TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chad9k Archive

View 4 posts and 33 comments by chad9k on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yea, it’s not productive and I’m sure it breeds more incels than guys who can maintain healthy relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 09:54 PM
3

This is honestly something I suspected but couldn’t put into words well. I think this satisfies the point of thread, I just wish we could have something more like the first example instead. c'est la vie.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 09:47 PM
1

My original point though, was that TRPers are just pulling research and drawing their own more implicit conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 03:46 PM
1

I can tell you that I've seen it happen first hand. It's a bit much of a generalization to say that it never happens. I mean, are you going to say that gender discrimination never happened in the past? Then why is it out of the question to you that it occurs now with pay (not as a result of "maternity leave, etc." but just plain old unfounded discrimination)?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 03:44 PM
2

My point was that just because you can find examples of discrimination against men, doesn't mean the same doesn't happen to women. The reason why the "women get paid less cause they're women" rhetoric makes no sense to me is the implication that businessmen refuse to save money by hiring more women. If you could simply pay women less money for the same amount of work, women would dominate pretty much every industry easily. Wouldn't the same businessmen who think it's ok to pay women less not wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 03:32 PM
1

No, you are applying Kant wrongly. In all honesty I probably am so I digress. The humanity does not stop to exist if everyone ignores everyone. How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 03:26 PM
1

But even if I argue from that perspective, ignoring people is not wrong from Kant's perspective or divine command theory. How? A categorical imperative as defined by deontology is as follows: A categorical imperative, on the other hand, denotes an absolute, unconditional requirement that must be obeyed in all circumstances and is justified as an end in itself. So you're saying that everyone should ignore everyone? Because that would be the rule you're following, and under Kant's logic, it should…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 03:16 PM
2

There is, but it affects men. Like how women have lower standards put on them to get most jobs, like the police/firefighters/army giving them lower physical requirements, or affirmative action making female only admissions in colleges, or there being female-only government programs to get women in different careers while there are 0 male-only equivalents. I can tell you first-hand, even female family members in corporate positions with the same amount of experience as other males in the same pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 03:12 PM
1

I'm not sure you've been on there recently then. /r/seduction has become a cesspool of useless YouTube videos and motivational image porn. At least TRP filters itself to serious/relevant discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 03:05 PM
2

Most of the things trp supports are also supported by evolutionary phychologists and data What evolutionary psychologists are making direct claims about TRP ideas? .Other parts are the logical result of observation. Observation is a personal experience tainted by bias. If you think you are better served not believing this stuff ,go ahead ,but I personally think you are deluding yourself. This entire time I've said the opposite. I've said a lot of TRP advice has helped me. Understanding why these…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 03:03 PM
2

I don't know who that is. Author of The Rational Male. One of the books thats constantly recommended on TRP as a starting point. It's about patterns and not chasing after unicorns, regardless of whether or not unicorns are real. You can make a claim like that but it's still used to oversimplify women into these heartless evil creatures. Emphasis on lifting. How is that nonsense? I should have left this out/clarified (not to open another can of worms) because this is something regarding my own ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 02:58 PM
4

Everything Rollo has written ever. Using AWALT to oversimplify women into psychopathic sluts. Emphasis on lifting. I mean even right now, there's a post about the "gender pay gap myth" on TRP's front page. Without opening that can of worms, TRP is now this place where women are this boogeyman and they're just trying to cheat the system by creating false narratives about the pay gap. Yea, I'm sure there are people out there that want to take advantage of "the system," but I can tell you firsthead…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 02:46 PM
5

My issue ultimately has to do with their credibility and authority. TRP has essentially written this bible of ideas, and there seems to be a tendency to explain it all through biological perspectives (i.e. alpha passes his genes, beta provider helps raise children, etc.). Who are they to say that any of this is true? ESPECIALLY Rollo, he makes these claims and people blindly listen because he uses big words and complicated sentences. I'm not saying anything about whether what he says works, some…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 02:34 PM
0

I'm not asking for a blue-pilled alternative, nor did I ever say any of it is offensive. And just because I identified that there seems to be a lot of conservative virtue signaling, doesn't mean I'm a lefty either. Don't straw-man me. I wouldn't be where I am today if I listened to blue pilled subs exclusively, TRP has helped a lot. My point is that TRP has great advice but it's surrounded by complete nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 02:25 PM
1

Same logic carries over for many guys, especially the ones who struggle with dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 02:21 PM
1

How exactly are these women demanding to be treated as if they have a low number of partners? Why should a distinction be made? Yea, I’m sure many inexperienced guys are intimidated by women who are much more experienced. They probably wanna date other women who are closer in experience level. But besides that, what treatment are they demanding?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 11:37 AM
1

I know, I said you would ignoring a girl for the sake of it under deontological logic. If you see one person approach another in person and very clearly say something to them and it gets ignored, it is odd. You are not forced to respond to her, but you are inherently focusing on the result when you say “she likes me more after the fact.” Look, I’m not saying it doesn’t work and that you shouldn’t do it if you want to do well with girls. I do it myself. I’m just saying that when posting advice fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 11:34 AM
0

There’s this sentiment of disapproval of women who have slept with more people than average though. That suggests that they believe there should (and heavy emphasis on should) be some level of change, no matter how secondary the sentiment of change is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 11:15 AM
2

I think they take it a step beyond “pretending to be someone else.” I think the difference varies in the level of self awareness. There seems to be a lack of that among TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 11:06 AM
1

Not to go full amateur philosopher but: Under consequentialist logic, ignoring a girl isn’t shitty. But I’m talking about looking at it through a deontological perspective. What’s the rule you’re following when you ignore a girl? That you should just ignore girls? Should you just ignore people then? No, generally that’s a shitty thing to do if you’re just ignoring someone for the sake of ignoring them. However, consequentialism would say that purposefully ignoring a girl would help when they are…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 11:03 AM
5

I’ve seen a few right-wing talking points but then again it’s not that implicit. I’ve also only ever seen pro-Trump sentiment, which isn’t the issue in and of itself. I just feel like if the goal is improving your interactions with women then it’s unnecessary to talk about politics like that. It definitely is blind leading blind, but then wouldn’t it help tremendously if they were upfront about it? Shouldn’t the attitude be, “I’m not the authority on this but doing x is what works for me. Try it…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 10:51 AM
1

Yea but there seems to be a general consensus imo. Whatever the usage is, I think it’s unnecessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 11:23 PM
1

Its colloquial usage is similar to the whole “Chad” caricature and every user seems to be referring to that same idea. It really doesn’t seem that subjective. It just seems silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 11:16 PM
2

yea but I don’t feel full after watching a video of someone eating a hamburger.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 09:36 PM
8

I don’t think anything in the sidebar is that objective so I’ll preface by saying this is my opinion. The concept of Alpha, or even just the use of that word. Most posters are larping as this concept of “alpha.” Edit: also most citing of “biological evidence” to support claims
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 02:23 PM
-2

I’m all for free speech but weren’t they banned for brigading and targeting different people? Surely if that’s what they’re promoting, that’s reasonable grounds for being banned?
/r/TheRedPill13/09/18 02:47 AM
1

I think something a lot of people miss is that oneitis is not something you can logically work yourself through (at least in my experience). Hear me out. I’ve just finished high school. I know I don’t have much expertise to be giving my opinion. I went through severe oneitis. This was with a girl I had been crushing on since elementary school. I didn’t even talk to her till senior year. I was able to put my knowledge of game to use. And it worked. We went out for a bit until I bugged out like a …
/r/TheRedPill08/07/18 07:36 AM
1

Yea I think I also might be a little anxious to talk about going out with girls because of the way I was raised. Its not something I'm used to talking about with them so I also feel a little embarrassed. The position I think they are coming from is that they went out a lot at my age and had a lot of fun but now regret it. They don't want me to do the same.
/r/seduction19/12/17 01:19 AM
–

They think that spending time meeting girls is a waste of time and that I should focus on school and working.
/r/seduction18/12/17 10:14 PM
–

They're very paranoid about drug and alcohol use which has led them to be massively overprotective. I wish I could figure out how to get around that. :/
/r/seduction17/12/17 11:46 PM
–

I guess I could try that. The only issue is if I get caught, its game over. Losing their trust like that will keep me from being around friends. I think getting a part-time job might help my case in terms of more freedom also.
/r/seduction17/12/17 11:25 PM
–

I’m 17. I stray away from lying because they always ask specific questions about who I’m with, sometimes even checking to make sure I’m being honest.
/r/seduction17/12/17 10:26 PM
1

So did I, but it still had the first chapter that was supposed to be removed. I wonder if this problem is from Amazon's side?
/r/seduction16/03/16 08:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter