TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bluewit Archive

View 9 posts and 437 comments by bluewit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
243

bluewit/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:11 AM
63

Generalbluewit/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:54 PM
31

Reverse Gendersbluewit/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:12 PM
22

bluewit/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:51 AM
18

Outragebluewit/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:37 PM
14

bluewit/r/MensRights17/10/14 04:52 PM
11

Social Issuesbluewit/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:06 PM
9

Discussionbluewit/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:58 PM
5

Generalbluewit/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:34 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Somehow women picking men solely for their wealth whilst pretending they aren't is never talked about. Which planet are you discussing?
/r/MensRights14/07/16 06:39 PM
-1

Really not a well thought out plan, but I think an ankle-monitor probation seems appropriate. This could include gps and audio recording components, livestreamed to an encrypted database. This data can be kept inaccessible unless -or until such time as- another accusation of a crime serves as just cause to examine the records. Additionally the monitor could serve as having a 'panic button' in case of the wearer being faced with harm; at which time the data could be used to verify accusations. An…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 06:52 PM
1

I can sort of ansewer that based on concert venues & bars etc: the urinals become wasted space, because the line to the men's room will typically stretch back dozens of people long, about half the people women, while at most about 2-3 out of 8-10 urinals get used, despite more than half the men waiting in line only needing to urinate. The women in the men's line clog it up to where those men will mostly be waiting anyway because they can't see into the restroom to know urinals are free, and thos…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 06:33 PM
1

we all poop the goddamn same a lot of people with digestive issues would disagree.. especially those who use colostomy bags... just seemed worth a mention
/r/MensRights30/04/16 06:24 PM
6

I'm gonna be direct & question your claim here; maybe if you're alone you'll try to cause a scene, but in almost any circumstance where a woman uses a men's restroom you will not be the lone person, nevermind the lone male person in attendance; that said, simply opening your mouth at most venues where that typically happens these days (concerts, bars etc, right?) is more likely to get a white knight up in your face than anything else beyond those women laughing off your protests... jmho
/r/MensRights30/04/16 06:22 PM
1

poorly
/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:08 PM
0

You just have to be the equivalent of a reasonably intelligent circus monkey. fuck right off with your attitude please. My point isn't to say you can't tell who or what she is parodying at the start / context, but that when she starts with the parts that are meant to be taken seriously she stays in a mock-y parody tone, which makes her 'message' or intent' entirely too unclear-- making whole exercise hollow except to wink to those already on-side. Making it pointless except as an in-joke. This, …
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:59 PM
1

So she fucked up because she turned this into a haute culture joke that you need to be "in" on to get rather than an accessible message... imo anyhow
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:25 PM
1

In the overwhelming majority of cases where men work most of their lives, those men continue to work because of the stark reality that for any given man quality of life (and perceived VALUE or WORTH as a man person) is directly tied to -and CONTINGENT UPON- that man's position & revenue/potential earning. In other words typically men tend to feel unable to opt out (--excluding suicides...). --does that help isolate why it it seems unfair?
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:44 PM
0

--you know this ISN'T heforshe right? I mean, her delivery seems really off; too much head wagging & her tones / tempo etc sound completely disingenuous & stilted / phony.. made far worse by her self-defining as actress & preforming since childhood etc... --all to the point where it sounds like a parody rather than the message offered in the letters of her words.. But the message in the letter of the words seems to fit here.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:17 PM
2

Prepare a statement, hire a lawyer, run the statement by the lawyer, refine the statement, practice the statement until you can deliver it properly without having to read from it too much, record yourself giving your statement, publish to youtube & send to media outlets. ... seemed like a good plan huh? --except the part where from then on anyone who googles that kid's name finds "accused rapist" & it never goes away. (--Even tho really, that might happen either way, and NOT doing the above pret…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:33 PM
1

In case OP is Mark / Sandy: And the social power… Considering the amount of engagement I got as Sandy on twitter, on an account made on the same say day just a note.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:51 AM
1

I feel like I perhaps ought to consider removing my post to move this directly to the top. Cheers.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 07:18 PM
3

Look I get it: traumas AND trials are scary... but jeez.. here are a few snippets-- The conversation eventually gets to rape shield laws preventing questions about a person's previous sexual activity & of course the guests start suggesting that there's something inappropriate about daring to ask about the complainant's' behavior after their alleged incidents.. Which might seem like a reasonable "thought" from a survivor-centric perspective... But as they are discussing this, the current case, it…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:05 AM
2

Nazis also wore hats, therefore pope = nazi. [gesture of not quite closed fist tugging at a mimed pole]
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:40 PM
3

I agree. Mostly for lack of argument against a simple subtle aesthetic change to the subreddit title portion of the sidebar. Two ideas: Simply MR or a men's sign I get the sentiment of wanting to be free to not fear, but I think there is reasonable merit to a bit of discretion. Considering the assaults people were met with for "menenist" shirts? I'm suprised so many seem opposed to the idea of a more subtle sidebar in the interest of men feeling safer browsing, without feeling they're potentiall…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:00 AM
9

Tell uninformed parents their little girl boy will be declared guilty of raped due to some kangaroo court citing a made up statistical certainty and then they don't send herhim. FTFY
/r/MensRights16/02/16 08:14 PM
2

Agreed: except that it was to protest bills which were introduced but not passed.. -- so this post has a poor title & premise, however: this is a good example to point to when people claim certain groups as superior in character, or rational in tactics... --also the comments on threads supporting this point to a clear "us vs them" mentality, whereby because some men had to be involved in proposing legislation that would affect most women (ignoring that many men opposing such bills is why such bi…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 08:08 PM
1

Mind posting an archive link? -- Forbes ad revenue is not something to which I care to contribute, and their pop-under policies & the like have led me to boycott directly accessing anything they .. actually, nevermind;-- I made an archive link , but to see the actual clip without adding to forbes traffic any further took some google-fu... The following link to the same clip, just up to you who you give traffic http://www.advertolog.com/pandora/adverts/valentines-20978705/ http://www.adforum.com/…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 07:59 PM
2

so if you're wearing your school dress and suddenly someone says hey let's play football or soccer you'll immediately join? I don't think you will, but I do know that most guys would. umm... in their school attire..? I don't see how having to wear a suit and tie "holds men down." however I do see how having to wear a dress would hold women down. o RLLY????
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:45 PM
6

P.P. denied Granted
/r/MensRights13/02/16 09:38 PM
1

i have to give mad respect for my post not getting downvoted to shit; on second look I seem to have missed the image-definition portion; having only perused the text... my bad
/r/MensRights13/02/16 05:03 PM
5

This is a campaign to create more awareness about the power of our words and how what we choose to say affects others around us. This is not a regulatory or punitive campaign. Instead, it is meant to address the campus climate by helping individuals reconsider the effect of their words and be more inclusive. Lemme test a thought.. Saying "Hey" Perpetuates hearing bias and reinforces the idea of a hearing-centric society I mean, we are a pretty hearing-centric society, is that a bad thing? should…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:15 PM
1

Not to be a pain, but the post title may be somewhat poor: Yes the article seeks to shame men & target men with the new shitword (that's my new word for.. well you can guess) BUT the term gunsplainer is in itself non gendered, despite being framed as such in the context in which it is used in the article. And I suppose to at least a small extent that should be understandable to a degree when the statistics skew in favor of men when it comes to gun ownership... A bit like how while shitword in th…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:41 PM
10

archive link
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:20 PM
3

(Yes (don't get me wrong; mostly yes) AND sort of no; there should ALWAYS be an archive link TO DENY THIS SORT OF THING THE TRAFFIC & AD REVENUE THEY ARE REWARDED WITH FOR POSTING MENTAL VOMIT -- buuuut it's often useful to have the original link as the actual link in cases where there are multiple other Discussions already taking place about the exact same link)
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:20 PM
9

She will run into someone who will hurt her and it --will be a man, and men will be blamed. FTFY
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:58 PM
1

So you're upset because of the handle I chose? Is there a place to clear those beforehand? Like are you part of a committee I could consult or something? You asked why I seemed upset by your post, & I answered. No need to get childish about the very valid criticism you requested. I suggest you drop it.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:05 AM
3

I'm deeply offended by your fucking name in the first place buddy. If you need to ask why just ask "am I the best person to have such a title?"-- anyone who is confident enough to just say YES or to sign up with such a name & isn't on par with honeybadger is fucking sorely mistaken & overestimating their position of authority, influence, and relevance.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:01 PM
2

In this sub? no. That sort of no effort attempt to somehow make your shit look less weak by pointing at someone with weaker shit makes me hope your account is shut down asap.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:44 PM
0

If I politely ask why you keep trying to molest kids, without cursing, in response to you saying you like kids or if I ask why you think people of color aren't humans because you said you rather not have your name on a wall at the ACLU that makes me the rude one even if you're the first to curse in response. You can kindly go suck a lemon
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:59 PM
0

one post... ? lmao. okay there buddy; I'm not a mod & I was just offering insight into how/why even at a brief fucking glance you (even having that username, nevermind starting that thread, much less) behaving as you were in that thread is just bad PR waiting to happen... but sure, insult my capacities based on unsupported presumptions & make unsupported generalizations some more. That seems about your speed.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:55 PM
1

Who are you quoting? I didn't write that. I'm not the person you were replying to but they also didn't write that. oh? you didn't know who I was quoting AND say you aren't the person to whom I was replying AND say THEY didn't write that, before you get an answer to the "Who are you quoting? " bit? Multiple accounts busted. nice try.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:49 PM
1

I'm just trying to tell you guys a lot of things that your fathers can't for whatever reason. WHAT??!! I never presented anything other than my personal experiences. hmmm When your sex hormones drop to nearly nothing, you can expect your sex drive to also fall to nearly nothing and that's what happens to menopausal women. Add to that that once your hormonal sex drive drops, many sex acts that seemed run of the mill previously will now seem distasteful or downright disgusting. The idea that women…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:41 PM
0

Presumably because rather than sticking to your own alleged personal anecdotes you went n did a LOT of controversial generalizing about groups without citing sauces, on an hours old account... Which is the sort of thread that doesn't exactly help with the perceived image of a sub such as this. If I were a mod I'd have my finger poised over a delete option while reading anything posted with such a --shall we say -- 'representative' username
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:28 PM
0

If I say I don't want my account associated with something it means just that; it does not mean I like nor dislike that, simply that I rather not have this account associated with that. Hope that satisfies your frankly fucking rude demands for me to justify a position I had never claimed to take. kindly f right off
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:19 PM
1

I'm not moving the goal posts. [proceeds to both move goal posts AND turn the conversation into feels vs rational thought regarding double standards & cultural values] My mother? Is my mother alive? Do you know where I can reach her??? TELL ME!!!! If my mother were dense enough to not understand that if her tits are more exposed people are more likely to look at them, then odds are I would not have been conceived. Are you really confused as to why your mother others might be uncomfortable with p…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:16 PM
1

yea, you aren't playing pedantic semantic phony baloney game at alllllll... & you clearly aren't disingenuous /s They aren't the huge deal people make of them in the west in other cultures. you recognize that for our society & culture they are at the least anthropologically a significant [huge deal] sex signer like a big ol red baboon ass (the sex signer-- not calling you what I should call you). Discussion over.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:41 PM
2

It's apparently a bait-troll account. I realized too late, but a re-read of it shows the entire comment is intended to derail the topic & hopefully generate drama for the sake of presumable showing how downvoted a comment would get for "calling out" made up interpretations of how to read the comic strip & how "hateful" the sub is towards women that the users downvote someone speaking up for women bla bla bla. Least that's how I can't help but read it... men still dictating what women can and can…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:35 PM
1

yeaaaaa I'm gonna go ahead & say that neither is exposed genitals in some cultures etc, and hey, know what? neither is violence / rape in some cultures, right? if you wanna seem like you're actually trying to carry on a serious rational discussion rather than moving goalposts each time your argument is shot to complete shit you may wanna refrain from imposing other cultural values on a rational discussion already focused on a given culture's existing moires-- or at the least, maybe try to pull y…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:29 PM
0

The fuck are you on about?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:23 PM
10

brillaint how you intentionally choose to ignore the other comments in this thread literally quoting definitions where tits are in fact sex organs, (nevermind ignoring basic biological signing-- are peacocks ornate tailfeathers then not sexual signing organs, right, they're just for... tailfeathering? I mean you have to be intentionally being obtuse to pretend the cleavage is somehow less a sexual region to display than the area directly above the male genitals spanning the lower abdominal cradl…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:17 AM
5

Wouldn't a day or so later like say the 15th make WAY more sense? (--AND somewhat avoid MRAs getting characterized as irrationally intentionally seeking out extra ire?... jmho)
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:42 AM
1

I feel similarly & try not to affiliate my account with subs like ppd
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:27 AM
12

He said that because he couldn't very well retain his dignity and use the example of if he called her a hysterical shrill harpy.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:15 AM
3

If OP still hasn't soon somebody ought to reap that sweet karma
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:13 AM
8

Tits aren't sex organs. .. mamilla, mammilla, nipple, teat, tit, pap - the small projection of a mammary gland ... doesn't make the claim that the clevance is showing sexual organs. It says nipples are. enough bs please. Edit :I also decided to try taking your original comment for an edit: This cartoon seems to confuse be about a frumpy woman wearing clothes that give air to an area which is otherwise sweaty and not not genitals which men aren't typically permitted to air out in the workplace, *…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 04:30 AM
1

Relevant username is trolling username
/r/MensRights11/02/16 04:21 AM
4

Noun 1. sex organ - any organ involved in sexual reproduction sex organ - any organ involved in sexual reproduction reproductive organ organ - a fully differentiated structural and functional unit in an animal that is specialized for some particular function genital system, reproductive system - organs and tissues involved in the production and maturation of gametes and in their union and subsequent development as offspring genital organ, genitalia, genitals, private parts, privates, crotch - ex…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 04:18 AM
3

Well generally speaking photons bounce off the surface of your eyes & scatter hitting everything within your direct visual range with some dispersed photons too... And quantum physics touch upon the idea of how the very state of being observed can have an influence on things...
/r/MensRights11/02/16 04:10 AM
1

archive link please
/r/MensRights11/02/16 02:04 AM
8

I definitely don't advocate such acts for the sake of progress, but I have serious trouble trying to counter the logic. Especially if you consider the prison term to which he's been sentenced: sentenced to nine years in prison --& when this all started: In 2009 Woodward, prosecutors said, gave Greaves the drug The events happened in 2009, so at least 6 years in custody already-- with time served he has 3 years left... that's 9 years in custody vs 18+ years of indentured servitude. --He'll be out…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 01:57 AM
3

"I will resist they will need pepper spray or a tazer to take me into custody." is not a threat of violence, it is a recognition that mere refusal to comply is treated as resistance & results in violence being done upon a person. A person should not be apprehended for having nightmares. He said no threat in the video, and she acknowledged that he didn't say anything threatening, even said "no" to his suggestion that he was now being treated like a criminal. She didn't claim he had said anything …
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:50 PM
6

Not a MensRights issue, maybe you submitted to wrong subreddit?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:02 PM
4

From Anglo-Norman barbour, from Old French barbeor, from barbe ‎(“beard”), from Latin barba. A person whose profession is cutting (usually male) customers' hair and beards. But really: c. 1300, from Anglo-French barbour (attested as a surname from early 13c.), from Old French barbeor, barbieor (Modern French barbier, which has a more restricted sense than the English word), from Vulgar Latin *barbatorem, from Latin barba "beard" (see barb (n.)). Originally also regular practitioners of surgery, …
/r/MensRights08/09/15 10:58 PM
1

the argument is typically that when alone with a male the potential "danger" exists of "harm" (or more often of social consequences) should they "try to" reject his advances- as though such concerns were on the same level as being alone out in the middle of the ocean with Dennis in that episode of Always Sunny where the gang buys a boat: "she would never say no... because of the IMPLICATION" --pretty much to say the argument usually becomes "yeah but she was scared if she said no he would hurt h…
/r/MensRights08/09/15 10:45 PM
0

I agree, but figured there would be no harm to explaining what that person may have intended if it were a matter of suggested punctuation; clearly I shouldn't have interjected, & deserved a downvote.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 08:57 PM
-1

A semicolon can often replace a period or comma when two linked statements are presented as a single sentence or as or two separate sentences: You may be right; whatever the 'rationale', a single day of probation is about the most tokenistic sentence it's possible to conceive of. (BTW, this is the case you mention; I have heard of it before). (Just my interpretation, IANAenglishteacher; I do enjoy semicolons tho.)
/r/MensRights08/09/15 04:05 PM
7

Cause "Women are wonderful", duh.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:40 PM
1

well you're free to kiss me on it, otherwise feel free to toss me on it; you & plenty of other "supporters" are doing all you can to drive supporters to say "fuck this; my life is fine, good luck to the rest; why would I wanna look like I wanted anything to do with people who'll just make me look bad for agreeing with anything they say, given so much of the other shit they say is completely indefensible or asinine". but whatever.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 01:28 AM
9

supports the legalization of rape the way Swift supported the eating of babies. Look I think the guy seems a douche / tool likely worth the cause distancing itself from as best it can to a reasonable degree... but it seems like you're taking that detail out of context & giving it more genuine weight than is merited...
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:17 PM
1

Seems out of place for MensRights.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 04:11 PM
2

Just get ready for the incoming ban. banning a handful of communities that exist solely to annoy other redditors, prevent us from improving Reddit, and generally make Reddit worse for everyone else. Too easy to persuade people MRA = hate, supremacy etc etc. REGARDLESS what is posted. Just assume a ban is on its way.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:28 PM
4

hellllls no. Read the comments properly dissecting this.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:35 PM
2

You're being fooled.. look closer at the comments for both analysis of the post & the submitter's own biases & followings of patriarchy theory; this is on par with that crap.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:32 PM
1

Well, when you put it like that it seems pretty bad. But to be clear, I try to NOT claim to be a part of the movement or the cause because--while I would "advocate" for men's rights, which is what MRA stands for as a label--self labeling? A- who needs the pressure? and B- Even if I wasn't worried about how I would make the cause look, the media narrative means I'd look like I supported an extremist supremacy & hate movement. With figureheads like Elliot Rodgers. --That is how the general public …
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:11 AM
2

rational feminist http://oratorasaurus.tumblr.com/post/50147759527/correct-for-every-one-innocent-man-in-jail-there If the good would at least slightly decry the bad apples just a lil bit I might buy that there even is such a thing... Far as I'm concerned the only "rational feminist" is an ignorant person or an opportunist.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:49 AM
3

Those occur about equally to either gender.. unless you count prisons, then rape is a problem faced overwhelmingly by men....
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:28 AM
1

Didn't say he was posing as an or claiming to be an MRA said, he's one of many that are alleged by the media to be MRA. My whole point was that when media does that, these names should be added to a list, assuming we as a community want the cause to distance from such folks... But maybe I'm not expressing myself clearly.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:25 AM
2

lol i'd just delete my post if you edited, but either way I'll take this opportunity to thank you for your well reasoned, well sourced & suprisingly level headed comments (--cause tbh I was feeling a bit hot under the collar on your behalf with the question even being asked about for or "againts") (edir: a letter)
/r/MensRights06/08/15 11:11 PM
2

This sort of thing is making me think there should be a sticky & sidebar list of all the alleged MRA people who the vast majority of the movement's proponents feel ought be publicly decried as/for hurting the cause. I mean if we can say "This is NOT a champion of this cause; this is someone from whom those who care about this cause would like to disassociate" it would go a fair ways towards keeping MRA's noses cleaner than feminists as far as the extremists & douches associated with respective c…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 11:01 PM
25

/*per capita
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:50 PM
2

In fairness there should be an edit on male genital mutilation as they tended to not fight against that, but rather for it. --That is, unless you meant fought to oppose recognition that male genital mutilation is in fact genital mutilation..
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:40 PM
4

Look at how feminism has fought AGAINST men's domestic violence shelters better?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:46 PM
20

Maybe you should try to "even remotely" define "what feminism is all about" in a way that is both accurate to yourself and accurate to the history (past AND present) of feminism's outspoken and active proponents' definitions of terms & their impacts on society & public stances?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 08:48 PM
1

Nobody's buying it at this point, but false apology acknowledged.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 07:39 PM
1

She asked, she didn't sue. u/nominalgeek not once have I said she should have or could have SUED him for anything after they settled on paternity and child support. /u/nominalgeek And not once have I said that you are a troll or are attempting to troll.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 07:26 PM
0

Ok [trolledface] a court order to provide child support and reimburse the state for its welfare costs comes from doing what? --More importantly for what are you saying she should be able to sue him for at all if not the child support she was granted and above and beyond which he went? IANAL but you can be charged with blackmail / extortion for saying you will do things, which would be within your rights to do (were you not issuing a threat), which you know will upset them, unless they pay you. E…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:48 PM
2

She sued in the past: After a lawsuit forced Jobs to take a paternity test, leading to a court order to provide child support and reimburse the state for its welfare costs, Jobs began paying $500 a month. and got the support she was deserving of. Much later, when he was one of the 50 richest men alive she "asked" while pretty much saying if he didn't give it to her she'd publish memoirs. So she attempted extortion , because she wasn't in a position to sue again.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:26 PM
12

“He was cheap as he could be. He under-provided for everything. It was always like pulling teeth to get him to step up.” Over the years after their daughter’s birth, Jobs bought Brennan two cars and a $400,000 house, paid Lisa’s private school tuition, and at times offered other financial help. Despite this, Brennan filed for bankruptcy in 1996. ... Lisa was born in May 1978. JUST the house value spread over <20 years is a value greater than $20,000 per year... Just the house, ignore the 2 cars …
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:18 PM
1

Hm. I assumed this post was gonna be more about comments like Except her.. Who the hell would pay for that alopecia-looking fat sack of shite. Bitch should pay me for holding the vomit back. & Do you have vision problems? She's a whale. (Having just looked at the top post on front page to find quick examples of the type of post I seem to too often see here of late, and expected this thread to be about...) as they hurt the cause
/r/MensRights24/07/15 05:38 AM
1

thank you
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:15 PM
2

Seems silly to remove when linking to differing URL of same content: I say this because it will hardly get to or clutter front / top pages, but will allow people to see "other discussions" to know how different people are responding to the given content. (which is the only thing that makes me hesitate t freak out about how rarely people use archive.today & makes me wanna freak out EXTRA when people use donotlink.. but i agree, overposting, especially of the same url, can be a pain...
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:51 PM
1

pretty much guaran fucking teed this is staged. HEY MODS! Remove this shit for being completely fucking out of place please --The above is exactly what is being put in the report on this submission. (edit: admittedly, report cut off at the "completely f--" point)
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:44 PM
2

" but until you live in a world in which your objectification leads to excessive victim-blaming, unwelcome catcalling, mortifyingly high rates of sexual assault and rape and having your value in society based exclusively on what you look like, I will continue to exercise my God-given right to objectify you. Because the objectification of women leads to all of those things. The objectification of men does not. And that’s why it’s okay to do it." ... --have at it.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:10 PM
5

A healthy appetite for desserts?
/r/MensRights10/06/15 06:36 AM
3

Mr. A. Redchan?
/r/MensRights10/06/15 06:29 AM
3

the point of my post tho, was.. to paraphrase RadioactiveMan: "Ze condoms, zey do naathink!"
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:26 PM
13

The story starts back in the the late 1980s, when an ex-girlfriend needed a name to put down as the father of her child so that she could receive welfare. She used Alexander's name knowing that he was not the father. Alexander says he didn't learn of this until years later when he was stopped for a traffic violation and was told that he was being arrested for back child support. http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/judge_orders_detroit_man_to_pay_30_000_in_back_child_support_for_child_th…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:55 PM
1

I think they might be okay with a guy putting a kid up for adoption after the mother has died..?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:54 PM
-1

so... like OneY or MensRants?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:26 PM
8

Thanks for not being presumptuous! thank the system in place the world over with regards to women going to prison for merely failing to pay child support, the sentences handed to those women, and the state of those prisons-- for the reasonable assertion that if that was her only charge she had (at LEAST comparatively) no cause to fear by virtue of being a woman. Do you imagine for a fucking moment that nobody was sympathetic to this dude? You're a wonderful example of not even sympathetic until …
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:50 PM
2

Admittedly that wasn't well phrased on my part: Which equally developed but more progressive-towards-men while not insanely dangerous, nor ass backwards, where one can still get by while speaking only English nation do you suggest? I mean SHIT i didn't hear russia was suddenly okay with gay or bisexual or iffeminate males, cool-- and you mean to tell me Brazil stopped being the world murder capital? awesome... -- And Thailand wasn't branded one of the most dangerous tourist destinations... and t…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:42 PM
23

that sounds like a mens' rights themed comedy act tho..
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:26 PM
7

This sort of hypothetical makes me wonder...-- if a man and woman TRY to conceive, but find they are unable, should the man be within his rights to unilaterally choose to impregnate a surrogate, while keeping his spouse who was trying to conceive on the hook for raising / providing for the surrogate-born kid?-- on the basis of how things work when men are forced to pay child support even after only finding out years later the kid wasn't biologically his offspring..
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:12 PM
5

Which equally developed but more progressive-towards-men nation do you suggest? Just wondering cause I hear this at times, spoken to canadian/us/uk men interested in these topics & generally there seem to be pretty limited options..
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:05 PM
19

Jess_than_three, before I get out of line & presume to tell you you're out of line... Was your mom afraid of going to jail for not paying? No? Should your mom have had to want to kill herself before she would get any sympathy from anyone over her situation? Paco said : We're unimportant & disposable. to which you reply "Not at all. [...]" Do you imagine nobody was sympathetic to your mother's plight? Even when she said she may kill herself? Do you imagine after actually having killed herself tha…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:00 PM
6

This is more a post for 1Y or Mensrants.. Doesn't really fit in this sub.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:55 PM
0

egregious error Seems excessive, it was a simple transposition error as yyou're the user to whom I was responding, I'd say my bad, but between that & your ramblings ? Not inclined to grant more respect than your characterizations afford me.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 06:13 AM
2

I like this answer because it still points to offering up or asking the accuser for definition(s) of the term(s) & clarifies the meaning behind the accusation... After all if a person were accused of "touching children" there's a whole different response when the question of "well what do we mean when we say "touching children" ?" reveals that they were simply playing Tag or duck-duck goose... Or shooting children & infants-- With a telephoto lens..
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:31 PM
-1

You may have sound reasoning if you wish to say that SOMETIMES ignoring accusations is prudent, but to be very clear: Actually claiming you are not a misogynist wasn't at all the suggestion in the subject, the suggestion in the subject is asking the accuser to support how the accusation makes sense given what the term means. --If anything the subject could be read as also advising against "Actually claiming you are not a misogynist ", as all it suggests is to invite an accuser to quantify the lo…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:25 PM
-1

Troll harder?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:10 PM
2

And then other listeners / readers can use their own higher reasoning to consider if the issue merits more independant understanding of the terms being discussed-- just an hour ago in this same thread, u/NUMBER357* said : I don't think misogyny has to mean literal "hatred" of women anymore than misandry means literal "hatred" of men. So this wouldn't work. Misogyny simply means negative sexist attitudes towards women, and these people can twist anything into being about sexism against women. Of …
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:08 PM
1

So, if someone drops that, it's simply not worth it, in fact it was not worth to begin the conversation in the first place. If you want to enact change, a way to start is by INITIATING A DISCUSSION... one might even say-- to begin the conversation in the first place. you know, in order to discuss Now unless you are gonna try to claim there are NO instances of people who hate women you're essentially taking the stance of someone who wants to change equal opportunity or hate crime legislature but …
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:44 PM
-3

using crap like "cuckold allies" & lumping all people who misuse that term as feminists tells me you may be part of the problem.. add the username & I assume you see things as a joke & are more concerned with coming across as clever or edgy or some combination thereof over having a well-reasoned interchange. There are those who will out of hand dismiss everything you have to say, (and by extension anything a movement with which you choose to associate, which doesn't disavow statements such as yo…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:34 PM
-6

Shit I guess we better just abandon the sub & the movement then.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:20 PM
2

It's harder for then to call us misogynists when we are clearly the more egalitarian ones. ( when we are clearly the more egalitarian ones. I can't hep but be drawn to how the tail end of that sentence screams of a desire to make this into nanny-nanny-poo-poo-ism, or to treat such as worthy of serious attention...) & re "call[ing] us misogynists": you've inspired a thread on the topic of misuse of the term misogyny & responding to accusations where such misuse applies.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:25 PM
2

seems to me you're misconstruing the details of events, AND misconstruing the laws: A disturbance must be more than mere emotional upset or annoyance. The disturbance must be foreseeable as a consequence from the act. [1] The actus reus of the offence involving obscene language requires that the obscene language cause an externally manifested disturbance.[2] Swearing includes the use of bad, obscene or offensive language.[4] Disturbance requires most than merely an observing crowd or a crowd sho…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:24 AM
1

But this guy still deserves to be laid off. What he did was unacceptable, and whether or not people like to admit it, what you do in public in a public forum can cause problems for you. to be fair, he did it to a female reporter in a country dominated by feminazis. This is the equivalent of a black slave dissing the white master/mistress with them looking on. --Could sort of twist those together to imply the sentiment that such a slave would deserve being lashed or whatnot, rather than what I im…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:20 AM
2

Don't forget crack smoking mayor rob ford's having plenty of pussy to eat at home, still on city council, baby..
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:15 AM
1

I thought he was a technical engineer or something?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:14 AM
1

The guy in glasses didn't say it either; it was the guy with the goatee & wide-fauxhawk or whatever you call it....
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:11 AM
2

That's news to me; glad I came back for another round of chase the comments...
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:07 AM
0

Try this analogy: Your dog knows you like sports & get excited when anything sports related comes on or up... Now, because when it first happened that the dog acted all excited too you were clearly amused, now because of that that dog will incessantly yap when anything sports related comes on or even if someone is wearing sneakers, it gets pretty infuriating... You have tried various approaches to curb this behavior & nothing has yet worked... People-- not many really, considering that dog takes…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:01 AM
1

besides: fhritp was one thing: this guy who got fired & publicly named etc just interjected found it "fucking hilarious", as someone else was being interviewed about the vulgar subject, who had also cursed, & then kept getting pressed for more comments... If anyone should be held liable if the station got charged for the latter 2/3 guys' curses it would be Shawna Hunt for pursuing the matter actively one would think...
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:25 AM
1

If he said "Rape babies right up the ass" maybe then you would agree. He didn't say FHRITP either: he came upo n a reporter already pursuing & provoking reponses from a drunk attendee who was already cursing in his responses to his her questions pertaining to vulgarities-- and he contributed that he thinks the practice to be "fucking hilarious" & added detail of how events had unfolded differently in other incidents similar to those she was actively soliciting opinions on from people under the i…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:17 AM
1

That ... makes the issue a bunch more serious actually
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:09 AM
0

People should be professional in the public eye. This point applies to Sharon Osbourne & Shawna Hunt (the reporter), a person on the street or attending an event where alcohol is being served & emotions are running high should be extra cautious of their conduct, but hardly because they are worried that saying that something that hurts no one at all in any way, regardless if it is "annoying" is "fucking hilarious" to them... And more importantly regarding this point the reporter simply should not…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:03 AM
1

It's worth noting that the employer was likely acting preemptively as result of the prompting of the public to come forward to identify these men 2/3 of whom didn't seem to commit any criminal acts in that clip. Doesn't excuse the employer, but I could see a boss recognizing someone on the news, hearing the crown or rcmp or whatever plus team owners are actively seeking info on the person & that boss just deciding to try to get ahead of media shitstorm if someome sees him heading to work or what…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:42 AM
1

not even: A disturbance must be more than mere emotional upset or annoyance. The disturbance must be foreseeable as a consequence from the act. [1] The actus reus of the offence involving obscene language requires that the obscene language cause an externally manifested disturbance.[2] Swearing includes the use of bad, obscene or offensive language.[4] Disturbance requires most than merely an observing crowd or a crowd shouting anti-police sentiment as officers make arrests.[5] An officer's beli…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:34 AM
1

I would agree if it were the companies alone: it's the general public perspective and pervasive double standard values as applied to people based on gender: If a woman were fired for the EXACT statements that man made, especially from a technical field, the public outcry against that company would be insane... she would win her wrongful termination suit & people would describe her as empowered for saying what the guy said, & having a right to speak her mind... Were a man to speak as sharon did o…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:19 PM
1

Listen. Let's call a spade a spade; this sub is just ridiculous and represents a concept only discussed on the internet because no one cares about it enough in real life to devote their limited time to it. Want to know why no one cares? It's because of posts like this... Just pointing out acts of hypocritical conduct has NOTHING to do with men's rights. It just shows some people are hypocrites. That's it man. In regards to the sub itself: there are many action opportunity posts & other relevant …
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:13 PM
1

In regards to your own experiences, the fact of the matter is that if you're getting into fights with people about this topic, then you aren't compatible with that person regardless of the topic. IN other words, you're ostracized, made a pariah, insulted, and threatened because you're not liked in general by whoever is treating you like this. And you want sympathy and some internet consolation because you got into a fight with someone? That is an insult to someone who is ACTUALLY affected by gen…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:51 PM
2

Amazing that a conversation can happen where blow me as a reply is genuinely contributing more to a conversation than the dozens of lines of text put out by the user to whom the quoted user is replying.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:46 PM
1

I'd actually like to field this one.. It has affected me in that: when I so much as express distaste at those who maliciously find amusement in real life occurrences of men's genitals being severed in these acts of vengeance retribution & spite, I find myself socially ostracized, made a pariah, insulted, THREATENED, (oh and those with whom I more closely associate threatened & insulted)... I find that sort of mentality makes the world itself into a hostile (work) environment; that to so much as …
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:40 PM
0

within reason*
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:41 PM
1

higher standards from an energy supply & transistor company, for what an engineer says in his off time while not associated with the company in any discernible way until outed by that company (in response to the LEO's & the team owners utterly baseless witchhunt of the wrong people), whose position has nothiing to do with opinions or public relations... than what a television broadcasting company has for a talkshow host whose very job nature is to relate directly to their public/consumers/viewer…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:40 PM
1

No. The reporter SOUGHT input from people after the UNIDENTIFIED man pulled the STUNT. One man, whose interjection was SOLICITED, on a topic SHE WAS CHOOSING TO ADDRESS, with people she KNEW to be intoxicated put it all on her if she lost footage for dropping the " what did you think of today's game" and instead PURSUING the matter of vulgarities with people she anticipated would have those views. edit: ps- we don't live in the past, so why would we have to pretend we do to make the case for the…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:30 PM
0

in fairness it would appear the employer recognized him & acted unilaterally, in advance of any doxxing etc.. doesn't make it right, and might even illustrate how big an issue the sjw outcry media circlejerk of employers as nannies for off duty workers with duties unrelated to their unpopular behavior or beliefs-- that it's such an issue an employer acts on the expectation of such unreasonable backlash from people who for the most part would likely have never been consumers of their products or …
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:22 PM
1

It is illegal, yes, under a barely used summary charge. not even: A disturbance must be more than mere emotional upset or annoyance. The disturbance must be foreseeable as a consequence from the act. [1] The actus reus of the offence involving obscene language requires that the obscene language cause an externally manifested disturbance.[2]
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:14 PM
-1

except that this happened in Canada did it not? So who the hell cares that she's american?? Thing is the law is very much based on spirit in which it was written rather than being a pedantic fucking tool in matters like this: if anything, beyond the first person to FHRITP-bomb the broadcast, the REPORTER would be considered the one causing a disturbance, if anyone: Proof of the Offence[edit] subsection (a) The crown should prove: the identity of the accused as culprit the jurisdiction in which t…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:13 PM
1

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-04-08/women-choose-mates-by-shoulder-size-first-research-suggests /shrug
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:51 PM
1

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-04-08/women-choose-mates-by-shoulder-size-first-research-suggests Male shoulders may actually be more of a distraction to most women than strobe lights, speedos or cocks... (there are reasons women's clothing has long had padded bras while -rather than padding their crotches- men's fashion dictated they pad their shoulders) And let's be more science-y for a sec: a strobe light, like lightning or flickering, your brain is naturally inclined to adjust to…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:39 PM
1

is that guy part muppet? Also, I'm baffled: how is this relevant to men's rights?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:05 AM
1

Sorry, perhaps you're new to the movement: the social mores of what is acceptable portrayal of males / females are fundamental to the modern concepts of human nature & by extension the lack of compassion towards the issues faced by and the general (mis)treatment of men. I don't want to be rude by not addressing how this would not quite be "like criticizing Flo from the Progressive commercial for implying women are crazy stalkers.", but take the opportunity to point out that a part of umbrella un…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:17 PM
1

Your own presumptions & prejudices are showing through here (sorry but was curious about your other recent posts to the sub & I seem to be seeing a lot of combativeness on your part over what you feel are appropriate things for men to be concerned about and this seemed like as good an example as most to point ou where you seem to be projecting, so please re-read OP's post, then your reply, with the following context in mind...) I just know that if it was a man instead there would be an issue and…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:00 PM
0

.. you make a point of mentioning you 're not a guy but you come & be all uppity about victim complexes in this sub? Go troll 2x. (edit: edited bit in bold) edit 2: (strikethrough and--) I see by post history that you likely aren't trolling, but for real your comment ignores Grailums' points, sidesteps them, brings up that you are female as if to derail the gender reversal point that was being made, while flat out ignoring the point it made... then you went on to (essentially) lump together in o…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:01 PM
1

Would you have heard of it if it had been named? wouldn't even reach the theatres before getting censored, and burned down. the point is a producer / exec / whatever sees that shit & veto's it before risking the outcry.. Look at the recent avengers AoU flick: even mentioning that black widow was a monster for killing people just got joss whedon (aka the dude who did buffy ffs) harassed to where he deleted his twitter...
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:35 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/34dlks/reminder_the_correct_name_should_be_positive/
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:59 AM
2

Jim Jefferies' material suggests he has mra leanings. Just to add one not yet mentioned.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:37 AM
9

http://www.northpennlegal.org/
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:46 PM
4

Well you took her car AND punched her in RETALIATION after she slapped you in defense of what was hers . Might be time for you to apologize.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:39 PM
2

Does not belong here.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:24 PM
2

According to The Expo they were "politely asked" to leave, so presumably they politely declined... dunno if that counts as escalating..
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:27 PM
12

http://www.vancouverobserver.com/contributors/danny-kresnyak Recent prairie ex-pat Danny Kresnyak says journalism is a verb and as close as he gets to a religion. He writes about the bonds between human beings, the struggles they face and the innovations they create to overcome them. Danny Kresnyak in the OP article: The group had purchased a booth at the event, but people quickly reacted because their banner displayed the logo of "#gamergate," a movement associated with opposing harassment agai…
/r/MensRights23/04/15 04:19 AM
2

This really doesn't belong here. More like TRP as highlighted all along bottom of video... pussypassdenied or other places. But IMHO this doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:56 AM
3

Much as it sucks: literally now means figuratively, "for emphasis"... Nobody wants to be the pedant trying to police language to retain older meanings, especially given how impossible a task it is to fight such changes... The lesson is to get ahead of the game: create a narrative & a public perception of that term which will be readily accepted, fits, and holds up over time. Using a mirrored term like misandry likely contributes to its being so easily misappropriated /dismissed -- I'm no linguis…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:42 AM
2

Misplaced trust & frustrating realities.. -- if your SO is costing you 20k+ annually and you can half that, or eliminate the loss, turn it into a tax return-- or better yet, if making a lot, shelter a greater sum than those above from taxes by gifting it to a supposedly equal partner--it seems like a sweet deal... People might imagine it "greed", but it's more a matter of logic, considering that even without getting the tax incentives, a cohabitation may be treated as sufficient grounds to grant…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 07:54 PM
4

Archive link
/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:14 AM
1

Fwiw Since the question is about an artist's expressions I'll toss some analogy in my response. Generally, while offensive media influences are big issue, there tend to be a lot of other issues likely more worthy of directing the movement's attention towards than individual artistic expressions in a great many cases where they may be wrought with gender bias. AskMen or OneY are likely a more appropriate place to discuss this; as this is a peripheral matter to MRM & more a symptom of a greater is…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:04 AM
1

The holocaust comment is pretty valid, which speaks to the validity of things people react to as straight up disruptive dickery... --& if you think the comment was completely invalid, what would you do when faced with the choice of supporting the SS & nazi-ing up vs you & everyone that can be associated with you being rounded up as traitors?-- Would youknow any better what to do in such a spot? Because really those "responsible for the Holocaust" were more at the hide/"do nothing" or the "just d…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 09:01 PM
1

nobody [buy]ing any more [houses /dog]s. --was ( I thought , pretty clearly) meant to be analogous to nobody having any more kids. but by all means assume I'm making a laughable point instead of expressing some humility in the realm of using analogies.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:22 AM
-2

Yet when I got here your comment was nearly ten minutes old & this was sitting on 100% upvoted... Just sayin
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:13 PM
1

What your analogy boils down to though (to be realistic, again) is faulty, as nations are unlikely to topple within a single generation, society won't end & nor will humanity's stretch as a thriving specie grind to a halt as result of nobody buying any more houses /dogs... Parenthood / reproduction is a whole other equation that has to be treated differently from those examples because the broader impact / implications of it is so significantly different. Not defending the current status quo, no…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:00 PM
2

Would a simpler more elegant solution perhaps be to spread the burden among the populace which is so strongly in favor of unilateral choice? Say perhaps ALL parents get per-child state-issued child-support checks for up to 18 years, and everyone parent or not has part of all income deducted in taxes towards child support costs. Perhaps in such a scenario the many folks who don't want to be parents, who aren't the parents, or even can't be parents-- but who are stuck with the bill so others can f…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 11:07 AM
2

To be realistic we can't flip or ignore gender just yet when it comes to parental rights in the current social culture (given the lack of medical resources / costs etc as well)-- "Should one's desire to become a parent to or to not parent a child trump the rights of another whose desires run counter to theirs?" would run closer to the full equation question regarding abortions / financial abortions. There is an argument to be made of an ingrained genetic predisposition / instinct in many to defa…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 10:49 AM
1

thing is with terrorism, it applies to anyone/anything terrorized--a neighborhood can be terrorized by having a pest infestation, one can be terrorized by prank phonecalls... Which actually makes far M O R E sense than say Canada's legal definitions of terrorists/terrorism if you are a member of a group that is on the government’s list of terrorist organizations, you are a terrorist. another definition: violence used "in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objecti…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:39 AM
1

Except this issue, and your misguided thought process on it, point to a problem in men's body images that demands at least as much attention as the other body image issues the media addresses as causes for concern.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 07:09 PM
3

Holy shitbeans... sorry but this demands sidetracking. wtf. w t actual f. How did I--how did everyone miss this?. So i watched your clip, then rewatched the first & thought: She was 19. At 19 people are generally fully developed for the most part & women mature faster than men right? --From the look of her in videos I presume she can kick my ass, and could kick a good half or more of the adults I know's asses (both genders equally)... I noted the quote from OP-link "Now at that point I thought h…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:19 AM
4

"How you gonna compare me to ray rice?" excessive force is excessive force; it doesn't matter that you aren't a gridiron player, if you are no longer defending against a reasonable threat & have gotten your "attacker" to the ground, pleading for you to stop as you kick them, you are now the attacker. The point of comparing ray rice is ray rice was in a CLOSED space with someone NON sexually VIOLENTLY assaulting him, and anything he tried to do to "defend" himself would cause damage.. The level o…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:02 PM
4

the writer apparently
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:30 PM
3

THANK YOU!!!
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:25 PM
4

But... I just saw a video on the MR frontpage that says everything that happens to people is their own fault... /s
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:18 PM
1

"The people that I've met that I've met who have actually been abused, exploited, imprisoned, slandered, beaten, abandoned.. have had to deal with [...] death threats, physical & mental brutality... are some of the most grateful strongest happy-go-lucky people I have ever laid eyes on" Sure hope she gets what she needs to also experience life as one of those most grateful, strong, happy-go-lucky people herself sooner than later.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:12 PM
0

should be a bot that will remove non archive posts, just like the reddit.np stuff, or flairless posts... OP's can link real link in comments or description. been seeing this pop up sporadically for over a year now.. stickying it would be a nice "something at all", but there seems to be lethargy or apathy with regards to actually enacting anything mod-side that might reduce the traffic this sub sends to promoters of hate...
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:59 PM
9

i think that the historical injustices that women have suffered through the centuries. needs the "this bit is kinda bullshit" quotes more than the "set right" part... especially given that said portion is meant to express how many MRAs interpret feminists' "justifications".
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:41 PM
5

According to her clemency appeal, her lead trial attorney, Edwin Wilson, said he thought the jury would not sentence her to death "because she was a woman nevermind the other reasons...
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:55 AM
1

THAT makes sense
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:39 PM
1

...rule 64 ? -- "Don't copy that floppy"-fanfiction? ... or "tony stark cobbled [her] together in a cave from a box of scraps" -fanfiction?... (Guessing you meant 34, but this was still amusing)
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:27 PM
3

The legal drinking age in Quebec, including Montreal and Quebec City, is 18.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:16 PM
1

Those with twitter (or whatever other means may be available, facebook etc) may wanna tweet (or such) to Alanis , as I get the impression she'd take exception to her name being directly associated with misandry (or just about any group-hate) (edit: link)
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:33 PM
0

Let's dissect something a moment; pretend you are an audience member rather than narrator: He stands accused of rape that you can't possibly know he committed, but to grant her sympathy and support is to condemn him & deny him sympathy / support, right?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:51 PM
5

Because her perjury was related to the existence of a script/treatment she had made for a film called "Star Crazy", and when presented with HER notes on how the lead character, a 20-something actress (character) who intent on getting back at an ex, intended to take out a false restraining order in order to "schmooze" the police, when Perrette was asked what was meant by "schmooze" she responded : "THESE ARE JUST LITTLE NOTES. SO I CAN T--I REMEMBER THINKING THAT SHE WAS--THAT SHE--I DON T KNOW. …
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:25 PM
1

Man, and here I thought Snake Plisskin was just a badass role of his --now it seems he was typecast for having those brass ones in real life...
/r/MensRights05/01/15 09:53 PM
2

I would assume to avoid becoming a media target, a doxxing target, a swatting target etc any more than need be... To avoid having whoever hosts the content being bombarded until his posts are taken down for whatever excuses they come up with... There are plenty of reasons...
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:51 PM
222

Next up: homeless unemployed people starving on the street are now to be offered seminars on how to avoid commiting workplace sexual harassment and on the fundamentals of chair-sitting and wearing shoes.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 05:20 PM
2

I gotta assume what got deleted here was the same link that can he found at the top where it says "Other Discussions (1)" --warning: may trigger rage
/r/MensRights19/12/14 08:02 PM
1

http://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/2pl1cu/a_missouri_republican_is_pushing_a_bill_that/cmxr0sc Pretty well said... would wanna submit to bestof..if this site weren't so imbalanced
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:21 PM
7

Generally speaking fraud =\= theft... And let's be real: if someone offered to pay you $1,000 to let them punch you in the face as hard as they want for up to an hour or until you TKO out (boxing is legal, right? And so is hiring stunt people for movies?) so they can film it, offering $3,000 if you last the full hour---but then after busting you in the face they refused to pay, or only offer $100 -- would you think it was just theft, or did it then turn into assault as you agreed to it under fal…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:10 PM
2

Pretty sure it exists in Canada... But to be on the safe side, please try to avoid blanket statements about laws existing on the basis of one region: worth remembering that a lot of folks affected by men's issues reside in Australia, Uk, Canada, etc., not just the Usa.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:02 PM
4

Pilar Sanders was sentenced Tuesday to seven days in Collin County Jail on a contempt-of-court charge Sooo jailed for one week, not for posting anything.. --also her 30 day sentence for her actual wrongdoing (which seems related to custody rather than just her posted accusations etc)..? That got suspended /probated for a year...
/r/MensRights17/12/14 06:30 PM
9

And "literally" was meant to mean "in actual fact" rather than "for emphasis", --and there was some word meant to mean "hatred" of women that now gets thrown at men for things like appreciating their attraction to women, or suggesting women take measures at all to avoid risks... Feels trump definitions, unfortunately
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:13 PM
0

Careful--pointing out the username who authored the post might be twisted into a story about MRA doxxing the poor special snowflake... especially as that might lead people to their profile where they may have comments or submissions which might include other personal info....
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:43 PM
0

This special little snowflake knows there will already be special treatments and protections and opportune pities (autocorrect was kinda right so I'm gonna leave it), because special snowflake men are seen as victims of patriarchy, are not held accountable for the acts of all men before them, and are not seen as the perpetual threats cis males must always be treated as.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:38 PM
8

I think you are trying to ask a loaded question that can be flipped against the MRM if not answered carefully, is what I think... The short answer is that that quote is off the mark. It can be said in jest or derisively / farcically, but that is because feminism is supposed to be about addressing the female perspective and component to gender equality, much like the MRM for the male component/perspective, but feminisn is instead typically characterized /"defined" as directly representative of ge…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 05:49 AM
3

Clickbait douchery. This crap should be transcribed rather than giving them the traffic they seek.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:53 PM
4

Troll hat is showing...
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:44 PM
2

If we go back far enough there is some basis in law: those skinny jeans that look painted on? It used to be that certain courts saw it possible to dismiss claims of rape if the alleged victim had on such tight jeans as it was believed they would make the situation such that an attempted rapists would be unable to remove said clothing without the compliance/assistance of their victim without any signs of trauma/struggle... There were eventually pushes for the mentality that a victim may comply ou…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:04 PM
1

Men are still pieces of shit, as are women, as were women then. Or Yup: your male ancestors were rapists and my female ancestors were rape victims... Or You mean as opposed to all the dogs & cats & children that are pieces of shit?--wait so one has to be expected to know better & have agency & when they fail to meet your later-defined-standards retrospectively, retroactively that makes them pieces of shit?... Just a few options...
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:49 PM
1

Troll harder "bruh " http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/275vgt/i_do_not_get_mens_rights/chxol15
/r/MensRights08/12/14 04:54 PM
2

Here's the real issue many folks will overlook: Most folks would look at the headline and think something like "Good--if someone did that to my kid of whichever gender I would be within my rights to mutilate that sick fucker's genitals..." or something to that effect... --until it is suggested that such acts are enacted upon women known to have molested children... --or until it is discovered this happened to someone based on mere suspicion and could potentially be later determined to have been …
/r/MensRights07/12/14 07:40 PM
26

You understate it... that misused word has now come to mean any behaviours by males in relation to females that can be construed into taking place under a negative light: Express appreciation for female form?--the word meaning hatred of women... Think women might appreciate your input on something (almost anything)?--that word meant to mean hatred of women.. Express concern that what is expressed as factual seems to conflict with rational analysis of statistical data? --they keep using that word…
/r/MensRights06/12/14 09:00 PM
1

Also, people can be gay, even if it were allllll about attracting someone...
/r/MensRights06/12/14 08:11 PM
2

Also because water. Every person who has ever been downvoted was downvoted because of water. --also all racism is just a direct result people trying to get people to have sex with them... And when someone mugs another person for money to buy crack it is just a misfire of programming intended for survival and reproduction... And when you chew your nails & pick your nose it's just vestigial programming that came with behaviours meant to pass-on your genes. Also being gay. And enjoying scifi. And a…
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:28 PM
2

Let's also not forget the question of being able to succeed at sports like the role models in every field, or defend one's self / be seen as less of a target in a world where men are so likely to be victims of violent assaults etc...
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:21 PM
1

We'll have to agree to disagree on that.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:38 PM
2

Female cicrumcision can also be limited to a pinprick... http://www.bioethics.net/2010/05/whats-the-harm-in-a-pinprick/
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:48 PM
3

The simplest logical application of cultural norms makes the story flawed in a blatent way: white knights. Nobody can honestly say that a group could make this an initiation requirement without at least one pledge trying to expose their frat for this... I could even see one of her rapists claiming he had been led to believe she was a drama major with a kinky gangrape fantasy used to test the solidarity /commitment of pledges--both absolving himself of knowingly having done wrong while elevating …
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:15 PM
-1

Let's go down the hypothetical rabbit hole--say i'm a discipline problem who refused to get in the pool, now you told me to go to the office & I just say "no; I won't be denied the visual/theory learning I can get from the sidelines (while I flirt or make funny faces or otherwise disrupt)"--then what?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:48 PM
-1

But then come the claims she was mentruating & didn't wanna have to say so in front of anyone: best he really could have done was given her her pussypass n moved on
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:43 PM
-1

Were his players at Rutgers lying on the floor & throwing tantruns like kindergardeners?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:42 PM
2

I think you just mean should.. because they wouldn't. And that seems to be op's point
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:41 PM
0

Those downvoting are missing some points: if a boy were saying no for ANY reason you can suggest he would be punished unless he could supply a note. For the girl the writers are suggesting that because it would muss her hair --and because teen girls may menstruate--and allegedly her top was coming off (why?) and because feels--swimming should be removed from PE... Also she changed into the appropriate attire for gym but didn't want to participate but had no note excusing her... I will be impress…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:37 PM
2

I think you mean by that logic a business should be allowed to reserve the right to refuse anyone service for any reason at the owner's discretion... a policy many establishments of various types have....
/r/MensRights29/11/14 07:01 AM
-4

Please leave it until monday
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:19 PM
3

In Lena dunham's case it was more like "among the earliest" in a long line of incidents, as the one in the title was when her sister was one & she seven yet event sontinued well into lena's puberty..
/r/MensRights07/11/14 05:11 PM
1

http://www.allvoices.com/article/100002109 It wasn't exactly one-off in the Lena dunham written confession included in her writings...
/r/MensRights07/11/14 05:08 PM
2

Funny--most of us making those arguments are tired of BOYS & men facing the treatment we're pointing out, we highlight the hypocrisy blatently demonstrated by the double standard of such pussypasses to further convey the disparity, inequality & outright fucking misandry of such a situation --but this is just a sub to discuss men's rights so fuck men right?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:37 PM
3

It saddens me how astute this assessment is...
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:28 PM
2

Can you also not use google???? http://www.allvoices.com/article/100002109
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:08 PM
5

In fairness Lena Dunham details events that involve similar behaviour progressing for years beyond the pinpointed vaginal touching cited in OP's title; it is just the easiest example from the book to contrast with a 6year old boy kissing a schoolmate's hand at school... girls mature faster than boys or so we all hear & this seems to have almost definitely by her own accounting had similarly inappropriate event's happening through to her puberty...
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:04 PM
2

With a name that includes the word pedantic I would expect less hyperbole of the generalizing/absolutism variety
/r/MensRights07/11/14 02:56 PM
4

Reverse the genders m8: imagine a popular male actor not just letting slip but rather putting in a book that when he was seven he touched an infant inappropriately, then went on to groom & manipulate the kid into bed together for more inappropriateness like masturbation while sharing a bed several years down the line... not exactly a cheap shot when we know how a male in such circtumstance would be villified etc
/r/MensRights07/11/14 02:54 PM
1

A more accurate assertion on the subject, might be that often women who express intelligence on the level of being "pretty bright" in whichever field or realm can often have this proficiency recognized & subsequently misread as sufficient cause to presume a generally above-average capacity on various/multiple realms (ie subjects/skills etc which in many cases are unrelated) -- --couple that with a society where PR & HR & RFs are all quite insistent that female applicants be given priority opport…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:38 PM
1

we won’t see worldwide gender equality until approximately the year 2095. At that rate, [continued next quote] (Odd they seem to have omitted the word PAY....but here comes the most telling portion of the article: ) women will be riding around on hoverboards before they’re making the same amount as their male counterparts. Because ONE CAN CURRENTLY PAY $10,000 TO GET A HOVERBOARD KIT if they themselves have that kind of money to blow on such things, or can persuade others to put the money up for…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:03 PM
1

Part (most) of me wants to agree withe you because ffs this sub is CONSTANTLY brigaded & that truth swept under the rug etc etc- -but a small part of me also wanted to downvote the post for linking directly rather than using a donotclick or archive link which would have served to deny theguardian the extra traffic from all the clickthroughs reposting of clickbait generates.. giving such publishers the traffic they want is what perpetuates this cycle of employing media messages maligning men
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:55 PM
1

...victims of statutory molestation need to press charges?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:00 PM
-4

No. Here the men think "MOST Men face worse than this every day; ALL men get blamed for the acts of 2VERY FEW men-- "woman-up."."
/r/MensRights28/10/14 11:23 PM
-5

The irony is palapable coming from a rape-culture promoter...
/r/MensRights28/10/14 11:17 PM
-4

Your implication, perhaps unintentional, was that 'because crimes happen mostly to men, threatening behaviour towards women is okay'... No. My implication, which was intentional, was that the " threatening behaviour " bit is utter bullshit when contrasted to genuine threats, as further proven by your BS trotting out of rape claims as if the woman on video EVER felt like the men were likely to rape her... and further evidenced by moving the goalposts into nightclubs...
/r/MensRights28/10/14 08:02 PM
-6

I suspect you only see "hysterics going hysterical" because women think you're gross. Please leave the planet.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:36 PM
2

You understand, I hope, that it's entirely unclear if you mean those making such a video, those the video seeks to call out, or those in this thread feeling maligned by the narrative.... (or all the above...)
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:35 PM
6

In fairness --odds are-- walking a zigzag path through Harlem, odds are high there would be more than 100 catcalls in under 3 hours... But then the video would run the risk of seeming racist-- and being waaaay too easy to replicate the results of by substituting her with a male who'd have similar polite greetings from some, & be mocked or solicited or maligned etc by others...
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:34 PM
-7

This is the real world. People get raped. All the time. They get sexually assaulted even more often. And that makes people quite rightly nervous. A- Rape is most likely to happen with SOMEONE YOU ALREADY KNOW. B- Rapes happen way less than violent assaults/attacks, especially in north america, especially in NYC-- & men are the primary victims of random violent attacks in north america/NYC.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:30 PM
-4

I've seen it in harlem DEFINITELY... But as for Jamaica.. -- I used to have fantasies that I'd retire to Jamaica.. then went on a trip to one of the less gun-filled areas, only to find every minute to 2 minutes (TOPS) of walking was harassment by people trying to engage you-- ironically those doing the harassing were about equal of both sexes... MANY MANY women harassing worse than in this video in a region far less densely populated than NYC... (many of whom pulled the "What you think you're to…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:17 PM
-7

Funny how in most dense traffic areas depending on ethnicity / dress etc most men will have a similar frequency of verbal approaches from people seeking directions, spare change, trying to sell something (legal & not), trying to promote a religion or charity or new commodity, asking for the time, correcting their behaviors etc. whatever else... The problem with this video is the framing still leaves that straw man in the shot.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:41 PM
6

I think a lot of people here would appreciate if you edit or delete your comment; And never being involuntarily single a day in your life... that's the highest form of privilege. that sort of thinking/speak hurts the potential for Men's issues to be taken seriously, and you really ought to know better. [edit: spelling]
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:32 PM
7

You misread. what's not statistically significant is the difference between proportion of groups A & B who were X (arrested) and the proportion of groups A & B who were Y (placed in jail).
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:10 AM
1

Your opinion is noted
/r/MensRights19/10/14 03:28 PM
1

Men are better fighters than women, more enduring, etc. NAMALT [for the lazy "not all men are like that"] Blinded by ideology. so you're saying ALL men are better fighters than women?--or admitting to your having been blinded by ideology? No, that's what you said I said. I said, women can't fight.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 03:10 PM
1

Indeed I may-- just seemed worth suggesting, as it is my strong hope that you do so.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:57 PM
1

so you're saying ALL men are better fighters than women?--or admitting to your having been blinded by ideology?
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:55 PM
1

Match point: u/sejedreng47
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:52 PM
1

radfems, clearly.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:50 PM
3

well, if we trust hillary clinton women are the REAL victims when men are made to go to war resulting in said men suffering the severest of traumas & dying for causes they may themselves oppose...
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:22 PM
1

If we're looking at historical feminism in relation to this topic just have a read of this paper...
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:19 PM
1

NAMALT
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:06 PM
1

as for you--I woulda backed off but for your accusation that the person to whom you were responding was being asinine, when in fact YOU are the one guilty of said transgression-- i wanted to stay out of it but the short of it is: sometimes there is a need to send people into combat where odds are they will die in order to achieve other objectives. that is a reality of any war, and that is a reality for people drafted especially to the front lines, and that is beynd any reasonable doubt what was …
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:04 PM
1

You sir can fuck right off.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 01:57 PM
1

I really suggest you cool off, step away from the keyboard, decompress doing something else, reflect on the complexities of war & the subtleties of why people might rather not be forced to register vs why others feel it is a necessary move weighted against the risks / pitfalls that come with dire straits... (Or at least examine what you write before hitting send with the question "might this make me seem like a troll?", cause at this point you are coming across as a troll by taking that quote ou…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 01:26 AM
13

So men aren't made to register regardless of their physical / mental capacities?
/r/MensRights19/10/14 01:09 AM
13

Because People are more likely to be compassionate towards men AND WOMEN than to JUST men. Also because those in favor of the draft feel it is an undesirable but necessary measure, which is not an entirely unreasonable stance: what is unreasonable is treating one gender's right to choose (service, life, abortion, adoption, informing male parent & so on) as a right & the other gender's right to choose a tad more of a fairy tale...
/r/MensRights19/10/14 01:06 AM
9

Not in a world where there is the unspoken law of compassion for women & condemnation for men. It is the crux of most gender-related disadvantages men face.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:58 AM
2

Most things feminists don't want tend to be legislated against these days...
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:56 AM
7

your throwing the accusation Are you so blinded by your Men's Right's zeal that you have lost the ability to think logically about anything sounds a lot more "feminist on tumblr" than anything I see coming from him in this thread. --I think you may be the one a little too emotionally invested in a certain way of thinking to have rational discourse with someone whose reasoning happens not to parallel yours.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:49 AM
22

--are you saying they can't pilot vessels, navigate, man turrets, control drones, serve as medics, cooks etc? Nevermind the question of frail 110-pound men forced to register anyway...
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:41 AM
0

I agree with all your points, but I think the hard one to nail down in a quick relate-able turn of phrase is the general populace's popular partaking in this persistent predisposition to forego actual meaning & definitions etc in favor of appeals to emotions & instincts reliant entirely on sympathies & "feels". This applies equally to sexism, gender-equality & the bs of tipping. Unfortunately, language is fluid & flows with immeasurable force... Thus "Misogyny" [defined as HATRED of women] is no…
/r/MensRights17/10/14 07:02 PM
3

Thanks for your post. As you might imagine by my original post, I don't agree with the first 2/3 regarding indirect linking, but I certainly understand some of your thinking.--it would be nice to be able to steer the conversation in a productive direction, but with all the sensationalist slander omnipresent in the media's narrative of gender-ed issues there tends to be little to no chance to carry on a conversation according to our own timetable and agenda once the court of public opinion has al…
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:35 PM
1

As I understand it <1 year is already treated differently most places than >1year...
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:59 PM
1

I have to admit-- while my general sentiment on elected officials is "Whoever wins is the one you'll find out was lying in order to get elected", you raise a strong point: Odds areat least one candidate will claim to share your values to win your votes, but if a candidate already loudly champions causes that seek to fuck you over hard, it's likely worth voting for anyone else.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:58 PM
1

Seemed to me the point was to imply censorship & condemnation had been granted a wide berth / vague umbrella that anything that COULD be characterized as "ranting about women" would fall under "verbotten"... Then again I'm late to the table & just transcribing what I've seen pretty much everywhere else..
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:53 PM
1

The downvotes make me think this likely has merit / accuracy to it...
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:50 PM
1

FUCK THIS
/r/MensRights17/10/14 04:37 PM
1

relevant username much? In British, Irish, Australian, New Zealand and South African English the back-formation pleb, along with the more recently derived adjectival form plebby,[5] is used as a derogatory term for someone considered unsophisticated or uncultured.[6] [Emphasis mine]
/r/MensRights17/10/14 03:41 PM
12

physical evidence is often absent. it's reasonable enough to understand that it's still rape even when an assailant is 'gentle' and a victim opts not to 'fight back' for fear of harm (such harm often serving as a form of physical evidence). Also ejaculate isn't required for rape to have taken place. Sometimes a trial & the pressures involved can bring new evidence to light, or (sadly, in cases like the false accusations,) can stress the accused into copping a plea despite a lack of evidence.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 03:35 PM
1

To decide to abort a baby, when this wasn't your first choice, because of financial issues must be devastating. And the only reason you have against this is because the man wants the choice to ignore/reject responsibility he created. This responsibly either gets pushed onto the mother, or onto the Government via welfare. Weird how putting a kid up for adoption works huh?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:52 PM
1

How would you like to pay for all these kids out of your taxes, taking welfare from those who need them, because fathers decide they don't want to pay for something they helped to create. You mean like we already have happen when women choose to put a kid up for adoption, with no obligation to involve the male parent in the decision (and no obligation to even inform the male he was a parent)?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:49 PM
1

If you let the man give up 100% of his financial responsibility of the child then you've got issues, because now we have x amount of children in the world with no support. & a woman having a child she chooses to give up for adoption is better because?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:45 PM
9

I disagree. Your imagined feelings on the offspring's part are akin to the progeny of a rape victim expressing "I don't give a f*ck about poor mom's feelings. Do you really want me to be sad that I'm alive.... I am so glad that dad did whatever he did b/c, well I like living... End of story." There is merit in the kid being made aware of the details, even if they aren't all rosy.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:24 AM
0

O.O
/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:14 PM
0

I understand where you're coming from, but be realistic: I mispronounce, mumbble & cut myself off midthought regularly when I talk, just imagine how i mean sure some people would figure it out but mmm aybe not ifn i rote th wai oy pro-nunce tins... but... the duty is on the writer to express him or herself in a way that other readers can most easily relate to, if they wish their sentiment to be interpreted in an accurate manner. In the case of cursing it is an utter waste of emphasis & leaves yo…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:41 PM
1

I would like you to submit a post saying precisely this so we can all upvote it to frontpage so that some media outlets who simply make articles based on reddit posts on slow " news " days might run with it..
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:21 PM
1

double standard number (whoknowsatthispoint) --if no sexual assaults on women are reported at a college there must be coverups & silencing & shaming & sweeping under rug etc. Females who have suffered traumatic abuse rarely come forward. females who have been through traumas should not be pressured into having to relive their experiences over and over by recounting the details of their suffering for skeptics before we take appropriate actions to protect potential future victims (and importantly:…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:17 PM
1

Do you have any links that tell the whole story the way you have? (ie the part they omit)
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:08 PM
1

Botttom line: they jump to it being victim blaming--if I say no one should rape anyone, but add that no one should be getting so drunk that they act in a way they may later regret or fail to recall--the immediate presumption seems to be that I am victim blaming/shaming with the latter portion when I could easily enough have been describing the rapists who had gotten too drunk & acted in a regrettable way. In short people are derps
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:09 PM
3

Cause a significant portion of people never take childhood-indoctrinated rules literally to the detriment of society? Don't be obtuse yourself there rog
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:32 AM
5

But given sex workers make several hundred dollars a pop wouldn't this work out GREAT for all the men who masturbate; taking sex professional work into their own hands should then entitle these men to be paid for their hard work too, right? Could be making money hand over fist if the government or your SO had to cough up a wad each time you do the same unassisted... we could all be making loads & loads.... swimming in it! Erm --so to speak...
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:11 PM
1

Word. Article text posted above.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:05 PM
1

This article doesn't belong here. Just about every trait he ascribes can be generalized to region not just one gender of the region..
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:45 AM
3

As long as they don't have to bake it themselves
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:43 AM
2

Hm. If I tilt my head & look at it the right way... It speaks to the culture of men viewed as disposable, their worth tied to social status & earning power... while not a hard men's rights issue like those relating to body autonomy etc there is a "men's issues" matter of how men's roles are greater in relationships. I agree this is probably a stretch, but no more so than it being a women's [rights] issue if a man were to write of having broken it off with a wonderful woman because she couldn't c…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 06:12 PM
3

Thanks
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:00 PM
0

Sorry but how the f is this relevant?????????
/r/MensRights07/09/14 03:35 PM
1

Explain
/r/MensRights07/09/14 03:29 PM
1

If I say "All the females are bitches: fact, not opinion" as my post title & it turns out my article is pretty much about domestic canines, despite misleading title,, turns out I wasn't being sexist.. Apparent sexism for the sake of sensationalism, clickbait, human interest, garnering sympathy, emotional manipulation etc? In cases where it is clearly intentional I tend to treat it as sexism (or worse, as it is an intentional tactic rather than born of ignorance)
/r/MensRights07/09/14 03:23 PM
86

Please can we have donotclick link so we aren't giving them the traffic they seek with their daily click bait? I mean given that's the only issue mentionned in the title & all...
/r/MensRights07/09/14 03:02 PM
3

I say make/ask for copies of every bit of course material you can, especially he videos. Ask if you can record lectures as well & do so, wait until your course is done & you have your degree--then as one person with a degree to others with degrees consult the institution's HR department, present them your key points while offering copies of all the materials you accumulated. Take the approach of explaining how this is a discrimination liability & they are in desperate need of updating course mat…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:08 AM
-6

I think the writer just wants more attention on the issue & thinks "calling out" feminists will spur that--OR writer just heard about the situation & rather than tackling it as the PR PC BS matter that it is thought it would somehow be prudent to make it into an excuse to attack feminists.. Among the worse articles this sub has linked me to without being flared "outrage" or such
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:46 PM
1

Important to note they immediately sidetracked at that point to "derp reality shows today huh?" To sweep the point she made under the rug & out of the spotlight. If no one stops these poultryheads they will keep clucking away about how awful & guilty whichever guy must clearly be & how they & the rest of the men's should man up & do as tyt prescribe etc.. rather than wasting the last 2 minutes on light fluff to distract from how the main premise of the show is to convict any accused man in a cou…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:29 PM
2

Because you don't hear hooves in north America & assume "zebra" nor "camel"...
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:23 PM
1

Please do it
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:13 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:45 AM
3

please do everyone a favor & deny them the traffic by posting screenshot of what you linked. thank you.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:18 AM
4

word. [/reassuring back-pat]
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:02 PM
8

You know what? I think we should sjw it up too & start a campaign against shoe stores that carry any kind of heel for their support of the patriarchy: their diversity of heels only serves to further sexualize & objectify women, leading to sexism & rape culture-- after all there is no male sexualization equivalent of how heels are used to sexualize their bodies. So nevermind that the target customers like it or that it doesn't really cause people to have these predispositions but rather offers th…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:41 PM
12

This should be fine, or even good news --would not really be an issue IF laws & conviction rates & sentencing etc etc had a more reasonable balance & there were better recourse / recompense in cases of false allegations / wrongful convictions etc... as therabid points out--we are today facing a social justice craze that considers 0 reported rapes to mean the victims must be scared to speak out, that changing one's mind upon consideration days after sex can count as rape, having consentual sex wi…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:35 PM
-1

Facebook posts must be done w/ screenshot & blanked names. From this sub's rules
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:32 PM
-1

Ummmm shouldn't M---- P-----'s name also be clacked out in the final comment where the poster starts out addressing her by name????!!
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:58 PM
1

If you are saying to abstain it is political ergo it is political to say to vote even without saying how to vote. The simple implication if the only words on a poster were "PLEASE VOTE" without any other details at all, black & white etc?--whichever person or group posting this believes an under-represented demographic may be projected or surveyed as likely to vote a certain way were they to vote at all, but that they are unlikely to vote without media prompting... remember when good citizenship…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:08 PM
8

Nope. Sorry. Misleading title in that it was taken down following a complaint from a woman that the poster went against the policies outlined in the agreement Posting a poster talking about using votes where the rules stipulate no political posters doesn't make you oppressed it makes you.. how did key & peele put it?... If the poster were just a raise awareness deal this would be all sorts of fair grounds for raging, but it clearly talks about votes: this is just an attempt to spin a screw-up..
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:43 PM
3

Just a week ago you likely haven't reused the space that was stored to; odds are it can be restored/recovered using free stoftware
/r/MensRights16/08/14 08:23 PM
1

I'm not a good candidate for taking the lead on stuff like that & I know it. But My understanding is such posts in such subs often tend to be "brigaded" by something called a "fempire"...
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:11 AM
1

I like the way you think...
/r/MensRights14/08/14 06:04 AM
57

At what point can articles like this get posted to r/News instead of being relegated to only MensRights? Just seems off that stories about female cutting are worthy of news&worldnews rather than isolated to r/feminism, or how tech/science related news can go to news etc rather than just the tech/sci subs...
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:59 PM
0

Not even reading what you have to say at this point. Like I said you're not up to your task. I tried to offer some useful perspective & wish you luck. Ps as I wrote this I couldn't help catching that last bit (link stands out) how you try to turn karma whoring back on me & gotta point out that i'm not the one who started a thread suggesting people not try to X in reaction to Y, so my doing so doesn't make me look as much the full of shit type as yourself. Get over yourself m8. Really.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 09:33 PM
1

Correct
/r/MensRights12/08/14 08:31 PM
2

Don't know why some tool downvoted that. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 08:27 PM
0

Funny enough getting a job doesn't always mean you're the best person for that job Mayor Ford/Pres Bush etc--just because you work in the MRM doesn't mean you're the best or even a good candidate for the position. no. you completely worded things differently.. I can no longer even try to take you seriously after such a claim. (Nevermind that this post came up right after your own unsuccessful attempt to karma whore his death in another sub) I did imply that maybe you may not care about the movem…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 08:20 PM
0

Don't apoligise for how others feel unless your goal is to troll. TIL "sorry you don't like how I phrased it" is a way to deflect after using the wrong words entirely & not having agency for my failings enough to just say "oops my bad",and in so doing also further frustrate someone for trying to help better my capacity to further --or at least avoid hindering--causes I supposedly care about.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:31 AM
2

That is rather a FAR cry from politicizing. What you describe is finger-pointing, witch-hunting & the like. Politicizing is to do with the larger issues at play, not laying the blame on individuals navigating the broken system politicizing seeks to address.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:05 AM
1

Hmmmmmmm good question--beautifully spun. Let me turn it back around on you: "Please, let's not politicize this one." ---so, what were you hoping to get in the way of with that?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:23 AM
1

Are you being asinine?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:16 AM
0

I just looked through your recent post history (not much of it but enough to get a knee-jerk feel for your thought-out/big-picture sense of scope,) & would suggest others do the same before treating your request/suggestion as meritous. I don't mean you offense, but I get the impression it may benefit you to consider taking the approach that for many the best way they can contribute their leadership skills is by recognizing situations in which the most productive and helpful thing might simply be…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:53 AM
2

Wtf is with people taking the cut off someone's junk attitude? Even if we're talking about a rapists -it seems like more a petty act of sadistic retribution/vengeance than anything... When there's a female accused of forcing a child to engage in sexual acts maybe a crowd should rally behind the idea of carving out the entirety of her vagina; that pretty much follows this prescribed logic, right?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:39 AM
15

If you keep posting this and PM within sufficient time to do so I will very happily go through post history & upvote pretty much every post you author saying the above. Sorry the pointsndon't matter & it's not reddit gold, but THANK YOU. The most self defeating thing we keep doing is giving these clickbaiters exactly what they want.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:01 PM
4

TL;DR: something either gender can do, which men happen to be more inclined towards doing based on their biological constraints is painted as privilege... Next week: why aren't most men's shirts tighter & why do so few outfits show their full legs/arms; is it chauvanism?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 05:56 PM
1

Up til that point I was holding onto hopes the article was just trying to offer input from varying perspectives as if expressing them from the different standpoints... then I realized nope
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:52 PM
4

Dude... what did your mom's bf do to you?...
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:47 PM
9

I hope things turn out ok for that kid... and the other kid... and the infant... seems like a fortunate turn of events so far from a potentially grim/bleak situation...
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:33 AM
1

A googling shows pics of both sexes w/the tag...
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:34 AM
-1

Well you do need ID to pick up your con badge...
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:11 PM
7

Meh--if Joe smiths applies for a job & the enployer upon googling the name sees a felony assault article? That employer might look up what happened, weigh if charges being dropped etc vs qualifications & so on... but if you google Joe Smith & find articles about sexual misconduct, esp w/a minor? I mean honestly nobody wants to be associated with that, despite other articles saying the person was cleared
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:10 PM
1

We're discussing Tv hosts aka court of public opinion rather than court od law (where generally what you describe would still appear to be less a factor than sex)
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:39 AM
2

This should be the top comment... hell-this comment attached under a subtitled image of what was said in the video should be on the front page.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:48 PM
5

Pretend both were men & suddenly it's clear how bullshit it is
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:44 PM
1

Is it racist when you get called a white knight?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:39 PM
3

Pretend that I ask you for a dollar towards oh I don't know "to stop people from dying from cancer"--then it turns out the funding is only going towards (either way) only testicular & prostate cancer, or only cervical cancer... so as a person with the other anatomy who is only at risk of one the funding isn't helping that seems like a prick move/ a con. Especially when we look at things & find gender neutral cancers like lung & skin to be the bigger killers. Much like how focusing on issues of m…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:14 PM
4

Some people feel their condition A-is not a defect & B- would have made for an easier gender reassignment surgery as an adult had nothing been done...
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:28 PM
1

This
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:51 PM
2

Articles like this have me convinced the sub should (in all honesty all of reddit should) have the initial link send the User to a screencap of full page with the option of a link to full content FOR ANY ARTICLE AT ALL. --Why? Because articles like this are all about generating traffic /hits etc & there will always be "publications" that put out garbage like this written by garbage like that because circlejerking radfems will circulate it almost as much as we do in our raging about it. This bs w…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:21 PM
8

Did you read the article?
/r/MensRights16/07/14 09:57 PM
4

Well. First off going back the next day is not a metric for proving something wasn't rape. Secondly I have a feeling one of us may have misread the article regarding such a sequence of events.. In any case-- Quantifying teacher as hot in title points to characterization of this behaviour in a favorable light compared with if genders were reversed--i mean come on if a male teacher sent dick pics to a couple of 18year old students from the school where he taught?? (even if they were never his stud…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:57 AM
1

Wait--if only men can rape--so wouldn't..--doesn't that mean going after these ones or...?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:38 AM
0

Funny enough that was pretty much the article's original title...
/r/MensRights05/07/14 10:03 PM
1

This
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:35 PM
2

To which her jaw responded by breaking
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:34 PM
-2

No
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:30 PM
6

you deserve more upvotes; your sentiment not only has merit, but is expressed in a manner both rational & poignant.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:34 PM
-5

I kinda feel that way about the article itself, the constant pointing to traits of "maleness" seems more along certain colored pill ways of thinking...
/r/MensRights01/07/14 04:37 PM
1

The only question this raised for me was how does one multi-upvote
/r/MensRights30/06/14 08:09 PM
10

False : title had me assuming female.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:54 PM
17

Well put
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:55 PM
2

"#YesAllWomen"?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:11 PM
11

(Regarding your title, not that it matters in the grand scope, but freedom of speech refers to the right to not be silenced by the government rather than an underlying "no one can organize to try to silence you" type thing..)
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:42 PM
2

furthermore YES we are the male version of feminist: we have twits lke yourself claiming to back the cause & making a bad name for us while at the core our intended principles & intended purposes are in fact with merit, but we have to deal with opposition from outside & rotten refuse like yourself being what the outside world instead sees us as, and yes, that situation, and yourself, are pathetic.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:57 PM
6

Troll harder: clearly i was attacking what you said as nothing more than a hypocritical attack, that it happened to be made by a pathetic poser was extra toppings, but no your argment is stupid & foundationless. "Let's all work on addressing AIDS & stop wasting resources on cancer & starvation & gun control laws & road repair until we've resolved things one thing at a time"--no. stupid. argument over.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:54 PM
3

Says the super focused person here on a break from karmafarming purplepill & "trpgame"? Pathetic
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:42 PM
8

And were sheltered from film, television etc I presume then?--so if something like that is the case for the comment to which i had initially replied (not you; you actually provided the relevant context, so please don't take this as directed at you)- why even chime in?--it's like someone who's lived in the desert their whole life popping into a thread about how govt needs to do more about winter-weather damages the roads, only to chime in about how they never even heard of such a thing..
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:12 PM
14

How big is this rock you live under?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:38 PM
8

Wait--What do they do if it's a full flight, of just males?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:31 PM
6

Should this really be marked as news when it's about an opinion piece published several years ago? (In case it changes leading to confusion over this comment: it currently displays as MensRightsNews at thetime of my posting this)
/r/MensRights21/04/14 08:15 AM
5

Crazy how when an adult woman did a similar recording of an assailant's confession years after her abuse-- the law was so quick to absolve her of what this kid was charged with...
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:44 PM
-4

We have previously explained here why "sexual coercion" -- shorthand to describe the boorish act of nagging for sex -- is not properly considered sexual misconduct. Since it is not sexual misconduct when young men practice it, it is not sexual misconduct when young women practice it. is Read our explanation before assuming we are incorrect. ummm.... wait-- that previous study starts out: More and more colleges are punishing men for engaging in a form of consensual sexual behavior obtained by sup…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:28 PM
1

Not too much progress over the last couple of years, but worth noting the article is from April 2012
/r/MensRights27/03/14 12:34 PM
8

Not that much progress happens over a couple of years, but the article is from 2012
/r/MensRights25/03/14 12:10 PM
2

The twist: Hitler was just joking too "MEIN BAD!" It vaas just ein innochent tveet!"
/r/MensRights24/03/14 11:02 PM
2

Kinda sparse on the how they drew their conclusions...
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:39 AM
1

It would be great if this gained momentum - & one of the reasons is it could encourage other public transportation organizations to better apply considerations for concerns such as safety of their patrons equally to both sexes
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:04 AM
3

I think there has to be an element of purgery & slander & libel etc; the way you word it would be shot down in a second, as your phrasing indicates that upon a not-guilty verdict or overturned case the plaintiff would be sentenced if the defendant served any time at all... which seems like it would discourage genuine victims from seeking justice
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:54 PM
2

I dunno m8- oppression Olympics might be scored differently for different sexes... Also I think gays won the oppression Olympics this year...
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:03 AM
2

word
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:34 AM
3

I've met many; I do agree with your main intended messages, but I felt the gender bias on that specific point detracted some from my ability to presume your stance to be objectively observing with a gender-neutral lens. -- My cheesy examples of Shia & fake millionaires were perhaps less reasonable to make my point of "fake geeks" of both genders than if I were to for instance bring up how "liking the spider-man films" is a far cry from being "really into spider-man", or how being into astrology …
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:21 AM
0

Having met & not been pleased with "fake geek guys" I feel the writer has some gendered preconceptions to work out. The fair reason for elitism is as simple as "If I have special skills or talents that I may get some recognition or at least a bit of a nod for possessing, I'm not so pleased to have my spotlight shared with - or odds of success reduced by- all the phonies giving false impressions of representing a learned individual of a given subculture or interest or such to which I'd dedicated …
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:02 AM
3

Red is quite clever with the wording on the prison stats "man kills his wife[...] as little as 5 years" then "If a woman kills her husband[...] the average sentence is no less than 10"... average =\= minimum & we all know the 1/4 rape thing is Mr Obama's misinformation continuing.... presumably the 1/3 stat has to do with how [in 32 states] (http://oratorasaurus.tumblr.com/post/54004227723/false-accusations-of-domestic-violence-by-the-numbers#sthash.n3GkmdkR.dpuf) civil definitions of domestic “…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 04:38 AM
6

Empathy?... the fact you could just go on with your day rather than interjecting without an intent to discuss but instead to "shame" others for their views? If we apply the 3 example system offered in other comments re slut/creep, to your accusation ofnlack of scientific backing you may understand why I use the term shaming... simply put you are claiming a lack of science to a metaphor as your reason for not allowing for something to make sense to you--when simply saying you fail to see the corr…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:27 PM
2

I think that's a bit silly as those near or under ten make the majority of that group... & the older the target the greater the intended insult I would imagine..
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:11 PM
1

derp de terp te teedly tum marklar marklar marklar? you are arguing the equivalenf of "corn on the cob iz the widely accepted form of corn & it involves bbqing or boiling & justifies putting butter on it- therefore we should only consider that format to be corn- because you don't bbq/ boil popcorn or corn flakes nor even put butter on corn flakes --and nobody eats corn in the feild while it is on stalks. so I only ever mean corn on the cob when I say corn & you should too because that's the one …
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:03 PM
1

right... if we totally ignore the actual accepted meanings of terms in favor of the vocabulary suggested by someone who repeatedly fails to form a cogent sentence to express themselves; having repeated the exact same error when it was just pointed out & a suggested wording to form a clearer sentence was offered, acknowledged, then not corrected for... and ignore the circumstances of events-then you're totally making it impossible for me to take you seriously. sorry but at this point there is der…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 07:40 PM
1

i was speaking of strictly legal definitions as they exist; not personal bias of the vernacular or classification for transgressions... --your assertion of rape allowing for lethal force seems faulty--as does your wording (I think you mean to say something like "strongly against considering anything other than violent acts of rape as rape"-- which, while less ridiculous a stance than "strongly against anything but the violent act considered to be rape"- is stil incredibly naiive or misguided. I …
/r/MensRights06/02/14 06:26 PM
2

thanks! -- sounds like I can stand by my stance..
/r/MensRights06/02/14 05:32 PM
2

and we aren't siblings. Nevermind that i am roaming & it' hardly worth my roaming data to debate with you- certainly isnt worth using roaming data to see the video so i can appease you as well as giving it more traffic; not with the information provided by comments readily avaiable... I really don't need to watch the video: waved underwear in face of someone hired to deliver something constitutes sexual harassment with the possible exception of if the item being delivered were underwear. was tha…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:45 PM
2

sis. my watching the vid or not would not change the fact you're presenting your arguments like a thumbsucker.. if you want to argue that this isn't a MR issue take it to meta
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:30 PM
2

Clearly --again without seeing the video; simply by what you have described of it nevermind other comments--she at the least committed sexual harassment & should- again at the least- be fined... Further: if you feel men charged if they did same would be frivolous charges too & should be protested clearly the obvious route is by holding women just as culpable for equivalent bahavior-to set the prescident of dismissing flagrant harasment charges which arakin deems "bull shit" --Sorry why are you e…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:05 PM
2

What is it you're suggesting be done? "Man up/shut up"?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:46 PM
1

As the courts should have advised him: he was in fact the victim of rape--as consent to a sexual act given under false pretense constitutes rape: this precident has been set I multiple cases where a sex worker preformed acts consentually with the understanding they would recieve payment and where subsequently clients refused to pay; the - even presumed - expectation of the other party to conduct themselves in a certain way following a sexual act only consented to on the basis of said reasonable …
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:37 PM
2

Doing nothing does nothing; and leaves the door open for a conviction if or when something were to happen with sexes reversed- Aqquital of such a case would serve as prescident to dismiss sex-reversed cases of same leading to it being statute that- as you seem to desire "nothing happens" to perpetratofs of such acts. Personally I would like there tobe charges & for them to stick to discourage others from bullying by sex... but hey; I'm currently roaming so have yet to see the video -- otherwise …
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:44 PM
2

Here here!! The article touches on being good -more with regards to defending a male's right to expression,suggesting humanisation over feminization as a desired endgame...--but a lot of that baby seems ruined by the bathwater being kool-aid... (Example: (Edit: sorry redditing on a phone, hit save when trying to paste) You may or may not believe that things like widespread acceptance of full equality for gay people or absolutist stances against violence of all kinds -- be it war, rape or guns --…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:24 PM
9

Should this be posted to a fem sub so they can also get mad about the business of painting women as victims in need of men to protect them; when really the message should be women's pride at how far they have come: That now even theiving scum acknowledge that women now have sufficient resources to start being victims of muggings like equals of men rather than excluded from that role in society? & that they are no longer just objectified sexually-- but seen instead as men are seen; seen as resour…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 04:21 AM
7

I know you implied it but worth stating bluntly--the "old code of the streets" has to do with the old lack of women & children having funds of their own, not just a supposed sense of "honor among theives"...
/r/MensRights05/02/14 04:12 AM
4

And for those reasons I'd say get a lawyer & draft a document that makes a clear message with the following gist: This information will be divulged & and this transgression will not occur again; if these terms are not met I have every intention of organizing, along with other single parents a media package (& assuming the lawyer feels you'd have a case at all) litigous recourse.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:22 AM
7

Nor watched amateur porn...?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:07 AM
1

I asked you to stop harassing me. Please stop harassing me.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 01:34 PM
1

(The questions were rhetorical; the rest serious; you refuse to have a rational discussion, refuse to hear sides other than your own except to manipulate & misconstrue & in several cases just lie. So: ) please leave me alone.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 01:28 PM
1

So you deny children turn into adults? Or that children can be female? Oh wait you ALREADY CONCEEDED REFUSAL TO HAVR INTELLIGENY RATIONAL DISCUSSION ON THIS THREAD & DECIDE YOU ARE F-ING GOD... GO BEAT THE DEAD HORSE OF PROVING HOW MUCH OF A HYPOCRITICAL WASTE OF EVOLUTION'S EFFORTS ON SOMEBODY ELSE'S POSTS AND STOP REPEATING YOURSELF TO ME LIKE A RAPIST WHO REFUSES TO TAKE "PLEASE STOP PLEASE JUST LEAVE ME ALONE: I DON'T LIKE YOU" DEMANDS. (Edit typos, & sorry bout the caps but not retyping & w…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 01:25 PM
1

(Which is less awful than "I happened to be recording when on the call; after discovering what the call was about I got a degree of relief in finding it had actually documented the conversation, and so I preserved that portion of the audio"... or some similar version of events still keeping things entirely accurate... if pressed better to be honest & admit IF you intentionally recorded it.. if pressed..--as at that point expressing emotion & a slight illogic of "I thought I might get sent to jai…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:50 AM
1

Actually--scratch requesting records; as that opens yours to question... and yours includes this post wherein you volunteer having audio recorded without getting consent: which could rightly be taken to imply you generally see consent to things others may feel are violations as optional
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:30 AM
3

As stated we are not lawyers (tho some redditors are... maybe there is an "asklwyers" sub, if there isn't there should be)... From what I have read --it seems in educational institutions they rarely if at all allow lawyers to represent the accused; more likely you are allowed to confer with one as whatever is brought before that panel may be subject to examination under judicial review (ie if charges are pressed in a court etc..) Apart from that the main piece of advice I have seen on these matt…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:15 AM
1

Many fathers in the world – from south London to the Swat valley – have never, it was noted, had that experience, perhaps because the dangers of such love for traditional power structures meant that holding a baby remained an unmanly taboo. More like perhaps because many fathers are denied parental rights or unaware they have offspring at all?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:41 AM
1

... from amateur whats? "Rape-peventers"?...
/r/MensRights03/02/14 03:28 AM
1

Which you keep stating & refusing to intelligently discuss except as an absolute. So you conceed your unwillingness to have an intelligent rational discourse in this thread. Close enough. Hope you don't have kids... if you sonic hopenthey cannfigure out how to be safe on their own I guess..
/r/MensRights03/02/14 03:26 AM
1

If you are so determined to have an interaction these are my terms: I would request that you allow me to pose several serious, not to be misrepresented nor misconstrued, simple yes or no questions to which you only respond with yes or no before proceeding any further--would you agree to that?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 03:18 AM
1

Actually I jumped into the thread responding to you because I thought reframing what someone else was trying to express might get their point accross to you if framed differently, but you seem to (un?)intentionally misconstrue everything you respond to so I am not mocking you and am being entirely serious when I say: I have pretty much given up on trying to have an actual interaction with you other than to try to genuinely encourage you to seek professional help.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 03:03 AM
1

I've read about don't blame the victim thanks. Maybe once you get professional help you might be able to remove that foot lodged in your mouth ..
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:56 AM
1

Mirror match!!
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:54 AM
1

Polly want a cracker?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:47 AM
1

I did not call you a rapists. ever. Just another example of your apparent cognitive defficiencies it would seem. Sorry. I truly hope professional help does you some good & you seek some.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:47 AM
0

"Stupid analogies" look up analogy then look at your non analogy.. then seek professional help. Please. Seriously. Starting to worry that I should feel bad for upsetting someone with genuine serious cognitive issues. Have you been professionally evaluated? (Edit : replaced tested with professionally evaluated)
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:44 AM
1

Are you stuck in a 5 minute groundhogs day? & who made a false accusation? All I did was respond on the level you're responding to myself & others.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:40 AM
1

Talking to yourself.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:35 AM
1

Spoken like a true rapists.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:31 AM
1

Ok... i'm not gonna respond to every further post you reply to mine with "spoken like a true rapist", even though seeing as how rapists are just people who may also in some cases have such ridiculous lacks of respect for intelligent discourse as has been demonstrated by you--even though such comments would be perfectly valid & better reasoned & less misrepresentative of that to which i was responding than pretty much anything i've yet to see you post. But I might to SOME... Enjoy.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:29 AM
1

Accuses people of being know it alls, berates them for it & for unsolicited advice;; claims to be the absolute authority, beats the dead horse's already powdered bones with his unsolicited opinion about the invalidity of any input on a valid subject without presenting logic nor reason in arguments for why the subject is none of mensrights cncern.. just keeps repeating, advising ... then, after people get sick of responding in ways that directly reasonably & logically, thouroughly address bossy a…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:16 AM
0

Yea ok troll. Given that you're the only commenter coming accross as a know it all & you're offering your "unsolicited advice", and not taking the easy opportunity to prove your claims of non-trollness: we all get what you are saying, we also get that you're either a troll or beyond obtuse... no more point in you further accusing people who advise caution of being victim blamers. We got the message. And we would like to be able to block your repeated calls back. You said your piece, got your int…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 11:19 PM
-1

No, my analogy suggests EVEN YOU would say SOME VICTIMS "COLLOQUIALLY" "ask for it" ... some=\= all. SOME TRAUMA SURVIVORS--wrestle with self blame... boo fucking hoo so let's baby EVERYONEN as they are in that boat & thus need to be sheltered at the expense of those who could potentially avoid being victimized alltogether cause fuck them right? AND AS I POINTED OUT ALREADY YOU ARE IN /MR. IF YOU HAVE DONE YOUR HOMEWORK YOU FUCKING GODDAMN BLOODY WELL KNOW MEN ARE JUST AS MUCH VICTIMS OF RAPE (N…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:56 PM
0

Men get raped. You are trolling. Troll harder Sis
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:30 PM
1

Dude you took an analogy that amounts to "be careful, as carelessness can be at varying degrees tantamount to creating a target on yourself as a victim (just the sign example) " & turned it into "if anything ever fucking happens to anyone ever you think it must be their fault because you are saying rape or theft is always their fault because they asked for it because you used an example that was over the top so that is how you see every case of everything --straw man red pill now answer me my qu…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:29 PM
1

Possibly not ... oy
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:22 PM
2

Ummm in so far as how people use language? Fuck yea?!
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:21 PM
0

No. You are trolling. You misrepresent posts you respond to, put words in other's moths etc. Like if I said some apples are bad going by your replies you would accuse me of saying all fruit is always bad--if I say some victims--of theft--need to take responsibility for their actions, and victim-blame to that degree it does not mean that all are in THAT boat.. same with rape. Obviously. Ergo: you are trolling.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:20 PM
-1

not that rape prevention tipstering has anything to do with mens rights in the first place. Clearly a troll -anyone who knows anything about MR knows men are just as much victims of rape. Troll using "manipulation" in each post to non-violently troll: busted.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:14 PM
0

Forget it; "TRPACC" is trolling. Presumable not his or her only "***ACC"
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:10 PM
1

Wait: I only said asking to get robbed in my subtle examples; with exaggerated example you victim blamed & called the first example of someone who may be traumatized by a form of victimization for enjoying their valid rights & freedoms "asking for it", so you feel if someonen flaunts what they know people want & acts irresponsible by not applying a reasonable degree of caution they are asking for it--but you wanna troll so hard you're tripping over your own trolling, while neglecting to respond …
/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:05 PM
1

Oh but now ur victim blaming!! If I wanna slut-walk & have the right to go to any area of Manhattan topless at any time of day at any level of inhebriated vulnerability---it's an exaggerated example, in case "money sticking out of pocket or left on windowsill="asking to get robbed"(colloquial) would make for too subtle an example of the principle
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:40 PM
1

Him-he is trpacc, tho ur the one it's intended to save time n effort
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:37 PM
1

Let me help here: does anyone "ask to get robbed"? Like if a 5 foot nothing hundred pound white guy strolls thru Harlem dressed to the 9s with money sticking out pockets & two iphones & bling, & is clearly super drunk & passes out on a bench at 2 or 3am then can you get the point & drop your trollade trpacc?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:31 PM
8

Shitty analogy insofar "teach tiger cubs not to be tigers" implies when a boy (tiger cub) becomes an adult male he naturally becomes an "attacker" (tiger)... but I get your intended point
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:25 PM
2

He could just be really hot or gay..
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:06 PM
3

Watch a movie or some tv series or youtube vids from this century please centered on high schoolers or college (age) peoples before taking such a derisive tone please.. to name a few: the inbetweeners, misfits, the guild,--what ami talking about this century? They even saidit in clueless didn't they? & sixteen candles? Breakfast club? Are you people who don't know just not into comedy on top of not socialozing woth people 35 or under, or just living under rocks?--i'm being lighthearted of course…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:01 PM
-1

Not true feminist only believe that when the feeling aren't reciprocated (or in the case of male feminists when perceived as potential competition)
/r/MensRights02/02/14 08:53 PM
0

I would very much like if you would start a thread making the same suggestion (perhaps suggesting more hosts etc than tumblr, preferably linking or requesting link info for those you suggested be contacted?) (Edited: typo)
/r/MensRights02/02/14 06:51 PM
1

Hm..-accusing the victims of oppression of being as bad as their oppressors for trying to counter suffering further discrimination-form-oppression.. brillliant the whole implying I said anything about lumpingnwomen together when I was careful to only say feminist-sympathizers & "feminists" (even using quotes to emphasize i mean those calling themselves feminists who equality-minded feminists would decry..), and never even made a claim that femists need be women....etc. you're the one doing the l…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:54 PM
1

"due to what feminists claim is patriarchy & further claim about said paitiarchy myth" you mean? --if so then yea..
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:33 PM
1

Ps nice job sidestepping the way my analogy blew a huge fucking crater in your claims of progressiveness... let's offer every white male the Ceo jobs first in the name of progress for the needy & let the other demographics fight that whilewe say we're doing it in the name of progress & equality & tell them they're all oppressors & as bad as white supremist patriarchs, shall we?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:21 PM
2

Ohhhhh I get it you're justunaware how that goes.. here: Anyone: yes, that's great, but you need to include men too', Feminist-sympathizer:Your comment has been deleted manspainer. Man up. Shut up. Stop trying to oppress us by sabotaging our progress towards what we tell everyone is for equality by daring to claim it should apply to you too--rspecially when the system needs to address issues you face in this regard way more than those of our group--whoops wait I mean "because patriarchy oppresse…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:16 PM
2

*One--you realize we are discussing this in r/MENSRIGHTS, right? What you just suggested we do is what we fucking do. *TWO--SO YOU ARE CONCEEDING FEMINSM IS ABOUT WOMEN'S ISSUES NOT EQUALITY; IE GYNOCENTRICITY? *THREE-- if I say "many white men earn so little they struggle to get by: we need to make sure all white men are considered for any higher paid executive positions" does the anti-logic to your reaches for justification of putting a specific gender on any issue, (especially an issue in whi…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 04:54 PM
1

Right "shill"; a system oppressing men with higher conviction rates & harsher sentencing than for women as institionalized oppression totally wouldn't make anyone wtf if genders were reversed & men were proposing that since so few men are ever convicted to begin with, & since so many of them who are convicted get such ridiculously light sentences (compated to female counterparts' sentences upon conviction for equal crimes), that it would be more productive for everyone to focus efforts on gettin…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:45 PM
1

(And must add to your bracketed stuff the missing analysis of "less convictions=\= less crimes committed"...&MANY feminists take the attitude that it should be applied across the board; look at OP link.).
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:31 PM
1

--if your edit of adding "strikethrough" to your completely wrong portion was intended to retract it I'm also glad to retract my degree of patronizing tone etc
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:27 PM
1

Ohhhg I get it; you're just blind to real statistical data & furthering institutionalized gender disparity that already exists. Gotcha. No worries then. Best of luck with that.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:21 PM
1

But... then logic says their approach should be "we should be imprisoning women AT LEAST 12 months if at all" or "no prison for anyone". Specifying a gender should get more considerations, because they already make up the majority of those who get more considerations is a ridiculous lack of reasoning. And i'll reiterate the real "imbalance" hurts men more than women, so how does that "imbalance" justify this idea as furthering equality?-- or are we not bothering to pretend feminism is about equa…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:05 PM
0

Oh! While we are looking at other activity of posters to invalidate anything they might have to say how about this little Gem, posted within the same hour as you made this comment to which I am posting this reply: Red_Not_Dead 7 hours ago-This is why all men need to be locked up and farmed for semen. BUSTED!!!!
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:34 PM
1

Can we agree that there are different degrees of "rich"?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:47 PM
2

Yes it does invalidate it. Are you being obtuse or are you actually as the name suggests a shill? --By "the imbalance" do you mean the way men are more likely to be convicted of same crime with the same evidence? Or how in the cases where women are convicted they already get far lighter sentences when convicted of the same crimes? Cause there certainly is an imbalance--but not one that justifies that stance, even as a knee-jerk reaction...
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:43 PM
3

I invite you to suggest wording that addresses the same concerns but is likely to receive a response
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:33 PM
13

Sent them this query
/r/MensRights02/02/14 04:44 AM
26

Many do work other ( or as you say "real") jobs, just as many musicians, artists, comics, actors, performers in general etc do. Check your tone. Edited this line for you for accuracy: Most HUMANS live off of somebody else's money for years until ANYTHING starts paying back.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:01 PM
1

Agree to disagree: a lot of voters & "community-minded" people back the idea of responsible decisions, including more abortions... as long as the women want them... unless women want something else... because patriarchy...
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:42 PM
2

A-it's called unemployment / welfare /tax breaks for multiple dependant offspring etc etc etc--in short the state, from a fiscal standpoint, does act as a surrogate parent to a(n albeit limited) degree.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:38 PM
3

Ty to whoever banned & deleted that "sheep in wolf's clothing" so to speak...--screenshot for those who may be curious about the presumably feminist poster trying to look like "another bad egg from MR"
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:30 PM
9

Your point about cultures & subcultures & Japanese manga etc also makes a nice opportunity to chime in about how the writer gets all racist claiming it's a largely whitemale thing--nevermind east Asia or anything.... right... not a bigger, more (or at least as much) towards the Nerdy fantasy end of the spectrum population.. nahhhhh... And this is totally a new phenomenon: ancient Greece never had stories about characters like Hercules, nor did any culture have anything like that right? (Please n…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:14 PM
1

haha stupid femnazi dogs. fuck women men for life #1 Posts like this make us look bad; please don't act like a gender-reversed feminist. Especially not in this sub. Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 01:59 PM
6

Please remind me if you ever see me with reddit gold or such to give you some for that comment. Only one part with which I disagree; it was not long nor rambling, but rather poignant & astute. Thank you for posting it. (Edited to fix missing spacese)
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:57 AM
4

Dancingis 100% right on all points. You are acting like a troll OP. I'm curious: do you havesex with male partners & have a preference in that regard as motivation behind your shall we say "zeal" (to put it kindly)?[serious]{really, asking seriously as the majority of anticircumcision proponents who haven't suffered a complication tend to coincidentally have sexual predeliction for the types of penises they are trying to mandate}
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:50 AM
1

See the thing is people self-define as feminists.. and the vast majority, or maybe the more voiced ones, who self-define as such fall closer to anti-male... and the rest blindly support their loud stuff you seem soooo upset by--well, upset by when shoes are on other feet.. I know when a religious extremist goes all death to the infidels the people that represent the core non extreme values often decry those douches. Such is not the case with feminism. Such IS the case with MRAs, but because of t…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:54 AM
1

Also: they self-define as feminist right? & they realize there are feminists who go to the extreme like say women on the view cackling over the idea of men having their genitals removed for purposes of revenge? Yet you're gonna come in on a high horse for them like some brainwashed white knight cause they "support men"-- while calling themselves feminist--and out the other side of your mouth disparage any value to men's rights based on your perception of the very real & justified (edit for accur…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:20 AM
1

Gotta Lol a bit at the whole not wanting to turn on the light excuse: shift the genders again--if the seat or lid is down & a male is aiming in the dark I think we can expect a good amount of urine not reaching the bowl. (Let's be honest, even with the seat & lid up that's a pretty risky move unless you really know the place & have good aim / consistent streams etc)
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:02 AM
-1

Remind me if I ever get reddit gold or stuff like that to give you some. THAT is the state of affairs in a cut-off nutshell
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter