TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

catipillar Archive

View 1 posts and 430 comments by catipillar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I guess I haven't seen any evidence of that.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy23/04/22 06:08 AM
1

No he doesn't?
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy23/04/22 06:08 AM
1

I like Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson. I like all people who think and debate, really, whether I agree or not I'd not consider that a red flag, however, the fact that he thought he could worn his way into your standards and change you is clearly a major problem.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/04/22 09:12 PM
30

I'm dying for a massage. My back muscles are so F-ing sore.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/04/22 06:43 AM
13

Strong agree. I didn't go to college and was successful in sales before I had kids. I plan to get back into sales as the kids are old enough. I think college is great, but only if you're entering a field where it's very important...like engineering or something. I don't plan to have my kids go right to college, either. I want them to work for a year or two, also. I think that work is an infinitely better teacher than any professor.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy08/04/22 05:30 AM
1

Thanks! :-D
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy10/10/20 12:06 PM
5

Thanks!
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy28/09/20 02:42 PM
21

Do you have a link to this? I'd love to read it.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy28/09/20 12:18 PM
-7

I don't think it will be accomplished by either, quite genuinely. Both need to be torn down and rebuilt in a way that, in my opinion, function as a limited growth, somewhat isolationist capitalist system. Isolationist because dependency on foreign oils and manufacturing have been terrible for the enviornment and terrible for our workforce. Were companies compelled to compete for labor, wages wouldn't have stagnated so. And our career politicians? That's a criminal racket which needs to be oblite…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy27/09/20 06:53 AM
9

I feel like that's what they tell you it's about, so you're anxious about the state of our social institutions. This way, you don't focus on Corporate lobbying, the purchase of our governemnt by big corporations, (domestic and abroad,) the abuse of our taxes to create a global elite, and the fact that our "parties" are two competing businesses. If i sound like I'm being condescending or dismissive, I apologize. When I hear a party talking about making the purchase of votes illegal, term limits, …
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy27/09/20 01:16 AM
6

Think of the trouble you hopefully save the next girls! If you train him to learn this behavior is not acceptable, he'll hopefully improve on the future. We all owe you a thank you.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy26/09/20 10:19 AM
2

Oh my goodness, thank you! I was howling and cringing at the same time. In any case, I don't think he said they don't get wet, I think he was just expressing confusion over the obvious hyperbole for "comdeic" purposes...but that clip was golden in it's awkwardness. Thank you.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy20/09/20 07:03 AM
17

Link to this? I'd love a chuckle.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy18/09/20 03:34 PM
7

All virgins know what they want if they see only 2 or 3 items on the menu. When they let them flip through the whole book, their selection is likely to change.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy17/09/20 11:47 AM
4

I get that this is a common belief among many people; however, I contend that a high value woman would never seek a whorey fuck boy. A whorey fuck boy isn't the sort of man that lives the values that a discerning woman seeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 09:22 AM
1

I don't disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 07:16 PM
1

Lol, that's wrong. I was so in love with a guy growing up. He did the bad guy thing...he dressed like Sid Vicious. But he also quoted Baudelaire and went to the most prestigious art school in the country. He had a freakin female fan club.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 07:11 PM
22

Women who are 16-22 want men who are cool because being "cool" is a symbol of success among that age/peer group. That's because women admire successful men. OP's point is accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 05:06 AM
309

"Yes, Johnny FuckRag, I am on my period. What is your excuse for being an emotional little force pisser? Is it your constant state?"
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy19/07/20 03:56 AM
3

Among all women that I associate with, we have all seemed to come to the unanimous consensus that experience with the opposite sex determines the standards that you deem acceptable or unacceptable. This applies to experience in your profession, experience with your children, experience with your car, experience with absolutely everything. A woman with no sexual experience has little knowledge of what she personally requires. She may have a theory, bit we all know that theory and practice are oft…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:48 AM
7

Well, I remember when I was a virgin, I fell inconsolably in love with the first man that made me feel even remotely desirable. I associated my vulnerability in our intimate acts with love for him. By my current standard, he wouldn't even be picked up on my radar. When he dumped me, years went by and I experienced a few more relationships, which enabled me to learn what being valued sexually, intellectually, and emotionally actually looks like. My standards increased exponentially. So no, I don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:19 AM
7

Men want women who worship them with minimal effort, and women want men who are "worthy" of worship. If men want a woman to worship them, they have to work hard to meet that woman's standards. If women want to be desirable to a man, she has to work hard to meet his standards. Fair enough. Men want a woman that they feel is exclusive to them. Someone that only they were able to "conquer." The trouble is that men want virgins because that enables them to shirk all responsibility in the mating deal…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 02:44 AM
19

You're linking articles that say men are becoming less desirable as mates...not that women are lacking male companionship. Most women have a plethora of beta orbiters. There's just fewer Chads for women to desire sexually. The real reason why men don't want sexually experienced women is because men fantasize about a girl who looks at them with big adoring eyes...who sees his penis and it's the biggest she's ever seen. Who idolizes him for his low-effort "kiss, grab boobs, and then penetrate" fuc…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 02:22 AM
11

I strongly agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 02:09 AM
0

Either way. I don't think the cheating likelihood is why a with a high count is unattractive to men. I think it's because a woman who has many partners is less likely to be adoring of the one she ends up with and men want women to adore them with minimal effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 02:40 AM
0

No, she is 36% likely to cheat. She is 74% likely not to. There is a completely different reason why.men want women who dont have a high body count and because they may cheat is last on the list.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 12:41 PM
2

So a guy can also marry an HB10 who's 23 but who has slept with 36 guys. She can lie about it and he still thinks he has a high value hole, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 02:53 AM
21

That's right, though. Terms and conditions. You're not entering into the contract on a "his-whim" basis, and he was an early violator. He doesn't need to be coddled for his assholery. You did well. Next.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy27/05/20 04:17 AM
2

Oh my fucking god...I can't believe I even needed to put an /s tag on that...apparently I did. Is it not glaringly obvious that I'm parodying the generic right-wing reply? And is it not obvious that I am replying to your satire with satire?? Hot potato.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy16/05/20 06:06 AM
102

I was pro-choice before I became a mother. Now that I am a mother, I've found myself fanatic about how imperative it is for women to have access to abortions. Giving birth can kill you. No matter how healthy you are, unexpected shit happens in the hospital. You can be left with a body that never functions the same way again on many levels. Children are absolutely beautiful and I adore them wholeheartedly but they should NEVER be carried unwittingly or unwillingly. Imagine teenage girls who get p…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy11/05/20 04:27 AM
53

I know this sounds like a cliche, but you shouldn't let a man's opinion influence your self esteem. That can be hard if you've come to value the man, and subsequently, his opinion. Try to generate a rock hard base for your self esteem rockets...like, "I am fucking indisputably spectacular because I wreck it in the gym 4 times a week and I KILLED the numbers at work this month, while ALSO completing a painting I started in 3 days! I'm talented, successful, and generating a stellar body. If that g…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy13/01/20 05:03 AM
15

Please will you answer her questions? I'm so interested in your answers.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/12/19 04:31 AM
9

Once you're married and pregnant and THEN they turn...what do you do then?
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy15/11/19 02:04 AM
77

It isn’t just a “women’s nature” 🙄thing either; try typical red pill strategies on a weak or at-a-low-point man and you’ll see strikingly similar results (usually plus literal worship). That's the one thing that's always really exasperated me about TRP. Their techniques work...but they work on everyone. When executed discerningly, they work in your job enviornment. When executed on lite mode, they work with your family. When executed with abandon "in the field," you can collect dozens of male pl…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/11/19 07:38 PM
22

Half the "women" giving advice on there are just men, lol!
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy30/10/19 12:21 AM
13

The guys on TRP would say you're "alpha widowed" and they would refer to you as a "plate." They have actual terminology for your exact situation. I am sorry if I sound rude. *That should be enough to convince you that you're in a situation that is not in your best interest and it would be good for you to leave it.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy29/10/19 02:56 PM
3

Take my advice with a grain of salt, because it's different then the advice I see here. I would reply. I would reply with, "yes, you did upset me. I generally don't tolerate rude behavior in the people that i bring into my life and i think your behavior was disrespectful to me. I value the people in my life and I expect to be valued as well." And then the ball is in his court. He can either ignore you, which indicates that he's not willing to accept the terms of respect that you've laid out, or …
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy27/10/19 07:25 PM
6

LOL!!! So happy that I found this sub today!! I was muted from RPW for pointing out how irritating it is that some dumbfuck dude came in and started with condescending advice about how some woman in a post should act. When I pointed out how hypocritical it is, I had about 17 upvoted before it was removed and I was muted. They're a bunch of useless handmaids. I'm happily married and all, but CONSTANT reminders of how to be the best women I can be has always helped me keep my relationship strong, …
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy27/10/19 04:44 PM
1

If anything, part of RPW is a rejection of the parts of feminism that dismiss the needs of men. Right. I can meet you here. This makes absolute sense. Considering men to be remarkable, valuable and absolutely deserving of incredibly love, especially the love that we're equipped to give as women, is one of the most helpful tenets of RPW philosophy. On the other hand, RPW encourages women to be virtuous and to be highly discriminating and exclusive with whom she shares this love, lest the value of…
/r/RedPillWomen26/08/19 03:47 PM
1

As per my previous edit: if you're a woman, and I've assumed your sex, you'd certainly have my very genuine apology. Are you a woman?
/r/RedPillWomen26/08/19 02:29 PM
1

Lesbians are women.
/r/RedPillWomen26/08/19 02:27 PM
1

RPW is a place for women to discuss our relationships and RP methods for improving them with other women.
/r/RedPillWomen26/08/19 02:19 PM
1

Maybe just kindly exit, stage left.:-)
/r/RedPillWomen26/08/19 02:08 PM
1

I often wonder why, if I were to post about how well something works in TRP, I would be told it is a male space and my female validation is not sought...and yet i find male validation comments in this female space so often? Personally, my husband's opinion is the only male validation I'm interested in.
/r/RedPillWomen26/08/19 01:50 PM
6

This man does not love you. In the eyes of this man, you meet the criteria HE is looking for. He wants a specific type of woman and you manage to "check all of his boxes." I am married to an Eastern European man and in his culture, men are also very assertive, very stoic, very cold. It took a long time for my husband to open up to me, but open up to me he did. This is why I considered him "safe" enough to marry. The dynamic should be Captain and First Mate...a Captain makes the call, but he alwa…
/r/RedPillWomen23/08/19 05:07 PM
3

I've always loved Dominique Francon.
/r/RedPillWomen18/08/19 03:34 AM
1

Thanks!!
/r/RedPillWomen09/08/19 01:45 PM
1

This is my burning question as well.
/r/RedPillWomen09/08/19 12:54 PM
5

That was the first thing that struck me. Radfems are supportive of women, which means OPs Mom is almost definitely just angry, insecure and if course, unfortunately jealous.
/r/RedPillWomen04/08/19 07:52 AM
13

Scarlet's character aside, your points on charm are great reminders. You needn't be a full blown beauty to behave with elegance, grace, wit, feminine joy and class...and often, these characteristics have the ability to make you more attractive then the beauty who may be lacking substance or personality. Thanks. :-)
/r/RedPillWomen07/07/19 05:19 PM
7

However, none of this changes the FACT that he has high value in the sexual marketplace and that was my point That's right. And as far as my experience dictates, the vast amount of RPW aren't striving to operate on the level of the sexual marketplace, but to operate above it to secure a LTR or marraige. This is why a woman who sleeps around is looked down upon. Of course. Evolutionary biology has never proven to be untrue to me, from the male or female perspective. I don't get why you like Andy …
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/19 04:34 PM
10

I value exclusivity...something cheap and freely available to anyone meeting basic criteria isn't valuable. In other words, I'd be ashamed to walk down the street with swinging dick Danny...almost if the other girls we pass, I'd wonder how many if them had a peice of my guy. I'd be thrilled walking down the street with arrogant Andy. I'd like all of the other girls to think, "what does she have that I don't? I even sent him my hottest nudes and he still didn't call! What makes her so special?" I…
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/19 01:18 PM
9

Of course the sub is about how to be the highest value woman that you can. The sub is also about finding a high value man. I don't know about you, but never saw the "free-fuck" guy as being very high value. Some men can trick you into believing they're high value by appearing selective when the truth is they're grunting and thrusting and begging for validation through side plates. A real high value man is focused on himself and can't be bothered spending the time that "free fucks" and secrecy re…
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/19 12:36 PM
37

Right...I'm not sure what this weird, apologist comment is upvoted for. We all know that a high value man is not congruent to a grunting thrusting ape with no self control. Selective men are of much higher value then those who "free-fuck." Op had the misfortune of ending up with a man who hadn't established self control but appeared to, otherwise, hold a healthy enough value that he would attract a side* woman with high desires and low standards.
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/19 08:43 AM
7

Rules and regulations. I've told every girlfriend of mine that to never get in bed with him unless you're sure of his character from the get go, or unless you lay out the rules and regs. I have always let a guy know, right from the first date, that I'd rather not waste any time with the whole FWB thing. I have relationships. I don't really have guy friends so we're here to find out if we match for a relationship. if he's more of a "play the feild," one night stand kind of guy, I'm happy for him,…
/r/RedPillWomen21/06/19 05:46 PM
30

I'll always remember that the number 1 reason why I listened to my Mom's advice about boys was because I just liked my Mom so freaking much. She would teach me through stories...she'd tell me examples of how the boys at school would go for her because of her chest and they'd tell her all of the things that she wanted to hear but she was too smart for them. Then a girl would fall for it and those boys would go and ruin her reputation but not my Mom because she was always smarter then the boys. Th…
/r/RedPillWomen31/05/19 03:53 PM
1

You're oversimplifying absolutely everything I've said. Do you want an inept man child in your life? Maybe he's funny, smart, introspective, and considerate...but if he's a man-child, he's not partner material. I had a very long relationship with the kindest most considerate, most supportive and absolutely brilliant man I've ever met. He was also very good looking. In the end, though, he fell profoundly short in the hygiene area and he felt that so many jobs were just not worth it because they d…
/r/ExRedPill05/05/19 05:46 PM
1

"Love" is nonexistent in the beginning...it's a nonsensical swish of oxytocin and serotonin for the first year. A year old relationship is in it's infancy. After about a year and a half, the baby shell breaks and the relationship burns out, or the beauty finally begins to bloom, and love begins. Real love is based in a foundation of respect. A woman who respects her man will strive to earn his, and a man who respects his woman will strive to earn hers. What do women generally respect? A man who …
/r/ExRedPill05/05/19 05:16 AM
1

JP is perfectly fine, as long as you're able to listen critically and sort the useless from the useful.
/r/ExRedPill18/04/19 10:52 PM
15

Find a man who challenges you. Find a guy who expects more from you then you'd normally give. Look for someone who has higher standards then you do. A guy who doesn't want you to submit, but rise higher then you thought you could. Easier said then done, I'm sure, but I'd bet that this sort of guy would be a good partner for someone like you. He'd probably be someone you could comfortably look up to, also.
/r/RedPillWomen22/03/19 01:32 AM
23

First of all, this post seems odd to me. You're saying that you found a man attractive and fantasized an alternate life with him. Do you genuinely believe that this is purely female-centric behavior? My husband does this as well. We joke about it together. Men want more, women want the best, and alternate life fantasies with attractive strangers are perfectly mundane occurrences. As other posters have said, it's acting on them that is the issue. In regard to this video you've posted, i'm afraid …
/r/RedPillWives14/03/19 10:42 PM
2

You would kill yourself if you ended up a stripper or a bus driver?
/r/RedPillWomen08/01/19 10:11 PM
8

My word. Your man shouldn't see you do makeup. Head to the bathroom, keep your essentials there, and get the fresh look done in less then 10 minutes. I wake up, grab a coffee, and head to the bathroom where I have a small kit in the cabinet. I brush my hair, slap on some under eye, quick contour, blush, and mascara all in about 5 minutes. I run the water and brush my teeth right after. I also moisturize and emerge in my bathrobe. He assumes that is just my face! When he sees me get "done up," I …
/r/RedPillWomen21/12/18 04:40 AM
5

I don't think he's projecting how you see women because you basically made a post that says you see women like dogs on a cartoon show.
/r/ExRedPill10/12/18 08:25 PM
8

I got off birth control at 17 and never looked back. Weight gain, incessant rage, inconsolable deapair...i honestly don't know why it did this to me. Some people suggested that I'd tried the "wrong one." I'm not going to go testing my body and throwing experimental hormones into my system before I find the "right" one. I've always been much happier without it, simply just practicing cognizance seems better and has been more effective.
/r/RedPillWomen27/11/18 05:41 AM
5

No, love, I understand everything perfectly.
/r/ExRedPill21/11/18 12:12 AM
11

This is the greatest post this sub has ever seen. I can't believe it's downvoted.
/r/ExRedPill20/11/18 10:05 PM
9

Aren't you experiencing endless stress and suffering from keeping every single contrary opinion and thought you have inside? I would have exploded by now if I were you. Why don't you make it VERY clear to him that you will not, under any circumstance, tolerate insults. NEVER. You will not abide your children to learn that a woman may not have ooo ions, and you will not abide your children learning that it's acceptable to insult women. Period. He will change or he will leave. Optimal scenario is …
/r/RedPillWomen19/11/18 07:16 PM
7

I always find posts like these so perplexing. Just say, "Oh, friend, you should look at this insanely enlightening forum, reddit.com/r/redpillwomen. There is some of the best self and relationship advice I've ever received over there. You should get into it, too!"
/r/RedPillWomen10/09/18 07:52 AM
1

A man who values your input is a wonderful gauge of where a relationship is. You can determine his respect for you when he seeks your input without you needing to give unsolicited advice. When you find yourself nagging, it's because he doesn't respect you. Super post.
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/18 04:57 PM
7

I've never thought of this. You've made a believer out of me.
/r/ExRedPill07/09/18 12:38 PM
14

Exacatly. A man with natural, innate confidence is attractive. A man that's constantly reading new tricks and tactics is not really the sort that makes you want to be a better person.
/r/RedPillWomen29/08/18 06:26 PM
2

Awesome, thanks for your reply! What sort of things do you write?
/r/RedPillWives27/08/18 04:23 AM
2

If you don't mind me asking, what field are you in? I'm looking to transition to a career where I can work from home.
/r/RedPillWives26/08/18 07:11 PM
6

Personally I think that older men could be beneficial based on their assumed progress. The idea is that an older man will have already established himself in his career and his values, and he'll also likely have already been through the promiscuity phase of youth, which means he'll be more likely to seek commitment. On the other hand, there are plenty of older men who may have established themselves in their career but haven't managed to solidify any concrete value system and are still behaving …
/r/RedPillWomen26/08/18 07:10 PM
3

It's easy to be angry. It's very easy to be angry at a lot of things. Doesn't the red pill teach you that you need to focus on yourself above all things, though? Most rp idealology is just incredibly oversimplified manipulation tactics, but if you get anything out of it, get the idea of a better self. There are limitless things in the world that you can't control. You can't control the disgusting indecency of society or the festering animosity brewing between right, left, man, woman...the bloate…
/r/ExRedPill07/08/18 03:58 AM
26

Exacatly. This is RP women. We know the typical strategies men are trying to learn to fuck us. This sub exists for us to better ourselves so that we can find alpha men. Not men on trp. Those men like to "spin plates" and give field reports. You don't want men like that. You want a quality man who is honest, ambitious, physically attractive, and full of integrity. You will find that kind of man studying in a library, spending afternoons in the gym, orchestrating a think tank...not on Reddit talki…
/r/RedPillWomen06/08/18 07:11 AM
1

Darling, RP men are not quality men. Men who need to school themselves on sexual strategy are betas trying to present as ALPHAS so that they can fuck a lot.
/r/RedPillWomen06/08/18 06:50 AM
3

Right. If a woman at 40 wants to be alone she can. But she also has the choice of when and where she settles down with. They aren't in scarcity, having to settle for any man that gives them attention because they can't risk losing him because they have no idea how to get any other guy. And what is wrong with running every morning? Setting a goal and working towards it. Not making men the center of your life, he is just there for the ride and if he doesn't like what you do he can leave and anothe…
/r/ExRedPill05/08/18 10:43 PM
9

Right, because the only way to be happy is to gasp and hump and gasp and hump some more until you're 42, alone, and confused. PLATES! PLATES! LOOK RPM!! SEE HOW MANY PLATES I GOT?? Am I a real man now? Lol. Real men don't need trp. Trp is for genetic omegas trying to learn to pose like alphas
/r/ExRedPill29/07/18 04:39 PM
47

Cool. I'll let you know everything I think, since I'm on glass of wine number 3. What do men want? Pussy. How much? A LOT. From who? Hot, tight, sexy child-ready girls, who will eat out of your jock strap. How many? 10 plates per cycle if possible. HOW TO DO IT? BE ATTRACTIVE. Be confident enough that even if you're lacking in 6 packs and 6 figures, your frame that you're holding so tightly at least implies it. What do bitches want? RESOURCES! ALPHAS! Great. Now let's reverse. Men are basically …
/r/ExRedPill29/07/18 07:21 AM
4

Trp has some genuinely worthwhile points, but so much of their suggestions (in terms of how to be DA ALFFFFAAAAA) aren't even in keeping with their initial philosophy.
/r/ExRedPill02/07/18 11:25 PM
24

Listen, there's studies which show that men have a biological imperative to fuck as many women as possible, as often as possible, and to pick the youngest ones available to maximize child rearing/gene spreading potential. Should I puss off in a corner and fear men forever, or should I trust that I can find one that I am capable of forming a long-term, trusting bond with...despite that he's hard wired to cum all over everything with freshly grown tits? Be confident in yourself and in your choice …
/r/ExRedPill21/06/18 06:20 PM
9

I can't provide an actual study but you can always find couples who have been together for decades and ask the woman how she managed to avoid impulse fucking every potential superior option that came along. I'd phrase it like..."wow, together 21 years! What's your secret?"
/r/ExRedPill21/06/18 05:37 PM
3

RPW doesn't mean to wallow in subservience to RPM. Being a RPW doesn't even have anything to do with RPM. To be a RPW you simply have to acknowledge that evolutionary biology is real and if you want to be a woman who has a genetically desirable man then you should develop genetically desirable female characteristics. It's just "girl game." I think most RPM are sub-par genetic undesirables who need to work very, very, very hard to learn basic male game, and that's why their sub exists. I personal…
/r/RedPillWomen02/08/17 09:05 AM
26

I found that "why he may consider marrying you" post to be laughable. It operates under the assumption that RPW seek RPM, not natural Captains. If I need the advice of an RPM I would take time out of my day to seek it. Otherwise, I read this sub for RPW discussions and topics. I don't believe my man would be caught dead on any RP subreddits because he is a natural captain, not a learned one, so the only man who's unsolicited advice I welcome is his.
/r/RedPillWomen01/08/17 05:27 AM
–

An explanation for why 24 year olds are "better" even if their appearance or fitness is substandard. Doesn't that go completely contrary to the idea that men seek mates based on their appearance of youth and vitality? So if someone appeared more youthful and vital, (fitness and clean eating promote this effect) at 34 then they did at 24, then what makes 24 objectively better?
/r/askTRP19/06/17 09:59 AM
–

Well, realistically, I look much better now then I did when I was 24, and I exercise and eat well now, when most 24 year olds just eat shit. I think that's the case for most people. Maybe you should reexamine your belief?
/r/askTRP19/06/17 09:45 AM
–

Me at 24.
/r/askTRP19/06/17 09:16 AM
–

But I have a lot of money and no debt, so why would I need a rich guy? Shouldn't I just find a good man who loves me for myself that I can love for him? The whole point of this thread is that I've found out that now no one even wants to love me for me because I have a 3 in my number, so I'm struggling here.
/r/askTRP19/06/17 09:13 AM
–

Hm...so have my looks started to fade?
/r/askTRP19/06/17 09:04 AM
–

I have a gym where I work and I go twice a day; before breakfast, and before bed. Why would my body not be tight? I am personally quite proud of my body. Why would I have baggage just because I have a 3 in my number? Does injecting a 3 in your number somehow complicate your life? Why would I also not have lust for life because there is a 3 in my number? And lastly, why would anyone want a solely sexual relationship with anyone? Doesn't that feel so bleak and empty?
/r/askTRP19/06/17 08:36 AM
–

It's been there all along. You just got confronted with it. It wasn't. I'm insecure about my crooked tooth, my lack of formal education, and my sister's lifestyle. I didn't realize that now I must be insecure, also, about something I can't even control, like my age. Do you want an LTR? I've not thought much about it. I just got out of one I've been in since I was 23. When I do start to think about it again, though, I guess now I know I'm not a viable option for a huge percentage of men because I…
/r/askTRP19/06/17 08:11 AM
–

You see how this can be self perpetuating, though? Reading hundreds of comment about how we're not worth anything, we're this, we're that, etc, and then guys being like, "well, it's because you're insecure about your age." Well, of course someone would be insecure about their age after reading hundreds of comments which say we're no longer viable partners because of our age!
/r/askTRP19/06/17 07:36 AM
1

The health care bill was on the front page two days ago.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 04:33 PM
1

They remove funding from all health organizations, or no health organizations. Tax dollars shouldn't have to pay for it. No tax dollar ever,ever has.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 04:31 PM
1

When does this laundry list of what the gov is required to do to appease everyone stop? When they stop trying to enter the past and fuck with rights that were already granted decades ago.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 04:29 PM
5

Nope. Clients pay for their own abortions. You can cover your ears and scream "LALALA I PAY FOR ABORTIONS" all you want, but clients pay for their own abortions and no tax dollar in the history of the United States ever has.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 04:26 PM
3

The Federal Government is an institution I pay and I want them directing the resources I give them to my preferred health center. Of all of the government funded health centers I have to select from, I choose that one, and I don't agree with the disengagement of my tax dollars from it's continued function. They can defund medicaid instead if they want to save some money, or they can discontinue using my money to give senators free healthcare.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 04:22 PM
8

No federal dollar has ever, in the history of the United States, paid for an abortion. The client pays for the abortion. Planned Parenthood is a provider, and when women want an abortion, they must pay that provider. So how about this? We fuck whoever we want, we continue to pay for our abortions, and you stay the fuck out of deciding our preferred provider?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 04:16 PM
1

No, the U.S, Lesotho, Swaziland and Papua New Guinea do not have maternity leave. The U.S. has high infant mortality rates: Rank Country Under-five mortality rate 1 Turkey 13.5 2 Mexico 13.2 3 Chile 8.1 4 Slovakia 7.3 5 United States 6.5 The United States lags behind 60 countries in maternal death prevention. Women are not victims, we just want the government to fuck off.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 04:13 PM
82

De-funding of Planned Parenthood and renewed attacks on abortion rights.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 01:25 PM
2

Well, the woman in question is still married and is merely making observations about the behaviors of other women, therefore I'd safely say we can assume she is not a sociopath.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/02/16 11:33 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/RedPillWomen18/01/16 04:30 PM
1

I wasn't able to find the woman's version...do you have a link?
/r/RedPillWomen18/01/16 03:47 PM
2

"Tonight you will impress me. Goodbye."
/r/MarriedRedPill16/01/16 05:55 AM
2

Mind your use of fish oils!
/r/RedPillWomen16/01/16 05:35 AM
1

...so...link?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 03:53 PM
13

I wasn't offended at all while reading that. I thought, "Yeah, this is true, we should teach women not to throw babies in dumpsters..." Then I read more and realized I was supposed to be upset.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 03:45 PM
3

Maybe it's that I'm afraid if I express interest in another male then that male will see less of my partner as a result and that idea disgusts me so I'd rather have a one sided open relationship than allow someone to think poorly of my man. My word, this is one of my biggest fears. I would never want my behavior to reflect poorly on him. I'd never want him to end up a laughingstock behind closed doors.
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/15 04:42 AM
2

Queen Elizabeth has always been a source of inspiration to me in this situation. After being completely screwed over by a fellow, she reinvented herself, wiped her slate, and she became the unattainable virgin queen. Queen Elizabeth yourself, love. This is the best way to bring him off the pedestal you've put him on. Imagine how you want him to see you. You want him to see you as head twistingly beautiful. You want him to see you as brilliant, immaculate, clean, funny, talented, popular, and des…
/r/RedPillWomen01/12/15 09:42 PM
2

I don't know if this has been suggested since the last post, but let me give you another suggestion! (I get very excited by this kind of thing.) Get a very small box and wrap some tickets in it...tickets for two to his favorite sports team, with tickets for two to a great day at a spa, (spas have goregeous treatments that men would love, too, like full body massages, etc.) with "tickets" you make yourself for his favorite restaurant, or two plane tickets to a tropical location for a weekend get-…
/r/RedPillWomen01/12/15 09:30 PM
1

You can't go wrong with a beautiful watch.
/r/RedPillWomen01/12/15 05:28 PM
3

It has worked for me on many occasions. As long as you stay positive about it, which is key. If it becomes a "FINE! I'm just going to go have fun without you." Then you proceed to huff and puff and get crabby, it'll just make you come off as bratty...not that I think you would, but it's a mistake I used to make.
/r/RedPillWomen01/12/15 05:20 PM
5

If I were you and I found this situation occurring, I would do the following: On one of our "in" nights, I might mention I heard how great X restaurant is, and I am in the mood to go. I would upsell the restaurant and say, "grab your shoes! Let's go! On me!" Then I would get up and get my jacket on, smiling, happy, excited, and enthusiastic. If he said "no," for whatever odd reason, I would say, "Ok, no worries, babe! I'm going to go check it out. Want to call me tomorrow?" He would probably say…
/r/RedPillWomen28/11/15 06:28 PM
2

What!? Men in long term relationships get a ton of practice! A man can have 2 partners in his entire life and be incredibly experienced in bed because he and his partners explored their sexuality in a committed, healthy, and honorable way. Just because a man fantasizes it doesn't mean he understands how to put his fantasies into realistic play. Women's bodies are complex, and one should never take too much from porn as it caters toward male fantasies only. Women strive to please their man in bed…
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/15 11:19 PM
1

Virginity in a man isn't attractive because this means he'll be inept in an intimate setting, and ineptitude is especially unattractive during something an intimate as sex. A man must be a knowledgeable lover, certainly. But he also can't be a "swinging dick," so to speak. That suggests frivilousness and a lack of self control.
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/15 08:50 PM
5

No...most stable women don't view men with high partner counts as being stable men. My sister and I both have always written men off as "players. Many years ago a high earning, magnificently attractive man was into me. My sister and I had one look through his Facebook page and I instantly wrote him off as a "player." Those men tend to be a waste of our very valuable, pre-wall time. Not interested. Many women do go for men with high partner counts, but those women just end up being a notch on a b…
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/15 10:13 AM
5

I have to disagree. My man was with one girl before he was with me. He was 24 when we started dating. He is a very handsome man. He's just not interested in women who don't suit his standard, and really, very few do. I found his low count to be very alluring as it meant that he is very hard to get. We go to Thanksgiving at our friends' every year. This year there were far more people there then normal. I found it very enjoyable to watch a girl who didn't know we were together hitting on him. She…
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/15 08:49 AM
2

I found it on Amazon. $84.00. Ouch. If you have time a book report might be fun!!
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/15 09:18 PM
1

I have a copy of the 1981 edition and it includes the part on marital satisfaction!
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/15 03:51 PM
1

I don't think she does claim to love him? She certainly doesn't seem to. I would love to hear what attracted her to him in the first place because they dont seem as if they began a relationship on shared values.
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/14 10:33 AM
1

So he, of course, helps all of his friends to this extent...not just this girl. Correct?
/r/RedPillWomen30/12/14 12:46 PM
2

I agree. She should know, for her own benefit, what to look out for in the future.
/r/RedPillWomen30/12/14 10:03 AM
2

That's absolutely an admirable world view.
/r/RedPillWomen30/12/14 09:56 AM
3

"Men are suffering; they need our understanding, they need our love." The ending to this was very poignant to me. I also like that she points out that being a woman feels like a privilege. It's never been lost on me how hard men have it in the dating scene and how incredibly unkind and condescending some women can be to the men who brave it. I am going to have to get this book. Thanks for the post.
/r/RedPillWomen29/12/14 01:50 PM
2

Please eventually post an update.
/r/RedPillWomen09/12/14 08:31 AM
0

My vagina's cool, thanks. I don't need your validation. Though my comment certainly does serve to validate the validity of the post!
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 04:48 AM
0

Why should you get anything out of a mutual display of affection other then the enjoyable sentiments associated with a mutual display of affection? What's next, blow jobs in exchange for fist-bumps?
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 01:25 AM
2

It's hyperbole, son.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 12:23 PM
2

Sure, when you're 16. But after you're a fully mature man, you have every right to expect a partner capable of providing more then a gaping hole and a half awake smile.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 05:52 AM
4

I think the joke here is that the article is ironically claiming men are interested in relationships only if the girl is stupid and fuck-worthy. But we all know that men aren't that primative and obtuse. Obviously men need more then just a vagina and tits to enjoy their relationship.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 02:22 AM
-3

LOL, this is so true! My pathetic, mooching father almost took everything from my Mom. Luckily he was too poor to get a good lawyer, since that loser never worked, and she was able to get one good enough to protect most of her assets, but that creep still made out like a bandit, and squandered it all soon after. She had to pay him spousal support for years, too. Marriage is such a joke. *Edit: Excuse me, why the downvotes?
/r/TheRedPill13/08/13 03:52 PM
3

They've evolved the "One Child Policy." You can still only technically only have one child, but now if you have two, they're supposed to just levy you with enormous fines. Basically only rich people can have more then one kid now.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:59 AM
3

Why? Because you may stumble across willing ex-supermodels when you're 40?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/13 02:05 PM
2

By downvoting these indisputable facts when you are presented with them, Oh...do you have some kind of magical reddit hack where you can see what I downvote? Because I don't see anything that I've commented on in the last few days as having been downvoted by me. you display your fundamental intellectual dishonesty and actually alienate people and gain advocates for the MRM. Why don't you quit shooting yourselves in the foot? What makes you think I don't want advocates for MRM? These events DO cr…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:27 PM
8

See, female suspicion of men inspires such devices, while male suspicion of women laments such devices. See how this vicious circle goes? Earlier you said: " What would help American women is to detach themselves from the rapefear culture." Perhaps American men should also detach themselves from the evilwoman fear culture while women are detaching themselves from rapefear culture.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:22 AM
6

What percent of women are psychopathic criminal penis destroyers?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 07:56 AM
1

Luck has nothing to do with it. And all of the things I wrote come from my 6 (and counting!) years of being a stripper, so I'm pretty sure I know a helluva lot more then you. Nice try troll.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 04:48 AM
1

A dancer is just another woman and I treated her like one. Of course a stripper is just "another" woman, but the point is that there's at least 100 confident, resourceful guys who patronize a club per night, so you must have been going to one of the creepy hole in the wall strip clubs in a small town or something, or you have a lot of money, and she dated you in the hopes that she could get some, or you're unusually attractive. I mean very unusually attractive. They saw I wasn't some desperate c…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 05:04 AM
0

...yes. Yes, it is. If you "dabbled" with a few, it's either because you're unusually good looking, are very rich, or* you picked up the very old, grizzled "career-stripper" types.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:52 PM
0

There's absolutely no way he had sex with strippers. I believe what he meant was that he probably used a call service, or picked up prostitutes.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:53 PM
1

But if you're using "fuck around" in the context of your comment two days ago in the sense you just described, then why complain? What's the problem with a girl "fucking around" before instantly settling while she's young, when she has plenty of great years ahead of her?
/r/TheRedPill24/01/13 10:12 PM
1

Why does this translate to: "she has to fuck around..."?? To me it reads: "she has to be able to date different men and find out what personality traits suit her disposition best before settling on a long term life partner." I'm not seeing any reference to casual sex or "fucking."
/r/TheRedPill24/01/13 07:27 AM
1

Seriously? I suspect myself of being misophonic, and his esophageal, gentle pants, and his halting, stuttering nasal voice, his attempts to sound articulate, despite that his diction is so cringe-worthy...it was fucking torture. And what's with the jolting hand motions? What's with the "I dunno, I just FEEL it" explanations, or the complete lack of any kind of legitimate articulation? Why did it take him almost 7 minutes to say, "This girl is utilizing popular Youtube MRA's to bolster her own i…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:02 AM
2

What the hell is wrong with this guy? Is he on something?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:50 AM
12

"women are incapable of integrity..." Wow. Hear, try this one, and tell me what your first gut reaction is... "Men are incapable of empathy. It's outside of their cognizance." Ouch, makes you just rage seeing misandrist statements like that, doesn't it? Because your mysoginistic comment kind of makes me rage. And look! 7 upvotes! 7 people are pleased to see your comment that women are incapable of integrity.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:05 PM
1

You made me both laugh and think hard on a subject. Cheers!
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:57 PM
1

"courting them?" Walking up to a woman and saying something obscene is courting her?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:51 PM
0

That constitutes as 'bullying' in my eyes. So if a communist walks into one of my conversations to talk to me about communism, they are "poisoning me with their nonsense," and thus they are "bullying" me? I don't think so. People aren't "bullying" people for seeking to discuss opposing viewpoints. That's nonsensical hyperbole. Now, was she rude when she demanded eye contact? Absolutely! When people are rude, is it correct to get into their face and scream at them? Absolutely not. He reminded me …
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:40 AM
0

bully anybody into their bigoted rhetoric. She wasn't bullying anyone. She rudely demanded eye contact. Rudeness and bullying aren't comparable in any way. react to a bully this way He reacted to rudeness aggressively, posturing, instantly screaming, thrusting himself at her face. What an embarrassing disaster.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:56 AM
1

She threatened to beat his granddaughter because he said he was going to bring his granddaughter down to "slice her face up." The hitting him while stationary part, however, is clearly unacceptable.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:54 AM
0

She's really not a moron. She's an incredibly talented and hard working artist. She sure was rude when she told him to look at her eyes, no one could argue that, but his aggressive, screaming over reaction was incredibly cringe worthy. He really seemed like a lobotomized gorilla. There are so many ways he could have handled this that would have allowed him to maintain a degree of respectability. He could have said, "excuse me...you're not my Mother. I'll look wherever I like, thanks, and I'd rat…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:40 AM
12

I don't think it's "feminism" that will lose you your friend; rather, I think it's your intention to push your personal alliance onto her.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:09 AM
5

Yea, anyone who just ditches their people in a situation like this is just an asshole. No two ways about it, really. Any lady who'd fled the theater and left her husband with kids while she drove off would be a scumbag, too. Edit: Watching the video right now...his fake crying, and his fake sad voice is really fucking irritating...and fake.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:27 PM
-5

Here, on /r/mensrights, I often see men feeling upset and angry by the fact that a certain brand of "maleness" is societally imposed on them. Men aren't to cry, to want to play with babies, to be "lazy," etc. The thing is, a certain brand of "femaleness" is forced on girls, as well, and part of that includes being "good." A girl who gets in trouble is very, very ostracized by her female peers. For boys, it's OK and even sometimes encouraged to be "bad," and for girls it simply isn't. This articl…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:19 PM
3

Women in Benue state are sold to the groom's family.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 09:56 AM
1

...you realize marriages in Benue state are arranged, and women are sold to the men's family...? *edit: ...downvotes? Why...? Am I not allowed to tell StackOfFiveMarmots that his fantasy of female empowerment and freedom of choice in Nigeria isn't correct?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:38 AM
2

In a place like Benue state, Nigeria, where women are commonly discriminated against, I wouldn't say that suggesting she enslave herself to a high status man, at the risk of her health, (polygamy is believed to be on of the contributors to the inordinately high STD problem there) in exchange for the man's sexual delight, is in any way a benefit to her. Rather, saying that the woman should be free to enjoy the same rights as a man so that she needn't acquiesce to being hole number 6 for a rich ma…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:04 AM
3

As a woman, I would absolutely be destroyed if I were forced to become some man's hole number 6. This would not benefit me.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:47 AM
3

You can be cocky and nice at the same time. The two aren't antonyms.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 12:01 AM
2

After going through this thread, I can't find anything, anywhere, about Obamacare defunding male services, either. This entire thread is full of links and sources to the actual bill, and full of easy to understand, comprehensive conversation about hundreds of aspects of the bill. The bill is also linked in the comments section, so I'd like to see a source for this person's claim, since I am utterly incapable of finding any evidence.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 07:03 AM
2

Therein lies the trouble: women are oppressed by being forced to stand by helplessly while someone else makes their life for them. There's a reason that a woman born in Afghanistan will live longer than a boy born in Brighton, UK--it's because she's told to stay safe at home, and not leave without a male protector. And when he dies, she's left to the mercy of his family. You're told you may not leave your home. You spend your entire world raising and rearing a boy, whom you cook for, love, and t…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:51 AM
1

But isn't /r/mensrights a place for men's issues? I mean, if you feel that men and women should be equal, then you go to /r/feminism to discuss the issues that women have that deny them equality, and you go to /r/mensrights to discuss the issues that men have to deny them equality. If women feel that they aren't equal, yet seek equality, it would be important to speak to other like minded women on the issues at hand, and if men feel that men aren't equal, yet seek equality, it would be important…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:39 AM
1

I don't condone "asswhuppin" of any kind. She, however, just like you, probably thought: Sometimes a good asswhuppin is the only thing that will teach people the lessons they so desperately need to learn. Which is exactly what you think.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:27 AM
4

To be fair, most people likely assume that "libertarianism" means socially liberal, and nothing more. The term is grossly misrepresented by most major media outlets.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:23 AM
3

Sometimes a good asswhuppin is the only thing that will teach people the lessons they so desperately need to learn. Yeah...I'll bet that's what she thought when she punched that guy, too.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:08 AM
1

You responded to my response about vagina capital. Please re-read.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 01:25 AM
2

Sure, when you only look for evidence to support your theory, it makes sense that you only find evidence to support your theory. So, you're telling me that you know that the media perpetuates stereotypes, but ONLY MALE stereotypes! Listen, I'm not goofy enough to discredit men for being frustrated by the way the media perpetuates their stereotypes, why would you be goofy enough to discredit women if they're unhappy about essentially the same thing? I find that a lot, here. Men claiming that they…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:24 PM
0

...you brought up slut shaming first, not me. I never once talked about slut shaming, so I don't know why you keep saying it at me.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:00 PM
2

Wait a second...so you're telling me social, gender oriented stereotypes don't exist, or "simoly do not happen," but one sentence later, you're giving me an example of one?!?
/r/MensRights05/06/12 11:10 AM
0

Well, since Alanna replied to my question with a statement about "slut shaming" I assumed that she was equivocating preferences with "slut shaming," so rather then argue semantics with her, I simply wanted to address what seemed to be something of a counter point to my question to another poster. For the record, yes, to answer your question, it is a preference. I don't consider a preference for less promiscuous sex partners "slut shaming," either, unless it's for reasons other then health, or th…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:11 AM
5

I'm sure there are just as many women who dislike men having had too many partners as well. Well, I think the male equivalent to this problem is that many women dislike men who have had too few partners because they feel that the man is somehow immasculine.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:37 AM
3

guys like women that like having sex. Sure, girls like men who like having sex. Herein lies the problem; many men dislike women who have had too many partners because they feel that the woman is devalued. As a result, women, in order to remain in the good graces of men, often don't have sex, which has a double edged sword: men like women who like having sex, but conversely, men dislike when women have had too many partners because then the woman is devalued. sometimes a guy is looking for casual…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 12:14 AM
4

Sure, not all men feel that way. But if the general consensus in a society is that one sex dislikes X behavior in the other sex, or at least one sex is continually told that the other sex dislikes X behavior, then sex A abstains from pleasurable things that they believe sex B dislikes their indulgence in, in order to be able to engage with sex B.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:23 PM
3

If men have a negative opinion of her, then she can't fuck around with them, because guys won't fuck around with her, since they have a negative opinion of her.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:00 PM
7

But there's tons of men on this thread saying that they value promiscuous women less?
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:58 PM
5

If a woman wants to screw around, then she can do so - fuck the opinions of men, why let a little thing like that hold her back? Because if she's a straight woman, and she wants to screw around with men, then she has to take their opinion of her into consideration, and when she's finished screwing around, she'll have damaged their opinions of her. I, personally, am put off by promiscuity, but I know quite a few men who, like you, prefer a more experienced gal. I can see the merits of both!
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:46 PM
3

To be honest, the thread actually pissed me off for a number of reasons. One of the reasons the thread pissed me off is because I felt like the big issues were missed; sure, I'd agree with the guy in the top picture on his premise that I confident girl doesn't show off her naked bod. Why would anyone do that for any reason other then seeking sexual approval? But what I found most irritating was the presumption that seeking sexual approval is somehow something to be disdained. For both men and wo…
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:27 PM
0

However, the theory is that women like to control men through sex. Thus in order to keep men sex hungry they make it a scare commodity. Women who freely distribute sex are therefore devaluing the product of the sisterhood, who duly shame her as a slut to keep the price of their pussy sky high If you'd found the thread that the OP is discussing, you'd see that the vast majority of women there are talking about how they'd be more likely to put out if they didn't feel that men would judge them as l…
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:14 PM
1

There seems to be a whole of red here. Particularly in those, you know, third-world countries I was talking about. You're reaffirming my statement that you didn't read the details. You make my case for me with every word that you type. Legalizing anything MAY increase victims, but its VERY unlikely so. WELL, if coercion exists in countries where it is legal, then it's reasonable to conclude that legalizing it would increase coercion!!!! I never claimed 'women were NEVER coerced', just that I don…
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:43 AM
0

Prostitution is NOT mostly legal in second/third world nations, at least not 'de jure' legal. They also, clearly, do NOT regulate prostitution in these nations. Well, I linked a chart for you which outlines the laws regarding prostitution in every country in detail. You didn't read it because if you did, you wouldn't type this erroneous bullet point. This argument started with you saying that you can 'understand the concerns' of those who are against prostitution. Me (and numerous others) stated…
/r/MensRights02/06/12 08:12 PM
1

What's really bizarre to me is that you're arguing things with me that I have repeatedly stated that I already think. I mean...it's really bizarre. Did you see the part where I said: I know what issues men face ? I know what issues men face. Does that mean that their issues OVERRIDE women's issues? No. Do women's issues OVERRIDE men's? No. I'm not sure why you're trivializing other people's issues in order to act like men's issues are the most important. Every person's issue is important, and ev…
/r/MensRights02/06/12 12:07 AM
1

Not every single MRA believes 100% the same thing. I'm speaking on MY perspective and my perspective only. Ok, MR. CAPS LOCK, but if a guy who is an MRA and LIVES IN EUROPE where he has a first hand account, and YOU DON'T, then your perspective is ignorant, and his isn't, and therefore, yours is wrong. Because they claim to fight for GENDER EQUALITY, not BENEFITS FOR WOMEN. If you claim to fight for GENDER EQUALITY, then you fight for GENDER EQUALITY. Fighting for ONE GENDER, isn't GENDER EQUALI…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 10:04 PM
2

It's evidence of the fact that women in Amsterdam acknowledge that there's a problem with sexual slavery, despite that prostitution is legal. Yes, you bring up a good point when you mention that the problem is the lack of proper regulation, not the actual legalization.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 09:24 PM
0

I'm guessing you didn't watch the entire video. Yes, I agree with you. I that illegal prostitution creates more victims then the the victims that could be potentially created by legalizing it. I think it's stupid to keep it illegal, to be frank, however I can understand the fears of the people who want it to be illegal because they're afraid of potential sex slavery becoming an epidemic. I was talking to a lady I know about this issue recently, and I was talking about why it's stupid to make pro…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 09:20 PM
1

I believe that the 'seriousness' of how 'large' the problem is, is a feminist invention. But you heard it from a MRA...I copied 2 of his comments and pasted them in the last message. There are sex slaves in the world (particularly in non-Western nations such as Ukraines) but these nations tend to have a plethora of other even more serious (male) problems which feminists never bother to address. Yes, but why should feminists address male issues? They are concerned with women's issues. Should MRA'…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 09:13 PM
1

Prostitution laws outlined here The problem is discussed by European redditors in this thread. [–]kratistos 4 points 19 days ago All the big football event trafficking claims are hoaxes Nope. I live in Berlin in a somewhat bad neighborhood. 2006, when the World Cup was in Germany, the streets where flooded with Eastern European prostitutes. Prostitution in Germany is legal, but nobody denies that sex traffic is real and a problem. [–]kratistos 10 points 19 days ago Let me try to explain: Europe …
/r/MensRights01/06/12 08:12 PM
0

This 'sex slavery' is just another feminist scare tactic. ...no. No, it is not. At all. No one is comparing willful prostitution to sex slavery. Sex slavery is different then prostitution. Sex slavery is a terrible, terrible problem in Eastern European and Asian countries. In fact, about a month ago there was a thread here about a feminist group in Eastern Europe protesting the upcomming soccer tournament. The thread quickly filled with eastern European MRAS who validated the serious problem of …
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:31 PM
7

Religion is why it was originally made illegal. spelling*
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:19 PM
-3

It's not stupid. Workers in Amsterdam recently staged a demonstration to point out the huge sexual slavery problem. You just have to decide which is the lesser of two evils: making it illegal, thus paying for the cost of imprisoning pimps/whores, further impoverishing women who are prostitutes, forcing them to seek dangerous or exploitative pimps, etc, or making it legal and regulating it, while potentially increasing the traffic of sexual slavery. Edit: You know what? Forget it. Counter points …
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:12 PM
-4

Sure, I'd agree. HOWEVER, the fear that sexual slavery would increase is also a valid one.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 06:35 PM
-9

...listen, I think this is a paranoid concept. Many women want prostitution illegal because of the fear of girls being forced into it. Edit: To clarify, I don't think this, however I can understand why many other women do. I think it should be legal, mainly because I don't give a shit if people want to pay for sex, or get paid to give it. It's not my genitalia or my money, so I can't see why it's even my concern. However, the concern that legalizing protitution will encourage sexual slavery is v…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 05:48 PM
1

Yes, like I said, out of context it may seem aggressive. Maybe you noticed his mockery that I was responding to? Also, I called a person a faggot...I don't go around calling people ( plural) faggots...unless you found multiple incidents that I somehow don't remember?
/r/MensRights01/06/12 04:08 PM
2

Without that context its hard to judge one way or another and just taking a brief look at your comment history reveals a rather aggressive style which could, alternatively, be the culprit in this case. Maybe I seem "aggressive" out of context, but I'm generally not. Unfortunately my comment history won't go back very far, and that's probably because I comment pretty incessantly. In fact, being called a "feminist" so often has led me to visit this sub less, but I used to visit much more often...m…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:19 PM
2

If I met you in a bar, I would buy you your first 5 rounds.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 03:46 PM
9

Samew thing happens on /r/mensrights. If you disagree, you're quickly labeled a "feminist." It's not kind of funny for me...I'm not a feminist at all.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 04:21 PM
6

I've explained why I think both feminism and Men'srights are unnessecary on men'srights before, and also made it clear that I was a girl, and gotten nothing but hate and vitrol, despite that my post reflected much of the sentiment that you have towards feminism in your screen shotted posts. I thought my points were non-judgemental and well thought out, but no one seemed to agree.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 04:13 PM
-2

Feminists have repeatedly assured me that no women would ever falsely accuse a man of a sexual offense. Source?
/r/MensRights28/05/12 03:25 PM
2

Women, or "feminists?"
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:15 AM
2

Unfortunately, saying that it worked out fine before women entered the workforce in large numbers is no solution, either. It's inhumane to condemn a sex to one place, whether that sex is male or female. If women did all of the work, while men were condemned to diaper changing, dishes, dinner, and daytime Tv...well, the monotony and mind rot would have spurnned a male revolution. So if you're not saying we go back to keeping women in the home, then what do you suggest?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:26 AM
1

It's fine if they aren't paid as much for being unproductive for any reason other then a medical reason. "Risky" behavior is entirely subjective. I think it's risky not to go to the dentist once a month. Poor dental hygiene leads to heart disease. I also think it's risky to drive accident prone highways, to swim in the ocean, and to live in the city. If you refuse women medical leave for pregnancy, you put an unbearable burden on men; now he is the only financial contributor and has to work like…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 07:06 AM
1

You sound very much like you'd like to live in "The Jungle" society. A company has a responsibility to those they employ. If you don't believe that employers should give humane leeway to a person who needs a medical hiatus for any reason, then you either want higher taxes for universal government assistance, or expect a person who's worked hard all of their life to lose everything in the event of illness.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 06:33 AM
1

Your use of the phrase "not allowing them to try" implies that men are in a position of power. Do you feel that men are in a position of power in western society?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 06:28 AM
1

So when I get cancer for smoking, my company shouldn't give me any medical leave since I chose behavior that I knew would make me less productive. Lol, I mean helloooo! Everyone knows my sales will drop if I'm a cancer face. Also, it's a shame my co worker chose to eat all of those cheeseburgers! Everyone knows fatties don't work as quickly. We won't give him medical leave for his gastric bypass, though...I mean, it's not like anyone force fed him all of that pig food, lol! Oh, Jenny went mounta…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 05:13 PM
2

In my state, audio is illegal. Here women and men would both be obligated to endure verbal assault.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:34 PM
2

But you'll pay some guy to fuck some chick?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 01:12 PM
2

Then you'll be paying for that kid's food stamps.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 01:11 PM
2

Well, why would a woman fuck you if you do all kinds of things she doesn't want? Why would a man fuck a lady who does all kinds of things that he doesn't want...?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 12:51 PM
0

So does having cancer. You don't approve of medical leave?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 12:46 PM
1

You make an excellent point when you point out that female bosses may potentially hold back female employees.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 12:45 PM
3

You can't prove most abuse.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 11:58 AM
1

It doesn't do that. Women conscientious enough to have an abortion instead of having an illegitamate kid they can't support are not undesirable and should procreate. Oh. The irony.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:59 PM
9

Every woman who chooses to abort an unwanted child is doing the society that you live in a huge favor.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 07:35 PM
2

No, I don't think that women are physically capable, either. Therein lies the problem; we acknowledge that the two sexes are different, yet for some reason, we seek to make them equal. I don't see why this would make any sense.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:34 PM
5

What are they? I don't disagree with you, but I'm still interested in your reasons.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:32 PM
2

ARGH. Any doctor who would do this should have warned him that he'd look terrible because his arms wouldn't match his new longer legs.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:25 PM
2

Thanks for the response; I especially hadn't considered your 1st point.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 07:33 AM
1

This question will make everyone mad, so please don't kill me, but rather, please just explain. She wasn't that big. Yeah, she's a fat person, but if she effectively suppressed the fighting of a guy from a body building website...well, I assumed she would have had to be massive. Would it actually have been that hard for the guy to get her off like he said he did? I know questions like mine aren't supposed to be asked; people would say: "would you ask that of a woman?" The truth is that people wo…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 03:06 AM
3

The author seems to be shocked that he went into a nightclub and it wasn't a library.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 02:51 AM
2

Because soccer fans do utilize prostitution services, and most of those prostitutes are slaves.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 02:23 AM
1

She's illustrating how women in the Ukraine are viewed as little other then sexual commodity by utilizing that which she's been simplified to.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 02:18 AM
3

Their issue in the Ukraine is the prevalence of trafficking, which means the woman hasn't a choice at all.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 05:14 PM
2

MERLOT! I'm pretty hung over, let's not talk about Merlot, LOL! Cheers with my massive jug of water!
/r/MensRights12/05/12 01:55 PM
-1

I'm not really sure why, when I say "You're right," you feel the need to elaborate? Did "you're right" imply that I somehow didn't understand, or didn't agree with your assertion that I'd implied something negative? When this happened: "They think we're a bunch of rapists or wife beaters when we really just want the same thing they want." -- and your response is "I often have to explain the human value of women to men on this subbreddit." My response was intended to explain that I've encountered…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:33 PM
-1

You're right. What I'd intended to suggest was more along the lines of what I'd said later. I realized after I'd written that that it sounded as if I was insinuating that women are only good for sex, when in reality, what I'd written later was more of what I wanted to convey. If you're not trolling, you're doing a great impression of one. No need to insult me.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:53 PM
2

I can't believe you're downvoted for quoting a fucking article.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:19 PM
2

Your first statement on intimacy. Intimate bonds can be formed with your own gender. You have not offered substantial evidence that intimacy with a woman is valuable enough to deal with the additional hassle I'd agree that intimate bonds can be formed within your own gender, however, sexual intimacy produces a specific kind of intimacy that is exclusive to romantic relationships. http://people.howstuffworks.com/love7.htm I can say from personal experience that the intimate bond that I have with …
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:13 PM
-8

with excess clitoral and labial tissue that is unhygienic, unsightly and interferes with sexual penetration, especially if the same mother would choose circumcision to ensure healthy and aesthetically appealing genitalia for her son? The labia is essential to female sexual enjoyment, particularly when the majority of women haven't the fabled "g-spot." The WHO has offered four classifications of FGM. The main three are Type I, removal of the clitoral hood, almost invariably accompanied by removal…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:45 PM
2

Intimacy can only occur between a man and a woman? I'm sorry...I'm reviewing my comment to you and I don't believe that I said, at any point, that intimacy can only occur between a man and a woman. You're heading into straw man territory. Let's take a step back; if you wanted to discuss homosexual relations, I haven't the slightest shred of doubt that any lobotomy patient is aware that homosexual men are intimate with each other. Just like homosexual females! I think you are overestimating women…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:17 PM
1

What were they?
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:52 PM
-4

Can you show me a source that suggests that removal of the hood is the norm, and not the more extreme form?
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:43 PM
2

I don't know...after my dad divorced my Mom and left her to take care of 3 kids without a lick of child support, and also collecting the alimony checks that she had to pay him, he still drank himself to death pretty quickly.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:40 PM
8

I think that being masculine has a great deal of value...I belief which a great deal of mra's strongly disagree with me on. I assume, op, since you take umbridge with this woman's statement, you must agree with mine.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:32 PM
-12

Less serious (then male circumscision) but pretty much exacatly the same?
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:23 PM
0

...what?
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:21 PM
1

Yet you are in the soririty.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:15 PM
-11

See my last comment in my history: I often have to explain the human value of women to men on this subbreddit.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:10 PM
1

Intimacy, for one. A man can be close to another man, of course, but he'd lack the intimacy from his man friends that he'd experience with a woman with whom he was involved romantically. There's another: romance. A man can both enjoy the benefits of instigating romantic overtures as well as enjoying being the recipient of romantic overtures. Confidence would be another...when a man and a woman are intimate, a trust grows between them that can only be derived from their original intimacy...not th…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:02 PM
0

So are you saying that you think sex is all that women can offer?!
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:50 PM
-1

Perhaps because men are sexually stimulated by visuals?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:41 AM
-3

Some would speculate that you enjoy sex, like most humans, and would assume that you enjoy it with women.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:35 AM
1

This is where men should step up and lay down the law for what they will and will not deal with in a relationship. Every woman respects a man who asserts himself.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:34 AM
1

...Then stop letting women train you to avoid helping children...?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 02:40 AM
1

Clearly, white knight, you hate me for expressing love and apporval of men. Go back to /r/srs, man hater.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:21 AM
1

Lololol! So you hate me because I like men, ey, you psychotic fuck? Sounds like YOU are the crazy boogeyman feminist here, sailor.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:33 AM
0

Woah, we have an angry mysoginist, here! Sorry, honey, I know you want me to tell you you're lady like, but it just won't happen. I guess this is why you're spewing hate for my beautiful lady parts...jealousy. don't worry, though, honey...that make surgery for that now! Chin up, sailor. It'll be ok.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:00 AM
2

::applause.::
/r/MensRights24/04/12 08:17 PM
-1

Sorry, honey, I won't lie to you and tell you you're just like a woman.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 08:16 PM
-1

Yes...that's what at least half of /r/mensrights has qualms with. You haven't been here long, ey? Downvotes, no explanation. Should I link all of articles where mras complain about being depicted as strong or stoic or otherwise stereotypically awesome?
/r/MensRights24/04/12 10:49 AM
-7

This is my view on men's rights: I adore a strong, wild, proud man with the same fervor that I adore a beautiful sculpute of an anatomically perfect man. I adore men; their mysterious delicacy hidden beneath their stoic exterior, their majestic sense of pride, their stalwart view of right...and their indignation when faced with wrong. I am in awe of the quintisentially masculine traits that compel the stronger sex to achieve respect, dominance, and to carve out their small kingdom in a world of …
/r/MensRights24/04/12 10:21 AM
6

Ok. Give me one second, hereeeee.... [–]spriggig 57 points 4 days ago The benefits aren't worth the effort required to keep a relationship stable, let alone happy. Women demand too much for what they bring to the table. Really? Ouch. [–]elwood78 9 points 4 days ago Agreed. Women these days seem ungrateful and spoiled. [–]Bobsutan 3 points 4 days ago* I agree many, if not most, western women are dead weight these days. Sad that it's come to this. They just don't strive to improve themselves and e…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 10:09 PM
0

Yes...yes it does. In the early 20th century, childbirth was dangerous and fertility ages of women were much lower. Biologically, women have always been preserved at the expense of men because women have long gestation periods compared to those of other animals, a high incidence of death during child birth, and a small reproductive window. That is not the case for men; men can fertilize hundreds of women for decades longer then a woman can be fertilized. Before science and advanced medicine, it …
/r/MensRights19/04/12 09:26 PM
0

Do mra's think that "women and children first" was a bad policy in the early 20th century, or do they understand why it was crucial to the perpetuation of the species?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:54 AM
0

You're correct.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:46 AM
10

This sub has many, many men who do.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:45 AM
2

So you're pro-birth, not "pro-life."
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:42 AM
5

But it looks like most of the women there approve of your rant...?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:39 AM
0

Just like SOME men bring quite a bit to the table, while others don't at all. Dating is something of an interview process; I've found that it's important to ask the right questions and have the right conversations before you can know if a person is right for you. It can't simply be, "We have fun, and we make each other laugh!"
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:44 PM
1

On that note, I've always been curious...would you say that for most men, they can automatically be "in the mood" without any visual or physical stimulus? I've heard a lot of varying viewpoints on this, but what is yours?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:42 PM
3

How do you "have no real way of identifying" these awful women ahead of time?!
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:59 AM
-1

Maybe it's because those women make a lot and they've had damaging experiences with moochers in the past?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:54 AM
2

i see what you're saying...apologies, I thought you hadn't realized that they were divorcing but now I understand what you meant.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:46 AM
1

I'm the breadwinner. Im taking my boyfriend to South America in December. I cook and clean. I love and respect the man to no end. Women bring quite a bit to the table, but you have to know if her priorities synch with yours, first.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:37 AM
2

When a woman isn't aroused, sex is painful. That's why sex is different then seeing a foreign film.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:27 AM
3

They did get married.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:11 AM
2

"Since the advent of the nature v nurture argument, there has been this push to make men more like women. They are urged to “get in touch” with their feelings, to think before they speak and to be kind and gentle towards all. This is especially true in the school system. Sadly this denies them everything that makes them men and you boys don’t even have the serotonin levels necessary for such behavior. And who says men aren’t in touch with their feelings anyway?" I'm surprised you don't agree wit…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 02:57 PM
2

"Criminalizing harming a fetus, arresting, imprisoning, and charging men who force misscarrages with murder.... This works both ways. If a man (or woman) who gives the falcon punch to a pregnant woman can be charged with murder/child endangerment/etc for harming the fetus, then the pregnant woman should get the same charge for intentionally falling down the stairs, drinking heavily, doing drugs." This is why abortion should be legal.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 02:28 PM
0

Why does it have to be an "us vs. them" thing? Can't everyone just agree to work together, instead of always pitting one sex's social ills against the others?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 02:27 PM
1

why?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 02:25 PM
1

Is the man in some way incapacitated?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 02:13 PM
0

"..."I wouldn't start this dick measuring contest, I'll win." [–]catipillar 1 point 15 hours ago You wouldn't...I'm uncircumcised. LOLOLOL, I am so funny!!!
/r/MensRights19/03/12 02:52 AM
0

Do you know what a clitoris is? Edit: Ok, this link explains the history of female and male mutilation. Yeah...male mutilation is a stupid, and so is female mutilation. I am reading through the links that are in this article, and this isn't telling me a single thing I don't know about both sides. Edit: Ok, reading more...I'm guessing that you're trying to tell me that MGM is bad, which I have actually told YOU at least 3 times at this point.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 11:22 AM
0

Yes. Mine was making fun of you, too! Are you still struggling, buddy?
/r/MensRights18/03/12 11:21 AM
1

...didn't you just spend the previous post convincing me that you were educated? You REALLY can't understand why I wrote that?
/r/MensRights18/03/12 11:08 AM
1

These countries mutilate their women: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Djibouti, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ The extreme version of FGM is NOT incredibly rare. In fact, I have yet to find a source anywhere that isn't a Men's Rights webpage that says anything OTHER then the…
/r/MensRights18/03/12 11:07 AM
1

You wouldn't...I'm uncircumcised.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:56 AM
0

I'm sorry to see that you had trouble understanding what I've written. Public school? This link seems like it may help. http://www.howtoimprovereadingcomprehension.com/ Good luck!
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:23 AM
1

Please see my previous comments for my lists of sources. Listen, removing every element of sexual pleasure on a female's vagina is worse then removing the foreskin on a man's. Like I've said, I believe that it's worse for men because their mutilation occurs in higher numbers and is more widely accepted, however, the physical repercussions for women are higher. Also, I don't dislike male babies...I fucking hate babies in general. But I like and respect adults, (generally) which is why I don't thi…
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:21 AM
1

Again, I disagree, and the reason why is because, like I said in other comments, (though I'm sure you haven't come across them) most women have a VERY limited area from which they can derive sexual pleasure. The labia minora and the clitoris are the full extent of most women's genital sexual enjoyment. If you were to remove a woman's clitoris or clitoral hood, (Incidentally damaging some of the nerves of the clitoris) a woman may be permanently incapable of experiencing orgasm forever.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 01:06 PM
1

"Male genital mutilation is, in fact, worse than other types of FGM -" Ok, well, there we go! I don't even need to link a comment. Yea, FGM is fine, as long as it only happens to niggers, right bro? It's banned in white countries, so nothing to see here, right?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 01:00 PM
0

"The "inability" to say nigger or faggot is not that big a deal when you consider that saying it can legitimately ruin someone's day." Yeah, that's the part that I hate. It just seems to me that if it became common, and if people used it as lingo, instead of only preserving it for the highest and most offensive of insults, it simply couldn't have the power to ruin anyone's day anymore.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:19 PM
5

My human sexuality encyclopedia. I will see if I can find an internet article for you, though so far all the ones that I have ever come across suggest that it's existence is debatable even still. I'm sure it won't help for me to tell you that of all of the women I know, two claim to have G-spots, and most of my girlfriends claim that they think it's nonsense. I know I certainly don't have one. I'll work on finding sources for you, though. This is the gist of most articles that I've found: "You b…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:05 AM
2

"It doesn't change the fact that it occurs in males in exponentially greater numbers, in "civilized" cultures with the approval of the state and the church." That's true, and I can see why this would infuriate men entirely, especially when they grow up and feel anger over the fact that a sensitive part of their sexual anatomy was removed without consent. I can understand this sentiment 100%. "At least female genital mutilation is pretty universally called "terrible" by any reasonable person." Th…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:51 AM
1

I don't think that it was full of misandry...I think she was trying to illustrate how insane it would be if women were to do these things to men, despite that these things are done to women in most of the world. Edit: I mean, come on. "And for all those guys envious of the probes and procedures that Virginia's women are going to be subjected to before they can get a simple abortion, why not pass laws requiring prostate exams whenever they demand a refill of Viagra or a package of condoms?" I'm s…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:37 AM
-1

The vast majority of nerve endings in the vagina are concentrated at the entrance of the vagina. The deeper you go, the less sensation a woman experiences. The majority of women report having no G-spot, and as a result, removing the labia or the clitoris completely destroys a woman's ability to experience sexual pleasure. Ok, downvote me because you want to think that women have super sensation tubes inside of their bodies. It's cool, I get it.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:36 AM
2

That's not true; well over half of women don't report having a G spot. My source is my human sexuality encyclopedia.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:31 AM
4

Listen, everyone's going to bash me for this, but please recognize that there are enormous differences. I do feel tremendous disgust with male circumcision; my man and I have decided that when we have children, we won't ever have our boy circumcised. I've heard so many men say that their foreskin has quite a bit of feeling, and to remove a functioning part of my future son's penis seems more then a little absurd to me. Female genital mutilation, however, is designed to destroy a vagina. The labi…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:29 AM
0

Listen, do you call strippers "sluts," or do you call prostitutes "whores?" Do you call overweight people "fat," or aesthetically unappealing people "ugly?" Do you call someone with hygiene that may not be up to standard "dirty?" The point is that all people get offended by something, and a word is just a word. The more taboo you make the word, the more you fan the fire of it's power. The moment you take away the power of it, the moment that word becomes less capable of hurting someone. When you…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:42 AM
0

Well, white people can say ANY word that they want, they just can't say it without social repercussions. I want to say "nigger, retard, faggot" or whatever else I please without having people then assume that I hate black people, gay men, or people with down syndrome. To me, they're just words. I generally don't use them, because I realize that people claim to be offended by them, and I generally try not to offend people. The truth is, however, I don't want my life ruined if I say to my friend, …
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:36 AM
1

Puss.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 08:47 AM
4

This makes sense to me...and sorry to trouble you further, but do you know, then, where the conception that a woman makes 75 cents to a man's dollar comes from?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:00 PM
4

I feel like the trouble with this article is that measuring the median isn't an accurate way to arrive at any concrete conclusion...at least, I don't believe so.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:59 PM
3

I'd like to see that, if you can find it! The last article I was linked was speculation on inconclusive data.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:48 PM
0

According to this article, the way gap was determined by the median wage of male and female workers, and that studies are essentially inconclusive because there hasn't been quite enough studies done.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:47 PM
-7

Have you read this?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:14 PM
-1

Can you show me a source for where the wage gap was debunked? I've never seen this.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:21 PM
1

I'd agree. The thing with the pill, however, that most women don't even know is that if you were to forget to take one, went to take it the next day, saw yesterdays so you just take both, you've just decreased it's chance of working by a percentage. Waaaaay back in the day when I took the pill, my first doctor hadn't eccentric 5old me that...that I can recall, at least! Otherwise, we're in agreement. Cheers!
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:41 PM
0

I don't look at user names, and wasn't aware that we'd had previous interactions! How charming: you're flattering yourself! I don't recall ever having been "thrashed" by any of you fellows...in fact, I've left every interaction I've ever had with any of you feeling pity for you; you always resort to rage and insults, none of you ever acknowledge or respond to points, and you always just start screaming "FEMINIST! FEMINIST!" I don't remember you personally, but I find it charming, (and also kind …
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:04 PM
3

Hey, lil buddy, no need to get emotional! LOL, isn't that a female thang? Condoms+allegation of being on the pill = drastically decreased incidents of unwanted pregnancy.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 09:19 AM
3

I feel bad for him. You should read the last messgae we had...he's slowly telling a story of being a skinny guy who's had no choice but to seek mentally unstable women, and he can't appeal to the kind of woman that he wants, so he's stuck trying to justify this by telling himself that women are awful. He's getting very hysterical, which leads me to conclude that we may soon reach a break through. Stay tuned, LOL!
/r/MensRights12/02/12 09:18 AM
2

Was it nessecary for you to correct my typo? Were you unable to understand the meaning because of the additional consonant? "I do it all the time angelcakes, you aren't anything special." So you misrepresent yourself. Perhaps you are a woman? "Certainly, as are most women. Women's nature is to be self-loathing." It would be nonsense for anyone to describe me as being self-loathing, because I am very confident and comfortable with myself...more so then most men. Perhaps I am a man? "Sure you do, …
/r/MensRights12/02/12 09:12 AM
2

First of all, it's very bizzare that you're editing comments after I respond to them. Second of all: "If I wasn't already committed to one I'd seduce you for the amusement factor. I once told an anorexic girl she was fat and later banged her, lol." That is because a woman who is anorexic is obviously suffering from some serious self loathing, so having sex with you would be consistent with her mental disorder. Moreover, there isn't a chance in hell that you would be successfully able to seduce m…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:12 AM
2

How can you enjoy this partner's company, since she is stupid, lazy, cheating, lying, manipulative, and selfish? No, having sex with women is dangerous; they might trick you into getting them pregnant, remember?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:39 AM
3

...I don't understand. Why don't you just purchase a fleshlight, a "real doll" or a big warm dog to cuddle with? If women are only useful to you because of what they provide physically, then why are you willing to risk all of their life threatening flaws for a fuck and a cuddle? If men were only interesting to me because of their dick, I would probably just get a dildo instead of have them ruin my life. Don't you think that you're being dangerously weak here?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:34 AM
4

If a woman were to read this article, it would suggest to her that this is what all men are inherently desperate for, because their biology forced them to be obsessed with sex.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:27 AM
2

...I don't understand. If I felt that men were money grubbing, lying, tricky, dumb, and self centered, why would I include them in my life, even if one was funny or attractive? Wouldn't he be detrimental to my overall well being, and isn't it pretty dumb of me to NOT exclude him from my life? What attributes could possibly trump the fact that women are unintelligent, after the accumulation of years of your hard work, lazy, tricking, lying, and selfish? I can't think of a single attribute that wo…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:25 AM
1

Yes. That's why I am happy that you have come to the conclusion to exclude them from your life! :-D I think that you're going to be on the road to a much happier, satisfying, successful life without that collectively dumb group hindering you. :-D Good descision! Spread the word here on /r/mensrights! Would you like my help doing the same? I'll give you credit, of course!
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:19 AM
3

Is that because you have no disagreement with me, and you do believe that you should thus remove women from your life entirely? Because that is the best solution that I can see, considering, and I can't imagine that you would disagree with me, which I am assuming the fact that you couldn't respond is supposed to convey! :-D And no, Jerimiah, my name is Jess...not Katie. I can't imagine why you were confused?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:08 AM
1

...I'm sorry, but could you respond to my inquiry?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:01 AM
1

For example?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:59 AM
1

I'm sorry? I feel that I am just reflecting the issues I see pointed out here...one of them would be: "Women only care about themselves, and men only care about women." This is a very serious issue, if true. As a result, these evidently very selfish people shouldn't be in any way involved in the lives of men. Right?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:55 AM
1

Please quote the part where I was an internet tough guy. Please quote the part where I am perpetuating steryotypes. Yes, internet tough girl, I did read the whole thread, and I've concluded that you're pretty much an asshole.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:30 PM
2

Why not? Women are clearly terrible human beings. They want to trick you into making babies with them, then they want to take all of your money. They don't recognize your rights as a human being, they are useless once they're old, they commit acts of violence against you with impunity and immunity, they silence your discussion about rape or your cry for legitimacy under the law. Why not stay away from them?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:29 PM
2

You could solve this problem by staying away from women.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:22 PM
2

Yes, because the fail is fail safe, fool proof, and an absolute guarantee that the woman taking it will never, under any circumstance, get pregnant ever. (Use condoms. :-)
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:20 PM
1

If you fuck a lady who says she's on the pill without a condom, you're kind of a retard. The reason for this is because a woman could easily be telling the truth, however, she doesn't remember that 6 days ago she forgot to take her pill. The woman could also be telling the truth, however, she forgot to explain the complexities of her pill taking schedule, and she forgot to mention that she was a day or two behind schedule last month, however, she feels that she's rectified the scenario by remain…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:18 PM
1

Yes, I disaprove of your inability to engage in discussion, and the fact that you instead are just being rude...the logical conclusion to arrive at here is that I hate men and think that women are superior. Fflur is not my other account. You could probably compare our comment histories to find out. "SRS trolls, and feminists, are the ones that do as you're doing.." What am I doing? It looks to me like I'm critisizing your lack of manners. Wow, so SRS and feminists hate rudeness? They must be goo…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:07 PM
1

Read /r/feminism. I have yet to see man bashing there.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:43 PM
2

This is what is wrong with /r/mensrights. Do an experiment for me: Copy and paste this, post it on any other relevant topic. You will be upvoted! The only reason why you're downvoted here is because everyone wants to look superior in this thread, since it's about their image.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:37 PM
6

It isn't merely a perception; there is flagrant mysogny here. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pd4ul/the_great_scam/ Read some of those comments.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:32 PM
1

Wow, you look like a real post-lobotomy here.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:25 PM
11

LOL, I just read the thread you linked. I can't believe they even ask why they have a bad image here.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:07 PM
5

I feel like what you said would be true, however, it's slightly irrelevant to the point being made. The point being made is that people avoid men's rights because of the mysoginy, not because they don't agree with the discussions about the issues. People feel that /r/mensrights doesn't actually raise awareness about the issues, they instead just complain about women.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:52 PM
-5

I think that "women have legitimate issues, but I hate feminism" is a perfectly acceptable statement...
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:49 PM
1

I think that feminism is laughable and contemptable...for the same reason that I think your little men's rights movement is laughable and contemptable. But you think that anyone who disagrees with you is an evil "FEMINIST!" That's pretty fucking stupid...no offense. Wrist rubs? No, amigo, the tendons that control the wrist go all the way up someone's arm, first of all, and second of all, almost ANY kind of physical exertion is worse then walking barefoot across the city. Standing for too long is…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:27 PM
1

Ok, well, I've gone barefoot on concrete more times then I can count, and there is no comparison to walking in high heels. "walking on the street where you can get cuts, infections and parasites through the skin" Oh, you pussy! Seriously? "putting your bare foot on the ground is very dangerous! You could DIE or get a cut. It's no laughing matter." LOL, you're pretty much a bitch, aren't you?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:20 PM
1

I've seen this before. You realize that this is misleading; it's not the story of feminism as told by women, it's the story of nothing as misrepresented by the manhood academy, right? More then half these women shown have made no statement toward feminism one way or the other. They're just random clips taken out of context that are used to create a story that has nothing to do with what they're originally saying. Have you seen it? It's pretty funny.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:40 PM
1

No way. I find tons of men here that misunderstand feminism, women, and strive to make an issue out of complete non issues while demonizing and generalizing women in a way that's reminicent of people demonizing and generalizing gays or blacks. I'm probably overlooking the totally rational men, however, because I am so distraught and shocked of the former.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:34 PM
1

You're missing the point, my friend. It was a tounge and cheek order. They don't have to follow it if they don't feel like it. I am sure ANYONE would prefer that to being put in jail.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:31 PM
1

Someone linked the entire speech for me; I did read it. I'm not sure why it would pander to feminists, but she was certainly trying to convince the women that she was speaking to that she could relate to their plight, though I'd say the way she did it was extrordinarily thoughtless.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:31 PM
-2

I am sorry, maybe you're not that socially adept, which is alright; not everyone is. But when a tragic crime that creates victims occurs, the first thing is to issue empathy. Lower on the list of priorities is to issue self evident advice. :-D
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:29 PM
3

True, she shouldn't have. I'm just really hoping that she misspoke.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:34 PM
-2

Well, yes, it does. If Mike and Linda were murdered in their homes, the first thing shouldn't be to point out what they did wrong because it's a bit insensitive. Well, shoulda, coulda, woulda!
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:24 PM
0

I dunno...I simply can't swallow the fact that someone could mean that women at home are the PRIMARY victims of war. I read a lot about war...don't ask me why. This just seems unconcionable to me. It's not that I don't believe you, but do you have a source? I'd like to read the whole thing in all of it's potentially horrifying context.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:22 PM
2

Hopefully no one really thinks that women are disproportionately affected. I'm no fan of Hillary Clinton, by ANY stretch, (in fact, I think she's as much of a whore as I think select other politicians are, if not worse!) but I'm going to venture to guess that what she was trying to do was remind people that when thousands of men die horrible deaths, the pain simply doesn't end because it continues back home?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:01 PM
0

Yes, I absolutely and most certainly do.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:09 PM
1

I don't think there was any humor involved. Would you have prefered that he have the man thrown in jail?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:09 PM
1

Why? Sufferage wasn't nessecary to you?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:43 AM
1

You imagine things. The judge didn't order them to stay married, and his verdicct is tongue and cheek. No one is going to enforce their date. If the man wants to get a divorce after this, he's free to do so. This woman put him into such a rage? If a woman punched a man, is she justified because "the man put her into such a rage?" I don't think so. Check your wording.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:43 AM
2

Good verdict. This reminds me of the non-meddling authoritiy of times past.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:27 AM
2

...the lady said she wants to save it...
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:26 AM
1

My Mom told me this when I was a teenager. I liked it.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:04 AM
2

It's not so much that men advocate violence, but that I've noticed some men seem to demonize and gerneralize women in a way that makes me feel more then a little put off. I found this one guy a few months back...he had 37 upvotes the last time I checked, and he was talking about how women are less then men, and should be treated and viewed as such. To me, this doesn't display an attitude of willing to work within society toward bettering society, and it's reminiscent of white men saying black me…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:46 AM
6

Because of your errant vowel, I can't read or understand a single thing that you're saying, and as a result, I can't address the context and instead must go out of my way to prove my superiority by pointing out that you have ruined the entire discussion.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:34 AM
2

It's not that he cares about karma, it's that he cares about the reddiquitte. You only downvote when something isn't part of the conversation, not if you happen to dislike it personally.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:29 AM
1

Because I believe in biology strongly, also, I loathe the premise that men and women should be treated as "equals." I hear this premise repeated by men and women, and it makes me roll my eyes every time I hear it. Women are not equal to men. Men are not equal to women. They're different.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:19 AM
2

Surprisingly, I'd say that you're the first men's rights guy I've come across that I both absolutely agree with, and who's point of view reflects my own. I think there was a time when feminism was sbolutely nessecary, but like I think that there are no more real punk rockers, I also think that there are no more real feminists. Any "feminist" issue that exists now is just drivel, with the exception of the fact that women don't get paid the same. I support about half of the issues I see here in /r…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:09 AM
-2

I don't know...military wives are a pretty fanatically dedicated bunch. A grade school friend of mine runs a huge support group for women in this very position. They certainly suffer. It's hard seeing the man that you love suffering, and it's hard being his full time nurse. No one wants to see the people that they love suffer. That's why I think this is more of an issue of politics; the way war impacts families should certainly give us all reason to force our government to make more responsible …
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:52 AM
-5

I think that's because assault is a little more tragic then theft.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:47 AM
-4

Both feminism, a movement based around the position of women, and men's rights, a movement based around the position of men, are laughable.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:46 AM
0

I can't imagine why...if her husband is missing his limbs she'll have to wipe his ass, feed him, bathe him, shave him, brush his hair, write his letters, answer his phone for him, push his wheelchair, dole out his meds, while taking care of the kids and working...not to mention she'll have to be stoic as fuck for about a decade while her husband adjusts to the devestation and strain of having lost an enormous aspect of his independence, Why don't we just hope that this never happens because it's…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:41 AM
13

I'm not sure if you're being facetious or serious.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:08 AM
1

I know, men should TOTALLY not seek to please women, right? Women should ONLY treat men like princes, and men should never treat women like princesses. They're subservient, when will they learn?
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:23 AM
2

LOL, enablers are SUCH a pain, right? I've recently encouraged my girlfriend to go to councelling because her husband ignores her and watches football for hours at a time, and she let him, and was fine with it. I told her that's enabling, and we, as women, can't accept aloof male behavior that contriubutes to the destruction of the nuclear home, simmilar to men can't accept how women are emotional. She's in councelling now for enabling him!
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:21 AM
1

Nice cop out. lol.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:47 PM
1

Yea, totally sure. lol. You can't even recognize your own, bra. lol.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:11 PM
2

Uop, it looks like you're "lying" about me!
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:23 PM
1

"lying" about you? That's another insane delusion. :-D I'm merely responding to observation. I have provided, but since you are delusional, you've chosen to ignore it. If I am "sexist" against both genders, then stop acting like a bitch, please, and act like a man. Your grandfather would be ashamed. Now get a pair, bro. :-D
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:21 PM
1

You have yet to prove any. lol.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:50 PM
1

The "don't demonize one aspect of an entire species that all does the same thing, but it suits you to hold one aspect of it accountable only, since that supports your bias" defense. Also, stop typing "lol" after everything you say. Unless you have the mentality of a hysterical downsyndrome child, nothing is that funny.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 02:43 PM
1

"I have no reason to believe you if you provide no evidence. Your story is vague enough to pretty much mean anything and you have provided no proof whatsoever. And the best way to explain your point of view is to give logical, factual, understandable reasons why you feel it is correct. Furthermore, if you look at my posting history you will see that I don't blindly accept what I am told. And your pathetic appeal to emotion wasn't nearly guilt tripping enough for me to break that." I repeat that …
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:59 AM
1

No, I want men and women to adhere to their gender roles. No one is FORCING men to be gentlemen, but women have every right to shun the men who aren't. Just like no one is FORCING women to behave like ladies, but men have every right to shun the ones that don't. If you happen across a group of women who chose not to seek a mate that doesn't behave like a gentleman, then kudos to them! They can fuck whomever they'd like, and if they chose not to fuck inconsiderate, wimpy men, then I applaud their…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:20 AM
0

"Then you are stupider than a sack of hammers..." Hey, lil buddy! I guess no one told you that calling someone stupid is not nice! Awww, lil Petey, no wonder you couldn't figure out this whole thing! Don't worry, lil bud, you'll figure it out one day!
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:06 AM
1

"... AND MEN..." And yet you refuse to acknowledge it in this case.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:05 AM
1

Woah, there, brah...it's possible for women AND MEN to have entitled attitudes. I'm sorry you take this lunatics story so profoundly to heart, brah. Didn't mean to upset you, but your bosom bro is probably lying, k, brah?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:29 PM
0

No, lil guy, I'm pretty bright. I'm sorry you lose tones in text. It doesn't happen to we smart people, but I guess it's a symptom of your lower evolution. GL w/ that, brah.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:25 PM
1

"Yay, anonymous, unproven allegations to make me feel sorry for you. Sorry if it doesn't work or I don't believe you. Did you know that I used to be the King of a small island country? I won a Nobel Prize and had 15 PhDs. But then those evil feminazis took all of that away from me. I now work at McDonalds because of the feminists' sexist opinions." LOL, see what a lunatic you are? I haven't seen you critically think a single thing here, yet you act like I told some physcho, far fetched nonsense …
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:42 PM
1

you're putting your own personal spin on an issue that's a complete NON ISSUE. I am focusing on this issue because it's terrifying to me that you people think of this as some kind of sex thing. HA! There are a TON of things that I am expected to do as a woman, and I am happy to! Men and women are different, amigo. I don't care what feminists say, or what you men say.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:27 PM
0

Oh, YES, in a relationship, each party is entitled to seek whatever qualities they would like in a mate. Lastly, you guys are being absurd. You desperately want to hate this girl, so you go ahead and do it...but it sounds like brown_engineer is a PMSey bitch. Who storms off of their girlfriend in the middle of a date, leaving her alone on a street, unless they have some SERIOUS issues in the 1st place? He's either lying, omitting something, or exaggerating, and you guys are super enthusiastic ab…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:25 PM
0

I'm sorry...I didn't realize I was attacking you? No need to be defensive. I guess it's rude to hope someone experiences a loving relationship where both people are entitled to have standards about what they expect from their significant other.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:22 PM
-1

http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/35qfbj/ OH MY GOD, men have ENSLAVED WOMEN, this is just another example of how society has set it up so that women must sacrifice all of women's time for male comfort, how fucking DARE she do something nice for him!?!?!?!
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:16 AM
1

Yeah, I'm perplexed, here. Most of these guys are enraged because some nice guy helped out his girlfriend. Way to undermine actual issues, bros.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:12 AM
3

So he can either: Never go to formal events, because it would be ridiculous if, when he jacket gets to hot, he were to ask me for help, Re-educate himself to the meaning of love, Potentially freeze horribly since it's ridiculous to expect your girlfriend to help you, and leave your jacket in the car, thus being uncomfortable all night, OR! Find a sane and loving woman who is always happy to help the man she loves! Which would you chose?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:11 AM
2

Yeah, brown_engineer can tell you what it was like for him to experience it that day.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:57 AM
3

"What the fuck kind of guy asks his girl to carry his jacket?" LOL!!!! Why, because men should sacrifice themselves to the burden of carrying the jacket that's making them hot and uncomfortable, instead of inconveniencing the woman?!!?!? Can you spot the inconsistency!? LOL, this is hilarious.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:55 AM
0

She is entitled to expect that her significant other should be concerned about her physical comfort. I'm glad he helped her wash her hands of him. I just hope that one day he asks a girl to carry his heavy wool pea coat, and she says, "OMG, I shouldn't have to sacrifice for your poor decisions." Then he says, "Wow, you're not nice." And she storms off like a psycho. It will then have come full circle.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:53 AM
1

I DEMAND that my boyfriend work toward my comfort in all areas of life that may occasionally cause him discomfort. I EXPECT that my boyfriend will DEMAND that I work toward his comfort in all areas of my life that may occasionally cause me discomfort. My discomfort is no matter; I love my man and care about his happiness. His discomfort should be no matter to him; he loves me and cares about my happiness. This is the beauty of love. I hope one day you will experience it.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:50 AM
2

I have been spending a great deal of time of Men's Rights lately, and the reason why is because I am haunted by a decision that a Judge made many years ago that sent my life spiraling into a whirlpool of pain and ruin, from which I've recovered. But I've been toying with the idea of sending this Judge a letter to tell him about how his Men's Rights opinion destroyed the life of my sister, and seriously affected that of my brother and myself. Before I sent that letter I thought I would take some …
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:47 AM
1

I gave my boyfriend my socks in the woods and walked barefoot the rest of the time. Do you know why? Because I love my boyfriend, and he hates wet socks. Men's Rights is teaching me that I should have instead told my boyfriend to go fuck himself. Is that correct?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:28 AM
1

The reason he wouldn't give his shoes to anyone is because he is a selfish, inconsiderate brat. I wouldn't be his guy friend or his girlfriend.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:27 AM
2

So the next time my boyfriend wears a suit jacket which he HATES with a passion, since they make him very hot, uncomfortable, and create stiffness in his back since they never quite fit correctly unless he spends a fuck ton to get them tailored, and he asks me to carry it, I should say, "How dare you demand that I make a sacrifice for your lack of foresight!?" When he gets upset, I should storm off and leave him abandoned, like an irrational, PMSey, selfish ass psycho bitch...(or like brown_engi…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:12 AM
0

I should hope from the bottom of my heart that my boyfriend EXPECTS me to help him...just like I expect him to help me. If I don't strive to make his life easy and comfortable, no matter what, then I am certainly not worth his time. Just like if he doesn't strive to make my life easy and comfortable no matter what, he certainly isn't worth mine either.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:04 AM
0

I have never been in a situation where I HAD to tell my boyfriend he wasn't a gentleman. Conversely, my boyfriend isn't such a bitch that he wouldn't put his delicate, precious foot on concrete. If I wore heels, there isn't shit my boyfriend wouldn't do for me. Conversely, I gave my boyfriend my socks one time while in the woods because his were soaked. I just went barefoot, because I hate wearing sneaks with no socks. If his socks had gotten soaked, and he asked for mine, and I wouldn't give th…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:01 AM
1

LOLOLOLOL! I walked around New York for a few days with no shoes on because I went on an impromptu trip with my gal pal while equipped with only heels, which I decided were annoying, so I kicked them off. And have you ever massaged a man's bulging, muscular forearm? Yea, it's uncomfortable as fuck to do for longer then a minute at a time, by my concern is his happiness, just as I'd expect his to be mine. Lastly, someone embarassed because people are juding him for no shoes on OR is too much of a…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:53 AM
3

Nope. Just grateful that I wouldn't have to expect most men to abandon me alone on the street if I asked for some help.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:50 AM
2

wait till you find out what's involved in "oral sex."
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:43 AM
1

Well, we're all just fucking machines, essentially...
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:40 AM
-1

Oh, yes, the good ole Victorian era! Where women were imprisoned for crying, enjoying sex, or expressing any degree of humanity! Those were the days... (Oh, yea, I forgot...there were a few Crusades, with myriad reasons! That's a good theory of your history professor's, though. He must be a smart fellow!)
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:35 AM
-7

Yea. Thank god most men aren't so insane.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:21 AM
6

So the next time my boyfriend's wrists are sore from an all night Tekken match with his best friend, you are telling me I shouldn't laugh and make him warm compresses and rub his arms, because I would be sacrificing myself for the choices that he made without a real need to? Wow...TIL how to be an "equal" partner! Thanks, men's rights! Ok...to summarize...don't help people you love....am I doing this right?!?!?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:19 AM
3

I had to stop reading at the 1st paragraph; neither Tiger Woods or his wife discussed with the police what happened between them.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:28 AM
8

My boyfriend would do that for me in a heartbeat. Do you know why? Because he loves me, and if we dress for an occasion, he knows that heels are part of the female formal code. You're instantly assuming that because women are touched by his kindness that we wouldn't conversely carry his stiff suit jacket, help him un-do his tie, iron and crease his dress pants, then make him his coffee just the way he likes it when he gets home! If women were to take every fuuuuuuuuuu cartoon where men gloat the…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:18 AM
2

I like how there are serious issues posted here, and this guy is pussy because a guy helped out his date.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:05 AM
1

See: above comments.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:01 AM
-1

lol! 405a has different thought then you, so you call them the BADDEST word of all...."FEMINIST!" "Masculineist" isn't a bad word, though, is it? Maybe 405a is just reasonable...?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 07:59 AM
1

Lol! Perfect assessment!
/r/MensRights04/02/12 07:54 AM
-2

Wow, you're a serious Dick.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 07:51 AM
5

Just because women think it's a friendly gesture doesn't mean women. EXPECT it. You know what happens when you assume!
/r/MensRights04/02/12 07:50 AM
6

I think you're reading way too much into this.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:44 PM
-2

But consider entertainment media: average women aren't used in television of film. Average men are...a lot. For a woman to fit any role she must be skinny and pretty...thenerd, the loner, the farmer, the professional, the victim, the antagonist...ALL must be skinny as hell, and super "pretty." Average" men mhave a gajillion more opportunities....dammit, cant type on my kindle.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:40 PM
0

I am not talking about gender...I am talking about sex. Please read the book. The scientist/author makes my case better then I do...but I understand your point, as well. The thing is that incapacitating one sex in favor of the other sexes abilities wouldn't be in keeping with the expectation of equal rights. Also, I don't see anything wrong with half of what you're using as a negative example, but I understand that it may frustrate the ladies who don't want kids, or who can navigate, etc. So I s…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 11:26 PM
0

"Again, I expects equal rights, but I will go to my grave dreading the day that I am treated by a man as if I am the same as a man.." "I don't understand, being talked to as an equal is awesome." I do not and will never speak to men as if they are equal to me. They are different then me. I will talk about my bowel movements with my girlfriends, but I will set myself on fire before I talk to a man about them. I will talk about my period with my girlfriends, but I will cut my own throat before I d…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 09:16 PM
0

It isn't, dear, and you being here and arguing this at menright's is pretty ridiculous. Physically, females are smaller and weaker then males. There may be a tiny percentage that this doesn't apply. I am sorry that it makes you upset that we are different, however, maybe you can take it up with science. " weaker sex..." Yes, physically weaker! We ladies are physically weaker. I can arm wrestle a skinny guy and STILL lose. I am 5'1. The average (meaning, literally, the average) height for men is:…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 06:20 PM
1

The woman is lauded and the man is "lucky." "Cougars" are a sad parody of women...everyone knows it. It's a fact that I find sad, as well. I mean...look at your wording. You are emphasising WOMEN'S issues, here...yes, "the beautiful 21" year old. Not "the pretty, but stupid, vapid and uninspired 21 year old." You are reaffirming the fact that men judge if a woman is worth persuing by her appearance only, then feel enraged when this hot girl doesn't have to pull the same weight as a man in societ…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 05:53 PM
0

I know that they lighten women's military load...that is just one more way that women and men aren't equal, and never should pretend to be. Anyway...cheers!
/r/MensRights10/01/12 05:44 AM
0

...laying down my life for the rights of others, in the event that those rights were under threat, wouldn't even be a question. I intended to sign up for the Marines after 9/11, but then we went to Iraq, I got angry, and changed my mind because it was clear to me that we were no longer doing anything useful or relevant. The fact is, however, that for me to carry around a gigantic machine gun would be pretty stupid. I am 5'1 and 120 lbs. I am sure I could be useful in some other way, however...I …
/r/MensRights10/01/12 03:33 AM
-1

But you can't have them because you aren't capable of them. You can't be a lumberjack because you lack the physical strength. You can't complete the same military training requirements because you lack the physical strength. That is why women training in infantry have their requirements diminished to accomodate the fact that they aren't of the same physical stature as men. Women and men aren't the same, we are different. We are not equal in the same way that German Shephards and Rottweilers are …
/r/MensRights09/01/12 11:46 PM
1

...you do NOT want to be treated like an equal. You want equal rights, not equal sociological expectations.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 11:33 PM
1

LOLWHUT!? Holding the door for you because you're a woman isn't condescending AT ALL. The man isn't implying that you're some weakling; it's a social gesture intended to display his willingness to care for you. That being said, yes, one should always hold the door for anyone because it is polite. But on a date, certain social gestures from men to women, like holding the door, are intended to convey that the man is willing to lighten a woman's load. Holy fuck, women like you destroy my dating exp…
/r/MensRights09/01/12 11:17 PM
6

I just had a talk with my boyfriend about this today. Every girl I know raves about the men that hold the door for her, pull out her chair, or gently kiss them goodnight at the end of the date. The women who scream at you for holding the door for them are not "feminists;" that wasn't the initial feminine initiative. The women that do that are just angry, rejected bitches...simmilar to the men who rage against ladies.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 11:00 PM
1

I think most women enjoy being women, and enjoy being treated like women, while enjoying men and enjoying that men behave like men. I think I didn't get it because I have never met a woman that wants to overpower men, because all of the women I know enjoy the chivalrous and protective aspect of men.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 10:34 PM
5

"Warfare has been a near constant feature of human society before the modern era, and whenever two tribes or kingdoms went to war with each other, the losing side saw many of its fighting-age men exterminated, while the women were assimilated into the invading society. Now, becoming a concubine or a housekeeper is an unfortunate fate, but not nearly as bad as being slaughtered in battle as the men were. To anyone who disagrees, would you like for the men and women to trade outcomes?" Well, had w…
/r/MensRights09/01/12 10:13 PM
4

Deciphering social standards are always funny, so I enjoyed a good laugh at this. However, it also gave me pause...are people actually confused as to why humanity has a very long standard of protecting the women and children? There is a reason: it is the remnant of our desperate fight for survival. You see, in order for the human species to survive, there must be more women then men. The men are like the pollenators, and the women are like the flower. Men can spread their seed daily for 40 years…
/r/MensRights09/01/12 09:13 PM
2

I'm new here, and I don't know if my point of view is welcome or relevant, but this is the most irritating thing I have ever read. Nice guys are compatible with nice girls. Nice guys need to stop pinning all of their hopes on a superficial woman that CLEARLY takes his kindness for granted. In the event that aforementioned guy is interested in a girl, following her around shopping, listening to her, holding her while she cries about her boyfriend, and generally being her manservant aren't an effe…
/r/seduction20/04/11 05:29 AM
2

Keep it casual. You can let her know you're into her without ever saying it's a date. A compliment or two helps, when placed correctly in the conversation. A good example would be something along the lines of: Ladyperson, "Oh, I'm so beat, X class kicked my ass today." You: "I would never know, you look amazing to me. So what kind of stuff did you go over?" I'd say it'd be very helpful to set up another date right before coffee ends, too. Something a little more date-like. You: "I'm so glad you …
/r/seduction20/04/11 04:09 AM
3

Asking for her number is best. It keeps the ball in your court. If you give her yours, the next move is hers, not yours, and she may chose not to make it, and then you're out of moves. I find that it works best with me when men are frank, sincere, and confident. If they seem in any way apologetic when asking me for a date or my number I am 100X less likely to give it.
/r/seduction20/04/11 03:56 AM
6

Girl person here. I don't know your entire situation, obviously, but if you can run into her on campus, it would be a much better way of asking her. You could say, "Hey, I'm on my way to grab a coffee...I'd like you to come with me, it would be nice. How about it?" Then smile. If she's not big on Facebook, your message could sit in her inbox for days and days, cultivating a heavy load of anxiety for you, which may affect your next interaction. Don't say, "if not, I'll survive ;-)" It sounds self…
/r/seduction20/04/11 03:40 AM
4

The woman that wrote this is shockingly ignorant of the subject.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 09:46 AM
3

Here's a thought: Buying a person a drink is an ANCIENT STANDARD OF ETIQUITTE. Yes...an ANCIENT standard of ETIQUITTE. It is different then PAYING FOR SOMEONE'S TIME. It's excercising a polite practice, and hideously juxtaposing it with brutish and crass behavior. You have some kind of ulterior motive here; I can only assume you are some kind of embittered, vengeful girl who is trying to win male approval by siding with nonsense at all costs, so I'm just going to end this conversation now.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 12:27 AM
1

If he wants to pay for drinks for fuckbuddies, it's my buisness because he has requested that I be one. I say "no," I think he's an offensive gorilla, I make fun of him to my friends, and it's still no big deal, as I never stated that it was at any point, so I'm not sure why you continue to reiterate that. Promiscuoius sex with strangers in bars in unhealthy mentally, emotionally, and physically. If I want to be treated as a thinking mind instead of a gaping hole, I'd say at that point my standa…
/r/MensRights16/02/11 04:58 AM
1

No, but if you are into CONVERSATION, or maybe getting to know this guy, and maybe sharing your number so that you can have a proper date LATER, you ACCEPT the drink, drink it with him, spend some time with him, maybe reciprocate... Human beings aren't primates. We shouldn't go around and fuck people with abandon, like monkeys do in the jungle. If a man assumes that I am a primate, (which is what he implies by assuming that I'm just gonna mosy on up and give him a good old fuck for the hell of i…
/r/MensRights16/02/11 03:52 AM
1

"It's disrespectful because what the guy is essentially saying to the girl is, "I have no interest in anything having to do with you at all with the exception of jamming my stick into the hole between your legs, vigorously thrusting into it until I come, and then hopefully being rid of you." Yep. Pretty fucking insulting. At least...any lady who considers herself a litttttttllllle bit more then a hole would be insulted. If I were to go up to a guy and say, "Listen, I'll buy you a drink, just fuc…
/r/MensRights16/02/11 03:30 AM
2

See my previous comment.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 03:28 AM
0

I don't, not have I ever had casual sex. The point is that if a woman agrees to accept a drink from you at the bar it's often under the premise that she's willing to settle in for a bit of chatting, "get to know you," maybe exchange phone number time. She's not agreeing to sit down and have some guy insult her by saying, "Before I buy you this drink, will you have sex with me?" That makes a guy a rude, disrespectful jerk.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 03:08 AM
0

Yes, women enjoy violence. They enjoy Pepsi, too. Also, don't forget to add that they love Maxi pads. Christ knows they bleed enough, obviously they love blood too, those disgusting vile skags. Give those conniving bitches a free hand, they'll be drinking up a Pepsi storm, beating black men into pies on a daily, and probably forcing everyone to wear a Maxi. Best keep em under lock.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 03:04 AM
2

I've been to bars where people buy drinks for people randomly. I've sent drinks to couples before because I thought they looked cute and happy. I got a shot for a strange girl because I heard her saying it was her birthday in the bathroom on the phone. I've had guys buy a drink for me on their way out of a bar, walk by me and say, "You're really beautiful, have a good night, enjoy the drink!" with no expectations at all. People do buy drinks for random unknown women...and men.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 02:32 AM
1

It's disrespectful because what the guy is essentially saying to the girl is, "I have no interest in anything having to do with you at all with the exception of jamming my stick into the hole between your legs, vigorously thrusting into it until I come, and then hopefully being rid of you." Yep. Pretty fucking insulting. At least...any lady who considers herself a litttttttllllle bit more then a hole would be insulted. If I were to go up to a guy and say, "Listen, I'll buy you a drink, just fuck…
/r/MensRights16/02/11 02:26 AM
1

I went to a bar with my girlfriend in Miami. Guys would send us over drinks, and the bartender would point them out. I would look in their direction, they'd raise a glass and smile, and go back to drinking or dancing or having their conversation with no additional interest in me. I never got the sense that I was a cheap asshole at all. I got the sense that these guys were fun, congenial gentlemen that liked seeing other people have a good time. If the drinks weren't $27.00 each, I would have sen…
/r/MensRights16/02/11 02:18 AM
6

I remember when I was a little girl on the school yard. A boy was taken inside the school by the teachers because he'd started to cry. I remember thinking that this was kind of the teachers, because it was probably embarassing for him to let the other boys see him cry. We walked past him in the principal's office on the way back into our class rooms, and about an hour later my teachers asked me if I'd be willing to bring him his homework because he was going home. I'd thought it was odd that she…
/r/MensRights12/01/11 05:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter