TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

biggerarmsthanyou Archive

View 8 posts and 45 comments by biggerarmsthanyou on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Most issues with face skin is sun damage, statistically. Wear sunscreen
/r/BlackPillScience14/07/24 08:11 PM
0

I mean despite what you think it actually has some benefits and the risks are very small. Plus, we can do a pole but a lot of people look more aesthetic after so.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 11:56 PM
0

The point is that it’s easier on everybody early on
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:09 PM
-18

Why? No one ever answers that. It’s just arbitrary. We kill adults animals with more sentience than fetuses that can’t even sense the world around them. I don’t care that they are a clump of human cells; to me they are not that important. Maybe you feel more strongly than I do. I just don’t see how killing a bunch of cells that is not sentient is worst than butchering cows alive and pulling their legs apart. I still eat steak but I also don’t have a problem with fetus murder so :).
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:04 PM
1

its sarcasm
/r/MensRights20/06/22 04:52 PM
7

Objectivity as implied in my sentence is agreed upon beauty standards at the level of majority. Of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder
/r/MensRights14/06/22 03:22 AM
15

Okay, we can all agree she's a horrible person, but objectively she is hot even in old age...
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:24 AM
1

no. and there are more polite ways to say that than mansplaining. and also, that humans from women to men and you are doing that right now. stop womensplaining me.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:43 PM
5

Nope. Thankfully, should’ve seen it coming
/r/MensRights11/06/22 02:34 PM
62

First off, I would *seriously* question the validity of ANY research done and used to support this position. It most likely is not statistically correct, done by non-biased researchers, and the conclusions drawn are 100% incorrect. And not only that, murder and only crimes can be "complex." That does not change the punishment. If you do something unethical and are caught, then you deal with the consequences. It extreme misandry. Once again I am baffled that otherwise normal people could support …
/r/MensRights11/06/22 02:42 AM
13

lol
/r/MensRights05/06/22 03:24 PM
1

lol no
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:30 AM
1

no u
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:30 AM
2

lol
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:19 AM
2

That’s not what I said
/r/MensRights29/05/22 01:53 AM
20

Again, mentally ill people will not reason with you. So no, the only time to actually engage is when you are personally affected or their is a policy that needs to be combated. They won't listen to you.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 04:56 PM
24

Holy fucking shit. Reading http://www.rolereboot.org/culture-and-politics/details/2017-07-im-done-pretending-men-safe-even-sons/ pissed me the fuck off. Seriously. I usually dont get mad. How fucking dare someone assume their experience as a whole group is worth more merit than any individuals? Many men have grown up in abuse, cancer, disease, mental illness and so much more. We are not privileged. And for this bitch to come over and say that OUR experience is not as worthy of a womens is absolu…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 03:46 AM
4

Lmao, it is true. Check the instagram comment sections holy shit
/r/MensRights28/05/22 03:14 AM
2

I agree
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:46 AM
1

Lol exactly
/r/MensRights25/05/22 01:04 PM
16

Personally I am going in she’s hot af
/r/MensRights19/05/22 11:41 PM
7

Exactly. Stoicism has a lot of things to offer, however it doesn’t have the insight of modern science. Lots of research on happiness and well being have been done. Social connection is key
/r/MensRights16/05/22 12:40 PM
11

exactly. assigning a whole group as toxic is ridiculous and could just as easily be attributed to anything. it comes back to the ideologues who weaponize the "other," which happens a lot with feminists. unfortunately, they are not always aware of it on a conscious level so changing their minds is quite hard. the good news is as long as policy does not adopt their views, we don't need to engage with idiots. confirmation bias with them is real
/r/MensRights15/05/22 06:25 PM
1

Tindr
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:06 PM
0

I’m not traumatized at all from circumcision, in fact I don’t recall the event at all :)
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:14 PM
-4

of course. i don't know the stats, however it would shock me if complications were high for a routine circumcision. i mean, we can pole a bunch of people and see if they prefer circumcision or not (not on this sub, biased pole).
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:02 PM
1

Again, false equivalence.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:22 PM
-1

Let’s not pretend that a flap of skin on your dick is a major organ. I’m also missing an appendix. I don’t miss that thing really at all. Neither do I miss my dick tip thing. Literally at all.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:20 PM
-1

Again, I’m totally fine with my circumcision. I realize some are not, however it is what it is. Do you now suppose people wait till they are 18 before making the choice to cut off a flab of skin which will turn into a bigger surgery the longer you wait?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:16 PM
-2

It’s a flap of skin
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:14 PM
0

again, humans choose to pursue cosmetic surgery all the time. how is this any different?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 05:44 PM
-6

I mean, it looks better. And it becomes more dangerous later in life. So, it is a gamble / cosmetic surgery
/r/MensRights26/04/22 04:25 PM
0

Yeah because chopping your dick off at 18 makes sense
/r/MensRights26/04/22 04:16 PM
-8

I mean, I’m fine with my circumcision. I think it looks better. However, I understand not everyone feels the same way. It’s a gamble
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:08 PM
1

No. Atheism is the absence of belief. Agnosticism is a term some atheists attach to the front as in agnostic atheism
/r/MensRights17/04/22 03:12 PM
6

It’s based on reality and not fairytales, sorry. The correct articulation of it is the absence of belief without evidence because the person bearing the theory has the burden of proof.therefore we should turn to what evidence we do have, theoretical physics, to know that it is more probably all religion is wrong. And even if there is a god, with all the trazillion religions there are, the chances of yours being the true god are extremely slim. It’s why I believe in a Flying Spaghetti Monster :) …
/r/MensRights17/04/22 05:07 AM
-8

Great. I felt the need to enlighten you.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 05:02 AM
-15

What is my opinion? Atheism is the only correct position on religion, objectively
/r/MensRights17/04/22 05:00 AM
-7

I intuitively agree, although I don’t care, but “spiritual”? Like what, a lot of us are atheists. That has no bearing here.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:58 AM
1

All the things you mentioned, plus the fact they will deny it and be hypocritical about it if you do the same thing as a guy.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:30 AM
3

You don’t get it.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:31 PM
7

No, that’s not want what I’m saying at all. And whether abortion is murder is a much deeper question and not a debate I’m interested in having on this sub.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:41 AM
12

Sure, but if the goal of feminism is true equality I cannot help but notice the lack of a similar method for men.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:59 AM
15

It’s irrelevant to the right to abortions for men just like women have
/r/MensRights15/04/22 12:02 AM
1

lets make it a movement like wallstreetbets
/r/MensRights07/04/22 03:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter