TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

basilwhite Archive

View 3 posts and 116 comments by basilwhite on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

My criterion for character is "how do you make the time people spend with you worthwhile? How are you a valuable investment of other people's time?" "I don't know" is a valid answer, but some people of character have valid answers, and many oxygen-wasters self-identify by responding to this question with anger.
/r/askTRP04/10/16 08:58 PM
19

Redditor: How get laid? RedPill: Lift weights, neg, Dread Game. BluePill: RedPill is dicks. Redditor: BluePill, how get laid? BluePill: Be nice. RedPill: You lie! BluePill: YOU lie!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 10:38 AM
1

Learn improvisational acting. Yes and, accept every offer, where you dare not go is where you must go. Then treat your life as an improvisational stage. Yes and, accept every offer, where you dare not go is where you must go.
/r/seduction30/05/16 04:33 PM
1

It's not their fault for choosing: it's their fault for staying (if, in fact, there's any fault at all.)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 07:31 PM
7

I ask that about the editorial staff at Cosmopolitan magazine.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 09:27 PM
1

TIL Natural Alphas are natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 11:04 AM
1

Maybe recessive genes correlate with mental illness.
/r/askTRP21/12/15 01:40 PM
1

Shopping for angry old men would be so much easier if sex workers sold gift cards.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 06:10 PM
1

Redditor: How get laid? RedPill: Lift weights, neg, Dread Game. BluePill: RedPill is dicks. Redditor: BluePill, how get laid? BluePill: Be nice. RedPill: You lie! BluePill: YOU lie!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 06:00 PM
6

We value others based on their net benefit to us, and we revise our ideology to rationalize the values we assign to people so that we can still see ourselves as a kind, fairminded person. We feel shocked, SHOCKED, that people to whom we give nothing assign a low value to us. Add whatever prefix to -ism or -archy you want, our ideologies adapt to rationalize the boundary we set between humans who help you and the subhumans who don't. When we do this, it's rational. When others do it, it's unfair.…
/r/MGTOW05/12/15 02:01 PM
1

Okay, ugly ducklings and rough diamonds, I'll give you a chance. What do you offer? Are you smart? Funny? Interesting? Talented? Ambitious? Creative? OK, now what do you do to demonstrate those attributes to the world? Because the world only cares about what it can get from you. To other people, you are nothing more than the sum total of your useful skills, and people only value those skills after you demonstrate them. What you are inside only matters because of what It makes you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 05:23 PM
1

Lemme introduce you to the joy and bliss of social verification. 1) Make a friend 2) Ask this friend "can you recommend anyone for me to date? 3) If no, go to 1 4) Date that person and share feedback with the friend who recommended them 5) If incompatible for a relationship, go to 1 6) Participate in a relationship and share feedback with the friend who recommended them 7) If relationship ends, go to 2 8) Go to 6 Don't get stuck on Step 1. That one's a doozy!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:38 PM
1

Personality and a coherent moral code are essential, yet not sufficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:09 PM
0

"And before you say anything about those mean fathers and those coaches and those brothers and those bully friends, my wife and three daughters, the ones who you just signed the books for, they had rather see me die on top of my white horse than have to watch me fall off."
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 11:36 AM
12

FORD: Family, Occupation, Recreation, Dreams.
/r/seduction14/11/15 03:13 PM
1

War isn't masculine, war is psychopathic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 01:56 PM
1

When humans want to behave a certain way that might cause negative social consequences, they search for a rationalization that will mitigate those consequences so the behavior will have a net gain for them, and if they find that rationalization, they behave, convinced that their rationalization is the reason for their behavior, and unaware that they're doing any rationalizing, because that awareness would make the rationalization less effective. Women do this not because they're women, but becau…
/r/seduction28/09/15 12:43 PM
2

Agree.
/r/PussyPass18/09/15 04:37 PM
2

COIFFURE MADE, TAPER FADE
/r/PussyPass18/09/15 01:24 PM
2

Well, then, justice was served. Sorry OP.
/r/PussyPass18/09/15 12:46 PM
-2

Fade?
/r/PussyPass18/09/15 11:45 AM
10

This article would get a D in journalism class for failing to answer the WWHWWW of the headline. Did she want a man's haircut (a service the business offers to men) or a woman's haircut (a service the business offers to no one)? Big legal and civil difference between "we don't cut women's hair" and "we only give male haircuts." Consider the Amélie.
/r/PussyPass18/09/15 10:44 AM
0

Give me what I ask for, the first time, without bitching about it. This includes information. One of the sexiest things about my wife is she gives me straight, knowledgeable answers to my questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 10:28 AM
1

I recommend Brené Brown's Daring Greatly.
/r/askTRP21/08/15 08:30 PM
1

Are you fun? Is your company worth keeping? Are you mindful of making the time that people spend with you worth their investment? These questions relate to ALL ages and genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 06:38 PM
1

Some other Reddit post. I don't remember the details, other than thinking "this reads like a behavioral economics coloring book or primer."
/r/MGTOW16/07/15 05:55 PM
10

It's what's on the inside that counts, but it's what's on the outside that matters.
/r/MGTOW15/07/15 10:54 AM
3

The second one's less spontaneous, but sometimes you wanna balance spontaneity with personalization. Please consider that pretty women hear that they're pretty constantly, but hear an insightful comment about why they're pretty only occasionally.
/r/seduction14/07/15 04:04 PM
0

When I think of a compliment, I imagine the receiver responding with "Why do you say that?" then saying my answer to this question as my actual compliment. This makes the compliment relevant and specific. "You're pretty." = meh. "You have gorgeous eyes and look like you're smiling everywhere." = poontang or jail. God spits out the lukewarm.
/r/seduction14/07/15 03:40 PM
1

I want to hack a hotel conference room sign with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 01:42 PM
2

Is it possible that abused women marry safe men to cure themselves of their attraction to predators, like gay men marry women to try to cure themselves of their attraction to men? I have no bias either way, I'm genuinely curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:35 AM
4

This reminds me of the comic strip where a predator calls a sex line to hear a wounded, immobile gazelle cry for help.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:31 AM
2

TL;DR: Work the Serenity Prayer on your problems before you bitch about them.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/15 03:33 PM
3

TL;DR: Can't fuck a diploma
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 12:46 PM
13

At least the magazines don't look inbred.
/r/MGTOW10/06/15 08:10 PM
3

"You have an eye for quality."
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 07:59 PM
1

FORD - Family, Occupation, Recreation, Dreams. Ask a question, then answer it yourself. The trick to making yourself comfortable around others is to focus on making them comfortable around you.
/r/seduction27/05/15 07:08 PM
3

FORD: Family Occupation Recreation Dreams. Share on those topics and make friends.
/r/seduction15/05/15 08:19 PM
19

"All guns are loaded" might have a more pragmatic outcome over time than the truer heuristic "assume that all guns are loaded." The goal of a heuristic is not to accurately model the world, it's to maximize outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:25 PM
1

When someone asks for your opinion, think about your answer, ask yourself why you have that opinion, and respond with this second answer. This makes you seem thoughtful, and is in fact a thoughtful activity.
/r/seduction27/03/15 04:12 PM
2

"The opinions expressed here were strictly those of the person who gave them. Take what you like and leave the rest. The things you heard were spoken in confidence and should be treated as confidential. Keep them within the walls of this room and the confines of your mind. A few special words to those of you who haven’t been with us long: Whatever your problems,there are those among us who have had them too. If you try to keep an open mind, you will find help. You will come to realize that there…
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 05:41 PM
1

There's some microbiology stuff on genetic mutation, competing evolutionary theories of the origin of sexual reproduction and why and how gender and sexual reproduction was "selected" over asexual reproduction, effect of hormones on gender, how gender creates seduction roles. Because of its multispecies focus on how gender works, the pair-bonding insighta would relate more to a brideseeker than a pumperdumper so RP mileage would vary. The research is empirical and robust, but most of it is in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 07:34 PM
1

The Red Queen comes to mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:09 PM
1

Not THIS paper specifically, but some of the "philosophy" of RP comes from research in neurosciences and social sciences, some of it reproducible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 07:47 PM
1

Somewhat, similar to how politics sometimes bases its strategies on evidence, mashed up with anecdote and fear-driven thinking. I do find enough empirically-reproducible results to consider the strategies and weigh the evidence. I just wish there was an inventory of sexual strategies sorted for effectiveness AND ethics (yes, there are empirical foundations for quantifying ethics).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 01:01 PM
1

This seems like beta passive-aggression.
/r/seduction27/02/15 12:21 PM
2

You skipped the first step where you come to an understanding of how she feels first. Phrasing.
/r/seduction26/02/15 02:14 PM
1

The journal source site put up a fee, you worked around it. If the correlations they claim in the abstract are weak, which ones? Please refute.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 11:31 AM
1

And the OP article isn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 11:22 AM
1

They asked for money and I didn't wanna pay. Way to steal. So, does the full article refute the abstract, which I quoted verbatim? Or were you asking if I had read the article to insinuate that there was some nuance lost in the abstract? Now that you stole the article, did you even read it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 09:13 PM
1

Summarized here, sort of. http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2h2lvh/if_you_dont_have_a_solution_youre_not_debating_i/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 09:10 PM
0

They aren't explicitly unfounded OR unethical, just that BP dismisses them as such. In fact heuristics sort on spectra of effectiveness and ethics, but RP just inventories them without sorting them by either variable, and BP refutes them outright as evil pseudoscience. A pox on both your houses.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 09:03 PM
1

Nope. The abstract and article were clearly written and free. Have you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 09:00 PM
0

That seems like some reproducible evidence. Are there evidence-based seduction strategies that positively correlate with crotch rot? Signs point to yes! Just so I don't have to hear any more jibber jabber about seduction heuristics having no basis on reproducible evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 08:52 PM
2

"Don't be a dick" doean't quite qualify as a heuristic. Social science gets a bad rap because once it discovers something, the discovery is dismissed as common sense. There's a lot of BP dismissal of seduction heuristics as unfounded and unethical. I expected the denials here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 08:49 PM
0

Yup, they do. I agree, we all use heuristics.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 08:45 PM
3

Actual LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 08:44 PM
15

But why would Mr. Baney look outside that relationship for intimacy?
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 07:34 PM
-2

What's crushed apple cider?
/r/seduction18/02/15 09:03 PM
5

Lemme ELI5 it. Seeker: How get laid? RedPill: Lift weights, lose weight, neg, Dread Game. BluePill: RedPill is dicks. Seeker: BluePill, how get laid? BluePill: Be nice. RedPill: You lie! BluePill: YOU lie!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 07:34 PM
8

Being "Feminist approved" is worth nothing. Why would being Feminist approved mean men should do it? Some men might have the goals of getting laid as much as possible AND not feeling like a psychopath. Some men might wanna get laid as much as possible AND avoid behavior they wouldn't want a boy to exhibit with his daughter. There are seduction strategies that are more or less effective, more or less evidence-based, more or less ethical. RedPill inventories these strategies and shares opinions, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 02:27 PM
1

There are seduction strategies that are more or less effective, more or less evidence-based, more or less ethical. RedPill inventories these strategies and shares opinions, anecdotes and evidence about their effectiveness, but not much about their ethics. BluePill dismisses sexual strategies on the whole as ineffective and unethical, and as such, provides no inventory of strategies, including an inventory of only those strategies that have empirical proof of effectiveness and are ethically neutr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 02:20 PM
1

It's about the futility of finding win-win in the content of PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 05:01 PM
0

People are mammals and give feedback about what they reward. Maybe you reward niceness with sex. Maybe you rationalize the bad behavior of people you have sex with. Maybe both.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 05:00 PM
1

Forewarned is forearmed, but defender can only defend against behavior whereas the manipulator can infer what the defender is guarding against and use another tactic. See "The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis," by Richards Heuer. Also salesmen counter defenses my making buyers think they've gotten one over on the salesmen.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 04:57 PM
4

Seeker: How get laid? RedPill: Lift weights, lose weight, look attractive, neg, Dread Game. BluePill: RedPill is dicks. Seeker: BluePill, how get laid? BluePill: Be nice. RedPill: You lie. BluePill: YOU lie!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 12:11 PM
5

So then they can select each other and leave the rest of us alone then whither all the anti-RP butthurt?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 11:58 AM
8

Also being aware of a cognitive bias doesn't correct for it. I can tell myself that the salesman will try to manipulate me to make the sale, but that awareness doesn't negate the effectiveness of those manipulations, or the fact that I'm an amateur customer encountering a professional salesman who has these encounters every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 01:43 AM
1

As a human, what you want has weak correlation with the behavior you reward with attention/approval/sex. We aren't slot machines, we don't give sex as a conscious reward for certain attributes. We're biological creatures who respond to evolutionary signals, some of which can be imitated. I'm kidding. You're a rationally-driven agent of mindfulness. Enjoy your day.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 01:38 AM
0

It's empowerment. Sometimes it appeals to fairness, sometimes outrage, sometimes pity, sometimes vanity, sometimes revenge. It's about power.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 08:20 PM
2

Beauty = fertility signals. I admired a fertile young woman. The woman I was with shit-tested me with "why are you looking at her?" I answered with "mammals respond to fertility signals." PASSED.
/r/askTRP10/02/15 04:52 PM
0

Too bad feminists tell their sons "just be yourself," instead of evidence-based solutions like "lose weight, get a decent haircut, dress nice, send provider signals," and instead abdicate seduction techniques to RedPill. Because seduction techniques are evil when men do them. Consider manipulation in the context of framing. There seems to be a strong correlation between the need to "hold frame," aka "manage the message," for a seduction technique to work, and the degree to which people find that…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 12:31 PM
7

RedPill doesn't sort seduction techniques along any ethical scale because RedPillers come to RedPill to get laid, not to become better virgins. BluePill doesn't sort seduction techniques along any ethical scale because seduction techniques are manipulative by design and therefore unethical on the whole. A pox on both your houses.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 12:01 PM
1

get what it is that men like. Or maybe some women haven't admitted and accepted that they'd rather not have a man in their lives than do what they'd have to do to make a man want to be with them. For these women, I hope they figure this out and go their own way, so they don't waste their time and ours.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 05:32 PM
5

Past tense. Past performance does not indicate future returns, check with your behavioral economist before investing. Feeling owed does not equate to current value. Also you make a pretty strong RedPill argument for why rich men shouldn't marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 02:54 PM
2

I find the mantra "be worth keeping" extremely pragmatic. For years I heard new comics ask how to get promoted to feature act or headliner. That's the wrong question. The right question is "How do I become the comedian that bookers want to promote?" But that question requires personal responsibility for one's own success. Further reading: #3. You Hate Yourself Because You Don't Do Anything, http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-harsh-truths-that-will-make-you-better-person_p2/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 04:28 AM
2

Please share this essay on the transactional nature of human society with your friend: http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-harsh-truths-that-will-make-you-better-person/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 03:50 AM
3

I make no claims about what is "okay."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 03:35 AM
11

That's easy to figure. She brought youth to the relationship, then after 15 years she had stopped bringing youth to the relationship, and didn't bring anything else that Johnny Depp valued. "The wife thinks, 'This guy was a lonely mess before I came along, who knows where he'd be if it wasn't for me rescuing him! Probably dead!' Meanwhile, the guy thinks, 'I'm the breadwinner, I gave her this nice house, if not for me she could have wound up with some scumbag who beats her! Probably to death!' B…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 03:01 AM
1

Because your SMV will decline relative to men your own age as you age, you're still better off playing the market early. In the long run the universe reaches heat equilibrium and everything dies, so in the long run I guess our decisions don't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 02:51 AM
1

There is a philosophy of science ethics where an observer can sort things along a spectrum of ethical standards in such a way that you can replace that observer with another trained observer and get the same sorting, or at least a statistically-close-to-identical sorting. The weird thing is that these ethical standards are not based on whether the subject comes to harm, but whether the experimenter misrepresented the facts, causes, effects or outcomes. The upshot of this is that you could lift w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 03:54 AM
1

This x 1,000,000. Heuristics don't require any dogma to be effective, women-poop-related or otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 03:35 AM
5

Heuristic = noun, experience-based technique for problem solving, learning, and discovery that finds a solution. How are the examples I've given (weightlifting, Toastmasters) not heuristics for seduction? Not necessarily ethical or effective, just whether they fit the definition of heuristics. Is it possible that maybe you don't understand my argument for sorting seduction heuristics across the variables of ethics and effectiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 03:27 AM
7

No, you're unclearing it. Let me mansplain: Imagine a 2x2 quadrant. The top two boxes, left to right, are "Ethical/Ineffective" and "Ethical/Effective." The bottom two boxes are "Unethical/Ineffective" and "Unethical/Effective." Then we scatter seduction heuristics along these quadrants to help people make more informed decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 03:08 AM
2

What's worse, I've heard how men "should" be attracted to a woman because of her career or financial independence or real estate...just like how women "should" be attracted to a man because he's polite. "These are the things I have achieved, so your gonads should moisten at the thought of the character traits my achievements imply." Darwin is Lord.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 03:00 AM
2

Then let's rank-order all those heuristics along the dimensions of ethics and effectiveness. If misogyny fails, then let it fail. My money's on weightlifting and Toastmasters. I think people would choose the ethical+effective quadrant if we quadrated the heuristics by ethics and effectiveness. Remember, people study RP to get laid; they don't study RP to become better virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 02:49 AM
5

What are the ethical, evidence-based seduction techniques? RP inventories seduction techniques with weak identification of which ones are more ethical than others, and varying degrees of evidence from peer-reviewed research to one-trial anecdote. BP dismisses seduction techniques as unethical and/or ineffective, so provides no inventory of them. I submit that we could identify seduction techniques that have no manipulative or duplicitous component, then rank-order them by the strength of their s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 02:38 AM
16

One of the articles you cite says The advice given to “nice girls” who are having trouble attracting men tends to be of the “there’s something wrong with YOU, so put on some makeup, lose some weight, fix your hair and submerge your real personality because men are justified in overlooking you” type. The above is *EXACTLY* what RedPill tells men to do: groom yourself, lose weight, fix your hair and synthesize a more attractive personality. But Bluepillers here refute these attraction heuristics a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 02:17 AM
2

I had a female feminist hetero friend who said she had trouble getting second dates. I asked her "are you fun?" She stared at me quizzically. I explained to her that I try to make people better off having known me, and make people feel that the time spent with me is time well invested, both in the long run and moment-to-moment. She looked at me like I was reading out of The Necronomicon. Later she said she felt insulted that I would ask her "are you fun?" I've made this point to several people a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 09:39 PM
1

Heuristics do not exist to accurately model the world. Heuristics exist to guide behavior and decisions to affect outcomes. Maybe unconditional love and AxALT are both heuristics, in that they don't accommodate all evidence about human behavior, but yield more positive outcomes than a more evidence-based model of the world. I'm reminded of Captain Picard telling Guinan before an engagement with the Borg, "We may yet prevail. That's a conceit, but it's a healthy one." AxALT may not yield healthy …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 02:49 PM
0

There's the evidence that confirms or disconfirms the heuristic. BREAK BREAK. There's the outcomes associated with applying a heuristic. If you want to create or avoid certain outcomes, you may select a heuristic that has weaker evidence than one that accommodates for more evidence but has less favorable outcomes. Of course, AWALT, like most (if not all) heuristics, can create negative outcomes that the AWALTer may never have the insight to notice or measure.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 07:16 PM
3

Yes, they're all heuristics based on a pragmatic outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 07:08 PM
2

AWALT is not AWAT. Pragmatically an AxALT strategy could yield preferable outcomes than a strategy that accommodates exceptions. Don't hate the behavioral economist, hate the economy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 07:06 PM
5

Gay, bi, straight, we all want pizza, beer and blowjobs. Love all the bros.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 09:52 PM
1

Thoughts? I think this: 6 Harsh Truths That Will Make You A Better Person
/r/TheRedPill23/01/15 08:05 PM
2

Not moral or immoral. Not ethical or unethical. Agnostic to ethics. Orthagonal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 03:52 PM
3

Well, there's whether you've deceived or not, whether you FEEL you've deceived or not, and those two might or might not equate. You might be a naturally ethically effective person.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 01:57 PM
2

TRP says women are sexually selective (which they are), and shows you how to become desireable. Agnostic to ethics. TBP says people should love you unconditionally for who you are (no one but your momma buddy) and gives you no roadmap to sexual success except hope something falls on your lap due to sheer dumb luck and hump it ferociously while you can. Agnostic to effectiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 01:53 PM
2

Many BP (as far as I have observed) would likely state that any use of a 'strategy' is in itself the wrong way of going about things, subscribing to the view that all people are individuals and therefore should be treated on a purely case by case basis. This doesn't really help out with the virginity thing of course. Maybe strategies get a bad rap because once someone identifies a strategy as ethical, they no longer identify it as a strategy. Strategies include "saying hello," and "develop genui…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 01:34 PM
3

I agree, hookers and drug dealers don't chastise customers for failing to say please and thank you. Outcomes include ethical outcomes, and if seekers care about the ethical outcomes of seduction strategies, they might want an inventory of strategies sorted by effectiveness and ethical outcomes, so they can balance the outcomes of increasing their likelihood of getting laid and decreasing their likelihood of feeling like a monster.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 12:39 PM
1

Because there are other people involved, that's where morals and ethics come into it. Lots of people, men and women, don't approve of dread and negging, and they wouldn't change their minds if you said "hey, but it works!". Their problem with it isn't that it's ineffective (which it also is). The fact that other people are involved would SUPPORT the idea of sorting effective seduction strategies ethically, and identifying WHY unethical seduction strategies are ineffective. You may be absolutely …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 11:41 AM
13

TL;DR: Redditor: How get laid? RedPill: Lift weights, neg, Dread Game. BluePill: RedPill is dicks. Redditor: BluePill, how get laid? BluePill: Be nice. RedPill: You lie! BluePill: You lie!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/15 09:53 PM
0

I used to be 5'6". I didn't like it.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/15 04:30 PM
-14

Don't care
/r/PussyPass20/01/15 07:49 PM
-16

Those dirty crackers, always stealin' shit, go back to Europe.
/r/PussyPass20/01/15 02:22 PM
9

tl;dr Grant me the serenity to accept the poontang I cannot change; the courage to change the poontang I can; and the wisdom to know the difference.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 08:54 PM
1

I submit that if you're in a relationship where sex and active listening are emotional needs, sexual unavailability IS emotional unavailability.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 03:13 PM
3

There's a saying in recovery groups: "You will fall in love with the same people until you learn what they have to teach you."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 09:59 PM
1

Don't complain about how girls fall for jerks; they fall for those jerks because those jerks have other things they can offer.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 08:17 PM
1

"Value. What do you have to offer?" Source
/r/askTRP26/08/14 02:57 PM
0

"Asked and answered." Works with kids too.
/r/askTRP19/07/14 12:55 AM
1

Decision support
/r/seduction27/06/14 07:59 PM
2

I don't feel shame for losing. I only feel shame for QUITTING. So I persist.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 01:40 PM
3

"The act is something you fall back on if you can't think of anything else to say." – Bill Hicks
/r/seduction25/06/14 11:27 AM
2

The alumni magazine has become a ubiquitous, living record of achievement bragging. Rise above.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 02:40 PM
13

There's also the abstraction between what someone wants versus what they reward. To paraphrase your own words, when someone asks, "How do I attract potential partners?", in my mind this translates to "what behaviors do my potential partners reward?" When people tell me that they're unsatisfied with their dating experiences, I ask them what behavior they reward, because the behavior you reward drives the behavior you get. Inevitably people tell me that they don't connect the behavior they want wi…
/r/seduction14/03/13 07:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter