| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Need Advise Please.Not required. Everyone always gets wrapped up around that. Unless there's a court order in place stating that one parent MUST have custody at a certain time, there is no criminal offence. It must be specific, too. Exact days (April 14th) as opposed to 50%. And even if it has those specific days, unless the order specifically states in Police Enforceable (less than 10% do), it might as well be written in crayon. I'm not agreeing with the mother here. Far from it. I think it's all sorts of scummy.… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 10:59 PM |
| -1 | Need Advise Please.See above. This is not kidnapping. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 10:45 PM |
| -1 | Need Advise Please.You, uh, you should actually read that.. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 08:31 PM |
| -1 | Need Advise Please.Criminal Code of Canada Section 279. Kidnapping (1) Every person commits an offence who kidnaps a person with intent (a) to cause the person to be confined or imprisoned against the person’s will; (b) to cause the person to be unlawfully sent or transported out of Canada against the person’s will; or (c) to hold the person for ransom or to service against the person’s will. None of these apply. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 08:06 PM |
| -2 | Need Advise Please.Ah. The random internet law act of 2013. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 08:02 PM |
| -2 | Need Advise Please.Yeah? What law is she breaking? Be specific. Show your work. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 07:46 PM |
| -2 | Need Advise Please.Incorrect. This is dealt with on a case by case basis. No criminal offence has occurred. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 04:54 PM |
| -2 | Need Advise Please.I doubt the police would even take a report. No criminal offence has occurred. While slimy as all fuck, a mother taking her own kids somewhere is not a crime. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 04:53 PM |
| 1 | I'm all for co-ed sports, but this is ridiculous.Some of the toughest warriors I've met we're women. That being said, so were the worst.. | /r/MensRights | 29/08/13 06:09 AM |
| 0 | I've heard about it, but it finally happened to me."Uh, hey man. Someone said you've hassling kids? Have.. Have you been" "No. Just sitting here." "Cool. See ya later. Have a crime free day!" | /r/MensRights | 24/08/13 01:17 AM |
| 0 | I've heard about it, but it finally happened to me.Not towing the party line or anything. I've seen a lot of people sewer themselves by not talking to us. Providing a reasonable and likely statement can save you a ton of hassle. Now, that being said, I work in Canada. Ontario to be specific. My knowledge on American policy is limited. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/13 12:04 AM |
| -1 | I've heard about it, but it finally happened to me.No. They can't act on just sketchy. But suspicious circumstances following an independent witness (credibility of the witness is admittedly questionable), provides grounds for investigative detention and depending on your location, arrest. Talk to cops. It might save you. Just don't be stupid. Don't admit guilt. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/13 03:13 PM |
| 0 | I've heard about it, but it finally happened to me.It seems to me as yes, he was being detained. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/13 03:10 PM |
| 0 | I've heard about it, but it finally happened to me.Terrible advice. "Officer. I saw the man on the swings harassing children" Witness testimony provides reasonable and probable grounds. Saying nothing is sketchy as fuck. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/13 06:13 AM |
| 10 | I've heard about it, but it finally happened to me.Cop here / MRA here. We don't get to pick. We're told to go, and we go. Usually with incorrect or incomplete information. Actions on scene are up to us. It sounds like this guy did ok. Asked a few questions. Can tell his boss there's no issue. No stupid arrests or charges. Everyone goes home, albeit minorly annoyed. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/13 06:06 AM |
| 2 | Is this a men's rights issue? I suggest: yes.Correct me if I'm mistaken, but I do believe the article was stating that this new law makes it illegal to be homosexual. I don't ever recall it mentioning a law in which children MUST be indoctrinated to gay sex and anal fisting.. Maybe I missed that part, though | /r/MensRights | 22/07/13 01:46 PM |
| 3 | Is this a men's rights issue? I suggest: yes.It's a HUMAN rights issue | /r/MensRights | 21/07/13 06:09 PM |
| 3 | I'm being harassed by radical feminists what should I do?Fire. Lots of it. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/13 04:49 PM |
| 5 | Happened at my son's school (8th grade)You can still report if its not your son. You have reasonable and probable grounds a criminal offence occurred. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/13 09:35 AM |
| 1 | I forgot that my only reason for being on Earth was to protect women.In that photo, none of the rifles are loaded. Just sayin.. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/13 06:09 PM |
| 3 | So this is equalityIn Canada Sexual Intercourse is defined as any penetration. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/12 09:16 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter