TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

divers69 Archive

View 2 posts and 73 comments by divers69 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
60

Social Issuesdivers69/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:12 PM
37

Social Issuesdivers69/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:13 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-38

Then you are fooling yourself into believing that an interpretation is a fact.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:15 PM
-37

I substantially agree but I don't think that you can conclude that she lied. She might have. Or she might have become genuinely convinced of her memory, perhaps via pressure from others. There is a whole volume of learning about memory in this case. Alas I don't think that it is being examined.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:11 PM
2

Hi I was a psychologist for many years and have taken SSRIs myself, so I have some thoughts on this. First, I cannot advise you whether or not to stop taking them. I dont know your situation. This is something you need to discuss with Drs/therapist as appropriate. Id suggest that you reflect on the anger in particular, and think about where it fits in all this. However, if you decide to stop, then be aware that symptoms are pretty common. Forewarned is forearmed in things like this! Brain zaps, …
/r/MenSupportMen22/08/21 09:42 AM
-4

Get a life, bot dude.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 06:16 PM
-15

Its not lenient treatment of women like this that is the problem. Its the harsh treatment of men in similar circumstances.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 06:12 PM
1

Lowly beta simp is inappropriate language,
/r/MensRights12/01/21 06:22 PM
6

It is a poor and ill informed article. The appeal was not granted on the basis of coercive control, it was granted on the basis that she had mental health problems that were not made clear to the court at the time. Of course if such an approach were taken in similar cases with male perpetrators it would be interesting. A couple of other facts are omitted; when she was found near Beachy Head, she is reported as saying 'if I cant have him, no one can'. Also she placed a hammer in her bag when she …
/r/MensRights21/12/20 03:45 PM
1

I look forward to it, as it should highlight the odd place where women are really paid less, and undermine the fantasy that in europe and north america women are paid less for the same work . This should show the gender pay gap for the myth it is, but of course all that will happen is that it will be re-defined and the process will go on... Of course fairness should require that employers publish data on deaths and serious injury by gender , but I wont hold my breath.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 09:01 AM
2

It seems that the woman who attacked him got a year in prison, but the driver was seen as showing a lack of control and an inappropriate response (but it doesnt say what that was), even though he said that he thought he might die in the attack. Impossible to judge that one without the video evidence. Would they have done the same if a woman driver was attacked? Im guessing not.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 11:19 AM
1

Bates is like a modern day witchfinder general, touring the country to find witchcraft. We know what the outcome will be. Its reminiscent of the USSR where NKVD/KGB were despatched to find traitors in particular areas. They never returned empty handed.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 11:45 AM
4

Great analysis. Its no great surprise as you only have to eyeball the data to smell the rat; 2 out of 19 countries in their sample (Belgium and Bolivia) have especially bad outcomes compared to the greater sample (the 196 countries in the world). This is about 11% of their 19 cases, and suggests that the proportion of bad outcomes among female led countries is no different to the male led ones. The paper makes no mention of this. With a small sample, case matching of all 19 (including Belgium an…
/r/MensRights21/08/20 12:07 PM
1

A superb and well referenced post. Useful as a reference. My hope is that we are now in the position where we were when I was younger; then, casual racism, sexism against women and homophobia were everywhere. It seemed like it would never change. Then, rather like the collapse of the USSR, there seemed to be a massive shift (in fact it took 20 years or so I guess). I desperately hope that the current sexist bigotry might go the same way in a massive shift of the tide. The problem is that the big…
/r/MensRights06/08/20 10:22 AM
10

She is a hero. She suffered the most vicious hate filled abuse and fought back.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 10:04 AM
2

The claim is a bit of a stretch. Mothers are one of the perpetrators in 83% of cases, but in most of these they jointly abuse with a male partner or relative. In 28% of cases it was mother alone., compared to 16% or so men alone. Almost a 2:1 ration but this is for the monority of all cases, so its a bit misleading. The true value of this evidence is that it puts a hole right through the 'violence against women and girls' BS. It shows that women are marginally more likely (54%) to be the abuser,…
/r/MensRights28/07/20 09:38 AM
5

One of the fascinating lines of argument is that he is an addict and thus his memory is untrustworthy. He might not even remember attacking her. Imagine the outrage if this was said of a woman.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 09:24 AM
5

More skewed thinking by the dogmatists. Allegations of dv have become weaponised, masking the danger to children from mothers. They are as likely as fathers to kill their children, and as the CAFCASS review found, half of children killed in families where dv was alleged were not killed by the alleged dv perpetrator. This suggests that either the victim of dv is driven to such lengths that she kills her child, or that perhaps the alleged dv was not the whole story when it came to violence. Either…
/r/MensRights25/06/20 11:02 AM
3

Why?
/r/MensRights24/06/20 10:53 AM
1

Oh fuck off tosser
/r/MensRights19/06/20 03:08 PM
6

The study about the trolley problem is not about feminism. It is about the fundamental bias in favour of women and against men (male disposability). My view is that it is this bias that pervades society and drives a lot of feminist thinking. It is not so much a result of feminist thinking as a cause of some of the distorted attitudes (such as violence against women and girls being somehow worse than violence against men)
/r/MensRights16/06/20 09:32 AM
1

Please dont be so arrogant as to tell me what I really want. If police are first on the scene at any incident they are expected to respond apporopriately until better qualified people arrive. Having caused this guy to fall, they simply carried on regardless and ignored a man with blood coming from his head. As for being ignorant about treatment of head injury, I think the ignorance is yours not mine.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 09:56 AM
1

What I expect them to do is protect and serve. If something happens in front of them, they have a responsibility to act and deal with the situation until better trained people arrive. I am not ingterested in tears, I am interested in decent professional behaviour rather than a disgusting lack of concern.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 10:07 AM
1

Interesting question. At its heart intersectionality is a great concept because it tries to get away from the silly monolithic black/white, male/female, gay/straight dichotomies and acknowledge that life is much more complex than that. It opens the possibility that different people in different circumstances can be disadvantaged. Unfortunately like all world views, feminism has tended to try and incorporate the true meaning of intersectionality into its monolithic perspective. At a psychological…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:23 AM
2

What is most shocking to me is not that the guy fell. It is that the people who pushed him simply carried on. Not one of them showed any human concern or offered assistance to someone who was clearly in trouble. This is how such situations dehumanise people. The appalling military kit they wear adds to this sense of aggression.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:05 AM
8

Everyone has biases, especially the ones who claim to not be biased. I dont think that it is about male or female. Look for someone who seems to think rather than feel. Perhaps ask them about their own biases, that should flush out something. But in reality we can never be sure in advance, as we can all come out with bias in the right circumstances.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:01 AM
2

I see your point. It is a loaded word.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 09:46 AM
1

I think you are really trying too hard to find bias here.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 04:46 PM
1

removed
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:05 PM
1

But dont you realise that should that happen, it would 'be worse for women' , and the whole cycle would begin again.....
/r/MensRights07/04/20 10:13 AM
1

This is ridiculous. It is prioritising women giving birth, not all women. This headline mirrors some of the idiotic complaints by feminists about non existant 'sexism'
/r/MensRights05/04/20 09:48 AM
3

I have read your responses below, and I really believe that you are interested in dialogue, so I want to respond. As a rule I dont like the overuse of personal experiences, but I think it relevant here; I grew up with feminism. My mother was a huge fan of the suffragettes and 70s feminism had a formative impact on my thinking (and I hope on my behaviour). I passionately supported the idea of equality that it espoused. I then worked for over 30 years in heavily female dominated and 'right on' org…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 09:21 AM
1

This is a terrible example of the wrong man being convicted because of a mistaken victim. It is not a 'false rape allegation' as indicated in the title.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 11:22 AM
1

This is ill informed nonsense. The best evidence available is that a majority of rape victims will suffer significant PTSD.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 10:22 AM
5

Ah, sorry. The defence would be either she nagged me and I flipped, or she was shagging someone else and I flipped. The term just encapsulated the two common lines of defence against a domestic murder charge. Both were argued as reasons for distress/loss of control. Akin to the French crime passionelle. Hated by feminists who saw it as men excusing their violence (as indeed it sometimes was) but of course about actions that are now subsumed in the coercive control idea and used to argue understa…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 10:56 AM
2

Shagging is UK slang for fucking.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 10:28 AM
10

In the UK, barristers used to call it the 'nagging and shagging' defence. Feminists used to hate it because 'violence is violence and there is never an excuse.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:01 PM
3

Make a complaint to the governors of the school (you have a witness). This sort of thing makes my blood boil. I dont want to sound nasty, but do make sure that you are succinct. Other information can come in as footnotes or appendices. If they do try the 'men are more a risk to children' shit, point out that most children on the at risk register are being abused/neglected by women, and that mothers kill more of their children than fathers. Good luck.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 11:43 AM
2

To those downvoting, let me elaborate; I worked as a psychologist for some years in the field of paraphilias, including with sex offenders. We dont really know what causes them tbh, but they do seem to be established pretty early. I dont think that we can judge the circumcision story. Autobiographies usually conceal as much as they reveal. It may be that he was tricked , it may be that he suffered from phimosis and needed it doing. We can never know. By the age of 17 Berry is likely to have alre…
/r/MensRights29/10/19 11:41 AM
-11

Highly unlikely
/r/MensRights28/10/19 04:40 PM
8

Its not that only 6% responded. 6.7% reported 'rape' as a first sexual experience. As with other dodgy research, the definition of rape is the interesting part. The researcher said; "If somebody is verbally pressured into having sex, it's just as much rape,” In other words the people reporting often didnt consider themselves as having been raped, it was the researchers who labelled it as rape. Seen this before anywhere?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 08:49 AM
1

Good point, although this survey is a hypoethical comparing hard brexit and joining Eire. My understanding is that the demographics are changing, and I am quite sure that brexit will have an impact. I guess that eventually NI will want to join Eire (and in my view rightly). Im really speaking historically as I am old enough to remember the troubles starting.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 08:46 AM
1

You miss the part where the majority of NI want to be part of the UK.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 09:38 AM
-1

First things first. What is the evidence that rates are skyrocketing? Go beyond that point without evidence and you just make the same error feminist writing often makes.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 01:29 PM
5

For once, she is right. The far right Islamists need to be opposed in a liberal society.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 08:45 AM
2

If the overall lifetime rate of assault is 24%, how can it be only 23% for women and 19% for men?
/r/MensRights20/05/19 11:16 AM
2

There is a slight problem with your argument; In general, the rates of suicide have reduced over the last 50 years.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 12:35 PM
1

Its an interesting idea, but there is absolutelky no evidence that it works.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 10:31 AM
-5

Where he belongs. ​
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:55 PM
1

This guy is a right wing piece of shit with several criminal convictions who gets funding from hard right sources in the USA. This has nothing to do with mens rights. ​
/r/MensRights06/03/19 11:11 AM
1

seconded
/r/MensRights02/03/19 11:22 AM
7

Shes lucky. When men brush up against women at Waterloo station, they end up with a rape allegation. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/man-falsely-accused-of-sexually-assaulting-actress-feels-like-he-has-undergone-mental-torture-a6867366.html
/r/MensRights02/03/19 11:21 AM
-1

Spot on. All groups develop blind spots, and those of us concerned with mens issues are no different. We risk ending up like the man who only has a hammer, who treats the whole world like a nail. We have to avoid the simplistic bigotry that is often present in modern feminist opinions.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:37 AM
1

The important thing about this story is what happened next; She was subject to some dumb comments by a few idiots, and now all anyone talks about is her '600 rape threats'. She managed to turn attention from her bad behaviour to her as 'victim'. It is hard to confront victim culture, but the abuse just gave her the ammo. ​
/r/MensRights05/01/19 11:35 AM
1

Anyone know the source of this? I would like to look at the data.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 11:40 AM
7

This is a superb article. It is well informed and well written. I like to think that I know a lot about the subject (I used to be a psychologist), but I learned a couple of things I didn't know. Thanks for posting the link
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:41 PM
-5

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:20 PM
24

As a psychologist Dr Ford should know that polygraphs are an invalid tool when it comes to determining if someone is lying.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:42 AM
1

I've looked for him saying that women shouldn't be physicists but not found it on his slides. Where is that? I agree that his anger at not getting a job is a real issue and should (in my view) have been dealt with elsewhere.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 12:17 PM
3

I think that this is a push back from that very issue.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:55 PM
5

There is a lot here, too much to respond to in detail; Overall, yes we do not need to speak of a false accusation 'epidemic'. Such language is unhelpful. The proper measure for false allegations is the proportion of the number of rapes reported, so figures about the supposed numbers of rapes overall are irrelevant. For methodological reasons we need to be very cagey about the false accusation rate. Add to this that a lot of the research has been from questionable sources (Lisak for example) and …
/r/MensRights22/09/18 12:32 PM
5

What an excellent post. I agree that at times some mens rights and some feminists mirror each other. Its an incredibly easy thing to do, we feel strongly about something and dig in. We exaggerate facts and seek reasons to justify our view. We attack the 'other', and develop a preciously held sense of victimhood. Good luck , and my suggestion is a donation to anyone helping men/boys who have been abused. ​
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:40 AM
3

Excellent news. Almost worthy of an Archers episode.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:43 PM
4

What an extraordinary example of poor logic. 'I am a woman, this happened to me, therefore it must have happened to me because I am a woman' You might have expected someone with a doctorate to know better. I guess it must happen to me because Im tall and bald.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:41 PM
0

She will accept the award now, but come back in some years time and claim that she didn't really want it, and that she was abused by the people presenting it.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:31 PM
3

I wondered how long it would take before she went down this route. ​
/r/MensRights05/09/18 03:24 PM
1

Using their idiotic reasoning, they should ensure that women do not take their children, as between one third and two thirds of children killed by parents are killed by mothers. https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000112#T1
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:17 PM
1

It is sampling bias. Any clinical sample is a biased sample. It is not intended as offensive, nor should it be taken as such. I think that I am simply pointing out a basic truth. We see the people who end up coming to us, not those who do not come to us. It is a very basic error to think that we can extrapolate from what we see professionally to the field as a whole (in this case the proportion of sex offenders against children who are female). I saw a lot (and I hope learned a lot) over 35 year…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 09:07 AM
9

I suspect that these figures reflect sampling bias. She worked with women offenders, and saw a skewed sample. Its a common mistake that even people who should no better (like psychologists) make. I have no doubt that there are far more women sex offenders than is commonly believed. Current best guesses suggest that 20% of sexually abused males are abused by women, but there are multiple factors that suggest this is an underestimate, starting with a simple denial of the possibility that women abu…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 09:32 AM
10

They were convicted. They behaved in a disgusting manner. Dont waste sympathy on them, they have got away with a very lenient sentence.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:10 AM
2

It depends how you define abusive background! One fact that is frequently missed is that women are often the perpetrator when it comes to homicides of children in their care ; https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000112 I agree with your comments about how a self declared history of abuse gets dealt with differently. The Julie Bindel piece posted above is an example; the woman is said to have had a neighbour spy on her husband, and to have read his e mails, yet he was the coercive controlli…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:56 PM
2

It is not simply a matter of unconscious bias. The guidance issued by the CPS locates Coercive and controlling behaviour as part of its violence against women and girls strategy, and states; 'Controlling or coercive behaviour is primarily a form of violence against women and girls and is underpinned by wider societal gender inequality.' https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/controlling-or-coercive-behaviour-intimate-or-family-relationship It goes on to use the fact that most prosecutions are of …
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:46 PM
0

It isnt a false fact. Women attempt suicide more often, men succeed in killing themselves about 2-3 times more frequently.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:37 PM
32

You make some good points and I agree with the thrust of what you say. I certainly like your warning about not mirroring the blindness of many feminist arguments. However yours is basically a statistical argument, whereas good sentencing should be about the individual crime and criminal. To sentence someone on the basis of gender is no different from sentencing them on the basis of their race or class. To my mind it is prejudiced.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 10:10 AM
2

When my second child was born, I asked to go part time. Most female workers in my department were part time for child care reasons. I was told that it wasn't possible. I will never prove it but my impression was that they just couldnt cope with a man asking for such a thing. At a different place I asked for an alarm and was told they were rape alarms only available to women. I pointed out that men get attacked too (more often in fact) and eventually was given one, but I was treated with contempt…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter