TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aussietoads Archive

View 9 posts and 3,734 comments by aussietoads on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,734 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Try getting yourself a lobotomy to raise your IQ.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 02:24 AM
-1

That's precisely why I don't get a flu vaccination every year. Vaccines are fine for fighting off infectious agents that don't mutate every year, and have been trialled over extended periods of time. E.G TB, polio, tetanus etc. Only stupid guinea pigs line up for vac jabs without question. Especially vac jabs that haven't been properly and thoroughly trialled over extended time periods.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 11:10 PM
-6

FOFF with the idea of forced vaccinations. I'm all for voluntary vac, but am against these vacs because they have all been developed hastily and without long term study of effectiveness and side effects. Intensive studies are not a replacement for long term studies. Edit: Obviously a lot of fearful hypochondriacs in this thread.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 04:54 AM
6

We desperately need more women in Sewage Treatment & Effluent Management, also known as S.T.E.M. , right now !! Before SHTF.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 11:24 AM
2

I didn’t say all men don’t get vasectomies I said men. Perhaps you should have said some men, or even many men. Just saying men is the same as saying all men.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 02:11 AM
10

Men don’t get vasectomies Really ? Well that snip I had down there over 30 years ago must be called something else then ?
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:37 PM
1

The point is, he didn't need a woman in his life to be productive.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:08 PM
1

Da Vinci was Gay, Tesla was a womanising bachelor. Either way, they didn't need a permanent woman partner to be a productive person.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:08 PM
435

What I find curiously interesting is the great number of historically famous men who contributed enormously to the benefit of humanity and who were also life long bachelors. Two examples are Leonardo Da Vinci and Nikola Tesla, but there are many more.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:42 AM
1

I always smile when I get to swear. Relieves the daily tension.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:29 PM
2

Just be quiet and leave the preaching to Sunday school. I never tell sad sacks to smile. They can be as miserable as they want, not my problem. I wasn't preaching, and as an atheist I don't do Sunday school. But I do swear. So GFY.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 07:15 AM
1

Obviously these sad sacks have never understood the psychology behind embracing a smile. Plenty of studies over the years have shown that by merely smiling we end up feeling better ourselves. Smiling has a beneficial positive feedback effect on the person who is smiling as well as a positive effect on the person looking at them. Let these sad sacks drown in their own ocean of misery.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 03:44 AM
22

LOL Years ago I had a stupid feminist tell me that prejudice against men exists but sexism doesn't. I told her I thought she was a fucking idiot if she thinks being a bigoted prejudicial arsehole isn't just as bad as being a bigoted sexist arsehole.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 10:04 PM
3

" Then what name do we give all the narcissistic, hateful feminist traits? " What name ? Feminism, of course.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 10:18 PM
3

LGBTQI .. . I'm a person, that's my label. Hang additional labels on yourself if you want to, but it seems limiting rather than liberating to me.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 09:56 AM
13

I should have known it was our very own Australian bush pig, Clem the Ford. Nothing unusual about vitriolic bile coming from her, that's her stock in trade.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 06:39 AM
1

The only rift between the genders is the fake rift caused by feminists who need a rift to exist to justify their own existence. As a former lefty I do not vote for the status quo when the status quo are the left.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 01:19 AM
12

As a conservative I'd like to know where you got most of your strawman ideas about what conservatives think. Conservatives are no different to other people in that they do not all think the same, vote the same, or wish for the same things.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 01:32 AM
1

TDS = Trump Derangement Syndrome. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=tds+syndrome
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:25 PM
3

De Niro suffers from TDS. He's a nutjob if ever there was one.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 09:19 PM
5

You're just searching for a reason to justify double standards held by feminists. Me, I personally don't care what jobs women fight for, but I do care that feminists bullshit everyone that they only want equality, when what they really want is simply to pick the cream. Now if they only want the cream, fine. Just don't bullshit me that they want equality across the board, because they don't.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 07:17 AM
12

Yet they constantly tell us that they want true equality, which in my opinion means taking the bad with the good. Instead they want only the good. F..k em.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 01:40 AM
12

Next they will be requiring that no less than 50% of seats are to be held by socialists regardless of voting outcomes.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 09:16 PM
2

But call it "traditional gender roles", not patriarchy. Yet it seems like the great increase in suicide rates has coincided with the denigration of " traditional gender roles", and smashing " the patriarchy TM "
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:08 PM
4

Are you human.? If so then just demand the same human rights for everyone.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 09:37 AM
3

that do not reflect our ideology The moment this sub becomes an ideological circle-jerk is the moment it becomes toxic and counter productive like most feminist subs. Sharing and debating ideas is good, but adopting an ideological hive mind is not.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 10:55 PM
5

LOL. Well you get no argument from me over that statement ! LOL Either way, beware menslib.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 09:45 AM
13

Menslib is a feminist trojan horse.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 09:59 PM
8

Solving any problem is antithetical to their modus operandi. Without people who feel disenfranchised for some reason they would have no followers.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 08:39 PM
3

So she calls herself a feminist, though from her spiel she seems far more like an egalitarian. No need to diss her for wanting to help. Justice, fairness and human rights are, and should be, everyone's concern.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 12:48 AM
7

In response : Should idiots be allowed to ask stupid questions ?
/r/MensRights16/03/21 10:33 PM
3

It's a pity he didn't pay her with counterfeit cash. When she got tracked down by the police for spending it, and tried to point the finger at him, he could simply shrug and say he knows nothing about it and she's the one with the funny money.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 07:22 AM
7

Females only have intrinsic value because they are currently the only means by which humans can reproduce due to their possession of a womb. Artificial wombs will make females as expendable as males. That is why feminists have opposed the development of artificial wombs. It's not because they care about the children who may be gestated in an artificial womb, it's because they fear the obvious redundancy of natural wombs that successful artificial wombs will bring about. Personally I don't want t…
/r/MensRights16/03/21 07:10 AM
1

It's going to keep reprogressing. FTFY.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 06:48 AM
1

You are confirming the importance of men to the steel industry. Additionally, more men would have to be employed above and beyond the usual steelworkers in the short term, to clear up whatever mess was created. That would be true of virtually all industries. Instead of creating short term employment by sending men to kill each other in useless wars, the powers that be would have to employ them to rebuild the affected industries.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 07:47 AM
1

Men have had to pay with their own lives by the millions in wars that have lasted for years, not days or weeks. A week is a drop in the bucket compared to the duration of misery so many men have had to endure for the sake of 'society'. By all means exempt doctors, paramedics and nurses if you really think they are absolutely necessary. However, take this on board - in the late 1970's doctors in America went on strike to protest the federal governments medical/remuneration policies at the time. T…
/r/MensRights15/03/21 07:39 AM
5

The world won't stop. Just certain aspects of modern civilisation we all take for granted will become so obvious in their absence.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 06:57 AM
8

A day is way too short. Make it a week if you truly wan't to see a long lasting beneficial effect.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 06:55 AM
5

LOL
/r/MensRights14/03/21 06:25 AM
1

Feminists think ? That's news !
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:10 PM
7

You mean besides demonising us ? Nothing positive that's for sure.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 01:18 AM
6

Fear is a positive survival mechanism. Too many idiots think they should be able to roam wherever they like without fear. Many will become contenders for the Darwin awards.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:17 AM
3

Feminist is the abbreviation for female supremacist. Women's rights activist and men's rights activist is a more honest title for those seeking specific rights for their own sex. If a person really wants to be associated with the notion of equality then egalitarian is the most appropriate title.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 06:26 AM
7

It's not specifically a male issue Human rights issues ARE men's right issues. An issue doesn't have to be exclusive to men in order for men to be concerned.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 09:23 PM
18

In Australia the public service is nearly 70% women. While many of those in the private sector lost jobs and or income, those in the public service essentially had a stay at home holiday on full pay. Oh the suffering of all those poor women /s.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 10:52 PM
7

The goodbye wave.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 08:46 PM
18

I have my own rule of thumb which is that if something was stated as fact by a feminist, it's bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 05:32 AM
9

While dumb-arses like you are just seen as the dumb-arses they are.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 03:34 AM
4

no. So you believe women don't have agency or personhood. Get the fuck out of here you sexist piece of garbage.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 09:32 PM
1

support that the far right is getting Don't fall into the trap of labelling everybody who is right of the left as far right. Moderate centrists are a bigger demographic than both left and right will admit, but the left seems to like labelling anyone who doesn't identify as a leftist as FAR right. As a right leaning centrist I say bollocks to that.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 07:56 AM
1

If someone identifies as trans male then they need a reality check because there is no such thing as trans male.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 12:26 AM
1

It’s clear he is a trans male No it is clear that they refer to themselves as trans men. There is a reason trans gender exists but trans sexual does not. You can change your gender expression (man - woman) but you can't change your biological sex (male - female).
/r/MensRights18/02/21 08:40 PM
2

Someone has to mansplain to a feminist. How else will they improve their knowledge ?
/r/MensRights15/02/21 12:56 AM
4

Be prepared to bow, my name is nobody ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9Vfoa6rDkM
/r/MensRights12/02/21 09:16 AM
19

And many psychologists wonder why the other fields of science don't take the field of psychology seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 07:03 AM
21

Yeh they are also so racist and bigoted that they allow men of all races, religions and nationalities to join. What a bunch of thuggish exclusive shitlords. /s
/r/MensRights11/02/21 09:29 PM
2

I know what feminism is. It's a social cancer in need of eradication.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 08:20 PM
9

When you lose your sense of humour you are halfway to becoming a feminist.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 10:53 PM
4

but there does seem to be something of an agenda in these awards. All such awards have been politicised for decades. The Nobel peace prize is another example of something which once merited respect but is now just another propaganda prop.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 03:34 AM
2

With all this gender neutrality being so popular I can't wait to see a womb-person get pregnant to a eunuch.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 08:34 PM
8

Yes you can be both simply by being egalitarian.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 12:45 AM
2

For every politician who has his back, others oppose him. You've done nothing wrong so you have nothing to be ashamed of. The greatest thing to fear is fear itself.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 09:14 PM
1

Then expose his actions to the public. Politicians hate their bad behaviours given the disinfectant of public attention.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 08:56 PM
4

a fraction of the government experience. That's probably the best thing about Trump. He is a businessman who knows how to generate wealth. Most governments are generally made up of career politicians who only know how to redistribute wealth they have taken from others, they don't have a clue how to create it themselves.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 06:10 AM
10

A feminist by any other name is a feminist just the same. Male feminist, female feminist, unicorn feminist. They all will be ignored by me at best or be on the receiving end of my contempt at worst.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:39 PM
15

Depends which men you are talking about. Trump did more to end the useless wars and diffuse hostilities in the middle east than any other president thus far. Less war means less men being sacrificed. My biggest concern with Biden is that the first thing he'll do internationally is spark another war in the middle east. He's already talking about re-engaging Iran with help towards their nuclear power. That scares the shit out of most of the other middle east countries because they don't trust Iran…
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:25 PM
2

One question. More than who or what ?
/r/MensRights19/01/21 05:43 AM
6

It's not a political issue That's where you are wrong. Human rights for anyone has been and will continue to be a political issue. You probably mean it shouldn't be a partisan political issue, to which I agree. It should be, and is, a bi-partisan political issue. As an aside, not all women are feminists, and in the same vein, not all lefties are feminists either.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 06:40 AM
1

Found the feminist. Found the feminist. You spelled arsehole wrong.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 12:53 AM
5

My comment is for others to contemplate. Now be a good femcel and gfy.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 10:31 PM
4

@OP : LOL. Opinions are like arseholes, everybody has one. Fortunately I can ignore stinking opinions like yours.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 10:23 PM
3

Julia Gillard is a backstabbing duplicitous ex-politician suffering from irrelevancy syndrome since she lost her position to another male politician who is now also suffering from the same ailment.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 06:21 AM
3

How about arrogantly stupid or stupidly arrogant ?
/r/MensRights17/12/20 06:12 AM
12

When she said she liked your shirt you should have replied, " umm, well you can't have it ".
/r/MensRights05/12/20 09:09 PM
2

Facebook has always been fucked.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 09:06 PM
2

They were raised by American women.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 09:17 PM
2

Be very careful which charities you donate to and support. I used to support many different charities, now I only support local animal welfare groups.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/20 08:43 PM
2

They stick their head up their arse and pull the stats out with their teeth.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 10:31 PM
4

@OP : You are entitled to your opinion. Fortunately, I'm entitled to ignore it.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 08:59 PM
6

If the men's is full, then identify as a woman for 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 12:43 AM
17

" this sub has a lot more overtly anti feminist posts than r/feminism has about hating men." Anti feminism is not anti woman. Feminism is a misanthropic mental illness in need of eradication.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 12:26 AM
6

@OP : Please consider using an archiver instead of linking directly to sites like the guardian which never allow comments to rebuke the content of their articles. Starve them of ad revenue.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 02:17 AM
6

She's right. It is a violation of equal rights. When was the last time that she did her equal share in boosting a male's confidence with a dogwhistle or a wolfcall ? Tell her she should not only share in the enthusiasm of publicly expressing her admiration and approval to a member of the opposite sex, but also the risk of receiving public and personal ire from those who find offence in everything.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:21 AM
3

Ad hominem begets ad hominem.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 06:31 AM
2

It's not cute that you're an arsehole.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 06:24 AM
8

Go back and get it on recording. It is illegal in Australia to discriminate on the basis of sex/gender.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 10:41 PM
9

Feminism is a disease in need of eradication.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:25 AM
6

I don't want to argue with feminists. Hell, I don't even want to talk to them.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:25 AM
3

You have drunk the globalist agenda 21 kool-aid. Give your job to China now, as Biden will export your job anyway, you might as well help him out.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 08:54 PM
2

I've declared my opinion on abortion already. Not good enough for you.? Too bad. You can air your opinions about any matter, and I might agree or disagree without using ad hominem, but when you try to tell me I don't think what I do think, then all you deserve is an ad hominem response.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 11:24 PM
2

My opinion is you are an idiot. Now GFY.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 09:13 PM
2

You owe me nothing, and you are projecting BS. I'm a father and a grandfather, and I know my feelings well. On that note, I don't care whether you down vote or up vote. This is not a place I come to have my opinions lauded, nor care whether others agree or disagree. I state my opinions. End of story. Now take your asinine projection on what you think I think, and shove it where the sun doesn't shine.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 08:48 PM
1

Too many qualifiers in your question. However, on the subject of pro life and pro choice : Personally, I'm pro woman's choice, because I think it is ultimately the woman's choice to continue a pregnancy or not. But I'm pro life from the point of view that I always hope that a woman will choose life for the unborn.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 09:05 AM
0

Oh you poor thing you really can't see you're being trolled can you? What you don't seem to realise is that I agree with you about gender, but the statements I posted are typical of an SJW reaction. Hence the /s (/s=sarcasm) at the end of the first post, the scare quotes around abnormal in the second post, and calling you a shitlord, which is now an almost old fashioned ad hominem frequently used by retarded SJW's. Sadly you seem ignorant of the language of the gender ideologues and SJW crowd, b…
/r/MensRights31/10/20 04:59 AM
1

You don't understand sarcasm do you? LOL. What the fuck has normal got to do with anything, and are you implying that being trans is 'abnormal'. Oh you fucking shitlord ! No sarcasm intended.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 01:41 AM
1

You need to book yourself in for a lobotomy to raise your IQ from moron to at least idiot.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 12:55 AM
2

Wow, that's blasphemy. Take a cat'o'nine tails and go stand in a corner and self flagellate till the cat loses all it's tails ! /s
/r/MensRights31/10/20 12:52 AM
7

Yep. Nothing's changed since the days of Whitlam. Overreach is labor's hallmark.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 07:16 AM
1

Sorry, but I've never heard a radfem say that anybody other than a mother as a parent matters.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 09:10 PM
1

Yes, based on what you just posted, I agree with you. He didn't need to tell anyone to FU and I don't see how he saw any racism in any of your comments prior to his angry response. Edit : I just re-read your comment and I suggest there was no reason to refer to white people as entitled or even assume his race as being white. So back to square one. What you said had a degree of racism associated with it.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 07:12 AM
2

Not enough context to support your assertion. He made an angry statement for sure, but I'm inclined to believe it was in response to something he found offensive, judging by what he said.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 05:19 AM
4

Virtually no context provided.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 05:15 AM
2

A little more context required.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 05:14 AM
-1

We are also being brainwashed by those using Covid as an excuse to strip us of our human rights, and preparing us for a new 'normal'. With terms like ' social distancing ' instead of safe distance, ' staying apart keeps us together ', (Orwellian doublespeak) and ' Covid normal ' instead of normal. And don't forget ' women most affected by Covid -19 ', another gaslighting phrase.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 10:07 PM
3

You should have identified as a coloured native disabled woman. Then told her it would be obvious that if you didn't get the job, you were being oppressed and discriminated against. Then ask her how she spells her name for reference in any future law suit, whether you get the job or not !
/r/MensRights21/10/20 09:08 PM
1

he did nothing wrong! In a just universe you would be 100% correct. Sadly, we don't live in a just universe.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 04:52 AM
9

I'm very pleased that in Australia a charity group called Polish Man has started a campaign " Stop violence against children ", as opposed to the usual feminist biased " Stop violence against women and their children." It's a subtle yet meaningful departure from the usual campaigns which lump women and children together as victims whilst failing to acknowledge that women are also perpetrators.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 12:24 AM
12

Surprise, surprise, another lesbian who hates men. Well golly gee.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 08:14 PM
2

As with most things, it depends on context and setting. Usually the reaction to your answer gives away the intent of the questioner. Unfortunately, when you are in an on-line conversation, unless it's video chat form, you cannot see the body language of the other person, so a lot of nuance is missed.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 05:13 AM
26

I was once in the company of an aboriginal friend who was asked 'what do you do for a living' and he simply replied, " I breathe air, drink water and eat food. Isn't that what everybody does for a living? " I couldn't hold back my laughter.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 09:18 PM
3

I am a male. I'm also a man. I was once a male infant, then a male boy before I became a male man. The one consistent label I identify as, is male. That is not up for negotiation. Fuck off if you think being called either man or male is bad.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 09:08 PM
22

When you've met for the first time, and you're not even dating, just talking, and she asks 'what do you do for a living'. Basically trying to gauge the potential content of your wallet.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:59 PM
2

A much smaller number of women are homeless compared to men, so we shouldn't bother trying to help women find accommodation. Also fewer women attempt suicide so we should pour all our resources into helping to prevent men's suicides. /s
/r/MensRights16/10/20 09:48 PM
1

Oh well, back to the drawing board.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 08:20 PM
2

No you are not being a Karen. The pool staff and pool policy is discriminating against you. I would seek legal advice about sueing them.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 06:13 AM
8

A good lawyer would suggest to the judge that bringing up prior false allegations is not about her prior sexual history but about her prior lying history.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 06:09 AM
11

Next time you might try throwing a cat among the pigeons. Instead of denying their 'wage gap' it might be more fruitful to say something like " Yeh I can see you're concerned about the small earnings gap, but I'm more concerned about the very large spending gap. How are women able to spend 80% of the money involved in consumer purchasing unless they are spending someone else's money ? "
/r/MensRights13/10/20 09:19 PM
25

If you are a heterosexual male then why would you want to date a male suffering from sexual dysphoria ? Sexual preferences are personal, so don't let name callers using ad hominem such as 'transphobia' dictate what your preferences should be. I don't call trans people heterophobic or homophobic and trans people shouldn't call me or anyone else transphobic for preferring biological females, whether kids are wanted or not.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 11:17 PM
1

Your head is really fucked up. No its not. It's most likely that the man she fucked did not know she was married. It doesn't matter whether the man knew or not, it's the result that can't be ignored. The cheating could have occurred with another woman, but she cheated with another man resulting in a child. The child is a constant reminder of infidelity that her cheating with another woman wouldn't have created. As for blaming the man, that needs more contextual information, because irrespective …
/r/MensRights11/10/20 04:28 AM
64

Liberate yourself, stop caring about what feminists think.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 02:57 AM
0

At least get the labels right. A paedophile is an adult person who is sexually attracted to and prefers prepubescent children. A 17 years old person is an adolescent. An adult who is attracted to and prefers post pubescent/adolescent minors is an ephebophile. Edit : interesting how pointing out a simple fact is negative to some people.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:33 AM
1

Trying to improve your own financial situation is everyone's right, including men.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:11 AM
1

Yeh, calling hags girls is demeaning - to girls.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 09:46 PM
10

Whenever an article states that "Science Says" or "Scientists Say" without citing the actual scientists names, you can rest assured it's BS. Even more laughable is citing another tabloid magazine article as the source.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 04:23 AM
6

/s = this is sarcasm. After reading your second post in this thread it is obvious you are full of feminist kool-aid.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 04:07 AM
13

Did you forget the /s or are you really that full of feminist kool-aid ?
/r/MensRights09/10/20 01:03 AM
3

why would we discourage conversation via insults? Again, I can only speak for myself and give reasons for my own comments. There is no 'we' in me.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 12:30 AM
6

|First of all apologies for the few negative comments. No. By all means, apologise for something you might have written, but do not presume you have the authority to apologise for others. Feel free to disagree with others, but do not feel free to speak for them unless they ask you to.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 10:53 PM
4

Did you even read the article.?
/r/MensRights08/10/20 08:19 PM
1

You can't control what others have done to you, or haven't done for you. You can control how you respond. How you deal with all things is all in your head.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 08:12 PM
0

LOL. Yep, that literary contribution is bound to have long lasting positive effects for men's betterment and well being. LOL.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:03 AM
0

LOL. So you're clairvoyant, and know what I do and who I am ? LOL No doubt you live a life in full pursuit of the betterment of man. I hope you do a better job of it than you do with your inane ad hominems.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 05:46 AM
1

Project all the useless inane ad hominems you like. Being victimized is one thing, but identifying as a victim is as SJW/oppression olympic as you can get. No thanks, I'd rather do something positive for men such as I do in my job, than join the whining of oppression olympians.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 05:11 AM
1

You can identify as a victim as much as you like. It will get you nowhere. Enjoy your oppression olympics, just like femhorroids do.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 02:44 AM
2

You're confusing being male with victimhood and how you perceive others are treating you. It's great to be male, now do yourself and other males a favour and treat yourself and them how you want to be treated. You can't change the world in one step, but the first step towards changing anything is to change the way you perceive and treat yourself and others.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 02:05 AM
12

All the best. It's not just ok to be male, it's great to be male!
/r/MensRights07/10/20 08:53 PM
1

|if you prove in a court of law, that she lied about taking brith control, can you be absolved of paying child support? No.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 12:43 AM
11

Are they really superior to all the other 51 genders ?
/r/MensRights04/10/20 06:39 AM
2

Aussie here. Settle petal. You're getting your knickers in a knot over something that is true. Aussie femhorroids ARE hypocritical scum. Most feminists are, but the article is about a whining Aussie femhorroid. Context counts.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 09:20 PM
1

" although I agree with the need of the lockdown it's rules make no sense at all, " Lockdowns don't work and are politically driven. I live in Victoria in Australia. We have been subject to the most strict and longest lockdown measures in all of Australia. Our economy has been destroyed, peoples lives are in tatters and the lock down has achieved nothing. Victoria has the worst morbidity of all the states with deaths continuing to happen. Locking down entire healthy populations is insanity and c…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 10:37 PM
1

Dave's not here man.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:59 AM
2

LOL. For the last two thousand years (and probably more) doomsayers have been spreading their prophecies of doom and gloom and collapse for various civilisations and the world at large. Sure some civilisations collapsed, only to be replaced by new stronger and longer lasting ones. " The end of the world is nigh " - 550th revision edition. LOL.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 10:09 PM
3

The spelling ?
/r/MensRights01/10/20 06:30 AM
6

Yes Cathy that's what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 05:03 AM
14

|How is that related to mothers? It's not related at all Cathy.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 02:27 AM
19

Congratulations, you win the " Cathy Newman " award today.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 02:24 AM
8

No, I'm saying that cashiers, whether male or female shouldn't expect the same compensation as a manager, whether male or female. If that's not clear enough for you then perhaps your reading comprehension needs improvement.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 02:18 AM
9

Regarding the second point, if a male works as cashier would they anticipate getting the same compensation as a male manager ? If not, then why would a female cashier expect the same compensation as a male manager ?
/r/MensRights01/10/20 01:48 AM
4

California is on fire because Antifa arsonists keep lighting fires.. Poor forest management, lack of ground fuel clearing and regular controlled burn offs, and lack of maintenance and creation of fire fighting access tracks in forests are the great contributors to the current state of wild fires in the US. As a volunteer fire fighter in Australia I've seen first hand how green politics and poor forest management are the greatest contributors to uncontrollable bush fires. As for the pandemic resp…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 01:39 AM
1

Take your intersectionality BS and shove it where the sun doesn't shine.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:48 AM
4

I love women in general. I loathe feminists in general. I don't conflate one generality with the other.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 06:46 AM
1

People are legitimately more concerned about Trump's tax returns People Democraps are legitimately more concerned about Trump's tax returns
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:12 AM
2

Meh, throw a mouse into the room and see whose survival response is superior.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 02:57 AM
3

Your teacher is being an a-hole.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 01:00 AM
1

Society's malaise originates from its smallest unit, the family. Society's malaise originates from its attacks on the smallest unit, the family.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 10:12 PM
1

Lucky for you though, you couldn't say that to their face. Well you could way back then, but then you'd be left with no face.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 03:17 AM
12

Avoid people who WILL not pay for their own bills.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 09:04 PM
4

They also have all occurred under the watch of a Democrat Congress, and almost all have occurred under a Democrat State Governor or Democrat City Mayor.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 03:44 AM
1

There is no word ' cross dressing '. It's two words. I think you need to brush up on your maths.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 02:36 AM
5

White Ribbon in Australia was forced into liquidation after it lost Government funding because it was defrauding the government and the public. When forced to release details of its expenditure, it was found that most of the money went to staff wages, a small amount going to 'raising awareness' programs, and none going to help actual victims of DV. In essence, White Ribbon (Australia) was a money making scam for virtue signallers and nothing more. I see no reason to believe other chapters of the…
/r/MensRights16/09/20 02:29 AM
6

but her goal is to just help women who are being abused, No, her goal is to only help women abused by males. Otherwise she would have written, " end violence against women " instead of " end MALE violence against women. " Thus she is ignoring the high rate of violence among lesbian women, and perpetuating the idea that only males are violent offenders in domestic abuse while ignoring male victims completely.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 02:24 AM
16

Menslib is a feminist trojan horse. Wise not to let it through your gates.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 02:16 AM
12

No argument from me. I agree 100%
/r/MensRights14/09/20 09:29 PM
2

It's a pity you didn't provide matches to go with all your strawmen. We could have one hell of a bon-fire.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 12:40 AM
11

Ban men from feminist spaces. Yes please. Oh and while your at it, ban feminists from mens spaces. Seems like a mutually good deal.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 10:13 PM
10

" feminism is a movement for equality of both genders and not just woman? " LOL. Thanks for the joke, I needed a good belly laugh.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 03:42 AM
3

Eventually femhorroids will find a new word/phrase to weaponize. Prior to Y2K their favourite word was "chauvinist".
/r/MensRights07/09/20 08:12 AM
3

Yes they are issues. They are just not issues to me or are minor issues to me, but they are still relevant issues.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 02:17 AM
63

Find a good lawyer and sue your professional ethics board.
/r/MensRights05/09/20 12:19 AM
2

Fear and hate all you want. What you give is what you'll receive.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 11:13 PM
1

You haven't gone far enough away. Try Mars.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 05:00 AM
1

Yes there should be more Feminist Women in Sewage Treatment and Effluent Management. As the saying goes, "there is money in muck", so go to it Feminist Women, and make your fortune from the huge pile of shit you create, which gets larger by the day.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 08:51 AM
3

Well a woman is simply a wo-man so I guess wo-men can't be raped.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 02:42 AM
1

Feminists are morons.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 12:48 AM
205

Do yourself a favour. Stop caring about what feminists think.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 08:51 AM
2

Menslib sub ?
/r/MensRights02/09/20 02:15 AM
1

LOL. The Toronto University lecturer (shudder to think this guy spews his nonsense to an naive audience) very first words are " basically it's not correct that there is such a thing as biological sex " Everything that came out of his mouth after that was sophistry to muddy the waters. Care factor fast approaching zero.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 10:43 AM
1

I linked to that search results page to show that it is a broad subject with many entries. You chose one example. However, this was also put in the last edit of the last post https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WI8HrZ7mnl8
/r/MensRights01/09/20 09:47 AM
1

It's an idea thats been around since Plato and probably longer. https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=blank+slate+meaning&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 As I also said, it is an extreme position. Here's a contemporary lunatic who not only thinks sex is ascribed, but teaches it at university level. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WI8HrZ7mnl8
/r/MensRights01/09/20 09:38 AM
1

Sorry, I misunderstood you as a blank slater, who thinks we ascribe a persons attributes at birth rather than simply recognize them. Naming an attribute in contemporary language doesn't change the inherent nature of it. What I wrote stands on it's own as correct. None of the characteristics mentioned (eye colour, hair colour or sex) is determined at birth, all were determined at conception. A blank slater thinks all characteristics are proscribed by sociological edict, even biologically, inheren…
/r/MensRights01/09/20 09:10 AM
1

I don't often say this ad hominem to people, but you are a moron. People are not assigned eye colour, hair colour or sex at birth. Those attributes are all observed and simply noted at birth, not assigned.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 07:41 AM
2

All-men includes wo-men.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 07:32 AM
5

Firstly, let's acknowledge that 1 in 5 women will be raped/sexually assaulted. Ah no, let's not acknowledge what has been proven to be one of the most persistent and wilfully misleading woozles ever foisted upon the human race.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 07:26 AM
44

Oh look, another feminist in need of a lobotomy to raise her IQ.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 10:04 PM
3

" Why is everyone on this sub suddenly a Feminist? " Are they ? It's time to leave Yoda, let us depart.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 11:38 AM
25

Mars. There's no rights to be had on Mars, but then again, there's no one to violate them either.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 01:33 AM
7

@OP : You are a man and you don't deserve to have any human rights at all. None. Nada. Zip. You should not even assume you have the right to post here. Did you ask your feminist overlords for permission to post here?
/r/MensRights29/08/20 10:06 PM
7

Do men have a right to vent and air their frustrations or don't they? Since they can't do it almost anywhere else, why shouldn't they be welcome to vent here. Or do men only have the right to say positive things on a men's rights sub?
/r/MensRights26/08/20 02:45 AM
2

All-men includes wo-men.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 09:29 PM
2

It had nothing to do with either sexism or racism and everything to do with classism.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 09:35 PM
30

"in the US alone: there are people who live in our country today who were alive at a time when women couldn't vote." That's true. What's also true is that in the same period, the majority of men couldn't vote either.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 11:07 AM
1

the Greeks were the first civilization to have a significant written tradition of knowledge No they weren't. The Greeks written language came more than a thousand years AFTER the Sumerians, who invented writing and wrote down everything in cunieform, beginning around 3500 BCE.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 02:08 AM
2

That is just a few but wow, what sick messages. Yes, very sad really.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 06:28 AM
2

I agree. Feminism is misanthropic at its core. Humans are a sexually dimorphic species. Feminists would deny that fact, or at the very least, deny it has any relevance to daily living, and they would denigrate and dismiss those who acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 05:41 AM
5

I think incels are a fairly well-defined group of men There are some men (and women) who self identify as incel. Nothing wrong with that. But I have never seen the term used by feminists and some others as anything other than a derogatory term of mockery and shaming. You even used the term yourself as a simile for extremism. It wasn't just 'some feminists' who shamed young underaged boys and men to sign up for war, it was the very influential and publicly recognised leaders of the English suffra…
/r/MensRights23/08/20 01:40 AM
8

Incels - Another made up word used primarily to shame or mock someone. Why did you even put it into a sentence unless you were trying to infer something negative? There was/is absolutely no reason why you should have used that word in response to anything I just wrote, so I can only assume it is your way of being dismissive and indirectly insulting. LOL. You can call me anything you like but don't call me late for supper.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 10:37 PM
3

Also, women getting the vote lead to working class men getting the vote in England. That's a misrepresentation of history by feminists. The universal suffrage movement secured the vote for working class men and women, in spite of the tactics of the suffragettes (who were only interested in the vote for women). The suffragettes held universal voting rights back by nearly a decade by using militant and violent tactics causing the establishment to double down instead of relenting. Those same suffra…
/r/MensRights22/08/20 10:21 PM
3

Feminists can only say what the feminist elite tell them they can say. Stray outside of the elite guidelines and you'll be cancelled just like everyone else. Try going to a feminist sub and saying " Love all men ". LOL, the pitch forks will fly faster than a jet plane. I don't speak for all Australians, nor do I give a stuff about politeness.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 11:47 AM
8

I have friends who are feminists, and virtually all of them thinks MRAs are the propaganda stereotype Of course they do, they've been taught to think that anything a person says or does that isn't a reflection of feminist thought or gynocentric in content and intent, is evil and misogynist.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 12:07 AM
3

I wish I had the freedom of speech feminists have! LOL. I wish I had access to whatever drugs you're taking. LOL your humour has made my day.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 12:03 AM
3

Positive reinforcement is a welcomed good thing.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 11:57 PM
1

Just another strawman hit piece on those who aren't regressive lefties. Anybody even slightly right of far left these days is likely to be branded a nazi, a white supremacist, a misogynist, homophobe, etc, whatever ad hominem they deem fit to use at the time.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 05:18 AM
5

In my location and generation, the most positive and reassuring statement I could give to an old friend would be along the lines of " It's really good to see you, ya ol' bastard " followed by a quick gesture internationally recognised as " let's go for a drink ".
/r/MensRights19/08/20 10:43 AM
3

You're entitled to your opinion and others are entitled to show however they wish, what they think of it.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 10:17 AM
2

I know we'll all get through this eventually, but the hardest thing I'm finding is having to constantly give reassurances to my clients, to put them at ease, when in truth I can give them no real assurances regarding their safety. The media have a lot to answer for in this respect. They have been like relentless sharks circling on their prey, with their daily constant feast of fear and alarm mongering 'news'.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 10:01 AM
3

Normally I'd say I'm sixty three years young, but as a health support worker in aged care, the psychological toll this pandemic is having on me, is making me feel like a hundred and sixty three!
/r/MensRights19/08/20 09:42 AM
6

Yep. Crap is a nice way of saying it. :) Hang in there, as an old bastard there is one thing I know from experience. This all will pass.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 08:59 AM
7

Sad for you. Me too. I'm in Geelong, (stage 3 lockdown). I've got an adult son living in Eltham (stage 4 lockdown) and another living in Torquay (s3). Wife and I haven't been able to directly see them or visit them for way too long. Missing them both. Keeping in touch by phone and video chat is best we can do. Better than nothing I guess. Really missing my grandkids too!
/r/MensRights19/08/20 08:53 AM
9

G'day right back at ya! Mate!!
/r/MensRights19/08/20 08:42 AM
11

Forgive my assumption but ya gotta be Aussie right? Not that I care, and I am frequently wrong!
/r/MensRights19/08/20 08:38 AM
1

he just has a problem when it comes to people who he sees as priviliged say they have a problem. I will stay friends with him because hes a fun and bright individual to be around. He seems neither bright nor fun. He sounds more like a non empathetic self righteous ass.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 11:15 PM
2

Tell him that he is right, as a man he doesn't deserve and shouldn't have any human rights. None at all. Watch the cognitive dissonance appear in his face.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 11:10 PM
8

All-men includes wo-men.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 08:48 AM
1

Twitter is for twits.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 03:28 AM
4

@OP: That's not just the UK you know. The Queen (monarch) of the UK is also the Queen of the remaining signatory states/nations of the British Commonwealth, which includes Australia and Canada.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 06:21 AM
3

When you get really negative responses then ask, what's wrong with " Kids Are Wonderful " ?
/r/MensRights07/08/20 10:51 PM
1

When I'm looking for a stupid argument I'll be sure to look you up at your school.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:35 AM
1

Tell someone who cares. That's even simpler.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:32 AM
1

That's some shitty logic. Logic is logic. Predators are predators. Your objection doesn't change that truth any more than it makes me care about your opinion.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:26 AM
2

In case you hadn't noticed, humans are the apex predators on this planet.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 09:16 PM
1

It hasn't gone far enough. It needs to go over a very high cliff.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 10:57 PM
12

It was/is society listening to feminists that has landed everybody in the (relationship) shit we are in today.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 03:03 AM
79

My generation let feminists get out of control. Sorry. Hopefully your generation can reel them back in.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 09:46 PM
4

Throughout life people will say things or call you names that you don't like. Humor is often the best diffuser. When attacked with ad hominem I prefer to say ' You can call me anything you like, but please don't call me late for supper '.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 09:29 AM
3

Time to say goodbye to your gf.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 09:11 PM
6

Feminism Is PatriarchyTM
/r/MensRights01/08/20 10:00 PM
12

Are you? Glad I'm not you then.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 09:27 PM
3

No, nor should they teach about feminism.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 03:37 AM
3

Toxic Masculinity is a feminist motte and bailey expression that pisses many of us off more than the toxic societal expectations that feminists claim it means. But that's just a minor issue. In most cases it's simply a matter of wanting feminists to get out of our way and stop opposing our quest for justice in a gynocentric system.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 08:25 AM
9

I'm betting it'll be a whitewash, excusing teachers and the education system in general while attempting to blame the parents of the boys, or worse still, blame the boys themselves.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 08:17 AM
1

Feminism has done plenty for all men. It has demonised them, dismissed their issues as irrelevant, made fun of them for being victims of DV and false allegations and gaslighted them at every opportunity. The least we can do is say thanks. /s
/r/MensRights28/07/20 12:47 AM
23

Some lawyers will work and not charge unless they win the case. Try looking around to find one. You never know your luck.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 12:33 AM
1

Took you hours to try to come back Some of us, like me, are busy working all day. You ought to try it sometime. Also, I thought you were 'done with me'.? Obviously you either don't know your own mind, or you can't be trusted to adhere to your own words. I'm betting on both.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 08:47 AM
1

They'll sell or tell you anything Karen just to get you out of the shop.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 08:05 AM
1

Bye Karen, say hello to the manager for me.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 02:00 AM
1

Bye Karen.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 09:07 PM
16

Who cares what a bunch of feminist a-holes think ?
/r/MensRights26/07/20 02:54 AM
2

At first I thought you might have something interesting to say, then realised you're just another femtard who needs to fuck off back to their own safe space.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 02:50 AM
3

The situation may have improved beyond just 2 shelters, but I don't know, and I do doubt it.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 01:30 AM
2

Karen is racist. BS. Are you really trying to say that only white women are called Karen for being a-holes, or that Karen is only a white woman's name? I've known plenty of non whites who are nice people named Karen, and I've also known plenty of non white people whose name is not Karen, but sure as hell act like an entitled Karen.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 10:30 PM
6

The difference is, in both cases, males will receive little to zero funding to alleviate their issues, whether they are the majority of sufferers or minority.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 10:20 PM
3

Boys are equal to girls, not women. Men are equal to women.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 10:03 PM
13

Feminism.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 01:00 AM
6

Unless he's a clone I'm pretty sure that most parts of his body won't look like yours. I'm circumcised but chose to break the cycle with my two sons and did not circumcise them. They are both now adults and could have chosen to circumcise themselves anytime they liked over the last 20 years of their adulthood. They choose to remain intact. Why is anyone obsessed over having their genitals looking the same as one of their parents ? Never once did my sons say they felt awkward in my presence becau…
/r/MensRights25/07/20 12:53 AM
2

So his history makes him an obvious suspect, and also a perfect fall guy.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 12:29 AM
11

they were right and early to support LGBT. They were early to co-opt LGBT for their own political purposes.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 09:57 AM
3

As I said, I am probably wrong. However the husband and son of the judge might have been about to blow the whistle too. With Hollanders known past, he makes a perfect fall guy. Of course, it's mere conjecture on my behalf. Nothing provable re evidence. And like most, I don't know the whole story anyway.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 07:00 AM
2

I did say I'm probably wrong.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 06:58 AM
0

Take your assumptions and indignation and shove them where the sun don't shine.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 06:57 AM
1

Feminism is Patriarchy<sup>TM</sup>
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:49 AM
0

Good question. I doubt it, but I don't really know.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:14 AM
1

I posted this opinion of mine in another thread but I'll post it here because it's possibly relevant : I can't prove it, (and I'm probably wrong) but I think it is a frame up to hide the real motive for the murder of both Roy Hollander (who supposedly shot himself) and Marc Angelucci. It's possible they were both murdered to prevent further exposure of a corrupt court judiciary and a local police force who are involved in land grabbing scams by framing individuals with false sexual assault alleg…
/r/MensRights22/07/20 11:43 PM
2

In this case its right. No it's not right, because Roy Hollander was NOT an MRA and he was adamant about that himself. He thought MRA's were a bunch of wimpy whiners. Hollander may have been a woman hater, but he was not an mra.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 11:41 PM
25

I can't prove it, (and I'm probably wrong) but I think it is a frame up to hide the real motive for the murder of both Roy Hollander (who supposedly shot himself) and Marc Angelucci. It's possible they were both murdered to prevent further exposure of a corrupt court judiciary and a local police force who are involved in land grabbing scams by framing individuals with false sexual assault allegations, then fighting their victims through the courts until they have used up all their liquidity and …
/r/MensRights22/07/20 03:01 AM
4

Another irrelevant and biased study from a professional self loathing misandrist.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 02:42 AM
4

So you are a feminist ? Take two panadol and go to bed. If your condition still persists tomorrow morning, make an appointment to see your doctor.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:32 AM
5

Do you mean those modern 'liberals' who want to cancel anyone who disagrees with them ? Those free speech advocates ?
/r/MensRights18/07/20 10:26 PM
94

Whoever wrote this needs to learn to spell Depp.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 10:21 PM
0

Mansplain it to them as they don't understand normal explanations.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 10:38 PM
3

So you are an unfortunate incel. Got it.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 02:36 AM
23

It's confirmed : Vice writers are higher (on drugs) beings.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 08:16 AM
4

I think it's tragic too, and I also think it is tragic that you think so little of yourself. You obviously care, and whether you realise it or not, others do care too.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 05:38 AM
4

Do you care ? Are you someone or no one ?
/r/MensRights14/07/20 12:25 AM
4

You cannot reform cancer, you can only choose to live with it or destroy it. I would choose the latter. Feminism is cancer.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 01:29 AM
8

feminism is funded by the elite not like the KKK They're both funded by a-holes.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:09 PM
19

Just ask them to direct you to an office of the patriarchy so you can get your membership card and access to your privileges.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 01:11 AM
6

If you want to fight against toxic masculinity and harmful gender norms, you have to fight against feminism. If you want to fight against toxic masculinity and harmful gender norms societal expectations, you have to fight against feminism.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 10:38 PM
9

Menslib is a feminist trojan horse. Don't let it through your gate.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 10:34 PM
1

I once considered myself a feminist. There is no best of them.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 10:11 PM
3

Perhaps you just disagree with a strawman of what feminism really is. I judge feminism by the actions of its constituents, not the dictionary definition that feminists point to whenever they are asked what they stand for. After closely watching their actions for 50 years, I know I don't want anything to do with feminists or their misanthropic ideology.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 07:11 AM
5

I understand feminists. That's why I want nothing to do with them.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 01:36 AM
2

No 'wave' of feminism has ever been about equality. Each wave has been about specific rights for women minus any encumbrance of associated responsibilities.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 07:36 AM
2

Written without a fucking clue.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 04:54 AM
13

You said leaders, not world leaders. And it still wouldn't make any difference. DuckDuckGo : more wars fought under female leaders than male leaders. https://duckduckgo.com/?t=avg&q=more+wars+fought+under+female+leaders+than+male+leaders.&ia=web&iai=r1-1&page=1&sexp=%7B%22v7exp%22%3A%22a%22%2C%22rgiexp%22%3A%22b%22%2C%22bfexp%22%3A%22a%22%2C%22wiadrk%22%3A%22a%22%7D
/r/MensRights04/07/20 10:26 PM
13

It's never made any difference in the past, why would it make any difference in the future ?
/r/MensRights04/07/20 10:22 PM
13

If men could get pregnant they'd be women.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 12:45 AM
4

Ex lefty here. I took off the leftist blinkers years ago. It's kind of odd that when it comes to gay rights, ................ it's the left that is always in support of it. Here in Australia, the left had ample opportunity to change the marriage laws to enable same sex marriage but didn't. Instead, it was a right leaning conservative government that changed the law.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 11:37 PM
10

What kind of worthless upbringing did they have. Take a guess.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 01:28 AM
9

More gaslighting on that page than an eighteenth century London street.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:37 AM
2

Yeh, it's not the best format, but I've not heard of feminists or other a-holes taking it over, as yet.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 07:35 AM
9

The Women's Liberation Movement was good for women, feminism has never been good for anyone.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 01:51 AM
21

If they shut this sub down, I'm off to Voat full time.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 12:59 AM
2

Calm down, I never said I knew what you were talking about, and I care even less. The word 'unless' is a qualifier. It is the same in this context as using the word 'if'.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 02:30 AM
9

it's "feminists" Unless of course he is talking about members of the Ukraine founded misandrist group known as 'Femen', in which case Femenists would be accurate.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 01:26 AM
6

BLM is just another Marxist front, and so is Feminism. Fuck em.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 01:37 AM
6

I think that's what was meant, although it's getting harder to tell as NPC programming is getting more sophisticated.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 11:02 PM
14

@OP: Could you please point me towards the Patriarchy TM as they still haven't sent me my privilege card that I've been waiting 63 years for.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 11:00 PM
10

The fight against toxic masculinity The fight against toxic masculinity societal expectations FTFY.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 09:06 PM
2

I'm 63 and I was born and raised in Adelaide in South Australia. For me, both primary and high schooling years were pretty much 50F/50M. For both my sons, their primary schooling was approx' 85F/15M and their high schooling was approx' 65F/35M.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 08:48 AM
4

When I was a youngster there were plenty of males in the teaching profession, making up at least half if not more than half of the teachers in the schools I attended. I suggest the massive reduction in male teachers is not because males are less interested in teaching, rather they are less interested in working in an anti male environment which the education sector has morphed into over the last 50 years. In Australia we have an education sector called TAFE which is aimed at providing upskilling…
/r/MensRights24/06/20 03:04 AM
1

Umm... Different Spelling ??
/r/MensRights23/06/20 11:12 AM
3

I don't know how old you are, but I'm 63. I've come to realize that the older I get, the less I know. And I've also come to the conclusion that left and right have no meaning in this schizophrenic century. Up is down, left is right. Nobody young knows Orwell because 1984 is history, and history is being erased.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 11:08 AM
1

I can, but I won't. I don't care about whether you are right or wrong. Anyone seriously comparing a human fetus to a chicken in terms of human relevance and life value simply needs to either take their meds or get off of them. I'm an omnivore but I'm definitely not a cannibal!
/r/MensRights23/06/20 10:17 AM
2

Indeed, educate your son. Teach him that he is as important as any girl and deserves the same rights.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 07:28 AM
1

LOL. I think you need to take your meds, your thinking is akin to hallucinating, or even worse, equivalent to a feminist.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 07:23 AM
3

JL is every bit as much a misandrist as CF. Edit : judging by the downvote it looks like someone here thinks Judith Lucy is either funny or not a misandrist or both. Each to their own I guess.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 10:02 PM
5

I believe women need a women's rights movement that focuses solely on the rights of women (=feminism; to protect them from misogyny). There was once such a movement. They called themselves The Women's Liberation Movement. Then they were infiltrated by Marxists, and became a misanthropic movement called Feminism that hates everyone.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 09:50 PM
6

LOL. Thanks for the laugh, I needed a dose of humour.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 07:37 AM
6

Feminists are imposters, making out they are human.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 01:09 AM
3

You are confusing facts with misogyny, that's a feminist problem if ever there was one.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 09:23 PM
1

So killing is good, got it.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 09:08 PM
6

Men are overrepresented in most crimes. Men are also over represented as rescuers in times of need. If you see one at night while alone in the street, don't be alarmed as he'll probably protect you.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 10:34 PM
5

" Feminism is life affirming " LOL. Abortion is their testament to their affirmation of life.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 10:18 PM
3

And your point is ?
/r/MensRights20/06/20 10:14 PM
8

@OP : Down voted your post simply because the content has absolutely nothing to do with the title. Now telling you to GFY because the mismatch was obviously intentional.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 11:35 PM
3

The UN is a waste of space, money and resources.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 08:28 AM
0

Like I said, it's not feminism, it's sexism. Feminism is sexism.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 09:21 PM
4

Toxic masculinity is what prevents men from feeling comfortable doing so. Toxic masculinity societal expectations is what prevents men from feeling comfortable doing so. FTFY.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 03:50 AM
7

To simplify : What the fuck is right with Clementine Ford. Answer = Nothing.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 03:32 AM
6

The three groups are: 1. Normal people 2. Other normal people 3. Feminists
/r/MensRights17/06/20 06:30 AM
2

@OP : Since you obviously don't need anybody else for anything, being 'the man' and all that, I suggest you GFY.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 06:40 AM
3

Men are mostly ephebophiles not pedophiles. The term pedophile is thrown around commonly by feminists and many others without regard to the true meaning of the word. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
/r/MensRights15/06/20 08:18 AM
7

I knew it wouldnt be long before the incels would show themselves in this sub. You're here, and the incel count started immediately with your presence.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 11:21 PM
7

It seems strange There's nothing strange about it. It is typical feminist double standards and double think.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 11:05 PM
14

confirmed female-governed countries experiences a lower death rate... It's times like these I wish I bookmarked every interesting article regarding covid 19 I come across because it was only a few days ago that an article debunking this claim showed that in terms of rates per million (as opposed to absolute numbers) most of the female led countries were actually doing worse not better than MOST other countries. Australia has done very well in terms of deaths per million and absolute deaths at 10…
/r/MensRights12/06/20 07:13 AM
3

So do we blame mothers for creating femorrhoids ?
/r/MensRights12/06/20 01:55 AM
3

As a former leftie, I agree with everything you posted except your exclusion of the left while targeting populist movements. It is because of the projection and gaslighting that the left excels at, that I stopped associating with it some years ago.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:23 AM
4

I am not in total agreement with the premise as it was originally proposed by a psychologist years ago, I agree with some of it. No, I do not agree with the concept of 'toxic masculinity', I agree with some aspects of the concept of 'toxic societal expectations'. I am definitely not in agreement with the way in which many feminists use the phrase as a general male descriptor. And yes, as a grand parent I do think about the impact of statements on children. And so should you. After all, it is wha…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 04:11 AM
5

First up, I'm not your dude. Secondly, accurate descriptions of anything are essential to good communication. Thirdly, I agree that some expectations of society regarding men are toxic, as are some societal expectations of women. I would never use the phrase toxic femininity to infer that some societal expectations are toxic for women. When you use a phrase in a sentence that requires qualifying or clarifying then the likelihood that phrase will be misunderstood is high. Would a young person who…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 03:19 AM
5

So you choose to gaslight rather than recognize the error of describing toxic societal expectations of males as toxic masculinity. First you claim that toxic masculinity doesn't refer to masculinity but is actually a concept that's all about the unhealthy expectations society places on men then you claim "Toxic masculinity" does not refer to ALL masculinity, just the toxic kind. So which is it? Does it refer to some masculinity which is toxic or does it refer to toxic societal expectations of ma…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 02:29 AM
4

Let's take the concept of toxic masculinity for example. Let's talk about how the term toxic masculinity is a gaslighting term, where the moment you object to it's use, the propagator uses the motte and bailey switch tactic and says, " oh it's a concept that's all about the unhealthy expectations society places on men. " Then why not call it toxic societal expectations if it doesn't mean that masculinity is toxic.? E.G. How does the term toxic masculinity differ from, toxic air toxic chemicals t…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 01:31 AM
2

Turkish denial of the Armenian genocide in the early 1900's is extremely offensive. If talking about it offends you, then I hope it's because you regret the actions of your genocidal forebears, and not because you refuse to acknowledge the truth of their murderous actions.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 07:09 AM
2

I know my place. It is anywhere I choose to be.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 07:01 AM
3

Best answer I've read or heard so far.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 06:45 AM
3

called social justice warriors. And here I was thinking they were socially useless worriers.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 02:42 AM
5

You can offer your opinion and information regarding your opinion, but that's where your involvement begins and ends.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 02:04 AM
2

We don't ban posts by ignoramus like you. We prefer your stupidity to be on show for all the world to see.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 11:42 PM
5

Cancer is the result. Feminism is worse than cancer, it is a carcinogen.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 01:32 AM
9

According to feminist theory, I think you mean : According to feminist BS,
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:17 PM
3

" sick of men " translates to "they don't ask me out".
/r/MensRights06/06/20 07:11 AM
4

Menslib is a feminist trojan horse. It's best left outside the gate.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 10:16 AM
24

Then tell her to keep her mouth shut and she doesn't have to debate anything.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 01:35 AM
25

End violence by Women Against Their Children.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 01:26 AM
2

LOL, yet in spite of the attempt to belittle anyone who votes no, the majority voted no. LOL
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:15 PM
5

LOL. So someone thinks that because the Y chromosome has less genes, then that means males are 'lesser' in the survival stakes. Well then I guess we should all aspire to become a water flea, as they have more genes than any other creature, including female humans.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 02:44 AM
5

Indeed we should all stop calling some women Karen, when the most appropriate name for them is arsehole.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 10:47 PM
0

While we're at it, can we take back the technology you wrote your po crap on.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 10:28 PM
1

A-holes are the main problem.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 10:23 PM
20

Meh, more shite from the SA bush pig. Nothing new here.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 08:38 AM
3

At OP : Have you ever thought about having a lobotomy to increase your IQ ?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:37 AM
5

And imagine if I called him “gay black boy”. And imagine if I called Xis “gay black boy”. FTFY.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 04:27 AM
19

I never mindlessly call some men a cuck or a simp. I always mindfully call them a cuck or a simp.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 10:24 PM
-5

Are you implying that undiagnosed Autistic people are dangerous?
/r/MensRights23/05/20 10:02 PM
2

LOL
/r/MensRights23/05/20 04:36 AM
4

Normalize men being and doing whatever the fuck they want to be and do.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 10:59 PM
10

Men may not be needed any more, but they are also not needed any less.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 07:27 AM
3

So color me sexist.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 10:27 PM
34

Am I the only one around here who ... whole heartedly believes in feminism and EQUAL rights? Pick one or pick the other, but you can't have both because feminism and equality are mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 05:32 AM
6

The difference is, Dame Edna (Barry Humphries) has talent.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 05:29 AM
1

Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. 75% of teachers are women. Hmmmn.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 11:58 PM
2

Then no more excuses. You wanted that big heavy box moved, do it yourself.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 11:49 PM
5

Antifa are Nazis.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 01:43 AM
1

Nice meaningless word salad. Can I have mayonaise with that.? Now try telling someone who cares.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 09:21 PM
2

Therefore you've refuted nothing. There's nothing to refute. It's a garbage article hosted by a garbage company.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 09:09 PM
1

Ancient history (2014) and hosted by 'cracked'. Yes I can see now how I should take it all so seriously. Not.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 06:55 AM
5

It's just another garbage article written by someone with opinions reflecting his shoe size instead of his age.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 03:33 AM
4

Kicking isn't mentioned.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:38 PM
5

I tried to watch for longer than a minute but I could feel my head about to explode.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 01:59 AM
3

Meh, David The Fool Tells trying to be relevant and continuing to fail.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 10:23 PM
8

It would be, but you have to make exceptions for that retard.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 01:24 AM
10

Did you have a point ?
/r/MensRights08/05/20 01:21 AM
3

Considering feminists claim that any unwanted touching of a woman by a man is sexual assault then Biden has numerous sexual assault allegations made against him. https://news.yahoo.com/seven-women-have-now-accused-joe-biden-of-inappropriate-touching-131204785.html
/r/MensRights06/05/20 11:33 PM
3

Many people think more progressively now. But feminists are leaders in regressive thinking.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 11:06 PM
4

I've been kicked in the nuts and I've had kidney stones. You want pain? Try kidney stones.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:56 PM
0

Yeh, LOL, Pictures or it didn't happen!
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:38 AM
11

The opposite of feminism is fairness.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 03:37 AM
9

Even though I think ' innocent until proven guilty ', there's this nagging voice in my head that keeps saying, ' Biden meet Karma '.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 08:18 AM
3

" using sociology and feminist theory." One half of that statement shows where they went wrong.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 01:57 AM
3

You lost me at " y'all ".
/r/MensRights02/05/20 05:09 AM
7

Biden meet Karma, you deserve it.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 01:35 AM
1

" people have already bought into the idea that he is a rapist purely based on the woman's word. " Biden meet Karma, you deserve it.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 12:14 AM
5

OP thinks he/she/it is being edgy. Instead he/she/it is just showing that he/she/it is as edgy as a blunt butterknife.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 11:34 PM
81

It's truly amazing how feminists say there is no such thing as gender, it is just a social construct, but also say that everything is gendered. LOL.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:08 PM
13

Is cyanide any better in Europe than in the US ? I think the answer will be the same.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:40 AM
1

Since when does the US census bureau add non wage earnings to wage earnings for total earnings to represent the wage gap ? If it did this, then alimony would be part of the wage gap definition.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 06:33 AM
0

The problem is that you are referring to earnings in a way that includes non wage earnings, while non wage earnings are not factored into either feminist or MRA talking points. If feminists factored in non wage earnings, then any gap might possibly either narrow to zero or actually increase in the opposite direction because women receive much more non wage income through the welfare system, and through divorce, which sees women getting a windfall from alimony payments.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 03:33 AM
1

There is also an hours worked gap, a taxes paid gap, and a welfare benefits gap.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 03:24 AM
4

You care. Are you nobody or somebody?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 10:36 AM
3

So are men only allowed to be anything but a traditionalist? That's not the men's rights I joined. AFAI'm concerned, men's rights include the right to live a traditional lifestyle. In fact it includes the right to live any lifestyle they choose within legal limits. If anyone here has a problem with that, then they are just like feminists pretending to care about men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 08:31 AM
6

Fucking everyone on this sub has this disgusting worldview where ... Everyone ? Yeh right. You are a whinging moron excelling in generalizations and nothing more. GFY, you're not worth the time it takes to formulate a reasonable rebuttal to your BS.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 08:14 AM
6

Bye. Don't slam the door on the way out.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 08:10 AM
18

The lesson for today is : simps will be simps.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 10:07 PM
4

It is predominantly liberals who want to ban guns. Killers will use whatever weapons are available. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/04/23/list-fatal-vehicle-attacks/544603002/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2017_Melbourne_car_attack https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/vehicles-are-becoming-weapons-choice-terrorists-n768846 https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3151607/terror-attack-van-car-truck-new-york/
/r/MensRights23/04/20 03:41 AM
6

Killers are gonna kill. Take away their guns and they'll just use something else, like a vehicle to run over many pedestrians.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:34 PM
1

No, and no.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:01 PM
26

Who ??
/r/MensRights22/04/20 11:15 AM
5

So many strawmen, it's a pity you haven't supplied any matches.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 06:35 AM
8

Far from creating unity, intersectionality is just another SJW invention that creates further division. Try just being a person. No other labels are needed.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 03:38 AM
7

Feminists are a-holes, and the truth is not hate.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 02:23 AM
-1

This is not the Men's Rights Activism sub, this is MensRights the DISCUSSION sub. If you want action, look to the real world or at least try looking at the side bar >>> for the appropriate sub. In the meantime, ask yourself, what are you doing to help tackle men's issues.?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:11 AM
7

add 35lbs. add 35lbs kg.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 02:42 AM
27

Lots of big fonts to make up for incredibly small mind.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 12:36 AM
5

FDS members are just femcels waiting for a cat.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 10:35 PM
7

I'm atheist, have no affiliations with Pell, and I think that throughout his trial, and the media circus surrounding it, he was the scapegoat to push an anti christian (specifically - roman catholic) church narrative. He was railroaded IMO.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 12:51 AM
3

From the very first sentence : " sees environmentalism, and the relationship between women and the earth, as foundational " So it's as exclusive and sexist as every other flavour of femorrhoidism.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 11:18 PM
1

now I'm done with you. Hallelujah - HAHAHAHAHA. Good news at last!
/r/MensRights13/04/20 11:11 PM
0

LOL. Your desire to be top oppression olympian is very entertaining. Keep it up. I like a good laugh.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 11:00 PM
2

LOL. Solution found!
/r/MensRights13/04/20 10:20 PM
0

Wow you really are wanting to be a victim of something I've never said. Cathy Newman would be proud of you. LOL. You really should try telling someone who cares.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 10:18 PM
2

Female is a biological sex, so it wont be acknowledged that males can ever be females and suffer from female genital mutilation. That's one reason why the whole gender re-assignment debate revolves around the word transgender and not the word transsexual. However, man/boy genital mutilation can/will be potentially woman/girl genital mutilation, according to the twisted 'social construct' logic of sjw's, feminists, and the left in general.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 08:42 AM
0

|You don't get to impose your ignorance on other people and tell them how to live. Period. LOL. Neither do you. HAHAHAHA You're doing a great Cathy Newman imitation. Keep it up. It's very amusing.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 08:24 AM
8

Welllll, you see, it's safer to manipulate and direct from the safety of the shadows. It's called plausible deniability, and it works very well for those who practice it.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 01:07 AM
7

The nazi era of totalitarianism lasted a short while. On the other hand, due to its longevity, feminism is best compared to that other insidious and long lasting totalitarianism : communism.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 12:49 AM
1

Everyone is entitled to ignore your opinion. FTFY
/r/MensRights12/04/20 11:48 PM
2

rampant androphobia I think that's a euphemism for misandry.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 11:15 PM
1

There is no we, and I am finished responding to your irrelevant posts. Bye, have a nice day.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:35 PM
1

OK one more time. Your thoughts on the matter are irrelevant to me. I don't need your explanations of or for, anything, and I don't eat cookies.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:30 PM
2

Everyone is entitled to their opinions without having ad hominem thrown their way just because you may disagree with their statement. You can try to define or re-define what things mean any way you want. I don't have to agree with your premises and for the record, I don't. So you can cease issuing your patronising explanations and stop condescending as if I were some child who doesn't understand your pov. I do, and I disagree with you.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:24 PM
1

Your deluding yourself if you think anything you typed out was relevant to anything I wrote.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:19 PM
1

Your condescending and patronising word salad was as helpful as tits on a bull.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:09 PM
0

So you can't quote my own words (that I never said) back to me. Got it.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:01 PM
0

Nice irrelevant word salad, which has nothing to do with anything I said/wrote.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:01 PM
1

So quote the exact words I said back to me please, without imitating Cathy Newman. Not moving along until you show me where I said what you claim I said. Which means obviously, that I'm not moving along.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 09:35 AM
23

IMHO. Leave while you can.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 07:26 AM
2

LOL. Did I say I was transphobic in English or Jibberish or Feminish?
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:27 AM
42

It would seem that they are 2 X toxic.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 03:20 AM
6

Most likely a school teacher or social worker? LOL. Yeh, I had a few teachers that would fit the mould. LOL.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 11:08 PM
7

We GET it, you're transphobic. Reacting like a feminist, much? - Oh, I don't agree with you, therefore you must be (insert favourite buzzword prefix here) -phobic.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 11:04 PM
3

I've never used the word femoid, but I do use femorrhoid (feminist - hemorrhoid : pain in the arse) all the time now.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 03:50 AM
31

Menslib is a feminist trojan horse.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 03:43 AM
11

Menslib is a feminist trojan horse. Ignore and avoid it.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 09:32 PM
2

Yeh, "Drive-By Posting" is a pretty accurate description for what they do.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 07:24 AM
2

How many times do feminists come here, spout their BS, then when they don't get the answers they are looking for, delete their posts? This happens so often we need a word for it.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 02:05 AM
1

Again, no, stop with the BS motte and bailey.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:27 AM
2

It’s, collectively, almost every member of society perpetuating these ideas. Yet you choose to call it patriarchy when in reality it is society. Talk about motte and bailey. Feminists are masters of double think and bait and switch.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:11 AM
1

I'm not cancerous.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:04 AM
14

Anti men's rights a-holes come onto this sub regularly to post crap like this to deliberately smear the sub as a whole. That's the whole purpose of their post - to hurt our cause.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:29 AM
3

????
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:25 AM
11

I used to think the term Feminazi was hyperbolic. Now I can see that it is accurately descriptive.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 10:25 PM
3

I thought NPC's were a thing of the past. Clearly, with all the buzzwords you've used, I am wrong.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 10:00 PM
1

Which world?
/r/MensRights03/04/20 09:57 PM
2

That may be so, but they are also well known.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 08:33 PM
1

And apparently commonly unknown to the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:58 AM
0

Reforming title IX and returning due process to accused students is a good start.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:19 AM
4

Biden framed and introduced title IX that destroyed due process for males on campus. Biden proudly admitted he had a Ukrainian prosecutor sacked for investigating possible corrupt actions by his son. Obama put more illegal immigrants into the so called concentration camps that you object to. And it was the democrat president Bill Clinton that introduced prison for profit which saw so many men incarcerated with ridiculously long sentences for trivial offences. You want to vote for the lesser evil…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:01 AM
2

" Prestigious " Belgian university. How so? Unlike Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, I've never heard of it.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 03:12 AM
10

Nagging is a form of abuse. It is verbal harassment. So yes, people should not nag their partners.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 02:06 AM
98

Feminism is not just Cancer, it is CV too!
/r/MensRights01/04/20 01:39 AM
3

" I’m a non-binary individual (assigned female at birth) " No, no, no. Your sex wasn't assigned at birth, it was created at conception. Your sex was merely observed and recorded at birth.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 01:23 AM
7

Feminists can make up any names and descriptions they like to denigrate someone, but calling a person a feminist is denigration enough for me.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 08:47 PM
1

Man = Adult male human primate. Don't over think it.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 11:34 PM
8

So what was the post about ? - all references to it are removed.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 04:29 AM
5

Well said. I couldn't think of a better description myself.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:36 AM
1

It's hard to know what to think about this current world crisis. How much is true? How much is BS? How much reaction is too much? How much reaction is not enough? How much do we know about this virus? How can it be treated? I'll give Finland the benefit of the doubt because there is no clear and inconsequential precedent for dealing with this virus, nor the social and economic fallout to come.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 09:38 AM
3

Nobody needs feminism.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 11:07 PM
5

LOL. You're one deluded simp for sure. You're in the wrong sub, r/menslib is that way >
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:39 AM
2

|In any case, kindly fuck right off You first. I never said she was a troll. Simps like you are a bigger problem than any femorrhoid will ever be.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:34 AM
5

You say she's here in good faith. She claims to be here in good faith. I disagree with you, and I don't believe her. I stand by my statement about the 'patriarchy TM'. BTW I wrote femorrhoid (not femroid). If you don't like what I wrote, tell someone who cares.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:27 AM
4

When you talk about feminism, that is a generalisation. If you talk about a feminist, that's being specific. The 'movement' is a generalisation, so a general statement about it is appropriate. And the description of feminism as a disease is accurate. To be more specific, feminism is cancer.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:07 AM
3

It’s a disease that plagues the movement. The feminist movement itself is the disease.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:01 AM
4

I'm suggesting that none of the crap you wrote has anything to do with a mythical patriarchy. The misandrist concept of the 'patriarchy TM' only exists in the minds of femorrhoid.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 11:37 PM
5

So you can't point me to the patriarchy then. All you can give me is a list of strawmen. Not surprised really, oh well I guess I'll have to wait another 63 years to get my membership card.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 11:29 PM
10

Can you please point me to the patriarchy, after 63 years I still haven't received my membership/privilege card.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 11:22 PM
7

You seem unable to differentiate abstractions like 'study the enemy' from actual personal relationships. If anyone needs protection, it may be the people you are in relationships with.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 05:28 AM
32

So many strawmen, not enough matches.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:30 AM
3

No single person invented the internet. Berners-Lee was a contributor, yes, but he didn't invent the internet.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 09:21 PM
1

Germaine Greer has always been nothing more than a contrarian and provocateur.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 05:51 AM
9

What’s your problem? It's hard for him to see clearly with his head stuck up where the sun doesn't shine.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 09:39 PM
26

Women aren't funny, but she is. Just not in the comedic sense of funny.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:51 AM
12

Islam for Spain anybody? Couldn't be any worse could it?
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:44 AM
10

If I were her husband, I'd be mad at myself for marrying her.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 01:49 AM
7

Feminists don't misunderstand the biology of gender relations, they simply want to dismiss it altogether.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 01:32 AM
1

Good question. I don't know.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 08:32 PM
4

MensLib is a feminist trojan horse. Simply avoid it.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 08:32 AM
10

His past videos were a wealth of information and critical analysis of men's issues. He must have put a lot of time into making them.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:24 AM
7

I use google for maps and I watch Youtube a lot. But I use adblocker so I get to use their services without contributing to their ad revenue. Unfortunately, adblocker also blocks ads for content creators of YT that I like, so I am constantly turning adblocker on then off depending on the channel I'm visiting. When I joined reddit I used to allow ads. But after seeing many anti male tactics and censorship on male issues I now use adblocker for reddit too.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:36 AM
3

Pocahontas is female ?
/r/MensRights07/03/20 09:04 AM
3

I'll be frank and admit that I didn't have time to read that report cover to cover before I sent you the link It's a tedious and depressing read and much of the data presentation is very difficult to follow as it tends to jump all over the place in terms of it's references to different demographics.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 05:25 AM
8

Indeed. Whoever controls the language controls the discourse. That's why I refuse to go along with attempted changes to a word's meanings. For example, phobia means an irrational fear. It does not mean fear of and/or contempt for something. It just means irrational fear.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 04:47 AM
3

@OP: Elsewhere you posted this. |Of course any documentation or citation that undermines some of the less creditable MRA notions just gets quietly ignored. Speaking of citations. You recently posted this. |Even though in 2019 80 percent of DV deaths were men killing women, and the coroner determined that all the women who killed an intimate partner were acting in self defense... And I asked for citations. You replied with this. |https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/challenging-the-mra-cl…
/r/MensRights07/03/20 03:50 AM
5

Love him or hate him, he's done more to get MR issues into the public consciousness than you or I. Until the likes of Elam came along, MRA's were totally ineffectual and completely ignored. Personally I don't like his style, but I do like his efforts. He played a major role in changing Cassie Jaye's views when she was making the Red Pill movie.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 11:54 PM
1

No, femicide is just a word to describe the murder of a female, in the same way that infanticide is a word used to describe the murder of an infant. Have you ever noticed how feminists say that there is no such thing as gender differences, then make painstaking efforts to differentiate the genders.?
/r/MensRights06/03/20 10:22 PM
2

Hating feminism is a noble action.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 12:29 AM
3

They might also save a great deal of time, money, and injustice if all accusers were given a lie detector test as well.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 01:45 AM
2

|mentions marxism and hints that answers may be found there. The only answers found in marxism are totalitarianism, mediocrity and equal poverty for everyone except the political rulers.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 08:58 PM
3

I came across femhorroid a few months ago and have used it ever since. It perfectly describes the pains in the arse that feminists have become.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 08:50 PM
5

" The sad part was that she's a very nice and sweet lady normally " The sad part is that you bought into her act. If she was only very nice and sweet when she had EVERYTHING her way, and you agreed with EVERYTHING she said, then she wasn't really nice and sweet at all.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 03:28 AM
10

Menslib sub is a feminist trojan horse. Simply avoid it.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 09:15 PM
2

Ah yes, I see that David TheFoolTells is still desperately trying to maintain a sense of relevance and failing badly.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 10:27 PM
1

I went to bed. I just got up 20 minutes ago and I am off to work very shortly. I gave a very quick view of the pdf - and want to read it all more thoroughly when I get home tonight. There were a few red flags in that pdf that need a more thorough read through. I didn't bother reading most of the ABC article as the source material is more valid.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 08:56 PM
2

|Even though in 2019 80 percent of DV deaths were men killing women, and the coroner determined that all the women who killed an intimate partner were acting in self defense... Citations needed for that very dubious claim.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 09:26 AM
3

No, not at all. The feminists in this instance who are leading a smear campaign against Bettina are bullshitters whether you like Bettina or not. You don't have to like Bettina to see that she is being unfairly targeted for her beliefs. Unless of course, your world is black and white. Whether or not you like her, bears no justification for anyone smearing her in a malicious campaign of misinformation and character assassination.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 09:16 AM
3

If you'd been following the smear campaign against Bettina waged by well known academic feminists and political feminists over the past few months, and aided enthusiastically by some sections of the Australian media, then you'd see that's it's not so much a great leap as a small jump from one lillypad to another.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 09:05 AM
3

So you believe feminist bullshitters then?
/r/MensRights26/02/20 02:55 AM
6

I'm tired of posts that begin with " Sick of seeing posts ..... " then blah blah blah. Close your eyes if it's that sickening for you.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 07:32 AM
1

You called yourself a Hufflepuff, and your post that I responded to is concern trolling worthy of disregarding. LOL. That's not an attack, that's an observation. I see that you won't even stand by your own words. You deleted that post.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 08:54 PM
4

You're welcome. You do realize Theknoll rhymes with Troll, don't you?
/r/MensRights24/02/20 11:07 AM
4

Whatever you say Hufflepuff.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 10:53 AM
8

I agree, yet I still think you're concern trolling, so join the troll queue. Your concerns will be rightly ignored in due time.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 10:40 AM
3

|I'm a supporter of Arndt, So am I. |but what possible reason could the man have to burn children alive? I have absolutely no idea, which is exactly why a thorough and proper investigation needs to be carried out. I cannot comprehend any sane person doing such a thing. For me the reason can lay anywhere between pure evil and insane. At the very least, we all deserve some insight based on evidence because we cannot help to change what we don't know or don't understand. The murders themselves are …
/r/MensRights24/02/20 08:46 AM
10

The OP's title is incorrect. She defended the detective who said we shouldn't jump to conclusions and that a full investigation gathering evidence should be carried out before rushing to judgment. The detective made the mistake of saying that the perpetrator may have acted out due to external pressures and of course the femhorroids immediately spun that as blaming the victim. Bettina Arndt agreed with the detective and now she and Hanson and the detective are being vilified.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 07:23 AM
10

Nobody is defending his actions or excusing them. What is being sought are his reasons for committing such a crime, instead of the usual 'all men are culpable' and 'patriarchal misogyny' feminist narrative which is the go to explanation whenever a man commits a crime against women and children.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 07:11 AM
2

I'd be happy to stand there and say " I'm a man who wants tragedies like these prevented. " A) Because I speak for myself only, and B) Because it refers to all and any tragedies with the same outcome. C) Because many of these tragedies have their roots in mental health problems. When this occurred : https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/children-stabbed-to-death-in-the-cairns-suburb-of-manoora/news-story/1a564e0ee1a45b22b3d79389988737c9 I didn't want to respond with " I want women to stop …
/r/MensRights23/02/20 06:24 AM
3

No. It needs to keep going to the end of the road, through the safety barrier then over the fucking cliff.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 09:37 PM
3

I prefer the old interface. New isn't always better.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 09:29 PM
1

What I really want to know is how a single individual person transitions from he/she to the pluralist collective, them/they. Truly clown world.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:33 PM
7

We can't have a future with feminism. FTFH.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:24 PM
2

helping feminist to overcome the female gender role that women are saints and can't do no harm Which feminists? From my view it has been feminists that perpetuate the women are saints narrative with their 'everything is the fault of the patriarchy' BS.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:12 PM
2

Rational people and feminist ideology cannot coexist. FTFY.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 10:55 PM
6

I am not a victim, and I want to see less victims not more. But nothing changes unless public perception of mental health issues changes. You want to dismiss the narrative as being unimportant, I want the narrative to change. |No sadness for the dead. No anger at the are home. That's a huge presumption on your behalf. If you do nothing or say nothing, then nothing will ever change. You'll just continue to read more of the same sad headlines with the same tragic outcomes. If you are just a citize…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 10:07 AM
4

|Stop whining about perceived media bias Coverage alone is one thing, but the narrative in that coverage is another. Media narratives help shape public opinion, which in turn shape police responses, and government policy regarding crime, mental health issues AND domestic violence. Big cities (as you put it) are absolutely important because the great majority of people live in them and hold the majority of opinion, which in turn affects politicians decisions. That's exactly why you should be whin…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 09:43 AM
3

The recent coverage of this great tragedy is widespread and the public reaction like my own is one of horror. The main reason this got so much coverage was because there were children murdered, and a painful and gruesome method of death was experienced by all the victims. The same public reaction does not occur when women commit similar crimes. My point is simple really, there is an empathy gap when men alone are the victims, and a sympathy bias when women are the perpetrators. There is instant …
/r/MensRights21/02/20 09:26 AM
12

Fact men kill more men, women and children than women do. Fact : men kill more men and women. Fact : women kill more children. FTFY. Also fact : it was only a few weeks ago in Australia that a woman killed her husband by pouring petrol all over him, then torching him, in front of their children. The story was reported, yes. But the public reaction as usual was crickets.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 07:20 AM
4

According to the article " Pekonen said a more equal distribution of domestic workload between parents has been proven to diminish the risk of divorce. " I wish I could remember where and when an article appeared not so long ago that stated the exact opposite of this claim. That the greater the equality of domestic work, the more likely a divorce.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 07:15 AM
2

LOL. Perhaps all boys should have reversible vasectomies while still in high school. Then instead of women tricking them into being a wallet for their child's upbringing, they will actually have to beg for a man to have a reversal in order to conceive. /j
/r/MensRights19/02/20 02:39 AM
6

So many strawmen. Anyone got a match?
/r/MensRights18/02/20 08:19 PM
3

Women are the majority of voters everywhere. Hmmn, seems like a dictatorship may have some advantages. /j
/r/MensRights18/02/20 08:03 AM
3

Because single to a woman simply means not married. It doesn't mean they are not getting any dick.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 12:43 AM
1

All journeys begin with a single step. Start with your own social circle. Call out misandry where and when you see it. Explain why you don't agree with a certain pov.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:34 AM
5

As an aged care worker I can attest to the fact that those of my clients who continue to engage in life with physical activity definitely fair better than those who don't. Not only do they maintain the ability to move about for much longer but they are also more optimistic and enjoy life more. You don't have to be a fitness fanatic, but the one piece of advice I give to all my clients is, keep moving until you can't.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:29 AM
2

Nature doesn't really care about female orgasm because it's a sexual luxury that is not required for reproductive purposes. Just as nature made males the expendable sex (in the majority of sexual animals), it also made male orgasm an essential part of reproduction. Call it balance, call it what you like, but nature always makes the final call. Nature imbued men (males) with easy orgasm tied to ejaculation which is necessary for reproduction to occur (in mammals). Nature is a minimalist, it doesn…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:14 AM
2

I stopped watching 'The Project' years ago due to it's totally biased misrepresentations of almost everything and anyone who doesn't fall into lockstep with the hosts ideals. That, and also the fact that none of their 'comedy' is ever really funny.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 11:21 PM
2

Walleed Ali is probably our country's most hated TV non-personality at the moment. I can't believe that he is still hired by any TV channel.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 11:08 PM
4

No. Not yet. This suggestion is the brainchild of the Premier of Victoria, comrade Daniel Andrews, chief communist cuck, and misandrist. He gave away 2.6 BILLION dollars to feminists last year to tackle 'DV'. DV means anything his feminists comrades want it to mean, and the money will be spent in any way they see fit without Government oversight or accountability. This is the same Premier who proudly allocated funding for 'pet shelters' for women who are using DV support services, but ignored pl…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 02:53 AM
9

@OP: Good on you, and thank you for taking a compassionate and active interest in justice for male victims of female abuse.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 08:42 AM
5

Good on her.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 04:35 AM
6

Or you could just conscript them, unpopular as that may be.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 04:33 AM
1

" For example, what are your views on mandatory paternity leave that is the same length as maternity leave? " Depends on what you mean by mandatory. If I was forced to take paternity leave then I say, GFY to whoever wants to force me. If you mean that it should be mandatory that a company should have to OFFER the same leave as they offer women, then yeh ok, I agree.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 11:12 PM
0

Somebody has to mansplain to a femhorroid, otherwise they'll never understand some things.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 08:07 AM
53

When feminists hypocrisy and double standards became too obvious to ignore or deny.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 02:23 AM
5

The new extremism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYQUfPcvdCw
/r/MensRights08/02/20 09:00 PM
0

These two well known people seem to agree with the general premise of the article. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ7pMIZQRqs
/r/MensRights08/02/20 07:59 AM
2

Ad hominem in lieu of argument doesn't make him/her/(insert gender here) right.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 06:54 AM
3

Can you rebuke any of the 8 points made in that article.?
/r/MensRights08/02/20 06:50 AM
0

What do you think might be the reason experts refer to transgender and not transexual?
/r/MensRights08/02/20 06:46 AM
0

Their claims have no medical basis whatsoever, Rebuke any one of the 8 points given in that article. In my layman opinion, to treat a psychological problem with drastic physical solutions certainly doesn't sound like a solution based in medicine, or based on the benefit of the patient either.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 06:40 AM
2

So you say. I say one lot of experts disagrees with another. Nothing unusual or hateful about that. Here's another recognized medical association questioning the narrative and raising concerns. https://twitter.com/Transgendertrd/status/1225183689824403456?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Eprofile%3ATransgendertrd%7Ctwcon%5Etimelinechrome&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.transgendertrend.com%2Fa-scientist-reviews-transgender-suicide-stats%2F Edited.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 06:31 AM
2

As usual, what one lot of 'experts' have to say doesn't reflect the attitude of all experts. https://www.right-mind.us/american-college-of-pediatrics-reaches-decision-transgenderism-of-children-is-child-abuse-2/
/r/MensRights08/02/20 06:24 AM
3

CORRECT answer. Go straight past jail and collect $200.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 04:35 AM
3

we are not defined by our height, skin colour LOL. Almost every prerequisite by women for dating a man includes : 'He must be tall, dark and handsome'.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 09:10 PM
2

In the absence of a named (by the mother) father , the mother's surname will be the default. The state RECORDS a child's identity, which is determined by the parents, primarily the mother.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 08:50 PM
5

@OP: Being rich, narcissistic and privileged doesn't negate your human rights or your humanity any more than being the opposite promotes them. Shove your classist views where the sun don't shine. Depp is a man, flesh, blood and bones like the rest of us. His plight is worthy of discussion and empathy. Edited.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 09:05 AM
3

Certainly it seems that feminists want to deny both that choice. Which makes sense because it conforms to their stated agenda of wanting to destroy anything that resembles a traditional nuclear family due to it's being, in their minds, the cornerstone of 'the patriarchyTM '.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 05:25 AM
3

Different countries have different rules, but these days, the majority will record the mothers surname as the child's surname by default. Traditionally, marriage conveyed the father's surname to the child by default. Women traditionally took their husbands surname (though they weren't compelled to) as this meant that all members of an ensuing family would share the same family surname. The reason children were traditionally given the fathers surname was to consolidate both his personal interest …
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:26 AM
2

Whose surname do you think the children will automatically be recorded as having, by the state.? Have you ever heard the saying : Momma's baby, poppa's maybe.? This is just another way in which a man's relationship with his children can be legally and socially diminished by making his surname for the children an option dependent on the mother's whims.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:56 AM
3

I don't believe that all people should be treated with equal respect. I'll treat all people with equal civility, but my respect has to be earned. Femhorroids, due to their nature, do not have my respect.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 01:53 AM
3

Try the sewer. Everything they say will blend in perfectly with the environment.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 09:33 PM
1

For me it's about what they stand for at the core of their being. The current Democrats stand for Socialism not Democracy. Check out any country that isn't a Democracy and see what basic rights the citizens have.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 08:06 AM
2

I'm no fan of Trump, but if I were an American faced with who to elect and my only choice was between him and a current Democrat, I'd either vote Trump or more than likely just not vote at all. I hate wasting a vote, but there is no way I would support the current Democrats.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 08:00 AM
1

Perhaps they are supporting him because even if everything the Democrats accuse him of were true (which it isn't), he's still seen as the lesser of political evils.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 07:55 AM
6

Australia. The land of Twiddle Dee (Labour) and Twiddle Dum (Liberal).
/r/MensRights03/02/20 03:45 AM
6

I'm not American, but as an outsider looking in on American politics for the last 40 years, I'd say the current crop of Democrats are exactly what Trump described them as : corrupt swamp dwellers.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 03:42 AM
11

Any torrent of abuse you may get on this sub will be from feminists who have infiltrated it. The great majority of males on this sub know exactly how feminists use stats to misinform the general public and gaslight men at the same time.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 03:36 AM
1

Also the presence of pseudo estrogen in soy products, hence the invention of the term : 'soy boys'. And the presence of other artificial female hormone mimickers in many plastics which can leak out of the plastic into our foods.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 03:09 AM
4

That depends on what you are trying to express and where you are trying to express it.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 02:27 AM
10

It's a space to express oneself without being subjugated, smeared and shamed by femhorroids for doing so.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 09:38 PM
1

Everything.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 02:12 AM
12

You're a feminist. Take two panadol to alleviate the condition and go to bed. If your condition persists tomorrow, see a doctor.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 10:59 AM
13

Somebody already engineered an anti white male virus - it's called feminism. Like most viruses it has already mutated and now attacks any male.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 09:40 PM
7

In Australia, Jenna Price is a well known Academic Femhorroid overflowing with misandry. Ignore her. Attention makes her feel relevant.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 07:09 AM
17

Put in a complaint to the police right now if she didn't ask for your consent. It seems that today, the first in to accuse is not the one to lose.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:13 AM
1

Name one.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:10 AM
1

Feminism is a Socially Transmitted Dysfunction.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 03:41 AM
21

It's pretty accurate, yes!
/r/MensRights24/01/20 09:48 PM
1

LOL. Couldn't resist that one.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 09:17 PM
3

|That's what wedding vowels are for. That's what wedding vows are for. LOL. FTFY.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 08:27 AM
5

Makes sense not to buy a home when you've got a greater than 50% chance of losing it in a divorce. Men need to take a leaf out of women's investment habits of the past. Buy lots of personal things like good clothes and jewelry because they are not considered by family courts as marriage assets, and therefore can't be taken away by the spouse in divorce.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 09:34 PM
2

Now HE is Jessica. FTFY.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 02:01 AM
2

It can call itself a woman. But male it will never be.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 01:58 AM
1

Poor diddums, did I offend you with the obvious.?
/r/MensRights19/01/20 09:43 AM
0

Menstruate.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:26 AM
5

Did you forget the /s or are you providing us all with the joke of the day ?
/r/MensRights18/01/20 09:26 PM
5

" People will never view Men's Rights as anything but a bunch of incels." My two sons would laugh at that suggestion.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 10:50 PM
4

How are women oppressed.? By feminism of course. Now do I get an A.?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 10:43 PM
3

This idea has the same level of naivety as believing someone who says " the cheque is in the mail ", or " I'm from the government and I'm here to help you."
/r/MensRights16/01/20 10:19 PM
35

Your body, your problem.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 10:11 PM
3

Press charges. This.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 02:43 AM
6

As a former lefty all I can say is good luck. Hope you find your light.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 06:23 AM
-1

The tone police are getting more numerous and more boring.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 05:08 AM
1

To evolve generally means to improve upon. So if men evolved from women, well .....
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:48 AM
26

Indeed, what a racist garbage father.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 09:33 PM
2

Not off the top of my head because I don't save links on every subject I get embroiled in. However, there are many world wide studies conducted over the years that bear this out so you shouldn't have too much trouble finding a source yourself.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 08:26 AM
13

" If women were larger and stronger would this become much more even? " Women are larger and stronger than most children and also commit the most violence against children.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 03:46 AM
8

@OP: Stop assuming that you know what others do in real life outside this sub. This sub is simply a discussion focus, it is not the be all and end all of peoples lives.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:59 AM
32

More wars have been waged under female heads of state than under male heads of state. https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/
/r/MensRights06/01/20 07:45 AM
2

Somebody has to mansplain to femtards or they'll never understand anything.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 03:40 AM
1

Just the ramblings of a #RamboWannabe
/r/MensRights06/01/20 03:30 AM
3

You want to know what happens when women are left to cope alone.? Just watch Bear Grylls : The island - men versus women.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 11:08 PM
81

I'm sure Cyprus can survive without feminists. Hell, it might even be a great advertising point. " Come and spend a feminist free time in Cyprus and have the time of your life. "
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:19 AM
2

I'm not arguing about the cause of men's issues. Merely that men have issues, some of which can be addressed without opposition and some of which have solutions which are opposed by feminists and some others. Some of those issues can be directly traced to feminists, e.g. child custody issues go back to the 'tender years doctrine' which was formulated by a feminist and used to lobby politicians around the world to change custody laws back in the nineteenth century. Other issues like forced milita…
/r/MensRights03/01/20 10:59 PM
5

I never said the draft had anything to do with feminism, even though the suffragettes in England actively pushed the draft. I gave an example of men's rights that need addressing. You asked me to name a complaint that men had. Well I gave you one. Many here are opposed to modern feminists because all too often the fight for those rights are hindered or outright opposed by feminists.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 10:12 PM
2

Now I just gave an example of forced military drafts, but apparently just one example is not enough. Voting without the compulsory requirement to sign up for selective service is another men's issue if you live in the USA. There are plenty more, but I'm not here to convince you when you can't be bothered educating yourself.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 10:06 PM
1

If you really don't know then try reading a little history before coming here and trying to tone police everyone. Most of the social/legal problems men face today started in the 60's, and have been exacerbated over time, but some, such as forced military drafts have been with us since history began.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:56 PM
2

Nobody took MRA seriously for decades when all they did was play nice. Now that many MRA's have taken the kid gloves off that is changing.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:35 PM
5

Wow, you really are being taken for a ride. Get out now while you can.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:31 PM
1

You don't have to be better than someone to abhor them.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:23 PM
3

Male feminists think Sure fooled everyone.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 10:19 PM
4

They'll either have to join us, or expose their hypocrisy for everyone else to see. You are assuming that feminists have a conscience. They don't. Accusations of hypocrisy slide off them like water slides off a duck's feathers.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 09:51 PM
6

To me 'Nuclear' makes feminism sound very toxic and dangerous, which it is.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 10:15 PM
14

Feminism = Toxic femininity. Say it loud, say it clear.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 09:24 PM
19

Penile mutilation is not a Christian requirement, so being Catholic is no reason for your parents to have you mutilated, nor a good reason for you to mutilate any of your sons, now, or in the future.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 11:15 PM
129

LOL. What a great way to drive away more potential support for Sanders. Great comedy material right there.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 07:31 AM
6

He was probably the store detective following her because she was acting like a shifty shoplifter.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 04:39 AM
1

Try reading it again in Vincent Price's voice. !
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/19 05:28 AM
5

You telling me what I care about or don't care about is projection of your assumptions onto me.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 11:47 PM
8

My main point is how you don’t care one bit about Asian jokes You have no idea what I think or care about anything, so go shove your projection where the sun don't shine.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 10:04 PM
7

First of all there are not 4.54 billion Asian males in the world when the total world population is only 7.8 billion people, with more than half that number being women. That means there are less than 4 billion men world wide. Secondly I stated that he should leave the rest of the MEN in the world out of his self deprecation. None of us need it. Thirdly, I don't care what the race of any man is, which is why I didn't specify race.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 09:48 PM
15

There is nothing wrong with a self deprecating joke, just leave the other 3.5 billion men out of it. They don't need deprecating, just because Yang likes to deprecate himself.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 09:03 PM
19

Which is why, if I were an American citizen, I would be voting republican in the upcoming election.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 12:19 AM
254

As an outsider looking in, I thought Yang might be a Democrat worthy of voting for. Once again I am completely wrong. Ouch.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:08 PM
32

An exclusion I'm happy to accept and to reciprocate.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 07:49 AM
1

Your posts were/are a total waste of keyboard strokes anyway, so nothing of value lost there.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 10:02 PM
1

So you can't express your pov without ad hominem. Got it. And you assume that the woman who cat called the op would object to him doing the same. If you are not generalising then be specific. But you can't in this instance because neither you nor the op know what the response by that same woman would be to cat calling. Instead you are happy to generalize. A habit that is endemic in feminist circles. You were first with the ad hominem, and continue to ad hominem, like a feminist apologist.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:58 PM
1

I've lost nothing, and if you are confused, that's your problem. You seem to think a ubiquitous double standard exists about cat calling. Guess what. A double standard only exists if the same person/people who object to a behaviour engage in it. Just because a bunch of feminists think cat calling is bad, they impose their idea of behaviour on every one else. If you buy into their shit, then you are assuming all women think like them, and therefore all women are guilty of a double standard. They …
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:40 PM
0

I have no trouble responding with tit for tat with feminist apologists like you. I am currently on leave and have all the time in the world and no reason not to annoy the shit out of apologists like you who are happy to let feminists set the behavioural agenda.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:20 PM
0

Stop being a feminist.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:16 PM
0

Stop letting feminists control you.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:04 PM
-1

Not you that's for certain.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 05:13 AM
-3

Why do fucking halfwits like you assume that all women agree with each other on what's acceptable. They don't. YOU are assuming ALL women are feminist assholes who don't like anything that males do, especially if it has sexual connotations. The good news is, only a minority of women go along with all the metoo, anti male bs. Most women enjoy sexual banter. Just because a minority of feminists a-holes want everybody else to go along with their puritanical bs doesn't mean you have to. Many here ha…
/r/MensRights19/12/19 05:13 AM
-14

So a woman has yelled out something to indicate she is sexually attracted to you and you react angrily like a stupid fucking femtard. Do you realize there are innumerable women who are not retarded feminists who enjoy being cat called ? When you accept the bullshit notion that men whistle at women and cat call because they are misogynist, then you are perfectly brainwashed by the femhorroids. Edit: Lot's of people here accepting feminists setting the rules, perhaps they are even feminists themse…
/r/MensRights19/12/19 03:02 AM
13

The only devastating result is that she got re-elected. Proof that there is no shortage of morons.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 01:20 AM
18

There is currently a lot of medical controversy going on in the USA over the safety of vaping because 52 consenting adults have died from vaping related issues in the past year. Yet there is no apparent controversy over the more than one hundred baby boys who die each year from complications arising from unnecessary genital mutilation, in the USA alone. Neither is any fuss being raised about the hundreds more who need to undergo further corrective surgery and sustained medical intervention to of…
/r/MensRights18/12/19 03:20 AM
27

I've never asked a feminist to do anything for anyone. That's an invitation for disaster.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 03:12 AM
1

society is still up and running With a reproduction rate less than the replacement rate. If it continues, democratic western society will not exist in another 50 years, having been absorbed by cultures that care less about individuals and diversity and more about biological perpetuation of the species.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:43 PM
8

Then it would help to remove any uncertainty by at least placing a /s at the end. Without being able to hear the nuance or inflection in a persons voice, sarcasm doesn't always appear obvious in the written word.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:28 PM
15

" I have zero idea about what is actually removed via circumcision." Yet you're glad that the most erogenous and sensitive tissue you were born with was removed without your consent. Facepalms X 10.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:24 PM
-1

I accept science, not political propaganda with a taxation agenda. I take my climate science information from reliable experts like Piers Corbyn who successfully makes long term climate forecasts and has done so for decades now, as opposed to most of his contemporaries who can't even accurately forecast more than 3 days ahead. There's a word for 'settled science'. It's called dogma.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 11:16 PM
2

@OP : Apart from being a concern troll it seems you are also one who thinks 'climate science is settled', just because you believe one pov. If you think climate science is settled, then you probably also believe that feminism means equality.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 09:46 PM
6

@OP: No, it doesn't.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 03:19 AM
5

It is when you've already had the number of children you want and don't want any more. I'm happy with the decision I made after having two sons. I didn't want any more children but my wife did. Her bad luck. Not that she was terribly upset about my decision, and she loved and helped raise our two sons into two wonderful adults. As for permanent sterility - well that's a misnomer because if I ever wanted more children I could try for reversal or simply have sperm taken directly from a testicle. V…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 02:16 AM
7

Had the snip over 30 years ago. Best decision ever regarding fertility control. I'd be happy to receive all her little offerings acknowledging my decision.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 09:41 PM
8

Labour will introduce a no-fault divorce procedure. In all the other countries that have introduced no-fault divorce, it immediately morphed into men's-fault divorce.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 12:49 AM
15

Turd Brown : Feminism, feminists, femhorroid.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:09 AM
1

You are confusing equivalent with equal.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 11:20 PM
1

Hmmn. I tried to sign twice. Received 'unknown error' message twice.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:18 AM
4

Stand in a light summer breeze long enough and your lips will chafe, your eyes will dry, your skin will dry and wrinkle. Perfect consequences for any misandrist.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 02:49 AM
14

What I find interesting is that this whole 'men should be allowed to cry' message has only been broadly expounded since the birth of second wave feminism. Interesting because it's also only since then that there appears to be any 'problem' with men crying or not crying. As a 62 year old man, I've cried many times in my life and I witnessed my grandfathers and father, uncles, cousins and older brothers and friends, cry on numerous occasions, all before second wave feminists said 'men should be ab…
/r/MensRights25/11/19 07:37 AM
5

NO.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:11 PM
1

Girls are female human primates in the state of childhood and/or adolescence.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 08:13 AM
1

Yep.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 08:10 AM
1

Yep.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 07:48 AM
12

Men are adult male human primates.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 04:37 AM
4

We don't need a misleading label like 'toxic femininity' when we already have a perfectly suitable label : i.e. feminism.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 07:07 AM
1

Feminism like hemorrhoids, is a pain in the arse - for everyone, but especially men.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 12:23 AM
1

Sarcasm doesn't always convey itself readily. Try /s for certainty.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 09:34 PM
1

Feminism IS men's rights hemorrhoids
/r/MensRights21/11/19 09:33 PM
2

Did you have your circumcision done as an adult, a child or teenager or as an infant.? If it was done as an infant then you wouldn't know if it feels better or not.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 04:38 AM
12

Why does it seem like most men on this sub are against feminism? Because we are against feminism.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:14 AM
14

When is the International Day to End Violence By Women?
/r/MensRights18/11/19 03:34 AM
28

At least she showed gratitude to her husband. Most femorrhoids would expect their husbands/bf/so to finance their desires whilst simultaneously trashing them for the wage gap that enables them to pursue those desires.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:44 AM
-2

Men are parents too. Parental rights are men's rights just as much as women's rights.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 05:53 AM
1

As a white cisgender heterosexual male I will enhance your diversity profile by promising not to sue you for rejecting me on the basis of your obvious sexism and racism, if, and only if, you hire me.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 08:46 AM
2

Women rape women too. Seems too many people forget that and assume that the woman rapist is raping a man. Regardless of the gender of the victim, all rapists should be sentenced to jail time.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 08:07 AM
6

Personally I prefer femorrhoid, since feminists are best described as pains in the arse, just like any other hemorrhoid.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 12:36 AM
9

Rapists are reprehensible human beings. When everything is decried as rape, then everyone is reprehensible.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 08:14 PM
1

We expect women to follow that rule here, We don't have a no women rule on this sub, so stop talking out of your arse.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 02:28 AM
2

Recycled Troll Post.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 09:03 AM
1

No wonder you're baffled. You never lent me your goat, but I'm sure that's only because you're too busy fucking it.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 03:13 AM
3

It doesn't provide you with good comebacks, so no.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 02:59 AM
4

Let your goat explain it to you then.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 02:49 AM
3

Obviously not, since you can read it without your goat interpreting for you.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 02:47 AM
3

Fucking goats doesn't count as real sex though.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 02:45 AM
1

He probably won't take any information from a man seriously so direct him to Karen Straughan's videos on YT.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 04:27 AM
1

Although feminists currently wield disproportionate political power for their actual numbers of staunch adherents, that doesn't make them a majority among liberals or conservatives. We don't have to win over feminist liberals, we only have to change the thinking among the majority of non feminist liberals (and conservatives) who currently support them. The combination of both conservative and liberal leaning support is the best to aim for. A non partisan majority is the greatest majority one cou…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:47 AM
2

Not all issues, however, are politically partisan. Men's rights need to be seen as politically non partisan so that support can come from and be accepted by all quarters.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:38 AM
9

MRA is fine thank you very much. Isms generally are based in ideology. Ideologies generally have a lot of tacked on baggage unrelated to the core of the ideology. The term ' Men's rights ' is not beholden to any ideology or political leaning and is fairly self explanatory.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:30 AM
1

The ultimate gaslighting statement based on pure projection.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 09:26 PM
1

@OP: I think you meant " a shit test for civilization ". FTFY And yes, it is nothing more and nothing less.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 09:22 PM
1

Thanks to you it is now full of shit plus one posts.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 09:20 PM
1

Of course it's the Patriarchy's fault. Feminism IS PatriarchyTM.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:21 PM
89

LOL. Bad news for a non existent fantasy boogeyman.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 09:52 PM
7

Femorrhoid refers to feminist pains in the arse, whom I disdain for the hateful ideology they follow. The last time I looked, a feminist can be male or female. Femorrhoid is gender neutral, in the same way that hemorrhoids are.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 12:06 AM
11

" I absolutely loathe sexism, regardless of who it is targeted at. " Define your sexism. After all, according to the majority of femorrhoids, it is apparently sexism to acknowledge that men and women are different. I for one do not seek equality at all costs if it means that acknowledging sex difference is sexist. Colour me sexist, I don't care. I'm not looking for equality between the sexes, which as far as I'm concerned is a nebulous and unattainable goal, and sometimes at odds with biology. I…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 11:12 PM
19

If men behaved more like women behave toward other women in the workforce, then women would win less, not more.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 10:30 AM
21

Misandry sprinkled with commie crap from the bowels of a femeroid.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 09:46 AM
6

Too many men fail to realize that, as with most children, reverse psychology is the best method for dealing with infantile soon to be ex-wives. The first mistake is looking at everything short term. Look to the long play. Then begin by doing and saying the exact opposite of what is expected. Don't even mention the kids. When she brings them up, let her know how much of an imposition on your new lifestyle it will be, having to have them for some of the time during the week, and especially how inc…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 08:00 AM
43

We really need better female representation in all STEM careers, especially the one that rarely gets a mention : Sewage Treatment and Effluent Management.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:30 AM
16

Try using DuckDuckGo for your searches. I've also had many sites return a null result in my ordinary browsers, but those same sites can be accessed using my Tor browser.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 09:33 PM
3

and still be in profit shows Australia is lost. The ABC doesn't have to run at profit. It is 100% Australian Government owned and financed by the taxpayer.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 10:19 AM
5

The human right of access to true justice. Men's rights are human rights. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 08:26 AM
3

Considering it's a puss hole of marxists, I don't give a damn about being able to post there or not.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:03 PM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 07:53 AM
4

Glad you had the foresight to archive her article and not link directly to it. Starve the motor mouth from ad revenue.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 09:31 PM
13

Garbage by any other name is garbage just the same.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 12:10 AM
1

@OP : Your post has inflated the cringe and your incel status is duly noted.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 11:17 PM
16

And what a great tool it is. Pity feminists don't use it.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:51 AM
11

Good. Hope they succeed.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:51 AM
5

Unless the scientists are named, you can be sure there were no scientists involved.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 08:06 AM
13

Good to see someones posts reflecting their user name.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:58 AM
23

Remove arbitrary barriers ? So when will the walls separating individual cubicles come down?
/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:57 AM
9

Keep your acidic grapefruit off my hand wipes!
/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:50 AM
9

Of course there is the patriarchy. Feminism IS PatriarchyTM.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 10:44 PM
1

The word 'feminism' was first coined in 1890. But the women's liberation movement never broadly adopted the term until the late 1960's. The majority women's liberation movement preferred 'women's liberation' as the moniker of their movement. It all went to complete shit after the 1960's when the movement broadly adopted 'feminist' principles after being hi-jacked by leftist politics.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 10:10 PM
7

Yes, indeed.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 10:15 AM
26

I've never had a problem with women who call themselves women's rights activists or women's liberationists because the titles honestly reflect their aspirations. But feminism has never actually been about women's rights. Feminism is merely marxism in pink. Marxists simply want everybody to be completely and totally subservient to the state. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 04:35 AM
6

As a 'right winger' the only time I'd ever turn to feminism is when I'm looking for somewhere to shit.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 03:29 AM
5

Please consider using an archiver instead of linking to sites like ABC which don't allow for comments to rebuke the content of an article. Although the ABC (Australia) doesn't benefit from advertiser money through site visitation, the extra numbers of people visiting from subs like ours may give them the unreasonable impression that their content is relevant and beneficial. It usually isn't.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 03:09 AM
3

open to considering alternatives If they are open to alternatives then they are not 'bound' to feminism.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 11:42 PM
3

You can't change the mind of a person 'bound' to feminism so I would tell them to fuck off and stay away from me.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 11:41 PM
1

LOL. It is feminists who actually want to disempower women from making free choices and to become wage slaves to the state. Any choice made by women that doesn't meet feminist expectations is immediately denigrated by feminists.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 11:29 PM
9

Menslib is a feminist trojan horse.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 09:37 PM
17

Well who could have thought that equality of income and female hypergamy were mutually exclusive, while male hypergamy was totally unacceptable? /s
/r/MensRights26/09/19 08:28 AM
40

Well colour me sexist, I don't care, but feminist I will never be.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 07:21 AM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights26/09/19 03:57 AM
2

They already had a gender neutral doll. It's name was Ken. It had no balls or penis or vagina or breasts.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 03:38 AM
1

Meh. Trolls will be trolls.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 10:25 AM
11

LOL. The NPC has done her job, buzzwords included.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 10:12 AM
1

Nah. Just call them the assholes that they are. Punctuate it with 'creepy' assholes if need be.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 05:52 AM
5

Move on. Find better friends. You are not their mental health doctor and they are certainly not your friend.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 05:43 AM
1

I don't think any of us could have said it better.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 05:35 AM
10

Oh look, the only real man on the internet has come to enlighten us. /s
/r/MensRights23/09/19 10:00 PM
16

Depp's appropriate answer : see you in court.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 03:50 AM
2

You do realize that without men, you'll have to blame women for everything that goes wrong. Right ?
/r/MensRights22/09/19 03:29 AM
3

Treat em mean, keep em keen!
/r/MensRights22/09/19 03:23 AM
7

You are not asking questions, you are making assertions. Your whole spiel is framed in the same way that Cathy Newman interviewed Jordan Peterson. Instead of asking things, she started almost every sentence with " So you are saying ", then proceeded to make false assertions. Instead of asserting things like " You think " or " Why do you believe " , try actually asking, " Do you think " or " Do you believe " .
/r/MensRights20/09/19 11:06 PM
1

Virginity is a social concept created by women who think they are pure and their purity will be sullied by having sex with a filthy sinful man. Hey, I can spout off idiotic ideas too.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:10 AM
1

AT OP: You're a POS.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:08 AM
1

Ttiania McGrath was/is a parody/satire account. Congratulations on downing an anti-feminist parody account. /s
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:26 PM
24

" There's nothing wrong with supporting feminism ". You wouldn't support cancer so why support feminism.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 02:35 AM
8

Yes it's grown. Unfortunately there is always a small percentage of members that are feminist trolls and trojan horses or other agents with dubious intent. I think it is a good sub, with most members allowing for broad discussion and dissent. The ban hammer here is small and used sparingly.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:43 AM
3

I have zero problem being nice to non feminist women, but feminists of any flavour can go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 06:54 AM
1

Feminism IS Cancer.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 06:51 AM
6

You shouldn't refer to yourself as 'it'.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 03:38 AM
3

Feminism IS PatriarchyTM
/r/MensRights13/09/19 11:11 PM
5

|Do you disagree that men have played a part in the unequal expectations for men that are hurting men? No, I agree that some men have played a part. Do you disagree that the use of the term toxic masculinity is a gas-lighting term that should be replaced with the more accurate term of toxic societal expectations.?
/r/MensRights13/09/19 11:01 PM
5

I also am unable to look up numerous websites using my normal browser. Often the result of putting in a particular address is 'page not found'. However, when I enter the addresses into my Tor Browser, I can access those sites. Download Tor and try accessing sites that way. It may help.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 10:51 PM
10

Then obviously the audio book is more informative than the short written spiel. And yes I object to the use of the term toxic masculinity because it infers that the cause of men's problems are solely inherent to their masculinity and not extant as is mostly the case.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 10:33 PM
11

I read the whole spiel. It's more BS from the ' let's save men from toxic masculinity' brigade. She thinks men need their own form of feminism. We have it already. It's called MRA.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 10:15 PM
11

Great. /s Another feminist who thinks she knows what's best for us men.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 10:12 PM
1

the groups that are the experts on suicide prevention If those groups are experts on prevention, then sadly, they are failing to direct effective solutions, as suicide is increasing.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 09:32 AM
4

They are just one category of useful idiots. It is not them we are losing to. We are losing to corrupt politicians, banksters, wealthy corporate entities and Enemies, who have been, and still are, manipulating all of us, for their own ends. The past is always relevant to now and the future. Heed the warnings now and help win the future. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX3EZCVj2XA
/r/MensRights13/09/19 08:13 AM
10

Feminist are morons.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 12:29 AM
2

It is better to be gender neutral but at the same time more specific with the target. FeministsAreTrash
/r/MensRights11/09/19 07:04 AM
2

Well yes OK. But every woman who ever gave birth to a male child and let him live is complicit and should also be put into the gas chambers. Hmmn, I wonder how the remaining women could then reproduce. I don't think this silly bitch has really thought it through.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 07:02 AM
14

It's not the first game where women make more than men. Women have been making more than men in the prostitution game since forever.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 06:54 AM
3

Well gee girl, my positive result of aspermia from my vasectomy predates your positive pregnancy test. Hmmmn, what have you been up to without me?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 11:10 AM
1

Differential pricing for haircuts was a big issue a few years ago in Australia. The 'problem' was raised by feminists of course. The solution that hairdressers came up with was simple. Their rates for basic haircuts only, became chargeable by time taken, and charged by minimum 15 minute intervals. So if a cut took 20 minutes, you were charged for 2 x 15 minute intervals. LOL, needless to say, this meant some hairdressers actually increased the average cost of a basic cut for females. Feminists w…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 06:37 AM
1

Eat a bag of dicks. But only feminist dicks.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 06:04 AM
2

Because feminists are morons. Also, menslib is a feminist trojan horse. It should be directed to a glue factory for processing.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:47 AM
3

" totally non-judgemental " LOL I think she means totally mental.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:39 AM
3

Person can be payed less because they are a stupid feminist who signed up for gender studies instead of stem.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 10:11 PM
2

Well obviously they are into racism. Who wants to be a part of that.?
/r/MensRights09/09/19 09:50 PM
12

Have you ever heard the expression ' keep your friends close and your enemies closer ' ? Women may have some close long term friends, but my observations and experience show that they also tend to have many more long term frenemies. Don't confuse friends with frenemies.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:18 AM
1

I'm not disgusted by periods, but I always knew when my wife was having her period if I used the toilet shortly after her. There was never any physical trace, but the rotten potato smell would inform my nose that it was that time of month for her.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:47 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 04:12 AM
8

I was once a lefty, till I took off the blinkers and saw what the left has become.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:43 AM
1

I don't disagree that he was at fault or that he statutorily raped her. I disagree that he coerced her. I find it scary that you assume so much about something I never said or 'implied'.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:39 PM
1

was coerced by him Unless he actually used threats, force or physical violence of any sort, then no, she was not coerced. https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/coerce Persistence may be annoying but it is not coercion unless accompanied by force or threat of force. However, due to her being underaged (in California) then technically she was raped (statutory rape).
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:25 PM
0

Fair enough, but their is no mention of location in the OP.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:16 PM
1

It's statutory rape by legal definition. That depends wholly on which country you live in. In Australia 17 is legal age of consent (16 in some states).
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:14 PM
1

The fall of Sparta, and the fall of Rome, are just two historical examples where powerful women and weak men eroded their society from within.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:59 AM
0

It seems you're unable to recognize sarcasm.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:16 AM
1

Have you considered having a lobotomy to raise your IQ?
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:27 AM
1

we put women on a pedestal they do not belong Sometimes they do belong on a pedestal. The pedestal just below the hangman's noose. What's good for male murderers is good for female murderers too. Unless of course you think women deserve lighter sentences for their evil doings.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 12:45 AM
3

Thanks to your second sentence, you got one out of two correct.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 10:04 PM
3

And like all bad product spiels, there is no avenue provided for comment or complaint.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 07:44 AM
2

It's a stupid question which requires a typical feminist ploy of turning the situations into oppression olympics. Both situations are appalling. End of story.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 07:12 AM
5

Menslib is just a feminist trojan horse. Screw them.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 11:11 PM
7

Feminists, can't live with them, can live without them.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 09:06 AM
1

I don't know about your country but here in Australia, less than one in five women think of themselves as feminists and less than one in ten men think of themselves as feminists. So no, being a feminist is not socially normal. It's just our left wing feminist inspired mainstream media that tries to convince everyone that feminism is the norm. Fewer Aussies than ever now take the msm seriously on any issue, let alone msm feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:20 AM
1

it’s like socially normal to be a feminist That's what feminists want you to believe, but reality says otherwise.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:09 AM
7

Feminism functions exactly like conservative politics and religion. Except for a few important differences. E.G. Feminists never preach forgiveness and to love ones enemy as oneself.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 10:20 PM
6

Perhaps all their gossip is about you not for you. ?
/r/MensRights31/08/19 07:14 AM
3

You can always tell when an article is nothing but propaganda by the lack of facility for readers to comment.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 01:56 AM
4

I don't speak for others, only for myself. I calmly read the op's comment, then calmly filed it where I think it belongs. People can play devils advocate all they want, nobody here is stopping them.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:14 AM
4

Your concerns are duly noted by me and immediately filed in the WPB.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:05 AM
10

If I were fine with men's status quo I wouldn't be part of this sub. No doubt many others feel the same way.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 10:26 PM
20

Total sample size was 1207 adults. LOL. Hardly indicative of anything really.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 04:37 AM
5

The best thing the left can do for young men is to leave them alone, they've already contributed enough problems.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 10:32 PM
1

That's because they were too busy working.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:57 AM
1

It's just the impression I get from reports over the years in 'The College Fix'. Not sure if that is the case, which is why I said 'seems'.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:44 AM
9

The best scene in the whole movie is when Rhett turns his back on Scarlett and leaves.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 11:19 PM
3

As an outsider looking in, titleIX seems to work for whoever is the first accuser. If you have any evidence at all, perhaps you should claim harassment by her for creating a hostile environment.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 10:58 PM
3

Is it that time of the month again, when trolls come out to play?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:37 AM
2

which bases it's arguemnt off of maths rather than semantics and logic since with maths, one person is right and the other is wrong. 7 x 13 = 28 Prove me wrong : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzxVyO6cpos
/r/MensRights22/08/19 10:35 AM
1

Yet I saw it anyway, because I read the entirety of the comments in this thread which included a link to your meme.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:23 AM
1

I do not think That about sums it up really. And the meme was pretty ordinary mediocre, but that is my subjective opinion.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:10 AM
1

Your thoughts on the matter are duly noted and filed immediately in the wpb.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:05 AM
2

The fact that you claim that the deliberate infliction of excruciating pain (irrespective of the reason for doing so) is not an act of violence is itself proof of your willful blindness to the violence that is committed against infants. An act of violence can be physical or psychological. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/violence
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:47 AM
2

https://returntonow.net/2016/03/02/circumcision-is-child-abuse-and-torture/ http://www.drmomma.org/2009/08/plastibell-infant-circumcision.html How about an appendectomy without anesthesia, on a non consenting person? Not that I expect an honest answer from the willfully blind.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:22 AM
2

The trouble is that it is typically done by trained people in specific ways, and to me that removes the 'violence' angle. It is done on unwilling infants without anasthesia. Dr Mengele was a trained professional too. Perhaps he should have been awarded a prize for his 'non violent' experiments on humans against their will.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 11:19 PM
1

Perhaps I should have been more specific : Infant male circumcision. Hmmn, lets see now. I put you into a special receptacle with restraints designed to keep you still against your will. Then I use a scalpel type instrument to forcefully and painfully separate your foreskin from your glans, because it is actually attached in the same way your fingernail is attached to your finger. Of course no effective pain killer is administered during the whole procedure due to your young age. After performin…
/r/MensRights21/08/19 10:50 PM
2

|● Advocating for violence/illegal acts will be removed.) male genital mutilation is LEGAL Male circumcision may be legal, but one can easily argue that it is violent, and therefore any pro-circ post should be removed.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 10:38 PM
4

The only 'creeps' I really can't stand are the ones who think others should be mind readers. If something or someone 'creeps' you out then say so. Don't expect others to take a 'hint' when none is given.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 07:04 AM
6

As an Aussie I have to agree. Our family court and criminal court justice system are broken.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:19 AM
3

John Oliver is an unfunny twat.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 10:18 PM
3

Feminism IS Patriarchy TM Smash Patriarchy TM
/r/MensRights19/08/19 02:32 AM
11

NPR = Nonsense Propaganda Repository.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 03:29 AM
5

To be fair, those women weren't womansplaining, they were femsplaining.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 10:16 PM
3

In this age, these stereotypes must be eliminated. Why should any stereotype be eliminated? People should be free to follow any lifestyle they want to, including a stereotypical one. The problem isn't stereotyping, it's blindly accepting the opinion that stereotyping is necessarily bad, or that only stereotypes are acceptable, or that no stereotypes are acceptable.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 07:38 AM
6

Feminism IS Cancer.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:18 PM
43

Start using the women's only toilet, and if anyone tries to call you out for it, make a really big loud fuss and tell them you identify as a woman in the moment. If enough males did this, the school authorities will have to take notice and respond.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 06:47 AM
1

My grandfather (r.i.p) and I are both left handed. He used to joke to me that I shouldn't worry about all the jibes I get from right handed people, because god made 5% of the population perfect, and the rest he made right handed. Perhaps, there should be a day for the less than perfect people. LOL.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 07:59 AM
1

Seems like a good time to accuse all the lawyers involved in the drafting of this BS, of rape. After all, they are raping the whole notion of justice.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:03 AM
9

You are making a lot of assumptions on behalf of 'we'. I neither subscribe to the notion of 'we' nor the assumptions you have made about what 'we' think.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 07:28 AM
2

You decide. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=the+effect+of+make+up+on+the+environment&t=avg&ia=web
/r/MensRights08/08/19 08:39 AM
3

@OP: Ask your mother if she remembers the song 'I don't like Mondays'. Then ask her if she knows what the song is about and who was the inspiration for the song.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 03:39 AM
24

The extent to which women really (don't) care about the environment is painted on their faces every day.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 03:35 AM
0

Sometimes?
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:07 PM
3

So you want to ban a parody. Got ya.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:06 PM
102

Although I agree with most of your post, in very many cases, it simply boils down to " the juice isn't worth the squeeze ". No need to over think it.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 07:00 AM
12

Please tell me she isn't a real nurse!
/r/MensRights06/08/19 01:52 AM
8

Your expectations are your problem.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 07:22 AM
3

BS, census do not record unreported data.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 10:39 PM
3

all of the rapes and sexual assaults that go on which never get reported. The greatest assumption ever made is to assume that any number is accurate for non reporting, when in fact, if a crime is not reported then we have absolutely zero idea of how many crimes are not reported.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 10:32 PM
1

So glad I can have a dose of shaming with my tone policing today. Goodness knows, I really need a dash of both.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:51 AM
5

" If I point this out, I'm called a sexist. " Don't point out the difference, just point to the server that needs lifting and tell them they need to lift it.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 05:35 AM
14

They are really angry that their own funding has been sliced, so others can get funding. Good. An angry feminist means somebody somewhere is doing something right.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 05:33 AM
6

Feminism IS Cancer : source - any 21st century rational thinker.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 05:20 AM
3

First and foremost, Leyonhjelm is a politician. As with all pollies, he has allies and foes. But he doesn't bow down to Feminism and PC, on either side of the political spectrum, and for that, I applaud him, even though I disagree with almost all his politics.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 03:28 AM
4

He's not an MRA hero, but he is known to put feminists on the back foot from time to time, exposing the misandry and double standards of a few feminist Aussie senators in particular.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 02:54 AM
1

I've learned that the best response to anything a feminist says is simply 'tell someone who cares'.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 11:40 PM
3

Love the irony that she's writing for the obviously PatriarchalTM "New StatesMAN".
/r/MensRights24/07/19 11:47 AM
2

YEP.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:03 AM
6

These days you don't have to get married to lose half your shit when a relationship ends. In most western countries just co-habitating for 12 months is enough to get you hung, while in Feminazi New Zealand, you only have to co habitat for 6 months to qualify for the asset guillotine.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:57 PM
3

It's true, and it's also one reason why sexism is not always an evil thing. To believe in differences in gender is sexist apparently. Well then colour me sexist and viva la difference. I would rather be sexist and give different flavoured learning strategies to help boys and girls, than ignore the differences and treat them all to a vanilla education.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:49 PM
2

Noh tru Scotsman, I tell ya.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 10:12 AM
1

Take it however you want, I'll leave it at the door where it belongs.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:57 AM
21

Whatever you say Jane.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:55 AM
1

Save your sermons for the pulpit at menslib. I'm sure you'll get all the pats on the back you obviously think you deserve.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:55 AM
29

Then you would understand that menslib is a trojan horse Jane.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:44 AM
1

Oh my goodness what a jacked up self righteous NPC you are. I've been happily married for 40 years to a wonderful woman who is my equal. So what does that mean. It means I know what true love is. And it isn't turning a blind eye to her faults while denying my own. It's acknowledging them and loving her in spite of them. So the post you take issue with is bigoted. I agree. But misogynist it isn't.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:43 AM
52

Menslib is a feminist trojan horse. Remember what happened to the trojans when they let the horse into troy.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:18 AM
1

Speaking his opinion about his perceived nature of women may be a misguided opinion, but it wasn't and isn't based on hatred of women. Like it or not, many women are vain. But most men love them regardless. In the same vain, many men are arrogant, but most women love them just the same. Pointing out the perceived negative aspects of any one individual or group is not hateful, its honesty, even if your perception is honestly misguided. It is your kneejerk reaction by using words like misogyny to …
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:03 AM
1

Found the NPC.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:07 AM
1

It will all end when the sun stops shining. Until then, stock up on UV blocker.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:07 AM
5

Hey yeh! I didn't think of that. But that's a real bonus too!
/r/MensRights22/07/19 05:31 AM
14

I must admit, I came up with the same solution after a few looks at the same item posted on numerous occasions in this sub. Even the pathetic attempt at a back support is an obvious place to put your hands or elbows on to increase stability and / or comfort level.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:20 AM
2

Some parts ? Oh, you mean the start, the middle and the end.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 09:06 PM
3

Good luck for the future.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:01 PM
4

Find a brain. Any brain will do.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 02:23 AM
10

Titania McGrath is a created troll. Her male creator thought it was his best way to show the absurdity of feminist thinking. He's right on the money!
/r/MensRights15/07/19 02:21 AM
1

Believe what you will. I have no favourite horse in the race.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:12 AM
1

If a person is friends with you on the condition that you only ever express opinions they agree with, they are not your friend, they are attempting to be your overlord.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:07 AM
3

Psychiatry deals with chemical imbalances in the brain which can be both the cause of neurological and psychological problems as well as the result of said problems. Since all study of the brain (and mind) is relatively recent and in it's infancy, there will be overlap between the various disciplines. * And there probably always will be overlap. While clinical psychology and psychiatry are generally accepted as genuine scientific disciplines, social psychology still has many detractors. Edit: *
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:46 AM
3

Psychology is a pseudo science to a large degree because it deals with intangible mental processes, unlike Psychiatry which deals with physical processes within the brain. This doesn't mean psychology is unscientific in it's approach, it's just that science deals with physical phenomena, while thinking (mental activity) is a process that goes beyond the mere physical, spilling over into the meta-physical. Thus psychology will always suffer from a degree of scepticism due to many of it's hypothes…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:35 AM
8

While I'm all for acknowledging that both men and women can be sexual assault victims, I think the 1 in 6 for men and 1 in 4 (or 5?) for women are grossly overstated figures. I don't believe either of those figures account for genuine (legally defined) sexual assault.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:38 AM
4

Hmmn, how about Miss Fu Ckoff with all the BS mis-labels.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 09:29 AM
8

It's simple. Feminism IS PatriarchyTM
/r/MensRights05/07/19 09:21 AM
1

Apparently YOU need to hate women to be a man, and it is you who referred to yourself as a 'fucking' man. Clearly an adjective that suits you and your attitude.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 08:08 AM
2

I am a fucking man So you hate yourself. Got it.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 07:57 AM
5

Watch out Luke, the 'force' is strong in this one!
/r/MensRights05/07/19 07:51 AM
2

What are my thoughts? Hmmn. John Oliver is a first class twat. Oh, sorry, you mean about the era.? Hmmn, still thinking.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 09:56 AM
32

Good that she posts enough evidence that you would be dodging a bullet by ignoring her.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 05:06 AM
1

Gender isn't given at birth, it is observed and officially noted at birth. It is also observed pre-birth, but not registered until after birth.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 11:53 PM
3

Well the sentence does begin with "If". That's a mighty big IF!
/r/MensRights01/07/19 11:44 PM
-1

That's why we say no That's why YOU say no to both, I say no to femturds and libturds.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 11:40 PM
7

Let her carry her own load. The challenge of doing so is a good metaphor for life's challenges in general. She can only get stronger from the experience.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:38 AM
1

Intellectual cowardice is no different to any other form of cowardice. The published guidelines for men and boys are the result of such cowardice.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:36 AM
1

Why not make it an easier question for people to answer briefly, in less than one page.? E.G. - Has anyone had positive real life experiences with feminists.?
/r/MensRights20/06/19 05:29 AM
1

And here I was thinking a transgender server was one that is transitioning from Microsoft Windows Server to Linux Server.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 05:00 AM
80

Tell her if she is ever attacked by another woman, you'll remember her words.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 02:28 AM
2

Yeh, join the fight against misandry on father's day.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 03:48 AM
1

Who cares. She makes entertaining videos. That's good enough reason to watch them.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 03:46 AM
3

Don't care about labels. Do care about issues.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 07:27 AM
5

I haven't watched television for over six years now. Apparently I'm not missing anything worthwhile.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:31 AM
33

That may have been how men saw the world a few decades ago, but now the streets are laden with land whales, making it very hard to get a decent view around them.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 10:07 AM
22

If no one fucks with them (women), there is no human future for sure!
/r/MensRights12/06/19 11:23 AM
10

A feminist trojan horse.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 11:10 AM
9

Your observations are correct. They also reflect the cyclical rise and fall of social liberalism and social conservatism. It always has and always will be so. Sometimes the pendulum swings from conservatism to liberalism or vice versa, slowly over a few generations, sometimes in just one. But the pendulum swings regardless.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 08:41 AM
19

As much as I disdain feminists, even they are innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 05:53 AM
0

You fail to see the obvious sarcasm in the original post, reply to it with ad hominem, then segue into science and consensus, while trying to berate me for my mere opinion. Good luck with your discussion. Your posts seem more like preaching than discussing.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:08 PM
1

Of course science doesn’t work by consensus Nuf said.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:51 AM
2

Sorry (not sorry), uncle Patriarchy says no to feminists.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:28 AM
18

Note the overall high levels that cluster around WW1, the great depression era, and WW2. Also the corresponding big spikes in suicide rates for men under 50, post WW2, and the spike in under 40, post the Vietnam war, and the spike in under 30's, post Afghanistan, Iraq wars.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:06 AM
0

The moment you put the word consensus in the same sentence as science, any argument you may proffer has lost credibility. Science does not work by consensus, as much as ideological based media would like us to believe it does.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:50 AM
10

" I know that most people trust only very left-leaning stuff " Thank goodness I'm not most people!
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:44 AM
2

At the height of stiletto fashion in the late 1960's to early 1970's when women wore them to just about any function, whether it was shopping, dating or just lounging around on a sofa, many stores began banning stiletto wearers from entry to their premises because of the damage done to their floors.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:28 PM
2

Innate rights don't mean shit unless they are underpinned by legal rights supporting them.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:31 AM
8

"I've decided just to not let him go." Watch out for your divorce papers in the mail.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 03:13 AM
3

That guy still is a douchebag.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 09:09 PM
1

The cynic in me says you're trolling.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 10:46 AM
1

I loved the third animation. Playful dad.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 06:27 AM
1

Sure, just put a non refundable $1,000,000 deposit into my bank account. BofAmerica 0079476561 After that you'll get all the information you need/want.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 05:41 AM
1

I have a 'golden' bridge to sell in San Francisco if you're interested. 100% honest.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 05:35 AM
1

Sorry, I don't believe you. MRI's aren't given to mindless trolls.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 05:31 AM
1

You also need a mind to have it enlightened. I don't think you can be enlightened. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 05:25 AM
1

You need a mind to have a perspective. I don't think you have either. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 05:22 AM
2

I don't think you have a mind. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 05:06 AM
7

There are no 'good friends' in politics. Only allies and shifting alliances.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:11 AM
7

Ah yes, good old comrade Pilger. Nuf said. She probably was a colossal bitch. But she was definitely successful, without the aid of contemporary feminists.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:03 AM
14

Did you write all that yourself or did you lift it from an article, and if you lifted it from an article, how about linking to the source. There's a lot of assertions that deserve a thorough investigation of their validity.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 03:55 AM
12

Can you prove those wild assertions. If not, stfu.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 03:34 AM
1

Have you been hiding under a rock? There have been weekly accounts (sometimes daily) of the misuse of Section 498A by women in India over the last few decades. Here's a short explanation of what 498A is. https://www.oneindia.com/feature/what-is-section-498-a-how-it-is-misused-explained-1981686.html If you want more information - search for it yourself, that's what search engines are for.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:48 AM
1

It has happened in India by the 10's of thousands. Slightly different law, but same effect - financial incentives for malicious women to make false allegations against innocent men AND other members of their family.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:37 AM
5

@OP: In future please don't link directly to any article written by Van Badham. She is from the same mold (i.e. mould) as Clementine Ford. Please try using an archiver instead.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:32 AM
14

LOL. In Melbourne, Australia, they tried to encourage more people to ride bicycles in the city to reduce traffic. They came up with free bicycle and helmet stations where you could grab a bike and helmet for free, cycle around the city at will, then drop off the bike and helmet at the end of the day. It worked great for guys but not for gals. Why? When surveyed, they found out that women were more concerned at ruining their hairdo (wearing safety helmets is mandatory for cyclists in Australia) t…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:13 AM
1

Then you are talking about the fifties not the sixties.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 10:15 AM
1

A 'man' just recently gave birth. So I guess it's now time for all men to express their opinion on abortion if they want to.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 02:08 AM
1

What's wrong with the sixties? Best decade for music innovation, sexual liberation, expansion and diversity of self expression and a general acceptance of the sovereignty of the individual. Civil rights for all. If anything, some seem to be wanting a return to the restrictions of the 1950's, but only for men.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 02:00 AM
4

Dr Phil, professional expert at pulling opinions from his arse.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:40 AM
9

Where's the complaint?, the sentence from the OP is a simple statement of fact.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:28 AM
2

Not some people, just some feminists.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:30 PM
2

I didn't know land whales could write?
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:25 PM
3

Yeh, we have the same BS show in Oz, going by the same name. A show better described as yesterday's Left-overs.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 10:18 AM
4

It does no harm except to the hundred or more infant boys who die (just in America alone) each year from botched circumcisions. http://www.circumstitions.com/death.html
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:36 AM
3

Sadly, I'm guessing there are So Many interesting and fascinating moments in history, because so many failed to learn from their own history.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:24 AM
-1

OK, so you are a fully matured parasite apparently, while everybody else is just a human being.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:51 AM
5

Sorry I was wrong. You don't reek like a dog, dogs are good. You do reek and write like an NPC.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:31 AM
3

While you just reek like a dog.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:20 AM
3

Men also cause 100% of wanted pregnancies.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:19 AM
2

" Still, better than fucking Labor. " Yeh, that about sums up my position. I'm not really a Liberal supporter, but the current Labor party would be a disaster for Australia if they had won.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:34 PM
-1

As an atheist I am opposed to abortion on any grounds other than a clear and present physical danger to the pregnant woman should she continue with the pregnancy. If we don't value a new human life at it's beginning, why should we value it at any other point in time.? Already feminists have been pushing the limit of what's an acceptable time to kill the unborn to a time including after the child is born. I'm not surprised either, I even predicted back in the 1970's that feminists would not stop …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:02 AM
8

No feminism hasn't got this crazy. It has always been crazy from the start. All that's changed is they are no longer able to hide it.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:51 AM
6

Because it isn't and never was about equality.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 07:32 AM
1

@OP: GFY
/r/MensRights14/05/19 09:08 PM
5

The Duluth Model and its derivatives have denied women their best bet to escape the cycle of violence. That's because the Duluth model was never intended to find solutions to the cycle of violence, it was developed to exacerbate problems between couples to ensure the career paths of many feminists working in the domestic violence / social services industry.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:45 AM
1

Your choices are always your choice. It's just that the outcomes aren't always going to be what you'd expected. But this is true in all facets of life, not just sex. Learn to respect your own choices, embrace them and learn from them.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:35 AM
2

If girl scouts admitted boys in the same way that boy scouts admitted girls there would be equality. Since that won't happen ever, I see no problem with boys having their own separate provider. Previously both groups had access to their own providers, so they had equality and separateness. If girls are allowed to have their own provider to the exclusion of boys, then boys should equally have the same right to exclusive provision. If girls were unhappy with the sort of experiences they were getti…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 06:39 AM
2

Upvoted you for a bit of good Karma.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 06:08 AM
1

Well thank you for calling me a child. I feel over fifty years younger now. Hell, I think you just put a spring in my step. Good Karma!
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:58 AM
1

LOL. Yeh, Karma screws with everyone!
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:52 AM
7

Don't worry, in a few years, there will only be girls in the boy scouts and lesbians will be happier than pigs in shit.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:39 AM
2

Teenagers with raging hormones (of both sexes) have always found a way to bypass restrictions and hovering protective adults. |all this sexual harassment could be avoided. Not when sexual harassment is so broadly defined that almost any male action apart from breathing can be considered as such. The safest place for any boy these days is as far away from females as he can get. It might be boring for them, but at least it's safe. If the genders are kept completely separate then whats the point of…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:13 AM
3

|but still have the option of being a housewife without anyone to look down on me. Well, anyone, except rabid feminists.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:03 AM
5

While we're at it lets get gays and fundamentalist muslims together to sort out their sexual orientation differences. Of course I recommend they meet in a basement for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:00 AM
11

the old farts who thought girls couldn’t handle camping, hiking, shooting, etc. That may be your perception, and it may have even been indicated by those senior men, but in reality it is far more likely that what they were really afraid of is sexual interaction between horny teenagers. A reality that exists but no one is allowed to talk about unless it's framed as boys sexually harassing girls.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:38 AM
8

LOL. Thanks for so many jokes rolled into one word salad.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 09:08 PM
1

Ah yes, the Guardian, cesspool of marxists out to destroy the dreaded patriarchy. I do hope they can find the patriarchy one day, they deserve at least one successful gambit.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 03:37 AM
1

Point them to the nearest mushroom farm, tell them the farm will take all the BS they can spout.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 07:09 AM
1

Yeh, it's a travesty that there aren't more women in Sewage Treatment and Effluent Management, also known as STEM.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 12:03 AM
2

Or Fescist for short.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 11:11 PM
1

The people who brought the word gender into the common lexicon in lieu of the word sex were the 19th century French Aristocrats who thought gender was a preferable word for sex than the gutteral and base sounding word (to them) , sex. The great majority of people you speak of have simply been cajoled by feminists and other PC obsessives to use their definitions of words or be damned by them. Since I don't give a damn about PC obsessives or feminazis I'll continue to use the words sex and gender …
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:34 AM
3

Fortunately I don't subscribe to feminist group think, so sex and gender mean the same thing.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:48 AM
-1

Feminism IS cancer Edit : downvote as much as you like, it won't change the fact that feminism is cancer
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:29 AM
18

Her body is a temple - the temple of doom!
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:43 AM
1

The next time some dimwit goes on and on about the patriarchy ask them in a very nice tone if they could give you the contact details of the patriarchy. Then wait for their brains to explode.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:36 AM
3

Although I didn't understand a word that was said in the beginning, the ending spelled it out.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 05:29 AM
4

It's not so much 'anti male', but it is antiquated male.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 04:51 AM
2

One thing that is almost 100% for certain. If he has a vasectomy, she will not be able to burden him with another man's child without him knowing it's not his. If she wants to cheat, she will have to be extra careful not to get pregnant, if she doesn't want her marriage destroyed. Personally, I had a vasectomy after the birth of my second son, because I wanted it, because I didn't want anymore children. My wife didn't want me to have a vasectomy, but I told her that it wasn't negotiable, as I di…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:37 PM
9

Going by the number of suicides by veterans and the veterans protests about their post service treatment, I would say that plenty of veterans are told to "get over it", by a-holes who are supposed to help them.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:45 PM
2

Done. Opposed the proposal. It's definitely about trying to reverse the onus of proof in a trial, onto the accused.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:35 AM
7

First off, you were a boy not a man, when you were assaulted, so feminists are doubly wrong. Secondly - feminists are tumors, the only cure is removing them from your life.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 10:58 PM
6

WTF are you still with her for. Leave now. Edit - I see from a post below you already have. Good.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 02:28 AM
2

Anyone not conforming to the edicts of the comrade left are described as far right. Even centre left is considered far right by any lefty who considers themselves left of centre. As a former leftist, I'm glad that I took my blinkers off and saw the dung pile that the left side of politics has created since the beginning of the 20th century. It's never too late to embrace reason.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 06:18 AM
2

'Clementine Ford' is Aussie PC for 'Bush Pig.'
/r/MensRights29/04/19 04:43 AM
3

YES - Speaking for myself only here.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 02:27 AM
1

|no matter what he might like What if he likes strangling cucks?
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:52 AM
3

No it’s not. Feminism is about equal rights. LOL. Sorry, you lost me there.!
/r/MensRights26/04/19 11:09 AM
2

As Camille Paglia has often said, if the building of civilization was left in the hands of women, we'd still be living in grass huts.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 09:58 AM
2

But again, society would not grind to a halt. They would be replaced. Replaced by whom? Sure women might be able to do all the grunt work jobs that are currently done by men, but the simple fact is, they don't do them now, in spite of decades of encouragement, so what makes you think they will do them when no men are around.? Go watch Bear Grylls 'The Island - Men versus Women' If that doesn't open your eyes to the ineffectual efforts of women when confronted with surviving without men, then I g…
/r/MensRights26/04/19 07:37 AM
2

My favourite way of getting through a crowd quickly is to put one hand loosely over my mouth and to mumble that I'm about to spew. Works like a miracle broom, every single time.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:39 PM
1

I see you are trying to extend your vocabulary. Keep trying, eventually the number of words you can write will equal your IQ score.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:12 PM
12

Took the words right out of my mouth.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:18 AM
1

I really hate those robo-voice videos. Is it really that hard to narrate a video in person?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 11:16 PM
5

So it appears your primary interest in posting here is getting up votes, not expressing and standing by your opinion no matter how much others may disagree with it.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 10:44 PM
7

Unwanted by whom? Just because the woman may not want to have a child doesn't mean the man doesn't either.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 02:15 AM
6

There is a simple reason why men will always be needed. Someone has to take out the garbage, and someone has to be blamed when things go wrong. And without men, things will definitely go wrong as the garbage piles up.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 07:27 AM
3

" Today, I just want to ask you to please consider how your actions and beliefs can cause real damage to precisely the population you're here to support. " Seems like Feminist Gaslighting to me. ​
/r/MensRights15/04/19 04:56 AM
3

NO.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 05:08 AM
3

You mean he was a physicist and an inventor. OK, so he had a partner, he wasn't working on LCD research for a corporation nor for any government. Ideas may come from anywhere, and one of the information leaflets you'll find at any patent office regarding patents, reveals that the majority of patent applications come from individuals working on inventions that lie outside their normal domain of work.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 01:22 AM
2

Never said it was cooked up by one man in his garage. There was previous research, and also ongoing research, however the essential effect used in LCD technology which was eventually put into a practical invention and use was initially developed by one man in 1927 - Vsevolod Frederiks.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 01:08 AM
3

There may not be genius inventors who invent things with the same proclivity and sheer volume as Tesla, but there have been plenty of individuals since Tesla who have invented things even though the status quo of scientists working in large corporations or for Governments have told them they are wasting their time on the impossible. Fortunately inventor geniuses never let naysayers get in their way of doing the impossible. Examples of technology invented by individuals that previous status quo s…
/r/MensRights12/04/19 12:48 AM
6

@OP : It seems that you are easily amused.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:47 AM
5

Super Hideous Young avoiding reason at all costs.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 09:25 PM
1

Because she is obviously insane.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:47 AM
6

I've always thought pussy looks more like an oyster dropped onto a pile of lint. Either way, I wouldn't describe them as attractive to look at.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:46 AM
0

Nazism : National Socialism. All flavors of socialism are left, they vary only by degree, hence I mock them all, to varying degree.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 05:55 AM
3

Wow, so much nonsense from one so clueless.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:17 PM
2

The NAZI's were left wing socialists. Your comparison of them to the alt-right is laughable.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:15 PM
2

Interesting that she wants to ban vasectomies when vasectomies make an abortion unnecessary to begin with. Unless of course, the woman is cheating!
/r/MensRights13/03/19 02:06 AM
1

Feminism is the way to go batshit crazy!!! FTFY.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 04:29 AM
6

Then every uncircumcised male mammal is engaging in dangerous sex. Gee, now I wonder how any mammal species survive at all.?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:02 AM
5

I made no claims on behalf of biologists regarding benefit or harm of circumcision. My reference to biology was about your weird statement implying that if you are not circumcised you can't have children. LOFL. Tell that to the 2/3 majority of men world wide who are not circumcised, that they can't have children! You are fucking hilarious.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:56 AM
10

LOL. Name one.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:04 AM
15

LOL. I see you skipped biology.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:59 AM
9

Get rid of both. Replace them with two international 'Everyone have a great day'. It's about as meaningful, which is to say, not very meaningful at all.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:40 AM
0

or many their ability to time-separate opposing beliefs. LOL. I'd just call that 'blowing with the breeze.'
/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:23 AM
2

I never started celebrating fictional strong female characters so I don't need to stop.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:17 AM
11

I agree. Sexist Feminism has permeated every nook and cranny with it's systemic misanthropy and blatant misandry.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:44 AM
2

I'd rather read the comments of whiny cunts than comments from oderous cankles like you.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 02:35 AM
2

If you think fems are reacting badly to this just wait for the shit to really hit the fan when external artificial wombs become a practical reality. They are terrified of losing their sexual bartering power, when they lose their reproductive bargaining power it's all over for them.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 07:23 AM
24

All very reasonable and logical. That's why it will all fall on deaf feminist ears.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 09:22 AM
2

As the saying goes, hard cases make hard law. Meaning that a law, a crime, a verdict, and punishment, are never going to be the perfect combination from the perspective of some or even many. Perhaps mandatory minimums may help in the case of murder, grievous bodily harm and other physically violent crimes, but I dunno.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:49 AM
0

Stop. There is no such thing as a consistent, fair and intelligent feminist, only duplicitous assholes calling themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:08 AM
1

Never date any feminist. There ya go, FT title FY.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:03 AM
3

How can I raise my son to not just survive, but positively thrive?
/r/MensRights28/02/19 05:20 AM
3

LOL. As an Aussie I'm disappointed that no one can give me the contact details of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 04:50 AM
3

Parasite.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 04:45 AM
1

In the last female dominated job I worked at I would have been far more likely (and accurate) to have referred to my female co workers as ho, vinegar tits, asswipe and fugly. Fortunately in my current female dominated workplace I do not feel the need to refer to any of them that way.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:58 AM
5

Link doesn't work for me ?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 06:53 AM
5

LOL. Yeh, when my wife was a young lass she occasionally had some difficulty differentiating her dreams from reality. After 42 years together, time seems to have fixed that. Thank goodness.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 06:28 AM
1

I love the fact that Mark Latham has been so vocal about the pervasive misandry in Australia. Both he and David Leyonhjelm are to be applauded for their political and social stance on men's rights in Australia.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 10:04 PM
1

He was ahead of the modern conversation Yeh, while others were talking about the ethics of bombing countries that are not engaged in war by committing preemptive strikes against possible (but not necessarily proven) terrorists, he just said, meh, let's send in the drones.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 09:28 PM
2

In the grander scheme of all things living and dead, time brings extinction as the rule, with evolution as the exception. Yet every species tries to survive irrespective of the odds against them. That's life. A constant battle to survive. Every living organism is expendable - but also programmed to try to survive anyway.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 08:54 AM
1

Think whatever you like vinegar tits.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 09:59 PM
1

We? Please speak only for yourself.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 01:31 AM
2

Be true to you and become the nurse YOU want to be.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 07:50 AM
24

LOL. Someones fantasy has jumped the shark.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 01:36 AM
3

If women no longer need to keep having 4-7 children in order to keep the population from declining, things are going to change. And there lies the elephant in the western progressive room. The more educated and career minded the women in society are, the greater the problem of decreasing population within that society. This is why the elite of western countries are hell bent on mass immigration to shore up the younger working class numbers. The problem of course, is that they encourage immigrati…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 01:27 AM
1

One woman says " you can't be a socialist without being a feminist " Fortunately I am neither and I don't want to be either.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 02:25 AM
2

Rational arguments don't work with feminists. If they tell you they are oppressed, just agree and tell them they get what they deserve. If they want to be treated better, they need to become better people.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:25 PM
1

Wow, that's brave or suicidal or both.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:14 AM
11

I put this " male reporter sexually assaulted by female " into duckduckgo and got an appropriate search response. https://duckduckgo.com/?t=avg&q=male+reporter+sexually+assaulted+by+female&ia=web
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:42 AM
8

Reading through the comments there, I am now more convinced than ever, that feminists are batshit crazy.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:39 AM
5

Ask them, this sub has nothing to do with their sub.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 10:35 PM
5

Another feminist a-hole troll who should simply GTFO.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:08 PM
1

Nobody could accuse Vice journos of being the sharpest tools in the shed, especially when they use a screen shot of mgtow to attack MRA's.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 09:00 AM
1

She can drive you to suicide with a click of her fingers. Yes, but some insurance companies won't pay out for suicide, so murdering the partner becomes the woman's preferred option.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 10:25 PM
4

I believe in a free market place of ideas and beliefs. I didn't need to make demands from anyone. I found the right doctor. That's all I needed to do.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:42 AM
25

This happened to me 35 years ago. I had to shop around for a doctor who would perform the surgery without my wife's written consent. The irony is that my wife had agreed with me to have the procedure, but I was so pissed off at their (the medical practice) sexist requirement, that I told them so, then proceeded to look elsewhere until I found a doctor who agreed that it was my body, my choice, and my wife's agreement to the operation was irrelevant.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:23 AM
3

Feminism is Cancer. FTFY.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 12:10 AM
1

And we just know what his nick name is likely to be. Poor kid.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 06:33 AM
2

LOL. Call me whatever you like, just don't call me late for supper.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:51 AM
2

but what am I Superfluous.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:48 AM
2

I'm sure a 2nd grader can explain it to you.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:42 AM
2

Try telling someone who cares.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:38 AM
2

I'm leaning towards stupid. Yes, I agree, you are stupid.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:23 AM
3

Assume whatever you want. Your asinine projections are of no consequence.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 12:59 AM
4

You seem to be laboring under the misguided delusion that I care what you think.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 12:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter