TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

destarolat Archive

View 0 posts and 608 comments by destarolat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

The supreme court is a joke. I would not count on them.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 12:30 AM
14

They just got a plea deal with no jail time.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 01:24 AM
3

Churches in the west are becoming woke, not so much in other places.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 03:52 AM
-1

I judge any person who goes to Starbucks, men or woman. It is a place for morons. Same for people addicted to sugar. Same for the stupid "soyboy" open mouth. Same for a lot of stuff in the list, some of them are at best stupid, but some others are highly unhealthy. In any case, I fail to see what most have to do with sex. Most of them are stupid or bad for both men and women.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 11:18 AM
56

By that logic men should not be charged with rape because women might use it to get out of crimes. Why are feminist arguments always so stupid and manipulative?
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:33 AM
6

He should go to prison for killing thousands of old people for political gain. The harassment? Who knows if true or not. I would not be surprised if all of this is just a smoke screen to try to deviate the conversation from killing innocents to a stupid sexual harassment case (and in the process protect the other governors who did the same). Politics is nasty business.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 06:01 AM
6

She belongs to PedoWood and has to defend it. It is the same as "Believe all women", you were supposed to believe it as long as it was from one political party and not the other. The woman who accused Bill Clinton, the same night she was raped not decades later, is basically ignored by the press. Same for the woman who accused Joe Biden. It is all about power and coherence does not factor in. She is part of PedoWood and is defending it.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 04:29 AM
11

He is a kid, he has no idea who he wants to be. Are you suggesting kids do not need to be educated?
/r/MensRights28/02/21 01:46 PM
2

Exploiting has a negative connotation. If you told your girlfriend you like being with her because you exploit her very well, she would be offended and anyone listening would think you are an abusive asshole.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 09:39 AM
3

So now we are defining natural instincts as exploitation? BTW, I agree with you in that women tend to want specific things from men and men tend to want other specific things from women, I just would not call it exploitation. Me wanting sex from a woman is not me wanting to exploit her. And a woman looking from financial security from me is not her trying to exploit me. These desires can be pursued in an exploitative way, as with anything human, if they involve lies, deception, etc... but in a n…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 09:07 AM
11

He should not kill himself, he should flee Italy to a country with no extradition to Italy.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 09:00 AM
5

Stupid woman pandering apart, it is true that men all over the world have worse and worse sperm and that affects fertility. And it keeps getting worse. There is a lot of speculation as to why: sedentary life, increasing fatness, chemist substances in the water and food, ... but nothing conclusive.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 11:51 AM
0

This does not answer his point.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 06:18 AM
0

Women have always worked. I am not sure how feminists managed to convince people that women were not allowed to work in the past. It is a lie.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 04:47 PM
-8

You are right, but this is not the place.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 01:46 AM
22

Break 'masculine mindset'? If a doctor thinks like that I'm not going.
/r/MensRights13/02/21 06:14 AM
8

Yes, according to Vice buying GME is white supremacy. Not joking, they published that article.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 05:48 AM
7

OK, no more M&M for me. Keep losing revenue you morons.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 07:40 AM
-2

We need to stop making excuses and trying to protect weak men. These are the same men that will throw you under the bus the moment a woman ask them. Fuck them, let them suffer the consequences of their own weakness, as they would betray you just to smell some pussy from the distance. Men that care for other men need to start looking for each other. We should fight to ensure that men can freely do a paternity test in the countries where they are not allowed. But that is about it. For the record, …
/r/MensRights08/02/21 07:26 AM
5

I still do not understand why men do not ask for paternity tests. It does not have to be mandatory, you can just ask for it. It is not even that expensive, specially compared to the consequences.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 06:52 AM
7

Women always take low value men for granted.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 11:28 AM
10

Problem is you can not listen to feminists, but feminists work hard and with a lot of money to make your kids listen to them, in fact they make feminism the only thing your kids listen to in school when it comes to gender. They also make politicians and people who make laws listen to them, and only them, and you have to obey laws. They take over your favorite series, movies, games, comics,... and ruin it. Feminists will not leave you alone. If you think you can just avoid them you are greatly mi…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 09:43 AM
34

The ACLU is a hate group.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 08:51 AM
40

A lot of men are already checking out of the system. Doing the minimum to be able to live their life's, saying "Yes, Bwana" when they have no other choice and doing their thing when out of sight of the mainstream... The biggest indicator is the marriage rates. There are several reasons for that, not all is men choices, but part of it is. Or look at Trump election, where way more men than women voted for him. Or a lot of the fuck the system movements, like GME. Not only because of men, but with a…
/r/MensRights30/01/21 08:51 AM
102

It is one of the few comic heroes movies that is not just special effects and actually has a deep script, maybe even the only one. Actually, it felt like a proper movie, not like a comic hero movie at all. You should watch it.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 08:44 AM
1

I understand what you think it is respectful to do. You have said it multiple times. I have also stated that I agree with you on this point. The question is what happens when the person you are interacting with thinks a white lie is the respectful thing and the straight truth is disrespectful. Would it not be respectful to humour her instead of imposing your preferences?
/r/MensRights26/01/21 10:36 AM
1

You have not answered the question.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 07:29 AM
0

What if the person you are interacting with thinks a white lie is more respectful than being told the truth straigh? You would still think your way is the only respectful way over what she deems respectful?
/r/MensRights26/01/21 07:10 AM
2

You are again saying that being overt is more respectful than being covert, just with different words, while at the same time denying saying it. And again I will tell you that I agree with you, I personally prefer being told the truth than bullshit around. But the issue is not what you or me prefer. The issue is that most women do not like being told directly to the point of reacting angrily to it, and prefer the bullshit. So the question remains, why do you think it is more respectful to treat …
/r/MensRights26/01/21 06:44 AM
2

Why are you assuming being overt is more respectful than being covert? That is a manly way of thinking, which is fine if you are interacting with men. And BTW, I agree with you, when someone interacts with me I appreciate if they are overt and find it insulting if they are covert, tends to sound like bullshit. But I also know that most women prefer covert communication, so why not respect her preferences? Why impose what you would prefer for yourself on her, when you know she prefers the opposit…
/r/MensRights26/01/21 05:54 AM
0

Yes treat adults like adults, but do not treat men like women and, like in this case, do not treat women like men. Women like the pretense (99% of them), I do not get why it is so importart for them, but it is. What is so wrong about knowing this and applying it? You do not have to do what I suggested, but it will make your interactions with women go more smooth.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 05:41 AM
14

She should not have reacted that way, but most girls will if you make things overt. Next time instead of telling her you are seeing someone else (therefore overtly stating that you understand her invitation is sexual) you should tell her you are very tired or you have to wake up very early tomorrow or whatever other excuse that keeps her sexual invitation obscured. You, her and everybody know her invitation was sexual, but girls like the pretense that it wasn't. I know for us men is weird, but t…
/r/MensRights26/01/21 04:22 AM
2

She could be lying. I'm not saying it is a lie necessarily, enough crazy people out there for this to happen, but it sounds like the first excuse she could think of.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 06:03 AM
15

You need to interact more with feminists so you can understand why you are not a feminist.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 12:05 PM
9

Depends, does it benefit or damage a woman?
/r/MensRights14/01/21 03:46 AM
3

Funnily enough a lot of us do.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 02:25 AM
38

She says she values diversity, but he is too different.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 01:58 AM
13

This is a mistake. Feminists have not risen to power by being batshit irrational. They appear batshit irrational when it suits them, but they are not. It is dangerous of you to assume they are.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 08:00 PM
10

The feminist patriarchy does not exist in the world. It is 100% bullshit. If you refer to Patriarchy to a completely different and more nuanced idea than the feminist patriarchy, then you are talking about a completely different thing, just with the same name, and that could exists obviously. But the patriarchy as feminists define it is 100% horseshit.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 07:34 PM
2

The thing is, it was not fucked this way 50 years ago. Man hating being socially acceptable is a new development brought on by feminism. We should not have allowed it to develop, but we did. Now, we have to push forward against it, which is always harder but it is the only solution left.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 11:23 AM
63

Water is wet.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 11:19 AM
1

I'm honestly curious about your comments about feminism when you research about first wave feminists and their rabid racism and classism, instead of the pop version they gave you in school.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 01:24 PM
11

Demoralization
/r/MensRights29/12/20 07:45 AM
3

Obviously, if a person has lied before is something that is taken into account in court. You can call witnesses to testify as to the reputation of a person. If a person has falsely accused others of rape before, you think it should not matter if he or she accuses you of rape? Understand, I'm not saying the accusation should be dismissed outright, it should be studied, but reputation matters.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 10:23 AM
5

Why is reputation accepted for all crimes, but now there is a push for reputation not to matter for certain crimes that feminists are obsessed about?
/r/MensRights28/12/20 09:16 AM
13

Men have struggled enough with the idea that they need to be tough guys being shoved down their throats. There's no reason to continue pushing that narrative when so many men are suffering from it. No. Men, and boys, are struggling because feminist have been pushing the idea that the experience of how better be a man of millions of men before us is not good, and some delusional ideas of people who are not men and have no idea how it feels should be imposed on the kids.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 04:37 AM
3

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. Hope she keeps her word and you can resolve it amicably, but prepare for the worst, meaning contact a lawyer and be ready to go to court. She might be honest about arranging it without lawyers and courts, she might be just trying to catch you off guard and unprepared. You never know, hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 06:36 AM
1

If that were true and they are only lots of idiots, why don't they criticize China? Even Lebron James refused to even speak of China's abuses. If they are just idiots, they would fire in every direction, but they don't.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 08:15 AM
0

Don't get this the wrong way, I want to praise you, as this is a good write up. It does look like you are maturing, and leaving being some teenager ideas and habits (sorry if you are way older, but it is still true). I am saying this because, while a bit sad to see as an older person, it is normal for male teenagers to be obsessed with sex and women. It takes some time to grow out of it and be interested but not obsessed with sex.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 10:24 AM
5

You should always call them out in it, in a way everybody will understand. For example, when she admits she trusts women more than men because trauma, tell her that's fine, but then why people should listen to a person with trauma about complex issues. She is trying to get sympathy to get away with it. Give her all the sympathy, be very nice, but deny her any respect, never stop pointing how that disqualifies her opinion while giving her all thee sympathy of the world. You repeat this several ti…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 10:21 AM
5

Yes, you describe the useful idiots, but have you not wondered why they are heavily backed?
/r/MensRights04/12/20 09:17 AM
0

So you don't think the USA spies and tries to interfere in other nations to try to stay on top, and other nations do similar things back to try to overthrow the USA? Believing that would be very naive.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 09:16 AM
6

Weakening western civilization, so it can be overthrown eventually. It is quite obvious.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 08:31 AM
1

Nah, I don't think so. You can not fight your natural instincts. The same way the most rabid feminists that denies her motherly instincs ends up with a house full of cats to fulfill her natural nurturing tendencies, any men or MRA that denies his own natural instincs, including protecting women and competing against other men, will end up pursuing those instincs in a caricature way. This is why I always say, we should accept those instincs, but direct them in a way that helps us. What I do is I …
/r/MensRights04/12/20 07:38 AM
1

It is still in a lot of ways. First of all in preference. Second, in some characteristics, like hability to handle stress, where on average men exceed women, and on capacity to nurture, where on average women exceed men. You are not going to undo millions of years of evolution and adaption to the environment through genetic selection, just in a few decades, which in evolutionary terms is nothing, just because the elites think that promoting women to work will increase the labor pool and lower wa…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 07:25 AM
0

So never.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 01:50 AM
6

Most white women had to work too. Most white women were poor.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:02 AM
3

The reality is that society forces fathers away from children, and mothers towards the home. It is not society. It is that in societies where 90%+ of the work is manual it makes sense for the strong partner to be doing those jobs.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:01 AM
5

I'm OK with women having these jobs, IF they are capable of doing them. Basically, I want a firefighter able to rescue my family from a fire. I don't care what gender, as long as he can do it. Same with any other job. I also don't mind if the team is all men or all women, as long as they get the job done. Honestly, it feels really stupid that something like this needs to be said. So then, the obvious question is: if the physical requirements were necessary, why change them? I want firefighters t…
/r/MensRights23/11/20 07:19 AM
2

There is nothing wrong with ALM.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 06:29 AM
1

Look at the evidence, man. Come on, man!!! Jokes apart, there is a lot of evidence of cheating. I personally think that Biden has no chance of winning. But we will see in court.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 12:50 PM
12

It has been called by the press for Biden. Nobody has won it yet. It is disturbing the need of one side to pretend it has been decided when it is a fact it hasn't, and then call names to anyone who points out the fact. It should not be this way. In any case, good luck.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 06:16 AM
14

That's the spirit. If you really think Biden won without cheating, there is nothing wrong with auditing and recounting. If you are right, Biden will come on top again. I apreaciate your honesty and fair game.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 06:06 AM
8

Why? Even if Biden succeeds on stealing the election, I don't live in any of the countries he will invade (he already has announced Syria), so I think I'm safe. But for the sake of world peace and lives let's hope he does not manage to steal the election.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 06:02 AM
7

Do you also find it funny that Kamala has not quit her senate seat to become VP? Apparently she is not as convinced as you about who won.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:58 AM
7

Are you one of those crazy people who believes Biden playing pretend president in his basement means anything?
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:44 AM
3

I admit the press has called it for Biden/Harris. Now you move past your denial and admit that means nothing.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:43 AM
1

They can both play pretend in the basement, while Trump has his second term. Kamala does not seem very committed to her pretend VP because she still has not resigned her Senate seat. Wonder why.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 03:59 AM
-4

No, because Biden will remain in his basement pretending to be president elect and will never be in the White House.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 03:23 AM
8

She is not the new VP.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 03:20 AM
193

During their relationship she had supplied him with a lavish sexlife. Now the relationship has ended he needs her continued support to maintain that lavish sexlife. Makes sense.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 06:59 AM
0

Gore was announced by the press to be the winner of the election. After a month and a half in court, it was announced that Bush was the new president of the USA. What I'm saying is that Biden/Harris will not be in the White House.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 05:16 AM
1

The winner doesn't look as if he can survive the rigours of the job. Trump seems fine.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 02:09 AM
0

Who cares, Biden is 2020's Gore.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 02:08 AM
3

What action? George Flood died from fentanyl overdose.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:48 PM
3

The racism, the classism...
/r/MensRights07/11/20 06:22 PM
3

Why would men stop sexualizing women? Sexuality and attraction are basic functions of humans. Asking anyone to stop sexualizing other people is asking them to stop being human. It can not be done and, more importantly, it should not be done. Plus, women would hate it if men stopped sexualizing them.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 06:21 AM
7

Nope. Feminism was always shitty. Check what the first wave feminists did. What they actually did, not the sugar fake version they tell you in school.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 06:16 AM
3

What's sad is they get considerably more upvotes/comments then MRA on every single post. What the hell are we doing wrong. Nothing. Reddit is just a trashy place dominated by lunatics.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 07:29 AM
13

How is "working more" defined as "dominating"?
/r/MensRights31/10/20 04:53 AM
42

So "only" all the feminists with any power. Is that supposed to be comforting?
/r/MensRights31/10/20 04:52 AM
1

Sure, "in mind".
/r/MensRights31/10/20 04:13 AM
7

When it comes to physicality, men have several more advantages on top of upper body strength, like quicker reaction time, more resistance, quicker recovery times, better 3D spatial awareness, ... (most of them due to higher testosterone levels).
/r/MensRights30/10/20 10:03 AM
781

I wish we could have only females and only males groups, but feminists said that was all kind of -ist and -phobe, so now eat your own medicine.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 01:45 PM
1

Of course it is the Jesuits.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 09:53 AM
9

Not equally, but with respect. Even women, or even feminists, don't want to be treated equally in practice, even if they pay lip service to it. Men and women are different and should be treated somehow different. There is nothing wrong about it as long as we are treating everybody respectfully.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 09:50 AM
9

There is a different between protecting and taking care of women and cattering to every demand of a pathological subsection of women.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 12:16 AM
2

He married her 16 years ago, so he was mid 50's. Should have known better. Don't get me wrong, what is happening to him is unfair. And yet, he should have known better.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 04:41 PM
4

The situation is not fair, but he has a point. By now, men should know the result of marrying. The first men who got fucked got a deal that was almost impossible to predict when they married. But men marrying now know what they sign for. If you marry, you have a high chance of end up working a big time of your life to support your ex wife. If you are OK with that, marry, if you find it unfair, do not marry. That is how reality is now and everybody knows it. If you marry and you are surprised at …
/r/MensRights22/10/20 04:08 PM
9

Because then she gets your money, obviously. Until women offer a better marriage deal, there is no reason for men to marry.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 04:03 PM
3

Why did he marry?
/r/MensRights22/10/20 02:57 PM
2

And as a living being? We need to know...
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:05 AM
24

Not all hours are the same. Some people put the hours and produce shit, some people produce gold.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 12:31 AM
2

Despite what your teacher told you at school, the un-american activities committee was very fair and the main problem is that it was slandered and did not go far enough.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 11:01 AM
100

They are going mainstream kinda... They will not appear in CNN, MSNBC, ... and Twitter and Facebook will censor them... But those media are hardly mainstream anymore. Their ratings are so low it is ridiculous to call them mainstream. YouTube channels get way more viewers than them. Twitter and Facebook censorship are a bigger problem, but even then people find ways around it. Mensright's are growing and become mainstream, not in the old way, but in a real way, despite the modern social media cen…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 03:41 AM
5

Reading between the lines the VP understand what is happening but sides with the other women. She will not do anything about it.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 06:19 PM
11

That's the justification that keeps the behavior uncorrected. It allows them to think that it is OK and moral to hate men.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 12:15 PM
30

You do have a point. The issue is that this idea of men not feeling anything is not real. It is a strawman feminist created to then be able to tell men how they should feel within feminists terms. Men have always talk about controlling your feelings, about being emotionally stable, never about not feeling anything, that is a feminist strawman. One created for feminists to tell us how we should feel, not to free us and feel how we want. Men have always felt and also expressed our feelings. We jus…
/r/MensRights13/10/20 08:20 AM
34

Men's clubs need to come back. Feminists destroyed men's clubs, where men used to socialize among ourselves, by saying they were misogynists. Now they want to create alternative men's clubs but only under the terms feminists deem acceptable. We need to go back to creating our own clubs with no feminist oversight. Just writing this shit feels dystopian, but here is where we are.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 08:11 AM
7

This is the way.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:18 AM
48

It is a trap. What feminist call "healthy masculinity" is emasculating men and it hurts us. Feminists do not want emotionally healthy men because those men are able to see and stand up to their bullshit. This shit is really evil.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:16 AM
1

Society teaches men not to rape. And it is only a testament of the stupidity tough in modern western education that I have to write this obvious explanation: The issue is that despite any amount of education, there are still some bad men out there. And despite any amount of education, men still have biological strong impulses. So when a bad men sees a woman showing a lot of skin it is more probable that he will think about rape. If he is caught, he will be punished for it and he knows it, yet th…
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:57 AM
10

"Economist". He was an ideologue.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 04:06 AM
2

That's not true though. Historically, Christian societies gave the control of the kids to the man. It was the feminist movement that changed it.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 05:15 AM
411

And she does not allow men to remove her trash. Or use sewers built and maintained by men. Or live in a nation defended with the blood of men... She is just a spoiled sex grifter.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 11:15 AM
1

I do my exercise without a gym. Go run in the streets and do chalistenics at home (lots of internet videos showing you from beginner to expert).
/r/MensRights24/09/20 06:47 PM
13

I agree with you. The problem is feminism and therefore modern society wants males to keep their gender obligations while freeing females of theirs. I am OK with being a traditional male and performing the duties of a traditional male, IF, and only if, she is going to be a traditional female and performing the duties of a traditional female. And I dont think a female should be forced to be traditional. If she wants a new arrangement she is free to try it. But it is a new arrangement for everybod…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 08:53 AM
2

That comments, in the shortest way possible, means: Feminism is communism or is nothing. Very telling indeed.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 08:47 AM
2

Even the CDC and Fauci said there is no evidence masks prevent anything.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 08:13 AM
4

Dont you get tired of being such a sad cliché?
/r/MensRights18/09/20 08:07 AM
4

No, it is not. That is just the excuse the director has come up with.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 05:25 AM
1

That is not what valid means, but not going to discuss the meaning of words.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 11:51 AM
-2

No, not all your feelings are valid. That kind of thinking will turn you into a vapid narcissist. The same way not all theories are correct, not all feelings are correct. You should pay attention and consider all your feelings, do not ignore them, but that does not mean all your feelings are valid.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 09:45 AM
4

But it is true that being short hinders your love live opportunities. The issue is there is nothing in this world that will change it. At least go to the gym and try other things to compensate.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 05:48 PM
0

I find body positivity and in general most theories of positive thinking quite empty and ultimately detrimental for the person. In my experience it is better to be realistic and tackle the issue at hand. For example, if you are a short man, accept it and find alternative attitudes and strategies to accomplish what you want. Once you find the right way, positivity comes naturally and without the delusional element of those theories.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 03:15 PM
4

Nobody needs body positivity. What people need is to be told the truth and learn to accept it and deal with it.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 09:38 AM
29

Way to miss the point.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 06:28 AM
2

but saying blacks have to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps is why I’m saying you’re lucky they don’t want revenge. What’s wrong with them getting a little bit of help? What's wrong with me getting a bit of help? From the African Americans who's ancestors enslaved mine. Affirmative action is racist. African Americans should be the first ones asking for it to be removed.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 07:34 AM
16

Every race has been slaved and nobody asked for nothing afterwards, they just lifted themselves through work and intelligence, generation after generation. My ancestors were enslaved in mass by north and west Africans. Since almost all of black Americans come from West Africa, should I ask them for compensation?. Should I go and take their shit because justice? Are they lucky I just want equality and not revenge?
/r/MensRights08/09/20 12:53 PM
10

First, that workers should be paid based on the labor they perform and not on how much they generate is a Marxist position, not leftist in general. Second, in the entertainment industry, this particular case, are the workers really doing the same labor if one brings a lot more people to the stadium and watching live than another? How do you account for one footballer doing more shit in the field and creating more attention than another? What about promoting outside the field?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/20 02:21 AM
13

I was going to make a comment similar to you but when you look at every item, all of them are ridiculous. Almost one million usd a month on entertainment? 100k a month on mortgage? This one could look like the closest to sanity of them all but it is still insane. With 300k anyone can buy a house that can give you a very comfortable and happy life, even with less. Wtf is someone asking a 100k a month mortgage as a necessity? If she wants more she can work and take risks for it.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 11:43 AM
3

Nobody is free from social pressure. Social pressure is an effect of living in society. Saying people should be fee of social pressure in society is the same as saying people should be free of gravity when falling off a window. It is a manipulative argument. Whoever is saying anyone should be free of social pressure is manipulating and has bad intentions. And the problem here is when this people say Re/Undefining masculinity, what they want to do is educate men in a way that is negative for us m…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 11:14 AM
48

This woman is out of her mind.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 11:10 AM
0

I find this answer unsatisfactory. It is not real. Men and women are all human, and therefore we share a lot of commonalities (biologically and culturally). Both men and women can talk about what it is being a human. But that is not what it is being asked. In this particular case the question is specifically about what it is being a man. Your answer is similar as if someone asked what it is to be human and someone answered: "oh, it is just like being an animal honestly and caring about other ani…
/r/MensRights05/09/20 07:52 AM
3

Also the part they always leave out. Let's say she talks about it, which they don't even when they think they do, they just give "signals" that they think are very obvious but in reality it could be anything and the man has no fucking clue... But let's say she talks about it (or whatever) and the problem is still not solved, then she can leave him and then, and only then, do whatever the fuck she wants. The argument can also be turned upside down. If a man cheats is because the woman is not plea…
/r/MensRights05/09/20 07:44 AM
1

Well said. There is a difference between being grateful and taking it for granted. Another problem, is the hypocrisy of the last generations of women. They can say men like providing, which in general is true. But if you say that women like pleasing their men, by cooking, cleaning, sex, etc... you'll be labeled a mysoginist and scum of the earth. And if you even say that women are genetically predisposed to pleasing their men, which is as much true as men providing, you might even be canceled. W…
/r/MensRights04/09/20 05:58 AM
7

Read what the first wave feminists said. Men hating did not start on the 70's. Since you mention women voting, feminists actually delayed the vote for women with their terrorists attacks, even when they were told to stop since it was going to happen. That's just one of the reasons why women's rights advocates hated feminists back then.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 12:01 PM
8

It does not matter the definition you want to chose, it matters what feminists have said and done since the start.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 11:58 AM
5

How would you reform a movement that has been anti-male since its inception? I know I'm invoking the Hitler rule, but that's like saying Nazis are not that bad, I'm sure the Nazi movement can be reformed.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 11:16 AM
8

I don't see how. Feminism has always been anti males having rights, so I don't see how any MRA can not be anti feminists. You can be an MRA and pro solving women issues and giving women more rights, but not a feminist.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 11:15 AM
4

They should cancel themselves since they damaged your experience with their decision.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:31 AM
4

The point is a feminist is again pointing out some risk of being a women while minimizing and even trying to ignore the risks of men, to unfairly paint women as victims in society and try to gain more privileges at the expense of men. Nobody is denying the risks of being a women. We are just trying to point out how manipulative and malignant feminists are.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 07:59 AM
6

The Marxists that are trying to change the definition of racism from "hating a race" to "only whites can be racists" can go fuck themselves. We see through you, we will never accept your stupid manipulative attempt to manipulate by changing the definition.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 03:40 AM
6

Not only that. They will critize her for not hating men, then turn around and with a straight face say that feminists do not hate men.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 10:22 AM
1

Yes, in my experience most men with femenine attitude seem content and comfortable, but most of them would want something more, they just don't know how to do it.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 09:31 AM
1

As I already said they are making their lives more difficult, less fulfilling, because they are using attitudes and strategies that are not suited for their biology and are not using the ones that are. I was educated with femenine attitudes. My mother was a feminist. I though it was the right way and I did not even realized I was being femenine, it was just how I had been brought up. I was always somehow insecure and anxious, even when trying hard, I felt like things never really clicked for me.…
/r/MensRights21/08/20 04:39 AM
2

Let them enjoy their cats and bottles of wine after 30. Never settle girl!!!!
/r/MensRights20/08/20 09:59 AM
26

There is nothing more cringey than a person relaying on feminism to appear authoritative.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 08:34 AM
8

In a traditional gender role system, it made sense for men to pay the bill. Dating was more focused on finding a husband and a wife. The woman would try to showcase her skills in traditional femenine roles, like cooking, while the man would try to show that he had extra money and could maintain a full family and not just himself by spending on the woman. Nowadays? It makes absolutely no sense. Plus, if a woman wants me to pay like a traditional gentleman, she should be the perfect traditional la…
/r/MensRights19/08/20 03:36 AM
2

For what I'm reading on the internet, the difference between scissors and shears is size. If that is correct and in my experience, in barbers scissors are mostly used. I'm guessing is because men usually have short hair. The way he was cutting the kid's hair is normal, I'm not sure why you find it strange.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 03:26 AM
1

I disagree. A man living a femenine lifestyle is hurting himself, and indirectly the ones around him. Of course, he is free to live the life he chooses, but others are also free to not like being around femenine men.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 02:17 AM
6

Being femenine is not the optimal attitude given the biological attributes of men. If some man wants to be femenine that is his prerogative, but 1. He is going to have issues because he does not have the biology and privileges females have, 2. A lot of men are not going to share interests with him which will make socializing and making friends with them very hard. It is just not ideal, but of course to each its own.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 07:03 AM
29

Thank god, that system is horrible.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 07:38 PM
3

Sadly, the free part of the market can react, but feminists are also entrenched in government. The regulations feminists pass with half truths and outright lies to promote their hateful ideology, those you will not be able to escape.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 10:16 AM
53

And by problem you mean "problem". It is not really a problem, it is just a social nuisance that adults should be able to handle. It is impossible for all men to be socially tactful, some men will be bad socially. Even some men that are usually socially skillful enough to not create akward situations, will have a bad day a make an untactful comment to some women. That is just life and learning how to deal with social akward situations is a needed skill in society. Pretending that you can just go…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:04 PM
3

Rumors say both have refused. But who knows.
/r/MensRights10/08/20 05:49 PM
3

I'm not a conservative but I can tell you, you don't understand what they are saying. They complain that the media has a left wing bias because most TV news station are left, the reporters in college are mostly left, and every news station seems to turn more and more to the left, as you have seen with CNN, considered center a few decades ago, and seems not to care about losing audience by going more and more left, joining the rest of channels. And with what is happening with Fox news now that Mu…
/r/MensRights09/08/20 04:46 PM
3

What makes him a nutter in your opinion?
/r/MensRights09/08/20 07:57 AM
6

His college professor said so.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 07:07 AM
36

The most watched news show in the USA by far. It is always surprising how in reddit, a radical minority convince themselves they are the norm and the majority is actually a radical minority. For your mental health, you should come back to reality.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 01:23 AM
2

The Wuhan Coronavirus is going around because coronavirus type viruses are extremely contagious and will likely be with humans until the end of times. Also the Wuhan Coronavirus hysteria will go away after November's elections in the USA. I know now you are having an emotional reaction. Believe what you want now, but keep it in the back of your mind for the next 3 months and check then if I'm right or not.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 07:33 AM
9

It is sad how people don't know about the history of feminism and think that only modern feminism is bad. Feminism has not gone too far, feminism was always, since the start, about female supremacy. Just read what first wave feminists said.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 07:24 AM
8

Aka feminism.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 01:35 PM
61

Well, we are intelligent enough to look at statistics and see that men and women make the same for the same work IF they work the same amount of hours. The wage gap is a myth, it is a fake story feminists created. There is an earnings gap, there is absolutely no wage gap.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 06:19 AM
2

All of those are part of being a narcissist and are also often exhibited by sociopaths.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 04:53 PM
7

Narcissism and sociopathy only work short term. Long term these people end up alone and in a bad place. The people that glorify those two traits usually only are capable to realize the short term benefits but don't see it is a one exit street.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:01 AM
-3

If you think asking you if you are blind is rude you need to develop a lot more thick skin and interact more with masculine men. This is nothing compared to the shit that is socially accepted to say between men. Actually, your answer is the perfect example of what is wrong with modern schools and how femenized they are. I know it is not your fault, it is the only thing you have known, but it is not normal. Neither it is positive for you. It is not your fault, but it is the situation you are in s…
/r/MensRights26/07/20 07:14 AM
-2

Are you blind?
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:25 AM
8

Feminism has never been about equality. Read what even the first wave feminists were writing. Feminists only use the equality line to make their quest for power more palatable. You got caught on their lie. Feminism is a hate ideology.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 06:39 AM
2

The oppressor/oppressed dichotomy is a feminist framing. It's also revisionist history. And it's harmful. It helps to create absolute fanatics It is Marxism, but instead of bourgeois/proletariat it is men/women.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 12:22 PM
2

Pedophiles and libertarianism has nothing to do with each other. Not sure why you think they do.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 07:49 AM
93

Not drilled by society, it is just that as a man if you hit someone else there will be consequences, so you have to be strategical about it. As a woman, she expects no consequences, so why shouldn't she attack?
/r/MensRights13/07/20 01:14 PM
5

Also, men are naturally less histrionic than women. We have emotions, we just don't show them in such an exaggerated way as women do. But that dies not mean we are less emotional.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 11:47 AM
4

Traditional gender stereotypes: A lot of people are reluctant to give up the traditional gender stereotypes of woman weak, man bad. Feminists included. I agree with all the rest, but this one is not true. Traditional gender roles do not have that image if men. That image was brought in by feminists.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:02 PM
13

You have to live with the cards you are dealt with. You can lament how shit is all you want, but it will do nothing (and I understand you sometime need to vent). It is better if you work towards finding a solution. One thing that works for short people is getting very muscular. It works for everybody, but it has a bigger effect on short men because being muscular makes you look bigger. In reality, women like to be with a men that can protect them, not necessarily tall. This is a strongly ingrain…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:42 AM
20

It is worse than not caring. Not caring would be an improvement for feminists. They actively try to hinder us.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:25 AM
23

Rating women for how attractive they are is not toxic.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 01:53 AM
-2

There's plenty of value in learning from others experiences and lessons, there's not a single bit in my posts that say otherwise. And then I don't give a fuck about "gender roles" or biological differences because it doesn't really matter to me. I wrote something mildly edgy, and then I though better. You say you want to learn, I'll only say this. Not knowing about sex biological differences and why gender roles came to be (even if you don't follow them to a T, I don't) is opening oneself to bei…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 08:53 AM
-8

You're arguing with yourself buddy, not me. A "real" man doesn't exist. That's literally all my post is. The point of my absent minded reply was not to debate gender roles or biological differences, I could not give any less of a fuck about that That's fine, you can say you do not care, and yet you keep answering to me. Moreover, why should people take seriously the opinion of someone who does not care and seems to just want to feel good in the short term with whatever justification? it was not …
/r/MensRights10/07/20 08:21 AM
-10

No, you can not be whatever the hell you want, the same way you can not jump out a window and fly if you want it enough. There are biological constraints to being a man, telling men they can be whatever they want is setting us for failure. Now, you don't have to be exactly what other people want you to be, you don't have to limit yourself to certain stereotypes or roles, but you absolutely can not be whatever you want. Allow yourself to try new things, but keep in mind we are limited by our biol…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 06:28 AM
1

No, they pushed a girl just out of college to be the lead architect, because obviously the team had to be all women and I guess they could not find anyone else for such moronic idea. So the girl with zero experience just out of college fucked it... This is what happens when your ideology does not care about reality and just construct arguments on the fly with the only objective of gaining power.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 10:43 AM
22

I come from a culture where raping women and stealing banks is acceptable. I expect to be respected for my culture.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 06:13 PM
2

It is just my opinion. Just saying you want to hold the government accountable is a very naive opinion. In human history, governments have never been accountable. And any logical analysis makes it clear the incentives governments introduce will never let them be accountable. Also, taking other people's labor is not a human right. The only thing that can guarantee you "human rights" is you working hard and collaborating with people around you (instead of wanting to take their money). In any case,…
/r/MensRights08/07/20 12:37 PM
1

We can agree a better system is needed. I already told you how that could be achieved. Foreign help does not help the people here, it is just used to further the interests of the donating country in this country and it is mostly absorbed by the elites. As I said, government works how government works, and foreign help is not an exception.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 11:00 AM
8

For a very simple reason, because the incentives the government has will never allow it work in any other way. The people in government have their own interests. But you have not answer the question: given that there is not enough resources in the world given the current technology level of humanity for all humans to have the standard of living you have now, would you be willing to lower your standard of living in exchange for people in other countries to have a higher one than they have now? Si…
/r/MensRights08/07/20 10:35 AM
2

You want me to be totally honest? In the first place I doubt your story is true. But for sake of argument, let's assume it is true. Your case is the perfect example as to why private charity is the answer and not government help. With private charity, the organization can be on the ground deciding which cases deserve help, as the way you have painted yours, and which cases are just scammers. Because government help only creates a class of citizens that will never get out of the cycle of handouts…
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:59 AM
-4

Take a joke for a joke!
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:36 AM
-6

Take a joke for a joke. I am sure even you sometimes have the though that a hard lesson would help these people mature quicker.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:32 AM
2

Why is your dad not helping? I mean, I am sure you can see the problem other people have with you taking the money they work for and preventing it to go to their own families, instead of getting it from your own father.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:31 AM
-10

What about pushing down to teach a lesson? Is there anything more humanitarian than a good lesson?
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:10 AM
7

Yes, it shouldn't. What I don't understand from your supposed case is how were your parents able to maintain the two kids in the example before. I get that living separated is more expensive, but if it was possible before it can not be that far away to do it now. Has your mother considered moving to a different part of the country where life is less expensive. And let me answer your question with another question: why should other workers finance your mother's decisions when doing so will hinder…
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:08 AM
1

Government funded organizations (public is a misnomer) are as partial as private ones.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 07:10 AM
3

we need huge evolutionary change immediately Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 12:33 PM
1

That's not the point. There is lots of things you can do with that recordings in order to identify and classify people.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 08:55 AM
2

It is a Chinese app that spies on its users. It is not safe.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 04:03 PM
1

From the text, he did nothing bad, every time when he discovered they were minors, he removed himself.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 04:03 PM
14

You are being down voted, but you are correct. Most revolutions in human history happen because there are masses of men with no options. We men go into the "fuck it" mode and shit happens quickly.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 09:27 AM
2

Don't use Zoom.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 02:57 AM
3

Its vague, but if you use your communist to English translator, it means that white males are free targets.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:53 AM
3

Why? Because he likes 20 something women like every healthy heterosexual male?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:47 AM
17

It does not matter if your sub spreads hate or prejudice (and those two things are subjective). Reddit is banning subreddits based on political influence against what they push, the hate is just the excuse.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 06:29 PM
1

There were even local laws banning child labor before those ones, that were mostly ignored. The federal laws banning child labor came when child labor was mostly gone already, because the USA was already wealthy enough for parents to be able to afford not to send their kids to work. And this experience is repeated everywhere. In fact, studies have shown that when India banned child labor because of western pressure in the 80's child labor increased. The reason is banning child labor made childre…
/r/MensRights30/06/20 12:00 PM
1

I agree with you in the theory. My point is that is not what happened, and is unfair for the system to apply different standards to different people. On top of that, the gay couple could have easily gone to a different baker and have their cake, because the bakery business is not a pure free market but they are close to it. Instead, the banking system is a highly regulated business, with the Federal Reserve system the banking system is basically a government enforced oligopoly. So asking the ban…
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:01 AM
2

That's not what happened in reality.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 05:48 AM
-1

The free market ended child work, not the government. Learn history. Children only stopped working because the wealth and increase if productivity brought by the free market allowed parents to afford to have their children not working.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 03:43 AM
2

So it is OK for a cake maker to not bake a gay wedding cake then, since private business?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 03:41 AM
1

The point is that your argument about death is bogus. As I said, people are free to not attack me, if they do I will respond as quick and hard as I can for my own safety, and recommend everyone else do the same. You can take risks if you want.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 05:05 AM
3

True, but these people learned this behavior in college and got solidified when nobody was looking at them, they had not that much power, and they could easily blame someone else. By the time the shit hits the fan they are deep in it and even believe it is all a conspiracy against them because they can not conceive other explanations. We are starting to see the society reaction to these people and a correction, but it will take a while. We are still in the 70's but luckily already heading toward…
/r/MensRights21/06/20 11:22 AM
2

What about the recent case in the UK where the guy got his face deformed because the girl hit him with a glass? Sure, he did not die, but his life has changed radically. Besides, my point is speaking in general. If a person attacks me, I'm not taking risks. They are always free to not attack me.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 07:42 AM
24

The ideologically possessed sees the power that comes from being at the top of a company as a way to spread the ideology, not as a way to increase profits. These people are also managers not investors, so if the company fails, they just jump to a different company and try again. They don't care about the company, profits, serve the costumers... There will be lip service to that, but the true motivation is spreading the ideology.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 06:06 AM
2

Sure, best option is to try to get out of trouble as fast as possible. But a lot of times that is not possible and showing weakness will only make you get hit harder, so your best option is to attack back and disable the attacker as quick and strongly as possible independently of the gender.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 12:15 PM
2

The point is that you don't know if the other person has a knife, or is willing to grab anything and use it as a weapon. If you are being attacked, you have the right to eliminate the thread as quick and strongly as possible so you don't put yourself in even more risk. This is not an endorsement of going around attacking weak people, this advice on how to defend yourself, that is how to respond when someone decides to attack you. The other person always has the option of not attacking you, so th…
/r/MensRights20/06/20 10:42 AM
2

Bullshit. If someone is attacking you, that person is putting your life in danger. You should never hold back, I'll quote my other comment: If a small weak man hits a big muscled man and then gets hit back, nobody would complain about the strength difference. People would call the small man stupid for trying and women would even laugh about him. The strength difference is just a coup out feminists use to hide the female privilege. People should not resort to violence, but if someone attacks you,…
/r/MensRights20/06/20 10:14 AM
6

If a small weak man hits a big muscled man and then gets hit back, nobody would complain about the strength difference. People would call the small man stupid for trying and women would even laugh about him. The strength difference is just a coup out feminists use to hide the female privilege. People should not resort to violence, but if someone attacks you, you should answer by attacking them and disabling them as quick and as strongly as you can. You don't know if that person has a weapon like…
/r/MensRights20/06/20 10:11 AM
1

So BLM wants to get rid of affirmative action or they support keeping it? BLM has called for "reparations" which is just getting money for being black paid by the rest, how is that equality? I could go on.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:02 PM
2

Why do you think the race riots are different? You never explained that. There is a reason why BLM only appears a few months before elections and all their donations go to DNC candidates (including whites, jews and asians) instead of going to black causes.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:43 AM
6

and not power for the sake of building up our society, but power for its own sake This is a bigger issue than most people realize. Feminism weakens nations and leaves its people more vulnerable. The price will take some time yo be paid, but it will be paid in full and then some.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 09:57 AM
4

Right on, that sounds like a great experience. I'm nitpicking but, just because your father did not cry with you does not mean he was not emotional. The way men and women are emotional is different. You get some emotions from your mum that you will not get from your dad, but the opposite is true as well. Your dad laughing and talking with you as you build something sounds like an emotional experience, just a typically masculine one. It is completely possible that your dad was too distant to you …
/r/MensRights13/06/20 11:00 AM
4

Agreed. Also, men are becoming more feminine and that repulses women sexually, despite the claims from feminists. A lot of young men are very confused and don't know how to behave like a man, which instinctively pushes women away.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 05:20 AM
1

I wish you would go ahead instead of just commenting about it, so you could see the reaction and see what BLM is really about. Hint, all the donations to BLM, asked in the name of helping black people, go to actblue, an organization that funds democrats. Please, check it yourself. Go to https://blacklivesmatter.com/ , find and click the donation button and see if it takes you to actblue or not. The records on how to actblue spends the money are public, they fund democrats.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 03:58 PM
1

I really wish you started that organization you mentioned so you could witness the reaction. It would open your eyes.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 02:21 PM
12

No, I want a society where posting a provocative image of a man stepping on a woman or a woman stepping on a man will not get you canceled. We are talking about fiction, not reality.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 12:30 PM
4

I would prefer to live in a society where this is acceptable, even if personally some people find it in bad taste. The problem is that right now this is not acceptable for men. I don't think the solution is to make it socially unacceptable for women, but to make it socially acceptable for men too again. It would be sad to live in a stupidly puritan society.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 11:12 AM
1

And what is wrong or racist with countering or "highjacking" BLM? BLM is a horrible organization.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 07:24 AM
1

Most men couldn't vote either. There is more to power than voting, in fact IMO, voting means very little, but that is another discussion.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 07:23 AM
1

That's a feminist lie.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 11:25 PM
5

That's bullshit. First, freeing women of their responsibility, is not only untrue, but unfair and even sexist. And secondly, if we are going to collectivize the bad, then we ought to collectivize the good too. If I am going to be blamed by the actions of some person that lived 200 years ago and loosely looked like me, then I want to be praised for their good also. I want to be thanked for most of the discoveries of modern medicine that have saved so many lives. Once that happens I will think apo…
/r/MensRights08/06/20 04:04 AM
4

And so did white women, or Asian and black people in other eras. It does not explain why the focus on whites or on men.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 03:55 AM
3

All lives matter does not have racist connotations. If you started a movement called citizens against brutality you would receive the same racist allegations as ALM. You are kidding yourself if you think it wouldn't.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 03:53 AM
2

My bet is on clearly made up. Still funny.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 12:48 PM
29

Yes, the wife comments are violent but I don't see the racism anywhere.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 12:46 PM
3

Progressivism was born racist. Their history is very documented.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 02:45 AM
8

Yes, nobody is asking to ban them, but we can criticize them too. The problem is that any criticisms is met with stupid accusations of all kinds.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 01:59 PM
2

You do have a point, but being less annoying than feminists is not a great feat.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 01:54 PM
1

There is nothing wrong in what you said now, but I feel you are not really reading what I'm writing.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 11:17 PM
2

Why do you assume traditional men could not show their emotions? That is just another feminist manipulation. The reality is that in traditional gender roles there are specific manly ways of expression that work better in society. You can try different ways if you disagree, feel free, but the biological realities of how women and other men perceive you as a man will make some solutions will work better than others. You can keep trying ignoring the biology of men and women, just like feminists wan…
/r/MensRights02/06/20 03:40 PM
1

Why would gender roles be useless? Gender roles are the accumulated knowledge of countless generations about what is good for men and women. I am a person who embrace change, so I'm all for new ideas on how men and women can behave to have a good live. I also agree that there is no need to take traditional gender roles as gospel that can not be questioned. But from there to saying that gender roles are useless is the most egocentric and stupid thing I've heard in a long time. Why would you not w…
/r/MensRights02/06/20 12:45 PM
-1

You are giving bad advice and men will suffer for it. We, men and women, are not biologically equal. You don't go to bed and recommend the same sexual moves for a men than for a women. That would be absurd. Men like some type of physical stimulation and women another, among other thing because our sexual organs are different. Our brains are different too, so men and women tend to react different to emotional stimulus too. You advising men to emotionally react like women will only bring suffering…
/r/MensRights02/06/20 09:55 AM
8

Tbh, I feel sorry for these guys. I was raised with the same mentality and lies that he believes, and I can tell you it is not fun. It is very confusing and depressing. You go through constant ups and downs that eat into your daily energy, but you keep pushing because you have been convinced you are doing The Great Good. You see yourself almost as a hero, when you are acting like a fool. It is sad. I hope he wakes up.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 09:49 AM
1

It is a good thing that you are trying to be strategic about it, but it is important to keep in mind that feminism ultimately is about power. If feminists perceive that you are going against the hive mind and threatening their main source of power, the perception of female victim hood, they will turn on you no matter of how logical, equitable or respectful you try to be.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 02:24 PM
4

Second wave feminists were already saying this decades ago. Books saying this are mandatory reading in some courses all over western colleges. Not sure why this surprises you. Claiming that all heterosexual sex is rape is not a surprising statement in feminist circles.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 02:19 PM
8

Apparently she does not hate debating enough to not tell you that she hates you being in this group. Very convenient that she hates debating but still tells you what she wants you to do.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 05:48 AM
1

Including white people?
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:47 AM
5

I am sure it happens. There are fucked up men out there. Tbh, from all the stupidity that sub shows, and as badly expressed as it is, the underlying message is not that wrong. Opening a shared account should almost never be done outside of very committed relationships. I would not do it until after marriage, and even then not with all my accounts, just a shared part.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:42 AM
25

The issue is that some women are claiming abuse after murdering her husband and the judges are assuming it as true with no previous reports of abuse or no evidence, just the woman words. That is insane. Basically you can now have a husband that has never had any reports of abuse, that has no evidence of abuse, be killed by the wife and she gets preferential treatment by just claiming abuse with zero evidence. If you don't see how terrifying the incentives are, I don't know what to tell you.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:37 AM
1

Sweden is cold and dark. No shit they feel alone.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 04:36 AM
1

It is not unrealistic. You can keep calling it that but it does not make it true. You don't have to look like that. You are free to live your life how you want, but calling it unrealistic is stupid.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 06:13 PM
1

Being strong is not unrealistic. You don't want to put the effort, fine, nobody is going to force you, but it is not unrealistic.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 04:48 PM
5

That's it. L'Oreal goes to the black list.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 07:18 AM
13

But even in the past, the patriarchal system was what you define, but not what feminists define patriarchy as. The feminist patriarchy never existed.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 08:00 AM
3

I found the action scenes were really good but the script is laughable, completely unbelievable and nonsensical.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 04:03 AM
1

Ask them that if a woman gets wet or even orgasm during an unwanted penetration if that is rape then? If just asking is not enough, follow up by stating that most women get wet while being raped and some even orgasm.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 02:13 PM
3

Feminism in general. Men can not be raped comes from second wave feminism. It is not new.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 02:11 PM
3

I would never go to a rally that was mainly supported by Nazis, communists, facists or similar.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 04:11 AM
18

There will not be a debate with Biden. He is senile, he will be replaced by someone before the debates. I am not sure who, maybe Hillary or Michael, but he will be replaced.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 11:09 PM
2

What was not hateful about the racist classist terrorist first wave feminists?
/r/MensRights11/05/20 08:04 AM
9

No, it is better to not link directly to those propaganda outlets to not give them traffic. A picture or an achieved version is better. If anything, you can ask for the link in the comments, and, again an achieved version is better than the direct link.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 07:54 AM
7

Womyn
/r/MensRights09/05/20 11:24 AM
7

Mainly to not give clicks to propaganda outlets like the guardian.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 03:52 AM
3

How many of this women have gone to court against him? Because as far as I know, the only ones who have gone to court against him have lost. I get that you hate the guy and want to believe them, but that is not a crime he has gotten away with. I really would like to see a reference to a crime Trump has committed and has gotten away with.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:28 PM
1

She looks exactly how you would imagine.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:17 PM
3

And my point is that the lack of knowledge about those dynamics among modern men is what has lead to feminism running rampant.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:09 PM
7

Then it will be very easy to give me one example with source, again one that it is not some CNN/NYT stupid innuendo. I am willing to change my mind, you just have to show me. Also, I don't use Google.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:06 PM
4

How is it not related? The whole basis of feminism is lying about the history of the relations between men and women and then abusing their female privilege, specially the tendency of men of taking care of wen, to get even more privileges with no extra responsibilities.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 11:11 AM
5

You can see his male privilege in the face. Thanks to feminists explaining us that this guy was an extremely privileged human and an opressor, he changed his ways...
/r/MensRights06/05/20 11:07 AM
1

Let me be 100% honest and say that I think you are brainwashed about Trump but I am willing to change my mind if credible evidence is presented to me. Can you give me examples of Trump commiting a crime and getting away with it because someone protects him? And I mean credible evidence, not CNN/NYT innuendo. I am really tired of reading bullshit that leads to nothing about Trump.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 06:55 AM
4

What if he and his kind are subhumans? If i call National-Socialists scum of the earth, is that hate speech? If I call Pol Pot a despicable human, is that hate speech? And more importantly, who gets to decide? And how is all of this not subjective?
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:12 AM
-4

Sure, I am being sarcastic, but I wonder why this sub is supportive of something like hate speech, which is a feminist idea. Anything can be constructed as hate speech, it is completely subjective, so what is the point?
/r/MensRights05/05/20 07:23 AM
-16

I find your comment hateful. Are you going to report yourself for hate speech?
/r/MensRights05/05/20 04:00 AM
6

Exactly. The lesson of all of this for progressives seems to be that believe all women is great unless he is a democrat.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 02:38 AM
1

Exactly. But like all these schemes it is not sustainable, as men are adapting by less of them getting married. So this particular scheme has less and less fools to drain as men wise up. When marriage rates keep going lower we will see how they react.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:03 AM
5

No. I judge everybody, men and women, just like you do, and just like everyone else does. Asking people not to judge is hypocritical and, more importantly, stupid. Judging is an important skill in human social life. Also, I will not support you or any other man like women do. I will support you as men do, never as women do. Moreover, if anyone tries to support me or treat me like women do, I will rebuff them. I do not want to be treated like a woman, I want to be treated like a man, with all the…
/r/MensRights01/05/20 07:14 AM
6

I think you are kind of wrong. The issue is progressivism has become the mainstream ideas, and conservatism has become the counter culture now. But progressive keep acting like they are rebels when in reality they are in charge (education, media, entertainment, governmemt, corporationd,...).
/r/MensRights30/04/20 05:20 AM
7

How you feel when hearing a normal word is not our problem. Learn to behave like a mature human in society or stay closed at home until you can. Your immaturity is not anyone's problem but yourself.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 04:46 PM
15

I'm a man, a male, a human and an animal. I'm also a mammal, just in case you think that is offensive for some weird reason.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 04:45 PM
6

The tweet is neutral, but the article itself is horrible, as you would expect from that rag.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 02:09 PM
2

But she is wrong. I agree that the selective sexism feminists do is bullshit, as in for feminists it is sexist when you say men and women are different to point out that males do better in some area, but it is completely fine to point out that females do better than males in another area. Males and females are different, including mentally. In some areas those difference make no impact, but in some others one sex tends to be better than the other. So it is not necessarily sexists to say that fem…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:21 AM
4

No, you can not. You can understand them and work with them or around them. Other people can also push you to repress them, but that has behavioural consequences, unintended consequences, and why would you do that to yourself?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 01:21 PM
1

Nobody teaches women to behave like that, it is just that the instincts that push women to act this way are useful for the survival of the spices.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 12:06 PM
40

This kind of ideas sound good in theory but are bad in practice, because they don't take into account human nature. Men are wired to care about women problems, in general we feel good when we help women. Women are also repulsed by weak men. They can even care about a weak men, as they care about children, but in their mind he will not be a real man, a sexual man. So you are trying to go against the natural tendencies of males and females. It will not work. Funnily enough this is the same a lot o…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 11:04 AM
3

Social science is code word for not real science.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:57 AM
27

Society in general will never want to listen about male weakness. Never. The problem is that men had their own way of dealing with loneliness and depression, but the push to eliminate masculinity has left men unable to learn them from older men or outright impossible to practice. Because of our biology, we men will never feel good and will never improve our mental health by doing what helps women. We also do not have the privilege females have that everybody cares about their problems. We need t…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:54 AM
8

She probably doesn't.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:36 AM
108

Or the same sex as the retarded buzzfed employee from the video? If you go off the retarded end, the questions never end.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:36 AM
-1

I laughed more to this joke than I should.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:02 AM
2

I think she might be putting an act for white men who have low self steel and hate themselves.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 05:44 AM
1

I personally think it was their toxic ego centrical personality, but objectively we can not know why, so your guess is as good as mine.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 05:41 AM
9

Apart from being racist and terrorists? What about delaying women suffrage in the USA with their actions despite the plead of women's rights advocates for them to stop?
/r/MensRights03/04/20 03:02 PM
15

No, it is the other way around. Feminists have convinced a bunch of good people that feminism is a good movement and not the hateful ideology it really is. And no, early feminists were not better. Every person I have spoken that believes the problem is third wave and first and second waves were good, has no idea about the history of feminism and has just bought into the propaganda.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 02:57 PM
17

If she is honest, at some point she will understand the movement she says she belongs too and stop calling herself a feminist.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 02:54 PM
10

The USA women team lost against the men teenagers team (I think they were the 14yo). So not even teen level. I do not understand the push to deny reality. Men have more physicality and have quicker reaction than women. This is the result of men and women being different. Men excel in some areas over women, while women do over men in some others. How is denying facts and forcing people to tell lies going to help society become better?
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:58 PM
10

I know I am going against the grain here, but this has nothing to do with him being a man. Hollywood silences all the cases of pedophilia they have, man or female. If people were aware of the amount of cases of pedophilia that happens in Hollywood, and therefore the amount of pedophiles that work and are in positions of power in Hollywood, there would be absolute outrage and demands to completely clean the industry. That is why all stories of child abuse in Hollywood get silenced.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:51 PM
3

You will never take over feminism. A lot of people are already against feminism, so it is the easier way.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 08:22 AM
3

Yes, you do what you like and also be ready to accept the social consequences of doing what you like. Also, don't forget that nature is real, not everything is nurture, so certain attitudes and preferences will have certain consequences.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 02:39 AM
2

First, I'm not a conservative, I'm a left winger. If SJW would stop assuming everyone that disagree with them is whatever boogieman they can imagine at the moment, people would not assume automatically all SJW are morons. Second, I know they turn the skin of the cock around. It is still not a vagina. Starting by the fact that it does not lubricate and you need lube, but most importantly, it does not have ovaries and all the rest so it can not have kids which is the only reason vaginas exist for.…
/r/MensRights11/02/20 12:04 PM
1

Though I usually think of God as fundamentally nonbinary. Because neither exist?
/r/MensRights11/02/20 09:47 AM
4

Ask her if God getting the period and feeling moody is the cause of all the murders and rapes in the world.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 04:29 AM
13

Not really. They call them sex change operations but they just chop your dick and make a whole on you, plus add plastic tits. That's a far far far cry from really changing your sex.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 12:36 AM
1

Not all, but most therapists are a bunch of cucks.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 06:20 AM
17

He is a pussy for accepting that deal.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 06:00 AM
1

I personally do not care if there is an equal divide if it just happened. I don't see nothing wrong on having an equal divide. The problem I have is with forcing an equal divide when I don't see it adds any value. You tried to justify why you see diversity as good, but never justified why an equal divide is good, which was the initial question.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 05:50 AM
3

That still does not answer the question about parity. Tbh and not trying to be confrontational, it is not even a good justification for diversity. Sounds more like talking points.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 05:28 AM
1

That is not the question. I assume you can not answer then.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:34 AM
0

Why is an equal divide a good thing?
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:14 AM
5

You did not refute any of his claims. This is coming from someone with no previous knowledge about this woman and not really knowing who's correct, his position is a lot more convincing at this point. You seem just like a lot of histrionics with no real point.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:25 PM
11

I am a male presenting lesbian trans-woman.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 03:49 AM
12

I think it is a problem of representation and appreciation. I, as a man, I don't feel specially inclined to contribute to this society. I'll respect the laws doing the minimum to benefit from the advantages of living in society, but I don't actively collaborate since I don't think I will get the same deference back, more like chastising and shame. For example, I think it is the natural instinct of men to protect women. I at least feel that instinct. But now if I see a woman in danger I will not …
/r/MensRights10/01/20 05:54 PM
13

Good riddance. It sucks not to have a job and I hope you find a new one, but you would have suffered in that other place. That is not a good job environment.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 05:34 PM
177

Next time someone says feminism cares and helps men, you think about your story. This was not like this before. Feminists have explicitly pushed to remove rights from men using rape hysteria. If we men and the women that want justice, do not band together and stop their game, this will keep happening, even worse.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 11:41 AM
74

It was glorious.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 12:25 PM
3

Chemical castration is not irreversible. The problem here is the high rates of reincidence rapist and pedophiles have.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 04:55 PM
8

Why not go also for male presenting lesbian trans-woman? That's a lot of diversity points right there.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 07:57 AM
1

Well, then change college.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 01:18 PM
7

Why are now a few men's rights people going the same way as feminism and claiming everything is a social construct? Denying nature will not get you results.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:53 AM
12

Not the point. Spitting saliva on people is also less risky than sperm, would you be OK people spitting on you? This is disrespectful and unsanitary.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:56 PM
1

There was a study posted here years ago that said that extremely high and low levels of testosterone in men, made us more aggressive. Middle levels of testosterone kept us under control.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 04:21 PM
2

You'd be surprised how much pussy an attractive wealthy guy gets. A lot of them don't talk about it, because they know it bothers other men, as we men are competitive. The men that go boasting about how much women they get at every occasion are the only ones you see.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 02:30 AM
-7

Mostly for women. Men evolved to spread our seed so we don't suffer so much from being promiscious.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 03:54 AM
0

I doubt "she" has a vagina. At most a reversed cock hole.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 04:20 PM
2

Feminism is eerily similar to mental illness.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 04:18 PM
6

They are. I bet you more than half of them are on anti depressants or other mental medication and most of them are in and out of therapy.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:45 PM
3

The bad boy look but the beta behaviour. Women and their fantasies...
/r/MensRights24/12/19 02:10 AM
2

I understand what you are saying, but let me point out that democrats also do not follow those rules. In fact, Republicans have been asking for more civility in politics until they got tired of democrats taking advantage by breaking civility at every opportunity they had. Now republicans are matching the aggression level democrats have set in the last decades and you are not liking it. Maybe should have though about it before? Personally, I think there is no coming back. Whether you, I or anyone…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 07:15 AM
1

First, that is not an answer to my question. You said you don't like the way republicans are acting under Trump. I asked why and you gave me a couple of unrelated talking points. It would be good if you answer the actual question. But let's play your game: Low wage income citizens have seen the biggest increase in wages than any other social class under Trump. Plus unemployment is at historical lows. That makes education and healthcare more affordable. Second, education being expensive has happe…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 04:36 AM
1

What is according to you wrong with their ways now?
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:41 AM
9

Anti-feminism, not anti-female.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:32 AM
29

Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:29 AM
1

We strongly disagree. Your biological arguments are not convincing at all. And your dismissal without responding to the core arguments of the people who are giving you long answers is very telling. I'm not surprised to see the MRM started to be afflicted by the same biology denialism as feminism, but it is sad tbh.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:28 AM
1

Sorry, but this argument you just made makes absolutely no sense. Men being disposable does not make them necessarily less valuable to breed.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 04:04 PM
0

Why? That's like saying: I am very worried about the myth that men are physically stronger than women. We should be the ones... It is a matter of whether it is true or not, not a matter of morality or preference. It does not matter what you (or I or anyone) thinks what should be, it is a matter of whether it is true or not. Your or my preferences are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 03:55 PM
2

The problem is all these cases where the woman commits a crime and suddenly without any precedent she claims all kinds of abuse. If she had gone to police before with the claims, I would be note inclined to believe. But no, all these abuses magically appear after the woman commits a crime. Bullshit! It is like a free license to commit crimes. I don't like my neighbor, I can kill him and them claim abuse... Fantastic, what could go wrong?
/r/MensRights21/12/19 01:43 AM
1

Yes. You do know the statistics show the increase in crimes come from immigrants, don't you? Well, except in countries where it was but then decided to stop publishing that information. You, again, think you are being clever when you are not.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 03:42 AM
7

She is financed by a George Soros organization. They are just promoting their asset.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:31 PM
2

Yes, this post is toxic. Men who believe this bullshit will suffer.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:31 AM
37

They did. The point is the amount of rapes have increased massively in the last years. Did you really think you were doing a clever comment? Nobody understood there were zero rapists before. But when the amount of rapes multiply, there is an issue.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:19 AM
7

There is always one desperate man... He won't be attractive or entertaining or fun or interesting... But he will be willing to pay.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 03:55 PM
2

If he was not gay, maybe, but there is no need to get rid of a gay guy, he is not competition.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 01:13 PM
1

In modern times. In the past it was pointed that men were doing something heroic. It has stopped happening in the last decades.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 10:14 AM
15

He is implying that women have very little sympathy towards grown men and tend to side with other women over men in a dispute, which has been proven again and again in different psychological studies.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 09:43 AM
28

That is more than a fuck face, that teacher is a psycho. Absolutely crazy and should be at minimum fired and never hired again in any educational capacity. She is not fit to be teaching young adults. If a male professor would have pulled something like this, I bet there would have been charges against him.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 09:41 AM
1

That is not an answer to what I said. I find your question hateful. What needs to be done about it?
/r/MensRights15/12/19 12:30 AM
1

Define hate speech. I think the idea of hate speech is hateful since it is designed to infringe in my free speech right, so I guess that your question is a big example of hate speech that I have encountered. Are you going to apologize and correct your speech?
/r/MensRights14/12/19 01:05 PM
1

First, fingerprints do not go into a database or they didn't use to and they should not. And second, ADN is orders of magnitude more dangerous than fingerprints. Let me remind you that the National Socialist were able to efficiently exterminate Jews because their religious affiliation was in government databases. After that, Europe prohibited the government to have that kind of information. And here we are making the same mistake again. Let me remind you that not even a hundred years ago the pro…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 03:34 AM
2

Most people think Greta is bullshit. Why would we have to listen to a mentally ill kid being manipulated by her parents? Would you listen to a kid for medical advice f.e.? Greta is loved by the elites and their media lackies because it is distracting and polarizing. That is the only reason she is there. But most people couldn't give less is a fuck about her.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 03:45 AM
4

Please do not post Google amp links, post the link directly.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:25 AM
0

Yeah, let's break basic rights to accomplish any objective we think positive. What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:39 AM
10

What's not wrong with putting someone's DNA in a database without consent?
/r/MensRights09/12/19 04:26 AM
2

Indeed.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 02:16 AM
2

Not really, this is just typical elitist way of thinking. Plain and direct tends to be better.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 07:35 AM
5

Why?
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:34 PM
3

Trying to reason with censors on a mission is useless. They want your ideas gone.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:31 PM
3

She is a nobody. Stop talking about her, that's what she wants. Down voted.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 06:48 AM
612

He got suspended by the twitter censors for this comment.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:23 AM
9

You kind of justified my own position too, don't you think? attraction combines the more primal and physical elements with the more sophisticated and emotional compatibility, you need to have both to be a good match Hence hypergamy in women is a factor.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:26 AM
7

Well I do. Would you believe a man telling you he does not really care about the exterior appearance of a woman, that he only feels sexually aroused by her intelligence or your first instinct would be to call bullshit?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:57 AM
7

Would you find it unfair if I say I don't believe you and/or I think you are not honest with yourself?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:42 AM
7

Never was
/r/MensRights05/12/19 03:58 AM
13

Feminism was originally decried by women's right activists as a stupid movement for rich and entitled women that did not care about the real problems of the majority of women. I think you need to go back and read the history of feminism.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 03:35 AM
16

The main reason is she is a woman. Nobody would be so sympathetic to a guy that drugs, robs and rapes women because they were mean to him.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:34 PM
5

First, I do not believe for a moment that you are not, at minimum subconsciously, competing with other men. Second, just for the sake of discussion, let's assume you don't, it does not matter, you still are subjugated to the competition. Evolution does not go away just because you feel like you should not have to compete.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:40 PM
8

Your advice is equal to " do not get into a relationship with a woman".
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:38 PM
2

Again, saying extremism is bad in every situation is a fallacy.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:06 AM
0

You have made no counter point and you are literally trying to defend a well known fallacy.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:36 AM
-3

You can use faulty rhetoric all you want, my point stands. And in fact one common theme back then was accusing the people who wanted to eliminate slavery radicals (they even were accused of being unrealistic). Completely eliminating slavery is one radical end of the political discussion. And it also happens to be the correct one. You are trying to defend a version of the fallacy of the middle point: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/middle-ground
/r/MensRights03/12/19 03:28 AM
-4

This is a fallacy, the middle point fallacy. Extremism can be good or bad depending on the situation, same as moderation. For example, when it came to slavery, we now recognize that the extremist position of eliminating it completely was the right choice. I'm guessing that if you had found yourself in those times you would have adopted a moderate position of restricting slavery to 5 slaves per person maximum, because "obviously" all extremism is bad and moderation is always the right position...…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 03:21 AM
16

If you need to feel empowered by what other people, not you, have done, your life is sad and miserable.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:28 AM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:24 AM
6

Can I ask, why did you feel the need to note that you are "definitely not a fan of Jordan Peterson"?
/r/MensRights29/11/19 07:57 AM
1

What's the issue with conspiracy theories?
/r/MensRights22/11/19 08:29 AM
1

Would you also acknowledge someone as being black when biologically they are Asian? Or acknowledge them as a dog when biologically they are human? It does not really matter right?
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:21 AM
1

Can you expand on why you think the line at being able to change your gender but not your age, your race or your spices is so obvious?
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:16 AM
59

People should shame fat people. Social pressure works on keeping society healthy.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 12:46 AM
18

It is infantile, yes. But women in general, opposite to males, do not mind being infantilized if it gives them an advantage.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 09:11 AM
2

Because he can. Why is your business to be calling out what you think it is immoral? What is your business for calling out if someone is racist? Just stay in your business, right? You can be called out for being promiscuous and you can call them back for whatever you want. This is how this works. Plus there are real consequences to promiscuity, for example in the capacity to pair bond. Personally, I won't call someone out for being promiscuous, not my problem, but it saddens me that a lot of gir…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 05:46 AM
4

I was going to click on the link. Thanks for letting me know it was the Young Turds so I could save it.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 06:02 AM
0

That's silly.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:57 AM
2

Canada has the first modern openly racist president. To each their own.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:56 AM
2

It actually can be, the issue is women do it x10 and see no problem with it. Women play with other people emotions, socially, a lot. But when men do a fraction of what they do to them, then it is the end of the world. Women views on relationships and entitlement versus men can be extremely ridiculous and unfair, to the point of abusive.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 12:46 AM
3

I'm guessing and hoping it is not real blood, because blood can carry a lot of infections and diseases and that would be extremely unsanitary and careless.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 12:22 PM
7

That's not his point. Women indeed have no monopoly in kindness and emotion. The point is the ad makes it look like traditional masculinity is devoid of kindness and emotion and only females had it, so men should act more like females. This is utter bullshit, the whole ad is bullshit. Men have emotions and can be kind, we just express emotions differently than women. Men should not be asked to be more like women because that does not work for us and instead hurt us.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 01:48 AM
2

No, because I was not expecting anything else
/r/MensRights08/11/19 08:21 AM
1

Men are more variable than women.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 06:16 AM
18

Oh, they are, because they don't follow their own rules. Feminism is about control.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 10:08 AM
7

Well said. Women have always worked before feminism. The myth that women were not allowed to work and stayed home was always a lie. The only women who could afford not to work were the ones married to wealthy men. Coincidentally they were the ones starting feminism and when they said women can not work, they meant the jobs their wealthy husbands were doing, not the job not-wealthy women (or men) were doing.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 12:02 PM
1

Bullshit. Being fat is nothing to be proud or happy about and not only it should not be encouraged but actively discouraged. For men and women.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 03:33 AM
9

You use the word "lost". I'm curious about why you think things were different in the past.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:02 PM
2

The idea of objectification is stupid.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:29 AM
7

There is too much funding for Gender Studies research. Anything above zero is too much already.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 05:06 AM
12

Try to make me understand what is a better source than Fox or Breitbar. And don't say CNN or NYT, because they are as trashy if not more than those two. One thing I have noticed is sometimes the Daily Mail or the Sun are the only sources for some stories as others hide stories than portray women in bad light. It is unfortunate, but that is the present state of the world.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:12 PM
3

Within their biological constrictions, which BTW are different for men and women.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:05 PM
4

Create a different account and subscribe under that account.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:34 AM
14

Learn to take a joke.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:14 AM
1

You sound very hateful. Why are you chastising him for writing how he feels? And he has a point: Women giving her opinion on how men should behave? Great! The other way? Horrible! And then you try to shame him because he uses crass language, which is what males do. Why are you so hateful?
/r/MensRights06/10/19 06:00 AM
1

OK, first of all, let me recognize that you have accepted the flaws in your initial comment and congratulate you for having the personality of recognizing it instead of going aggressive like it often happens on the internet. I will also agree with you that this type of post, while not bad on their own, can lead to some bad outcomes in the sub, specially if they proliferate too much. You do have a point, IMO you did not expressed it the best way, but you have a point. With all that said let me co…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 02:31 PM
1

On the contrary, you are the problem. You are trying to shame a good post that is simple and direct at showing female entitlement, which feminism heavily promotes BTW. Not all posts have to be heavy discourses with lots of content and references. Those are great, but these short post also help get attention from users who would otherwise dismiss the sub as too heavy. If anything, the only criticism this post could get is that this same post has been made several times already. Also, your use of …
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:26 AM
9

No, it doesn't. Men count does not correlate with divorce rates at all. Women count on the other hand does.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:18 AM
4

I've been saying it for a while. Feminists are the female versions of incels.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 11:26 AM
20

The redpill is not hateful, that's bullshit. Some particular users might hate some shit, but the subreddit in general is tolerant (as opposed to reddit admins) and open for discussion.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 08:28 AM
1

It's foolish to rely on a communication medium that can be knocked out at a single point. We need to work on distributed communication systems as swell as more conventional ones. Just after you recommend joining Discord, which is centralized and does exactly the same as Reddit. The men's right discord should at least open a Matrix/Riot room.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 08:26 AM
1

They are both right.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 04:08 AM
3

This guy is a political shill and he even lost his medical license. Why would anyone want to associate with him? From a left winger.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 02:18 AM
422

You feel depressed in a big part because you backed down, you complied with what the accuser wanted. Next time stand up for yourself, don't leave and you will feel better with yourself.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 06:01 PM
14

First wave feminist were horrible people and should be denounced. They were extremely racist and clasist, they hated man, they used violence and terrorist attacks, they even were despised by women's rights activists. Any decent person will denounce all feminism.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 07:10 AM
79

Men need men spaces back. It makes it easier for men to make friends. The suicide epidemic started as soon as feminists managed to destroy male spaces after campaigning against them.
/r/MensRights21/09/19 01:03 PM
3

I'm personally a fan of Stallman, but here he fucked up trying to defend a friend who should have not been defended given his actions.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 09:53 AM
3

Some of the people accepting his money knew he was a pedophile when accepting his money, thus why they accepted the donations anonymously and not in his name.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 05:25 AM
1

Because you are promising men that if they protest or fight, they can change a biological reality. Evolution is a slow process and you would need millions of years to change something like that (assuming you would want to change it and it would not ruin the survival chances of humanity). Men disposability is not going to change in our lifetime, the lifetime of your children or grandchildren, not even in 100 generations. Instead of helping men adapt to our reality, you are making them go in an im…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:39 AM
1

It does not matter whether in this specific moment, men need to be disposable or not, that is not how evolution works. Males are seen as disposable and that won't change because for a few hundreds of years it is not necessary. Hundreds of years is nothing in evolutionary terms.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:32 AM
1

It is also unfair that women can give birth and men don't. I hope that when you are done fixing male disposability you get on that one. Men are people too!!! It is sad to see the men's rights movement turn into feminism and deny biology. Men disposability is a biological fact, not something society imposed onto you. If you want to help men, teach men how to navigate reality, do not promise us you can change the biology of the human spices. It is very selfish and egotistical from your part to do …
/r/MensRights09/09/19 04:19 AM
5

What you are describing is (socially) enforced monogamy. Beta males have no access to females, so alpha males came with the idea of letting them have one female in exchange for their labor. This way beta males are pacificied and can be used productively, but obviously still considered disposable like any male. This is the trick alpha males play on beta males.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:02 PM
4

Because democrat.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 08:31 PM
0

You are asking others to learn to check statistics and yet you don't even know how to do it. Learn yourself before telling others. How many times were blacks stopped by police vs whites? And what percentage of each ended up in death? Then you can say whether it is more dangerous to be stopped by police as a black or a white. The amount of population is not the factor here.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 04:03 PM
6

It is already happening, its just that you are not allowed to talk about it. A lot of western women are alone, childless cat ladies on anti depressants.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 08:45 AM
1

Percentage wise it is worse to be white in the last years. Check your statistics.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 02:29 AM
11

In politics it is reversed. In politics never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by malice.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 01:40 PM
-1

It is not ideal from a genetic variability point of view to reduce the pool of eligible men for reproduction, as you say. But if you have to chose between reducing the genetic variability, that means sacrificing a lot of men for the survival of the women in the tribe, versus having the tribe grow slower, that means sacrificing some women to save more men, the tribe that chooses sacrificing some genetic variability to maintain growth, that is sacrifice men to save women, will absolutely dominate …
/r/MensRights31/08/19 07:58 AM
11

Most of these dudes are white... hating and afraid of whites.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:06 PM
44

Internalized misogyny, obviously. Is there something more iconic than feminists and their rape fantasies?
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:39 AM
1

What nobody is saying is: this is an undatable women but that prob looks ok-ish (my bet a 5 or a 6), so men pump and dump her, which means they go on one or few dates until they fuck her and then ignore her. Her ego is too big to admit she has a bad personality that pushes men away, so the "obvious" conclusion she arrives to is that there is a problem with men. It is not a problem with her and her personality, it is a problem with all the men she has met. Even when a lot of those men would be ha…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 05:59 AM
44

You read it, they are just providing a helping hand, which is completely 100% different from lowering standards. Completely and utterly different, and if you disagree you are sexist, misogynistic, and also transphobic, racist and ableist.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 05:41 AM
2

Marketers use social networks data to track engagement. They believe the more engagement the better because free publicity and the numbers look better towards a promotion in the corporation. Woke culture creates the most engagement. They have been discovering lately that more engagement does not translate in more money, sometimes even the opposite.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:02 AM
8

I am afraid I have to inform you it already happened, not in court but in TV. Whoopi Goldberg tried to justify the actions of the pedophile Polanski by saying that what he did was not rape rape.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 06:19 PM
37

Positive discrimination is the biggest scam ever. It is intellectually corrupt also. I am still waiting for a woman to argue in court that what she did is OK because it was positive rape, as oppose to rape rape.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:40 PM
4

Bill Burr is not misogynistic, rude and barely self righteous. Not pompous at all. I think you are confusing him with something else.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 07:04 AM
4

Females have such an easy access to sex, even ugly fat ones, that it is hard for you to ever imagine how desperate for sex the average man can get. Note I said average man, not the 10%-20% of top men that get a lot of female attention. Being starved for sex with testosterone pushing in your brain can make men do very stupid shit.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 06:57 AM
10

Koch brothers are not bad guys anymore since they are now giving money to democrats because Trump is cutting illegal immigration for real. You won't see anymore smears on them.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:53 AM
2

In these cases he is allowed to resign to soften the blow instead of being fired, but it is the same.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 03:59 PM
2

You are creating a straw man. Men have different emotions than women. When a man is not crying it does not mean he is not experiencing emotions. The problem of the feminist push for men to cry and "express" their emotions is that is counter productive for men, because we express our emotions differently than women. Telling men to act more like women hurts men. Feminists are not telling men to express emotions how we prefer, feminists are telling men to express emotions more like women, which is …
/r/MensRights19/08/19 02:11 PM
6

This woman does not realize of her own privilege that men do not have and is miseducating the kid.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 07:22 PM
11

This is all bullshit meant to create media attention. None of this is real, just a PR move.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:46 AM
1

No, it can not, that is you being delusional and egocentric. It has been shown that the emotional system makes a decision and then the rational part rationalizes that decision. Scientists could even guess which decision you've taken before you know consciously. Also, why would you assume eliminating instincts would be "betterment"? Those instincts have evolved through trial and error for millions of years and have allowed us to survive and thrive. Even in the most intelligent humans, our logical…
/r/MensRights15/08/19 06:14 AM
3

Sure, there are way fewer cases of children raised by a single father, so the data point is not as significant, but there are enough cases to make it impossible to dismiss like you are doing. At least, it should be investigated why this happens.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 07:00 PM
4

Children from single mothers statistically do way worse than children of single fathers. If you think this fact is supremacist then reality is supremacist. You either accept and adapt to reality or you can keep your ideology while ignoring reality.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:22 AM
14

Tattoos and a thousand cock stare. Such a waste of a life trying to redeem herself with feminist retardation. I'd be surprised if she is not already on antidepressants.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:14 AM
22

You are wrong, the wage gap is not real. The wage gap is defined as men getting paid more than women for the same work. Men and women doing the same work get paid the same, therefore the wage gap is not real. What it is real is the earnings gap, as in men earn more money than women (notice the absence of "for the same work").
/r/MensRights30/07/19 06:17 AM
7

If the problem is only some internet loud voices that you can safely ignore, why are men losing their jobs and sometimes their careers because of some unfounded allegation? Why are men being spelled out of college by kangaroo courts? Why are colleges giving preference to female admissions despite being more females in college? ... I could go on, but the point is very clear. All of this is new, it was not happening just a few years earlier. It happened because there was a well organized and funde…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:34 AM
4

Also it is used when boys play a bit rough and maybe get a scratch in the skin. Or they go somewhere and get wet and dirty. All those things you can say boys will be boys. Raping someone is a crime. It has never been boys will be boys. It is just an invention of feminists trying to find new ways of being victims.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:11 PM
3

That's not what he means. Stop repeating feminist talking points and try to have a normal conversation.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:33 PM
7

Fuck you trying to tell men to be more like women which will only make things worse.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 11:20 AM
29

It is not strange when you understand how isolated in their bubbles feminists are.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 10:52 AM
10

It is too late but use crypto currencies.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 10:50 AM
1

I do agree with you it is pathetic. I disagree that it will change. Let's face it, a lot of men are (and will be) pathetic when it comes to relationships with the opposite sex. Hell, I was pathetic when I was young and I'm sure I could still improve and (forgive my lack of modesty) I'm above average with women. Imagine dudes that are below average. Desperation sets in and men will do whatever it takes to get it wet.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:48 AM
-6

Men, stop letting women control your money. Maybe the day men stop liking pussy. Until then, good luck with that.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 02:52 PM
1

Men are disposable, that's a fact. Even other men see men as disposable. You can not change biology (at least not in less than thousands of years).
/r/MensRights16/07/19 12:47 AM
6

Is he allowed to show his feelings in the relationship? Or if he express his feelings he is a bad person? Is she an adult, therefore capable of handling confrontation (emotional)? Or is she required to be given everything in the relationship in a silver platter with no effort from her part? She is a relationship where she is demanding sexual exclusivity. He can only get sex from her. He can not go somewhere else to get it if she says no. If he is feeling sexually frustrated, he is going to get m…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:56 AM
7

There is always some desperate patsy that will marry her. And they probably deserve each other, they'll share their misery.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:43 AM
1

Exactly, the only reason he went down is because she connected with his jaw very accurately. The jaw is the weakest point of the face and a hit to the jaw will knock you down very quick, even if the hit is not that strong. That said she seemed to hit decently hard for a woman and her accuracy seems on point.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:02 PM
7

Yes, they are. Their founders are also sex abusers and are in just for the money. It is a big scam.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:01 PM
1

You don't have to apologize for anything. I don't see it as a negative trait in women. You might not believe it but your girl is still like that. She is just doing what she thinks is the best she can do, instinctively. Maybe she thinks you have a decent or even good future and wants you to bond with her so you two will have a future together, which is what high quality women do. I want to point out that there is a difference between normal women valuing success and wealth and gold diggers. Women…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 08:37 AM
-3

No, that is a man that have been sold a fantasy about how women are and can not handle her being honest. All men should understand that all women are attracted to success and wealth.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 07:20 AM
3

It is not a joke, it is Goolag. You should use a real search engine. Google is censoring much more and much more blatantly than most people realize. Use a real search engine.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 07:18 AM
6

Indeed, that is a fit body, nowhere near a dad body. He is probably still training, just not as hard. A couple of weeks of hard training and diet, and he would be back in top shape. but the reality is that most elite athletes lose their abs in the offseason because they don't need them. They don't lose them, they get hidden. And you can still see his abs just not as defined. I'm sure he's oh so terribly sorry that his current pictures aren't adequately lean enough for them to gawk at while Hitac…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 07:14 AM
2

I don't really buy the idea that women are better at emotional stuff. Women tend to be better at emotional stuff (same way men tend to be better at logical stuff), but not the way feminists claim. Women's brain is connected differently than male brains with more connections between the left and right parts, and it gives them an advantage at guessing stuff, specially social stuff, what we call intuition or sixth sense. The issue is that does not make women better people or more amenable to be aro…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 09:32 AM
7

So? It is a good joke and related to female entitlement.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 05:17 AM
8

Typical feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:27 PM
2

The problem is we have no way of knowing how many of the "not guilty" verdicts are fake accusation. A "not guilty" verdict can mean a lot of things from one extreme to the other, for example that there was not enough evidence to convict despite the accused being actually guilty. Or that the police got the wrong guy, so there was a rape but the accused is innocent. Or that the accuser is lying and there was no rape. Or... You get the idea. And the issue is that we have no idea of how many of each…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 07:43 PM
10

Technically, he has not been proven innocent. He has been proven "not guilty", and because we are innocent until proven otherwise he is assumed innocent. But strictly speaking being proven innocent and not guilty are different.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 03:56 PM
-6

So you paid money for a book that made you feel better in the short term by convincing you that improving yourself was not worth it. You could have saved the money.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 08:36 AM
15

That's almost always safe. Unexpected accidents happen and people in that line of work die despite all measures taken.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 08:34 AM
13

It didn't, but it is a funny joke.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:41 PM
6

I don't really see a problem with what she said, tbh. Is it the most respectful comment? Obviously not, but an offensive joke should be OK and tolerated by anyone with half a brain. The problem is the hypocrisy. Feminism has made it a social sin for men to make a comment half that offensive, when it shouldn't be. Men should be able to do the same offensive jokes about women.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:38 PM
10

Yes, you should assume any woman (or any man) can cheat and lie. What kind of romantic education did you receive? I'm not saying it is OK what she did or that I don't feel for the guy, but your answer is very naive. Trust but verify should be standard with anyone, including your wife. People cheat. Assuming you found the one woman that won't under any circumstances is extremely naive. And that is precisely the reason I agree with you that performing a paternity test on newborns should be the def…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:18 PM
0

You sound very irresponsible and immature in the way you take decisions in life. You are childish and should not be lecturing anyone until you mature.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 05:14 AM
3

Nothing crazy about it. A man hurts a woman, woman decides to hate all men, woman finds hateful ideology that justifies her hate and even makes it socially acceptable in feminism, woman does not emotionally heal and becomes emotionally dependant on feminist bullshit. It is political weaponization of losers.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 05:07 AM
1

Vasagel?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:49 AM
3

I would use to. Not anymore. Now only help women I know and are not feminists. The risk of false accusations is obviously an important weight on the decision. But what rubs me also the wrong way and very strongly is the lack of respect feminists have for manhood. You want to constantly mock, ridicule and completely disrespect men, go ahead, its your right, but don't expect anything from me in return.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:41 AM
3

CNN is having liquidity problems too, letting people go and paying late. The NYT was going bankrupt before it was rescued by a Mexican billionaire who supported Hillarina. The woke press is not a viable business model.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:34 AM
4

Feminists have been doing this for ages.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:30 AM
13

She made a lot of money from donations from morons. I doubt she is so thoughtful but if she was a bit careful she could retire with what she has made.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:29 AM
13

It never was a legitimate viewpoint. Go and read what the first wave feminists were writing and you'll realize two things: 1. How crazy they were. 2. How successful the propaganda to promote feminism as a sane and progressive ideology has been.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:26 AM
0

Yes, telling people that an operation increases their risk of suicide is not caring, but hiding it from them because of political ideology is caring about them. Your priorities are very clear.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 11:38 AM
1

So having sex with different women and one night stands is having a darker side? That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:31 AM
0

No, transgender people are not born with the brain of the gender they identify as. That is fake science. Trans males do not have male brains, among other things because they have had a completely different hormonal load since inside their mothers. And if transitioning is the only "cure", why are suicides in transgender people higher after they transition? When have you hear that a "solution" produces more deaths than the condition it claims to solve? And I know you are going to say that the one …
/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:27 AM
1

Trans men do not have male brains. They believe and feel they are mentally men, which is different from having male brains.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:18 AM
5

... no longer ... When wasn't feminism a hate movement?
/r/MensRights15/06/19 04:10 AM
5

Mentioning "I'm a girl" to get a better price is obnoxious, but the worst part is not respecting her own word. She made an offer for 400usd and he agreed, that should have been the end of it, but she went back on her word and reneged of the 400 offer. That's someone you don't want to deal with.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 03:07 AM
4

This post is ridiculous. He can ask to fuck without condom, he'll bare the consequences. But leaving it to the last moment is being sneaky in all the wrong ways. She had all the right to feel mislead and pissed.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:14 AM
3

She has said similar things before.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:08 AM
13

40% said they would. I bet you a good bunch of them are just being cautious and not telling the truth.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:07 AM
10

Watch Patrice O'Neal.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:05 AM
4

No, humans don't show emotion in the same way and of course gender matters when it comes to human behaviour. Stop being a science denialist. Men and women have behavioral differences that are gender related. And again you are not answering my point and are giving manipulative responses (why are you doing this?): of course men can (and do) cry, specially if they want to. My point, again, is that telling men that they have to show emotions like women do is toxic. Men have their own preferences and…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 05:29 AM
4

No, men also cry. But that is a non-answer from your part (also manipulative). My point stands, telling men that the only way to show emotions is doing it like women do is toxic.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 05:09 AM
3

Babylon Bee is satire. For fake news you want to visit CNN.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:48 AM
2

It is funny everywhere except in combat sports like MMA. Female fighters have gotten seriously injured after having to fight with a man.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:48 AM
4

There is a lot of ways of showing emotions. Telling men that the only way to show emotions is doing it like women do is toxic.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:36 AM
0

Thank you, I was going to watch it, but being the Guardian I'll pass.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 02:33 PM
1

There is an actual documentary about this case. It is good. Make yourself a favor and go watch the real people involved in the case and not some Netflix paid actors pretending to be them.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 08:35 AM
7

For all the men that suffer, don't open like women want. Most women that tell men to just open up have good intentions but do not understand men. Men and women are different, but these woman think that because opening up helped them, it will help men. The issue is, men and women are different so that is not necessarily true. For men suffering, I've been in your place. My recommendation is try not to stay alone, join some group of men doing some physical or simple activity. It could be some amate…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 07:05 AM
5

So edgy.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:19 AM
7

Science is not the same as religion because testing. It makes it closer to reality. Science is not perfect, but it is closer to reality than religion. But people abuse the prestige that the science word has garnered to push bad science. Psychology being a prime example.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:37 AM
1

Ignore it and keep giving your opinion. What is the feminist going to do?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:26 AM
7

This is abusing male disposability though. There is no good reason for this.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:33 AM
7

The guardian is so trashy.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:00 AM
0

It probably includes pregnant fathers too but that's super rare and hadn't happened yet at the time it was written. Males can not get pregnant.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:58 AM
1

I agree with you, but this is just more metrosexual bullshit trying to look manly. The brand is called war paint, but it tries to seel typical female make up to men.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 05:22 AM
1

She did not even attack him. She phoned her brother, who was not even in the bus and joined later, to do it for her.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 03:52 AM
6

I fully support racist business owners outing themselves as racist. They will ruin their business. You know by the time of the civil rights movements, racist business were losing market share rapidly, right? In fact, racist business had a problem that the civil rights act helped solve for them by forcing them to accept blacks, a movement which otherwise would have seen as a betrayal to their old clientele.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 03:45 AM
5

She does want stares, she just have been convinced men staring is evil patriarchy. Everybody likes signs signaling other people find you attractive.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:09 AM
5

As soon as women like taking care of men and men who are submissive, it will change things a lot. Just need to wait a few million years for evolution to happen and all will be solved.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:35 PM
1

She was very hot when young and has certainly let herself go a lot.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 01:13 AM
1

That does not answer anything we are discussing.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 12:48 AM
2

Men and women are not equal.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 08:01 PM
6

Would I tackle a shooter to give my husband and kids the chance to escape a bad situation? I would hope I was compelled to follow my beliefs in the moment. You won't, at least not for your husband, but probably yes for your kids. In a moment like that your instincts will kick in and you will expect the male to act and take it. There is nothing wrong with you for acting that way, you are a human female.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:59 AM
1

Yes, we are. Don't delude yourself trying to deny biology, just like feminists. The best thing you can do is understand the biological realities of being a man, among them disposability, so you can use it and adapt to the world better.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:54 AM
1

He should not have seriously dated a woman with kids in the first place. I'm sure there are exceptions, but in general they are more trouble than they are worth.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 02:29 AM
9

She thinks she is being cute. Some people are so used to a comfortable life that they act out in stupid ways because they've lost the fear of not being able to survive, they've lost site of consequences and therefore responsibility.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 04:03 PM
11

Its always assumed that we are unbreakable. No. It is that they don't care if we break.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 02:05 PM
-2

Don't give stupid people your time. You say that but here you are talking to me, gotcha Did you just called yourself stupid? Come on man. BTW, I'm getting a feet massage as we speak so I reddit keeps me entertained. Please go out in to the world and say this, and see how well it goes, if you do I promise I'll give you a pint Maybe some feminist will raise a fit but most women will have no problem with it, in fact they'll probably like it. But yes, we probably agree mostly but have some different…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 12:19 PM
3

I don't necessarily agree with the Chinese version, but Its essentially the boys don't cry, take it like a man attitude that prevents us from having feelings This is not true. Traditional men have feelings, we just do not express them like women. There is nothing positive for men expressing our feelings like women do. Teaching boys not to cry needlessly for example is a good thing. MRM is not for making men act like women, that's feminism.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 12:16 PM
-6

He moved on You say he moved on and yet he was still responding to her stupid messages. If he had moved on he would have blocked or ignored her messages. Don't give stupid people your time. It does matter its not the 1930s otherwise he would beat the living shit out of this dumb bitch It does not matter the laws regarding partner violence have gotten more strict. Women want to be maintained. You don't have to do it if you don't want to, but also don't be naive about it. Men should express their …
/r/MensRights28/04/19 09:53 AM
6

Gender stereotyping is not negative, call it providing gender guidance if it makes you feel better. Gender expression has a biological base (it is not 100% biological, but it has a biological component), therefore through human history males (and females) have been discovering attitudes that help us in life and have passed this knowledge to their male kids. It is useful for the kids as there is a common biological base to how we males feel. This does not mean kids can not deviate and should be i…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 07:01 AM
-8

Yes, but he is not much better. Wtf is he doing arguing with his ex? She is indeed a turd of a woman, be happy is over and move on. What do you get of arguing with her? She is not your girlfriend, use your time and energy in better ways. Even going to sleep would be more productive than arguing with your ex. It doesn't matter it is not the 30's. Women want to be provided. You don't have to do it, but you have to understand if you can't it will affect your relationships. Again, you don't have to …
/r/MensRights28/04/19 06:36 AM
10

Men are disposable and gain value by what they do and produce. It is biological you will never change it. We are even wired to feel good about doing this type of heroic acts, and to admire when we see one. If you want to stop being disposable and have value only for being born, get an uterus. That's your only option. What we can do is being very selective about who we exercise our protective and heroic instincts for. If you know a woman is a feminists and doesn't value your traditional manly act…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 06:24 AM
33

According to feminists, multiple accusations of rape is proof of guilt, because, according to them, a group of people would never get together and plan fake accusations, it's too far fetched. So basically she is a rapist.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 06:14 AM
1

Influential? I mean... sure... if you mean making a heinous accusation in attempt to ruin his life, career, and reputation, all because he has different views than you. And ultimately not achieving what she was trying which is to derail his nomination. Such a big influence.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:05 AM
0

Not suppress emotional displays really, just not displaying emotions like women, that's the typical classic male gender role. Females can tell their friends that they like them and love them with tender voice. Men can show affection to other men by being loud, in your face, joking around, patting the back firmly, ... In those situations men are showing emotion and nobody finds it weird. Instead if a woman acted like the previous description for men it would be weird. Same as men acting like the …
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:29 AM
2

It's quite common actually. They seem to have a lot of free time.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 08:52 AM
2

I think his answer was perfect.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 05:38 AM
1

Money. Female beauty sells.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 09:42 AM
2

Lol, not in favor of this, 100% for freedom of speech, but it is funny when a government that can censor, which is what western feminists ask for, shows the feminists what censorship is really about.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 09:41 AM
2

Don't use Goolag.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 09:32 AM
17

If you switch the sexes around and denying sex is really sexual abuse, women are the biggest abusers for the whole history of humanity. Maybe men should ask for reparations and turn the earth into a giant big orgy.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 09:29 AM
1

Can we get a link from a reliable news source? I don't like giving clicks to tabloids like CNN.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:43 PM
2

Also, assuming they are designed for women is very misogynistic.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:48 AM
42

I bet you this is the type of woman that would not dare do this to a black guy for fear of being called racist.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 12:37 PM
2

You made money, that was your job. Apparently you had no other attachment to your job and that's fine, probably not ideal, but if it worked for you, it worked for you. But you had a job that paid you well enough that you manage to live, possibly provide and retire. How is that not part of your identity?
/r/MensRights07/04/19 04:52 AM
1

If you are in an authoritarian repressive region, like the EU, you should get a VPN.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 01:36 AM
31

Netflix is SJW infected. You can see it in most shit they produce.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 01:27 AM
4

Specially when you see the pictures of Biden touching kids. This is not a "no evidence" accusation from 30 years ago. He is on camera groping kids.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 01:36 AM
6

Not only that, but that the genetic father is his brother. Betrayed by your wife and by your brother... It is life changing.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 06:18 AM
2

Not only probably a lie but even if you believe her, it was a one-night stand with no condom. It is bad enough that you are cheating on your partner, but on top of that to put his health and even life at risk is being extremely miserable.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 02:54 PM
3

I would not try it even if gov approved. Too many unknowns.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 01:33 PM
40

It will do nothing. Men and women do not feel for abused men the way they feel for abused women. At an intellectual level we understand women it is similar, but the gut feeling is a lot weaker when the abused is a man. It will do nothing.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 06:07 AM
388

One of the four terrorist was a woman. This feminist is not only a miserable person but also ignorant.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 11:21 AM
1

I'm not angry. I'm direct, which you clearly don't know how to deal with and that is why you are pestering everybody for nothing.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:55 AM
1

There is nothing empathetic about what you are doing. You are just being thick, not empathetic. You are adding nothing to the issue, while creating a problem where there was none and drawing attention to you and your issue. Nothing empathetic about it. If you want to be empathetic add something to the conversation that helps his issue, not something that draws attention to you and what you want to talk about.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:08 AM
3

Don't be so sensitive. That was his mistake. That does not mean all of this is his fault, but if you look at the situation strategically that was his mistake.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 02:45 PM
293

Since the group training, they were waiting for you to say something they disagreed with and use it to fire you. When you were so careful to not say anything they could remotely hang on with, they got tired of waiting and fire you anyways. Your mistake was not see it coming. Next time you see this type of behaviour, do as you did but, more importantly, start looking for a new job.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:07 AM
2

Solo was not a bad movie. It was decent, its problem was that it was behind TLJ. You keep repeating that TLJ did over a billion but not mention of the extra cost of making it or the cancellation of the other side movies (yes, a TV show is coming, but that's not comparable). And on top of that you accuse me of a lie, still waiting for you to point it. You are a bad troll.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:08 AM
5

Stop trolling. I said: TLJ also did well initially just because of the inertia of Star Wars. Then we all know what happened. Where is the lie?
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:29 AM
2

You are free to chose your own delusion.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:50 AM
14

And the next Star Wars movies crashed and a lot of the side movies were cancelled, losing Disney a lot of money when you count what they paid for the franchise. Because that's exactly what happened.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:36 AM
13

TLJ also did well initially just because of the inertia of Star Wars. Then we all know what happened.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 03:04 AM
26

There are multiple accounts of people saying their legit review has been removed and they are not allowed to review again. The surge in popularity was almost instant with examples of positive reviews using the same exact text. Basically bots pushing it up, but this is allowed. RT is owned by a subsidiary of Warner. That is the real issue and why all of this is happening. RT is not a valid source anymore.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 03:03 AM
3

What does being a grown up has to do with not liking being insulted and not liking ideological stupid people?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:16 AM
-3

Choosing to sacrifice yourself for your beliefs, family or truth is one thing; Dying a fool's death at home or in a foreign land, or becoming dispensable on the fickle nature of a woman backed by an ever more intrusive government, is another. I agree, that's exactly what I'm advocating in my comment. The fact of the matter is we aren't dispensable in any sort of way. Contemporary society is the unnatural state This is absolutely ignorant. With all its faults present society treats men way better…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 04:44 PM
4

If we aren't doing something for someone else (women) we are worthless. That is the biological fate of men, same as having kids is the biological fate of women, as much as feminism promises the sky to women if they "liberate" themselves. If the MRM starts ignoring the biological realities it will become as stupid as feminism. Men are dispensable and that fact is genetically codified. You are not going to change it no matter what you do. What you can do is teach men to play their cards as best as…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 03:42 PM
23

That's not what she means. She means that the power balance is so lopsided that the man has to accept more and more shit because the consequences of breaking the marriage are even worse, effectively losing his dignity.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:08 AM
6

Why would you?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:39 PM
28

Because its natural for humans to look at things they like. Certain things catch your eye and you instinctively look. You can not pretend that men should go around with 100% concentration all the time to suppress our natural instincts, it is absolutely ludicrous. If a woman does not want men taking a look, she should cover up. If she is showing, she is going to get looks, which BTW is nothing traumatic or devastating, just people looking.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:48 PM
1

No, we are able to balance our impulses to hurt people with our impulses to collaborate with people. For example, a father found in the act the babysitter making his little boy suck his dick. He started punching him and made him a new face, literally. Police did not press charges against the father, everybody understood. Same with the rest. Evolution has created us this way for a reason. Don't try to fight your natural instincts (like feminists do). You'll fail and end up bitter. Instead try to …
/r/MensRights20/01/19 02:19 PM
1

Trying to fight and repress your biological impulses is a losing strategy. They are there for a reason. What you are proposing is no different than feminists disregarding occupation preferences for each sex and trying to convince women to go into STEM to have a 50/50 ratio.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:45 PM
4

I dont know why i value facsimiles of myself so little, that I attach myself emotionally to people who view themselves as disposable. Because we men are biologically programmed that way, we are programmed to protect women and children even risking our lives, and no amount of activism is going to change that, even when a few people here believe its possible. It is the same as women feeling sexually attracted to muscular dominant successful men. No amount of feminist indoctrination is going to mak…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 07:50 AM
2

Why should a person not be able to defend himself just because the attacker is weaker? If the girl did not want to be hurt all she had to do is not attack. Once you decide to attack, the other person has the right to defend himself independently of how strong is the attacker.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:10 PM
7

Yes, OralB is P&G. I have been using them for years, not anymore.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:14 AM
4

I use Oralb. I won't anymore and will buy another brand as soon as I finish the supplies I have. I have written them to inform them why.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 08:55 AM
11

Western women, absolutely. And they treat their man like shit.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 06:45 AM
1

Not really. Remember women find the right kind of assholes attractive. You'd be surprised how many feminists sexually fantasize with outright misogynists.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 12:57 PM
4

Karl Marx and most of the communists heros, including the Bolsheviks and Che Guevara, were also bankrolled by rich industrialists. It is very telling. The nature of identity politics in culture and the nature of Marxism is class and economics are very similar. Divide in simple groups and distort the subtleties of real theory that actually describes the world. It is very telling that some rich industrialists spent money to finance all of it, Marxism and IdPol.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 12:48 PM
2

Not worse than any other mainstream news source.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 11:48 AM
-5

Why?
/r/MensRights31/12/18 08:39 AM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights27/12/18 07:58 AM
95

I don't understand how they don't realize these type of stuff can backfire. If I was a women leading a restaurant I would not like having the sign and would focus on the quality of the restaurant. What happens when people start avoiding restaurants with the sign because they are tired of sexist bullshit? But the people who set this up is the same who still don't understand why Trump won, so not really surprising they don't understand how it can backfire.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:04 AM
12

Actually, exposing kids to dirt and germs (within measure) is good. Plus any decent gym will be cleaned regularly. Decades ago when people started getting really anal about protecting kids, some mothers started cleaning the house too much (yes, that is possible) and not letting their kids play in sand, dirt or anything that could be even mildly dirty, to protect them from germs. What ended up happening is these kids grew up with an underdeveloped immune system and got ill very easily. Some of th…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 12:59 PM
7

So innocent... Good luck internet extranger.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:27 PM
18

She married his money.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 12:14 PM
1

"Woman" is a gender. "Man" is a gender. Gender is psychological. Anyone can be any gender they like. I don't care. It's trivial. Wear a dress, wear makeup, I don't give a shit. Still not true. You can not have the gender you want. Gender is the cultural expression of your sex. Just because you dress in a certain way does not change your hormonal load and how that influences your behaviour (otherwise trans people would not need hormonal treatments). Assuming sex and gender are independent is stup…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 08:51 AM
147

Online dating is women favored. That's the reality of it. Attract the women and men will come. Companies know it and react accordingly.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 01:00 PM
9

Gender studies should not be recognized as an official college title. If people want to study it as a course that's fine, free country, but should not qualify as a college education.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 07:24 PM
16

The funny part is that feminists are the woman equivalent to incels in men. Both do not understand the opposite sex, think they all are malignant and blame them all for their own problems.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 01:16 PM
3

If you marry her, her debts become yours. Also, there is correlation in women between number of partners before marriage and probability of divorce.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 11:27 AM
15

She had previously said she was willing to debate a conservative. Ben Shapiro called her offer out. She could have refused, but she chose to present her as the victim with that histrionic and dramatic tweet. Tells you everything you need to know about her.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:27 AM
1

Its not bringing unprofessionalism to work, its being able to act human. Why do you think everybody thinks corporate work is soul-less and ends up making even successful people unhappy? The rules were put there for a reason indeed, to protect employers at the expense of employees mental health. These rules are not conductive to a good healthy human environment. They are there just to make employers live easier by turning the job environment cold, soul-less and robotic, which is something that is…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 05:53 AM
-1

You are still human. Expecting people to drop their humanity and behave like robots at work is completely unrealistic.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 02:05 PM
1

Lol, your hero is going to kowtow to the democratic plantation owners while getting rich. She is acting, she is a posh girl posing as modest to get fools to vote for her. See you in couple years, but don't say you weren't warned.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 08:46 AM
0

She is a politician. For that alone she is free game like any other politician. If she is not OK with that she chose the wrong profession. She does not get to be a safe snowflake. Also, she is a total fake. She is an intelligent well educated high middle class woman with a political activist career pretending to be a dumb poor woman from the Bronx working as bartender to appease to their followers as if she is one of them when she is just a posh girl. She is a dishonest hack, acting for her targ…
/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:14 AM
0

It turns out he was right and most of the people were actually Russian spies. We know this now because the Russians declassified a lot of documents which proved he was right.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 08:55 PM
1

I have no horse in this race and maybe he deserves to stay in the UK, but your characterization of gays in Kenya is completely wrong. Gays in Kenya are mostly tolerated as long as they do their thing without too much noise. There are even open to the public lgbt meetings in Nairobi. If the police wanted to crash them they could, yet they ignore them. The situation might not be ideal from a western point of view, but it is not what you described at all. Very far from it.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 06:10 AM
10

It is incorrect. Some people with money are decent people, believe it or not.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:13 AM
7

Regardless of this, nobody should use Goolag. Their searches are biased.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:52 AM
7

You have to understand what he is doing. Trump gives outlandish declarations to the press so they keep talking about him. He is just playing his cards to get over the brutal anti Trump bias from the press. Even John Stewart has called the press out, saying their own narcissism is what Trump is using to keep them focused on him. Trump is just playing the game, quite effectively I must say.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 06:36 AM
3

Don't use the Goolag for your searches.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:39 AM
2

What a lovely couple...
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:02 PM
19

Yes, it is government propaganda, obviously. But you are missing the points. One, women collaborate with those campaigns. Two, they use the symbology of women telling men to go do something brave for a reason, it works. We men are biologically wired to please women. Instead of admitting their privilege, feminists berate men in general as abusers of women, when most of us do nothing but take care of the women close to us. It is absolutely miserable. Three, for women to push for men to go to war, …
/r/MensRights15/11/18 11:48 AM
1

Why do you think he is abusive?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 04:40 AM
2

I have never seen anyone in academia claim experience does not matter. Never.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 04:16 AM
-1

The thing is there is not those two sides. Biological determinism is a feminist invention, an strawman created to make themselves look better. The discussion has always been between the people defending that human behaviour is a mix of genetics and experience vs the tabula rasa people (feminists, postmodernists) who think human behaviour is all experience.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:50 PM
3

So it's not about "equality", it's about women trying to get themselves a bailout. No, you are very wrong. It is about rich women getting the upper hand. This measure will screw poor women, but feminists do not care one bit about poor women. Feminism started and has always been a rich women club for the privilege of rich women.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 12:48 PM
5

Because politics. That's the only logical reason to believe it.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 12:36 PM
1

No, it wasn't. The ancient cultures tended to have stricter gender roles for both men and women than present western society, and in some cases that produced issues for both men and women (different issues for each). But as usual, feminists just ignore the hardships of men and look only at the hardships of women to create the fake narrative of women oppression.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:02 AM
6

Teach women not to lie about rape.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 09:56 AM
1

You did not even get the joke of "Your Bayesian approach is called bias" and you call others simple minded and thinking black and white. The accusation of Ford is the definition of unsubstantiated. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:38 AM
1

Your Bayesian approach is called bias. You don't know any of them, you have no idea about the circumstances. Your "Bayesian approach" is colored by your politics. You have no idea if she made it all up from the start for attention, you don't know if she misrepresented something with someone else and then in her mind projected the judge face, you don't know if it actually happen what she said but with a different person (BTW a man came out describing a similar accident with her in the past, how d…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:29 AM
0

And still it is proof of nothing regarding this case. What you are saying is that anyone who claimed a traumatic experience in therapy can accuse anyone without evidence and we should believe that person. It is absolutely insane.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:07 AM
-2

Calling Ford or Ramirez substantial is living in LA LA land. They were anything but substantial. "I don't know when it happened, I don't know where it happened, all the people I claim to be there deny it,..." No one with half a brain can call that substantial. They were literally unsubstantiated accusations.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:04 AM
1

In twiteris it would be: bitches be horny.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 01:17 PM
8

Women show empathy towards everybody, including men, but have a very hard time showing sympathy towards men. It is evolutionary. If you want to be understood talk to other men, not women. I am sorry that you have to learn this lesson through this painful experience, but that is the way of the world.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:40 AM
1

All poor and most middle class women.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 02:09 PM
0

Please, do not link to racist publications like the NYT directly. Use archive instead.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 04:34 AM
36

The New York times, a racist publication, bragging openly about using puritanical outrage to push forward the careers of women. What a time to be alive.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 08:11 AM
37

What you're describing is not feminism, it is the misuse of feminism as class warfare. Upper class "dignitaries" did indeed misuse the idea of feminism to reinforce a pre-existing societal structure Upper class women did not misuse feminism, they created it. First wave feminists, the suffragettes, were very racist and classist. To the point that they would not allow black women to become feminists and openly advocated against black being able to vote. But racism was not all, they were extremely …
/r/MensRights27/10/18 12:21 PM
11

Have you ever been around most socialists in the USA? Blaming white men for everything is their preferred past time.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 10:49 AM
53

You are missing the point completely. Nobody is saying societal organization 100 years ago was perfect and we should go back to it and never change it. Nobody is saying this. What we are saying is that feminists created a historic lie to get privileges and fuck over poor women and most men. What we are saying is that the standard feminist version of history that is tough in most schools is an absolute biased lie. And not an innocent one, but a purposely engineered lie to change society for their…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 10:24 AM
4

Corporate welfare usually refers to the subsidies and regulations governments grant to big corporations though.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 09:06 AM
26

I think we are losing sight of the fact it was a pretty bitter existence for all back then. Not for all but for most, yes. But nobody is losing sight that we now live better than 100 years ago, even poor people, at least in western countries. The issue is that feminists like to point out the crude circumstances of women back then, ignore the crude circumstances men had too, and blame men for the situation of women, while most men were working their lives out for their women. It is a very miserab…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 08:55 AM
9

Most women had to work on top of taking care of the house and kids to supplement their husband income. Women not working and staying home was not the norm or the expectation for most women, only for a few privileged ones. In fact, women rights advocates noted than when speaking with women at the time, one of their biggest wishes was that they wanted to stop working and be able to just take care of kids and house. But feminism was a movement composed of rich privileged white women, so for them th…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 08:51 AM
183

True, but rich and even high middle class women were 100% maintained. They did not even had to take care of the house or children as they had servants. As you point out, poor and most middle class women, most women, had to work on top of maintaining the house and kids to supplement their husband income. The biggest irony of feminism is that poor and middle class women wanted to stop working. That was their plight when asked by women rights advocates. But feminists were mostly rich women complete…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 08:43 AM
14

I am going to bet they will hire a gender studies white woman for the position. Another bullshit job for the white women to leach out of the productive people.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:15 AM
712

The biggest feminist lie. Rewriting history to make it look like women staying at home and taking care of the kids was an oppressive plan by men to go to work and have all the fun like those distinguished gentleman in the picture.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:11 AM
1

The democratic party is outspending the republicans 2 to 1 in the midterm elections. If you are against rich people influencing elections you have to vote against the Democrats.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 05:16 AM
12

He is saying that is how democrats portray him to be.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 05:11 AM
3

You can show women all kind of emotions, but for sure don't cry in front of them.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:57 AM
8

Do not link directly to racist publications like the NYT.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 01:36 AM
4

Even the ice thing is probably false. He was accused of trowing ice in a bar, by a person who had thrown a glass at him, but nobody else in the bar corroborated that accusation, so it seems the other guy was just making shit up to look less guilty.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:17 AM
21

He is absolutely right. Glad men are waking up to the stupid feminists games.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:15 AM
10

The SJW movement is extremist. It has not been highjacked.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 07:22 AM
5

The problem is mainly the British and German influence. In a lot of non-western countries what you mention is common. Even in some places in the west, like the south of Europe, touching your male friends is normal. But the British/Germans have an insane sense of their personal space. I wish they loosen up a bit, human contact is good for you.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:53 PM
5

SJW are the hippies and now the 70's are ending and the 80's are coming. The hippies went from being heralded as the new way of life to becoming the butt of every joke and so will the SJW.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 06:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter