men are now the victims of the gender struggle is absurd, she says. "For thousands of years women were subjugated as second class citizens. We've just started to change that in the last two centuries and there's a long way to go. The men's activists are denying history." Oh ok, feel free to do whatever you feel like to men, who have all been treated like kings since forever. Edit: it's the same old "oppressed class/oppressor class" shit. Women have had it bad so men must have had i…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:33 PM
4

Warren Farrell, GirlWritesWhat and Christina Hoff Sommers (does she count?) all have numerous videos uploaded to YouTube of their "real world" activism.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 08:41 PM
9

Which strenuous, filthy, and/or physically-dangerous traditionally-male job will you be volunteering for? I VOLUNTEER TO REPLACE THE KOCH BROTHERS
/r/MensRights02/12/13 02:32 AM
7

But as men, it is our duty to women to protect them. So if I, a male, do not die protecting a woman, I have failed in my duty as a man? We compliment eachother. You're right. Real men give women safety and money, and real women provide us with sex and babies. /s You are absolutely allowed to think that, but I do not have to agree with you, or live up to your expectations Edit: damn phone
/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:18 AM
13

I /u/asmoos, by the powers vested in me by our patriarchal forefathers, confer upon you /u/twasdreary, oh most deserved, the title of White Knight. May you die a noble death protecting weak and innocent women and children from ignoble men, and know that your sacrifice was not in vain. For the Greater Good! Edit: wording, wasn't quite enough
/r/MensRights26/11/13 05:55 AM
1

One of the studies the white ribbon campaign references mentions that 61%(?) of domestic homicides are perpetrated by women, but the media is still going to portray domestic violence as what men do to women. (Ill drag up the study in the morning)
/r/MensRights25/11/13 03:42 PM
1

isnt this a compliment? calling groups who "consider 'the term woman to apply to anyone who presents herself as a woman or says she is one'." MRAs implies that MRAs are 'liberal' in regards to perceptions of gender?
/r/MensRights25/11/13 11:01 AM
5

speculation: when our train lines are undergoing trackwork, buses replace the trains. a bus marshal is probably the person who answers questions/redirects people to the busses
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:41 AM
1

Here is a link to the study From the abstract: Biological and physiological differences between the sexes are unlikely to explain large-scale gender differences in mortality rates. Social norms and role behavior provide some further explanation, but what is likely to matter most is the everyday socio-economic status of women. And from the section Social Norms and Role Behavior ...social norms and role behavior will often put women at greater risk of disaster mortality, but this depends on the ty…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 06:04 AM
1

Maybe people aren't offering suggestions as to how to fix problems because the problems are things like false imprisonment, where it's pretty obvious what to do
/r/MensRights07/11/13 02:55 PM
3

What's even better than legislated gender quotas? Unlegislated ones!!
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:47 PM
9

The mods have a strict anti-censorship policy. Censoring those attempting to censor still counts as censorship, so just down vote them and move on
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:12 PM
3

a poster i saw when i was about 10 that read "Violence against women - Australia says no!" and little me wondered if that meant that violence against men was ok
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter