TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bishnu13 Archive

View 3 posts and 69 comments by bishnu13 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Women are treated more sympathetically but so should men. The answer here is not to say we should go harder on women, but we should be more sympathetic to men. The psychologist gives a very human reason for this behavior. People like to separate themselves from others like this since they don't want to confront that this shadow exists in them as well. When you look at bad behavior others do, you are in some sense looking at the behavior you could do, since we are all similar. In Buddhism, there …
/r/MensRights03/11/17 05:22 PM
4

Stop mansplaning mansplaning /s
/r/MensRights25/10/17 12:42 AM
2

I was banned for saying that USSR failed partly since the price of oil collapsed. I was upvoted by members and then banned by the mod for "spreading lies". In America SJW and communist belifs are generally coheld under a egalitarian understanding of communism and a belief that capitalism enforces sexism, and racism, and etc. The interesting part is that I believe there is a great Marxist critique of SJWs. SJWs think that identity politics should be the main "classes" of division between people. …
/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:19 AM
1

I think TRP is just a symptom of how a lot of men are treated by society. They are treated like shit and ostracized, so TRP provides a radical angle for them. Some of the advice is good for people who have bought some of the lies told by society, but mixes them with a lot of toxicity as well. I see the same thing in a lot of feminism too. A lot of women are not happy and radical feminism provides a worldview for them to fix it. It mixes good advice with a lot of toxic beliefs.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 10:09 PM
6

I read so much where people said that type of sacrifice shows they are "true men". Imagine the shitstorm if women dying in childbirth are true women.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 07:43 PM
8

Your values and worldview constantly shared by politicians, courts, teachers, and etc. It was just accepted. I mean hell where I was from not being a christian would get you looked down upon. It was a scandal that my gym teacher was a lesbian, because it was against god. The very fact you can do that is privilege. No other religion would've been able to try to enforce their values in the community.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:56 AM
3

This is just another example of something I have noticed a lot. A lot of feminism is war against their own unconscious. Women have for a long time been constrained by culture (as have men, but in different ways). So as Women try to now take on more male roles, it is like a giant societal coming of age story. Men have long grown and accepted the constraints, responsibilities, and limits that are inherent in society, since we have a long tradition of taking on these roles. A lot of things that peo…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:59 PM
5

This really depends on where you are in the country, however with time it is switching into the way you describe more and more. The "traditional privileges" have been reversed in many areas (liberal areas especially), but in some areas they still hold true. It wasn't that long ago that the christian perspective was privileged among all others. Now I agree it is openly mocked and looked down upon as "stupid" (where all other religions are elevated). The same thing happened and is happening with w…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:44 PM
1

I don't see it sorry. She is just an alcoholic. Everyone can be one and the best way to deal with them is to get them help. She may be dangerous but like most alcoholics is not malicious. It is horrible to try to change unbiased biases against men and women, by pointing out pathological and sick cases. Also, it is needlessly cruel to kick someone like this while they are down. It is actually a little sickening that we are sitting here gossiping about this person we don't even know. Just for the …
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:12 AM
2

Women don't understand why a lot of men fight. Men fight in a display of dominance and no one is going to think you dominated someone else because you did the dishonorable thing of kicking them in the balls. No one thinks you are more of a man for shooting or stabbing a man in the back or using excessive force and it is the same for kicking them in the balls. It shows nothing about yourself other than being a weasel. It doesn't show your strength or skill. Now everyone is going to go for the bal…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:15 AM
1

It is a perfect example I believe of societal thinking. It has become an unquestionable belief. Because of that no one is socially able to argue from the other side. It creates a huge imbalanced pressure, so the ideas get progressively more absurd. The issue is even worse now since most people can't reason about what is okay from a consistent set of core beliefs, so they just accept what others say as to prevent becoming socially ostracized. This must have been a lot like it was like to grow up …
/r/MensRights01/08/17 05:41 AM
1

Yes. Women to a large extent are interested in the status of being a doctor and not actually being one. Well a lot of men are as well, but it plays out differently. Women think status is something you are where men see it as something you do (being capable and earning respect of peers). So men continue working as a doctor, but women can just get the degree and feel like they have the status.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 05:32 AM
6

It is privilege since she expected to be able to act with impunity.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:19 PM
6

They will just say the gender bias exists in the gaps of what we have measured and know. It is the social justice equivalent of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps for the existence of god.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 04:18 AM
1

Their defense mechanism would be to laugh at us for being "ignorant". Or a "bias in the gaps" argument. There is still bias for men in the blind study because some bullshit reason. Feminists are so convinced that we are all tabula rasas that any negative difference in outcome between genders MUST be to culture. They merely just need to find the reason. That is how they think.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:55 PM
3

Just another person who think they are "woke" and others are just ignorant sheep. I hate this attitude.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:55 PM
6

The only thing worse than harassment is no harassment. She wants there to be a foil to her cause, so she creates one (because in her mind it justifies what she is saying and the urgency of it). The hilarious part is that feminists have no real sexists left to attack. We are in the age of sexism without sexists. Hence they need to create one which they strawmen MRAs to fill.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:25 AM
1

Check your biases :P
/r/MensRights07/06/17 07:52 PM
3

I think there are a couple reasons. One is it takes the actually scary to the elite mentality (marxism) and instead turns it around to be men vs women. This demographic has nothing to do with their place in society. So instead of it being rich vs poor which could hurt the elite, it is men vs women which leaves them mostly safe. Also, it reduced the cost of labor by increasing the labor pool. Women going to work was a huge reason for the stagnation of wages. They also got a whole demographic of p…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 07:39 PM
1

This a sign of a good step forward. If people are willing to start seeing it exists, it won't be long for people to realize the point of view which allows this disparity to exist is bullshit. It is a sign of the Hegelian dialectic moving forward. Eventually the artificial opposites of women vs mens rights will converge into a global understanding of human rights. The process is moving forward since there is a greater awareness and admittance of things women generally consider bad as also happeni…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:48 PM
3

They aren't interested in defending it, because why would they? They already "know" they are right and morally just and hence you are a ignorant shitbag, so why should they waste their time on you. They just want to talk about what they already believe and swap stories which confirm their biases and points of view. They want support, not to win in the arena of ideas.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:53 PM
19

Because sex is viewed as something men do to women, so men have all of the agency and by similar reason all of the liability.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:48 PM
2

As for divorce/child support/alimony. That's largely a myth. Studies show that women are economically harmed more than men, who typically have gains. This is consistent with the other facts. It is mostly since men will make the same or more over time and give up less than half their income. The initial asset split is a finite amount. A lot of women work part time, have retired, were a SAHM, was under-employeed or just didn't work. Meaning they mostly have to rely on their income (which is low) p…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:47 PM
8

The ironic part is that a lot of women literally depend on men to be selfless. That is in terms of financial support, but also the fact that women often wield power via a male proxy. They get a third party to help them and that requires some man to be willing to intervene.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:40 PM
5

It is a perfect example of dogmatic thinking. Everyone just goes right to the same rationalization and it includes "foundation" facts which are politically incorrect to question, like around the role of socialization and being more concerned for others, and other completely unjustified facts.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:37 PM
1

Man that is fucked up
/r/MensRights15/04/17 11:08 PM
8

The irony is that feminism created a new stronger gender role that women need to value career over everything. The dynamic is like your dad asking you to go to your grandma's house. Before your dad is like "you have to go, no if, ands, or buts about it." Now it is like your dad saying "Of course you have a choice to go to your grandma's or not. It would be wrong to force anyone to do it. But just so you know your sister had to fight really hard to get the right to visit her. They used to not all…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 11:00 PM
1

It doesn't matter what they think. Docs can be held responsible for prescribing medicine to anyone who is showing signs of opiate abuse and one sign is doctor shopping. They are going to play it super safe.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:51 AM
1

Opiates are very controlled now, due to the opiate epidemic. There is evidence as well that opiates are not great for chronic pain and can actually cause the pain to be worse overtime. Some people actually find that they feel better when they get off meds. However, the easiest way to get meds if you really want them or think you need them for chronic pain is to present yourself as an addict. You can then go to a methadone clinic or go to an addiction medicine clinic and get suboxone. These are a…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:49 AM
3

It is more a reaction to the wage gap. If you think the wage gap is serious thrn you need to see thr workplace death gap as serious. I don't find this type of argument cogent IMO, but it is a very common rhetorical tool.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:54 PM
3

TwoX is like at least 60% men.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 10:21 PM
10

So basically you are not a lawyer or don't know shit about the law, but you are arguing you know better than this dude? At best he is pulling it out of his ass as well, but how the fuck would you know?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 09:52 PM
7

I think that the type and distribution of personalities is more or less constant over time. There is a certain personality that took to fundamentalist religion. I think that same personality type also likes fundamentalist feminism / social justice. As in most liberal areas fundamentalist religion is dead, these people are now taking to social justice instead. I think the personality is one of high inter-personal disgust and need for external control. Others disgust them and this gives them the r…
/r/MensRights06/04/17 12:57 AM
1

This won't work. We have ton of these events at my work, and we get ostracized for even asking about it anyway that can be construed as anything but enthusiastically supportive.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 12:18 AM
5

If this is not privilege then what is?
/r/MensRights31/03/17 06:11 AM
16

Very cogent argument.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 06:02 AM
5

Ya me too. It softened the aggressive aspect to just make it look forceful, where with trump it seemed much more aggressive.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:32 AM
3

The logic here makes my head hurt. Basically it isn't sexist because all guys do it as well. They bitch constantly about women generalizations and they generalize me as saying generalizations to justify generalizations. Basically the definition of sexism is treating a group as a monolith. Also someone else doing something sexist doesn't make what you do not sexist...
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:13 PM
2

Yep definitely not. This is minor compared to the stuff my work officially sponsors.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 12:15 AM
15

A lot of career women believe that women are socialized to have low confidence and hence do not take risks or think they don't deserve to do something. They think men are socialized to have high self confidence and hence a lot of men are positions they don't deserve. The gist is basically that there are a lot of men who have undeserved blind confidence and are in good positions because of this and that women should try to have this same level of blind self confidence. I believe it is an external…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:28 PM
8

It is one thing to have a dark sense of humor and another to make dark jokes and not know they are dark.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:23 PM
24

Trans exclusionary radical feminism. They think trans women are just another example of men trying to ruin and control their spaces.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:40 AM
2

Report it again. I am telling you 100% the result you got was not correct.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 03:08 AM
1

I can guarantee this should have been removed. FB has a variety of people who look at the content and make the call to remove it. In this case, they most likely made the wrong call. This does not represent FB policy. Not each rando person represents the policy perfectly. Also the reporting flow uses a variety of automated image processing. So it could have been lost in some corner case of an algorithm. If you reported this has child sexuality it would be removed and most likely removed immediate…
/r/MensRights12/02/17 02:34 AM
0

Sometimes the truth hurts but it is not unnecessary.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 12:49 AM
0

Most people use their brain to tell.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 09:43 PM
2

It is clear selection bias. The physician who is going to get the most is a specialist and only a GP if the patient has no issues. You are more likely to see a specialist if you have a serious medical issue and I also bet there are more males who are specialists. It could also be that women are more likely to see routine specialists then men (like gyno, pregnancy, and etc) which do not correlate with health outcome.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:15 AM
0

Woosh
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:51 PM
-1

I know you are, but what am I
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:42 PM
-1

I literally just copied from the statue, but sure I agree it is not straightforward, but the point is it is not clear legally and you could be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:24 PM
-1

“Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night. (b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:02 PM
-5

I think you are going to be pretty disappointed at being in jail when you shoot someone in this case. http://www.husseinandwebber.com/case-work/criminal-defense-articles/floridas-stand-ground-law/
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:21 AM
-9

He could have stopped at the head lock. Also basically every jury would rule that excessive. Edit: Proportional is what it is called. Proportional Response The use of self-defense must also match the level of the threat in question. In other words, a person can only employ as much force as required to remove the threat. If the threat involves deadly force, the person defending themselves can use deadly force to counteract the threat. If, however, the threat involves only minor force and the pers…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:20 AM
-7

It is not necessarily lawful if the force is not proportional.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:59 AM
3

He would say not to have self pity. Stephen Fry has a serious mental illness himself. He is Bipolar. You don't see self-pity from him.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 02:45 PM
3

You really shouldn't feel silly. In this day and age, this is one of the worst things to be accused of. It would almost be better to be accused of murder. Pedophile or child molester is like the only thing worse. This has the clear potential to cause damage to your social and financial life (if it hasn't already). You need to go on the offensive immediately and get a lawyer and maybe make a public statement (After consulting with a lawyer). You are playing a dangerous game and you cannot afford …
/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:14 AM
0

To be fair, she said that was a stupid phrase she said and was not meant literally. Much like people say "well fuck me in the ass" if something went wrong. She maintains they were not literal and from reading the texts she sent it seems reasonable. Intellectual honesty is important.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:18 AM
2

Streisand effect does not apply here. Not saying shit like this in first place is all that is needed.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 08:39 AM
1

Come on man. Do you really want that quote to be cherry picked and used to stand for what TRP believes? It is only going to prevent more men from finding this place.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 04:36 AM
2

What is a provider if you cannot provide resources? I am sorry, but this is wrong. Likely it will be the dual income fallacy. She will think she has more income because she has yours. Even though you didn't have much before and you are still supporting two people. It will just take what disposable income you had.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 06:16 AM
22

Don't count your eggs before they hatch. Academics is a hard envirnoment and getting a professorship is even more difficult.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:21 AM
2

http://grammarist.com/eggcorns/for-all-intensive-purposes/
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 05:25 PM
2

She needed to tell her husband during the first pregnancy and then go back on birth control after that is resolved. Mistakes happen. Doesn't mean you keep doing them though. I assume he is mature enough to deal with the pregnancy, seeing as he still had unprotected sex with her. Pregnancy was always possible albeit harder than normal. If he didn't know that then he is an idiot. But saying he is to blame for something actively hidden from him is crazy.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 11:33 AM
5

The top comment is ridiculous. Maybe if it happened once I wouldn't disagree. But three times! Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on you, and THEN fool three times shame on you. Ridiculous. She needs to take responsibility. Go back on birth control. Tell her husband during the first pregnancy. That is what all of us people in sane healthy world would have done.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 11:24 AM
7

Make sure Valentines day is equal (or at least portray it as such).
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 03:50 AM
14

Think if you gave a women an STD by lying about wearing a condom (taking it off during sex) or that you are clean. It would be considered rape since the consent was predicated on this information. This is what Assange was accused of in Sweden, IIRC. This is no different. She was lying about the circumstances of their sexual encounters. That is rape (by the modern feminist definition).
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 07:54 AM
11

If gender roles were reversed this would be regarded as rape, since it was not an eager consent
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 02:31 AM
1

I would like a discussion and was wondering what this subreddit thought. I don't really give a fuck about validation from this subreddit. If I did I wouldn't post something quasi-controversial.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 02:16 AM
1

Yes common law marriage is meant to deal with cases where two people lived by themselves and never got their marriage "official". Basically it is the state recognizing that marriages are not just state creations but choices between people. If both people considered themselves married but never got the paper then you can be considered common law married. This is useful for things like inheritance. So by definition someone cannot be surprised that they are in a common law marriage.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter