TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

darklogic420 Archive

View 11 posts and 331 comments by darklogic420 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
159

darklogic420/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:52 AM
151

darklogic420/r/MensRights02/11/13 08:11 AM
65

Red Pill Theorydarklogic420/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:00 AM
25

Ask Red Pilldarklogic420/r/TheRedPill10/11/13 11:38 PM
18

darklogic420/r/askMRP02/07/19 04:10 PM
11

darklogic420/r/RedPillWomen23/01/14 08:25 AM
8

Ask Red Pilldarklogic420/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 05:35 PM
8

darklogic420/r/askTRP01/07/19 11:44 PM
4

Red Pill Theorydarklogic420/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 04:15 AM
2

darklogic420/r/seduction15/10/13 05:13 AM
1

darklogic420/r/RedPillWomen25/11/13 05:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

In other words, the Patriarchy narrative is one that serves corporate plutocratic masters.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 06:12 PM
1

The existence of female-held wealth or power does not invalidate the theory of patriarchy. The problem with patriarchy as a theory isn't so obvious or easily dismissed as that. The reality that patriarchy fails to describe isn't one sex that holds a monopoly on power, because that is demonstrably false. It's that powerful people ally with other powerful people, not with powerless people that match them on a few salient features. Naturally, powerful people also make powerful enemies. Therefore, a…
/r/MensRights08/02/24 03:19 PM
1

Consider legal alternatives to marriage, such as a cohabitation agreement. Determine if common-law marriages exist in your jurisdiction before you go this route. As you are unmarried, you will need additional legal documents regarding rights such as hospital visitation, shared parentage of any children, and estate planning. Marriage simplifies all of these implicit agreements, of which there are many, but that simplification has a cost, of which you're aware. There are pros and cons to both meth…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 03:25 PM
5

Misandry. It means misandry.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:45 PM
3

Name one jurisdiction that gives gestational surrogates the right to keep a baby they aren't genetically related to. Not a genetic mother. Not someone giving up their baby for adoption. A surrogate. Name one. Provide a link. Please. Name one jurisdiction that would tell an expectant mother (or father, or mothers or fathers in the case of a homosexual pairing) "no, you may not have the baby you and your husband wanted, paid for, contracted a surrogate for, and obtained donor tissue to create/used…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:53 AM
2

That is patently false. Many jurisdictions prevent that by enforceable contracts so long as the gestational surrogate is NOT the genetic mother. Look up the laws in your state/nation/province before believing such a blanket statement.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 10:49 PM
2

As a sub gets larger post quality dies down and it becomes more difficult to moderate. This is a natural consequence of an idea catching on. You will find as you go through life that some of the worst people you meet are those who agree with you but for the wrong reasons.
/r/askTRP23/09/19 05:22 PM
12

Plenty. Too many to list in the spare time I have right now. You can just google studies on sexual partner count (both in and out of scholar mode) and let the horrors be unleashed in the results.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/19 06:02 PM
51

https://www.medinstitute.org/articles/pair-bonding-and-the-brain/ Was this the study you were talking about?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/19 02:55 PM
2

I intentionally made my advice somewhat broad. I have no idea if I'm talking to someone skinny, fat, or someone who only needs modest fine tuning of their diet. That being said, for most people who don't have specific dietary needs due to allergies or other chronic conditions, diet is not too complicated so long as they can be honest to themselves and maintain discipline. Watch your calories is the the primary thing to watch for. Secondary to that is maintaining a good balance of macro-nutrients…
/r/askTRP30/07/19 02:30 AM
40

Eat a diet that can support the lifting you do at the gym. Eat to support your workout goals. Don't eat like a skinny vegan or like a fat ass, but like a man should eat to maintain peak physical performance. Lean meats, fruits, vegetables, nuts, healthy sources of fats and carbohydrates such as olive oil and whole grains. If in doubt get an app on your phone to track calories and tell it how much you want to weight and use it to honestly track your food intake.
/r/askTRP29/07/19 01:27 PM
76

" what would she gain saying that?" This part is obvious: if you receive all the blame, then she doesn't have to put in any effort for her problems. You may consider confronting your wife's therapist in a couple's session to determine if either A. the therapist is worth your time and money or B. if your wife is lying to you about what happened in her session. If B, consider your options carefully.
/r/askTRP11/07/19 12:23 AM
1

I've not read WISNIFG. I'll get that next. I didn't lie about reading the specific posts I mentioned, but I did not state which books I had read. Can you read those posts, specifically the Depressed Wives posts (the author commented here with a great follow up which provides clarity) and explain away the "it's your fault" part? Because it seems you're cutting me too much slack here and going easy on me. You cover it with rude insults, but really you're letting me off the hook in your reply by na…
/r/askMRP08/07/19 01:09 AM
0

Once again you resort to insulting strangers on the internet instead of relying on logic. Do you believe you matter? You don't. My life is my own project. I solicited advice with a limited set of aims in mind, with admitted indecision. My goals and yours don't align, probably because we are at different stages of life. Me having a frame that I'm in need of repairing isn't a reason to break your own frame. Don't get so emotionally invested in a stranger's life that you need to insult them, you're…
/r/askMRP06/07/19 06:36 PM
2

Of course it's cute. I'm fucking adorable.
/r/askMRP06/07/19 04:09 PM
1

On some level you're right that I still have that low level guy stuck to me and holding me back. But no matter how many red pills I swallow I don't abandon honor and hurt people just because I can, especially when they have done nothing wrong to me. Women are often weak, and even when they aren't moments of weakness still come round the bend. I can choose to climb the pinnacle of the world by myself and spin plates, or I can be married to a weak person otherwise known as a woman. If I'm staying …
/r/askMRP06/07/19 03:54 AM
1

And yet here you are posting a reply on a board on the internet. That makes you trash just like me, but at least I admit what I am you filth.
/r/askMRP06/07/19 03:46 AM
1

She stuck by me when I was a much lower SMV than I am now. Divorce will be an option of last resort for me. I fully acknowledge I'm walking away from an abundant dating/sexual marketplace by working on my marriage and my wife.
/r/askTRP04/07/19 03:32 PM
3

The truth hurts. Thanks.
/r/askMRP04/07/19 03:29 PM
2

Do you trudge home and kick up your feet, taking about how tired you are ? Are you listening to her comments if being a tyrant at work ? How could she know this ? If you aren’t busy talking about and perusing interests and ambitions outside of work ? This hits the nail on the head for me. I definitely have a work mode and a home mode (possibly several other modes if I'm honest with myself). Work mode is high energy, intense, and aggressive yet intellectual. Home mode is relaxed with a desire to …
/r/askMRP04/07/19 03:31 AM
2

She definitely believes that I'm going to give up on her, and my lack of positive or negative feedback probably leads her to that conclusion. I want to encourage her and be honest with her without being brutal about it to help her improve. I've been operating under the assumption that I have to deal with her depression first then guide her to improve, but I'm learning here that guiding her to improve in itself will help her depression.
/r/askMRP04/07/19 03:26 AM
2

There's a definite Yang (Male) vs Yin (Female) to your theoretical framework. I don't like the way you say (or deliver) some of it regarding me and my situation, but I definitely appreciate the content.
/r/askMRP04/07/19 03:22 AM
1

I wouldn't have posted to askMRP if I knew what to do already. That is kinda obvious.
/r/askMRP04/07/19 03:19 AM
2

Will reread Sex God Method. Thank you for the advice about physical fun. I'm definitely implementing screen free date nights for us.
/r/askMRP04/07/19 03:18 AM
1

Ok it's my fault. This topic has been done by others and better. We've already moved past this point to work on a plan of action. Can you please add your two cents to the plan?
/r/askMRP03/07/19 02:34 AM
1

Just to clarify: the kids aren't to save the marriage. Whether she and I are together or not children are a goal of mine. It's just a question of whether my kids are with her or not. If with her then we are running short on time, true.
/r/askMRP02/07/19 05:06 PM
3

This is the sobering reply that I needed. If there is any other material you can point me to (other than direct sidebar links) I would appreciate it. And no, I'm not fun. I may be a bedrock in a storm but I'm not fun. I'll work on that, among the many other things I need to work on.
/r/askMRP02/07/19 04:47 PM
1

Harsh, but I appreciate it.
/r/askTRP02/07/19 04:43 PM
1

I am trying very hard to refute what you are saying, but deleting things as I type them. There are some positives, but do they outweigh the negatives? That's one of the things I am struggling with.
/r/askTRP02/07/19 04:42 PM
1

Working out 3 times a week, and we're both using the same application on our phones to count calories. We are both heavier than we want to be, but I see this effort as a positive sign. I'm the one who makes sure our cheat meals don't get too crazy and am the one encouraging her. I know that if I slack off then she will quit completely. The hamster is in full force but that is to be expected. In her mind everyone where we used to live including our therapist just did not see her needs and dismiss…
/r/askTRP02/07/19 04:39 PM
1

Are you recommending a silent or an overt deadline? Should dread be used in this situation?
/r/askTRP02/07/19 04:17 PM
1

Harsh. But appreciated.
/r/askTRP02/07/19 04:16 PM
1

" Even dread will get you, at best, hysterical bonding. " This pattern has repeated many times. This one sentence was something I needed to read. Thank you.
/r/askTRP02/07/19 04:15 PM
2

I have read that post but was hoping for more specific insights other than owning the situation as my own responsibility. I've reached that step. I'm trying to figure out the next one.
/r/askTRP02/07/19 04:12 PM
9

I normally do not comment in this sub, but here I must speak up. ​ If you purchase real estate with another person, do not place it in your personal name or add the other person's name to the title. Purchase it in an LLC. The bylaws of the LLC must be thought of in advance: who pays the taxes, who pays insurance, who pays for maintenance, who pays the mortgage, and who ultimately owns what % of the property. It's best if both parties agree to rent from the LLC and the LLC uses the money to pay t…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/19 12:55 AM
3

I would love to know statistics of divorce rates for Cosmo readers vs other women, and other such stats. If there was a significant delta and such was published, we'd potentially see men swear off Cosmo readers as qualifying mates and that in turn would eventually sink them and their advertisers.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 06:06 PM
11

Thinking about things using this analogy won't click for everyone, but to be clear complacency and excuses are for no one. I myself hire the services of a personal trainer and go for hour long sessions 3-5 times a week depending on my work schedule. I'm the only one at my gym buying that much training time, and I demand that my money is well spent by ensuring that my workout is more grueling and more efficient than anyone else's (that he's training). As for other areas of life, everything comes …
/r/TheRedPill15/02/17 08:31 PM
3

A true body acceptance movement would address people with physical malformations either from birth or through trauma. It would also address heightism is women and shame them for not wanting to date short men. It would embrace genital diversity and raise huge schlongs and tiny peckers as being equal, as well as both tight and loose vaginas. In other words, it would constantly remind us that a person's body is not necessarily a reflection on their character. Fat acceptance is not body acceptance, …
/r/TheRedPill15/02/17 08:20 PM
7

I would be legitimately interested in knowing if there is a correlation between having the same last name and a delta in divorce rates and lengths of marriage before a divorce is filed.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 04:34 PM
1

Adoption. Surrogacy. Child support. Those are the easiest
/r/askTRP03/12/16 01:00 AM
15

Acquitted just means there is no ability to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. While this could be a pass, it might not be. People, even men, get acquitted all the time.
/r/PussyPass19/09/16 12:38 PM
1

It is an expensive and difficult way you have chosen. I wish you the best.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 08:05 AM
1

I would suggest you do surrogacy coupled with adoption papers abroad. Consult a lawyer if this is a path you might pursue.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 05:09 AM
2

I what country are you in because in the US it is legal if you work with an agency and purchase an egg from an egg donor. As long as the child is not genetically related to the surrogate they have no claim at least in CA. Check the laws in your jurisdiction.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 03:05 AM
2

You can already do this through surrogacy. If they turn you away as a single man you can claim that they discriminate against homosexuals or asexuals and either smear or sue as the situation warrants.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 02:40 AM
1

Real estate and construction.
/r/askTRP25/08/16 10:05 PM
2

He is saying that human technology and knowledge advances faster than human evolution and wisdom.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 03:41 AM
2

That was part of his point
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:52 AM
3

You would think that nations that allow homosexual marriage would update this even if they cling to a "men bad, women good" mindset just to avoid accusations of systemic homophobia
/r/MensRights01/08/16 01:08 PM
3

I would love this idea personally.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 05:16 PM
4

What ideas do you have to bring these groups together?
/r/MensRights10/07/16 04:14 PM
3

I don't know if it is outsourced or done in-house, but whoever is in charge has been a disaster.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 10:34 PM
3

No shit. However if they have even a marginal drop in sales it might get their attention. Marginal however would still need to be in the multiples of millions.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 10:01 PM
1

By attack on craft beer do you just mean trying to compete against them or is there a specific attack campaign I'm not aware of?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 06:57 PM
8

While that is a valid and valuable point if one of their brands suffers because of this kind of stupidity they will insulate that stupidity into just that one brand. Corporations prefer to cut a branch off rather than let their entire corporate tree get infected with failure.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 06:35 PM
7

Consider it a late stage of porn addiction. The brain has been trained to achieve stronger arousal through voyeurism than sex. Personally I like meeting people like this, as it can lead to a maintenance free plate. As long as you don't insult the guy (unless they are into that) you get free kinky sex with zero strings guilt or other nonsense.
/r/askTRP03/07/16 05:26 PM
0

Well caught good sir.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 05:13 PM
178

If you want to fight this stupidity and you drink beer, stop drinking Budweiser products.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 04:16 PM
10

Sometimes you fight fire with fire.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 03:48 PM
0

The advice in that last sentence only holds true in some jurisdictions
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 05:05 PM
10

Now I might actually have something worth contributing. There is almost no other topic I could cover that has not been handled better by someone else already. Finances, contracts, passive income, real estate... these things are areas that this sub severely lacks in (though there are other subs that cover these very well).
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 03:23 PM
2

Doing that can nullify a prenuptial agreement. You can do one strategy or the other, not both.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 03:16 PM
3

This generic advice is the core of "The Handbook" by Epictatus. And it is actually very applicable.
/r/askTRP24/04/16 07:51 AM
13

Only concern yourself with what you can control. The past is beyond your control, as is the future. Take control of what you can in the present. Anything beyond that is wasted struggling.
/r/askTRP24/04/16 07:11 AM
1

Fitness comes way before PE.
/r/askTRP05/12/15 07:59 AM
6

The genetic nature of one set of traits makes it more intrinsic to an individual's person than the social and economic capital one acquires later in life. While I agree that only the internal state of consciousness is truly intrinsic, there are varying degrees of removal you must take into account.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 02:56 AM
12

What is. What should be. These two things do not match up.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 02:00 AM
6

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/no-1-in-5-women-have-not-been-raped-on-college-campuses/article/2551980 Here it is stated as 1 in 5. Different sources cannot agree on a 1 in 4 or a 1 in 5. This was found using a simple google search "1 in 4" and debunked as keywords. The number of articles found was actually quite large.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 08:07 PM
0

As someone who has been on this bandwagon before, thank you. I needed my amoral ass pointed out to me.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 06:41 PM
1

No. I'm disagreeing about the definition used in Wikipedia, which is a terrible source to cite.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 07:11 AM
1

If "the" definition is so broad as to be all inclusive, then the definition functionally does not exist. You are right about the denial though, you're just wrong about which of us is infected.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 06:49 AM
2

Then your definition of echo chamber is broad enough to be rendered useless.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 05:07 AM
1

You may be right to a degree, but I still assert that overt censorship is the true hallmark of absolute group think and therefore of an echo chamber.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 05:06 AM
1

I understand where you are coming from but that definition is broad enough to define almost any subreddit as an echo chamber. Objective behaviors must be accepted as part of the tautology. I propose that bans are far more indicative than downvotes.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 04:30 AM
2

Because a downvote means "I disagree" or "I do not feel this contributes to the discussion" which are both merely matters of dissenting opinion. A ban is explicitly censoring a voice so it does not disrupt the echo chamber.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 04:27 AM
4

I disagree that this is just an echo chamber. I'd define a subreddit as an echo chamber if disagreeing with veteran members of the subreddit will get you banned to protect their group think. SRS does this, as does askwomen and twoxchromosomes. Further it does not preach emotional manipulation. It preaches self improvement within a spectrum that people are socially and biologically programmed to respond to. It preaches amorality and to let go of anger and holding others to squeamish moral standar…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 02:34 AM
16

If you are already married, then she already has half of your stuff (less if you covered your ass well enough but even then there are ways she can get around that...) Deciding to stay loyal to a dead bedroom out of fear is an exercise of the sunk cost fallacy.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 10:18 PM
3

You misinterpreted him. He was not stating anything about the culture of the colonial power, but of the native population. You took this misinterpretation and ran roughshod with it. He wasn't saying that the natives want the culture of the foreign invader, but the invader's wealth. He further claims that they would rather have the invader's wealth than their own culture, and would therefore assimilate aspects of the foreign culture into their own. There are holes in the argument, but not the one…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 02:07 AM
23

The most useful statistic to track how well society is doing in regards to marriage is the average length of first marriages. Divorce rate as raw data can be conflated due to repeat divorce offenders, and a divorce at year two implies something different than one at year twenty. One of the best ways to display this data is the percentage of marriages that make it to a particular anniversary. http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-125.pdf Note table 4, page 11. If you got married in the early 19…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 03:22 PM
1

In my experience making a clear "one penis policy" has always been effective. If a woman knows that you will absolutely abandon her the moment she even gets in line for a cock carousel ride, it gives her pause. This works even in marriage, but only if you are clearly an appreciating asset over time and can demonstrate this. Show, do not tell. And don't stop spinning plates even if you get in an LTR. Threesomes in an LTR are a thing, and help establish your SMV with the most visual social proof p…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 09:03 PM
11

Even if she gave birth to you, she is not guaranteed to be your ally.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 12:27 AM
1

I think you need to learn what the phrase "not entirely dissimilar" means. Of course it wasn't water-boarding. Don't make specious arguments that twist the words of someone else.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 05:44 AM
10

What you describe as roughhousing and the definition used by the general population are in conflict. These boys were not roughhousing, they were ganging up on someone smaller and lower status than them and they bound the person against their will and then engaged in activities not entirely dissimilar from water boarding, a form of torture made illegal by the international community. Do not associate the Red Pill with disgusting antics like this. Do not defend this. Be a man.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/14 05:03 PM
1

Jelqing, penis pumps, and other methods of stretching all have pros and cons. Jelqing and penis pumps both have the pro of adding to your girth as well as your length. Actually they tend to be better at adding girth than length in my opinion. As for the amount of time, you would need to stick to a regimen religiously for years to see meaningful results. Most people give up long before they ever make any gains. This is not like working out. Your penis is not designed like a muscle to break down a…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/14 06:15 AM
6

Most people will log on here just to tell you that "male enhancement" does not work, and to accept what you've got. I'm here to tell you that you have options, but none of them are easy or good. There is no quick fix. Surgery is the fastest option, but the method makes your penis less functional. You either are having adipose tissue (or a substitute) injected to increase girth, or you are having tissue cut that while will admittedly let more of your penis exit your abdomen and thereby increase l…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/14 05:00 AM
2

No. TRP merely recognizes that women objectify men as success objects and directs men to act according to what women desire. Not what they say they desire, but what their behavior evidences that they desire.
/r/askTRP08/10/14 06:52 AM
29

It would have to be somewhere truly and completely anonymous. Any board where you have an account linked to an email would not work. What you are suggesting is libel because it's targets are women. Remember at all times that women are a special legal class of their own with special privileges, and those who attack those privileges do face repercussion in our society. It may be Redpill in here, but it isn't out there.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:37 AM
11

Just had my 12th anniversary. My mother in law asked when I was going to get her daughter an anniversary ring. Women just assume this shit is part of the rules. There is no romance, just greed and entitlement.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 03:30 AM
3

What are the implications of stiffened penalties on "revenge porn" for men who record their sexual encounters to avoid false rape charges?
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 02:23 AM
1

You are clearly interpreting the data, including the data of your made up scenario, with bias. Further, you are misinterpreting and misrepresenting my statements to mean something that they are not. Further, you have assumed my position for me as being identical to that of other posters, thereby fabricating a straw man argument regarding my position which I did not state. You have exited rational discussion and it is clearly pointless to convince you otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 09:13 PM
1

In your example you created a situation where a minority of the male population had sexual access to the majority of the female population. Understand that this is independent of the sexual access of the other males in that same population. Unless your scenario breaks all laws of social behavior, there will be a bell curve of male sexual access to females. The higher infection rate proves the bell curve exists, but you are correct that there is a lack of information to determine the shape of the…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:16 PM
2

Nothing in the numbers you spit out negated the infection disparity. Your assertion that the disparity does not correlate to behavior was stated without anything supporting the statement. In other words, this is just your opinion unless you can back it up. Really, explain it like we're all five.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 05:50 AM
1

I think there's a simpler explanation: female hypergamy demands that women want the best man and to have him all to herself for as long as he is useful to her. Male sexuality though generally renders us more willing to have sex with large numbers of beautiful women.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:04 AM
4

Consider supply and demand. There will always be more men than women willing to go into porn, therefore men will be paid less and sometimes have to pay. Interestingly, the male attributes required to be a success in porn don't necessarily guarantee higher pay but rather job security against the onslaught of willing male competition in the industry.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:10 AM
1

This may be fine for setting up the next time you see each other (or don't) but correct application of assertiveness in person can also be very powerful.
/r/seduction22/08/14 10:05 AM
1

Go lift. It sounds simplistic and even silly, but it is fundamental to feeling more masculine. Nothing looks as good or feels as good on you as muscle does. Nothing builds confidence like muscle does. As an added bonus, being geeky means you have social proof of your intelligence. You'll stand out from other geeks if you have muscle to back up your brains. Try to spin several plates, even if it makes you uncomfortable. Treat it as a weeding out process to find your one true love if you want, and…
/r/askTRP22/08/14 04:52 AM
11

Paying for the date is a shit test to hook you into being a provider or even a beta orbiter. Don't do it. Not the first, not the second... hell not ever. Don't pay unless you are explicitly treating her and are treating it as a gift. And if the woman isn't grateful, then she's a hollow soul and should never be more than a pump and dump in your mind.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 11:13 AM
2

They're considering a new tax on single men for starters.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 11:07 AM
4

I cannot agree with this comment enough. R. Kiyosaki books are amazing for teaching the uninitiated into the finer points of personal finance.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 12:52 PM
5

Consider how they hamster when they hit the wall, that they no longer want the type of man that they used to want. They will fashion their sons to become the type of man they themselves settled for.
/r/askTRP07/08/14 07:16 AM
1

As someone whose libido has struggled in the past I must ask: is it possible your husband is depressed? Is he under a lot of stress? I struggle with depression and it kills my libido. Unfortunately the medicine I take for it also kills my libido. Because of this tag team on it my doctors have allowed for me to take testosterone even though my levels fall within normal range. The extra test really helps quite a lot. I also recomend that if his heart is healthy that he take a daily ED tablet such …
/r/RedPillWomen20/07/14 12:57 AM
0

If they think they'll be the center of a male female male threesome, then they're cool with it and are very interested fro a one night stand. Once the idea crosses their mind that one guy will be touching, groping, or doing anything more intimate to the other... nope. Most women just have no interest in being anywhere near that or near someone who takes part in that.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 10:52 PM
22

Just because the poster is gay, the content he is posting is not about the gay lifestyle specifically. So no, I don't think this post needs to be removed or relocated.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 05:43 PM
7

Criminal accusations that are false are uncommon. Character assassination accusations such as those seen on college campuses are becoming increasingly frequent. You might not go to prison, but you could be expelled or get fired from your job.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 06:59 AM
7

The recording idea has merit. There are several specific things you should do to make consent undeniable though. First, do not have sex with someone who is intoxicated. They legally cannot give consent. Second, completely withdraw the moment you hear a no or a stop. Complete cold shoulder withdrawal. If she wants to continue after that do so only at her invitation. Otherwise never see her again. Condoms. Every single time use a condom. Dispose of it yourself. Do not ejaculate anywhere but inside…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 05:06 AM
4

This should have the Men's Rights tag.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/14 05:39 AM
-1

I honestly don't know how long this can keep going. There is no formal agreement. Her mood could shift dramatically and I could lose half my shit. Yeah really great ego stroke. Just because someone doesn't live like you and it sounds great doesn't mean it's perfect or fake.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 05:53 PM
-2

I'm not the first LTR to complain about the lack of LTR reception on this sub. Most LTR discussion in the RP world seems to happen in redpillwomen for that reason. I alone do not make a trend, but I do perceive that I'm part of one. The responses were inflammatory and juvenile for the most part. I didn't come here for an ego stroking. I came here hoping to understand something. I seriously am losing faith in this community.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 05:20 PM
-1

I am that guy. It was not bullshit. If I fathomed the question I wouldn't have asked for input. It doesn't make sense to me why that should matter to her. Obviously it makes no sense to anyone here either.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 04:47 PM
-8

This is not a safe space for LTR material. Anyone seeking LTR advice will get ridicule here. When the Red Pill sees anything resembling a Red Pill Marriage, they verbally tear it down. The Red Pill is full of juveniles that do not earn this place the reputation that it could have if more people put more thought into their replies like you do.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 03:45 PM
3

Considering just how juvenile some of the posters are here and how much antipathy they show to LTRs, this subreddit will have a bad reputation for a long time no matter how well reasoned other posters are.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 03:11 PM
25

There are no ethics in sexual strategy. I prefer to not judge guys like this and instead get them to see me as a safe choice to fulfill their fantasy.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 05:54 PM
17

Withdraw. Create a wall of emotional distance with them. Only reacquaint yourself with them once you have successfully redesigned yourself into the man you want to be. Do not resume the friendships as they once were under any circumstances. Instead, evaluate which if any could be plates. In the meantime focus of self improvement. Lift and get physical. Practice game by building rapport with strangers.Become knowledgeable and interesting in your own right. Secure and hold assets and advance your …
/r/askTRP18/06/14 04:57 AM
1

Time to ask whether he wants other men to see you dressed that way or whether he wants you to dress that way for him in private. Then consider how you feel about his answer.
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/14 04:33 PM
-2

Keep in mind that most of the red pill community wants to spin plates but when they have a more serious relationship they want the woman to remain virtuous in her fidelity. To outsiders this seems as a double standard and seems adversarial. To red pill men it is a fair exchange of status, resources, and protection for fidelity. Any model that follows this exchange regardless of the level of honesty fits in one or more categories of red pill thinking.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 07:16 AM
1

I was young and naive. Fortunately I was lucky. In most cases marriage is a bad idea. It wasn't in my case.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 10:32 AM
3

You have taught me quite a lot. Given everything you've stated, I'll agree that Bitcoin is an ideal vehicle for liquid wealth transfers. For physical assets though I remain convinced that Trusts are the way to go. Can you think of a way for a Bitcoin wallet to be held in a Trust account or is such obfuscation unnecessary given the nature of Bitcoin?
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 03:23 AM
8

My wife and I have an understanding of sorts regarding jewelry. I did start giving her some after we were married for some time. I refer to the jewelry collection as a "widow's mite" and have strict instructions on how she is to handle it. She knows that I hide money, but I also look out for her security as well. Jewelry increases that sense of security because it is hers. There is hiding your money, and then there's being a dick by never getting your wife a single sparkly thing in her life. In …
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 01:15 AM
3

Yes, that is true. Assets personally obtained or hidden during the marriage are at risk. A trust set up beforehand that has assets placed in it rather than in your personal holdings protects them, and even assets obtained after marriage so long as its the trust that obtains them and they never are personally held by you.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 01:08 AM
4

Ask yourself how long the average Hollywood marriage lasts. Then reread what you just posted. There is red pill, then there is what you wrote: a low effort post.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 01:06 AM
0

PIN accounts are the old style accounts that are linked to a PIN and password, but not to a name. If someone found your PIN and password they could rob you blind. In recent years bank secrecy laws have forced banks to assign names to said accounts making them traceable. It is only a matter of time before such a thing happens to Bitcoin.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 12:18 AM
0

You don't know what a rhetorical question is. I officially look down on you with scorn and derision. You're pathetic.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 11:40 PM
2

If you are sober you are still under representing yourself. What kind of engineer are you? What firm are you going to work at upon graduation? What if your alma mater? The more impressive the answers are to these the greater an insult to such institutions you are by making your posts shoddy and supposedly while intoxicated. I doubt even that though as your sober and intoxicated posts have the same staccato and syntax. Edit: Oh yeah you're the software engineer that asked me for real estate advic…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 11:28 PM
19

It's credit you deserve. It's a shame that it's so remarkable for someone to actually give you that credit.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 10:02 PM
3

One thing I've found useful is to assign a less impressive title to what you do or to simply describe some of the mundane details of your job. One medical technician would mislabel himself as a medical assistant (a bullshit title) and you could just watch interest fade in the eyes of gold diggers.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 09:59 PM
1

I would posit then that any statement regarding a PIN account is also then true of Bitcoin.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 09:46 PM
4

Enjoy your youth and inexperience. Based on your grammar and typing I doubt that you're magna cum anything, but maybe while I play down my wealth you play down your intellect. To each their own.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 08:28 PM
1

Bitcoin is in and of itself an asset, not a holding method. Therefore it is completely exposed and if not disclosed during a divorce can get you in a lawsuit post-divorce. Holding your Bitcoins in a holding company of some kind would help.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 08:24 PM
3

Thanks for the well wishes for my marriage of over a decade.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 08:22 PM
5

Impressing the people you work with is unavoidable in my industry if you want to succeed. I fail to see the hypocrisy in that.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:57 PM
9

I'm sorry that you got caught by the female version of pump and dump.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:56 PM
5

Physical assets that you can stash away are indeed the oldest method of hiding away your real wealth. And there is no paper trail showing where it is hidden, only where and when you bought it.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:55 PM
1

The Trust does not necessarily have to be offshore, but yes it is the best way. PIN accounts do still exist after a fashion, but the level of protection they offer is admittedly not what it once was.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:53 PM
11

An LLC or Limited Liability Company exists to legally separate yourself from an asset. It is ideal for protecting you from lawsuits and some creditors. However it works best when you don't own all the shares in the LLC, so you'd need someone that you trust in order to pull it off. A Trust on the other hand is a financial vehicle for ownership that completely divorces you from ownership of the asset in question. If you set up the trust to be "Irrevocable" then you have signed away the power to pu…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:50 PM
5

Exactly. He was a childhood friends so it was impossible for him not to know. My mistake though was I didn't tell him about my low status facade. So to anyone else doing this let your inner circle know what you are doing. Then if one of them lets the truth slip out, even trickle truth, you can extract them from your inner circle.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:41 PM
2

Congratulations on finding a partner of quality. Only women of low character will get unreasonably angry at the charade.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:39 PM
1

There are better ways to do that, and they are older and more established. Offshore accounts. PIN number accounts. Trust funds.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:36 PM
2

I never said not to spend on yourself at all. But you should hide your money where others can't get to it. But I will qualify my belief on spending: you should invest in yourself, not just spend on yourself. It's one thing to buy something that gives you momentary pleasure, it's another to buy something that advances you towards your goals in some way. My work clothes are far more expensive than my casual attire, for example. When buying my own clothes I look at the price tags when I know I won'…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:35 PM
1

Mate guarding and dread are not diametrically opposed. In the example given the guy doesn't negotiate, he flat out says the relationship will be over if she goes to the club. Ultimatums of the relationship ending that are completely uncompromising is a form of dread.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 06:55 PM
2

Due to hypergamy and female filtering out of less desirable males from their perception, women will throng towards success objects regardless of what category you speak of. At an rpg table, the nerdy girls prefer the game master over the other gamers. At anime conventions, the guy whose cosplay shows off that he's a gym rat wins him points with every woman he meets. To win female attention you must stand out and stand above your immediate competition. Fame lets you stand above your global compet…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 07:36 PM
2

Success objects. I very much like that term. Gender roles will never completely die off because social forces cannot completely kill of biological forces. By denying biology feminists will disarm themselves from actually meddling in biology through medical advancements, and that makes me sigh in relief.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 07:35 PM
8

Read that part again. "Chad" said no such thing. Rather the OP said it, assuming Chad's position as in "How is it my fault that you think women are garbage?" or some other attack disguised as a question. It's like asking someone "When will you stop beating your wife?" in that it assumes a terrible aspect of their character and confronts them with that accusation.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 02:34 AM
13

Fame of any caliber acts as a pre-selection filter. Add to this a heady mixture of confidence, physical fitness, and a hefty paycheck. You will see the same thing in all major sports, in the music and movie industries, and even in high school when you compare the sportsmen that are getting scouted to everyone else. In all of the above those who are a cut above the rest get their choice of women. They live in an economy of abundance. Nothing observed here is new. Things have always been this way.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 02:28 AM
13

Your question assumes patriarchy, a fallacy of assumption.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 02:23 AM
3

He's referring to mate competition.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 02:22 AM
2

You might want to check out what other options there are. http://malecontraceptives.org/index.php There's a good place to start. Among other methods, contraception by heat is actually very effective if you have the time and patience to plan ahead. The method is safe if done properly and can last for months on end. Heat by compression over a protracted period can have long term impact on fertility but heat via immersion can be used instead with proper time and preparation. The best thing about th…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 11:41 PM
2

Just don't let this impact your life. Don't let him bring a cheater around you, or anywhere near any woman you want in your life. If he asks why, tell him it's because you don't want anyone thinking you approve of what she did or that you're pathetic enough to take back a cheating whore.
/r/askTRP04/06/14 04:07 AM
1

You can no doubt use software to keep track of your real estate portfolio, and all incomes and expenses related to it. I just use excel. Beyond that honestly I don't know. Do you have any other skills related to hardware? That way you could offer networking services or the like to your tenants.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 05:09 AM
1

That depends: are you an employee in a large firm, a small company, or are you an independent contractor?
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 11:14 AM
1

So prostitution would be legal? /s
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 08:14 PM
7

My suggestion that she lie was in part to point out the intellectual dishonesty inherent to being a "reformed slut" who isn't willing to do for their husband what they were willing to do for any man or woman that came before. That massive a shift means she is inherently lying eithe rto herself, her husband, or both.
/r/RedPillWomen24/04/14 06:51 AM
6

It's called lying. You lie to him. You tell him you had no such thing in the past. If you tell him that your past was wild and sexual, but you are reformed now, then you are telling him that you're settling for him now that you've hit the wall. If you really want that all to stay in your past, then lie. Lie like your marriage depends on it, because if all you're giving him is the leftovers of other men then your marriage does in fact depend on you lying to him.
/r/RedPillWomen23/04/14 11:57 PM
1

It's to weed out the men who can't either due to lack of genetic fitness (symmetry) or skill. We are the weed out gender, and the orgasm is just another feature women can use to weed us out.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 10:06 PM
1

Do both. There is no excuse not to, and anyone who doesn't is pretty pathetic. The only reason to not bring a woman to orgasm is when you have already decided to no longer continue spinning that plate.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 07:23 AM
1

The idea that a man who does not bring a woman to orgasm can be considered alpha is laughable. Skills in the bedroom sets the men apart from the boys, and if you seriously think otherwise I have bad news for you. The article I was referring to it here A woman's capacity for orgasm depends not on her partner's sexual skill but on her subconscious evaluation of his genetic merits. If you're referring to genetic fitness as "alpha" ness then you are not using the term in the traditional TRP sense wh…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 05:54 AM
2

There is such a thing as a friend with benefits. This is the type of situation where it can come in handy to mention it... especially if you swear each other to secrecy ie. no one will find out what she does with you and she doesn't need to officially consider you part of her sexual past because after all you're both just friends
/r/askTRP22/04/14 08:18 AM
1

I'd love to read that. Can you provide a link please?
/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:32 PM
3

The female orgasm is difficult to achieve. Therefore women will be driven to find mates that can help them achieve it and filter out mates that they deem unable. If a mate provides such orgasms consistently it builds an emotional rapport with said mate and bonds the woman to her mate.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 05:05 PM
3

This is an amazing idea for a bot. A simple word count bot that racks up I(s) and me(s). The idea that a bot can call people out on their selfish bullshit just by doing a simple word count should be as sobering as cold ice water to those who understand the implications. Unfortunately I don't thing r/relationships will let you upload that kind of bot into their 'non-hostile' space. They'd try to ban such a bot and the user that made it.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 01:45 AM
1

Correct in that there are no unicorns. Incorrect in that statistics don't matter. Rather: they don't exist in a vacuum. What I would put forward though is that people don't need to justify what they are and are not attracted to and what they will and will not put up with in a partner. We're talking about a potentially lifelong commitment, you deserve to be picky as much as your SMV allows you to be.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:50 PM
0

Fuck Happiness. Happiness is a crutch for those who lack ambition. Set your own goals and achieve them. Then set more. Once your remove happiness as a goal you no longer give anyone else control or power over your happiness. Once you are goal and ambition oriented you won't waste your time and energy on someone else hoping against all hope that they will magically love and appreciate you and make you happy. Fuck Happiness.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:11 PM
1

What kind of man/leader accepts a partner/first mate that doesn't meet his requirements? You can parse out these all as distinct factors, but in human relationships everything overlaps.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:01 PM
20

Here's an abstract. If you want the study, you access it yourself.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 01:56 PM
4

I have been the bull. I do recommend it.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 06:01 AM
1

There is something to be said here about the laws of entropy. Without effort men that allow the forces of their surroundings (ie their relationships) to impact them will be molded by them, whereas men that actively mold their surroundings do not alter to fit the environment. This is a microcosm of civilization itself: the most successful societies are the ones that altered their surroundings to fit the needs of the society, not change the society to fit the needs of the surroundings.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 12:12 AM
16

I don't think the purpose of life is just reproduction. That aside, women don't help men reproduce. Men help women reproduce. It's women that biologically create life from the dna we provide them, and it's the woman that decides ultimately in Western society what fate that life will have. You as a man do not have a say or reproductive rights. You are disposable.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 07:19 AM
1

In anarcho-communism yes. In all other models no.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 05:54 AM
1

I have read some, although there is much more. Never got around to Das Kapital, which I've been lead to understand was one of his better works. Of what I have read I agree with 70-90% of what you wrote here. His advocation for complete socialism best resembles the kind undertaken in Scandinavia, but don't be mistaken about one thing: he did in fact advocate for violent revolution. That one facet was twisted and lead directly to the philosophies of Lenin and it was all downhill from there.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 04:31 PM
1

Everyone has an agenda. Even me.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 07:17 AM
0

Never read or even heard of Zinn, though I know Chomsky offhandedly. Where is the best place to start on either?
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:51 AM
9

Marx, which is at the root of socialism and of feminism. Some of his observations are indeed accurate: that control of the means of production is the key to acquiring wealth, as is contractual control of the labor of others as part of that means. However, his solutions that he proposes reads as a dystopian nightmare: no more family, only individuals completely reliant upon the state. It's a strange mix of ideas that read like something akin to 1984 or Brave New World depending which part of Marx…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:50 AM
42

To be blunt: Because it is biologically difficult to empathise with men. Therefore men are disposable even in democratic societies. People in power need disposable people to advance their agendas. To fight wars. To do manual labor. Feminism and similar politically correct mindsets are used by the powerful to create a society that is so divided in against each other that they never unite to turn on those in power. Because of Feminism, women hate men. Because of Marxism, workers hate employers. Be…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 04:19 AM
1

What you're describing is a female wingman, not a friendzoned woman.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 08:38 AM
1

So all the Scandinavian research is dismissed offhand by you. Good. Now I know not to speak to you since you dismiss science with opinion because it makes you feel good.
/r/PussyPass24/03/14 05:48 AM
1

To say that one gender is better than another is like saying a spoon is better than a knife. Each is designed to do what it does well, and comparing the two is not useful.
/r/PussyPass23/03/14 05:39 PM
1

Well when you put it that way you don't come off like a retarded ass hat. Much better this time around.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 05:37 PM
2

We're often dehumanized and have stereotypes made about us. There is a lot of variation here, but you have to get up close to see it.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 07:36 AM
2

Why is your face that long? Were you beaten as a child? But seriously, nothing I said is PC at all. To believe that someone is alpha or someone is beta inherently leaves no room for self improvement. It relieves us all from the burden of bettering ourselves by simply leaving it up to the fates to determine if someone has the trait or not. In other words, you're a hamster, and I can see your vagina from here. You might've turned it inside out to look like a dick but it's clearly bleeding once a m…
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 06:51 AM
1

In my experience finding such a woman as a "unicorn" just doesn't last. Someone gets jealous, and someone gets hurt. I can relate to swingers better than I can to poly, but their community has more secrets and more rules to it. We unfortunately live in a society where when a woman seeks to have her hypergamy and her LTR too she's considered empowered but a man trying the same thing is a pig. Couples like us have a lot to hide in a society that is this judgmental.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 05:55 AM
1

Women can afford to be more direct. "I'm here with my man. He's sitting over there. Want to join us for a drink?" If she says yes, then she knows where it might lead.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 02:14 AM
1

Odd that a group seeking nn-judgment from others would be so judgmental. What works for you works for you, and that should be the end of it.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 02:13 AM
2

If that is the case: as a woman you can approach the other woman head on, and your man can be your wingman. Once you confirm she's into you, you can draw her in and the two of you can flirt with her together. I recommend r/nonmonogamy or r/polyamory for more.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 01:08 AM
2

Alpha and beta are not set in stone status types but rather behaviors. No one is an alpha and no one is a beta. Everyone has beta and alpha behaviors along a spectrum. People are here to learn regardless of where they are because self improvement is a never ending process. It is not our place to say where someone else is on that journey, because he is only in a race against himself.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 12:53 AM
12

I like that no one is in an uproar at all over the title "Marry Her and Die for Her"
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 11:13 AM
43

When discussing anything about feminism with a feminist, agree and amplify to the point that you make them uncomfortable with their feminism. (Unless you're being a troll online for shits and giggles) I have said the following point blank to a feminist: "I don't believe the Men's Rights Movement will ever succeed and I sincerely believe that it shouldn't. No society has ever carried itself forward without having disposable people. We no longer have slavery so we need a new underclass. We need me…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 08:42 AM
7

I agree with absolutely everything here. TRP as I've seen it has nothing to do with feminism. The two are non-sequitur to each other. MRM seeks to fight feminism, whereas TRP is merely a set of survival skills and would exist regardless of what the actual rules were. TRP would simply state "these are the rules, unpleasant as they are" regardless of what those rules were at that point in history.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 08:35 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5LRdW8xw70 Watch this documentary and all of the follow up documentaries in this series.
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 08:07 PM
3

When transferring assets use Irrevocable Income Trusts. Those are very difficult to break open to get at the resources hidden inside. Just don't get confused on the terms Trustor and Trustee and you'll be able to plan out how you want your assets hidden away. Also, be sure to have your income go into a separate account. If you live in a house that legally is owned by a Trust, pay your mortgage in two steps. First pay rent to your Trust then have your Trust automatically pay the mortgage. Do not …
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 06:17 PM
13

SRS seriously has them beat. They have a rule to not actually discuss things, just "circlequeef"
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 05:36 AM
7

So many female leaders in history also throws off the boogeyman theory of patriarchy. You cannot tell me that Empress Maria Theresa was part of the patriarchy, or Elizabeth the I, or Isabella of Spain who was called a King as often as she was called a Queen. History is chock full of exceedingly powerful women. Borte the wife of Genghis Kahn ran the bureaucracy of his empire. Empress Theodora, a former actress and rumored prostitute, rose to become an Empress so popular that she eclipsed her husb…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 04:38 PM
2

Hypatia comes to mind. I recommend the recent film) about her life. There are others, but this woman stands out from the crowd.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 03:59 PM
1

Coming up on age 32. Net worth is over $900k. Do a lot of what u/_social_caterpiller, but we'll tweak it to focus on earning more income passively. To do that, do the following: Buy real estate if you can. Avoid renting if possible. If you are scraping by renting where you are, then downsize so you can save up more money. Or better yet, sublet space to someone else at a slightly higher per square foot rate than you are paying. If you absolutely must, find someone (or several someones) who can sp…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 09:03 PM
1

Doubtful that it will just end. They will make legal loopholes or at least try, but in the end the person harmed by these loopholes will be another woman in the interest of protecting another woman. These loopholes will be challenged because men cannot benefit from them and there is no biological basis for the discrimination. Once said loopholes are thrown out, they'll probably resort to strengthening the power of prenuptial agreements. Marriage and divorce as a default will still be a woman's g…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 08:19 AM
2

I'm looking forward to gay marriage. Let's see what happens when a bunch of women are paying spousal support and have implied paternal responsibilities to children from the other woman's past relationships.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 08:06 AM
2

Female hypergamy being what it is this isn't surprising, and is even rational. Her instincts are telling her to find a better mate. This same instinct however can be satisfied by having a mate that is consistently improving himself. This is why women like men with "ambition" because they can marry at one status and ride up to another without swinging to a new branch. A woman who truly is with the best male in her perception does not get "unhappy" once her children reach a certain age, at least n…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 07:45 AM
1

Consequently those same children require more time and investment in order to be prepared to face the world. This incubation period we call childhood and adolescence gets longer as the world we've made becomes more complicated.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 06:23 AM
1

Even in such tribes polyandry is rare. Polygyny is far more prevalent in human history and culture.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 06:21 AM
3

I think what you described is the male strategy. Genetic diversity via multiple mothers is more of a male trope. Case in point: when a woman remarries and has children in her new marriage, often she will reject or marginalize the children from her prior marriage. This holds true often in nonmarital cohabitation as well. She will claim to love them all, but watch as the stepchildren of the new father figure get pushed away more and more. Men on the other hand show very little investment in their …
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 12:29 AM
7

Ayn Rand gets a bad rap and is often misinterpreted. She's in favor of individual rights. End of story.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 02:33 AM
2

Exactly. It's alpha fucks beta bucks without the beta's bucks even being in proportion to their own actions.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 06:44 AM
3

Actually it does enforce a financial commitment. Just not from the biological father. In their culture the uncles of the mother's family act as the paternal male. So if you're a man whose sister has a lot of kids you get stuck with helping out. It's a different form of alpha fucks beta bucks, but it still is a form of it.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 11:37 PM
1

However, I won't let the acts of a few ruin the overall useful benefit that currency has provided man as a whole. Based on this, I'd say no, he's not a communist.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 11:35 PM
3

I have taken gender studies, or Sociology of Gender as some call it. I've studied the Sociology and Social Psychology of Medicine, the Sociology of Business (Business Majors weren't offered at my University), and I've dabbled in the Social Psychology of Sexuality and the Anthropology of Religion. Where Sociology, Social Psychology, and Anthropology differ is a different discussion, and one I do not feel like having. Now some of what I took should have been labelled the Repetition of the Redundan…
/r/askTRP18/02/14 05:11 AM
1

Quote the specific claims I made. Edit: In case you haven't figured it out: I don't intend to claim anything or prove anything in RP with Sociology for you. I merely deride the RP sentiment that Sociology is somehow a bunk science. Unless you want to contest that claim move on with your life.
/r/askTRP17/02/14 10:19 AM
1

What claim did I make exactly? If I wasted five minutes of your life that you won't get back, it makes me wonder why you're even on reddit and why you even are responding to me. Go outside and take a walk.
/r/askTRP17/02/14 09:16 AM
1

I got some error message saying that it was, and then could not find that comment. I did not "switch" from one to the other. I use one to test the other. There is a significant difference. I'm not going to google all of the Sociology of Human Sexuality research out there for you. And it's the internet, so it's not just your time. you're not the only one who's special here. Below find links to ONLY the work of one pair of sociologists at the University of California Santa Barbara. This research i…
/r/askTRP16/02/14 05:45 PM
0

I clicked the link and read the reviews on it. Will download later. Whoever downvoted this is illiterate.
/r/askTRP16/02/14 08:32 AM
10

As a sociology major who came to the red pill via Sociology, I'm curious why you lol'd. My guess is you are associating pure sociology with feminist theory, when the two are very distinct. EDIT: I was going to reply to another comment below mine but the comment was deleted. I was asked how I transitioned from sociology to the red pill. Here cut and pasted is my reply: Sociology breaks down roughly into three theoretical frameworks: Conflict theory: the idea being that in any interaction there is…
/r/askTRP16/02/14 07:08 AM
1

I have.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 11:44 PM
5

I'm going to disagree here. TRP destroyes relationships in the sense that military training destroys people: it crushes what the relationship used to be, not what it is at its core. If a relationship survives a TRP transition, then it was a good relationship. If not, then it never was.
/r/askTRP05/02/14 03:21 PM
13

Strawman plus confirmation bias. Lovely.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 08:15 PM
35

Considering how radically different the two subs are, it's pretty clear these people haven't even read the sidebars of either sub.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 06:08 PM
3

Good call. Wouldn't want you to get in an argument and question your beliefs.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/14 03:14 PM
2

That is true, but thou shalt not commit a logical fallacy. But entertain me. What specific claim (cite the claim, or I'll call strawman fallacy) do you wish to refute?
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/14 02:45 PM
1

You're using the fallacy of the majority. The majority of the populace in France during the French revolution had to problem with mass beheadings, for example. And the majority of the populace in the united States was fine with segregation not too many decades ago. Please consider your rhetoric before attempting to dissuade me of something, especially when you don't even know what my personal stances are.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/14 10:11 AM
-1

Because someone talking about an open relationship question shouldn't be answered by people that have actually had open relationships.
/r/askTRP29/01/14 02:08 AM
5

As someone who is in a (sometimes) half open relationship, I feel you need to hear this. You're a douche. You did not communicate your standards, and have laid out a trap for her to fall into. You have discussed opening the relationship, and did not let her know what you expect of her. You are effectively deceiving her and setting her up to fail. Stop. Stop right now. It is possible to get to the type of relationship that you want, but this isn't the way to do it. EDIT: As a MAN who is MARRIED a…
/r/askTRP28/01/14 08:05 PM
7

TRP isn't by its nature truly objective. It can't be. Reddit is so anti-TRP in general that is TRP opened itself up to objective debate it would be drowned in anti-TRP slogans and bandwagons. Objectiveness would result in a tyranny of the majority as seen in many other places on reddit. To combat this certain forms of free speech are pruned away, ones that disagree with TRP. This is good in that these forms have plenty of other outlets, but is bad because it makes TRP into a self feeding loop of…
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/14 09:09 AM
10

As a guy over at RP more often than not, I find this overgeneralization you're describing happens a lot. There is truth to it, but it's so focussed in on a few aspects that it feels like a larger picture is being missed.
/r/RedPillWomen27/01/14 10:16 PM
1

Fair point.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 03:22 PM
1

Thanks for the read. I'll dive into it later (after work) but is there any research on a woman's ability to perceive the health of another couple's relationship, and how that affects her mate poaching behavior?
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 02:44 PM
1

Fair point. So how hard they pursue you isn't related to how happy in the relationship you appear to be? In my experience, women can sniff out even the slightest trouble in a marriage and will actually try to sabotage your existing relationship just to make more room for themselves in your life.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 02:40 PM
2

Doesn't work that way actually. Wearing indicators that you are taken AND happily so shuts interest down.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 08:17 AM
21

Lawyer up. Empty your 401k into an offshore account, even if you face a tax penalty. Start cancelling credit cards and draining accounts. Negotiate with your boss to get your pay cut, possibly in exchange for future benefits. Lock up your house into a Living Irrevocable Trust with your children as the beneficiaries and yourself as the sole Trustor, so that neither you or your wife can go after it as a divisible asset. Prepare for a messy divorce because when it involves two marriages things get …
/r/askTRP27/01/14 06:15 AM
9

Good life advice. Poor SMV advice. Women crawls out of the woodwork once you are officially taken.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/14 10:15 PM
10

This is one of the best comments I have ever read. Period.
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/14 06:18 AM
2

Please note that some of this involves study that rely on honesty in their feedback, so we're only seeing what people are willing to admit to. Regardless of that, the feedback appears to strongly confirm that infidelity is biological and is here to stay. This supports the amorality of sexual strategy.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 04:16 AM
2

After some more conversation I'm unsure she even knows what she wants. She has a romanticized picture in her head of what a leader driven marriage can be, but there is not plan to get there or even an idea of what it would look like in all practicality. It's just broad sweeping terms. So yes this is something I want... but I want a way better plan than that.
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/14 08:13 AM
2

She doesn't Reddit...
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/14 08:07 AM
3

I'm not sure why this was downvoted. I have at times been passive. This is true. However, I'm going to nitpick here. I never said outside forces forced us to marry. I said that we decided to marry when we did because outside forces wanted to tear us apart. It was still a decision. We could easily have just decided it was never meant to be. I actually defied my parents which up till that point in my life I had never done, and I chose a very life altering decision to do it on. So have I been passi…
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/14 08:06 AM
2

Answer: Actually yes, I do want to lead. Part of the reason I want to is practical, in that I believe being a good leader is part of what makes a man attractive and what leads to a happier marriage. I'm tired of the times my wife tries to lead or over-assert herself because she often is unsure of what she wants or what direction we're supposed to head in (unless it's literal directions, she has a fine tuned compass). But on a personal level there is a part of me that wants the power because for …
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/14 08:00 AM
1

That was rhetorical you fucktard.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:58 PM
1

Do not dictate what I do and do not care about. I wanted allies for MRM. Instead I just have assholes like you. And how exactly do I get out of here before the Baked Alaska melts? Chop off my dick? Seriously, how? I'm a man. I expect to be a father some day, hopefully of boys. So go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:09 AM
3

No, it is not sugarcoating. I've lurked long enough to see the difference between sugar coated feel good threads and this. This is intellectual exploration, the postulation of a theory. The red pill up to this point only describes what is, and to a degree describes how to navigate the world as it currently stands. He is exploring the second part of those two: how to navigate the world. There is no inconsistency with the stated goal of maximum happiness and everything that you described, even if …
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 10:45 PM
3

I posit that what we need is a new moral paradigm. Those who accept it know what to expect of each other, and those who do not are shunned or at least not held to the same expectations and given the same privilege. To a limited degree red pill achieves this in a way other male centric communities do not, but it is stymied by a common stance of amoralism. The red pill is a statement of how the world is, not how it should be. A new moral paradigm for the modern world would acknowledge what is, des…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 10:40 PM
2

Not necessarily. He is merely prescribing that a moral code should be cultivated where each gender masters and understands their base instincts and make rational choices based off of that understanding. To date, there are few (possibly none, I'd need to check) cultural norms in the history of the world that teach women to master themselves, rather than rely on men to instruct and guide them. We are in a period of feminism, where women have thrown off the "shackles" of male guidance but have not …
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 10:32 PM
1

Or flirting. Or swinging. Or "the lifestyle". Or polygamy. Or polyamory. Or a hall pass.
/r/askTRP16/01/14 05:18 PM
2

In addition to what others are saying: Invest in your personality and personal value, which will not expire. Date to find a quality man worth marrying. Have a hobby other than shopping worth talking about. Learn to cook dishes you are proud serving to other people. In other words, cultivate elements of yourself that won't ever get dated with age. But yes, exercise: I've seen some old ladies at the gym that kick serious butt.
/r/RedPillWomen14/01/14 05:38 AM
11

I recommend a luxury cruise. Marriages on a cruise aren't enforceable once you disembark.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 01:45 AM
2

In our marriage my wife and I borrowed a tradition from Japan. Basically Valentine's day is for her to do something romantic for me. I get to see just how much effort she puts into knowing me and catering to my imperative. Then a month later I mirror her effort level exactly. This practice actually opens a woman's eyes regarding what connected intimacy really means when it's the woman that must step up to the plate.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 07:38 PM
2

Step one is to silent dissenters. Step two is to burn their books.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 07:25 PM
1

Sexual Market Value and Social Value are different things in my book. What you are asking about is SMV. Social Value, however, will always be skewed towards women. Always, for your entire life. Women will always be damsels in distress and white knights will always be there for them. Women and children first, off a sinking ship and first in line when rights and worth are passed out. Get used to it. It has always been this way and always will.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 12:53 PM
5

Mothers are not by default better caretakers. That is a myth.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 08:16 PM
0

You can have a domestic partnership cohabitating with a woman and having children. This does not require marriage. Want to put them in your will? Do it. Want to give your children a life estate so there is no fear of anyone kicking them out and making them homeless. Do it. Done.
/r/askTRP28/12/13 07:36 PM
0

Opting out of Marriage: rational. Opting out of liberal arts education: rational. Opting out of a technical, medical, legal, science, engineering, math, accounting, or business degree: completely irrational Opting out of any of the career choices such rational degrees would obtain: completely irrational. These fields have very low unemployment, and many such professionals are self employed. Opting out of relationships that are NOT marriage: irrational. Opting out of fatherhood inside of marriage…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:48 AM
1

PR is a side benefit. The main benefit is it will bring marital legislation under scrutiny.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:41 PM
2

Some are in support, some are not. We aren't a united front on this issue, regardless of the fact that there are homosexuals that happen to be men.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:24 AM
3

Please explain how Gay Rights = The Enemy in this context. I do not follow your reasoning here.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:22 AM
10

"why does society look down on a crying man?" "why can girls play with boy toys but when my son plays with his barbie people laugh?" "why are men expected to be strong and non emotional?" "I'm offended by the term 'man up'?" I've never said any of these things nor do I even know anyone personally who has. Nothing you said actually describes what mainstream MRM tries to achieve. You're attacking your imagination. You make me sad. I pity you.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:51 AM
1

Unconditional love is important to express. Stoking the fires of greatness though is in my opinion just as viable a form of love to show. It shows that you believe they can achieve greatness, that for them it is worth trying. But overall, yeah you're solid.
/r/RedPillWomen17/12/13 06:00 AM
1

Ah. Improve does not mean change. It can, but it doesn't have to. Improve means a constant pursuit to better oneself in some way. Write that novel you always wanted to. Get that promotion you've been dreaming about. Finally do thirty pull-ups. Improvement is the constant progression of goal setting that defines the male of our species. All of history. Every empire. Every monument. Every poem. Every single scientific discovery. All of it, all of that improvement... was made to impress you. That i…
/r/RedPillWomen17/12/13 05:36 AM
1

I don't want him to do anything to increase his SMV- he's wonderful as he is. I'm sure that you mean that when you say it. But as a man, I'm going to lay one harsh truth in front of you: Men who are not improving themselves are slowly dying. It is just a sad fact. This is why men who retire die sooner than men who work until the end of their lives. So no, I'm telling you that yes you do want him to improve himself constantly, even if you have no complaints about who he is or what he is. Just let…
/r/RedPillWomen17/12/13 05:29 AM
5

Nooooope
/r/RedPillWomen17/12/13 05:15 AM
1

I'll chime is with a male opinion of the engagement phase specifically: There will come a stage in planning a wedding where it will be a major and stressful priority for you. Do not ignore your man or your relationship, even if it makes planning the wedding more difficult. A man ignored by a bustling bride to be is a man feeling cold feet about marriage. Source: Been there myself. A few other thoughts in general that should last your whole marriage: Oh and as far as guy time: space is inferior t…
/r/RedPillWomen17/12/13 05:02 AM
2

Actually children can be quite cruel at times. They've not incorporated moral reasoning into their mindset, and so often lack empathy. If most of the children you encounter are sweet and innocent, that speaks better of their parents than of children as a whole.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 03:13 AM
1

As people get older, they become more conservative. Life hits everyone hard. Their dreams and ideals stop holding the same luster. And as the facade peals away and the wall hits, a great many hampster away but many also see the world for all its horror and all its glory. Decades from now, assuming reddit is still a thing, many of the young marxist feminist liberals of today will be the jaded cynical capitalists of tomorrow. Time does not heal all wounds. Some it makes clearer with the paid of ag…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 12:53 AM
1

Is there a difference?
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 02:20 AM
1

Clicked the link within. Was sent to a page saying "Hi" and nothing else.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 02:18 AM
2

You're 31. Your value is high right now assuming you invest in yourself. Search through those little girls. One of them is a real woman. The rest can still be fun.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 02:16 AM
5

Say they wish for, but really wish for? Not so much.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 12:39 AM
9

No kids. My assets are locked in trusts. I have had prior extras but currently do not. If I have more in the future great, otherwise no big deal. I strive to be the kind of husband that deserves a fucking threesome every now and then. I used to be the kind of husband that whined about not getting one. The difference between the two is massive.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 11:34 PM
2

Too true. Still a funny idea, but it would get stale fast. Still it might be a good place for all the "blue pill examples" to be sent off to as a cooperative subreddit in the RP family.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 11:10 PM
5

In my case, I married in my Blue Pill days but the relationship took a turn toward Red Pill especially as my SMV rose sharply. I assume this is the case for most Red Pill marriages, but I'm sure the women on r/redpillwomen would disagree. In a RP LTR, the male leads and is respected, but also assumes a mantle of responsibility. There are perks to this arrangement for both partners. On the deep red spectrum, you get half open marriages where the man steps out and the wife is a cuckqueen, the oppo…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 11:03 PM
22

You can't even post a link to a truly objective study on AW without getting banned. I found a study proving disparate rates of sexual encounters between genders backed up by STD spread rates, and was immediately banned. Science is not allowed on AW.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 10:58 PM
13

I have to disagree here. Commitment can be done on RP terms. Branding people losers and other knee jerk terminology doesn't add to RP discussion either, as it leaves RP long term relationships off the table for discussion. Source: Red Pill. Married. And staying that way.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 10:52 PM
10

Oh god now I want to make r/askhamsters. I'd better not though.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 10:47 PM
3

This problem will resolve itself, it will just take a long time.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 10:42 PM
15

For your sake I wish I wasn't. Unless you were deceiving us all in your original post and in your follow ups, I'm afraid the truth is spelled out pretty clearly. I'm sorry dude, I really am.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 10:32 PM
13

Women are in love with how you make them feel, not with who you are deep down inside. Remember that phrase when people complain about the decline in their sex life. It means something changed and the woman no longer feels the same way about that man as she used to.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 09:49 PM
34

This is not wife material. She is approaching the wall and her biological clock is telling her to go for the kind of man she normally would not. Do not marry this woman.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 09:46 PM
7

Just to be clear: did you describe a "past self" version of you four years ago to her or is this something she is saying about her "past self"? That would provide a lot more context.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 08:40 PM
0

I see the sword as the inherent jealousy and bitterness of everyone around you that wants to be you: the betas who think of the alpha as nothing but a douchebag and are waiting for a single mistake so they can lash out like the straw dogs they are. No alpha can escape that. In fact trying to escape is cowardly and is decidedly not-alpha. Betas can sense fear: it is one of the few social currencies they understand. Betas will try to disrupt your frame instinctively because they try to make themse…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 08:34 PM
9

I never made any claim that women do not love men. I am simply pointing out that it is difficult to find a woman that is willing to lay down their life, ie love with the same sense of honor and self sacrifice that defines the male side of the equation. Saying women don't love men or other such nonsense is like saying spoons make terrible knives. It's an irrelevant comment. Spoons are spoons, women are women, and men are men. Each does what it is designed to do: nothing less, nothing more. Women …
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 09:17 PM
4

Men are willing to die to save the lives of their women, even when they are not married. Historically, women are not willing to do the same before serious commitments like marriage or children are brought into play. In fact, it is patently hard to find a single case.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 09:03 PM
1

Sexual strategy by definition is amoral. Relearn your red pill. Red pill is about accepting the brutal nature of human beings. Your pathetic morality is the last vestige of your blue pill poisoning your mind. Inherent value or inherent lack of worth are not socially derived as morality is. Sexual market value however is socially derived, and isn't even what I was addressing in my post. Get your subjective and objective straight.
/r/RedPillWomen12/12/13 06:09 AM
2

It is true that most men have a preference towards a woman with a low sexual partner count in her history. I don't see that as a moral or immoral statement, just as I do not judge the woman on moral grounds. Part of red pill is understanding that sexual strategy is instinctive and not morally charged. That is why I said the second woman had nothing inherently wrong with her. Equally there is nothing inherently wrong with a man who has given up on having a meaningful career or to apply himself in…
/r/RedPillWomen12/12/13 06:02 AM
0

Do you have plans on writing about non-relationship applications of TRP?
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 04:32 AM
5

I hold up to you two women: One is a woman who is newly initiated to sex, and wants to explore it only with her man. He is her first, and he will will be her last. She is the subject of many romance novels. The other is a woman who knows what her body wants and her body doesn't care about who so much as what and how much, but it certainly craves often. She has had many partners, and will have many more. She is honest about this, and her partners know what to expect from her. If she ever settles …
/r/RedPillWomen12/12/13 04:05 AM
3

When times are tough for me I ask my wife to do one thing for me that we normally do not do. I ask her to pet me while I put my head in her lap. Normally I'm the one leading, the one she leans on , the one she relies on whenever there is a problem. She wants to advise me, I know, and help me work through each and every problem. But I can't do that with her. I can see the faith in her eyes erode when I unload on her like that, especially when she is racking her brain to help me with a problem she…
/r/RedPillWomen12/12/13 03:46 AM
1

Usually yes. One time I did it on a spur of the moment and it caused a LOT of heartache for all parties involved. I do not recommend that.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 02:41 AM
19

I do not recommend cheating (if you want to remain in a relationship), as the results are highly unpredictable. Women are equally as likely to leave and not look back as to throw themselves at you.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/13 05:11 PM
29

I can confirm that dread causes arousal in women. After the most recent threesome I was in (my wife was not a part of it) my wife sexed me up for several weeks on end aggressively. I refer to this as a woman "reclaiming" their mate. She admits that even though she hates it when I step out on the marital bed, the arousal she feels and the quality of the sex massively complicate that emotion for her. To be honest, I love this woman. I have serious one-itis. If there was a way to arouse her to the …
/r/TheRedPill09/12/13 04:58 PM
5

You obviously have no idea who Musashi was.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/13 08:15 AM
6

Draft a lease agreement. Forgive her rent if you want, but make it a lease.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/13 05:20 AM
1

Yes.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/13 12:38 AM
17

TIL that years on end of bestiality is ok if it's a woman that does it.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 04:51 PM
3

No idea why anyone down-voted this. Avoiding awkwardness is key.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 07:54 AM
1

Thanks for catching the typo. MOFO is an acronym I don't know yet and isn't in the list on the sidebar. Enlighten me?
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 07:36 AM
19

I'll make a lengthier post about this later if you're interested, but for now off the top of my head I'll say this: Step 1: Identify a "reformed" slut who is firmly entrenched in a long term relationship with a clearly blue pill beta. The best indicator is that she has had many sexual partners before meeting him and isn't even shy about it. Bonus points if he was a virgin when they met. Step 2: Never do anything remotely beta in her presence, but always remain friendly and respectful to her beta…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 05:33 AM
16

I'm a little late jumping in on this conversation, but I'll say this: Getting a woman to cheat is one thing. Getting her to convince her beta provider that her cuckolding him is good for their relationship and making his beta-hamster accept it is actually not that much harder, and is ultimately much more rewarding.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 04:54 AM
2

This. Develop your ability to read people and their bullshit. There is no excuse not to. It will help you in every facet of life. Part of the red pill is being able to understand that people will deceive themselves, and they will also try to deceive you. Without developing this skill you won't be able to discover whether someone is truly honest or not.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 02:42 AM
1

So you're completely comfortable with the possibility that she was a spun plate that got nexted by someone better than you that she still desires because they were better than you in the sack? You sir are a brave man to not want to know about that. Me, I'd want to be prepared as hell by understanding everything about someone before forming a long term relationship.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 05:53 PM
22

If you don't want to know about someone's past, don't plan a future with that person.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 07:25 AM
4

No. They exist. Unicorns are either nonexistent or so rare you could not make a subreddit of them. That being said, I think a red pill woman is actually better to find than a Unicorn. A Unicorn can become corrupted, but a red pill woman embodies the kind of feminine strength that can galvanize the alpha qualities of her mate. If you find a woman that makes you a better alpha, then you don't need to keep looking for a Unicorn. You've found something better.
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/13 03:16 AM
3

Dishonor on Your Cow!
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 12:50 AM
2

Dishonor on you! Dishonor on your family! Dishonor on your cow!
/r/TheRedPill30/11/13 10:51 PM
4

Man speaking here: I admire Borte, the first and only true wife of Genghis Kahn, Empress of the Mongolian Empire, whose sons and daughters went on to rule the far corners of his empire. She and her daughters were the true administrators of the empire and operated the center of the imperial beauracracy while her husband was the state figurehead and the head of the military. Since Mongolian tradition only allowed blood descendants to inherit, and there was a lot of inheritance to fight over, Borte…
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/13 08:37 AM
1

This is a non-issue for a woman who is married to an alpha. He reminds her, albeit not always directly, that he is attractive enough to have other options. He validates her by choosing her instead of other options, but they are still there. You are describing a beta marriage.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/13 01:01 AM
2

In economics the phrase "All else being equal" is used when creating models of economic outcomes. Similarly, when taking a survey it is best to assume that all other factors are equal.
/r/RedPillWomen27/11/13 07:31 AM
1

I'd recommend choosing the option that is the most similar to your own from among the choices. If you are 50/50 split, ask yourself if you are really a 51/49 split on an issue. Otherwise, leave it blank so that you don't affect the statistics on that particular answer.
/r/RedPillWomen26/11/13 10:56 PM
2

Fair enough. I still feel that the survey is important, but yes background research done beforehand would make a more rigorous testing method, as well as refining any hypothesis beforehand.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/13 06:21 PM
2

Thus far I have created a large survey that I can filter the answers into answering separate and distinct questions relevant to TRP. I feel this is a better approach than making five or more distinct surveys, but I could be proved wrong. Your other points however were extremely valuable.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/13 05:52 PM
1

Consistency != truth. You are an embarrassment to "social" science, or rather proof once again it doesn't deserve the title. No. Consistency is one litmus test for truth. People have lied on surveys for many many years. Also, I think you meant to have science in quotes in order to mock social science, since the social part it the one you are not calling into question. You cannot prove even that. Once again you leap wildly into "oh I can totally prove things with surveys!" Fucking idiot. Sorry bu…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/13 05:48 PM
0

You've never seen a survey with built in contradiction testing methods to test if a given survey taker is answering with consistency then have you? Look, I know well enough that the only thing a survey of enough rigorous study can do is disprove a null theory. You do know what a null theory is yes? The first major skill in creating a survey is creating questions that do not "lead the witness" or alarm them into just what their answers could ultimately mean. Secondary to this are inserted consist…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/13 06:19 AM
1

That actually is really helpful. Present partner satisfaction versus prior partner satisfaction is a statistic I did not consider. Thank you.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/13 04:17 AM
1

There seems to be some confusion. I'm not trying to prove that the red pill strategy works, as that would involve more than a single survey. I'm trying to prove whether or not the core tenets of the red pill are true, ie. what is the state of the world and the genders in their relationship to each other. If red pill is true, it will not matter how many survey fillers are blue pill or not. Once people are categorized according to red pill theory, certain clear patterns should emerge from the data…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/13 04:15 AM
1

Please note I have a real job and am not getting paid to do this. Thanks for the condescension though.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 09:23 PM
7

Fair opinion, but my background in statistical surveys suggests that narrow questions like "Would you prefer your partner be tall or short" where applicants answer in binary terms without opt-out answers available does a pretty good job of forcing honesty out of people and out of querents
/r/RedPillWomen25/11/13 08:11 PM
1

Can you tell me more about these bootcamps? I've never heard of this before. It's not something I would have even thought to put in my survey.
/r/RedPillWomen25/11/13 06:15 PM
2

I'm trying to find out if the rp is true, not if people know what it is. But the natural role question is one I am trying to ask in a way that won't immediately raise alarm bells in anyone's heads.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 06:11 PM
4

As someone who has built surveys before I think I can ask questions in a way where lies can be mitigated, but thank you for the warning
/r/RedPillWomen25/11/13 06:08 PM
3

What data points would you suggest that indicate knowing about rp without asking the rp question directly?
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 06:03 PM
1

I had a well written angry post almost finished when I sat down, had dinner with my wife and all my friends when they came over, and had time to think about what you said instead of my gut instinct emotional reaction. You're right. Most people won't care about someone else being victimized as a child. It's not their problem. So yeah, I apologize for responding to you like you matter, because since neither of us will ever know each other we will never matter to each other. So yeah, I retract what…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 04:52 AM
1

If you ask for explicit details about the molestation of a child and you are not going to lift a finger to make the world a better place by pursuing the culprit or investigating the claims, then yes that qualifies you as having a morbid fascination with pedophilia. Claiming you don't give a rat's ass about something you inquired so much about is just denial. So really: go fuck yourself with a knife.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:54 PM
7

Comedy is funniest when it rings true.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 11:33 AM
1

I edited the OP. If you need more, either prove you're going to investigate this woman for pressing charges or be labeled a pedophile.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:25 AM
1

"Evidence should be required for criminal culpability. Evidence should not be required for treatment and support." This should be plastered all over the place. It makes so much sense.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:54 AM
1

This. So much this.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:53 AM
1

What about for treatment and support? Until you discuss that I can't tell if I agree with you on this point.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:52 AM
2

Thanks for the heads up. I've simply adopted the attitude that if someone is decrying accusations of pedophilia too loudly then they have something to hide. Case in point the Catholic Church and the modern days extremists among Feminists.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:50 AM
2

How many details of what I do remember do you want you sicko?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 12:48 AM
2

I don't feel a need to name my accuser because I know nothing will happen if I do. This happened over twenty years ago. Something tells me that combined with my gender equals justice beyond reach. As far as certainty, I have asked myself these questions for years. Just because these are pieces missing doesn't mean the existing evidence within my memories are dismiss able. There isn't enough to convict anyone, but there is enough to justify counseling.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 12:24 AM
3

You're the first (self identified) woman to empathize with me on this level. Thank you. You have no idea how much this helps.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 11:12 PM
1

United States
/r/MensRights02/11/13 09:38 PM
2

Thank you for this. This helped quite a lot. Reading the responses also was illuminating. I also find it helpful that out of the hundreds who commented, only five people down-voted it. These aren't feminists in my book, these are pedophiles. The only rational reason I can think of for a woman to say that women cannot abuse is to cover up female abuse. They are hiding pedophiles with as much or more vitriol than any church or other institution. It's a cover up. And I am pissed off.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 07:42 PM
4

I know it's too late to chase down this woman and get justice. For all I know she is no longer even in my home country. She was an immigrant with status due to her marriage, and after the divorce I'm not sure if she got to stay or not. I might not even have anyone left to put a charge against. There are photos with both her and I in them. You can tell that the child in the photo is not happy, and at times look petrified with fear. That child was me. If I was a child and was molested by a man, yo…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 07:08 PM
3

There are pieces missing. The pieces that are not missing are still pretty bad. Seven year-old children should not have the memories, incomplete or complete, that my childhood produced.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 06:50 PM
1

Actually after reading this I realized that I ran into this years ago. I'm a married man, happily so. My wife understands that I don't say something unless I mean it, and doesn't dig into me for false accolades. Interestingly, when I'm out buying a piece of jewelry or something nice for her, and she isn't around, women tell me that she is lucky to have me, and that they wish their man spoiled them like I do my wife. They're reinforcing my behavior. By sheer contrast, I work out and my hands have…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/13 10:15 PM
1

So within the same paragraph it contradicts itself and admits further study is needed. Look, some doctors say yes there is a biological gender difference in regards to reported symptoms, and some do not. Just from a liability perspective, it's better to discuss all symptoms for all patients. Once again, gender discrimination exists. This is not an example of it.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:10 PM
11

Agreed. That would be the best way to go.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:35 AM
63

You're ignoring that heart attacks occur with different warning signs in women, which is what this is primarily about. Yes, sexism in favor of women exists. This is not an example of it.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 04:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter