TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cyborek Archive

View 4 posts and 122 comments by cyborek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

You mean tumblr 3.0. When it started tumblr was cool people all around. Then after the Google lady bought it after becoming yahoo ceo the feminazi shitstorm started. As a bonus, her fans insisted that people bitching at her for being a strict boss is misoginy, because nobody bitched about Jobs or Torvalds.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/15 06:14 PM
0

Reposts are better than a dead sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/15 04:33 PM
2

Arrow looks like a full on stripper, let's be honest.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:33 AM
1

The thing is that in the last few years objectification in all the media is on the rise for men and falling for women, and I'd even say that all things considered women got a slight upper hand in who's less affected now.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:25 AM
3

She's not missing any points she just doesn't care about any points beyond her own.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:07 AM
2

If her dad had police connections I think it might all even been set up to scare him even though the dad knew that nothing happened, stupid animal of a dad wanted to mark his territory. If you're not a man of iron who'd be able to land her daddy in a world of legislative pain for being a shit head, then don't touch girls with shit head daddies. Edit: I'm not in any way putting the blame for what happened on the boy, just saying that shit head daddy daughters aren't worth effort.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:26 AM
2

I worded the title that way as to present the case as an encouragement not to bow to blackmail in these kinds of situations, hope it's not taken the other way around.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 02:43 AM
2

That doesn't really have meaning for middle and lower class people, as women have more power there, so those male ceos and politicians cater to lower and middle class women, not men. But the reason for that situation isn't that women are hardwired with aversion to politics.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:10 PM
1

The view that our perception of the world is born through constant stimulation of our senses, is called constructivism, it's more adequate to what you described in the last comment, solipsism is the notion that your own existence is more probable then the existence of people surrounding you, and as I said there is nothing in the world that would hint that ( my response to your fidelity problem ). I mean no offence, but most people I known who ascribed to some solipsistic view (myself in the past…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:33 PM
1

You basically agreed with me in your last point, there is no way for any of these "system" people to distinguish wether some other person is true or real, there is nothing that should compell you to think that others are less real than you and so your solipsism impairs your ability to relate to others. You are an artificial person born through natural evolution alongside other artificial people to this system called world. Edit: Concerning the problem of fidelity, there is no way to attain this …
/r/MensRights14/08/14 06:45 PM
1

To account for these people the "system" would have to set up processes that simulate perfectly the way your own brain works, for these people to act as real as they do they have to be exactly what you see them for, people operating on the same principles you do, you have no way of differentiating between you and them, and a part of the system that pressumes that the rest of the system might not be "real" seems impaired. Edit: Concerning the political system you described: utopias do not work.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:56 PM
1

Point against solipsism is that for people to behave the way they behave they need to be controlled by a mind as complex as your own, every moment you live proves to you that everything that surrounds you is as real as you are. Your description resembles awfully a certain you know who who put people in ovens because he thought they were less important, you just think they're less real, I hope you don't really identify with what you described.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:20 PM
1

You have point, and u/riktrat just have proven it with his latest comment.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:11 PM
1

Like I said, every case is unique, and do you really consider yourself a fascist solipsist?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:25 PM
-2

Every case is unique and I don't pull false fire alarms dolandolan.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:30 PM
0

Shutting up people that deserve every ounce of hatred this world has is not censorship.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:57 PM
4

I meant pay attention to detail in the movie. Edit: I mean that she claims that males' shirtless scenes do not sexualize them but females' costumes do. I say that both males and females in the movie were sexualized and that it was slightly more visible with males.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:58 PM
1

Yes they do, stop dissmissing the obvious and thinking of roundabout explanations only because you want to appear "better" than the feminists and "rational", because what you're doing now is exactly what they do: inventing newspeak to describe things that aren't there.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:44 PM
1

Where, women's studies? Edit: If you tried sarcasm, then you did kinda wrong dude, it's better to explain it than leave that comment as it is.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:26 PM
2

If you pay attention to detail you might actually see that it's the exact reverse of what she's claiming. Dudes shirtless scenes seemed slightly more sexualised than the way Gamorra's costume was presented.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:00 PM
0

There were some hot teachers in my middle and highschool. She's considered hot now? Damn the world have fallen in 10 years.
/r/PussyPass12/08/14 09:29 PM
4

It got some positive karma, maybe it'd be good to try doing this every time some "feminist humour" surfaces. M'ladys'll get the message that they're not invulnerable to that kind of "humour" and other guys will get encouraged to respond too.
/r/PussyPass12/08/14 08:35 PM
3

This is not a sign of lack of basic sympathy, it's a sign of annoyance at lack of sympathy for that 40% mentioned in his comment.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 12:51 AM
1

What groups? Edit: Question is why is it politically incorrect? It wasn't 2 years ago. It's because of that media campaign I'm talking about, it's the reason that you can't openly say what you want.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 07:51 PM
1

What I wrote is that there's not many men who care enough to oppose the feminist bullshit. They voice their opinion on obvious things like circumcision but they won't touch more ambiguous things with a stick. You're right about feminist brainwashing, but 2012 was a beginning of a media onslaught that lasts to this day (that's the only agenda there is, no Guardian specific machinations) and pushes out anyone who would dare call them on their crap.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:29 PM
1

In a sense, yes a certain media profile draws certain kind of viewership and repels some of the viewers. In other words there's not enough men who care reading Guardian to oppose what's happening.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:25 PM
-4

I explained where did your "several years" come from, and that there is really no normal public that could oppose it.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:06 PM
5

Mainstream media has been made completely feminist sometime after 2012, I don't know what public you are talking about.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:49 PM
17

Looks like they remove not the most abusive comments but the ones that are the most on point, and might garner some sympathy.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:44 PM
1

That's what you call thinking outside the box, I think if they stopped trying to keep you from talking about mgm then you should still be using that word, don't pass a chance to specifically remind people that boys are also victims of practices like that.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 12:06 AM
2

You're making legit points about how Guardian operates nowadays, but as a simple indication of some levelheadedness that's left I gotta say that a few articles sound quite reasonable, like the one about sexual violence, the one about school achievement, and the one about ban bossy. The thing about Jolie is neutral.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:55 PM
0

It's an ugly smug dude. I can imagine feminists cringing at this sight and that makes it good.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:57 PM
1

Yeah, I it used to be different, but it's like that for some time already. Don't know what it is with guys' aversion to see another man's face, internalized something maybe?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:16 PM
1

And gay men are most of the time objectified and fetishized. It's bullshit that it's for gay audience, it's for white women.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:09 PM
4

Fun to have such a simplistic view of the world.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:30 PM
3

I didn't mention sjws srs or anyone else, the only reason I posted this is me reading the comment I linked. The fact is that sub hijacking does happen for any kind of reasons and you don't really have a point here.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:00 PM
3

But it does happen and that's the point of this post. I don't know why do you care so much about it.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:44 PM
2

Or you might just be ignorant as you don't seem to notice that going through reddit request isn't the only way of becoming a mod.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:35 PM
1

Something similar might have happened with nosleep and fearme, not complete takeover but new mods completely changed the character of the subs, apologies to the mods if I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:27 PM
2

Isn't reddit request only for requesting inactive subs and removing inactive mods? If so then I wouldn't have any way of knowing who and when wants to be a mod here. The only purpose of this post is noting that hijacking subs is a thing.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:05 PM
1

There's also a remark about "getting someone else on the inside". I understand that means cheating the mods into taking them in? I'm not implying naivety on the side of the mods here, just remarking on the possibility of this kinds of intentions from people who might want in on the mod team. edit: In case anyone for any weird reason wanted to remove the comment I'm linking to, here's a redditlog snapshot.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:16 PM
1

No, but female prostitutes are treated better than male prostitutes. That's my problem with prostitution.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 04:29 PM
1

Spreading awareness is not the same as advocating inaction. It's good to comment and talk here even if you do nothing else. Everything counts pal. What's wrong is the attitude of telling people to shut up if they have nothing else to contribute, that way you cut off a huge amount of people whose voices count.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 03:25 PM
1

And again, you don't get what they're offended about. It's the comparison to puppy training and only that what's offensive in this text.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 03:04 PM
1

Everybody is concerned of creating "echo chambers" but seeing people experiencing the same problems as yourself gives incentive and men need it. Discussion is important in itself.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:52 PM
2

Yes, men have no incentive, that's why "echo chambers" are important for people to see that they are not alone in their problems. That's how you give them motivation.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:25 PM
1

You don't get why they are offended, I wish your gf treats you that way constatly.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:51 PM
1

Opression of women is pretty much covered everywhere, we got an article about men and you bring up stuff irrelevant to the post.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:51 PM
1

Subreddit vs a publication that pays people.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:38 PM
1

That's funny how nobody upvoted the most relevant reponse in this thread. Somebody compares you to a dog and you still wanna discuss their points? That disqualifies them from any discussion in my eyes.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:34 PM
1

Gtfo dude.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:29 PM
1

You not having a problem with that kind of language completely discriminates you from talking about men at all.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:27 PM
0

That lazing around doing nothing is bad has nothing to do with this post, there are other jobs and doing this kind of shit is a sign of low self esteem. Why don't these rich women find female servants if sex has nothing to do with it, they'd understand their needs better.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:18 PM
3

Maybe that's because if you're taught to refer to your private parts with a term carrying more serious connotations you're on average more inclined to treat your bodily autonomy more seriously. Maybe usage of less serious terms in a family goes hand in hand with less understanding of the concept of bodily autonomy. Either way most people these days still know what a "weewee" is while coresponding female expressions are rather nonexistent. Looks like people care less for boys' bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 10:13 PM
2

I encountered a post on some health forum once where a mom refered to her daughters problem using that kind of word and her respondents wanted to eat her alive. They said that it was demeaning to refer to your daughter that way and that she finds it acceptable probably means a lot of internalised misogyny.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:22 PM
1

I know what playing a devils advocate means, but you declaring that the intention of your post is playing devils advocate does not mean a thing. What does that mean that you don't agree with that view? Does it mean that you don't think that most people here would do that or that you don't accept beating disabled people? What counts is the main part of your post that suggests exactly what I accuse you of.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 02:00 PM
1

Are you trying to make frequenters of this sub into monsters who beat people with ocd for grabbing onto their shirts? This was a grown woman being annoying and not respecting his personal space. He got pissed and she got served. Get out of here and take your bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 01:35 PM
1

Yeah dude you could learn from that.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:49 AM
2

In some languages mothers have diminutive words for female genitalia like weewee for boys.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:43 AM
4

But why it is more socially acceptable?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:38 AM
7

Maybe, but it's good that there are people who think that their personal satisfaction is worth some risk.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 10:00 AM
1

There's a matriarchal state in India where there's no women in politics.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 02:46 PM
1

It's your false idea that feminism is finished encourages "let's open a beer we won" kind of thinking, when everybody should know that some essential pushback is still necessary. You're the one knocking wind out of people. None of what I wrote is an attack on you, just on the idea you present here.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:45 AM
2

Most what you wrote is irrelevant to the point you're trying to make. For example you think that there is some simple definition of "high moral grounds", that feminism needs that to have power. Points you make in your post are just separate descriptions of some situations from the past that have no merit for the discussion and the main point you're making is false. That's why people don't want to read it. Be concise and to the point.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:20 PM
1

When they kicked angry dudes from facebook?
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:55 PM
1

No problem, even though I often decry comments that say this or that is not relevant for mrm, this really is just a minor observation on my part. Instead of here, I posted more concise version into mensrants.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 12:17 AM
1

Ok, this would probably be better in r/mensrants, and I mean that as an observation that maybe there are more moms who are narcissists than dads. These kinds of specific rulesets are often made as blankets for narcissists who are unable to teach these things by example, but I agree that the pic is confusing in this context so I'll probably remove this post and post the question alone in r/mensrants.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:27 PM
1

I mean looks like r/raisedbynarcissists perceive moms as narcissists much more often than dads.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:31 PM
1

Why was op deleted?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:47 PM
1

I need feminism because... Yeah, I need french revolution because without it I would still be working in some assholes field and be whipped when I don't work fast enough.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 02:25 PM
1

Most of that story is great, but the implication at the end that we're all supposed to watch guys whore out while women get to keep with moderately innocent image is what's stupid. I'd like the ladies to be as open with their bodies as guys, but if that's not possible than guys shouldn't be as open as well.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 11:56 AM
1

No, there was never as much acceptance for their bullshit as there is now, and there's so many mras now exactly because wherever you look you see open hate.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 01:05 AM
1

No, these were some snarky comments here and there from time to time, happy open bashing is what we have now. Before there was enough influential dudes who wouldn't let slide being insulted, now they shut up like good boys because feminists have enough influence to mark them as (wo)man eating monsters if they open their mouth.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:30 AM
0

But the incidents like that were far and inbetween, I should ask you where you have been. Nobody gave a shit about mrm because an average Joe had no reason to care, manhaters were sitting quietly under their stone.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:16 AM
1

Breyvik was probably another Jeremy. Wasn't treated well by his mother, and in his manifesto he wrote something about how boys shoud be only raised by fathers.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 11:16 PM
2

I don't know what do you mean by always, nobody spout bullshit like that even 2 years ago, they were confined to jezebels and other obscure internet holes before. If they were pushed so much against the wall like you say they woukd be angry, and not gleefully taking apart mrm conference and making fun of it.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:23 PM
11

No, that means that feminists are now influential enough to say whatever they like on mainstream media. It's not opposition, it's exercising their privilege.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 09:53 PM
11

As punishment for the cops I'd send them to work as gay prostitutes.
/r/PussyPass09/07/14 08:30 PM
1

Supposedly both him and his wife researched these kinds of accidents and explained they were afraid this could happen. Not long time ago there was a case where I live of a baby missing, then evidence surfaced that suggested the kid died in an accident following mother's neglect and she tried to cover it up by claiming that the child dissappeared. Then they found out mom was researching common accidents that take children lives.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:46 AM
3

Force them to act like people?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:15 AM
1

Yeah, all that concern from you stoic and dignified people reeks of telling others what they should care for. If you don't give a fuck maybe just shut up and let people who care decide for themselves. edit: downvote and move on maybe? Sorry for the profanity.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:02 AM
1

I wonder how is it possible that so few people notice that. edit: Maybe nobody's gonna see that post anymore, but I think that I should clarify that this was not sarcasm. It is genuinely baffling to me how is that possible that even so few mras notice the scale of this double standard.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:06 PM
1

Simply don't like it, plus, it's made on money not meant for bullshit like that. Who thinks like me?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 05:25 PM
5

Crappy place, shouldn't exist. Now others vote your opinion here, if you don't care don't say anything.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 05:08 PM
1

What you wrote here is basic yet noone here will listen to you. Let me repeat it, this above is 100% right and there is really not much that can be added, we need some personality.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:29 AM
4

It's probable that if a guy threw a glass he'd be rightfully prompted to feel like a shithead.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:05 AM
1

We should probably make a club of people who know that everything's complicated because too much people think that they can fit the world into a three sentence description.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 12:28 PM
1

The coolest thing of late.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:12 PM
2

I don't know if I understand what you mean, but I'm not from US and I had a similar problem, teachers would punish me with grades for my behaviour in middle school and highschool and the two standardized tests at the end of both would come up radically different from what was expected. So I don't know if there's any place where you'd get different treatment.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:00 AM
1

That's why I was talking about an average dude, the greatest inflow into mrm sites was when they messed with facebook.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 01:48 AM
1

Before, as lately as last year even, nobody told you what you can and can't say on the internet, and mainstream media was moderately neutral, so there was no reason for outrage for an ordinary dude. Where do you think that new massive inflow of people came from, sudden enlightement? The only place they can still say more or less anything are these little mensrights spots and even here there are fools going around trying to censor them. It's actually now that you can get f*d if feminists don't li…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 04:01 PM
2

Good thing, that should be done everywhere in the world so men stop donating. Gotta get rid of spermbanks.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 12:32 PM
2

I don't think the case is lack of courage, it's just that nobody really cared till feminists started to censor the internet and hijacked mainstream media lately.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:10 PM
0

Modern men can't into politics, getting angry at a dude who can be useful instead of telling him to stfu about the things he's doing wrong.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:23 PM
1

The thing is they aren't pushing for some line that marks equality, they'll be pushing forward as long as nobody pushes back.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:15 PM
1

Same concerns about the MGTOW not being enough.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:12 PM
1

I mean men should care more about the things they do and think, that's a start for organising.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:09 PM
2

That's partialy because an average joe desn't care about things as much as an average joan. He likes to complain about female hivemind but the thing is that this "hivemind" is actually complety healthy behavior, men used to be able to act that way and we should remember how to if we want change.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:54 PM
6

We are talking about how often men are victims of violent attacks vs how often women are, and you behave like experience of one person invalidates experiences of other people. Someone used the word hypothetical because in the posted picture there is no mention of anyone's specific experience, just the assumption that women are afraid every moment of their lives.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:09 PM
5

We are only saying that violence against women is perceived as something different of even worse than violence against men, while men face violent attacks more often than women. We're discussing the reasons behind this. How is this not a men's issue?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:36 PM
2

Actually, I think you both are right on the reasons for why would awareness of threat be bigger for women (check the interview with Miles Groth). All that orzx' wrote was right but in talking about breaking the stranglehold of fem bullshit on our culture he used some shitty wording, don't let your anger control you to the point of bringing violent imagery, becuse then people won't read what's important in your post and you get undeserved downvotes.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:15 PM
2

Neat, you see a spot in the interests advertising your cause and you complain that it's in the wrong neighborhood. Hardly anyone cares about men's rights, in that situation you don't get to be picky, and even talking to children counts. You're not doing the talking so what do you care.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:09 AM
0

The thing is, pushing for traditionalist ideas in today's world is impossible and for politicians the most important thing is keeping power so the only real leverage for him is men's rights and he wouldn't be able to do any wrongs.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 11:54 AM
6

Regardless of who is the biggest promoter, circumcision is a men's issue.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:29 AM
4

Problem is there's some significant number of nasty chicks who act like men aren't human, that's why we need to be nasty to these people so they feel nasty. There's no other way to educate people like this except ridicule or making them taste their own medicine.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:15 AM
6

Fingertips are very sensitive, nails protect the upperside, which means their function have some similarity with the function of foreskin.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:53 AM
2

I think the best response to you is that its so much shit that all the subs hosting material similar to r/creepshots aren't banned like creepshots itself. When you wanna know what some of us feel just do an EXACT gender swap.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:36 PM
1

Characters in a smut work aren't treated as full persons, they are depicted in unrealistic situations designed for your gratification and when you use real people as basis for them that's like bringing all the aspects of these peoples lives to the level of objects. In short, everything about a fanfic like that screams objectification while in the ad you have normal activity by whole but anonymous people but filmed and edited for your gratification. It's objectifying the body of an anonymous pers…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 06:50 PM
4

Boobs are not dicks, it'd be like this if there were people posting similar things with sleeping women to r/pussy and joking about it, but I don't see that happening. You can't equate an occasional sideboob to pics of dicks on a dedicated site.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:00 PM
1

Yeah, I read smut from time to time and it's all bullshit you can only discuss with a humorous manner and not spout crap about "well-rounded characters". You were comparing the level of objectification not exposure in the media, and the level of objectification is like a dressed stripper vs live sex. I don't know how warm-up isn't part of sport, these were clothes people actually play in. Smut that contains names of actual people is crap you pull out of your ass about someone's life, it's pure v…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:29 AM
1

Dude, it's like they are performing a sex act on display, and everywhere in the ad where the athletes engaged in sport.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 01:54 AM
2

Politics is the process of forming policies and that's how human groups will always operate, it will never be dated.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 12:28 AM
1

Showing closeups of people doing sports is more demeaning than depicting people in intimate situations? You need a serious check of your definitions. There's nothing more objectifying than using someone's image to depict activities said person would find uncomfortable. On another note: people should stop using robot phrases like "I would have to say..."
/r/MensRights04/04/14 12:09 AM
1

That way is not dated, it's how political debate always was and still is.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:58 PM
-1

Agreed, it's just that pointing out these little differences in treatment gives us more leverage in discussion with feminists.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:20 PM
10

I'm all for... is a statement of people who don't give a f...
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:18 PM
13

I don't care what other responsibilities Ottawa got, they can deal with those without me caring. I care about a guy who got wrongly accused and is still being treated like he did it, you probably should too, considering the subreddit you're on.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:58 PM
1

Around 100 comments here and most irrelevant to the title: drooling over male athletes - nobody cares; drooling over female athletes - bad, courtesy of Jezebel. I don't know what's unclear here, either stop telling me that I'm an evil monster for talking smack about women or stop taking smack about dudes.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:37 PM
2

No, but we want to oppose double standards which are an important problem too. The only way we can do this is by calling them out on that, everywhere.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:04 PM
3

Try to make a tv series that depicts sex that way but with a dominant man and do a promo. Shitload of people will tell you that's violence towards women.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:31 PM
1

I meant the whole concept of rule34 not just the sub, now anything too kinky disappears quickly no matter where you post it. I bet anything with a dude on top would be considered rape.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 10:44 AM
1

Actually, much of that's been cleared off the internet by angry wimminz because you can't objectify wimminz ( ofcourse you can do that to menz as much as you want ), been made private so that practically noone can see it, or at best downvoted into the underbelly of the net. Rule34 doesn't really work anymore.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter