TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

audacious-optimism Archive

View 2 posts and 86 comments by audacious-optimism on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I suggest Jordan Peterson meetups. Or maybe Sam Harris. Lots of single women go to those.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 09:55 PM
2

I think people are in too much of a hurry. It's not about the abs or the photos at all. The only task is to make good friends. Good friends can be the best matchmakers. And what's not fun about making friends??? No naked fun, that's what. Again: too much of a hurry to get to that, in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 04:11 AM
2

Nonsense. Some people aren't settling for less, and one can always find ways to become more attractive. Just a question of time and effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 02:42 AM
1

Scaredy cat.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 06:18 AM
1

So, you do not believe that men can be multi-orgasmic. https://www.amazon.com/Multi-Orgasmic-Man-Sexual-Secrets-Should-ebook/dp/B000FC12XM/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2BPDLK9BMVTXM&keywords=the+multiorgasmic+man&qid=1577427281&sprefix=The+multi+orgasmic+%2Caps%2C268&sr=8-1 You’re the flat-earther, obviously. You don’t know how to concede when you’ve lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 06:16 AM
1

Yes, but I know because I am the one in this conversation who has had Tantric Sex. I know how every single day is a more mind-blowing experience than the day before. Men can be multi-orgasmic, you know. Have you heard of that? It’s possible to have an orgasm every second, for hours. The ejaculation can cause blackouts. What is your expertise here?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 06:08 AM
1

What difference could that make, if it were true?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 06:04 AM
1

And you know that how?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 06:03 AM
1

That is because you do not understand, or you do not believe, Tantric Sex. Access isn’t enough. There is always another virgin to teach.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 06:03 AM
1

There is never enough. Tantric Sex is better than any drug ever known, and, done right, it gets better every day. I am now repeating what I have already said.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 06:02 AM
1

What does my position on feminism have to do with voting in 1910?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:44 AM
1

Politically powerful men KNOW how to get voters to vote however they want them to. They will resort to threats if it benefits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:43 AM
1

Correct. Only the politically powerful healthy heterosexual men who are not hardcore theists will necessarily learn it. ALL of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:40 AM
1

Quite the contrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:39 AM
1

Of course. They might not have called it that, but it’s an inevitable technique healthy men who have access to an unlimited number of beautiful women will necessarily learn.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:38 AM
1

Digging their grave would be getting a STD.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:36 AM
1

No, some men in the 1910s were undoubtedly Tantric Masters. Thus, they could handle a ridiculous number of sexual partners. Variety is the spice of life. If a beautiful virgin offers sex, only a hardcore theist will decline, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:36 AM
1

I suggest you research Tantric Sex. Properly trained, the male body is capable of having sex for hours each day, and done right, it literally gets better every single time. I am not exaggerating. I am a Tantric Master myself, and I am happy to prove that, but I have very high standards. Tantric Sex is BETTER than heroin or morphine or any kind of drug. It’s not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:33 AM
1

Whores tend to have more diseases, and they cost money. Ideally speaking, men tend to like virgins, and they REALLY like it when they know that they’re the only one, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:29 AM
1

Now you’re claiming that a man can be satisfied with his sexual options? Have you heard of group sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:28 AM
1

Irrelevant. The women will agree to keep having sex until they are voting.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:25 AM
1

Correct. Average voters are irrelevant. Politicians are the ones who are relevant. A 1910 politician had the ability to get as much sex as he wanted from the most attractive women in his vicinity. So, the average male politician did, and it made very little difference what he looked like or smelled like. Henry Kissinger says that power is the ultimate aphrodisiac. I suppose you disagree?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:24 AM
1

Me? I thought you asked about 1910 to 1920. I am 53 years old. A single woman in 1910 who desperately wanted her future daughters to have the right to vote would be thrilled to sleep with any man, no matter how fat and ugly, with the power to help to make that occur. I mean, she might sleep with men she finds disgusting every single night, up until she has the right to vote. Women tend to have no qualms about sacrificing their bodies if it benefits their children. That’s evolution in a nutshell.…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:19 AM
1

And what happens to the early adopting men? Lots of sex, that’s what. QED
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:04 AM
1

Easy. Women who want to vote (meaning, pretty much all of them) withhold sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:49 AM
1

The world is a bizarre place. I am surprised that you didn’t notice. The vast majority of non-theist women demand bodily autonomy, plus many theist women do, too. You better believe that they can smell a Republican a mile away. Theist women who are A-OK with limits on bodily autonomy tend to marry a man from their church. Smart men know this of course, and some men pretend to be theists; however, they generally won’t get sex outside of marriage, so it can be a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:46 AM
1

Personally I believe that everything has to do with sex. Everyone wants to be attractive because everyone wants to get the most attractive mate possible, however that person defines attractive. Also, most people want to live as long as possible. That can imply a fear of death, which can rush decision making. If a person is unable to attract attractive mates, then the best option statistically speaking is to change: to get healthier, to earn more money, to learn how to be funny, etc. Change is HA…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:37 AM
1

Men will do whatever they feel helps them have the best sexual choices. When the most attractive women are feminists, then the men will necessarily become feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 02:26 AM
0

I am human and I live in Oregon. I am an exception to your claim. Genes which survive will be too. Natural selection will inevitably eliminate the hedonists. Further, https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/e4agsa/choose_one_and_only_one_the_ability_to_have/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/19 05:44 AM
2

What do you mean "we"? My genes are selfish and they intend to survive. That's evolution in a nutshell I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/19 04:38 AM
7

Wait until VR porn becomes realistic. Cultures that prioritize hedonism over child rearing will largely die out. Remember the Orgasmatron in Woody Allen's "Sleeper"? I guess the Amish are safe and I would guess that the vast majority of the rest of the world is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/19 11:33 PM
1

You mean the ones that aren't here anymore? The ones that aren't here anymore have been killed off by evolution. Evolution doesn't just affect species. Evolution affects political systems, too. Only the best ones survive. "Things are getting worse, we've got to make it better." - Janet Jackson, who seemed to get it more than you do. What exactly are Ms. Jackson's credentials here, other than that she agrees with you? Yet history keeps proving pessimists right because no one listens to their warn…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 04:02 PM
1

You refuse to believe in the reality that countless civilizations have rescued themselves. What I am is a person telling you that if we continue the course we're on, we're going to be totally fucked just like civilizations before us. Then perhaps we won't continue the course we're on. Perhaps we are not changing quickly enough for your tastes, but such changes, when they involve technology, occur exponentially. So most people won't even see it coming. Pessimists in particular never will until it…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 07:10 AM
1

I think people are too hasty. If you want to be something, then be it. Don't ask. Just do it. I'm not saying it's easy, but anyone can do it. You have to be a master diplomat and know which gaps to fill, and you have to not care at all about getting credit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 06:55 AM
1

you are willfully ignoring the problems that are raging all around us Um, no I'm not. I am very aware of them. I am doing literally everything I can think of to fix them. If you aren't a theist then you're a nihilist and you are forced to conclude that humanity is doomed. You are forced to conclude that humanity will die out - and any subsequent sentient species will, too. Any species in the entire universe, in fact, is doomed to destroy itself. That is your philosophy, and if you disagree, I ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 12:09 AM
1

A wedding ring is a type of cultural protection. It reduces interest. To say “his protection does nothing” is hyperbole and is objectively false. I am not saying that a boyfriend/husband is the only tactic or the best one. I am saying that it is a very common one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 11:49 PM
1

The Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics coheres with Free Will if human consciousness implies perfect randomness, BTW. Interesting don't you think? God doesn't play dice with the universe. We do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 08:04 PM
1

this system is unsustainable. Right, but so what? Somewhere down the line one of your descendants is going to have to pick up the pieces That descendant will learn from our mistakes. That's evolution in a nutshell. At least Chicken Little got his ass prepared. And you are preparing yourself how? I suppose you've built a bunker under your house and stocked it with food? You have chosen to be a nihilist. See http://www.simulation-argument.com There are three options, and two of them imply theism. …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 07:50 PM
1

You can easily find as much disappointment as you want. It's everywhere. I think that what you cannot accept is that you can find as much joy as you want, also. Joy is literally EVERYWHERE. It's just a question of perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 07:37 PM
1

I am a philosopher, and, I wish to live a happy life. Nihilism is incompatible with happiness for me. Therefore I have no choice but to be a theist, and to hope for the best. There is a non-zero chance that World Peace will happen, so I focus my efforts on doing everything I can to increase that percentage, even if it's an unseen minute amount. Because that makes me happy. If being "realistic" makes you happy, or, you do not care about being happy, then, fine, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 07:31 PM
1

You are a pessimistic historian.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 07:25 PM
0

I wonder if you are genetically hard-wired to be a pessimist, or it's a result of your upbringing. Do you have any opinion on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 07:22 PM
1

And yet, we're still here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 07:20 PM
1

Are you saying that no woman has ever successfully escalated? Or, was your comment intended to be ad-hominem?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:58 PM
1

I don't get why everyone doesn't go their own way. It baffles me that everyone else feels like they need to be a follower. I wonder if that is genetic. It's certainly safer, granted. I think that this probably has to do with me being a theist and being utterly convinced that I will live for eternity. I honestly don't care much about my own needs in the next hundred years, and I'll probably say the same thing in a hundred years, if I am alive then. I mostly just care about making sure my daughter…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:56 PM
1

So what? That's just growing pains. We somehow survived the Great Depression. We will survive the next one because there are billions of good people who care more about their kids than themselves. The book "Collapse" by Jared Diamond is on-point.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:52 PM
1

I am the change I want to see in the world. I refuse to date and I refuse to escalate. That's how. If it works then others will copy me. If it doesn't, then I die surrounded by friends and no wife. Win/win in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:48 PM
1

All the best jobs I got was when someone came to me. Some of us never apply for jobs, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:45 PM
1

This is more interesting. This is politics The point of this post is a cultural change that may fix this problem. I am at least trying. Do you have a better idea? If so, then speak up. Or are you just being a naysayer?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:42 PM
1

As a result there is an explosion of women who are at Host Bars PAYING to be coddled. Sounds like a temporary problem. If true, then men will flock there. Japan must start to allow immigrants, or die. Globalization will fix this. Lonely men willing to take a cultural risk will go to where the women are. And, then the best genes, and the best culture, will survive. So this sounds like evolutionary growing pains to me. The weak must die out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:40 PM
1

The game needs players. Which player will win? Which players are winning now? Jeff Bezos? Bill Gates? Warren Buffett? What attributes do all of the current winners have? What attributes MUST they have? Or, are you suggesting we change the rules of the game? If so, how?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:34 PM
1

Aggression alone is a small component in that. Small? Have you ever tried to start a business? It is cutthroat in the United States. It is close to impossible for moral people. I agree that intelligence and tenacity are required, too. There are many components, but aggression (properly controlled, aggression is not immoral) is key.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:29 PM
1

> Have you read my second paragraph? Yes, which was why I replied with "How?", because I wanted specifics. > Democracy and capitalism are not a result of millions years of evolution Yes they are. Apes had mafias long ago, before they could speak. > 7+ figures and subordinate people do. Properly controlled, aggression leads to 7+ figures and subordinates.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:25 PM
1

Remove the power, the problem solved. How? That is fighting millions of years of evolution. Females could all take shots of testosterone, I guess. Or males could be forced to have less testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:20 PM
1

I don't understand how men are protectors. How is the average man protecting his wife or girlfriend? Generally speaking, a single female has good reason to fear all male strangers, particularly in the United States. Attractive single females, in particular. They get accosted constantly. The most attractive single females cannot risk being friendly with an unattractive heterosexual single male stranger. At best, it is a waste of time, because she will end up being hit on. At worst, I don't want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:17 PM
1

That is of course not true, the rest build fuher upon that so its total nonsense. Allow me to rephrase. The tiny percentage (1%) of male psychopaths make dating much more difficult for a significant number of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 05:46 PM
2

Personally I prefer cultural changes that minimize violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 03:15 AM
1

Charleton Heston IIRC. Sorry. I meant omega male. https://www.macmillandictionary.com/us/buzzword/entries/omega-male.html
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 03:09 AM
3

In the meantime I am trying this out for myself. I flatly refuse to escalate. I only look for friends regardless of their gender or appearance. Maybe I won’t get sex, but I should be able to find some cool friends, and who knows? Maybe one of them will set me up. I think that this might be a winning strategy for omega males.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 02:49 AM
1

Then why do you care to have this discussion? Do you have nothing better to do with your time?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 02:47 PM
1

Does it threaten you? Do you have a problem with the definition of love I gave?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:58 AM
1

It can also mean that he loves his wife, so if she isn’t happy, then he cannot be.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:54 AM
1

Rewind to before you married.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:28 AM
2

You lose your ability to adopt also. You can never parent any child.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:27 AM
2

Some people value love over money and free time. Kids tend to love unconditionally if they aren’t psychologically damaged, either biologically, or by abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:26 AM
1

No, the question is more than that. It means that you’d never date a woman with a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:23 AM
1

Are you a nihilist?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:21 AM
1

I think you misunderstood the question. Either sex or kids. If you choose sex then you never get to be a parent in any form, so adoption is out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:20 AM
1

Rewind to before you had kids. That is the answer I am looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:18 AM
2

Don’t be too hard on yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:17 AM
0

That wasn’t an option.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:16 AM
3

Or that they have no clue of how to protect children from such a world.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 06:12 AM
1

And you’d give up sex? Or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:52 AM
1

Well, anything that involves sex, clearly. Gay marriage is another big issue in this space.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:51 AM
1

Theists, who believe that they do not own their bodies, might disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:48 AM
2

I assume then that you also prioritize bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:44 AM
1

True. I would also add to that the people who feel that they are unqualified to be parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:42 AM
2

Yes. I’m trying to figure out what rationale or life experiences would lead someone to value sex over kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:40 AM
3

Why do the specifics matter? They shouldn’t. It’s a thought experiment to figure out what is most important to people. But fine, consider that you married someone, and then there was a horrific accident which prevents all sexual activity. But, you can still adopt. Does that help you to answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:38 AM
2

Love has been defined as having your own happiness dependent on another’s. Happy wife happy life, for example. Love comes with risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:35 AM
2

What does romance have to do with kids? You get to choose one and only one. I just want to know where your priorities are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:33 AM
1

How so? Imagine that you are married to your best friend. You share the exact same interests and hobbies. You just cannot ever get naked together. Is that so horrible?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:13 AM
1

Monks have their reasons I am quite sure, and “permanent post-nut clarity” could conceivably be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 05:00 AM
4

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 04:53 AM
5

It is a thought experiment to determine what people consider to be more fulfilling to a happy life. That’s all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 04:47 AM
1

Genes are selfish. Genes desire the best possible genes to mate with.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 01:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter