TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dannomac Archive

View 1 post and 147 comments by dannomac on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

dannomac/r/MensRights23/07/09 06:17 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Well, in Scouts Canada the two deep leader rule applies to all Scouters, male and female. It's taken just as seriously with women.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 02:20 AM
2

Sounds like he should come work out for the CFL. Different game, different size requirements.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 12:52 PM
1

Quebec doesn't have common law marriage.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 12:31 AM
46

These are more common than not where I live. Most places that have changing stations either have them in the mens and womens washrooms, or in a communal "family" washroom. Very rarely do I see one only in the womens. This is in stark contrast to about 8-9 years ago, when I had all sorts of trouble finding a change station that wasn't in the womens room. I even had one person tell me that the family change room was "for mothers with small children".
/r/MensRights24/02/14 06:48 PM
2

Senator Anne Cools was never elected, but she did run several times. She is the first Black Canadian to be appointed to the senate, and she is openly supportive of shared parenting and fathers' rights following divorce.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:40 PM
2

The filmmakers can't help it if there weren't female developers helping get Facebook off the ground. The filmmakers need to start enhancing the truth!
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:54 PM
1

Not entirely correct. There's 35 weeks of "parental leave" that can be split up however the couple wants, and 17 weeks of "maternity leave" that is exclusively for the mother.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:55 PM
1

Nothing really to worry about anymore. Most hospitals in Canada don't do infant circumcisions anymore.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:42 PM
1

The sovereign state is the United Kingdom. Seems this law only applies to England and Wales, however. Apparently Scotland has banned rape porn for a while now.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:19 PM
5

You should if you pay EI premiums. They're just optional if you're self employed.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:06 AM
4

Nah. Ontario companies can move to British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, or Newfoundland and Labrador fairly easily. I think you'll find a decent number doing just that.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 01:31 PM
2

No idea about Ontario, but from what I hear Alberta also bans gender as a factor in determining insurance premiums.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:17 AM
3

In Saskatchewan car insurance is based on: The car The experience of the owner Insurance gets cheaper the longer you have a clean record. Everybody starts at the same rate. A 30 year old woman with no driving experience is charged the same as a 16 year old boy. Also, we're hiring.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:15 PM
2

According to Saskatchewan law hyphenated names can have at most two names in them.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:09 PM
2

The difference here is that Quebec doesn't have common-law marriage. British Columbia and Alberta do.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:38 PM
4

True in my province as well. Also the insurance company is government owned and has the mandate to break even.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:43 PM
1

After upping the age of consent in Canada to 16 from 14, the new compromise that also came with it is not unreasonable: 5 year age gap before 16, so 15+20? okay, 14+20? not okay, 18+17? definitely okay.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:31 AM
1

Nobody said legally. It simply doesn't get enforced.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:09 AM
3

Canada survives without a SS. It also has draft registration, though here we call it income tax. The last time Canada's draft was activated it drafted both men and women and used income tax data to do so.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:30 PM
3

That's called constructive dismissal, and is indeed illegal.. at least here.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 01:05 AM
1

In Canada this isn't sexual assault. It was sexual interference, the crime of having consensual sex with one too young to give it to you. If it is a man and a 14 year old girl the media generally uses the same phrasing, although the last time I read about it in the media it was still perfectly legal, so that's kind of moot.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:58 PM
1

I pay the same as everyone else with my car and driving record in Saskatchewan. I hear the BC is the same.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 06:29 PM
1

This website is bilingual. In French it's a male coach and a male OR female athlete. "L'Entraineur pass beaucoup de temps avec un jouer ou une jouese en dehors des practiques". Clearly the coach is only male, otherwise it would have used L'Entraineur ou L'Entraineuse going by how the player is treated.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:04 PM
5

When my daughter was born there were at least two male med students who were learning the ropes in maternity. That was at the local teaching hospital last year. Mind you, we're in Canada.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:33 AM
2

He'll be punished either way. The SCC will decide if the crime was criminal negligence or aggravated assault. This will prove very interesting, because in Canada doing this to a female at all is aggravated assault.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 01:48 AM
1

It's legal to sell sex and to buy it. Talking about it is illegal, and it's illegal for it to be someone's primary source of income. The effect is that street prostitution is illegal, but escort services and call girls are perfectly legal. This ruling makes brothels legal too, as well as making it legal to make a living as a prostitute. Being a pimp is still illegal as is street solicitation, but doing it in a place of business is a-okay.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 08:16 PM
1

This company makes money on insurance using very few variables to determine rates: make/model/year of vehicle, use of vehicle, and "safety rating" awarded for each year without an at fault accident or traffic violation. Seems fair to me.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 03:21 AM
1

Sorry I wasn't clear.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:44 PM
1

I said where I live. Laws vary by region.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:07 PM
2

Huh. Here the law's pretty clear: if the parents can't agree on a surname the baby's name is the parents' names hyphenated in alphabetical order.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:47 PM
4

And breastfeeding is cheaper!
/r/MensRights02/03/12 08:33 AM
7

No, Canola Oil comes from Canola; Rapeseed oil comes from Rape. Canola is a cultivar of rape, rape is not canola. /saskatchewan farm boy.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 03:26 PM
0

My father was apparently the first one in my family line raised speaking English. Until then Gaelic was somewhat tolerated in Canada, but during and after the second world war the shit hit the fan because (and this is actually what the government believed) Canadian Gaelic = Irish therefore Canadian Gaelic speakers are traitors because Ireland is neutral in the war.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 09:49 PM
1

In Canada you don't have the right to have a lawyer present, though you do have the right to consult with one and refuse to answer questions.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 07:28 AM
3

Didn't like her much when she was in office, don't like her any better now.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 11:11 PM
1

That would have been interesting to see, considering it's a federal registry. The only think I think he would have reasonably been able to do is create an Ontario sex offenders registry.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 01:49 AM
2

Nobody in Canada can check the sex offender registry except for the RCMP. They're not allowed to disclose the results of the search unless one is doing a vulnerable sector search for a job application and there's some pretty strict criteria to qualify for that search.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 05:01 PM
1

Actually, many breastfeeding women DO spray milk all over the place.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:09 AM
0

Birth alone can cost you anywhere from $7000+. That's fucked up. When my kids were born the total cost was $50, and that was to pay for parking at the hospital.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 01:08 AM
1

Not as separate as you might think. She chose Conservative prime ministers until 1958 when that party got its own method of selecting leaders.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:56 PM
1

Well Winston Churchill is currently dead so he can't offer an apology. True, but the Queen's still alive and her reign started in 1952. She was around when Turning was convicted and later committed suicide. It would have been nice to hear it from her, methinks.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:24 AM
1

Upvoted for "Nelly McClung would spit in your mouth". I believe it.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 04:47 PM
4

No it isn't, it's closer to 30. It's 44% in Ontario, and nil in Newfoundland. It varies pretty widely across the country, but overall it's a lot less than 50%.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:31 PM
3

The age of consent in New Zealand is 16.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 05:07 PM
1

It's 17 weeks and 35, It adds up to a total of 52. I didn't paternal leave when my daughter was born because (unlike for women) my employer doesn't top up parental leave for men. I just took two weeks of vacation time.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 12:36 AM
1

In Canada they're appointed by the government in theory. In practice the government solicits advice from the bar association.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 12:12 AM
2

The difference is that youth's names are not mentioned when they're being associated with crime. The Youth Criminal Justice Act forbids publishing the names of minors accused (or convicted of) crimes.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 09:09 PM
3

Under 18s in Canada never get their names published. This is the first I've ever heard of it happening to ANYONE, male or female.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 04:50 PM
1

That's true of a lot of tax benefits in Canada, but the for the child tax benefit the code explicitly states that it goes to the female if both live with the children.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 07:37 PM
4

I'm torn about this. It's certainly out of the ordinary and apparently illegal where it happened, but that situation would have been perfectly legal in Canada in 1997.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 08:01 PM
1

I wouldn't be surprised if the Christian religious right would oppose this. Many of them know that circumcision is not required by Christianity, and indeed the Catholic bible talks about how it is bad.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 07:55 PM
1

It's still a "choice" in many countries with universal health care. Canada, Australia, the UK all have universal health care, and circumcision is still available in each of those countries. It's definitely on the decline, though, and when it stopped being paid for it fell pretty drastically, but is still is available.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 07:03 PM
1

That's the strange thing. You'd think extradition treaties would exist between Canada and the USA. They are each other's most obvious place to take a child, I think.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 03:52 PM
2

You didn't answer my question. Let me repeat: What Christian groups consider circumcision a religious rite?
/r/MensRights01/06/11 09:58 PM
1

What Christian groups consider circumcision a religious rite?
/r/MensRights01/06/11 04:30 PM
4

That's a good chunk of it. No provinces fund it any more. The last one was Manitoba.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 02:53 AM
1

Many hospitals in Canada don't even do them any more. But like the US it varies by region.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 04:33 PM
3

I have a hard time disagreeing with a presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 04:23 PM
1

True. There may have been some support roles, too. Indeed, Elizabeth was a mechanic for the Royal Army during the war, so women were involved.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 01:44 PM
3

Canada has no standing draft registration. When conscription happened in the past the government would pull from income tax information. Women and men were both considered, but only men were ever conscripted. The UK, did, however, conscript women.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 07:18 PM
1

The child has to eat. Feed it, it's important.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 08:07 PM
1

You don't have a choice about which insurance to use? Not here. There's exactly one choice. At least it's cheap and doesn't base its policies on anything other than kind of car and driving record.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 10:22 PM
1

What reason did your professor give?
/r/MensRights16/02/11 07:53 PM
3

Also, Canada doesn't have a public sex offender list with restrictions like that, so certainly not.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 03:02 PM
3

We have a sex offender registry, but only the RCMP has access to it. It takes a lot of work to get on it.. repeat offences, violence, etc. This person won't be on it. The punishment isn't out of line, our sentences tend to be a lot lighter than American ones, the sentence being primarily for rehabilitation rather than punishment. I don't know what a man in a similar situation would get, though.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 03:02 PM
7

Only one of those is counter to the general statement I made. Like I said: "rape victims are usually anonymous and alleged rapists are not.", unless the victim is a minor. If the victim is a minor they'll try to protect the minor by not publishing names, unless there's good reason to believe that the victim can't be identified simply by naming the accused.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 05:14 PM
8

No. If it had been a 44 year old man and a 13 year old girl the names would not be released, to protect the victim. On the other hand, rape victims are usually anonymous and alleged rapists are not.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 04:18 PM
1

Where and how does this happen?
/r/MensRights31/01/11 07:35 PM
2

There's also a big difference between being found innocent and being found not guilty.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 05:15 AM
1

The argument goes something like this: Premise: The foreskin is not a body part. Support: We routinely cut it off. So, since the foreskin is not a body part, because it's routinely removed from male infants, it's legal to sell it. Also, it gets cut off because it's not a body part.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 09:23 PM
2

If you're referring to a plastibell then what happens is they tear the foreskin away from the glans before inserting the bell.
/r/MensRights29/10/10 10:05 PM
1

No kidding. At 6 and 7 they should be able to do that themselves.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 02:20 AM
2

Here in Canada we have expectant mother spaces and parent with infant spaces.
/r/MensRights11/09/10 03:47 AM
1

Hamilton is in Ontario.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 11:33 PM
1

I don't know that two Catholic priests would be a problem. One perhaps.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 05:09 PM
1

I don't know where you live, but here we'd probably just use more festuce.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 05:09 AM
2

In Canada it's still legal because there's a 5 year age window too.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 12:12 AM
1

Where I live everyone starts with a base rate at 16. As they earn their driving record they get a 2% "discount" per year for each year they have a clean record, to a maximum of 20%. On the other hand, if you get a bad driving record you earn negative "discounts". So, let's say you have 6 years of clean driving, you'd have a 12% discount. Then you cause an accident, you're back down to 0. If you cause another, -12% for you.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 02:22 AM
1

At the high school I went to there was no official dress code; the only really big rule was no hats. In HS I never saw it, but at the local university it's not uncommon for men to wear kilts.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 03:34 AM
5

I'd be interested to know how that can happen without forceful retraction.
/r/MensRights19/05/10 12:03 AM
3

How long ago were you a teenager? I'm in Canada, so this certainly doesn't apply to the US, but when I was in high school there was an exceptionally attractive girl who somehow got it in her head that all boys were circumcised here; she asked several of us at a table at lunch one day and found out that less than 20% of us were. That was in 1997. My point is, situations like what you describe change with time and place.
/r/MensRights25/02/10 06:01 AM
2

Oh, I'm Canadian, and I think that way, but I'm from a part of Canada that nearly universally rejects the current idea of federal gun control policy. Technically any unregistered firearm in Canada is an illegal firearm.
/r/MensRights04/02/10 05:15 AM
3

They're kilts. They're called such because anyone who calls them skirts gets kilt.
/r/MensRights04/02/10 05:06 AM
1

Yup. A small handgun can be easily concealed. It's dumb, but that's the reasoning.
/r/MensRights04/02/10 05:01 AM
2

96VAC, 60hz while working on a telephone cable plant. Nearly made me fall off the ladder.
/r/MensRights14/01/10 03:46 AM
5

My son does hug his friends goodbye at daycare. Nobody thinks twice about it. Mind you, this is the daycare with a male employee with dread locks that nobody thinks twice about.
/r/MensRights05/01/10 07:39 AM
3

Oh, I agree. It just happens that most circumcisions in North America happen on infants, so there is no consent possible.
/r/MensRights30/12/09 05:39 PM
7

Men and boys have the right to genital integrity just like women and girls do. Circumcision is a violation of that; hence Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights30/12/09 07:32 AM
8

I'm sure you're trying to be funny, but not cool.
/r/MensRights20/12/09 05:48 AM
2

See, they made a path in his lawn, then walked on it.
/r/MensRights19/12/09 04:38 AM
1

This one is interesting. Most of the time when I hear statements like that the phrase "for the same work" is added. This just says that (total number of dollars earned by women) / (total number of dollars earned by men) == $0.84.
/r/MensRights17/12/09 02:15 AM
3

If you're Canadian, the Criminal Code is a piece of federal legislation.
/r/MensRights09/12/09 07:45 AM
4

Of course Canada has its share of murderers and rapists and the like. But I seriously had no idea what constitutes a felony until I looked it up today, apparently the analog here is an indictable offence, one tried by jury. I wonder how well allowing convicts to vote would go over down there. I know it wasn't popular here when the SCOC decided that it was a right that couldn't be taken away.
/r/MensRights30/11/09 08:24 AM
8

Well, we don't have felonies here, so likewise there are no felons. One tactic used by governments to stay in power is to disenfranchise people. By disenfranchising (I'm using an example here) someone who was convicted of trafficking marijuana it makes it slightly less likely that laws banning trafficking marijuana will be overturned, leading to fewer people in jail for that offence. I know this also wasn't in my original post, but it might also make prison conditions somewhat better if politici…
/r/MensRights30/11/09 06:20 AM
9

In Canada every citizen over the age of 18 can vote. Including prisoners. I think the USA should try it, it might mean fewer people in jail for non-violent crimes.
/r/MensRights30/11/09 06:01 AM
1

I have no idea. Talk to a lawyer. But anyway, best of luck to you. I was lucky enough to be spared in the early 80s (in SK).
/r/MensRights23/11/09 10:27 PM
5

Male Circumcision is still legal throughout Canada, and I believe a few provinces still pay for it as part of the provincial medical plan. Definitely correct about the first part; but I don't think any provinces pay for it anymore. Some provinces (ie Saskatchewan) have flat out warned physicians that they may get sued for performing them by the boys once they turn 18.
/r/MensRights23/11/09 01:19 AM
1

Indeed. Mary and the Holy Ghost. I'd say that it's parthenogenesis as long as Joseph wasn't involved.
/r/MensRights13/11/09 06:30 AM
0

I'd think many Christians would argue that at least one human (well, exactly one), mastered parthenogenesis.
/r/MensRights13/11/09 06:21 AM
1

Around here you can start to ride in April, and then you have to stop (unless you have a suicide wish) when the snow starts. Usually it would have been by now, but not this year. When we switched to single payer insurance there were many for profit providers, just like in the US. It was a struggle, the doctors even went on strike for nearly a month over it.
/r/MensRights12/11/09 05:18 AM
1

Yes, our single payer insurance is unconditional; there are a few things that are payed out of pocket, though. Ambulance rides, casts, and crutches are not covered, but they're pretty cheap and covered by almost everyone's employer's group insurance. Because of that if you were put into the position you describe your liability insurance would only need to cover lost wages during the time in hospital. But lost wages would only mean 1/3 to 1/2 of their regular wage due to short term disability ben…
/r/MensRights11/11/09 11:02 PM
1

Everyone gets the same basic insurance more or less as follows: Coverage for your vehicle ($700 deductible) Coverage for injury liability caused by you. Coverage for others vehicles or property caused by your vehicle. All of these are to a maximum of $200000 per collision. You can get better coverage for not a lot more from either the crown insurance provider, or private insurers. My wife's car is the one we use when we travel out of province, so it has a $200 deductible and $1000000 in liabilit…
/r/MensRights11/11/09 07:17 PM
1

It's significantly more expensive if you own a nicer car. My wife's car is $950, and my father's is $1600. Still cheaper than a lot of places, though.
/r/MensRights10/11/09 10:43 PM
1

Saskatchewan, but it is a double edged sword. Insurance is provided by a crown corporation that is a monopoly on basic auto insurance, so some people believe that it is too expensive here. Myself, I'm happy to pay less than $500 a year on my full featured auto insurance; I know how expensive it was when I lived in Alberta.
/r/MensRights10/11/09 06:31 PM
2

Makes me glad I live where I do. The two factors in determining car insurance here are book value of the vehicle and driving record.
/r/MensRights10/11/09 08:10 AM
1

I'm pretty sure that study was carried out by the Toronto Children's Hospital.
/r/MensRights09/11/09 02:11 PM
3

Obligatory: Circular Reasoning
/r/MensRights16/10/09 07:57 PM
2

Ick. It should be left alone until it detaches on its own. I can't imagine a doctor doing that to me (or my son, for that matter). I'd have switched doctors too. Apparently it's quite a common belief that they should be retracted after 3 years or so.
/r/MensRights02/10/09 01:38 AM
2

The BC government pays for foreskin restoration, so I think it's more fair to say that men are not afforded any sympathy in the USA if they admit they don't like being circumcised.
/r/MensRights01/10/09 10:21 PM
2

Please tell me that doctors don't tell you you need to retract and clean under infant foreskin?
/r/MensRights01/10/09 10:19 PM
2

Change can be slow, but it is happening. I'm Canadian, and here circumcision was never more than common than 50-60% of the population. It used to be accepted, but is getting less so, and my city no longer allows circumcisions at all in hospitals. Hopefully the same will happen south of the border.
/r/MensRights01/10/09 10:18 PM
3

There was a teacher like that at my secondary school. Thankfully I wasn't one of her victims. She pretty much had a three tiered grading system. Boys on the bottom (x < 70), Girls (70 < x < 85), and cheerleaders (85<x). I believe she's since been fired.
/r/MensRights22/09/09 06:39 AM
4

Sometimes Mens Rights and Feminism's goals and messages align. Feminism != evil.
/r/MensRights21/09/09 10:28 PM
4

They're reddit posters.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 12:12 AM
2

Can circumcised people cure AIDS simply by touching the afflicted? Don't give them ideas.
/r/MensRights04/09/09 04:51 PM
4

If it was male teacher who had sex with a 17 year old student I doubt he would have gotten off so lightly. I don't think so. Canada's sex offender registry is about as sane as one can be and still exist.
/r/MensRights30/08/09 08:05 AM
4

According to the criminal code, infanticide only happens when a woman who has not recovered from the birth through an act or an omission causes the death of her newborn infant. So, if a man did it it would probably be manslaughter.
/r/MensRights23/07/09 06:19 PM
2

She wasn't charged with infanticide, she was charged with manslaughter. Also, the charge of infanticide carries a maximum penalty of 5 years.
/r/MensRights23/07/09 06:16 PM
6

Interesting that the Crown was only seeking 30 months, too.
/r/MensRights23/07/09 05:43 AM
1

Child support is tax free.
/r/MensRights17/07/09 04:36 PM
1

Did you still have any sex segregated dorms? We do, mostly to make people who are uncomfortable with the idea of mixed gender dorms happy.
/r/MensRights07/07/09 03:52 PM
1

Well, in late 1990s early 2000s Saskatchewan the toilets had stalls, but the showers didn't. Girls' locker room though had stalls for both.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 11:57 PM
1

Good. Here at my university there are male-only dorms, female-only dorms, (well, they're different floors of the same building), "couple's" dorms, mixed (single occupancy, but not specifically male or female only sections), and two bed mixed gender.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 11:55 PM
1

Showering after gym. Funny you should mention that. Is it still true that boys' shower rooms don't have stalls while girls' do? It sure was when I was in high school.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 11:47 PM
2

My spellcheck doesn't allow one to globally select anything other than "US English" at install time.
/r/MensRights28/06/09 08:14 PM
2

18 is when one is considered an adult, but what matters is the time the offence occurred, not when the conviction occurred. This happened a few years ago, probably when the woman was 16 or 17.
/r/MensRights27/06/09 07:23 AM
2

You're correct, she was under age when she committed the crime, so she gets the youth sentencing discount. It's there, it's explicit, and it applies equally to girls and boys. As does the name publishing thing.
/r/MensRights27/06/09 07:22 AM
1

And why should women-owned businesses have an artificial advantage over male-owned businesses? Do they now?
/r/MensRights25/06/09 08:40 PM
1

I think part of the issue is that dads acknowledge that people fuck, while a lot of women don't. Hence, dads are more likely to instruct on safe sex rather than just preaching abstinence or ignoring it completely. Just my hypothesis, feel free to correct me (or do research).
/r/MensRights16/06/09 08:25 PM
0

Internet sarcasm detectors are very unreliable, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights15/06/09 04:49 AM
2

I think you're probably right, but I was in Safeway yesterday and they were soliciting donations to prostate cancer research. Not much, but certainly a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights15/06/09 04:32 AM
3

And a link to the original, thanks The_Idiot.
/r/MensRights12/06/09 07:15 PM
1

Another way is to make sure that insurance companies won't cover circumcision or any complications arising from it. Then the risk might be great enough to stop it in the USA. In Canada it's good enough that it's not covered by the public health system. Manitoba need to cut it tough, no pun intended, and Saskatchewan needs to raise the price.
/r/MensRights03/06/09 05:43 PM
11

This happened in the UK, where Crown prosecutors are not elected officials like DAs are in the States. This was just a bunch of dumbasses punishing some poor guy because his wife probably killed herself.
/r/MensRights26/05/09 03:56 PM
1

I don't know where cresur lives, but here if you live together and have a child you're married. If you have lived together for 1 year and have no children, you're married. Same rights and responsibilities.
/r/MensRights01/05/09 02:36 PM
3

Many people refer to it as Male Genital Mutilation. That's demonising, I think.
/r/MensRights30/03/09 05:39 AM
1

That works, but in general if a child approaches a stranger they'll be treated well enough. The "don't talk to strangers" attitude really means don't talk to the ones who approach you.
/r/MensRights25/02/09 07:02 PM
1

In Canada prostitution isn't illegal.
/r/MensRights12/02/09 02:36 AM
2

Read the article. All that's happening is the criminal court decided that the civil court must be the one to grant an eviction.
/r/MensRights12/02/09 02:04 AM
2

This is Canada. Canada needs a strong masculist movement.
/r/MensRights12/02/09 02:03 AM
1

Also, for you Canadians, this is one argument to keep the Senate the way it is. Senator Cools can say these things without worrying about winning the next election. Personally, I want an equal Senate (n seats, each province getting n/10 seats).
/r/MensRights27/01/09 02:58 AM
1

In Canada that is legal.
/r/MensRights09/12/08 06:28 AM
1

Canada. This happened in Canada, let's remember that we seem to have some saner laws than the USA.
/r/MensRights09/12/08 06:27 AM
1

Movember!
/r/MensRights08/12/08 07:59 PM
1

Jeans are much warmer than dress pants, so they're also for winter.
/r/MensRights08/12/08 06:29 PM
1

At least she got a proper sentence.
/r/MensRights28/11/08 03:15 AM
2

X looks very much like the Greek letter Chi. It's the first letter of the word "Christ" in Greek. Edit: Make the link work. Just learnt how to do that.
/r/MensRights10/11/08 04:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter