TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dunker741 Archive

View 8 posts and 58 comments by dunker741 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Funny thing is these feminists who are against prostitution are constantly screaming and starting shitstorms about how a woman should be free to choose to do whatever she wants with her body. If that's the case why shouldn't she be free to choose to sell it for sex? Oh that's right, because now she's doing it in a way feminists disagree with.
/r/MGTOW11/04/17 03:50 PM
2

The irony is hilarious because they're constantly telling MGTOW to just "go your own way already". All the feminazis and white knights there are free to live their own lives by the blue pill if they want, we never said they couldn't. But they spend all their time and energy trying to attack us when all they do make us more popular. Epic fail.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/17 08:07 AM
1

Welp, looks like it actually got us all the way to the White House! Suck on that! Hahaha!
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:56 PM
1

I'll quote one of my favorite comedians Jim Jefferies. "Every single time a man sleeps with a lot of women he's called a stud. But if a woman sleeps with a lot of men she's called a slut. People think this is unfair. Nah! It's completely fair and I'll tell you why alright. It's fucking easy to be a slut. It's fucking hard to be a stud. To be a stud you have to be witty, charming, well-dressed, have nice shoes and a fake job. To be a slut you just have to be there. There are fat ugly sluts out th…
/r/askTRP11/12/16 10:43 AM
1

I will say too, there are plenty of women who have bad experiences with men. Whether it's rape, domestic violence or an abusive relationship. And it's common for them to go through a stage of anger and hatred towards men. Why are they never criticized the way MGTOW is? Most of the comments I see here are saying things like well, if they want to go their own way they should just suck it up and go their own way. People who have gone through bad experiences with the opposite sex have the right to v…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 09:46 AM
3

Could ask the same in reverse. Why did the liberal blue pill media harp on Brock Turner for weeks on end, but actually deliberately go out of their way to attempt to cover up the hundreds of sexual assaults in the Cologne incident?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 09:35 AM
1

If we were talking about fraud or money laundering then yes absolutely you would have a point. But we're talking about rape here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 09:29 AM
45

I like how nothing is ever mentioned about the absurd amount of single mothers sitting around all day living off the state, using the state as a surrogate father. Not only not doing anything, but also taking taxpayer money. At least these men aren't a burden to the taxpayer.
/r/MGTOW04/11/16 02:45 PM
2

For all this talk about how men are violent and started every war and all the bad things. Guess what. Every good thing in this country was created by a man too. Our government, our society, our infrastructure. And all the technology these feminazis use to bash men were created by men.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:02 AM
1

Yes because the LA times is totally just a "google result". Research? What research? People with an 83% liberal bias is valid research to you? No wonder you're so delusional
/r/MensRights18/10/16 06:02 AM
1

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-gross-academia-conservatives-hiring-20160520-snap-story.html https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-01-07/academics-are-so-lefty-they-don-t-even-see-it http://nypost.com/2014/10/12/liberal-bias-in-academia-is-destroying-the-integrity-of-research/ Even more sources proving the outright and blatant liberal bias in academia. And this is what you consider scholarly and credible. Hahahahahah
/r/MensRights18/10/16 05:45 AM
1

Actually a video of a live event that happened right in front of your eyes is not a conspiracy theory. And yeah I discredited it with a study showing 5 of 6 professors are liberal. Over 83% liberal and you claim it to be legit academia with no bias. Hilarious.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 05:30 AM
1

Yup again can't address the point so you just try to discredit the source.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 04:01 AM
1

If you need more proof: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IawEMxTroBk Depaul university blatantly and overtly allowed Milo, a conservative speaker to be physically assaulted because he's a white male and they disagree with his opinions. You think they would allow anything close to this happen to a female speaker? So there is some actual visual and video evidence for you. If you still don't believe that and think that you need 100 liberal professors to agree with you that the sky is blue, in order fo…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 01:14 PM
1

Not conspiracy theories at all. http://dailysignal.com/2016/01/14/liberal-professors-outnumber-conservative-faculty-5-to-1-academics-explain-why-this-matters/ Now I know you're going to try to discredit this by saying well, because 100000 liberal peer reviewers didn't act against their own self interests and approve this story means it's not legit. But it's blatantly obvious that there is a huge liberal bias in higher education. This is a typical feminist tactic. When you can't address the point…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 12:58 PM
1

Funny how what you described is actually what your sources are. Guess where "academia scholarly sources" come from? Liberal propaganda machines known as universities. The same ones who spread myths like the wage gap. Universities are being funded by the government and feminist lobby groups. Using fancy words like scholarly and peer reviewed doesn't mean anything. All it proves is that it's even more biased and not credible.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 12:25 PM
1

https://www.amazon.com/Men-Strike-Boycotting-Marriage-Fatherhood/dp/1594037620. You want true scholarly sources check this out. A PHd and former feminist admitting women have it better now, and citing tons of actual data(not liberal funded propaganda machine influenced studies such as the wage gap which has been disproven over and over). Knock yourself out.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:24 AM
1

Yeah, "scholarly" sources such as the cucked, liberal propaganda machine known as modern day universities. Scholarly such as the bullshit at DePaul where because they couldn't refute Milo's arguments, they overtly let him be physically assaulted. Scholarly such as this shit, telling boys at age 6 that they're terrible abusers. All scholarly means in this day an age is brainwashed from the cucked, pussy whipped liberal propaganda.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:21 AM
1

Consider that sex offenders are treated the worst in prison. Someone who gets falsely accused goes to jail and will likely get raped himself many times in his prison sentence. So even if we look at it from a rape for rape perspective, a false rape accusation is actually much worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 01:51 PM
1

Don't forget the patriarchy too.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:22 PM
3

100% true. I dropped out of college when I was 20 because I felt so misplaced, not to mention the absurd tuition fees of college here. Recently I started traveling Europe and it's been such a better experience. Girls there are intelligent, can hold a conversation about something other than fucking twilight or harry potter. Not to mention a huge upgrade in the looks and personality department. I hope more and more guys read this and reject the blue pill media propaganda. There's so much more the …
/r/TheRedPill28/09/16 03:37 PM
2

^ This. The downside of capitalism means that you are one accident or health issue away from losing all the massive cash you speak of. Not to mention in order to make this massive cash, you have to first absorb massive amounts of college tuition debt. Which is free or at least much cheaper in these other countries.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/16 04:18 PM
38

I think this is getting downvoted because a lot of redpillers are also nationalists. But as someone who has traveled many countries in Eastern Europe, this guy is absolutely right. The girls are much more intelligent, feminine, very few landwhales and love Americans. You will feel like you're superman; going back to America and dealing with these fat, materialistic, entitled American women will have you feeling like you're back on Krypton.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/16 04:24 PM
2

A few days ago, someone here pointed out how feminists made their own meme comparing men to M&Ms, but threw a bitch-fit over Trump doing essentially the same thing towards Syrian refugees. To take it a step further, there are many ways this logic is dangerous, bigoted and outrageous. This is just one of many examples. And in fact, this one would actually be far more factually grounded than the one they used, as far more black men have criminal records, than men in general who are rapists. Whethe…
/r/MGTOW24/09/16 04:08 AM
2

You say not all women are psychotic, gold-digging cunts who will leave you and take half your shit? Imagine a bowl of M&Ms, 50%(the actual divorce rate) are poison. Go ahead! Eat a handful!
/r/MGTOW21/09/16 04:52 PM
1

That's not what I said at all. I never said they're worthless. What I said was they are not and can never be equal to men. Doesn't mean they can't be good or even great. Just not the same level as men.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 06:26 PM
1

LOL that backfired on you real quick
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 06:24 PM
1

I worked in Estonia for a few months. Man those women are some of the prettiest on earth. Salute to you for being strong enough to resist them haha.
/r/MGTOW12/09/16 06:30 PM
1

They write all these damn independent women songs like they can...but then when it comes time to actually be independent they are nowhere to be found.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 02:07 AM
1

This reminds me of Bill Burr's bit about relentless women where he compares waves hitting a beach to women nagging: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spinaW-zC-E
/r/MGTOW26/08/16 02:12 AM
3

The thing I like most is this constant "Why don't you just go your own way then without telling everyone you're going your own way". Under this logic, no movement or group would exist. Why don't the PUAs just go and pick up girls without telling everyone they're doing it then? Every group or movement involves like-minded individuals getting together to discuss ideas. But for some reason, we're the only ones who get flak for it.
/r/MGTOW11/08/16 07:56 PM
6

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-01/asian-men-win-the-hourly-earnings-race-in-america Sadly he also didn't realize Asian men are the most successful financially. Getting paid an extra $3 per hour for not having to deal with crazy, obese and materialistic American whores? As an Asian guy I have to say this is more than fair compensation.
/r/MGTOW05/07/16 05:13 AM
1

Meanwhile this is going on in Europe and not a word from feminists about it: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7H5a4ytOrwU Priorities...
/r/MGTOW04/06/16 01:13 PM
1

That's not the case at all. I dated an older woman once. Didn't depend on her but she always took me to her house to hang out and drove me around since I didn't have my own place or car. My friends all envied me because their girlfriends were constantly draining their financial resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 02:43 AM
1

You may praise those men but this isn't about your own personal opinion. If all of society had your own personal opinion then we wouldn't even be having this conversation. I must have had different experiences than you, as I've never seen a woman scorned for being a stay-at-home mom. But I've seen plenty of men shamed for being a stay-at-home dad. It has everything to do with the subject at hand. My whole point is, yes there is a double standard, but there are equal if not worse double standards…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 02:24 AM
1

Uh I don't know where you've been. But a ton of young guys have a thing for cougars and sugar mamas these days. And the opposite exists against men too. There are plenty of shows where a rich and successful millionaire has a hot wife. Yet no show where a poor an unsuccessful man finds princess charming who sweeps him off his feet and puts him in a nice, big house. My point isn't that there isn't a double standard, my point is that double standards go both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 02:21 AM
2

Of course but those things are purely subjective. There are actual numbers and statistics which prove a certain weight is too much. Okay deal. If you give me my poor, young guy married to an older, rich sugar mama, I will give you the fat woman being married to a handsome, loving, and caring man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 01:48 AM
3

You know what we also don't see? Poor men/Stay-at-home dads being praised and admired for what they do. But women who break the traditional path are sure as hell celebrated on all fronts when they break the mold and enter the workforce. In the same way, if a woman chooses a traditional life and is a stay-at-home mom, no one would ever shame or shun her. And if a man goes into the traditional workforce, he certainly will not get any bonus points from anyone. Basically all I'm hearing is that men …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 01:42 AM
3

You know why? Because the very term in black is not overdark or overblack, which means it's not a bad thing. Also I didn't bring up the comparison, that was someone else you quoted. In the same way, I'd love to hear about any movie/tv show that stars a young, mildly attractive guy married to a rich sugar mama who buys him a big house, fancy car, and constantly showers him with gifts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 01:25 AM
4

This is an awful comparison for 2 reasons. 1) Being a certain race is something you were born with and nothings wrong with it. Being fat, the very term is OVERweight, implying that there is something wrong with it. 2) You can lose weight but you can't change your race.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 11:06 PM
2

Way to make yourself the unofficial spokeswoman for every woman in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 11:04 PM
2

You clearly misinterpreted everything I said. I didn't say ALL women were materialistic. I just said ENOUGH were to make it so a guy can compensate for being fat by being rich. And by the way, way to accuse me of overgeneralizing then pulling out a single one example to support your own case. And even your one example doesn't support your own case, because I guarantee money was at least part of the reason she was with him in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 11:02 PM
2

You wanna know why this is the case? Because women care and like to marry rich guys, whether the guy is fat or not. If a guy is rich and successful and fat, he will still have women all over him. Guys on the other hand are far less materialistic and are more into physical traits. So therefore women are the ones who enable fat guys to still be successful and attractive. Telling a women she's beautiful in her own way even though she's fat is the same as telling a man he's rich in his own way even …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 03:50 PM
1

It shows women have a huge pull in politics now too.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:24 PM
1

Lol, this reminds me of a question I asked feminists a while ago on /rAskfeminists. Thought I'd share it here the responses were pretty absurdly hilarious: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1xa2mn/question_about_porn_and_prostitution/
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 02:30 AM
2

I really never understood the idea that women who are models are porn stars are being objectified. "Oh you only like them for their looks you don't like them for who they really are." If that's the logic, there isn't a single career out there that's not objectification. Professional athletes are objectified too in that case. Oh you don't like the football players for who they really are, you wouldn't be watching football or even know who they are if it weren't for their athleticism. So every sin…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 11:13 PM
1

Holy shit some actual sensible law-makers and politicians. I've always wanted to move to Europe this is making me want to move there even more.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:56 PM
1

I need to move to the UK then lol.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:55 PM
3

Yes! Yes! Yes! This is exactly what I have been trying to tell people.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:55 PM
0

Wow the more stories I read the more infuriated I become. Someone needs to bring this up to a politician. I really feel like we have no voice while females have professional bitchers working on their behalf 24/7
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:40 PM
3

Yep not surprised.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:39 PM
0

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:01 PM
0

True, not exactly sure what that stat is though.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 05:42 PM
5

You know it pisses me off that when women get charged more for health insurance, it actually becomes a political talking point in a presidential election(Not that Obama really believe this shit, he's just pandering for votes). You haven't heard one single political yet speak on men's rights. And if they did they would be ridiculed by feminists for being little boy and crybabies and told to grow up. Funny coming from a group of professional bitchers.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:38 PM
7

Yeah you're being charged that much just for being a male. But then if health insurance companies charge more for women just for being a woman it's sexist. Fucking bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:24 PM
2

Yeah I agree, in UK it' already falling apart as a new law was passed that men can't be charged more for it. Unfortunately feminists still have more power here, mainly because they are professional complainers, and it's more acceptable for women to bitch than men. Hopefully they crumble like Rome in this country soon too.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:22 PM
3

Wtf $300 wow that's insane.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:18 PM
4

It was a sarcastic mock of the argument feminists use to justify that. I highly doubt that study is even legit.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter