TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

elborracho420 Archive

View 0 posts and 175 comments by elborracho420 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

As a guy, I hate getting older. Every birthday after my 21st was pretty much dreaded. I think it's a human thing. The whole existential crisis of the death march. One year closer.
/r/ExRedPill15/11/19 08:24 PM
6

Do alphas not have jobs or homes or achievements? Are they dependent on someone else? Who is paying their bills?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/19 06:39 PM
5

I would imagine that some males do, just as some women are guilty of the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 08:23 PM
4

That's kind of sad tbh but that is ultimately your prerogative. Cheers!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 08:20 PM
8

Okay, just wanted to confirm it was a statement made in ignorance and not something I was misunderstanding. Thank you for your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 08:06 PM
12

Trying so hard to see the point of this comment. There are a lot of women who masturbate regularly and would happily have sex with a disembodied chunk of silicone as well, should we ignore what women say they "hate?"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 07:50 PM
1

So you are just a troll then. Carry on.
/r/ExRedPill11/12/18 02:31 AM
1

Because the writers are playing off emotions to create shock value. Basically like being trolled.
/r/ExRedPill11/12/18 02:25 AM
1

They wrote a scene people would react to.
/r/ExRedPill11/12/18 02:07 AM
1

I'm just taking your argument in good faith. You're the one saying what you see in this cartoon is women these days. Or at least that you feel that way. Can you understand why that would been seen as irrational?
/r/ExRedPill11/12/18 02:00 AM
1

An example of an irrational thought would be for you to watch the cartoon scene you posted in the OP, about a fictional story, and then come to the conclusion that what you've seen in the cartoon is real. From Google: Irrationality is cognition, thinking, talking, or acting without inclusion of rationality. It is more specifically described as an action or opinion given through inadequate use of reason, or through emotional distress or cognitive deficiency.
/r/ExRedPill11/12/18 12:38 AM
1

I don't think you understand the meaning of determinism or the noble lie if you think either are caused by simply choosing rational thought over irrational thought. The truth is you can't have free will without rationality.
/r/ExRedPill11/12/18 12:13 AM
2

This reads almost nonsensically. If anything, by shaping a tool, you are also shaping yourself in the act of creation. But the tool isn't doing anything but being shaped and used. Seems like you're stretching because you want to use a fictional trope to justify your own prejudices.
/r/ExRedPill10/12/18 09:02 PM
1

Don't act on feelings. Act on thoughts. Thoughts can be logical and rational, feelings cannot. When you have irrational feelings you don't like, examine them closely. Write down what caused the feeling, and why you think the cause gave you this particular feelings. You can learn a great deal about yourself this way.
/r/ExRedPill10/12/18 08:57 PM
9

Your opinion is the popular opinion. The opinion in the meme is not a popular opinion
/r/MensRights01/07/18 02:26 PM
1

It's saying that kids require their fathers masculinity growing up. The argument being posed is that you don't have to be masculine toward your children to be a good father figure. That kids don't need dads for masculinity or moms for femininity. They need moms and dads for parents.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 10:39 PM
1

You need to face a challenge in your life that changes you as you struggle and overcome it and become stronger. Ideally one that you benefit from, like moving up career wise for example. But it doesn't have to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 06:49 AM
0

autistic screeching ensues
/r/TheRedPill05/11/16 01:26 PM
0

Two reasons. Or really, two kind of people. Actual evil rapists who are consciously aware they are preying on intoxicated targets which are clearly easier to get. And drunk college students who aren't well versed in the philosophies of consent and how intoxication blurs ones ability to give consent. But there is no such thing as rape culture in the USA. Culture is behavior that is learned and shared by a community. As a community, we abhor rape. Any "rape culture" that is real only exists in pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/16 01:42 PM
11

I think this whole "pill debate" thing is retarded and only sub here to read the cringey material on both sides, but surely you must realize that you're literally "hamstering" right here, no? Throwing out a strawman that has nothing to do with the original argument so you can "win" the discussion?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 10:37 PM
2

Well I'll be damned.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 02:55 PM
1

What i mean is, grabbing someone's butt against their consent should not be held/punished at the same standard as rape, because one is clearly worse than the other.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:58 PM
2

I don't disagree with you here, I'm just pointing out the fact that it's up to the individual who is having their ass grabbed as to whether or not they consent to it. Trying to make the OP an issue is only valid if the players in question felt as if the advances were assault. You cannot decide for them that this is a problem, only the players themselves can.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 08:13 PM
1

You can choose for it to be a problem for yourself. You cannot choose for it to be a problem for someone else if they don't see it as one.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 04:13 PM
4

Sometimes it's appropriate and necessary to punish undesired advances with jail.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 04:10 PM
1

I made $24.5 k in 2013 that I reported on my taxes and FAFSA and I received the full Pell grant for that fall and semester as long as I was taking 12 credit hours, but I can see that not many people can work full time and go to school full time simultaneously
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:49 PM
5

What's really shitty about this, is parents don't have to send you to college or help you. So, requiring you to report their income at the age of 18 is pointless, unless they've either agreed to pay for you or are obligated to by the state. Just because your parents have money to pay for college doesn't mean you have money to pay for college.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:45 PM
1

Looks like I jumped the gun by assuming. I agree with everything you've said here.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:41 PM
3

So perspective from another country isn't valid for this conversation? Does the UK not offer income based funding to its population similar to other first world countries?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 07:48 PM
4

So, affirmative action should be used to get poor white men into the countries top colleges? State universities or community college aren't good enough for you? They were good enough for me. I started off with federal and state grants, and was able to procure scholarships because of my grades starting in my third semester.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 07:45 PM
3

I got lots of financial aid stateside, just graduated spring 2015. Not sure how it works in the UK but there is a lot of help for anyone in the US that's low income. I didn't have to pay tuition or any books, and had a little left over each semester to help with other bills.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:12 PM
1

Yes, but they are exceptions, and to pretend that they are the norm is absurd.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:43 AM
1

You can insult and use all the ad hominems you like, it only shows the fact that you can't support your argument stand out even more. An 18 year old from the first world is not significantly more capable of making informed rational decisions than a 14 year old, and they are both very much children, regardless of their numeric age. You probably think its okay for someone who's 40 to sleep with someone who's 18 because it's legal. Because the 18 year old is perfectly capable of making an informed …
/r/MensRights06/12/15 01:00 AM
1

You're acting like 18 year olds are significantly more capable than 14 year olds of making informed decisions. They are not, and this is a bastardization of the real purpose of what this law was originally create d for: to prevent children from being taken advantage if by grown adults. 14 year olds are a lot more sexual these days than you might think. If a grown man did this to a 14 year old, I would agree with you, but regardless of what the law says, or your personal opinion, the fact is your…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:55 PM
4

Not sure if you're seriously looking for an answer to your questions, but a 14 year olds desire/motivation to do homework and chores is not going to be the same as their desire/motivation to do things they've glamourized, like sex and drugs.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:13 PM
1

He was 18. You act like he was some 40 year old. They were nearly the same age. Thus was technically illegal, but not pedophilia like you're claiming.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:56 PM
2

Incorrect, your statement is a non sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 06:11 AM
1

This comment needs to be at the top. Sometimes the people here can be pretty ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:47 PM
1

I'm not 100% sure I understand the point you're making, are you equating getting sex advice from TRP as the same kind of... not really advice but information one gets from sex education?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 02:19 AM
1

Well, there's definitely a difference between relationship/sexual advice and medical advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 06:35 PM
2

Well, before you get mad at me, I'm not revealing my stance toward TRP in any of my comments. What I mean by that statement is it seems (from my perspective) the average person who is exposed to TRP perceives it as a hateful group. Do you think that most people like TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 05:59 PM
1

Eh, the principle of your argument is flawed. There's nothing wrong with asking strangers online for advice about sex or relationships. Seeking advice from what's tantamount to a hate group is what is wrong, which I'm sure is how most normal people see TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 01:14 PM
-5

False accusations do happen, but arguing the exception as the norm is a logical fallacy. This has nothing to do with men's rights aside from the misguided angry circlejerk prevalent in both feminism and the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:02 PM
1

Then whatever your definition of a social movement is wouldn't include TRP either. I've already offered you a clear and definitive definition for social movement that includes TRP. I've asked you for your definition of rap and how it is a social movement, you could not provide one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 11:11 PM
1

I think the rap genre has been influenced by multiple social movements, and I think you see this reflected in some lyrics of some songs. I don't think that rap itself is a specific social movement. As far as rap being misogynist, not all rap is. Only specific songs are, not the entire genre. I'm pretty sure you could find a pro-feminist rap song if you looked hard enough. There's christian rap, I've even heard rednecks rap about aryan circle shit when I was in the penitentiary. I don't think rap…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 10:56 PM
1

The wikipedia article is pretty long, any way you could copy paste the part your referencing?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 08:57 PM
1

How are you defining rap in this discussion right now? If I'm playing semantics and using the wrong definition for the word rap, tell me what definition of the word applies to how you're using it as a social movement and not a style of music.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 08:23 PM
1

It depends on how you're using the word rap right now. I'm assuming you're indicating a genre of music with the word. Is there something else behind it that you're referencing? When I google the definition of rap, this is what I'm getting a type of popular music of US black origin in which words are recited rapidly and rhythmically over a prerecorded, typically electronic instrumental backing. So, unless you're using the word rap to reference something else other than a genre of music, which is …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 08:09 PM
1

Not as a specific genre of music, maybe a particular song's lyrics could have a message that does it, but rap in and of itself is just a genre describing a type of music.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 07:56 PM
1

You made the argument that a social movement is an idea with a philosophy behind it that could, as an example you chose, be used to guide parenting techniques. The definition I've given for a social movement has already been established as the following: Social movements are a type of group action. They are large, sometimes informal, groupings of individuals or organizations which focus on specific political or social issues. In other words, they carry out, resist or undo a social change. TRP re…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 07:45 PM
1

Gay marriage is feminism? What about "black lives matter" parenting advice? Or is that feminism too? Actually, that's not what I said, this is just a strawman you've come up with. In a previous comment I've assigned womens suffrage to feminism (the higher order social movement that contains the womens suffrage movement), but you could also consider it part of the civil rights movement, which would be an even higher order than feminism. The gay marriage (gonna stop using the scare quotes now) wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 07:22 PM
1

Vegan parenting advice, sure. "Gay marriage," like womens suffrage, can be assigned to a higher order social movement, so yeah. Social media is a physical tool we use to communicate with each other rather than a movement of individuals. Never heard of a "eat local" social movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 07:08 PM
1

Well, I'd call it feminist parenting advice, but yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 06:53 PM
1

It's the type of advice he's looking for. He's not looking for general parenting advice, or he'd go to /r/parenting. He wants to raise his son according to TRP doctrine. It's not the seeking of parenting advice, it's the specific brand of it that is the social movement. He's indoctrinating his son into TRP at the age of 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 06:22 PM
1

But there's not a connecting philosophy behind every post on how one should behave and raise their kids to behave. He would have posted in /r/redpillparenting, but the sub was dead. He's not looking for normal parenting advice, he's looking for a very specific brand of parenting advice that adheres to TRPs philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 06:06 PM
1

A specific brand of parenting advice, adhering to TRPs philosophies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 05:48 PM
1

It's not really the act of you reading a message board that makes it a social movement. The teachings themselves are a social movement. The philosophies behind the teachings. For example, here is a man seeking to use red pill philosophies to teach his 5 year old son how to deal with bullies: https://www.reddit.com/r/marriedredpill/comments/3di375/how_kids_should_deal_with_bullying/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 04:50 PM
1

This app can't definitively prove consent though. Any court that believes it does would be absurd in that belief.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:46 PM
1

You keep trying to spin it that way. Saying the same thing over and over again doesn't make it true. But to each their own I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 04:17 PM
1

Actually the sex is part of the essential definition of social behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 04:16 PM
1

Any chance you might have a link?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 11:14 PM
3

Shit, I would've actually liked to read that. I figured if anybody would be for the poster, it would be them.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:45 PM
1

I'm not sure if you really aren't understanding or if you're just trolling, but I'll go ahead and answer in good faith. "Social movements are a type of group action. They are large, sometimes informal, groupings of individuals or organization which focus on specific political or social issues." Social issues. Relationship dynamics is a social issue. TRP is a doctrine that teaches a specific relationship paradigm in which the man is in control and is able to get sex when he wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 10:21 PM
1

It's not really any one individuals fault. But it doesn't matter, because it detracts from the original point. Feminists are mad because the lyrics are misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 10:04 PM
2

No they're claiming the misogyny is in white record execs not rap music, No, they're claiming that the lyrics of the rap music are misogynist, and they're blaming the record execs because they're the ones giving the artist a platform to be heard by the masses, because that's the kind of music that sells.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 10:00 PM
1

TRP is focused on how to be a better man TRP is advice on how to behave to get you laid more. The whole "self improvement" thing is just part of the plan to get laid more. It's based on evolutionary psychology, how to behave in a way that will result in you getting desired* behavior out of women. This is absolutely social behavior. Edit: desired*
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 09:43 PM
2

Edit: I just realized I think I misunderstood what the nofap subreddit was about. I thought that they were actively going out and trying to stop other people from masturbating. This looks more like a sub for people to go to when they want to quit fapping and are looking for tips on how to. You gotta take the whole context of the quote your giving me into consideration. "Sex and violence are seen as quick sells, so record industry executives pump money into artists with the rawest lyrics, includi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 08:08 PM
2

Find me some. First 3 links from googling feminism vs hip hop: "Rap music is still a male-dominated industry with a notorious reputation for blatantly degrading outlier groups such as women and members of the LGBT community. " http://raprehab.com/feminism-vs-rap/ "Rap became more known for its obsession with wealth and glamour and unadulterated objectification of women than for its social-commentary roots." http://www.socialism.com/drupal-6.8/articles/women-feminism-hip-hop "Responses to misogyn…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 06:05 PM
2

Why do feminists criticize all those and rap gets a free pass? I'm pretty sure feminists criticize misogynist messages in rap. There just isn't as big an outcry against it on reddit as there is against TRP. If you're suggesting that all feminists, or even the majority of them are okay with misogynist lyrics in rap, I think that's pretty absurd. TRP is a message board, not a religion or a social movement or any of that crap. I disagree, at least with it being a social movement. It's a doctrine th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 02:40 PM
49

Been scrolling through the comments for about 15 minutes now. I haven't found a single one that defends the message in the picture. Which surprised even me, with this being the internet and all. I'm sure there are some, I just haven't found them yet. So I guess what I'm trying to say is, I'm glad that the general consensus is that this is a bullshit message, not just /r/mensrights believes that.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:26 PM
0

I don't normally get mixed up in these shitshows, but I would say there's a big difference between what is basically art versus a school of thought. Art can be biased, sexist, racist, etc, it's art, people are allowed to create what they want, and if other people like it, great. TRP is a school of thought, a philosophy that is actively teaching a sexual strategy to help men manipulate women to get what they want. TRP also focuses a lot more on gender issues, because, that's really all it's about…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 01:11 AM
5

... God dammit.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 11:57 PM
0

Can't have consensual sex with an 8th grader bro.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 11:56 PM
1

What kind of resources are only exclusively available to women and not to men? Serious question, genuinely curious, don't know that much about this specific topic.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:44 AM
1

What I'm saying is, if there's more single mothers than fathers, would it not make sense that the single mothers get more help than the fathers, based simply on the fact that there's more of them? Doesn't it make more sense that more resources would be given to the ones who need them the most? If there's a finite amount of resources, would those resources not be spread amongst the recipients equally? And if so, doesn't that mean that if 75% of the people who need those resources have a black mar…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:15 AM
-1

Is there not also more single mothers than single fathers?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:24 AM
2

The problem is the photo is very much oversimplifying what you've just described. Oversimplification is misleading, and it's a cop out way to make an argument. The argument you've made is perfectly reasonable and fine, there's no reason to stoop down to spreading misleading information around.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:23 AM
1

Dunno if you noticed/FWIW, he replied to this comment, but replied to the wrong comment: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/375m0i/probably_the_realest_thing_you_will_see_on/crkem2z
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:22 AM
1

You replied to the wrong comment
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:21 AM
0

While I have a feeling your anecdote will be taken as more credible than mine, I have seen women sent to jail for not paying child support in south Texas, and I've never seen anyone sent to jail for missing one payment. I think someone might be bullshitting you on that one.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:20 AM
-2

Well, those houses are for single parents who are experiencing financial hardship, not just women, although I agree you'll find more single parent women in them than men because there are more single parent women then there are single parent men. On to the jail cells, those are where the non custodial parents who don't pay child support after they've been ordered to by a court of law. This applies to women and men, it just depends on who is the non custodial parent. So, no, this really isn't the…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:15 AM
13

I just call myself an egalitarian and forget about it. This is pretty much what everyone should do.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:44 AM
3

And that basically sums it all up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/15 12:10 AM
1

I agree that there is a double standard when it comes to how people react to female on male violence/abuse. There has always been a huge focus on male on female abuse, and largely because male on female violence is typically more lethal/deadly than female on male violence, however, it's still just as serious. I would have to say though, in my personal experience, most women I know would find this womans actions abhorrent.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:24 PM
2

In the circles I run in, and all of the people I know, very few people would find her behavior socially acceptable. If you run in circles where most people would find it otherwise... it sounds like you might be involved with some pretty shitty people. Yes, people do joke about male on female abuse all the time, it doesn't just happen on 4chan. And the vast majority of women I know can empathize with males. It's really sad that you're comment is being upvoted so much on this sub though. It's like…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:20 PM
1

So you're suggesting that... one somehow invalidates the other? I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:16 PM
1

Ignorant people ignore and support male on female abuse all the time. You ever hear the joke: what do you say to a woman with two black eyes? Nothing, she's already been told twice. However, the majority of people, man and woman, would find this behavior inappropriate. To pretend that people typically support things like this is absurd.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:52 PM
1

Your still not telling me how this post has anything to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:37 PM
1

You're dealing in a lot of absolutes there. Her actions are absolutely not socially acceptable. People ignore and joke about male on female abuse all the time. It goes both ways. It's just ignorant people, the gender doesn't really matter. You really believe that women can't empathize with males?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:46 AM
1

I asked if she claimed to be a feminist. I'm asking because you're response to /u/ClassyBurn's comment was to try to point out the "no true scotsman" fallacy, except it doesn't work, because she never claimed to be a feminist, the post had nothing to do with feminism, it only had to do with a woman acting inappropriately. You associate this with feminism because you believe that typical feminists are just a group of women acting inappropriately. You're no true scotsman works both ways. This post…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:42 AM
7

I... don't think that this picture has anything to do with feminism. That would be like if someone found a situation where a man was abusing a woman, and said that /r/mensrights supports it because the abuser is a male.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:44 AM
2

Does she even claim to be a feminist in the image? I think what's happening here is you're seeing a woman act very inappropriately and unethically, and you're somehow connecting this to feminism cause you're on /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:44 AM
11

Do you believe that the majority of people would find her behavior appropriate? The majority of people I know would find the womans actions to be wrong in this situation, man or women. There are a few people I know who would laugh at it, but it's not at all the typical opinion. Whether or not someone would say something or intervene however is an entirely different story.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:40 AM
1

I genuinely think for the most part that the majority of people, man or woman, would find her actions to be wrong. Whether or not anyone would say anything or do anything about it is another story entirely.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:35 AM
1

Thank you for posting! I'm sorry you had to go threw this and I'm glad neither your husband or kids were home. I agree with the top poster, you should alert the media.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:48 PM
2

Very true. Just really depends on the business.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:40 PM
2

I guess the point I'm trying to make is even to a small business like the one I work at, 500k isn't shit.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 05:15 PM
1

Right. I guess the point I was trying to make is that even to a small business (like a hotel with 78 rooms) 500k isn't shit. Obviously one hotel isn't going to compete with the oilfield lol. Maybe if gas prices kept dropping, lol.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:49 PM
14

I work in hospitality, our property did 2.2 million gross last year. We have 78 rooms. 500k isn't shit.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:38 AM
7

And why some workplaces have no women. No job is inherently dependent on someone's gender as much as their capability to do the job.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:23 AM
1

So... You're confirming my comment then.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:21 AM
1

Discrimination based on gender.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:36 AM
0

Oh is that a mod? I'm on alien blue so I can't see flair.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:33 AM
0

ELI5?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:29 AM
61

No shit right? I feel like this whole post is more just to spite their failure than it is about men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:21 AM
0

Not to mention you can't really do much in the field of psychology without at least a Masters degree, and then you're only really looking at being a counselor, at least in the state of Texas. To become a clinical psychologist, you have to get a phd, which is what my end game is.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:10 AM
2

For getting into gender studies or being an SJW? Just pointing out that the former is exactly why this sub exists.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:08 AM
1

Well, if hell is real, it sounds like that's where she belongs.
/r/PussyPass18/04/15 07:21 PM
25

When a heroin addict runs out of heroin is usually when they go to prison. Source: myself
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:04 PM
1

www.whoaverse.com
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:47 PM
1

It looks like you've lost your toucan there bud.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:05 PM
-1

Attacking me instead of my argument. Nice. Thanks for being the MRMs equivalent of a tumblrina.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:39 PM
-6

Well, first I'll point out that what I said is both genders have disadvantages depending on the circumstances. This is different than systematic oppression. The article still does not prove that women aren't oppressed however--it does show that there is systematic oppression of men in this instance.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:40 PM
-10

I think it's fair to say that both genders have disadvantages depending on the circumstances. This post in no way proves that women aren't oppressed.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:22 PM
1

How bizarre. The way my professor graded, it was x points off for each mistake you made in your work. So, there was literally no way for this to happen. Sounds like this could be fixed with just having someone implement a system for grading that wouldn't allow for the bias?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 02:58 AM
2

You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from SSRN.com ($5) for electronic delivery. Ah well. If there's one thing I won't do, it's spend money to verify the accuracy of a Reddit comment, haha. But thanks for the link, I'll see if I can find it in my college's database.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 12:31 AM
4

I'm not saying whether I believe coercion makes it rape or not, but legally speaking it does make it rape.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:26 AM
4

teachers give higher grades to girls' math tests when they take the names away How would the name change the grade on a math test? Isn't math like, 100% objective? It's not like you're writing an essay where the person doing the grading can have bias because they don't like the "way it was written." Do you have a source on this? Not saying you're lying, I'm just genuinely curious as to how this works.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 12:02 AM
17

He's consenting after she coerced him into it.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:32 PM
2

It's called a cop out. It pretty much works like this. I make an argument. You counter my argument. I accuse you of mansplaining. Your argument is now invalid. I win.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 05:30 PM
1

If a woman talks down to another woman is that mansplaining? Or if a woman talks down to a man? Or is it only when a man talks down to a woman? Or is it a special kind of "talking down" men do to women that exclusively only men do? It's all so confusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 05:24 PM
3

Do a lot of people simply use "stop mansplaining" as their entire argument? Yes. This would be called "femsplaining."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 05:22 PM
1

Yeah... I pretty much just go look for stuff that makes me mad. Then I get mad that I'm mad. Then I realize it's my own fault. Then I smoke a joint and go to bed, and the cycle repeats itself.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 02:42 AM
2

Well... there are some subs that are like that, like /r/pussypass. I think this sub is more for discussion, or for me it is personally lol.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 11:56 PM
4

If you have to tell someone to shut up instead of proving their argument wrong, I don't think that you belong in college.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 11:41 PM
19

Just hijacking the top comment to link to the male students change.org petition that calls for the ban to be lifted: https://www.change.org/p/reed-college-restore-jeremiah-josias-luther-george-true-to-his-humanities-110-conference-2?after_sign_exp=member_sponsored_donation
/r/MensRights19/03/15 11:30 PM
13

I did too. I should have listened. Sometimes I wonder if I look for shit just to piss myself off.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 10:28 PM
4

Science, bitch!
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:34 AM
1

Ice already stated the reason I am against capital punishment is because when used it is inevitable that innocent people are put to death.
/r/PussyPass09/03/15 03:58 AM
1

It costs much more to put someone to death than give them life in prison.
/r/PussyPass08/03/15 04:35 PM
0

I think it's because the entire OP doesn't really belong here. It's getting upvoted because of mob mentality, but the woman in question is still going to get punished for the crime. She's either going to get life without parole, or life with a possibility of parole after 25 years. The juror in question voted against the death penalty, she didn't vote to say she was not guilty. There is no indication that the death penalty was voted against by her because the defendant was a woman. That's why OP …
/r/PussyPass08/03/15 01:40 AM
0

I agree, I just question whether this belongs on /r/pussypass
/r/PussyPass08/03/15 01:16 AM
0

You're correct, another commenter had pointed it out to me. It still stands though--she didn't vote to get her off the hook, or vote not guilty, she voted against the death penalty. Are you serious about the lifetime movie though? Cause that sounds like some bullshit that would actually happen.
/r/PussyPass08/03/15 12:52 AM
1

Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:40 AM
3

Good point. I wonder how much the percentage changes as you drop a decade (80 to 70, 70 to 60, etc).
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:37 AM
-1

Signed.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:19 AM
8

8/10 men will develop prostate cancer?! Holy fuck!
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:19 AM
2

They cost much more too. The problem with the death penalty is that it has to be a lengthy process, to try to avoid as many innocent executions as possible. Ultimately, it's better to just do away with it all together.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 10:36 PM
4

a case of a female wanting to let another female get away with murder. No, she just didn't want her to be put to death. Most murderers get life in prison instead of capital punishment. This is for good reason, because the death penalty is utter shit.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 05:07 PM
2

I'm personally against the death penalty because I would rather someone who's guilty not be put to death than one innocent person be put to death by mistake.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 05:05 PM
1

I'm using alien blue, I didn't see a video, just an article. Will have to watch it tomorrow at work. I guess until then my jimmies will remain neutral.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 08:27 AM
4

How do you figure? Murderers more often get life in prison instead of the death penalty.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 07:40 AM
0

The jury votes guilty or not guilty, and then has a separate vote for sentencing.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 07:38 AM
3

It doesn't say that she decided from the beginning, it says that one of the male jurors believed she had decided from the beginning. But if it's a pussy pass, why did she vote guilty? She would have had to have entered a guilty vote, otherwise it would have been a mistrial. Maybe she's just against the death penalty. Not trying to give anyone a pussy pass here myself, but if I'm gonna get my jimmies rustled, I want it to be a clear and indisputable pussy pass.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 04:41 AM
-2

The lady was found guilty, she just won't be put to death. It will be life without parole or life with the possibility of parole after 25 years.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 04:11 AM
2

The lady was found guilty, she just won't be put to death. It will be life without parole or life with the possibility of parole after 25 years.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 04:11 AM
21

A case of a female not wanting to see another female get punished for murder. Actually, I'm not sure if anyone else is aware, but she will be punished for murder. She just won't be put to death. She's either going to get life with no parole, or life with the possibility of parole after 25 years. This could just be a matter of someone not wanting to choose the death penalty as the punishment, because she had to vote guilty, otherwise it would have been a mistrial.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 04:11 AM
1

I see. If she wasn't charged or convicted for the first instance, they may have treated this as a first offense. It's hard to say though--I'm still curious what they call the charge when you command your dog to attack someone.
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 03:21 AM
1

This is a multiple offense? In the sense that she's been convicted of it or something similar in the past?
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 03:11 AM
6

That definitely sounds about right then. I'm glad that we're able to point out when posts aren't legit on this sub. I only want my jimmies rustled about real passes!
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 02:48 AM
3

Any idea what they even call the charge for something like this? It could be possible with a little research to find out what the typical punishment for this crime is. But if this was her first offense, 6 months doesn't seem that bad. What, is she supposed to do 25 to life?
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 01:21 AM
2

She says "oh lord."
/r/PussyPass28/02/15 03:37 PM
1

She never says "but I'm a woman." She clearly says "oh lord."
/r/PussyPass28/02/15 03:37 PM
2

but we know not all of them are such hurtful, selfish people and targeting all women as potential false accusers would be as unfair to the rest as targeting all men as potential rapists. Well said.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:07 PM
9

OP even gave her a pussy pass by putting "tries to slit officer's throat" in his title.
/r/PussyPass24/02/15 02:19 AM
13

Ah, I see. The title says "tries to slit officer's throat" and in an article somewhere else in the comments the description of what happened sounded like she never successfully landed the knife on him. Regardless, if I did that shit I would be put under the fucking jail.
/r/PussyPass24/02/15 01:23 AM
6

Did she actually cut his throat? From what I'm understanding she tried to use the knife on him, but never succeeded.
/r/PussyPass24/02/15 12:54 AM
5

I would say it's best for everyone to just keep their hands to themselves.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 03:53 AM
18

This is also stupid and should not be encouraged.
/r/PussyPass21/02/15 07:28 PM
1

It was capital murder. But I agree on the plea bargain thing. Did the girl in this article plea bargain or take it to trial?
/r/PussyPass21/02/15 07:43 AM
0

There was a man in south Texas who smashed his wife's head with a toilet tank lid. He was offered 10 years for a plea bargain by the DA. He turned it down like an idiot, and was sentenced to 40 years by the jury.
/r/PussyPass21/02/15 07:18 AM
2

That's the reason I'm posting this, to stop any further misinformation.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 10:14 PM
50

Actually, they were both given tickets and charged as a misdemeanor. The reason the man was arrested was because he was on probation, and had violated it. http://www.10news.com/news/strangers-recorded-having-sex-in-public
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:23 PM
16

Actually, they were both given misdemeanor tickets for having sex in public. The reason the man was arrested was because he was on probation and he had violated the probation. http://www.10news.com/news/strangers-recorded-having-sex-in-public
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:22 PM
2

Can you give an example? And please understand, I'm not being facetious; but I am questioning if sending them to prison is the correct answer.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:36 PM
2

Sure, I agree, they're wrong for that. Having said that, what are we supposed to do to children who take pictures of themselves having sex with other children and spread the pictures around?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:29 PM
1

So what you're saying is that even though the girl herself admitted later on that the sex acts were consensual and she said otherwise because she didn't want to be slut shamed that it's still rape?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:09 PM
2

What exactly are they "technically" guilty of? I'm not defending them or anything, but your stance on the issue is kind of vague and scary.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:07 PM
-1

I mean, it's psych 101 simple. It is some interesting stuff though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 09:42 PM
0

It's mostly in group/out group psychology. Also, exposure theory. It's really not that complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 07:56 PM
2

Now what's the difference between moving on from someone who mistreats you and "kicking them to the curb"/nexting them? I can see how ignoring someone you're in a relationship with is petty and childish. However, leaving someone because you're not happy with the relationship or letting them know if they cross certain boundaries you will be leaving (this is what I'm assuming is threatening someone with leaving to keep them in line means) isn't wrong. By the way, I don't want you to think I'm bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 05:52 PM
1

Just curious, what in your opinion are some TRP gotos for when a woman mistreats them? Because I thought it would be to kick them to the curb i.e. move on/not associate with them. However, I only know what I read on these subs, and I haven't read anything that specific yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 05:22 PM
5

:/ I'm here to read the debates, I'm not defending anything. Sorry if I upset you buddy. Edit: to be clear, I am neither blue or red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/14 06:13 PM
3

Your making me ferklempt!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/14 06:12 PM
4

Alright, I'll give you a topic. Rhode Island. Neither a road; nor an island. Discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/14 11:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter