bluedinosaur12345 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
49	Porn is not cheating	Debate	bluedinosaur12345	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:08 AM
0	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them.	Debate	bluedinosaur12345	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 07:28 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
–	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. Focussing on the last point, they do try and bring these sites down, there's just too much of it, and it's way too easy to bypass	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/11/24 05:56 AM
–	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. "Its literally just porn." is in the description, and I also emphasise it later on	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/11/24 05:55 AM
–	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. The bible doesn't focus on those scenes. It focuses on spreading the lords word, and understanding the nature that God wants the Earth to be like. It's meant to redeem you spiritually with moral living. Also the Bible is a fuckin chunk of a book, I'd doubt children would even be reading at that skill level at that age.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/11/24 05:54 AM
–	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I have no other account, and it shouldn't matter whether or not I'm over or under a certain age. People would react the same if I was a 40 year old man	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/11/24 05:49 AM
–	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. Just one question, do you consider these books as porn?	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/11/24 05:48 AM
–	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I do understand the the kids are going to be exposed to tgat content under a young age, but kids learning sex through books isn't the right way to teach them. Parents need to make sure the child is comfortable with talking about that, and they also need to give advice on what and what not to do	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/11/24 05:46 AM
–	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. No, because it doesn't go into detail, and it takes up a very very tiny space in the book. I believe less than 3 minor scenes are in all 12 books	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/11/24 05:43 AM
-3	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. The bible is made to educate. Education books are fine, because obviously, they're supposed to educate you. Stuff like Icebreaker is for arousal and entertainment, not education. There's a difference between the bible and what im picking at	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 11:25 AM
0	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I feel like it'd depend on the thing. For use of arousal, it'd be a good idea, but if it's to educate or to ask a question about sex or content like that, I think it'd be alright depending on the context. I just feel like there's are too many kids everywhere on the internet that If they fall into the wrong hole, they can be potentially exposed to this sorta content	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 11:23 AM
1	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. It'd depend on the severity if the scene if course. I read "Tomorrow, When the War Began" when I was 11 ish, and it has one very light sex scene which includes a very small detail. That's fine. Whereas Icebreaker, for example, shouldn't be in possession on children because of the high amount of porn and detail in those scenes. And also, not every porn book is a fanfic and online	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 11:20 AM
-2	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. If a parent suspects their child is having sex, then itd be good of the parent to bring up the topic of sex, as well as telling them if you're fine with it or not. I said in another comment that it's good to fill your child in on how the entire thing works and the risks of it, and getting it from a trusted source that isn't some book they got off of a shelf isn't a very good idea if the point of the book is arousal and focusses less on educating	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 09:52 AM
2	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I totally agree with this. It is very Important to ensure your child is aware of the risks of sex, and also doubling down on them learning it in school and talking about it at home is an amazing way to do this. Well said lol	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 09:48 AM
0	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. Mainly children in general, and young teenagers	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 09:45 AM
-10	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. Sometimes parents aren't able to monitor what their children are doing	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 09:28 AM
1	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. In Australia, it is illegal to sell porn to a minor. Books in Australia with porn thats meant to arouse the reader is considered as porn	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 08:48 AM
-2	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. Books with sex scenes in it can also leave an impression on the reader as well. (Im assuming your kids have not been in a heterosexual relationship). If they read a book with that material in it, then they might go off into a relationship thinking that's what's going to happen, and also thinking that's how it is for everyone in general. Would you let your teenagers watch porn?	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 08:45 AM
1	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I agree to have a conversation with them about sex, and I do understand that books can be a good learning opportunity, but a lot of them again weren't made to educate. They also might leave an impression on the children that what is in the book is what sex is like for everyone, even that can harm the child	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 08:42 AM
-1	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I understand teens are interested in sex, and there are a variety of ways to access it still, I just wouldn't really be comfortable if I caught my imaginary child doing either. I'd at least wait till the age of consent before doing anything like that	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 08:14 AM
-4	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. This sub is to discuss sex, gender, and relationship issues. Does sex not play a big part in porn?	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 08:02 AM
-4	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I wouldn't find a sexually graphic book very educating. People buy those books for entertainment, not education. If they were to buy a book to be educated, it'd be anything but that lmao	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 08:00 AM
2	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I'm focussing more on points 3 and 4 by the way	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 07:50 AM
1	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I live in Australia. We ban stuff like pornhub until 18, but not with books. Directly quoted from the Richmond River High School: In certain circumstances there are exceptions ,and this is where some teens can be in breach of the law. 1. When the material is classified as child exploitation/abuse/pornography individual under the age of 18. When pornographic material is sent to other people who are under 18. 3. When pornographic material is shown to others under 18. This applies to your home as w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 07:50 AM
5	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. I slightly agree with that. I read "Tomorrow, When the War Began" when I was 12, and it has one very little scene in it, tahts alright since movies allow it. "Icebreaker," for example, shouldn't be allowed for minors because it goes into much more detail (Happy cake day)	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 07:41 AM
-3	Under-age children should not be able to access books with sex scenes in them unless it's a book that'll actually educated them. Minors shouldn't be able to read sexually explicit books	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 07:39 AM
2	Porn is not cheating 100% agree with that, no further comment lol	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/10/24 11:13 PM
1	Porn is not cheating Explain	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/10/24 04:48 AM
0	Porn is not cheating So me or her aren't even allowed to look at a movie star and think that they're attractive for example? Attraction is what most people base it on with first impressions, not just with relationships, but with friendships too. You'd be friends with an attractive dude, but there'd be less chance of you wanting to be friends with a short guy with a shit ton of pimples and a terrible haircut	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 08:26 PM
8	Porn is not cheating I totally agree with that. As long as my partner is porn addicted, then it shouldn't be a problem. Also, that study idea isn't bad. I wish I was influential enough to be able to do something that big	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 10:20 AM
0	Porn is not cheating Many people have an addiction that's incredibly hard to control. Kinda like smoking. You could also get into the habit of watching porn and then getting into a relationship with someone who frowns upon it, then there's problems of controllability. This taking over concept also links with depression, and a lot more.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 08:29 AM
2	Porn is not cheating I'd be fine with it, as long as she doesn't do that with a gigachad with mega inches drilling into her irl	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 08:26 AM
2	Porn is not cheating True that	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 08:23 AM
0	Porn is not cheating I'm talking about thoughts. And actions that don't include another person being there with the person who is in that mood is not cheating. (Stupid point), but what if the porn you're watching you're not into? Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of imagining you having sex with the material?	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 08:23 AM
0	Porn is not cheating I do understand, but calling it cheating is going over the edge a little bit	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 08:17 AM
-2	Porn is not cheating Thoughts aren't cheating. If you follow up those thoughts and put them into real-life situations, then that's where the problem arises	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 08:14 AM
0	Porn is not cheating And also some fetishes don't include penetration, youre basing it off of the most common kink	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 08:13 AM
3	Porn is not cheating Altgough I'd be slightly sensitive with that, as long as she isn't going off and doing that or asking Chad's with 6 packs and massive dicks for nudes, I'm fine with it. The main reason being, lust is incredibly hard to control. It overrites our brains and our thinking. All lust wants to do is to make sure you're satisfied with your fantasies. This also works with the men, I bet you most men are guilty of wanting to have sex with other women whilst in a relationship, including me. But I don't go …	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 08:12 AM
2	Porn is not cheating I'm glad to hear that :)	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 07:49 AM
2	Porn is not cheating Well I'm glad it all worked out for you in the end, I hope it's going well :)	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 07:11 AM
2	Porn is not cheating because you’re fantasizing about fucking other women That's not usually the case. Yes, you're still jerking off to them, but some fetishes don't include having sex. You're basing it off of the most common kink (if i can even call it a kink, i cant find another word for it)	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 07:09 AM
-1	Porn is not cheating Lust lowers standards a lot. So I might be disgusted looking at sexual material right now, but if I was turned on, I'd be more attracted to it because of that sexual drive lust has given me. Yes, you are 'lusting' for another person, but that's just what lust does to the body and the brain, it takes over.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 07:03 AM
2	Porn is not cheating You're all good lol. Impressions are weird sometimes	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:59 AM
0	Porn is not cheating Lust is an emotion that mainly drives on attraction, which lowers the person's standards a lot. If I, for example, looked at a photo of sexual material right now, I'd be slightly disgusted because I'm not lustful. If I was in a lustful mood and looked at the same photo, I'd be more turned on than disgusted because of that sexual drive lust has given me.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:52 AM
-4	Porn is not cheating My gf doesn't like it if I would do it I feel like the reason why she doesn't like it when you do is because she might be slightly insecure about herself. This isn't a go at you or your girlfriend, but that's sometimes what can happen. Also, I wouldn't consider myself on the lower end of EQ, I personally think I'm doing fine with it	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:48 AM
-3	Porn is not cheating and sacrificing sexual gratification from others is a method of it Some relationships actually use this method to stop them from having sex with one another, whether it's from STD, not being able to buy things that'll protect the male, etc.. again, I just don't know why people would be sensitive over that	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:44 AM
7	Porn is not cheating Why would it be considered cheating? And also, there are so many porn actresses/ex who are in a relationship, including from the 70s	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:40 AM
-2	Porn is not cheating So take a guess which women would not be as keen on it. Religious people who frown upon it, and children. they don't want you to look and especially not pleasure yourself because of other women. Which was my question, why?	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:36 AM
11	Porn is not cheating accepting drinks from random men while out at a bar or local watering hole. Men feel uncomfortable from that because the person handing them a drink obviously has some form of attraction to them, whilst they're already in a relationship. There's also slight risk of spiking. You never really know when it comes to that, that's why guys aren't for that behaviour. And if you're dating people when you're in a relationship, that's cheating	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:28 AM
-1	Porn is not cheating But what part do people who set those boundaries think that it's cheating?	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:24 AM
-2	Porn is not cheating Women watch porn too, and some men get sensitive about that. It's not just men who do that. Also, why would it be cheating? Yes, boundaries, but what part of it do people find sensitive about it?	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 06:23 AM