TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dnnastyness1992 Archive

View 13 posts and 107 comments by dnnastyness1992 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That's not theft, it would be fraudulent misrepresentation
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/21 02:56 PM
2

Sluts reduce value of sex. Cucks reduce value of commitment.
/r/MGTOW09/03/21 12:23 PM
1

ASD anti slut defense
/r/MGTOW13/02/21 05:33 AM
11

Most people don't understand this, including PUAs and red guys
/r/MGTOW09/02/21 05:08 AM
1

Start selling roofs for storm restoration?
/r/MGTOW19/01/21 08:04 AM
8

My ex- she was obsessed with me and getting my approval when I just liked her, but when I began to feel strongly for her, she became cold. She broke up with me.
/r/MGTOW11/01/21 06:18 AM
1

be a roofing contractor
/r/MGTOW24/12/20 06:25 AM
1

I agree with her
/r/MGTOW10/10/20 07:44 AM
7

lmao
/r/MGTOW18/08/20 04:21 AM
1

Roofing contractor or insurance adjuster
/r/MGTOW14/08/20 05:41 AM
99

why would you pay anything? gtfo
/r/MGTOW29/07/20 04:35 AM
2

With all due respect, that's not a good reason to go MGTOW. You'd be more like an incel than a MGTOW in my opinion. I agree that it's unfair that kino escalation falls on men, but the reason you're not doing it is out of fear of rejection, which comes from being overly anxious or having low self esteem
/r/MGTOW221/07/20 09:34 AM
1

Id give her a 7
/r/MGTOW12/07/20 03:45 AM
1

This is for any man; from virgins to the extremely good with women/PUA Bad experiences just draw us here But I do have an ex who I genuinely believe to be 98% NAWALT. I don't hate or dislike women I think if you obey 4 things you are legit MGTOW: No living with a woman Seeking your own approval primarily, not women's. No marriage. No kids
/r/MGTOW12/07/20 03:44 AM
1

I had it done, it was super easy
/r/MGTOW10/07/20 03:37 AM
1

People don't always need to hear my side of the story. I am my own judge.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 11:07 AM
2

100 million worldwide you mean?
/r/MGTOW28/03/20 03:05 AM
1

Ok I'll think of a different way
/r/MensRights25/03/20 01:59 PM
2

Good point I like to use this to debate feminists who say Men don't have nearly as many issues as woman, or they say that feminism is already working on them. I am.aure you've heard that before
/r/MensRights25/03/20 01:53 PM
1

It's actually there 3 times
/r/MensRights25/03/20 05:21 AM
1

Social issues under each of the 3 categories 3 different types of social issues and 3 different types if general, or 'institutional' issues
/r/MensRights25/03/20 04:55 AM
3

Good advice
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 11:50 AM
1

The wall just means the beginning of the decline of SMV, doesnt mean they can't get dates
/r/MGTOW20/07/19 03:24 AM
1

how do you see mgtow and society at large in 10 years?
/r/MGTOW18/07/19 03:12 PM
1

This is ridiculously blue pilled
/r/MGTOW12/07/19 06:26 PM
1

STOP SPENDING MONEY ON WOMEN
/r/MGTOW10/07/19 07:50 AM
1

So you pay for what after you've fucked?
/r/MGTOW02/07/19 11:21 AM
3

But why?
/r/MGTOW02/07/19 11:21 AM
2

No, all sex is transactional if you're unattractive
/r/MGTOW02/07/19 12:24 AM
1

Easier to pay?
/r/MGTOW02/07/19 12:23 AM
2

Wow, right, I am surprised that I got downvotes for talking about having sex with girls without paying for them. . . lol Clearly jealousy
/r/MGTOW02/07/19 12:22 AM
6

Why though?
/r/MGTOW02/07/19 12:20 AM
2

Yes!!
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 10:26 PM
2

That's what I am trying to figure out. I think it's out of a sense of decency/duty for some reason.
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 03:52 PM
2

Oh. Do you think paying for dinner really helps you get laid? And do you think this results in transactional sex?
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 03:51 PM
2

Where are you from? I live in the U.S., and here, we do not call it prostitution. It doesn't really have a name besides just being a social custom. To be clear, I don't mean overt prostitution, but I mean paying for a girl's food/drinks etc. because you are intimate or hope to become intimate with her.
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 03:33 PM
2

I know a lot of guys who are attractive enough to not pay for women but they still pay
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 03:29 PM
2

Talk your way into a hole?
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 03:27 PM
3

I know that. I'm not talking about opportunity cost; the woman is accruing opportunity cost in a similar sense. Plus, I would generally rather talk to a girl than work. I am talking about men actually paying money for women
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 03:27 PM
2

Explain please
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 03:05 PM
3

I'm talking about monetary here
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 03:04 PM
0

You don't have to, though. I have fucked and dated a decent amount of attractive women and never paid for them. Amd I'm not some insanely hot Chad.
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 02:42 PM
2

huh?
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 02:41 PM
6

Why isn't the reward your dick?
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 02:36 PM
1

I'll change the wording to say 'equally practical'
/r/MensRights14/02/19 06:08 PM
1

That's why I used the word practically. I don't see it as practical to carry that thing around
/r/MensRights13/02/19 09:16 PM
1

I'll consider putting that on the men's list
/r/MensRights13/02/19 09:15 PM
1

This is not a list of examples of discrimination against women. Read it.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 09:14 PM
1

Okay, well, you're simply being unreasonable, then, because I even have on the list that women can't urinate practically while standing up. As trivial as it is, it's not false
/r/MensRights13/02/19 08:04 PM
1

Where in the U.S. is it legal for women to be topless?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 03:54 PM
1

Ok I'll read this and look into it. I appreciate you helping me out
/r/MensRights13/02/19 03:53 PM
1

I believe all of them items on the list have validity; I don't include nonsense on the list. If you convince me that one of these points is unsound for some reason, I will gladly remove it. Seriously.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 03:37 PM
2

I talk about those issues in the Men's lists. Although, the difference in percentage of custodial fathers vs. custodial mothers who don't receive child support is almost the same, from what I read. Male promiscuity is seen as a sign of status, since it is takes considerable ability to convince a lot of women to have. Female promoscuity is seen as the woman having low standards. Slut, whore, thot are typically seen as pejorative Player, man-whore, stud are typically seen as endeering
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:42 AM
1

Alright, go ahead and debunk them and I'll be actually quite happy, because the main reason I made these lists was to use as a tool to debate feminists.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:37 AM
1

That's a red herring. I address that issue in the Men's Issue list. The issue for women is the legality of it. Though things may be rarely or never prosecuted, I still think it's worth including discriminatory laws
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:36 AM
2

You saw I have a list of Men's Issues, and that it's much longer? How are men jailed for promiscuity?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:20 AM
1

I am absolutely open to your ideas- please link me to some sources
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:18 AM
1

Okay, well feel free to debunk them and I'll seriously consider it. You do know that I think men have more severe issues, right?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:17 AM
1

I never said anything about the frequency at which ot happened. False analogy- only men have penises. Both sexes have nipples
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:16 AM
1

I've actually looked into each of these, and there is convincing evidence for each. Do you have contrary info?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:54 PM
2

Thanks a lot, great information. I added that to the list
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:33 PM
1

Transphobic isn't a proper word ane should never be used IMO
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:03 PM
3

Appreciate the input, but it's still true that female promiscuity is socially punished and male promiscuity is socially rewarded. It's slowly changing, but it has its roots deep in evolution
/r/MensRights12/02/19 02:46 AM
2

Sounds like a good point. Do you have any links where I can find more info?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 02:28 AM
2

I'm confused- what issue do you have with it?. And I see- do you have any articles that talk about that medical early phase trial gender disparity?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 02:11 AM
3

Interesting, I'll ponder all that. Props to the nuanced and balanced viewpoint. Any links about the last stuff?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 01:20 AM
1

Thanks not sure how
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:43 PM
4

No, it's feminist. in the description
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:45 PM
7

Yes, it is really odd. MRAs can be misogynistic and sexist occasionally, ans feminists can be misandric and sexist as well. But I've noticed with feminists that it seems to be more like a cult/religion than MRA, with dogma that is socially punished if you ask questions.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:42 PM
2

Well, yes, the word 'violence' should not be overused like that. That's silly and harmful. But there are ways to change social norms besides through the law.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:38 PM
2

That's a very valid opinion, I'll consider making that two separate items. I want to hold the men's list to the same, or a higher level of scrutiny to the women's list, partially so people can't poke holes in that. I'll think about it :)
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:32 PM
16

Update: I just got banned from r/gendercritical for posting these on there
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:16 PM
1

Would it be aggravated assault and battery if the victim is a minor (otherwise consensual, no force used)? Even so, (traditional sense of the word) rapists who rape men versus rapists who rape women, under this law, would likely have potentially different average sentences. Are you arguing that the Georgia law to which I linked does not have any legitimate use?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 10:05 PM
1

Yeah, it is fair game to bring it up, but as far as I'm concerned, it was a red herring, because I was mostly just responding to your claim about the overt sex discrimination in law. Can you geneuinely not imagine how it could be an advantage? If one group is prioritized in the law as victims, that could arbitrarily result in harsher sentences where a victim is female. This would make it less strongly discouraged to rape a male. That could result in males being raped more. That's not good for ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 09:51 PM
1

I don't particularly wish to get into the red herring that discusses what advantages the law may or may not give to specific groups or individuals*
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 09:33 PM
1

For the Georgia law, there may be other laws that do protect male victims, but this does not appear to be one of them. I don't particularly wish to get into a red herring about how it advantage the law may or may not give. The point is, you were incorrect in stating "There are no overt laws that discriminate on the basis of sex in the US besides the [Selective Service]". Right? The Georgia law discriminates on the basis of sex. Otherwise, why would the descriptor 'female' be in the operative tex…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 09:29 PM
1

Oh, I didn't know you can't see the OP. Like I said, the Constitutionality/legal precedent of laws is interesting, but not at all pertinent or my contentions. Law that tells law enforcement to side with a woman over a man in domestic violence situations with conflicting allegation: https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/2017-05-30/act-2012-005 This rape law says victims, by definition, must be female: https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-6/16-6-1/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 09:00 PM
1

So, FGM is explicitly illegal, but MGM is not? What about the rape law that excludes make victims? And you're maintaining that there's no law (besides Selective Service) that discriminates based on gender/sex? Also, I'm not concerned about this from a Constitutional/administrative aspect of this at all, I'm only concerned with it from an ethical standpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 08:06 PM
1

I should clarify they are not all explicit statements of gender exclusion in the operative texts; I haven't read them all. 13 definitely would count, though
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:44 PM
1

Not 100% sure if 9 is one. If circumcision is legal and female genital mutilation is not, that would be one, although I don't know which statute(s).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:34 PM
1

See 6, 8, 13
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:32 PM
1

But even if Selective Service were the only law affecting one gender, it would still make perfect rational sense to categorize those potentially, explicitly affected as a "group", for the intents and purposes of discussion around that law, and whom it affects, and whom it does not affect.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:29 PM
1

Your statement is incorrect; just briefly skim through the first 10 items on my list for Men's Issues
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:27 PM
1

I generally reject leftism, as well. That's actually a big reason for why I made these documents. You may not consider them in the same "group", but there are certain laws that overtly to discriminate based on gender. Would you dispute that? Wouldn't that be one way in which they could be considered a "group" (a collective of people who are explicitly affected in a certain way by a certain law)?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:04 PM
1

So you don't think enslaving African Americans was systematic oppression? That seems odd, although I agree the term 'systematic oppression' is overused. I will say, the group with the most external disadvantages, then. Which group has the most external disadvantages, then? Men, or women? (In the U.S. today)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 06:15 PM
1

You don't believe systemic oppression is possible? So it has never happened?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 05:38 PM
0

The first part of your post proves my point- it's that they are not talked about because not enough people care about them, or know they exist Let me ask, who do you think face more systematic oppression, men or women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 04:26 PM
1

These lists has a lot of things that pertain directly to relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 03:47 PM
0

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_expendability People are less likely to listen. In evolutarionary biology, females are viewed as much less expendable, because they have a uterus.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 03:46 PM
1

But do you disagree?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 03:39 PM
1

This seems perfectly on topic for PurplePillDebate subreddit, isn't it? It's a debate about gender issues
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 03:39 PM
0

I never made an assertion of how anything gets talked about- I'm not sure where you're getting that. However, now that you bring it up, Men's Rights Activists do get a silenced and discredited, because of a very small minority of them who are misogynist. Many feminists are also misandrists.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 03:35 PM
1

Sure. That does nothing to disqualify that point, I've already taken that into account. Small minorities of men are, at least somewhat responsible for almost each and every item listed. Ethically, from a methodological individualism standpoint of ethics, this makes no pertinent difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 03:32 PM
1

Done
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:19 PM
1

I've read that website
/r/MensRights09/02/19 12:41 AM
2

I did
/r/MensRights09/02/19 12:33 AM
1

Any studies you are thinking of?
/r/MensRights08/02/19 08:42 PM
2

Thanks for the analysis
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:39 AM
1

Can you expand on the addiction and mental health issues? Links at all?
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:32 AM
4

Nice adds, but do these happen in the US?
/r/MensRights07/02/19 04:46 PM
1

Yessir
/r/MensRights07/02/19 02:55 PM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights07/02/19 08:09 AM
2

Expand?
/r/MensRights07/02/19 03:07 AM
2

I'm a little confused, could you elaborate? What do numbers mean? what do you meqn by RBOMI?
/r/MensRights07/02/19 02:27 AM
1

Yeah, that's mine. It's colored in red, to signify it's a myth
/r/MensRights07/02/19 01:39 AM
5

Got it, thanks
/r/MensRights07/02/19 12:09 AM
7

Good distinction. Updated
/r/MensRights06/02/19 11:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter