TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

disposable_mail Archive

View 8 posts and 94 comments by disposable_mail on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
277

disposable_mail/r/MensRights14/04/13 12:18 PM
207

disposable_mail/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:13 PM
43

disposable_mail/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:45 PM
11

disposable_mail/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:15 PM
11

disposable_mail/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:55 PM
9

disposable_mail/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:18 PM
7

disposable_mail/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:09 PM
4

disposable_mail/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:32 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

Page #7. Yellow. Third one down. Where are the graphs that say men earn more per hour statistically? The CONSAID report is rather clear that men work more hours. Men are more likely to go to college? What? You need this article http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/08/gender_pay_gap_the_familiar_line_that_women_make_77_cents_to_every_man_s.html and this article http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2013/jul/15/terry-mcauliffe/mcauliffe-says-women-earn-77-percent-mens-pay-sa…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:48 PM
3

Slane girl
/r/MensRights19/10/13 09:20 AM
8

Probably wont see too many arguments for equality in these shit going down scenarios.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:44 PM
18

The only alternative emotion seems to be angry. Not physically violent angry. Thats not allowed.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:16 PM
6

Men have agency Women are objects /s
/r/MensRights06/10/13 03:18 PM
2

These need to be collected and put together into a coffee table book.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:58 PM
5

http://i.imgur.com/xAamBOI.jpg?2
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:09 PM
3

Is this story supposed to be more engaging with the "power" behind the story becomes the man with "real" agency?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:08 PM
6

Interesting. So, this person goes to "The Zoo" and the author paints this woman as having "no plans for a holiday romance."
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:02 PM
5

Folks of men's rights. This thread has obviously been subject to a vote brigade in order to make the top comment a misleading criticism of the science behind the original infographic. Just to be clear, the criticisms raised are without merit. Although the study is flawed, it is flawed in the direction of undercounting male victims of rape not overcounting them. Thats what it seemed like to me, when the top comment said The discussion here has led me to believe this data is both very bad science,…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 08:14 PM
6

Shh. The secret "Jews control the world" meeting is right after the patriarchy meeting. /s
/r/MensRights04/08/13 01:25 PM
4

Well done. Just well done.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:56 PM
3

I think we found your trigger. :)
/r/MensRights01/08/13 11:42 PM
2

I did. The story is really just too complicated to fit in here, so I'm going to keep it short. Its been one long epiphany, and thanks to those people.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 09:00 AM
19

I on the other hand had 31 years of feeling a lot more sensation in my penis and now for the past 2 years have had reduced sensation in my penis. That makes you the authority on the issue at that table. QED. Plus, if any of them were indignant about all the men at the hearings on womens contraception, they might want to take stock of their own hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:15 PM
2

Jailbreak the Patriarchy Except, what you'll see translated doesn't do much to support the paradigm of "patriarchy." It does flip genders easily, though. That part works well.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:10 PM
109

*The whole point of what my generation achieved was to remove from our heads — and from the heads of those who stood in our way — the notion that women were born to be victims. We proved we both could and deserved to stand on our own two feet, equal to one, equal to all. To see a younger generation of self-styled ‘feminists’ come along, turn back the clock and declare themselves victims all over again is, for us, a disappointment. Classical Liberal feminist clashing with young third wave feminis…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:29 PM
15

Excellent, concise bullet points, and a mainstream source.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:26 PM
3

Thanks for the pick-me-up. I really liked this story.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 12:29 AM
45

The only thing that does matter is the best interest of the child. Argument of forced best interests of the child and parenthood somehow never come into play when the woman wants to kill the fetus through abortion, give it up through adoption or dump the baby on the state through safe haven laws. Best interest is used as a bludgeon only if and only if she decides the baby should live and she decides she wants to raise it. Its a bullshit argument. Double standards.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:37 AM
23

Dvorak writes, noting that a government study found that in 96 percent of sexual assaults on children the offenders were male. Wait. What? Haven't we've seen a variety of statistics here to the contrary? In studies that ask students about offenders, sex differences are less than in adult reports. The 2000 AAUW data indicate that 57.2 percent of all students report a male offender and 42.4 percent a female offender with the Cameron et al. study reporting nearly identical proportions as the 2000 A…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:59 PM
7

http://i.imgur.com/wYn4oat.jpg
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:55 PM
2

Also true. This is a macabre, yet grossly relevant discussion.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:51 PM
1

Good additions.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:49 PM
4

Women in SA = 26,581,769 3,600 rapes per day 1,311,300 rapes per year Will take 20.27 years to met population total.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:39 PM
9

Listening to GWW explain the math of reported rapes and false accusations was an experience in patience. Frankly, you'd have a better time explaining how to unpack Ikea furniture to a potato.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:32 AM
1

I am EXTEMELY skeptical of claims that most of the existing gaps are due to purely biological factors. He didn't say the existing gap was purely biological.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 07:27 AM
6

You've likely heard about it in school. In 1907 a mine collapse in WV killed over 300 miners. In 1911 one occurred in NM that killed over 200. All men. Likely you hadn't heard of either. I hadn't before I looked in to it. Rarely do I read a post and have it resonate so hard like this one did.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:11 PM
1

In the quote, the "m" is not capitalized. I capitalized it. This requires square brackets around the modified text http://writingcommons.org/research/integrate-evidence/incorporate-evidence/inserting-or-altering-words-in-a-direct-quotation
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:57 PM
2

I think about this, and how hypergamy is used here, but something recent happened that made me see this in a different angle. This article came around and it made the 'rounds on social media. I saw complaint after complaint about the unfair conditions when a simple portion was left out in the article or the discussion: stay at home dads. Anecdotal information, sure. It was just amazing to see everyone not even register it as an option.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:50 PM
1

So close... then he repeats the wage gap myth. Worse, he mentions all the ways in which women are surpassing men, then goes straight for a 1% example of CEO's to explain "the 'hollow' patriarchy" Gosh, what about the majority of men and women you just described? "Meanwhile, women’s rise to economic dominance within the middle class continues. Since 1996, women have earned more bachelor’s degrees than men, and last year they started earning a greater number of master’s and doctoral degrees. It is…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:04 AM
24

best interests of the child, The best interests argument is a farce. The best interests of the unborn baby or newborn come into play after the mother has chosen to not kill it or give it to the state. It is a double standard then to claim, after the mother has made the choice to keep the baby alive and to not give it up, that the father has obligations based on best interests of the child.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:08 PM
-1

And cases where the 'damsel' is a minority and/or male aren't? Only about 100 missing-child reports each year fit the profile of a stereotypical abduction by a stranger or vague acquaintance. Two-thirds of those victims are ages 12 to 17, and among those eight out of 10 are white females, according to a Justice Department study. Nearly 90 percent of the abductors are men, and they sexually assault their victims in half of the cases.....government research shows that victims of nonfamily abductio…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:18 PM
-2

Saw this in my facebook feed, noted 4 people I've met at functions approving of it. Not sure what to think about either my line of work or who I associate with at the moment.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:32 PM
5

" We see almost no coverage of missing boys, or missing children of color" For this issue in particular, there is a reason for it. An astounding 2,300 Americans are reported missing every day, including both adults and children. But only a tiny fraction of those are stereotypical abductions or kidnappings by a stranger. For example, the federal government counted 840,279 missing persons cases in 2001. All but about 50,000 were juveniles, classified as anyone younger than 18. Only about 100 missi…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:11 PM
7

I want to thank OP and everyone who is providing constructive criticism for this. It would be great if, through a collaborative effort, the data was met with rigorous scrutiny so we could use this infographic without the possible derailment of pedantic inaccuracies. I would love to use this after it has gone through some tough criticism here.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 12:12 PM
3

I'm seeing it in some of the replies. Logical fallacies everywhere and desperate attempts to throw PoMo/relativist arguments on discussions where they don't fit.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 08:21 PM
1

And it certainly matters for your overall goal as well, too. If this is a choice men invite, then our focus should be on changing their attitudes about these decisions. You are trying, real hard, to make "institutional" happen. You cant contort something men dont want to happen into "a choice men invite." You set out to prove this wasn't a choice. You haven't done so You need reading comprehension skills. "Men who work 50 to 60 hours a week want to work an average of 13 fewer hours; those workin…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:12 AM
1

Now its The only word of yours I'm arguing against is the "nope" to Everything you wrote just now is wrong. Your argument is quite schizophrenic. You don't understand the structure of the argument. Says the person who has, so far, brought a strawman argument, shifting goal posts, a red herring, and two cases of projection to the discussion. you are more in the mood to argue than to think clearly. ....make that three cases of projection. This thread has sufficiently corrected the omission, and no…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 09:53 PM
1

You've moved the goal posts from I just showed that your statement was factually incorrect. To The only word of yours I'm arguing against is the "nope" Gosh. Will we now define exactly what I was "noping," rather than focusing the glaring absence in your initial statement, the use of a poor citation that agreed with my position, and skip over your shifting goalposts? You'll excuse me if I find that to be a worthless red herring.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 09:31 PM
1

Projection I just showed that your statement was factually incorrect. to I didn't respond to the rest of your post because it's not necessarily wrong You have arbitrary standards designed to "win" internet arguments. You said, "X does not exist. Y exists." Strawman. Here is what was said: -- You: but if I remember correctly, studies that control for those factors still have men living shorter lives. This isn't too surprising, since men and women are different enough to have different health issu…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 09:11 PM
1

This the the fucking internet, not a scientific paper I have standards for evidence. your statement was factually incorrect ? You never showed this below was factually incorrect. Never. Men set to live as long as women, figures show The reason could be down to men living a healthier lifestyle. "One of the main reasons, I think, is the trend in the prevalence of smoking. Smoking took off after 1920 in the male population and at its high about 80% of males smoked. Other factors are thought to be s…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:51 PM
2

In some lines of work, its career suicide. She would have to up and leave her life.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:21 PM
0

I'm not impressed with a wikipedia citation, the organization that the founder himself states people should not cite. Please, try again. added: The argument you want is on telomeres and two X chromosomes and how that relates to genetic replication. The problem with that is on how these trends show, a decidedly narowing gap.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:00 PM
4

Those things contribute, but if I remember correctly, studies that control for those factors still have men living shorter lives. Nope Men set to live as long as women, figures show The reason could be down to men living a healthier lifestyle. "One of the main reasons, I think, is the trend in the prevalence of smoking. Smoking took off after 1920 in the male population and at its high about 80% of males smoked. Other factors are thought to be safer, more office-based, jobs. Millions of men used…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:44 PM
2

People do all kinds of things they don't want to As I mentioned above, the relativist argument doesnt work as men do it more, and do not like it. "They don't want to" is not proof that this is institutional, Frankly, whether it is institutional and how you define institutional is irrelevant and will drag this into a non-sequir and endless discussion on what "institutional" is. Its a fluid term and this point on biological stress and death is interesting on how can sidestep this meandering. What …
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:32 PM
3

Men are working the extra hours, and they don't want to. Plain as day. That analysis did not say men are forced to work these hours. Right. They have a choice to be unemployed, instead.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:00 PM
5

Is that a personal choice that these men are making? Theres only four lines of text there. Two of which says - "Men who work 50 to 60 hours a week want to work an average of 13 fewer hours; those working more than 60 hours a week would prefer to work a stunning 25 less."" How could you miss that?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:14 PM
4

Start here Roughly 40 percent of college-educated men work 50 hours a week or more — often much more — compared with just 14 percent of college-educated women. Men who work 50 to 60 hours a week want to work an average of 13 fewer hours; those working more than 60 hours a week would prefer to work a stunning 25 less." Keep reading here men are 2.25 to 1 times as likely to work overtime as women men work 2.65 to 1 times as much overtime as women
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:44 PM
8

Men run the world, so you run the world. Kind of how the Lakers are a team filled with men, so all men are Lakers. Actually had a hard time hitting reply button from movement due to laughter.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:40 PM
31

You missed a bold The average married woman receiving Social Security benefits will outlive her husband by eight years. We die 8 years earlier. This isn't supposed to happen, but does, and its one of the most profound forms of unspoken gender inequality in society. Relativistic or Po Mo arguments have a hard time saying dying earlier is better for an entire gender.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:54 AM
2

Counterpoint Kitty Pryde says Danny Brown's onstage oral sex incident was sexual assault Danny Brown's Oral Sex Incident Gets A New Look Courtesy Of Kitty Pryde
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:17 PM
1

Can you give us an approximate time to fast forward to?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 09:03 AM
17

The first google hit. Its loaded with it. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8e/US_Race_Household_Income.png
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:45 PM
15

Sadly, the last part is necessary. Poes law.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:59 PM
120

"White people are disproportionately wealthier than non whites" Nope. Asians are the wealthiest. Then, break it down to religion. http://i.imgur.com/0T64cwC.png Source
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:05 PM
2

Here is a start. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ch1rg/is_the_apex_fallacy_a_type_of_logical_fallacy/
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:51 PM
0

Describe your definition of patriarchy in detail, please.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 11:35 PM
21

I didnt make it. I just thought the original needed to be here.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 08:46 PM
159

Original for comparison
/r/MensRights16/04/13 07:56 PM
1

Before hand they were making a bet. thats where the 1000 bucks comes from. if you want to see it, just watch the youtube video from the beginning (use the slider).
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:19 PM
13

The logic behind declaring this an MRA attack seems to be simply that she became famous for criticizing the MRM. So naturally anything bad that happens to her after this is some plot by the MRA grande conspiracy. There should be a conspiracy metric. If you replace "men" with "Jews," how does that sound? Example: There is an overrepresentation of men Jews in the media, so there are natural male Jewish interests. Sound conspiratorial? Sound crazy? If so, reconsider the corresponding argument on pa…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:15 PM
6

"same to u fag" I was instantly reminded by the ugly Louie video, and how "faggot" was used to shame male sexuality when a male was rejecting unwanted advances.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 10:37 AM
4

I've done it to leave amicably. Sometimes its just not a good experience, but the person is nice and you don't want to create trouble.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 10:08 AM
8

the there's a secret Zionist Conspiracy based in Jerusalem that controls the world kind of proves that the Jews are actually running the world . By the way, the Zionist conspiracy meeting has been relocated to make way for the secret Patriarchy meeting. Please adjust your calendars.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:35 PM
3

My favorite thing is how friendly and polite everyone is here. Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:22 PM
2

This is a very general reply without specifics. What is cherry picked? What is incorrect here?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:01 PM
13

Your analysis is fantastic and extremely insightful, and I secretly hope to see you go to graduate school to turn things upside down. I enjoy the videos, but it is my impression that you outclass your opponents, and they are there simply to create a cohesive theme for your next video. Its more inspiration than it is a debate. I wonder what you could do given the opportunity to work within the system, with funding. This is a hijack, and I just wanted to say that.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:18 PM
9

For instance, you might have two people convicted of drug possession with incredibly disparate sentences, but the person with the harsher sentence had two prior convictions for felonious assault and had an illegal gun in his possession when he was arrested. I see your point, and I'm going to stick on sexism and comparing like for like. This issue of prior conviction (comparing like for like) actually magnifies the second conviction. In other words, when "females arrested for a crime are also sig…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 01:42 PM
9

Theres a king, a few generals, and a whole bunch of men running over the top, getting mowed down. If those men over the top make it, they can expect to go home to a "The Jungle" hell-hole of workplace injury and death. We could as easy be discussing serfs and sharecroppers form other ages. Public recreations of other times are rife of this view from the top. Sure, the Renaissance Faire has knights and kings, but a severe shortage of serfs shoveling manure. Lets be sure to look at the whole of me…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 01:27 PM
14

I used to chat with this sociologist down the hall. We were discussing crime, and I wanted to know how confirmation bias affected her. I proposed a series of conditions to her on poverty and possible outcomes. She suggested this would support her paradigm perfectly. I then showed her that the data was the exact opposite of what I proposed. I constructed it to be the exact opposite. My mouth dropped open when she then argued how this data, too supported her paradigm. It was shameless confirmation…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 01:04 PM
12

When people make the assumption that patriarchy benefits all (or dial it back to most) men, they always seem to focus on the top performers, while ignoring the workplace deaths, the suicides, the overall lower life expectancy, how males arrested for a crime are also significantly more likely to receive charges and convictions entirely, and twice as likely to be incarcerated if convicted, how 40 percent of college-educated men work 50 hours a week or more — often much more — compared with just 14…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:50 PM
93

He refutes the commonly-accepted theory of patriarchy, asking how men could really hold all the power when society treats them as the most “disposable” sex. Quotes weren't really necessary for disposable.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 11:50 AM
1

Considering this is coming from the AEI, I wonder if the GOP is going to consider using mens rights issues as means to remodel their domestic platform. Simple and direct points like the gap in education, and criticizing anyone using the 77 cents to a dollar myth are easy points to score. It seems like an easy fit. It could bring these issues to the center stage.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:29 AM
30

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/11/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742.html The study found that men receive sentences that are 63 percent higher, on average, than their female counterparts. Starr also found that females arrested for a crime are also significantly more likely to avoid charges and convictions entirely, and twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted. Other research has found evidence of the same gender gap, though Starr asserts that the disparity i…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:21 AM
3

This post is just brilliant. I love the term "Kafka Trapping," and I intend to use it.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:35 PM
5

Let me think about this. I know its the internet, and its out there and all that... but my first intentions were to keep this party low key. I don't know if I'm ready for the big time.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:23 PM
3

I think I'm going to store this away for the next unexpected time I run into someone like this. This particular person, I am going to avoid. drag you into a war in the Middle East. Yes, I am definitely going to avoid. Far, far away.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:22 PM
2

Thanks. Re-re-read your post and noticed my question did not make sense. Thanks for the input. (For anyone wondering what it was, I misread "make your victim the villain," and missed the point on that, asking for elaboration.)
/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:16 PM
1

Maybe thats it, really. These examples I have of male collaboration are hierarchical. You can speak freely, but when the plan is set, everyone works towards it.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:56 PM
1

I would like to read more about this. Its a striking difference for me. However, when there is a high stress environment, a male heirarchy is there. There also is male collaboration, but you execute the plan, even if you think its an "ok" plan, because coming together in an emergency on an OK plan is much better than waiting forever on a perfect plan. Non essential or emergency? I've noticed a much different dynamic.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:31 PM
3

Consider this done.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:18 PM
12

If anything, I need to get a smartphone recording app so I can answer these questions reliably in the future.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:16 PM
1

Thanks for responding and thanks for the videos. I really like them.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:16 PM
6

learning how to anticipate this sort of situation and have a set of techniques for dealing with them. I'm interested. I also see the side bar. I assume I should go there for a foundation on these techniques and apply them to my own personal style? I also agree that being aggressive would be counter-productive in such an environment. That's why I'm suggesting a more devious approach of appearing to play nice but really setting traps that will undermine and antagonize your opponent. If you stay ca…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:12 PM
16

Where the term "mansplaining" is dealt with not as a loaded term, but used seriously to determine whether I'm one of the "good ones," seems like the place where you find out exactly what the term "Pyrrhic Victory" means.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:05 PM
1

Interesting.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:02 PM
4

What a great question. I have most certainly seen very cooperative male environments, but it has been in more high stress areas. Perhaps this is a great reason to look forward to a new work environment. I will pay specific attention to this when observing new places.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:52 PM
5

I am not 100 percent on this. What I wrote above is my best recollection. I do recall once I regained composure was the lively debate on mansplaining.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:49 PM
10

Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:41 PM
3

I hope so. You have to make these decisions fast, and it is hard to figure out what the right course is.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:41 PM
23

Is she senior to you or in some position of authority or power over you? I'm wondering why you backed down so completely under her attacks. I don't want to give a lot of details. To answer the question: No. She is not my superior. Also, your question is something that I have been monday morning quarterbacking myself over. At the time, I needed to assess and size up the situation - right then. My assessment then was here was a group where I was the outsider. I have a defender, but I do not know h…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:38 PM
20

Thanks for your input. In some ways, its just really relieving to be able to type it out and have someone understand what I'm saying and maybe share their experience.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:20 PM
4

Certainly it is statistics of small numbers. Lets say in my other work, when it gets dangerous, male teams work together well. In my nerdier life, it is very antagonistic among males. Women have a much more collaborative and helpful environment. It is my small experience, and it comes from a very small and limited sample size that in no way can represent the whole.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter