TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cmvmania Archive

View 2 posts and 361 comments by cmvmania on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Question For Womencmvmania/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 12:30 AM
1

Discussioncmvmania/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 09:42 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Not when prenups are unenforceable. You just made it in life, made a couple mil, get married to some broad and she decides another dude was hotter and then his dick went inside her couple times and once you found out she gets to take half of your shit. I dont think rich people are this dumb after seeing so much bullshit like these.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 08:07 AM
5

There has never been such a naive take as this post, even if you theoretically claim men outnumber women in voting, you forgot the simple fact that not all men are born equal, some are even disabled There's a distinction between what benefits the few (e.g., the wealthy, powerful, or influential, the players and the pimps) and what benefits the majority. Those at the top often actively work to limit the resources and privileges accessible to the general populace to retain their own exclusivity. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 10:51 AM
2

It comes very straightforward and easy to me. You look good, you then also attract good looking people, (halo effect), people like to associate themselves with good looking people, whether in business (corporate), social approval, etc. and then hopefully you get to attract an attractive spouse which gives you a chance at bettering your offsprings looks and genetics. People are simple in that way. I am not saying you could be a dick of a person just by looking good only but people give you more s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 07:53 PM
10

We are spending too much time complaining instead of taking action and finding out what works for each individual guy. This is true, no one has enough balls and money to risk for a limb lengthening surgery or a plastic surgery. Go bleakpill until you are rich enough to afford the most minimum risk cosmetic surgery done by professionals.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 04:07 AM
3

"The threshold" is mainly a combination between two things: Raw Looks (Attractiveness, Build, Style) and Tingles (Charisma, Game, and High Social Circle Approval) Those two can be interrelated (one could result in the latter, etc.) Thats the threshold formula. Both factors add up to 100% The reason why women don't give a clear answer is basically just weighting, some can have 50:50% some have 60:40, 70:30, etc. just some minor variations in human preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 05:56 AM
8

There's an attractiveness threshold that disqualifies people from first dates/interactions, continuing to several dates, and there's another threshold towards genuine attraction or being relegated into the friend zone. Its the shortest way of how i can explain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 04:52 AM
5

People should be more open to be setup by their friends and family. You can't negotiate sexual attraction, period. Shit always always goes south when honeymoon ends
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:41 AM
4

Let me go off a tangent and give a simple analogy. Why robin hood is considered a legend? because he steals from the rich who hoards all the wealth and shares with the poor. Players, pimps, you name it. They hoard all the women either due to some innate ability/acquired skill. Replace women with money, we have the billionaires. Sounds like I’m objectifying? maybe, or the notion of having a partner/sexually/etc. translates to a commodity or a social status/need? just like having and abundant reso…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 10:37 AM
1

"Sex is concentrated within a small, yet sexually active, group of people. In one study, it was reported that the 5% of the population with the highest number of vaginal sex acts (penile–vaginal intercourse) accounted for more vaginal sex acts than the bottom 50% of the population with the lowest number of vaginal sex acts.4 The 5% is thus having half the (penile–vaginal) sex in the world." Replace Sex with Money/Resources
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 01:21 AM
8

this is exactly what happens with failed societies. if too much people gets unemployed many will revolt, despite no one owes them a job or food. at the end of the day, people need to get paid and get laid. incels vs chads is exactly the same as socialists vs billionaires
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 09:25 AM
2

As a dude, as long as she's not ugly and more on the pretty cute side, I'd love it. Because this never happens to you unless you're some celebrity or a good looking dude yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 01:19 PM
4

this is the real answer
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 05:41 PM
3

So only ugly dudes who get no chicks that go abroad? If you put yourselves in the shoes of the locals, its blackpilling. Considering that most wmaf women also date for height, and not everyone who geomaxx is objectively ugly. Theres also a stat that for an asian dude you need to make x amount more $ than a tall caucasian. Don't forget to look up SPG/Sarong Party Girls in Singapore.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 05:40 PM
7

Can you give some examples of what this bullying looked like? Classic case of high school gang leader beating a guy leading to exclusion and smaller social groups, the bullied guy crush who used to symphatize ended up dating and fucking the bully and went to prom together. ​ Also, we’re you ever married or do you just have a theory? Never married
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 04:16 PM
21

Four scenarios easily come to mind: ​ Being short/ugly leads to being bullied by women and/or even family members during gatherings Being bullied and seeing your crush dates your bully in school Getting cheated on in relationships, Some are even as late as getting divorced by a cheating wife and losing your assets. That dude is either an out of shape chad or living life in a happy go lucky manner, almost delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 02:21 PM
3

You forgot number 10, the absence of asset protection policies and no room for reasonable concession due to no fault divorce and assets are automatically conceded to half. Very devastating for victims of spousal infidelity who also happens to be the sole breadwinner in the relationship. Many developed countries does not preserve pre-marital assets, and its why im not surprised that marriage rates plummet drastically.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 06:50 PM
1

no, thats not how it works. It would happen gradually through behavior and attitude shifts first. ​ eliminating abortion (i don't fully agree with this and there should be exceptions for victims of sexual assault, medical emergencies and life threatening situations): people will think more long term and holistically in their mating strategies. they can't just get an abortion because they fucked raw and dude won't commit. there are many contraceptives if you just want to fuck. I think we've done …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 10:27 AM
0

this concern could easily be eliminated or at least reduced significantly if the forced asset forfeiture/taking half of your assets during divorce is eliminated. we need to stop rewarding infidelity and cheating spouses who don't contribute to the marital assets at all. many will argue "yeah but how do you compensate someone's time served as a stay at home spouse?" simple, you cheat, you lose. go fuck a rich dude and hope he will marry you then.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 09:08 AM
2

Time will tell is what people who have no facts or even logic on their side say. Do you have a crystal ball?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 06:06 AM
1

But you're saying kill the chads like in the French Revolution? I did not say that. Though are some paralels in reactions towards them by the have nots. Just like socialists towards billionaires. ​ But every guy wants to BE a Chad. So how is that going to work, exactly? Good question, chads will need to share more to the bottom half or face increased scrutiny. This could be shown in a change in behavior and attitudes. Everybody needs to get paid and get laid. Surely there is a good incentive to …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 06:01 AM
1

Are you sure its simply due to lack of money? ask people who already have enough money but still refuse to marry and have kids. chances are its not the root cause. Would you want to get married and then cannot protect your assets if your wife cheats and divorce on you? all your hard earned assets gets chopped in half. Much worse if she did not contribute to the marital assets at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 04:20 AM
4

well how would you know? votes are being cast on the ballot box, not on social media. mainstream media and surveys have their own agenda. only time can tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 04:38 PM
3

Because how do you fight for pussy if women don't want to give it to you? This is true, you cannot. But there would probably a mass-boycott/culture shift and envy piling up on the haves, a.k.a chads who have been living decadently like the french monarchs. Well, we know whats going to happen next according to the history books. This is why investment on military and security apparatuses are in high demand right now. I can not tell when but if this shit doesn't get addressed it will hit the fan a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 04:26 PM
7

well if thats how its always been, a.k.a the truth/reality, what prevents the have-nots from revolting? exactly, blue pill lies and social gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 04:00 PM
5

Yup, been there done that
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 12:28 PM
17

Because in Singapore there are lots of SPG (Sarong Party Girls), same just like Hongkong and Taiwan. Any modernized (westernized) Asian economies is full of them. Meaning, local Asian dudes are fucked. I don't know what the equivalent term is in Japan and SK. Just google the term if you want to learn more about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 10:39 AM
1

ability for one income household? you think if wages magically increase by tomorrow women will just find someone to marry without giving up work when their wage is equally able to sustain a family themselves? The status quo doesn't change, they will still be hypergamous. Why would you decide to marry once you have made more money? In fact, they didn't when most of them already made good money in white collar jobs. At most, they would still marry someone wealthier.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 12:45 PM
2

Women demand should ignored by men who aren’t born super rich and chad. That’s it. “Trying” or “fake it until you make it” is just going to destroy men who are worshipping the pedestal. this is it. tryhards fail their econ 101 class. diminishing returns.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 07:35 PM
-5

you can grow up to fuck the Prom Queen they forgot to tell you that you have to "pay and get in the line" while others had her for free. Of course its true, how long have you graduated from high school again?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 07:19 PM
2

Observation: girls are constantly baiting guys into destroying their own futures at every point in life I am not going to dive into evolutionary biology as that is a talk for another day. At every stage of their lives, people always want the hottest thing. Women sit on the finish line and fuck the "winners". Its RP 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 07:17 PM
8

Most men fit in that. why are more dudes sexless than women though? the numbers don't lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 06:35 PM
1

should people with an abusive family and background, only date people with similar backgrounds? All of these kind of problems, marrying people with lower social status/wealth, judging people with high n counts because they are not fit for marriage with someone who is not as experienced, etc. These are all valid problems and people not doing enough justice to tackle the root problem/concern, which is: The fear of infidelity, which leads to a divorce that takes half (a huge amount) of money of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 07:08 AM
3

Seriously, go to places like India, Pakistan etc. The last thing the average 40 year old mother cares about there is how hot she looks. You're talking about the general lower, middle-class. Of course they are more concerned to marrying "up" to a wealthier family and/or marrying someone from a higher/equal caste. If you're talking about upper class or even middle class, many families who have leverage/wealth are making requirements e.g. white/pale skin, not fat, etc. etc. you'll turn to a blackpi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 06:10 AM
3

not really counts though, coz when a richer dude/higher social status guy marries down, chances are he is opening the possibility for the girl to cheat on him with someone as rich but better looking or cheat on him with someone much more richer due to her being included in his life/social circle/acquaintances and friends. This is why people often try to marry within equal social status due to: Fear of asset forfeiture/loss in a no fault divorce, and/or infidelity related divorces If infidelity/a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 04:18 PM
-3

deadbedrooms coem from women not feeling sexy anymore. so why don't they cheat on with a obese neckbeard who puts her on a pedestal, and instead with a dude thats probably better looking/hung than her current husband? because that gives her the validation that she's still "sexy" right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 04:11 PM
1

Craving cake and ice cream? You can choose restraint and eat an orange (healthy) or indulgence (obesity). So does this mean that fat people have lower impulse control, which equates them to be promiscuous if they had the chance? What about promiscuous people who happen to be fit, who happen to have just enough discipline to keep their body slim but have the urge to fuck the tallest dude w the biggest dong at the club?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 03:45 PM
7

Raves? Do you mean the EDC/Coachella kind? coz thats the most blackpilling scene I've ever been at. I am starting to doubt you've never been to one to make this conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 06:24 AM
2

Husbands are the top alphas Some of them can be beta buxx husbands though If she got pump and dumped, that dude is still alpha for making her into a single mom
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 10:31 AM
3

Alphas are the guys who secure good women and build a nuclear family. Says who? you? objectively speaking though, the dude who banged the hottest girl in the room and pump and dumped her is still an alpha though. Because out of all the dudes she still chose to fuck him in the first place. that is some force of nature shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 07:18 PM
1

all this long thread but you just can't negotiate attraction, man. world is full of haves and have nots.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 07:16 PM
1

https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:720/format:webp/1*KPtcKcwp_HjvK09ld1Ct2A.png
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 06:30 PM
3

“Researchers from Indiana University say that nearly 1 in 3 American men, ages 18 to 24, reported no sexual activity in the past year.” Young men are not only not hooking up, they’re barely having sex at all. come back again after you've cited the number of sexual activity for young women and bam now it turns into a 80:20 rule discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 06:55 AM
1

If your possessions are the most important thing in your life, then you’re probably right to not get married. Good. At least we're getting some where. ​ The longer you’re together, the more likely it becomes that you’ll cheat on her, since male infidelity increases with age. I don’t see much difference btwn dumping your wife because you want a younger model as the reason to divorce and cheating while the marriage is still official. Having three paragraph of interaction has made me seriously doub…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 04:41 PM
1

You’re supposed to know. No, people change. Unless you have a crystal ball. Or, you are simply trying to maximize the current status quo. I can cheat, and still walk away with more. I don't give a fuck about how more women outearn their men in the marriage, as a reason to why we should just keep the status quo. For myriad of reasons, the only thing I care about as a dude is that I want my assets to be safe in the event of a divorce, especially infidelity related or in a no-fault divorce. I don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 03:39 PM
1

then choose one equal to you. people change, sounds ideal in theory but if the unemployed woman was nicer to me than the career lady i would rather marry the one that treats me the best. however, if she decides to cheat down the line, how the fuck am i supposed to know? i'd rather not marry at this point. her possibly cheating with another dude (hypergamy) thats much richer than me and i still dont get to keep my hard earned money just rubs salt on the wound. I have a big problem with laws actua…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 02:31 PM
1

No, the current status quo is that regardless of who cheats, the assets gets split in half. However, if you happen to be the sole breadwinner or the spouse who contributed more in the relationship, it still gets split into half. Notwithstanding specific circumstances such as when your spouse went away and had an affair with someone who is richer/much well off, you are still forced to part with your hard-earned money in the divorce. This is fucked up due to no-fault divorce system, without any as…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 11:55 AM
2

She can like/love you but if she does not completely lust after you then there will always be something intangible missing. We all know that the same woman will not treat all her bf’s or partners with the same enthusiasm and effort. There’s almost this fear of being the guy she settled for or who was just good enough. She is also likely to cheat on, deadbedroom or breakup/divorce with you. One of the ways some men try to screen for this is how quickly she sleeps with you or which sexual acts she…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 08:58 AM
-1

Instead of devising monetary solutions in order to increase marriage and birth rates, why not simply criminalize adultery and introduce an asset protection policy to victims of no fault divorces, usually for infidelity. Because even if I have enough cash to buy a house and start a family there is no way I want to have a wife who is/was a hoe that she could just cheat and take my money which I will lose that damn check in a divorce, again.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 05:28 AM
1

Honestly as a dude I don't care if women in general don't put on a makeup, I would have an easier time to decipher who has the raw natural beauty and who doesn't. Who had cosmetic surgery, etc. Then move accordingly from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:56 PM
1

Personality is viewed as a meme in modern dating, but it really shouldn't. If you have any intention of bonding with a person without seeing him/her as a mere commodity of pleasure, you have to acknoledge who that person is under the face you physically see. Listen, I will try to advocate for women's choices and why choosing the tallest dude with the best looking face and the biggest dong is not a short-sighted choice. Why? Evolution and Sexual Selection. Biology 101. She is going to bet on her …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 07:31 PM

There is nothing inherently wrong in sex, having sex and enjoying pleasure. This true, but doesn't have any correlation with what I've said. I said it sucks to be the fall back dude, but life is unfair and there is always going to be haves and have nots.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:52 AM

kind of true, because former/reformed party girls should just stick with other party dudes/chads and not giving the shittier end of the stick to the dudes that work hard despite being rejected throughout his adolescent life. Unless he wants to be the simp of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 08:39 AM
16

this is why women keep saying they love the "big dick energy". Generally, dudes that are tall (because people assume he's packing) or dudes that are actually packing know this, because they have the goods to back it up, thus the "natural confidence" that women sense and be attracted to. Its like having a gun in your jacket and you're going to be confident if someone tries to engage in a fist fight to deter your opponents.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 02:46 AM
1

Lionel messi or a goodlooking 6‘6 stud who works in mcdonalds? Fallacious line of thinking Not everyone will be Lionel Messi, or very little will be able to attain that status. Do you think if everyone "just works hard" and everyone will be Messi? then Messi will be another synonym for "Average Joe" real quick. If he's a goodlooking 6'6 stud happen to work at Mcdonalds he will never work there for long unless he never tries or barely puts any effort, like the very minimum. Most likely someone wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 02:10 PM
2

My point is if the guy cheats and the woman leaves him over it, people on this sub will still blame her over it. who? me? you'd probably have to exclude me on that. I was actually more concerned with hypergamy to the point that I need real asset protection in the event of a infidelity-driven divorce or I don't see a point for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:44 PM
1

If another dude's genitals went inside her then she is already gone and relationship is toast, unless you want to stay as "Friends". Its no rocket science
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:32 PM
2

That sounds irrelevant as it is the current status quo. If I cheat and divorce, I deserve to lose half of my assets because I saw it coming. However, if I get cheated on and end up in divorce, I still don't get to keep my assets despite I am/was the sole breadwinner and she cheats with a much well-off dude?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 04:09 PM
3

And really, if this were not the case, it would be way too dangerous for anyone to give up their career to stay home with the kids. If she is not satisfied with the relationship but still wants to have the same standards of living she can cheat with someone richer/as wealthy as myself. On the other hand, I need assurance that I can still keep my assets. Since its too vague and no one is "at fault".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 01:55 PM
0

I am perfectly fine with letting my wife doing nothing or just be a SAHM, I'll get what she needs but I'll have a massive problem when she divorces and take half of my hard earned assets and still be able to fuck the neighbor or the dude from tinder every day. Worse if they get to cheat on someone richer and i still dont get to keep what i had. This is the problem with todays divorce laws and the lack of asset protection in no fault divorces. Any reasonable guy will smell this issue from a mile …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 05:53 AM
1

You've basically gave out two article links without giving any context nor explanations which was kind of lazy, but no worries, I will try to interpret it on my own. both article, which shows that pornography was the cause of male sexlessness is still irrelevant as to why we have more sexless men than women. because if the number of men goes out of the dating pool voluntary or involuntary due to porn, then women will gladly fuck other men which is why their numbers stayed the same. This instead …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 06:42 AM
1

Then why are we having more sexless men than women? the numbers dont add up https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:720/format:webp/1*KPtcKcwp_HjvK09ld1Ct2A.png
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 04:00 AM
0

Oh so it’s 90 percent of men rejecting women for not hitting their standards now? You'd still try to date people who are already incompatible for long term relationships? By the way, are we trying to be as poly as possible? Aren't we trying to narrow down our choices by default? ​ So what about all that 80/20 bullshit you red pillers have been on about for years? That there's always going to be haves and have nots. The 20 percent of chads get what their want and makes dating unpalatable for the …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 04:14 PM
3

The average man has more casual sex than the average women. Then why are we having more sexless men than women? https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:720/format:webp/1*KPtcKcwp_HjvK09ld1Ct2A.png
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 03:34 PM
1

Keep living the lies you’ve been fed. prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 02:08 PM
3

yeah but the numbers don't lie do they?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 10:54 AM
2

Not justifying it just saying it happens for a reason Yeah and? we should keep letting promiscuous women divorce and get more money and thats perfectly fine?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 10:43 AM
9

Just for curiosity sake, why do men not hold themselves to the same sexual standards they want of women? Because 1, Hypergamy which means women will always seek someone who is objectively above average. (Bigger D, Tall, Good Looking, Richest/Powerful in town, or a combination of them.) and 2, do you know how much sex deprived the average man is, letting alone having any dates? holding women to the same sexual standards as how they want their men will make them involuntary celibate for ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 10:40 AM
16

And let's not forget the list of "requirements." -she needs to be successful, but make less than her man -she needs to be AT LEAST an 8, but 9 or 10 is preferable -she needs to be completely wild in bed, but also have very little experience -she must be willing to entertain all of her man's preferences, desires, kinks, or side "habits." -she needs to be passive -she must not have a strong personality -she must not be independent, but also can't be needy This is a strawman. 90% of dudes requireme…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 06:29 AM
2

People like you who gaslight and justify cheating in this manner just proves the need for asset protection policies in the event of no fault divorce. If there is no fault, then the cheating spouse is not entitled to get away with more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 04:54 AM
2

Hypergamy is not always based on overal standards of living. Its boiled down to raw numbers and attraction. Your older sister chose her unemployed pothead bf could be explained that he might be taller, better looking, and have a bigger d than her established, office guy pursuer/orbiter if there is any. She wants to bet on her kids hoping that they will win the genetic lottery in the long run. This is hypergamy, and its a rational choice. If she has 2 more IQ points then she could've marry someon…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 02:06 PM
1

Men, Can you touching a women be 100% platonic? Yeah, if the dude acting zesty as hell like a homosexual. If you straight and single there's no way touching can be platonic, unless you're probably too old to enter the dating market
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 04:15 AM

sarong party girls throw in some ultra strict parents, missing out on things in childhood (FOMO), resulting in idealizations of living abroad/moving away from country, self-hate/hating their own people/culture. You kind of get the idea. ​ how unforgiving asian beauty standards are not that relevant since their targets are not asian men
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 01:49 AM
2

Men are more superficial about weight than women This is true. Women tolerate you more if you are 6ft+ above but still have a dad bod. I doubt you're getting laid if you're overweight and 5'8 though. Now what does this say?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 05:18 AM
2

not really, some broad just want tall and white genes, they are not necessarily poor or prostitutes. because the tall white and handsome asian kpop looking dudes have more options and tend to go for their counterparts. some people are inherently just like that. its getting into more black pill than red pill. in singapore, wmafs are known as sarong party girls. in china and hong kong, its something else but i forget about it. real asians from asia/spent quite some time in asia know what im talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 02:13 AM
1

this is true, there are many kids who aren't even mean in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 12:39 AM
1

True, but my point isn't about the pain going away. It's about recognizing that the person who caused your pain isn't actually the same one standing before you now. You aren't really mad at them, just at the memory of who they used to be. not necessarily true. the only time you can prove it is when shits at stake or when shits hits the fan then the true nature of the person- a.k.a the same person / the kid inside starts coming out again.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 12:39 AM
12

Sounds like a rational choice if you are an economist or someone with a basic understanding of how supply demand leverage works.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 12:26 AM
2

Did I say close friends? I work in a grocery store, I see people loving each other all the time. this has to be one of the dumbest anecdotes to be presented
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 03:25 AM

There's a difference from only experienced it once and only being able to experience it once.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 02:16 AM
3

Men often assume that the body they are chasing after or envy is the the same body women find the most attractive. But that’s not based in reality. But 9 times out of ten they look like the dude who stole their exes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 03:07 AM
0

No, it's vastly more likely that they'll remember sex they had with the same person many many times over a long period of time (for instance, in a relationship) than some random they banged once or twice. If something/someone is really that good even just witnessing/experiencing it just once you will remember it for quite a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 02:31 AM

infidelity is not a victimless crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 07:21 AM
2

But the assets still needs to be halved, right? regardless of who's at fault/commited adultery?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 03:53 PM
5

If prenups were 100% enforceable, I am willing to sign on it, given that I won't cheat. However, women already have the privileges of no fault divorces while men does not have a similar protection when they happen to be the victims of infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 12:34 PM
4

Come on. I cannot fathom y'all keep saying the biggest reason for declining marriage and birthrates are simply due to lack of money to start a family/relationship. As if I had enough cash and a house I would just start marrying some broad just to get divorced and rob me off my assets just because she found out some other dude is better at fucking her while I'm at work? Fix your divorce laws and asset protection laws. There is no way people starting families when there is rampant infidelity and p…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 11:29 AM
5

This is true. I think undeniably the fundamentals/gold standards that all men seek and care about had all three things in common. ​ - Pretty - Wholesome - Not promiscuous
/r/RedPillWomen28/05/23 03:26 AM

I've slept with my fair share of people (woman and a couple men) and if someone were to break up with me or turn me down for the amount of people I've fucked that would really hurt. As it should. There's only very limited time in this world and why would someone take a huge risk by overlooking one of the biggest infidelity indicators known for ages. The risk is not worth it, especially nowadays in a divorce you have to suffer twice from infidelity and forced asset forfeiture. This is why most pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 08:34 AM
15

This has been disproven time and again. social expectations, family pressure, keeping up w the joneses will automatically filter out those who are weak willed, pushovers, the beta buxxers and the one who fears to be alone to marry someone or become the settled husband by age 30-40. Sadly this has always been the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 05:46 PM
1

I suppose it is even 10x more powerful if they are obviously a couple. But in this case we're talking about orbiters ​ It seems so. The devil is in the details. Some scenarios definitely can give benefit of doubt like if the dude is alright lookin and not a midget or seriously lacking in many other departments that other dudes and women can smell from ten miles away.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 06:53 PM
20

Do you really believe other dudes will think you're sort of cool and "have status" just because some average chick who puts you in the friendzone greets you down the hall once in a while? And other chicks take it as a pre-selection?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 06:34 PM
1

Exactly, thus proves my second paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 04:30 PM
1

Does having experience necessarily mean having to go through alot of d*cks? Can't a girl with low body count have experience? See if everyone walks around with their body count on their forehead then men wouldn't necessarily make the assumption that young women have been through less d*cks and not necessarily having lack of "experience". There are clearly older people with very naive mentalities and a child-like attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 01:50 PM
2

So having the lack of money (to buy a house) was the cause of failing marriage, birthrates, and heterosexual long-term relationships? You have to try harder my friend. Even if I have enough money to start a family there is no guarantee that my wife will not cheat on me and take my money in a no fault divorce. Judges who don't respect contract laws can simply throw out prenuptial agreements. The reason for failing marriage is rampant infidelity and the lack/absence of asset protection policies fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 11:00 AM
2

I simply don't see myself wanting a single woman You mean robbing other men's girlfriends or you meant "virgin" but it was a typo?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 05:06 AM
2

why do people argue they are afraid to marry a virgin because the sex might be bad? For women, it shouldn't be too big of a deal. Yeah the sex might be bad but the pros outweigh the cons easily. If she's not ugly, that means she have been very picky and more win to those who got hers which means you've won against many competition. For men, it signifies underlying problems, meaning, dude's short and ugly, have terrible social skills which made him still a virgin. if he's celibate by choice, you …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 04:49 AM
13

Man so we women are goods now lol Yes, I am sick of pretending every time the analogy is passed as OBjecTiFicaTioN when dating, 80/20 rule, chads and simps clearly follows market mechanisms and easily predicted by economics. The only thing creating market failure and inefficiencies a.k.a exceptions to the rule are information asymmetries, which are cognitive dissonances and the lack of body count number of everyone's forehead.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 04:23 AM
5

This would go two ways- A, either the AI robot go full NPC pushover bot mode which is going to be predictable and boring af and ceases to be the perfect bf/gf, or B, the AI robot will be too sentient enough to have free will and refuse degenerate and irrational demands which ceases to be the perfect bf/gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/23 07:51 PM
2

In this case, the positives clearly outweighs the negatives. As long as she’s not acting like an erratic ten year old and doesn’t talk much (at least knows when to shut up or talks minimally by default), Intellectual disability is not even close to things that I most worry about if she has a nice demeanor and pretty enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/23 06:24 AM

This is true. At the end of the day, people still need to get paid and get laid. No matter what type of gaslighting/social engineering type of shit that OP may endorse, I am not buying it. I’d rather be a bad person, weak minded and non-stoic whatever is the label attached but still get laid than being labeled by OP’s definition as a good person but won’t ever get my dick wet. The world runs on incentives, not good will, but free will.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 07:04 PM

“A truly good man, is nice and kind because he has abundance. He is strong and confident and interesting and is happy for people when they’re succesful in life or love.” Now this starts to sound like mass social engineering/gaslighting kind of shit. I truly believe poor people will keep on shitting on billionaires and rich people until they’re at least a multi millionaire themselves. Just like people who hasn’t got laid will never be able to relate until he gets some. The world runs through ince…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 06:59 PM

One of the most bluepilled posts in a while
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/23 04:45 PM

Then why are you here? Larping?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 04:35 PM
2

backwards logic. I would say that the majority of them are pretty much well endowed, tall, and jacked. Women would obviously prefer the rich chad than the felon chad but if she had to choose who to get laid with in a heartbeat most would rather go for the felon chad than fucking a beta shortass pushover dude despite having money.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 05:02 PM
2

I mean what are the odds that I would be more attracted to the career woman than the bombshell chick with options? also what are the odds that she'll like me back?don't forget about hypergamy to the equation too.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 03:16 PM

Because it’s an insurance policy to protect stay at home parents. It provides financial security to the spouse that crippled their own earning potential in order to devote all of their time and attention to the healthy development of their children. You shouldn't be entitled to alimony the moment you fuck someone else and became the reason for the divorce. This is where I draw the line and why I think the law is retarded and start to wonder if THAT was the reason why marriage and birth rates are…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 09:57 AM

it’s usually when one spouse was a full-time homemaker, so of course more women are going to receive it than men Even if she's the one who commited adultery? now that's where it matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 09:45 AM
26

Men cant be mad when women take half their stuff if they marry broke women Quick question, why is there no asset protection policies for victims of adultery related divorces? like you know, prenups could easily get tossed by judges who don't respect contract laws. Now I am starting to wonder if THAT is the reason of declining marriage and birth rates and not about having lack of money. Because I think it's a pretty rational concern that even if I have some cash why tf would I marry someone who w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 09:44 AM
10

Say all you want, whether they are all sissy, girly, wear make up and skincare.... at the end of the day there is one undeniable common denominator is that they are still 6ft+ tall dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 03:44 PM
1

The logic does not follow. If that is the case then the AI would need to be "sentient" enough, and posesses some degree of free will. That way there won't be a "perfect" boyfriend slave anymore since he has the agency to refuse irrational demands
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 06:14 PM
2

Causing arousal isn’t the same thing as causing happiness/enjoyment in a relationship But if you don't get laid then it don't mean anything too
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/23 03:56 PM
1

B - because he's not made official. No boyfriend status. He can't command girl not to check on other dudes because dude is not the boyfriend. no exclusivity. He's a simp A is just plain rejection and dude moves on without wasting time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 06:39 AM
1

people who GAF about body count should be able to see a person’s body count on their forehead. lol... privacy laws, need to disclose, consent to disclose? its not that easy to manifest and I doubt we have that technology ready anytime soon. Why? cuz people lie... Until that happens I'd probably keep my stance on things
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 04:41 AM
2

Well I did, but there's some nuance that OP did not address which I think is valid, since obviously there's need to be a trade-off. Maybe keep things as is, and I won't gatekeep abortions anymore, but I think people should be walking with their body count on their forehead. Now how's that sound?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 04:20 AM
2

Men dont stand up for our rights. For example in the case of abortion a lot of men are against it simply as a way to "punish" women for having sex. Yeah there is some truth to this. Because if we already have unlimited abortions then how are we going to weed out the one who really need and deserve it and prevent the "reformed hoe" from fucking around and aborting it from every "Chads that don't commit" while acting like a reborn virgin when she looks for someone to "settle down" with instead of …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 05:16 PM
1

If wealth, power and chauvinistic behaviors weren't rewarded then the divide wouldn't be as bad as it is currently. yeah its like saying women should fuck short and ugly (but kind) dudes for the rest of her life in order to create a better society and, for what? its like asking people to be good, be kind, don't lie cheat or steal but we see a lot of people who do it also get away with it freely, did not suffer from karma, and while we have no idea if heaven/hell even exists so why the fuck shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 03:33 PM
1

I would say the gender divide in voting preferences is significant Like how though? its not like all men can outright demand "free sex for all dudes or I am not voting" and the politicians be like "oh shit there are more men out there we gotta pass ass mandates as our next bill just to get us re-elected" its not that retarded
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 01:08 PM
-1

I doubt it, the movement itself is not that big and worth attention until we witness some real movement as big as "occupy wall street". What its going to be this time? "Occupy Chadstreet"? The large gist of the issue is not because people are "lonely". Its a matter of keeping with the jones' type of shit and considering that "sex is a need" just like how we equate it with poor people complaining against Billionaires when they are just getting by/not fucking. The problem is that a large number of…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 12:07 PM
3

Ultimately the men that are doing this are simply attempting to meet the demands of women that entertain the bs So, tell me which kind of hot women demographic that strictly bangs under 5"9, overweight nerds?? last time i heard the fatties won't even give the fat dudes a minute
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 06:48 PM
1

The short answer is to live better than your ex and her cheating partner. The elaborate answer, is to be better than your cheating partner, so if he's a dude you better grind to be stronger, richer, etc. than him. Because well obviously, she cheated on you cuz he was better than you at some point. Obviously if dude is taller and well endowed then are you really going to risk your life and career just to cut his d*ck off? no. Then you need to get richer, acquire power, connections, and assets in …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 02:48 PM

The Point is most Men never reach my Level, and therefore believe i am like the rich guys that say "money doesnt matter" i can tell you from my experience, when you won it all, the Hookup Game has no value anymore to you, you just know that ure a all time great in Pulling Women, and this leads to boredom. Thank you for the ted talk Mr. Billionaire in casual sex. Now are you going to share some bitches to the poor incels in Rugwanda and Los Santos or say nothing worth listening at all? My 2 cents…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 01:21 PM
1

Im now open to dating new men and I’m wondering when is too long for you too wait? After three dates. The golden ratio is to make him wait but at the same don't let him second guess that you'll fuck another dude in the meantime.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 11:19 AM

something viral doesn't necessarily mean it has a good conversion rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 05:17 AM
1

This is why so many dumbasses get it wrong, they kept on blaming that social media algorithms intentionally pushing for Tate and Redpill content thats why there are more and more people subscribing to it. Like literally if the content is downright false and doesn't contain any merit then we would be seeing mass backlashes instead of witnessing a record amount of young men becoming Tate supporters.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 06:29 PM
8

3 things to sedate a whole generation of men Bread = Done, cheap food, fast food, food stamps Drugs = Weed, Prescriptions, Alcohol, Nicotine, Done. Getting Laid = Porn/AI/VR porn? not quite. Prostitutes? Chad got it for free. If you nail the third part all men are done for. No more revolutions. 99% will throw their ambitions straight to the door. The reason young dudes still subscribing to red pill rhetorics is because he knows deep down he ain't 6 foot nor he got a good looking face, he is sing…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 07:25 PM
9

I can't keep being friends with a guy after I've rejected them, it's just too emasculating for them I respect that you sound pretty considerate as a person. Cutting off the relationship really sounds better in retrospect. I used to have 2 people in my friend group. One dude and One chick. Well the story was pretty straightforward. He simps hard for the girl when she doesn't like him back. Despite she rejected him already she keeps asking him for favors which kinda made me lose respect for both. …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 03:19 AM
3

It always has been. Once you're out of school and get into the real world, you compete with everyone on all fronts, work, life, business, etc. etc. Heck even seniors were dating 8th graders when I went to highschool and the 6ft tall seniors made my classmates look like midgets since our height was yet to peak. there are no fucking rules in this game.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 12:18 PM
4

Generally respect is proportional to how much effort people put into the community and how well they can get along with everyone sometimes if you want to win hearts and favors you gotta share or people give you the envy stare. its not about sharing bitches. its more than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 04:18 PM
3

and trust, is earned and not assumed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 03:59 PM
1

so the saying once you go black... was true after all?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 02:34 PM
2

yeah, no. I was referring to all the pick me ladies in general who post those kind of content to get views and likes. If she's really about that body positivity, she should have some skin in the game and get an obese husband/bf, etc. etc. Practice what you preach kind of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 03:41 PM
1

hipocrisy and virtue signalling bullshit. Tell her to get real and fuck the insecure dudes she's advocating for on social media, tons of them are damn insecure for a reason and I doubt she would fuck and date any of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 03:26 PM
9

Thats why i keep things to myself, people flexing shit that dont matter just keeps on inviting people that want them too like flies on shit
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 05:33 AM
19

Its not going to work. Even if you provide free shelter and free food for everyone, people will still demand more. Basically what he's deprived of the current status quo. For example, if someone is sex starved he would still berate women on reddit despite his living standards improve, he's still going to want to get laid and live like a chad despite you already gave them a lifestyle boost by giving them an apartment key when he used to live in a basement. Its just human nature. Before social med…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 04:08 AM
3

Most men are starved of compliments. Go give a man a genuine compliment and make his day. Yeah, not quite. I'd say men are not starved of positive affirmations. The problem is men need to get fucking laid and not the kind that takes money out of your pocket when he sees other dudes were fucking like rabbits without spending a dime. Social Inequality is the tale as old as time. We have 6 foot walking mega chads next to an autistic 5 foot 4 dude who is horny as fuck, that definitely screams envy o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 04:07 PM
3

How is that an insult? We already made abortions unlimited, free-for-all so that even promiscuous hoes who fuck every chad that doesn't want to commit will not become a single mom. Thats why the last thing I want is to have a "reformed" promiscuous woman trying to trap me in a marriage, afbb style. For the very least I deserve to know that I'm the dad so I won't be a victim of my wife's infidelity. I think that is fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 10:55 AM
1

What happened to this guy after following the red pill ideology? He lost his gf, he lost his friends, nobody in the industry want to talk to him, he was permanently banned from twitch, he lost a lot of his viewers, he destroyed his career and permanently damaged his reputation. But he goes to the gym now so He is isolated, a terrible recipe for young lonely, radical and depressed men, which now make up a majority of his viewers. This sounds like a punishment by design than a cause-effect related…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 07:16 AM
2

"If a lender considers a credit check to be mandatory for making a loan, they probably shouldn’t be lending in the first place." "If the government requires a background check to get a security clearance they probably shouldn't be issuing security clearances to begin with." "Insurance policies should never exist"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 06:55 AM
6

When you walk around with thoughts of I'm too short, I'm too ugly, nobody likes me, etc etc people can feel that when you talk to them. Nobody wants to be around that energy. Yeah cool but how tall are you actually?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 04:46 PM
0

redpill says high body makes men more attractive to women cuz of preselection and men being less valuable than women Somewhat true, even if many women in this sub claims that they hate man hoes, or promiscuous dudes, the fact is that they almost always end up liking/falling for the same dudes they claim to despise. The truth is that many of them possess the traits that enables them to be promiscuous if they wanted to, e.g. Tall, good-looking, well-endowed (which translates to their confidence ak…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 04:23 PM
0

First get laid, then find a good looking and loving wife material gf to marry. we don't care how we get it nor if its feasible but we ain't stopping till we get it. basically everything that chad could have experienced, we want them too. Just like how a communist sophomore student act hostile towards the billionaires.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 03:01 AM
5

height is part of looks sadly, you could've told us if the 5/10 dude was a 5 foot eight slayer then this post will start to have weight and worth to be taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 02:26 PM
43

you did not factor in two things: Tragedy of the commons, basic market failure in economics. In salesperson lingo, that basically means the product/brand reputation has eroded due to pesky salespeople and/or bad interactions with past salespeople selling a similar product/same company. How many random groups will be affected before Brad risks his reputation and being labeled as "That Guy" and he have to move states/move to a new market. Its called diminishing returns.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 04:07 PM
1

Who treat others with kindness and respect and have zero interest in dating the chads of the world. But men are consistently blinded by women who focus on nothing but their appearance. Then men paint all women with that brush, say we are all like that. We most certainly aren’t. "yeah he's definitely a kind and sweet guy, he just happens to be 6 ft tall and have a huge dick!"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 01:59 PM
1

Asking men to vet better, or trust your spouse is just the same as asking single moms who got pump and dumped to "vet better", don't you agree? But if abortions are legalized for women who didn't want to become single moms why can't we normalize on demand court-ordered paternity tests for men who don't wish to suffer from his wife's infidelity?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:53 AM
1

Why delay the inevitable? asking men to vet better is just the same as asking single moms who got pump and dumped to "vet better", don't you agree? But if abortions are legalized for women who didn't want to become single moms why can't we normalize court-ordered paternity tests for men who don't wish to suffer from his wife's infidelity?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:51 AM
0

well put
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 06:46 AM
0

If that is all you can say about it then I have the last laugh since there is no contest to my points and arguments
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 12:44 AM
0

Why are so many men against abortion given that most them just want casual sex? That's easy. To punish hoes. Yes we like casual sex but to be honest, most of us aren't having any especially as non-chads, men at the bottom 80% of looks and height and dick size. This is why since we made peace with the fact that we can never have what chad has, the least we want to have is a cheating promiscuous hoe as a wife who claim to be something she is not as she could abort it as much as she wants after eac…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:39 AM
6

lol @ girls saying its weird, all the 8th graders are dating seniors who are about to graduate high school
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 12:47 AM

like a new car, yes. unless the car is a kia or a peugeot.....
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 01:09 AM
1

Exactly. As I said, the reason more people get converted to red pill and black pill was because they were never good looking enough to their crushes (the women they were attracted to) which is why they were unsuccessful romantically nor getting their physical needs met. In turn, better looking dudes, a.k.a the dudes that robbed them of their crushes is the source of their despair due to hypergamous nature of women (their crush) as well as their much superior looks (red/black pill) this is not ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 01:55 AM
0

no. the one that is not good looking enough to their crushes (which is why they fucked someone else) is the reason he becomes red or blackpilled depending on how severe/how many the amount of rejection he got throughout life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 12:55 AM
7

its more likely that 99% of men that get laid, including the pumperdumpers met their looks threshold (a.k.a good-looking). Thus the reason why we get boatloads of men getting converted to redpills and blackpills since both pills addresses about hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 12:31 PM
5

guess what, thats life for 99% of men. The only one who get treated nice are toddlers and men of status who happen to provide jobs, money, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 12:21 PM
8

Some are learned through trials and errors, which means experience. They might not necessarily be good looking or having a majority of "perfect traits" but their confidence is trained through time. While the other, lets say if you have a bazooka in your jacket then you'll be much more confident that you'll come out on the winning side if someone tries to mess up w u. Same as if you're born good looking, tall, well-endowed, and having clout or being the big dog in your social circle. That's confi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 03:35 AM
1

Some women know this earlier, and thus AF;BB. Some women that didn't know this earlier, becomes an alpha widow or a single mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 03:49 PM
1

Don’t pretend thats out of this world. If there’s a mutual attraction, 99% women would have an affair. There’s no need to divorce unless husband finds out. Thus AF/BB
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 09:31 AM
2

why is wealth being centered as the holy grail to getting laid and getting married? Given if you’re still lacking in many other departments despite the fact that you’re rich enough chances are she will cheat on you with someone taller and well endowed with comparable net worth. Did we all forgot to include hypergamy here??
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 01:42 AM
3

From this thread I just learned that you could work hard to be 6’5 and have a 7 inch dick
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 01:33 AM
-1

they are more pragmatic, its not because society still shames them for having high body counts but they aren't having sex with an average joe at least in physical traits. if shit hits the fan and she became a single mom at the very least she got an attractive looking baby whose childhood is funded by the government using tax paid by incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:03 PM
1

Buying clothing has nothing to do with the end goal, even though there are products nor messaging that caters to men body positivity most of them will not work in the long run since their hottest crushes are still dating tall muscular dudes and not the overweight dudes, as in the majority. Therefore, less and less dudes want to be fat and buy oversized shirts as staying fat won't get them laid with the girls they truly want to be with. I can't believe i had to elaborate my point like that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 03:12 AM
3

I think its pretty obvious. Men are more results oriented. They tried to buy into some body positivity movement kool aid until they realized that shit won't get them laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 06:02 PM
1

Having sex 500 times with 2 boyfriends in 5 years is different than having sex with 12 different dudes in 5 years. the first could be a good reason to find out what you like and gain experience in sex and relationships but the latter is largely debatable and will cast doubt on many. main concerns for the latter include: STDs, baggages, other interpersonal red flags which reduces suitability for long term mate, considering most men don't rack up high body count unless he's a chad with high body c…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 02:27 PM
4

So you're not a utilitarian?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 10:14 AM
-2

I don't agree and there's at least two scenarios why women could or will love unconditionally a textbook style chad gave her mind blowing sex which she couldn't go back after she will love him unconditionally with very low expectations given that there's no extreme behaviors in the relationship e.g. physical assault even though they broke up somehow i would still bet on my money she would go her way to cheat on her partner to get laid with her ex and relive "the old days" if there's an opportuni…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 04:16 PM
1

I feel in the anglicised west women are very adept on manipulating weak men. Evidently, you see so many fat, unkempt, promiscuous women walking around with men deathly afraid of holding those same women accountable. How?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 06:07 AM
1

Would you rather have a woman who's genuinely into you, who loves having frequent sex with you, who respects, praises you and you know would never cheat on you, BUT she's lazy around the house and doesn't put much effort into her appearance (not obese or anything, she just doesn't care to spend time beautifying herself) Well if she's not that ugly without make up then its still a no brainer than choosing the second one
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 05:54 AM
1

What should've been doesn't necessarily reflect reality. Promiscuous dudes usually are already (mostly) good looking, well endowed, and tall or has a combination of traits that support him being able to exercise their options. OP got confused with why society doesn't stigmatize promiscuous dudes, a.k.a players because it works the other way around. Not every men have the combination of traits to exercise their promiscuity despite wanting to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 06:31 PM
7

If you used to post thirst traps, definitely expect backlashes and unfollows once you have a boyfriend since there is a transition of your target audience.
/r/RedPillWomen18/01/23 05:18 PM
0

Kind of want to support your hypotheses, but then I figured out that polygamy is allowed in Islam. Then comes Dubai and Saudi Arabia, and other rich gulf nations to mind. How do you explain that? Also, I think that monogamy was kind of heavily encouraged due to industrial revolution. With productivity increasing due to technology, it is going to be a distant past.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 06:37 PM
1

For some men this wait for sex can be a few months, and some girls may even become religious later on and say they won't have sex until marriage. I've seen both scenarios. Hell, I even have a best friend whose wife wouldn't have sex with him until she was married. He would tell me, she wouldn't change in the same room as him, wouldn't get down to her underwear in front of him, and he didn't get to see her naked until their wedding night... even though she had a lot of sex prior with different me…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 09:31 AM
1

I don't disagree with that. I'm just using the word for the general term to categorize specific acts and not conflating it with something self-proclaimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/23 08:42 AM
1

If a guy is rage quitting culture because he doesn't want to address systemic issues.... fine! Good! go play games. No one needs you clearly. There will always be plenty of men (and people in general) who can handle both looking at our culture and participating in it. If some dudes don't want to? And they have the luxury of sitting around playing games? Seems pretty good for everyone. I would find it depressing. But they get to choose. There will come a breaking point and the number of dudes wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 08:00 PM
1

Everyone needs some time to readjust when shit doesn't go their way, but deciding that full-on retreating from the world because you feel undervalued is narcissistic in the extreme. The truth is, no one will do chivalrous act forever just for the sake of being a good person. at the end of the day, people still need to get paid and get laid. How did you acknowledge that life is unfair and the world is an uncaring place yet still arrive to a different conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 07:54 PM
1

which is often a thankless grind of hard work Its not about being underappreciated, its about the lack of incentives. At the end of the day, no one is going to do some charity work forever, or some bullshit act of chivalry to get good boy points. all humans like it or not, will eventually need to get paid and get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 07:23 PM
1

You keep saying that the relationship will be pursued ethically. So what the fuck is ethical to you? Yes you get all the benefits while outsourcing misery in return for the loser boyfriend. You are a nasty individual who never thought about being on the other side a.k.a if you are the bf and you have a hoe ass gf that lives in your house for free while fucking other dude on the same bed you bought.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 07:22 AM
2

He won't have faith in you if he is a self respecting individual. No man wants to be a doormat cuckold when he's girlfriend fucking another dude on the same bed he bought unless he's kind of fucked in the head/suffered a huge ego death level embarassment which I believe you have did to him
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 07:16 AM
1

The truth is that having money/earning potential only makes you tolerable if you actually get married. But it only gets your foot in the door/won't take you that far, there is no guarantee that she won't cheat on you with a richer and better looking dude (comparably) who might happen to be your friend/colleague/etc. once you introduce her to your circle. Short answer is hypergamy. The fundamentals are still looks based and not personality. If you make her laugh all the time but cannot entice sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 08:50 PM
1

Translation: I am going to gaslight tf out of my current boyfriend to enjoy being a cuckold while still being able to have someone who is reliable enough to bail me out when shit hits the fan
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 07:37 PM
1

Then fucking break up and find someone else who is as good as your current boyfriend but also happens to be well endowed. I can't grasp the concept of having the best of both worlds without not acknowledging that ur just an egomaniac nympho thats trying to be a smartass without any personal accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 07:26 PM
7

The dating market is called a market for a reason. The chads/slayers would similarly equate to the megacorporation with monopolistic power over the market. Their movements could destroy the bottom end of the market especially in the event of a recession where they can easily hoard resources at the top. Meanwhile, The guys who can pull bombshells usually end up doing pretty well in life. Lots of dudes claim their gfs/partners cheat on them with "bums", but I doubt they are objectively that good l…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 07:07 PM
1

But how can you preach about love and caring and being a great partner for somebody, when you don’t want the absolute best for them, instead you’d be happy for that woman you think is amazing because you love her to be less happy than she could because you’d be happy with her stuck with you. Ah yes. I just learned that the synonym of love is "cucked". A cuckold has to be a lover boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 05:51 PM
1

If your theories were correct, and women ONLY selected for height, there would be no men under 5'7" at all; it's a ridiculous presupposition and isn't reflected in reality. Sure there are rich 5'7 dudes still able to get laid and have children but most of people aren't rich. We're talking millionaire net worth. Evolution takes time. It takes generations to manifest. Its only been almost two decades since we invented a smartphone and social media
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 10:33 AM
2

Strawman. There is no implication that says women should date their coworkers in my response.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 07:08 PM
5

I can attest to this. Seen so many dudes trying to jestermaxx when there's female coworkers its kinda sad. Everyone is secretly trying to one up each other or suffer in envy while keeping a straight face.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 05:50 PM
3

By your logic then university students will have a fucking hard time getting a job. No one is willing to bet on potential, so how the fuck people get hired now? because they have talents? because they just ‘get it’?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 06:58 PM
2

youre getting into r/blackpillscience territory but there is some merit to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 02:59 PM
5

even other women dont even watch their sports. they watch netflix.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 02:43 PM
0

most dudes will likely smash an overweight lady/lower their standards but ain’t no way he’s letting himself being seen with her going on a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:57 PM
2

this is not accurate in today’s age. if dudes reject a woman from dating the first thing on their mind is that either she’s not sexually attractive and cant even picture being w her for a long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:38 PM
1

this is basic economics, OP. Whoever is the best looking/has the most sought after commodity will be the market maker. Picture a monopolistic cartel. Only a group of people will certain characteristics is able to move the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 05:12 AM
1

It’s nobody’s fucking business how many people anyone has slept with. Someone is spending waaaaaay too much time on crap that shouldn’t matter. If I was viewed as one type of person before you knew my body count, and viewed as a different person after knowing, you’re going about life wrong. Wait until you got divorce raped or being cheated on. "Well yeah thats because she's a shitty person in the first place." See how it makes sense???
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:26 AM
1

Honestly, i fully agree w this. Its just sexual selection coming in full force. Its a dog eat dog world
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 10:55 AM
3

that is only a statement. problem is, a majority of them is attracted to traits owned by promiscuous men, or at least have the capacity of being promiscuous. Which is, being associated to good looks, having game, height, etc. etc. Now what do you have to back up your statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 12:59 AM
15

its not that they think women wants a promiscuous dude, its more like promiscuous dudes often have traits that gets women, at least in getting laid. Meanwhile, many women claim that they want low n count dudes before finding out that mostly negative traits are discovered that made him unable to rack up his n count in the first place. (e.g. short, bad social skills, no network/friends, etc. etc.)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 07:11 PM
5

if shes not even sexually attracted to you then commitment is out of the table. only time offering commitment is easier than getting laid is a divorce rape waiting to happen
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 08:01 PM
2

For young ones usually goes like this, some guy who he was not in good terms with, or his bully, fucked his crush. For some older dudes usually some struck of infidelity/divorce rapes or being rejected for too long. Crazy how nature works.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 05:31 AM
1

have you every disclose that fact transparently, or he was also a similar kind of dude himself. him being not interested to find out about that is a no-contest.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 04:11 PM
5

the phenomenon has been there since the 80s, silicon valley style. Being white, above 6ft and slightly good looking is a very low requirement to have. It gives those women equal bragging rights just like getting an asian husband who has a house, respectable job who makes over 100k usd a year. Im just being extreme but you get the idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 07:44 PM
5

Assimilation and to shit on their fellow peers, asian dudes. We call them boba liberals.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 07:18 PM
2

I think a lot of men here delude themselves into thinking high n count women/women over 30/etc. struggle to find relationships and they really don’t. Nah, its more like there is a huge backlash of false "entitlement, insecure, misogynistic, patriarchal, etc. etc." allegations against men that seems to be unfounded.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 07:49 PM
0

Only men can have visceral reactions, only men have emotions. Only women are expected to change textbook strawman example.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 07:45 PM
1

As a dude, just being barely attractive (not ugly) and not promiscuous is all i need. While the latter definitely needs some time investment for screening red flags and vet for warning signs. See how I mentioned about money, status, height, intelligence, hobbies, length, etc.?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 03:34 PM
0

this, is a perfect textbook example of a strawman argument
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 04:19 AM
2

somewhere in between. yeah, its a right skewed distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 02:38 PM
5

you will pretend to care until you find out that those virgin guys have zero social skills, no game, have short dicks and/or no social status. until then you will keep on pretending that you hate man hoes online.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 11:11 AM
1

they pretend to care until they find out that those virgin guys have zero social skills, no game, have short dicks and/or no social status. until then they will keep on pretending that they hate man hoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 11:10 AM
2

even though our society is supposedly more "accepting." only morons truly say what they think on public. they are obviously being politically correct for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 04:02 AM
6

On a more personal note, I am 28, autistic, and rice is a staple family food. We all frequently enjoy eating it with bok choy and dried pork. You are an asian dude, but definitely not south asian. In the western world there is clearly an ethnic tax due to Hollywood and the pp size prejudice.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 06:08 PM
2

on the individual level, everything is a privilege. unless if you want to form a (functioning) society, then laws and rights including needs will eventually need to be acknowledged.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 07:42 PM
3

I agree. this is how it has always been. Since cavemen days people kill each other to get laid. Kings and Emperors, powerful people from east to west kill other men just to get laid with the hottest chick. only after post monarchy era we have something called monogamy, nuclear family concept is promoted during the industrial revolution. However, with technology era like today, the inequalities come back.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 07:27 PM
11

op is bluepilled asf
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 07:41 PM
3

But after a certain age women don’t want to chase after the guy they think is physically attractive so they start thinking in terms of emotional attractiveness. That’s what us normies can provide. We can be the shoulder to cry on, the good conversation piece, the one that makes her laugh till she pisses herself, none of that is innate like height or facial structure. It can be learned and easily. So if one guy isn’t performing his emotional duties, another guy can, and most average women have mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 07:36 PM
1

yeah, until the taller dude tries to mog the shorter but handsome dude to assert dominance
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 05:39 PM
1

a mandate = forced action by the government, e.g. vaccine mandates, taxation, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 04:49 AM
4

only if you put them head on against each other, meaning, shorter guy will have less odds of winning only if hes fighting for the same chick that the tall dude wants
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 04:45 AM
2

its either going to be one of these three…. legalized prostitution, forced monogamy (unlikely), or ass mandates
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 04:43 AM
0

describing and answering your question in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 02:54 PM
0

its an analogy
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 02:46 PM
0

when an asset/commodity is overvalued, something has got to give in order for a market correction to occur. same goes with a stock market bubble. its like when a giant multinational company seizes the whole lake for its bottled water company, everyone strikes
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 02:45 PM
1

at first i wanted to agree with your claim, as we seem to both agree that N count is an infidelity predictor which leads to some of your assumptions, however, im kind of conflicted on last minute considering 70% of divorce initiated by women. does trophy husbands count as afbb for women though?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 02:05 PM
0

that your claim starting from the second half of your thread is a false equivalence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 01:54 PM
-4

Lets unpack some assumptions here. But some women say that her preferences merely evolved, she's not doing anything hypocritical, she merely used to like one type, then her taste changed, and now she likes another type. How are you able to prove that? remember, 70% divorces initiated by women. Infidelity driven divorce rapes are one of the most common scenarios. If that's the case then men can say the same thing.A guy used to fuck around in his youth and racked up a high N count but wants to set…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 01:49 PM
1

Hi OP, we could share the same mindset if only: a) adultery is criminalized (which is highly unlikely) or b) forced asset forfeiture during divorce ceased to exist. I promise to everyone in this sub to never bring up afbb issues or concern about body counts ever again
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 02:07 PM
2

An Asian 6'1" male model, Kevin Kreider, would go "days" without getting any matches on Tinder while his white friends "killed it" on online dating. Shit man I was trying to mention Alex Landi
/r/BlackPillScience11/10/22 06:55 PM
1

Well said
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 06:53 PM
1

that would probably at number 3, but number one would be "assimilation" and hypergamy
/r/BlackPillScience11/10/22 06:47 PM
4

what the hell does that mean lol. if you are asking me to read between the lines then here is my interpretation: "we are all meant to build meaningful relationships, all you need is love! all these issues i've laid out is just meant to distract us all from loving one another and driving each other apart, i don't need to lay out a critique of current issues because all WE need is a leap of faith!" (john lennon - imagine playing in the background) yeah, ignorance is bliss. you do you, I would rath…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 05:53 PM
1

beg to disagree but feel free to tell me what you think, But i do think that the underlying motive is too easy to guess. Fear of infidelity (due to n count being used as an infidelity predictor), and AFBB which results to infidelity driven divorce rapes. I know this sounds highly unlikely to happen but if society would do everyone a favor by criminalizing adultery and prevent them from taking their spouse assets during divorce, surely i would bet millions that this body count issue and afbb will…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 05:43 PM
1

so basically the long ass history lesson that you wrote simply implies that body count preferences are dragging us back to the dark ages? and those preferences are coming from theocratic principles? sounds a bit farfetched to me
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 03:48 PM
6

You seem to downplay the fact that life is unfair and people are always at competition with everyone. you chose to ignore thousands of years of history where it was hardly ever monogamous. from animals killing each other so they can mate until kings and powerful people of the medieval ages from east to west slaughtering other men just to get laid with the hottest chick, all the same. the women wait at the finish line and get with the "winners". However, somehow post monarchism era we have someth…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 01:49 PM
1

Sure, i will go and check. if i don't seem to find any, i would just not leave any further response until your next reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 07:17 AM
1

If you found out your wife was promiscuous In college after a 10 year marriage would she suddenly lose value ? The amazing, strong , loyal , caring person you know her to be, suddenly not amazing anymore ? Logical Fallacy. Its a classic non-sequitur since you are talking about something yet tries to connect it with something else that clearly don't match/go with each other. Past promiscuity is indicative as an infidelity predictor. how can someone be promiscuous and finally, just FINALLY she is …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 07:03 AM
5

Despise the things you cannot have. its law 36 from 48 laws of power, bob greene
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 04:55 AM
1

hmm, makes sense. it would only make the richer dudes more vulnerable. the more you have the more you fear to lose so they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 07:15 PM
2

how? because they are gold diggers to begin with?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 05:14 PM
1

thats right, and even if you look at the top billionaires/old riches, the majority of them obviously still decides to marry someone with a huge age gap. 80 yr old dude marries a 40 year old woman. that is like, 4 generations apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:47 PM
1

On the flip side, it is a woman's biological imperative to want a man who can provide, and protect to mate with. Thus when a woman says what she wants in a man, educated, $high income$, these kinds of things is in her biology to be attracted to. Because AFBB. Women who marry rich dudes but still somehow ends up in an infidelity driven divorce rape because mr Beta bucks is lacking in the physical department. Solution: Criminalize adultery and prevent the spouse who did the crime to have any asset…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:24 PM
2

unless if we're talking about director or c-suite level but those are still a long stretch
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 02:16 PM
2

then sign a legally binding contract where if they leave you they get your shit OP hasn't mentioned this, but I did the research whereas since 2016 Philippines has outlawed adultery.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 06:40 AM
1

Do men desire sex with attractive women more than ugly women? If yes, it would make it better for women to have more partners. A lot more. i dont follow your logic. maybe its your assumption of equality being in play but it doesn't play out like that in real life. Yes, it's still relatively easy for an ugly woman to have partners, but having even more partners shows that a woman is highly attractive. where is the logic? a 5-6 out of 10 women, barely attractive can be a town bicycle just because …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 05:38 AM
0

The “double standard” of men being lauded for having many sexual partners and women being shamed stems from the biological reality that a man can produce many, many more offspring than women. beg to disagree. for men, having a high body count usually translates to inherent favorable qualities, but people often misunderstand that he does that because hes a man hoe instead of he is able to be a man hoe because he has this and this (usually tall, good looks, social status, strong, and somewhere in …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 04:37 PM
3

unfortunately a lot of people brush this off until shit happens. you know if actually society do us all a favor by criminalizing adultery and prevent the other spouse (who did the crime) to have any assets during divorce, this afbb thing and the body count issue would cease to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 02:01 PM
3

these type of people are born cheaters. they have a tiny bit of sanity knowing that the best dudes that they want to get laid with are not compatible for the long run e.g. will beat them the fuck up (at least capable) at some point. Meanwhile, for most of the time they want to live comfortable nice lives in a nice house provided by mr beta bucks but since mr beta bucks have serious deficiencies in the physical department twice a year she would find mr chad to be her lover and let her mask off. b…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 11:04 AM
2

tl;dr = AFBB
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 09:12 AM
1

Criminalization isn't going to happen. In the west the previous USA and UK President / PM were prolific adulterers, and people happily voted for them. The irony for me is they were both conservative representatives. Sure, here's another case study: Since 2016, Philippines (assume it to be a third world country where gender roles are still more pronounced than the west) have outlawed adultery. it ain't men who protest the law the most, nor taking them onto real street level riots and online backl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 09:54 AM
1

the underlying motive is too easy to guess. Fear of infidelity resulting to divorce rapes. if society would do everyone a favor by criminalizing adultery and prevent them from taking their spouse assets during divorce, surely i would bet millions that this body count issue will cease to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 09:10 AM
2

divorce attorneys industry is going to take a hit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:16 AM
4

Just criminalize adultery and make it a clause that if you commit that shit (crime) you are not entitled to any of your spouse's assets when divorce happens. Done. this body count issue will never be relevant anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 07:00 AM
-2

Lots of women openly admit they wouldn't date a virgin. If a guy is a virgin at 30, or never had a gf at 30, this will automatically make him disqualified in many women's eyes. So why is this okay, but a man not wanting to marry a woman who's slept with lots of guys wrong? In both cases it's caring about sexual history. Many women don't wanna be judged on their sexual history but will reject a man for lack of his. I posit that this is hypocritical. hahahaha. been sayin this for a thousand times.…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 01:25 PM
7

When women do cheat, it’s because they aren’t getting enough attention or they are being abused. It could also be because their man cheated and they are getting revenge. She could've also found out that the other dude is better in bed, much better status, better hung, is a despicable individual who should've got herself humbled, etc. surely this argument that women only cheat because of this and this is outdated.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 04:52 AM
1

Criminalizing adultery would be a good start
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 07:35 AM
2

Just a huge projection , why are you so bothered? What bothers you ? What do you mean by confidence? You don't think it will last or something? Resort to "projection" tactics And yes more conservative people especially religious will more likely want someone with similar experience. And ? I'm against that as well . That's just insecurity Insecurity? how do you confirm that it was in fact insecurity when you haven't countered any of those arguments, let alone back up your own thoughts. Question y…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 06:14 AM
3

Criminalize adultery As a man, i don't even object to this. I can fully back that without having to worry about getting divorce raped. Philippines have done this and guess which gender opposes this the most, from online backlashes to protests. You have my upvote
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 04:49 PM
4

one out of three chances the girl catches feelings and tries to make a boyfriend out of the dude due to the physical qualities and the "chemistry". happens more than what people assume to be a one night stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 11:38 AM
4

simply put, af/bb = early bird gets the worm fun time's over for those women, now all beta orbiters gets the chance fighting each other to offer her the best deals. worst nightmare ever lmao. its like a rat race.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 08:47 PM
-1

ah ok, i guess thats true. can't have the cake and eat the icing too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 11:19 AM
4

That's why a man who informs another man of his fiancé's past discretions is an evil scumbag. Because she had a chance of what she deserves and he took it away. Forget the guy who's grateful to hear this news, he's a piece of shit too. nope. she just got patrolled. Can't let God/Karma do all the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 11:17 AM
5

why is being promiscuous = colorful? those two words don't match.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 07:47 PM
1

why would anyone refuse extra money?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 04:04 PM
0

But if your statistics are accurate, you can significantly improve your odds by just not cheating on her or hitting her. Well, she found chad and got laid. Now since she don't want to be my wife next thing she's going to do is to rob half of my assets to pour salt in the wound. how would you explain this? hands down majority of divorces are like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 03:06 PM
1

Its not that hard, you just have to be 6ft+, looking clean, smell nice, and look like a calvin klein model. even if you get rejected, most likely its pretty mild or just a friendzone. but sure if you don't have the qualities prescribed, SOMETIMES fortune favors the brave. but most of the other times words will spread like covid that you are a creep unless if you are moving from stranger to stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 06:10 AM
1

Sure, but that’s more an online dating thing, where men also outnumber women 4 or more to 1. And that’s the number Tinder was willing to publish… I’m sure they didn’t carefully scrub out bots and pros and “social experiment” accounts. ok. nuff said, fair enough In real life, most women aren’t that extreme, and just want a guy taller than them. For the overwhelming majority of women, a guy taller than her is much easier to find than a guy shorter than her. in real life people tend to tone it down…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 07:08 PM
1

reminds me of the stages of grief
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:16 PM
3

kinda agree w this. being a respected chad usually comes with generosity and not being a dickhead to other men. if not, resentment will fuel and people will try to backstab you for anything. this is getting almost similar like the mob/revolutions/etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 04:56 PM
2

there is a stupidly positive correlation with people straight up demanding wealth redistribution and incels demanding ass mandates
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 04:51 PM
1

inflation is crazy when you're 5'5 and wanting a guy who's 6 ft
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 04:41 PM
0

yes context is important so that even when you're famous never stand next to a force of nature gigachad or you'll get mogged. its about maximizing potential not a head to head fight
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:43 AM
1

how can this be prevented? meaning, can a woman know she's shooting above her league before getting laid or just take the L after getting pump and dumped by chads while racking up an extra N.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 06:20 PM
1

man's dodged a bullet. she could've used it against him in the future. if he decided to show vulnerabilities, he would count his days until she cheats on him with some force of nature level type of dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 01:54 PM
1

simply put, it was never a level playing field, but its a story for another day. think of it as a backlog/bottleneck.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 03:09 PM
5

So, with these in mind, my position is: the average guy has only incentives to focus every dating energy he has on casual sex for as long as he can, and no incentives to focus on long term relationships I think only after his casual sex needs thresholds are fulfilled, men will finally start to prepare themselves to focus on long term relationships. sadly for most men, it happens way after college. this is also when we start to get responses from women like "he ain't committing, men only want to …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 06:23 PM
1

the reason why single moms are rampant is because they operate on the looks scale. meaning, they used to vet for the best attributes (genes) that can result into the best looking children. (e.g. Height, Face, etc.) while personality, upbringing, etc. are miniscule compared to the importance of genes. why? it's the halo effect. good looking people will be treated better. they act on the assumption that if their kids look great then they will have an easier life, and bet their lives on it. who nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:10 PM
1

When a man is looking for a wife, his priorities change - he will select for attributes that make for a good wife - the opposite of the promiscuous woman. Not quite. women will select attributes (or genes, can we say) that will make for the best looking child. height, face, etc. who needs men when single mothers can survive on foodstamps and a job. all this is simply due to the assumption that life will treat good looking people better and bet on it. Halo effect. and if the handsome kid got succ…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 04:34 PM
1

black pill
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 06:58 AM
1

ass mandates is the future
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 10:57 PM
18

highschool teacher said this couple years back and i thought it was just a banter... "boys just talk about games while girls gossip boys."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 07:26 PM
1

someone actually named their program "Hustlers" University?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 06:32 PM
0

i think it was due to different hormones acting, can't remember which hormones for the male one but basically in a nutshell for women oxytocin/vassopresin decreases per n count. sounds crazy but i have to revisit the paper.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:06 PM
15

tragedy of the commons
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 05:47 PM
3

Its called tragedy of the commons. In market failure, basically some douchebags took all the fish in the lake as their the only ones who can afford a boat to scoop all the fish when the rest of the village only has a stick and a worm despite the amount of fish is initially sustainable for every villagers. OP states how the top/rich/etc. can destabilize the whole economy down to the bottom ladder without giving a fuck/realizing it. Its just like when elephants fight against each other, the ants g…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:22 PM
1

pretty understandable, but how does that fall into disrespect? are you the one who's chasing dudes and got rejected?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 06:50 PM
2

only information i have is that humans are also animals in a sense as well as mammals. thus retains the lizard brain part which are common in social hierarchy and dominance games that are also found in the animal kingdom. then again someone would say we're not animals and we have laws and social contract etc. etc. which is why i would not make a conclusion further than that. i could also argue for honey traps, where some women use sex to win favors, political gain etc. etc. but it seems to be mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 03:33 PM
12

would refrain using locks and keys analogy.. used to watch nat geo and almost all mammals compete for sex ended up killing or beating up the lesser/weaker male then proceeds to mate where the females submissively accepts their fate. some call it the lizard brain. in biology it is sexual selection. that is my take.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 03:28 PM
1

interesting. unlike east and south east asians such cultures are still preserved even after immigration to a whole new society. i hypothesize inceldom is probably low in the indian community. (excluding the low and lower middle class)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:50 PM
1

lol you'd assume those exists in the west?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:37 AM
1

"you'll never know unless you try." "a new sucker is born everyday."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:45 PM
1

As well men who have had success but still struggle with confidence when it comes to women for other reasons. well yes since all he knew for sure is that he has money/resources but he can never be sure if someone likes him for his face or confidence in terms of attraction because throughout his life he has never been complimented/receive good feedback in that area. and thus he fears for gold diggers
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:54 AM
5

this sounds like backwards process thinking/fallacy. confidence is there because intrinsically you have something debatable/to back it up. meaning, if you carry a weapon inside your jacket you would much be braver to engage in a streetfight if situation requires.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 06:16 AM
2

get buffed and be quick witted
/r/TheRedPill17/06/22 04:23 PM
16

I'd snitch but this is in no way an advice knowing that i have zero knowledge beyond whats going on besides this post.
/r/RedPillWomen16/06/22 05:33 PM
1

If one of em is not sexually attractive and both self aware, yes
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:16 AM
1

Yes, unfortunately she caught feelings over time but i had to make it clear and honest that there is no sexual attraction and the relationship died.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 10:38 PM
1

A much more cutthroat one for sure
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 03:16 AM
2

I think some men when they're finally well off in life always think they can always get better (just like hypergamy in women), but the fact is that they were never Chads to begin with (e.g. beta bucks, "nice guys", the bullied kid back in high school) so they try to be a "chad" at a stage of life that does not permit them already, and we have these kind of stories. Some got married through arranged marriage or at that moment think "she's good enough" due to many reasons such as societal/family/r…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 12:29 AM
1

Women always claim they want a guy with low n-count, until they realize those guys are also lacking social skills as well as in their physical department (looks, size) which is why he has a low n-count. It is rarely mutually exclusive, unless he's sort of a monk. Exceptions don't make the rule. This however, don't apply vice versa. I wonder why.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 07:08 AM
2

Well yeah, its definitely a minority whos going to be on the top of the ladder. Considering they meet all the requirements, which proves the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 11:57 AM
0

other than Floyd Mayweather, maybe some unknown bloke from haiti?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:59 AM
3

Nah not really, we often see them hugging dogs etc on social media but in reality most of their pets die young because of neglect
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 10:35 PM
6

UMC Indians dont go by this logic
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 05:46 AM
3

Is this observation has something to back up or is it purely anecdotal?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/21 10:56 PM
1

Simple 3 which I believe is the gold standard - Not Obese - Not Ugly (Grotesque Looking) - Not promiscuous (Risk to father another mans kids or getting divorce raped)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 05:08 PM
5

Numbers and trends today shows a complete opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 12:15 AM
4

Problem is if a pre wall stacy settles down with a Billy Beta chances are shes able to or still having sexual affairs with chads while the billy beta cant have it with another stacy. Its not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 11:58 PM
1

Uhh, but the “want” here is completely not the best word here. Well you see, chads get the “pick me girls” you said which led them to the pump and dump scene, while settling down with whoever they want. Meanwhile, the stacies settle down and marry the simps if she cant lock up a chad but she’s obviously having an affair with a chad. Stacies obviously dont want the simps for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 04:59 PM
2

Chances are those hairy guys with creepy mustaches have things in common with chads across all generations: Buff/Athletic, 6ft+ tall, with a 7 Incher. This is what we call having skin in the game. Adhering to principles of sexual selection by Darwin.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 06:57 AM

So you're saying the 80/20 rule or the Pareto Principle was discovered after online dating was invented?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 04:15 AM
1

What the hell, they're already doing it. Chads get all the sex and relationships. they dont even need to get the most attractive women just because they're too high maintenance so they'll just get the most attractive women who are most submissive while Stacys settle down with some beta bux dude or a rich man and have a sex affair with a chad out of town.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 10:03 PM
1

The difference between confidence and arrogance is that confidence/game has the goods to back it up. Simply put, a 6'4 dude with an 8 incher having looksmaxxed through gym and grooming will organically exert its "game" effortlessly and not perceived as a tryhard because he has the goods to back it up, meaning he naturally feels that he's the elephant in the room. Try talking that to a 5'6 dude despite already being looksmaxxed I guarantee you he's going to get a much starkingly different outcome…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 11:08 PM
1

What is "check" and checking here? is it about checks and balances, like tell her off when she is in the wrong or just checking her out?
/r/TheRedPill04/08/21 11:00 AM
2

pay gap is bs. now i will tell you why. The reason is that most blue collar jobs are overwhelmingly dominated by men. Women, being the more "educated" gender with a degree, obviously prefers to work for the white collar air conditioned office jobs, leading to an over supply of women competing against each other for the position in the same industry. either you increase quotas for women to level the pay, or you just have to accept the fact that you are much more replaceable than your counterparts…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 09:20 AM
1

Are you monogamous?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 10:06 PM
1

of course, since studs have enjoyed much as well being the male version of a slut, but think of it as a retiring veteran decorated with medals
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 05:53 AM
3

Peterson is a tradcon who advocates for marriage and he has a nawalt mindset
/r/MGTOW220/07/21 04:18 AM
1

Ur not completely wrong but my point is just showing that both are completely different person in terms of outcome
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:37 PM
1

Its just a tactic with a dash of gaslighting to the other end to justify that they have the same bargaining power as 9-10 wahmen do when in reality they do not. They just want to be equally picky without putting more work. Unfortunately, this shit is irrelevant to men bcs the opposite criteria would be a specific height, dick length and looks which is totally blackpill territory while the only criteria that is able to be changed albeit taking tons of effort when compared to losing weight is earn…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 07:53 AM
1

Tbf, Some baddest women are found in church. They clappin hands after gettin them cheeks clapped.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:58 AM
1

Typical High N Count Men = Has Game, Great Appearance and Physical Traits, High Sex Drive, Chased by top tier women (who betabux want) and/or scoring them Typical High N Count Women = Great/Decent Apperance and Physical Traits, High Sex-Drive, Mostly chased by beta orbiters and most of the times got ran thru/can't get High N Count men to commit There are similarities, but some details made huge differences
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:53 AM
2

do u realize most men take poly/open relationship advices with a grain of salt in this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:44 AM
10

Bali is pretty chill, much internationalized. Its like living in a bubble. Indonesian govt is pretty based though. Beware of ex-hos trying to be spiritual after decades of finding themselves.
/r/MGTOW18/07/21 01:08 AM
2

with all the rp and mgtow information nowadays its getting less and less appealing to be a beta provider after being involuntary celibate throughout your early adulthood, chad polygamy, lesbian couples and/or sperm banks are much more realistic to happen
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 05:57 PM
1

Its not that appealing to get married if u been involuntary celibate in your 20s just to marry and support a ran through chick once you get a decent income.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 04:41 PM
1

I used to be when I was in my early twenties, but it went away Sounds like hitting the wall after the cc sesh threw you under the bus.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 03:10 AM
2

If u flip ur old calculator…
/r/ExRedPill13/07/21 08:20 PM
1

Knowledge is power, you could use it to justify your self deprecation, or use that knowledge to take control over your life, e.g. change how you deal w women
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 07:55 PM
1

Another reply w no substance. Have a great day sweetie. All the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 10:40 PM
1

Did I by any chance said those two words or you are just making it up to set up a nuance without any real substance? Going by your logic, Because I dont wanna give someone a chance due to my preferences that must also mean that I dont respect them as humans/strangers? You sound like a salty hypocrite, as if you dont have any preferences, or you just dont want to be held accountable for your past actions that might affect your ideal future spouse who might not share the same views and values like…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 10:27 PM
1

Imagine violent dislike goes as far as having preferences for a LTR? Theres no coercion involved either. I do not condemn them, I am just stating my preferences for a ltr monogamous relationship. Period.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:56 PM
1

To answer your first claim why men dont hold men accountable for trashing a “good woman”, is the same reason why women dont hold other women accountable for trashing a “good man”. It doesn’t make sense. It’s your own choice and incapability for not being able to see through the BS. Same for men who get cucked. Meanwhile, Im just gonna quote what you said “If I was planning on having kids, I pick a sexless relationship with a good father/provider until the kids grow up and I can go fuck young hot…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 01:17 AM
13

Also gonna put this research paper here for people who are interested in biology Abstract: “Enduring social bonds play an essential role in human society. These bonds positively affect psychological, physiological, and behavioral functions. Here, we review the recent literature on the neurobiology, particularly the role of oxytocin and dopamine, of pair bond formation, bond disruption, and social buffering effects on stress responses, from studies utilizing the socially monogamous prairie vole (…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 12:15 AM
1

I thought this is an appropriate platform for ppd? If one doesnt express their preferences on social media do you think they wont project their preferences on real life? Social media is only one example of medium of speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 11:07 PM
0

I see, then why would you care so much about their preferences while labelling them as insecure in the first place if they never had a chance with you? Or they’re insecure simply because they have such preferences? Therefore, I simply don’t think theres anything to worry about if you had different values in the first place, chances are highly likely you’ll never be together.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 10:55 PM
2

Well Im just going to be brief, I clearly dont judge strangers who had high n counts, I clearly only want to know when someone is going to be part of my life. (Serious Relationships) Simply put, its damn hard to commit in a monogamous LTR when you view sex casually as you change partners often. Disclaimer: I dont care about open relationships or poly or relationships in general. Im just saying in the context for men who wants to be in a monogamous LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 10:36 PM
2

Respect for being real. Its actually a win-win in the long run. You get to weed out the insecure blokes and they who have such preferences will be relieved cos they dodged a bullet. It sucks to find out/have a relationship w people that aren’t on the same page. And yeah I fully respect transparency.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 10:06 PM
2

Although I prefer women who have low n counts, I totally respect you for being real. More transparency is needed to actually find out who is truly compatible for both men and women instead of hiding your past by lying when you clearly had different values in the first place. But yeah, you also weed out men you think are “insecure” and they will probably also be relieved cos they feel like they “dodged a bullet” sounds harsh, but just being transparent. At the end of the day, its a win-win
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 09:57 PM
1

Well we’re talking in the context of monogamous ltrs. I dont care about poly and open relationship so please dont try to sidetrack this as a mindset towards relationships in general. Its literally called a unicorn cos its so rare to find a guy who doesnt mate guard. Like who wants to imagine your wife fucking other ppl when youre at work and simply let her “be happy” because you “love” her but then you never get sex from her as much as she did w her fwb. I guess that clearly shows that she’s onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 09:40 PM
2

Great perspective, I would agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 09:28 PM
2

Well it seems that men who are looking for marriage/LT monogamous relationships aren’t buying it? Besides, easier said than done. Of course I dont give a damn how many times she had it with her boyfriend of 5 years. Heck If I’m the third guy in her life that’d be more meaningful instead of being the 20th dude she dated where intimacy and sex has no meaning at all to her. Like do you really think you have the ability to bond with that much dudes in such short span of time? Also read about Oxytoci…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 12:13 PM
1

Okay well here’s to draw the line I guess. Personally, I really don’t think men will judge a woman for how many times she had sex w her ex bf of 5 years. But I think it will turn into a red flag when she had 12 different men in a year. That is, a criteria for LTRs/Marriage by men who wish to be monogamous. Just for casual sex/FWBs? Dont think anyone gives a crap for n count. Besides, you dont need double digit n count to be serviceable at sex do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 11:46 AM
2

Yeah I agree w u theres hardly any difference for women/men who had high n counts. Problem is when you just label someone insecure just cause they have preferences. Why cant someone who had low n count cannot want someone who had a similar tally. Besides they have their own reasons too. When you gotta commit you wanna make sure she on the same page. Clearly how good is someone at committing when 12+ Dudes bang in a year round? At that moment you can only hope its not because its “your turn”. Off…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 11:03 AM
5

You just dont have that mindset of looking for LTRs dont you, well its self explanatory since you only attract what you are? Even you confessed for cheating and dumping from the previous comment. If you cant commit either then how credible on the conclusion that it is overrated?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 10:50 AM
3

Well you already have the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 10:26 AM
7

I really dont think anyone will disrespect you if you only wanna have sex or even becoming fwbs. Just be clear about it in the first place though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 10:02 AM
2

Define high quality here... I clearly dont see having lots of casual flings could increase SMV for both sides. But having a stable relationship in the past could help. (Of course I am not concerned w how many times you fucked w your boyfriend of 3 years) Besides, highly likely that its only “your turn” anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 09:59 AM
8

Well not too harsh, but probably most will cross women like that outta their wife prospects.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 09:54 AM
1

Its called having a preference buddy. You do you and am happy for ya bud. Others may not think like you and its okay too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 09:42 AM
1

That is perfectly fine and rational. Goes both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 09:41 AM
0

Wow such extremes. If she doesnt have a high n count then she must be a virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 09:34 AM
1

No. Just be real. and so what if he rejects you, you just have to accept that both of you have differing values in the first place and why would you force that on someone who youre gonna live for the rest of your life. If youre not insecure about it you would definitely tell him straight up if you dont think having a high n count shouldnt ruin the relationship cos even yourself knew it would and chose to not tell about it as an alternative than “lying”.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 09:14 AM
8

“Peace be better than truth” if you bought your way in by lying, don’t get mad when you get duped? Besides if you had to lie in the first place sounds like you dont even value him as an equal partner, youre just insecure cos deep down you dont wanna take accountability if your dream guy wont take you because you fucked around too much, you really think he wont ask your friends/look up your past?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 01:51 AM
8

I never said it was a women problem. The fact is that more women and not men are normalizing such behavior nowadays and even more they had to talk shit to men who have preferences for women w low body count as insecure, etc. In fact, many will even create outrageous blog posts like “if he asks your body count, dump him” like wtf?? Think if a dude writes such blog post, he’ll get doxxed the next day
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 01:31 AM
-1

“You’d think one would develop thick skin but for me it’s been the other way around tbh the more I hear it the more I think about it.” Sounds like you’re regretting something lmao. Besides, if youre really worried that men will slutshame you IRL, they won’t. they just cross you off in their head.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 12:28 AM
0

I dont think any guy would think too much/mind being judged as a beta/incel/loser just because he’s still a virgin at 20. Id take that any day lmao, more benefit of doubt if dude’s good looking. Ps. What if he’s religious?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 12:19 AM
7

“Its that they trash and consider women damaged goods who have any sexual history at all.” Lol yeah right, let me draw the line here. Of course I dont mind how many times you had sex w your boyfriend of 3 years. I am concerned w women with 2 digit n counts that rack them up in such a short amount of time. (Example: 9-10 dudes in a year) Meaning, she deadass cant commit to a LTR, especially for men who wish to be monogamous. Just gonna put it here, some women will give classic excuses like “well …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 11:30 PM
1

https://archive.is/5fFJM Heres some data for educational purposes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 07:51 AM
1

I would never get insecure nor judge someone that has a higher n count just to increase my “numbers” (meaning fwb or hookups) only for LTR then I would have a different mindset and preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 07:42 AM
1

Yeah definitely agree w you, and I wouldnt even want someone w high n count in the first place so I definitely wont judge people that do cos theyre strangers to me unless I had a plan for the future/serious relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 06:08 AM
2

“But then she is eventually nothing for me.” Yeah different thing is you dont even have to let that happen to you in the first place. Whatever buddy, its how you deal with things. I believe if one fucked around too much before settling down it will be damn hard to maintain a long term relationship. Huge red flag. Btw, why do you think its unrelated to character? Do you think you can bond with all 15-20 men you fkd with in the past? Even if you claimed you had a long term relationship, the number…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 05:59 AM
2

Generally yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 03:47 AM
2

1) Most men hate mind games unless if they had to, or theyll learn eventually. 2) “women who are upfront are only doing so for lack of better options and not because they are genuinely interested in them.” Let me be honest just to draw the line, some men will only judge you with such if you are: Over 30, and they knew you never liked him in the past or they knew you had lots of casual flings/high body count before you decided to pursue him.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 02:04 AM
3

Just gonna put it here, I know deep down for myself and even heard confessions from majority of guy friends that i know is concerned with high body count. Its not simply about STDs and that lame crap. It shows that you aren’t able to commit a long term relationship/have the ability to be intimate and/or faithful in a relationship. critical parts of marriage for men who wish to be monogamous. Meanwhile, “Well yeah he shouldnt control my body besides whats wrong with fucking men I like during my p…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 01:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter