TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

coke501 Archive

View 2 posts and 966 comments by coke501 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm looking for support financially Ok, you're searching for a husband then? my college life never mind.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/22 11:50 AM
8

Well ... yeah. The sad thing is that this fear (especially the unfounded variants) gets validated through all of society, because people do not understand probability and statistic (Also a lot of people still believe women wouldn't lie about these things) It's like whenever someone tells me, he's playing lotto and his numbers are foolproof. I tell them I play '1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6' (it's 6 out or 45 here) and they tell me: 'Come on, that'd never happen'. Pure idiocy and willfull ignorance. Disclaime…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/03/22 01:59 PM
11

If you are scared about how someone will react then shaming and ridiculing them whilst dismissing their concerns is not the way to go Well, because they are not scared. They are well aware that these people pose no threat to their wellbeing, unlike the hawt badboys they want to match with.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/03/22 12:08 PM
16

o Be 40 o No Daddies o No Sex o Regularily a mess ... o only ugly ones match o surprised pikachu
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/03/22 12:04 PM
4

but your parents will love me Honey, they are afraid you're gonna eat them, if they say the wrong thing. Of course they pretend to like you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/02/22 01:30 PM
23

taught to men by their fathers and mentors These don't exist anymore, sadly. Fathers get thrown out and replaced by stepfathers that aren't allowed to discipline the children or not replaced at all, backed by courts and governments that don't punish the women that do it, and punishes the men that get thrown out. Male teachers are a dying breed after decades of bullying and discrimination against the very idea. Mentoring some young lad at work gets you written up for discrimination by the "why no…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/02/22 07:02 AM
5

She's bringing vagina, and this is all you need You won't get to use it often, though. She isn't that kind of girl (anymore)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/02/22 06:41 AM
34

She wants a talking dog.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/01/22 09:25 AM
6

hitting a wall at 35 At 35 it'd be the 3rd or 4th time most women crashed into it. There's exceptionally few women that haven't hit the wall at least once by 35. [EDIT] Also: Those men should be seeking women around their age Shit out of luck finding a man looking for an old hag, huh? [/EDIT]
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/01/22 07:46 AM
3

How do men fuck people they don't find attractive. Well, honey. Imagine a world where the only men that would want to fuck you are the men that find you attractive. You wouldn't like this world. In this imaginary world your planned celibacy wouldn't have been voluntarily because, you'd be creeped out by those that'd actually see more in you than a cheap cumdumpster. Just like you are creeped out by them now. That's why you chose someone to use you instead of someone that found you attractive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/22 03:56 PM
10

So? There's still plenty of men that would have wifed her up and she chose not to entertain the thought. I mean, if only women that qualify as wife material were to marry, marriage would have been a distant memory of past times ages ago.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/01/22 03:38 PM
16

I'm just tired of the games Yeah, no. You're tired of losing. You didn't complain while you were on a winning*-streak *Getting all the attention from guys way out of your league while laughing at all the men that would have wifed you up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/01/22 09:43 AM
2

I mean, if throwing a temper tantrum doesn't indicate class, I don't want a classy lady /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/22 10:21 AM
4

Covered in tattoos and a clean record? What are the odds outside of sports?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/22 10:17 AM
1

Dog: I have dogs, my only friends and the only ones who listen to me Well, you sound incredibly boring. I guess your dogs only listen because they have no idea what you are saying.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/01/22 06:50 AM
6

Here's hoping your hobbies aren't popular.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/22 06:41 AM
3

I mean, I'm attracted to this kind of man because it reflects a lot of what I see in myself, so I feel you Nope, Fucking bad boys has stopped being against the status quo a long time ago. You're not special.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/22 02:38 PM
4

We see old women the same way that women would see an unsuccessful and unattractive 50 year old man
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/22 02:21 PM
21

Well, going by her bio she spent her life getting dicked and impregnated by guys who beat her up and only now has the epiphany that this is a bad way to live your life? Honestly, I think I couldn't bare being around someone that stupid.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/22 10:19 AM
5

I call bullshit. They are reality-TV-stars nowadays.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/22 10:15 AM
4

It's one thing having sex once and then realising "Fuck, what have I done?!" I don't know. As others have pointed out, an affair doesn't start with the sex. She has to have been unfaithful to him long before that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/22 08:52 AM
2

From the comments This is a very sad situation for all involved. Many mistakes were made before and after the affair became out in the open. Yeah, can't directly blame the only person that made mistakes now, can we? Would get you banned from that particular forum.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/22 08:41 AM
5

Whenever I was feeling down about this I would read Sara Eckel's book "It's not You" Because looking at yourself and figuring out what you can change is for idiots. It's absolutely okay to expect the rest of the world to change and bend over backwards to satisfy your unrealistic expectations.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/22 08:17 AM
11

Let's see, what happened in 2017 Well, she also turned 30 or almost 30. I guess there's also some level of wall-crashing involved.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/22 08:13 AM
5

I could stay with him and give my kids a good life My kids could have a backyard and their own bedrooms But fuck that shit, amirite? I mean, they are children, they should suck it up, so you can take a chance to feel better (you won't though, because your unhappiness stems from within you, not from your circumstances) Also: one of whicht already has anger issues I wonder who the person in charge of raising him was.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/22 08:04 AM
17

I guess when I made the profile, I didn't have her but now I do. And forgot to change it No, stupid. You said it yourself. You knew that your crotchgoblin is a dealbreaker that will 'probably scare' the men you want to bail you out, away. Cue your lying ass trying to get a man invested in you enough to feel guilty for breaking said deal before you let the bomb explode.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/22 03:12 PM
9

After all we've done to each other and us not working on our relationship bitch, he tried. he tried so har that you called him obsessive a few sentences ago. but I hate that I lost him Nah, you pushed him away. Multiple times. You got way more chances than you deserved and you blew all of them but I wish I had a third person tell me that it could be a mistake And here I am, being entirely sure people told you exactly that. But as you said yourself I turned to Reddit, blogs, social media, etc ...…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/01/22 02:18 PM
18

I, for one, salute OP for making it through this gibberish and actually understand what this waste of oxygen wanted the world to know. On a serious note: How the fuck can you write something like this, then read it and think: "Yeah, this'll do"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/11/21 11:05 AM
24

Feminists and idiots that believe in feminism: Let's make it so way more women than men get to go to college. Let's give them every privilege availiable from affirmative action to stipends. Let's drive men out of higher education with cancel-culture and rape-tribunals. Because there's no better way to empower women than acknowledging that they absolutely can't hang with the boys without massive help. Also Feminists and idiots that believe in feminism: Why are there not enough college educated me…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/21 02:36 PM
16

I want to get to know a guy for once. Funny how you raise your demands only after the milk that others got for free is rotten. But I see you're used to be passed around at festivals. Hard to get to know the guys that fucked your brains out there, right? The mental health awareness is just icing on the shit-cake
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/21 12:55 PM
10

great husband material Heh, the one I got was "dream son-in-law", as in the man mothers would want their daughters to marry.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/11/21 09:44 AM
2

Also: Someone that uses you to vent, while not even considering to solve the problem (or worse, berating you for suggesting solutions) clearly shows that they don't respect your time and by extension, you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/11/21 09:39 AM
2

because of some bad faith characters Yeah, keep telling yourself that, actually, all women are wonderful and most of single motherhood is just due to circumstances outside of the control of the poor mother and not because she can fucking do it without having to pay for the consequences. And yeah, we need babies, but you know the statistics about the children of single mothers?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 11:23 AM
20

Now that's a smug face, if i ever saw one. Oh well, in ten years she'll ask herself where she went wrong. And the really astonishing thing is, she will have a video of the day where she told the whole world (of one of the hundreds of times) where she went wrong but she will not realize it. Behold the consequences of a life so sheltered, so full of choices (I mean, she just ditched a top-tear-guy for someone who drinks microwaved beer). They will come, just as her choices dry up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 09:43 AM
2

WTF is wrong with these women? It's what happens when you have no concept of the consequences of your actions combined with a society that bends over backwards to make these consequences sting as little as possible.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 07:59 AM
1

Also "Looking for a man to change my life" Because I sure as hell won't change myself and my habits. I just need someone to pay for my bad choices.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 07:50 AM
2

Not without all the fucking money they get for churning out little future parasites, they don't.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 07:36 AM
3

Its such a weird conversation starter. In this day and age signaling this is actually a red flag. This woman has a need to be seen as a victim. She probably was the primary abuser in the relationship, but after hubby once held her hand to stop her from hitting him and told her she'll regret it if she didn't stop it was him all along.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 07:27 AM
2

too incompetent to work too incompetent to live.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 07:24 AM
5

Why the fuck is she actively trying to make herself even uglier? It's hard to believe that anyone could look at the last picture and think; "Yep, that's going to bring the boys to my yard". Honestly, what's wrong with these idiots?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 07:19 AM
2

So, taking money from people that don't have children because they don't think they can afford them and giving it to idiots that don't care if they can afford them and will raise the next generation of idiots that don't care if they can afford children is a reasonable solution?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 07:06 AM
1

Why thank you. Didn't expect that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 06:36 AM
10

But she has a Vagina. A VAGINA. Doesn't that make her extra-special?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/10/21 08:07 AM
18

Most women who call themselves feminists don't believe in the core definition of feminism (i.e. equal rights between genders). Feminism doesn't believe in equal rights between genders. They fight tooth and nail whenever men want to have equal rights (eg. reproductive rights) And the worse thing is the other side of the coin that rarely gets mentioned: Feminism at it's core never talks about responsibilities. The reason for that is obvious: Feminists don't want women to be held responsible for an…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/10/21 07:53 AM
26

I don't think she knows. She feels, that she is stunning and beautiful and scales are a tool of the patriarchy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/10/21 07:21 AM
23

Which is it? They WANT their past to be no big deal. That's all the screeching for. They hope they can shame men into ignoring her years of cum-swallowing in the back-alley of the worst bar in town. And the men they serviced there absolutely think that their past don't matter. Problem is, these men think that these sluts don't matter at all, they're just cum-dumpsters. And the shaming just doesn't work on the men they want to commit to provide for them. That's why they start lying.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/10/21 12:03 PM
2

I don't have a second language You don't? Actually you don't seem have a first one either, honey.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/21 12:43 PM
8

I know my worth Nope, sweaty. You have absolutely no idea what you're worth. I mean, you realize that, even when wearing a trashbag for pants, you still look like you have your ass on the wrong side of your body. No?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/08/21 08:13 AM
5

I don't think that anyone could tolerate an FWB-Arrangement with her. I see a lot of ghosting in her future. Imagine being a supposedly hot woman that is so intolerable that her FWBs ghost her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/08/21 08:08 AM
2

I had no idea that female empowerment (which Bumble proudly claims to be) is about attacking and insulting men..... Well, was there any chance to make women feel better about themselves (and better then men) other than tearing men down? I mean, individual women, sure, but women as a group were never going to actually become better human beings to justify all this 'you go gurl'-shit. And these individual women I mentioned: They didn't need 'female empowerement' to shine in the first place. In fac…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/08/21 08:00 AM
6

Not a native speaker. Thanks for the heads up
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/21 03:31 PM
12

To be fair: Most men have at least one criterium that excludes a whole lot of women these days. Also known as: Is not a landwhale
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/21 06:37 AM
2

funny reading that from the gender that loses all self control, dignitiy, decency and morals as soon as a tall man walks around the corner
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/21 10:15 AM
29

If I see a guy that look better than mine, on me im cheating Grammar and spelling aside ... You go girl, we'll cheer you on when you inevitably end up here again, crying about being pumped and dumped all the time and your boyfriend not wanting you back.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/21 07:35 AM
60

Women Men should be connected to their emotions and vulnerable Also Women No, not like that. Gentlemen, let this story be a warning: When women say that they want you to be vulnerable they are just searching for things that they can resent you for, either now or at a later date when she's bored of you. The number of women that could tolerate an emotional or vulnerable man is infinitely small, and, unless there's a long time of bonding and trust-building involved, they might not exist at all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/21 07:33 AM
6

Did you just fatshame her? Don't you know that you can be healthy at every size? Her dietary advice is to stuff your face with everything you want until you feel good. Because feelings are the only thing that matters, physics and reality be damned.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/21 06:04 AM
1

You're 28, unemployed and have 3 children. You should have started to take life seriously like, 8 years ago. It's telling though. Only in our society can a single, unemployed mother of 3 not take life serious and survive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/08/21 08:29 AM
21

entitlement attitude another man's child 'education' drama That's actually a lot.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/08/21 08:22 AM
33

Do these women not have any idea how outrageous it is to ask a man to pick up this tab for somebody else’s kid? But they love their child, it's their world. Therefore everyone loves their child. The worst part is, that they probably actually resent their children for 'ruining their life'.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/08/21 08:20 AM
1

They celebrate because they hate the idea of men not wanting to give them their resources. And a MGOTW is the worst kind of man, because a lot of them have realized that there's no reason to work hard and pay taxes when it's only used to subsidize women's poor choices. They are basically doubleplus-no-good, neither contributing directly nor indirectly.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/08/21 08:17 AM
6

Women wanting tall men is evolutionary So is men wanting young pleasant, fit, fertile virgins without tatoos. But men get shamed if they state even one of these preferences.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/21 07:53 AM
8

Maybe I missed it, but ... in this whole rant she only ever talks about what she wants others to do for them (love them, care for them, watch anime with them) but spends not even a word about what they did for them (except providing their body). She sees men as objects and utilities as much as she claims men see her that way. Also: I don't think she has the mental capacity to choose men that would want her for something other than her body. Because the men that would look for something more are …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/21 06:31 AM
2

Meh. There's worse things than to be judged unworthy by a slut that can't be trusted to know when to keep their legs closes ;) Can't be trusted to realize that she should have saif no after the fact.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/21 08:14 PM
3

For sure. It's just funny how they differnentiate between men they already have cucked and men they want to cuck.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/21 05:40 PM
44

NEVER ask / follow women opinion of how real men are supposed to, since almost always what come out of her mouth are things that ONLY benefit her / women in general And to add insult to injury their advice makes the life of the receiver of said advice considerably worse most of the time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/21 12:00 PM
199

Funny how, unknowingly paying for somone elses kids makes you a cuck but knowingly paying for them somehow makes you a man.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/21 11:29 AM
1

they know society would fall apart without that 80%. I'm willing to bet that they do not know that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 09:45 AM
2

That is precisely why women are perpetually miserable. Either they refuse to date down and remain single or settle by dating down and hate their partner. And when they marry up they automatically adjust to the new baseline and start searching for even better men and resenting their husband because he isn't higher status than her anymore
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 08:40 AM
8

She also writes it in case someone who knows her irl finds her. "I am totally here to find friends or a true relationship. See, it says 'no sex' right here. teeheee"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 08:14 AM
38

proceeds to cover the pulp-novel that is her life with a picture of her boobs almost falling out Funny how you critisize gym-bros for being only interesting for their body all the while you literally only offer the exact same thing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 07:55 AM
1

Oh, how the turntables ...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/21 03:28 PM
4

How can I deal with the damage done to my marriage I take 'denying responsibility and blaming everyone but myself' for 500, alex. She doesn't even stop to think where her own actions come into play. But her marriage is doomed either way. - if he takes her back, she'll lose all respect for him - if he doesn't she'll rationalize that he abused her
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/21 02:04 PM
5

Start meeting men at places that are of interest to you [like] shopping [or] a fashion showcase Yeah, known hotspots for straight HVMs.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/21 01:04 PM
0

Meh, we live in a world where gender is just a feeling, so age surely can be solely a number as well.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/21 12:24 PM
19

Who doesn't want to do sacrifice his dignity on the altair of "You're not my real dad" and "how dare you speak to my boy like that"?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/21 12:20 PM
10

That happens to women that don't need no men. Men don't want them. Tough luck, cupcake.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/21 12:18 PM
3

By more she means that you can not only be her friend, but that you get the privilege of spending your money and time on her. No sex, though, you're just a friend. On the other hand: I'd be willing to spend money to not having to spend time with her. Old soul my ass
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/07/21 06:40 AM
8

To be fair: The last thing on my mind when looking at ... this, is sex.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/07/21 06:37 AM
21

Her problem is not that there are no good men around. It's that none of them want her any more. I call Bullshit on that. I'm sure there are plenty of good men availiable, even for her. Her problem is that she wouldn't recognize these men as human if they saved her from a burning building.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/07/21 08:29 AM
1

I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt here. It's in her "We get it"-section, so i think she only shows awareness of the numbers-game.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/21 06:54 AM
14

Yeah, but it's not nice to drag innocent children into this. She has shown that she is unable to make sound decisions adopting a child would be seriously detrimental to the wellbeing of said child.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/21 06:25 AM
5

Isn't it amazing that so-called "strong" women today are so incredibly "needy" for circus clown like attention Attention is a very addictive thing. Even more so when you have no real personality to fall back on while getting none.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/21 07:10 AM
0

Isn't it amazing that so-called "strong" women today are so incredibly "needy" for circus clown like attention Attention is a very addictive thing. Even more so when you have no real personality to fall back on while getting none.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/21 07:10 AM
1

I am not to seek, I am more to find Yeah, i was hide and seek champion too. Spent hours behind the courtains and nobody found me. They were so ashamed of themselves that they pretended that they didn't search for me and played videogames instead.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/21 06:41 AM
3

I am tired of stories that go nowhere I see a lot of sleep in your future. Your best bet is finding a single father and submitting to him. Your second best bet is finding a man and submitting to him, and that includes submitting the authority over your world child. Every other man and every other behaviour will lead to guys eventually running away. Divorced girl You are a 35 year old post wall women. You should be ashamed of yourself calling yourself a girl. But I bet you think of yourself as a …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/21 06:38 AM
7

What is the point of making that a standard when she is lying with her own profile? Telling the truth is a tool of the patriarchy, smh I'm willing to bet that, nothing in her profile is actually true, except maybe the age if meerita above is right.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/21 06:31 AM
7

I mean, she is kind of right, no? There's no incentive for women to not act like this. At least none they would see. They are told by everyone that everything will fall into place eventually and they'll get their happy ever after. Media sells them fairy tales and they eat them up enthusiastically Their parents tell them they are perfect little angels (boys at least get the more realistic approach that live sucks and you won't get ahead counting only on others) Feminism tells them they need no me…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/21 06:19 AM
10

If it helps: Even if you have chad genes she'll eventually get bored and consider you 'not enough' for her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/07/21 01:23 PM
1

I know what I bring to the table Well, good for you. It's telling that you don't try to write out what you bring to the table, though. I won't lie to you, cheat on you, steal from you ... So ... Is this my cue to be impressed? Because 'impressed' isn't exactly the first thing that comes to mind. I want a man that ... Yeah, and I want to shit solid gold (actually not, that might hurt). I get bored with the same sh*tday[sic] after day I think you should adopt a monkey. Cause the men you think you …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/07/21 12:24 PM
2

I am looking for ... guy has to be ... Yeah, you don't get to make demands. Actually I think you should forget that you even have preferences, because no man that fits these will ever commit to you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/07/21 12:19 PM
14

Yeah, because it's unheard of that women are freeroaming of guys they don't fuck. I mean, 'Either you pay my shit until I find myself some Chad or I call the cops and tell them you beat me' is a very powerful statement. Or a guy that still thinks he can get her back if he just fulfills every demand she has. Or the millions of other posibilities we talk on this sub every day that have led to women becoming the entitled cunts they are nowadays.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/21 09:29 AM
3

This lying to women to make them feel good sets an unrealistic image in women and makes them inflate their own self worth It's par for the course, no? I mean, they lie to themselves all the time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/21 06:39 AM
13

Nah, I think this means that he still tolerates her BS and finances her dirty 'close'. If he'd stopped shelling out he'd be an abusive ex in an instant.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/21 06:11 AM
4

Oh she 100% knows what she wants alright - She demands a submissive man (any guys under 6' HARD PASS so don't even try it > because you WILL be blocked) with a fully paid off house and an above average income to provide a comfortable life for her and her child while she sits on her ass at home all day Until she gets bored from sitting on her ass all day and fucks a random thug because he's so hawt. Of course it's the mans fault, he was never there for her, working his ass off providing for her. …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/21 01:45 PM
3

Actively sabotaging a marriage sounds very unloyal to me. Maybe it's different where you live.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/21 10:23 AM
2

#lifegoals
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/21 07:45 AM
1

That's nice. But neither sex with robots pretending to be women nor sex with men pretending to be women will give you the approval or attention of women. As I said, nothing short of the matrix wll achieve that feat.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/21 08:51 PM
1

I'm a single mother of one I'm trustworthy I wouldn't trust someone that makes decisions that bad. Aquarius Yeah, when your newspaper tells you that you are unhappy you'll try to divorce rape any man unlucky enough to be in the same general area, no?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/21 01:39 PM
14

she didnt know 10$ say she didn't even ask before she let him take her raw.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/21 12:57 PM
3

Before you had to be 6´2+ now she just wants a man to be her height or taller Yeah, if she's 6´ herself. If she's smaller he still would have to be 6´0+ Her self esteem is higher Sure it is. That's why she uses enough filter to clean the sewage of Los angeles Before she would sleep with a mean she just met That's correct Now, she requires several high effort dates That's because the men she fucked before stopped dating her. And she finds the men willing to date her now really disgusting (one rea…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/21 12:54 PM
4

Makes sense. She's an unloyal cunt, so he should change for her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/21 12:41 PM
1

And I'm pretty sure that won't be satisfying.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/21 08:25 PM
11

it goes beyond physical attraction for her. She seems like an arrogant mess. Men have limited tolerance for that even if a chick is a 10/19. Sure. But her desire for physical attraction automatically locks her out of virtually every man that would even entertain the thought of commiting to her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/21 08:48 AM
23

Physical attraction is equally important to me as [...] Same goes for the men you want to date. Your problem: The men you are attracted to don't think you are physically attractive. And they have bootloads of better options.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/21 08:34 AM
15

There's a reason she has no photos that show her face unobstructed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/21 02:23 PM
15

Took a while to understand Due by. I don't think she knows what she's in for, though. Men who fly women to Grease or Due by most certainly expect certain behaviours and services in exchange.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/21 02:21 PM
2

That would make the ass kicking OK though.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/21 02:18 PM
11

Some men (like 10%) are winning more. The rest is fucked (actually not fucked)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/21 11:12 AM
2

If you're wondering my hobbies are [..] Nope, stopped caring after the fifth word of your profile-text.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/21 11:03 AM
22

Make sure he wanted to abandon you before you knock his ass out. He might very well have been forced out of your life.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/21 11:00 AM
13

The equivalent for women would be someone who fucks them but doesn't acknowledge their existance publicly. [EDIT]Typo[/EDIT]
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/04/21 10:29 AM
12

I'd say that these aren't friendships to begin with. It's all about status and attention.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/04/21 09:54 AM
67

Most women wouldn't mind losing their male friends, if said male friends treated these women like they treat their male friends. Because most women make shitty friends (which is bound to happen when you think relations only in terms of what you can gain) and men don't treat put shitty friends on a pedestal and and cater to their every whim.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/04/21 07:03 AM
1

Sex bots are right around the corner They won't give men female attention and approval. I don't think any technology short of the matrix could break this basic biologic curse.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/04/21 06:32 AM
17

She propably had a plan 20 years ago too. But then her plan pumped and dumped her and she has repeated that cycle for the next 15 years.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/04/21 02:05 PM
23

James Dean was a rebel without a cause. This lady is a planner without a clue.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/04/21 11:00 AM
11

Our thirst for female attention and approval is the single most useful tool women (in general and indidually) have at their disposal. Imagine the world if all men stopped giving a single fuck about women at the same time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/04/21 08:33 AM
15

Funnily enough most feminists don't know what the origin of the term toxic masculinity is. If they knew, they'd stop complaining about it, because one of the core-pillars of toxic masculinity is our desire to self sacrifice for others, especially women. Toxic masculinity describes ways certain male traits are harmful. To men, especially to themselves. Unsurprisingly women cannot understand something that has no relation to themselves so they redefined it as everything they (on an inidividual lev…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/04/21 07:26 AM
220

[39] I'm a planner ~2-3 years from now i want to be [...] working on our first kid I mean Hitler deemed himself a strategist and still tried to invade Russia in the winter, so you're not that bad a planner in comparision.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/04/21 07:18 AM
1

Me and my little family are my priority So, what about the father? just need someone to love us to join the fun now I'm just goint to guess: Fun=money? You can find out the rest ... [] Yah, I think I'll pass. On a positive note: You're collarbone is visible. In this day and age that's almost impressive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/21 06:30 PM
107

I'm actually impressed. A wall of text and not a single word about you. Or why I'd actually would want you. But I'll have to say, I like how you have your priorities straigt. I mean, you spent years searching for someone to change your life. Other people just do that. Change their lives, I mean. But not you. You are confident enough to believe that your prince is right around the corner, showing you the way. Except if he doesn't look good enough for you. Then you keep on waiting. I foresee a lon…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/21 06:25 PM
5

and a good sense of humour. I figure he has to provide it. Because I don't think you made your profile to make other people laugh. To be fair: I laughed nevertheless.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/21 06:18 PM
2

I bet there'd be takers Hooray for Clown world.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/21 05:51 PM
1

my world revolves around them, my dog and my business The good news is: She won't have time to spend with you, so you can have this one without having to put up with her too much. The bad news is: She'll still expect you to carry her world financially. Kids and 'buisnesses' tend to be expensive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/21 11:17 AM
15

I'd b a prostitute n get payed for it Press X for doubt.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/21 11:13 AM
1

a man that [...] doesn't value your time That's where you are wrong, sweaty. He just isn't willing to pay the overinflated bullshit you think you are owed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/04/21 09:42 AM
1

I don't want a picture of your penis. You're in luck, you won't get one. The thought of touching a woman has to make my penis hard before I consider sendig dick-pics.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/04/21 09:10 AM
18

Make that 2 kids, 6 years, 100 pounds and 1 wall later
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/04/21 08:31 AM
-1

And then she calls herself a buisness-owner in her OLD-profile.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 12:24 PM
13

So ... Either she got pregnant way past her 'best before'-Date. Or there's a (probably bizarre) reason why she needs people to understand her relationship with her daughter.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 12:21 PM
3

Well, she's got a hell of a thousand cock stare going. While not exactly unique, it is sort of impressive at the tender age of 22.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 06:31 AM
2

be an adult Because you can't be bothered to be one? Still searching for someone to replace your father?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 06:30 AM
10

If you feel guilty and empty now wait until you hit the wall and the consant stream of dicks and validation dries up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 06:28 AM
13

We produced generations of men that have no pride and generations of women that have no shame. Sad cringe indeed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 06:24 AM
55

go ahead and ask anything. Q: You look drugged out of your mind. Are you drugged out of your mind? Q: How much of a fuckup do you have to be to not have your children with you as a woman? Q: So you were an option to be used before you reached the conclusion that being an option to be used is a bad deal. How many men are we talking? High two-digits? Three-digits? Q: Periods. Do you know what they are for?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/04/21 01:06 PM
3

Let's pretend this was a real situation. Can you imagine how much she must despise this man who is completely unable/unwilling to lead her and has failed every shit test ever?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/04/21 11:50 AM
1

Very late to the question but here goes: BLM only covers male african american thugs and african american celebrities. And only in relation to white people. The biggest threat to black lives (other blacks) is conveniently ignored.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/04/21 10:12 AM
2

I'll also guess that her view of "Good morals" deviates significantly from conventional morality If it makes her feel good, it's morally good. What makes her feel good changes by the hour, of course.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/04/21 09:35 AM
2

The derision directed at blue checkmarks in recent years comes from Twitter doling them out to every leftist hack who claims to be a JoUrNaLiSt. Also Twitter tends to remove the checkmarks from people they disagree with, even when they meet the original Standards. So yeah, nowadays a blue checkmark is an endorsement by Twitter, regardless of what they officially state.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/04/21 10:16 AM
7

Come on. Don't these words men that she is practically a pure virgin again?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/04/21 09:56 AM
2

Danger hair is what seems to be used rather often.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/21 01:48 PM
4

In her own words he changed his mind two weeks later saying that he wasn't feeling "it" proceeds to be his cum dumpster for three months. since what we had felt seriously felt perfect Reality doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is what she is feeling at this exact moment in time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/21 01:37 PM
2

She can't even maintain eyebrows and she wants me to believe she's an intellectual mastermind. Also: Is a single mother.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/21 01:16 PM
3

Except when a woman says it. Then it means fucking all the men (that are visible to her)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/21 12:36 PM
5

Yeah, they never seem to ask what they have to offer that a man would want. The only things they publicly offer are the things that get themselves attention.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/21 10:35 AM
12

Too soon, bro. That particular wall destroyed many good men's lives.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/21 02:22 PM
7

Tough shit. They can marry the Berlin wall for all I care
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/21 02:20 PM
6

I have saved it as an example of typical feminist logic and lack of any concern for men You should have left it at that. You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't reason themselves into to begin with.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre10/03/21 01:39 PM
1

Plot Twist: They all do not care.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/21 11:41 AM
2

Funny. I didn't give a damn about her before she asked for cash, either.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/21 11:39 AM
9

Nah, it should read "... so I will do whatever I can to make you happy for the rest of your life, if you are willing to accept that I already have kids from another man."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/21 11:37 AM
84

I mean, good for them, no? All my life I've been told the sole purpose of marriage is the opression of women. Now that men don't want to marry any more, women can finally be free. Hurray.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/21 11:34 AM
4

So, you thought your sister was prettier than you, so you decided to fuck all the men to prove that she isn't. Seems to not having worked out for ya.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/03/21 12:17 PM
10

I don't know. Swapping a woman that maybe only wants you for your money and will divorce-rape you if she think it's worth it for a woman that definitely only wants you for your money and will divorce-rape you if she thinks it's worth it, doesn't sound like a good deal.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/03/21 06:46 AM
1

But I hate play games Talk about ambiguity here. Does she hate playing games? Or does she hate-play games (strange kink, but whatever). Or did she completely mistype and actually plays hate-games. Would be par for the course for a woman in her 40ies.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/21 03:35 PM
4

here for only friends Maybe she misspellt OnlyFans?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/21 02:54 PM
94

Still, female 4s get to reproduce. Male 4s get called names by main stream media. Funnily enough the chance to be happy is higher for the male 4, if he learns the right lessons.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/21 02:51 PM
9

When do you stop searching for "the one"? As a woman? You take the best man you can get to commit to you without letting him fuck you as soon as possible. Then you do your best to stay faithful to this man and he will most probably do everything to make you happy forever. Or you can, you know, find yourself and fuck a few football-teams. But at the end of that road you will find neither "the one" nor a man that you at least can tolerate. And I see, you already made your choice.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/21 11:53 AM
1

Funnily enough there's a lot of men out there that would commit to her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/21 03:39 PM
9

You tell me. It's like these infomercials but the other way round. You can have this shit-sandwich for 1000$. But if you order right now we'll also kick you in the balls for only 500$ extra. [EDIT]Typo[/EDIT]
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/21 03:34 PM
7

Men say they like a natural look and don't mind extra weight Have you ever considered that they are lying because that's what gets them into your pants (though I can't imagine why they would want that) Also: When your natural look is fugly, most men don't like a natural look. Not fair? Tell that to all the guys under 6 feet.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/21 03:29 PM
2

Women don't seem to understand, once you present yourself as something that's it Isn't that their very nature? I mean don't they try to hide all their red flags just to unleash them once they locked someone down (aka marriage)? It seems to be the good ol' projection again. As in: 'I don't really want what I say I want. I only say it to get what I really want. Men are the same, no?'
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/21 02:48 PM
33

I'll repost my answer to that particular idiocy from an other forum. Dear Denmark, I'm honestly surprised that you are surprised. You see, denmark. Men are fast to adapt to adverse or even favourable circumstances, but they are slow to really change on a fundamental level. You, dear denmark and all your feminists and the simps that listen to these feminists and the powers that be that use these feminists have told your men that women don't need men. That they don't want men. That men are dangero…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/21 12:23 PM
51

Yup way too many choices so ultimatly she never chooses any of them Well, how could she. What if she chooses and then something better comes along? She'd hate herself forever. I'm also courious how many of these 500 she has fucked.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/21 12:21 PM
3

I'm turned on by things that take time to discover. [List of things that sound thoughtfull and attractive in a romantic novel] proceeds to not even try to find out if the person on the other side of the table you are dining at has any of these qualities. Yeah, I think I see your problem here.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/21 10:59 AM
11

or is there a chance I may meet someone that is secure enough to trust me First of all: The men that would choose to commit to you aren't secure, they are desperate. Second: You meet men like this every day. You just don't see them because you think they are not good enough for you. Third: You will cheat on a man that is willing to commit to you. Because, as I wrote above, you will not be attracted to this man.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/21 10:07 AM
1

At least she doesn't pretend to care about anything but other peoples money. I'll have to give her that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/21 10:01 AM
2

She'd look better if you finally started financing her love for fashion. Duh. Now step up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/21 03:15 PM
1

I don't want to be superwoman. I want to cater to a family Then why the hell did you spend the best years of your life buying a house and excelling at your career? Actually I'd like both ... Nevermind.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/21 03:06 PM
1

if you think it's trashy Yes or gross Yes your misogonystic thinking Ye ... Actually no. You do know what misogony means, no? Nah, who am I kidding, you think it's something you can say when you don't want to be held responsible for your shitty life-choices.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/21 03:02 PM
2

I'm here for grown things. Yes, we can tell. And you eat all of them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/21 02:59 PM
7

but is a complete BITCH That's why I'm willing to give her ex the benefit of the doubt here. I can imagine that he has another kid with a somewhat acceptable version of her that he also is in a relationship with, and she doesn't like that very much. If I had to guess, I'd say he was a stable but boring man that had enough will left to not let her completely steamroll him. Which counts as abuse these days.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/21 02:57 PM
1

I'd imagine that when you have a lot of hobbies and still no friends then you either only have hobbies that don't lend themselves to meeting people (and are most certainly nothing to bond over) or you are quite the bitch.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/21 02:52 PM
13

not a choice a responsible adult would make so .. what about women?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/02/21 10:55 AM
14

Just imagine what her body will look like 10 years down the line.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/02/21 10:45 AM
2

Keep embracing feminism. It sure will help you. I mean it helped you get to where you are now, hasn't it?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/02/21 01:29 PM
7

It's nice when they clearly spell out what's going on Things she doesn't have JOB/Career Car And a place to live Things she wants (you to give to her) Marriage Kids Things she is not Hardworking Honest Loyal Funny The best part is her claiming to be honest followed by a plethora of lies such as BBW The percentage of big women that have the right to claim to be still beautiful is miniscule. It wouldn't be a risky bet to say you are delusional. But I'm sure a lot of men told you you are. Right bef…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/21 01:20 PM
3

And I want basic literacy. It looks like we are not meant to be.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/02/21 12:52 PM
24

So ... she got pregnant by Betabux (who's certainly on the hook for child support) and now wants some Chad-cock (presumably to find herself)? Or was it Chad and she actually realizes that this is her last chance to capture a young (und thus inexperienced) man who's at least somewhat ambitious and willing to commit to her?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/02/21 12:48 PM
4

Well, in the past when she fell on hard things there was usually something in it for her. Just saying.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/02/21 12:04 PM
10

Best of all, she was a cocktail waitress (who we suspected sugar babied) May very well be projection on her part. People that get unreasonably upset at hypothetical crimes are often guilty of said crimes themselves.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/02/21 12:02 PM
1

So ... if I treat you like you are the only woman on my planet ... I mean .. wouldn't that mean that your girls don't even exist in my world? I don't think you'd like me ignoring your monetary demands when you need to spend money on your crotchgoblins.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/02/21 10:15 AM
3

Be fair. It's rather hard to find that attractive alpha bucks that is actually willing to commit and willing to commit to her (and he has to be rich of course, and over 6'0 and ... you know the drill) The rest of the people she meets are not people to her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/02/21 01:20 PM
26

they were all extremely good looking and for some reason they all working in some type of construction, Electrician, Foreman, Roofer Sounds like she accidently dates porn-clichees. I'm also courious how she would describe her efforts in demanding her partners sexual needs.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/02/21 01:18 PM
2

I have noticed the same thing. Women are all feminists, until they have to pay for something or do something. There are no feminists in a burning building
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/02/21 10:36 AM
14

Mental health awareness" wasn't a giant redflag for you Why would I bother to read the second line?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/02/21 06:51 PM
131

Tatoos Astrology Art Travel That was a fast nope.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/02/21 02:16 PM
5

While demanding at least 1 dollar more. Except for chad. He gets all you can eat for .50
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/01/21 05:15 PM
23

She could use a profile-picture without filters and weird angles. That should weed at least a few of them out.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/01/21 12:19 PM
8

You searched for a 35 year old woman that was not dtf?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/01/21 12:09 PM
3

I'm use to the finer things in life.... I can tell by the filters you use. So fine that no even a shred of how you really look is left.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/01/21 12:03 PM
68

Any advice on how to curb or stop it Stop using OLD. No man on Dating-apps is searching 35 year old women who wouldn't be dtf.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/01/21 12:00 PM
8

She clearly says she saw all the red flags each time Don't liesten what they say, watch what they do. I'm sure she didn't see the red flags. If you asked her at the time if there was anything she'd thought was bad about these men, she'd have told you some completely unimportant nitpicks and stated that otherwise these guys were perfect (and so hot te hee)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/01/21 11:47 AM
3

She didn't state she has ambitious goals.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/01/21 07:19 AM
24

Having her life 100% paid for by other people?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/21 03:48 PM
3

Crotchgoblin aside: The catch is all the STDs you catch when you even look in her general direction.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/21 02:48 PM
3

I could be considered empathetic I'm beginning to suspect that most women wouldn't know empathy if it bit their nose off.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/01/21 11:27 AM
6

Sometimes I wonder how many deadbeat fathers that abandoned their kids (according to mom) don't even know that they are fathers.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/01/21 10:34 AM
3

That's a Good Thing. Not necessarily.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/01/21 02:15 PM
3

Won't watch the vid at work but I'm willing to bet that the number of guys she has fucked because they were nice to her is less than 1.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/01/21 02:01 PM
3

It is somewhat applicable, isn't it? At least if you look at what the respective genders want out of the deal. The guy who sleeps with them is only in it for himself. He doesn't care if it was fulfilling for her, he doesn't care for her one bit and he sure as hell won't commit The woman who keeps their beta emotional tampons is also only in it for herself. She doesn't care if his emotional needs are met, she doesn't care for him at all, and she sure as hell won't put out. The cum-dumpster wants …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/01/21 03:08 PM
17

So, not vegitarian at all. Got it. Like a woman who saves herself for marriage. But she lets Chad and Tyrone run through her from time to time, not daily.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/01/21 02:10 PM
14

She's not allowed to be happy? Of course she is allowed. But she is not entitled to be happy. Because no one is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 09:23 AM
10

Some guys want to be step daddies Sure enough. Anomalies exist. Some guys want to be step daddies. Some guys are chubby chasers. And in both cases the supply heavily outweighs (heh) the demand. I'd also say a healthy amount of both aforementioned types are rather disturbed mentally. [EDIT]Typo[/EDIT]
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 09:21 AM
8

adding that women were pushed into choosing You chose to be a whore long before corona-chan.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 09:14 AM
10

I haven't had sex in 8 years and before that I had a dry spell of 10 years. I still can't drink enough to even think about hitting that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 09:07 AM
5

She also says "be a dad" but doesn't mention that you won't be allowed to set any rules. It's not your kid after all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 09:06 AM
13

I've got nothing else. I can't dance, I can't sing, I can't do anything. Funny, how the only things you can think of create the same amount of real value as the whoring you are doing right now.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/21 01:34 PM
10

why does she think she deserves a decent guy? Because everyone in her life tells her that she does. And everyone that says otherwise is a mysogynist incel that should be cancelled. If it's someone from work she'll do the cancelling herself (aka reporting to HR)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/21 01:27 PM
12

Her last boyfriend spent several months chasing her Wonder what that looked like. Either he hung around her trying to get into her panties, casting her aside when he finally made it he was really interested into getting to know her. When he finally did, he noped the fuck out. has gone from one bad relationship to another Now what's the common denominator here? Nah, must be that all men are bad.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/21 11:27 AM
3

I am here looking for a real connection to his bank account?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/21 11:01 AM
31

Well of course. They are, after all, tools of the patriarchy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/21 07:30 PM
12

What about denying paternity. Like, always? Sure, it's not the best for a relationship/marriage but the alternative is worse, no?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/21 03:01 PM
93

They told me that their friends pressure them to have "hoe phases" Sounds about right. Never ever ever ever dare to think about accepting even a hint of responsibility.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/21 02:53 PM
74

My friends reassured me that I did nothing wrong Your friends reassured themselves that they did nothing wrong. They couldn't care less about you. You know that of course, that's why you seek validation on the intertubes. But guess what: These people also don't care about you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/21 02:50 PM
4

Also: A lot of the men under 40 that actually make decent money are beneath them anyway because they learned a trade and do not have a fancy degree, thus cannot elevate their social value.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/21 11:54 AM
14

Sometimes I wonder if feminism is a long prank. Like, a dude that made a bet that he can make women as a whole deeply unhappy and having them thank him for it. His friends said: 'No way, man. Women aren't that dumb'. Thus he drafted the declaration of sentiments.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/21 11:30 AM
6

I think the analogy is perfect with public toilets. Most would use it, no one wants to buy one so the public is left with maintaining their existence.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/21 11:24 AM
1

I'm pretty sure the asshole didn't have to endure any of that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/21 11:21 AM
7

Women are also more likely in these big cities, to vote far left over and over. It's way worse. Women in relationship are more likely to vote conservative. And these same women then vote liberal when the relationship ends. They don't vote based in morals or believes, they vote based on what gets them the most money. When they are single they want welfare and handouts, when they are in a relationship they want their partner to have more money to spend on her, so less taxes etc.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/21 11:09 AM
20

If a 400 pound broke loser defined himself as attractive don't forget healthy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/21 10:05 AM
6

Not after sex pests According to common knowledge (at least here) whatever a woman on a hookup-app writes that she has no interest in tells you everything you need to know about what kind of guy she chose in the past. I am far to sensible, trustworthy, reliable, honest and respectful Yeah, trustworthy and reliable are not traits that you have, just because you claim that you do. That' for other people to decide. As for the rest, sensible is not something I really care about and honesty is the ba…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/12/20 02:28 PM
2

This is comparing husbands and wives in divorce.outcomes using $$$. Women win 60-70% of the time. I still don't really follow. They win what exactly? More than the half of their husbands assets and income? More than they themselves put into the marriage? Serious question. If you use happiness instead of financial victory then men win 90% of divorces. Unless there are children involved. Divorced men with children are among the most vulnerable demographics for suicide. Unless you don't count dead …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/20 03:31 PM
1

~63% of divorces will have a "favourable financial outcome" for the female I'm curious. That means 37% of the women would be better of, if the couple just went seperate ways and never talked to each other again? Or are they just worse of then they were, when they leeched of their husbands money?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/20 11:48 AM
10

compare their marriages with some influencers or friends that appear to be "happy" and doing a lot of things together like flying Are they also jealous of Robert Downey jr. and his miraculous flying Ironman suit? Oh, that wasn't real? But influencers are. Got it. smh.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/20 11:30 AM
6

Winner of the 2020 world championship in mental gymnastics. On the other hand, compared to other posts here, she wouldn't even qualify for an amateur league.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/20 11:25 AM
6

"I'm a high level athlete" mental gymnastics isn't a real sport, darling
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/20 11:21 AM
4

a pothead I first read potatohead and I thought to myself 'well, sure, but they aren't that honest usually'.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/20 02:03 PM
2

She really didn't do herself favors with the last foto. That receeding hairline ...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/11/20 01:17 PM
2

It basically is. It aims to shame mens sexuality because they have nothing relevant to say to counter you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/11/20 10:52 AM
3

She: ......... ( Hamster just died ) Thought/Thot over load. You clearly underestimate the hamster. More like ... She: Yes, but I know now that that was wrong. I am a different person now or She: That wasn't my fault. They lied to me just to get in my pants. or She: How dare you judge me by my past, incel
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/11/20 09:24 AM
1

It makes me think most guys who are Christian might not want to know anymore Sweaty, they sure as heck want to know. And they sure as heck will reject you for it. It's you that wants them not wanting to know. You blew (heh) any chance to get a real Christian man to commit to you about 200 sex-partners ago.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 10:34 AM
2

She also doesn't consider what he might have missed out on. In fact he doesn't register as a human being with feelings at all throughout the whole story. Hence the question what buttons she should press to make him love her again. Because he's a machine, amiright.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 09:36 AM
3

I mean, she's right. It hurts to read this. The english language has done nothing to deserve this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/20 03:13 PM
8

Uhh, either she used to have sex way sooner than 3 months way too often That was exactly my thought as well. sex makes me confused and causes me to get attached too fast how the fuck would you know when you have always been this way?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/11/20 11:21 AM
7

he mentioned the distance was hard for him. and that he wanted to see the person he was dating all the time I listened and was empathetic, but also mentioned if we had [blablabla] She basically told him she will not adjust for him, so he decided to ditch her. This is squarely on her shoulders. Also and was empathetic fuck off.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/11/20 11:14 AM
3

that guys dont compliment them. To be fair, they still want it criminalized when it's not Chad complimenting them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/20 02:40 PM
3

Why do men even bother getting married? Because marriage was invented for exactly this reason. Like in, a married woman monkey branching was the end of her social life and most certainly a ticket to homelessnes or poverty. Nowadays it's just another way to rape men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/20 02:16 PM
10

Very Feminine = "SHUT UP AND PROVIDE FOR ME!" Nah, this also means she's fat. As in she has 'curves' like a 'real woman' not like these stickfigures over there.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/20 11:20 AM
2

Feminism declares that women get (and have always gotten) the short end of the stick and deserve more than they actually get. The desire to get provided for is more or less hardwired. Feminism just adds an additional unearned entitlement on top of this, furthering the gap that women demand when considering the value they ascribe to potential mates.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 11:19 AM
1

Heh ... Where are all the good Employers. They need to man up and give me the job I deserve.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 11:08 AM
3

She's searching for the missing link between cause and effect. As it stands it's her own fault and that can't be true now, can it?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 11:00 AM
7

I have bad news for you. Men don't need to bail women out anymore. Daddy government does it (with men's money). It's another reason for the insane entitlement we see here every day.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 10:57 AM
2

Despite the proliferation of feminism some all women still have this in built, seemingly unshakable need for someone to provide for them. FTFY Feminism is hypergamy institutionalized.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 10:53 AM
9

I also think it's funny how, in this whole rant, she never ever asked herself the question, let alone letting anyone know, why he should want her. She's painfully aware that she brings nothing to the table but a moist hole but at the same time she is literally unable to say it out loud (to herself and everyone else)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 10:21 AM
6

Mentioning of all social media is an instant red flag. Onlyfans is just extrared.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 10:13 AM
3

where I don't want to share my body [...] with someone who doesn't want to build something with me So let me guess. He has to build something for you first. And them you will maybe share a little bit of your body with him. And not in the way you used to share it for free with all the really dirty sex with your several sex-buddies. Yeah, I'm sure that guy won't feel like leftovers, honey.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/20 01:07 PM
20

I'm looking 4 a king that is loyal,respectful,family oriented,non abusive verbally,physically, and emotionally know how to make a woman feel like a queen and want to settle down and want marriage I'm willing to bet that she is not a queen is not loyal is not family oriented is abusive, verbally, physically and emotionally doesn't have an idea how to make a man feel like a king and doesn't care about settling down and marriage, only for the money
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/20 09:41 AM
9

I love to shower them back tenfold I don't believe you. I wouldn't believe you if you said you give compliments to men at even a 1 to 100 ratio of what you receive. Most men are so starved of compliments that they get suspicious immediatly when they receive one and I don't believe that you are the one woman that compliments a man even when he's not perfect at that exact moment in time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/10/20 02:42 PM
8

Why am I, and so many of my smart, beautiful, successful friends, struggling to meet decent men? Because most men don't care too much about smart and less about successful. These things are not traits men seek when they look for someone to risk their life on.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/10/20 02:31 PM
5

It IS projection, funnily enough. Because that's the kind of man that gets her juices flowing. She'll say he ain't shit but her panties would drop faster than a meteor shower if he even looked at her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/10/20 01:25 PM
3

Needs to settle down and get serious proceeds to meet and fuck (at least) three different men in the span of 2 and a half months.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/20 10:45 AM
2

I'm sorry, I'm very late to the party, but there's a third option, and she took it plenty. You only apply to jobs that have a reputation to work their employees to death for almost no pay and fire them before long to hire someone else they can work to death for almost no pay.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/20 10:18 AM
6

ve been. If you look around, you can see they've started swiping on you, then opening with their link Nah, the only ones swiping on me are asian women over 30. I am that uninteresting to the average woman ;) I am pretty sure though that promoting an OnlyFans without a match (just like in OP with Instagram) will become standard, at least for a short time, devaluating pussy even more in the process.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/20 05:47 PM
10

It's only a matter of time until they promote their OnlyFans on Dating-Apps.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/20 02:23 PM
5

With the “winners” in the current dating pool, who can blame girls for staying single? Nobody blames them. But, unlike all the men you just complained about, they are not single by choice.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/20 02:12 PM
12

and she didn’t want to lose (another male student) as a friend and potential boyfriend I take "why would somebody lie about something as horrible as rape" for 500, Alex.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 12:58 PM
4

Most women will read this and say he's a jerk. And then they think about how much they want to have him.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/20 11:20 AM
2

peepee in her thingaling She wants your Ding Ding Dong in her Tralala
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/20 09:40 AM
1

but couldn't beat up a woman! with the help of his brother no less.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:57 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:54 PM
2

Well, if the scenario is that you reaaaaallly want to have sex and there is absolutely no chance in hell to get condoms (or a partner you know isn't positive) and you may die if you didn't have sex right there and then ... yeah, there may be some benefit in being circumcised. And I'm sceptical of even that, because as I said, the studies you referenced are flawed at best.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 04:57 PM
2

So, why has the most circumcised country in the western world the highes prevalence of HIV then? Shouldn't it be less either way? Have you read the study you posted? Do you know the studies it references? Do you know that most of these studies were aborted when the conclusions were met? Do you know that the circumcised men in these studies had less sex than the uncircumcised men because they couldn't have sex right after being circumcised? Do you know that the circumcised men were provided condo…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 04:03 PM
2

First point. Also the first search result on google for "prevalence of hiv us vs europe" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7986418 Incidence of HIV in the US is 4 times the incidence of HIV in europe. Strange for a country that has so much more circumcised people, no? For my second point: Feel free to show me a european medical association that is for circumcision. As for my third point: I don't need a source for the claim that it's stupid to have unprotected sex just because you have no fores…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:53 PM
8

Also: The circumsiced people couldn't have fucking sex while their wounds healed. Nobody cared to control for that factor. I wonder why.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:27 PM
2

Makes sense. That's why the 1st world country with the highest number of circumsicions also hast the highest number of HIV-positive people. Wait, what?? Also: Hey, did you know that almost no other western medical body thinks circumsicion is something you should do without absolute medical necessity? Also: Thinking that circumsicion will protect you in a significant way against HIV is beyond retarded. But you do you, champ.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:26 PM
2

I'm sure that is intentional. Maybe down the line a man who is made to penetrate will be accused of rape because he didn't get consent first.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:54 PM
2

Because no man ever has made laws and policies that hurt men as a group and benefitted women, no Sir. The right to vote without obligation isn't a thing in the western world and only men have the right to bodily integrity ... wait ....
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:40 PM
4

How do anti-abortion-laws disatvantage women compared to men? I mean, men don't have the right to legally abandon unwanted children either. If a man aborted a child he doesn't want, he'd go to jail. But it's as they always say. When you are privileged, equality feels like opresion.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:37 PM
3

where is the line between "unpaid labor" and taking care of your shits ? Living: Everything a person does, for themselves or others, that doesn't get paid. Unpaid Labor: The same thing when a woman in a relationship does it. ~ some feminist, probably
/r/MensRights18/02/20 12:51 PM
1

A: Yeah, the head-witch is dead. B: Well, yes. But we sure killed a lot of innocent people along the way, didn't we? A: Eh, who cares. Most of them where witches for sure. Also, Matt Lauer the King Witch is gone. B: Are we sure, he was a witch? A: Who cares, he did despicable things, and you know what they say: "The ends justify the means" B: Sure buddy. But I'm really sure my son was innocent. A: Yah, sorry bout that, mate. But we wouldn't have killed the Head-witch without his sacrifice. B: He…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:32 PM
6

Well, because most of them are sex-negative und insecure and this is the right they don't want other/hotter women to have.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:36 AM
1

Well, there are a lot of 'answers' to that question. Women can't abort whenever they want Women have to be afraid in the dark Women have to look after their children etc pp. The sad thing is: A lot of feminist really believe any of these things are in any way valuable answers to the original question.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:34 AM
1

I know. I just took the opportunity for a jab against McGregor ;)
/r/MensRights05/02/20 03:25 PM
5

it's an all female cast Ewan McGregor ... On the other hand, he's a male feminist, so you're kind of right.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 02:44 PM
1

He should identify as transgender. A lot of people have no problem with girls getting destroyed in a competition when the winner pretends to be a girl too.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 01:48 PM
2

I'm not sure if that's not a step up. I mean, men that go all in for the social contract are seen as worthless by feminists. Men that won't are seen as dangerous. Just saying.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 01:30 PM
3

It's funny, because they lied to the girls as well. A lot of women wouldn't be half as bitter if they weren't fed the lie that they want a nice guy. But they were and so they cry themselves to sleep wondering what's wrong with them falling for the 'assholes' again and again when they are supposed to like soyboys (which they find repulsing)
/r/MensRights24/01/20 01:27 PM
1

I could also give you a list of all the injustices against women by the type of man who would identify as a MRA. I am sure you can't. And no, acting in preposterous ways isn't an injustice. Preventing all men that were raped by women to be included in rape-statistics is.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:22 PM
2

What are you talking about? How is voting a basic human right? Most men in the US do not have this right. Hell, I think the majority of men worldwide do not have a unconditional right to vote.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:02 PM
0

And my point is, that implying that there is an apropriate age for this is not helpful
/r/MensRights18/12/19 06:50 PM
0

As if it was A OK at any other age. I'm sure you didn't mean it that way, but the qualifier seems unnecessary
/r/MensRights18/12/19 04:39 PM
3

Ask her what health benefits it has that actually matter before he is old enough to decide it for himself. Also: If you don't circumcise, remember to explain to her how the male penis works. As in: No, she should not retract the foreskin by force. I am certain she has no idea about this, will do it and use the resulting infection as justification for her wish to circumcise.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:05 PM
3

Most certainly they see only girls as human beings deserving of bodily integrity. They just don't admit to themelves that they see men and boys as subhuman.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:50 PM
89

I should have done an /s, shouldn't I? There's few things in america more biased towards women and harmful to men than family court. Maybe the Title IX Kangoroo-courts but it's a very short list. What makes you think a specialized sex-court would play out differently with all the 'believe-women'-crap nowadays?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:41 PM
81

Like in family court?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:38 PM
1

At the end of the day I stress, he is under no obligation here, that doesn't make him the bad guy I never ever made this about the asker. It is possible for both statements to be true. The asker has no obligation to the child The child has a right to try to reach out If the boy calls again, then there is no excuse. I just think there's a million cases where we (as in the mens rights sub and as MRAs) would encourage the child to call. And a million were we wouldn't. Based on the information at ha…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:31 PM
2

I bolded the parts for you since you can't seem to read your own posts. That doesn't pin any obligation on the asker. It just absolves the teen from wrongdoing. But I also think we are taking wildly different approaches here. And we use wildly different assumptions in our argumentation. You obviously assume that the child knows that he contacted a person that is not his father. I'm sympathetic to what you said in this case, although I'd argue that I still understand the wish of the child to rees…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:03 PM
1

Why are you pinning everything on this random guy Just courious. Where exactly did I imply any obligation on the guy? I am not considering the real father because I don't have any information on him. All i know is that the asker was the only father the child knew for at least half of the boys life and that his mother is a cheating, lying whore. We don't even know if the real father knows about the boy. What makes you think the son knew that the asker doesn't want to be contacted? How many posts …
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:40 PM
1

but at the same time that doesn't give him the right to go and contact him I mean, that's very much condemnig him. He shouldn't even try to reach out, because his feelings don't matter. The actions of a cheating, lying, (seemingly) heartless woman have tainted the boy by association. Again, don't get me wrong, the asker has every right to not want contact. Hell, he can deny the very existence of the child. But I don't think trying to contact the man he knew as his father for half his life (or lo…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:24 PM
1

Strange. We would have told the son that he did nothing wrong by trying to contact the man he considered his father for more than half of his life. Hell, we don't even know what exactly the boy knew. Does he even know he is not his biological father? If he does, does he know, why he left? If he does, how was his life with one of his most important male role models gone? Yeah, it's the mothers fault, the father has no obligation whatsoever to the boy and has chosen to make his decision clear. But…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:09 PM
2

Well, man need to make sure that no woman is discriminated against, ever. See. Same class for both.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:43 PM
2

And women, as a whole, also don't pay for it. If you know you'll be better off, if certain policies are implemented, you'll vote for it. Women are better off when welfare increases (not really, but if you only look at the numbers, they are), men are worse off, because it's their money that pays that system. If women didn't have the vote, the power of gibs-promises would decrese drastically, because a whole lot of men will not be benefactors of wellfare.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 01:29 PM
1

Eh... it will be 4 Minutes max, then she gets disgusted, leaves and you never see her again.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:00 PM
1

Then why would they need the evidence, then? Why make this law in the first place as a reaction to Ghomeshi being declared not guilty? There is absolutely no reason for the prosecution to have a right to see evidence before the trial. We have two possibilities here. Either the law is harmful and will be used to charge and convict innocent people. Or it is completely useless and should be taken of the books. Or can you think of anything that law is good for. Don't forget that the defense can subm…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:27 PM
1

They can't just declare "I'm accusing X of rape, give me all my evidence". That isn't how this works at all. They can't, that's right. But you cannot use evidence that favours you, if you didn't give it to them. That's the evil part in this law.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:07 PM
1

Of course they get that information before it goes to court. That's the whole reason this law was made. Gomeshi succesfully produced evidence that his accusers were lying POS. If this law was in place when the Ghomeshi-thing went down, he would either had to give the prosecutor his evidence before the accusers where in the stand or not use the evidence at all. If he had handed it over he would have been fucked because the prosecution would have instructed the accusers what not to say. If he hadn…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:28 PM
1

Why would anyone want to participate on a subreddit that does this?
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:03 PM
1

Let's go hypothetical. MittenMagik accuses you that you raped them. Yesterday at 12 o clock in a McDonalds-Toilet in Texas. You have video-evidence that yesterday at 12 o clock you were at the bahamas doing some shit. This law forces you to hand this evidence to the prosecution that can share this evidence with MittenMagik. Now MittenMagik accuses you that you raped them. Two weeks ago at 12 o clock in a McDonalds-Toilet in Texas. Rinse and repeat until you do not have an alibi left. As this hap…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 11:47 AM
1

Ahh, so not a right. Just not as many people that do it.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 01:19 PM
3

Show it to feminists and they will say, it's mens fault. The women only did it because Epstein made them do it. And people will belive it because women are wonderful, of course. /s
/r/MensRights10/10/19 02:15 PM
2

Ah, the Mary P. Koss school of equality. The absolute lack of empathy is as disgusting as it ever was. I guess it's projection, as always.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 02:12 PM
3

It's really interesting and the thing that stood out most to me in Cassie Jayes TedxTalk. She described how an MRA would talk about false rape accusations and she literally couldn't process the word 'False' until after she transcribed the interview. As in: he said 'false rape accusation' and she heard 'rape'
/r/MensRights09/10/19 10:19 AM
0

Sexualization of females, even adult ones You wish. Even fictual ones. Yay
/r/MensRights07/10/19 02:51 PM
1

Always worth the watch
/r/MensRights07/10/19 02:41 PM
1

This should go to r/showerthoughts but I'm starting to think that, for a lot of women, especially those that subscribe to feminism, it IS about Power. The whole spiel about male rapists getting of on overpowering women is just another case of feminists projecting their own fucked up worldview on everyone else ...
/r/MensRights01/10/19 11:13 AM
1

Gay Student Mothers ... ? or maybe something todo with mobile phones
/r/MensRights25/09/19 02:01 PM
5

It's also islamophobic And of course mysoginistic, because of all the women that don't want to have sex with an uncircumcised ... baby?
/r/MensRights25/09/19 01:58 PM
1

Your "mistake" doesn't apply to what I wrote. She didn't know that he didn't rape her.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:14 PM
2

As long as it is handled confidentially (ie: Destruction of the material, no archiving of the records, no information besides establishing fatherhood) there is NO good reason to be against it. I mean, I still can't think of a single Contra-Argument against mandatory testing. Well, one. Cost. Well, there is another one, but only if you are a cheating little pos. [EDIT]wording[/EDIT]
/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:12 PM
1

Can it be established beyond reasonable doubt that she accused someone while knowing he didn't do it? I mean my sentence wasn't that complicated, was it?
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:47 PM
1

Accusing someone of rape while knowing he didn't rape her. Easy.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 09:47 AM
2

Going to the police and accusing someone to have raped you, wait for the prosecution to destroy his life and then coming clean, when the police start to find more and more holes in your story is slander now? Who knew ... If you make the penalty high, all but the most malevolent people would not dare to make a false accusation anymore. We are not talking about misidentifying someone or misunderstanding what constitutes rape. We are talking about knowingly lying to the police to make the state act…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 09:46 AM
7

If we want to defeat women That's our goal? Who knew ...
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:54 PM
3

You are aware that, at least in the US (and a whole lot of other states), men do not have the right to vote?
/r/MensRights27/08/19 02:33 PM
5

They (as in the feminist academics) fear the day people actually understand the relevant feminist concepts. They rely on people not understanding the relevant feminist concepts and taking their word that feminism is inherently good.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 11:45 AM
5

It's easy. If it is a parents right then it must follow that parents have the right to mutilate their children. Period. It parents don't have the right to mutilate all of their children but only the boys it cannot be a parents right issue. If parents have the right to mutilate male children but not female children it is a gendered issue and therefore in the domain of mens rights. Questions? Obviously if you think that parents should have the right to mutilate infant girls too, then you are right…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:34 PM
11

Nobody here is against circumcision. We are against the practice of performing unneccesary surgery that alters the body permanently on people that have no ability to consent to it. And of course it is a men's rights issue. Male genital mutilation is allowed all over the world when it should be forbidden as every other unneccesary surgery on people that cannot consent to it is. And there are enough parents that want to mutilate their babygirls. We don't let them. Rightly so. So no, it's not a par…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 02:36 PM
1

I had a really long answer prepared. Then I went for a drink with a mate and took some time to think about our conversation. And I realized its pointless. We are on oppising ends of the debate. You see gendered discrimination where I see basic biology and profit driven behaviour. You think society would be able to (and in fact has) override our hardwired behaviour and I see us defaulting to predicted behaviours when we are given the choice (swedens overwhelming 'traditional' distribution of work…
/r/MensRights23/07/19 08:30 PM
2

Oof. For one thing it's a shitty ass Tumblr post, not even a well cited blog or peer reviewed journal. I'm surprised that you took the time adress at least something. Good for you. Secondly most of the "citations" for the first point on the wage gap are as good a source as me giving you vox articles lmao.. I see how this works. Only peer-reviewed articles are OK now. What's next? Only peer-reviewed articles in feminist magazines? Just asking. Some of these articles are sourced by journals btw. h…
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:52 PM
4

You can't be arsed to spend five minutes to at least adress one argument. Don't try to mask your refusal to challenge yourself as some heroic act of defiance against the patriarchy. As I said. If there is no source you refuse to acknowledge what is said because there is no source. If there is a source you refuse to acknowledge what is said because you refuse to engage with the source. Very convenient.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 01:19 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cglnxp/your_feminism_is_shit/euizm4q/ This was the post with the fifty sourced reasons that you refused to answer. You may have read them but I really doubt it. But anyway. You yourself admitted that feminism is something you believe in. As in: No amount of facts can challenge your faith in feminism because you didn't arrive at this faith via reason and logic.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 01:02 PM
3

Yeah, and when you get sources, you refuse to read them. Very convenient.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:55 PM
2

1 Girl 2 Cups?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:57 AM
0

Nah... They'll pretend that feminism is salvagable and had a noble cause once. It's important to remind them (or show them, because most feminists have no idea) that the movement was rotten to the core from it's inception.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:34 PM
1

So you think that fathers that don't want their children should have the right to just walk away without any financial responsibility?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:15 PM
1

Sure. Because women never report false rape claims.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:12 PM
2

Well, that was an attempt at sarcasm. As in: "Feminism isn't as bad as you say. They are much worse"
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:02 AM
2

I am not sure you understand what i have written. Nothing in my previous post implies that I think that feminism is (or ever was) for equality.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:33 PM
1

That's not completely true. First wave - get mens Rights without mens responsibilities Second wave - reduce womens responsibilities to society Third wave - increase mens responsibilities to women Now - reduce mens rights (due process)
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:55 AM
1

Who needs consent forms? Just make legal paternal surrender and mandatory DNA-Testing a thing. That would improve the situations for fathers and children (who should know their lineage for the possible genetic defect alone) immensely while not taking rights away from the mothers.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:50 AM
2

enience is important, whats wrong with it. its her body, her choice thus you need to provide a reason to force to carry the pregnancy. There is no reason t As long as we don't need a reason to force men to pay for it should she not want to abort, this argument is hypocritical as fuck.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:32 AM
4

I still think the 'malicious intent' part is problematic. Reason is, I remembered examples that could be interpreted as 'without malicious intent'. And I don't think these people should get off. https://thoughtcatalog.com/janet-bloomfield/2014/12/13-women-who-lied-about-being-raped-and-why-they-did-it/
/r/MensRights09/05/19 02:53 PM
2

Got it. I could have worded my question better. How do you knowingly make a false accusation without the intent to harm?
/r/MensRights09/05/19 01:55 PM
5

Sure. But that only works if both of the points he mentioned are ignored. to only punish if it is proven that the person who made the accusation knew the accused was innocent only be punished if the intent was to harm them or damage their reputations If the first point stands, your example can't come to fruition.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 01:43 PM
8

and only be punished if the intent was to harm them or damage their reputations why? and... how do you make a false rape accusation without the intent to harm? Otherwise it could result in women not accusing and persecuting legitimate rapists because they are afraid this law is going to punish them instead I cannot imagine a scenario where a legitimate rape victim can be prosecuted under this law. Maybe you have an idea.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 01:33 PM
1

Buddy, you think people that mutilate babies are monsters. For some very fucked up reason you make an exception for penises. But continue to tell yourself that boys are worth less than girls. I'm sure you know where the feminism sub is. They agree with you And no: unless circumcision is a crime on the same level as fgm, the conversation isn't over.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:00 PM
1

First of all: What leads you to believe that i am not a parent? Second, I really appreciate that you didn't find it in you to respond to anything that I said. Your only reason for mutilating your children still is: 'Because I can'. Third: You obviously don't know what a personal attack is. I'm not surprised. You obviously don't know what the diffence between responsibilty and power is, either, so yeah... As I said: You mutilated your children, you can't deny it (and all of your reasons for doing…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:51 PM
1

So, the moment you are responsible for a human being your first reaction is: Well, I can do what I want with them, I think the best thing is that I let them experience insufferable pain and alter their body. I mean, I have no good reason for it (because the reasons I use to make myself feel better do not apply to babies) but I'll do it anyway. Because I can. I'm glad you do not have responsibility (and power) over more people. Stop comparing circumsicion with vaccination. We have reasons to vacc…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:48 PM
2

Does it matter?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:55 PM
3

Easy. Men are bad. Hating them is ok. Not hating them is not ok Trump is bad. Not hating him is not ok. Hating him is ok. Duh ... /s of course, but that's the world we live in. Simple solutions for simple minds. [EDIT]spelling[/EDIT]
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:27 PM
1

especially at the expense of men ;)
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:23 PM
1

Parents can impose their will on young boys Religions can impose their will on young boys Medical professionals can make a nice profit Producers of Cosmetics can make a nice profit Celebrities get creams made of foreskins that are good for their skin. Don't say there are no benefits. The benefits just aren't for the child ;)
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:18 PM
2

The prevalence of penile cancer in Men under 18 is what? Zero? Below Zero? You are not supposed to pull back the foreskin at all. The prevalence of infections in circumcised und uncircumsised boys is not significat if you don't do this. Ask Europeans (aka the people that don't pull the fucking foreskin back when it's not meant to be pulled back Under what circumstances is the pain of a medically unneccesary procedure not unneeded? I mean, good for you that you do not have problems and/or ill wil…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:13 PM
1

8 LOC vs 1, both accomplishing the same thing. I know I'd prefer the 1 over the 8, as would just about every Sr dev I work with. I wouldn't LoC is a useless method anyway.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 12:59 PM
2

(Very) Late to the party but in before the inevitable We must forbid men from suing false accusers because real victims will be afraid to report their rape some deluded feminist in a High-profile newspaper.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:53 AM
3

There are people that genuinely believe that it's the right thing to sew a babygirls vagina shut. We ban that practice and lock those people up if they ignore the ban. Now let's do the same thing to the practice of cutting little boys penises and do the same thing to the people that think it's the right thing to cut a babyboys penis. See, that was easy.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 11:38 AM
2

I didn't know this! Right on Germany! I'll do some research, but thanks for the information (if legit after confirming myself :D) It was brought back, right after they altered the law to make it so only mutilating boys is OK Yay, equality
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:52 PM
1

Ehh, far less complicated. It's more or less a checklist. You get Points for different shit (education, former jobs, etc.) and the one who scores highest gets the job. So the woman may have had 1000 points and the guy may have had 1025 points. Voila. Things that are not on the list don't net you points (being female is not on the list).
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:34 AM
1

d it as 25%, in which case I think it's entirely reasonable for him to be chosen instead. However, I would assume that the reporter is competent enough to report the correct numbers, otherwise I'd be surprised that it hasn't been corrected It doesn't matter. We're talking about a job within the administration of the austrian state. There are strict rules for getting a job (Objektivierung). Passing the best candidate over for any reason is grounds for a meeting before a judge and there is almost …
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:03 PM
2

One (completely unknown to the public) posted an internal memo that was backed up by science and largely uncontroversial, no one outside of google would know about it, if someone else didn't leak it (and that would be the person that should have been fired in this case, if you insist on firing someone) The other one trumpeted xer racist viewpoints for the world to see, was the face of a marketing campaign that aimed at exactly the opposite of those very views So this ou literally want a differen…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 01:14 PM
2

That's not exactly right, is it? I remember seeing some report that feminist cried out loud when more women were injured, relative to men. As in, something should be done about this travesty. Turns out, women injured stayed basically the same and it was mens injuries that went down that changed the proportion.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 11:10 AM
4

It used to be ok to beat your wife with a stick no bigger than your thumb, is that still ok today? citation needed. Just saying
/r/MensRights26/08/16 07:38 AM
1

very real indeed oO
/r/MensRights22/08/16 11:47 AM
2

As if it could be changed to match reality. I mean, the crime statistics would be outrageous when the number of women convicted of DV would double, triple or more while the number of men goes down (still more than twice as high due to lenient sentencing for female offenders). Although it would be somewhat glorious to read (if somewhat infuriating) the internet the day these statistics are publicized.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 10:14 PM
1

Well, Germany doesn't need to ban FGM. In Germany every procedure (except for medical reasons) that violates the bodily integrity of someone without their consent is considered a crime (even getting your hair cut). Since 2012, however, MGM is the exception. From wikipedia On 12 December 2012, following a series of hearings and consultations, the Bundestag adopted the proposed law explicitly permitting non-therapeutic circumcision to be performed under certain conditions; it is now §1631(d) in th…
/r/MensRights09/08/16 05:53 AM
1

So, where is FGM allowed but MGM is not. I did not expect anyone here using only half of a sentence, saying that half is not true and not backing that claim up by anything. Feeling insulted by 'honey' is cute, though.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 08:36 PM
2

Honey, please use the rest of the sentence when you quote me. As in There is no country in the world where FGM is allowed/mandatory and MGM is not I mean, talk about dishonesty oO
/r/MensRights08/08/16 12:43 PM
2

I take issue with FGM vs circumcision. In poor countries, FGM is routinely performed by people who are not health professionals in unclean and unsafe environments. It's performed on girls in the pre teens and teens. The girl or her parents can not refuse it, as it is law, and if they do the punishment may be jail, exile or death. This is why it is illegal in the US. So that these counties cannot force girls to go back and have it done against their will. Everything you wrote is true for MGM too.…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 09:31 AM
4

As far as I understand it: Carrier was all for listen and believe (going as far as spearhading Atheism+ (injecting 'social justice values' and feminism to make a 'better' atheism) in the wake of elevatorgate) until it hit HIM. You know, because he is a good guy. When he participated in witch hunts it was justified, because those were bad guys. This is bascally feminism eating their own all over again. While false allegations are wrong, he had it coming.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 06:53 AM
–

BLM posts are not MR posts as far as I am concerned. Sure, the overlap is huge but that's statistics and not common goals. If you ask me (and I recommend not to) the sub should continue to deal with Men's Rights and Men's rights only. Intersectionality is a dangerous path to go, imo, because it enables people to deflect their shortcomings and critisism of their arguments with strawmen. I don't think we should take that path. Let's stick to men's rights. It's black men's rights as well as withe m…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 09:17 PM
11

I really don't get, why the original was deleted. There was a lot of evidence (videos that didn't go online) that suggested that the woman was, in fact, not raped. She initially didn't even file a rape report. She sent the man she accused a short message 'miss you' after the fact and met with him again. The process handling the rape is closed and the judge ruled 'not guilty', so, as far as the jurisdiction is concerned there was no rape. The actual case tries to find out, if she lied under oath …
/r/MensRights06/07/16 09:05 AM
2

I am courious too: what advantage is enough to justify the mutilation of a minor.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:38 PM
1

Maybe she is worried that Kanye's Vid works like the one from the ring?
/r/MensRights29/06/16 01:40 PM
5

so ... why is there only one form of mutilation ... err... surgery that can be done on the request of the parents and without any medical reason, that doesn't get someone dragged before a judge?
/r/MensRights20/06/16 10:36 PM
1

Really? There's a cultural paradigm shift going on in regards to women? Where?
/r/MensRights16/06/16 08:43 PM
2

The morons provide and secure the echo-chamber. They are the muscle to the intellectual dishonesty. Without them, the dishonesty would be irrelevant, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights07/06/16 10:02 PM
1

One is intentional, one is moronic. Not sure which is worse though.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 09:42 AM
2

At least they are right. These things are not reverse-anything. On the other hand, I do not think we are looking at mental gymnastics. This is outright intellectual dishonesty.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:23 AM
5

Even then. How can one KNOW? I can think it is this way, based on the evidence at hand or being rather sure it is this way, based on the evidence at hand.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:50 AM
7

They know? How the fuck do they know?
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:36 AM
3

Isn't that really (as in really really really) inefficient? Who would be the authority that can decide that kind of thing and, assuming it is the state, who the heck should pay this nonsense? Maybe I am old-fashioned but I think that either the collateral or the financial damage in 'what, you think you are old enough to do whatever you are saying you want to do now. OK let's test you' is to high to consider a case to case basis. Don't get me wrong, the status quo is fucked in a number of ways an…
/r/MensRights03/06/16 09:11 PM
3

So, what is your proposal? Checking every case down to it's core? The one year old that has an affair (/s just to make sure it's sarcasm) with the 40 year old should be checked for their maturity? I wanted to ask more, but I am really interested. Where do you draw the line? And why is this specific line exactly there. Or is it a question that you have to decide in each and every case?
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:54 PM
5

Good Tiamat. Now that is some task for Sisyphus. Even If we pretend there didn't exist an agreed upon definition of rape (the one that is written into law and ignored by anyone but the state (though it might ignore it too)), the nature of the crime makes it almost impossible to create an agreement. How do you make the 'victim' accept that they weren't raped when everything they have gone through matches the definition but the fact that they just couldn't say 'no'? How do you make the 'perpetrato…
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:46 PM
3

The old question: If you do not know that you are commiting a crime (better, think that you are not commiting a crime), can you be held responsible for it (aka mens rea)? First thing: I am sure that there are many cases of people freezing up and remaining silent when faced with dangerous things, and if you haven't heard of it, you may want to ask google for a bit. Second thing: of course they are not the same thing. That's why there are a lot of sexual offenders that are not in jail but in some …
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:37 PM
1

Wasn't there a video floating around of this particular female soccer player? Girl sure had a nice set of (foul) skills. Especially the hair-pulling. Have yet to see men doing this kind of shit.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:22 PM
7

How come that everytime someone has an unreasonable fear of something we call it a phobia, but if women are unreasonable afraid of men we don't tell them to seek help?
/r/MensRights06/05/16 09:06 AM
2

Ehhh... wouldn't that make him a rapist? As far as I was educated, only an enthusiastic yes counts as yes (at least until it's decided that yes wasn't that enthusiastic)
/r/MensRights02/05/16 11:46 PM
1

Eh, the MRM wants to hold women to the same standards too. The question is not if men and women are equals. They are not. Ever. So what do we do with this information?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:08 PM
1

Or you know, we could just let people do whatever the fuck they want and quit trying to force jobs on them to make us feel better. While not pursuing these jobs and fields ourselves. It's like those parents that push their children to extreme lengths in some kind of sports because they themselves wanted to be succesful in them.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:48 AM
2

I am sure that, if you browse through this sub, you will find a lot of cases of women being judged unfairly, i.e. getting ridiculously light sentences for serious offences.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:19 AM
83

Well, she is right, isn't she? If women were treated fair, they would get much harsher sentences.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 10:29 PM
2

Well, we disagree here. I don't think anything worthwile can happen by bringing things like these to social media.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:20 PM
2

I didn't say they should not go to the right places (HR, whoever handles discrimination etc). I said they shouldn't take it to social media, because nothing can be won there for a male victim but shame and ridicule. Going social media is the feminist modus operandi when you know your cause has no substance and will get thrown out by the appropriate authorities. Why? Because there is nothing more tragic and outrageous in the public opinion than a poor female victim. For men it's the other way rou…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:28 PM
7

So, they should go public with it, be shamed and ridiculed and nothing is gained? Doesn't sound like a good plan.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:36 PM
28

Are you new to this planet? The guys will be shamed and ridiculed for either 'not enjoying it' or for 'not being man enough to endure such harmless things'. And harmless they are, because it was just 'one situation' as in "career advancement doesn't cease to exist after one situation." Also, I think it would take a long time before feminists would stop finding 'reasons' how this is all the fault of the men and the women acted perfectly reasonable. And they will use words and sentences that would…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:49 PM
1

It's rather nice, isn't it. The shirt tells two stories for the price of one. feminists can be hot (assuming your girlfriend is hot) hot people can be delusional uncritical idiots (again, assuming your girlfriend is hot, the rest is implied) Show her my post. If it doesn't change her mind I cannot help you
/r/MensRights26/04/16 09:14 PM
19

Well, first of all: don't make generalisations like that. It puts you on their level and makes nafalt a valid response. Second: don't attack feminists, attack feminism. Third: just get sources on the wage gap and present them next time. Alternatively: challenge the narrative. The wage gap as told by feminism makes no sense at all (still waiting for a 'clever' feminist (or capitalist) to start an all-female company, paying 85 cents on the dollar and putting their 'idiotic' competition that still …
/r/MensRights26/04/16 12:12 AM
2

It was. Just wanted to say it anyway.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 09:35 AM
2

This is exactly what will not happen.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 08:39 AM
1

As I had time to read the wikipedia-article on the topic now: neither the trope or the possibility for it to be real have any meaning to me whatsoever. I haven't seen one film of the examples and counterexamples yet, and to be honest, the concept sounds very boring.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:05 PM
1

I have never heard of the manic pixie dream girl trope before. This answer may or may not help you. I'm going to check out what it means now, maybe I'll give a more useful answer then.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:00 PM
5

Rational wiki on thunderfoot Rational wiki on rebecca watson The site is a waste of mBytes
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:23 PM
2

I am not going to click that. Who am I kidding, of course I am. FML. Good Namtillaku, I really could use some bleach for my eyes now.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 09:20 AM
1

Also: I don't want to imagine hillary nude, let alone see it. Great Scott. ..
/r/MensRights19/04/16 02:17 AM
2

Yeah, I'm a pain in the ass. I like it that way.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 10:44 PM
2

Won't probably help. He creates new accounts all the time.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 10:43 PM
2

I'd ask how many dead babies are enough to start worrying about. I mean, one would think even one is too much.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 10:43 PM
2

But if it's awesome enough to let a toddler live through massive pain, risking life long problems, amputation and even death, it has to be awesome enough to endure the pain as an adult, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:37 PM
2

You realize that you are in no way required to answer?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:27 PM
2

Maybe I will. Probably not.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:23 PM
1

Not legally.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:19 PM
2

Go ahead, I'm looking forward to it.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:16 PM
1

Absence of no doesn't mean absence of consent legally. Doesn't matter if the perpetrator is male or female. If you see a crime here you are the one that is thinking along the lines of feminists.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:13 PM
1

promoting mens safety You mean the app thing? I wouldn't have deleted it, I think it was really funny. women soccer players being paid the same as men but being paid by a womens association I am aware of a few posts that talked about the crazy ideas some female US-Soccer players had but I am not aware of posts that were deleted. What was the exact wording? Eh, I am an asshole at best. Creepy maybe. But I am most definetly not a troll.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:11 PM
2

So, you redefine stats and details as one and the same thing so your statement holds true and I am the one that backtracks? I think I see how that works. And yes: I demand that if you accuse someone of a crime that you at least specify what the fucking crime was and how you come to the conclusion that a crime happened. Still, this are details, not stats. Stats would be, If I asked for numbers that describe how often people like you accuse other people of crimes without backing the accusation up.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:07 PM
1

I assume that "most of you" are exactly one or two people, but I have no way to prove that except for the fact that the writing style is really similar. I have to wonder though what the end-game of "post blitzes" would be. Can't your arguments stand on their own and need mass-spamming to be taken somewhat seriously? Oh, and I'd really love to hear how one can sport 'female syntax'. I must warn you though, as I am not a native speaker your rules probably do not apply.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:02 PM
2

You <> everyone. Also: It's nice that you think only women would be appalled by the things you write.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:56 PM
2

If you use > before the things I wrote it will appear as quote. I never denied that I asked for details. I denied that I asked for stats. Different things and no: When you write "stats or details" these things stay different. I am well aware that what I wrote doesn't disappear unless I delete it, or some mod does. I do not delete my posts.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:54 PM
5

Yay, you give feminists a field day quote mining this sub and I am the troll.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:50 PM
3

So, you are a feminist? Because that's what feminists advocate for. Erosion of due-process. Listen and believe. Fuck evidence, let's just throw someone into jail. Also: I didn't ask for statistics and I am not the one that accuses someone of a crime.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:46 PM
4

How in the world is this fair? And how is it fair to assign a female CEO for every male one?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:40 PM
0

This isn't the listen-and-believe-sub. If you are going to accuse someone of a crime you have at least clarify what crime it was and how it happened. The OP contains nothing that is a crime anywhere in the western world.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:39 PM
4

So, for every man killed in war we should kill a woman? For every male CEO there should be a female one?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:33 PM
0

So, no crime?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:32 PM
3

Easy there.. I saw this video from buzzfeed with feminists (actors) askink men 36 questions. They really do know better than you how your body works (they even showed how they can cross their arms although their boobs were in the way). Pls stop mansplaining how your body works, feminists already got that covered. It works for men too, you know? /s
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:27 PM
2

Erikhooper is most certainly our favourite "fabulous gay fashion designer women that was raped and wants to take responsibility for it (also designing an app and asks us for 200 000$)". Don't engage, unless you are aware of this.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:21 PM
0

Still searching for the crime. Or do you advocate the funny rape-definitions that feminist circles love to push?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:06 PM
6

Why?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:34 PM
7

I think we should concentrate on the base-problem: People should leave the genitals of children alone, no matter what. Even if it prevented STDs by 100% there is no reason to mutilate anyone that cannot consent, even if it gave you 10 000 times the sexual pleasure a foreskin can give you, there is no reason to mutilate the genitals of anyone that cannot consent. Even if mutilated genitals gave you magical powers there is no reason to mutilate the genitals of anyone that cannot consent. If male g…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:24 AM
1

There's money to be made. And people are that much more willing to spend money (without expecting immediate results) on poor women and girls than they are on men and boys.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:19 AM
1

coke501 would be me. He has some real problems keeping his shit together. Also he seems only be trolling weekends. Maybe his employer doesn't allow reddit at work (according to him, he is a fabulous gay fashion designer (or a raped woman, depending on the day))
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:16 AM
1

I am surprised that you don't brag about all your gay-credibility this time. What happened?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:36 PM
2

Yeah, name calling will really help.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:52 PM
2

I get it and i think it's hilarious how you cannot change your modus operandi to not get identified immediatly. But sire, have fun with your 200k that you will get for sure.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:32 PM
1

The troll again. Still no life?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:20 PM
2

Women as generalisation? Yes. Individual women. Not so much.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 10:18 PM
5

Well, that’s kind of edgy and countercultural, I thought. I had never seen anything that said I — a white, heterosexual male — was actually the one being discriminated against. It was so provocative. The cover art was a white guy in a business suit being strangled by his necktie. He was a victim, when he started to look into the MRM and he is a victim now. The best place for perpetual victims s is feminism, so he just found his place. 'Self proclaimed victim' of course
/r/MensRights15/04/16 10:16 PM
2

Things that are not a reason to mutilate the genitals of people under 18 for non emergency reasons: EVERY FUCKING STUDY EVER!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights15/04/16 10:09 PM
15

He may have thought of 'privileges' and used 'rights' instead
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:58 PM
3

You still have not anything to bring to the table but bullshit-generalisations? After at least two weeks of chances to learn how to troll? That's pathetic, isn't it?
/r/MensRights12/04/16 09:20 PM
1

You got it all wrong. It's 'the price is coke501' ;)
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:00 PM
2

you pricey bastard. yup, that's me. I am still waiting for the huffpo hit-piece he threatened they would release with all the evidence for censorship he had.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:30 PM
2

Well, as I am already a 'price' in his book, you may have a point here
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:27 PM
2

Eh, english obviously isn't his strong suit, so I'm willing to let that slide, for I am not a native speaker and can see that it's sometimes hard to find the right words. Doesn't make the content of his posts any better if you ignore his bad grammar and spelling, though.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:23 PM
3

What the heck is a price?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:52 PM
2

because you are an idiot
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:49 PM
3

20 now? The last time it was only 3. At least keep your lies straight.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:43 PM
1

Loaded question. I'll try to address it tomorrow, I am already in bed (on tablet) and this one is a bit tricky to get right with that setup.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:48 PM
3

How about the 'system'? Classism is also nice. The only real opression in the 1st world
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:27 PM
1

1 to 3 are 'easy'. Well, at last I think so 1 I. Really don't care about gender roles. At the same time I can't deny basic biology. The more advanced we get, the less important gender roles will be. But denying that differences exist and refusing to benefit from them is just dumb. 2: people exaggerate. Problem is, only boys and men are told to suck it up and get on with their lives. (Generalisation and hyperbole here but you get the idea) 3: yes, some feminists literally hate men. No, that's not…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:20 PM
1

Of course you do
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:06 PM
1

This one is for me, I suppose. You still don't understand, do you? Of course you don't.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:59 PM
1

Nah, that's just an asshole. Maybe you can try to learn how to troll on a decent level and come back at me then.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:20 PM
1

As I said. Of course you don't
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:05 PM
1

Alright. Sometimes TiA bleeds over ;)
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:03 PM
1

Of course you don't. You never do.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:48 PM
3

I was once not robbed of three quadrillion dollars. But please don't ask me questions, because it may remind me of all the things that did not happen.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:45 PM
1

As an original Pink Rottweiler Is this some otherkin-stuff? Really courious, not trolling.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:44 PM
1

I really thought you got the point of the reply-thing by now. Boy, was I wrong.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:43 PM
0

Exactly that. But I have to be honest. I really really want them to sue. Because theres only two possible outcomes. 1. The judge agrees. Soccer in the US dies and they will lose their jobs The judge disagrees and sets a precedent for every other aspect of entertainment (hello tennis). Sadly I am sure they just talk because they are not dumb enough to try to ruin their own careers.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:41 PM
0

Isn't it that way most of the time?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:36 PM
1

I am really torn. One hand says, we don't ban and censor. On the other side: It's rarely that clear that we talk about an absolute troll.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:19 PM
4

Wow, you get better. You actually used the same account to answer and you found the reply-Button. Congrats.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:27 AM
8

I haven't read all your posts, but what stereotypes about MRAs are left that you haven't already tried out here? women are disgusting - check we promote FGM - check rape victims are to blame - check we censor dissenting views - check I mean, sure, you are obviously trolling and the reactions give you thrills. But don't you have anything else to live for?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:00 AM
1

You cannot even keep your accounts in order?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:03 PM
2

You are a real goldmine for quote mining. No way that shit could backfire.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:41 PM
3

What the everloving fuck is this?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:26 AM
2

Yeah, thinking that you can't win your war and not knowing what is going on are literally the same thing. And you are the enlightened one and us dumb peons just have to listen to you.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:20 PM
2

As I said. Greed is the ultimative human nature. Ever war, every revolution, every societal change ever was triggered or co-opted by the greedy. You think that it is possible to fundamentaly change the system. I do not. I think it is possible to gradually change aspects of it (so much for the question why I am here) by using the way it works. But please,go on with whatever you are doing here and keep alienating people to your cause. As a certain misled person today needed to say: 'spread the wor…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:15 PM
1

I get 'feminism definition' 'second wave feminism' 'radical feminism' 'feminism quotes' So there's that
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:57 PM
2

There are fights you can have small wins in, and then there is the fight against the ultimate driver of human nature.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:55 PM
1

But you don't break any narrative at all. You create a political breach that only weakens what this is all about. You think the enemy is neoliberalism and you may be right. But guess what. If I had to choose between enemies I will take gynocentrism every day of the week, because there are things that can be won. The fight against greed is unwinnable by design unless we go full blown revolution and that won't happen anytime soon. And if it happens those that are on the bottom now will be so after…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:54 PM
3

I really start to wonder what your endgame is. I mean, it definitely isn't men's rights, you stopped to post about that little thing a while ago.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:58 PM
2

ever heard of the 'filter bubble'?
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:52 PM
19

Fucking biology. Always disrupting the narrative.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:40 PM
1

that get paid to provide the desired results You said paid. The survey is done on algorithm. The results are not altered by the company. That would be fraud. You should really try to read what I wrote again and understand it. I never said anything about your survey being paid for. I DID said it's not worth the elictricity that was used to get it online but that's something very different. never even thought of that!! Mens rights activists are more likely to suffer violent assault from women. Why…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:38 PM
1

This is why a despise women We already got that part. This isn't the local women-hate-sub though.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:01 PM
1

Nobody is paying for the servey. It's independent. I didn't say anybody paid for it. I said, agencies that take money to produce desired results would be emberassed to present something like your survey to their client. It's respondents from the men's fights forum. It's your members telling their experiences. You have no idea what unbiased means, do you? Ever heard of a randomized sample. All your survey says, that users of the men's rights sub may be disproportionally often the victims of abuse…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:57 AM
3

Yup, that's exactly the reason. We all secretly hate men. Has nothing to do with you behaving like a troll, nope. If it walks like a duck ...
/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:18 AM
1

spread the word Yay, let's just turn around this sub and embrace feminist procedure. Who needs facts when you can use sensationalist self-selected surveys with a sample size that agencies that get paid to provide the desired results would call emberrasing. Come back with something substantial.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:11 AM
1

Give the survey data, so everyone can see how 'unbiased' it is. To quote /u/Lethn It doesn't matter who they are done by or for what purpose, if the poll sampling is less than the population of a small village it can be safely ignored. Also Fuck off
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:45 AM
1

my case?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:13 PM
26

It's 'bigger' in the sense that not many people think it is necessary to teach girls to respect boys and men while people go out of their way to hammer the same thing into boys heads from the minute they can understand.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:09 PM
0

/s ? Yes
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:26 AM
-1

Well, the man gets money and the women are probably forced to stay at home. That's the very definition of oppression, isn't it?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:45 AM
6

They seem to believe we live in wonderland where a) every women wants to work fulltime with children b) there will magically be more money as soon as everyone pays women more/hires more women c) divorce and single-mother households are non-existant. The report also found that 59% of minimum wage jobs are held by women. "Too little attention has been focused on the situation of women working in low-paid, highly feminised sectors like care, retail and cleaning, " it said. "Until their rates of pay…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:26 AM
1

Only 1 in three Canadians understand what sexual consent means And the rest of Canada put together this website?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:07 AM
7

The judge mentioned that he assumes the previous cases weren't as clear cut. I have no information about these cases. As for the reminder. It has gotten worse, hasn't it? Nowadays there would be people that would still call her a victim and that would be glad that the rape of marginalised women gets some attention. Although I can imagine that she is not attractive enough to be the poster child for these kind of campaigns.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:24 AM
1

It was the latter. Well somewhat. I reversed the order because you used 'sometimes'. My personal feelings is 'more often than not' (women over children) hence I felt the need to reverse your initial statement. Note: I am talking explicitly about 3rdwave feminists and not women here
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:19 AM
1

Nope. What I wrote was deliberate, if somewhat pessimistic. Whenever women's 'right's' seem in danger I have the feeling that 3rd wavers would throw all and any children under the bus if it would help their cause.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:08 AM
1

What about fighting teeth and claw against shared parenting? Hard to imagine that this fight is fought for the children. Or the fight against parental rights for fathers? Or the right of children to know their father? Their complete indifference of male circumcision? It seems like 3rd wave has arrived at sometimes placing children over women and not the other way round. It could be that I just spend to much time reading on this sub, though.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:55 PM
23

You are right of course. I sometimes forget that these medals are handed out for the fact that those who get it are male and that fact alone. Of course that is inherently sexist.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:48 PM
2

and children You sure about that, mate?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:31 PM
69

Well, this is not TumblrInAction but I am sure there will be articles that blame that fact on the patriarchy, misogony or any combination thereof. On a related note and this will be Men's Rights-Material: What are the odds for people asking to lower the requirements for female recruits within the next 12 months?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:58 PM
6

Am I missing something? If you missed something I can't find it too. Rather tame thread with mostly sane responses.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:12 PM
1

Sure thing. That's why I think that women that have nothing to offer but sex will have a hard time. Except if they are cheapter than these robots. Everyone else will just continue to exist alongside a new sex toy that will have a not very profound impact on their life.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:46 PM
1

It's your right to think this way. But we are at the start. Making women obsolete with sex robots will be as much social engineering as whatever goes on right now. And again: Biology and human nature will win. There may be a fight but I doubt that the results will make women obsolete.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:43 PM
3

That doesn't stop people from trying whenever they think human nature doesn't pander to their special needs. Wasn't there an 'experiment' in israel that yielded 'desastrous' results for anyone that says social engineering can truely succeed?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:14 PM
5

I have watched the video now. My answer persists: Just no. Women that have nothing to bring to the table but sex?: Yes
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:13 PM
5

As of now I have yet to watch the video, but my predicted response is: No
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:48 PM
30

This is key. When I was dating in my early-mid thirties, SO many women were eliminated simply because they were disagreeable drama queens. Its like these women don;t understand that you have to be nice to men in order for them to like you. It's kind of a mirror, isn't it? Boys are told that women want sensitive doormats that put them on a pedestal and wonder why no women wants them when they grow up to be doormats. Girls are told they are strong and empowered and don't need no man and wonder why…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 04:23 PM
1

wat?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:05 PM
193

He continued: "We take rape allegations very seriously and those that make false claims need to face the consequences. So very much this. This is all everyone here is asking for. Sadly the second part needs some tweaking as this case shows.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:04 PM
1

Ah, ok. Didn't realize this is in Canada.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:31 PM
1

Well, I like the thought that reporting in this case means that the accusations get handled by the people with the tools to handle it (i.e. the police) and colleges go back where they belong.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:25 PM
1

Correct me if I am wrong but isn't this Weaver’s bill would require all colleges and universities to report sexual assaults to the government a very good thing?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 10:56 AM
2

You are most certainly right. You see, I have yet to meet these types of insane people in real life. There are a lot of ignorant people that believe whatever newspapers tell them (77%, 1 in 5 etc) but as soon as you make them think for themselves that is a non-issue. Arguing a 'real' feminist is without any merit, other than for a possible audience to see the dishonesty of their arguments.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 10:31 AM
2

Well, the thing with war is both things. Women are valuable (as in more important in reproduction) and incapable (as in most probably not able to do the things men in war have to do) But I would just ask if they would prefer to not be seen as weak (and let them have their cake) and rather be forced to go dying in a foreign land. I have come to believe that you must let them contradict themselves. Arguing doesn't do any good most of the time. Asking questions seems to be more effective.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 10:10 AM
1

There is video-evidence? [EDIT]This reporter has had bruises for sure. Start at 7:40
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:21 AM
1

voluntary I mean, really?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 09:25 AM
0

Eh, why care. Let men chase those victoria secret models they will never get and women search for their sensitive Chad thundercock. They want to be miserable? Fine, more fun for me
/r/MensRights16/03/16 01:14 AM
1

Censorship = Denying free speech + power /s
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:25 AM
8

That gets thrown out because it was forced. At least when there is more money to be made from that option.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 07:02 PM
3

I wonder if she will come back and demand more.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 07:01 PM
131

Breaking news: Movement that relies heavily on facts does not need censorship to debate it's goals. More at 11.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 05:56 PM
1

So, it really sound worse than only a 'get out of jail free'-card for girls. There are reasons why we very rarely charge 12-year olds for anything. A law that can yields a result like this is completely fucked up.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:22 PM
1

I think the sarcasm in my answer to your answer was obvious enough to leave the /s out. I got what you were saying.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:07 PM
1

Wouldn't I have to have a paper on paper-related studies to give a relevant answer to that question? I mean, everything I say her comes from a paper-piece-layman and therefore has no value in any discussion whatsoever. Or not. As I said, I lack the papers to talk about papers.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:03 PM
3

I am not that much into smartphone tech, so I can't really helpt there. But again: The most important thing (if it is as you write) is to get a lawyer and set up a defense. Preferably without her knowing. A lawyer can help you much more than almost anyone here can do.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 10:44 PM
1

Why would anyone need credentials? Do credentials trump logic and facts? And what is worth more mentioning? Biology? History? Gender Studies?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:59 PM
1

I am sorry that you think not reporting a rape is something a sane parent would do. [EDIT]misread you there. I see you think the same way I do.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:55 PM
4

I don't know how ready your brother is to let her go. If he is ready he can try to collect evidence and strike first, which would help him in whatever follows. If he doesn't and she starts, he will be in a much worse position even with evidence. Even if he is able to clear his name, this shit sticks and anything short of a major relocation will probably be not enough.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:53 PM
5

Mom, I just want to sing. I don't want to be a rape-case victim. I just want to get my music out Yep, let's save that thing for a time when I want out of my contract. I said it before and I say it again: I you go public with rape accusations without any evidence and without even trying to talk to the police you should automatically be sued for slander
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:49 PM
4

So, a 12 yr old boy can be charged with rape (as per definition of the law) but a girl under 17 can not. Right or wrong?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:38 PM
9

Keep a record of everything. Don't let anything slip. Record her every word i possible. Things like 'I'll say you molested my kids if you leave' can be very helpful. As /u/Tycel said: Lawyer up. See if there a are experts for divorce in you area and hire the best. When she is what you write she is, the best protection is needed. Divorce lawyers know how to handle accusations, as they know how to wield them.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:36 PM
4

"I know I was wrong but it I did it in an act of rage." Ah, then it is A-OK. You should seek therapy though. 5 years of rage sounds unhealthy.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:28 PM
1

But if all boats are raised then none are. As in 'when everyone is rich, no one is'. I already agreed with you that there are ways to make the situation better (hell, I live in Austria, we handle that shit much better than the US, therefore our gap in this regard is much smaller). I just also say that having two parents has much more benefits than just not slipping into poverty. We seemed to be taking very different aspects of parenthood from the go hence our disagreement. Also: The reason this …
/r/MensRights10/03/16 03:54 PM
1

Some would, that much is true. But I don't think we should choose nutjobs as role models.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 03:45 PM
1

Of course statistics show bad stuff about single parents, we've had millenia of time for society to acclimate to the assumption of a two-parent household You assume that the only thing that holds back single-parent kids (and single parents) is the societal expectation of two parents (and all things that go with it as, for example our payment-structure). This must mean that two parents are not inherently better for a child on average than one parent. It must follow from your premise that things w…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 03:42 PM
1

I did not break down the problem of single-parent children to societies unwillingnes to accept single parents. I do not have any sources right now, but I am willing to bet that single-parent children fare worse on every demographic that was tested in this regard. We can, of course blame society for this. Or we can think (I know, It's really unreasonable to do so) that having two parents when you grow up may mean a bit more than two incomes and societal acceptance. Maybe, just maybe, these 'untra…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 03:12 PM
3

I know. But honestly, I couldn't care less. Meaningless buzzwords are meaningless.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 02:28 PM
80

They can say what ever they want. It's a free world with free speech. They have obviously no basic human decency, no real empathy and lack the ability to think logically though. I'd ask them if they are mentally handicapped, if they said something like this.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 10:27 AM
1

Let's go with your take. It would mean that the second parent in a household with a lot disposable income can't have any positive influence whatsoever on the children?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:34 AM
6

Soooo..... You say that having only one parent is only a problem because society wants it to be a problem? That the other parent (be it father or mother) wouldn't have any positive influence, if society stopped to judge single parents?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 09:52 PM
4

You know how much money would not go to women if this was law?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 02:38 PM
3

Wait? So my employer needs a court to find me guilty of a crime to fire me? Good to know. Also, she doesn't seem to realize why she is fired. [T]he Curators are punishing me for standing with students who have drawn attention to the issue of overt racism at the University of Missouri. Good Sarasvati
/r/MensRights09/03/16 02:36 PM
2

It's their right to think that way. I really encourage them to go after the people that are interested in Labiaplasty (it would really be fun to watch where the media would stand on this one, the rich women or the 'opressed' women) and try to tear them a new one.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:30 AM
1

The question wasn't if Labiaplasty is banned, but if Labiaplasty is a form of clitoridectomy and therefore comparable to circumcision. I think it is, and I also think, adults should be able to do as much self harm as they are able and williing to do, as long as they don't harm anyone but themselves and as long as they don't ask society to comepensate them for whatever loss they might experience.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:26 AM
1

I don't think protecting adults from dumb decisions per banning something is the way to go. As long as they only hurt themselves.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:22 PM
2

Why not? It's their body. I couldn't care less about adults doing idiotic things.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:50 PM
2

Because adults should have the right to do with their genitals whatever the fuck they want?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:24 PM
12

I doubt that anyone will go so far to write what you did unsarcastically. But I am sure there will be people defending the vile human being that started all of this.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:31 PM
4

What the fricking fuck? Also: If i remember correctly, Juliet never said that Romeo has beaten her.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:20 PM
2

To what effect? Aside from giving a lot of media-'personalities' the chance to accuse the MRM from making everything about men and derailing the discussion?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:51 PM
1

I don't know the laws in California, but what does he technically need to file the restraining order, other than himself feeling unsafe? The recording is the backup, for when shit may hit the fan. Even more important as soon as the restraining order is filed and granted.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:37 PM
2

What is the potential backlash? As in opposed to the potential backlash of a rape-accusation?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:02 PM
3

It never gets aggressive in these discussions. As I said, I don't have the kind of people here that feel constantly oppressed. The wage gap is generally something that may be true for others, not for them, as they don't experience it at all. They really see how, for the wage gap as described by feminism to be real, every woman around them needs to constantly be paid less for the same work. Feminism doesn't have legs in the austrian country-side.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:01 PM
9

My Thoughts? They may ban whenever and whomever they want. The more they do so, the less people will go there, the more fringe they become, the more they ban and so on. I for one see no point in debating there, as the goals of men's rights will most likely not be helped by feminism at all.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 12:55 PM
1

Good question. Where do we put Labiaplasty in all of this?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 12:02 PM
10

I have not yet met someone that defended their believe after asking them to show me one case of a women getting 72% of a man for the same work. The people I talk to on a regular basis aren't into feminism very much, they happen to believe their bullshit sometimes, though.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:24 AM
20

Rough (tldr) Translation: A feminist collective spread this stickers on ticket-dispensers around Zürich. The stickers are made to look like they are official. They have no connection to the ZVV (public transit service in Zürich). The reason the collective gave: They want to bring the wage gap to the public discussion in a funny way. The question for me is, as always: Do they really believe in the wage gap?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 10:55 AM
8

Start to record that shit and get a restraining order against her?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 10:50 AM
3

A complete ban would be quite moronic, wouldn't it? A ban for anyone under the age of consent and the written consent of the person to be circumcised is the way to go.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 10:41 AM
3

This does hurt the children. How does it hurt the women that (like in this case) only care for custody because money is involved?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 10:23 AM
12

Judges have been able to resolve these issues efficiently and fairly for decades. Sure. It doesn't get fairer than lifelong alimony based on the current income of the partner that earns more. It is offensive to me to hear men or women say they can't retire because they can't afford to retire if they have to pay a fraction of their income for tax-deductible alimony goes on to say Women are not allowed at present to an award that exceeds half their former spouse's income So, while the half is inde…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 09:28 AM
138

It's sad that another man (boy in this case) was driven to kill himself. The investigation was probably the right thing to do but the accusation itself should never have happened. That's what you get when criminals (false accusers) go free on a regular basis.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 08:53 AM
1

Companies paying the same money for less output? I can't see this really catching on. A few may try it for publicity-reasons but being outperformed by the competition while bleeding money into non-existing work isn't something that Managers are keen on.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:23 PM
2

So feminism is a women's rights movement?
/r/MensRights04/03/16 01:01 PM
1

How can you use the same logic to come to the opposite conclusion that he has come to? There is only one thing you can attack and that are his premises (1 and 2). You may try, but I don't think you can do it. As for 'still a lot of places'. I don't see western feminists fight these fights. All I hear is wage gap here, manspreading there, rape culture everywhere. You know, the topics that are not topics at all or based on incredible intelectual dishonest premises.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 11:48 AM
7

At least the article itself doesn't hide behind euphemisms.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 10:15 AM
3

Here's what I don't get about feminists demanding these studies or making claims of a wage gap. What else should they do? Admitting all they have left is bullshit and stop receiving attention, jobs and funds? The pay gap is easily enough to believe if you don't really care about it and therefore an easy way to legitimize their existence as fighters for 'equality'
/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:50 AM
2

I do not want to outsmart them. I usually don't argue these things 1 on 1. I want everyone else to see that these people have nothing to back up their claims.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 09:59 AM
15

I know. And I am not even remotely a citizen of the US. But the fucking POTUS goes on record and publicly admits that the state is obviously too dumb to uphold their own laws (and that's before we talk about the staff of the white house) That's why I always engage them individually. The narrative is poisoned. They can always fall back on 'statistics'. Give them the chance to take action and they cannot fall back on bogus statistics and whatever gets shouted in the media. It opens a lot of eyes b…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 10:55 PM
75

I don't get it at all. I mean: There's only one thing I (always) say when someone mentions the wage gap. 'Ok, then let's sue the fuck out of these misogonysts. I mean, we are talking about 20% or more, so there must be literally tens of thousands of employers that engage in that sort of thing. And you know what? It's fucking illegal to do that sort of thing. So let's do it. You bring the cases and I find the lawyer that get's us money out of this shit, Ok? Can't be that hard to find some. Event …
/r/MensRights29/02/16 10:06 PM
20

Yeah, that is definetly not going to destroy some friendships. But it will be interesting how long the average SJW circlejerk needs to use the app before the 'privileged' (as in white, male, christian, etc...) ones start to realize that statistics and history mean jack shit on an individual level.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:24 AM
1

My demand was serious though. We are aware that it's hard to see ones own privilege so I really would want to know some privileges one can have for being male.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 09:49 AM
2

Name the ones that are not inherently biological then we can talk. And: as i said elsewhere in this thread, i do not have a problem with female privilege per se.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:12 PM
0

I found seeing your privileges for what they are makes you (well, me at least) a much happier person, for I can be grateful for what I have instead of being sad for things I don't have.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 05:08 PM
2

Yes but it is not that easy. Take the right to be relatively free from sexual harassment (ignoring for a moment the fact that sexual harassment of men is much more widespread than most people assume). Assuring that right for both sexes is hard to do without also according women a certain level of privilege. I don't get that part. Granting a right does not guarantee it will not be violated by others. What must not happen though, is the state denying or violating your rights. If your rights are vi…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:31 PM
16

A big problem is that feminism doesn't see female privilege. I do not have a problem with female privilege per se. I have a problem with keeping it (even denying it exists) while at the same time everything is done to erode male privilege. I think feminism tries to accelerate a natural process (the more advanced we become the more egalitarian all of society becomes) for one side only while throwing the other side under the bus. Same thing with SJWs of all kinds do for their favourite minority.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:00 PM
16

If you can't grant it equally for everyone it is a privilege. [EDIT]Certain things (biology) may be problematic sometimes but should be minimised.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:33 PM
40

While we are not trying to get rid of female rights, we are trying to get rid of female privilege. To a lot of people that sounds the same.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:44 PM
3

Do I get this right? Instead of stopping the idiotic practice of genital mutilation of boys that cannot consent they advocate for the legalization of genital mutilation of girls that cannot consent? dafuq?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:39 AM
1

The 14 women attacked and murdered are interesting. First of all, mixing murdered and attacked is some brutal intellectual dishonesty, but I can see where your paranoia comes from. Except if you mean, all of the attacked were murdered. Than I would like to know how these murders can be underreported. Does nobody give a shit anymore? Second: What area are we talking about? Eugene? Oregon? The US? I mean, the murder rate for the whole US in 2013 was 3.8 for every 100.000 citizens. I mean, that's a…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:15 AM
4

I don't see where 'forcing men into poverty' will ever be taken as an important topic outside of the MRM. It's even worse. Men forced into poverty are the deadbeats, the bad ones.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:20 PM
1

The spin on 4) will be that the male surrendering his rights is forcing the woman into abortion or poverty. I can't see this flying with lawmakers anytime soon.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:39 PM
1

I'd click it if I wasn't so afraid of shortcuts. Nice pic though. Also: I am impressed how you could create that much threads in such a short time with that many different usernames. Some kind of script?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:31 AM
10

Well, telling only one half of the population that hitting the opposing gender is bad could easily be defined as gender inequality.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:14 AM
36

"I want to be an asshole but I don't want to be called out for it" - There's a definition for that.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:02 AM
10

Does this article try to straightsplain the preference-gap? Since when do we not take poor interpretations of statistics as gospel and chastise those who seem privileged? The 'privileged' are women, you say? Oh, then never mind.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 02:11 PM
2

It's only wrong when they (the out-group) do it. If we (the in-group) do it, it's for justice and the greater good. blergh..
/r/MensRights19/02/16 02:06 PM
8

How feminism is failing. It needs to coopt yet another thing to remain to seem relevant.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 09:14 AM
1

Well, Panda. I am sorry to make you sad. But that does not change what I think. Also: I am not talking about freedom of consequence. If I execute my right to free speech I must be aware what may follow. I'd rather have speech that is hateful, wrong, slanderous etc. attacked for its substance than having it censored and banned. Also: Yes, freedom of speech gives me the right to speak obscenely. Also: Speech can and does not oppress. Sticks and stones...
/r/MensRights19/02/16 08:41 AM
3

If you can't stand the heat ... There is either free speech or not.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:59 PM
2

Wait. The guy considers a defamation lawsuit? Isn't that the same thing as rape?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:57 PM
3

I don't agree with you getting downvoted. But: really bad form dude.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:49 PM
2

'You think your dick is your friend?' He's damn right I think that. And he's damn right I am wrong
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:42 PM
8

As far as i can tell, you have to be an obvious troll to get banned. I think we should only ban spammers and leave trolls to the peons [EDIT]Autocorrect and spelling
/r/MensRights18/02/16 09:01 PM
11

Now that's how you hit a nail on the head. Of course that won't stop them 'fighting' for 'equality'
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:28 AM
3

Yup. And none of them probably could bring a sound argument, let alone facts, to support that opinion.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:54 PM
3

They push for the erosion for due-process. This alone is enough to distance myself as far as I can from this movement.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:47 PM
1

Have any Links? None of the names gets me results that seem to be related
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:42 PM
1

We need to ban the practice altogether (as long as no consent can be given) but that's another discussion. This should really not be about convincing. I think you are somewhat right, though. Circumcusion may not be a good topic. But I think at least the reproductive organs of men and women should be represented intact in literature. I have read that schoolbooks may only show circumcised penises in the US.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:30 PM
3

Why?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:23 PM
-1

Can't really blame her 10 year old self. She shouldn't have waited that long though when she figured out that what she did was wrong. The justice system fucked up again. Basically only one wittnes (that can't be cross examinated) and little evidence at all.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:36 PM
4

The reality about the foreskin and circumcision.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:32 PM
2

Well, if i start to tickle a girl that I know for 10 minutes I'd suspect my problems lie deeper than just not knowing how to deal with women. I mean, there's this thing called common sense that should have kicked in somewhere in your story (preferably 10 minutes before he started to tickle the girl)
/r/MensRights17/02/16 05:08 PM
1

That's why I asked. The OP does not really give useful information.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 05:05 PM
4

What would you want to teach them?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 01:49 PM
29

They will argue that these 75% shouldn't be forced to stay in a marriage because they are afraid to lose their standard of living. You know, like all the men that are forced to stay in a marriage because they are afraid to lose their standard of living, their house, their children and so on. Fucking hypocrites.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:17 AM
28

Hiring the person that went to the UN asking to prohibit criticism. What can go wrong.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:48 PM
3

Reality doesn't generate money as reality follows basic rules. (unless you get into quantum mechanics but honestly: fuck that shit) Therefore feminism doesn't care about reality. Feminism only cares about money and power. The debunking image would cost them almost all power they have left (aside from the wage gap there is nothing left that anyone that is not completely insane would take seriously), so what did you expect. Each day the move one step further into the fringe and you can watch it li…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:13 PM
16

I lie for a living. Please give me money - The exhibition Of course no one is brave enough to call her out on it because that would be misogony. And there is nothing worse than being misogonist in todays society.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:08 PM
4

I like it, cannot really say if it's accurate though
/r/MensRights16/02/16 12:47 PM
2

Well, it's the only way to explain the articles that are popping up everywhere. I just don't get how these people cannot see that the sword they so desperately want to wield cuts both ways and the only one that has anything to gain from an erosion of rights is the state (and not in a good way)
/r/MensRights15/02/16 05:02 PM
11

And, in an ideal world, more fathers that spent time with their children and therefore are seen, will reduce the number of lunatics that casually accuse men out with their children of pedofilia.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:39 PM
22

Neither Hamilton nor all the others who make more or less the same case have explained how exactly the Charter, which actually mandates due process, is somehow violated by due process. When they write 'the Charter' they mean 'my privilege of not being questioned and the power that is derived from that privilege'
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:08 PM
2

It may be, but that is not the question here, is it? The question we started out with was, if polygamy benefits women more than it does men. In this context morals or genetics or religion or society or whatever are a whole other can of worms that may or may not be needed to explore. Again: I am not for polygamy, like, at all. One of the reasons is, that I belong to the undesirables and I don't want the playing field leaning even more against me. The other reasons you mentioned are valid as well.…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:24 PM
2

I never said anything about right or wrong. I just think that the argument made in the article is sound. I think a lot of women would be willing to share their husband and a lot of men would be willing to have a woman for each night of the week. And I think class would decide who gets to have sex and relationships rather than religion (it does so even when religion is involved). The metaphorical 3 guys at the bottom won't be literally starving but they would be even more undesirable than they ar…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:07 PM
5

You think religion will be the only reason why multiple women would try to marry the same men (and men would try to marry multiple women)? Can you please explain Hugh Hefner to me?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:32 PM
4

What do you think would happen, if polygamy was legal in the US (or any other country that has first-word-standards)?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:24 PM
3

I know the country malta. Well, I know of it. Never been there so I cannot really say anything about it. I just happen to live near the village malta (262,02 km², so considerably smaller than your country) and found it amusing ;)
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:55 AM
6

Malta isn't a real country. It's a small village near where I live. Nah, it is a real country. But it is also a small village near where I live.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:39 AM
15

Joking about it is ok though. We don't want speech to be policed for a reason. The problem isn't joking about this topic. The problem is that joking about other topics is considered more problematic.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 06:56 AM
1

Maybe, but I doubt it would happen on such a large scale that the 'wage gap' would disappear.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:57 PM
2

So, it is a synonym for 'femquality'?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 09:28 AM
4

Do you want men to stop working more than women? Because that is how you make men stop working more hours than women.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 09:25 AM
1

I was a little bit drunk and reading enough on this sub builds some rage. My coping mechanism is sarcasm. I am sure a lot of people didn't read it to the end, though.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 08:11 AM
1

When I first read the suggestion, I thought: what a shitty idea, Murphy's law will brutally assault it and rape its dead body. And boy, was I right. Who would have thought ...
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:18 PM
6

The gaps you mentioned and those mentioned in the comments are really high on feminists list. But you need to understand that they are all men's own fault. Their decisions lead to these gaps, unlike the wage gap that has absolutely nothing to do with women's choices and is, in fact, the fault of the patriarchy. Homeless-gap: toxic masculinity. Men would either die in the winter than to ask for help, because their male pride is so fragile they couldn't survive having it questioned. Life-expectanc…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:10 PM
5

Oppressive shitlord. Have an upvote
/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:48 PM
1

How would one measure? Really courious.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:57 AM
2

Maybe. I read an article (on Cracked of all places) on people who were in cults, where they described how they got sucked in (very slowly). I still can't fathom how one can start to ignore reality when it doesn't bend to an ideology.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:47 AM
1

I've seen polls that say most American women prefer the look of circumcised penises The only way this would legitimize the circumcision of anyone under the age of 10 is if female pedofiles are suddenly somewhat OK. Over the age of 10 up until the age of consent we have other words that are also associated with criminal behaviour.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:19 AM
10

It always awes me how people can be transformed from being outgoing, confident and (for lack of a better word, not a native speaker) fearless to a quivering pile of self-doubt and paranoia without anything physical happening to them. I mean: What the everloving fuck? Also: Yeah, feminism is everything but empowering these days.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:09 AM
2

So they looked at the wage-gap myth, correctly identified the reasons that men earn more over a lifetime and ... ... still found a way to think this is in any way or form unfair?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:01 AM
9

To get it out of the way: I read Meth head. For the topic at hand: I am not sure how this will turn out. If he doesn't have proper political backing this could be his downfall. If he stays true to his word it would be a step in the right direction. The next step would be to always prosecute people where the likelyhood that they were false accusers is high.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:58 AM
8

We just had the case of a man accused of Sexual assault for brushing a woman when walking past her. The article claims that unwanted touching counted as assault. The 41% response rate is fishy. I call bs, but we need to see the study (methodology, interpretation etc.) to say more about it.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:03 PM
17

But but but but Anita said .... Of course Video games don't cause violence or sexism. But nobody cares for the truth when there is money to be made
/r/MensRights10/02/16 06:10 PM
4

You noticed the /s? It stands for sarcasm And people already wrote shit like this for real
/r/MensRights10/02/16 05:54 PM
5

Well I didn't know of it, so there's that. Also: The results broadly show that playing videogames doesn’t make people sexist. I didn't except this. Except I completely did.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 03:04 PM
9

Another rapist goes free. And that's why we can't have trials in rape-cases. How can future victims ever come forward when they see how cruel cross-examination is? /s
/r/MensRights10/02/16 02:53 PM
3

Nah, they will say that it was the right step but too late. At least the media will say that. Nothing can push a company that relies on freedom of speech like good old censorship.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 01:45 PM
2

Did i miss a memo? How did MRAs throw Roosh under the bus?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 01:27 PM
84

Ok, let's do it. But let's do it honestly. Women obviously can't be truested, so ... no legal contracts anymore. no rights to children whatsoever no right to vote /s Can it be that they don't know what they want to have? Or do feminists always only see the 'privilege' and don't ever see the responsibility that goes with it?
/r/MensRights09/02/16 10:51 PM
3

Teach women how to avoid rape -> less potential lawsuits. And honestly, who would want less opportunities to paint all men as demons?
/r/MensRights09/02/16 10:46 PM
3

Ahhh... come on. It's just a little tissue and the boy won't remember it anyway. Also: Women really dig cut guys :D Everyone that let get it done should feel what life is worth when decisions are made without their consent.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 10:45 PM
10

it's not worse than being dead. yeah? Women are the primary victims of war -Hillary Clinton I have nothing more to say
/r/MensRights09/02/16 04:19 PM
3

So be it. But let's stop to pretend otherwise, then.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 04:09 PM
5

It's just logical. First you eliminate 'No means yes' That's not that controversial altough cuts out a huge part of human interaction (noverbal), but ok. Then you eliminate 'Absence of no means yes' More controversial. One partner does not participate enthusiastically and the next thing you know is you get charged with assault or rape? Mens rea anyone? Anyone? The next thing eliminated? 'Yes means Yes', of course. Accusing someone who I have had fun with just because I regret it. Now that's an e…
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:56 PM
10

Nah, she just wishes the witnesses would be better at lying so they can finally score the High-profile conviction they are aching for. [EDIT]Guilt doesn't matter to them.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:18 PM
12

Who wants to ignore facts and rely on feelings and hearsay to reach a conviction? It's the people that advocate for due process, right?
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:16 PM
30

What's sickening. If the defending lawyer did not produce all those documents (as in, the documents existed but the defendant couldn't get a hold of them) the witnesses would be celebrated as heroes that brought down an evil evil man.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:58 PM
3

tl;dr Evidence or GTFO I'd love that. We should try it for accused people too.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 11:47 AM
1

This is a trick-question?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:08 PM
1

I think that there's at least some that think like this. But that's only assumptions so there's nothing you can do. This one needs to get ousted as soon as possible.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:46 PM
4

I am sure that the London underground didn't manipulate the video. Someone must have. This person or the person who told them to do it but decided not to disclose the fact on court should not be in any position of law-enforcement/prosecution.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:27 PM
5

Nice how their policies are not gender biased. I am sure a female student would face the same fate if someone accused her of rape seven months after the fact. That whole 'Dear Collegues'-thing is an utter disaster. It does nothing to secure justice for anyone and harms real victims and supports real perpetrators as those who should prosecute these things do not even get involved. 'preponderance of evidence' my ass. And the 'regret equals rape'-woman should be fired and prevented from any positio…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:24 PM
10

The prosecutors will surely be punished for this? OK, who am I kidding.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 02:47 PM
7

But that is not the equality they are looking for. You know, that kind of equality that combines equality of rights and equality of responsibility.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 02:42 PM
2

And then immediately hiring another guy that doesn't do any of the things they say they want in an employee.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:34 PM
59

But she totally felt assaulted. That should mean something. /s The people involved in this should be prosecuted and charged.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:13 PM
2

A system where you have to 'apply' for a relationship sounds interesting. Or the other way round. You spend some time with a company and try to find out if they like you enough to hire you. And it's super-awkward if they don't but want to remain friends.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 12:04 PM
1

I don't know how I could really help you with this. The only thing that I can suggest is to really go back where you started. Be logical, be analytical. And force yourself to it. I often find myself cheering for the poor women (victims) just by default. I mean I was raised this way. Then I force myself to think whatever situation I had at hand through to come to a view that I can defend rationally instead of emotionally. You say it yourself. The worst thing you could have been in the past was ig…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 11:08 AM
2

I am not sure if I get you. You are aware of those things, so you are somewhat able to analyze yourself. Isn't this the first step to get out of the bubble? I mean, you are aware that you put race and gender above everything else. Have you ever second-guess these priorities? Ever second-guessed your Triggers (Don't know how you define the word trigger here)? As In: Can you rationalize (logically, not emotionally) why you feel uncomfortable around white people. Can you explain why masculinity sca…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 10:44 AM
3

Don't use the 'not interested in a relationship' line. It will bite you in the ass long term. Just tell him the truth, he is not your type and leave it at that. Almost every guy will accept that, we are used to rejection.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:02 AM
1

I don't see it either. I only mentioned it because they, i.e. those who made the study, are confident. My confidence is much lower. That's why I questioned the 10% in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 12:49 AM
1

explained by the resistance group being less likely to report a sexual encounter as rape. To be fair that was mentioned in the excerpt of the study. They are confident that possibility didn't have much influence on the reporting.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 12:33 AM
8

Am I the only one that finds a 1-year-risk of completed rape of 10% (untrained) extremely crass?
/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:11 PM
45

Well it is. Unless no immediate protection is needed. Them you may as well go fuck yourself, you patriarchy-reinforcing shitlord.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 01:57 PM
3

Well, you got to respect and protect the 'victims'. All of these things will cause 'victims' to think twice before accusing someone. Can't have any of that.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 10:23 AM
6

'strong and independent woman' means 'as long as I do not have to take any responsibility whatsoever'. Always did.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 10:20 AM
9

So the fathers want to attract pedophiles? oO I don't believe there are that many women who crave baby-dicks to justify cutting more than zero boys. As for the ridicule-thing. They will be anyway. No men goes through the first 20 years of his life without being regularily ridiculed. We don't take surgical measures for all the other things they could be ridiculed for, do we?
/r/MensRights05/02/16 10:12 AM
29

Ok, now that is a reason to mutilate babies. /s
/r/MensRights05/02/16 09:20 AM
3

it goes to the courts and they decide whether not registering women is constitutional Wasn't the only reason the supreme court decided against a female draft the fact that women were not allowed in combat roles? So where can the courts go from there (except ignoring the SCOTUS, of course)
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:45 PM
5

Is there even anything lawmakers can do? Wouldn't every law be voided if someone decided to sue for discrimination?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:36 PM
6

Well, when they fight too, they won't be the primary victims, would they? Because being dead is better than losing someone or something like this.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:23 PM
2

Thx. That the study isn't very good is rather clear. The participation-rate is really low and in the second experiment there are 6 times more women than men.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 02:17 PM
4

Can someone explain laymen-terms what 'implicit self-esteem' is? Also: I read some of the comments. The site is comedy-gold. Yep, GamerGate happened because men are upset when girls are better gamerst than them. And we all hate Lena Dunham because she is so succesful.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:36 PM
21

Surely legalizing rape is not part of this? The guy, RooshV, who wrote this thing is not an MRA, openly against the Men's Rights Movement and has repeated it every now and then. The very first two stickied posts on this sub are about exactly that.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:01 PM
1

I like the strategic butt covers :) /s
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:25 AM
2

I live in Austria and people do believe the wage gap is real. They cannot name one example but it has to be real. The newspapers said so. I didn't give much thought to these things for a long time. I mean the papers said these things and there were studies (studies!!!) behind the articles, so why question it. When I started to learn about the MRM reality hit like a stone. I started to bring these topics up casually and I couldn't believe how natural everyone accepted these things (wage gap, righ…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:23 AM
9

'I want to spread my hate and not get flak for it' - The Article.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:18 AM
5

Most people i know already think feminism today is insane. That may be true. The same people also think that women have less rights than men, are paid less and generally get the short end of the stick. And that's a bit of a problem.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:51 AM
3

Well, first of all, even if she is lying, it could have happened. And the awareness raised is definitely worth it, isn't it? I mean, it's only a man whos life is ruined. /s
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:56 AM
2

Can we stop concernig ourseleves with idiots like Roosh? The MRM is based an facts, let those speak? Feminism (not at all) and RPers (when they see fit) don't care about facts. They have an agenda and, while reality tends to bend around their agenda, they will do anything to not get it challenged.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 09:28 PM
6

They don't understand basic Sun Tsu or Machiavelli. Us vs. them is about identifying 'allies' (only people that think exactly the way they think) instead of finding useful idiots to fight their wars. It wasn't always this way, but i for one, welcome out new feminist overlords that will eat their own within a few months.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 09:24 PM
2

Yeah, the double standard is disgusting. Especially the silence from all those anti-rape activists.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 09:21 PM
1

I don't think so. The share is as low as it is because there aren't enough guys willing to do these things. Feminists call that sexism. Or misogony.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 03:06 PM
1

As far as I know a lot of the numbers are public or at least accessable. There are various studies on the topic, aren't they? But, as with the 'wage gap' it's all about spin. There are about 2 to 3% of accusations that went to court and were proven false (That doesn't mean 'not guilty' for the 'rapist', these cases are not in the 2 to 3%, that does mean someone decided to prosecute the false accuser and proved him guilty beyond reasonable doubt). And then there are countless cases where nothing …
/r/MensRights03/02/16 11:03 AM
16

And they only want them, because they think there is no hard work involved.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:39 AM
1

Well, it certainly is not flattering for women (some may say it is not flattering for the disabled)
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:37 AM
3

Alimony for half the time married capped at 4 years. Default shared custody and therefore no child support as long as it can't be proven that one pa ent is not fit enough. Divorce rates would go down very very fast.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 01:43 AM
2

How many letters? I mean, if she is not completely unreasonable if would take some time to feel harassed or claim harassement.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:38 AM
3

That goes hand in hand with the Duluth-thing mentioned above. You said it is not in UKs laws, well Duluth isn't law either, as far as I understand. It's a set of guidelines for police on how to act with DV-calls. You should try to get information on the guidelines that are used in the UK. I think they may not be far off. Also: this and the reddit thread on it. As I said, there is something similar in UK law for sure.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:31 AM
3

Well, he is right. Of course. He is John fucking Cleese. But as long as people pander to the delusional adult babies nothing will change, sadly.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:14 AM
4

But Carl Monetti, 66, wrote that he could not be intimate with women until after he was cut while serving in the Air Force: “Trust me, I would much rather have gone through the procedure as a baby than at 21.’’ We conclude He was not intimate with women until he was cut. The question is: Why? The second question is: How can he tell the difference then? He wished he would have gone through it as a baby? Again: Why? Did he not like being cut as an adult? Did it hurt? Well, lets cut babys then, the…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:55 AM
0

If men were as disgusted by rape as they are by periods the 1 in 5 statistic would be something women and feminists hoped was true. Delusional pack. [EDIT]periods and rape were in the wrong order
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:55 AM
2

But it isn't. I really don't think this belongs here.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:19 PM
2

Why is this here?
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:04 PM
9

Well it IS not the same thing. Nobody expects women to be able to care for a child. That's what men are for. As in: a man that doesn't/can't pay child support is a deadbeat and must be jailed, a women that does the same is a poor victim and should receive any help we can afford/not afford.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 12:26 PM
8

What are we gonna do? It's satanic panic all over again. You can't fight unbased emotions. I mean, even I do unconsciously rationalize those parents actions. Yeah, I catch the rationalisation and think twice but it's really deeply ingrained in our society.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 12:14 PM
2

Gay black men would work, I suppose. I just find it a little disgusting that you have to add various opression-adjectives to get a problem recognized.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 12:09 PM
1

I don't think gay men will fly with them either. SJWs are starting to see them as privileged too. At least as long as they are white.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:44 AM
2

Demand a new model for domestic abuse, so that it is just. Men are not taken seriously as victims! FTFY
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:26 AM
3

sociopathic nutcase he has a penis Hillary has a penis?
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:23 AM
1

Why do you think many feminists have consistently doubled down in cases like these, despite evidence indicating the report was false? As someone els said. The reasons may be as diverse as the reasons for reporting in the first place. I think, however, the main reason is that the acceptance that false accusing happens on a non-trivial scale may hurt their movement (and it will) Do you think my showerthought may have some basis in reality or am I way off? There may be some basis. But I think that'…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:19 AM
-1

I didn't see that before. thx.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:42 PM
4

They are more likely to be behind but less likely to go to jail for being behind, so it's kinda fair /s
/r/MensRights29/01/16 10:50 PM
-13

well, that is sexist of course. You should clarify that in a top lvl comment
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:16 PM
-31

Apart from the fact that the vast majority of people that pay child support are men I fail to see the sexism here.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:48 PM
4

woman sees pizza topping 'just for men'. nervous meltdown man sees products 'just for women'. Doesn't realize he saw a product 'just for women' feminism claims men are completely the same as women I have nothing more to say
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:58 PM
2

I always imagined libraries as a place for old people to play solitaire. But whatever floats you boat, I gues. Except masturbation of course. Well, as long as you clean everything after you leave I might not care at all.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:37 PM
1

I'd like that ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:35 PM
16

I would be surprised if this wasn't so unsurprising.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 02:18 PM
29

Well, if we are to trust the wikipedia-article she, more or less, commited suicide and almost killed an innocent while doing so.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 02:18 PM
30

I found one dead suffragette in wikipedia. Don't quite know if this counts as heroic sacrifice.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:56 PM
3

I am sure most women will enthusiastically sign up for the app and let you record them having sex with you.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:37 PM
8

They've never been in a public women's bathroom?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:21 AM
1

I know, but censorship of feminists already affects women Not the right ones. It should affect Watson, Big Red and their ilk. It should affect those who call for it.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:47 AM
88

The patriarchy strikes again. I am glad that I have all this privilege. [EDIT]Can people stop masturbating in libraries, though?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:37 AM
9

Tell him that if he thinks the genders should have equal rights, he is inherently a feminist, whether he chooses to identify as such or not. Buahahahahaaa Oh, you're serious? Buahahahahaaaaaahahaaahaahaaahaaa Haaaahaahaahaaa snork
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:35 AM
2

extract skepticism (Dawkins) insert anti-skepticism (feminism) ??? profit Or no profit in the long run because feminism runs against everything that skepticism stands for. Hence the astonishing success of Atheism+
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:31 AM
1

I really don't understand why the state doesn't do anything. I mean, the 'wage gap' implies that women are discriminated against on a massive scale. There are laws against this kind of discrimination. Shouldn't countless companies be prosecuted for discrimination all the time? If I had a company that paid equal money for equal work, couldn't i sue the state for doing nothing? I mean, I would be massive disadvantaged against my competition, wouldn't I?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:22 AM
1

I don't think so. As long as women think they will not be affected they will only push further and there are more than enough people pandering to their needs (and feels). Only when it starts affecting them they will stop.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:25 PM
2

We shouldn't mock them. We should use their weapons against them. As long as they are not affected they will not stop for they have no idea what they are advocating for.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:52 PM
24

Well. I am so glad that feminism helps men too. Because otherwise there would be no one who cares about mens rights because feminists would shut everything not feminist down if they only had the power.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:45 PM
3

Well, the girls are not white dudes, so thats completely OK.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:43 PM
1

Yeah. Not a native speaker, so sometimes i get the phrasing wrong. Thx for the suggestion.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:20 PM
12

Well it was a nice trap but, as i was educated time and again, you can't be sexist against men, so there would be nothing to enforce.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:17 PM
6

Always searching for explanations why some women are not wonderful. pathetic.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:07 PM
3

Then just report on it. It happened, there were this many attack helicopters, everybody had fun, very few casualties.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:59 PM
2

I don't know the subreddits thoughts. I have a few for myself. Who cares (in the sense that it's a real nonmatter in my mind) If the genders were reversed it would also be called sexist by the same people. Who cares Sorry, I am a little bit cynical at the moment.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:46 PM
4

Well, isn't the sample size a little to small to draw valid conclusions?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:24 PM
8

But now you know and can start to be offended every time this happens. I am sure your life will improve dramatically. How could you live that long without constant victimization?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:28 PM
136

How to avoid gender bias in law enforcement. reinforce stereotypes and gender bias.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:27 PM
6

The second part was, yes. The first part is, sadly, how a lot of 'research' is done in our day and age.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:49 PM
8

That one is easy. You have a conclusion and then you search for evidence that supports that conclusion and ignore all evidence that contradicts it. I mean, that's how the scientific method works, isn't it?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:18 PM
72

for example, they attended meetings or signed a petition – also tended to report experiencing more sexual harassment, of both types Or, they are much more sensitive and feel harassed where other men wouldn't even shrug. Because they learned that everything is sexist, everything is problematic and it must be pointed out. Whatever that means.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:23 PM
3

I think feminism will stop working soon. Not gynocentrism, male disposability or things like that. Just feminism. Their academic circles are so far up their own butt that you often cannot see if something is serious or a parody. Poes law is strong in feminism. And on the practical side of things. Well, feminism has really run out of things to fight for. The things they faught for in the past may or may not have been legitimate, but at least they were big enough to make people care. Nowadays they…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:36 AM
5

I still don't think men really fight. Sure, they use weapons (laws) to protect themselves, but fighting back (again using laws) is rarely seen. Of course, feminists are devestated if it happens (Bahar Mustafa) but more often then not you read of someone who decided not to press charges because he wants it to be all over (or he doesn't want to hurt the other party) [EDIT]A minor change of wording
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:51 AM
9

I think you are reading too much into your parents motivation. There wasn't much of an awarenes regarding circumcision when you were born. Everyone 'knew' that the foreskun serves no purpose and it reduces the risk of cancer. I am rather sure your parents loved you and didn't think they would be harming you. If anything I like to hope that you can redirect the anger and/or hate you feel for your parents now and go for those who openly support and recommend MGM. The more they get exposed for the …
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:16 AM
9

Is criticism of Israeli policy anti-Semitic now? Depending on where you live, yes. In Germany or Austria it may get you in hot water.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:26 AM
8

As far as I understand it, there is only one side that wants it to be a war.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:22 AM
2

You are looking way to deep into the facts. It really interferes with your potential to be offended.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:14 AM
34

Nah, she is just a misogynist. The only reason less people want to see women starring is because we, as a society always search for new ways to oppress women. I mean, you can always make female characters the way you want without fearing that some people/organisations call for your head for portraying them the wrong way. That literarische never happens, because we, as society are strong enough to see something we don't like and not having a hysterical meltdown immediately (and call for the state…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:55 PM
2

But the university settled. There must have happened something. I mean, who do you want to believe. The justice system with their unfair, intimidating and traumatising procedures and that bs-presumption of innocence or that helpless victim that couldn't produce any relevant evidence? You misogynist! ! /s
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:50 PM
3

Ahhh.. Divorce as a shit test. Because talking and being honest is overrated
/r/MensRights27/01/16 08:07 PM
1

I still don't get it. Was he the only one who wanted the divorce initially?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:26 PM
4

Because the numbers of false accusations, while too high, aren't high enough to justify this behaviour. Because on the justice side of things, due process is still rather robust. And most importantly: why the fuck would I want to rape someone? The thoughts alone grosses me out.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:34 PM
2

my wife confessed that the women I had reached out to online were all fictitious personae that she had constructed with the intent of exhausting my search efforts But why?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:59 PM
3

It's kind of tragic, isn't it? They are so deep in their 'x+power'-bullshit that they honestly can't fathom the thought that a ruling in their favor wouldn't bite them in the ass down the line. They really believe that, as women, they cannot be accused of harassment, because as a minority (oO) they lack the power to harass a man.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:43 AM
1

I am near-sighted, so I only need to take my glasses off, but let me just say: I feel you, man :D
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:18 AM
2

While you surely aren't that far off, I like to believe that my 'explanation' is also somewhat valid. What you are saying is something that might fly in 'academic frminist' circles. The pawns may not think that 'deep' so my line of thinking (men are natural predators that will rape on instinct if not taught otherwise) would be happily accepted by them. All things considered it does not matter. Neither the 'academic circles' nor the pawns are interested in facts. Because the facts do not support …
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:01 AM
2

Isn't that the only (not completely moronic) explanation behind 'teach men not to rape'?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:43 AM
3

How would we get to the verdict? Easy. Is he accused? No: wait until til he is accused. Yes: something something listen and believe ... guilty. What more do you need. On a more serious note: the whole thing is a little bit more complicated and bigger than feminists want you to believe (and their pawns do believe) Erosion of due process will not stop at rape. The consequences of their utopia are not what they expect it to be... First they took the 'rapists'...
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:40 AM
3

Reading this makes me glad that I am not suicidal at all. I lost a cousin this way, and while I am sure he would have been listened to, I can absolutely understand why he thought otherwise. The urge to not be a parasite, to not be a burden, to not leave a fingerprint unless it is something great is strong, even within me, and as I said, there are few things less likely then me killing myself. And then I think back to my cousin, 17 years old, lacking a broader view of reality and life and feeling…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:32 AM
2

lesser potential punishments yeah. ruin a live AND put him in jail (after a whole lot of things you have to get right) vs. just ruin a live (without doing any work whatsoever) It's beautyful and really just.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:15 PM
1

It wouldn't fly with their voters?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:17 PM
7

I can already see the interpretation of HuffPo and Co. VT Alymony reform will force women out of their homes and into poverty.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:23 PM
1

With 'doing the same thing' i meant 'interpret those facts the same way they do now'. As in: intelectual dishonesty.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:08 PM
7

Ahh, and when they will earn less than those who can actually do work, they can cry about the wage gap in the video game industry.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:07 PM
2

1) How do negotiations blend into this system? 2) What would stop them from doing the same thing? If all those factors are considered (and they are considered in serious research) there is only a trivial gap and feminists know that. They just ignore those factors to push a narrative of victimhood
/r/MensRights26/01/16 02:44 PM
4

Now that was a nice read
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:53 PM
2

Already deleted. Most certainly some troll.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:48 PM
1

False equivalency isn't it? Nobody needs sex to survive.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:08 PM
2

I got that. It was the shared culpability that triggered my 'dafuq'
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:47 PM
4

dafuq?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:33 PM
1

As you should have. Everybody should have this right. Sounds delicious.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 10:28 AM
2

To feel safe- this a right guaranteed in Canada? If it isn't yet, it definitely should be. I mean, life is supposed to revolve around your needs and insecurities, isn't it? And while we are at it. There should be a right to never being subjected to anything that might disturb you on any level. And a right to get whatever you want just because you said so. And i think everyone should be entitled to unicorns.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 09:08 AM
3

At least it's consistent with how the media handles it. If the women is drunk it's the mens responsibility/fault. If both are drunk it's the mens responsibility/fault. If the men is drunk it's the mens responsibility/fault.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:25 AM
4

I am sure they know the stats. They just don't bother to cite correctly because it goes against what they believe is right. But let's be honest. Popularity is a really weak argument to justify a human right violation.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:47 PM
9

Well, take the MRM out of the equation Men do have problems but MRA's are whiney and hate women women have it worse so no one cares Take women out of the equation Men do have problems but MRA's are whiney and hate women they are men und just should suck it up so no one cares
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:42 PM
1

Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:23 PM
14

Well, those intactivists are clearly monsters. How dare they demanding human rights for male children. I wonder why it is so important to get the people cut while they cannot say no. Sure, aids and unprotected sex are big problems with toddlers but what other reason could they have.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 07:02 PM
8

Fun You keep using that word ...
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:29 PM
5

came into contact with about 80 men experiencing domestic violence in its first year, and housed 11 men in desperate situations from both Cornwall and outside the county, with many more applying Maybe it's not the one area where DV goes against any scientific research (mostly gender symetry) but the one area where men can get fucking help whereas everywhere else they are shamed, mocked and treated as perpetrators.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 02:36 PM
31

The article itself makes me cringe. What does her husband think of her contempt against his gender? Does she look at him and see the same stereotypical traits she assigns on her unborn child? How far do you have to drive on the misogony-train to think this way?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 02:02 PM
55

That was misogony too
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:30 PM
2

Repeat a lie often enough and it will, eventually, be believed.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:28 PM
5

Trolling feminism and Men's rights? Bored?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:12 AM
1

Yeah, I don't talk about the media. I talk about users on this sub that have a fairly reasonable post history yet throw it out of the window because there are so many accusers that arguably have nothing to gain from an accusation. On the other hand, 'innocent until proven guilty' regularly flies out the window if a man comes forward with an alleged rape-story, so maybe it is to be expected.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 11:04 AM
1

I know that. My /s wasn't there because i support this line of thinking. But it's quite telling what the state of 'innocent until proven guilty' is, when the sheer number of accusations is enough to convince people that he MUST have done something.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 10:38 AM
8

I was told (in this very sub) that he must have done something because never before was someone accused on such a large scale. And the women 'coming forward' have nothing to gain from their accusations. So this must be the one foul apple. All the others are surely truthful. Of course there is no evidence to gather 20something years after the alleged fact but we should just listen and believe. I mean so many women 'come forward', there must be something to it, mustn't it? /s
/r/MensRights20/01/16 10:12 AM
9

I wonder what she cried about. The daughter? Her fear of going to jail? We'll never know sadly.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:47 AM
13

But muh religous freedom The boy should look like his dad It's useles tissue anyway It looks better Women prefer it It prevents STDs Fuck those people
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:43 AM
5

You know what? I could live with that. Let's make it a law. Sure, society will burn but there's a level playing field at least. But this is worse. And I am sure the woman will be believed, even when she does not complain first. (See men getting jailed after being physically abused and calling the police)
/r/MensRights19/01/16 03:42 PM
34

This. Consider me positively surprised.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 03:39 PM
3

The quality of the trolls is really going downhill.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 11:30 AM
4

Nice Satire. But they are right. Possibly the only way to close what feminists call the wage gap. I doubt that women en mass will start to do the things necessary to get the jobs and earn the money that would close the 'wage gap'
/r/MensRights19/01/16 09:08 AM
6

Yeah, all those toddlers that contract AIDS because they are not circumcised. If that is not a reason to risk a baby's life, then I do not know what is.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:42 PM
3

Maybe no one taught her not to kill her children?
/r/MensRights18/01/16 10:08 AM
55

I think most of them are in it for the sex (i.e. they think whiteknighting will get them laid)
/r/MensRights15/01/16 11:05 AM
1

How can I edit this? I took the title reddit suggested EDIT: I con't care about karma at all
/r/MensRights14/01/16 10:53 PM
1

Say that to /u/girlwriteswhat I'm just the messenger
/r/MensRights14/01/16 07:09 PM
40

'unprovoked'
/r/MensRights14/01/16 12:44 PM
4

I would like to hear the reasoning why she got more. Doesn't make sense in my book.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 10:48 AM
2

if the only tool you have is a hammer feminism everything looks like a nail misogony.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 05:42 PM
3

Shouldn't the first 'yes' be something else? Like 'who cares'?
/r/MensRights13/01/16 04:15 PM
1

private circle-jerks Ahh, that's why everyone who doesn't agree or says something people here don't want to hear gets banned immediately. Wait ...
/r/MensRights13/01/16 01:07 PM
8

My comment was from the point of sanity. There is no approach that makes the erosion of due process rights apealing.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:56 PM
23

It would be a step in the right direction, at least.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:54 PM
5

Did it turn out that the accuser was lying? Misogony, rape culture and victim blaming.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:53 PM
30

I know that. That /s was there for a reason.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:29 PM
5

They commit virtually no sexual offences You don't say oO Isn't it very hard for anything a women does in Australia to a man to be counted as sexual offence?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:52 PM
2

A man that demands sex is harrasing his wife. I am very sure this will never ever backfire.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:33 PM
4

I am sure there are at least some people that would declare you a rapist for just one yes.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:21 PM
4

Well, obviously they were mysogonists. I mean, they didn't just listen and believe, did they?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:20 PM
286

Almighty Nerthus, is this guy nuts? If law enforcement was involved that would mean that actual investigations would be commited. Who would come forward with an accusation if they knew they had to provide at least coherent memories? No, law enforcment involvement in campus rape means fewer rape accusations and nobody wants that to happen, amiright? /s
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:53 PM
31

Let me be the first to say: who the fuck cares which is worse? Can we just stop cutting childrens genitals, ffs?
/r/MensRights11/01/16 10:27 PM
22

Come on. That's not fair. Men are privileged in every aspect of life so holding them liable for child support without their consent is just punching up. /s this is utterly disgusting and child support, alimony and marriage are in deep need for reform. Of course that won't happen until enough women are affected (childless, unmarried ...) and that won't happen within 2 or 3 generations.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:30 PM
4

I'm a guy myself I'm a lawnmower. What does that bring into the discussion?
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:03 PM
13

Well, you can't put responsibility on girls, can you?
/r/MensRights11/01/16 02:29 PM
1

It's nice to have some muscle when you need it Sorry for the sarcasm, came here right after TIA
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:50 PM
5

I doubt that a significant portion of men subscribe or are even aware of a 'bro code'. There's expectations from society for both men and women but that would be the end of it, as far as I am concerned.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:17 PM
19

Well, they wanted to destroy the institution of marriage and they succeeded. What did they think would happen? Also: Not by choice? Sure they chose, they just weren't aware of it.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:43 PM
6

For all I care, there's no need for segregation in sports. Most women won't get into a mens team though so everything would stay the same. Except she tries to force quotas, then she may as well go and fuck herself.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:26 PM
2

Look at comment sections. More and more are closed and if they are not the responses get more and more challenging. They had their time pretending to do it all for the women (and children) but it is running out. More and more women (even feminists) see what they sowed and they don't like it. You can villify men for some time. You can even force them to cooperate (for some time). But ultimately even feminists can't contradict basic nature (even with modern instruments). Men and Women both have th…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 10:09 PM
1

As I said. Yes thay can. But they are just starting to face reality. No, they won't.. much longer..
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:33 PM
2

I am not sure where this is heading. What do you want to say?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:04 PM
3

Yes, they can. They are already. Read online news and shake your head about all the bs that gets published every day. No, they can't. Feminism, having run out of things to fight for has nothing left to rely on but 'what about the womyn' and more and more people want them to stfu. I say: Let them run wild the next years and let them make their own graves.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:03 PM
1

Well, it's tied to the draft to this day, isn't it. At least in some states. Not registering is a felony and felons mustn't vote. Not a direct tie but nevertheless. But there sure are better informed people for this topic than me (not native in England/America and not a historian)
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:53 PM
8

Pros make the largest number of false accusations Didn't know that But it's funny. Our current society breeds MGTOW. And then they turn around and shame them for not pursuing women. It will be nice to watch.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:40 PM
18

It will only get worse since every guy that goes into college today learns he can be accused of rape at any time without having to have a relationship like this.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:26 PM
3

It's nice that he is against it, but he doesn't specify any better idea. If he just wrote '50-50 parenting bad. Me don't like' he would have said as much without having to write 3 pages. Also: Nice how it's the poor women that need protection from the bad men in his anecdotes.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:24 PM
2

civilizations. Even as far back as WW2 women were knowingly risking their lives to contribute to the war effort. Maybe not charging out of the trenches but work It doesn't matter if they were allowed to enlist. The vote for (most) men was tied to the draft, at least in the US (as in the state cannot force men to fight it's wars without letting him have a say) and in the UK there was no majority for female suffrage until it was made clear there would be no draft tied to it. Being allowed to do so…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 11:54 AM
3

As far as I am concerned, feminism was never about important social movements. It was about gaining privilege without the related responsibility (vote without draft) and about getting rid of responsibility (or opression if you like) without letting go of the privileges. (You may look at the institution of marriage where it is now so that a man has nothing left to gain and everything to lose)
/r/MensRights05/01/16 11:31 AM
2

“Women still face gender inequality at work; there's a 10% pay gap for full time workers and over 34% for part time workers…” [citation needed] Tell her she should show you one case then you can sue the hell out of the place for discrimination. “Only 1 in 4 MPs are women... “ The majority of voters are women. So ... .... “77% of young men still think rape is OK even if the girl says no…” [citation needed] dafuq?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 11:27 AM
2

The article linked spent a whole paragraph getting the elephant in the room out of the way. But try to discuss it. Almost every thread I read here lands at the 'but i don't feel mutilated'-rail sooner or later. It's like the vote for women 100 years ago. If you can't even get you ingroup to agree, how can you get the world. The sad thing is: I think circumcised people should feel as awesome as they want to. They can cut dicks all day if they want. But they should keep their fingers to themselves…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 08:49 PM
1

And even then they wouldn't give in to responsibilities (draft, fighting in wars) that men had (and that got the majority of them the vote in the first place) They were always hypocritical. They must be as their ideology is based on flawed assumptions (patriarchy theory) that can't stand against reality. Double-think is the only answer to overcome the gap in your brain.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 04:17 PM
0

Short answer: money. Long answer: moooooooneeeeeyyyy. EDIT: And privilege of course.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 04:00 PM
1

I wasn't really serious with my answer. As things stand there is virtually nothing to gain. Problem is, most people don't know this as most people don't see marriage as a contract but in light of the romantic delusions they have been taught (women and men alike)
/r/MensRights04/01/16 03:36 PM
5

The teenager and his mother were at Taylor's Naperville home having pizza when Taylor asked the boy's mom if he could walk her dog with her, ABC 7 in Chicago reported. Instead of walking the dog, Taylor allegedly took the teen into her bedroom and sexually abused him around 9 p.m., prosecutors said. dafuq? How can you become a teacher with that little common sense? What did she think would happen?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 02:11 PM
2

Well, 'truth' is a bit overstated but it is a reasonable scenario nonetheless.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:33 PM
3

*You're
/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:00 PM
2

Hard to say. The best he can get out of it is, that his wife will have some kind of support/access to his assets (and vice versa, I think?) or something like this. So, if he cares deeply for his wife that's a plus, isn't it?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 11:19 AM
1

Shave it. I have read somewhere that your current style is rated the lowest.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:57 AM
2

Well, it deprieves women of a privilege. Less privilege means less equality. Therefore sexism. And while I absolutely agree with /u/MrDoradus, I am sure as hell that there are people out there who think exactly like that.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:45 AM
3

TLDR but, the increased leverage they will give women in sexual encounters Yeah, as if (young) women needed more leverage (I know that this isn't the opinion of the author but of the lawmakers and advocates)
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:42 AM
2

Now that is a strange reason not to report. Congratulations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48rz8udZBmQ
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:08 AM
2

I didn't say they are less productive. But on average they work less, even in the same position (read: hours)
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:22 PM
3

Well it is true, kind of. But expect to get 30% less work out of the female employee as well. There are reasons for the 30% but feminism doesn't like to talk about these reasons.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 09:38 AM
3

Sure they mean something to both, but not the same thing. I think we are at a disagreement here that we will not solve because it's rather fundamental.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:34 AM
1

MRA: Identify areas where men are discriminated against and/or face hardships and find ways to fight against these things. (also: bitching about fucked up women for being fucked up. As in, going for a 9 hour fuck-session and letting your newborn die) red pill: accepting that the system is fucked up, learning how to change yourself (and manipulating women) to get pussy. That would be my ELI5 as far as I understand it.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:30 AM
2

So you think men and women are exactly the same. That they are all attracted to physical attributes? Money power and status do not mean anything in the context of sexual attraction. Or, if they do, they mean the same thing to men and women?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:25 AM
1

Sure they are. I am not dumb. But physical attractivenes plays a different role for men and women. And there is the problem. We can see a hot woman for what she is. Hot. And everyone will be like '8/10 would bang'. But we can't see what drew a teenage girl to her teacher (if it was consensual) because it isn't obvious. You never hear '8/10 would totally bang' when the 'victim' is female because we can't see what exactly she found attractive.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:21 AM
0

I am not sarcastic. As I said before, I am not sure where you want to go with this. I am still consistent with my initial statement. Attractivenes plays a major role in the double standard because everyone can 'relate' to a teenage boy wanting to fuck a hot 20something. The same just isn't true if the genders are reversed, so there must be another reason why the sex happened (coercion, rape, abuse). Thus the genders are treated differently (which they shouldn't and consent laws are all kinds of …
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:11 AM
2

How is saying that the boy in question surely wanted to bang her in any form the same as saying he isn't capable of making decisions for himself? Girls are coerced, abused and raped. They have no agency whatsoever whenever such a case surfaces. Boys totally wanted it, they are the actors, they make decisions.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:04 AM
2

I am not sure where you are going with this. We were talking about the double standard and I think attraction plays a major role in it. Men and women alike think that it probably was consensual when a barely attractive female is the perpetrator. The other way round the male perpetrator has to be ridicously hot for that to even be considered (altough in that case other things (status, power) may be at play but they are rarely as obvious as attractivenes)
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:57 AM
-1

Well, men aren't seen attractive by women the same way women are seen by men. The bar for 'would totally bang' is much higher in terms of attractivenes than it is for women. The bias is built in our biology.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:48 AM
4

Men must be on board to help eradicate workplace gender bias that affects women. You forget to write that you only mean the bias that affects women.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:29 AM
1

It's been much longer than that. Think lynchings. There seem to be texts from ancient greece about men incarcerated on the word of a woman alone.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 08:55 AM
6

Ah, come on. False accusations rarely happen and if the girl filed an accusation there must have happened something. Why would she do such a thing if nothing happened? When there is smoke... The sad thing is: I could say this on a number of subs newspaper comment sections and forum around the net and be applauded for it. Good Ra. Also: How about schools being excluded from public funding whenever they do not bring accusations to the police (as that would satisfy Title IX, wouldn't it?)
/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:03 PM
1

Feminized vs. feminist. It's taught and used because it's effective. I don't think it's inherent.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:51 PM
2

I'd say for the 1 in three for the women there's also need for a very unusual life. EDIT: As in, i think the number must be higher in reality
/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:40 PM
14

The UN estimates that 35 per cent of women worldwide have been the victims of violence. Compared to what? 90% of men? Fewer than one in 30 rape victims in the UK see their attacker convicted. The word you were thinking of but forget to write is 'alleged' Women with full-time work still earn only about 77 per cent percent of their male counterparts. Then they should maybe work as hard as them* *not suggesting women cannot work as hard as men. But those fucking 77% stems mostly from the fact, that…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 05:11 PM
6

OCR had sought an additional $30 million in funding in part to help ease the burden of campus sexual assault investigations Thank Odin they got more money. Who else would do all those investigations.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 04:14 PM
2

I am not sure but it seems that way. I never had any desire to post on feminist subs, so I can't really confirm. But there are posts now and then from users that were banned on other subs after posting here. EDIT: Changed the wording after not finding plenty of posts of people being banned. I was, however, sure that I read enough of them (r/offmychest being referenced most)
/r/MensRights21/12/15 03:39 PM
2

In Saudi Arabia, males are stoned to death 50x more often than women (according to Karen Straughan -- I haven't looked up the data). Because we are naturally gynocentric, we regard female executions as infinitely worse than male executions, even though males are executed far more often and for equally frivolous reasons. Well, men are executed for rape, so that is OK. Women get executed because they were raped which is a No-Go. Note: Yes I am aware that it is not so and women get executed for adu…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 03:13 PM
1

I think I've learned my lesson after this mishap though. Don't worry. You posted here so you will likely be banned from most of those subs. Because this is a hate-sub and posting here means you hate women.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:32 PM
2

Well, you called 2nd and 3rd world countries shitholes. So theres the racism. Also: You said, that your reply applies to every feminist on the sub. There sure as hell are some proud trans WoC-feminists on the sub, therefore you were double-racist (and sexist and transphobic, probably ableist too but I'm not sure) I really see no reason to post in any feminist sub.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:22 PM
12

Sexist. You deprive them of the commitment they are entitled to.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 11:59 AM
1

Well, you can't prove that he didn't do it, can you? And what reason would his wife have to say something like this, if he never did anything? I mean, when there's smoke ... /s
/r/MensRights18/12/15 11:35 AM
3

Can't we just let them have their utopia? I sure as hell have the patience to sit on my hands for the 3 or 4 weeks it will take for them to turn on themselves and we can go back to normal.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 11:28 AM
0

Sure they were. Still are. As well as men. The only way to reduce oppression might be wealth. The wealthier you are the less oppression you feel. Unless you have more money than you can spend there is always life that forces you to do things you rather might not.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 11:15 AM
1

Won't anyone think about the children?
/r/MensRights18/12/15 10:47 AM
6

Where did he suggest otherwise?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 04:09 PM
11

Wrong question. The right question would be: Who cares? I mean, honestly, why would one want to be part of a sub where what you say is more or less predetermined?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 03:18 PM
20

Also: You filmed her without her knowing. She didn't consent to that therefore rape. Filming her with her knowledge would lead to no sex whatsoever most certainly.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:44 PM
1

Ah, It wasn't that bad. Of course it hurt but on the other hand i am a man so i obviously enjoy being violent.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:01 PM
1

I am not sure I can follow. "mo to tail" doesn't rhyme with support at all. They will treat men equal to women. Right?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:58 PM
8

yep. I will now beat myself for an hour. I don't even have the excuse of alcohol. ouch ...
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:21 PM
7

Well the reasoning behind it is clear. Boys are sex crazed and she is somewhat hot. Of course he seduced her. Why would a girl (innocent, sweet and completely unaware of sex) ever go for an old fart. Can't be, can it? Is this doublethink disgusting? Sure it is. Will it ever go away? Don't think so.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:09 PM
3

wat?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:00 PM
1

Aren't there studies that show that women control the majority of money spent?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:53 AM
22

Isn't it funny? They think the 'abuse' they get online is sexism while the fact that they don't receive this abuse in person is sexism (some would call it benevolent sexism). Honey, the abuse you get online is equality. You are treated as an equal to a man that would get the same kind of abuse/harassement/insults/whatever. You being a women doesn't protect you from equality because we feel much less empathy for a picture on a monitor than we do for a person standing in front of us. All your bitc…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:41 AM
2

Every system that can be abused will be abused.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:08 AM
127

Women can't rape men, honey. Also: Alcohol is never an excuse. Except if the women is drunk then she may not be held accountable for anything sex-related. I wish I was joking EDIT: Well...
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:53 AM
9

If I had to choose one thing: stop white knighting. And with that I mean: try to resist the urge to protect and help women whenever they seem helpless. Just treat them like you would treat a guy. I may be wrong but I like to think when enough men do this, feminism will face a lot of questions they cannot answer and a lot of angry women that will abandon them
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:26 AM
1

Did you just spoil the whole movie? If so, why? Do you hate me?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:17 AM
1

Well, thx, I just try to fit in. Have you considered 'Lord of gay'? Sounds that much more badass :D
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:59 AM
1

Lol @ how both your last replies began with "you sure are". Don't oppress me with your superior language skills. Check your native privilege, shitlord (gaylord?)
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:52 AM
2

I am with you here. Well, at least I think so. Let me try: if we make and enforce laws for statutory rape we should enforce them equally, read without regard sex, gender or kin (or whatever tumblr is up to next) of victim or perpetrator.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:48 AM
1

You sure like to jump to conclusions, don't you? Or do we have new information that I am not aware of?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:42 AM
1

You sure are. Kind of (I couldn't imagine not to be attracted to women)
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:39 AM
2

They're arguing that she left her previous job after being found to have inappropriate relations with students, and the district was aware of this when they hired her. That makes sense. If they knew, I too think they should be held accountable Regarding the age thing. I just don't know. Where I come from the age wouldn't have mattered (the teacher student this game is something else). I think 16 is old enough to be able to consent (male or female)
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:35 AM
1

Now that's what I call click bait. I really want to like milo, but can't he be just a little more... I don't know... less attention whoring?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:28 AM
1

You sure are. Sounds a bit like MGTOW to be honest. II couldn't subscribe to that though. The combination of men and women is what brought us here (discussing on an irrelevant Internet site on an irrelevant planet) and I think it's the way to go in the future (minus all the bullshit we have to endure at the moment)
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:23 AM
1

That's ok. I do not think so but that's a very different discussion.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:05 AM
1

That's why their state lawsuit got thrown out. They're trying it in federal court now - I guess trying to argue that a state can't just pass a law making itself immune from Title IX lawsuits. I am really undecided on this one. I am not located in the US so I don't really have insight but I don't think the state should be held responsible for the actions of an individual as long as it does it's best to prevent this actions. She had sex with 3 underage students Despite having sex with 3 different …
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:42 PM
1

So no matresses? I figured they might be useful if made of cevlar. But Ok, you may be right Sex segregation sounds like a good solution. We should apply it everywhere :D /s: sorry not completely sober and I have an especially cynical day
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:28 PM
3

In other news: Bycicle in netherlands toppled down. Eye witnesses shoked. United nations call special meeting. Serious note: It's bound to happen. Even in 1st world countries people use it as an excuse to circumcise innocent children and there will be always people who believe that bs- 'But mah freedom to humulate my (male) child as i see fit!!!!111one111eleven!!'
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:23 PM
4

The internet has to be a way to speak truth to power Well, if that is not a reason to silence everyone we don't want to hear, what is?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:18 PM
7

Am I the only one that doesn't see anything remotely eloquent in this essay? I mean, sure he figures he will not be his wifes equal but from what is there to read he puts the burden solely on him.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:15 PM
1

Nah, I don't hate autistic cherookees. Cherokees OR autistics ia another thing for another day of course. As I said, I do it for the free carma. I do have to ask though: Why? I get sarcasm and I sure get a joke, but your post wasn't remotely funny.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:06 PM
2

I really hesitated to answer to this but then I thought: who cares, free karma. So, what I always wanted to ask you: dafuq? FYI: Yeah I looked for his post history but I am bored, so you can bite my shiny metal arse.. or something like that :)
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:51 PM
4

While we might agree about Amanda, we really disagree in one important point but I am willing to let him prove his innocence in court. Never ever. Man or women, adult or child or Hitler-Kin. Innocent until proven guilty fffs
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:40 PM
17

Wouldn't that be ridiculous with all the matresses they need to carry?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:34 PM
1

Immunity Act. As far as i can tell that thing grants the school imunity against lawsuits of this kind. Please correct me if I am wrong. What about the teacher. Did she get punished?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:25 PM
2

As I am not to comment in the original thread: What the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:21 PM
4

Who the heck shopped her photo? This looks creepy oO Also: Would need more facts And yes, I am aware what the article would look like if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 03:09 PM
76

We’ve got specially trained officers working with the young woman, providing her with the support she needs in an attempt to understand the reasoning behind her actions. I am going to say she did it because she can.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:42 PM
7

Well, if the boys fall behind a little bit more we will finally have achieved equality /s
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:36 PM
7

Are we at tumblr now and just redefine everything so it doesn't contradict how we feel? When I take your 'simple' explanation To put it simply, most feminists are just interested in ending sexism and achieving gender equality then MRAs are feminists too and vice versa. If that were so you would never hear anything bad about the MRM from feminists. But you do. All the time. Guess why. To put it simply, a lot of feminists are just interested in ending sexism and achieving gender equality (superior…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:29 AM
2

Well, that maybe just malewashing by the patriarchy. Can you prove that Nikolaos was not a proud trans WoC? /s
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:16 AM
11

The very core of feminism is patriarchy theory. Patriarchy theory states that the system is designed for men as a class to exploit und opress women as a class. To say you are a feminist and not subscribe to this concept is like saying you are christian while not believing in christ. That type of "feminist" is incredibly rare and isn't going to actually achieve anything You don't have to say that you are anti-men to be anti-men. Those rare types of feminists have succesfully installed the VAWA, o…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:10 AM
1

I don't know enough about her to not use her as a source. The examples in her post seem to be linked to serious news-sources. For the rest: It will be next to impossible to prove they are lying. As it will be next to impossible to prove that Cosby raped any of them. The normal (if unsatisfying thing) to do, is to go on with our lives. At least for me. As I said, I will not judge without any hard evidence. But that's just me, and a large part of the world (and media) has already made their mind u…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 01:09 AM
1

So her views change any of the facts in my linked article? Very interesting oO
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:58 AM
2

Well they believe that is not a contradiction, don't they? Of course you can critisize feminism all day long If you happen to share their views on feminism. Otherwise just move along It's always the small print EDIT: Not small enough
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:30 PM
5

I like how she rubs their smugness right into their faces. We care for boys and men citation needed holy burn, batman
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:20 PM
1

Very nice one. Sometimes you have to ask yourself how they can isolate themselves so much that they really believe what they write and say
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:26 PM
29

Same old story. It's not really her fault. The man made her do it.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:36 PM
20

maybe for some giggles with her friends?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:34 PM
2

The narrative doesn't really fly in the US too (the people believing and repeating it are a loud minority with non-trivial media back up). That doesn't mean that it is not the narrative they try to establish. To now concentrate on the fact that most rapists are serial rapists would be a 180 and I believe they'd rather let some serial rapers escape than to give up their narrative that let's them vililfy all men. Also: I am not located in America, that would be Austria.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:05 PM
2

That is true. So what was written isn't applicable to the past, or at least it's hardly so. But it sure as hell is for the present.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:00 PM
5

That's not what i meant. You suggested that the nature of serial rapists should be focused on and made public knowledge. The current narrative is that of a 'rape culture' i.e. every man is a rapist waiting for a chance to do the deed and that men need to be tought not to rape. Serial rapists imply that only a fraction of man are willing to rape and that directly contradicts the current(?) feminist narrative. Also: I didn't say that feminists run those campaigns. I said, they set the tone and pol…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:58 AM
2

Who doesn't? Even young white men hate young white men. And on tumblr young white men hate themselves for being young white men.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:50 AM
2

It didn't happen at that large scale. But it did happen. And don't disregard my comment that there are potential benefits to all of this. And I don't see many drawbacks as of yet. The women that came out are heralded as heroes while Cosby is a monster. Police departments need good education on how to handle rape victims, for one Sounds good For two there needs to be a campaign on the serial nature of rapists, emphasising that if a victim gets to the police as soon as possible they're saving the …
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:43 AM
4

Obama would say that that is what equality is all about. So we must keep pushing :D
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:27 AM
8

No, I want an explanation as to why 50 women lie about rape in general, I've already spent god knows how many nights trying to figure that out. I have none. But does it matter? You know, I am not trying to defend him. I just cannot grasp how anyone dares to make a judgement (apart from the people who know the truth (that would be Cosby and his accusers)). Sure it's the Zeitgeist to do so, but I find that habit disgusting. Also I'm not judging that he's guilty solely on the number of accusers. Fa…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:06 AM
13

http://thoughtcatalog.com/janet-bloomfield/2014/12/13-women-who-lied-about-being-raped-and-why-they-did-it/ Again: I am not judging anyone here. I can't because I am not telepathic nor do I have any kind of evidence. That's for the prosecution and maybe a judge or jury to decide. But to flat out assume his guilt because of the number of accusers... well, I think that's not the way we should think ever. Also: There is a little difference between 'marches straight down to the police station' and '…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:32 AM
1

Come on. Ok, she most certainly wasn't raped. Yes, she lied her way through all of that and ruined tried to ruin some guys life while she was at it. But dontcha know? It could have happened and we really need her to raise awareness for that kind of thing. /s
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:11 AM
4

No Need to encourage boys to 'say no to feminism'. Let them read an article by Clementine Ford and they'll stay away from this ideology forever.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:07 AM
21

I am completely undecided. He may have or have not raped or abused someone. Many people claiming a thing doesn't make it true or false. If he is guilty then yes, this would be very disgusting and it would prove again that being rich is the greatest privilege there is. But as long as there is no conviction I am not gonna judge either way. But I will say that much: If you accuse someone of anything without any way to support your claim and this person sues you for defamation, you get what you aske…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:58 AM
35

dafuq? So an innocent man (and as far as we know he is innocent (until proven guilty)) should not be allowed to legally go after people who accuse him of a crime?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:04 AM
1

The what?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:29 PM
8

Milo loves chugging circumcised cock completely OK with that In this regard he is the consumate hobbyist and therefore supports MGM because it means there will be more circumcised cocks for him to chug completely OK with that I wouldn't take it personal he's just biased towards cut cocks. no problem. None of these are a reason to circumcise young children/children/adolescents. So, unless Milo wants a lot of underage cock (preferably circumcised) there is no reason to advocate the MGM for newborn…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:07 PM
7

I dunno man, plenty of women go for labiaplasty all the time these days Nobody here would ever say anything against someone who decides for himself that he wants his foreskin cut. EVER! You realize that?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:56 PM
1

Edit: I told you to educate yourself shitlord! Right, didn't see that. Don't you dare telling me to educate myself. Also: I prefer "Lord of Shit" coz Ima proud LoS
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:15 PM
2

Couldn't be bothered to read but may I ask: How do they imagine gender-neutral loos? With or without urinals? I can't imagine with because it won't be long before someone feels uncomfortable. And I think that without is a massive waste of space.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:02 PM
4

Don't you dare to educate me. On a more serious note: It's strange how this is the only time this argument flies. Imagine everything else than the foreskin in this argument.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:52 PM
6

Then he must have changed his mind. Here he says it should be done as early as possible http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/28/no-one-wants-to-live-in-a-world-of-uncircumcised-penises/
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:48 PM
4

Can't watch the video atm but I've read an article he wrote on the subject. Really strange stuff with lots of un- under- and missunderstood stuff in it. But what I will never understand in the whole debate: Why the fuck do people do this to children? If it is that fantastic people will for sure opt to do it when they are able to consent, wouldn't they? [EDIT]Link
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:39 PM
13

Didn't the father say that the boy was crazy for sex? Or was that some other case? If so: Obviously he wanted it /s
/r/MensRights14/12/15 01:07 PM
1

This. And: It's so fucking dishonest to mix those two up to artificially inflate the sexual violence numbers. These people have no shame.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 12:04 PM
1

(2) men make up about 95% of workplace deaths. Isn't dying on the job worse than earning less because you choose a less difficult, safer occupation? How is it remotely "progressive" to concentrate on the woes of the more privileged group? patriarchy hurts men too, sweety
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:40 PM
3

Is this a project one gets credit for or just some random poster to raise "awarenes" (read ignorance)? If it's the former, you should talk to the teacher supervising the project and demand that they get bad grades (or fail) for intelectual dishonesty and/or completely misunderstanding the topic If it's the latter then just pin something more accurate right next to it.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:20 AM
1

I thought this was about Miley Cyrus attack on Robin Thicke
/r/MensRights11/12/15 09:38 AM
2

Two questions: How does this fit into men's rights? What are you trying to tell us? That strong desires lead to less than competent decisions? If we define this as exploitation the word loses every meaning it might have left. And the thing about femdom doesn't seem to fit in the rest of the post.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:24 AM
9

CGCGSWSSU dafuq? Also: They just don't science. They do not look at something and form conclusions based on the observed. They form conclusions and search for things to observe that support them (well, sometimes they do not even search). Their conclusion in this case: Feminism is gender equality. The fact that supports that conclusion: Feminism says so Reality is: Feminism is anything but, otherwise they wouldn't fight for things that openly discriminate against men (duluth, default shared custo…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:11 AM
79

Nice. They gave RAINN two footnotes to make it look like there is more than one highly problematic study behind their claims.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:16 PM
19

Closing her article with a video on Emma Sulkowicz. I mean, come on ...
/r/MensRights09/12/15 01:30 PM
1

i beg you pardon?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:52 PM
4

Are there any analysis breaking down race, gender and financial status in drug-related crimes?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:18 PM
1

just hate the fact that my son's mother uses it for her own personal spending money There really should be some kind of control. Even if it's only randomly tested, the threat of being busted would get a lot of the money that is meant for the kids to the place where it belongs. I know it's hardly doable but I think every cent of CS should go to the kids (and the spender should be held accountable for every cent)
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:41 AM
2

Isn't NO MEN only the summary/conclusion of all stated above? I mean you have to be quite the masochist to even want to live there as a man.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:36 AM
4

Nice that they can't really offer examples of things to give up that are not completely debunked.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:34 AM
0

As far as I have been "educated" men have always been in power and were and are celebrated everyday (hence no need for a international men's day), so it would be all of history cynicism aside: I don't think there was something as a golden age for the vast majority of the human population. Even in ancient greece or rome only the rich had it nice EDIT: And absolutely spoken it would be the 80s of the last century to the mid-2000s. Now that was an awesome time to be a (hu)man, though it's not that …
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:31 AM
2

The women were spared, but raped. Women have always been the primary victims of war
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:15 AM
1

14 and 22. Come on. This would be legal in Germany. You sure about that? As far as I can tell up until 16 there is a maximum of 2 years age difference. So a 15 year old can get it on with a 17 year old but not with an 18 year old
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:08 AM
-1

Where do the downvotes come from? Isn't it true that, on the average, a man will have considerably more upper body strength as well as overall strength?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:02 AM
3

I said it on another thread (regarding victims of violence): The abuse of men would not count because it is done by men. Or so the feminist logic goes.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 10:57 AM
19

That one is not that easy The most obvious answer is, of course: It pays of for them. Trolls usually do not care what the topic is, they only care about the response. Trolling a "famous" feminist promises a huge payoff (offendednes+publicity) This is not about some feminist, this is about Clementine Ford, who got someone fired over an insult (a standard she does not hold herself to)
/r/MensRights07/12/15 10:38 AM
1

Well the homicides are probably commited by men, so they don't count, do they? The same with the suicides. And nah, I am not serious. But it has been used to dismiss the higher number of men being victims to violence.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 10:18 AM
1

I sure am happy to live in austria. While there's the occasional feminist BS (gender neutral anthem) most of the time gender issues are handled rather sane.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:26 AM
17

How in the world does FGM matter in the context of MGM? Please, for the love of everything, someone explain to me why everytime someone brings circumcision up, someone else needs to point out how horrible FGM is? Should we really stop caring about the (legal) violation of human rights because something that is illegal almost everywhere can be worse?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:24 AM
2

Well, you can't put her into jail, can you? She needs to be there for her children. How will her son be prepared for the world if there isn't a woman in his life that falsely accuses him for something?
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:57 AM
-14

my comment isn't necessarily the first one to show up. So, depending on where I end up while someone reads this, he might or might not remember the context. That's why I do this. Anyway: deal with it
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:35 PM
16

That's a reason why many feminists dislike her. Her work in the field is as unbiased as one can get without completely throwing feminism out of the window altogether. Problem is: Her way needs work and much effort, for you can not just view everything through feminist goggles, cry patriarchy and demand to get paid for your in-depth-analysis
/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:11 PM
43

that's HER DEFENCE, let that sink in for a minute, and she still got to walk away. Fuck The CPS, shit like this makes me not adhere to the law, since if the law has no respect for its subjects the subjects should have no respect for it. Well, the friend in question was probably a man, so she can't be held accountable anyway.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:06 PM
1

I know that, my first comment was pure sarcasm. The whole situation is fucked up. Feminists (some? many? all?) want that 'has no evidence' is seen as equivalent with 'was not believed'. And they want that 'was not believed' is seen as equivalent with 'is accused of lying' to have a reason for demanding false-accusations to have no consequences ('everyone can be charged with false-accusations, look at all the rape accusations where the rapist goes unpunished (so, there was no evidence, so the gir…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:45 PM
1

Because reasons, of course.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:25 PM
1

You can't do that. You see, if you punish someone who is deliberately lying (and proven beyond reasonable doubt to be lying) to hurt someone else, then no women will ever (EVER) again go to the police if they really were raped. And: That's what we do with other crimes too. You can accuse anyone for anything anytime without having to fear consequences. Because if there were consequences nobody that was the victim of any crime would ever report again. Why should the accusation of rape being handle…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:35 AM
2

Wait? So she's done all of the Tropes vs. Women in Video Games vids she collected money for? Why didn't anybody tell me?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:20 AM
2

Well, why don't go for the obvious solution then: Burquas. Feminists seem to think that men can't control their opressive behaviour and every boob within 300 miles makes them want to rape someone. No visible boobs, no problem.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:12 AM
1

I still don't get it. First of all i was under the illusion that men's rights fights for men's rights. Second I sure do not give a fuck about who was opressed by whom in the past. This isn't a competition, or is it? Maybe I am completely wrong here, but as far as I am concerned there is no need for an ideology othere than: "We look out for where men get the short end of the stick and/or are discriminated against and try to change it, if the social implications are acceptable"
/r/MensRights01/12/15 11:48 AM
4

As far as i can tell it is not possible mor the MRM to not be anti-feminist. Feminism actively works against men's right (custody, Duluth, alimony, wage-gap) so to achieve it's goals the MRM has to tackle feminism every now and them.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:59 AM
1

Sorry, I just don't get it. Humanism and egalitarianism work against men's rights?
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:55 AM
2

Then why not leaving it at that? You can tackle every problem within the MRM under the "cover" of those ideologies.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:45 AM
0

Yeah, men's rights really needs an ideology. Because feminism has one and that really helped feminism in becoming a great fair unbigoted movement that's open to disagreement and free speech.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:33 AM
3

So what now? Everyone that gets raped but doesn't have evidence goes to the press and has the rapist socially crucified? And everyone that does get "raped" does the same? And everytime someones life gets destroyed, no matter if they comitted a crime or not? You know why "assuming he/she lies" is the way to go: It does the least harm to potentially innocent people. Also: I didn't say if she cannot bring evidence it didn't happen I said If she doesn't. well, tough luck Theres a difference between …
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:08 AM
27

I wouldn't go that far why wouldn't you. If she has evidence the right place to go is the police. If she doesn't. well, tough luck.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:28 PM
6

How in the world does that matter? Honest question.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:01 PM
9

Something bad happens That would be a step in the right direction. It's more of Someone says something bad happened unfortunately
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:07 PM
33

Too bad that our society has no mechanism that handles this sort of thing. I propose a system, let's call it "TryToFindTheTruth"-System. It goes like this: Something bad happens There is a place where you can report that something bad happened The people at this place try to find as much evidence as possible The evidence is presented before someone, let's call him "Decider" If the evidence proves beyind a reasonable doubt that something bad happened and someone is guilty of it, the person get's …
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:35 AM
7

Forgot that one -.-
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:24 AM
24

But wouldn't it be a glourious world? Every man below average (looks or status) would be in prison within a year. The women would flock around the rest and naturally most of them will be rejected, wich will likely lead to rape-accusations so the rest of men can go to prison too. Would love to see them running the country alone. Yeah, they would force the prisoners to do the hard work, but imagine all the bitch-fights :D
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:17 AM
1

One possible explanation: It's a hard trip and women are less likely to get killed if they stay.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:21 PM
2

You are completely right. I didn't deny that it was a rape if it happened. Nor would I. I just wanted to say that i cannot really imagine how he could not have defended himself based on physical things alone. EDIT: Just to clarify: His ability to defend himself has nothing to do with the question if a crime happened!
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:03 AM
0

Someone stands accused. Depending on the number of girlfriends he has had, more than one person stands accused. Except if no one that knows him knows his ex-girlfriends. Again: I cannot say if a rape happened or not. But I won't hold a man in higher redard than a women and just believe it. It's nice that the topic get's some mainstream-attention, that others see that they are not alone and that it can happen. It may help some people with the trauma they have to go through. But again: 'Listen and…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:18 AM
1

Of course I would. Why wouldn't I. How many threads are on this subreddit that are about not believing every rape accusation made by a woman and let the police investigate before making a judgement? Look, I don't say he definitly wasn't raped, I acknowleged that I can imagine reasons why he didn't/couldn't defend himself, I only said, that I have a hard time believing that an average woman can hold an average man down with physical force alone. We don't know if he was or was not raped. The only …
/r/MensRights26/11/15 09:37 AM
1

I read the article, and as i said, I acknowledge other reasons than physical ones (afraid to do harm and/or face repercussions for it). I just have problems understanding how she could have pinned him down so he has no chance to get her of him. And I read nothing about police in that article. Shouldn't we treat all alleged victims of rape the same?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:31 AM
1

It only makes sense if accusations of abuse (against the victim in this case) were taken into consideration, doesn't it? got that one covered, I think
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:20 AM
4

Obviously you can't grasp how hard it is to feel uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:37 AM
-1

Ok, that will be not very welcome here but: i find it hard to believe that one can't get rid of an attack like this (he said he wasn't weak and she wasn't especially strong, and if they were both average he would be stronger by some margin) with just physical force. It only makes sense if accusations of abuse (against the victim in this case) were taken into consideration, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 09:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter