TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chaz345 Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by chaz345 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

information page and why does everyone consider him a MRA, rather than an egalitarian for example? Because in the feminist view, anyone who isn't a full on female superiority espousing feminist must be an MRA.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:24 PM
1

It's not a good program BECAUSE there is no male equivalent.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:21 PM
1

I think it would be hilarious for a few boys to claim to gender identify as female and try to get into this program.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:20 PM
1

I actually heard a feminist, talking about the current gender split in college admissions that is 60/40 in favor of women saying that they have almost achieved equality.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:18 PM
1

In principle, yeah the fact that he wasn't available when he said he would be is a problem. But in this specific case, if taking a class and it's associated exam is too stressful for her, she's completely unsuited for being a nurse.
/r/PussyPass28/05/15 07:32 PM
1

Yes in lots of cases of "diagnosed" ADD it's just being a normal young boy. It is a real disorder but one that actually affects only a tiny percentage of those who have been "diagnosed" as having it.
/r/PussyPass28/05/15 07:22 PM
1

Yes we are. Both in the US and in Canada. Not just stress and anxiety but even things like being severely overweight too.
/r/PussyPass28/05/15 07:20 PM
1

She failed the class twice but the professor clearly did not offer much in the way of help to pass. Who is going to help her when the shit hits the fan when she's out there nursing and someone's life is possibly on the line? I've got no problem with accomodations for those with limitations but when their limitations make them inherently unsuitable for a certain job, it's a bit silly to let them train for that job.
/r/PussyPass28/05/15 07:18 PM
27

Wether it's true or not, the fact that it was laughed at and/or praised by feminists is quite telling.
/r/PussyPass28/05/15 07:08 PM
6

Feminists like to claim that idiots like this are an extreme fringe minority. If that were the case, then why are so many of them in prominent positions and where are the feminists opposing her BS?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:57 PM
3

Inferior overall? Of course not. Not as good at certain things(but better at others) because of inherent differences? Absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 06:36 PM
1

I agree. "Different but equal in value" would be a much better word choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 06:35 PM
2

I don't know how much time you spend in the gym but I imagine most of that 60-70 hours gone is spent working, which is way too much unless you're running your own business. Not hard to get to 60 hours away from home without working too much if you consider commute time which can easily be a couple hours a day and gym time of a couple hours a day. 10 hours commuting and 10 hours at the gym is 20, plus 40 working and we're already at 60.
/r/MarriedRedPill07/05/15 07:59 PM
1

I doubt that reproducing the argument would have done any good. People who still believe the 77 cents lie don't respond to facts and logic.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:58 PM
3

I picked 20 years because that is what would be typical in the US had he been convicted. So adjusting for the differences, she should, in my opinion, face whatever he would have. they just wouldn't make an arrest until the entire investigation has been completed. I agree with the idea but in the US it's problematic in that it's too easy for someone who has been accused to disappear in the timeframe that an investigation would take. While I absolutely believe that criminal proceedings need to be …
/r/MensRights25/02/15 02:40 PM
11

Sure that's the most upsetting, the most emotionally damaging. But from a what's wrong with the situation, it's pretty screwed up that they system allows this sort of thing to happen with such light consequenses.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:25 PM
5

Not really. The rape would be a completely separate thing from any false rape accusation. The lack of enough evidence to convict for rape doesn't provide any evidence for the idea that it was a false accusation.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:01 PM
12

Not likely. Well right now, while she's in prison of course, but as soon as she gets out, someone will figure that it was all just a matter of her having been damaged by living under the oppression of the patriarchy and give her a pass.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:59 PM
5

That it's so difficult to prove that a claim is false sort of makes the notion that stiffer penalties for false claims would cause fewer actual victims to report out to be the nonsense that it is. Unfortunately, harsh penalties still wouldn't do much They would deter at least some of the false accusers. I mean as it is someone contemplating making a false claim figures "why not, the worst that will happen, even if I admit that I made it all up, is some probation and community service". If that e…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:54 PM
33

No, the most f-ed up thing about it id the fact that she is serving 20 months in prison, which we all know will end up being 12 to 15 at most. It should be a LEAST that number of years.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:49 PM
3

absorbed into this extremist feminism It's not extremist if its not a small minority that buys into it. And it's very clearly not a small minority.
/r/MGTOW05/02/15 08:00 PM
4

I for one am surprised it hasn't already happened.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:42 PM
1

If the genders were reversed and it was proven to be consensual, would you be saying the same thing? But consensual is irrelevant if the student is under the age of consent. That's the entire concept, that someone that young can't give consent in the legal sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/15 10:52 PM
2

This centers on the idea that if the man is found not guilty then the woman would be charged by default with filing a false claim. Lots of people can't understand the difference and complete separation from the two possible crimes though. A not guilty finding on the rape charges has nothing at all to do with wether or not the woman filed a false claim.
/r/PussyPass12/11/14 07:47 PM
1

He got pretty well attacked by the media though. Maybe not as storngly as he should have, but there certainly wasn't anyone actively defending those actions, no one saying that there was nothing at all wrong with what he supposedly did.
/r/PussyPass12/11/14 07:44 PM
1

Not sure that people coming to the MRM, especially men, are empathizing as much as they are looking at and analyzing facts and finding feminist positions to be broken and harmful. It's more about right and wrong or doing good versus doing harm, than it is about empathizing.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:35 PM
1

Well that's sort of what happens when a woman is woken up by having a man she knows and loves and trusts get screwed over by the system. It doesn't feel good to her so it gets her attention.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:39 PM
2

I have been party to discussions about men who have been domestic violence victims who had nowhere to turn because most DV shelters refuse to serve men. The usual response is that since when men are DV victims it's less likely that they are seriously injured or die that it doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is that DV is perpetrated by roughly equal numbers of men and women. In terms of rape, if what occurs in prison were counted, men are actually raped, according to the CDC defintion, more …
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:36 PM
2

In the minds of many MRAs, feminists are anti-man. The real question is the degree to which either of the above beliefs are objectively true. The difference is that one of these two can be shown, through the use of facts, to be much more objectively true than the other. Many feminist policies and ideas can be shown to be harmful, not only to men but to women too. Here's the thing though. I believe that for the vast majority of feminists, it's entirely unintentional. The can't accept the fact tha…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:30 PM
1

As for women being disproportionately represented in congress, do you think that may be at least partially due to the fact that female representatives tend to be more extreme in their political position, be it left or right? Two prime examples being Nancy Pelosi and Michelle Bachmann.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:15 PM
2

That's true, but it's still the case that an ocurance like that is the thing that is most likely to get them to see the truth.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:12 PM
2

I more or less sarcastically thanked them for their honesty and told them that it's sad that an adult thinks that two wrongs make a right.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:11 PM
2

You can stick with your belief all you want, but until or unless you care to provide a source to a credible study, that's all it is, your belief. And no we don't agree that a significant wage disparity exists, or did you miss the part where I said that the studies that conclude that there is a 20% gap are deeply flawed. The problem is that such studies simply look at the median wages of men versus women, without accounting for different professions and without accounting for the fact that women …
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:10 PM
3

40 percent? Really? Even the deeply flawed studies that show a significant wage gap put the number at something under 20percent.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 03:50 PM
0

I'm not necessarily even talking about nature though. I'm talking about average physical capability. There will never be, for example, as many female firefighters as there are male ones simply because there are fewer women physically capable of the job. Of course no individual who is physically capable should be prevented from doing whatever they want because of their gender but that's not enough for today's feminists. They look at the fact that there are fewer female firefighters or soldiers, a…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:43 PM
3

That's pretty much what I meant with the chicken and egg comment. The stereotypes, while based on actual differences will also exaggerate those differences. So yes the existing stereotypes definitely play a part in creating the behavioral differences.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:19 PM
5

I've found that facts rarely change their minds. Feelings do. When a man they know and love and trust, such as a son,or husband or brother gets screwed over by the system that's been constructed by modern feminism is when eyes get opened.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:13 PM
2

We're not willing to concede much because anything that needed to be conceded, things like basic legal and social equality, are the well accepted norm. There is nothing that modern western feminism advocates that should be or even can be compromised on, it's all utter and complete garbage. For example when a modern feminist thinker can look at the fact that college admissions currently favor women nearly 60/40 and claim that equality for women has almost been reached in that area. Or when anothe…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:11 PM
95

The reason they are particularly brutal to women who are critical of feminism is that their usual bag of attacks and invalidating tactics won't work and it's harder to silence them. In the worst cases, the female critic of feminism actually causes them to think about their position and when they are forced to do that, they are faced with some very uncomfortable feelings and they hate than more than anything.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:06 PM
2

While I see your point, unlike the Nazis, there are two rather distinct and separate phases of feminism. The initial wave, the one that fought for basic legal equality was undeniably good and necessary. The very beginning of the second wave had some merit in their fight for social/cultural equality. The problem comes in when those goals have essentially been accomplished.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:03 PM
12

It's disappointing too, because the feminist movement could better fulfill its stated purpose of equality for women if it opened up a bit to self introspection. See that's just it, their actions prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that their stated purpose and their actual purpose are not the same thing at all. I've even encountered a few who are at least honest enough to admit that they think a time of matriarchy, a time of oppression of men as a payback for the way things had been for so long, wo…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:56 PM
6

everything to protect their feelings. It all hinges on that "f" word. Everything in their world is based on what feels good or right, not what is objectively right or wrong.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:54 PM
19

Based on my experience in dealing with many of them they are definitely not cognatively aware of it. The actually honestly see any deviation from the "party line" as an active and intentional attack on women. The only thing that can shake them from their position is if a man they know and love and trust, like a husband or brother or son, gets screwed over by the system that radical feminism has created.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:52 PM
18

they've banned me. Both subs. No explanation given. To the best of my knowledge I broke no rules See here's the exact problem with modern feminism. While you broke no rules of reddit or those subs, you broke the main rule of modern feminism which is that nothing about the current direction of the movement can even be questioned. Why this is the case is obvious. There is a fear that if certain questions are allowed, significant numbers of women and other feminists will start to see just how wrong…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:48 PM
-1

2 Cultural stereotypes and gender norms are limiting and anti-individualist. Absolutely true, but there is a bit of chicken and egg going on. Yes cultural stereotypes and norms cause some of the differences we see between men and women, but at the same time, those stereotypes and norms come from the fact that there are some inherent differences.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:43 PM
0

But see the problem? These goals have all been met. Exactly. As the original movement's goals were met, people who had an interest in keeping the movement alive found new things to fight for. Things that have nothing to do with actual equality and which harm men, children and ironically probably women most of all.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter