TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

botchedrobbery Archive

View 16 posts and 152 comments by botchedrobbery on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 04:05 PM
10

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 05:56 PM
7

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 09:56 PM
7

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 05:59 PM
6

Question for BluePillbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 01:11 AM
5

Q4Menbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 12:04 AM
4

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 09:30 PM
3

botchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 01:59 AM
3

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:19 AM
2

Question for RedPillbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 06:16 AM
2

Question for RedPillbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:44 AM
2

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 06:52 AM
2

botchedrobbery/r/askTRP28/09/16 03:41 AM
2

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 01:22 AM
1

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 03:52 PM
0

Discussionbotchedrobbery/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 01:24 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If we are analyzing individual woman, these are different guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 01:59 AM
1

I"ll ask another way: 1) are there other categories of human interaction besides sexual partners and platonic relationships; and 2) is it possible that's what he's looking for?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 06:27 AM
1

Ok. How does that address my question?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 06:20 AM
1

These are not the same guys. Some guys want sex quick and easy. Some guys want a woman with a smaller partner number. Women like you conflate them due to lack of vetting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 05:26 AM
1

Does he only have to be referring to sexual partners or platonic relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 05:18 AM
1

There are men, despite being short, that still get women and they are not even outliers How do you know they are not outliers?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 04:00 AM
1

He never mentioned getting laid though. Why did you mention pussy?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 03:57 AM
1

What I have found is that these girls think being smart is some kind of trump card. Its what they bring to the table and don't try to develop any other skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 11:02 PM
1

In other words you don't know. Thanks for clearing that up...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 03:06 AM
1

Spoken like a true blue piller...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 02:36 AM
1

Its not night time where I am...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 02:36 AM
1

Which partner is and isn't comfortable with how their SO is interacting with a stripper?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 02:32 AM
1

How would you know that?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 02:27 AM
1

Never said that either. You just don't seem to be keeping up with the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 02:27 AM
1

Where I did say the question was off topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 02:17 AM
1

Thanks for admitting the answer was off topic, pointless, and useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 02:10 AM
1

Right. So you've never seen a woman touch or interact with a male stripper in any way that their partner was not expecting and comfortable with?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 02:01 AM
1

But that doesn't matter. The question is conceptual and abstract. If she doesn't want to answer thats fine, but to pull a bait and switch like that is dishonest. If we wanted to know her experience, we could ask for that. But when we consider that this response was used to contradict the stripper in the OP, the response is not just dishonest but absurd. She is basically saying, "this stripper is lying because me and my friends laughed at all the strippers we partied with." That does not address …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 01:58 AM
1

This is going to go over your head but... The original question asked about why women, generally, want male strippers at their parties. The response was based off the reaction of a small group of people. That does not answer the question the OP asked nor does rule out the premise of the OP's argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 12:49 AM
1

Answering a question and answering a question with relevant information to the question asked are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 12:43 AM
1

Did you? I think you obfuscated but maybe I'm reading you wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 10:15 PM
1

Discussed OR assumed As they say in the legal world, we will just have to let the finder of fact figure out what that means.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:45 PM
1

Is it discussed? Or is it assumed? These are not the same things. So that's true of you, is that true of all your friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:38 PM
1

Humans do aberrant sexual things at a very low rate We are talking about a fairly narrow issue. You are trying to broaden this discussion to things no one else is talking about. You just said you don't know how "rare" it is. Can you at least define rare?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:32 PM
1

So how do you know it's rare? Light touching? If this light touching was done by women in some form of a relationship, did the partner know this light touching occurred?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:31 PM
1

I'll just say, this is why I don't take a lot of what you're saying credible. Dead people? What does that have to do with anything? Its just a deflection.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:24 PM
1

How rare?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:21 PM
1

No one is saying it is super common. But does it happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:17 PM
1

That's my point. You're not giving serious answers to anything anyone is saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:16 PM
1

I didn't ask that. And frankly, I don't see how that precludes the possibility of sleeping with him and I'm not sure each and every woman in the world would agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:11 PM
1

So what? No is saying otherwise. You just pulled that out of nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:08 PM
1

You're coming off as deliberately obtuse and overly sensitive. Or you're just trying to deflect on the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:07 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:04 PM
1

Why are you arguing this way?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:56 PM
1

What is this post trying to say?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:55 PM
1

You're so confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:49 PM
1

My credibility is not at issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:49 PM
1

Personal testimony counts as data.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:43 PM
1

most are saying there wasn't even a stripper there Ok.... We are talking about parties with male strippers. I'm not sure how saying you've been to parties with no male strippers means you are a credible source on parties with male strippers.... We are talking about the credibility of this stripper. Nothing you stated here speaks to that. I'm not sure why you responding to me. What points are you agreeing or disagreeing with?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:40 PM
2

That's an odd of looking it. Another is: We have one guy who has no reason to lie because he has nothing to gain or lose from being honest and makes a living going to bachelorette parties. He clearly has a lot of data to call on. On the other, we have a "dozens" of women who went to a few parties. Maybe they saw the movements of each and every individual at the party and were of sound mind (no consumption of alcohol) the entire time. Assuming that level of attention to detail, the stripper still…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:33 PM
2

The last sentence is a little strange and I'm not sure what you're getting at. Are you saying this is impossible for a woman to cheat right before getting married? Have you been to as many bachlorette parties as the stripper in the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:10 PM
2

How did you manage to keep track of each and every individual during these parties? Is it possible you were not aware of everything that happened at these parties?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:03 PM
3

There is no way to prevent women from doing this. You're either ok with this, or not, and therefore should not date.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 07:59 PM
1

You're talking about relationships. Hypergamy, allegedly, concerns relationships and casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 04:04 PM
2

Do you have any other studies that demonstrate this? A man losing his job is the most likely predictor of divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 03:58 PM
1

Guys cannot just decide to get pregnant though. Men need help doing that. So the question is, do women want to help them in this regard? The answer is, it depends.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 03:52 PM
6

These hoes ain't loyal. You therefore have two options: stick with them anyway or play their game.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:27 PM
2

Stats, the player's lives You can't just lump these two things in together like they are the same thing. These websites are trying to attract women. These websites did not cover this crap years ago. They want to grow their market share by turning into telenovelas.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 08:50 PM
2

No we don't. We just don't. I've never read TMZ in my life. I didn't know Pippen was married.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 08:44 PM
1

My question is for men who prefer that lifestyle, is she within her right to branch swing at will at the slightest chance of a better offer I love how TBP presents this question as if it matters how guys feel about it. Women are going to do what they want to do. You can be the most dutiful and faithful husband in the world. Scottie Pippen and his wife are divorcing after 19 years and 4 kids because she allegedly fucked Future. This Scottie Pippen thing is odd. How do you know this is not her fir…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 08:28 PM
1

I think I'd be dealing with some kind of left wing utopian. Frankly, I'd be scared of being myself around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 06:45 PM
1

Its still more than guys though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 02:28 PM
1

Nope, its costs money to keep them unpregnant too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 01:43 PM
1

A lot of reasons I guess. The reason most commonly cited is that you can get pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 11:36 AM
3

Because people are people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 03:07 AM
3

If I understand your question, yes. Or more precisely, it was possible for one to have nothing to do with the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:59 PM
4

What I have found (anecdotally), is that women do not instinctively understand the compartmentalization here. In her mind, sex is a shared emotional experience, therefore I'm having shared emotional experiences with other people. Which also cheapens or invalidates the shared experiences we have as a couple. Even when I read women in open relationships, many operate on this same premise: sex is an emotional experience. They just react a little differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:58 PM
3

The thing I could never find the words to explain was that the other girls were not contingent on her doing or not doing something. I wasn't unsatisfied with her, I just wanted something else at the time. Frankly, I think I wanted sex without the intimacy and because of our relationship, I could not have that with my gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:50 PM
2

I guess we have a new category.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:46 PM
2

I've done this before. The way I looked at was: With my main gf, I wanted a shared experience. With the plates, I wanted a personal sensation. Women, unfortunately, do not think this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:44 PM
1

I'm totally kidding about that. I thought you were saying you drink a lot of wine. On a serious note, the distinction to me is part geography, part class, part industry, and probably a fewer other things. Since you're a blooper with a law degree, I would say you are probably a wine lib.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:27 PM
1

No, we just call people like you alcoholics.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:19 PM
3

Yea. I think about it like, coasts vs heartland. Blue collar vs knowledge economy. I think about like this: Michael Moore, especially back in the day, beer liberal. Ezra Klein, wine liberal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:18 PM
2

I imagine them to have a conventional look and be engaged more or less conventional activities in public. I think they're mostly liberal, but wine liberals, not beer liberals. Probably currently upper middle class and white.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:04 PM
1

Mischaracterize what?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 09:06 PM
1

Good try what? I explained this to you already.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 09:02 PM
1

Why are you still responding? We have already settled you were talking about something no other person was discussing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 09:00 PM
1

Nothing about "insurers should/shouldn't have to cover contraception" screams an underlying belief for or against the so called "pink tax." Of course not. Not on its face at least. You were only commenting on part of my claim. It was necessary because it demonstrated the hypocrisy of the pink tax crowd. Nothing about "insurers should/shouldn't have to cover contraception" screams an underlying belief for or against the so called "pink tax." Again, of course not, or at least not on its face. But …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:45 PM
1

Pink taxes have nothing to do with taxpayers? I get what you're saying, but if you're not talking about the pink tax, I don't get why you're here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 07:14 PM
1

Taxing the poor people less (ideally) results in less poverty and less reliance on social services. When did we change the topic to poor people? I still don't see how you've managed to weasel out of your original claim here though. That's because you never bothered to actually read it. I would be for this on two conditions: First, it can be shown the amount of taxes paid by the genders is roughly equal. Second, Obamacare gets rid of the contraception mandate. This is the first thing I wrote here…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:29 PM
1

This is taxpayer-funded but no-one complains, because avoiding unwanted pregnancies means more productive, taxpaying women in the workforce, and less financial pressure on men Is that italics part true? Is anything in this stated here true? Furthermore, the government does not cover condoms that men buy. But even more fundamental, the purpose of the current scheme is to make the birth control cheaper for women. That's the rationale.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:04 PM
1

That's not the argument. The argument is that this tax helps fund critical government services. Ironically, the people here saying, "but what about the poor?!?!?!?!" Are the same people saying get rid of the tax. I'm just here to expose the hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:57 PM
1

I'm not talking about separate topic. I'm demonstrating the consequences of the OP'a argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:56 PM
1

so what? You're not even dealing with the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:36 PM
1

We're talking about this so called pink tax. If you don't want to do that, you should do something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:09 PM
1

How is Medicaid funded? How is any government program funded? This is about draining the government of funds. But you're also here with this sob story about unplanned pregnancies and the need for government to do something. So on one hand, you want to cut a government's source of revenue, on other hand we all need to pony up for your life style choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:40 AM
1

Unplanned pregnancies are a hell of lot more expensive than birth control, not to mention bringing in the world another child on Medicaid. At yet this whole OP is about cutting funding to all sorts of programs that help with unplanned pregnancies.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:28 AM
1

Why do I have think of that? I support humans going to Europa, do I have to write the code that gets us there too?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 06:11 AM
1

Feeding a kid, educating, clothing and taking them to the dr costs much more than this So we agree, fuck the kids you were talking about earlier, and lets focus on making more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:45 AM
1

Aren't you? Isn't that what this OP is all about?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:38 AM
1

What programs? If you meant cutting the government programs, that was a hypothetical. I'm referring to the OP. Because your tax dollars pay for the prison systems and right now, it's one of our biggest tax drains. And that's one tax you cannot get out of paying. OP does not seem to understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:29 AM
1

Prevention is ALWAYS cheaper than intervention. Yet here you are, advocating putting less money into these programs. So now we have these vulnerable people, no help for them, well what do you think will happen? You don't care, why should I?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:22 AM
1

I know this is patriarchy, but what if we all just did what we afforded. Its not fault you had a kid. I think its completely hypocritical for you to want to pay fewer taxes while also saying there are all these programs that need funding. This kind of reasoning is how you get a redpill and MRA movement to begin with. More people supporting your lifestyle, with you fighting to contribute less. Think of all the starving children you'll be starving by ending your pink tax. Sorry, I forgot, only men…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:15 AM
1

What about contraception used for medical purposes? That's not the rationale we were given for why should cover them. It found that a national mass media campaign that would cost $100 million would result in about $431 million in savings to taxpayers, largely by reducing unintended pregnancy, particularly among people who don't make much money. My response to this is basically, fuck it. No one says we have to spend the money in either scenario. Returning the pink tax, why would you opposed to yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 05:10 AM
1

I completely agree, let those two people share the cost. Why should some guy who never met them share the cost? Furthermore, why doesn't your argument hold for vasectomies? Lastly, what about gay men?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:23 AM
1

Its complicated but: We have a private insurance system here. Women are more expensive to insure. Obamacare seeks to eliminate that discrepancy by forcing men to essentially cover the cost of contraception for women. Vasectomies are not covered. We need this system abolished.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 04:11 AM
1

I would be for this on two conditions: First, it can be shown the amount of taxes paid by the genders is roughly equal. Second, Obamacare gets rid of the contraception mandate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 03:56 AM
4

I've had a few female roommates. Those specific women talked like this. The guy whose gf was fat, must have a small dick. The girl who dated socially awkward freak, the guy must be good in bed, or rich, or she must be insecure. And so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 03:19 AM
5

That's depressing....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 03:10 AM
1

Did he smash?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 03:09 AM
1

All women are shallow sometimes. All women are bitchy sometimes. Therefore, works on all women, but only some of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 08:15 PM
2

How are you going to raise daughters if you see nothing good in women? what if they don't have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 07:41 PM
1

I'm relate to an "artist." Handsome guy but his employment situation is always a little precarious. Never went to college but probably dated and slept with more college women than anyone. In the end, women just want to be entertained.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:16 PM
1

I'd assume who knew what kind of person she was when he married her/committed to her. He may not know of this particular instance but he knows, or should know (as in all the signs are there), that she's going to do this kind of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 08:28 AM
1

I don't think that follows. Maybe your interactions with women can be better. Maybe you can be a happier person.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 10:03 PM
1

I think the answer they would use is that, some people, no matter what they do, can never escape Incel-dom.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 09:20 PM
1

Fail how? What do you mean by fail? "Improvement" is not a zero sum game.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 09:12 PM
0

Technically they say men are the gatekeepers of relationships, and women are the gatekeepers of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 08:49 PM
1

Would you suggest someone, reasonable person, assume the legal rights and duties of being married?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 08:42 PM
3

I don't think they mean this literally. I think what they are saying is that small population of men dominate in the dating market/sexual market. As far of as "improvement" I never seen a TRP thread that says you can sleep with Beyonce. I think they are saying you improve on your own potential, which is inherently limited.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 08:33 PM
1

Simply as a contract, would you suggest someone enter into such a marriage contract?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 08:27 PM
0

How do you know that's the case? Could it be many of these people want to get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 08:19 PM
3

Someone comes to you with a marriage contract and says, "should I enter into one of these?" What's your answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 08:15 PM
1

Do we know why this is?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 08:13 PM
3

He didn't admit this. He wrote this in a journal where he admitted he was molested and took a lot of his anger out on his wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 01:27 AM
1

I've had girls say, "oh my god that was great!" only later to tell me it was not a big deal. One gf told her friends I "banged her so good" that they started making fun of me. She never said much to me. What should I believe, after a while I just stopped trying to figure what was real.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 06:07 AM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 03:41 PM
1

Gf went abroad on a class trip, she hooked with another student. The thing that got me though, was that months later I met with a professor who went on the trip also. I coincidentally needed recommendation from this professor for some post college pursuits. We made small talk before he brought up the trip and sort of grinned at me for a moment. I remember realizing he knew what happened and that I was a loser. I'm not interested in being publically humiliated again.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 05:59 AM
3

You're essentially saying, "you're entire life experience is wrong."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 01:43 AM
1

I think reading stuff like this is corrosive for every involved. You don't really know what causes these people to suffer. I think its a bit strange that you'd tell these people you know what is best for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 01:39 AM
1

I disagree with everything you stated here. From your charaxterizations of what I said to your premise. Not a single thing you stated is accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 03:31 AM
1

I still don't think that's the case. Just because women here care (or say they do) does not mean "all" women do. If you want to extrapolate to a handful of posters to all women, that's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 03:05 AM
2

Ok. Why is that different from guys who don't want to date a girl with a certain number of sexual partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 09:15 PM
3

I think we as a society need to accept that because there may be obvious consequences of that belief. Maybe these people are difficult to work with or are less ambitious. Maybe these people do not conventional political views. Maybe these people are difficult or confusing to live near. In other words, they are not the problem, society's reaction to them is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 09:14 PM
2

Is that your opinion? What is different from that reasoning to, "she got gangbanged by her college baseball team, yuck."(?)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 09:04 PM
1

Can you give me any reason you would this is a big deal to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 08:52 PM
1

Why do you think that sub is a representative sample of the population?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 08:48 PM
2

I mean withholding from her sexually. I actually don't think most adults care about seeing prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 08:45 PM
1

Is he withholding from her in any way? As to your last question, because many people don't think that way. Don't like it, find someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 08:33 PM
2

This is completely random but is your husband a lawyer too?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 10:08 PM
2

Of course you do. But if you had to pick one. Don't worry its not binding.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 09:39 PM
2

Women can come as they please. I agree with you but a monogamous relationship takes two to tango. Women initiate 2/3 of divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 02:37 PM
1

I think people can depend on institutions less. Marriage, higher ed, a factory job, etc. Whether its true or not, jobs seem to be more scarce, education carries less of a guarantee of stability, the ability to create a stable and loving family feels more elusive for more people. TRP is like the gospel of prosperity. Its based on a kind of faith that is internally self promoting. It's not so much an answer to problem that the institution is not working, but an attempt to create a new institution.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 04:16 AM
3

The premise in their argument is that she settles down with someone she would never have banged when she was younger and hotter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 06:03 AM
1

I'm holding you higher regard than that. You made claims, you stand to them. Qualifying them does not let you off the hook.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:41 PM
1

But you said a lot more than "I don't think so." You ran off a number of preferences and biases for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:34 PM
1

Is it? She's trying to speak for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:29 PM
1

You must be a chick...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 06:16 AM
1

Have seen some of these people? Many are not in their 20s anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 06:13 AM
1

What it be too much to say you mean they should seek social approval?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:58 AM
3

What makes you think your experience is analogous to the people you're talking about? My impression is that these aren't just 15 year olds who are confused. These are people well into their adult years.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:57 AM
1

What do you mean by cool?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:53 AM
1

I've actually had that happen to me a few times.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:52 AM
2

If a man with no arms or legs can find love, why can't an incel So you already have recognized that some people face defects that do not allow them to get along with the opposite sex. Why is it so hard to believe that for some people, this problem is insurmountable?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:51 AM
1

Is that true?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:48 AM
2

They can't help that society has conditioned them to have certain expectations and assumptions anymore than you can. Why don't you try to understand them instead of getting angry?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:46 AM
5

You still don't much about men...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:41 AM
3

They've learned over time that there are things about them that make it more likely than not that women will reject them, so they stop approaching. I know its nice to think our preferences are our preferences but there's nothing new under the sun. We have a narrow set of things we find attractive. People outside those norms suffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 01:26 AM
2

My question is, why would Gwyneth want to get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 02:08 AM
3

So, to put it another way, a business relationship has a specific purpose, therefore you have duties that tailored to that purpose. But marriage has no specific purpose or goal, therefore it would unfair or inappropriate to attach specific duties to the relationship. (?)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 02:25 AM
1

Then why do so many people cheat and leave/divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 01:58 PM
1

Are you being sarcastic?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 01:25 PM
1

I loved a girl when I was in college. By that I mean concerned for her well being ahead of mine, I thought of my future in terms of how to fit both of us into it, and I invested in her emotionally. That relationship ended ten years ago and I haven't really dated since.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 11:02 PM
2

Maybe this is a true in a civilized society...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 10:53 PM
1

The issue appears to be the deception. Many of the stories are involve the woman lying or lies of omission.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 04:40 AM
1

They define intelligence differently. I have female friend who just got out of a long term relationship with a guy with "STEM" job. She swears he was "smart." The DUI's he was convicted of, momentary lapses in judgement. He was fired. Went to an average school and wasn't a great student. She defined his smarts by what she could brag about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/16 03:35 AM
1

I think the phrasing is the issue. I treat people with respect and try to be a nice person. I think one benefit of this is that this normative behavior will allow me to live harmoniously with others. I'm not sure why this makes me a predator.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/16 02:08 PM
3

As a westerner who lived in China for a short time, I found its contradictions to be stunning. I don't mean that in a bad way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 07:53 PM
1

Is a blender a robot?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/16 01:14 AM
1

I get you, I just think the distinction is a little forced.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 06:55 PM
1

I guess my point is, a vibrator is a sexbot. We just don't think of it as a sexbot. Why? And what do we mean by sexbot? Is it something inherently bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 06:46 PM
1

How is this a loaded question?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 04:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter