TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dunesfrank Archive

View 21 posts and 220 comments by dunesfrank on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
424

Anti-MRMdunesfrank/r/MensRights19/01/19 10:02 PM
202

Social Issuesdunesfrank/r/MensRights21/02/19 05:10 AM
182

Feminismdunesfrank/r/MensRights23/01/19 08:03 AM
179

Social Issuesdunesfrank/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:21 AM
139

Generaldunesfrank/r/MensRights01/02/19 11:10 PM
84

Social Issuesdunesfrank/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:27 AM
83

Discriminationdunesfrank/r/MensRights20/02/19 01:35 PM
60

Social Issuesdunesfrank/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:23 AM
54

Social Issuesdunesfrank/r/MensRights19/01/19 09:26 PM
53

Feminismdunesfrank/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:25 AM
43

Feminismdunesfrank/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:08 PM
39

Discriminationdunesfrank/r/MensRights07/01/19 06:18 PM
29

Feminismdunesfrank/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:35 PM
27

Feminismdunesfrank/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:42 PM
24

Discriminationdunesfrank/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:35 PM
16

Social Issuesdunesfrank/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:08 PM
11

Social Issuesdunesfrank/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:34 AM
9

Activism/Supportdunesfrank/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:54 PM
6

Generaldunesfrank/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:00 PM
1

dunesfrank/r/MensRights21/02/19 01:11 AM
1

dunesfrank/r/MensRights02/02/19 07:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Again, it's called diplomacy. Apparently some people here are unfamiliar with the concept.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 07:23 AM
1

Indeed. When males make up the majority of the workforce let me know.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:34 AM
1

machismo among Latinos Has little or nothing to do with my original point.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 08:13 AM
1

Yes all fair points.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 03:34 PM
1

I fully agree with you. Didn't mean to suggest that there are no longer any issues for eg gays in the US. ​ Nevertheless I maintain that most of the attacks are against heterosexual males. It seems really strange at first, requires an analysis of "identity politics" more broadly. ​
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:00 PM
10

It's difficult to get accurate information on Sweden because both the left and right distort and falsify information to project political propaganda. I can say with certainty that the reason Sweden has the "highest rape rates in the world" is because Sweden has a ridiculously broad definition of "rape". It's sort of like the way the feminists claim "one in three women will be sexually assaulted during their lifetimes!" -- yet they include everything from an "unwanted kiss" to a a poorly received…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:41 AM
4

This is an important issue in countries like Chechnya. In the west the more urgent problem is hatred against traditional masculinity and heterosexual males.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:23 AM
22

Ah yes, feminist "humor". "Ironic misandry" etc. It's all about context. If Dave Chapelle makes a joke about "niggers" it's funny; if David Duke does so it's decidedly unfunny. And so it is with feminist "jokes" about hating/killing men and boys. The problem is that their entire philosophy is rooted in the hatred of men and boys. The founder of gender studies literally advocated killing men and boys. See what I mean? Context.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:19 AM
3

To be honest I'm not sure why you're focussing on this rather than low effort shit posts/memes. That seems to be the real problem on this sub. I mean technically those posts are already against the rules right?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:15 AM
1

Appalling.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 07:02 AM
2

Cheers :)
/r/MensRights30/01/19 05:53 AM
2

Mmmmm pineapple. God's greatest fruit. Next to Oscar Wilde.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 05:24 AM
1

There's a disturbing alternative: women will go on trying to maximize female privilege and the far far right will eventually triumph. I hope that doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 05:21 AM
34

I've never engaged in a boycott. Until now. I started with P and G. Way I figure -- enough is enough. I don't give a shit about ads, but little boys are watching this horror. It's almost absurd when I think about it -- I can't believe I wasted so much money on fucking razors.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 05:18 AM
3

Um, if I have it guess, most people here are already in a relationship or even married. The men's rights movement was founded by men who were being denied access to their children. It's quite possible to recognize an injustice while not being an immediate victim of it. But go on pretending as though things are hunky dory.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 05:12 AM
2

God DAMN. That was epic.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 05:07 AM
0

You might even say that masculinity is...beautiful.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 04:57 AM
4

word salad. But in a good sense. Like...Cesar salad with bacon and croutons, is your post.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 04:56 AM
2

My apologies. Someone else got on my nerves.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 03:09 AM
-7

Well, that was a rather wordy response to my blunt post. Touche. Yeah, the data is pretty clear: mothers are more likely to abuse and kill their children. Now you suggest that this is probably because women spend more time around children. Well, great, now you can go lobby feminists to allow shared parenting. So would you say a child is safer with their mother than father in spite of this? Father. Without question. But that's probably bias on my part.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 03:04 AM
-11

Well were sure were quick with the downvotes! Any commentary on the actual subject?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:54 AM
-12

Men and boys are institutionally oppressed in ever single facet of modern western society. How's that, douche?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:43 AM
1

Cheers. P.S. I love cats.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:59 AM
1

Indeed my friend.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:58 AM
10

Men aren't scared of domestic violence by women (though they should theoretically be -- frypans anyone?) They are rightly scaredy of proxy violence, via another man, or a another woman, or a police officer. Almost all female violence is proxy violence. Let's you and him fight.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:37 AM
2

Men are physically stronger than a woman. They are not physically stronger than the half dozen men she can call to her aid at any time. that's, quotable. Good luck baby I hope you are doing well, and your men's center. You rock.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:31 AM
3

I understand where you're coming from -- absolutely we should not not judge individuals based on group dynamics -- but men are being stuck between two untenable situations. Rock and a hard place, as it were. They're fucked. Take any single female dynamic and there is at least recourse -- you can appeal to the government etc. Men/boys...they're screwed. It's a complete crap shoot.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:36 AM
9

It's not important that females kill more babies than males. It's about not killing people.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 09:57 AM
6

At a certain point you have to let go (feminists). Some degree of "gender equality" is desirable, but trusting feminists with that job is insane.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 09:29 AM
1

Um, guy, I was quoting feminists.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:59 AM
1

Women have a net drain on taxes. So men are basically financing women, and are treated to lectures about "toxic masculinity" as a reward.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:11 AM
4

Rest assured that many here don't buy into the moronic "Democrat" vs "Republican" debate. They are both owned by billionaires. So speak up often :)
/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:07 AM
2

>but men and women are not different classes. And that's rather the point, no? Divide et Impera. The oldest trick in the book. The classic example is race. So you take a white guy and black guy and tell them their interests are diametrically opposed, when in fact the average white guy has much more in common with the black guy. Now imagine that you could do this not only with race but sex. Divide men and women against each other. It's so brutally simple it's amazing it took so long for them to f…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:57 AM
1

Well...that's a different take, and to be honest I'm having a hard time disagreeing with you.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:47 AM
2

Your posts are terrific, just wanted to say.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:41 AM
1

Hey! Fires have feelings too!
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:33 AM
2

Great post.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:32 AM
2

It didn't lead to anything. I see no need to respond to this.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:07 AM
3

Gender studies is both unscientific and immoral. Therefore I don't see any redeeming quality.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:38 AM
6

Honestly I think it was a class thing. "Divide and conquer" is the oldest trick in the book. Divide men against women, pretty simple.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:55 AM
7

Yep. I noted in OP that there is a huge difference between "gender studies" and real social sciences. That was exactly the point of the Swedes who studied the issue. Now I wouldn't doubt it if feminists have corrupted other fields of study, but evidence is required.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:11 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:08 AM
3

Cheers.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:00 AM
7

It's worth pointing out that although some theories of eugenics are questionable, it's otherwise an entirely valid subject scientifically. It led to killing people who were disabled. I understand what you're saying, but morality needs to be kept in mind. Otherwise there is no point to begin with.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:21 AM
9

The whole "cuck" thing is humorous, yes, but I think it's worth stressing that fathers who suddenly find out that their children are not their's suffer trauma akin to rape victims. As do the kids. So it's both a laughing matter and definitely not a laughing matter. I guess that explains its charm as a term: an extreme insult that also has a vulnerable quality.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:28 AM
42

If working-class women united with working class men Now you know why the super rich support feminism. Divde and conquer.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:18 AM
4

True. But Mother Nature is also a bitch. If life were fair George W. Bush would have been a fry cook not President of the United States.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:16 AM
4

Yes, I'm aware of that. And God loves Ozzies.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:35 PM
1

Good God man let it go. You are deranged.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:34 PM
2

You misunderstand me. My sister is an adult and can handle her own issues. Would you prefer I ride in on a white horse and "rescue" her? She is a fully capable adult, she can deal with it. Indeed I admire my sister due to her strength. She's awesome. In terms of the broader implications, yes I do think the "MeToo" thing is causing unnecessary conflict between men and women. There's also a clear double standard: men are expected to grin and bear it when they are sexually assaulted, while women ar…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:18 PM
1

Thank you for engaging in so much detail. Yours really is an interesting post. Sad to see "Judgy Bitch" call it a day; she was assaulted by feminists, I hope she comes back. In terms of GDP, the "progressive" movement was in some ways a response to unfettered capitalism. Remember that during the early 20th C, six year old boys got their arms chopped off in factories on a daily basis. Working conditions were horrific. So there was an attempt to make it a little less brutal (however unions weren't…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:57 PM
1

You're a creep.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:36 PM
1

Good God woman, let it go. I have no control over the situation. I respect my sister enough to let her deal with it.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:34 PM
1

Women only pay 25% of the taxes, but get 80% of the welfare. Is it any surprise that government has grown exponentially since women's suffrage? I agree with most of your post but this is questionable. Can you cite a source for this? In my experience when people talk about the size of government they are talking about different things, depending on political ideology. For example most people don't use terms like "the welfare state" when taking about the military, police, corporate hand-outs etc. …
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:27 PM
12

Yet only men are viewed with suspicion if they want to work with children. This is appalling. Children need both men and women in their lives.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:37 PM
8

Strange times that "you're a sick cunt" is a compliment. :)
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:16 PM
20

Use the term "toxic femininity" and watch her head explode. ;)
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:39 PM
2

Deserves a post of its own. Thanks.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:36 PM
19

Follow the money.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:17 PM
-1

She did the right thing. I don't care if you feel otherwise.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:09 AM
5

Ironically, Fox has the most sensible take on gender.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:51 AM
1

You fucking faggot, you're so insecure that you can't handle the idea that you are, as stated, a little faggot, and would run to protect your own ass. Sorry, junior, but you need to grow up. Learn to learn how faggots like you can protect themselves, and not inadvertently harm others through your own degeneracy and incompetence.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:52 AM
1

You're a funny little fellow, who thinks he should "beat" someone. You're a funny guy, and if you were in front of me I would slap you around like the little bitch you are.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:49 AM
-5

Get a life.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 08:22 AM
-10

Yeah you're probably right. I submit. But you have to remember that men are MUCH more likely to be attacked and killed while walking down the street. Because men really do have a sense of "chivalry." Take a man and a woman. If she is attacked, the man will come running. As I understand it, men feel more comfortable walking down the street at night, BUT they are more likely to be attacked and killed. Feminist hysteria about this issue doesn't help, does it?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 01:05 AM
-7

GOOD LORD MAN. Calm down. That's it. That's all I have to say. Just kidding: stop whining about your problems. I don't seek to "shame" people. People are capable of being shameful all on their own. You agree with Men's Rights? Well so do I.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:29 AM
-2

So you're partly sane and partly Insane. In my experience, women are much, much more likely to engage in unwanted touching of males. When I was a teenager young chicks couldn't keep their hands off me. If it were the other way around there would be a scandal. Indeed there was a scandal. A bunch of chicks touching dicks/balls, slipping their hands under dudes' kilts. Those poor, poor men. So you're full of shit, as always. Men are molested much more often than women. They just put up with it. Wom…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:16 AM
-5

This post is pretty strange. I basically said "my sister isn't an asshole asshole", and a lot of people took offense.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:11 AM
-10

it‘s really sad that you won‘t defend your sister against some harasser I'm not a white knight, you piece of excrement. I fully trust my sister, and fully trust her to do what is right. She is an adult. You, would rather control women. You suck. Bye.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:09 AM
-1

I don't see the contradiction.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:19 PM
-6

Stop crying. Learn to control yourself. I think this is good advice for everyone.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:13 PM
-5

Wow, you sound really angry. Get help, dip shit.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:12 PM
-2

You're an idiot. Bye.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:11 PM
-3

I'm not "happy" for the guy. I just think his misbehavior was rather mild. And I leave it up to my sister to solve the problem. I was sexually assaulted as a youth. I don't let it define me. There are greater horizons. You are a great person. Don't let an asshole define you.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:46 PM
1

This is unfair. Because Kathy Bigelow worked directly with the CIA. How is that fair? This crazy-eyed director worked WITH the CIA to produce a propaganda film about Osama Bin Laden. How many male directors have that chance? It's completely unfair, imo.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:40 PM
-1

So you're sane after all. Will wonders never cease?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:35 PM
-8

When I was a teenager I had girls cup my balls. I didn't cry about it. Grow up, stop living in fear. You can do better. Stop feeling sorry for yourself. The "guy in my story" is clearly a prick, or at least someone who could do a lot better. You can clearly do a lot better.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:27 PM
-9

Yes, he's an idiot, I agree; no, I don't think he should be banished to hell. And shame on you for suggesting as much. You should look up the word "compassion." You are a very hateful person.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:24 PM
-8

White knight, grow up.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:22 PM
-10

He took responsibility. He apologized and said he acted like an ass. You want to see him further punished and hurt. You have no interest in actually resolving the situation. You suck. Luckily my sister is more mature.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 09:15 PM
4

One is that i have a feeling you believe (and correct me if i’m wrong) that there is a plague of false sexual harassment/assault claims these days. This is the wrong argument. Real rape/sexual assault exists, and false accusations exist. Therefore we should treat every allegation as it is: an allegation. You're not sympathetic to men who have been falsely accused, but remember that there are few things worse. The Innocence Project, which studied DNA evidence, found that the majority of "rapists"…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 09:00 PM
-13

Mistakes should be punished. With complete lack of forgiveness. Yes, this is a good rule that will benefit society.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 08:48 PM
-31

if someone ran up and punched you in the face at work what would you do? I would punch him back. What's the argument? I already stated that the man acted like a lout. I'm also saying that he worked for a dozen years to get into med school, and that maybe he shouldn't be completely ostracized for making one drunken mistake? When did people become so vicious? Zero tolerance is a bad policy. Edit: my own sister decided that he deserved a second chance. But the white fucking knights here are so pure…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 08:47 PM
0

I would love to see Karen debate eg Valenti or Warren. That would be awesome. :)
/r/MensRights22/01/19 06:45 PM
-44

I hope he learned his lesson. Me Too. But not if you were in charge. You'd condemn this young man to the icy depths. As I stated, he fucked up. People make mistakes, they drink too much, they fuck up. Good thing you're so perfect.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 06:42 PM
1

I will do so. Thanks mod.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:58 PM
8

You need to take responsibility for your horrid comments. That's not on me, it's on you. Good day.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:46 PM
5

You're welcome. Edit: and just to be clear: you are a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:22 PM
0

Thank you. A sensible reply.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:09 PM
7

Like a guy going on a killing spree because he is an incel is not the same as a girl lying about being raped. One is clearly worse than the other. Indeed. Falsely accusing a man of rape is one of the worst crimes imaginable. It's the equivalent of those degenerate scum who kidnap a teenage girl and lock them up in their basements for ten years. I mean think about this. The man has his reputation utterly destroyed, his family and friends may disown him, he gets locked up for potentially several d…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:07 PM
1

Hysterical much?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 03:11 PM
1

Did the same. No more Gillette, no more P and G.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 02:13 PM
14

It's fine to talk about "toxic masculinity", so long as you spend just as much time talking about "toxic femininity," eg abusing children and using proxy violence. If feminists spent an equal amount of time talking about toxic femininity most men wouldn't have an issue. Instead feminists increasingly label all masculine behavior as toxic (including the stuff that keeps them safe and privileged) while pretending as though women are feckless damsels in distress.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 02:02 PM
-1

I just think this guy is clearly an idiot. He's clearly an idiot when he drinks too much. I'm just saying he should be given another chance. I don't know why so many people find this idea unconscionable. We all fuck up from time to time. If he does it again, sure, report him. But she behaved with compassion and realized that we all make mistakes.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 01:43 PM
-18

This is not a good thing. Be realistic. Someone who goes this far in their mid 20s isn't a one off. Maybe. Or maybe he got drunk and should be given a second chance. Maybe he shouldn't have his life thrown away. I think this represents a difference between good people and feminists like yourself. You're willing to give women a second chance when they fuck up, but not men. I clearly indicated that his behavior was out of line, and that my sister was/is more than capable of handling it. Ultimately…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 01:31 PM
-57

Well, I don't think he is. He already feels like a complete asshole and is totally apologetic. Should his life be destroyed due to a drunken mistake? No I don't think so.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 01:26 PM
0

Karen is fun. Karen is awesome. Don't tell me that you wouldn't love to see Karen debate eg Noam Chomsky. As for kilts, if it were women there would be a world-wide condemnation of people grabbing other people's genitals. You know it, and I know it.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 08:32 AM
-1

Don't get me wrong, I was angry when I heard about it, but she handled it on her own terms. I trust her as an adult to do what is right.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 07:59 AM
0

Ironically, MRA's advocate real "female empowerment", while (most) feminists advocate damselling in distress.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 07:41 AM
-1

A one-off drunken come-on, no. Reaching in to grab breasts and squeezing them hard, yes. We do ourselves no favours by letting those who commit the latter act, let alone worse ones, off the hook. I agree. A recent story on this board revealed that during "Kilt Night" in a Scottish bar, women were constantly reaching up and grabbing guys' dick/balls as a "joke". If it were the other way around, the bar would have been shut down. Instead they just ended "Kilt night." My main complaint is in bringi…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 07:40 AM
1

“The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be.” Lao-Tzu
/r/MensRights22/01/19 06:23 AM
1

Judge: a law student who marks his own papers. ~H.L. Mencken
/r/MensRights22/01/19 06:14 AM
0

Sorry you'll have to be more specific.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 06:07 AM
-1

Non sequitur.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:58 AM
1

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/bob-black-constitutionalism-the-white-man-s-ghost-dance
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:52 AM
-8

Why engage in a fist fight when you can get a man to do it on your behalf? That's the sort of snide remark that is the equivalent of your cynicism. No, believe it or not, my sis is a nice person, and didn't want to see a young man's life ruined over one drunken night. Remember that he is a resident and will work with her in future. If this guy continued to act like a lout, I would have no problem with her using a proxy. The point is to be an adult and not automatically go for the nuclear option.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:31 AM
0

Actually "customs" are much more effective than legal codes, in terms of enforcing good behavior. And customs are frequently more rational, enforced by all rather than a ruling minority.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:26 AM
-30

She handled it like an adult, I made that pretty clear. She's ten years his senior, and realized she could have destroyed his life in an instant if she wanted to. Instead, she showed compassion and behaved responsibly. Edit: holy shit, I can't believe this is being downvoted. Insane times.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:19 AM
2

You're welcome. Glad someone appreciated it.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 01:07 AM
-2

I sympathize with anarchists because anarchists want people to work things out without appealing to tyrannical authorities. I mean what we call "police" were only invented a couple hundred years ago.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 01:00 AM
26

It's not politically correct to say, but women (on average) seem to place a higher premium on emotional validation than logic and self-criticism. We're all aware of the cliche of a woman telling her boyfriend about some problem only to get angry when he offers a rational solution. "I don't want a solution, I just want to vent." Taking responsibility seems to be more difficult for women, at least in the current climate. Even extremely powerful figures like Hillary Clinton refuse to hold themselve…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:25 PM
9

Women control the majority of consumer spending (damn you patriarchy! ;) Hence the male-bashing. Presumably ad companies have found that portraying men as assholes/buffoons resonates with a lot of women. What these women don't seem to realize is that these ads don't just make men look bad, they make women look bad. If you take enjoyment in the degradation of others that makes you weak, petty, emotionally immature and sadistic. The response to the Gillette ad is encouraging. An increasing number …
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:31 PM
10

I wouldn't stop talking about men's issues when appropriate. I've brought up discrimination against males with people who would be considered "radical leftists" and they entirely agreed with me. I tend to avoid using terms like "feminist" and "MRA", just focus on specific issues. I will however correct them when someone says "well feminists are working on that", and point to specific examples to the contrary. I basically give them room to save face rather than attacking their identity. Better to…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:05 AM
15

Good criticism of that study: "The study looked at 18 shipwrecks of passenger ships from 1852 to 2011. In two of those incidents, it’s unknown whether the captain gave the ‘women and children first’ order. That leaves 16 shipwrecks. Ten of those occurred prior to the end of World War I. Out of those ten, the ‘women and children first’ order was given on five occasions. In other words, this ‘mythic’ order actually occurred half the time during that period. http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2012…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 08:33 AM
3

I’ve also never heard of “Brown,” whoever she is, but I’m interested to see if the rest of the field of sociology agrees with her interpretation. One scientist =/= consensus of the field. It's pretty standard. Cross-culturally women are attracted to men who exhibit certain characteristics, notably strength but also status, wealth, athletic ability, physical attractiveness etc. "Vulnerability" tends to be a turn off. Anthropologists like Marvin Harris have noted that female sexual selection is a …
/r/MensRights21/01/19 04:05 AM
7

It's hard to determine whether the defenders of the Ad are PR shills, man-hating feminists or just really, really dense. Is misandry really so ubiquitous at that point that some can't even see it? This ad will one day be featured in propaganda courses alongside other hate propaganda.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:36 AM
5

It's an appeal to male chivalry. In other words it accords exactly with patriarchal traditions, except for the "respect for men" part. A truly transgressive ad would have had women taking responsibility for other women and demanding they don't sexually assault men and boys, make false accusations, deny fathers access to their children, throw babies in dumpsters etc. Anyway it's more than slightly absurd to be lectured by a corporation that uses child slave labor. I don't think most men would car…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:34 AM
7

That’s why people are making fun of you for getting upset People are "making fun" of the ad's detractors because they lack empathy and respect for men and boys. Decent people are rightly appalled. It's really as simple as that. If an ad portrayed women as a bunch of degenerates I certainly wouldn't make fun of them if they complained. That would make me a degenerate. Indeed it would make me a sadist. No one would give a shit about the ad if it wasn't being released against a backdrop of extreme …
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:25 AM
5

Bingo. And it's not just because men are considered disposable, it's that feminists want to remove all agency from women (while bizarrely claiming that they are "strong and empowered). Thus when women have a problem it's "men must fix it", and when men (or even boys) have a problem it's also "men must fix it." The latter view is particularly insane in today's climate, when countless children have been separated from their fathers and most primary school teachers are female. There is actually sho…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:39 PM
5

The Gillette ad basically says No More; that boys and men need to know that the outdated standards no longer apply. They apply now more than ever. Feminists have done absolutely nothing to encourage male vulnerability and female responsibility. In the past, society said, "sacrifice yourself for women, and you'll be respected." The new message is "sacrifice yourself for women, and you'll still be labeled a piece of shit."
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:32 PM
12

(belittling men that do address their feelings as babies and sissies, for instance). So...exactly what feminists are doing when men state that they find this ad an appalling, degrading spectacle? Telling them that their masculinity is "fragile"? There's nothing new in the Gillette ad, aside from the sheer malignancy of the portrayal. Men have always been told to be chivalrous, take care of women, police other men etc. They've always been told that they are dangerous and disposable and that women…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:30 PM
12

I think you're absolutely right. I feel like these ads are actually the same ad, saying the same thing. They are not remotely comparable. One celebrates men and their sacrifices. The other attacks men and boys. It also genders issues that aren't actually gendered (sexual assault etc.).
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:20 PM
16

Great. I look forward to the Venus add encouraging female teachers to stop molesting boys, female teachers to stop marking down boys by an average of 20 percent, mothers denying their children access to their fathers, jilted lovers making false rape accusations, mothers throwing their babies in dumpsters etc. We can hold women collectively responsible for the actions of a minority, encourage them to step up, and combat toxic femininity. I'm sure that will go over really well with women. If they …
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:19 PM
1

Sally Miller Gearhart
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:09 PM
25

This is what a real "rape culture" looks like: women can sexually assault and rape men and boys with impunity. Meanwhile men are being fired and socially attacked for completely benign behavior; I just heard about a DJ in New Zealand who was fired for making a dirty joke overhead by a feminist.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 09:18 PM
1

Why is it so hard for critics of the concept of toxic masculinity to see the forest for the trees "Toxic masculinity" is a toxic concept. It's also a typical example of feminist irrationality. some of the traits they file under "masculinity" are also performed by women. most men aren't "toxic" in the slightest, yet the effect (regardless of intent) is to demonize males and masculinity. Allegedly "toxic" behaviors like risk-taking are vital for our survival as a species. some of these allegedly "…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 09:11 PM
2

I would be surprised if you've read more feminist literature than I have, but it's possible. Feminism is built on a faulty foundation, so most of what has followed has been in error. Karen Straughan has accurately stated that if feminist theory were true, men would have to be a race of psychopaths. You yourself seem to hold this view, absurdly claiming that men throughout history were happy to see their wives and daughters raped. You have to be very careful about getting history lessons from fem…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 08:02 PM
5

Females already have more rights than males and are privileged in every major institution from cradle to grave. Females also fair better on almost every quality of life indicator. What more do you want exactly? MRA's didn't pick a fight with feminists. They have opposed equality every step of the way. They shut down conferences on male suicide, they excommunicated Warren Farrel when he tried to highlight the importance of fathers, they tried to ban The Red Pill, they oppose legislation and polic…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:32 AM
6

While it's true in the most literal sense that a person of any gender is capable of harassment, assault, or rape, it's not true that women have a historical propensity for using physical force to rape men or for using sexual rejection by men to justify violence against them. Women are more likely to use social violence and proxy violence. This is due to their weaker strength, their superior social power and their greater risk aversion. See the history of lynching for a good example of proxy viol…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 08:02 AM
7

Feminists have an uncanny ability to destroy the credibility of every institution they touch. This is exactly what you'd expect from an ideology rooted in feelings rather than facts.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 06:18 AM
122

The woman who founded 'gender studies' (previously women's studies) literally advocated genocide against males. She was given a grant by the Ford Foundation. Now virtually all universities contain "gender studies" courses. They are completely unscientific and essentially teach hatred against men and boys. This is occurring despite the fact that males are shrinking minority on campuses. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that the entire education system is now a hostile environment for boy…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 05:46 AM
171

The KKK used the exact same reasoning when they forwent trials and lynched black men: that it would be "traumatic" and "cruel" to subject a female "victim" to cross examination.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 03:04 AM
62

A feminist society is unsustainable. You can't blatantly discriminate against and attack the entire male population and expect any degree of stability or progress. So yeah, feminism is not long for this earth. I'd like to see it end by real gender egalitarianism. If that doesn't happen, unfortunately, the far right will take more drastic measures.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:43 AM
54

Parent company, yes. Also Tide laundry detergent and a bunch of other brands.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:23 AM
228

I think the backlash shows a simmering, righteous anger hidden just beneath the surface of polite feminist society. Men are sick and tired of being demonized and abused. And feminists are not content to attack men, they must also attack boys. Plenty of women with sons are no doubt getting fed up as well. The anger is eventually going to boil over. Feminists have spent the last century cynically exploiting the good nature and protective instincts of men. Well, they said they wanted equality, it's…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:37 AM
21

lol you understand wrong.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:21 AM
110

ONWARD TO A MILLION. I think men are starting to reach the end of their ropes.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:19 AM
25

PR bots.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:10 AM
2

link?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:53 AM
2

Thanks for the link. Guideline 3 states that “in the aggregate, males experience a greater degree of social and economic power than girls and women in a patriarchal society”. Holy shit. I can't believe that (a) they think our society is "patriarchal" -- "rule of the father" my ass (b) they think the average man has any significant degree of economic power, especially when women control the majority of consumer spending (c) they think men have more social power than women -- even Susan B. Anthony…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:52 AM
287

I usually ignore boycotts but this is just beyond the pale. Fuck P and G. No more Gillette, no more Crest etc.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:13 AM
55

lol! You reap what you sew. Next up: transgender women dominate female sports.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:11 AM
508

Apparently they actually pinned one reading "my wife's son loved this" lol. Their PR department is sorely lacking. Edit: from Youtube comment: Gillette is owned by Procter & Gamble. The Group President of North America Selling and Market Operations is Carolyn Tastad. She leads the Corporate Women's Leadership Team. This is what society looks like with feminists in corporate leadership... Going back to a straight razor now. Edit 2: here's the screenshot complete with Gillette reply
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:27 PM
17

It's almost like feminists/SJW's are useful idiots for the billionaire class. You'd think a light bulb would go off over their heads at some point: "wait a minute, if I'm a righteous rebel fighting 'the man', why are the most powerful people in the world supporting me?" Divide and conquer people, divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 09:52 PM
8

Wrong. Here's a psychologist who was present at the meeting/feminist coup at the APA. He has condemned the new guidelines as unscientific, ideologically motivated and downright abusive: https://www.scribd.com/document/385347642/Review-of-Practice-Guidelines-for-Men-and-Boys A few excerpts: As one issue, the document uses copious use of progressive jargon throughout: power, privilege, intersection, “perform masculinity”, microaggressions (but see the recent exchange between Lilienfeld and others …
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:30 PM
8

It's very clearly not linked to a decline in masculinity I'm not one of those people who think men have become "feminized". They don't really have that luxury. Women and especially feminists continue to enforce the male gender role with ruthless precision. As Karen Straughan argued, feminism is "patriarchy dialed up to 11." However, while men are still expected to abide by their gender role they are also now treated with hatred and contempt. The point is that attacking masculinity is not going t…
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:08 PM
12

Rates are higher now than in the 50's and they are still climbing. This should not be the case if "traditional masculinity" was/is the primary culprit. We've had 40 years of trying to teach boys to be more like girls, excluding fathers from child rearing, attacking masculine traits etc. Talking about a mental health problem does not make you a burden, this is part of the fucking problem. I'm not talking about mere "health" problems. I'm talking about the various forms of institutional oppression…
/r/MensRights14/01/19 05:28 PM
6

The idea that men are "privileged' is completely, utterly laughable. On the contrary they suffer discrimination and outright abuse in every major institution from cradle to grave.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 05:17 PM
24

There was no male suicide epidemic in the 1950's when "traditional masculinity" was celebrated rather than attacked. So clearly something else is going on here. Attacking men for not "seeking assistance" is nothing more victim blaming. It also assumes that speaking to a therapist will solve or substantially mitigate whatever crisis is affecting the particular man. If for example a man is being denied contact with his children and being forced to subsidize his abusive ex, no amount of talking is …
/r/MensRights14/01/19 04:41 PM
3

Projection.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 02:21 AM
10

The exact opposite is true. A plethora of studies show that women are more likely to engage in coercive and controlling behavior in relationships. The difference is that men hardly ever report DV to police. Duluth was debunked decades ago, yet feminists continue to deny the facts and thereby perpetuate domestic violence against men, against children, and ultimately against women. Man-hating female supremacists have taken control of the legal system. We are so fucked.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:15 AM
3

On the contrary this is consistent with how many whistleblowers speak. Eg CIA whistleblowers from the 70's and 80's would say things like "we created death squads", "we tortured people" etc. It's a way of acknowledging their own complicity and coming clean.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 06:58 PM
4

There's nothing "liberal" about gender studies. It more closely resembles fascism.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:28 PM
29

Apparently the American psychological association has gone insane.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:21 AM
24

All "love" songs are like this. Compare eg Shania Twain's "That don't impress me much" vs. Bryan Adams' "I will die for you."
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:29 AM
24

Did he grab her vagina? Otherwise the two are not remotely comparable.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 06:22 PM
83

Two Swedish psychology professors recently analyzed gender studies and found that it was plagued by ideological bias, dubious scholarship and rejection of hard science (feelz before realz). Notably, non-feminist social science disciplines fared significantly better: "This would not be all that remarkable if Gender studies, with its heritage from the social sciences and humanities, were compared with the natural sciences and medicine. It seems quite remarkable when compared with other social scie…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 06:04 PM
9

A world gone mad.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:52 AM
13

It's an anti-male propaganda film. Even some feminists have criticized it for presenting dubious accusations as truthful.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:05 AM
6

France recently passed a law where if a man makes an "unwanted" verbal remark to a woman that constitutes "sexual harassment". In Spain men are automatically imprisoned for a certain amount of time based on a mere accusation of domestic violence. So scratch those two countries off the list.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 01:08 AM
18

That's insane.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 06:31 PM
91

I don't have a link handy but there was a an article about paternity fraud in a mainstream newspaper a few years ago where a (female) psychologist claimed the trauma for the man is similar to rape. Children also get emotionally scarred from female cuckolding. There should be automatic DNA tests at birth.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 05:53 PM
2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 10:12 PM
5

Women are no more oppressed than men in the middle east. Feminism won't do them any good.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:55 PM
10

The posters you're replying to are simply incapable of thinking about this rationally. We have an instinctual bias to value the well being of women more than men. So while we recoil in horror at women having chaperones, we shrug our shoulders at four year old boys being killed in camel races. It is international news when a woman is stoned to death. We shrug our shoulders at the 100 men stoned to death for every woman. "They treat their women badly" is also a major propaganda theme in wartime pr…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:54 PM
13

Until recently in Saudi Arabia boys as young as four were forced to become camel jockeys. They would frequently be maimed and killed during races. Men are imprisoned if they can't find a job and support their wives. Working class men and "guest workers" work in slave like conditions with no safety standards. Men are much more likely to commit suicide. Men receive much harsher sentences for crimes. Male victims of sexual assault and domestic violence are not recognized. As in every society, men a…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 07:08 PM
2

Your argument presents white men as a sort of borg hive collective. The average working class white man had much more in common with the average working class black man than a slave owner or plutocrat. This remains true. How many? A number low enough to be statistical noise. lol no. Read a history book. they took those actions on behalf of workers' rights, as you say, and as some workers were black, so black people benefited. But they benefited as labourers. These were not widespread social vict…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 07:48 AM
3

With this thread you are reaching new levels of mental retardation.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:55 AM
1

White men could have easily prevented eg blacks from achieving equal rights if they were the psychopathic privileged caricatures of feminist lore. Hundreds of thousands of white men fought and died during the civil war. White men were imprisoned and lynched standing up for black rights during and after reconstruction. The white men who ran eg the Knights of Labor and the Industrial Workers of the World were beaten, maimed, tarred and feathered, framed and murdered for standing up for labor right…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:13 AM
11

Feminists don't have arguments. They have shaming language, appeals to emotion and obfuscation.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:39 AM
15

If it weren't for white men then women, gays and "people of color" wouldn't have rights in the west.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:24 PM
8

Actually you're wrong. The percentage of men who are able to obtain sexual access is highly variable depending on culture. Feminist and polygamous societies entail a large percentage of men forced into celibacy. Interestingly, the 20 most unstable societies in the world are polygamous and racked by civil war. In hunter-gatherer bands (nomadic foragers) some men have sex much more than others (hence the DNA disparities) but all or most young men have sex. Attempts to monopolize either resources o…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 07:13 PM
8

Hundreds of baby boys die from MGM every year you miserable piece of shit. And the majority of FGM involves removing the clitoral hood. According to UNICEF: "In the majority of countries that have included questions regarding type of FGM/C, excision of the prepuce (Type 1) is found to be the most common." As stated in the Convention on the Rights of the Child, all actions concerning children should be undertaken in the best interests of the child (article 3.1). The Convention further asserts tha…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 06:50 PM
175

There was actually a study revealing that female cops are more likely to discharge their weapons. Wonderful.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 05:41 AM
1

Six year old boys have to work to support women and girls in Afghanistan. Feminists could sit around all day whining just as they do now.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:17 AM
5

No need to punish cats for bad decisions by women.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 11:39 PM
5

I think we all agree that women are disadvantaged in some ways while men are disadvantaged in other ways The question is, if you live in the first world, which sex is suffering institutional discrimination. The answer is males. In less developed countries both sexes tend to suffer institutional discrimination in different ways. Feminists don't have a leg to stand on. Their theories fly in the face of reality.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 11:23 PM
5

It's important to remember that in the western world it is males that suffer discrimination in schooling. This has been documented at length by eg Christina Hoff Sommers, and more recent studies have found that female teachers mark down boys by an average of 20 percent for the same work. Boys are also much more likely to be drugged (often for exhibiting natural boyish behavior) or otherwise punished. Meanwhile, female only programs and scholarships continue despite young men making up a shrinkin…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 11:19 PM
24

Yeah, my grandfather sure was "eating his cake" when he fought in WWII.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 11:14 PM
1

Every real or possible indiscretion You're forgetting false accusations. Socially they are treated the same way. Believe all women.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 07:39 PM
7

The Privileged Sex
/r/MensRights05/01/19 07:24 PM
8

There are both biological and institutional factors at play. For example even in "patriarchal" societies a much, much higher premium is placed on female safety. One could argue that this is a biological instinct, but it is also reflected in institutions.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 07:20 PM
16

for men, its our own faults that are holding back (in saudi arabia not else where). where as women's one is institutionalized Males suffer institutional oppression in almost every area of western life. Boys can have their genitals legally mutilated, causing hundreds of deaths every year; boys suffer institutional discrimination in schools (see CH Sommers "The War Against Boys"; also we now known that female teachers mark boys down by an average of 20 percent for the same work); males in college …
/r/MensRights05/01/19 07:07 PM
71

It's certainly superior to that of the feminist WEC and UN indexes, which don't even taken into account areas in which males are behind females in a particular area. In fact the WEC index actually portrays female superiority as "more equal". So this is at least a step in the right direction. However it's flawed. The paper doesn't really get into the institutional oppression of males in western nations and focuses mainly on health. It doesn't mention MGM, discrimination against boys in school, in…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 06:35 PM
2

There is no "leftist establishment" in the US. There is a femnist/identitarian establishment, but actual leftists who focus on things like class and imperialism are almost completely barred from mainstream exposure.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 06:08 PM
7

I don't consider women "oppressors." Feminists are certainly oppressive. And I used the word "major". Women certainly have gender based problems and disadvantages. But they are not institutionally oppressed like males, at least not in modern western nations.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 08:37 PM
8

There's no contest. Males are institutionally oppressed in every major area of western life. Females are institutionally privileged in every major area of western life. Feminists do themselves no favors by pretending otherwise. The longer this goes on and the worse it gets the worse the blowback will be. Either they come to grips with reality and start supporting MRA's or the far right will correct the problem for them.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 08:18 PM
5

He was even a leftist for fuck's sake, he encouraged people to vote for Hillary Hillary is about as left wing as Genghis Khan. I mean she's close personal friends with the Bush and Kissinger families.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 06:00 PM
41

As others have noted this study only scratches the surface. For example there is nothing about MGM, boys being more likely to suffer abuse, institutional discrimination against boys in the education system; there is nothing about the feminist war on hetero male sexuality, family courts, criminal courts etc. etc. However it's definitely a step in the right direction. The new measure has thrown up some strange results. For instance, it rated Saudi Arabia as having a high level of ‘gender parity’, …
/r/MensRights04/01/19 05:33 PM
2

You're a nut. Bye.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 08:18 AM
4

Re: China. Already linked to the study. Re: Androcide. This isn't controversial. Males are more likely to be killed at every stage of their lives. Historically, DNA evidence proves that females were significantly more likely to survive to adulthood and reproduce. Again, not controversial. Theories as to why this is so include: (1) males are much more dangerous from a military standpoint. Thus armies/militias kill the males and teenage boys (for a recent example, when the US flattened Fallujah, t…
/r/MensRights04/01/19 03:31 AM
2

I never claimed that female infanticide didn't occur in China. Only that the numbers were grossly exaggerated. I'm talking like 25 million people exaggerated. This has only become known in the past few years. Also, except in times of war, the disproportionate survival of women is due mostly to the extra vigor that infant girls get due to one more chromosome of heterozygosity, and partly due to the ‘Hold My Beer’ phenomenon/‘Who You Lookin’ At’ phenomenon Nope. Look up "androcide". Males are the …
/r/MensRights04/01/19 02:19 AM
1

Snort them.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 12:09 AM
4

Turns out that that was wildly overblown. Couples would simply not report the baby girls to authorities. One of the most catastrophic consequences of China’s decades-long one-child policy is said to be the preference to have boys over girls, which resulted in a severe gender imbalance. One study now claims that the gender imbalance is far overblown, because millions of female babies were not reported at birth. John Kennedy, an associate professor of political science at the University of Kansas,…
/r/MensRights04/01/19 12:06 AM
3

He's also gay.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:57 PM
1

but it would still be the world as usual. Hillary has never met a war she didn't like. She's a certifiable lunatic. One of her emails has her arguing that the US and Israel should attack Syria as a gateway to attacking Iran. She's close personal friends with Henry Kissinger. If Trump leaves office without attacking Iran I'll be satisfied that he was the superior choice. WWIII makes every other issue pale in significance.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 10:03 PM
3

What kind of jobs were they? How much are the employees being paid? Can the people working said jobs afford to live without resorting to food stamps or a second job? Can they try to form a union without the company moving to Bangladesh? We live in a gigantic corporate welfare state. It is absolutely obscene that people can work full time and still not afford a decent standard of living. What an incredibly rotten system. Anyway Bernie is not going to win the nomination. During his contest with Hi…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 06:21 PM
2

The exit polls between Hillary and Bernie were off by massive margins. Coincidentally this only occurred in counties that used easily hackable voting machines.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 06:10 PM
22

Dems are puppets of billionaires just like repubs.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:34 AM
20

Yep. I suspect this is why the feminist movement has been given lavish support by elites since at least the 1970's. The first gender studies course was funded by the Ford Foundation. The CIA gave major funding to the French post-modernist movement. Today every major corporation supports feminism and "diversity." Banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs create huge grants for "getting more women in STEM" etc. "Intersectional feminism" is proving to be just as effective as the more old-fashioned for…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 05:26 AM
5

Comments are refreshing. Feminazi articles are now routinely thrashed and debunked in the comment sections of newspapers. It's only a matter of time before they eliminate comments entirely.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:46 PM
13

This is what a matriarchy looks like. If a man hurts a woman's feelings = severe punishment. The subjective feelings of the woman are all important. Intent, context, logical coherence are all thrown out the window.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:10 PM
5

Feminists are too cowardly to kill people. They'd rather have state institutions enact violence on their behalf. Proxy violence.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 10:53 PM
12

*adult females.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 10:37 PM
19

I thought the #BelieveSurvivors thing was a reasonable request It was never a "reasonable" request. If you are going to automatically believe an accuser that means you automatically believe that the accused is guilty. It's a completely irrational position.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 10:36 PM
2

Actually throughout history females have been much, much more likely to survive to adulthood and reproduce. This has been confirmed by DNA studies. Any drive you may feel to protect women is placed there by social expectations, not biology. That's goofy. It is very, very obvious that all human societies place a much higher premium on the safety of women than they do men. As for poor women, to the extent that one gender has been offered some degree of protection it has again been females. This re…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 10:31 PM
1

There are indeed going to be multiple causes although variations in male fertility don't really account for a significant amount of it. If a man or small number of men have significantly more sex than others (due to being more attractive), they are going to be significantly more likely to impregnate women and thereby pass on their genes. This appears to be exactly what happened, because as mentioned these societies include both pair-bonding and polyamory: "Cooperative breeding systems tend to be…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:28 PM
2

All that really demonstrates (vis a vis hunter gatherer bands) is that some men had sex much more often than others. I am not specifically talking about reproduction but rather sexual access. These societies contain pair-bonding but they are also polyamorous. Attempts to dominate others (via hoarding resources or females) is considered the single greatest social transgression. If an individual male attempts to do so he will be subject to social sanction, and if that fails he will be murdered (wh…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 08:48 AM
2

The overwhelming majority of people who have ever reproduced did so after the advent of agriculture. I'm talking about nomadic foragers. There is no disagreement among anthropologists that egalitarianism was the defining ethos of our ancestors. Additionally, under civilization, males have been much, much less likely to survive to adulthood and reproduce.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:19 AM
8

Men aren't more aggressive/violent. They just tend to do more physical damage. Women specialize in relational aggression, proxy violence, and violence against children and the elderly. Men commit more homicides because they are physically stronger and less risk averse. The disparity results from female weakness/cowardice. Women prefer eg making a false accusation and having men perform violence on their behalf, or spreading a rumor that destroys someone's social life, or hitting their husband or…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:32 AM
3

Sure. I'll do it tomorrow.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 02:24 AM
3

It's women >>>>>> everything. Including children. Otherwise they would have created a "violence against children" act instead of a "violence against women" act. They couldn't do this because women are the majority abusers of children.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 08:48 PM
11

The incel phenomenon may be more serious than it first appears. I'm not sure if there's any hard data on the subject (I think both males and females lie about their sex lives in polls -- males inflate their number of partners, while while females do the opposite), but "Red Pill" types claim that women are all chasing the top 30 percent or so of men. Eventually they settle for the middle 30 percent of men. And that leads do about 40 percent of men going without sex and companionship. The argument…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 08:26 PM
34

Sickening. What a shitty mother.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 08:15 PM
1

Evidence? There was a recent study in the UK that concluded antisemitism is most common on the right, with the highest percentage found on the far right. The "far left" did not have higher rates than the general population. Criticizing Zionism and/or the policies of the Israeli government is not the same thing as antisemitism, though certain disingenuous apologists for Israel like to claim it is. Incidentally, Zionists collaborated with the Nazis. Truth is stranger than fiction. I can't speak fo…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 05:43 AM
12

"Peterson stumped me a few times, and I did the same back to him lol. I'm not even a fan of Peterson but I watched the interview and there was no "stumping" on her part. She made a fool of herself. Typical of feminists she seemed unable to grasp logical concepts, lashed out when Peterson hurt her feelings (eg when Peterson pointed out that females are more likely to use relational aggression), refused to concede a single point even when it was completely obvious, and spent the entire time trying…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 03:47 AM
53

The problem is that it's all talk. Women need to form "honey badgers" groups in every town and city. They need to start organizing at a political level and lobbying politicians like their feminist counterparts. Taking a "women against feminism" selfie and posting it on tumblr in is not enough. They need to be prepared to give up some of their privileges and take responsibility like adults. They need to learn to empathize with men and boys. They should do this for self-interest if nothing more, b…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 11:31 PM
3

I mean, society as a whole tells men to do that always, i dont understand why people think that when Peterson says that, its brand new information. indeed.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 10:22 PM
18

These stats are also true in patriarchies. But men are now being attacked by both tradcons and feminists, the left and the right. History has shown that men are willing to put up with almost anything provided they are afforded a smidgen of respect, fairness and purpose. Feminists have removed the carrot, so only the stick remains. If they think men are going to put up with this indefinitely they are in for a rude awakening. Every man has his breaking point. As for Peterson, he's reasonably solid…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:51 PM
3

You're either completely ignorant or lying through your teeth. There are stories posted here every day about women molesting teenage boys and and getting zero punishment. Hell there are stories about women molesting pre-pubescent boys and getting little or no punishment. Across the board women are basically treated like royalty by the criminal justice system. A study in Britain determined that if women were treated like men, roughly half of all prisoners would be female. Last year a pub in Scotl…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 02:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter