TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ckmtpm Archive

View 2 posts and 117 comments by ckmtpm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I’m not being rational when you’re the one making bizarre assumptions about an Internet stranger’s relationship dynamics? Alright. We are each other’s rocks at this point—he is no more mine than I am his. It’s frankly quite insulting for you to assume that he’s my rock but I’m not his. And as I’m the more successful one (and by far more financially stable because of my background), I don’t “need” him to “fall back on” — not now, not ever. We are there for each other because we want to be.
/r/askTRP16/12/17 12:29 PM
2

Of course I would be. I'm not sure why you would assume otherwise. At this point, I am actually the more successful one of the two of us, anyhow. You honestly sound bitter because the girl (girls?) you liked didn't care for you back. But that doesn't mean mutually loving relationships don't exist--it just means you haven't had the privilege of experiencing one.
/r/askTRP16/12/17 02:23 AM
1

Shock! Horror! Yes, I am. And I have a strong emotional bond with my boyfriend and it’s legit the best thing ever. We enhance each other’s lives in a way that meaningless sex cannot—and as a former college athlete, he’s had plenty of that to confirm the comparison.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 05:18 PM
0

Small minority? In what world? I’d say the vast majority of middle-aged men are married with families. The divorce rate is not as high as you seem to believe it is. The rumor that this sub is full of ex-incels and men who never witnessed a healthy relationship growing up, rings true. Having a strong, emotional bond with someone is valuable beyond just having someone to “wipe your ass” when you’re older. It’s about having a true partner—there with you through thick and thin, a rock to lean on and…
/r/askTRP14/12/17 04:48 PM
2

Sure but I think it’s a bit silly to pretend as if women are the only ones who want or “need” to procreate/have a family. You can “see” both genders wanting children, thus, it exists both ways, by your logic.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 04:46 PM
3

Why is it a need for women? Asking as a woman with no such “biological urge” to have children.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 01:25 PM
2

A retirement plan can drive you to medical appointments, make funeral arrangements when you’re grieving for a loved one, etc.? I don’t see how a retirement plan could substitute for having real human support in times of need. Friends will only do so much because at the end of the day, they have their own families to care for, too.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 01:20 PM
8

Why would hurting another human ever be a goal or something to aspire to? Why not focus on being happy and meeting your own needs, as opposed to “ruining” someone? This is bizarre.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 10:14 PM
5

Most people—men or women—will break hearts if necessary. Neither gender particularly likes when it happens to them but that’s life. Heartbreak isn’t a gender-specific phenomenon lol.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 10:09 PM
1

Or you could be married 50+ years and die still married.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 10:06 PM
8

You are a piece of trash.
/r/MGTOW24/10/17 03:53 AM
1

You’re a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 03:52 AM
1

Is this as much of an issue if it's obvious that you don't need their money?
/r/RedPillWomen27/12/16 03:55 AM
4

I think it's rather far-fetched to believe that two random Swedish exchange students stopped mid-bike ride to check on this guy, tackle him when he tried to run away, and call the police all for the sake of "saving" the reputation of a girl that they didn't know/didn't even go to their school? That really doesn't add up or make very much sense. It's also rather easy to confirm whether she was unconscious or not -- because I'd imagine if this were a consensual hook-up, she would have been awake, …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:56 AM
1

Idk man, maybe the hunting was a deal-breaker for her? I know some vegans/vegetarians who are very serious about the animal rights stuff and aren't willing to compromise or "agree to disagree" with their friends/significant others about it.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:45 AM
2

I don't know, I think when adrenaline is pumping, it's very easy to just leap into action and for everything to remain a blur afterwards. The very few times I've been in a tense situation, I know that very specific details (exact quotes of what I said) are blurry, even though I know exactly what I did and what happened.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:43 AM
7

She was unconscious, she was not "begging" for anything. Speculation is irrelevant to this case; both witnesses have testified that she was unconscious when they happened upon Brock assaulting her. There's no excuse or explanation that can justify his actions, or make her somehow "responsible." She made a stupid decision -- the difference is that HE made an evil one. Sadly, had those decent Swedish dudes happened upon her first, I bet that her stupid decision would have remained that and she wou…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:41 AM
4

Just because it's a stupid decision to get drunk doesn't mean she's "responsible" for what happened to her -- Brock made his decision to act as he did, and he's 100% responsible for his behavior. Whether she was drunk or not, he made the independent decision to assault an unwilling, unconscious person. Many of us are able to keep our hands to ourselves, tipsy or not, including the victim herself, so there's really no excuse for his actions.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:37 AM
6

It's unlikely to be true -- there is no way that his BS "alcohol and party culture made me do it" defense wouldn't have brought up that angle if it were true. He's well-connected enough to pull together a strong defense (and clearly did, given how short his sentence is), so I doubt that this wouldn't have been brought up by his lawyer, if it were actually true.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:34 AM
5

The witnesses stated that she was unconscious. I'll take the word of the people who were actually there and caught him mid-act over the speculations of people who weren't there.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:32 AM
8

There's no proof that she ever willingly left with him -- he actually changed his story once he realized that her memory of the night was fuzzy and started adding details (dancing, etc.) that never existed in his original telling of the story. And there's literally no proof that this wasn't just a normal college party. Not everyone goes to college parties to hook up.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:29 AM
7

There were two witnesses -- the Swedish students who caught him -- who stumbled upon him and saw that she was unconscious while he assaulted her. How much more evidence does there need to be?
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:28 AM
5

Serious question: how does being "under the influence of alcohol" change anything? I mean, lots of us manage to get tipsy or drunk without sticking our fingers (or anything else) in someone else. Shocking, I know. I mean, the victim here was drunk, and yet she managed to keep her fingers to herself, imagine that. Also, laughing at the first bullet point -- he was chased down and tackled because he approached by two students who were wondering what was up (because apparently even in the dark, beh…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 02:23 AM
1

There are plenty of genetically gifted women. Some women just don't gain weight, regardless of their eating habits or exercise routines (or lack thereof).
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 11:51 PM
0

What about late bloomers? There are a lot of women that haven't been attractive for most of their lives, and have only recently started getting more attention.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 11:42 PM
5

He clearly had other mental health issues going on -- I doubt it was actually "falling in love" that caused this horrible outcome. The only lesson I can glean from this tragedy is that if you see someone exhibiting unhealthy behavior (e.g. obsessively calling someone), try to direct them to the help they might need.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 11:23 PM
1

It's rough but a lot of people lack empathy in general. One of my friend's sister's boyfriend dumped her the day after she told him her mother had been diagnosed with cancer. Sadly, some people just suck.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 12:08 AM
1

This was very insightful. Thanks for sharing, hadn't thought of it that way.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 07:46 PM
1

Exactly -- only become a girl's friend if you want to actually be friends. If you're interested in her romantically, becoming a friend is counterproductive.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 07:45 PM
3

I agree about all of the improvements but the whole 'text her but then ignore her' fantasy is counterproductive. She isn't interested in keeping in touch with him, so if he does all of that hoping that she'll reach out or he'll have the last word so to speak, it might be disappointing for him in the end when she doesn't care about how successful/awesome/whatever he becomes.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 07:43 PM
2

Exactly. He needs to focus on other women. This girl has never felt that way about him, and likely never will, and it's counterproductive to focus his improvement on impressing her.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 07:39 PM
1

All the signs were there -- you purposefully ignored them. I don't think she ever even led you on, it seems like you were firmly a friend from the get go. You should definitely work on improving yourself, and your confidence, but I wouldn't pin any hopes on her regretting her decision to reject you (though, it may not have even been a conscious rejection if she never thought of you in the way). Some people just won't like you no matter what (for whatever reason, even if you're objectively a grea…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 07:38 PM
1

Again, it really depends on the women you know, and how well you know them. There are plenty of girls who are more conservative and/or picky with who they choose to involve themselves with. You just need to be observant, so you can tell the difference between who is genuine and who isn't. It's important to be able to spot someone gently rejecting you/brushing you off, but at the same time, unless you're only trying to get laid, I don't see the appeal in getting involved with someone who jumps in…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 07:29 PM
1

Yeah I don't get the big deal. Clearly, Ayesha Curry is happy and her beliefs and more conservative style are working for her. It's hypocritical to talk about giving women choices, but then being upset if they choose more traditional ones. People should live and let live.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 03:22 AM
2

I think it depends on the circumstances and the girl in question. How well do you know the woman? If she seems fairly open in that sense with others, then it might be her way of letting you down easy and there's no reason to waste any more time on her, because she's probably not interested. On the other hand, if she's displaying other signs of interest (wanting to hang out with you, doting on you in other ways), AND she seems to be picky/careful with who she involves herself with, then it might …
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 03:07 AM
1

I wonder if this is 'human decency respect' vs. 'admiration respect.' No one automatically receives the latter (it should be earned), but the former is something we should aim to treat everyone with (unless they are truly an awful, evil person).
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 03:05 AM
1

Wasn't Yahoo a mess before Meyer got her hands on it? There are definitely some women that do extremely well in the work place. I work with plenty of them. If you work in a place with high standards as far as hiring, you should be working with people that are, at the very least, fairly competent at what they do.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 02:56 AM
1

Feeling tingles and exerting self-control are two very different things. Being attracted and showing restraint are not mutually exclusive. Will power and sound judgment are important. If someone cannot help but sleep with anyone they are attracted to, I'm not interested.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/15 02:53 AM
1

According to the OKCupid stats a few years back, Middle Eastern women were actually the most popular race of women/received the most responses. Maybe the Kardashian effect?
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 07:32 PM
1

I think this really depends on the quality of the woman in question.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 07:13 PM
1

There are plenty, but he's likely not finding many of them if he's exclusively dating beauty queens and models.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 06:59 PM
1

It's also likely the circles he's running in. He'd likely have much better luck with someone outside showbiz/modeling/professional sports world, and I'm guessing that will be what he does once he's actually ready to settle down with someone.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 06:54 PM
1

In the original thread, a ton of people told him to reconsider dating her though. I didn't see all that much shaming.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/15 10:06 PM
0

60+ guys? How is that even possible?
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 03:00 PM
0

What about older virgins (early-mid 20s)? If they've got their v-card still, then obviously, it's not just a matter of them dangling it over the guy's head or making (only) him wait. How do you handle this?
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 04:08 AM
0

I've met a few pretty virgins. How, exactly, do you handle that? Obviously, most of them aren't going to sleep with someone early on, no matter how much they like him.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 04:06 AM
3

My opinion? Every woman. EVERY WOMAN has had sex within an hour of meeting a guy. Why him and not you? I don't think this is true. It really depends on the quality of women you're surrounding yourself with.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/15 10:35 PM
1

I agree with the premise of this -- Alphas do exist in multiple shapes and sizes, and I actually see a lot more "Captain America" type Alphas in real life, than the dark triad type, even though that seems to be the more popular type around here. ETA: I will say, though, that most of the Captain America type Alphas tend to be the ones that are very conventionally attractive. I wonder if there might be something to that, since Chris Evans is traditionally good-looking, whereas dark triad type Rob …
/r/TheRedPill11/10/15 10:18 PM
3

If it's a younger woman, it's also likely that her parents are footing (or are helping to foot) the bill. Most of my social circle has traveled a lot, but mostly on their parents' dime.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/15 10:11 PM
1

I think this really depends on the woman in question. I have a lot of friends that can afford to travel whenever they want, because their parents have provided them with a pretty big safety net, financially. A couple thousand for a vacation isn't a big deal for them, nor is it putting them in debt.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/15 10:05 PM
0

Wait, are you two in a relationship, or just hooking up? It's not clear to me, since she texted you about being a "team" but at the same time, your interactions with her don't seem very relationship-like.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 02:52 AM
1

Huh? I don't quite understand what tattoos or piercings have to do with anything.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/15 05:50 PM
1

Serious question for all commenters: Is there ever a time where not wanting to do something really is about the act, not the other person? As in, you have a girl who has honestly never tried something before and genuinely feels uncomfortable doing it with anyone? I think it's possible.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 12:14 AM
0

I think this depends on the area you're living in. At my college, the Asians and Indians had pretty close-knit social circles, with mostly people (men and women) of the same ethnicity. And it seemed to work out for them -- they all dated each other, partied together, etc. The men in those circles never seemed to have trouble getting a date, meeting women, etc., and the girls themselves appeared to be only interested in dating the guys already in their social group.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/15 03:49 AM
1

False. If a man will be with any kind of woman, regardless of whether she's interesting, kind, smart, etc., then he's clearly lacking substance and depth himself. Men who do have hobbies, opinions, education, etc., will likely seek out compatible women, who are likewise educated, opinionated, have hobbies/interests, and more.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 11:32 PM
0

His own son saw him with this other woman; I'd say that's rather solid evidence that something was going on. As far as the rest goes, that is why you don't get married if fidelity is something you struggle with. Everyone is perfectly aware of what can happen during a divorce--so save yourself the trouble if you know you'll be no good at the whole marriage thing.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 11:28 PM
1

People, men and women, lie for all of the reasons above. That's life. You always have to be cautious with who you trust.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:25 PM
1

She sounds cray. That is not normal.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:24 PM
1

This post is seriously disturbing and repulsive.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:22 PM
6

This. If you don't want to be faithful and don't want to be monogamous, the solution is simple: stay single. Don't get married. But if you make the choice to get married, don't cheat. And if you want to cheat at some point, leave your wife first.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:20 PM
6

This is crazy. His father was the one in the wrong. It sucks that his life turned out this way -- but he made his bed, now he has to lie in it. If he hadn't cheated, or if he had left after cheating, then he wouldn't be where he is today. But he cheated, and then tried to keep his marriage too, and this is how it turned out. I don't blame the mother and I think if she had been the one cheating, you'd feel a bit differently.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:18 PM
2

I think it's pretty clear that he did cheat. OP saw him with this other woman as well.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:15 PM
6

Maybe he shouldn't have cheated then? It's not cool when women do it, and it's not cool when men do it, either. No one's forcing you to be monogamous but if you choose to be, then you should be faithful. Once he cheated, he should have made a clean break and ended the relationship. He got what he deserved -- he wanted the LTR, wanted the other woman, and thought he could keep the marriage when all was said and done. Once broken, trust is hard to rebuild and almost never reaches the same place as…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:10 PM
1

It's not friendly. It's a formal greeting -- when you meet someone in a business setting, it's generally the correct way to greet them when introducing yourself. This, of course, might be different if you are outside the United States/western world. A hand on the back is not a widely accepted way of greeting someone, especially not in the Northeast/bigger cities. Having been born and raised in the Northeast, right outside a major city, I can say that I've never really seen someone just casually …
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 11:26 PM
-3

You need to meet some new women.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 01:32 AM
3

I think it's important to note that in a lot of places, it would not be normal to place your hand anywhere on a coworker's body, with the exception of a handshake. I know you were being friendly, but a lot of people would see that, and not understand why you would do that, when it served no purpose (it wasn't like you were trying to get her attention/have her move out of your way, in which case touching someone might also be appropriate).
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 01:29 AM
1

It's a good idea never to touch someone -- especially a coworker -- if you haven't built up to that level of friendship/comfort yet. A lot of people are uncomfortable with physical contact, so it's better to err on the side of caution.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 01:25 AM
1

With regard to "career women," I think it all boils down to what a man is looking for. For me, I'm generally only interested in so-called career women when it comes to LTRs, because (1) it leads to a better overall lifestyle because two big paychecks are better than one and (2) I want someone that's intelligent, accomplished and can hold her own in my social/professional circle. Also, life is stressful with a lot of ups and downs and when it comes to a long-term commitment, I want someone that I…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:14 PM
1

That makes sense. I suppose I'm curious about how a successful woman would perceive someone being less than straightforward about their career. Obviously, there's no reason for detailed discussion about finances until there's a real commitment. But in my social circle, there are a lot of women that wouldn't consider dating "unsuccessful men" -- not because they are looking for a sugar daddy, but more so because many of them have well-paid, respectable careers and degrees, and they want to have t…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 08:10 PM
1

Did she tell you to keep in touch, contact her, add her on FB? Usually women will give some kind of indication if they want to stay in touch -- asking for your number, giving you theirs, adding you on FB, or telling you their name so you can find them later. If she gave you no hint (and didn't provide you with all the necessary info to find her), it might come across a bit weird that you managed to find her on FB.
/r/askTRP12/07/15 07:54 PM
1

It might be rare these days but it's not impossible.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:43 PM
1

Why not date within your socio-economic circle (e.g. women that also grew up with money)? It would eliminate that problem.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:31 PM
2

Question: does this still apply if the women in question have no reason to be after your money? As in, the woman herself has a lucrative career and/or comes from an affluent background? I mean, there are obviously women who will try to suss out your career for the sake of gauging your salary, but if you're meeting an Ivy-educated lawyer making six figures, and she asks what you do, it's probably not because she's looking for you to pay her bills.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:27 PM
1

Just ignore her. It's not worth it. If you react, you'll look defensive and silly. Let your confidence speak for itself and don't let her comments ruffle your feathers.
/r/askTRP12/07/15 07:12 PM
1

I agree -- interesting is better. The most well-liked, sought-after people I've met have been people with loads of interesting stories and experiences. This is true for both men and women; people with varied interests, hobbies, experiences, and knowledge are generally more engaging. As a side note, I think the Captain America vs. Iron Man comparison is interesting. I would say that they are both Alphas, but in different ways. I think they could both pull high quality women pretty easily. I would…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 03:44 PM
1

I think this is true. I actually asked TRP a similar question, because of something I observed between an Alpha friend of mine and a girl he likes. Basically, my Alpha friend can occasionally act very beta, with little to no repercussions--the girl he likes still perceives him as an Alpha/out of her league and it's likely because he's very good-looking and athletic
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 03:28 PM
0

I don't know, most women I know prefer dogs/puppies. I only know a few 'cat people' overall.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 04:42 PM
0

Most Indian girls around my area tend to be pretty proud of their ethnicity and hang out/date mostly other Indians.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 04:41 PM
1

That makes sense. What I'm getting is that it's more of spectrum (not binary), so if an alpha regresses somewhat without completely entering beta territory, they might not feel any negative effects from that regression?
/r/askTRP19/05/15 09:36 PM
1

Nah, I'm not into her like that. I've already learned my lesson about being friends with girls I want to be with, definitely not a smart idea. She's a cool chick, but she's not really my type physically or personality-wise (very conservative - still has her v-card). I'm just curious as to how he can essentially get away with certain behavior and if there's some sort of leeway with beta behavior in some cases (e.g. if you can establish value in other ways, will displayed beta behavior matter less…
/r/askTRP19/05/15 02:04 AM
1

I'm not sure if it's oneitis. He got out of a relationship a few months ago and has been dating/sleeping with different girls on and off since then... but I think she's the only girl he'd want to possibly have a relationship with right now. But I get how this could read as oneitis -- which makes it even weirder that our mutual friends still seems intimidated and/or in awe of him, despite his obvious beta behavior.
/r/askTRP18/05/15 11:10 PM
1

Hmm... interesting. I always thought "bubbly" was a term for perpetually peppy/enthusiastic girls.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 10:22 PM
7

I don't know, I think there are a lot of women who are happier with their career success and don't care very much about having husbands or children. I think it's okay to acknowledge that as a legitimate life choice for some women. Because if you don't acknowledge that, you are going to have wives/mothers who aren't satisfied with their stay-at-home role (and likely won't be great at it as a result), but who do it anyway because they feel like it's the "right" thing for them. I know quite a few w…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 10:16 PM
2

It is pretty idiotic. If the convo did/does leak back to her, he's going to come across like a creepy stalker, not her knight-in-shining-armor.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 02:57 AM
1

That is really freaking weird. I think you handled it well, but it's probably best to ignore any messages from him in the future. It's really none of his business what you do with 'Steph' or how you treat her and it's downright creepy that he doesn't want her to know he spoke to you. I really don't understand what he was expecting to get out of the exchange, it's cringeworthy.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 02:55 AM
0

Wait, "bubbly" means fat now? I've described girls as "bubbly," never realized there was a connection there.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 06:49 PM
2

I don't think you could've done much differently, to be honest. If she wanted to stay with you at the original bar, despite her male friend's attempts to get her away, she would have stayed. My guess is that the male friend is good at reading her cues, and could tell she was interested in taking off with Guy #2, so he didn't try to interfere, because he knew he'd fail.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 02:00 PM
0

I think there's nothing wrong with having female friends, if you've got no romantic interest in them for whatever reason but genuinely enjoy their company. But if you're looking for more than that from a girl? Then friendship is not the way to go.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 11:31 PM
0

The song is Crave You by Flight Facilities. Other lyrics from the same song, which I think are also very true to life: "Let's just stop and think, before I lose faith. Surely I can't fall into a game of chase. Around his little finger, that boy has got me curled I try to reach out but he's in his own world. This boy's got my head tied in knots with all his games. I simply want him more because he looks the other way."
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 11:25 PM
2

There are still plenty of women like that out there... well, maybe, not at Marie Curie's level, obviously, but there are still a lot of them who can be very successful and serious in their careers, while maintaining healthy relationships in their personal lives. It might be hard to find the total package, but it definitely still exists.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 11:08 PM
1

He's probably going to get blindsided by her one of these days. Sucks for him.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 07:43 PM
1

Well, to be fair, a 6 year age difference is not exactly small at your age (or hers). Why not go for the 17-19 year-old girls? I'm sure there are plenty of those at university? Or get a fake ID?
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 07:42 PM
5

I feel so awful for her BF. Sounds like a good guy.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 07:37 PM
2

It's totally cool if it worked for you and you're happy with your results. My observations about her behavior and self-esteem were more for the benefit of the group. There are a lot of women who would have reacted differently than she did, whether you were a homeless dude or Chris Evans. I was just pointing that out, so that others can be cautious in applying the behavior described here to certain women. But like I said, if it works for you and the women you go for, awesome.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 07:04 PM
-1

I'm sorry, but someone who has such little regard for their own safety cannot be anything but unintelligent -- regardless of where she works. She might be a great programmer or whatever, but if she thinks it's fine to be left crying on the freeway at night, then she's probably not too sharp. I really have no idea what you mean about the 'free pass' -- I wasn't giving her a free pass. I was just making an observation that the kind of behavior described here would likely not go down very well with…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 03:11 AM
4

I wasn't justifying anything and I never said anything about her career. I only guessed that she likely has little self-respect (which is not related to what she does for a living) based on observing the women in my social circle.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 02:48 AM
1

He's Just Not That Into You - the Connor, Anna, and Ben love triangle where Connor (Kevin Connolly) is the BB and Ben (Bradley Cooper) is the AF.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 02:44 AM
3

As far as I can tell, it's only a problem because she doesn't know crap. If she was just as knowledgeable about astronomy as the rest of you, I don't think her gender would've been a problem right? Can't you talk to her BF and explain to him that the club is strictly for people that are actually interested in astronomy and have a certain level of knowledge about it? Maybe soften the blow by saying that his GF is welcome to rejoin the club once she's taken the time to learn more about astronomy a…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 02:39 AM
12

Honestly, I think that it might've been better to just tell her to get another ride, instead of leaving her there. She was okay, but if something had happened to her, I wouldn't want that crap on my conscience, but that's just me. However, the fact that she kept talking to him/slept with him afterwards makes it pretty obvious that she was desperate and likely too stupid to care for her own safety anyhow.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 02:34 AM
4

Kind of feel like this would only work with women who have low self-esteem and very little intelligence. Like the woman you left on the freeway? Sounds very low value, can't imagine someone with any ounce of self-respect would behave like that after that incident.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 02:30 AM
9

Just watched the clip. Man, that was rough, felt bad for the guy.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 10:20 PM
0

Yeah I was agreeing with you - the part about "don't support them and shit."
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 11:19 PM
0

I agree, I don't think it's ever a good idea to get seriously involved with someone who put you on the backburner/let you orbit. It's such a clear sign of disinterest -- there's no reason to be someone's Plan B.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 09:33 PM
2

I agree with this. I've seen some really rocky relationships, with both sides doing awful things to one another. But no matter how much they might complain about each other to friends, when things get resolved, they go back to being a "team" and will hold it against you if you took sides.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 09:29 PM
0

Watched the video, thought he had some really great advice. Thanks for sharing.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 01:53 AM
0

Yeah, I've read that too -- Cleopatra wasn't beautiful by any measure apparently, but her personality drew people in. It's very interesting.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 01:40 AM
2

I don't think she's worth pursuing or taking back. If she was really into you, she would've been all in and started exclusively dating you. The fact that she rarely made herself available (her "busy" schedule) and kept talking about her ex makes it pretty clear that whether she's hung up on him or not, she's not worth dating right now or in the near future.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 01:32 AM
1

I agree -- I've mostly noticed Indians and Asians hanging out in packs. The girls generally only date within their social group, so the guys have no problem picking them up.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 01:27 AM
2

I don't know, I guess it depends on what you're looking for. For a long-term relationship or marriage, I'd imagine the ideal situation would be to find an attractive, sweet, and financially independent woman, because it would be easier to establish yourselves as a young family (e.g. purchasing a home, affording children, saving for retirement, etc.). While it could be fun to have someone look up to you, simply because they're used to having less, I wonder how this would play out once marriage/ch…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 01:03 AM
0

Yeah, agreed - having a passion/hobby that you're good at makes you more interesting and valuable to most people. It gives you something to talk about.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:17 PM
0

Why not? Go, have fun, meet new people. It's not like she'll be the only person there.
/r/askTRP10/05/15 04:39 PM
0

Whether this flies or not also depends on (1) the girl and (2) your relationship/friendship with said girl. There are some girls that would almost never be alright with someone referring to them as a "bitch." And it's also something you cannot just "try out" with a girl you barely know/haven't developed a rapport with. It's all about reading the situation and the girl.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:28 PM
0

Just end the relationship, it doesn't seem to be going anywhere and you don't really seem that interested in her anyway.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:16 PM
0

I think it depends on the situation (is it appropriate/normal to seek out comfort?) and frequency. If it's a genuinely difficult situation (e.g. death in the family, major career setback, big health issues), then it seems natural and normal to seek out some affection and comfort, especially if you're in a long-term relationship. It also depends on how frequently you need that support--again, once in a while is probably fine and understandable, but too much is a turn-off.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:13 AM
0

Completely agree -- no one should be apologizing for every little thing, it makes you look silly in my opinion. It can also make things incredibly awkward if the other person doesn't think an apology is necessary. And on the other hand, if you do mess up, use actions instead of words to make it up to the person. Great post.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 05:08 AM
-7

I agree that being in shape and fit is important, but I just wanted to point out that there is such a thing as being "too big" for some women. I know a few girls who'd easily pick a lean, muscular soccer-type over a beefy, ripped football player. I don't think I've ever heard about a 'dad bod' preference, though.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:54 AM
1

Procrastination is the worst.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/15 10:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter