TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

creamyfrog Archive

View 4 posts and 478 comments by creamyfrog on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-6

Everyone's giving you advice on how to handle the situation so I'm gonna hop in with some victim blaming. You hold a lot of responsibility for this happening. Firstly, you cheated on your girlfriend and secondly you had casual sex with a person you did not really know. This is not only IMO immoral but immoral for practical reasons. You've betrayed your girlfriend and you've opened yourself up to these accusations. You should have kept your dick in your pants long enough to break things off with …
/r/MensRights13/03/19 12:48 AM
3

If she's upper class and stabs you with a butter knife it's okay. But since she stabbed you with something sharp, maybe she'll get a suspended sentence??
/r/MensRights28/01/19 09:00 PM
1

That's the problem, being masculine. If men just stopped being masculine they wouldn't be suicidal...
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:31 PM
2

Even without an erection girls just think nobody will reject sex from them because there are alot of thirsty guys.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:00 AM
1

If your a good looking guy women think they can do what they want
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:02 AM
1

Would just say "fuck off"? My parents said that everyone they knew would take it as a compliment and look forward to it. I mean it is a compliment, if a bit rude to some
/r/MensRights09/07/18 10:44 PM
2

You see that's a bit of bullshit isn't it. People who know what they are doing are never going to overcome a reach advantage or strength and weight. Unless they are the best in the business at it, and they are decently built already. They aren't going to beat someone who totally outclasses them genetically.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 05:14 AM
1

Yes it is. I've explained like in the most basic way possible. It's your problem
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:57 PM
1

Except I didn't. You're preference is a person. That's what I meant by MY sentence. Telling me what I meant by my own words is the dumbest attempt at debate. It's helps me. Chat shit, get banged mate
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:27 AM
1

Omg thee cringe of everybody an their mother using the term strawman incorrectly. No I said putting that in your profile makes you sound entitled to your preference, i.e. meaning you are entitled to another person. I can't fucking strawman my own position you absolute dumpster fire
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:20 AM
1

Except they're not. They are entitled to have a preference but they aren't entitled to have anyone. The thing is that when presented with someone who's mocking people based on something they can't control, why do people defend the bitch saying it's okay to have a preference? It's just white knighting at its finest. Literally nobody is saying you can't have a preference but putting in your bio mocking short people makes you a douche bag. Why are people defending a douche bag? And putting in your …
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:11 AM
1

Even putting no short people just makes you seem entitled to your preference and shallow. I'd still consider them to be an utter twat I don't want to associate with.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:12 PM
1

You don't even understand what you wrote. The first response to seeing this is you defending her having a preference.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 05:47 PM
1

Always love the false equivalence between height and being overweight. One you can control, the other you can't. Secondly no one says you can't have preferences but if you put in your profile "no fat chicks" you're an utter douche and so is this cunt for not only doing that but making fun of people for it. Do you go around just pointing and laughing at fat people? This is a men's issue, there is no equivalent to height that women have exclusively.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 05:39 PM
1

I can't fathom why you are defending this twat? So you think it's okay to make fun of people for something they can't control? You think it's okay to put something like this on a dating profile? You'd have to be an utter scumbag to act like this. Haha, those people are short and can't control it lets laugh at them. Fucking white Knights
/r/MensRights09/05/18 05:35 PM
1

What are you on about? What illness? And how is it the parents fault?
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:44 PM
1

More like adrenaline. They would need need testosterone because its manual work lifting a lot of gear.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 06:17 PM
1

Well that's the crux, I don't think men and women are experiencing the same mental illness on the whole. Maybe, not sure why that is though. There are so many possibilities. Off the top of my head the last school shooter was bullied. Maybe women are more passive and instead of trying to "fight back" as maybe a male would they go down the route of self harm. And males are more likely to fight back, or see getting revenge at the world as a form of that. Thereby going on a mass killing spree. It ma…
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:59 PM
5

How? By telling the truth and not mincing my words? I have no hate in my heart for people because of their gender. I am not sinking to their level at all by being unforgiving in telling the truth.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:46 AM
1

There is no correlation between mass shooters and testosterone. And if there was I'd hedge a guess it would be in the opposite direction. High amounts testosterone doesn't trigger mental illness, otherwise a gym would be a breeding ground for these people.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:44 AM
1

Actually it is us vs them, how can you be so pathetically weak? When people are hating you based on your gender there is no "working together to get the job done" Bob the builder mentality. Its these people are directly opposed to me and I'm going to be against them. Know that they are your ENEMY and don't apologise for winning.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:57 AM
1

And the correct response would be that nobody ever said the vast majority weren't. The point is that it clearly isn't Masculinity's fault for mass shooters if there are female perps. Unless you are willing to say its toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:53 AM
1

"I'm a woman not a merry-go-round" They aren't protesting the alleged rape, they're protesting the language they used in a private conversation about a sexual encounter, consensual or not it doesn't matter to these people. Its about you talking impolitely about women.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:22 PM
50

These people need to get a proper job.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:04 PM
1

Hormones are different from outside drugs influencing your mind. How are they though? If your argument is that it would have been something they otherwise wouldn't have done surely they haven't consented? And its something they cannot control unlike their blood alcohol level, so surely they are less culpable? No, because they were both drunk. But if one was drunk, and the other person, sober, then... Maybe. It depends. So wait you're saying its OK to be raped by someone if the person doing the r…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 02:01 PM
1

A person's personality does change, and in essence, they are not themselves. This can be considered losing the ability to think for yourself, when you are no longer yourself to begin with. One of the major things to be hindered is judgement, and when you are making decisions that you wouldn't make sober, that can be defined as losing the ability to think for yourself. Sorry but with all due respect I think that's bullshit. If go through a dry spell and am unusually aroused and I then sleep with …
/r/MensRights22/08/17 06:22 AM
1

No, as long as you are not unconscious, you still have the ability to consent. If another person was in the car telling you to do it, that is still your fault for listening to that person. I'd like to know what crime you can get off because you were drunk or when in life you are just not blamed because you were drunk. There arent any.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 06:13 AM
–

You are still responsible for your actions. Nobody else it controlling you unless by physical force.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 10:34 PM
–

Putting as side the overdone repost. Alcohol doesn't mean you cannot consent. Do we treat drunk drivers like children? No. Why is it any different to this? Alcohol doesn't make you loose the ability to think for yourself. If this is the case most if not all my tinder dates I have been raped.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 05:05 PM
1

No, ideally it would be defined as an endearing term. I don't care if they keep it this way, its just pointing out a double standard.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:08 AM
2

Its stupid your being down voted but I can still see why. When someone says "mums are heroes" would you just say "dads are heroes too, moms aren't the only heroes". Especially if dads got all the credit.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:06 PM
1

You need to actually site the source wikipedia uses to reach that conclusion. Secondly, this is a non point, mental dysfunctions do not mean that this is normal. There is a reason why they are in the minority and that's because they tend not to reproduce. Just like gay people.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:15 PM
1

Because women select a mate, while males seek out a mate. Women have far more choice when it comes to mating. When women are virgins its generally down yo choice. With men, its hardly ever choice, even if they successfully convince themselves otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:27 PM
1

Well the reason its an insult is because it means you have failed in the basic natural function of a man... to reproduce.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 07:21 AM
9

Yep and Zoe Quinn on the right
/r/MensRights10/08/17 05:16 PM
1

He clearly doesn't care all that much about his child so maybe its a good thing he doesn't have custody.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 11:38 PM
2

Na its pretty chill actually. After the first family it gets easier.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:57 PM
1

Well just for the record I am happy you are going to die. Very happy.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:11 PM
1

it felt good knowing he was going to die I CBA reading about this case as I don't really care but doesn't that imply she knew he would be murdered?
/r/MensRights25/07/17 05:05 PM
1

So why tell me?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 12:07 PM
–

I don't know why you would think I care about what you think it looks like?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:03 AM
0

Please be quiet PR police, I don't care about your opinions.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:27 PM
3

Bullshit, wifey is used as a term of endearment. And even if it wasn't there is still a double standard because they both serve the same fiction yet one is "condescending".
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:27 PM
–

I really have numbed to the PR police this sub fills itself with. No, it gynocentrism, and its being pointed out. I don't care if you think its bad for your agenda.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:25 PM
–

Two "cute" names for husband and wife yet one is described as "condescending" not the other.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:22 PM
1

I never asked you if you did care. To clarify I dont
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:20 PM
–

Firstly how will this bring out mysogynists in anyway? How is this in anyway supporting misogyny? And how in the holy fuck is people expressing misogyny on reddit "dangerous"? Thirdly its not unimportant silliness its gynocentrism, and its pointing it out. Whether you agree or not the reason this is popular is because it isn't a politically crafted narrative for your agenda. I don't care about tiptoeing around thing for the greater good of a movement. I do not wish to participate in your agenda.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:19 PM
–

I don't get you people. Nobody is going out and protesting this, they have simply just made a post showing the double standard.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:46 AM
1

I don't care about what you hate. You are a "redditor" you dunce. You have no evidence for God, therefore I have won the argument. You have no argument.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:50 AM
1

Do you think the scientific method requires no evidence?? I've already won, I'm just seeing how illogical you get.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:09 AM
-1

That was relevant. Maybe one day they will give one for belief without evidence?
/r/MensRights08/07/17 07:34 AM
9

In the same way I can't say unicorns don't exist yes. But Its generally assumed when there is literally zero evidence.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:33 AM
7

Terrorist would be a fine term to describe suffragettes and what they are doing is political violence soo...
/r/MensRights21/06/17 05:14 PM
4

I'm sorry, feminism has never been pro men. Just go back and see what Emmaline Pankhurst and her suffragettes where saying when talking about the draft. I don't think I need to bring up the white feathers causing multiple boys to commit suicide out of shame from the adult women who should have been protecting them.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 09:05 AM
-5

Can we not do this? Can we not sink to their level. Even if its a against the terms of service surely we support freedom of speech as a principal?
/r/MensRights16/05/17 05:14 PM
–

Did she even ask if there was a reason for that, it could be key to the story. Or they don't want to just call her a bad actress and ry let her down easy.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:37 AM
1

Yes because if the mod says something that means everyone. And even if it was most people, that makes you all cucks putting the perception of the movement above speaking naturally.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:59 AM
1

How do you know everyone who reads votes? I don't either way.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:17 PM
–

I'm glad you speak for everyone even though you all clearly do care. Everything people do should not be about the image to outsiders. The content is what's important.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 10:29 AM
–

Look at you all getting triggered by a word. Calm down.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:30 AM
7

Men who don't like women taking up space are exactly why we need the Fearless Girl. Hey why are you complaining about that girl who parked in your driveway? You just don't like women taking up space. This is exactly why we need her car in your driveway.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:58 AM
1

So is someone going to call the police on these idiots?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:52 PM
0

I'm an attorney with nearly a decade of experience and thousands of court appearances. Decorum isn't written down and you'd know that if you had any clue whatsoever of this situation. Watch any court room video online. The judge refers to the parties as sir, ma'am, ladies & gentlemen, all that stuff. You seeing this happen multiple times is not a rebuttal of what I have said. All it means is that this happens often not whether I'm wrong to suggest this. This isn't about him referring to them as …
/r/MensRights15/03/17 09:24 PM
0

Because she is. And that's proper decorum for a court. I'm going to need to see some form of evidence backing this up. I see no logical reason for this to be court etiquette. That's not evidence of bias, though. That's what you, as a layperson who doesn't understand how courts and judges operate, is not getting. And every time I try to explain it, people like you just spew back at me "OMG BUT HE USED THE WORD LADY". Just stop. Stop doing exactly what this sub pretends to hate about radfems, assu…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:23 PM
–

Why even mention the fact she is a woman. The evidence is plain and clear "I'm not sending a lady to prison for it" do all the mental gymnastics you want but that is what was said.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:23 AM
1

I'm not saying there haven't been extreme feminists who have gone way beyond the line, because there have been. We measure a Movement Based on its actions, not what a couple of coffee shop feminists think. The fact is that Emmaline Pankhurst was the main leader of the suffragettes and took part in the terrorist activities and shaming of you boys, even adolescents to make them fight for the rights she apparently didn't have. Erin Pizzey, the one who set up the first domestic abuse shelter in the …
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:06 PM
1

So the suffragettes who sought equal voting rights were a hate movement? Except they didn't. They didn't want the draft which came with the responsibility of the vote for men. They wanted the privilege but without the responsibility to protect your country that came with it. And they also made it all about the wimmins, even though most men fighting in WW1 didn't have the vote as they were under 21. Women were and are the most privileged people in society, what terrorist group do you know of that…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 08:51 PM
2

*-2 and no answer? Really guys? Its only been 23 hours dude. I'll reply in depth when I get a bit of time.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:15 AM
1

No I'm not, font speak for me, I'll reply to him in depth when I get a sec
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:13 AM
–

No, feminists. Stop trying to defend a hate movement.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 09:27 PM
1

I wonder if you'll drop out...?
/r/MensRights11/02/17 11:57 AM
1

I think Im gonna need to ask for some charity here. I knew and agree with all you said, I wrote my comment while in a vegetated state at work and misinterpreted/read the whole tweet. I though he was comparing it to a disease. In which case it the difference would be, one is voluntary and the other is burdened upon you. Which is open for debate if you classify metal illness taking away your agency. In all honesty when I read my comment back after you responded I was fucking puzzled as to why I wr…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:28 PM
3

Yea but He still needs to do it.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:17 PM
9

Well when their TOS are not allowing diverse opinion then I agree.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:14 PM
–

One, you have to actually prove that they're willingly NOT banning terrorists or pedophiles. Yep sorry, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/13/twitter-failure-child-pornography Two, they DO ban those groups On the surface they do but people have claimed they have been banned for reporting "clearly" abusive content: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaxVU31cKIc And yes it may not be due to malice but they clearly have a priority problem. They are more focused on banning political dis…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:09 PM
–

So if they are censoring people with politics they don't like its fair to assume there is some sort of reason they haven't suspended criminal accounts.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:12 PM
3

This makes me so fucking mad. NO THEY DO NOT HAVE THE SAME GOAL! Men's rights advocates, advocate equality under the law. Feminists want equality of outcome FFS there is not any truce to be made when their goals are in direct opposition to one another.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 09:57 PM
2

Do we now call murder of helpless infants "disposed of" and "concealment"? Words cannot describe how much I want this snake to feel real justice.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 09:44 PM
–

He needs to punch her ASAP
/r/MensRights07/02/17 01:09 PM
-2

Except the reason for this is because its down to choice.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 12:58 PM
1

How?
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:02 PM
1

The majority can elect a political who will.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 10:59 AM
1

It's banned in public hospitals. Where? And secondly I don't care if torture is carried out in public spaces or in private, torturing children is diabolical. It's really not that simple to ban it. Had it only been a muslim practice, it would have been banned. Except it really is, if the majority agree then there is no problem. European politicians are scared of angering Jews. You mean that tiny amount of people in the world? Why would they care about them?
/r/MensRights04/02/17 10:48 AM
1

If they were against it, it would be illegal. The fact is I know of not one country in which it has been outlawed with the exception of the UK who just doesn't procedure any cases.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 10:39 AM
5

How is this in anyway comparable to that sub? One is lonely men, the other is criminals bragging about abuse they have committed.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 01:26 AM
1

So is the rest of the world
/r/MensRights04/02/17 01:23 AM
7

Yea I think it needs to be separated from the women's March and we should take it seriously. Penis costumes make me think of the cringey shit those people wore at the women's march.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:27 PM
1

I don't know how it could have been anymore obvious that that was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:59 PM
–

That's not a REAL feminist though. Just a feminazi!
/r/MensRights24/01/17 12:25 PM
-1

It is your fault, if you left her like a rational person she wouldn't have been cheating and wouldn't be on here trying to squeeze out some victimhood.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:14 PM
1

There is no such thing as bad publicity.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:55 PM
1

Are you all this fucking stupid? WHO CARES!?! If he's getting in the news for men's rights its always a good thing. We need publicity.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:32 PM
10

Rapes child Judge has no problem with sending you to jail Judge doesn't send you to jail because it would mean you wouldn't have access to more children Please explain to me this logic?
/r/MensRights09/01/17 12:47 AM
0

Its not saying validate something that doesn't exist the gender wage gap dies exist. You just need to write about the fact it is an earnings gap.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 06:17 PM
6

Can we not give her any attention please. She says stuff on a whim to see what gets her most attention.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:18 PM
-1

How is that sexism you utter dunce?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:50 PM
1

That's racist xD
/r/MensRights02/01/17 12:48 AM
1

There's plenty of people willing to take the risk, it's not the end of the world. It is for the men whose lives are ruined. But I guess we can just ignore them... If anything a large portion of the mrm is people who already took the risk and lost. Where are you getting this from? There are plenty who don't need to put their hand in fire to realise they will get burned. Hopefully their kids will be citizens who can maintain what was given to them rather than end up criminals or layabouts. I don't…
/r/MensRights25/12/16 05:34 PM
1

What the fuck are you on about? If all my "ancestors" worked toward was to keep men in servitude, then it can burn. I have no interest in being a slave for other peoples goals. You can, but I'm OK. Its not lying down and giving up, I don't need a government contract to tell me who I do and do not love, and I don't need to have kids.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 05:26 PM
–

Stop marrying, Don't have kids. This should be the MRM motto.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 07:26 PM
1

It's is not one post (+621 atm) with a misleading title. I upvote most posts on here whether they are right or not just so it has more chance or reaching the front page. And there are a lot of people, site wide, who just read the title and up vote, I do it a lot. An upvote for a thread is completely different to up voting a stance or argument made in a comment thread. This subreddit falls for circlejerks all the time. Name one? Every time I see a post like this it gets tagged as so. And about "O…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 12:41 AM
1

Chance is irrelevant, we do not convict based on probability shes telling the truth. You need evidence and her testimony is not enough. Guilty by association is also not evidence.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 09:22 PM
2

Oh for fuck sake, shut the fuck up. One guy posts a misleading title and that is enough to call the whole sub a circle jerk. Tell that to the top comments with hundreds of up-votes telling you why this is misleading. And of course this sub is biased, nothing is unbiased but unlike some unnamed political rivals, we strive to be as unbiased as possible, that is why you get the highest comments being critical of the content when necessary and the protection of speech to all users.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 09:14 PM
1

A "chance" in the same way anyone who had contact with her could have.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 09:06 PM
2

Well I don't care much for conjecture. I want to hear the defence and the accusation before I make any decision but this article does not give evidence for or against him.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 07:25 PM
–

This article doesn't say much. We still do not know that it wasn't true. She didn't admit to making the whole thing up just to the fact it was her step father who abused her first. She is still holding her claim that he raped her, and this article doesn't give much information about the alledged crime at all.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 12:02 PM
11

That makes me chuckle. Its only bad when women have to do it.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 06:49 PM
2

How is that in any way creepy? Oh no he got it wrong, what a creep.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:04 PM
2

If you condone everything feminism has done for the past 100 - 120 years your not a true feminist.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 02:56 PM
2

How can such a great city have such a shitty council?
/r/MensRights27/11/16 02:52 PM
2

Funnily enough I took a picture for this very purpose as well but it seems you beat me to it.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 06:18 PM
-1

Exactly, you are relying on non aggression, there will always be aggressors.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 07:40 PM
–

You didn't ask me but I'm gonna put my faggy opinion out there anyway. I'm against the draft unless there is an attack and is only enacted in self defense. But if we have a a draft I'm not in opposition to men being treated equality.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 05:20 PM
–

That's because you haven't been attacked yet.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 05:17 PM
2

Teresa "this is what a feminist looks like" may? Don't get your hopes up.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:01 PM
2

Na m8, think that's just you. Nothing can save triggly puff other than losing weight.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:59 AM
–

As it should. I love naked women... Well... not the fat ones. Well... Maybe... If they have a nice face.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:16 PM
–

OK but you do realise you cannot go into any city without seeing a naked statue of a woman?
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:03 PM
1

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnd that kids is the definition of evil...
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:52 PM
-4

That's really not the case.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 09:16 AM
0

V-v-v-v...VIRTUE!? Where are you? Virtue!!!?!!?!
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:28 AM
1

I may have agreed with you a couple of months ago but I think the fainting is the straw that broke the camels back. Trump seems like the one who may win. Although I haven't seen the latest polls.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 05:01 PM
–

when Hillary wins I highly doubt it mate.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:56 AM
6

No one should give anyone reason too Isn't it great how the right to hit someone trumps your right to freedom of speech. What a fucking cunt.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 11:58 AM
1

Feminism as a whole is cancer, even back to the suffragettes.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 09:12 AM
27

After having sex You mean rape.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 05:20 PM
1

Hey now. Let's not beat our slaves, can we?
/r/MensRights14/09/16 09:16 PM
1

•Islam apologist? Al Jazeera check! •Gynocentrists? the most traumatized are the most vulnerable; women and children. Check! This has all the hall marks of a shitty video. A shitty video indeed.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:09 PM
-7

...do I care?
/r/MensRights07/09/16 09:09 PM
-9

Sargon has lost all his appeal. He's way too mild, he could easily have become a hitchens esk character if he didn't decide being anrgy "isn't productive". Its the passion that draws interest into your arguments. Now he flip flops on his arguments and has been clipped of any bark.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:07 PM
2

Women only spaces are toatz OK in public institutions like universities but having male only spaces on private property is oppression against women.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:50 PM
2

No, because its for women.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:36 PM
–

ARE YOU POINTING AT YOUR BODY!?!?
/r/MensRights07/09/16 07:31 AM
1

So you make the claim that "a lot of mens rights activists are exactly the same as their feminist counterparts" and yet you cannot give me one example let alone "alot"? Instead you tell me to "just read any thread here" which is the equivalent of telling me to "go educate myself shitlord". Well this subreddit is the only reason I keep my Reddit account so I visit this sub quite regularly and I don't see what you see and you have only been on reddit for year So im pretty sure I would have seen wh…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:54 PM
1

I'm not defending anyone, I'm asking you to substantiate your claim. Absolute strawman, I never said anyone was perfect, all I asked was for you to substantiate your claim with evidence.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 06:04 PM
2

i have noticed a lot of mens rights activists are exactly the same as their feminist counterparts; ignoring all the facts and latching on to the facts they like most. can we see some proof of this? in all, i think this sub is more bearable than most feminist subs. but i agree, a LOT of the people in this sub are just as whiny and ignorant as the bad feminists And can I have some proof of this also please.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:37 PM
8

What are you doing about sexism in your life? Sexism that anybody faces, not just men. Oh, the great "MRA's do nothing" Argument. Well we do, and we don't need to tell pricks like you what we are doing just so you don't think we are lazy. Sexim against women is not an issue in the slightest and I dont give the slightest shit about it. Sexim against women has been criminalised entirely so why do I need to talk about a non issue just to look good for a fence sitting arse hole like you, who bases t…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 01:24 PM
5

"Pussy whipped." So because someone called you pussy whipped, after you insulted the subreddit users because they didn't let your assertions go unchallenged, they are an ideologue? You'll have to show your working on that one. "Women =\= feminist." What? So let me get this straight, you think that women and feminism are one in the same? How is it ideological to think women are separate from feminism? If anything it is Separating an ideology and a biological group from your comment. An assertion …
/r/MensRights27/08/16 01:10 PM
–

Go on, give me one quote to back that up.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 12:21 PM
0

Yes because abusing your employees and intentionally giving them back problems is A-OK
/r/MensRights27/08/16 11:42 AM
–

I do love it when people like you say " sorry for thinking you would be open minded". Even though you didn't back up any of your claims with evidence. The people on here took the time out to answer your points and dissect your comments then you insult them because you can't argue logically against them. Entitled little prick.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 11:05 AM
0

encoraging, or advocation, of violence is prohibited. Not by that quotation you provided, those words are not interchangeable. you bring me an admin statement that says we can allow those comments and i'll gladly conceed the point. But will you stop censoring those comments? I don't need an admin to say its allowed, when they have not said it is prohibited. the fact of the matter however is that wishing something would happen to some one in a public forum IS encoraging others who feel the same w…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:01 PM
0

rules of reddit prohibit advocating for violence No they dont. Reddit rules: Content is prohibited if it •Is illegal •Is involuntary pornography •Encourages or incites violence •Threatens, harasses, or bullies or encourages others to do so •Is personal and confidential information •Impersonates someone in a misleading or deceptive manner •Is spam "I hope she gets raped" is not "Encouraging" anyone to violence. It is stating what they wish would happen. IF I say "we should rape her", that would b…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 02:03 PM
1

Why is everyone here so quick to welcome censorship for ideas you find reprehensible? Challenge them for fuck sakes instead of censoring them. I have lost loads of respect for the mods.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 12:58 PM
-1

Seriously? You are suppressing peoples views because you don't like them? I thought this sub was pro free speech as long as it is on topic. Wishing someone harm who has commuted a crime is a perfectly valid opinion. Whether you disagree or not why censor it instead of challenging it FFS?
/r/MensRights20/08/16 12:51 PM
5

/s
/r/MensRights19/08/16 11:31 AM
–

OK this is who I'm backing now. Don't care about his other policies.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 06:08 AM
1

Yes. He is spreading false information.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:30 PM
1

There are many reasons why he is retarded. Firstly he says "women work more hours, but men work more paid hours". Which is an absolute fabrication. You would not work unpaid hours. I assume he is stupidly referring to "house work" which is absolutely ludicrous. The reason men don't do house work is because they don't give a shit. It is not a job, house work is easy, most jobs aren't. So again unless you are a maid, its not a fucking job. Then he goes on to say how when taken into account for dif…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:13 PM
1

I assume to protect the child's identity.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:54 AM
–

He's an absolute retard.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:57 AM
1

Maybe I can pay in imaginary money for your imaginary pay gap? Lel
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:18 AM
4

You need to get in touch with FIRE. Good look pal.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:16 AM
1

Misandry shouldn't be interchangeable with sexism. Firstly what your wife said wasn't sexist, if she said you couldn't say that about the volleyball team that would be sexist. Stop shaming people for their biological attractions.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 11:44 AM
1

Who said anything about the MRM or him being a figure head for it? He is a conservative first and foremost. He would be practically the polar opposite to the MRM on a lot of issues. You said he was stupid, he's not. Warren Ferrell won't get anywhere, I'm sorry to say and neither will mike Buchanan or Philip Davis. Its just not going to happen. If change comes we it will come at the head of a stylish young and charismatic... Sorry, I seem to be just listing off personal quality's of mine. If chan…
/r/MensRights16/08/16 08:46 PM
1

I'm not conservative either. Disagreement doesn't mean he's an idiot.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 07:58 PM
1

You're joking right? He Has become a massive figure in the conservative "movement" and his politics are not that unique its that he is just good at politics. He triggers the right people and knows how to play the media. I think he's a (likeable) cunt, but not stupid by any means. Edit: You seem to have HEAVILY edited you initial comment If you want to respond to me don't retract your comment in an edit.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 07:42 PM
1

I don't think he's an idiot. I don't think idiots can do what he does.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 07:25 PM
1

Why would anyone care about being called misogynists when you actively hate men? Somehow I don't value your opinion. How is Milo friends with this cunt?
/r/MensRights16/08/16 06:13 AM
4

What are your opinions towards MGM?
/r/MensRights13/08/16 08:43 AM
1

I like the video but I thinks its time we expelled this myth that feminism is or ever has been good. Or that some feminists are "not real feminists" or pseudo-feminists. Feminism is and always has been, cancer.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:45 PM
–

If you have seen antman there was a scene in which he was trying to see his daughter and he was barely getting by .He went to his ex wife's house (which was massive) and while they were talking she was having a go at him to make sure he pays the child support in order to see his daughter. This was casual as if she was right to say it. I thought that may have kicked up a fuss, but no.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 05:10 PM
1

This sounds great, thanks for doing it.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 05:02 PM
0

Since its legislation, Title IX has formed the bedrock of equal educational opportunity in the U.S., necessitating countless reforms to raise the level of opportunity for female persons in an attempt to match what had in the past only been afforded to males. Care to substantiate?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 04:56 PM
–

Women don't lie shit lord.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:54 AM
9

Oh that's great, the police can decide what you can and Connot look at. Act natural Winston.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:49 AM
-4

Well they aren't wrong, they aren't real women. Edit: Buahahaha, go on then. Instead of just downvoting why not also comment and explain how they are real women you fucking nutjobs xD
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:22 AM
1

My God this article is annoying. They still respect a pedo enough to use his delusional pro nouns. Doesn't get jail time and is still having his pronouns respected. I wish I could get face to face with all these abusers of men and boys who went free and leave them all in a bloody mess.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:21 AM
2

Like it would even impact a woman as it does a man.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:01 PM
1

So what? Do you know the magnitude of wining a gold in the Olympics? He has every reason to rile up the crowd.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:57 PM
1

No, that school teacher is totally a victim of the students predatory actions.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:41 PM
1

He just won and you are calling him entitled for celebrating?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:38 PM
–

I think he was meaning "men's rights" shouldn't be controversial not that people argue on here. I may be wrong but that's what I read into it as.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 07:00 AM
2

Do her motivations stop it being rape?
/r/MensRights09/08/16 06:55 AM
6

I don't think you ask your question here m8. They'll make a separate thread on the twelfth.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 06:52 AM
2

Good ol' 6oodfella. You should watch his videos.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 06:49 AM
2

How do buzzfeed employees not have brain aneurysms with this amount of doublethink?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 10:18 PM
–

Even though men are far more likely to be victims of violence.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 06:14 AM
6

Jokes are a clear sign of a hate group xD
/r/MensRights01/08/16 10:02 PM
–

They can't even bring themselves to say it discriminates against men The school had received complaints from male students and worried the lounge’s women-only designation could alienate transgender students. “Thus, we decided on an open lounge for all students, rather than adding a male-only lounge,” Cody wrote in an email. Men complain about discrimination, WE ARE DOING IT FOR THE TRANS FATS! Not those filthy men.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 02:36 PM
–

This is supposed to be because the Crown Prosecution Service and police have done their homework beforehand and have only brought a case to trial that is 'in the interest of justice' and similar. Yes but It found an innocent man falsely accused and forced him into poverty. How is that justice? The problem is that the CPS in the past few years has been criticised for bringing ANY rape allegation to trial, regardless of how tenuous (although, sadly, I can't re-find the article about this that I re…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 09:33 AM
–

Wait so he doesn't get the fees paid for by the court even though he's innocent?
/r/MensRights31/07/16 08:36 AM
0

No she must have had post natal depression still, so its OK. Poor woman.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 08:26 AM
2

To be honest I think it should be that way, but for women too. I won't GAF about your problems and you don't have to GAF about mine. I can really see why someguys would start hating women over shit like this. Men are willing to risk their lives to stop someone attack a woman but at the same time they buy into the whole "victim" complex even though they are the most privileged gender imaginable.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 09:55 AM
0

I've not seen the movie as I CBA wasting money to watch a film I have no interest in but from what I've heard from reviews it wasn't particularly man bashing.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 09:58 PM
–

I wouldn't put it past some Muslim communities to think FGM is A-OK as well as MGM. You overestimate the human race xD.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 09:38 PM
–

You seem to be under the apprehension these people are logical. They can do any amount of doublethink they want to say MGM is a right and FGM is wrong. Also you mention how even the most brainless westerners wouldn't believe their religion justifies MGM, even though I have seen "MRA's" on this sub advocate just that.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 08:25 PM
–

Hey dude, the fairy tales I believe in make it ok to mutilate children. You are inhibiting my freedom of religion broooo.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:52 PM
5

Wouldn't an archive page be better than an image?
/r/MensRights19/07/16 12:40 PM
1

I love how that wikihow article said that generalising by race isn't useful, then goes on to state how white people commit most rapes. I guess you can only generalise about white people not the "good races".
/r/MensRights16/07/16 08:04 AM
1

How can people do this? How can you look at a child and want to harm it in anyway?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:40 AM
1

Ah well thanks for clearing that up, much appreciated.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 07:19 AM
1

Ah OK, my last question is the fact their comments where removed even though reply's were along the lines of "see, you aren't being censored" and then 1 hour later they are removed. The reply comments seem to suggest they are not breaking reddits rules. Unless they purposely break them later which is entirely possible I guess. I'd ask them for more evidence but that is probably considered brigading.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 07:19 PM
0

Why remove their comment history instead of just temp/perm banning them? Surely its more advantageous to leave the evidence for why they were banned, up for all to see. As much as I trust the mods of this sub I cannot simply take your guys words for it.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 07:02 PM
0

Can we get some verification on this post of theirs? If the moderators were removing their posts that's really fucking low and we need new mods. https://i.redd.it/2mb0f6ttjg7x.jpg
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:46 PM
15

No, it is rape.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 07:53 AM
5

That's it, boys are guilty of a crime before they have even committed one. Are we gonna teach young girls to stop killing their baby's aswell?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:58 PM
1

Seeing peter hitchens makes me just realise how sad it is Christopher is dead. Not a slant on peter, even if he believes in fairy tales
/r/MensRights29/05/16 02:00 AM
1

Name one plz. I want to know what you mean by "boy friendly".
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:47 AM
–

"boy friendly" what movies aren't boy friendly?
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:43 AM
2

I think the really sad part of this is the fact you browse yahoo beauty xD
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:35 AM
2

lel
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:34 AM
0

You're being a pedant Yea, evidence is pedantic. Witness testimony is considered evidence I never said it wasn't. I said the witness testimony didn't constitute rape either. But on the other hand, neither article provided much detail. "BuzzFeed News obtained a Student Conduct File collected by the WSU Office of Student Standards and Accountability (OSSA). It includes a “Final Memorandum” that spells out the logic behind their decision." I'd say including this document is evidence enough seen as …
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:52 PM
1

While it's entirely possible that she sexually assaulted a drunk man But there is no evidence to suggest she has. There is no compelling evidence in the affirmative, there are just two hazy versions of the story. There is actually no evidence at all. Even in the other students accounts he never said no. There could be a lot left out that changes the narrative and puts some nails in the coffin. It doesn't matter as there is no evidence to suggest she has done. Her story is plausible though and ba…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:14 PM
–

Time to put our WRA caps on. This is awful. She was guilty until proven innocent. Fucking hell look at the buzzfeed article But, “if the victim truly believed it to be nonconsensual [sex],” Bruno said, “then expelling her was the right decision.” As long as they feel it was sexual assault that means they were right to expel her. I feel so fucking sorry for this girl. The whole case he never said no to the sexual encounter and drunk sex is not rape FFS, you don't loose all responsibility when you…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 12:58 AM
1

Now correct me If I'm wrong but that model doesn't look like a woman.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 11:05 PM
2

I just shut off when I see the word man-spreading.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:00 AM
6

I'm interested to know how they deal with sexual harrassment when women claim it. Surely the only proof is witnesses. So how is this allowed.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:18 PM
6

How fucking blind am I?? Sorry dude, my bad.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:21 PM
1

Seriously no time stamp on an hour long video?
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:52 PM
2

...or its a testament to people fed up with your gender politics ruining everything they like.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:00 AM
2

The gender sensitive pricing echoes an ongoing debate in the UK around the 'pink tax', which sees women pay higher prices than men for virtually identical items. Oh really, so women are not allowed to buy these products? or is it just different companys pricing?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 12:32 AM
3

"Oh but we birth you" No you didn't I was grown in a lab
/r/MensRights06/05/16 10:02 AM
0

Yea who cares about cancer, as long as people perceive you to be healthy, you are xD
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:45 PM
1

Women in trouble? Fetch the clouds and rainbows.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:42 PM
3

Postponed*
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:31 PM
1

Could disagree with her response more. No you should not hide your views just so you don't offend people in your life. Don't be silenced by fear.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 09:14 AM
1

You should look up thorium's video on them.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:09 PM
1

Even then there were sickly male feminists.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:08 PM
–

If you don't report her because you feel you can handle it you are enabling her to do it to others. Its the same mentality of not reporting sexual assault. Ring the cops OP
/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:17 PM
0

"Honestly you call me the one who is a neck beard yet you fit the stereotype more. You rage when proven wrong and have to insult me personally outside of the topic." Think a sarky remark about a stereotype needs citation - Check Gets triggered when insulted on the internet - Check Thinks everything is a debate - Check Has no experience in social interaction - Check Yup it seems clear to me that you are stereotypical neck beard, either that or you are 13 year old that has no understanding of how …
/r/MensRights26/04/16 09:02 PM
1

"See you obviously are not well educated because I did not say you are a sjw" Are you trolling or are you literally this obtuse? You compared me to an SJW because I used anecdote in an off handed sarky comment. I have never met a more pedantic twat on reddit. "you are spouting bullshit with no evidence to back it up" Yes It was an off handed sarky comment based on my observations. You are the fucking language police, you think you have to back up every claim you make on the internet with statist…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 05:20 PM
0

Its unbelievable how fucking stupid you are. Yes I'm an SJW for stating my observation. Fuck off you utter dipshit. I don't need a study for an off handed comment about baristas. Is this how you speak to people when they say black people have big dicks? "oh but where is your study to confirm this assertion" I'm guessing you don't have any friends actually. Bell-end.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 02:07 PM
0

Oh shut the fuck up! its an observation. I'm not citing anything you dipshit.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 09:18 AM
2

Because it just puts a downer on my day. Very rarely I see good news. Not blaming the sub, I blame reality.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:07 PM
1

Can someone more knowledgeable give me some details of the case and why it was false? Links idealy
/r/MensRights21/04/16 10:34 AM
1

This sub pisses me off so much. Everyday I read shit like this.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 09:57 AM
1

This seems more like he's been texting himself. I need more proof. Plz.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:11 PM
1

Shit, they've found me out - RUN!
/r/MensRights18/04/16 10:25 AM
6

Yea but crazy is also so good at screwing up your life after bed.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:13 AM
1

U gay or summat?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:12 AM
–

*Rule 1 don't turn your back on milo
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:08 AM
1

OK, but that's not what I'm saying. Obviously after being raped you should be able to go through whatever emotional roads you need. I am specifically talking about those who use that one event as a means to have no responsibility for anything that has happened or will happen. People who think because they feel bad they are allowed to change the world around them because of it, thinking its society's duty to make them feel better and not their own. Self pity inevitably leads to selfishness if you…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:55 AM
0

It wasn't, but OK :)
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:44 AM
-10

sorry I don't watch shitty TV shows so that rule is only for the faggots that do.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 04:23 PM
–

You dont stick your dick in crazy. This is rule 1 for life.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:37 PM
1

I don't think you needed to clarify it was sarcasm tbh.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 10:49 AM
1

Even if it was an issue it shouldn't factor into anything as there it no way to prove anything was not reported. You have the right idea but what you are saying is factually incorrect.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:05 PM
2

bit l8
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:30 PM
1

here here
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:28 PM
2

sounds gr8
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:58 PM
1

I'll keep that in mind.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:54 PM
1

Cretinous Bimbo Turtle?
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:29 PM
1

I admit that did sound crass, I was writing on my phone really quickly (cos I didn't want people to see me typing out the words rape on the bus and get the wrong idea) and I didn't fully think out what I was saying before posting. Here's some clarification: As horrible as rape is, it is up to you to overcome it, not society to bend over for you. The only way to move on is to accept what happened and not indulge yourself in self pitty. (obviously within time) Obviously I sympathize with people wi…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:22 PM
2

I like this guy, i'm gonna look some more of him up, thanks.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:15 PM
1

England is the greatest country TBH.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:28 AM
1

Men aren't allowed to take pictures of children even if they are the fathers but its OK for women. There was a good WWYD episode on this.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:24 AM
–

I mean it wouldn't be fine but it would be fair.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:28 AM
1

Never stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:25 AM
1

Why did he cuck so hard?
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:10 AM
–

I think the comedian in that video is amazing. He's literally saying stuff like no one gives a fuck about male rape and its met with shrieks of laughter. He's proven his point.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:07 AM
1

Crime goes down police don't want to Los their jobs I guess. This was so fucking funny.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:01 AM
5

So anti feminists are not allowed freedom of speech?
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:55 AM
–

Self awareness level : 8/8
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:25 AM
–

Cancerous Bisexual Tranny?
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:21 AM
1

Its not just people who make it up. The people who have genuine trauma should not Willow in self pitty either. Its obviously its bad but I'm sorry the world doesn't stop for you, lots of people have it rough so grow a fucking spine and move on.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:21 AM
1

This is r/mensrights, do you really think that's his opinion?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:02 PM
1

We need more info of the evidence used to convict him
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:21 PM
1

Their stupidity knows no bounds.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:58 PM
1

Privilege plus power i guess nigga.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:56 AM
1

Read first paragraph and immediately knew it was the same privilege plus power argument served with waffles.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:32 PM
1

Well what about abortion rights? Surely there is need to distinguish. Sounds like a good idea in cases like this but I haven't spent to much thought on it and it seems stupid to do this for all laws.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:51 AM
1

20 year olds are adults. Those seven years difference is the difference between a young kid and an adult. Its crazy that you think they are the same.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:50 AM
–

That's stupid, a 20year olds mental development is vastly more than a thirteen year olds.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:09 PM
-1

They are 13 dude, are you really willing to condemned their lives to ruin over their adolescent stupidity? I get, you want "justice" but wanting 13 year olds to go to jail for their stupidity is just wrong, they have a full life to correct them and depriving them of job prospects, denies them that future.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 10:53 PM
2

Yet their already laws for any disagreement that would lead to abuse. Its not just abuse its about custody which is often disputed and is the fairest(in theory) way to come to a conclusion but obviously these courts are weighted heavily in the woman favor. If you take this issue we see that state should have said it is none of their business. Father can take kid to any church he wants and the mother can do the same. The only time the state would need to get involve is when one the parents behavi…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:57 PM
-11

This is the dumbest shit I've seen on this sub. Ever heard of a joke you special snowflake faggot? Literal SJW MRA's, take your victim complex and fuck off.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 04:29 AM
–

Well if they split up and live separately it can get messy if the state is not involved as people may not agree on custody. The courts have to settle cases when two people have the dispute and also have legal rights to the child.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 01:52 AM
2

Couple months late mate....
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:31 AM
–

Don't deserve to be debated Holy fuck dude, yes they do. This means you have no fucking argument. Is this Steve Shives? Seen as though lots of people don't think gender role models are important, there is a debate to be had, and if someone asks for one on the subject and you respond with "oh, you don't deserve a debate" you'll look like a complete faggot SJW.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 12:37 PM
-1

Asking for sources and information? Get all the fucking down votes, skeptical scum.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 12:31 PM
-2

Very handy copypasta
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:36 PM
2

Not biased at all.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:00 AM
5

I just found a great way to weed out the twats in dating, thanks.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:34 PM
3

I never understood this "chivalry" thing, My mum always taught me to open the door for everyone, and to walk in a single file when someone is walking near you. Its just common decency, why does everyone make it about only being respectful to women.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:56 PM
2

Because celebrity's are a higher class off people, no rights for those dirty non famous people. They don't need protecting under innocent till proven guilty.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 07:12 PM
0

yes.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:43 PM
0

You respond with "Yawn Is that all you got". Not refuting it, just acting all e-tough like a little faggot.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:08 PM
1

What are you on about?
/r/MensRights03/02/16 07:01 PM
0

Wow, this is amazing. Bullying on the internet is not a serious issue, you can block them not post publicly or even, wait for it.. not use social media. I'm not going to stoop to calling you stupid because I believe I have an argument. In the future, you really should keep your opinion to yourself. Sums you up quite nicely.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:13 PM
2

"I married you so that means I am entitled to your money" why TF do people get married anymore? You don't need the government to be in a relationship.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 12:34 PM
2

Having depression doesn't stop you having responsibility for yourself.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:25 PM
3

Yes I forgot to ask what happened about saying "gay", he stopped it at home but it would be interesting to know how it went at school and whether he changed his mind when discovering he was gay. I've heard gay guys use it but that's different to hearing it from strangers. Im not gonna lie he probably says it all the time at school and prob much worse. Although I do think when kids refrain from swearing/using "distasteful" words in front of their parents, it shows they have a deal of respect for …
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:54 PM
3

I tried to teach my boy why not to use "gay" as a way of expressing disapproval of things. In my opinion and experience telling someone not to say something just makes them want to say it more. I say you should be able to use all words but teach them the principals of racism etc. and tell them why I think its wrong. (I don't have a kid nor do I want one, but this is how i'd do it if I did) I don't see a problem with calling someone or something gay, I see a problem with homophobia. Just like I d…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 10:25 PM
3

Honestly, I seriously think it depends. If the person who said "Kill yourself" was saying it within an atmosphere where normally that would just be shit talk or banter, then yes, I think the law is would be stupid to apply to such a situation. I disagree. My belief is, your freedoms end when you violate the freedoms of others. I think even saying "kill yourself" sincerely should be allowed. They still have no power over the individual and it is the individual who is responsible for taking their …
/r/MensRights29/01/16 10:11 PM
–

One of the great things about Reddit is its support forums, and one of the things that is required for them to exist is the effective suppression of what you call "free speech". No they absolutely have the right to police their own platform, I do not agree with the principal of it but I agree they should have the right to moderate their own platform. Making it illegal to say certain thinks on the internet would be against freedom of speech. Its not illegal to post something against the rules on …
/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:44 PM
1

There are quite a few dead kids who would disagree with you on that. And a few adults. They took their own lives. You can view it as people harming themselves but that is sophistry. We are social beings. People connect with each other by communicating in various ways, and increasingly those ways are electronic. That is absolute tripe, you do not need social media at all. You can block them. You don't need to make your information public e.g you can set social media sites like twitter and faceboo…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:20 PM
-2

I'd say its 50/50, some people are pro free speech and some think they are but advocate against it. Edit: Don't get me wrong I don't think its "nice" to tell someone to kill themselves but I also don't think its criminal.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 05:42 PM
–

If you are that fragile I don't think you should be using the internet or at least not on a public forum. Mean words are a part of life and I don't think its acceptable to limit free speech based on the reaction of individuals to certain words. In short these people need to toughen up and If they have an actual medically diagnosed problem they should cease use of the internet. I'd even go as far to say death threats should be protected under free speech.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 05:16 PM
–

People have control only over themselves. Words on the internet cannot harm you. You harm yourself.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 04:40 PM
–

Stupid law is stupid.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 03:06 PM
1

No. I'm not.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:28 PM
1

Free promotion? You sure showed them.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:01 PM
1

Yea that's a great idea, promote a hateful podcast about misandry on an MRM sub. Miss ford is that you?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:52 PM
3

Ahahahaha
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:28 AM
3

Anyone kicks me in the nuts like that I'd punch square in the face.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:10 PM
0

Did you even read my comment? Yes but I misread it slightly. You don't –and can't– know that. No I cant know it for certain but It's highly likely I see no reason why it wouldn't; other than some obscure butterfly effect. Neither have I, but what "evidence" of racism would you even accept? Other than blatant hate speech? I'd say someone making judgments based on gender and race like you are is quite racist. Its not "hate speech" but its just as toxic. You have no reason to believe this was racia…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 03:08 PM
1

What? Prove it! That's absolute nonsense!
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:58 PM
-1

You don't know the full story. If I saw a stranger knocking on my door and looking distressed I would have done the same thing. You are a racist.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:22 PM
–

What does that have to do with either of their race? I'm pretty sure If I'd have made that call and the same cop came, the situation would turn out the exact same. Race should not be a factor as I've seen no evidence to say it was.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:20 PM
–

I see absolutely no evidence of this being a racial issue, so why the fuck would you put "asks white woman for help" in the title. What does her skin colour have to do with it?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:12 PM
1

I really don't give a shit about these edge lords they are the fucking worst. "Oh look we have a V for vendetta mask" they seem to think they are e-heroes.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 12:59 PM
–

Its wasn't a textbook it was a human boy. Dummy
/r/MensRights15/01/16 11:34 AM
0

Cuck for bern?
/r/MensRights13/01/16 12:39 PM
2

No, don't delete it. If people on this sub seem to share a common opinion by all means hold a magnifying glass to it, even if it makes us look bad. I don't agree with some stuff on this sub but I kinda like these faggots. Also you should know better than to drink and internet... That shit gets you killed.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 10:06 PM
–

I really don't think it should be illegal for women to go topless. I honestly think this is a valid WRA issue and should definitely be addressed. That's why I was happy to see feminist protesting this as I am all for it but It seems lately they have moved to advocating the burka instead. I would even dare to say this is an important women's issue in the west. I do think that the magazine example was a bad example though, cause there's plenty of shit in publicly sold magazines that wouldn't fly i…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:17 PM
1

No they aren't. How do breasts reproduce? Either way memory glands are way different from penises.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:10 PM
–

I don't think it is seen as though she wants to flaunt her breasts in public and I find It very logical. Why should you be allowed to see them on mag shelves and not let woman go bare chest when its hot. I'm all for seeing more tits and I don't think its vulgar. #freethenipple
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:37 PM
–

I think she is right. Comparing genitals to boobs is stupid.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 03:28 PM
1

"Brave" I thought you guys were better than this. Person writes words on the internet = brave... Really?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 03:24 PM
1

Hugging prank!... GONE SEXUAL!?!?!?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 06:48 PM
4

Hugging prank!... GONE SEXUAL!?!?!?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:56 PM
–

Thanks dude, much appreciated. Kisses
/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:30 PM
1

I was thinking along the lines of screenshots or examples?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 03:44 PM
–

Proof?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:54 PM
2

Why else would someone suck the D?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:52 PM
5

This is a response in relation to concerns raised over recent social media posts about coercive control. We have received correspondence from a number of people giving us feedback on the coercive control social media images and, as with all of our campaigns and initiatives, we will consider this and use it to help shape our work going forwards. Coercive control is a recently recognised form of domestic abuse and is used by perpetrators to control every part of someone’s life, it can be financial…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:33 AM
–

If you foolishly watched the videos like I did. This should help: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G47ZvozasTA
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:57 AM
2

Where was the dad after he got the first video? Law or no law he should have kidnapped that child and punched the mother in her face. I've seen such foul things like bomb suicide attacks but this fucking takes the cake. If you harm a child that is the ultimate crime you should never be let out of prison. Fuck this shit Im off to /r/humansbeingbros I cant take this much more
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:20 AM
1

Do eggs carry these traits in offspring?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:56 AM
2

this includes MRA, an equally useless label, you cant concentrate on a single gender in isolation and claim you are working for equality How? I identify as an MRA and a WRA do you think most people in this sub would ignore if women where being mistreated as much as men are? The reason the label is needed is because at this current time men (in the west) have significantly less rights than women. I see no fucking UN talks covering these issues under the banner of human rights. Tell me how the MRM…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:15 PM
–

She did
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:48 AM
–

Aww I really liked gone girl was a really fucking awesome movie TBH.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:32 AM
0

star wars is shit, you're shit. I hate you!
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:28 AM
1

repost
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:14 AM
–

I think its ludicrous to say it is an unfair law. She was in a position of authority and raped a minor. This is not OK, the fact men get harshly punished for this crime is because they got what they deserved the problem is women don't.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:07 AM
2

The two guys where in on it.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:55 AM
3

What, in the fuck did I just watch? This gives me fucking goose bums!
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:52 AM
–

Yea I see this a lot on most of their tweets too. Future is bright.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 12:40 AM
3

You could also say, why does the gender of the perpetrator make the victim not a victim? I mean they would inevitably admit women victims are just more import because they are sexist or they will stop replying.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 11:55 PM
3

But I had a little shred of respect for them when they confined this propaganda to their branch YT channel "broadly"... all gone now.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:56 PM
–

No you utter shitlord. Violence against men isn't important because it is mostly men-on-men violence. Therefore those victims are not valid. You stupid MRA, get fucked and educate yourself.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:54 PM
3

You fucking champ lady!
/r/MensRights20/12/15 01:53 AM
1

As long as it is very strictly used and accepted It sounds reasonable... but I'm no lawyer.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 10:21 PM
1

That's totally OK. I wasn't trying to prove you wrong I was just genuinely curious.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:31 PM
5

Lauren Southern must be quaking in her boots that she has the wrong stance.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:12 PM
–

I'd be interested in seeing the same happen to a man and a girl of the same age. Not saying they don't exist, I just haven't seen any.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:08 PM
2

Wait, so are women only carriages a thing?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:03 PM
1

Ahaha why don't you refute my point instead of thinking your propa 'ard for "picking on" a supposed autist.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:37 AM
0

Its not relevant.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:37 PM
0

But you are trying to say oh its not that bad because I mostly agree with him.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:17 PM
1

go on embarrass me I don't mind.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:49 PM
–

Beautiful people don't have much struggle in life Fucking bullshit R9K rhetoric
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:32 PM
0

but I still think he's the best thing to happen to the MRM for a long time But you don't seem to realize that doesn't exempt him from being mocked and called out for his views. There is no protected people, we can all say stupid shit.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:49 PM
1

Wow that's a really good article, I will archive that with a CTRL + S. Unfortunately I have no interest in changing his mind on the subject, If he wanted to debate it then sure I'd be happy to. However I see It as no benefit to engage him on it when he seems so unreasonable when this subject comes up. Hence why I titled the OP "his logic flies out the window". (uggh did I just quote myself? what fucking cunt I am) Edit: Thanks for the article :)
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:43 PM
0

I think Milo himself will agree he's a total dick most of the time and he does it because he knows people are thin-skinned. That's why he rags on atheists all the time. How is it being thin skinned to mock him? That's like the ultimate armor "you cannot decent because if you do you are thin skinned". I also don't see how you can lump "people who don't believe in God" into such a wide category. Maybe /r/athiesm (I'll admit they are faggy twats) but they are a small group of people who don't belie…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:37 PM
0

"Its just good grooming"
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:20 PM
-1

if you mock people who disagree with you as "saying stupid shit" when their opinions don't conform to yours then you are demanding ideological conformity. No, I'm saying I think its stupid shit? Go on then, prove me wrong tell me why I should agree with Milo. If it isn't stupid his opinions will hold up to scrutiny. In what way do I have the fucking power to demand he conform. I have not engaged him at all I am trying to mock him on a public forum. I have no interest in changing his opinion that…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:16 PM
1

But it's not mutilation. Mutilation - to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts:
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:09 PM
0

That article was like 80% trolling. That's really stupid. I have not seen evidence of where he says he was trolling. He has repeatedly made his views clear in debate these views back up what he said in the original article.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:07 PM
-1

No, why should I calm down? It doesn't matter what his other views are when we are talking about this subject.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:06 PM
1

That's up to you. You are entitled to your own opinion.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:01 PM
0

No, what I am saying is I don't see how any of it makes you think you can just use the excuse of satire. Its clearly his opinion on the matter.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:00 PM
-1

sure thing ;)
/r/MensRights14/12/15 10:07 PM
1

So no, you couldn't find where I said that when asked twice in a row. Neat! Quoted you twice m8 The difference here is they are existing rights(thoughts) enshrined in law which have yet to be over turned even with law's abating them. Not just existing thoughts. Sadly it appears you cant tell the difference or the reasoning for them either. Yes they are rights that exist in law that give parents the right to mutilate baby boys. The fact it exists doesn't mean it is OK. How come girls cant be muti…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 10:04 PM
3

He still disagreed it was mutilation and he didn't really say anything that would contradict other things he has already said.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:49 PM
–

For the record, I'm gay and I love foreskin. I wish I still had mine. Ill give you a BJ mate. No point responding to the rest, I agree with it all.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:45 PM
–

I don't demand ideological conformity. People have the right to their opinions but just like with feminist I will mock them when they say stupid shit. You seem to only care when It is someone you like but if a feminist laughed at MGM that would be front page shit.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:43 PM
1

No you said I couldn't take away your rights based on thoughts and feelings. Do you realize when people take away peoples right to violate others, they do so through arguments against it. Arguments would be thoughts, your response to my argument was that it was a "though and feeling". Can you point out where I agreed with this? Sure, you think its a religious right to mutilate baby's. How does this go against rabbis's doing the same in result giving the baby herpes. Seems to be a pattern with yo…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:36 PM
1

What did he say that was comparable to radical feminists/ wrong? Do you think its radical to not mutilate children?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:18 PM
0

No but it doesn't really matter. He obviously believes it he talks about it like he would talk about anything else he feels strongly about. I'm not about to give him a pass (no pun intended) because you claim he was "trolling".
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:06 PM
1

It also shows a lot about each of their character.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:02 PM
1

I did. Its a right. People have rights. Your response is people shouldn't have them if they disagree with your view. We call that facism. No your response was because you think religions have the right to violate others rights. When the rabbi gives babies herpes you see nothing wrong with it. You are an abhorrent human being. Would you also think its a right to perform FGM on baby girls? MGM kills hundreds of babies and you think its your right based on a book written hundreds of years ago. How …
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:01 PM
–

"troll" would imply he doesn't agree, that is clearly not true. Unless we now have to take everything he said as funny jukes. In fact all feminist that say the same are just trolls too right?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:47 PM
1

Nope. Its the fact that some people have inalienable rights. You think its people human right to cut another? #ReligionOfPeace The fact that just because you say you have a great argument Then maybe debate me on it. Tell me your best reasons for advocacy of MGM. I will then trample on them. doesn't mean you get to over ride those rights with your thoughts and feelings. Hate to break it to you but all arguments are thoughts. Fucking dipshit.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:40 PM
1

Oh I see so when you harm a child its perfectly OK because its not hurting me? That's ludicrous, by your logic its OK to be a kiddy fiddler because It doesn't directly affect me. Stupidity at its finest.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:31 PM
2

No, No, he does. We need crazies to get away from the delusion we don't have any idiots in our community. We just need to debunk and mock them when we see it.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:08 PM
3

No, I think the reason you don't want to is because your only defence is based on a thousands of years old book. Fucking pathetic.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:01 PM
2

So do you want to or not?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:47 PM
2

Then debate me if you think I'm wrong instead of using that "its just his opinion" bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:43 PM
-1

but I didn't even whisper to him, I have no interest in contacting him about it, hes views on the subject are clear.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:40 PM
–

TBH if someone has a history of pushing for true equality for men then it's much more believable So you think just because you agree with someone in most cases that makes them unable to be cunts once in a while. This cult of personality makes you blind to the fact the people you idolize so much are capable of having a really disgusting view on things. I'd call it satire if I actually believed he didn't think that way. When he has made so many instances where he shows that this is what he thinks …
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:39 PM
–

I'm sorry but not all opinions are equal.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:32 PM
-2

These are guys that trade videos of babies being mutilated as wank fodder [citation needed]... on second thoughts I wouldn't really wanna see that shit. Forgive me but I highly doubt this is Milo's opinion or the majority opinion. I'm not saying Milo is one of these guys Ahh ok I would also point out I don't think these people are in the majority but it is still shameful to advocate this torture.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:26 PM
–

"TIL"
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:21 PM
3

YOUR ABSURD HYSTERIA BECOMES SO MUCH MORE PERSUASIVE! I'm sorry you find it absurd to be offended at the thought of cutting babies. Your obsession with baby dicks is bizarre Ah, great ad hominem. I'm obsessed with the fact you and others think is perfectly acceptable to cut babies not about dicks in general. and your motivations are suspect. How? Because I think is disgusting to cut babies dicks? Why do my motivations matter, its the principal of cutting a baby! (and you just couldn't help yours…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:18 PM
4

The fact its legal is a problem.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:05 PM
–

ah I see because you are OK with it now you are an adult that means its not mutilation and is a-ok to cut babies.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:39 PM
–

In fact, I'd say is almost solely led by gay paedophiles and freaks. I don't think they are "paedophiles and freaks", I mean I think its acceptable to have a preference but when you actively support chopping up babies then you are one fucked individual.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:24 PM
0

In what way have I contacted Milo at all and screamed at him? Do you consider every time we highlight a feminists stupidity that we are screaming at them? Talking about someone is not harassment ffs. He's not above mocking!
/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:13 PM
–

That he thinks its OK to mutilate children? Stay classy.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:10 PM
1

Probably for the best, true cringe.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:59 PM
–

Milo has an excellent nose for bullshit. And he's got your number on this one, intactivists. Are you fucking kidding me? He couldn't even argue his point because it was so fucking stupid. You say this like he is impossible of being stupidly wrong. I'm sorry I understand he is your crush but I'll call out stupidity wherever I see it. If feminists advocate against female circumcision, then we have to advocate against male circumcision. No that's fucking moronic. Feminists did half the fucking job …
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:56 PM
2

Just like I don't think I can change a feminist opinion I don't think I can change Milo's. I didn't post this to change his opinion I posted to highlight the stupidity.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:23 PM
7

I dunno man, plenty of women go for labiaplasty all the time these days. I'd like to see your citation on that. As for your other comments it sounds like you're coming from emotion here No I'm coming from logic while speaking with emotion. I find it hard not to when we are talking about mutilating children. I never said I prefer fake tits. But there are guys that do. How is it different? My point is what guy ever had the audacity to tell his GF to get a boob job. Memory glands are much different…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:21 PM
7

Fine. I prefer cut vaginas, I now advocate FGM...
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:10 PM
–

That is absolutely irrelevant when we are talking about his view of MGM
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:09 PM
–

let me just clip off those ear lobes for you and maybe take off some skin from your forearm... Edit: I told you to educate yourself shitlord!
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:10 PM
–

killallwhitemen ... oh ahaha, just a jokey joke!
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:09 PM
–

He laughs at the fact people consider it mutilation. Again like Joe Rogan said, you wouldn't ever ask your wife to cut her flaps because they didn't look "nice" why TF would you do it to a guy? He's said he doesn't agree with doing it to children Joe- There isn't a single sexual procedure that comes close to the number of babies that get circumcised that's done to female girls Milo- I didn't realize you were one of these people. I mean I just think these circumcise people are like birthers there…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:04 PM
–

Don't worry its only a bit of skin, we are removing it for better"hygiene." Oh no this cant happen to girls because that's mutilation. Educate yourself shitlord!
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:48 PM
1

self defense is domestic violence... good to know
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:45 PM
–

As much as I like Milo, this fucking pisses me off.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:32 PM
5

indeed
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:04 AM
–

what if I told you the other 83.7% didn't get prosecuted because they weren't credible?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:27 PM
2

Well if this wasn't the downfall of the US military I don't know what is. You know they aren't gonna take women on by merit.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:50 AM
1

I'm far from ever being in favor of Anarchism but I toatz agree with you.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 01:44 PM
–

I can't fucking stand any of Americas Presidential Candidates. Although I'm not In the US this is precisely why I don't Vote. There Is nobody that represents me and I am not going to waste my valuable vote on people who I despise.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 02:34 AM
1

RTFA I have
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:58 PM
1

Imagine a feminist accusing you of being a virgin neckbeard and then you respond by truthfully stating that you're very sexually experienced and are very good looking. Would you be bragging? No, why do I care what a feminist who has never seen me calls me? I made a joke you got touchy and bragged about your income when It was nothing to do with how much you earn anyway.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:51 PM
0

No it EE(can only speak for the people I know)
/r/MensRights30/11/15 06:40 PM
1

true
/r/MensRights30/11/15 06:15 PM
1

Working as a Batista despite having a college degree is a SUPER common stereotype for Liberal Arts students. So is EE degrees.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 06:01 PM
2

Clocking off then getting the shit slapped out of you doesn nto make everything fair game. When did I say that? If Stoya didn't want him to fuck her and she said no and used her safe word in the privacy of her own home and he didn't adhear to that. That's rape. I agree but yet it is still unproven I don't understand what is so hard to grasp, you don't take people accusations as truth without evidence. You can hardly at this point say that james deen hasn't sexually assaulted people, full blown r…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:55 PM
2

No, I'm affraid these women are getting the redemption they deserve in the form of him being publicly shamed and professionally blacklisted. How do they deserve it? Non of it has been proven. He has denied it... he is innocent till proven otherwise. Are you happy to condemn and ruin a mans life on an unproven twitter accusation. Here's a scenario. You are at work and the attitude that people have is boistrous and playful, sometimes borderline violent. One of the guys is bigger than you, professi…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:28 PM
0

Qualified, and yes. If you get the chance ask a barista what they studied or are currently studying.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:41 PM
0

OK but I still hold my point that is strangely funny how most baristas are electrical engineers.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:38 PM
-1

Ugghh the cringe is real. No-body was asking you to brag about your income. It was a joke stop being so touchy.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:35 PM
0

It was a stereotype joke based on a my anecdotal experience and others. I should also add "touchy" to the electrical engineer list of qualitys.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:34 PM
2

Why would she do that and in turn lose her job over it? UHHH, I don't know... to protect future victims? And please name me one pornstar who has lost their Job because of this. He wasn't doing a scene with her therefore the 'roughness' coming from him wasn't agreed to Yup my mistake but again have any of these stories been backed up by witnesses? He was just a goon waiting for her to finnish so he could terrorize her becuase for what even reason he thought it would be fun. How? Non of this has b…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:31 PM
–

She gets paid to have consensual sex with a parter that she agrees to shoot with. Yes and sometimes its rough, which is what they also sign up for. You seem to have an issue with the fact that he assualted her How, Do you have any proof he assaulted her? If you do I'd be happy to look at it. Otherwise he is innocent till proven guilty. The reason I am more inclined to not belive this is as follows: Disoriented and nursing a sore jaw, I stood up—but before I could collect myself, he grabbed me by…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:51 PM
1

No it cant possibly be true even if it was over life time. Unless they use bullshit stats like they most likely did here.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:37 PM
-1

I roll a six and smite you down. But seriously every electrical engineer I have known is working in a coffee shop and every male barista is a qualified electrical engineer. I assume this is due to the over saturation of the field.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:16 PM
–

‘James Deen ruthlessly attacked and degraded me…’ That's what you get paid for love, now stop being an attention whore. Just because you have now decided that is sexually assault doesn't mean it is. I'd also be interested to look at this scene to know if what you are saying is true. Edit: I should have said that by "ruthless attack" I'm gonna go out on a limb and say he stabbed her with his pork sword and was a bit rough.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:11 PM
7

These people are the worst. I was just about to post this article I'm glad someone saw it as well.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:49 PM
–

We cant really comment on whether she is lying or not and frankly it doesn't matter, He is still innocent till proven otherwise. I really hope his friends and family have his back... even if he was a male feminist. All I know is that stating someone raped you on twitter makes you look like an attention whore, why the fuck didn't she go to the police?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:48 PM
–

Oh no, you don't understand. Women don't lie. Its pretty obvious he did rape her though because she made the accusation on twitter so the police could find out... oh wait I think I've mixed twitter up with a police station!
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:44 PM
1

If 1 in 4 men and women got raped you can be sure people would do something. That would be because people would have to be raped in broad daylight everyday for that to be true. Not so easy to not care.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:22 AM
-58

So I'm betting you either currently work, or have at one point worked in a coffee shop.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:09 AM
1

#feministMRA's
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:21 PM
1

Yea this turn to less of a men's issue and more into a "creating a public panic" issue. Also why do they need to say how many men get raped if they are offering a help line. Surely men who have been raped know its possible for men to be raped.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:21 PM
1

A couple have been jailed for forcing an underage girl to take part in a humiliating sexual assault on a 14-year-old boy. Oh so they forced her? The boy suffered months of bullying and teasing at school after the girl spread rumours about what had happened to him in Lawrence's flat in Mill Street, Bideford. I may be way off here but these don't sound like the actions of a victim. What I think is that there were three perpetrators and one victim. But why the fuck do you get more time than the act…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:06 PM
4

Wait so if men are a minority in rape cases doesn't that make women lower on the progressive stack?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:36 PM
1

Yea but It still seems hard to fathom happening 16years ago.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:23 AM
1

I was wondering If this could be debunked or already has? I don't have much time to read through it all so i was hoping that someone else has taken a look at this. Otherwise ill just have to look through it myself.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:28 PM
-2

TBF, men aren't really worthy of asylum.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 11:29 AM
1

Fair enough, I was trying to make you care more.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:41 PM
1

Well you shouldn't care for your own sake what about other people who will go through this trauma later if this carries on. I also have had benefits from it Like what? If you say aesthetics, I urge you to swap the genders and see if that still sounds OK. I am not sure what you want me to do. Personally I think this is the most urgent and important MRM issue RN, I was just trying to change your mind.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:28 PM
1

About not giving a fuck
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:45 AM
1

I wounder if you would change your mind if you saw a video of them removing it or one of another child?
/r/MensRights21/11/15 11:22 PM
1

No Breitbart labelled it bizarre because it doesn't fit their conservative agenda in that the Government must not be allowed interfere with Judeo-Christian practices. Prove it, don't just make such claims without any evidence. As much as I enjoy watching guys like Gavin McInnes and Milo Yiannopoulos humiliating feminazis Gavin McInnes doesn't work for Brietbart he works for rebel media. I personally think hes an asinine idiot and don't really follow him but the fact you levy such claims about Br…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:32 AM
0

No I think they are saying that because of the blood patches in the picture. TBF to a person walking down the street, it looks bizzare.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:23 PM
1

I read the sign"its OK to rape me" and thought it was going to be satire... But no, its another depressing story :(
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:10 AM
1

Yet still only two years for raping a child.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:07 AM
3

GG m8, you have earned my respect.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:10 PM
2

Is it wrong I shaved on movember, I feel bad but I don't really take notice of the months.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:42 PM
2

Wait, because I used swear words I'm mad?If I was mad how in the FUCK would "law and order" help that? Have you even seen that cringe-fest of a show? You just leveled up. exaggerated metaphors, swears, mouth-frothing silly typos, et al. Where have I used exaggerated metaphors? Oh, so we are at the stage of word policing. So I swear, who cares? By all means you can clutch your pearls all you want but when I swear it is not to express any anger toward you and I'm sorry you misinterpreted it that w…
/r/MensRights07/11/15 03:05 AM
2

Nobody has said this is not true. Nor have I said you did, it was to establish my point. this is nitpicking. That wrongful conviction does not change the fact that he had a child, the financial responsibilities of which are due from both parents, in this country. When you are locked up by the state for a crime you didn't commit your financial responsibilities should end there. If your have been unable to pay your debt due to false imprisonment why should you have to pay it back when its not your…
/r/MensRights07/11/15 01:02 AM
2

No, he has been wrongfully imprisoned and forced to pay child support. That money is his because the state wrong fully took away 25 years of his life. Even then money is not good compensation for 25 years of your life. Then you take AWAY his money for a corrupt child support system to add insult to injury.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 11:51 PM
1

Yea hes getting $80k a year for 25 years I assume. What I meant was they should pay the child support really. I just didn't articulate myself well, sorry.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:01 PM
–

He should be getting at least triple that for them taking 25years of his life.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 04:39 PM
1

They do realise you are only allowed about ten people to stand on a UK bus. You can't fit five people around one pole you fucktard because you are not allowed.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:43 AM
14

"these cases are very difficult to prosecute" How? You locked an innocent man up for 589 days; make his mother commit suicide thinking her son was a rapist with concrete evidence against the accusation. She walks away scott-free when she caused a man to be imprisoned and drive his mother to suicide. And he has been convicted of "pandering" and "promoting prostitution" all of which he didn't fucking do!
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:25 AM
2

What a CUUUUUUUUUUUUUNT!
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:55 AM
2

She din do nufin, she was a good girl just trying to get her life on track.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 01:01 AM
2

She's a deplorable Cow. Edit: Why didn't he mention MGM which is one of the worst things happening in this country, Its literally acceptable to cut and abuse a baby boy. That should take president over any other issues as children's safety should always come first.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:28 AM
1

But you can pretty much fuck yourself if the strength is with you I don't really understand that? Am I having a brain aneurysm or did you make a typo?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:57 AM
–

I don't think its ever right to hit a person and I don't agree you should be violent so it doesn't bottle up. If you dislike someone that much that you need to hit them you need to leave them immediately(if you can). I think its OK to hit in self defense if she is throwing things at you and I understand you cant leave when you have your child there.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 11:26 PM
5

This is fucking disgusting. He cant have his OWN FUCKING DAUGHTERS medical records. I cant believe how these people think they have the right to tell him his daughter cant have a fucking soda. The fucking nerve of this fat fucking land whale saying " I eat as healthy as possible" no you fucking don't or you wouldn't be so fucking over weight. She needs firing and a swift punch in the face. From what I heard they put her on this medication because they had to be "restrained". PUMP HER FULL OF PIL…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 04:04 PM
–

It's a Q&A and they keep asking for statistics, how the fuck is someone supposed to know what you where going to ask before the fact. Not only that but they don't bring conflicting statistics to back up their claims to their own assertions.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 05:10 PM
1

Sorry but no, fuck reddit I'm not going to "turn off that pesky adblock" to help the people at the root of the problem.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 01:21 PM
0

You didn't mention women get less sentences for the same crime as men not just infanticide. As for laws and right women don't have many people have asked but the only answer given is street compliments.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 01:12 PM
–

I don't think he should get any money but I see the contradiction.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 01:00 PM
1

Its not accidental, its a surprise.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:56 PM
2

Man spreading takes two spaces...?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:06 PM
6

Haven't read it yet but I'm guessing narcissism?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 11:55 AM
1

The fact you need to ask this, is why Jesu... I mean feminism exists.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 11:35 AM
1

You should have refused.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:31 PM
–

Its times like these that I see no end in sight and your motivation just utterly plummets. I was crossing my fingers before I clicked it saying please be Sweden, please be Sweden but no its my own fucked up country.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 01:23 PM
8

Classic, "do you compare it to MGM?" Yes and here's why... walks away angrily He's more bothered by peoples opinion on its severity than stopping the brutal practice and isn't even willing to see the other side of his opinion.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 01:32 AM
2

I wonder if he is actually talking to an audience? Nobody has pulled the fire alarm or heckled him.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:56 AM
2

No you are wrong companies love throwing away money.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:38 PM
–

What are you talking about? Its obviously because if women were hired they'd have to pay them less cuz patriarchy. As we all know companies LOVE spending as much money as possible. Stop being a bigot you shitlord.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:35 AM
1

Why should we applause when someone isn't a sexist cunt? Isn't that just normal standards that people should strive to be?
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:30 AM
–

To be fair she isn't wrong. Volkswagen wouldn't have survived long enough to have a scandal.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:46 AM
3

Wow who would have known Syria was a war zone? Poor lady she was expecting a nice holiday but 'twas a lie.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:29 AM
2

I don't think there is any significant rise I think most of them just go un-noticed or get away with it.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:09 AM
2

Fair enough but apple already knows about this podcast because they have supposedly promoted it so I think its clear where they stand. I personally think apple should host every voice regardless of "hate speech" but I also understand companies and other forums have the right to not make it a Bastian( I think I spelled that right) of free speech. If it breaks the t&c then by all means report it but does that help you? Does censoring someone, even though its allowed, help your cause? If you stand …
/r/MensRights14/10/15 12:03 PM
2

My position exactly.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 10:27 AM
2

I agree apple should not be promoting it and you should object to that, but trying to get it taken down is stupid imo. And I realise that apple has the right to censor their own platform but I still don't think its right that they do, us of all people shouldn't encourage it.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 10:27 AM
–

The thing is I don't care if people make fun of men and I don't care if they make fun of women. Hate speech is a stupid law and I don't agree with it at all. The thing is I know literally no-one that would laugh about MGM or other men's rights issues they may not agree but they wouldn't laugh or make fun of such a serious issue. It is not a normal thing to hate men(in my experience). So your stance is that they can only have free speech so long as people don't agree with them? You can't force pe…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 10:21 AM
2

No, how can you say that? We have the internet, if you want a message to get out you can by many means, It may be harder for your message to get out but that's the sacrifice you make in order to not become your enemy. If you are scared of your opposition speaking and are willing to censor them then you are no better than your enemy and you stand for fuck all. You shouldn't repay evil with evil. You have clearly woken up on the wrong side of the bed when you wrote this, clam tf down its a fucking…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:43 AM
–

Shouldn't we be promoting freedom of speech even if what they say is detestable? Sorry but I find hate speech laws stupid and you should too. Partaking in their tactics of censoring just serves to make us as bad as them.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 12:54 PM
5

He may also be a white man, living in a patriarchal society, with all the privilege that brings. Fuck this bullshit, I hope this was supposed to be a joke.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:27 PM
7

I'm just gonna take a deep breath and close reddit. What a cunt.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 09:36 AM
6

A case of "serial bad-judgement" why don't they call it what it is, its fucking rape! She's been doing it since 2011 and only gets a 4 year sentence and it was even considered harsh.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 09:17 AM
1

Yea in the context, my post didn't really make sense as it would be illegal to do the OP in the west. I was trying to say really that infant MGM was way worse than the OP. Well I'm glad there are a group of people that are mostly against MGM but its so fuckin sad that most people would spout those arguments for it. Yea I did get a bit too rude on the last comment but I don't think I said anything out of line. But thankfully this hasn't gone around in circles and the person hasn't responded back.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 11:04 AM
1

Wow are you really getting offended by a joke? GG men's rights subreddit, great first impression. I thought you were better than this. Consider this an aggressive Milo finger wagging.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter