TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

egalitarianfox Archive

View 2 posts and 29 comments by egalitarianfox on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
56

discussionegalitarianfox/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 06:02 PM
1

discussionegalitarianfox/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 09:25 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Alright, I'm tired of talking to you, so I will leave you here with a couple of things: Yes, I know that feminist subs are bad and probably worse than MR by any fair standard. The reason I go on those subs is precisely because of this. I have a different viewpoint than them and can explain it better to them. However, it is difficult to explain misogyny and racism to MR, since I have experienced neither. Yes, it would be troubling if several million people hated men. By your logic, there is no he…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 11:05 PM
1

I'm not debating you on how feminist subs are bad, we all know they are. My point is the MR is not a great sub either. The biggest overlap of users is between MR and MGTOW, and that should tell you all you have to know about MR users. MGTOW is notoriously hate-filled, and have had numerous cases of antisemitism, racism, and ethnocentrism, which ultimately resulted in them being quarantined. I'm not a feminist by most standards, last time I checked. I don't mind rants, and having a little toleran…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 10:57 PM
1

Because some women on those subs are not androphobic. If they were, it would be quite a troubling sign. Many people have not been presented rational arguments for men's rights, and there is no point staying in our little echo chamber screaming about how the world hates us if we aren't willing to change it, no matter how small the scale may be. I have certainly convinced some people on TwoX, TrollX, WitchesvsPat, and even one person from the old PinkPillFem that there are legitimate issues with f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 05:24 PM
1

Again, I'm seeing comments supporting pro lifers on this sub. This is supposed to be a pro choice sub, and I'm seeing people that are supporting pro life. No doubt that an MRA sub that isn't exclusively pro choice would have a significant portion of people that are pro life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:46 PM
1

Bruh, look at my comment history, I'm clearly not a troll. nukereddithistory extension. look it up. it allows me to enter feminist subs without being immediately banned for my comment history Again, not really. I just want to have discussions with groups that would immediately ban me otherwise. You clearly have not seen my comment history if you think I'm a troll.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:44 PM
0

Okay, I really don't see where you are going. Left wingers are not a perfect group, like, at all. It is full of identity politics and can lead to thinking about eugenics and genocide. Please see stupidpol. Because you are redefining what constitutes left and right just to justify your position that feminists have always been unilaterally left wing, JUST TO JUSTIFY your position that MRAs may have always been unilaterally right wing. In short - I am calling you out because you are trying to get a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:41 PM
1

Bruh, I have been on MensRights for a long time (since 2015). I have seen some racism, ethnocentrism, and conflating feminism with communism claiming patriarchy theory is neo-Marxist and at least some blatant misogyny along with people thinking traditional gender roles are good. A lot of comments on MR have tradcon talking points and most upvoted posts on MR are ragebait. I'm not going to continue arguing with you about this, but this is my experience. And MGTOW is not a healthy movement and nei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:34 PM
0

Eugenics, genocide and apartheid are not related to political affiliation. Even RadFems would be considered on the left wing. All of those ideas can be either on the left or right wing. I'm not really sure why you want to argue with this so much, but bad people exist on all sides. I am aware of menkampf.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:27 PM
1

I consistently delete my comment history and have been using reddit for several years now and consecutively delete and create accounts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:12 PM
1

Of course, I was making a broad brush statement. However, these broad brush statements are generally accepted when regarding feminists, so you agree that it is okay to categorize MRAs using the same types of statements. I have seen racism and bigotry on that subreddit. It is also closely linked with MGTOW (oops this one is too, but hopefully people understand that MGTOW is not healthy), which has been involved with some pretty shady stuff. Also, the incel movement is inextricably linked with far…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 02:40 AM
1

Hmm... I disagree with you an all accounts. PMC has almost as many members as this sub and frequently crossposts good posts on MenRights and LeftistsForMen, stupidpol, etc. I don't exactly know the reason behind the disagreement between this sub and PMC, but I feel like they should agree on a lot of things...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 02:13 AM
1

We never saw right wing feminists even during first and second wave...feminism has very much been a left wing, progressive movement, pretty much always.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 02:09 AM
5

Correct, Men's Rights is not a left/right issue. However, neither is feminism. Yet, we almost never see right wing feminists. Why is this? Movements and ideologies can be manipulated into serving a completely separate point of view. It may not be the point of it, but nevertheless it does this. According to this logic, FDS is a dating subreddit that is doing no harm. perhaps you view anyone left of centre as far-right and perhaps you're judging a person as a whole based on one or two interactions…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 10:45 PM
1

Abortion has nothing to do with the woman and everything to do with the foetus, ie when does a human gain their human rights. Well, I disagree here. It also has to do with bodily autonomy, i.e. when does the fetus become a separate human, which seems like the same thing, but really isn't. Even if pro lifers believe that the fetus is a human at conception, they would have to admit that it requires the mother to survive. That means that the mother should have the option to decide what to do with w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 07:17 PM
2

Yeah, most people can't get abortions past 24 weeks unless they have significant medical complications.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 07:13 PM
-2

The top poster of all time on r/MensRights (https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5j16nd/how_to_get_banned_from_rfeminism/) is a stringent conservative and has commented on various pro life subreddits and has argued for pro life across reddit. Of course, he was last active 3 years ago. In my experience, MensRights often comes out as a breeding ground for conservatives and occasionally far-right propaganda. Many times I see posts that support traditional gender norms and other tradcon ideo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 07:05 PM
1

Lol this guys doesn't care. look at this comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j8of3f/the_insane_female_privilege_of_getting_shorter/g8ew3yd/?context=3. I have been arguing with this troll for DAYS.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 02:30 AM
1

https://www.theworldcounts.com/stories/Modern_Day_Slavery_Statistics There are many different statistics out there, and ALL of them are estimates. Slavery may or may not disproportionately affect women. Also note that the 55% statistic is for "children" and well as women. This includes male children. Like I said, depending on what stat you use, you could actually show that slavery disproportionately affects men. men typically express emotion through anger while women express through sadness This…
/r/MensRights11/10/20 02:18 AM
1

You are right, the majority of war mongering rulers (including the years 1480-1913) were men. But also the majority of rulers were men. But women were disproportionately war-mongering rulers. You can't understand basic statistics, so I will show you an example. Take that there are 100 rulers. Then about 70 of them might be male, and the other 30 are female. Take 30 of the male rulers were war-mongering rulers, and 15 of the female rulers were war-mongering rulers. Then there are more male war-mo…
/r/MensRights11/10/20 02:07 AM
1

All circumstantial. Indira Gandhi, Jiang Qing, Elena Ceaușescu, Imelda Marcos, Isabel Peron. All are modern. Oh yeah, on top of this: you named different dictators. This is irrelevant to waging war. Yeah, more European monarchs were men. And guess what, most wars were probably started by men. The point is that when women get power, they are more likely to start war than when men are in power.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 02:06 AM
1

Bruh, are you actually using an alt account? You seem to be the same person, not being able to read. I could easily claim that stability from marrying allowed women who wanted to attack other nations to attack them. You completely forget that the woman is actually "waging" a war. The fact that marrying doesn't affect the percentage for men seals the deal. Let us take an example: let us say that an unmarried female ruler attacks other countries with probability 20%, and that unmarried men attack …
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:33 AM
3

No, starting wars is different than defending.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 07:10 PM
3

Yeah, I just read it. You greatly misunderstand the results. Both men and women display about equal levels of the basic indicators of narcissism: "Grandiose/Exhibitionism" - there is no significant difference. "Vulnerable narcissism" - there is no significant difference. Both of these indicate biological differences. The other two categories do not indicate biological differences, but rather social or possibly biosocial differences between men and women. In these two categories (the ones that ar…
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:57 PM
2

Interestingly, I can't find a single link to the actual study, but rather just press releases.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:43 PM
3

You didn't read what I said. The threshold for negative side effects from testosterone is 7 times higher for men, meaning they can have 7 times higher testosterone without exhibiting narcissistic behavior.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:34 PM
2

You don't have any data, then criticize me for having limited data Marriage caused both women and men to gain more power (from extra land and resources). Women turned around and used that extra power to attack others. Men did not (they were essentially unaffected by extra power). Marriage "enabled queens to pursue more aggressive war policies" because they got more resources. Marriage did not affect men.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:29 PM
4

Your first study: risking harm is different than actively harming others or yourself. You cliff diving is not actively committing suicide. The second: higher than average levels of any chemical in your brain will produce unintended results. Higher than average levels of testosterone in both women and men produce narcissistic behavior. Both women and men with average or lower than average levels of testosterone for their sex did not display narcissistic behavior. Testosterone has side effects for…
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:24 PM
2

obviously.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:17 PM
1

Most wars were started by women: https://www.nber.org/papers/w23337 Your wikipedia page is irrelevant to the topic. Also, an unproven hypothesis.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter