TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

barretsgoodhand Archive

View 1 post and 16 comments by barretsgoodhand on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
74

Legal Rightsbarretsgoodhand/r/MensRights05/10/17 04:30 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah, I wondered about that. The same issues-- apex fallacy, homelessness etc.-- likely are in other countries we in the West don't even think about. Never give up, UsedToBeRadical. Keep your head up high, make peace as much as possible without surrender, and make your points. Live a good life, and you will definitely change at least 1 person's opinion for the better.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:13 AM
2

I suspect the researcher is seeing how many sexists views we have, based on the questions. And I don't mind, as long as they are going to be honest with the reporting. Thanks, and good luck. I answered honestly and thoughtfully. It took me about 20 minutes, but I went fast. Expect 15-30 minutes, I'd say, depending on how you take tests.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:04 AM
2

Yeah, and that's just how Edna Mode talks to everyone. It wasn't a "women is cruel to a man =good" kind of thing.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 05:01 AM
4

I saw the movie with my family and have to agree with EricAllonde and tamemetroll. It was a decent movie that in no way demeaned men or promoted hateful feminism. I have no complaints from a men's rights point of view.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:55 AM
2

If you aren't doing it already, support MRA activists and philosophers. It always starts as a seed. I personally like Karen Straughan. A few dollars a month will have a cumulative effect. Give 5, 10 bucks a month. It'll probably be the best money you've ever spent-- what's better, a Wendy's cheesburger meal/videogames/Starbucks coffee or supporting people who defend your rights?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:16 PM
2

Also, you haven't said anything to indicate otherwise, but stay safe. We don't need you going on any type of missions or getting involved with seedy people. If an older dude tries to lure you or convince you that he needs you as his pal or sidekick... stay away from him. You're just a kid.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:44 AM
2

Thanks for the empathy. Question what you're told by an incredibly feminist-controlled education system, especially when you get to college (if you choose that for yourself). Take care of yourself, make sure you get your homework done and hang out with quality people who are moral and treat you with respect while demanding respect. That's not boilerplate advice to a youngster-- it affects the bedrock of your future, your life. Taking care of yourself will, in turn, make you much more capable of …
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:42 AM
1

There's a cracked article telling kids that's the "best video" on Jordan Peterson. Most mainstream critcis have no concept of what he's about, just squinting from a distance and lauding anyone who can create a negative picture from their blurry notion of the dim outlines. He threatens leftism, and is one of the few people to refuse to bow to hateful feminism (largely due to him simply remaining true to his ideals rather than him setting out to attack the dangerous critical theorists)-- therefore…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:05 PM
1

Agreed. It's always a complete strawman, with some Red Scare-level hysteria thrown in for good measure. Like the "enforced monogamy" thing. He's talking about some level of baseline cultural pressure against divorce, right? (As opposed to the new attitude of "break up the family when your marriage becomes even slightly unfun.") But "credible" news organizations have articles that actually, seriously claim he wants to force women to marry men against their will. Seriously?
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:00 PM
6

She's pretty left-wing, from the looks of it. Moderate opinion of Jordan Peterson is better than the leftist media would have you think. His book is good. The contrapoints video seemed to me to be style over substance. For people who are ignorant of JP, it might seem good, but (like most of his critics) it really misses the mark. In fact, IMHO, I think most of JP's critcs rely on their audience's ignorance. In other words, his critics are frequently bullshitters.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:24 PM
6

Cons are absolutely an SJW battleground.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 01:32 AM
7

I went to a pretty big con in the Eastern US, and there were a couple of SJW artists, panels, etc. I made the mistake of innocently asking one which her favorite game was... I bought a picture she drew of a popular game franchise and thought it was just be a quick friendly question. She assumed I was questioning her gamer cred or something. Some SJW in those circles are like, at war with you. Not to mention there are frequently harassment policies in the vein of Title IX college rules (you know,…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 01:30 AM
1

That's a fair point. But Tarantino did fuck up hard there. But I see your point. Would everyone be so outraged if he did it to a man? There's some white knight rescue mentality there. She deserved better, but I see what you're saying.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:49 AM
1

Okay, this is a little too far. Pointing to abusive directors decades ago doesn't make what Quentin did okay, and Uma talking about it does not make her some kind of false accuser. From the New York Times article: “Quentin came in my trailer and didn’t like to hear no [to the decision not to ride in the unsafe car], like any director,” she says. “He was furious because I’d cost them a lot of time. But I was scared. He said: ‘I promise you the car is fine. It’s a straight piece of road.’” He pers…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:49 AM
1

Interesting, I always thought "loophole" referred to using an exception to a rule for unorthodox or unintended (but technically allowed) purposes. For example, hijacking the amendment's design to help criminals repay society to instead focus on increase corporate profits. (And if that corporation were to turn around and start influencing laws to accelerate the cycle, then you have industrial complex, no?)
/r/MensRights05/10/17 08:52 PM
31

The basics: -Men, some of whom have not been convicted and would have their cases dismissed, are sent to a farm with inhumane conditions to profit the farm. -The men receive no compensation (save for the possibility of a tiny bonus at the end, at the discretion of the farm). -If a man is injured (such as the fellow who had his hand bent like a snapped popsicle stick) then the farm files for workers comp so the farm can keep the money rather than giving it to the injured man. -The chicken farm, S…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 04:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter