TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

assmunchinator Archive

View 5 posts and 652 comments by assmunchinator on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

probably an alt account of one of the mods. Its been admitted by the mods that most of them have alt accounts that they use here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 04:39 PM
1

Skimmed through And there's the source of the problem fam. Skimming doesn't mean that you are guarunteed to find the quote. You wanna actually find it? Then you have to put in effort. Sorry, but that's the c.old hard truth. Downvoting me doesn't make it any less real. And theres the source of your problem, looks like you skimmed through the thread :P
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/17 01:47 PM
1

She wasn't really trying to change his view. She just wanted to make sure everyone had heard her opinion on the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 04:34 PM
1

He says he has sex with girls on the first or second date. But somehow all these girls have a low n count and are not sluts. Those 2 things don't really add up at all lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 08:38 PM
1

says she's over this red pill nonsense...continues to comment in red pill nonsense sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 04:10 PM
10

looks like this guy just read the title and not the actual post.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 09:20 PM
1

those sound like the RP version of field reports. do you believe most field reports are true?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 06:44 PM
1

I was also genuinely trying to get across that I was using 'hate' casually and not in the 'people who take jokes literally make me shake and foam at the mouth with rage' way. I'm sure most people know you didnt literally mean hate. at least i would hope so.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 12:14 AM
1

i can't tell if you're trying to be ironic or taking 'hate" 100% literally
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 05:41 PM
1

?? Did someone force you to watch the video? If you don't want to watch the video, and don't really have anything to add, you have the option to like, not comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:48 PM
1

I said its probably confirmation bias cause you somehow just attributed "daddy issues" to girls who date older guys. You perceive younger woman dating older guys negatively, so you attribute "daddy issues" to them. Thats the confirmation bias. In either case, you made no case for your assertion which you claimed was somehow true without any kind of logical reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 05:39 AM
1

yeah thats fair. You were just spouting your opinion as if it was a researched fact that everyone knew. Obviously not the case. Just what you felt was true. probably confirmation bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 11:17 PM
1

Thats not evidence, thats just your small anecdote. I could also blindly make up things. All non-rp guys like to be dominated. Many of them have outright said this. I don't think its a particularly controversial statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:40 PM
1

Can you show me where guys are saying all sluts have issues and then point show me where those same guys are saying that they can't believe a woman dating only older guys have daddy issues? Otherwise your argument just falls apart. Anyone can just blindly make up things. Bluepillers complain all the time about RP anecdotes and field Reports...and then blue pillers give their own anecdotes and field reports.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:37 PM
0

I mean, it is true. The vast majority of women who seek out significantly older men do have daddy issues. Do you have any evidence for this? Sounds like you just made this up.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:51 PM
3

You guys want to believe all sluts have issues You just made this part up. You do this a lot. I'd say most RPers Just don't want to be in a LTR with a slutty woman. In your mind that translates to "all sluts have issues". Im sure a number of RPers actually believe all sluts have issues, but most just don't want a LTR. I'm sure you already knew this but go ahead with your straw man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:50 PM
3

interesting point. Would you also say the same in regards to woman complaining about the lack of woman in positions of power.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 06:11 PM
1

Now you're getting into wild crazy scenarios that make no sense. A decently attractive woman has a less than 1% success rate in finding men to have sex with? You're also just assuming he wants to have a LTR. I understand the point of hypotheticals but yours is so out of the wild there doesn't seem to be a point in taking it seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 06:09 PM
2

The label slut has nothing to do with whether i marry her or not. How do you jump to this logical conclusion. Hypothetically I label the woman you describe that has hustled as NOT a slut, but I still don't want to marry her because her values on n count don't align with mine. What then? Your hypothetical makes no sense. You're correlating two things that aren't correlated. The label slut, and my desire to marry her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 06:06 PM
2

We were talking about the label slut. I don't see where marriage comes in to this discussion nor making it personal to what I would do. My values are different and I would not marry her whether she hustled or not. What does this have to do with her being labelled a slut or not? Why do you think men aren't hurt by the label of slut, but women are? Thats the more interesting question.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 05:50 PM
5

So are feminists whining when they complain about the lack of women in stem or pointing out an inequality? Women already have the right to go into STEM.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 05:44 PM
2

Except you've clearly added a very rare scenario. that doesn't really work. A woman has a less than 1% sex rate in approaching men for sex. Somehow the guys judging her a slut know that she's had 1000s of attempts to have an n count of 50. In all likelihood, the guys wouldn't know she's had that many attempts. Whats even more unlikely is that she's failing that hard. She'd probably get called ugly/fat before she would be called a slut. There may be something else, but this does play a part IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 05:22 PM
17

Its funny how people dismiss field reports as completely fake, but those same people will believe a sob story that represents their negative views about TRP. Where's the skepticism from the BP side on this story?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 05:10 PM
3

So you think that TRP posts are made up but you don't think this is? Is it just a case of, it supports my views so its not a lie vs TRP is something I don't like so it's probably lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 09:22 PM
1

Pem was speaking in the context of your original OP. Use basic context and logic to realize it didn't specifically mean you lol. You asked a pretty rhetorical question. Generally you don't answer those. I didn't know this was news.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 02:57 AM
1

it seems you somehow misinterpreted Pem's message into saying that you personally have to do something. Why you took it personally, I don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 11:03 PM
1

Bluepill was referred to by TRP as behaviors that were already the status quo and not attractive before there was a bluepill subreddit. The BP subreddit appropriated the name after this and thats why you have this confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 08:40 PM
1

Why are we required to offer a specific alternative to recognize how silly TRP is? Look at the title of the OP. You aren't required to do anything but thats what would change most RPers minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 08:37 PM
1

I don't have to do shit, since I already said I don't care about converting people from TRP. Am I taking crazy pills? Your OP says what would it to change your mind? User replies that it would take an alternative strategy that is more effective to change his mind. Your question was answered, end of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 08:34 PM
5

The top comment in this thread is not from a RP user. is there a reason that is left up?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 06:52 PM
2

Fair enough but I know I reported some of them in the first thread, so I dont know how you could make a mistake if you look at the report log? I just scrolled to the last "question for Red Pill" thread before the one i linked above: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3nozd8/when_hypergamy_doesnt_care_and_women_are/ Many of the comments in here are also not answered by RP people: here here here here theres more in that thread I think but you get the point. If you don't look at rep…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 10:17 PM
3

Reds are free to contribute to the discussion by replying to top-level comments. These same rules apply in reverse for threads tagged as a question for the reds. I don't think this is true. Take a look at this thread here marked as question for red pill: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3nvew2/the_chad_of_my_world_trp_need_not_apply/ About half the top level comments are from blue pillers. Or this CMV thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3nhfq4/if_women_wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 02:38 PM
3

yes, generally people who agree, or are neutral, aren't likely to comment on these things. Theres not much to say if you already agree. The people who disagree or are repulsed in this case will be much more likely to respond. So you get a skewed perspective of the average women found here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 08:21 PM
1

cognitive dissonance, much? Did Sepean make both of those comments? If not, can you logically explain to me how this would be cognitive dissonance. If two different people, make two separate comments, its not CD. I hope you're able to actually see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 05:54 PM
1

Can you explain to me what Plating is? I don't really think you understand the concept. There is nothing in the concept about any kind of lying or manipulation. It seems like you just kind of added this in yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 03:12 PM
1

Pretty basic lack of understanding of dread game. Dread game is used when you're in a LTR not when you're trying to pick someone up. you've been here awhile, you should know better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 02:47 PM
1

In case you aren't just being sarcastic, the comment you are replying to was a joke lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 02:34 PM
3

Okay, so I have never been in a 10+ relationship. But I have been in two, 2 year LTRs. So bear that in mind when I answer (which I will because why not). But I figured a total of 4 years in LTRs is about half of what you are thinking. What's with people on PPD not being able to control themselves and answering questions that aren't addressed to them? This reply is not even close to the demographic that OP was asking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 01:56 PM
1

We both disagreed and figured out that the disagreement came from how it is used and defined in certain situations. Looks like you were the only one who misinterpreted (It's okay to admit you didn't understand the term). Seems like you're new here and don't really understand the terms that TRP uses that well. I don't think many in TRP would interpret "Next her" as something you verbally/angrily/boisterously communicate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 03:26 PM
1

The misunderstanding here is that people do not use the phrase in the same way. You are suggesting to use it in a healthy one (in your head as you walk away) so we will agree. Wait, Did you honestly misinterpret "Next Her", as loudly, verbally rejecting her after she rejects you??
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 03:15 PM
3

The irony writes itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 03:06 PM
1

Just cause you added a question, doesn't mean your question was neutral. If you did not think he believed that, you would have asked something like: "Do you think men have been deluded?" Your question above presupposed that he believed men haven't been deluded. This is pretty basic reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 03:01 PM
2

So you don't think men have been deluded at all? Where does he say this? Why are you assuming he believes this? He just said he thinks the biggest influence has been on women, not that there has been no influence on men. Whats with the strawmanning.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 06:33 PM
1

but please just let it go. It's a two way street. You could have also let it go, but you didnt. Why are you continuing to respond? If you don't want the conversation, take responsibility and stop responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 12:42 PM
1

If that's what you want, perhaps you're asking the wrong crowd ??? Did you read any of the other replies in the thread? Everyone else somehow managed it. If you can't do it that's fine, I was pointing out that you failed to answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 04:00 AM
1

They're completely different things. What you look for vs what women in general look for are completely different. Words have meanings. If you use different words, guess what, you get a different meanings. If you think they're the same thing, change your original answer to that. If my answer is so useless why do you feel the need to so vehemently call me out as stupid? The reason it seems as if I am "vehemently calling you out at stupid" (Nowhere did i call you stupid btw) is because you keep re…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 01:43 AM
1

Maybe you're new here and don't understand the context of the original question. Many BPers here say they don't have any affirmative beliefs about relationships, they're just anti-RP. Which is fine, but RPers say its hard to have a debate when only 1 side brings any affirmative beliefs to the table. Back to your answer. Sure, technically its an affirmative belief. I could have answered OP's question with "I like girls". That is an affirmative belief as well, but its just as useless as your state…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 12:34 AM
1

Nobody? Thats not what I said. The question was, What are you beliefs about relationships based your previous experience? The question was not, What do you look for in your personal relationships? Does that make sense? Do you see the difference? An Example of the first question above would be: I believe men take the initiative most of the time when asking the other person out. An example of the second question above would be. I look for men to ask me out in my relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 12:02 AM
1

the question wasn't, tell me about your your personal experiences. If it was, OP would have said that. OP asked for affirmative beliefs that you may have. He didn't ask for what you look for in relationships. he asked for your personal beliefs about relationships. This is pretty basic comprehension. You can speak about your personal experiences if you want. Where are you getting this idea that I'm saying you can't? It just doesn't really answer OP's question. If you don't have any affirmative be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 11:50 PM
2

Well if you're just going to disregard what I say, then why did you ask? One He didn't ask. Two you didn't even answer the OP. the OP asked for affirmative beliefs you have about gender relations, sex, mate selection. You just talked about yourself for a paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 06:49 PM
2

thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 10:26 PM
3

Typically in AMA's, people provide proof. Do you have any proof that you do work at a brothel?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 12:36 AM
3

No, that's why I'm asking you to show me. Is this really common? can you show some examples of what you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 12:03 AM
3

You haven't really established this to be true. Seems like guys on this sub just point out the 80/20 rule, and you interpret it as them calling it a great injustice. Do you have any comments or posts in mind that say this is a "great injustice?" Otherwise the premise of this post is kind of off.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 10:08 PM
2

Ignore it? Or at least don't be the one to start it. Almost all of his comments are circlejerking and in most of those cases hes the one that starts it. Even to comments that are at least trying to be engaging, hes just trolling. Can't really take him serious than can you. Plus I don't see how he can have any complaints about circlejerking if hes perpetuating it himself. If you're gonna complain about something, at least don't do the same thing you're complaining about lol. You lose any credibil…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 05:44 PM
1

I dont think thats true. There are plenty of threads where the top level comments arent from the group addressed. for example, I was just looking at this. You even commented in it lolll: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3f2xsu/women_do_you_really_like_romantic_sensitive/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 04:46 PM
1

Are you saying his anecdote is fiction but yours is non-fiction? lol?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 04:33 PM
5

ironic that you complain about circlejerking. Most of your comments in this thread are just snark/sarcasm/trolling. If you don't want a circlejerk, maybe you should start with yourself lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 02:54 PM
1

We're handwaving it because we disagree that it hurts men GET LAID. Being promiscuous helps you get laid lol. I don't understand how thats up for debate. Maybe it hurts their LTR chances but we're trying to make men be better than the average and thus not be as effected by these trends that say promiscuous men are risky in LTRs. We think we can better than what the trends say. So yes it doesn't matter if in general average male sluts are bad for LTRs
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 10:00 PM
1

Okay. If what you're saying is true, I guess it sucks to be RP then. Nobody will get involved with slutty guys so theres no need to worry about the RP. Why are you worried? Let the RPers, who you probably dislike, make their own mistakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 09:53 PM
1

You say male sluttiness is a turn off, I say its not. we're at a stand still. If you want to start an advice column or subreddit advising men to not be promiscuous go ahead. And that's where trp falls down, every time. Got any evidence of this happening? much less happening every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 09:49 PM
3

Why is that on TRP? TRP is geared toward men. Why should they care if the conversation isn't being skewed evenly toward men and women? They're in the business of advising men. If women want to talk about slutty men, they should. NOBODY is stopping them. If you actually feel strongly about this topic, then go warn other women. Nobody is stopping you from flipping the conversation to the other side.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:56 PM
5

The answer is simple then. Just tell women not to get involved with slutty guys. Done.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:51 PM
2

Depends what you call slut shaming. I don't walk around pointing out sluts and laughing at them. But if a friend of mine asks me about a girl that he's interested in seriously dating, I'll let him know shes pretty promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:49 PM
0

Well that's on them right. If a promiscuous man demands their partner not be promiscuous, than in theory he should be dismissed by most girls right? Why worry about what he says cause in theory he wouldn't be successful. Let him be delusional. Why would a girl who isn't promiscuous want to be with a guy that is? This isn't an issue right because it doesn't happen? So why worry that this guy has this demand. I think in your mind his demand won't be met anyway right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:46 PM
2

What's keeping a woman from saying the same thing? Is a man more capable than a woman of changing his ways when it comes time to settle down? Nothing!! A women can 100% TOTALLY say the exact same thing. No one is more/less capable. It's up to the guy to decide if he wants to be with her when he has the knowledge that promiscuous women are a greater risk in LTRs
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:43 PM
2

Lets say I'm a promiscuous man and I want to settle down. This knowledge is useless to me. What is this knowledge going to do? Am I supposed to think, "hmmm I've been promiscuous. I shouldn't get serious with anyone cause I might be jeopardizing my future." No thats not how people think. I'll just say yeah, that's the general trend but I'm better than the average and I won't jeopardize my future/career. It's up to the girls looking for LTRs do decide if they want to date promiscuous guys. For th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:39 PM
10

So why the hyper focus on promiscuous women, when the correlation exists for men too? Why would I as a man care if other men are promiscuous? I'm only interested in dating women. It matters to me if women might cheat due to being promiscuous. Other men being promiscuous has no affect on my relationship life. edit: if women want to point out to other women that promiscuous guys aren't worth dating then they should go ahead. Please be guest and warn other women just like trp warns guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:28 PM
8

I think he meant they don't get criticized by feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 09:04 PM
4

In general girls don't make moves. They'll usually show interest by flirting, eye contact, touching, etc. with this interpretation, how do you answer OP's question?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 06:53 PM
5

Say you're interested in a guy but he doesn't make a move initially. Later on (lets say a month or two later) he does make a move. Have you lost interest in the guy or has your interest waned?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 06:51 PM
3

But I was trying to answer OP's question. My assumption was that a guy had turned down my interest in him, in the scenario OP presented. That's not the scenario OP presented. The scenario was that a girl shows interest, but the guy doesn't make a move. The scenario is NOT that a girl makes a move and the guy rejects her as you are presenting. The real question OP is trying to ask: If a guy doesn't make a move initially after a girl shows she's interested, maybe because hes nervous, slow, or just…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 06:47 PM
6

Or just call them females. Its not that big of a deal to call them females.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 08:21 PM
1

MY comment that you just replied to said: usually complaining about downvotes leads to downvotes. just fyi. the comment i replied to with the above message said: Edit: oh look downvoted again, how unsurprising. I'm saying, in general on reddit you will get downvoted for complaining about downvotes. I'm telling you that complaining about getting downvoted won't help your situation. My comment wasn't about any previous conversations. I really dont understand why i have to break this down for you b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 11:43 PM
0

?? how does this relate to my last comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 11:37 PM
1

to be fair, her comment isnt downvoted past -5. It doesn't deserve the downvotes but its not as bad as you're claiming above.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 09:45 PM
0

usually complaining about downvotes leads to downvotes. just fyi.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 09:41 PM
3

Just cause most of the comments are RP, doesn't mean its a circlejerk. The bp comments that are downvoted are comments that are off tangent or trolly/circlejerky themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 09:37 PM
4

Not sure I agree with that reasoning but okay. Seems like a recipe for a circlejerk if it was a question only feminists were answering. I cant imagine there would be many well thought out answers. Imagine it the other way around. "Question for Red Pill", Do BPers understand RP?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 09:21 PM
3

Howcome this thread hasn't had its flair changed to "question for Redpillers" by you? I notice a lot of redpill threads labelled as discussion you change to "question for bluepillers" and this thread seems pretty clearly aimed at red pillers. Seems like its something you should do for consistency despite this thread having most of its comments made by RPers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 08:36 PM
2

you realize ppd is a place to debate TRP and its ideas. It is pretty safe to assume you understand basic RP terms. Even if it is 100% a made up term, you're here to debate TRP, therefore you should know their terms, otherwise wtf you doing here lol. I dont know about you but this is pretty logical. Not sure what I'm missing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 02:21 PM
2

Outside of reddit, I dont know how true that really is but even if it were, its like you said, they don't know the publication. My point was rok as a brand/site isn't really that well known.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 06:14 PM
2

I mean if you asked a bunch of random people who werent involved in any of these pill subs whether they've heard of Avfm or rok I'd say more have heard of avfm.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 06:06 PM
3

is there a list of all the other sites that get auto-removed by reddit? Or do you know what other sites do?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 06:05 PM
5

those sites are also a lot less well known.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 05:59 PM
1

oh makes sense. always forget that not everyone is in america.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 11:53 PM
1

I feel like I remember you mentioning you are under 21. how did you get into bars?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 11:21 PM
1

You say you're a devout christian above. I don't believe christianity nor god has proven to be true. Why should you follow it? Do you have any peer reviewed studies that prove religion?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 12:52 AM
1

here's a recent example from ppd: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2wpxsv/redpill_guys_looking_for_ltrsmarriage_how_do_you/cot9exq
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 11:53 PM
3

Can you please explain how /r/getmotivated actually motivates people? All i see is a bunch of quotes on images? it looks as related to getting motivated as /r/funny is to actually being funny. /r/books is pretty all encompassing and so general as to be useless in this topic. If you know what you're already looking for it might be useful. /r/fitness is good if you already want to work out. It does nothing to motivate you to work out. It just has information for people already doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 11:01 PM
5

Obviously people wouldn't want to come off as unempathetic to a man who just killed himself so you should have expected that nobody would call him entitled. I believe if this wasn't about a guy who had just committed suicide, you'd get more calls of "entitled."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 03:45 PM
1

But I don't even know why any of that is relevant. If a man is incapable of being attracted to anyone at his own level, why should he care if women do the same thing? If he gets to be exceedingly picky, then why should women date their equal when he won't? He shouldn't care and women should do what they want. TRP isn't trying to tell women what they should do. In my case, TRP helped give me more options and allowed me to be choosier with the kind of women I want to be with. It doesn't really mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 07:56 PM
4

If you were truly skeptical, you probably wouldn't have posted this. If you were skeptical of the story, there's not much to discuss related to the actual story. Why would someone post a FR from TRP to PPD if they didn't think it was true? What kind of discussion were you hoping to get out of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 06:32 PM
7

I do. And that was my point. I see many BPers questioning the validity of Field Reports, but many, including the OP, don't question these type of stories you see. Keep in mind this isn't the first time we've had a topic like this come in PPD. Usually its assumed that stories like this one about the negative experiences with supposed rp boyfriend are just true. I'm asking OP and other bpers why that is so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 05:35 PM
1

Sure? I don't generally believe anything blindly. If I read something, I can try it for myself and decide how useful it is for me. I don't care so much if others believe me when I say it works for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 03:57 PM
11

Then you should probably start? Doesn't hurt to question.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 03:46 PM
21

If you question the validity of field reports, you should probably be questioning the validity of this
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 03:36 PM
1

?? I'm not the one going around policing comments. You've shown that you do so im just wondering if you're consistent. Clearly you're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 03:47 PM
1

That's why I linked you to 2 others you happened to miss. You can go ahead and tell those commenters off too. You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 02:43 AM
2

Do you do this for every comment that doesn't match 1 of those 3 criteria? Since you're policing the sub, here are a couple more for you to respond to from the previous thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/15 08:40 PM
1

well this is one of the most ironic things I've read.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 03:43 PM
2

what. You didn't really respond to what I asked. I asked why you criticize "AWALT" for its semantics but are rather flippant about the semantics of "misogyny" If misogyny doesn't mean Hatred of women, its just a dumb abbreviation with no actual meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 06:49 PM
6

As for the 'misogyny', replace it with 'overly negative attitudes to women' if you get caught up in semantics. Have you ever gotten caught up in the semantics of AWALT where it doesn't literally mean every single individual women? If so why do you get caught in the semantics of AWALT but not in the semantics of Misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 02:59 PM
-1

you forgot to addreess this one: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2o7rtd/cmv_men_have_a_biological_clock_almost_as_strong/cmko1rh
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 11:56 PM
1

The self-improvement I mention is outside the Context of RP/BP. The post has little to do with TRP. Its self-improvement in general. YOU wrongly interpreted my OP as referring to RP Self improvement. That's on you. If I meant Self-Improvement in relation to TRP I would have said so in my OP. Can you quote where I said that or which part led you to assume I did? I mention the word self-improvement and you jump to "TRP is not doing any self-improvement." You made an illogical jump there. My post w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/14 02:56 AM
1

You completely missed the point. The person I replied to was curious why RPers respond strongly to girls with short hair/tattoos instead of responding with just apathy which would make more sense. I made the same parallel with TBP. Why would BPers respond strongly to outlandish claims by TRP when responding with apathy would make more sense. Was this really that difficult to follow? Or were you just not paying attention to any of the context I was replying to? Most of your comment was completely…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/14 02:50 AM
7

Let me clarify. The rest of your comment was fine. I think the last part was intended as needless jab at TRP just because you don't like TRP. It didn't really have to do with the original post or the rest of your comment. Typically those kinds of comments lead to insults/arguments here so I'm questioning why you added it in.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/14 02:26 AM
3

If you disagree, a better argument would either be to explain why they don't make you a better person, or what else does make you a better person. Thats not how debates work. I can't argue against something that hasnt even been established as a thing. You're claiming this is some guideline across many religions and philosophies. You're claiming these. Do you understand how debates work. You made the claim, you provide the proof. You haven't done that. You haven't really provided anything for me …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/14 02:22 AM
2

Hey man this comment is kind of useless. No need to start random shit-flinging. only gonna result in a circle of insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 10:56 PM
2

Thanks. I really just wanted opinions on the statement and if the statement was a common BP belief or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 10:47 PM
3

The person I quoted is a mod on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 10:46 PM
3

Right but that is still all your opinion. Theres no established guidelines on what that is. I could also make up a list of things I think make someone a good person. You're putting your opinion up as a universal truth. Sounds a bit like what BPers think of TRP. maybe an elaborate troll from you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 10:44 PM
6

I just don't consider TRP to be self-improvement. I made no mention of TRP in the original post. I wanted this to revolve around the comment that I quoted. Did you add this part in to try and start an argument, or just to shit-fling?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 10:41 PM
5

At the very least, improving oneself would involve not becoming a worse human being. But they're only becoming a worse human being in your opinion. You havent established any guidelines for what that is nor are you an arbiter of what a "worse human being" is. Do you have anything else to offer besides repeatedly saying they are becoming worse?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 10:26 PM
5

So you're not just here for the drama. okay. edit: you could have just answered that the first time he asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 10:23 PM
3

When self improvement is only done for a purpose of having sex it is easy to plateau. You get good, you work out, you have sex, what now? more sex? do you stop working out? Do you stop improving once you meet your goal? This is an odd statement. Usually when people meet some of their goals, they set new ones. Simple. Also I don't usually just have 1 goal in life at a time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 09:39 PM
4

I believe what hes trying to say is: There are people that I don't like, there are groups that I cant get along with. The usual response to them is apathy. Its not to try and dissuade them from whatever they're doing. so this guy above is asking you, why is your response to TRP not apathy?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 09:35 PM
6

OP is acting like the self-improvement is the controversial aspect of your subreddit. This is wrong. My post had nothing to do with claiming that self improvement is the controversial aspect of TRP. I don't know if you just misunderstood or are deliberately misrepresenting what I was going for. The post was specifically about the comment that I quoted and the attitude about it. Its literally in the title. It has nothing to do with TRP being good or bad for someone or with liking/disliking TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 09:18 PM
8

sounds like a copout. You're here and you're debating, but you're trying to give off the vibe that you don't really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 09:14 PM
2

My question in my mind was more towards the general attitude displayed by the person I quoted. Is that a common attitude, how many others think similarly and possible reasoning for why people do. It wasn't really about liking/not liking TRP. Obviously you need any acceptable reasons. I'm trying to see what people think are the acceptable reasons and why people think there are unacceptable reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 08:02 PM
2

for my own sanity, I'm just gonna assume the poster you're replying to is just trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 06:55 PM
2

OK let's say it's disgust + anger. Why is it so...strong? We've all seen another human being and had an "urgh" reaction in our heads, but unless the person is literally covered in weeping sores and soaked with their own effluent I just don't understand the virulence of the emotion from some men. The same could be said for lots of things. Like why is the Blue Pill reaction to TRP so...strong? There have been groups and people that I flat out don't like. Usually I just ignore them. I'd expect the …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 06:42 PM
1

Can you answer your own question? Why the fuck do you care about what others are doing if they don't directly impact you? drok's answer is probably in the same ballpark as yours would be to the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 08:30 PM
1

Wouldn't this apply to all of TBP? wouldn't this also apply to people who think this is a double standard? Who cares of RP people are hypocritical. If they think they can be sluts and women won't care, let them think that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 02:57 PM
1

The SAHM has no savings, no social security, no benefits, no unemployment, no network, no marketable skills, no years of experience, no earning power, nothing, to show for the years of supporting a husband and children. ??? Who said they have none of that. You assigned those traits to them. You made these assumption. I think they're false. My mother stayed at home. she was able to go to school and work. My sister in law also currently stays at home. She has multiple degrees and has worked before…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/14 12:38 AM
1

The contempt is because after a divorce, things should go both ways. As it is, child support/alimony are usually a 1 way street. What is the the Stay at home person providing post divorce to the person who was working? During the marriage, the one working provided money while the one who stayed at home, took care of the duties at home. Post divorce the one working provides the SAH person money and the person who stayed at home provides...? Nothing? At best RPers who dislike the idea of SAHM gett…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 11:28 PM
1

Do you take a Field Report you read at its word? People lie on the internet. You made the claim, so you back it up, otherwise theres no reason to believe it. Also there havent really been any significant rule changes. Which rule change are you referring to? Otherwise it just looks like you made claims about leaving but didn't stand by them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 11:23 PM
1

source? Otherwise you're just making it up. I have you tagged as someone who was never coming back to ppd. yet you're commenting. You haven't kept your word in a way once. Why should I trust that you're being honest in this case?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 05:50 AM
0

sounds like you're complaining about Rpers who don't like divorce. SAHM is not the issue, the divorce is the issue. Again you havent provided me a single example of SAHM bashing. Please form an actual argument instead of of snark/sarcasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 05:48 AM
1

I dont see anything related to bashing SAHM. Sounds like you're just making it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 04:30 PM
1

I've never seen as much SAHM bashing as I have from RPs. I started to think it wasn't lousy girlfriends that pushed them to TRP, but mommy issues. Can you show some examples of this? I've never seen this before.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 03:10 PM
1

Can you point to a few posts from TRP where you're getting these feelings from? I'm not quite sure I see where the anger phase is about not being able to sleep with the top 10% of women. I believe you're argument is based around a strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 03:01 AM
1

http://youtu.be/_pDOwnV-nzg This person in Australia also assaulted him. Should she be in Jail?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/14 07:08 PM
0

If he is touching women at all it is technically assault and battery, especially choking them, why aren't any of the women calling the police? because they like it They'd rather assault him: http://youtu.be/_pDOwnV-nzg
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/14 09:12 PM
4

being snarky/condescending on the internet isn't really shitty, but in a debate sub I think most people would say its pretty shitty. Instead of adding to discussion/debate you'd rather take the discourse towards arguments/insults. Pretty shitty.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/14 04:09 PM
2

Do you think you are justified in being a shitty person to TRPers because in your mind they are "shitty people"? Do you think you are a shitty person? Most of your responses aren't really thoughtful, just shitty responses intended to shit-fling.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/14 02:42 PM
5

Of the things you listed I can't really see how they relate to much that TRP advocates. TRP is pretty clear on commitment. Most advocate against marriage and to be upfront when "spinning plates" I don't really see TRP advocating TRP all that much. Dread game could be a described as a way of making others jealous. But the extreme end which is probably what you have in mind is more of a last resort and not really common. So I'm a little confused about the games you disapprove of from TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 09:14 PM
3

I meant the guy above you's point was that your statement was factually wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 08:59 PM
2

http://www.takepart.com/article/2011/11/29/6-year-old-boy-charged-felony-sexual-assault Still probably not very common for 6 year old boys to be punished but there you go it has happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 08:58 PM
8

That alternative doesn't offer much. It's along the lines of, you'll find love eventually, just keep waiting. What are the games that you disapprove of from both sides? What kind of game playing is wrong? At least the "games" that are common.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 08:57 PM
3

And no, this isnt a double standard. No-one would be proposing punishing a 7 year old boy for this shit, just getting him into therapy. then Erm... ??????
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 08:55 PM
6

So you're saying the one being attacked should just walk away? This sounds very idealist/vacuumy to me. Its common for manipulation/game playing to occur and is accepted and even expected for women to do it. Denouncing the smaller group from doing it doesn't really change anything. As women will still "game play" and those guys that don't will still be at the same place they were. You have to offer an alternative to guys like this besides, do nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 08:51 PM
9

Sure but it seems like a very odd position to me. Two people get in a fight. You tell the person defending himself from the attacker that fighting is wrong no matter what. The problem is you're telling the weaker side that defending yourself is not the answer. Do you see the disconnect? The argument sounds hollow to the one who is defending himself. Do you have an alternate solution?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 08:41 PM
3

Hey, at least its a change from the easy validation from linking to TBP
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 08:36 PM
5

but yet you actively disapprove and discuss against one but not the other. I would think it would be more relevant to eliminate "game playing" from the more popular/widespread source than the smaller one.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 08:28 PM
3

Seems like you're trying to force it. Most of the comments seem to disparage and disagree with cheaters but you want to hold on to the couple agree with it. If thats how you want to frame your argument thats fine but at best its disingenuous to basically imply that the average TRP user would encourage cheating. You can't even quote where in the first 3 threads that its being encouraged.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 05:15 PM
2

Who said it was unique? I just said that its a common trait of BPers so no surprise that you would do it here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 05:10 PM
3

??? You are the one who made the claim that cheating is encouraged all the time. That implies more than one person. If the majority disagree... None of them are encouraging it. They're posting that they or someone they knew did it and it worked. That doesn't mean theyre encouraging it. Just showing the power of it. The second link is merely a discussion as to the reason why people cheat. You're clearly being disingenuous. In your mind, if a TRP user mentions cheating at all, he is encouraging al…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 05:04 PM
3

Your first link. Where are the people advocating cheating? I see the OP mentioned his father cheated on his wife and his wife still stayed with him. Where are the people encouraging cheating? In fact I see the opposite. I agree with everything he said, but this? Nope, cheating? maybe ill forgive you once, but multiple times? fuck no. thats disgusting. 8 points. next one is 12 Hey man, i dont condone it either but there is alot of truth to that statement. Welcome to TRP So already you're being di…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 04:55 PM
1

The point was that BP people tend to read things out of context, and then get upset. Which is what you did. Its just funny when its pointed out and you don't even realize you're doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 04:29 PM
3

You only asked for one example. I still see 0 from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 04:23 PM
3

I showed you an example of you yourself being contradictory, you have yet to show me any examples. I didn't even have to look for other users. You did it yourself and you don't even realize. lol. My point still stands that BPers like to exaggerate what TRP says so they can circlejerk more. You didn't give any evidence to your core argument. At this point its just a random claim. Point still stands that you like to ask for sources/proof but can't provide any yourself when asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 04:20 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2jwemc/bppp_and_ladies_in_particular_why_is_it_wrong_for/clfp9zu
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 03:53 PM
2

Ok, soz I didn't realise that was what was said in the parent comment. I know you didn't. Which is why i thought it was funny how you claimed I was shifting the goal posts. Its pretty typical for BPers to read things out of context and then get outraged. That thread was discussed in the past on PPD. I'm not even sure if you actually read the whole thing given your very recent past of not reading things and then making judgements. You could probably find the thread here if you searched for it. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 03:00 PM
3

Youre taking my exaggeration and running with it. So you don't like when people do that? Thats odd. I thought BPers love taking RP exaggerations and running with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 02:54 PM
3

Thats not how proof works. You said they advocate cheating all the time. Find me a bunch of instances of them advocating cheating. If its all the time it should be right there on the front page. "you'd have to blind or pretty stupid to not have seen how woman or feminists say they can do absolutely anything a man can do"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 02:40 PM
3

I love how you ask for sources/evidence from others but can't provide the same when you make similar claims: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2jwemc/bppp_and_ladies_in_particular_why_is_it_wrong_for/clfp9zu
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 02:28 PM
3

??? I'm talking about what the original person i replied to said. look at her comment again. Thats what this chain is about. Please explain how I am shifting the goal posts when the original comment was this: Men on the TRP literally advocate cheating all the time if they dont get their way. Bullshit justification goes both ways. You came in to the comment chain midway. I asked for proof, the OP wasn't able to provide it and neither have you. I'd like an explanation as to how you think I was shi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 02:27 PM
1

Thats one option from one guy. That doesn't prove that cheating is advocated all the time. This would imply that cheating is implied through multiple sources and is encouraged throughout the sub. Why are you being disingenuous. I've heard BPers saying that all RP guys should die. Does this mean that TBP advocates killing RPs all the time?? Can you prove this statement with links or sources that TRP advocates cheating all the time?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 01:55 PM
-1

thats not how proof works. You have to give me specific examples. Otherwise you could claim anything. Is this really that difficult of a concept?? If its that simple, show me multiple examples of TPR advocating cheating all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 04:26 AM
1

Could maybe ask what the rest of the the sub thinks? Come to a consensus maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 08:17 PM
1

can you provide any proof for this? Especially this all the time part.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 08:04 PM
5

OP could literally say the same thing. He started off his post with a question to further his point. you decided to engage which meant you had no qualms. When he asked for an answer, you fell off the face of the planet. Only difference is that the OP started the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:55 PM
10

Legally, blacks and whites in the western world are the same. In case it wasn't clear, my comment was in reference to the western world. Where did you get the idea that I was referring to sunni Islam?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:52 PM
2

at best its not really appopriate for this sub. Should ban or temp ban users that do it. It only serves to bring the discourse down to an argument level.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:50 PM
10

???? He posted the Original question. He definitely asked first. I'm actually baffled that you replied with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:39 PM
11

So your analogy makes no sense. Legally, blacks and whites in the western world are the same. The same with men and women. Most would say that women have more legal advantages. Are women lacking in legal equality? Are there places where men have more legal advantages compared to women? Why don't you think they are the same? What kind of differences do they have?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:39 PM
9

you didn't answer his question, why should he answer yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:32 PM
12

Do you believe women and men are the same? I notice you always cop out from giving any kind of answer. You always try to give the most generic, PC possible answer instead of actually stating any kind of opinion. If you don't think men are equal to women than obviously the question isn't for you. Will you at least attempt to answer the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:32 PM
8

I'm doubting that the OP actually knows that this person is a "TRPer." I'm wondering why many of the people who automatically doubt the validity of Field Reports don't also at least question these kinds of stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:28 PM
11

/r/thathappened BP users question the validity of field reports and rightly so. Why do they not question "stories" such as this?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:15 PM
1

But it's not very often I see on TRP an argument that a wealthy 25 year old male has more SMV than a wealthy 35 year old male. whats the ratio of wealthy 35 year old males to wealthy 25 year old males? I would think many 25 year old males that have a chance to be wealthy would likely still be in school or just finished. After paying any debts, not much time to accumulate "wealth"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 03:24 PM
1

since the sub consistently rails against double standards that benefit women. Can you give some examples of which double standards that they rail against you had in mind?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 03:10 PM
3

usually happens when they want validation that their argument was "better" than the RP argument
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 02:28 PM
3

I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of accounts were TRP men on alts. This is pretty dumb. Do you have any proof? I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of TBP accounts were women on alts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 02:21 PM
2

???? I said nothing about a women's partner count.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/14 07:44 PM
1

Even if they do shame them, they are not demanding them to be discontinued and replaced. There is a difference. A desire is different from a demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/14 06:50 PM
3

??? We're talking about broader networks. "Old school ties" and cutting deals on the golf course are with people generally in the same network. What is preventing these women from expanding their network to people of lower status? That's the question. Or do women only want to associate with people of higher status once they themselves are high status?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/14 05:46 PM
3

Along the same lines, men are typically more aggressive when negotiating starting salaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/14 05:44 PM
7

It's definitely both or are you willing to tell me that most men are happy and content being the one making less, less educated, less socially important and that it's only women to blame for the status quo dynamic? I'd say its both but I'd lean towards women don't like men below their level, just as I'd say you lean the other way. I dont know of any studies or proof of this so I'd say we're at an impasse. Men of that caliber do have broader networks within their network This is what you said. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 07:00 PM
10

And more importantly people date within their network. A woman who is a doctor most likely goes to happy hours with other doctors, lawyers, i-bankers, serial entrepreneurs, etc... She would have to try hard to date out of her network. Men of that caliber do have broader networks within their network, meaning they won't just date the people they meet at happy hours or social events. They'll go to the strip club and fall for the dancer with the "heart of gold." They'll flirt with the cocktail wait…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 03:33 PM
0

That probably would have worked way better. Search for "Study" in the search bar for Ppd and you'll come across the previous discussions that have gone on for 1 study at a time. If you're really interested in them, you'll find some good discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 03:00 PM
1

What a surprise. A BPer cherry picking out of context statements? no! They've been posted here before, one or two at a time. try searching for them and you might find them. But if you really don't care, I don't see how that would make a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 02:37 PM
1

I agree, I'm just trying to point out the contradiction from the person I was replying to.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 02:25 PM
2

Then read a few lol. Looks like you haven't even read 1 yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 02:24 PM
3

In which world does many=3? In any case, the OP keeps changing parts of her story. I'd take this whole post with a large grain of salt.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 02:23 PM
2

I'd be very happy to see some of the papers that prove red pill logic. I have access to most major journals, so you can't just give me the citations if you can't find publicly available papers. WTF lol. Doesn't sound like you are very happy to see some of the papers. Why even ask if you're not invested enough to read through a couple? Its not his job to read it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 02:04 PM
2

Are you saying that these RP are lying when they say they don't want LTR's? I've heard many BP scoff at the idea of RP guys knowing women's thoughts better than women. Is that not what you are doing here? Or are you not that bothered by TRP believing they know women's thoughts better than women?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 02:44 AM
2

I prefer ketchup to mayonnaise, but I'm not demanding all mayonnaise go be put out of stock and discontinued to be completely replaced with ketchup. Are you saying that RP is demanding sluts to be discontinued and replaced? If so, can you show some evidence that this is the consensus?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/14 06:37 PM
0

But does each and every recipe build on all the other recipes? You could stretch and probably say they could. Just like you could stretch and say that all red pill concepts build on all the other ones. I don't agree with either. If you're desperate enough, you can fit anything under "ideology." At some point, the comparison becomes meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/14 01:14 AM
0

not sure how familiar you are with cooking but there are plenty of concepts that are related and that definitely carry over from recipe to recipe. Things like making a roux or a waghar in italian and indian foods. Even things like understanding heat/boiling water/oil all are related from recipe to recipe.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/14 12:28 AM
2

Gotta watch out for the crazies. yes...yes you do...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/14 12:10 AM
3

I would give up dude...I think she just wants to be outraged at something. Since she can't really be mad about your original point, she's just turning this into "you hate religion."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/14 07:23 PM
16

I think one thing people forget is that being a hypocrite doesn't necessarily make you wrong, just less credible. For example, a mass murderer telling you that killing someone is bad and you shouldn't do it would be a hypocrite, but he wouldn't really be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/14 03:27 PM
1

Right, and no one is forced to accept this whole rp framework that you talk about. That is what we were talking about. You can pick and choose. Or you can take none of it like you have done. Its obvious that someone who mostly agrees with RP would want to be accepted within the RP Framework. Whats up for discussion is the people who are in the middle or who don't agree. None of these people are "forced to accept the RP Framework."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 10:53 PM
1

But to exist and be accepted within the RP framework you are forced. And that's what I was talking about. Why would someone who disagrees and dislikes the RP want this? You dislike TRP and think its wrong. Why are you trying to be accepted within the RP framework? TRP says that doing xyz will make you more successful with women. If you don't agree with what they say, great! Go along your merry way or call them out if you wish. Many people agree and disagree with parts of TRP, myself included. I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 05:01 AM
1

Right and thats fine. But you agree that no one is forcing people to change or read or even understand TRP, correct? That was what we were talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 01:32 AM
1

Right. So if thats not for you....get out. Why are you even getting into posting and reading the sidebar. It should be very obvious from the start if TRP is for you or not. Why are you denying peoples agency. People can make their own choices. I don't understand, do people just keep reading and following something they dislike and disagree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 01:25 AM
1

TRP makes it very clear that if you aren't that image of masculinity/dominance you need to change yourself to fit that role if you want any hope with women I said this to you earlier but, The message I always got was if what you're doing so far hasn't worked, we recommend this. If you don't like it, don't use it and leave. Is TRP forcing anyone to read their sub. Is it forcing people to change if they want any hope with women? TRP just has its own ideas of what will work and what won't, you can …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 01:13 AM
0

I agree, I just don't think TRP tells you to not be yourself or change your "inner self"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 06:43 PM
1

Kind of. I'm thinking about how this relates to TRP and I don't really think TRP tells people to change their "inner self". extreme changes in interests or preferences I lose and gain interest in things all the time. I don't really agree that this is changing your inner self. People just get bored of things. We already talked about preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 06:42 PM
1

So now I'm a little confused on what changing your inner self could mean. Can you give me some examples of someone changing their inner self?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 06:29 PM
1

Okay so changing your preferences can mean changing your values as well. That differs from what you said above. I don't think changing your preferences is. Do you think going from someone who is not confident to someone who is confident is considered changing your inner self?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 06:19 PM
1

I wasn't really presupposing what you were in either direction. The message I always got was if what you're doing so far hasn't worked, we recommend this. If you don't like it, don't use it and leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 06:16 PM
1

Theres got to be a reason your preferences change. Are women near the wall who all of a sudden want beta men just changing their preferences or are they changing their values as well. Doesn't seem like that small of a change to just be a "preference"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 06:09 PM
0

I agree and thats the impression I've gotten from TRP. I never understood why people thought TRP recommends to change values.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 06:06 PM
1

Is changing your preferences considered changing your inner self? I'd consider that to be so
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 05:51 PM
1

It means you should be able to adapt when dating, since you never know what combination of preferences your potential partner will have. Sounds like the opposite of being yourself. This is what babyguineapig defined it as: Being yourself doesn't mean not making the best of yourself; it just means working with what you've got, rather than abandoning personal integrity in an effort to shoehorn oneself into a preconceived notion of what is desirable. Are you advocating dropping your personal integr…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 03:32 PM
2

Yes, because you've never seen it, it doesn't exist. The recent Ray Rice situation is a pretty good example. Media in the US was constantly talking about how we should be teaching boys not to hit girls. It wasn't teach kids not to hit each other, or teach boys not to hit boys. It was very specifically teach boys not to hit girls. Similar situation where Hope Solo has been accused of domestic violence against her sister and nephew is allowed to play and represent the US National team while she is…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/14 02:42 PM
10

yes, because nowadays, the only way you can learn these things is through feminism!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/14 02:34 PM
9

So you don't like when people take what you say literally? :P
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/14 02:28 PM
3

1 in 3 children is molested. Most offenders are male. You do the maths. got a source on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 11:24 PM
2

?? Did you read my comment. I said most people would be okay with fighting for equal rights. Nowadays people consider voting to be a right. May not have been a right way back when but it is now. I'll say it again, nobody has a problem with feminism fighting for equal rights. It's when they're fighting for privileges that people tend to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 11:23 PM
2

Not really about others committing a felony. Maybe im underestimating how mature/responsible 12 year olds are but I wouldn't trust one to have to make decisions travelling alone. Mostly issues of a kid being careless, inexperienced, not very knowledgeable, panicking, etc. Some kids are more responsible and would probably be okay, especially those that have traveled often. The average 12 year old? I dont know.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 06:19 PM
1

would it not also make sense to notify the OP of the other thread about the question format? Or do you think that other one has a question to debate/discuss?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 06:02 PM
1

likely because phones auto-capitalize first letters in sentences.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 03:00 PM
5

Voting is more of a right not a privilege. Most people don't have a problem with feminists fighting for equal rights especially nowadays in third world countries where some women don't have those rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 02:43 PM
6

I probably wouldn't be comfortable with my 12 year old daughter or son travelling unaccompanied in the first place. Would others here be okay with that? I'm kind of curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 02:38 PM
1

Anti-heros aren't villains. They are just flawed heros. . Not necessarily. Obviously they're not villains. Who said they were. But they're not just flawed heroes. Antiheroes have very specific "flaws." Heroes can also be flawed. In fact, tragic heroes always have a flaw (or a series of flaws). Just wondering if you noticed that you contradicted yourself very specifically. But antiheroes are not villains. Antiheroes are heroes with flaws. Was reading through the thread and these two responses wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/14 12:56 AM
1

In this case, the other professors in the rest of the states wouldn't have had a chance, so really you mean 88 out of total # of professors at Duke University. In either case, even 1 professor signing something like that is ridiculous. Why are 88 scholarly individuals who are presumably near the top of their fields okay with signing a something like that without due process. This is at one of the best universities in the country. Its troubling to me that 88 professors don't care for due process.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/14 07:43 PM
-1

Well then why are you asking this question? I did not ask. I'm merely pointing out that surveys aren't really proof. Even had I asked, that would still be the case. Also if you're going cite "surveys", the general courtesy is to actually link to them. Don't ask for something that you won't accept proof of. I asked for proof. I didn't ask for a half assed survey that is not based on science or facts. If you don't accept surveys as valid then there is no way to assess something not reported offici…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/14 07:21 PM
-1

Aren't surveys notoriously bad sources? People lie on them all the time and they're nowhere near being scientific. So you are simply throwing out this statement: That rape is underreported? No. There are lots of women who have been raped and have not come forward to authorities. Even more men probably. Without any proof. I can also make up claims to support me and cite "surveys."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/14 06:45 PM
3

Its interesting, I've seen it here plenty of times where RP guys will complain about the women around them. People will tell him if he's having problems with everyone around him, its probably him that's the problem. No one assumes the girls around him are the problem. I've seen this saying used in other completely unrelated subreddits too. I don't know if I necessarily agree with it or not but its interesting to think about. People just automatically assign blame to the person who has the proble…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/14 03:32 PM
12

The gay guys i've met aren't "bitchy, queeny," theyre just normal guys who happen to like other guys. Sounds like you're using gay as an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 04:38 PM
2

this is a pretty dumb argument. He's saying that the OP's argument cant really be trusted as that of an expert because the OP has taken a single class in college. What does the guy who pointed this out's age matter? Besides, being a hypocrite doesn't mean you're wrong, it just gives you less credibility. If a mass murderer tells you that murder is bad, he'd be a hypocrite but he wouldn't be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 01:42 AM
1

I was merely pointing out your errors with the job market. You don't get rid of an employee immediately because of a single flaw, just like you wouldn't get rid of a fwb because of a single outburst.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/14 05:55 PM
3

This is exactly what employers do when they're reasonably confident they can find another employee who is happy to work at that pay. It sounds like you have no work experience when you make a statement like this. It's much cheaper for employers to keep their current employees than hire new ones. There's a significant time and labor cost to finding, training, and getting new employees up to speed. Also an old employee is a known vs a new employee who may or may not be as good as the old. you're a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/14 02:08 PM
1

I wasn't referring to one-itis. I was referring to the situation where a guy tries to have sex with a girl in the hopes that it will convince her into a LTR in the future. I even quoted the relevant part in my post above so there wouldn't be confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/14 07:41 PM
3

Yes I agree with this. To expand on this, I believe people who are more aggressive are likely to get a higher offer when negotiating salary with potential employers. I believe in general men are more aggressive and are therefore more likely to negotiate a higher salary.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/14 02:33 PM
1

Never said it was proof. I didn't even say it was the majority. I said "a lot." And the thing about TRP Field Reports is that they use that as fact. I'm simply offering perspective, which is the exact word I use in my OP. Sure but you made a claim in your OP that this is something that happens a lot. I think of a lot as more than a majority, as something that's commonplace. You didn't say it was an opinion. I simply asked you for a source for your claim. I'm sure the people who write field repor…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/14 08:45 PM
0

If I showed you a field report from TRP and said this was proof that something was common place, would you believe me? Probably not. Why should I believe your anecdote happens "a lot"? Essentially don't fuck a girl you have feelings for unless you're sure it's going to be a relationship. My comment above addresses this. People don't realize or think they have feelings beforehand but develop feelings afterwards. That is not the same as fucking a girl you have feelings for in the hope of it becomi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/14 07:19 PM
0

So no, you don't have proof. I think what you're describing is more people agreeing to just sex beforehand, and then developing feelings afterwards. I think thats fairly different from guys "leading with sex in order to lock her down."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/14 07:06 PM
-1

There a lot of men who lead with sex with hopes of "locking her down" as well. Source? I'm pretty skeptical of this statement and I think you're throwing it around so that it makes things "even" with what women do. Do you have any proof for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/14 06:31 PM
6

No offence... but what women on reddit say they do and what the vast majority of women actually do are two very different things. It would be like going on a random pet forum and asking "are you cruel to animals?". No one would go on there and say "yeah, i fucking hate cats and treat them like shit!". So, the answers you'll get will be far from representative of life/culture in general, and that's not even going into the type of women who are crass, condescending, hurtful or spiteful towards men…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/14 02:53 PM
3

I've always thought that there should be a minimum comment karma requirement (100 points?) or a minimum account length (3 months?) before people should be allowed to comment here. It'll get rid of the more obvious trolls and hopefully lead to less to circlejerking. Won't solve anything but its better than nothing. I don't think this will happen though because the mods have said they also like to use alt accounts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/14 01:50 PM
1

It shows them doing that to one couple, and the guy was pissed. The guy was pissed, but the girl didn't care. If I saw that someone was clearly upset with the decision I was about to make, Id probably not do it. Especially as insignificant as this was. She could have also asked for him to come with. You don't think the guy could have gotten her number, take her out, etc if he wanted?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/14 04:15 PM
1

you're 22 years old and you make 90k/year? What do you do for a living?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/14 04:13 PM
0

The point is that men do see girls under the age of consent as attractive. In many places this age changes. Sometimes its 18, sometimes 16, and according to some people here, its 14 in their countries. It's generally not acceptable to talk about this in other places but men do think young women are the most attractive. Perhaps you disagree but thats the stated opinion and I think its okay to have that opinion. He wasn't saying things that were "wrong." He just phrased it in a crude way that he k…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 01:15 AM
0

What are your opinions on this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSLg4FshnlA Similar to the story above but the guy at the beginning asks a girl who's obviously with someone if she wants to go in the lambo with him. She ditches her bf? to go with random dude in lambo. Also later a girl pretends to not know english until she sees he has a lambo.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 01:09 AM
1

A similar type thing happened in a video shot in america. The guy specifically went after girls that were already with guys. The girls still went with him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSLg4FshnlA
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 01:03 AM
-1

Did you make an honest attempt at reading his comment? Did you read the context of his comment and the rest of the thread? If you're seriously interesting in knowing what the point was I'll try and answer but if you're just trolling to try and win an argument, its not worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 06:32 PM
0

The point is that he was being hyperbolic to a point because its funny when you get reactions out of people. He made a point, then exaggerated it. I don't know why you're confused, he basically admitted it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 05:50 PM
1

?? I was specifically talking about the comment the OP posted about and the comments below it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 05:26 PM
3

Some additional comments from the OP: That being said, maybe its possible some other guy was talking about me with him? Weve been together for six months, and am plannign to get married soon. Ive always wanted to have kids, i have this motherly instinct inside me haha. Hes a software engineer or something like that earning 100k/year, so its not as if they wont be well looked after! She doesn't know what her fiance does for a living? I sorta do have a shallow view of sex, I dont think its too spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 05:24 PM
1

Sure but the conversation started because i was offering it as another possibility, when you originally didn't even consider it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 04:36 PM
0

He was saying that he knew he'd get a reaction from the BP crowd for saying what he did. It's funny cause its very predictable and he knows people will be outraged and its funny to see it happen as it has right here. Its like you got baited into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 04:35 PM
1

Now its in their nature and not from society? I don't see any proof that society has influenced women to be less risky.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 04:24 PM
0

it was a joke. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 03:20 PM
4

He derived it directly from your title.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 03:16 PM
0

Or cause the poster the person who posted it was wrong? Its possible he thinks the average age of menstruation is 14. He's wrong but it could be what he thinks. Why not take his word for the age he prefers instead of guessing? He LITERALLY says the ages that he prefers but you ignore that in favor of an offhand comment? This makes no sense to me. Why would you ignore what he directly says?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 02:45 PM
-1

You did not answer any of the questions I asked. Why is there a need to logically deduce something from a "witty" phrase meant partially as a joke, when he directly states the ages he prefers and why he prefers them. When somebody says, "I would kill for some water right now", do you logically deduce that they would murder someone because they're thirsty?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 02:36 PM
1

You learning to be risk averse is not the fault of society, you have complete control over how much risk you are wiling to take. Society is not stopping you from taking more or less risk. How is society stopping women from taking more risks/working longer hours?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 02:34 PM
0

Im confused, He also said: So they state 14-22 and 18-24 as what men find attractive. Why is there a need to logically deduce something from a "witty" phrase meant partially as a joke, when he directly states the ages he prefers and why he prefers them. Why are you reading things so literally. When somebody says, "I would kill for some water right now", do you logically deduce that they would murder someone because they're thirsty?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 02:30 PM
1

Even if it is a learned behavior, thats not a societal barrier. Thats a personal barrier that you have to work on.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 02:05 AM
1

Given the relative parity of the gender ratio there must be a factor which accounts for the disparity. I'm providing a possible factor for why women have "lesser access". Its also part of the "wage gap" myth. Many on here choose the "patriarchy" as a possible factor. Or they say its discrimination. I think being risk-averse is the more likely option especially in today's world. You can see it in action because those women who are willing to put in the extra work and risk required, do make it to …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/14 03:32 PM
1

Either men have greater access, women have lesser, or even both, but barring extreme coincidence there is something behind it You're discounting a factor. Women in general have less of a desire to gain power. It is not easy to get into positions of power like congress and executive positions. It involves a lot of risk, and failing can punish you harder than average, regular jobs. Also requires a lot more time and effort. I believe women in general are less prone to risk taking (which makes them …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/14 01:01 AM
2

hes a mormon, unlikely he was intimate with any. Why follow his advice when he has no experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 01:51 PM
2

Yes, I come from a different cultural background where parents generally don't abandon kids at the age of 18 or 21, but kids also take care of their parents when their parents retire. My parents will never live in a retirement home. The reason you take loans is so you don't have to work 24 hours a week while working. 20 hours a week is considered part time. I worked 10 hours a week. Loans also help you so you don't have to stretch to "afford books/rent/tuition" I also mentioned that had my paren…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/14 12:55 PM
1

I think frats/sororities were more expensive at my school because you had to pay for living in the house + pay fees to the sorority/fraternity. Not sure what you're talking about with pyschology, you never mentioned anything about psychology before. If you say it takes 5-6 years to graduate from your schools I don't know what to say. No one I know has needed that long to graduate. I'm sure those people exist but that still blows my mind. Especially with AP classes nowadays, it should be fairly e…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/14 05:15 AM
1

If you're switching majors thats on you. Nobody said it was a good idea to switch majors and take way more classes than necessary. Thats poor decision making by you. Don't put the blame on that for anybody else. Its unfortunate that kids have to choose their futures by 18 but that's life. I do not believe a "vast majority" of college kids switch majors. do you have any proof for this? I've seen people switch majors. They still graduate on time. Its cause most classes at the beginning, are genera…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/14 02:49 AM
1

I would say you're more the outlier than I am. Most people that attend university do not have serious medical conditions that require them to withdraw in the middle of school. You don't have to be able to afford in state tuition. You take the loans you need, and pay them back after school. If you go into a meaningful career that has job opportunities, pays decently well, and you save your money, you should have no trouble paying off your debts. I also worked all 4 years for 10 hours a week which…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 08:53 PM
4

AHAHAHAHAHAHHA. Okay, keep in mind that my laughter is at my own current situation and every other person I know my age (mid-late 20s). I hate to be a black cloud over your near future, but unless things change drastically in the next few years, that's a fucking joke. I can tell you're 18 and I don't mean that as an insult. I went to an in-state public university for 4 years and I was able to pay off my debt after about a year of working. Thats the only thing that I really spent my money on and …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 12:51 AM
3

Isn't that like the most famous scene from that movie?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/14 03:32 AM
2

Im saying the person you replied to asked you a question, and you replied with attacking the person instead of addressing the points the user brought up. I'm asking why you're a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/14 01:36 PM
1

I was hoping the debate might move towards an area where I could suggest an alternate way of figuring out mating mechanics (my idea is one that has both genders present, not only male or only female), because I thought it was interesting. I like thinking about things. I like debating. It has happened so little on here I'm now just blurting out my theories because it's like nobody knows what I was trying to say and immediately I was getting non-debate responses. It's better than being called fat …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/14 12:11 AM
3

The subreddit in specific was built up by RPS. The ideas all came before him and have been around for awhile.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/14 12:18 AM
3

I don't see any proof that you got banned for any specific comment. All I see is that you got banned, and a screenshot of an exchange. How is this proof that you were banned for that exchange?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/14 12:05 AM
4

Are you serious? Why would the president's opinions matter when discussing the USA? He makes decisions for America as a country. You can't see why the opinions of the person who makes decisions for the country matter? Do you actually believe this? You don't think his opinions affect his decision making? His decisions which stem from his opinions could affect my life. "RPS's decisions" do not. What decisions is RPS making for Red Pill as a group? How are these affecting my life in any way?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/14 12:01 AM
6

You didn't address the reason why the points I brought up matter. Why do his opinions mean anything? He doesn't speak for individuals. This isn't some religion where hes the pope. He's in charge of the subreddit. The president does speak for the US. Why should we focus on his opinions?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 11:43 PM
3

If you're gonna be dishonest, I don't see it as worthwhile continuing this. He's also banned here so I guess we'll never know. Do you have any proof that you were banned for disagreeing?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 11:40 PM
2

Did you read the thread I linked? It clearly shows that that is not what he thinks regarding marital rape. And if you're in doubt, why not ask him? And thats an rok article. not a post by rps.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 11:17 PM
5

It matters because his opinions hold no sway over mine. I might agree/disagree with him but I hardly ever interact with him. I don't see why focusing on his opinions makes any sense. I couldn't even tell you what his opinions are. People can read and decide for themselves if they agree with him or not. People have agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 11:16 PM
4

What crazy views? The OP of the last thread never backed up his statements with proof. When he did attempt to in the comments, he was very obviously disproven. The premise of that post was off. It was a leading question. Its like if I ask you, "Does your mother know you murdered two children?". http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2bf1h8/controversial_opinions_of_uredpillschool_trp_head/cj4py8q http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2bf1h8/controversial_opinions_of_uredpi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 11:09 PM
3

I didn't see any debate. This is what /u/nicethingyoucanthave said in that thread said: No, it's not, actually. You have stated no point of view. There is nothing to debate. "I think that guy is wrong" is not a topic for debate. You can reframe it as "Resolved: (view opposing the guy I think is wrong) is right" asking a question is not the same thing as debating.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 10:52 PM
6

The difference is the president was voted in. Nobody chose to have RPS be in charge of the subreddit. He just happens to be the one who made the subreddit and is in charge. Anyone can make a subreddit and become a "leader."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 10:47 PM
9

I remember back when he was on ppd, he wasn't really saying stuff that was too crazy, but some of the BP people that followed him around trying to harass sounded nuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 08:04 PM
2

So what is the point of this? Nearly everyone talks about politics. Does any sub that mentions anything political mean they are considered political in nature? If something is partially political, does that mean it is political in nature? If people share the same values, does that mean they are political?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/14 11:24 PM
2

So if something has any political element at all, it is completely political? That would mean nearly every sub would be considered political. Why is The blue pill political? It's linked on /r/conservative[1] , a political sub. Its introduction addresses feminism, political correctness, and other political view points. Isn't it linked to /r/conservative against their wishes? And really, not liking political correctness means you are political? can you be any more disingenuous? Because it has the …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/14 10:58 PM
5

This: I don't think TRP is a philosophy or an ideology, or if it is, it is a very disjointed one. Doesn't match with what you said earlier. I would argue that TRP is not an academic philosophy, but instead an ideology. How do you match these 2 conflicting beliefs? What is its political bent, and how is it enforced? Edit: I was just answering your question: You don't think TRP is political?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/14 07:53 PM
4

Not really, you mentioned above that TRP says men "should" be masculine and women "should" be feminine. I don't really read it that way. I've always read it as, you will be more successful in general if as a man you are more masculine. Not people "should" do this or that. They're not attempting to change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/14 07:40 PM
-1

You led with your assumption. Like if I made a post, "Why is TBP full of hate?"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/14 07:30 PM
1

Rules for Posting: 2 Titles should be as neutral as possible
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/14 07:22 PM
6

OP's comment in the thread It's not normal. For the most part of our relationship, we averaged 3-5 times a week I'd say? Including a non-recipricated blowjob thrown in here and there. A few months ago I looked in the mirror and didn't like what I saw. I looked horrible naked and none of my clothes fit nicely, I had a muffin top. I've been trying to eat better and go to the gym ever since. My weekday routine has been shower, go to work, get off at 4pm, go home and cook dinner, go to the gym, watc…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 08:34 PM
6

?? the whole point of his communication in this instance is because communicating verbally didn't work. The likely reason he chose this method was because the first failed. In either case we don't really know.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 07:19 PM
6

We're only hearing one side of the story. I wouldn't assume he didn't try to communicate. I'm sure he tried communicating his frustrations before and when she disagreed/responded with apathy/didn't believe him, he then thought to get proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 06:34 PM
3

You get called out as a hypocrite, so you change the subject. okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 02:04 PM
3

Do you not understand subtelty? Do i have to qualify every statement as "in my opinion" or "in general" in order to make a statement? You made just as many statements as I did without adding "in my experience" People are attracted to physical aesthetics. And then after that, they're attracted to mentality. There are plenty of men who will find the first woman sexier. Some men admire competency. It's not the $dollar signs$ that makes a person more attractive. It's the level of competency. You did…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 07:15 PM
2

yes, a false dichotomy is clearly the answer. please imply more that my experiences are bad while your experiences are legit lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 07:01 PM
1

So I don't know if I agree with you that men aren't attracted to intellect/competency. It hasn't been my experience relationship wise/and via my friend's relationships. Its the strawmen that are a problem. Did you read what I said? Something something reading comprehension. I believe someone in here mentioned something about not understanding nuance and subtlety... I even specifically added in the qualifier so you wouldn't say this. A women's financial success will not influence his initial attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 05:42 PM
2

You're getting way ahead of yourself, when meeting girls, the first thought in their mind is not how will life be if they married. A women's financial success will not influence his initial attraction to her nearly as much as a guys financial success will influence her initial attraction to him. I think the disconnect is that I'm talking about initially meeting/seeing/learning about someone. In those moments, a womens financial ability will not make her more attractive. Maybe after dating for a …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 05:20 PM
1

I don't agree. Most men care much less about a women's income, than a man does about a women's income. I think when looking at LTR, most men just care that a women is a functional, independent adult. Being a doctor doesn't really make a women significantly more attractive than being a nurse. A guy being a doctor rather than a nurse will make him much more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 05:03 PM
5

I think almost everyone agrees the right amout of confidence is whats attractive. In trying to achieve that level, some will overcompensate. I think its better to overcompensate than under compensate. What the women in that thread seem to be attracted to is guys who have "overcompensated" levels of confidence. People see this and want to emulate it. What it says is that women prefer overconfidence to underconfidence. You don't see as many women secretly admitting to shamedly being attracted to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 10:24 PM
3

I was just pointing out that you can't conclude that she actively dates that type, just that we know she is aware of being attracted to that type. Part of the reasoning behind TRP is that women are attracted to those types. Maybe they won't get into a LTR but chances of being a ONS or just being wanted in general go up. People like to feel wanted and attractive. I'm not sure I'd feel that great if someone I was dating wasn't really that attracted to me. Its much easier getting into a relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 07:44 PM
5

wait, which specific comment are you talking about, I was just replying to the last commenters point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 07:13 PM
9

Apparently, she hates dating people with a personality trp would advocate. It's a negative experience for her. Why doesn't she, I dunno, stop dating those people. lol. I wouldn't start dating someone who's personality I hated and even if I got into a relationship with them and found out I hated their personality, I would just leave. But for whatever reason she continues to date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 05:20 PM
0

This is PPD not RP. Also a lot of people use guy and person interchangeably. In fact even when im referring to a group of girls, ill often say "you guys"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/14 07:07 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1ypciu/iama_bp_male_ama/ this also came up when i searched for an ama in the bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/14 06:54 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1ywzsv/i_am_a_heterosexual_woman_ama/ this is what stillveryalive was talking about. I think it kind of failed cause OP kinda dodged questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/14 04:56 PM
1

again you're being disingenuous. Can you read the whole conversation? The discussion was about physical labor jobs. I said men are more capable than women at doing those jobs. I didn't say anything about being mentally inferior. I have no idea what your last paragraph is about. When men like bill gates, mark zuckerberg, and Steve Jobs, started their businesses, they worked around the "old boys club". They built themselves up from the bottom. That whole thread started because I wanted opinions on…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/14 03:17 AM
1

The question was why aren't more women becoming more entrepreneurs. I presented contrary evidence, and now the goalposts are changing. "Yeah, well sure, they're entrepreneurs, but they aren't developing mid-sized businesses." You're being disingenuous, the discussion by exner was that women have a difficult time being executives because the environment is that of "an old boys club". When I asked why aren't there more entrepreneurs, I didn't literally mean small business owners. Do I have to spel…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/14 06:57 PM
1

i meant stopped as in stopped having affairs behind her back. He still wants to be with someone else, his wife just knows about it and hes being upfront. I dont know why he won't divorce either. A lot of his post is very confusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/14 01:46 PM
1

we've had this discussion before on ppd. this statement was interesting to me: What's interesting is that 88.3% of these business are non-employer firms. So it appear there is a trend of female entrepreneurship, but that these women are most interested in working for themselves, than trying to build small and mid-sized companies. So yeah, they're willing to create start-up small businesses, but not as willing to grow their businesses into companies and/or corporations. The old boys club isn't go…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/14 01:43 PM
2

Well his choices are divorce/not divorce. If he divorces without her consent, things don't go well for her. (He wants her consent before divorcing for w/e reason) He can see who he wants without cheating. If he divorces with her consent, everything is fine, he can see who he wants. She's not consenting to divorce. If he doesn't divorce, he fulfills his wifes wishes, but he's not happy in the marriage and cheats anyway, his wife knows about it and is ok? with it. if he doesnt divorce, he fulfills…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 08:02 PM
6

In the comments he says this about divorce: It's a long story, if she consent and we do this amicably, she'll be better off financially and it will give her an easier way to transition from being married for 15+ years to being divorced. That's why I am doing what I am doing now, I checked myself out of the marriage, we're not filing because of her convenience but I don't feel any obligations to the marriage anymore; I am treating her and my lover just like 2 plates. I don't know enough about div…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 07:46 PM
0

He also said he stopped once he swallowed the red pill: I have swallowed the Red Pill and I have realized that having affairs is not a way to cope with a bad marriage, even one where I love loved my wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 07:35 PM
6

I don't know too much about dread nor do I really care about it but this part that he said seems relevant: Will she leave me? Maybe. I don't care, I've told her that I want a divorce but she won't agree (long story). If she gives me the ultimatum "me or her" I will just remind her that I've asked her for a divorce long time and multiple times, she just need to agree to it and we both walk away. If he wants to leave but she won't allow for a divorce, I'm not sure why she'd be surprised that he'd …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 07:30 PM
0

I want to avoid that debate as much as possible to be honest, because it's messy But all the messy things are the most fun to talk about. the recipient of advances is the "gatekeeper" to sex and the initiator is either accepted or rejected by the recipient. Do you think in the western world, more often than not, women are the recipients and men are the initiators?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 09:26 AM
0

Did you not read? I said: probably every single culture? I added the probably to leave some room for error. Which cultures have the majority of women being the ones who ask men out or who initiate relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 09:23 AM
2

a cultural thing? In probably every single culture? doesn't that speak to a larger trend than just culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/14 06:48 PM
6

TBP clearly dislikes TPR/RPW. There can be almost no good from BPers posting on these subs. I don't really have a problem with banning people who they themselves claim they hate you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 07:17 PM
2

lol you're not gonna get an answer. They'll just avoid and dodge your questions rather than admit you have a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/14 07:54 PM
3

Do you think you could have had dating success just by improving yourself and still being your initial/default personality? Just a side not but your mentality is not the same as your personality. When improving myself, my personality didn't really change, but my outlook and focus did. I was still the same person, it was more how I presented myself as a person that changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 04:54 PM
3

I mentioned two prospects, not "so many" and the limiting factor is more likely to be time and money, not amounts of girls. Are you worried the single mother won't have time for you? Test that, who knows But I'd rather test that with women with no kids than I would with women with children. Sure it could work out with single mothers, but its far more likely for me to have a relationship with single women that I'd rather try a relationship with a single women. If it doesn't work out, I wouldn't t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 02:28 PM
4

Just put yourself out there with an open mind and see where things are going as they go, don't try to predict the future with some superstitious signs. The way I see it is that I'm not trying to predict the future, I'm giving myself the best chance. For example, If there were two women I was interested in dating, one a single mother and one just single, I'd try dating the single one first. It could work out with the single mother but chances are its more likely to work out with the girl that is …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 01:40 PM
4

Fair enough. I've seen it here plenty of times where people will get offended by things and be hyper sensitive to what people write, like the story with cats and dogs. I can't understand how that happens and was curious about the mindset. I'm also not sure why someone saying one is "winning" at relationships is the worst thing in the world. You could ask the OP but im fairly sure he didnt mean it as relationships are literally a competition between man and women. I could be wrong though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 02:03 AM
4

The original quote was this the TRP, PUA inspired, Dark Triad emulating, manipulative power play will be the way to win. I linked you to the other thread because I think you took it too sensitively. I read it as as "TRP is a way to win" = "TRP is a way to succeed", not literally that relationships are a game. You took it very literally for some reason. Were you really offended by his comments? Why were you offended? edit: I should say, why did you read it so literally?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 01:37 AM
6

you may be interested in this post: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/29i5rz/ideology_and_compromise/ specifically this part: Another comment, which inspired this topic is this one (linked)[3] . I made an offhand comment that may have inadvertently compared men and women to cats and dogs, to make a point about how meaningless it was to me to compare them in terms of "overall superiority". I was considering using the other idiom "comparing apples and oranges", but thought "cats vs…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 01:08 AM
1

hmm I tried but I don't think you even read it. You didn't respond to it either. You were trying to equate me to "women bashing". http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/298hen/which_trp_which_tbp/ciiuh3d
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 06:06 PM
3

I think that nearly everyone picks this sort of stuff up on their own, which leads me to believe that a lot of trpers might suffer from some form of autism. Do you have any evidence backing this up? I think most Americans are not very fit and most don't care for it. Here are some stats on it: http://www.fitness.gov/resource-center/facts-and-statistics/ More than 80% of adults do not meet the guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities, and more than 80% of adolescents do not …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 03:23 PM
1

The hostile attitude are towards men and women at different times. Neither really bother me. I explained to you why certain things TRP offers can't be found elsewhere? Do you accept those reasons or reject them?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 03:20 PM
1

its not. Why does it bother you so much? Did any of my explanations make sense on why TRP is different? I was interested in knowing whether you actually wanted to know or were just trying to catch me without any explanation?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 08:42 PM
0

You do not have to subscribe to comment. You can go on the mobile site or you can have RES and uncheck the "use subreddit style" button. Either way, that is not a citation of how many non RP people are subscribed. please provide proof for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 08:39 PM
2

But even more importantly, business and politics are traditionally old boys clubs that cater to white men with money. Women and minorities have faced tremendous hurdles in these areas, which has more to do with the bias and discrimination of the "club members." If this is the case, why aren't there more women entrepreneurs? If they start and grow their own business/corporations, they don't have to deal with an "old boys club"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 08:37 PM
1

I think TRP was able to motivate me because it was a lot more harsh and lot more straight to the point. Other people kind of tell you offhand that its a good idea. When someone says things as bluntly and harshly as TRP, it kind of awakens your by angering you first and then forces you to reconsider. The motivation was for more than just getting fit. That was just the example I used. I told you above what TRP offers to me. Did you miss what I typed in my last reply? I explained what TRP offers th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 09:45 PM
0

That's not a citation nor is it a source. You made the claim, you back it up or give up the claim. I think its less than 1%. Do you think thats non-negligble? 1% would be about 600 users that are subscribed from the BP. not just users who visit the site.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 09:01 PM
-1

Add in the fact that a lot of TRP subscribers and viewers aren't red pill citation needed. sidenote: EDIT: For example. /r/formula1[1] has 60k subs and 400 viewing currently. I can count the number of F1 fans i know IRL on one hand and none of them subscribe to the subreddit. This is cause you're probably American. Formula1 far more popular outside of America.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 08:45 PM
2

Why are you changing the goalposts? You didn't respond to anything I said. Do you have an actual reply to mine above?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 08:43 PM
1

Let me know when the establishment stops being an old boys club so they can. If thats the current establishment, why don't more women go into entrepreneurship? They ARE going to contribute, Not every degree is useful. Lots of people graduating with humanity degrees isn't as useful as fewer people graduating with engineering degrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 08:33 PM
1

I mean you told me getmotivated was a replacement for the self improvement aspects of TRP...which its not. Its a place for random quotes on a blurry background. I told you TRP helps you to motivate yourself into working on your fitness.../r/fitness does not... People go there when they're already motivated into working on fitness. I told you TRP is a place to talk about things unfiltered and talk about things that aren't politically correct and not usually talked about. TrollY is the equivalent …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 08:23 PM
3

This was posted in a thread the other day by fiatlux: That being said, results of technology are often completely different from expectations. Machines of burden were supposed to allow women to do more construction work. A free and open society with an advanced economy was supposed to allow men and women to do whatever they want regardless of gender roles. Turns out that not much changed, or they've been proceeding glacially. rest of the post here: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/commen…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 06:50 PM
1

Are you saying you wouldn't have thought of becoming fit or anything if no one had told you? You said your friends encouraged you to become fit though? I don't think so. I didn't start lifting till after I read TRP. I've always played sports, just never lifted. My friends wanted me to, I had no interest in it. So no I wouldn't have started lifting weights if I wasn't convinced. Most people aren't into lifting heavy weights. Again you mention issues. You're reading too much into it. By issues I m…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 06:20 PM
1

Self-improvement, dating advice (single/relationship/etc) or fitness advice can be found anywhere and guy talk isn't really an excuse either since there are subs for that as well. what does trp have that fitness or any of the other subs listed wouldn't? what does only trp seem to supply? Yes the how-to's can be found anywhere. A lot of the people that need this advice don't realize that they need it because no one really tells it to them plainly. TRP is really good at doing this. If you're alrea…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 05:58 PM
3

I think both are valuable but I also think men could do both. I don't think women would be capable of doing both. (Not that it really matters as this really hypothetical) This is really what I was asking. What do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 05:51 PM
4

Why do you disagree? Is it harder to be a caretaker? Would women be capable of doing the hard labor and physical jobs that are made up of mostly men?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 05:39 PM
1

I think you misunderstood, I'm with someone and don't really need the help. The "problems" I did have were fixed by reading through TRP and following some of the advice. I was speaking in general about guys that get help from TRP I don't really need advice on where I stand so rateme doesn't really do anything lol. I'm just explaining to you why most of the subs you recommended suck for someone that goes to TRP. Is there a reason you're painting me as someone who isn't capable of functioning with…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 05:27 PM
1

What about Dr.Nerdlove? I dunno. its blocked at work. trp isn't the only place in the universe you could have found "fitness is important". It's not. I've heard it from a lot of people. My friends had a phase where they got into fitness for awhile but I was never into it and they could never really get me to join in with them. But before, in my head I always wanted someone that wanted me as I was, not as someone different. I was always in good/average shape but I was never really muscular. TRP h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 04:43 PM
-3

I thought it was funny cause she was being hypocritical. She asked for a respectful discussion when not 5 minutes before she was disrespectful herself. I don't act snarky then tell someone else not to be snarky in the same breath.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 03:52 PM
-5

I ask this question in good faith and ask that the responses are in kind. your last 2 comments, snark and sarcasm: I made you a meme! I hope you like it! I advise walking away now, brave poster! Here be mealy-mouthed dragons! lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 03:31 PM
3

None of those things really point out to you what your problems are. I just looked at /r/getmotivated...its just a bunch of memes and pics. Please explain how this helps someone get motivated or improve themselves? TRP for me was very effective at getting me to improve myself and change some bad habits. None of these places really do that as well as TRP does. At least in my opinion. I went to /r/fitness and /r/gainit only after I was convinced after reading TRP how important fitness was. Trollyc…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 02:53 PM
1

Having something in common doesn't mean it has to distinguish itself. I think what draws people in to TRP is that theyre willing to talk about things that other people consider taboo. I don't agree with a lot of things said there which is why I don't go there too often anymore but I like the fact that politically incorrect topics are discussed there. I don't know a lot of places like that. Do you have any recommendations.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 02:43 PM
3

You didnt answer: Why does TRP have to distinguish itself? Its a forum on the internet. Do you tell every sub with a sidebar intro that it is a manifesto?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 02:34 PM
1

You still don't get it. Why does TRP have to distinguish itself? It's not trying to make money. Pizza hut has a goal of growing as a business. TRP has no such goal. Its a place to talk and help guys out. Please answer this. I'm not sure if you're being obtuse or not but yes TRP generally talks about "sexual strategy". This is what I meant by "stuff". Maybe I should have been more clear but I thought it was more obvious. Is there a published manifesto for TRP? An introduction to the sub in the fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 02:31 PM
0

I'm not sure I remember exactly, but didn't almost everyone disagree with that? It was heavily downvoted. Do you have a link to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 02:14 PM
4

Why does it have to be distinguished? I don't understand where you're going. Do you ask Pizza Hut how its distinguished from other other pizza places? There are ample places that serve pizza. Generally if you're new and you want to catch up, required reading should give you an understanding of what you're getting into. If you don't like it, then you know TRP is probably not the place for you. This seems like a fairly simple concept. I'm not sure why you're confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 02:12 PM
1

I told you above, to me red pill is a place for guys to talk about shit. Yes i'd imagine there are common "things" that RP guys would agree upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 01:57 PM
5

no ones moving goal posts if they all believe separate things. They're allowed to have different opinions from each other even if they both call themselves "Red Pill"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 01:51 PM
0

Thats the same thing as an FAQ or how askwomen has an "oft-queried" section. Theyre common things that people talk about or posts that have generated interest in the past. People just read and listen to what they want and add content/comments if they feel like it. They're not trying to be some uniform organization lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 01:40 PM
2

no shit. TRP isn't some course where you have to go in and memorize things, study all the material, then pass a test to become RP. Its mostly just guys talking about shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 12:50 PM
2

I meant the account was shadowbanned. I know you take it seriously. I think I wrote that to show that person was willing to doxx and was eventually banned for it. Howcome this thread got deleted? to try and move past this doxx thing or to hide it or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 05:38 PM
1

Holding information over someone and saying they could use that information but won't is threatening. Either way that user was banned for similar doxxing type issues. you can read more in this thread. http://redditlog.com/snapshots/753077 This is what the one threatened said "I didn't say they doxxed me, I said she threatened. She made it known to me that she had found my photobucket account (old and from 2004-07 and has pictures of me from H.S. when I was a minor) She also mentions finding my "…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 05:26 PM
2

this was a separate incident. http://redditlog.com/snapshots/753077 I think it says somewhere in that log that she was banned on her main account.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 05:10 PM
3

Sure, everyone has access to the CAN. Not everyone threatens with it. I don't think thats normal behavior. The person had access to publicly posted information, and stated that they would not doxx with it. Thats kind of like a mugger holding a hostage at gun point and saying they wont kill the hostage.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 04:52 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/user/theidesoflight http://i.imgur.com/2x56ffD.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 04:50 PM
2

Besides the one that was already banned of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 04:39 PM
2

That person doesn't seem hesitant at all to doxx someone. I think that user has been shadowbanned or just regularly banned from reddit for multiple doxxing incidents. Threatened to doxx someone. has information on the person. Doesn't seem like a stretch to say that they did/would doxx that person. and yeah that users account page no longer exists so banned. The person had access to publicly posted information, and stated that they would not doxx with it. Thats kind of like a mugger holding a hos…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 04:34 PM
3

I think its pretty common for most people to use the same username for multiple outlets. For ease, and cause people get attached to their names. Most aren't really thinking about people hunting them down on multiple websites to harass them. Doesn't excuse a mod of TBP threatening someone. It's not really a stretch when you're stalking peoples online profiles cause you're obsessed with what they say to eventually stalk their real life profile.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 04:26 PM
3

heres one of the others: http://i.imgur.com/2x56ffD.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 04:05 PM
1

If you're not gonna learn from the ones who have the know how, who are you gonna learn it from? The best person to learn something from is someone who was once unskilled, then was able to make himself skilled. He has the experience of changing himself and can relate to what it was like being unskilled. It makes the most sense to learn from this person. There are plenty of people in TRP that were once bad with bad with women and were able to change and learn to be more successful. They have the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 03:18 PM
2

thats kind of like saying "No offense but...(insert offensive statement)"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/14 03:29 PM
0

Sure, but I don't get too tied up about it. Lots of people say things on the internet cause they can. Does it translate to them shaming women in real life? I don't think so, but either way we don't really know. Does it bother you when they speak like that. It doesn't really cross my mind that it could be bothersome. Then again when I see some crazy feminists spout stuff on the internet it doesn't really bother me. It bothers me when I see them protesting and harassing MRA speeches and clubs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/14 02:56 PM
1

I don't aspire to have lots of casual sex. Who said I hold women who have lots of sex in low regard? Just because I wouldn't get into a relationship with them and would advise others not too as well, it doesn't mean I hate them or something. I'm not obligated to date them. By the way, you comment was in reply to cuittler but you addressed it to me. I just happened to see it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/14 02:31 PM
1

I think people should be cautious about dating both men and women who are promiscuous. The difference is, TRP isn't in the business of finding men for a LTR. They're interested in women so they will advise you not to get into a LTR with a girl who is promiscuous. Information about promiscuous guys is kind of irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/14 02:22 PM
1

You shrug your shoulders about it, but dont you see that its because the system favours men, thats why red pillers are happy to go along with it. If you have a think about morality, its wrong. Theres no system. Its not some kind of organized activity to put women down. There are lots of things that favor men. There are lots of things that favor women. It will always be this way. Its not like these people are going up to women and calling them sluts to their face. If they want to sleep around and…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/14 12:29 PM
3

Women being offended at being called sluts is irrelevant- the injustice is women being called sluts for doing the same thing as men when they are not called sluts for it. Geddit? It is very relevant. Go ahead and call men sluts for doing the same thing. watch what will happen. No man will be bothered by it, but women will. Grow thicker skin? The reason women are called sluts is cause people know it will hurt them. people are assholes. welcome to the world. Men get called creeps and get creepsham…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/14 12:23 PM
2

I dont know. I don't care. I can't answer for them all. I don't read TRP much at all and havent for awhile. You probably perceive their "disdain" as much harsher than it is. That kind of language is encouraged there. Its their way of saying they don't want women with high partners count. Thats pretty much it. You make it sound like they want to murder these women or something. I didn't avoid your question. look above at what you asked. for reference this is what you asked the first time (which I…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 11:15 PM
1

Exactly. Maybe Im pessimistic or selfish, but I'll never really try to change societies views on things. People who want to be negative will find a way no matter what. I'd rather worry about myself
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 06:37 PM
2

I think people in a way will use it more knowing that it "can get to you". I think slowly people will become desensitized to that image but it won't happen any time soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 06:26 PM
1

Most of my friends are people who's personality fits with mine. Or we just have things in common. I don't look for people that are exceptional to be my friends. Accomplishments don't really mean much to me. A personality that complements mine is more important than any achievement. I view those as kind of material.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 06:19 PM
2

IMO 'women don't care while men do' is not the case. Some people care, some people don't, and our expectations of the opposite sex are all influenced by our cultural heritage from previous generations who suppressed women's sexuality. That doesn't mean we should blindly accept and perpetuate them. I don't really care if our expectations are influenced from previous generations. I know that in general, men prefer women who have had fewer partners. Women being offended at being called sluts is not…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 06:15 PM
3

It's not different. Theyre the same thing. Women are allowed to not be interested in men who sleep around a lot. Same for men. Women just feel more shamed when they're perceived as sluts compared to when men are perceived that way. Also men generally prefer to get into LTR with women who don't sleep around. Women care about this particular issue a lot less.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 05:57 PM
0

I largely agree with your last paragraph. That doesn't really address why women in general find financially successful men more attractive than men find financially successful women. In generally, a women being very successful financially doesnt make her any more attractive to me than if she was simply capable of taking care of herself, but not anything remarkably special.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 05:54 PM
2

I can understand that, what I can't understand is going out of your way to put down someone with more experience than you. That I dont know. I don't do this. Im sure angry people in TRP do. It probably helps them feel better. Why do people go out of their way to make fun of others? It just happens and always will happen to an extent. My view is to always work around it. I don't expect society to change for me. I'd rather work on myself and maximizing what I can do because that is something I can…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 05:33 PM
1

Thats fair enough. Do you think this will just slowly die down as society modernizes over time? Do you personally feel ashamed/offended if someone think of you as a slut?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 05:30 PM
0

Are you asking me in specific? My partner count is not high so no.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 05:09 PM
2

Because men generally "congratulate" each other if theyre able to sleep with lots of women. Its like a mark of higher status. Generally men don't shame other men behind their backs for having slept with lots of women. I don't know how to true this is or not as I'm not a women but supposedly women gossip/backbite about other women who like to to sleep around/dress promiscuously/etc. Why do women get offended when theyre perceived as sluts?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 05:07 PM
5

You asked a flawed question. its not a higher standard, its a different standard. men and women are different. I don't know the whys of it. I just know that I prefer to get into a relationship with a women who has had fewer partners. Kind of like how I want to get into a relationship with a women who is thin. For whatever reason it turns me off if she has a lot of partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 05:02 PM
1

I don't either but I generally don't care about financial success nearly as much women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 05:00 PM
2

i meant women in general. So lets continue. Why do women feel shamed if they're perceived as sluts. Men aren't shamed if they're perceived as sluts. In fact, many men would take it as a compliment. Its interesting that this happens but why does it. Why don't men feel shamed for being labeled as sluts/promiscuous?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 04:42 PM
1

Are we really going to be this silly? You didnt answer this earlier. Maybe its hypocritical but if the girl doesn't care about his past sexual partner count, why does it matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 04:34 PM
3

You're speaking of this as if its some great injustice. And no one has really given me any good rationale for why men should get to have all the casual sex fun and women should just be quiet, good little girls who keep their legs closed waiting for an "alpha" to finish sleeping around and show them their own sexuality. The reason why men are "allowed" to have all the casual sex is because there is no consequence for them having it. Women generally don't care if men have had lots of partners. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 04:24 PM
2

I could say the same to you. You answered my questions with more questions. I think emotionally mature, confident individuals don't give a damn about partner count....but I've not run into many under my parents age. Call them what you like, but in general people do give a damn about partner count. Shaming them out of it won't change their minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 04:18 PM
1

But it doesn't make sense when it's ok for you to have a high partner count but not for a woman. What is the reasoning behind holding her to a higher standard than yourself? I don't understand this attitude. Does everything have to be perfectly equal? Do both of them have to have exactly 7 partners to be able to have a relationship? Others have explained why men prefer a women with less partners. Why does it matter to you if the women isn't bothered by it. The reason this can happen is because w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 12:39 PM
3

And is a woman who wants to "explore her sexuality" in her youth then settle down later different from a man who wants to "spin plates"[2] in his youth and settle down later? Why or why not? Its not about being different/double standard/unfair. Its a preference. For whatever reason, men generally want to get into relationships with women with less partners. Women in general don't care as much as men do about a partners past partner count. Is it wrong for men to have this preference. Is it wrong …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 03:13 AM
4

I don't think anything TRP says is exclusive to TRP or TRP is the first to point out. Its more the collection of ideas. Its more the phrasing and the blunt way of speaking that makes you look at things differently and evaluate things differently. I think I felt like people were more honest/real there and so I was willing to take their advice. I will say that TRP was able to convey a lot of ideas to me that other places/people were not. For example, a lot of my friends liked to work out. They wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 12:51 AM
1

survey predictions: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/26qbxh/finally_the_june_survey/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/14 03:17 AM
1

is there a sub of any significant size that isn't circlejerk? Almost every sub, besides some of the ask"subject" has its own circlejerky behavior. They all over use the same jokes, repeat the same memes, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/14 02:03 PM
2

sounds like an anecdote. I have no way of knowing if its true or not without seeing it. sources etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/14 04:01 AM
5

Linking things out of context and creating hyperbolic headlines doesn't really work. Reminds me of tabloids. disagreement =/= criticizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/14 04:00 AM
3

yes im sure many members try to accurately understand TRP. no bias going in at all. I'm sure they dont get their understanding from seconhand sources. i wasnt aware TBP were criticizing anything. I thought it was just a citclejerk
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 08:14 PM
2

thats not evidence nor is it proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 08:11 PM
2

I have no idea bout any recent activity on TRP. I'm not subscribed and I haven't looked at the sub on a regular basis at all since last summer/fall. You could be right. I always found it interesting how some BP members pay more attention to TRP than RP people. Seems like some of you are just sifting through the sub everyday looking for things to circlejerk over. I've never understood this mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 12:39 PM
2

Past evidence disproves you there. It's not about "politeness", they simply don't want people asking questions of them. What past evidence? I don't see any?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 12:36 PM
1

I said to not post it as a leading question and it politely. You asked it as a leading question. She did ask it in a condescending way. Maybe you didn't perceive it that way but others did.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 12:34 PM
3

Isn't that the same thing? He doesnt wan't to date promiscuous women. It's more likely that a girl with 30 partners by 30 is promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 12:32 PM
0

But what's the point when it's almost guaranteed that you'll get banned? RPW is not a place for discussion or questioning so why barge in there and ruin the place they've set up for themselves? Why not just take a minute and copy/paste your question over there? Is she that afraid of being banned? I don't think its a guaranteed ban if she doesn't ask her question in a leading way. If she posts her question politely she will not get banned. The people in the past that have been banned are usually …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 02:35 PM
1

The point being that it's not possible to work it out yourself by reading the literature because the literature contradicts itself and often these people are asking how red pillers can resolve this. This is because there is no unified set of rules that all people must follow. Everyone has a different philosophy and everyone has different goals. Of course things are going to contradict. I've seen people disagree plenty of times and no one gets banned. You only hear from the people who are banned …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 02:28 PM
1

Yeah that was the second example I gave in my post above, where someone asked why didn't they raise their concerns with RPW and they explained that they'd get banned if they did. That seems perfectly valid to me. I don't think she would have gotten banned if she asked her question in a friendly manner. In any case she didn't even try. If you're afraid of getting banned because of questions you might ask, whats the point? You're not going to comment anyway because of your fear so you might as wel…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 02:16 PM
3

I don't think I've ever seen the complaint raised in that way. It's normally presented after a red piller claims that SRS or /r/feminism etc censor dissent or speech that isn't politically correct, with the implication that TRP is better. You've never seen people blindly claim this? I just saw it a minute ago while browsing. http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/27tssg/to_red_pill_women_what_makes_you_want_to_leave/ci4buw9 It seems like most of the people that are instabanned are the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 02:03 PM
4

Theres definitely a lot more confidence that goes into it. Maybe its just a placebo effect where I just feel like I'm better or have more control. But ultimately it doesn't matter to me whether its fake or real, I care that its helped me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 08:06 PM
3

I think its more about having control over your dating life rather than floundering about. It's not like I was unsuccessful before reading TRP, I just felt like it was all luck or randomness whenever I got into a relationship I would always feel lucky if a girl chose me. Now its more like I have more control over my life and I have a handle on my dating life instead of just praying something might work.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 05:45 PM
2

The point is that there isn't a point to answering. My answers would ignored/downvoted in this thread. Look at all the RP responses in the thread. How many of them are just downvoted to the bottom or ignored? Theres no point to answering. At least in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 05:21 PM
2

Can you show me a few examples of this? I've gone through the past few pages and its all X pill asking Y pill a question or vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 04:36 PM
0

The question is framed as an opening to bash on TRP. Theres not really much of a discussion to be had. All of the responses that are repeating circlejerks from TBP will get upvoted because this isn't a discussion. Nobody wants to hear what TRP is about because they don't care, they'd rather keep the caricature they've built up in their heads. What do you think this thread is about?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 03:21 PM
1

This looks like its gonna be a circlejerk question with every RP answer downvoted and full of BP circlejerky responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 12:27 PM
4

Kinda like how we should teach women to not walk outside late at night in shady areas with skimpy clothes on. generic advice that isn't revolutionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 03:01 AM
7

Sounds like you're victim blaming the men. We should teach women not to lie/steal/cheat instead of blaming for being lied to/stolen from/cheated on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 12:58 AM
2

you don't think male teachers are discriminated against? specifically in primary schools? http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.TCHR.FE.ZS 87% of primary school teachers are women the last few years. Why do you not think males teachers are discriminated against? Why is there no push to get prejudiced employees to hire male nurses and teachers if that is what AA is created to fight against? My problem with Affirmative action is that its mostly appeasement. Its not about trying to create any …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 12:42 AM
3

why isnt it needed in nursing and teaching? There seems to be a lack of male teachers and nurses? Or does it only go one way? Why is forcing outcomes a good thing? People should have equal opportunities, not necessarily equal outcomes. And if you're hiring people based on race/gender/sex instead of hiring on ability/experience, that does effect work quality. I don't know why you'd think it wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/14 09:55 PM
-2

I try to behave similarly to men and women casually (not sexually though, obviously), but I don't think it's a major sin not to. Professionally, though, especially when you have some authority, I think treating women (edit: or men! Didn't mean to exclude them, men can face prejudice in the workplace in many different fields) "differently" is a big deal, and often times illegal. You should definitely avoid being prejudiced in that setting. Often times, treating men and women differently in regard…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/14 05:49 PM
3

Guys on the other hand had no problem sending the messages because they were playing the numbers game. Why do you think guys don't mind playing the numbers game while woman do mind playing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 03:11 AM
1

Yes, but it still barely grazes one percent. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 07:01 PM
4

Also the sub againstsmensrights on reddit had an image of "All men must die" on their page. Obviously the meant it literally. Do I have to spell out my sarcasm for you? Obviously I know its a joke. You asked for an image of people saying all men must die. I literally provided you with one.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 07:01 PM
4

http://imgur.com/lBIIeS3
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 05:48 PM
5

You missed my point. The point was for her to provide proof, when in the past she'd avoid doing it. I thought it was ironic that she'd ask for proof now when she was unwilling to provide it before. I don't think all feminists are feminazis. Most people are feminist in name only. If you ask a random person if they're a feminist, they'll likely say they are. Who is against womens rights? Pretty much everyone is for it. Most of them aren't active at all. From the percentage of feminists that are ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 05:45 PM
7

I doubt Morgan was literally asking her fellow women to commit patricide when she says "kill your fathers, not your mothers." Pretty sure that's meant to be a figurative statement. Thats funny, when someone in TRP says a controversial statement, everyone here takes it literally. But in this case it shouldn't be taken literally. Wheres the consistency? Or should you always just assume the best from your "side" and the worst from the other "side" Obviously I don't think she meant it literally, sim…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 04:44 PM
4

People have responded to you with resonable responses in the examples i posted. Yet you reply with vitriol and/or ignoring. Whats the point of taking you seriously if you won't listen to any dissenting opinion? If someone does provide the proof you ask for, you'll just dismiss it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 04:31 PM
5

I know that these stereotypes aren't representative. You guys don't. I think they are representative. So the burden of proof is on you then. Are you the lazy one? The point was, you don't take anyone seriously, or comment with any bit of respect so why would anyone else?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 04:24 PM
9

Thats funny that you of all people want proof/discussion/debate. Anytime anybody has asked you to clarify your opinion, respond to a comment, you resort to ignoring and insulting. If somebody asks you for proof or a link, you respond with: Google is a wonderful tool. You'll learn more by searching for them yourself. For example: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/26qcwl/discussion_of_massacre_on_npr/chu15fz and http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/23j0kk/feminism_and_…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 04:08 PM
0

Someone who reads/comments/posts on /r/thebluepill
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 05:13 PM
1

What hes saying is, if the mother wants, she can use "legal parental surrender" and give up her child and is not on the hook for child support. The father cannot do this. He is forced by the government to pay child support. The question is, why aren't women forced to. In the case of a custody fight and the father winning custody but the women still wants to see the child, she would have to pay child support. But if she gives up all her rights to the child, she doesn't have to pay child support. …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 02:42 PM
2

I think we both had different interpretations. I took bluepiller as someone that reads/comments/posts on TBP. You understood it as a set of beliefs one might hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 02:20 PM
2

So you post/view/comment on /r/thebluepill but don't identify yourself as a BPer? I'm curious cause some of the early survey results show very few people associate themselves here with TBP. But if people who are active in TBP say they are not BPers, it makes sense why the numbers are low. It's basically lying. You're also not the only one in this thread who has done that. Seems like the survey results might be skewed if a lot of people feel the same as you do. I'd have assumed its safe to call y…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 10:57 PM
2

Question. Does posting on /r/thebluepill qualify you as a bluepiller? If not, what does?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 07:56 PM
1

uhh... theres nothing you have to count, it tells you how many he moderates. maybe its RES only thing. Theres no way you can effectively moderate 50 subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/14 05:46 PM
-1

Whats the point of this? If you're going to leave, then leave. No reason to make a big fuss about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 05:37 PM
5

Isn't that obvious? Most people on reddit lurk without an account. A small proportion of that amount create an account and subscribe. A smaller portion of that actively upvote/downvote. Even smaller amount post and comment. No shit, most of the people on any sub on reddit aren't actively participating in discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/14 12:38 AM
6

Either way its an unsubstantiated claim with no way to prove that he is right. I think there are maybe 1% of people subbed to TRP that are just there to troll. Most people there to troll wouldn't subscribe.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 03:22 PM
3

Seems like a question for /r/asktrp and not much of a discussion for here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 03:19 PM
2

So you say; a lot of people legitimately believe TRP is turning men into mass murderers thus "affecting them irl." Either way the point is, people on TBP, including the mods, are willing to lie or omit context in order to make TRP look worse. Its like they're so blinded by their hatred, they'll do anything to make them look worse. Kind of sad they can't let it go.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 10:38 AM
7

source? You could say this about any subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 10:17 AM
2

A lot of people love to dissect every single word the RP mods say. Funny how it is when its the other way around. Its "they don't care what the mods say" lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 09:49 AM
5

I have you tagged as quitting ppd. What happened to that lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/14 02:00 AM
2

why not? But you gotta start somewhere. If you only acknowledge once side, cant really work on both.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 09:16 PM
3

You missed my point. There are extreme viewpoints everywhere. You speak as if TRP is the only place that contains extreme viewpoints. My point was that such extreme posts influence a large part of the perception of people who are unfamiliar with TRP (and understandably so). Do you not believe the same happens elsewhere? Or does it only matter if people are influenced by extreme posts on TRP but not on TBP? My point is why does it matter if there are a few extreme viewpoints, those are everywhere…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 09:15 PM
4

I've seen people on TBP advocate mass killings of Red pillers. Theres also a bunch of radfems that actively harass people and theres physical proof of that happening. Why don't you try and work against those people that are actively doing something negative, instead of talking about some people talking about potentially doing something bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 08:50 PM
8

Should just ban people who do this. Theyre not really here to debate. Look at rule #3
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 01:56 PM
6

He was referencing himself becoming a better man so he phrased it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 05:40 PM
4

He didn't say it was only limited to men. Does he have to qualify every statement to say its for both men and women? He was referencing himself becoming a better man so he phrased it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 05:30 PM
2

I think its cause the way the bot works is it counts posts in 2 different subs as crossovers. Theres likely way more posts on asktrp since its function is to answer questions. Something like BaM is mostly reading material and fewer posts, so the bot has nothing to count as crossover comparatively.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 03:26 PM
9

gonna need a peer reviewed study to believe this claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 12:26 AM
1

My first thought was that OP is insane for posting this here and thinking it a legitimate topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/14 02:24 PM
2

I didn't reply to archwinger. i replied to pickup sticks
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/14 07:24 PM
2

Do i really have to explain this? He said: I haven't seen any non RP types here ever suggest that telling the truth is manipulation. To disprove his statement, I just have to show him 1 example. There are probably more, but all I had to do was show one. Does it make sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/14 07:15 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/25mzd9/red_pill_and_abuse/chiwudj It IS manipulation to express wanting sex and then kick her out of the house if you don't get it. The one doing the manipulation in this case is the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/14 02:01 PM
1

I thought circlejerk comments were against the rules. check out rule #4. Mods?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 09:52 PM
1

i dunno, im not a social justice warrior, nor am i a feminist claiming to fight for equal rights for men and women. I've heard of feminists talk about certain male issues, but its mostly been to pay lip service, or to give the appearance that they're working towards equal rights for women and men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 06:24 PM
1

Its too bad feminism doesn't make any active effort to reverse this.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 06:07 PM
2

speaking in jive to a bunch of nerdy, white nba fans doesn't make you charismatic. Thats like telling dick jokes to 13 year olds and thinking your charismatic cause they all laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 08:52 PM
3

You should read through "No More Mr. Nice Guy". The book has helped a lot of people and the stories inside should give you some perspective on why some guys grew up the way they did. I think since you can't really relate its worth a read. It's pretty short. https://7chan.org/lit/src/Robert_Glover_-_No_More_Mr_Nice_Guy.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 03:56 PM
10

You should read through "No More Mr. Nice Guy". Just because it didn't happen to you, doesn't mean others weren't affected. The book has helped a lot of people and the stories inside should give you some perspective on why some guys grew up the way they did. https://7chan.org/lit/src/Robert_Glover_-_No_More_Mr_Nice_Guy.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 03:55 PM
4

yeah but those people are going into CMV specifically to have their opinion changed. that makes it significantly easier to change their mind. theres not much "charisma" being used
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 02:06 AM
6

If thats the case, almost nobody on the internet has that. No one changes their mind in an argument on the internet. Certainly no one here has that. I still can't take the term "online charisma" seriously lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:42 AM
3

Can you explain what you think online charisma is. I'm having a hard time understanding what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:16 AM
2

thanks for pleasant convo. I'm not here to defend TRP the sub, just the ideas/thoughts that have come out of it that have helped me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:02 AM
5

Fair enough. I tend to view those things as preferences or generalities, however. Women generally prefer more foreplay than men. Women generally prefer confident men. You get confident in bed by having more experience. Men don't care for confidence nearly as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:01 AM
3

It does carry over. Women absolutely have the right to not date men who sleep around a lot. In general though, women care a lot less about partner count than men do. Partner count is just not as important to them as it is to men. Similar to how height is important to women, but men, in general, don't really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:59 AM
1

Yeah, I'm definitely toning down the language here. You read it as bad, because you're probably not used to conversing in that manner so you perceive harsh language as bad. You could say that I'm used to it or desensitized, but the language doesn't stop me from understanding the points that come across. I know that a lot of people think that promiscuous women are bad over there and it sounds like im ignoring them, but I'm giving you a more moderate view of the idea. A lot of people there are ang…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:46 AM
2

The value comes because the general advice given is that it is a bad idea to get in a LTR with a promiscuous women. Doesn't mean promiscuous women are bad, just that you should probably not get into a LTR with them. Generally your hair color doesn't really affect your value in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:32 AM
6

Charisma online has really nothing to do with charisma in person. A lot of charisma is tone, timing, facial expressions, etc. None of that is captured in an online forum so this is kind of silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:20 AM
1

The slut double standard has been brought up a few times before. I replied to it below but ill copy it here. And I'm also questioning why you think it's wrong for a woman to be promiscuous but it's ok, and even encouraged for a man to act that way. You're asking why this is a double standard. It's not. Men in general have a preference for being in a LTR with women with low partner counts. Women in general, don't care as much as men do about partner counts when considering a LTR. Women generally …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:15 AM
1

There is no onus to not sleep around. TRP advocated making the best of the situation you are in. If women want to sleep around, that should give you liberty to do the same. TRP does tell you that it is a bad idea to get in a LTR with a women who sleeps around a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:13 AM
1

The slut double standard has been brought up a few times before. Try searching for old threads. Here's what I posted about it before: And I'm also questioning why you think it's wrong for a woman to be promiscuous but it's ok, and even encouraged for a man to act that way. You're asking why this is a double standard. It's not. Men in general have a preference for being in a LTR with women with low partner counts. Women in general, don't care as much as men do about partner counts when considerin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 10:43 PM
2

Not everything in those images you posted were serious. They were exagerations/jokes/hyperboles. Anybody can take something out of context and make it appear different. The media does this all the time with interviews. They take one thing somebody said, replay it out of context, and make it seem like the person is an idiot/bigot. You did no different. Hard to take your compilation seriously if theres no context provided. TBP regularly talks about wanting TRPers to die out, get diseases, etc. I'v…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 01:53 PM
3

lol what a joke. this is the 3rd or 4th time I've seen the OP completely contradict what she said.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 12:52 PM
0

Why do you give TBP a pass when it comes to their bigotry? Is it because you agree with them more, that you ignore when they make bigoted statements? This was the question I've been asking you and you've been ignoring.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 12:39 PM
-2

One of my old friends used to have a dog. Whenever it would make a mess, he would frequently say stuff like "I fucking hate dogs." Obviously he loved his dog but was just upset at the moment. This is a pretty common thing in general I've noticed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 03:35 AM
0

Even if they're not serious, it doesn't mean it isn't bigotry. This is what you said. Just because TBP is satire, doesn't mean it isn't bigotry. That is the irony in what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 03:27 AM
0

Do you not see the irony in this? This is exactly what the Blue Pill does. They wave away what they say because of "circlejerking" Why do you not call the The blue Pill bigots? Sounds hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 12:27 AM
4

it was a joke. You ignored all the points I made in the last 3 comments so you could continue your rant. You could have at least tried to address what i brought up. I replied to your thoughts. ignoring points is actually probably worse for discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 09:31 PM
4

oooh let it allll out. I don't think anyone is here to change peoples minds. You're not going to convert someone to the other side. I like it cause I get to hear the other side in a more rational manner and I can discuss how I view things in a similar manner. I'm not here to convince anybody and neither do I think are most of the people who comment here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 08:44 PM
1

I don't see the problem in discussing it. You also mention cluttering the sub. There has been 1 post on this sub today. There arent many posts in general. Theres not too much else being discussed so why not? what's the point of complaining about shit like this? To possibly make the sub better
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 08:35 PM
2

Read through this: https://7chan.org/lit/src/Robert_Glover_-_No_More_Mr_Nice_Guy.pdf
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 02:14 PM
1

'The Others can take the septons.'...She pounded on his chest with feeble fists, muttering about the risk, the danger, about her father, about the septons, about the wrath of the gods. He never heard her'" She was saying no, but he continued. In particular the line "He never heard her", meaning he would have had sex with her whether she wanted to or not. Sounds somewhat similar to the LMR that people here seem to despise. Jaime kept going even when she specifically said "no" and "not here". I as…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 07:14 PM
3

neither comment bothered me. Your hypocrisy did.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 03:33 PM
2

In the book Cersei, says no first, and then she changes her mind. I don't think it was so clear that it was "definitely not rape" "There was no tenderness in the kiss he returned to her, only hunger. Her mouth opened from his tongue. 'No...not here. The septons...' 'The Others can take the septons.'...She pounded on his chest with feeble fists, muttering about the risk, the danger, about her father, about the septons, about the wrath of the gods. He never heard her'" "He never Heard her", meanin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 03:19 PM
5

He meant that he doesn't like anal but instead regular sex. thats all i read into it. He basically said, "girls have vaginas, thats kind of nice." Neither of the jokes were particularly funny, I thought it was funny how you chose to single out the guy for it, rather than both of them in a post where you're attempting to compliment the opposite sex. Especially one that has 9 upvotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 03:12 PM
-1

In the book she definitely says no first, then changes her mind. I thought BP people have always said this is rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 03:10 PM
1

You could add to the discussion by giving your own thoughts. Also, the very top post is Guys have dicks, that's kind of nice. Any reason you didn't call that out?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 03:04 PM
3

its pretty obvious he was just continuing along the same line of jokes that rulenumber303 used. Why didn't you ask rulenumber303 why she couldn't come up with any other positives?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 03:01 PM
1

I dunno, I just wouldn't take her out then? I guess it's insulting if you're really looking to find something that's insulting. The way I see it, she can think how she wants, its not gonna make me sad. I just won't take her out. I wouldn't be upset by her terminology, I'd be upset if she lied about her intentions. that has nothing to do with dehumanization.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 05:04 PM
2

The only example that I can come up with is sometimes I hear the word boytoy thrown around. It really doesn't even cross my mind that I should be offended by it or feel objectified, even though I'm not looking for casual sex myself. If somehow I ended up in the position where I wanted a LTR and the girl just wanted casual sex, I'd get myself out of that situation. But I don't know how I'd somehow end up being in a LTR with someone that only wanted sex. The things that have offended me in the pas…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 03:03 PM
2

I'm trying to understand. Does it really bother you that much? I'm trying to imagine being bothered by someone calling me that and I can't. I don't really think of it as dehumanizing. I think you're over thinking it by a wide margin. Its a short phrase for an analogy. People make up their own terminology all the time. Things like idioms have existed for a long time. It just screams of over-sensitivity when people get bothered by a phrases like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 02:13 PM
2

Why do you use the term "fuckbuddy" instead of friends with benefits or plates? It's just a phrase. don't get so hung up over words. Why does it bother you that people choose different words to represent something?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 01:55 PM
3

welcome to every "question for redpillers" post.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:07 PM
2

Whys that? One of the mods admitted that all the mods use alt accounts and that he himself likes to cycle between them. Not too unreasonable to think you could be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 06:00 PM
1

This is a debate sub, you want us to read something, you have to provide sources/proof. The burden of proof is on you. If you didn't want to respond with sources, why even comment about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 12:20 PM
2

I think 100 is a good number. At least to get rid of the alt accounts popping up all the time. The mods probably won't implement this of course, because they like to use alt accounts too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 01:39 PM
2

Should be at least 100. I'd rather not have alt accounts popping up every day so they can spew whatever bullshit they want. Of course, the mods won't implement this, they like to use alt accounts themselves. Are you a mods alt account?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 01:39 PM
1

Seemed like reported posts/comments were largely ignored. I'm sure its cause you get a lot of reports so you quickly glance over them and many get overlooked. When I've taken time to message posts that I reported before, then mods would take action.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 06:42 PM
4

I used to report stuff, but until i actually messaged the moderators, nothing would happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 03:38 PM
6

Only allow users with a certain level of karma to post/comment. At least you'll get rid of the obvious trolls.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 03:37 PM
2

big words coming from a 1 day old alt account. I wonder which regular commenter this is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 03:29 PM
1

The MRM harasses college girls online and calls Anita Sarkeesian a cunt, calls that activism and then calls it a day. Sounds similar to what the people in the video linked and in the comments were doing. They called themselves feminists. This wasn't a one off occasion, and it wasn't just a couple of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 02:35 PM
1

So in your opinion, there is no place for men to talk about mens issues? You're completely okay with feminists physically preventing men from attending these lectures? A lot of these guys have no idea what the MRM movement is, they probably just saw a poster that looked interesting to them and wanted to attend. Seems like you're judging awfully quick. what a joke lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 12:23 PM
3

did you watch the video linked from /r/videos? It was a lady doing the talk, not Warren Farrell.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:29 AM
3

is it okay to judge MRA for their lifestyles? Why aren't feminists outwardly rallying in supposed of those who want to talk about mens issues? I realize your username is a joke but its hard to take you seriously when you say that people shouldn't be judged, but on the other hand, you're making light of the hate of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:22 AM
1

I know I can search for them myself. I'm asking you because I want to read from the sources that you recommend and back. Is it really that hard to type out a few sites?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:08 AM
2

Can you tell me which are the prominent well known feminist websites?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/14 09:08 PM
3

here And here I hope you actually wanted to read those instead of just asking for sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/14 12:41 PM
2

by that i meant that comments like this one: show feminists physically trying to prevent people from attending mens issue events. I didnt mean anything about there being shitty comments in the thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/14 12:32 PM
3

??? above the commenter said this: Make safer working conditions for men, compensate them better, convince men they don't need to take those sorts of jobs and let women do them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/14 12:26 PM
13

I guess the question is which ones are the true ones. I hear more about feminism from these "misandrists" than I do from "true feminists." Same for the some of the people attending those lectures in the videos in the comments. They were just attending a lecture, knew very little about feminism, but get attacked by a bunch of "feminists." So they and I assume that's what feminists are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/14 07:58 PM
6

Seems like you get a heaping bunch of misandry from feminists as shown from the links and videos. Those feminist websites aren't really heard from as you have to go search them out. So to most people, these radfems are the norm for feminists. Theres no real media that is decrying these type of feminists. Most people aren't actually searching for the "true feminist" websites.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/14 07:16 PM
15

I think its more than just yelling louder. They're actively and physically preventing talks about mens issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/14 07:11 PM
13

ROK is mostly click bait. They write ridiculous shit cause they know it will draw people in to their articles. it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/14 12:20 AM
2

It's much easier to insult/hate a group of people than think critically or discuss their issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 02:34 PM
1

I don't think most of them are at that level. Most of the people in the sub are new and probably still learning/angry/upset. I think a lot of the Endorsed contributors and and some of the more highly regarded commenters probably are. I do think most would like to be at that level. I don't think they'd really object to being called sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/14 07:57 PM
1

Sure, I just wouldn't really be interested in having a long term relationship with her. Men and women who have lots of partners are both sluts. Women seem to not care as much as men do about this particular topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/14 06:40 PM
7

And I'm also questioning why you think it's wrong for a woman to be promiscuous but it's ok, and even encouraged for a man to act that way. You're asking why this is a double standard. It's not. Men in general have a preference for being in a LTR with women with low partner counts. Women in general, don't care as much as men do about partner counts when considering a LTR. Women generally like taller men, but men don't have a a huge preference in height. Is that also a double standard? Its fair g…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/14 05:19 PM
0

I'm a little confused Commenter above said this You quoted post was about men who have a preference for younger girls. It is not the case for me and might not be the case for many other relationships of the kind. For me this is the first time I was able to relate to somebody that much younger. All other relationships where with women my age, last one was with somebody older than me. Then you said this: With that in mind, I don't really see an issue. I think people's reactions to you are largely …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 06:49 PM
1

The point was what the person I replied to said. Men objectifying women is a problem. Women objectifying men is not a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 05:18 PM
2

Of course it depends and of course its subjective. I'm just trying to hear some baseline ideas. The fun part is thinking about the answers and not just saying "it depends".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 05:15 PM
0

This brings about more questions for me. Say a 30 year old man has 4 relationships somewhat recently. 2 of them were with younger women, 2 with women his own age. Is that an issue? We already you think that if all 4 were with younger women it is an issue and if only 1 of those 4 were with younger women it is not an issue. So wheres the line between creepy and not? If 3 of those relationships were with younger women is it creepy? 2 and 2?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 04:55 PM
0

Yeah, why doesn't this guy call out these women for objectification?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 01:43 AM
2

ahahaha RES tagged him
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 04:01 AM
1

Not sure how familiar you are with probably, but Expected value = (Probability x Value). in this the EV of both of the options is 100,000. So the point I was trying to make (kind of unrelated) was that the options have the same value, but different probabilities of receiving those same values.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 09:33 PM
0

If you offer someone $100,000 a year, or a 1/100 shot at $10,000,000 a year, the'll choose the former. I might even argue it's human nature to choose the former. Not sure if you chose those numbers on purpose but the expected value of each option is the same. If both options have the same value, why would you choose the one that has risk over the one that has no risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 08:45 PM
2

Yeah, the purpose of the analogy is not the prove something, its just a way of viewing the topic in a different perspective. Shes trying wayyy too hard to stick with the original metaphor.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 05:38 PM
1

I don't really care whether its genetic or social. I just disagree when women say its a double standard that women sleeping around are sluts but its okay for men to sleep around. There's no double standard, both sexes have different preferences. It doesn't really matter to me if those preferences are social or genetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 05:36 PM
3

What I have noticed is that women generally want partners who are experienced. They don't want a virgin who might not be as confident or who might not be as good at sex. They want someone who knows what they are doing. For this reason, they generally don't care about a guys past sexual history (if its larger). Generally guys want a partner with a low partner count. They prefer someone who has slept with fewer partners over over someone with lots of partners, at least as it pertains to LTRs. It's…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 05:19 PM
0

I would definitely teach my son better than to do something like that. He has agency and its my responsibility to teach how best to make decisions. I wouldn't ignore gender talks when he would be growing up and I'd tell him how best to be successful with the opposite sex. I'd also talk to him about how certain laws go against him. If I follow your hypothetical situation, if my son is alpha as fuck and a perfect physical specimen, I'm not worried about him knocking up a fat 40 year old at all. At…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 03:30 PM
0

forgot about Canadia/other parts of the world that don't have this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 03:26 PM
6

Women can join the army / navy too just fyi. Men also are forced to join selective service at that age. I wouldn't have been able to vote or go to college if I didn't sign up for selective service. this doesn't exist for women. True, there is no draft nowadays but if this is the case, why not remove selective service or why not require women to sign up as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 03:16 PM
0

I'd question the 18 year olds as to why they were with the 30 year old. They have the capability of making their own decisions. It's their decisions to make. There's no need to demonize either the 18 year old or the 30 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 03:10 PM
1

A company full of women wouldn't be able market or brand their product/service? I'm sure they could at least market it to an audience of women saying the products were created and designed by women. In any case, cheaper store brand competition still exists even though people prefer brand names. Theres still a market for those items.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 04:19 AM
3

So you're saying that the reason women don't tend to grow their businesses is because they are concerned about discrimination? They're not willing to expand on their career because they're concerned they're being discriminated against? That just sounds silly and contrived. I think the better explanation is that they just prefer the safe option to the risky option. There's nothing wrong with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 02:50 AM
2

Agreed. The point of this post was a response to the one about women in power positions. The reason they are not filling as many of those executive positions is because they choose the safe, less risky options, and not simply because they are discriminated against.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 02:40 AM
3

What's telling isn't the why it happens, its the fact that it does happen. The fact that women aren't as ambitious, risk taking, or as willing to grow their business. That is what that stat says. It's also a better explanation as to why women don't make up a larger majority of executive positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 02:37 AM
2

The hard questions are the fun ones. I think whats telling is what /u/hyperrreal posted above. 88.3% of business owned by women are mostly them just working for themselves and not really expanding or growing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 12:21 AM
-1

What's interesting is that 88.3% of these business are non-employer firms[2] . So it appear there is a trend of female entrepreneurship, but that these women are most interested in working for themselves, than trying to build small and mid-sized companies. This is pretty interesting. What are the possible explanations for this? Do they just not have the drive and motivation to grow their businesses into larger corporations? Do they prefer a stable small business to a risky growing corporation? T…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 10:10 PM
3

its like you're deliberately trying to infuriate me, and its working! Its complEment not complIment. also, nobody said women would make bad executives. However, you cant just arbitrarily put them in those positions, they have to work towards them and earn them. Why arent more women doing this?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 07:42 PM
2

I mostly meant to say they aren't as risky as men but its already been said a bunch and I didn't want to repeat it. I agree. I just don't think its as simple as women aren't corporate executives because they're discriminated against, end of story, cased closed, no other explanations needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 06:59 PM
2

I think its similar to how women view executive positions, mine workers, construction workers, etc as men's jobs. Both of these positions are changing especially in the younger crowds but it isn't quite there yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 06:35 PM
5

I just don't hear/see it often. Do you have any examples of this happening in mainstream media/news? edit: Mostly what I hear is that male elementary teachers being viewed as pedophiles and you shouldn't trust your kids with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 06:30 PM
1

Im confused by this. We've talked about it in a couple other parts of this thread, but nobody really said women would make bad executives. The problem is you cant just pick somebody up and plant them into an executive position. Women generally have less of the traits that help people rise up into those positions. You need a certain level of experience and knowledge and have the work ethic to raise yourself into those positions. Think about all the successful entrepreneurs. People like bill gates…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 06:27 PM
7

Its great that you personally care but you're also a man. Society at large, the media, and especially women generally don't care. People love to bring up how there aren't women in executive positions, but no one even talks about males making up over 90% of work place deaths. No one is advocating for more male teachers and nurses. Is that also discrimination against men? Why aren't those topics taken seriously? Of course it takes a long time to wipe away perceptions but its got to start somewhere…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 03:50 PM
3

Those jobs are also more dangerous. They do require you to be a bit stronger but they also make up the majority of work place deaths. That's why no one questions why women aren't working those jobs. People care if women die. Why is no one asking why there aren't more male elementary teachers or male nurses? Are women just inherently better teachers? The point was that I don't think the default answer is that women are discriminated against as to the reason why there aren't as many women in execu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 02:24 PM
11

Do we ask why women don't want to be mine workers? do we ask why they don't want to be garbage women? do we ask why they don't want other risky jobs? How come half of those employees aren't women. I think an explanation instead of a "large social element influencing choice" could be that women are just more risk averse and generally rising up to executive positions involves a lot of risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 04:22 AM
1

Have you been to the midwest? Places like nebraska, iowa, illinois, ohio. Those states are completely full of farms except for the occasional big city. It's not quite the farming we're all thinking of but those states are full of farms.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 01:12 PM
5

Right. If there was a self help group for exclusively socially awkward people. Maybe taking advice from only each other and talking about how everyone else is at fault isn't the most productive way to go about it. Maybe it should be a more open discussion who have more experience with social interaction then just an emotional one sided discussion. Likewise, what does TRP offer more than /r/relationships[2] or asking a diverse group of people with experiences besides solidarity of similar backgro…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 12:40 PM
4

It means that women who are relationship eligible to you, but have not developed any skills outside of sex that make them better candidates for a relationship, are just a series of fuck holes. I just wrote this below but context is important. The original quote was written for a specific audience. The OP of this post in PPD was not the intended audience but read it anyway, misunderstood the quote, didn't know its background, left out the context, and then was confused by it and took the statemen…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 07:56 PM
8

Thats why context is important. The original quote was written for a specific audience. The OP of this post in PPD was not the intended audience but read it anyway, misunderstood the quote, didn't know its background, left out the context, and then was confused by it and took the statement literally.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 07:47 PM
1

you have a permalink to people in this thread saying, yes they think about their mothers, daughters, grandmothers as a series of fuckholes?? Also do you take everything you read so literally? "That mexican food last night tasted like shit!" "Oh do you know what shit taste like? Have you tried eating shit? Do you imagine all mexican food as a pile of fecal matter? You can be honest!"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 12:29 PM
2

This reads like such a troll. The answer to your silly question is pretty obvious. Are you just trying to rile some people up? I don't think you've gotten a single yes to your "question".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 04:48 AM
3

. Instead of looking at their parents, siblings, teachers, and Sunday school, they look at "society at large." As a side point, many do blame their parents, siblings, and teachers. It's pretty common.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/14 11:58 PM
3

However in this case, only the woman is drinking. Again, its her choice whether she wants to drink or not. why are you taking her agency away from her.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 06:52 PM
4

No, but that doesn't make someone a rapist. That's not how I conduct myself but I don't men that do are rapists. Nor do I think women who do so as rapists either.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 05:47 PM
1

No she's not. He said he was drinking. He had 1 drink. She had more than one but that's also her choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 05:38 PM
2

So? Is she acting completely on the whims of the man? She knows if she drinks 3 drinks in an hour, shes going to get buzzed or drunk. She can refuse to drink or she can order her own food or ask to eat now. She has agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 05:35 PM
4

you also have it slightly backward, look at the names on the mod list on the side. /u/quickquestionfor is not on there
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 03:55 PM
5

Sure I agree with that. I also think its sad that women aren't accountable for how much they drink or knowing that their decision making might impaired after a certain amount of drinks. She could also just order her own food, or just stop drinking. You make it sound like the guy forced the drinks down her throat and didn't feed her. Besides, what you said is: If you have to get a girl drunk to have sex with her, that's sad and unethical. Getting drunk before having sex is probably how most casua…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 03:45 PM
5

In the situation we're discussing, we're talking about both individuals consenting to sex while at certain levels of intoxication. We're not talking about a guy raping someone who is blackout drunk. They're both somewhat intoxicated and decided to have sex. The fault is somehow on the man while the women was taken advantage of, even though they both wanted to have sex. If she said no to sex but the guy continued, then she was raped yes. It was also not the decision of the drunk driver convinced …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 03:37 PM
4

She's responsible for decisions she makes after shes drunk. Is a drunk driver not responsible for driving under the influence or being pressured into driving by their friends? If the driver gets pulled over, is he the one given the DUI, or are his friends that convinced him to drive given the DUI?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 03:30 PM
4

Maybe we should work on helping those that think this way instead of shaming them. Its very common to find casual hookups at bars/partys where both individuals are various levels of drunk. Are all those people sad and unethical? Choosing to be in those locations and choosing to drink is the responsibility of both parties, yet you say the man is the one who is sad and unethical.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 03:20 PM
1

She chose to drink more than she could, she chose not to eat, she chose to go back to the guys home. If her decisions were impaired, it was because she chose to be in that state. All that is on her and its all under her control. If you think the guy is at fault for giving a girl drinks and taking advantage of their situation, its just as much her fault for taking them and drinking too much. They both acted on their own volition. Unless you want to start regulating how much people can drink, ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 03:16 PM
5

I mean, if as a mod, you cant even follow one of the rules that you helped create, you're doing a pretty poor job.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 03:07 PM
3

Excellent reply. People always imply that women don't have any choice in the matter. They have agency and can choose whether or not to accept a drink. Why is the women who drinks too much not held accountable for not knowing her limits? Men are held accountable for their state of sobriety and so should women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 02:58 PM
2

So whats your solution that balances the playing field for everyone. I don't know of any solution that fixes the problem right now. It's great that there might be long term solutions by changing peoples mindsets but that's not going to help men today. We can work on long term solutions and short term solutions at the same time. Not mutually exclusive. I don't think that TRP is the best short term solution or the only one, but its one that works and is better than the alternative for most guys th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/14 03:27 PM
3

This is pretty much what it comes down to. She wants a few generation of men to simply wait it out until one day women are comfortable enough to be the ones asking guys out?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/14 05:01 AM
4

Are women working on making it easier for men to approach? Especially men that aren't naturally forward?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/14 04:57 AM
3

Sure but most of the people who come to TRP are those that have trouble getting into relationships. That is the biggest problem for most guys who struggle. They're not even thinking about how to do well while in a relationship because they have so much trouble getting into them in the first place. For most of these people, "be yourself" is meaningless. I hope this helps you relate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 07:07 PM
2

When people make grand shows of leaving, they're just posturing. If you're actually going to leave, just do it. No reason to shout to the world that you've made your decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 05:20 PM
1

Sorry, those are long replies and skimming through it, I don't see him directly asking you what I did. If you could point to the specific reply or just copy/paste it to me that would help.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 04:57 PM
2

Claiming to disagree to an experience that you were not a part of is pretty ridiculous. I could understand him not believing me or saying I'm lying but to say my experiences were wrong based on...nothing...is pretty dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 04:55 PM
2

You disagree with with my personal experience? I didn't make any claims, I just stated my experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 01:07 PM
2

..... the post was clearly sarcastic and poking fun at The blue pill. I'm trying hard not to break rule 5, but are you a fucking dumbass?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 12:45 PM
1

so whats your qualification for being successful in relationships? Is everyone that has broken up with a LTR considered a failure in relationships?? About half of all marriages in America end in divorce. A fair amount of the ones that didn't end in divorce probably had both couples dating others before they got married. By what you're saying almost everyone is a failure at relationships. How many people are actually out there that have been in a LTR with one partner their whole lives? I'd guess …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 12:42 PM
2

The biggest difference maker, for me after discovering TRP/PUA was demanding rather than asking. I didn't make a whole lot of immediate changes, but demanding things instead of politely asking made a very noticeable difference in my interactions and relative success with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/14 01:58 PM
2

Thats pretty much correct, which is why it makes sense to me to take the advice from people who were once unsuccessful with women and are now relatively successful. Hence why people, including myself, went and go to TRP for advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 10:50 PM
-1

??? its an analogy. its for comparison. I you want something that doesn't offend your sensibilities, its like a skinny person that has a high metabolism telling someone struggling with obesity that its not that hard to be skinny.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 10:38 PM
2

This is what I what I tried to convey with my post. Yes, working out will make you hotter but that's pretty intuitive and doesn't need a whole lot of explaining. It also likely isn't enough on its own for plenty of men. Something like being charming isn't so intuitive or natural to a lot of people and understanding interactions helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 06:17 PM
1

TRP never really gave me explicit step by step instructions. That's more the PUA realm. I was fairly social before and I didn't really have troubles having conversations, I was just unsuccessful with any kind of relationship. What I mostly got from TRP was a different outlook and a different way of saying/responding to things which didn't really change much about me, just how i presented myself. I despise the line "just be yourself" or "act normally" because I did that before and it never worked…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 04:10 PM
2

My personality didn't change. My outlook changed and they way I responded to and said certain things changed. I have the same hobbies/interests and generally talk about similar things that I did before in conversations.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 02:22 PM
6

Don't tell men to be confident. That's a generalization and not all women want confident men. Only the shallow, low self esteem women want confident men. Also, don't be fun, outgoing, intelligent, strong, etc. Those are all generalizations and humans are too complex to be explained like that. It's impossible to summarize what 50% of the population likes so its pointless to try.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 02:19 PM
2

Did you mean this one below: Unless you are in a specific setting dedicated only to hooking up, make your first attempts at contact non sexual. If you feel a connection and the other person appears to feel the same, give out your number/facebook whatever. Continue to talk. When you know a bit more about each other, ask to do something that you think the other person might be interested in. It isn't that helpful. In the past, I'd have no trouble feeling a connection, it was getting the other pers…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 09:13 PM
7

I'm really confused. If you don't want to respond and it annoys you to respond to these threads....why are you responding?? If you're feeling lazy, you could, you know, not comment. I wanted to hear the advice from PPD. Is something not clear in what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 05:58 PM
3

you probably met a PUA.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 05:49 PM
5

So why do we need to waste our time simply regurgitating information you can find everywhere else on the internet and do work for strangers we don't know? Seriously, it's all there. Just take the effort to find it yourself at least. Because the OP asked? If you didn't want to answer the question, why did you bother responding in the thread? Nobody forced you to "waste your time for strangers." If I wanted to google the solutions, I wouldn't have asked here. I was specifically hoping to find BP r…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 05:47 PM
7

I think I understand the disconnect now. I've just always had people in my life to give advice about specific people. No one really shared with me any of the RP ideas. People who I knew that embodied RP ideas didn't know how to convey what they did. I found TRP online and a lot of the help I found there was a lot more beneficial to me than any individualistic advice I'd seen before. Other people in this thread have said that its not possible to give detailed general advice even though its been d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 04:13 PM
7

The "blue pill" approach, as described in this thread, would be more about talking to 1 or 2 girls in a single night, but using a more exacting approach to increase your odds. What is this exacting approach? I just see lists of what not to do instead of things you should do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 03:19 PM
1

Yeah but it doesn't let the OP know what the problem is. She'll just keep making angry threads if no one tells her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 02:50 PM
4

?? My comment was based on the responses already in this thread. They aren't very helpful. At least in regards to question #2. Based on how threads like this have gone in the past, I'm unlikely to see any proactive advice from TBP. You could of course change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 02:47 PM
10

I appreciate the comment but once again you're just telling him what not to do. All your advice is reactive to his advice. Do you have any advice of your own to give instead of just commenting on why his is bad? You're advice is not very proactive and you're not really giving him any kind of guidance. Also a lot of your advice near the bottom is for people already in a relationship. Most guys need help actually getting into one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 02:00 PM
3

Title is a leading question? You might need a time out before posting again. You seem to start posts very angry and combative.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 01:44 PM
6

I'd be interested in hearing advice for both Casual and Long Term relationships. Either way what I'm interested in is building attraction, as the initial attraction is kind of similar in both cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 12:59 PM
18

The same thing is happening in this thread as in every other similar thread before it. BP People telling you what not to do instead of what to do, and not actually giving advice. I really do want to hear some specific advice but it doesn't seem like anyone is going to even try to give it. They just want to shame you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/14 12:42 PM
1

you could try /r/purplepilldebate
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 07:24 PM
1

I believe most companies give you raises each year, at the minimum to combat inflation. I know I get them. You can't really measure effort on a resume. Especially for already hired employees. Do all jobs require references before promotions?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/14 04:32 AM
2

Keep in mind that "work place experience" would take into account the quality of previous work. If a women and a man have the same resume, they should get offered the same salary. Quantity of work place experience does not necessarily equate to quality of work place experience. I take it by mentioning resume you're talking about hiring. If I'm considering between two employees that have been working for 5 years in the same position for a greater pay raise, I'm going to choose the one who put in …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/14 11:57 PM
-2

you didnt even try to answer the original question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 06:44 PM
7

sarcasm is basically passive-aggressiveness. An indirect way of "insulting" someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 06:37 PM
4

I don't necessarily agree with everything and you didn't go too much into actual attraction, but for the most part you did a much better job then the OP. At least you went in to specifics and added some details. For arguments sake, If someone is uncomfortable in their body, how do they go about being more comfortable? Also many don't realize that they come off as being "uncomfortable" in their body.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 02:54 PM
1

If it was obvious enough, they would have known before getting into that situation. Obviously some of these people don't realize the consequences of some of their actions. It's also obvious that everyone knows the person who committed rape is to blame and is the one who committed a crime. No one is arguing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 01:34 PM
13

We've all heard this generic advice for. It's not really helpful. If I wanted to google the answers, I wouldn't ask the questions here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 07:49 PM
18

Can we have a different BP woman try this? This topic is interesting and I'm curious what advice a BP lady would give if she actually put forth some effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 07:18 PM
1

I don't buy that the sex drive difference is that great. I'd be interested in seeing the difference in libido in men/women with numbers. I also see many BP here that say that men and women are equal in terms of sex drive. Or they'll say the difference is due to "environment". Prostitution is a huge industry. Women's sex drive isn't that far behind. Most women have standards and would never turn to prostitution. They also would have a far easier time of getting sex if they went out, and wouldn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 05:33 PM
3

Toning is kind of a myth. look through this intro guide on /r/fitness http://www.reddit.com/r/Fitness/wiki/getting_started Also it takes men years to get a body like a linebacker. Thats with 10x as much testosterone. You're not going to get that kind of body by lifting heavy. It takes people years of hard work. It's insulting to the people who actually put in that kind of work for you to say you'll just end up looking like a linebacker by casually lifting heavy. Also this comment goes in a bit o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 04:40 PM
1

Are there more female prostitutes or male prostitutes? Why are there more female prostitutes? Because men have lower standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 04:33 PM
1

i love how you had to preface your question by saying it's real, you're a woman, and not rp.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 05:47 AM
2

uhhh i don't know if you looked at the username but that was a bot that reiterated the question like he was "deaf". That wasn't the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/14 07:52 PM
3

Random question. Do you think a male to female transsexual should be allowed to fight women in MMA competitions? Do you think its fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/14 01:58 PM
4

In an honest debate, you generally have to understand both sides' arguments and positions. You seem unwilling to understand what RP people have to say. How can you attack what the other sides position if you don't even understand what their position is. (I'm sure your biased, strawman view of what TRP actually is, is you claiming you understand what TRP is). Think about it, you're not the only one here who is BP. you're not the only one who has made contradictory comments, yet i singled you out.…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 01:26 PM
11

regarding your edit. Everyone gets downvoted. people don't follow the rules. Not too much you can do about it. RP people get downvoted just as much (I'd argue more) than BP. look at this thread Every RP reply to the original comment has downvotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 07:24 PM
7

Heres how I view it. This is a debate sub. If you're here, you're probably here cause you want to discuss both sides. From your comments in this thread, it seems like you just want to continue TBP circlejerk here. I'm here to hear how the other side views things and to see if my opinions can change. I want to see where the other side is coming from on some of these issues and I think this sub works for that. I think the onus is on both of us to be willing to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 07:10 PM
6

It doesn't seem like you have a very open mind. Most of the BP people here are at least willing to discuss and talk about the merits of TRP. I'm just curious why you're here if you're not very understanding and if you aren't even willing to budge a little bit. *typo
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 06:33 PM
12

I don't know if they were originally intended to offend but I think it does offend people and so some will continue using that language knowing that it does offend people. I don't know if it's a goal as I don't care too much about the direction of TRP but I think its a good thing that it does weed people out.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 05:01 PM
17

I think it helps weed out people (especially women) who are easily offended. In my experience, people who are sticklers about word choice and being politically correct are just not fun to be around. Everything has to be tailored to not offend them and its just a chore. Some of these labels helps keep the weak people out that don't want to look at the ideas TRP has and just want to dismiss TRP based on their preconceived notions. Some of the phrases, especially "alpha fucks beta bucks", used to r…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 04:29 PM
1

Yeah i guess the point for me was that whether or not a RP person made a comment in one of those Askreddit threads or not, look at the amount of upvotes there for people who post negatively about the TRP. The point is it doesnt matter if a RP person makes the comment in the thread. Its very likely that if he doesnt, somebody else will, and its obvious because of the number of upvotes it generates. People love their karma, and hating on TRP is easy karma so this kind of "marketing" will always be…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 04:08 PM
1

Theres a TON of people already lined up ready to do this for TRP already. Red pill doesnt have to do anything. Anytime something about worst subreddits gets mentioned on default reddit subs, TRP is going to be there, and its going to have a ton of upvotes. Almost none of it is by TRP members. You'll see a few trying to defend the TRP and get downvoted. theres waaaay to many people commenting and upvoting to have all come from TRP. Theres threads on TPR nearly every week about an askreddit thread…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 04:58 AM
1

How much of this is done by RPers? I see more BP people do this "marketing"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/14 03:48 PM
0

Seems like Blue Pillers are the same: http://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/1y6gla/my_omegle_partner_may_not_have_said_he_was_a/ ^ clearly is 100% real and not a setup by the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/14 04:06 AM
5

for me, it was what "shocked" me into improving myself. Lots of people have talked about working out before and plenty of my friends do it. But reading trp is what actually got me to get up and not be lazy. why it worked, i dont know, but it did. I don't really hang out there anymore because it seems like all the posts are just repeats of stuff i've already seen. which is good for newer people i guess but it gets boring for me. I got out of trp what i wanted and the rest is up to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/14 04:42 AM
1

I think your situation is fine. You don't want to be in a committed LTR. I think most of the people that want to be in a LTR here don't want to be in an open relationship. For those that want to be in a committed relationship, an SO's partner count can be important. It's a preference. Your second paragraph just looks like TBP circlejerk material.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 06:36 PM
0

You are claiming that TRP langauge dehumanizes women. TBP dehumanizes the TRP. If TRP is vindictive, you're at the same level. Two wrongs don't make a right. TRP doesn't believe its bad. TBP knows its bad but still continues. You don't get a pass for being insulting just because you claim that you are insulting beforehand. That's like the people who say "no offense but...(offensive statement)"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 03:27 PM
2

So what if she is? not my job to make sure she isn't offended. I would say the same thing to a guy who may have overheard me say something similar about him.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 03:20 PM
3

Seems like you're guessing peoples attitudes and beliefs. I truly don't think language choice is really toxic. Am I just lying to you? To me those phrases are just descriptors. I truly don't think I'm a sexist, some of those phrases can get the point across simply. I think its just as toxic to mock/ridicule/parody others for what they believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 06:57 PM
5

So it's only fair if your intent is to be insulting?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 06:33 PM
2

So whats the plan, get rid of any group that thinks only a certain way? Should we just eliminate TRP, TBP, feminism, republicans, anarchists? To me, telling people not to be a part of a group that thinks a certain is just as bad as being a part of that group that thinks a certain way. Both are restrictive. Every single group out there will cause you to think a certain way that could effect your actions positively and negatively.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 04:49 PM
2

No offense, but you described most people. What's your experience with psychology? If you've studied the subject at all, you'd know how impressionable people are. We're social animals and we have strong desires to conform to certain standards. If you surround yourself with people that all think a similar way, you'll start thinking that way as well. It's human nature. Part of that is true, but I also think the inverse is true in this regard. I like being surrounded by people that think similarly …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 04:28 PM
2

The OP asked what was meant by the phrase "pumped and dumped". I said there isn't too much meant by it and he's over analyzing it. I'm not arguing for or against certain types of language. I think it's okay to have the choice to use either. You are saying I should be pigeonholed into speaking/thinking a certain way. Are you saying that I have to think and talk a certain way? Should I avoid niche communities that have different opinions because my opinions will be changed to match theirs? You are…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 04:10 PM
4

Does it have to serve a purpose? What purpose does not speaking crudely and offensively serve? It's just a way of communicating that some enjoy. Almost everywhere else in your life, you will be demonized for speaking in any manner that is not PC. Is it wrong to enjoy a space where you can speak freely?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 03:21 PM
4

What does racism, sexism, homophobia have to do with this? Are you saying that men who use the phrase "pump and dump" have contempt for women? Sounds like you're mind reading. Why does it have to serve a purpose? You're over thinking a simple phrase. Part of the appeal of TRP is speaking crudely and offensively and not worrying about offending others with your language.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 03:05 PM
2

When Joe frat-guy riles up the dorm to mock and taunt his latest conquest as she walks down the hall the next morning, and then spreads dirty pictures of her around Okay, now you're just making shit up. RP =/= frat guy. Nor does pump and dump equal walking down the hall and taunting your latest conquest. You didn't answer the question I had above and you keep assuming bitterness leads to dehumanization. You're also assuming these men are bitter. You haven't provided any evidence that this is tru…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 02:57 PM
3

So to get this straight this is what you're extrapolating? Using phrases like "pumped and dumped" --> Bitterness --> Dehumanizing --> dark paths. I think you're thinking about this wayyyy too much. It's admirable that you're on a crusade to save RPers but I don't think being nit-picky about their word choice is the way to go about it. I still don't exactly know what you mean by "dark paths"?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 02:39 PM
4

What are these dark paths that these men will be led down? Do you have any source or evidence for this? Seems like you're just pulling stuff out of nowhere. Edit: I don't think anyone here really has the credentials or experience to say how behaviors/thoughts will impact people years down the line.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 02:28 PM
1

To be honest I don't think the difference between being a ONS and a pumped-dumped slut would be noticed by the lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 02:25 PM
3

Do you think this will affect RPers negatively in the future. I'm just curious why you think its so worrisome if it is true and why you are so worried for the health of RPers
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 01:55 PM
5

Either way you're kind of going about this passive-aggressively. It might be easier if you just come out ask what exactly your problem with the phrase is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 01:40 PM
6

I think you're over thinking this. to me it's just a cruder way of saying one night stand. You're trying to see a hidden meaning where really, there isn't one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 01:19 PM
3

They may have lots of sex, but they won't judge others harshly for having had more partners. They won't judge others as harshly because its not something they care about. Men care about partner count more than women so they will judge women more harshly for it then women will judge men. A woman will judge a man's financial status more than a man will judge a woman's financial status. It's also a double standard but its really that each sex has some different preferences and will judge partners b…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 07:41 PM
1

They're both sluts, I just don't think women care nearly as much as men do about an SO's previous partner count.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 06:59 PM
4

This guy runs his blog and makes his money on the fact that he is not very good looking yet he still has success with women. His whole selling point is that hes ugly. Not really a big fan of his though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 06:55 PM
7

TRP specifically advises men to become as attractive as possible. They talk about working out and dressing well fairly often. The 'example' you picked was of someone who was able to have success without following this specific advise. This doesn't change the fact that TRP says that looks are very important in attraction and recommends becoming more attractive physically. Please don't make things up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 06:47 PM
2

I have seen it literally said that men's attitude is 100% of it and appearance NEVER matters. I'd love to see some examples of red pill comments with a fair amount of upvotes that say this. Otherwise this post doesn't really seem like a red pill issue at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 05:31 AM
2

I thought the question was about 5/10 guys who aren't going to get any better, and just expect hot women to sleep with them because they're so alpha. If this is what you think, I don't think you've grasped TRP yet. TRP talks about increasing your value as a person, especially internally, before looking for women. The problem is, hot women already have a lot of offers so it won't be a foolproof thing. This is really saying nothing. Even going for average women isn't a foolproof thing. I think its…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 04:48 AM
1

. Also, you can improve your appearance without genetic blessings. Work out, dress well, learn how to style your hair and grow some stubble...men have their forms of "makeup" too. This is what TRP endorses. Doing this stuff will move you up from being a 6 or 7 to an 8 or 9. So why would you discourage guys from trying to go for hotter women. I'm not really sure where you get the entitled thing but I don't really see anybody in TRP endorsing that. TRP tells you to improvement yourself. It specifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 04:39 AM
3

I may be confused with what you're getting at, just wanna clear up what you're saying. Are you saying that if you're a guy and you didn't get lucky with genetics that you shouldn't even bother trying with hotter women? You say chances are slim so you should just stick with your lot in life and any amount of self improvement won't really help you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 04:23 AM
1

Would that statistic change significantly in a LTR rather than the formal contract of a marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/14 06:15 PM
1

I know we probably aren't going to agree, but if your relationship is based on love, trust and commitment and if you keep communicating and expanding on it (rather than letting it go stale) I don't see how you wouldn't be in the other 50%. What percent of the 50% that ended in divorce do you think got into marriages that were based on love, trust, and commitment yet still ended in divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/14 06:13 PM
2

It's used for College Admissions, especially in STEM fields. Might be why there's a gap between the amount of males and females in colleges.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/14 02:31 PM
7

Things like affirmative action, which gives advantage to women, are also legally holding men back so its not just terrible gender stereotypes that make things this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/14 01:11 PM
0

I thought he meant posts in the rest of reddit, not here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/14 01:32 PM
2

The honest answer is that for most people, the karma and validation is greater than their actual dislike of the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/14 05:53 AM
3

I've never understood Reddit's obsession with fedoras. How did it somehow become a negative thing. I've hardly seen anyone wearing them in my life. Seems like most people just use fedora as a way to symbolize basement dwelling neckbeard. I imagine people hating on fedoras are just as annoying as people that actually wear them. Honestly I don't really care what anyone wears, much less obsess over them wearing it. But to answer your question, I don't really care either way on them. I don't really …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/14 02:24 AM
6

I dunno, the OP made a post there 18 hours ago and its still there. http://www.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/1wilng/why_should_i_join_the_red_pill/
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 07:50 PM
1

Out of curiosity, do you see any value in having flairs?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/14 01:23 PM
1

Yeah, at this point i generally recognize by username who is RP and who is BP. I think not having flairs can help people who are new here to actually read content instead of automatically agreeing with their side. Doesn't guarantee they will take the time to think about comments but I think it can help more than it can hurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/14 04:23 AM
1

Yeah, I just think that the flairs don't really add anything. I'd rather people have to read a post and judge it based on whats written. I think the flairs allow people to dismiss/ignore comments before even reading them. I guess I just don't see the value in the flairs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/14 01:38 AM
4

Its also odd seeing as there are, i believe, more blue pillers than red. No real effort given to try and answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/14 01:34 AM
4

I think the flairs cause people to upvote/downvote someone based on their flair without necessarily reading their post. Obviously that doesn't mean everyone does it but i think many do. Although voting is just points, it does influence what is seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/14 08:53 PM
1

maybe you're right on the other. I think i was just annoyed that one line jokes get upvoted because its lazy and simpler to read but legitimate answers get ignored. I think it just doesn't contribute anything and should be removed. Thats just my thinking. Also you said this in a comment. Assume that your readers are intelligent all you like, but do not assume that they can recognize your tone from a very short comment without facial or vocal cues. It will only cause problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/14 06:59 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1wfr1g/what_does_your_side_get_wrong/cf1lwg8 http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1wfc40/this_sub_is_great/cf1i69b Both of these are circle jerky statements and didn't receive much warning. what gives?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/14 06:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter