TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

discdigger Archive

View 0 posts and 267 comments by discdigger on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Cheese! Awww...I bleu it.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:57 PM
1

cheap != inexpensive go for a hike = inexpensive. sneak samples at costco before your friends sneaks you into a theater = cheap
/r/MensRights13/01/13 04:21 PM
3

Nothing ever happened less than this.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 11:29 AM
7

OK, he has crappy insurance. Since that is (stupidly) tied to your employer anyway, shouldn't that be proof that we need regulation as to what is and is not covered? There are plenty of scenarios where people (men and women) would need a law mandating coverage. I happen to think a LOT of healthcare shit should be mandated. so I really don't see a problem with women asking for the pill to be guaranteed.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 06:09 PM
2

see you in /r/imgoingtohellforthis/
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:43 AM
6

Well, it reduces the man to a superficial fantasy, just like a lot of women are portrayed in other stories. Just like we don't want men abandoning everything and sacrificing their bodies/lives for women they have never met, we shouldn't expect women to do it, either. Honestly, that's why "The Princess Bride" is such a classic. They actually fall in love before, not because of, the rescue.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 01:54 PM
1

Let me re-lighten it. Terms of Enrampagement
/r/MensRights03/11/12 05:45 PM
0

The fuck, dude?
/r/MensRights03/11/12 05:38 PM
7

Except, in this case, politically correct was just plain correct.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:03 PM
3

Wow that almost makes up for their Olympics campaign. I also happen to like the Silverado one "So what do you do?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXJ6nL3gomM Work, Chess with an older male (his father, maybe) Romantic Dinner with wife Singing BINGO with his kids Work stuff Paintball Sounds like a well-rounded set of activities, which is surprising for a commercial.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 12:48 AM
14

Except that is the opposite of what Atheists actually do. (I have never been to Athiesm+, but you seem to have expanded your scope anyway) “Hm that's a good point, let me think for a bit Oh wait, my mistake, it's absolute bullshit. Science adjusts it's beliefs based on what's observed Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved. If you show me That, say, homeopathy works, Then I will change my mind I'll spin on a fucking dime I'll be embarrassed as hell, But I will run thr…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:50 PM
1

Congress can always amend the constitution. If they have the votes.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:39 PM
9

Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public. -H. L. Mencken
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:10 PM
2

In reality? Probably both. But you shouldn't let that stop you.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:42 AM
1

Doctor making 250k Repo Man making 25k/year
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:35 PM
4

Really? Someone who makes 250k/year could become a warlord? But someone who makes 25k/year couldn't? Back in reality, the city PD is protecting both the 500k townhome that one guy owns, and the 400/month condo that the other rents. And they probably care more about the upper class citizen, too.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:15 PM
4

People with more money get more benefit from a stable society.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:06 PM
1

Actually, yes. There was just a post a few weeks ago about a girl getting kicked out for dressing like Tinkerbell. A full costume may be a bit different, but we don't have a huge sample size to deal with, so the analogy can't be perfect.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 06:16 PM
10

It's not just that. Reddit intentionally displays vote totals that are 'off' by 1-2 votes, so that spammers/vote brigades cannot test to see if what they did worked.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:59 PM
3

Yes, but you left out that it also includes people who rescue victims, not just people who cause the accidents.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:36 AM
44

Of course you would. That's the point. They're trolling.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 12:05 PM
9

I agree that birth control should be part of any Universal Healthcare package (and I support single-payer HC, too), but teen pregnancy just hit a 30-year low.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:52 PM
5

Fair enough, they won't be around in their current form for long.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 04:44 PM
55

They won't be around for long. Just like Tower records was able to stagger along longer than a lot of smaller CD stores, B&N is now just a real estate company waiting for the market to pick up before they sell and GTFO. Too big to be efficient, to slow to specialize, they are doomed.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:01 PM
9

Sounds like you two handled it like grown-ups, congrats. If everyone operated like that, this probably wouldn't be an issue. No one is perfect, and all too often money makes both men and women do crazy things (not just in divorce, look at how messy inheritances, and other civil suits can be).
/r/MensRights20/05/12 12:35 PM
2

You can also accommodate about 20% more men per restroom, since urinals take up less space than stalls.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:48 PM
31

You know whats good for that? Doing it anyway. You get to have fun with the kid, and piss off those people.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:47 AM
5

I had to read that 1984 times before I saw what you did there...
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:36 PM
1

Yes, and that is one possible solution, just like I said. But there are lots of OTHER valid solutions, too. Finding out which one is optimal will require they... "discuss it like adults"
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:46 PM
2

The correct answer is "discuss it like adults". Splitting it 50/50 is one possible solution. It sounds like OP doesn't have a ton of money, but we don't know that for a fact, or anything about the girl, either. Maybe she can't pay for some reason. In that case, it may be worth it to make it a gift. Maybe her parents will flip out, or she is afraid of the peer pressure involved. Maybe they agree that he gets this one, and she gets the next one (or two regular dates). Also, see http://www.reddit.c…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:56 PM
2

Fat bottom girls make the rockin' world go 'round....
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:48 AM
-4

Watch a beer or deodorant commercial, and women are portrayed just as poorly. Watch a sports/luxury car/truck commercial, and men are gods. It depends on the audience being targeted.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:31 PM
3

yes.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 01:14 PM
1

Actually, it is grammatically fine as it is, just not in the way he intended. A man, who was hating his professor's incompetence, set off a chain of events that got her fired.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 02:38 AM
2

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=stock_photos Hot curly haired black women go moist for wireless broadband routers and mainframes.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 01:51 AM
1

Holy /r/firstworldproblems, batman!
/r/MensRights04/01/12 09:56 PM
5

I have the inclination, but I don't have a driveway or a garage. I am not about to change my brake pads while parallel parked on the street.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 12:30 PM
2

OR (and hear me out now) Take 2 pieces of your new-fangled bacon-bread, and put BACON between them!
/r/MensRights03/01/12 12:28 PM
4

Unless he went to Jared...
/r/MensRights30/12/11 05:05 AM
2

I make people meet me in public just to sell them my old junk. You have no idea who is actually on the other end of the internet, and there is no way in hell I am giving them my address.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 01:20 AM
2

The dude in the blue cap seems to be missing his left arm...
/r/MensRights28/12/11 01:11 AM
3

That's because the father is not in the article. She took the kid from her parent's house. Until recently, the boy was living with McCready's mother. Her mother was awarded guardianship in 2007. McCready took the boy during a recent visit at her father's Florida home.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 04:07 PM
2

Because he just doesn't give a shit. He is only in this to sell books, not win the nomination, or even the general election. Republicans figured out a few cycles ago that there is more easy money to be made in running for president, than there is in BEING president.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:25 PM
1

I am ok with them making one exception, for one parent, while they form a policy. Yes. This isn't a Magnet school, as far as I can tell, its a parent-run co-op for toddlers.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 10:40 AM
1

That sounds to me like they made an exception for her, and are going to look into the policy for all students. I'm still OK with that.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:02 AM
1

If we are taking her at her word (which is all I can do), then yes. My original post was misguided. Worse was my initial reaction to harsh criticism. Out of the blue my mom blog was pounded with stern comments pouring in so fast the server couldn't keep up. These commenters were unknown to me. I just jumped with my gut instinct to fight fire with fire. I freaked out in real time because I felt ambushed. It was a mistake I regret. Also, we don't know that the school policy is going to be changed …
/r/MensRights24/10/11 07:27 PM
3

I honestly doubt that. People who are forced to apologize usually come up with a non-apology apology. You know they kind: "I am sorry you were offended, or if you took my words the wrong way, etc". In this case, she actually says that she realizes the error of her ways, and feels like a better person for having her views changed.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 03:07 PM
-3

Its bad, sure, but it isn't the only one. DUI comes to mind...
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:49 PM
6

But that's my whole argument. Think about it this way. I could say that 80% of the people in jail are poor. That SUGGESTS that poor people commit more crimes than rich people, when the truth is that there are tons of other factors that people ignore. (In this case, the ability of richer people to afford lawyers, and the ratio of poor people to rich people in the general population). The most glaring omission I see in these stats is that it doesn't make any comparisons to the general population, …
/r/MensRights06/10/11 03:49 PM
5

No, correlation != causation. There could be some underlying root cause that is (for example) causing more men to be removed from the picture, and causing more children to commit suicide. Unless you control for other factors, or at least compare the rate to non-fatherless homes, you really don't have much of an argument. Read "Lying with statistics" for a great breakdown of this.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:34 AM
1

No, he is saying economists are saying that.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 03:06 AM
5

Digital in this case I assumed to mean "with your digits (fingers), not your penis".
/r/MensRights13/09/11 06:15 PM
3

That's all that you see wrong with it? Not the fact that she so easily tosses off lines like "Guys are so easy to confuse anyway!" Swap the genders, and see if you feel the same way. Hey Guys, its that time of year again. To raise awareness for the famine in Somalia, everyone post what you ate for lunch yesterday. All the women will think that we are placing orders for dinner tonight! (And will have to spend all day trying to make it!) P.S. I could feel myself getting stupider while typing that,…
/r/MensRights05/09/11 09:49 AM
4

Don't you talk bad about Lt. Dan! He ain't got no legs!
/r/MensRights08/08/11 09:29 AM
1

Cocaine with tiny bits of heroin inside.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 04:18 PM
0

You are fooling no one, you were a tri-lam, weren't you? /We're Lambda Lambda Lambda and, Omega Moos...
/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:42 AM
2

r/MaleStudies is a troll subreddit.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 02:18 PM
1

http://www.blinkx.com/watch-video/tom-brady-snl-sexual-harassment-psa/h7nIkQjgII_oYNH7gQfUpA
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:08 PM
-3

GET OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR CONTEXT!
/r/MensRights10/07/11 01:08 AM
7

jibes /pet peeve
/r/MensRights03/07/11 03:36 PM
2

Its not mine, its from the original thread, but thanks.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 10:16 AM
8

http://i.imgur.com/0Ubig.jpg
/r/MensRights01/07/11 12:36 AM
0

I bet the DMV did nothing, too!
/r/MensRights30/06/11 05:20 PM
1

If you are being asked to forego vacation, you need a new job (I know, easier said than done). But sick time to take care of a kid is not exactly "as they please". And if they ARE using their sick time, then it is just less time they get when THEY are sick. And if you AREN'T using your sick time, start!
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:26 PM
1

I have a 2 year old, so I know there are sleepless nights. But if it gets to the point that you have a reputation for laziness, something else is wrong. (Unless, of course, your kid actually has a real medical condition. In which case I think anyone would understand that caring for any sick relative takes precedence.)
/r/MensRights21/06/11 12:13 PM
2

My work offers "unlimited" time-off, as long as you do your job. They rely on social pressure to keep you there, and, like suckers, we fall for it.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 12:11 PM
1

Everyone is lazy. People with an excuse are just more brazen.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 03:21 AM
2

Yes. In the US, it isn't guaranteed by the gov't, but negotiated when you are hired. Most companies offer women substantially more than men.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:17 AM
1

They aren't tardy (or have poor work ethic) because they are parents, they are tardy (or have poor work ethic) because they are tardy people (or have poor work ethic).
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:15 AM
6

As a father let me just say that you are being rewarded for your work. I miss out on a lot of things to spend time with my kid. The moment my shift ends, I rush out to pick him up at daycare. Others stay late and polish projects, or wrap up work. I often miss meetings scheduled off-hours because I can't make the hours work. And I know that a lot of those people (including management) go out for drinks after work, and talk about the office, which I miss out on. They are all subtle, but, come prom…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:14 AM
10

Hermes Conrad, you are technically correct. THE BEST KIND OF CORRECT
/r/MensRights19/06/11 12:10 PM
1

NSFW language (but thats kind of the point): http://lyrics.wikia.com/Tim_Minchin:The_Pope_Song (embedded video so you don't have to fucking sign in)
/r/MensRights16/06/11 06:49 PM
58

Dude, its only been a few hours. On a Monday morning. And now it has 30. Chillax.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 11:57 AM
6

Riding lessons don't appear to be the punishment. It sounds like they just altered her sentence so that she could still attend. Dailymail is sensationalist crap.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 05:48 PM
0

Oh wow, that was SO clever. You should be SOOOO proud of that comment.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 05:07 PM
2

Sarcasm is very, VERY difficult to convey in type. That's what Poe's law is.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 12:09 PM
11

I think we are mostly fine with that. As long as we acknowledge that this is about your personal limits, and not the capability of the male doctors, no one is going to scream sexism.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 12:08 PM
2

/csb I recently had major surgery, and the next night was one of the worst in my life. My male nurse got me through it amazingly. He was phenomenal, to the point that when the surgeon followed up with me, I made sure they wrote who it was (I had some pretty good painkillers in me) so that I could thank him later, and so that his bosses would know.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 12:06 PM
2

It sounds like your lawyer sucks. He should be fighting EVERYTHING. Even if there is very little hope of getting it changed, it can be used to negotiate something else. Get a new lawyer.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 01:07 PM
2

Just goes to show how much of a difference cost-of-living really makes. OP is in the single most expensive place to live in America, and seems to be stuck there for the kids.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 01:04 PM
10

The landlord doesn't live there though, and if she feels uncomfortable RENTING to men, then that is still illegal under the FHA.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 10:32 AM
1

No, we need freely available birth control available to both men and women, and the education on how to use it. Then, failure to take your birth control can constitute consent to any children you spawn.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 03:04 PM
5

At 4:17, when she completely switches gears to the birds, I could have sworn she was going to start ranting about Global Warming. Still that sucked to watch all around. For the little girl, especially.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 05:37 PM
2

Hermes Conrad, you are technically correct. The BEST KIND of correct.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 09:12 PM
1

Absolutely false. In the American system, you are either guilty or you are not.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 07:24 PM
1

Explain youtube.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 06:35 PM
1

If that were true, wouldn't /r/suicidewatch be dominated by females claiming to need help?
/r/MensRights01/05/11 05:59 PM
3

Don't feed the crazy. You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.
/r/MensRights21/04/11 03:31 AM
9

I am anti-death penalty, so I have no problem with this.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:48 PM
9

It isn't. (assuming they don't have an exemption from all equal employment laws, like many small companies, or family farms). edit: *and you are in the United States.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 05:12 PM
1

Well, at least she had the backbone to refuse the money, rather than take it and tell you that anyway, right?
/r/MensRights03/04/11 12:25 PM
1

We could lower it even more if we included women with NO children, including female children. Hell, why stop there? What percentage of men (and boys!) have children with multiple other men?
/r/MensRights03/04/11 12:20 PM
-2

First, I am in favor of a paternity test. If it isn't his kid, I agree he should get out now. Having said that. The ends don't justify the means. Fair or not, it is HIS FUCKING KID. That kid has no other father. He needs to be there for him. And it is his place not to tell the mother how to raise the kid, but to do it PROPERLY, HIMSELF. You know why? Because REGARDLESS OF THE FUCKEDUPEDNESS OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES, it is HIS FUCKING KID.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:19 PM
-3

Don't punish the kid for the sins of the mother. And he shouldn't let her raise him with her fucked up morals.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:12 PM
2

If she turns out to be a he, take a stiff drink, and WEAR A CONDOM ANYWAY.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:31 AM
-5

If its really his kid, this is a shitty thing to do. He needs to prevent his (probably justified) anger at the mother from poisoning his relation ship with his son. He also needs to tell the girl that he will do everything he can to make sure the kid is raised properly, and that he is going to make sure that his child support is going to support the child.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:27 AM
-2

Raising a 6 month old is NOT an extended vacation. When my wife gave birth, we both needed as many weeks off as possible. Also, the post you are replying to never used that term, so you shouldn't be quoting it.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 07:25 PM
5

I think everyone agrees that you get to pick up where you "left off". The tricky part is that all of your peers will have 5 years of promotions/raises/experience that you (male OR female) don't.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 07:23 PM
4

I think this depends on demand (which isn't explained in the article). They say in the article that they are low on funds, and that if a male needs a ride, they will call them a cab (they better pay for it, too!). If they are getting one request/week for males, it makes more sense to outsource it, and not hire another bus driver. I don't know the layout here, but I would also like to point out that, rather than hire a bus driver, they should consider hiring people to walk them back to their dorm…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 05:24 PM
10

If you can find him.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 04:39 PM
1

That's what (the charge of) manslaughter is for.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 05:05 PM
2

I see the arguments for putting this in MR, but I think, more importantly, that this should be viewed exactly as what will happen to more scared, uneducated women if abortion is outlawed. We will now be paying for her prosecution, her defense, and possibly her jail time. As far as the "Scott Peterson" argument goes, I think this shows fairness in the system. Both are being charged with ending an (almost) life. I know MRs fall on a wide left <<-->> right spectrum of politics, but ANYONE who is pr…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 01:09 PM
1

If you are a Raiders fan, I doubt you have a girlfriend at all :P
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:52 AM
-2

Thank god I am not a moderator. Talk about thankless.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:45 AM
3

Agreed. By calling out the double standard early, they neutralized it. The characters are shallow and chauvinistic, but the message was pretty damn accurate. And don't forget the bordering-on-stunt-casting of Susan Sarandon. When she met Tim Robbins, she was 40, and he was just 28.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 05:21 PM
2

We spent about 10k, and that is about what it would cost for a kickass party (with food and bar!) for 100 of our friends anyway. And how often will we get an excuse to spend that much money on ourselves?
/r/MensRights21/03/11 05:17 PM
1

Except for the part where it is only implied, and not stated specifically, I actually don't see an issue with this. There are very real differences between young boys and young girls, and what works for one group may not work for the other. If this was developed to help young boys with their anger issues, great.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 05:15 PM
1

What about child support?
/r/MensRights16/03/11 10:40 PM
4

But he specifically excluded dual-income homes in his set of acceptable situations. For example, if a woman stays at home to raise children, so that her husband can work late hours building up a family business, there is an implied agreement that he is working for both of them, while she does "unpaid" labor. In that case, I absolutely feel that she should get a cut of the family business. It gets trickier if there is no family store, but instead just the man's career, or partnership at a law off…
/r/MensRights16/03/11 10:38 PM
9

No, you're right.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 07:16 PM
14

The good news is, at least in r/WTF, they are being called out as being crazy. Remember, the source website is for people who PAY to have a 50% chance of getting the gender child they want. (iow: morons). It isn't just people in MR that think they are way out of line.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 04:31 PM
6

To be fair, there are whole genre's of EVERYTHING pornographic out there. The internet is a wild, crazy, dirty, wonderful cesspool of every kink, fetish, and turn on that exists (and I wouldn't have it any other way). tl:dr (I fail at tables) :-----------:|:------------:|:------------: |Exists? | Boys Humiliating | Girls Humiliating | Boys | Yes | Yes Girls | Yes | Yes
/r/MensRights11/03/11 05:32 PM
6

interested, yes. ready? no.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 04:29 PM
5

He was a kid. Male/female doesn't matter
/r/MensRights08/03/11 03:59 PM
3

Well, to be fair, we asked him to write about this before we knew how he felt about it.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 03:47 PM
5

No, they don't. Also, the ACTUAL victim in this case is a 15 y/o boy.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 03:42 PM
2

Never, ever, EVER, plead to something you didn't do. No one is offering you a deal to make YOUR life easier.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 01:05 AM
3

Arbor Day represent!
/r/MensRights07/03/11 06:48 PM
1

good point. I think I may take back my downboat
/r/MensRights07/03/11 06:47 PM
4

But OP didn't do that, he just posted the article, with no attempt to start that conversation. Here, I will, though. In this case, they were arrested. AnnArchist, who is a pretty frequent poster here, thinks that was too harsh, presumably, for either gender. So in this case, even if that WERE the discussion OP was trying to start, it is an example of the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 06:42 PM
0

1/3rd of all people are morons, too. You are dead, it isn't your money anymore. Leave it up to your kids to decide how to use it/lose it, or better yet, give it to charity.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 06:38 PM
2

This seems like another damn good argument for universal healthcare, too.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 06:20 PM
2

People believe anything if you tell them you are a doctor/authority figure. See: Homeopathy, anti-vaccination nuts, voodoo, prayer, Atkins, Trepanning, etc
/r/MensRights02/03/11 07:21 PM
4

I flipped through the archives. On my second try, the article was about two women. Its crap writing, but again, it is snarky to whoever the photograph. http://uweekly.com/newsmag/01-12-2011/17030/fashion-police Leggings are not pants. Uggs are not acceptable footwear for any ol' outfit. And your little sister's shirt is not "cute" when you pair it with a longer shirt that covers your butt in those previously mentioned non-pants. We feel the worst, though, for the poor wild animal who had to die …
/r/MensRights02/03/11 07:17 PM
3

Fashion police are equal opportunity snark providers.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 04:23 PM
3

Article is appropriately harsh on both sides. Isn't that what we want?
/r/MensRights02/03/11 03:52 PM
4

just so your husband won't divorce you. If she had been honest with him, even AFTER cheating, he might not have divorced her. She did all this so that he wouldn't get mad at her.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 06:13 PM
1

Well, its really bad writing, because it is complete bullshit, made up by one "expert", who can't prove anything.
/r/MensRights25/02/11 06:40 PM
1

I can't read that.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:05 PM
2

1 link karma -1 comment karma buy StarHopper a month of reddit gold send messageredditor for 5 days Also note, that in another thread, they call themselves an unemployed actress. Project much?
/r/MensRights22/02/11 01:13 PM
12

While we're at it, why do they convict people of ATTEMPTED murder? Do they give Nobel prizes for ATTEMPTED chemistry?
/r/MensRights20/02/11 03:20 AM
6

I know you are joking, but I fed my son about half the time. Breast pumps let me do that, and I am glad I didn't miss out. (Although, I probably AM glad that he used a bottle and not, well, ME).
/r/MensRights20/02/11 03:16 AM
1

It could also be a reprint, from an older one...
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:07 PM
2

There was also a direct link posted 2 hours previous to this one. At least that was useful, and showed context.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:02 PM
1

Of course, if you are being pedantic, you could insist on only calling it a trigger if it is ">n standard deviations of triggering a bad reaction", but I think the point is the same.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 01:03 PM
1

Yeah, but the convict wasn't retarded.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:47 AM
-7

I am not saying he should go away for 20 years (or 30 days), but you are wrong. It has been established by the Supreme Court that the first amendment doesn't apply in cases of obscenity. If they determine that what he produced is obscene, he has no coverage from that amendment.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:46 AM
2

It is very, very real. For a non-rapey example, talk to a veteran who has survived intense combat.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:31 AM
7

I am legitimately sorry to hear that, but now I have to ask: What's your favorite rape joke?
/r/MensRights18/02/11 01:46 AM
4

Sure, but it was not created for the purpose of demeaning any particular race, it was showing how absurd people who ARE racist can be (and actually were). Of course, now I am going to have to rewatch it. //blame Canada
/r/MensRights17/02/11 10:09 PM
1

It isn't necessarily feminists, though. It is just as often uptight conservative bible-thumpers who over react to these things.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 07:59 PM
3

That was my point. That some people took it the wrong way is just proof of my other conclusion. people are easily offended, and often have no sense of humor.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 07:57 PM
1

Very few details there. As I understand it, if you go through a donor agency, you are covered. If you just volunteer to sleep with a woman in order to "donate sperm", you are EDIT [NOT] covered.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 06:07 PM
0

This is about money, not gender.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 05:48 PM
2

This is about the only time the term "Man up" is acceptable. It is also the best advice in the thread. If you DO have a son, you need to be there for him, no matter what.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 05:41 PM
9

For the same reason people think that any joke that cites race makes you a racist. Some rape jokes really do trivialize rape, or make it sound "acceptable", and some race jokes really are quite racist. I don't think the "dickwolves" comic promoted raping men, and I don't think that scene from the South Park movie (Operation: Get behind the darkies) was racist. Unfortunately, many people have a hard time understanding that some != all. If you want me to explain why people are easily offended, and…
/r/MensRights17/02/11 05:26 PM
3

Username makes this epic.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 03:25 PM
3

People who enjoy watching Jersey Shore are not the people I look to for valid opinions on complex subjects.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 03:05 AM
1

[DESCRIPTION](LINK)
/r/MensRights04/02/11 11:42 AM
1

Yeah, the article is crap. To the point where I no longer trust that they presented what the judge actually meant.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 11:41 AM
2

Nope, it was a typo
/r/MensRights03/02/11 04:43 AM
2

Male Studies is a troll subreddit. You can get banned without even posting anything there.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 12:45 PM
-3

IF you think 16 year olds can give consent (that is a different discussion)
/r/MensRights01/02/11 01:40 PM
2

But very nice too see.
/r/MensRights30/01/11 04:38 PM
2

Has he tried turning it off and then on again?
/r/MensRights16/01/11 01:19 AM
8

It is called being mentally unfit to stand trial, and yes, it IS used in other crimes. The article doesn't talk much about the context of this, but if it turns out she has an IQ no higher than about 75, or is otherwise really, REALLY incompetent (like, believes in Santa Claus level stupidity), I can understand the verdict.
/r/MensRights13/01/11 05:05 PM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/f08wb/womens_groups_get_urinal_removed_from_hamilton/c1cbmnh
/r/MensRights11/01/11 08:28 PM
2

I believe he is referring to "Paradise by the dashboard light", specifically, part 3: "Praying for the end of time"
/r/MensRights05/01/11 06:35 PM
9

HEY! This guy's being reasonable! GET HIM!
/r/MensRights05/01/11 03:04 PM
1

If it weren't for CNN, I would have no idea what is happening on twitter.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 07:24 PM
1

Ah, you're right. That's what I get for reading this board from my phone.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 02:18 PM
-1

edit: nm
/r/MensRights02/01/11 12:37 PM
2

I think you hit a little too close to home for some people...
/r/MensRights01/01/11 08:51 PM
4

MaleStudies is pretty much a troll subreddit. They go through other threads and premptively ban people they think they wouldn't like.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 08:43 PM
8

You should try some of this disc0unt ci@lis I have over here...
/r/MensRights01/01/11 01:26 PM
1

Sort by best. I saw no hostility in the first 20 responses.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 07:38 PM
4

Downvote for dailymail. Not for the content, but for the source.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 06:47 PM
1

You keep referring to it as "his" business, and "his" property, and giving the choice only to the husband. And if she does shut down the business, she loses just as much as him. Alimony should not be a reward for divorce, it SHOULD be a continuing payment on the returns generated by the marriage. Whether or not it is lump-sum or monthly.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 05:12 PM
2

Worse for who? The husband? What if the market goes south, and now he is committed to some monthly bill he can't afford, like in the OP? Also, she did all that shit to enable the husband to build the business. Marriage is a partnership. What she does with her half of the business is up to her.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 04:06 PM
1

It isn't just HIS business though. In that scenario, they built it up together.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 01:20 PM
3

Don't you think, in your example, it would have been better to give her half of the business in the divorce, so that she gets what she earned together with her husband, and isn't dependent on a monthly check from some guy who doesn't want to be in her life anymore?
/r/MensRights06/12/10 02:21 PM
2

Bass solo!
/r/MensRights06/12/10 02:16 PM
7

Don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:33 AM
1

The Sun is sensationalist garbage. That is all.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 04:51 AM
9

I went into a walk-in clinic with an earache, and was asked this, right along with "Do you take illegal drugs?" and "Are you sexually active?". I am a 32 year-old white male, living in the northeast. Maybe we just have better medical care up here, but I am glad they ask.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 05:36 PM
1

Maybe, but I was responding to the person who said they had never seen any similar type of restrictions on any of their playspaces (and by extension, any of their public areas).
/r/MensRights18/11/10 07:58 PM
0

But by whose definition of bullshit? I think a lot of people would say keeping a playground designed for kids suitable for kids use isn't bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 07:44 PM
1

What about Senior's centers then? Should anyone be allowed to use their spaces? Or should it be reserved for old folks?
/r/MensRights18/11/10 06:37 PM
-4

That is absolutely false. Haven't you ever seen a hiking trail with a "No snowmobiling" sign? It is because they want to use the resource for what it was designed for.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 04:42 PM
-11

Do you think people should be allowed to Rollerblade on the freeway, too?
/r/MensRights18/11/10 04:40 PM
2

Not that it is equal to what OP is going through, but as someone who is happily married with a young kid, I can tell you this: Kids are all stress, all the time. Emotional stress. Financial Stress. Physical stress. Lack-of-sleep stress. Having a great partner makes it easier, of course, but unless you are really, really, ready for it, it can be overwhelming. But, I wouldn't change it for anything.
/r/MensRights04/11/10 12:11 PM
1

I don't know the whole story about the laptop, but if he gave her access (for example, let her know his passwords), he is definitely on the hook. If she physically stole the laptop, but couldn't access it, he should not be responsible any more that someone who is mugged.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 04:15 PM
2

Have you ever read this comic before? It is hilariously sociopathic. Things like "You're the love of my life so far." are common. And if you read the alt-text, it adds another twist anyway.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 12:18 PM
1

Are they at least inflammatory? Is there any common thread?
/r/MensRights31/10/10 06:22 PM
5

I would say, in this case, the bias in alimony distribution is greatly overshadowed by the "you got hosed, and now you have to handle this mess, because your government sure as shit doesn't want your problem" factor.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 02:01 AM
-2

You are being massively upvoted, and the troll is being downvoted. What else do you want?
/r/MensRights18/10/10 07:23 PM
1

Booze, dude.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 02:42 PM
10

That makes absolutely no sense. Single people don't give blanket consent to entire groups of people. Marriage has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 02:41 PM
2

Society often romanticizes that, too. Think Bruce Willis in Armageddon.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 09:20 PM
2

May I be needlessly pedantic for a moment? One could argue that financial abuse would be abusing the current vicitm's bank account (finances), while economic abuse would be damaging their process for acquiring new sources of revenue (economy).
/r/MensRights07/10/10 03:37 PM
1

As for 1) I personally was conditioned to treat all DV as worthy of calling the police. In this particular story, it seems more a case of the bystander effect. As I said, though, he should have called the fuzz. 2) We don't really know, though, do we? Again, its a fine line, which is why I made sure to point out that I didn't downvote. I just think it belongs in a larger context.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 04:35 PM
1

Is this an animation class or an advertising class? I suppose it only matters if you want feedback...
/r/MensRights05/10/10 12:53 PM
2

I'm not going to downvote you, but this seems more about you seeing an abusive relationship first hand, than a MR issue. Yes, you SHOULD have called the police, hopefully, next time, (if there is one) you will. For those of us who unfortunately GREW UP seeing this, we know that either party can be the abuser, and that it can REALLY fuck someone up for life.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 12:47 PM
7

Good article. I had a lot of these same feelings while I was still on the dating scene as well. And the most interesting line to me was: Today, though, there is no stan­dard sce­nario for meet­ing and mat­ing, or even relat­ing. For one thing, men face a situation—and I’m not exag­ger­at­ing here—new to human his­tory. Never before have men wooed women who are, at least the­o­ret­i­cally, their equals—socially, pro­fes­sion­ally, and sexually. But it does make a few generalizations that I take i…
/r/MensRights05/10/10 12:30 PM
2

Absolutely. I don't know the ins and outs of newfie law, and if this were about hunting negligence, I would agree (although, you should ALWAYS wear orange, especially if you know there are other hunters in the area). But that doesn't make it murder.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 12:02 PM
3

The judge said Mr. Harshbarger walked back to the truck alone, after his guide stopped in the trees to urinate. He was not wearing hunter orange or other bright clothing, and he was hunched over -- looking at the rough ground -- when he came toward her.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:00 PM
1

high school girls != pro athletes who signed a CBA acknowledging the presence of locker room reporters.
/r/MensRights15/09/10 03:30 AM
4

To be clear, I was just explaining his post. I don't know if this town offers any boy-specific classes at all.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 07:41 PM
4

To make an analogy, you could ask why boys are being offered those toy pink tool sets. Its because the regular tool set is assumed to be the "boy" one.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 07:30 PM
1

I get that they are both wrong. The parent comment seems to want to make them both acceptable. To me, that is not acceptable, either.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 05:03 PM
-1

A gun makes everyone equals for a while. Just ask Phil Hartman.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 01:34 AM
5

Laughing at abuse is "natural"? I thought we wanted to work toward NO ONE being abused, not an agreement that it is ok because both sides do it...
/r/MensRights26/08/10 01:30 AM
1

/r/chesthair go go go!
/r/MensRights23/08/10 08:00 PM
4

If this were in the US (which it isn't), then no. BUT, if he ever dies due to AIDs, she could then possibly charged with ACTUAL murder. The precedent being when people die from wounds inflicted (sometimes decades previously) by another person.
/r/MensRights23/08/10 03:58 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jukQX2pl2Q
/r/MensRights22/08/10 10:57 PM
3

Money is a fungible commodity.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 10:55 PM
7

Money is a fungible commodity. Any money given to support the child "frees up" money to be spent on the caretaker. Itemizing receipts would make no difference, unless you also had a system to reject certain expenses. If the kids are being neglected, that is a case for DSS to take up with the caregiver. If they are NOT being neglected, the non-custodial parent shouldn't get to nit-pick where the kid's money goes. They may not think they need to go to sleep-away camp, but who makes the call?
/r/MensRights22/08/10 10:51 PM
6

You are conflating child support with welfare.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 06:42 PM
2

I have a feeling that ANYONE facing life in prison, male or female, would try to seek as many special privileges as they can. Look at how many people "convert" while behind bars....
/r/MensRights22/08/10 02:22 PM
3

Why do you say it was premeditated? She didn't go home and get the car and then come back looking for him. And she didn't knowingly run down an innocent man, (she didn't know he was innocent). I said before that I think 2nd-degree murder is the right charge here, and unless new details emerge, I stand by that.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 02:20 PM
0

Pedestrianizing while black?!?! He totally deserved it then!
/r/MensRights22/08/10 02:17 PM
-4

This is about someone fighting back against an attacker. Much like killing someone in self-defense. I couldn't quite make out the details, but if this happened on the same night, it could at least be argued. I punched my wife, but i had a shit day at work so there were mitigating circumstances. Your wife didn't give you a shit job. I smoked weed but i have chronic pain so there were mitigating circumstances. Medical Marijuana is become legal more and more. I was doing 120 on the interstate but i…
/r/MensRights22/08/10 02:16 PM
2

How was it premeditated? She saw the guy (some black guy?) and gunned it. Second Degree sounds about right to me (if she gets that). A plea-bargain for vehicular manslaughter is more likely, though.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 02:13 PM
9

Well, it is actually very more likely to be killed (or raped, or sexually abused) by someone you know. It is even more sensationalized that there are serial rapists lurking behind every tree (so ladies need to order that Broadview security today!!). In this case, all we have to go on is a police report who say he is a "person of interest", and a defense lawyer, who says his client is innocent (shocking!). If his watertight alibi consists solely of the time line he gave to the police, I would act…
/r/MensRights19/08/10 12:23 PM
3

I bet it was "Arithmetic" at first, but the manager made them change it because too many people were trying to buy that Arithmetic brand corn oil they had on sale...
/r/MensRights16/08/10 01:07 AM
10

Corn Oil: what happens to kids who don't study. And try new Soylent Green Corn oil! Now with 25% more children!
/r/MensRights16/08/10 01:05 AM
0

If they are in the middle of nowhere, how would anyone know about it to care?
/r/MensRights12/08/10 12:38 PM
6

It doesn't seem to me like she is "getting away with it" at all...
/r/MensRights11/08/10 11:54 PM
4

And he refused to even suggest that he did not. Presumption of innocence is a bitch if the victim isn't talking.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 12:40 AM
7

Training camp just started, and Monday Night Football is a few months away. Geez, don't you watch ESPN?
/r/MensRights04/08/10 02:37 PM
1

Let's back up here. Are you saying that ALL welfare is bad? That everyone on welfare is a "Welfare Queen"? While it is true that, like any system, some people may abuse it, if you think that all child support is just welfare, we may as well stop this thread right here, because your premise is flawed. Also, my dad didn't want 50/50 custody. A lot of dads don't want custody at all. A lot of mom's are not fit to be parents. (And vice versa). Think about it. What about moms/dads that have multiple k…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 12:14 PM
1

You simply CANNOT equate child support to welfare queens. 1st: Welfare is paid by the state, not by fathers. 2nd: You are confusing child support with alimony. I watched firsthand as my mother went thousands of dollars into debt raising my brothers and I while my father paid as little as possible, and intentionally roadblocked any attempt to pay a fair amount. She was by no means a welfare queen.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 02:15 AM
1

While this might be a valid topic, this article uses a very poor example to make its case. A person earning 12k/year will NEVER get out of poverty, whether they pay child support with 0 interest, 1%, or 9%. There are lots of valid arguments for (and against) this policy, that are not brought up. Just off the top of my head: If a parent is raising children, and has to go into debt because their partner is not paying CS, shouldn't that money be repaid with interest? What if one partner just spent …
/r/MensRights03/08/10 08:52 PM
-3

Because the kid still exists, and can't feed himself. ONCE THE KID IS OUT, it is the responsibility of both parents. What we need is a pill for men.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:38 AM
2

But, its like that EVERYWHERE. Post a joke on /r/funny, and it will get a few downvotes before anyone even has time to read it, no matter how funny the joke is. Comment karma is almost totally unreliable until +2 hours after a comment is made.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 01:52 PM
1

Are you kidding? Canada s nothing but Hockey, Beer, and Fishing. They practically INVENTED white trash.
/r/MensRights30/07/10 06:01 PM
1

It probably will be.
/r/MensRights30/07/10 06:00 PM
1

Life sentence?
/r/MensRights22/07/10 04:10 PM
5

In addition to the author of the article, it cites another case where a woman was arrested for having pictures of her breastfeeding her child...
/r/MensRights20/07/10 11:30 PM
4

[citation needed, but not expected]
/r/MensRights30/06/10 01:47 AM
1

But at least then he would have known she was lying months earlier, BEFORE they seized his assets. And he could have called her out for lying to him about it, along with implementing a plan to prove the kid was living with him, rather than going back and having to dig up receipts after the fact.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 12:10 PM
3

Me too. And I had a great father's day. Hope you did as well.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 02:33 AM
7

This woman was crazy. Why he married her, I have no idea. Why he TRUSTED her to sort out his bills, I will never know.
/r/MensRights21/06/10 10:09 PM
13

He spends the first half of that article talking about how horrible his ex-wife is, and the second half shocked...SHOCKED! that she didn't wade through a bunch of bureaucratic red tape so that she could get less money. What kind of a world does this guy live in? If people are sending you bills, OF ANY KIND, DEAL WITH THEM YOURSELF. Call the dept. Ask if they have been contacted. Sort it out BEFORE you bank account gets seized. As a child of a bitter divorce, I can tell you that ex-wives, and ex-…
/r/MensRights21/06/10 10:07 PM
2

Extradition treaties have been around for years. Do you disagree with them, too?
/r/MensRights18/06/10 02:32 PM
8

No. If you are watching a kid 30% of the time, you are not assuming 30% of the cost. Things like insurance, school supplies, clothes, gifts to friends birthday parties, new shoes, and athletic fees would almost always be paid by the primary caretaker. Child Support goes to a lot more than just food & shelter.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 01:22 PM
11

Not forever, but he SHOULD get some money, much like women who put their careers on hold for men should. In an ideal situation, this would be decided by competent people, on a case by case basis, but when absurd amounts of money like this are involved, things can get out of control. In this case, she is paying him 1/14th of her weekly "income" (for which she does not work)...to relate, if a person made 50k/year, it would be like paying ~70 dollars/week. What makes this case special is that NEITH…
/r/MensRights14/06/10 11:57 PM
5

Some people who did something I don't like still have jobs! (so vote republican!)
/r/MensRights13/06/10 02:54 PM
2

Rephrase your question in a serious manner, and you wouldn't get "flamed to shit for this". As is, you are just trolling for downvotes, either for lulz, or so that you can feign outrage that noone wants to have a "real conversation".
/r/MensRights09/06/10 01:59 AM
2

nah. Vaccines cause skin cancer!
/r/MensRights31/05/10 04:40 PM
4

Putting on suntan lotion isn't "manly", I guess?
/r/MensRights31/05/10 04:40 PM
1

OK, so since I am anti-death penalty in any situation, I am against this, too. That is a discussion on capital punishment, though, not Men's Rights. As for requiring background checks, I have to ask, what if it turns something up? Is it automatic disqualification? Only for violent offenses? Offenses against children? What if I was arrested for Possession with intent to distribute back in college, because I was holding onto some pot (note to anyone who knows me: I wasn't!)? And what if BOTH paren…
/r/MensRights21/05/10 08:28 PM
9

Its drivel, but come on, its also from dating.personals.yahoo.com. Go somewhere else if you want intelligent writing.
/r/MensRights21/05/10 08:20 PM
2

Dude, see a therapist. I grew up in the same time frame, and saw a lot of the same things you did, but you seem to have internalized them on a level much more severe than most people of our generation. If you didn't have a good male role model growing up, (as implied by your "all female household"), then you need to take it upon yourself to define what you think you should be proud of. Don't leave it up to commercials or sitcoms or whatever you see on TV. Did you play sports in high school? Mayb…
/r/MensRights19/05/10 02:32 PM
2

Agreed. Some context would be nice.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 02:39 PM
5

I love the big Samoan who threatens to kill the kid's dog. Shit just got real.
/r/MensRights17/05/10 03:40 PM
1

Looks to me like he was groping her, too. I would say that goes beyond offending...
/r/MensRights17/05/10 03:33 PM
1

But, this was at a playground, not a park (in the sense you are implying - wide open grassy spaces). Yes, slides are AWESOME, but they are designed to be used only by kids (and teenagers smoking pot after dark). EDIT: Also, kids aren't allowed on the softball field when adults have their league matches, so it does roughly even out, like in your dog park scenario)
/r/MensRights30/04/10 06:53 PM
1

Ignoring the MR issue, this is exactly how taxes work. Everyone pays for schools, but not everyone can go through them whenever they want. You pay taxes on the whole road, but you can only drive on the right side. You don't get to only pay taxes on the services you need/use.
/r/MensRights29/04/10 03:20 PM
2

I think the formula here is simple. Pick a fight with a larger website, hope that they see it and get outraged, and watch the clicks come rolling in.
/r/MensRights29/04/10 03:06 PM
1

Does pole dancing count as a skill? Strippers can make up from 150k to 300k per year (I was actually shocked by this number, too. I was just trying to google some random salaries, to show that there is an actual range of salaries for unskilled jobs, as done by both sexes.)
/r/MensRights27/04/10 12:42 AM
3

Dangerous jobs don't pay necessarily more. I sit on my ass all day, and make plenty of money.
/r/MensRights26/04/10 11:38 PM
1

I think you meant to add the Target Women link, not the SNL link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ7nBugejXs
/r/MensRights21/04/10 05:01 PM
3

go for it. Her Jewelry rant is spot-on, too
/r/MensRights19/04/10 06:37 PM
5

http://current.com/shows/infomania/91442708_sarah-haskins-in-target-women-broadview-security.htm ^ Smart women think this is stupid, too!
/r/MensRights19/04/10 05:20 PM
1

At my swimming pool, the age limit is 5. It seems to be a pretty arbitrary line to draw. I think 5 is fine, because at that age, they absolutely need help getting changed. 8 may be a bit old...where would YOU set the limit?
/r/MensRights16/04/10 03:12 AM
2

Why would moderators scare you? I am talking about an opt-in service for people who WANT moderation.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 05:54 PM
1

Other people have pointed out a lot of the pros and cons of this article, but I haven't seen this mentioned: (paraphrasing) Ladies, you get the same hostile environment that men get. Like it or leave it. I have to take exception to this. XBox Live, and online PC gaming is for everyone, and they shouldn't have to leave if it is offensive to them. But they shouldn't rant on random forums, either. They should figure out that there is a demand for this, from both women AND men, and find a way to sat…
/r/MensRights10/04/10 08:41 PM
1

you said: If you see the child for 2 days a week, then you should pay child support equivalent to 3 days. I said you should pay more, because during your two days, you are not supporting the full cost of the child, just their food, entertainment, etc. You then said: I think custody arrangements should include a requirement of paying for 50% of health costs, clothing costs, etc... I guess I don't see how your two ideas jibe.
/r/MensRights10/04/10 03:26 AM
2

right, but what I am saying is that just because you (or your partner, if the roles are reversed) are watching the kids 2/7ths of the week, you are not relieving 2/7ths of the cost-burden. Perhaps a split formula. Some determined by time-of-custody, but supplemented by a minimum amount that must be paid. Sort of like the US Congress. The House gives more representation to states with higher populations (more custody time), but the Senate balances that by giving every state a minimum voice...
/r/MensRights10/04/10 01:59 AM
3

re: #3 I think this sort of math could really disadvantage one person. If you see your child 2 days/week, you are likely seeing them on weekends, which have a much different cost-need than weekdays. One person needs to be designated the "primary" custodian, and then be responsible for things like Dental Work, School Clothes, and all those birthday presents he has to bring to his friend's parties. It really sucks, but there is no simple formula for determining things like this, especially because…
/r/MensRights10/04/10 01:34 AM
1

Not really. This happens all the time with Rally Cars vs NASCAR vs formula 1. I haven't done the research, but I am pretty sure they base the prize on popularity, not on driving distance. But your sentence is a bit ambiguous. When you say: If both races had the same prizes, Do you mean if they had identical prizes, or literally the SAME prize (meaning, there is one 1st place prize, given out to exactly one car, be it civic or sports car)? Now, if the Civics wanted to race IN the Daytona 500, but…
/r/MensRights08/04/10 04:28 PM
1

I would assume it is because these tournaments are, at their core, a business. There is no need to give out any more money that what it takes to attract top talent, and keep the sport thriving.
/r/MensRights08/04/10 03:08 AM
21

There could be valid examples made of this, but this isn't one of them. The prize money at Wimbledon is just that, PRIZE money. It isn't Salary. You don't get more if the match goes into extra sets, either. And besides, what about the person who comes in 2nd? They played just as much as the first place winner, but get much less. The only way I can see this becoming a valid analogy would be, for example, if female golfers (or seniors!) wanted to compete against men, for the men's prize money, but…
/r/MensRights07/04/10 09:05 PM
3

Then the author is a troll
/r/MensRights05/04/10 11:31 PM
3

Come on, dude. I thought Men's Rights was supposed to be about equality, not just bashing women. You can't be linking to some dude's blog, where he complains about an uncited blog post, and throws in lines like this: As a tangent: that statue should've been a dude. It's men who make liberty possible by defending it. Or how he goes off on a liberal-bashing right right after that. Fuck him, I'm a MRA, and a liberal.
/r/MensRights05/04/10 07:45 PM
1

You can be incapable of watching children, but not need to be locked up. Some of my stoner uncles, for example, should never be trusted to babysit kids...
/r/MensRights04/04/10 12:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter