TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

daygamebeast Archive

View 10 posts and 80 comments by daygamebeast on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

OP is coming in with major aggro and entitlement The OP is literally three quotes, none of which are mine, one says shit tests are sign she is interested, the last one says "don't collapse." WTF are you talking about?
/r/seduction16/03/22 11:00 AM
-2

Be yourself Do no harm That is all there is to "seduction," guys. Good luck everyone! LOL
/r/seduction16/03/22 07:28 AM
-4

I think IG is just better because if you're a creep it's easier for her to block you. She has more control. That's a good thing. Yes, IG is where she sends the "creeps." I personally never jump through the hoop. I think it is great you are so respectful... I happen to think bold, strong men make a stronger impression and get laid more. YMMV
/r/seduction16/03/22 07:20 AM
-1

I think your problem is that you automatically assume that this woman is giving her number to other people, and not you. You totally don’t know that I think lots of guys reading this (if they talk to a lot of girls) know that "how about IG?" is a blow off most of the time. It is a way to let you down easy, or stuff you into orbiter mode. Guys don't have to wonder. They do "follow her," and spin around, and like her shit... and they can decide if that is the same/better than being able to send he…
/r/seduction16/03/22 07:12 AM
-5

> i still dont understand 'shit tests' HER: We're not having sex tonight Avg Guy: Oh no, I mean, like, umm... HER: *rolling her eyes* You're done. Test failed. HER: We're not having sex tonight PUA: We'll see, I'm a sexy mf'er (credit: Jon Sinn) HER: LOL Test passed. You just created more attraction. Shit tests are everywhere
/r/seduction16/03/22 06:49 AM
-6

If I have ever been shit tested, I never knew thats what it wa That is probably right. YOU: Let me get your number, we'll talk later HER: How about IG? That ^ can be a kind of shit test. She gives her number to some guys. Why not you? Well, if you jump all over her IG... she knows what category to put you in (and she doesn't have a typically guy msging her). YOU: Let me get your number, we'll talk later HER: How about IG? YOU: IG is for girls [this is what I say] HER: LOL YOU: Give me your numbe…
/r/seduction16/03/22 06:46 AM
0

Hey I'm free tonight, come over No. Terrible. You meet a girl in COLD APPROACH, she knows you for 5 min, but you do a good job and take her number. Inviting her over is super low probability suggestion. Do a simple date. She might be ready to come back in 30+ minutes. To try to get her to "come over" not going to work. This is bad Tinder advice applied to daygame. Ill-advised. College guy: If you have a bunch of experience showing this work, I'm sure we'd love to hear it. But I have dated 100+ g…
/r/seduction20/04/21 12:23 PM
1

Now you and I are in agreement on the basic facts, but not on the conclusions. The vast majority of guys who "learn the game" don't even get your level of results. You yourself are already in the "top 10%" among guys who learn about the game and try to get laid. Most guys can't approach women consistently, let alone get laid. This is all true. I'll introduce the concept of HONEST SIGNALS (which I bet you already know of). If it's HARD... women can trust it. If it's EASY... it's a meaningless sig…
/r/TheRedPill22/01/20 09:58 AM
1

The 1/4 stat is world class, definitely not talking about me. Secondly I may have misrepresented that stat slightly, the 1/4 was cumulative between day and nightgame, Apologies I'll join you here and say that guys like Captain Jack (who taught Sinn) make claims to stats like that, mostly nightgame... where they had truly expert skills, knew women at an unbelievable level, would read her nonverbal signs, would communicate nonverbally, would cherry pick the set... and close 1 in 4. This isn't some…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/20 06:38 AM
1

Being face to face to someone isn't that big of a deal considering that's what a huge percentage of people do on a regular basis Haha. The "truth" straight from the YouTube generation. You the fuck machine bro. You're awesome.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/20 06:32 AM
1

> If you tell a complete chode to just go "be natural" he is going to be a chode, and get no where. True. > there are other guys who have taken a technical prescriptive and truly refined their skill who have achieved 1/4 pull/approach ratio. This is a ridiculous expectation. You're either talking about the "best week in a man's life" or the Top 0.1% of men... or... he has some status where he is preapproved. And the reason I call out this bad stat, is new guys might go 500-1000 approaches (if th…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/20 10:31 AM
1

Bro, you said it yourself that your stats are worse than 2-3 girls out of 100. You are getting laid not because of your skills, guys without skills have the same or higher success. You are getting girls thanks to the spam approach. You may (or may not) be a "natural" but you have no idea about the real lives of men. That's why you are not "wrong," but you dissing GAME is about your ego, and your failure to see the "stepping stones" that men go through. You also are comparing "avg guys" (at "20th…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/20 10:16 AM
2

a higher chance of getting a girl's true self through an online conversation than through daygame Ehhh. Maybe. And I wrote the post... but it's not really about DAYGAME. Daygame has a LOT of advantages (you can practice all the time, etc), but it's really ABOUT FACE TO FACE. So I am cool with Online, actually. As long as you are DATING A LOT. But if you're not crushing it... DAYGAMERS are actually FACE TO FACE with girls, everyday. 5-20 girls a day. FACE TO FACE. That is precious social skill th…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/20 06:51 AM
3

Getting girls isn't about "skill", it is about who you are. PUAs try to fake behavior patterns You were doing great until this part. Hey man... first time you went "surfing" (or whatever), did you rip it up? ESPN came out and filmed you? No? But, bru... "surfing isn't about a skill, its about who you are." LOL. I laugh at this. Game, like everything... can be learned. And I'm NOT GUESSING. I had GFs. But I was not Chad. And now... I can show up in any big city, talk to girls within hours, have d…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/20 06:48 AM
5

Because they overcomplicate things and, as a result, their frame becomes weak. I wrote the post. Your comment is "noise" to me, as each man should compare his results TO HIMSELF. To how much he would get laid without game. > compare them to stats of someone who approaches women naturally This is like saying, "compared to guys that are better than them, they aren't as good." Again, noise. A man has to learn. If he is born into a situation that facilitates "naturalness," great. If not... can he ge…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/20 08:31 AM
14

It's not really about day game, night game, afternoon game. It's about one experience. Daygame is one experience I wrote the post, and I agree with you. It's just experience. FIRST HAND experience.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/20 08:26 AM
13

Because they aren’t fat trolls This is true... Japanese girls are much less likely to be fat. Also... less likely to be super noisy and crass. It's a beautiful country... for many, many reasons.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/20 08:20 AM
13

This is so pathetic. White men are moving to the edges of the world to get a girl. I wrote the post. The "pathetic" thing to me is people thinking that white guys find is "easy" other places... can you follow your own logic? You're suggesting that other country's girls somehow just "fall for it." "Asian girls, real dumb," is that it? LOL. For GUYS reading this... it's not "easy" anywhere (unless it's easy for that guy everywhere). Asian girls are more attractive to me. Period. But again... that …
/r/TheRedPill02/01/20 08:19 AM
3

I agree that it's "perception," but that is all a marker of her comfort... that's the big deal. Agree... "logging seven hours" isn't the point at all. We all know guys that have logged 100+ hours, and she's never considered sleeping with the guy. The "seven hours" is about looking to see how comfortable she is... And the LARGER POINT is that you pace the seduction to the individual girl. Fast is fine, in some cases. But she'll have her own pace... and seven hours is a decent estimate for minimum…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/19 12:58 AM
12

Nash also doesn't know what he's doing, if you read his stories he's getting massive LMR regularly and he's been a player since forever, and you know what LMR means? Oh yeah? This is Nash. I'll make a bold statement: If you aren't getting LMR... it's because you only act on sure things. So... BillyNumbRocks... I'll assume you hide behind your ego when you make these comments. I bet you "never get rejected" - because you take no chances. And you never get LMR... because you wait until she drags y…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/19 04:20 AM
3

Maybe you're interacting with a girl who is just passing through town. She's feeling adventurous Yes. Perfect example when "fast sex" is the best option.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/19 04:15 AM
5

Diggin this guy's field reports. They're too full-bodied for some but I admire the comprehensiveness of them Thank you, very much. The next piece is the story of Miss Nervous. I originally did this as one post... but at 8k words I figured very few guys would get through it. So I cut it into two parts. I am really into the history and backstory... glad you're interested too.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/19 04:14 AM
11

For a girl to have sex with you, she has to feel like she's spent about 7 quality hours with you Here... I'll disagree. I think you were right the first time... it's a guideline. She doesn't necessarily need 7 hours, or to feel like she knows you... My read of all this is just: She needs to be ready. And 7 hours is a good guess for when avg girls might feel ready... based on whatever her particular criteria are. I take girls to be very self centered. So this is about her comfort. If she doesn't …
/r/TheRedPill04/12/19 04:12 AM
7

I wrote the piece. though the idea has been expanded upon and streamlined a great deal since his archaic feather boa clubbing days I took the quotes from a a 2012 talk... and his whole talk felt like it had been "cleaned up" versus 2005.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/19 04:10 AM
1

"terrifying" Why so dramatic? If we assume some percentage of the popular has "significant trauma" (aka "damaged goods") they can read harmless interactions as "terrifying." I'm not saying any of this is their "fault," but this is about their lives.. not about ours. Be smart. Learn to read people. Never be insistent... never. But bold is okay. Friendly is okay. If you have a sexuality... that is totally okay. Healthy people need not reduce their lives to accommodate the triggers of the most dama…
/r/seduction08/09/19 03:04 AM
2

It's not all cold approaches it's just cold approaching people wearing headphones. No disrespect, but this is 1000% not true. I have approached hundreds of girls wearing headphones. Dated tons of girls from that scenario. It is not an indication of anything... assuming you have some value to offer. It IS true that girls will sometimes wear headphones as a way to insulate themselves. In the same way that you might avoid eye contact. Not a big deal. It is ALSO TRUE that some girls wear headphones,…
/r/seduction08/09/19 03:00 AM
1

I would not make a joke about it. I think that makes you look goofy. That is "little kid" shit from my POV. Regardless of whether she is for real, how much do you like her? And is she trying to get rid of you? If she is trying to get rid of you, recognize that. But if she is acting sincere, and you like her, say, "Okay, I hear you. And I am still interested." If you can say that and hold yourself together, you have just escalated the situation. It should spike her - because it's a ballsy way to …
/r/seduction27/08/19 05:04 AM
1

Someone says "2nd tier" and your ears ring? Why is that? And that's twice now someone (might be you?) has seen that line and claimed it without even being named. Round one, that guy deleted all his original tweets... why is that? Round two, he repeated the claim... but nothing more. We are now on round three. I was describing hysteric bonding Sounds like you're trying to do something. Round three, man. If you are the guy that made that "brave remark," are you capable of defending it? You gonna s…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/19 02:34 AM
7

I got to a point where I needed to love then anyway. The plates I spin are not just warm wet holes that I use for sex. They are all people that I love to one degree or another. We have relationships that enrich my life and theirs. We have sex that is always getting better as we get closer to each other. I love it. I'm not a relationship guy, I'm into pickup, multiple partners per year... but this is exactly how I feel. I think a lot of men are like this. And we make room for this kind of experie…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/19 09:36 PM
7

ideas that things that are best and useful to beginners are not always optimal for advanced guys This is completely true. And it's where I would take the conversation once we acknowledge Types at all. I referenced a Pat Stedman article in the OP linked above... and he says this: "The “blue pill” for instance, is correctly labeled as dangerous advice for men, because it is (loosely) a form of relationship dynamics that only works in couples with high levels of consciousness." -- Pat Stedman That …
/r/TheRedPill20/08/19 09:33 PM
4

Hey man. I wrote the post. Really depends on where you are This is what I am trying to say with Types. It takes longer... but we're wise to check in as to what Type he is, what Type she is, and the Context of the pickup/rel. With that said, I think some attitudes mean you step out of the Game... and when you do, it's very hard to gain positive ref experiences. So you "hoard" your bad ref exp, and never take off. I'd like to steer guys away from that.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/19 09:27 PM
1

What do you mean by blowouts? Like they completely ignore you? There are many flavors of blowouts.. but it basically means she won't stop to talk to you at all. Sometimes, she is ice cold, won't even look at you. Or sticks a hand up to say "no." Or she just nods and keeps going. Or says "sorry" and keeps going." Or sometimes gives me a big smile... but walks off. Anything like that. Not all girls are interested. Blowouts are normal.
/r/seduction05/03/19 06:13 AM
0

Why do people keep blogs and stuff about this stuff I can give two reasons. One, to work out the details of their own lives. And two, to give some specific, real examples for other men. I have learned a lot from other men's stories that helped me to be prepared when it was in a similar situation. friend who has banged like 400+ very hot girls That is a freakishly high lay count. There are some guys with high lay counts that can be very instructive (Dante Nero, for example). But most guys that ge…
/r/seduction02/03/19 01:19 AM
2

Is is prepared. It is an example. But I don't think a "prepared" sounding line is bad here. You are changing the subject. And that itself is part of the message. She should feel "he didn't answer that." It is an interesting part of communication with girls that she asks something, you blow it off, maybe she asks again, you blow it off again (sometimes with humor), and she stops asking. This happens a lot.
/r/seduction01/02/19 01:22 AM
2

Alan Roger Currie is a black dude that writes about what he calls MODE ONE. MODE ONE... is about being direct. MODE TWO... is indirect, move to direct ASAP. MODE THREE... is "hiding your dick." MODE FOUR... is angry woman hater, who is also direct, but will never data a girl. He is not bad. Not a great writer, but he is very good with women and I like his phrasing there. I am a daygamer. You don't have to do daygame directly, but I recommend it. I only go direct. But going direct is just about b…
/r/seduction31/01/19 03:42 PM
1

right now she is not answering my texts Ask yourself this: How long do you think she goes without looking at her phone? Assuming she is not sleeping, etc... how long does she go without looking at her phone? Think about girls you know. An hour? 20 mins? 2 mins? She saw the message and didn't respond. Time to move on. It happens to all of us... but let her go. Is there any kind of way I can save this before I dump it? What would you recommend me to do? Do you know any lines that might work ? No. …
/r/seduction31/01/19 03:36 PM
2

No... I don't like Sneaky Tom. But I'm glad I could help.
/r/seduction21/01/19 09:00 AM
14

"Top 20%" is a good number. But 20% is not "looks." It's any factor that gets you that high in SMV.
/r/seduction14/01/19 01:30 PM
40

The best assessment you'll ever get is how people treat you. Want to take it the next step... try to get people (girls) to do what you want. Compliance takes value. If you can't get compliance, work your value.
/r/seduction14/01/19 08:27 AM
3

A few comments: If you have the same problem with men, or with non-sexual strangers, then you need conversation skills. If this only happens when you're sexually interested, AND you're a beginner... this is somewhat normal. The RSD guys are not beginners. Most guys find this gets better with time... mostly as you get less nervous. A "robot" answer to this question is: Make a comment ("say what you see"). Tease her (if you can). Ask a question (try to save these for when you're out of other ideas…
/r/seduction14/01/19 07:24 AM
2

To the detractors replying in this sub: you are being unrealistic about the nature of women. That girl you are advocating monogamy with is exactly the same as the girls that u/ElegantCyclist is talking about. I agree with your first line (nature of women), but I'll call NAWALT in terms Miss Slav. "TurboSlut" might be appropriate. No moral judgment, but I am looking for a descriptor for a her... she is not your average girl, nor in the next deviation. She seems like a special case. So I agree wit…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/18 09:55 PM
1

One could die waiting for that to happen This is ^ very wise, as I see it. There is a flavor of "make 'em chase" that is popular advice in game. And that is true, for SUPER HIGH VALUE guys (=famous, =very good looking). Most times, it's up to us to approach.
/r/seduction18/09/18 10:38 PM
1

> just hit 50 and am honestly just not attracted to women my age Yep. Good for you. We're not supposed to be attracted to women 35+. Sometimes... but rarely. > really dont want to be perceived as that "creepy guy" ... any thoughts? please be nice Some girls will "frame" you as creepy... but you won't have much control there. Actually, my favorite description of "creepy" is "wanting something, but trying to hide it." So this is one of those things... if you 1/2 approach, or do indirect... I think…
/r/seduction18/09/18 08:54 PM
1

I’ll keep the comfort thing in mind It's not just "comfort." That is sort of "short hand" for a range of things that would make the date more solid. Could be ADDING VALUE. You can be funny, or exciting, etc. That will help dates. Could be COMFORT, thou... I can't tell if sending pics of my cats are good/bad (depends on the girl), but I think that can "make me a real person" and/or have appeal to girls that like cats (most girls, in my opinion). You're right to avoid "endless chitchat," but findi…
/r/seduction18/09/18 12:57 AM
1

I counted instances where I messaged her the night or morning before the date and didn’t get a response as stood up, maybe I should have said ghosted instead to be clear Okay. Stood up, to me, means I'm at the location, and she never comes/messages. You hold yourself to a pretty high standard. Good for you. so sometimes I feel like I’m really grasping at straws to make something happen. I feel the same way... quite often.
/r/seduction18/09/18 12:54 AM
7

> I know that I should talk to her as little as possible until we meet, at least that's what I've doing @ArdAtak gave you great comments on this ^. My guess is you're pushing for the date too hard. CANCELLED: Happens to me a lot. Maybe 1:3. ​ STOOD UP: Only once in my life... and I've been on hundreds of dates. That's the redflag in your stats. ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION: I think 60% of dates that girls agree to a date should happen. Roughly that. If you're at 6 in 23, I think you're pushing for da…
/r/seduction18/09/18 12:07 AM
0

Not trying to dis anyone, but very generally speaking... I agree. " she glanced back with a twinkle in her eye. I was sure she was interested " @kibberty Kibberty is pointing to a factor that could make this reasonable/real... if it was a real IOI, and the guy's game is good... success off of IOI is radically higher than "cold approach." And that addresses my original issue as well... if he only approaches on IOI, he could have a much higher success rate. In general, these stories don't sound "r…
/r/seduction18/09/18 12:00 AM
58

> but when I do approach, it typically works IMAO... This ^ is usually a sign the poster doesn't actually approach much at all. This isn't personal, just a pattern I see. When you rarely approach, you tend to approach "sure things." So, maybe this is real. But if you approach regularly... and most of the time in cold approach... you know it MOSTLY "doesn't work." Solid guys will take numbers less than 50% of the time.
/r/seduction17/09/18 07:26 PM
5

> It’s my second year of community college and I’m 19 years old Did school start yet? If you go to school, you have a lot of girls around you. I wouldn't recommend "burning out your school," but you could certainly be working those options more. A recommendation: * First day of class (or now, if you're already in it).. * Sit next to some girls you like (preferably ones that don't know each other) * Before/after class, say... "Hey, you look smart" * "I'm homie, I am trying to set up study groups …
/r/seduction17/09/18 07:18 PM
2

Yeah, I hear you. Keep trying. And of course, I'd recommend daygame. Daygaming girls means you don't wait of a "match," and it teaches you to have balls. Most guys can't do it... so there is much less competition, and you have access to girls that don't date via apps.
/r/seduction25/06/18 10:28 PM
1

You sounds like you're reasonably experienced... and you're reading this pretty well. >> she isn't ready to date as she Mostly (and I bet you know this), this ^ means she doesn't want to date "you." Ignore "why," just take it as a "no." This happens to me too... no big deal. I also got this this year, after 2 dates, with her in my bed both dates. She said the exact same thing... I never contacted her again. >> let it go and move on Smart read. If you want to try again... leave her be for a week/…
/r/seduction25/06/18 10:26 PM
8

>> I'm almost 20 You're super young, dude. I don't think you can even call a 20 yr old virgin an "incel," I bet more than half of 20 yr olds are still virgins. >> afterwards I text them and asked how the date was Don't do this ^. Cool guys never ask the girl, "how was the date." By doing that, you are proving to her (in case she didn't already know), that you're not one of the cool guys. Don't ever ask that question again. You're obviously just getting started... but you'll KNOW when it was a go…
/r/seduction25/06/18 10:15 PM
1

>> do you use any such hobbies and/or tricks to impress the ladies? Do you have some reccomendations? No. Definitely not. Approach more. It's not "only" approaching, but that is how you get better... and then you don't need "tricks." So much of being good with women is learning social calibration. You can ONLY do that via social interactions. "Handwriting analysis" is a joke compared to social calibration... a terribly ineffective joke. Cool guys make fun of guys trying to do that kind of stuff …
/r/seduction25/06/18 10:06 PM
1

>> I ended up sleeping with two of the four girls flight attendants, oh yeah and the first brunette too. : ] LOL
/r/seduction25/06/18 09:58 PM
1

You still trying to suggest that GIRLS WILL COME TO YOU? LOL. This is the dream of men with no balls. You may be the exception. Such a thing is possible. Good for you. Just deal with the girls that come to you (you obviously have plenty)... tons of hot, quality chicks, hit on you, because you're high value. You live in abundance, tons of high quality girls, all over you... chasing your value. I believe you. For the other 97% of guys... they have nothing to learn from ^ this example. It is one th…
/r/seduction25/06/18 09:52 PM
1

I'll be personal... When I had no game, almost every girl I dated "hit on me"... which is statistically obvious, as "I had no game," so of course they came to me (or nothing would have happened). Too many guys have shit game, so ALL of their stories are about how the girl did the work. It happens, but as a % OF TOTAL SEX... it's super rare. And that should be super obvious. However... I happen to be a good dancer. Really good, and I base that on how much attention women give me when I'm out danc…
/r/seduction25/06/18 03:14 AM
1

Well, I have a ton of experience... and I know a ton of guys in the community, many with +100 laycounts... I have been in game for a long time... studied all the best guys... and the stories of "girls hitting on them dead openly" are incredibly rare. So... guys can talk about that all they want. I think they are mostly liars and pussies... and/or have 2 stories, and 1000s of nights alone. For most guys, if you have a high laycount, and ARE NOT famous... then you did the approaching. If you're sw…
/r/seduction25/06/18 03:07 AM
1

This doesn't sound good. It's good you're trying to get this started... BUT hitting on TAs is a very slow way to get good with women, and dangerous, as you have a formal relationship. Bigger picture... girls want to date guys with experience. I can tell by these details, you don't have a lot of experience. Very likely the girl can tell as well... they are comparing us to other men in their lives... and every attractive girl knows several cool guys. COLD APPROACH is important, because it allows g…
/r/seduction20/06/18 10:07 PM
6

Solid men know their territory. If you're dating girls, and want some alcohol in the mix... you should know a few bars. You should know you options for dates... BEFORE you even have a date. Go explore. The most common bar I take girls to is... a high end hotel bar. It's very nice. It's well lit. It's quiet. It's all ages (so I can take 18 yr olds, etc). It is a very good choice, because as I offer to take the girl here, even if she doesn't drink alcohol... we can have something non alcoholic to …
/r/seduction20/06/18 09:52 PM
1

And Rollo is not going to help guys do much more than "complain louder" (we'd all be wise to turn our backs on Cap't Salty), but per his own article that you linked to: "A Man needs to have a lot of simultaneous prospects spinning together. Think of each plate as a separate woman you are pursuing." -- Mr MGTOW himself
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 09:15 PM
8

The "plate" is not the interesting part. It's the SPINNING that matters. It's not about "plates." It's about SPINNING PLATES. This is LITERALLY the metaphor where the figurative "plate" comes from. As in... "it is difficult to spin multiple plates, thuswise, I compare dating multiple women to spinning plates... because of the difficulty." So I'll disagree and say, if you're "spinning"... "you're spinning plates." If you're not spinning (= juggling multiple women)... find a different analogy. SPI…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 09:12 PM
1

In Mar-May I did 60 days of daygame in a row. I know what this kind of challenge is like... I started out at about 10 day (everyday). And then that dropped as I started dating a lot (and daytime dates made it harder to game) and then... I was getting laid a lot, so I wasn't motivated to approach. I still approached, min 2 per day, until the very end. For the record... took me 35 days to get my first lay. Then I fucked three more girls in the next 3 weeks.
/r/seduction20/06/18 07:58 PM
2

100 Women in 50 Days I'm reading your story for the first time. A couple of comments: It's a pretty GOOD challenge, as 50 days in a row will begin to set some habits. That is excellent. But... You are making this HARDER on yourself, by only doing 2 / day. I hear you (in this post) saying it's hard to find girls to approach. I get it... but doing 2 per day means you are perpetually in "warm up" mode, or rather in "not warmed up yet mode," every day, day after day. That is going to set a precedent…
/r/seduction20/06/18 07:55 PM
2

I think the OP is about the approach. I’ve had multiple girls give me a no to a make out say, or sleeping together, and I just kept escalating, and ended up with the pull. Good discussion about this ^ here
/r/seduction20/06/18 07:46 PM
1

There is the concept of "PLOWING," and I have a suggestion for when/not to do that: Men should considering PLOWING when they themselves can't easily carry on the conversation. But if the girl is actually showing disinterest... no, DO NOT PLOW. Plowing is about overcome our own shyness... not about yammering the girl into submission.
/r/seduction20/06/18 07:42 PM
1

Anyone here pushed past disinterested behavior and actually got somewhere? This ^ is mostly about knowing what is actually disinterest, and what is uncertainty, or a "mean poker face" etc. If she's genuinely disinterested, >2% chance you'll change her mind. But... most guys err toward assuming she's not into them when she's just unsure or when she's nervous.
/r/seduction20/06/18 07:40 PM
0

Even alpha men don't really get "approached." Feminine women that like a guy will "hover" around him. Often, with their backs turned to him. It's what Mystery used to call "proximity" something-something. And ^ that is a fascinating example of how women's minds work. She wants him, but feminine girls will signal "indirectly" by hovering near the guy... AND, she'll turn her back, so that he HAS TO APPROACH (even though she is doing her best to make it easier for him). Having her back turned is a …
/r/seduction20/06/18 07:37 PM
1

It's funny that many women think approaching a man first will make her seem desperate, while most men have the opposite thought It's not about her being "desperate" per se (although, what kind of woman isn't get enough attention... could be she IS desperate). The problem is that women initiating puts them IN THE MASCULINE ROLE. And these softy boys that think they want that, are probably so "feminine" that they won't be disgusted or put of by masculine women. Most solid men... will have little r…
/r/seduction15/06/18 11:23 PM
4

I think it's just an excuse [FOR GUYS] for not knowing how to carry a conversation. ^ Exactly true. The guys that ask for women to make the move, almost universally have no moves of their own, and want women to "discover" how great they are.
/r/seduction15/06/18 11:19 PM
1

-1/+1 for you here: Tl;dr notch pursuit is motivated by ignorance of a deeper love or experience of heartache and a desire to remain sexually active without emotional attachment. You are out on a limb when you tell other men what their sex MEANS to them. I am still very interested in notches... as miles stones of something larger. I have had LTRs and been "in love" and lived with 4 women... what I hadn't done, was lived a life where I could create my own sexual opportunities on the fly. Those op…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 11:17 PM
2

I did a similar challenge recently... 60 Days of Daygame in a Row. I talked to 2-20 girls per day. It was a great challenge... and while it was exhausting, it was hard to stop. And yes... I got laid a bunch. So many interesting moments.
/r/seduction05/06/18 08:00 PM
5

I’m also less moved by pure novelty than some guys are. Don’t get me wrong, I like novelty, but I don’t automatically lose interest in a chick after nailing her a couple times. You and I have this in common, as we both like "recurring revenue" with girls. And when I see your post as a way to retain a girl you like (to keep ongoing lover-status going), I can see that as a useful "tool" to get that done. But this line I quoted here from you is a very interesting part of guys in game. I'm kind of f…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/18 07:10 PM
3

There is a quote from a movie I like that says something like "sex is about CONCENTRATION." This is an interesting way to look at it. She will assume you want sex, because you're "concentrating on her." There are so many people, why her? And if her, what is you motive? Sex is a very reasonable assumption. QUESTION is this... were you hitting on her? Was it a half-ass approach? If you're posting this here... I'll assume you WERE hitting on her, sort of. And that you're not "committed" to what you…
/r/seduction29/05/18 06:42 PM
2

Clean house, yeah... but if she's successful, "your house" is on the way to impress her. LEAD HER. BE MASCULINE. Is she looking for a "nice fixtures" or a MAN?
/r/seduction23/05/18 06:13 PM
0

Cold approaches are a numbers game. Prepare to speak to 10 women to get one phone number. That is normal. I'll add this ... it's a numbers game but ALSO requires self reflection. Pure "numbers game" is spamming girls, it's not effective, it won't help you become a cool guy. You need HIGH VOLUME, yes. But it is that self reflection (and coaching from other guys) that will make this more than spam approaching. Credit Roy Walker Daygame for that point on self reflection.
/r/seduction23/05/18 06:07 PM
3

HER: How old are you? ME: At least 10 years older than you... This is a great line I use all the time. It kills the question, and she doesn't need to hear that I am actually 20+ years older than her. Almost always settles the issue with the girl.
/r/seduction22/05/18 11:22 PM
3

Cool, happy to chat. all dating exploits are essentially practise for when we find the one we want I would advise you to try to open your mind to consider "ongoing screening/enjoyment" as the goal... and then "maybe" picking "the one" once she shows up and proves herself. Most guys don't enjoy dating because they aren't that good at it... but if you had lots of options, and dating was easy/fun... are you sure you're want to stop and settle down?? It's a very big shift... but one I advocate. If y…
/r/seduction22/05/18 11:19 PM
1

Still a good option. SDLs are rare, but possible. And the volume of girls in a big city is a big plus over whatever happens to be at the bar. Also... more girls on their own. If you're young... Tinder is probably easier, but I'd argue lower quality. And you won't "grow" as much as a man "swiping right" as you will via cold approach.
/r/seduction22/05/18 10:39 PM
1

Is this a date or a pickup? Sounds like you're looking to meet girls? I vote... DAYGAME. If you live in a big city... girls on tap, everyday.
/r/seduction22/05/18 09:33 PM
2

frankly my ex was 38 and I want a younger model Good for you. I'm much older than you and I still date that young or younger. we talked every day Bad sign... even if you're dating, I dont' recommend you talk everyday. Super cool guys don't do this... no insult. But she knows super cool guys, and this is a way to prove you are not. reeling a bit because of how perfectly our date went You need to date more, man. I get it... but she is too "precious" to you, and that is a sign TO HER that you're no…
/r/seduction22/05/18 08:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter