TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

envious1998 Archive

View 3 posts and 2,533 comments by envious1998 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,533 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I thought you would be smart enough to figure it out through context. I guess not. And that was an individual you btw
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 02:28 PM
2

And yet we see the weekly viral TikTok of a woman wondering why men don’t approach or compliment anymore and blame us for chivalry being dead. Pick a lane
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 02:27 PM
1

I was using you as in you women. Stop with the nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 09:12 AM
4

That isn’t a personal attack. It’s an attack on women just like you attacked men. Don’t play these stupid games
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 10:56 PM
2

You are never deadass
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 10:55 PM
3

You have got to be kidding me
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 08:40 PM
6

Okay how the actual fuck do they expect us to know which one is which. You may not be a monolith but why should we risk our status and potential freedom finding out?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 08:40 PM
2

It isn’t malicious. It’s fearful. You asked for this. You wanted all the sowing with no reaping. Doesn’t work that way
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 08:37 PM
–

Don’t worry you’re plenty harsh and insulting in virtually every other way to make up for it
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 08:33 PM
3

I don’t want kids. Especially ones that aren’t mine
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 08:30 PM
1

Who said anything about not wanting a partner? Is money all that matters to getting a partner for you? Kinda proving my point huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 08:27 PM
20

Then the women need to recognize that about themselves as well then
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 04:51 PM
1

Ah. So not a real source. Got it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 03:33 PM
3

I don’t date women based on the career they’ve built or how much domestic labor they can do. Crazy I know
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:07 PM
1

Even in your worst case scenario where a woman was dumped for a new wife she would still be entitled to half of his assets. She wouldn’t be SoL and nobody is saying to be a stay at home wife. Women don’t need to cross the finish line because most men don’t date based on a woman’s success. You are the investors. Get in early or else your husbands will forever be wondering if you’re actually with them for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:06 PM
6

Ya I’m gonna need a source for all of that because I smell bullshit from a mile away here
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:02 PM
–

I think women recognized their value relative to men better and invested in men earlier instead of waiting at the finish line
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:01 PM
0

Ya you’re basically citing a blog for your data here. All of this is is discarded after that
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:31 PM
1

Reported for personal attack
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:27 PM
1

The only way you actually improve in relation to other people they have to not improve. Hence you are rooting against their improvement. Otherwise the best case scenario is that you hope the entire bell curve shifts which gets you nowhere
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:26 PM
1

I directed you to your own comment in this thread. I don’t need to spoon feed you things actually
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:23 PM
1

Sounds like big time cope from you not being able to actually cite a rule
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:23 PM
–

A bell curve doesn’t stop being a bell curve because you shifted it to the right or left. This is very basic statistics. Just like if everyone tried to better themselves and get the best job they could in a capitalist system some people would still be flipping burgers. Counting on other people not doing something is not something you as an individual can control. Not to mention that your philosophy essentially encourages you to root against other people bettering themselves. I’m not doing that
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:47 PM
–

They are the main way genz is meeting so that’s just factually false
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:44 PM
1

I’ve listed the source twice now. Your refusal to accept it is not my problem
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:43 PM
1

Still not seeing any rules saying I have to do anything
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:43 PM
1

Projection
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:42 PM
3

Her money and labor are meaningless when you’ve already built a life for yourself. Nobody is getting their labor doubled. You act as if men who are single can’t function on their own. Nobody smart takes that ridiculous argument seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:42 PM
–

It isn’t about buying anybody. It’s about not being used for what you have built. They should have invested early and helped to build something together instead of waiting at the finish line to date whoever crosses. How you twisted that into buying people ill never know
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:40 PM
–

You can tell the kind of person someone was eventually. The truth always comes out. Especially if you go looking for it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:37 PM
–

Most people are always going to be mediocre. If everyone levels up there will still be the same amount of mediocre people. Those people should be happy with each other and not shunning each other trying to punch above their weight class
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:14 PM
–

You only think this is a gotcha if you don’t think women are a part of ‘everyone’. Why are you a misogynist?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:12 PM
–

Settled as in she wouldn’t have dated him when she was hotter and he was still trying to find his path to success in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:11 PM
–

Dating app data says otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:09 PM
2

Your previous comment
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:08 PM
1

Still trying to escape the L I see
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:08 PM
–

Those women are the ones who feel entitled to male labor after years of shunning those men. And those men need to stand up for themselves and not lay down for women who very clearly don’t care about them
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:08 PM
1

You can claim whatever you want and lie about whatever you want. I can’t stop you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:06 PM
–

And women are a part of everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:06 PM
1

And women are a part of everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:05 PM
4

The source is your previous comment. A non responsive comment I will take as an admission
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:32 PM
1

Okay so you’re admitting that I don’t actually have to. Glad you’re taking the L
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:32 PM
2

She complained that she couldn’t date because of misogyny. Being pedantic is not helping you here
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:31 PM
2

Not very good at the comprehension thing huh
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:30 PM
–

Unless you don’t believe women are people then I continue to be correct
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:29 PM
–

That’s only true if you don’t think women are people
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:27 PM
4

That’s a non response. I’ll take that as an admission
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:27 PM
1

You said I had to. So you’re saying I don’t actually have to? Are you admitting defeat?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:26 PM
2

You would know
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:26 PM
–

We believe that the reward is legal security and access to our resources and labor. A relationship where the woman would have not considered the man as an option when she was younger is not built on mutual contribution either. The man had to work a lot harder than her to be “worthy” of her.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:25 PM
1

You think men don’t sacrifice their bodies for women’s benefit? Do I need to show you the statistics about gendered workplace accidents and fatalities or are you going to be pedantic again? Shes not just saying that just to point it out. She’s saying it because the point she’s trying to make is that we live in a misogynistic society. That’s the natural extrapolation she leaves you the viewer to make. In the same way that Holden Caulfield doesn’t directly say that he hates growing up in Catcher i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:23 PM
1

In a separate comment under this post. You can find it. I believe in you
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:17 PM
–

No. You can find it. I believe in you
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:16 PM
–

In your original comment
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:16 PM
–

So if we extrapolate that further you were saying that mediocre women, who fall under ‘people’, should not settle for mediocre men ‘mediocrity’. Glad we cleared that up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:16 PM
2

You claimed that I must provide sources. Where is the rule that says that? Are you admitting defeat on this issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:14 PM
–

There is no mellowing out to do. It’s about not rewarding someone who didn’t see any worth in you with your love and time and effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:13 PM
2

Cool. Take the L
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:12 PM
2

She literally droned on about living in a man’s world and how women are expected to sacrifice in ways that men aren’t but somehow you don’t think that the subtext here is about misogyny. Okay. The pedantic antics continue I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:10 PM
–

Are you saying that there are no mediocre women then? Because the mere fact that I extrapolated a specific group from your general group you said in your comment does not mean I lied. So which is it? Are you saying there are no mediocre women or are you being pedantic?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:09 PM
–

Are you saying that there are no mediocre women then? Because the mere fact that I extrapolated a specific group from your general group you said in your comment does not mean I lied. So which is it? Are you saying there are no mediocre women or are you being pedantic?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:09 PM
–

When you act like a pedantic freak to everything I say I will respond to you with the same energy. So you can either knock it off so a productive conversation can be had, or we can continue doing this nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:07 PM
2

No no. You said I must provide sources. So are you saying you were wrong about this? Okay then.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:06 PM
1

Just because she didn’t say the literal term doesn’t mean it wasn’t just beneath everything she was talking about. If you can’t comprehend what she’s saying that’s a you problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:03 PM
–

You are the one asking me to explain the basic logic of an argument to you because you either can’t figure it out or are being pedantic. Either way I don’t think you have a good grasp of irony
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:01 PM
–

So are you saying women aren’t people? Otherwise I don’t see the lie here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:00 PM
–

Are you saying that women aren’t people? Where is the lie?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:59 PM
1

Also there weren’t as many single people at the beginning of those recessions anyway so it wouldn’t shock me if it went up this time because the situation is different now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:57 PM
–

She said women, of which the basic inference would be all women, should not settle for mediocrity. Given that most women are mediocre themselves, that is exactly what she was suggesting. Stop being pedantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:55 PM
–

Being with a woman who is only with you for stability and security is letting life pass you by. You should not be rewarding women who thought you weren’t worthy of them when they were young when you are older as a man. That just makes you a tool in a gynocentric system.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:54 PM
–

I truly do not care what you think you’ve heard of or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:52 PM
–

Actually I did.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:51 PM
-6

I’m not saying the rate overall will go up. I’m saying that the people who do will do so out of economic desperation. Stop this strawman nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:51 PM
–

She literally said that women shouldn’t settle for mediocrity. Most women are mediocre themselves. Hence she’s encouraging mediocre women to not settle for mediocre men. Keep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:50 PM
2

Show me the rule where I have to cite a source for every argument I make since we’re being pedantic to a point of insanity now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:49 PM
–

Women are also the vast majority of student debt holders that will be going into collections and tend to work at jobs that are the first to be laid off when companies make cuts. They are outperforming for now. When the recession fully hits that won’t be true anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:47 PM
–

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTjBPYHuv/ here you go. A viral post about a woman complaining about how dating men means sacrificing her self respect. At least one of these a week. You done being pedantic now?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:46 PM
–

You can think that all you want. But examples get posted all the time on this sub and are easily trackable on TikTok the fact that you will pedantically assert that I’m lying while not even lifting a finger to disprove me is proof that you don’t actually think I’m wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:40 PM
–

In times of recession like we will almost certainly have for the next 5-10 years people partner up out of economic desperation men need to not allow women to do that to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:38 PM
–

You are the one being pedantic. I don’t have to do anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:32 PM
–

You are perfectly capable of doing some searching on TikTok. These women would rather blame red pill ideologies and misogyny for why they are alone than look inward the mirror. Mediocre women should be with mediocre men. Telling mediocre women to stop settling for mediocrity is creating a massive problem that women will be the source of.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:28 PM
1

No I’m not. Because I’m saying that connecting an incident to a larger problem doesn’t mean you’re engaging in stereotypes. You immediately jumped to they must be stereotyping. And now you are pedantically trying to back peddle by gaslighting and playing word games
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:18 PM
0

That isn’t what you were doing. You were creating a binary dichotomy with no room for nuance whatsoever
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:11 PM
–

The first comment under this post was sayurikitsune saying women shouldn’t settle for mediocrity. Holy shit. Do even the slightest amount of checking before you ask me to do everything for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:09 PM
–

Stop being pedantic. I’m not here to cater to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:08 PM
1

I did. But you’re assuming there’s nothing in between talking about your lived experience and stereotyping an entire gender. You are wrong. This is not a binary thing
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:07 PM
–

There are literally women in this comments section saying that mediocre women should not be settling for mediocre men. It is not the men that need to look inward on this issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:56 PM
–

You can say that all you want but to pretend it’s not happening or not happening in a big way is just verifiably wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:51 PM
–

Literally just search “where are all the good men” on TikTok and thousands of posts of women complaining will pop up. I’m not going to do something that basic for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:49 PM
0

Connecting something to a larger problem is not the same as saying it’s universal. That is a strawman. Knock it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:48 PM
–

Yes. They are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:47 PM
–

You absolutely can negotiate attraction. There has been a concerted effort since the turn of the century to make men more attracted to curvy women and to a large extent it has worked. There are also tribes in Africa where women wear rings around their necks to grow them out like a giraffe and the men think that’s hot. To pretend like attraction is not socially constructed is absolutely insane and not supported by any kind of empirical evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:47 PM
–

There is a weekly “where are all the good men” post on TikTok that gets like a million likes with women blaming literally everything except for themselves in the comments
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:44 PM
0

Connecting it to a larger problem is also valid. I think that’s where you’re getting tripped up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:43 PM
–

It’s like a weekly viral post on TikTok of some 30 something or 40 something year old woman going “where are all the good men? I hate the patriarchy” with a million likes and 100k women in the comments going “yass queen slay”. It’s only going to get worse going forward too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:42 PM
–

I think the thing that men really have to watch out for moving forward is not being settled for. At the end of the day women do want monogamous relationships and there aren’t enough top 20% guys to go around. Men have to unite and hold the line so that they don’t get used when they get older.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:39 PM
–

Women will say this and then call it misogyny when they’re single at 40
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:38 PM
1

Your lived experience can be a manifestation of a greater problem and just because not all or not even a majority of women match that experience doesn’t mean it’s not a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:35 PM
–

Sure it’s unfair. But it’s a lot more fair for women when it comes to dating than it is for men and pointing that out is totally fine. Social change has always been about making unfair circumstances more fair. I don’t know why this has suddenly become impossible when short men want to make dating more fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:31 PM
–

Begging women to realize that being morbidly obese is controllable and being short is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:27 PM
0

Nothing about it is dominance. Nothing is stopping her from getting a bunch of drinks from dudes in Miami and having sex with them. It’s simping to the max. He would be better off buying her OF. At least then he might get to see something
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:21 PM
8

The difference is that men don’t tell women that they value emotional availability and kindness above looks. It’s just about being honest and not gaslighting. Something women on this sub seem to be incapable of
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:17 PM
–

Now you’re just making shit up about him. Editorializing his life to fit your narrative. The exact same thing I see women on this sub accusing men of when they talk about the cock carousel and other Andrew Tate stuff. This is just the woman version of that
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 07:01 PM
–

I assume when I get in my car I won’t crash. But I still wear a seatbelt and buy insurance, because actual normal people know that the world is very frequently not a nice place
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:14 PM
–

It’s a literal biological fact. It’s why people who have had more than 7 partners tend to have a harder time finding long term partners. Manosphere guys will tell you this is only for women, but it’s just as true for men. Science is not a right wing talking point
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:13 PM
–

If you can’t empathize with the position then you’re basically saying you’re indifferent to that situation happening. She’s basically acknowledging it’s happening and saying she doesn’t care. That isn’t insecurity on the part of the guy. She acknowledged that it was a very real situation men often deal with
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:11 PM
–

Nope. It’s for humans too
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:08 PM
–

Nope. I’m a leftist. Just don’t want to be with someone who isn’t actually attracted to me and who has ruined her ability to pair bond.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:57 PM
0

As they should
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:55 PM
–

She was specifically talking about the men who have those standards and trying to figure out their reasoning. The fact other men exist who don’t have those standards isn’t relevant here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:20 PM
–

No. He’s not projecting anything. People are allowed to acknowledge reality without being insecure. If the reason a woman tells you she’s with you is that you make her feel safe and secure but not that she’s attracted to you that isn’t your own insecurity, those are the literal reasons she gave you. Stop calling anything you don’t like an insecurity
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:19 PM
–

You are the one saying it’s an insecurity. You’re the one starting from that point instead of acknowledging that many men actually do like to live in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:15 PM
–

If she’s with you because of external factors and not because she’s attracted to you then no that’s not insecurity, that’s just an acknowledgement of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:13 PM
–

She was trying to understand why the men who do care though. So the people who don’t aren’t a part of the equation here. Also it’s not just conservative guys who care about that. I’m basically a communist and I wouldn’t date a woman who has likely ruined her ability to pair bond in a meaningful way
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:12 PM
1

What you fail to realize is that age lowers her status much more significantly than a man. It’s the concept of buy low and sell high for the long term. Not everything is about immediate gratification
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:03 PM
1

Do you think that I care whether you respond or not? It’s misleading to present what has been a modest drop in divorce rates (for pre COVID at least) at this massive drop. That is the context. Just take the L
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 11:09 PM
1

https://analythical.com/blog/zero-baseline-chart-formatting#:~:text=When%20creating%20a%20bar%20or,your%20data%20and%20its%20interpretation. Actually you are the one that needs educating
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 10:34 PM
1

I’m not saying the literal information is wrong. I’m saying the information is so poorly represented that it’s functionally propaganda
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:57 PM
1

The fact that you think empty space on a graph is zero additional information is exactly why you don’t understand why the graph was wrong in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 09:12 AM
1

It isn’t 90% zero information. It’s an accurate representation of the data. Literally anyone in statistics would tell you this. I’m not thinking of bar graphs this applies to every graph. It’s just misleading
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 12:08 AM
1

The Y axis starts at 2.2. Every graph should have X and Y start at 0. This is graphs 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 10:41 PM
1

Boy is that a misleading graph. The fact that you think this is some gotcha is actually pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 10:26 PM
1

Show me the stats that say that then
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 03:29 PM
1

I’m not telling you to do that either. I’m saying you shouldn’t be encouraging. Holy shit. Why must you try to twist literally everything I say? This is insane
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:45 PM
1

It’s not your job to tell them that. It’s your job to not encourage them to waste their time
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:23 AM
1

It’s an analogy. Nobody is telling a 5’4 dude that he can be in the NBA. That’s why it’s crazy that women tell ugly men they have a chance
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:55 PM
1

No one said anything about an insta model. Your intentional hyperbole already makes you not worth responding to
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:41 PM
1

I never said you did. It’s an analogy holy fuck. Clear trolling at this point. I’m done
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:40 PM
1

The height of the person involved, the idea that self improvement is the key to getting what you want even though you were doomed from the start, blaming them for actually believing the virtue signaling instead of the actual virtue signalers. It’s really incredibly simple
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 09:04 PM
1

You hating it does not mean it doesn’t count
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 09:01 PM
1

The similarities are endless. It’s your reading comprehension that isn’t keeping up. It’s okay to admit you’re wrong and that women at large are virtue signalers. It’s the first step towards actually healing the gender divide
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:51 PM
1

It’s literally the ting you’re advocating for. I love how you suddenly have no idea what an analogy is or how it works the minute I come up with a more accurate one than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:07 PM
2

And that is where you’re wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:04 PM
2

It isn’t made up. You’re telling someone who is 5’4 that they can play in the NBA if they just practice enough and believe in themselves all while knowing there isn’t anybody in the NBA that’s 5’4. And then you blame them for their failure after encouraging them. There’s an analogy for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 07:44 PM
26

You’re framing this in an inherently flawed and ragebaity way and this doesn’t even warrant an explanation. Ragebait failed
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 07:34 PM
–

It’s not irrelevant it’s the whole point. Stop virtue signaling to men that will never have a chance that they somehow have any amount of control over the situation. Just be blackpilled. Stop telling the 5’4 ugly guy that if he only gets a good job and is a cool person to be around that he has a chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 07:32 PM
1

Because women will settle. Next question
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 07:30 PM
3

Sure. Tons of men get settled for and divorced. That’s why the divorce rate keeps rising. I’m not saying only 20% of men do those things, I’m saying women only desire 20% of men. Those are two different statements. Learn reading comprehension
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 06:03 PM
1

But showing up drunk and late are things you are entirely in control of. Your looks not so much. Again, bad analogy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 06:02 PM
4

For every little mermaid you cite I can raise you a beauty and the beast or hunchback of notre dame or shrek. That’s why it wasn’t obvious
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 04:47 PM
6

That’s a bad analogy though. It’s not about what women are saying it’s about what they aren’t. They’re telling men they’d have a chance with them if they did xyz. But in reality it doesn’t matter if they do xyz if being v was a precursor to xyz the whole time. That’s something you should have mentioned before the xyz stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 04:46 PM
4

I think they say they were gaslighted because women do a lot of virtue signaling about what they want in a man that doesn’t include looks. They just don’t say the silent part out loud which is that he has to be what they perceive as the top 20% looks wise to even be considered an option
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 04:35 PM
1

It wasn’t one comment. That was pretty clear from the context of the show. Not to mention that she was completely unaware of his internal motivations and the fact that he thought she had sunk to his level says more about his own self confidence than it does about his feelings towards her
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:07 AM
4

I never said he was justified in killing her. I’m saying she had a major hand in creating the conditions for these types of incidents to happen. You’re reducing my argument to something ridiculous because any amount of nuance here would shatter your worldview
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 03:36 PM
14

He never said that. He said he thought he’d have a chance with her. That’s just the thought process of a horny insecure 14 year old. Do you really believe that launching a shaming campaign on social media after a guy asks you out, regardless of intention, is actually going to solve anything? Why is it that men are constantly being asked to think about women’s feelings but the same is not being asked of women? You are creating monsters and then wondering where all these monsters came from. I have…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 03:00 PM
3

Always absolving women of even the slightest amount of responsibility. She publicly shamed and mercilessly bullied him. The term ‘incel’ did not even come up in the show until she used it against him. She created the monster she hated so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:30 PM
19

Trying to publicly humiliate someone on social media for asking you out is not ‘standing up for yourself’. This narrative is out of control
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:22 PM
23

Something which dating apps have proven is ostensively true
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:17 PM
19

The problem is most of them only challenge women’s patriarchal gender roles which makes me despise the movement entirely
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 09:07 PM
1

I’ve literally never said ‘on rare occasions’. Are you schizophrenic? Serious question. Because you have been clearly arguing with a voice in your head you think is me
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:05 PM
1

I’ve worked to hard in my life to settle for a woman that doesn’t care about her appearance and that doesn’t make me a hypocrite
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:04 PM
1

Yes. More widespread than initially believed. That isn’t the same as widespread in an objective sense. I cannot believe I’m having to explain basic reading comprehension right now
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 04:34 PM
1

Not getting Chad to commit is not struggling. Guys like me were there the whole time. We weren’t chosen. I refuse to be a consolation prize.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 04:33 PM
1

Nowhere in that definition does it saying anything about ‘very common’. That is your definition that you made up. Stop this nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 03:47 PM
1

That is incredibly easy for you to say. I will enjoy life alone. But I’m not going to settle for someone who spent her young years dating around and now wants to settle for me. Not happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 03:46 PM
1

Again that’s just a definition you made up. You don’t get to decide what I mean by my words actually
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 03:36 PM
1

Because there were no other women to pick
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 03:02 PM
1

I didn’t say most. I said it’s more common than you think. It’s literally in the screenshot. Why the fuck are you deliberately lying about what I’m saying when you literally posted a screenshot of it. Holy fuck. I also love how you think I only have anecdotal evidence while your ‘evidence’ is literally just a couple screenshots from TikTok. Smooth brain activities going on right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 03:01 PM
1

My response was to point out that you self owned by proving this is a major trend full of scammers and regular women alike. And now you want to play victim because that is always the default
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 02:02 PM
1

You can keep posting all you want all you’re showing is that women will run elaborate scams to get men to buy their OF and that women are becoming sluttier in the workplace. And you wonder why it took you so long to get rights
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:31 PM
1

The proof is that this is a massive trend on TikTok done by hundreds of thousands of women that aren’t OF women
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 02:12 AM
1

Yes. This is way more common than you would think. You are just coping because there’s a large subsection of women that contradict the mental gymnastics you do
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 10:28 PM
1

Yes. I work with women who dress like that
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 12:42 PM
1

You think this is the only woman hopping on this trend?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 11:42 PM
4

First you say that they were mythological mermaids and after I pointed out how you were missing the point now all of a sudden they’re just manatees. You are not very good at this game you’re playing. Nothing I said boils down to women are evil. If anything, what I said boils down to women need to take more accountability if they are going to be granted more agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 04:17 PM
11

I really like how you focused on the fish tails instead of the fact that they tried to lure sailors to their death with their beauty. It’s truly incredible your ability to focus on the wrong part of an argument. You can’t even respond in any substantive way to what I’m saying. Everything you’ve said essentially boils down to ‘nuh uh’. It’s a sign that you are incapable of higher thought. Goodbye
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 03:51 PM
10

I never said anything about collusion. If you can’t address what I’m actually saying then don’t respond at all. They wouldn’t call it office SIREN if seduction wasn’t a part of what they were trying to do. You pull this kind of shit and then wonder why half of all men 18-27 haven’t approached a woman. There is no objective standard for harassment anymore because any woman can take to social media with any story she wants. Also, when the societal expectation is that men approach women don’t call …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 03:43 PM
7

You talk a lot about the first half of that name but not the second half. The half that’s clearly meant to try and seduce men at the workplace. This is why we don’t take you seriously. You want to play the victim even in a trend deliberately designed to seduce men. And then you get to unilaterally decide whether it’s seduction or harassment. I’m simply not going to take you seriously until you acknowledge that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 03:32 PM
0

Men that tell women the same thing when they complain about men are called misogynists. That’s the difference
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 12:12 PM
10

Because women get much more out of platonic relationships than men do
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:38 PM
0

You’re adding in things that aren’t there. Of course you get for compatibility. I’m not saying settle for the first guy willing to commit. That’s such a pathetic strawman I’m questioning whether you’re even approaching this in good faith at this point. And when you have to go to mental gymnastics and personal attacks that basically boil down to “no u” I’m not going to take you seriously. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 04:11 PM
0

This isn’t suspicion. It’s believing that the vast majority of men are simply beneath you, sometimes that they aren’t even human. This isn’t some safety issue. If it was about safety you’d be going to the guys most likely to commit and keep you safe. But you’re not doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 12:56 PM
0

You created that numbers game by consistently swiping on only the same top 5% of men. Don’t make it a numbers game for men and it won’t be a numbers game for men. Easy
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 12:25 PM
20

I would agree but having too many options is an infinitely better problem to have than having none, especially when that none stems from something out of your control like height
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 12:23 PM
–

Okay 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:18 PM
–

That’s like saying fat women should read posts where men call women fat. I’ve never ever seen a woman give that advice to another woman
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:06 PM
2

No. I’m saying that even if the percentages are low compared to what people have said they are that’s still a really huge percentage overall. If I gave you a bowl of 100 M&Ms and told you that 2 of the M&Ms from that bowl would ruin your life and send you to jail and the rest are fine would you still eat the M&Ms? Because if the answer is no then false accusations are still a huge problem
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 11:23 AM
7

Not to mention that even if that was the real figure that’s still an incredibly large number. Like more than enough to give any rational person pause
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:20 PM
2

You have to convince yourself of that because otherwise you would drown in your own hypocrisy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 03:28 PM
1

Yes. Yes there is. I know women think that everything men do has something to do with them but it really doesn’t. You’re just being a misandrist
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 01:46 PM
3

Guys in RP spaces aren’t solely there to ‘learn’. That’s an assumption you’re making. And you can’t argue that men in pilled spaces are trying to learn how to get women better while also saying they don’t take accountability. Those are mutually exclusive positions. If you are trying to learn and get better then you are automatically admitting that you aren’t good enough and could be better. That is the very definition of accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 01:20 PM
3

Who is actively seeking it? You’re assuming that’s actually happening. Nobody is asking you for advice. And if the prescription of ‘you should be attracted to the qualities that you eventually settle for anyway’ runs counter to your autonomy and happiness then you never deserved autonomy in the first place. If ‘be accountable’ runs counter to your autonomy and happiness then you never deserved autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 12:57 PM
3

Ah so when it’s women commenting on men it’s “offering advice” but when men do the same thing it’s a “paternalistic demand”. The framing is so transparently laughable it’s an insult to my intelligence that you keep trying to pull it off. Women have been prescribing actions for men to our expense for decades. We just want the slightest shred of accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 11:33 PM
1

In recent years men have been much more open to what they find attractive. There’s a reason plus size models are now on the cover of SI
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 11:30 PM
8

So why is it that women are allowed to constantly comment on what men ought to do, but men commenting on what women ought to do is “paternalistic and wrong headed”? You can screech about how men just want to use women, but haven’t answered the post that argues women are using men. Why is it okay that women get to use men for their husband qualities but the moment a man comments on what women should be doing you lose your mind? Pick a lane. Are we allowed to comment on what the other gender shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 06:37 PM
11

You’re bringing up the past in response to me talking about the present and what should be done in the future. You’re justifying women’s unacceptable present behavior on account of what people who are dead now, who never oppressed you personally, did a long time ago. This is such a non response
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 05:59 PM
18

We want you to be attracted to qualities in men that you deem ‘husband material’ and not simply choose those things out of comfort later in life. Much societal pressure has been applied to men to attempt to change what we find as attractive. And to a large extent it has worked. The same needs to happen for women but no one, especially women, is trying to work on that, and therein lies the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 04:41 PM
1

I don’t care if you want to engage with my point of view. But if you do then you have to actually engage with my point of view and not some schizophrenic shit you made up in your head that you think is my view.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 07:58 PM
1

Standard of living in those places is good. We are talking Sweden, Iceland, Germany. Places where the standard of living is good, the sexes are equal, and the government is even bending over backwards to get people to have kids. No amount of appeasing women makes them have babies. That is what the last 2 decades has taught us.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 07:57 PM
1

When did I ever say to do that? It’s like you just assume the absolute worst of everything I say and then twist to the point of absurdity. I can’t even engage with this properly because you can’t even understand my argument, or at least engage with it in good faith. I’m not going to talk with someone who clearly isn’t interested in what I have to say
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 05:23 PM
1

You can blame it on other things. But even in places where work culture is good and women have every right and resource available birth rates are still declining. The ideas of 4b are far more pervasive than you’re giving them credit for
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 05:21 PM
2

So even though women are very much a contributing factor to the issue, attempting to make them accountable for the piece they are responsible for is just ‘avoiding accountability’. Incredible. The projection is so strong with this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 03:47 PM
4

If 4b wasn’t something to be taken seriously then south Korea’s birth rate wouldn’t be dropping below 1 in many areas
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 03:44 PM
3

Nothing about what you said relates to anything red pill whatsoever. You just made up a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 02:53 PM
2

All this this woman’s posts are just ‘make up a guy’. There is no substance to any of these posts
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:42 PM
–

Nice personal attack man. Really killing it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:40 PM
3

I never said it’s solely on them to find a solution. I said that they are a part of the problem and therefore they must be a part of the solution. Either stop twisting what I’m saying or stop responding
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:40 PM
4

I’m not blaming it entirely on the opposite gender. But to pretend that women don’t have a hand in creating the conditions of the loneliness epidemic is just insane. Women aren’t allowed to go around saying ‘men are trash’ and treating men as such and then pretend like they are innocent in this. Take some responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 10:50 AM
7

Ah so now you’re just moving the goalposts. Now it’s impossible to be lonely if you have a few friends. Glad this guy has solved loneliness so that he can explain everyone’s feelings to them. Amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 10:47 AM
12

Why are you assuming that men aren’t doing those things? Why the cognitive dissonance? You cannot even fathom that a guy who has plenty of friends can still be lonely. Not to mention that you had to make it personal. Definitely the mark of someone that has a coherent position. Not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:09 AM
6

Jesus what a pathetic response. Assuming that women have ever “momed” us out of anything is insane. Women have a hand in men’s loneliness, they obviously have a hand in solving it too
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 12:34 AM
2

That they must also love you back? Sure, if you want to be pretentious and picky I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:48 PM
1

Ah the whole “I saw an ugly guy with a girlfriend once”. No stats. No real argument based in any kind of logic. Just “trust me bro” nonsense. Argument dismissed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:09 PM
1

Right that is what happened historically under patriarchy. Patriarchy was the solution to women’s natural hypergamy. Now that we are seeing it break down again you’re seeing a huge disparity especially with young men and young women. A huge portion of guys are now invisible to women that would have happily married them a few generations ago. We are seeing young men struggle more as a result. You keep saying that my argument isn’t based in reality while your reality is a literal fantasyland where…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:59 PM
1

You can say that, but then you need a reason to explain why the overwhelming majority of women still go for men who are good looking, have status, and have money. Sure it can’t explain what any individual might do, but it can explain what general trends there are. And the general trends do not look good for the guys with bad genetics. So you need an explanation for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:45 PM
1

Evolutionary psychology. Females naturally want to mate with males that are masculine (looks), have resources, and are leaders of the pack. In our society looks plays a larger role than the other two, so men who don’t have looks need to understand their situation
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:34 PM
3

Most redpill guys, myself included, started out by having pure and unconditional love for various women and when we realized that they did not have the same feelings for us that’s when the redpill started to make a lot of sense. It is the only advice that doesn’t simply put you on a hamster wheel of self improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:31 PM
1

Because it’s in their nature. Time and time again they have proven that looks, followed by money and status are the traits in a man that they are attracted to. Everything else is virtue signaling and gaslighting. The best an unattractive man can do is understand the situation he is in so that he doesn’t mistake his relationships for what they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:26 PM
1

No actually. Because that can always be the solution any time any guy has a complaint about dating. The hamster wheel of self improvement is not a valid argument. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:18 PM
3

You think it’s degrading to have to impress your date when that’s literally what men have been having to do for centuries now. These troll posts have got to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:11 PM
2

Exactly. That’s why unattractive men need to understand that the dynamic of the relationships they get into will be fundamentally different than other guys. Their relationships will be transactional, and if they’re okay with that then be my guest. The problem comes with the delusion that the relationship is something that it’s not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:10 PM
2

There are no better women to choose. That’s just a cop out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:07 PM
1

If you’re ugly women are never going to be attracted to you for you. You might as well have them be attracted to you for something instead of nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:04 PM
2

Seeing yourself as only worth what you have and can do is different from understanding that women will only view you that way. That is the mistake you made here
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:02 PM
2

I’m really tired of this woman trying to tell men what masculinity should be. Anything to deflect any responsibility from women
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 08:57 PM
1

Even if mental and emotional traits could be displayed in a dating profile, it wouldn’t change women’s swiping habits even a little bit. Plenty of dating apps have tried in various ways and they all have failed
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 11:56 PM
25

That’s what blue pillers do. They lock you in a Sisyphesian cycle of self improvement. Don’t take the bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 05:37 PM
8

Well said
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 05:36 PM
2

I think that people who give men advice on dating have too much of an internal locus of control. Both are equally bad and toxic. There is only so much self improvement one person can do before they have to look themselves in the mirror and realize they’re not the problem or they risk self annihilation
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 05:35 PM
1

The amount of assumptions being made here. Unreal
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:09 PM
1

That’s because you assume if they leave they must be unhappy. You said it yourself. It’s a self fulfilling prophecy in your worldview. It’s not possible to leave a happy relationship because you must be unhappy if you’re leaving. It’s a self serving logical fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 07:06 PM
1

Easy report and block. Thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 07:03 PM
1

Just because I disagreed with the majority of their post doesn’t mean I want the exact opposite. If you are this devoid of nuance I’m just going to block you and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:57 PM
1

They’re unhappy because they’re comparing their partner to the 10/10 gigachad. Comparison is the enemy of contentment
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:55 PM
1

No one is saying you should. But if you’re leaving someone who makes you generally happy because you think you can do better you deserve all of the unhappiness that comes your way. You’re using having standards as an excuse to be hypergamous. That is a disaster waiting to happen
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:50 PM
1

Nobody said anything about having a singular partner. What I take issue with is leaving thinking you can do better. That’s just hypergamy, and every successful society has found a way to keep female hypergamy in check
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:48 PM
1

Ya that’s one situation. There are a range of potential situations and you are heavy handedly deciding that if a woman can’t get a 10/10 gigachad she should just remain single because anything less than a 10/10 gigachad will make you unhappy. It’s like telling men to only date supermodels.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:21 PM
3

You can be attracted to a person and still be settling. There are different levels of attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:20 PM
2

You are assuming that settling makes you unhappy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 04:20 PM
2

You can say that all you want but there is no such thing as a perfect relationship. There’s a difference between having standards and settling. Not everyone has standards but everyone has to settle to at least some degree. Telling women that they would be unhappy with a guy that isn’t a 10/10 gigachad who goes on humanitarian missions and is also somehow a millionaire who makes them laugh is a recipe for disaster. The guys they pass up early in life learn how to deal with the pain of being passe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 02:30 PM
6

That isn’t what the post is saying though. If you’re unhappy just because you can’t have a guy that checks literally every box then your standards are too high. Newsflash: you aren’t going to check every box for a man either.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 01:50 PM
12

Because most women do get the urge to experience motherhood. And if you throw away the guys that would make good husbands and fathers and make us jaded you will end up alone and sad. And no amount of wine and anti depressants will make up for that void
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:44 AM
–

Okay so you want to chase Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:40 AM
2

Because I have eyes and ears. I notice how they act towards me vs other people. Don’t womansplain my experience to me
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:06 AM
1

No. They aren’t. You are truly illiterate
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 11:35 PM
2

As a human being? As a person that matters? Come on now
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 11:34 PM
1

It is not my job to track down every source. It’s your job to cite them. Post a link to the actual alleged sources (not an article that tells you about its sources without linking them) or I’m going to assume you’re sourceless
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 09:57 PM
1

There is not a single stat in that entire article. They just make claims and cite to other articles. Not a single stat in the entire article.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 09:52 PM
2

Who said anything about reciprocating romantic feelings? That’s your own projection I’m afraid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 09:16 PM
1

There is not a single number outside of dates in that entire article whatsoever. LMFAOOO. Not to mention this is a women’s aid group trying to raise money. Of course this is a biased source. This is fucking comical 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 09:15 PM
1

You didn’t provide those numbers at all. I directly cited a source that talks directly about violence in relationships. You did not. This is comical at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 06:40 PM
1

You didn’t post any links though. Just spouted numbers. Also that’s not what that article is saying, it’s saying women have a better ability to spot manipulation. Probably meaning that there are a lot of women who get away with manipulating their partner while their partner doesn’t even know it. And you never actually refuted the article itself, cry about age all you want unless you can find some flaw in methodology your cries are nothing but pathetic whataboutism
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 05:36 PM
1

Wtf are you talking about. It’s literally a published paper by the ncbi. Either you have 0 reading comprehension skills or you are blatantly lying at this point. Also, contextless numbers are meaningless without an actual explanation. Anyone can list numbers. It’s being able to interpret them that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 04:18 PM
1

It does give statistics and you know you don’t have an argument when you’re quibbling over the age of a study. Do you seriously believe that women have gotten better about their abuse in the last 20 years when me too has targeted specifically men with this kind of behavior? Give me a break. Come back when you have a real argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 03:49 PM
1

In the study. Holy shit. What do you think they do in studies? Write down everyone’s feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 01:26 PM
2

You don’t get to tell me that entire psychological concepts aren’t real and then give me a civility warning when I point out that’s stupid. Stop hiding behind what minuscule authority you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 01:26 PM
2

Look at my link from 2 comments ago. I linked to a separate comment that cites a study that directly contradicts what you’re saying. Stop playing dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 12:19 PM
0

But we are being abused by women more than we are abusing women. Even by your stats it was 186 women in 3 years killed by men. You’re using an unbelievably small number of psychopaths to justify casual violence against men in everyday relationships. That’s fucking insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 11:29 AM
3

Again, you’re only looking at data for crimes. Not actual domestic violence. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/oFRAK7VzQq this comment links to a study looking at actual domestic violence, not just the kind that gets reported and is considered a crime by police
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 11:18 AM
5

No we’re against it because you only recognize DV when it’s happening to you. Women are more likely than men to get physical in a relationship. Yet women only see it as a problem when it’s men doing it to them. Even in your example you prove me right because you only want an emergency for women despite that women commit more DV in relationships, you just don’t define it that way because in your woman brain men cannot be real victims of DV. Thanks for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 10:11 AM
–

Well they weren’t. And your outright rejection of an entire concept because you don’t like who uses it is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard. It’s like if I said Catholicism isn’t a real religion because I don’t like that a bunch of catholic priests diddled some kids. You don’t get to just claim things aren’t real because you don’t like them. Are you 5 years old or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 10:06 AM
–

Usually just in general. It’s a whole new level of shit we have to go through to be seen as a genuine romantic option and not just a tool to be exploited with the distant possibility of something like that occurring
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 12:27 AM
4

My experience as a below average attractiveness man who went through 4 years of college at a big party school and every experience of men in my relative situation who share their experiences with me. The amount of shit we have to go through just to be noticed by women would genuinely bring any woman to tears if they had to live as a man. If you don’t believe me, just ask trans men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 12:17 AM
5

You think men don’t see women as people in the same way women don’t see men as people? Ho boy do I have news for you
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 12:15 AM
3

I don’t think you know the origins of that phrase then. It was originally coined by leftists who were criticizing liberals for only feigning interest in helping the working class without actually doing anything. It was then co-opted by the right. To deny it as a concept outright is beyond batshit insane and you’re only doing it because it a perfect description of a lot of female behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 12:13 AM
8

Exactly. Women have empathy for people who they see as people. Most men don’t fit in that category.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 07:16 PM
10

You generalize us constantly. You’re acting like this is some new phenomenon you’re engaging in
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 07:14 PM
6

Women are great at virtue signaling, which most women and many men mistake as empathy, but no, women are not more empathetic than men. Not even close
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 07:07 PM
5

Women and blue pillers on this sub are constantly asking for sources and better thought out ideas but when someone actually goes and does it you don’t read it anyway. What a joke. You should be banned for not arguing in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 03:39 PM
2

Yep. Just another blue pill woman blaming men for not seeking help in the way women want them to.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:07 PM
2

Okay. Keep lying. That’s all you can do in the face of overwhelming reality I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 08:04 PM
2

No. It isn’t. The post I linked to was my post. That’s a screenshot of yours. You’re so bad at this I’m getting second hand embarrassment for you. Again you state things and expect me to just believe them. I’ve been giving sources and you’ve either been ignoring them or pretending they don’t exist. I’m done playing your little game. And you haven’t had a real argument for like 10 posts now. You first.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:19 PM
2

That isn’t the post I linked to you absolute dunce. Just because you claim racist isn’t at odds with feminism doesn’t make it true. Most terfs aren’t right wing and they are an increasingly large portion of feminists. Just because most people don’t like them doesn’t mean you can pretend they aren’t also feminists. And again more mental gymnastics. It’s sad the insane breakdown bluepillers have when met head first with reality
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:30 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/3IgxZrJHj0 I linked it in this comment. Jesus Christ you are so bad at this. Just digging your hole deeper. Cry about the source all you want the only way you’re not gonna look like a crybaby is to post your own link to the manifesto. Being racist is not at odds with feminism, feminism is not inherently intersectional as many feminists are vehemently against lgbt people as well. And you are really grasping at straws now. She’s literally claiming that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 05:23 PM
2

You actually think you did something didn’t you? LMFAOOOOO
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 05:22 PM
1

Aaaand we’re back to no answer. Shocking
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 04:23 PM
1

https://x.com/afpost/status/1868787247308587179?s=46 Here it is. Again.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 04:05 PM
1

I quite literally linked the source. The fact that you are incapable or unwilling to come to grips with reality is really not my problem
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 03:59 PM
1

I did quote it. It’s right there in the tweet who pulled it from the manifesto. You are just in full denial of reality at this point. I’ve never seen a blue piller have such a major breakdown like this
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 03:50 PM
2

I gave you literal proof right from the manifesto. I don’t know what else you could possibly want. Just take the L troll
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 03:15 PM
2

So nothing huh? Ya that’s what I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 12:55 PM
1

Pretty much. Since we were children genz girls have gotten to shit on the boys with no consequences
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 11:54 PM
1

It absolutely was. Video came out of him literally sucking off nick fuentes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 11:52 PM
2

That’s not what I said they’d be shocked to discover. The problem here is that you’re illiterate. It makes sense now
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 11:43 PM
1

Clearly you don’t interact with many genz women
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 11:42 PM
–

Nope. Women have no qualms about having men do the dirty and dangerous jobs and are making no real attempts to change the gender dynamic in that regard which would be the first step in having men separate from our gender role. When women were polled like less than 10% said they’d be okay with their husband as a homemaker. You are every bit as responsible for gender roles as men are
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 11:42 PM
2

Her manifesto is widely available. You know her name, stop playing dumb. And once again his digital footprint never infers he was red pilled. If anything he was blackpilled. This is your inference that you are making not an actual fact. I don’t care about your inferences
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 11:38 PM
1

Only if the conclusion you draw from it is that the blue pill is correct. Otherwise you need to cite your sources
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 09:08 PM
2

She praised them in her manifesto. I’ve told you this 3 times now. If you can’t read it’s on you at this point. And the article merely claims he was red pilled without actually linking anything that would infer that. He never identified as red pill and his online posts suggest he was far more black pilled. You’re just making shit up as blue pill trolls usually do
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:35 PM
3

I already told you she praised prominent feminists on twitter like RFH. And it mentions the red pill but doesn’t actually connect him to it whatsoever. It wrongly assumes, just like you, that the red pill is an inherently right wing ideology and therefore any right winger must be red pilled. This is pathetic. Make a real argument or take the L
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:24 PM
1

Nick Fuentes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 07:59 PM
2

They thought dudes they weren’t fucking were going to stand up for their right to fuck without consequences. They were shocked to find out that that’s not how that went down. I don’t know how much more simply I can put it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 07:59 PM
1

What I’m saying is that the most virulent man hating feminists tend to not be over 50. The women in my generation have all the same rights I do and yet they hate men the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 07:57 PM
3

She also hated men and praised prominent feminists. You can’t just ignore that because there were other parts to what she said. And nothing in that article indicates he was red pilled. He was far right but the far right is not synonymous the red pill. I’m a leftist, plenty of other red pillers are too. You’re gonna have to do waaaay better than that
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 07:55 PM
–

If women weren’t buying the smaller bikinis they wouldn’t be selling them. This isn’t some nefarious plot by the evil cabal of fashion designers to get women to show more skin, it’s supply and demand. Women are once again allergic to any amount of responsibility for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 03:07 PM
–

But we have to care about whether people are looking or not? Kinda seems like a double standard
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 03:05 PM
5

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna184482 She wrote a manifesto that literally cited RFH (rad fem hitler) a popular feminist account on twitter. Your turn, how was some shooting in may 2023 connected to the red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:57 PM
7

That is quite literally what the red pill tells you to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:51 PM
6

It isn’t homophobia to point out the destiny is a hypocrite for spouting off his ideology while quite literally sucking off a white nationalist. Quit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:48 PM
0

I don’t remember the last time there was a red pill mass shooter. We’ve started having plenty of femcel mass shooters recently but I’m sure you don’t have a problem with feminism as a result
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:46 PM
5

So now we’re supposed to disregard the data and just look around, but when a red piller does the same thing and reports on his experience suddenly we need cold hard evidence. The double standard on this sub is wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:45 PM
1

All of those sources essentially start with the premise that the red pill is bad. I’m highly educated and think education is a good thing, but academia is not a good place to look for the type of evidence the other guy is asking for. It simply doesn’t exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:42 PM
10

Identifying as red pill is niche. Adopting its ideas is becoming increasingly mainstream
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:39 PM
1

Do you seriously not understand the connection? Come on now, you’re supposed to have at least 2 brain cells to rub together if you’re gonna be on a debate sub
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:37 PM
1

Nope. I got it. You’re just trying to change lanes now
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:37 PM
1

They could already do that when roe was decided and the women shitting on men the most have always been able to do that. You’re bringing up things that modern women have never experienced
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:36 PM
1

I buy that theory. Also explains the femcel mass shooters we’re starting to see
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 02:34 PM
2

The point went right over your head apparently
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 12:04 AM
0

That whole thread is proof of what I was saying above
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 12:04 AM
1

What does the gender of the alleged victims have to do with anything? You’re grasping at straws. It’s pathetic. Knock it off. And deciding afterward that you withdraw consent happens all the time. It’s a big part of why a lot of allegations have a hard time being prosecuted.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 12:03 AM
–

Idk there were a lot of shocked feminists on election night
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:59 PM
1

No. You haven’t given your reasoning. You may think you have but you haven’t. I don’t know if you’re just illiterate or trolling at this point and I really don’t care anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:58 PM
–

I mean this more generally and not just in the context of this post. Although women constantly try to spin abortion as beneficial to men only to be shocked that the guys they aren’t fucking anyway don’t care about whether they can get an abortion or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 07:53 PM
-1

Keep doing what you are doing and we will keep finding it unattractive. Doormats love to say all the assholes get the women but what makes those guys assholes is the standing up for themselves part. Never once have i read of a man leaning to be more assertive and saying he regrets it. Where are all the stories from men showing that being a doormat is attractive and works well? Right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 07:48 PM
–

Women have repeatedly said they don’t care about men’s issues. Why should I care about theirs?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 07:46 PM
–

It’s crazy how they don’t understand this. Being on this sub has awoken me to the fact that women are generally incapable of think from a perspective that is not their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:37 AM
–

You’re right I don’t care. Why should I care about the guy who ends up as the baby daddy to a bunch of unwanted kids? Why should I care that the women that want casual sex with the top 20% of men are now having to face the consequences of their actions? Why should any guy who isn’t in that top 20% care?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:33 AM
-1

I love that sample you’re using as if those 7 are evenly spread out amongst the 250. Either you’re stupid enough to think I won’t point this out or you are not understanding my very simple point. Either way you’re not looking great in the intelligence department.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:28 AM
1

I don’t need to mention male victims because I never specifically mentioned female victims. This is you imposing your own biases onto this and accusing me of them. This is also the second time I’ve pointed this out. Knock it off. If someone says they want their car back you cannot magically teleport the car to them instantly. Which is basically what feminists are asking for in terms of consent. Not to mention that in your scenario the person asking for the car back is clearly communicating, some…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:26 AM
0

It’s not about adopting something to get what you want. It’s just an understanding of reality. I wish the red pill wasnt real. The world would be a much better place. But it is. So it goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:18 AM
2

Again you brag about women pulling levers on assembly lines while the men face the horrors of war. Amazing stuff. You’ve got a point when women start working as linemen and welders and plumbers. Your work isn’t unpaid you’ve been spending your husbands money. Literally never have I said that the traditional work of women isn’t socially valuable. Going and being an hr rep or marketing strategist sure as hell is though. Again, I never said men solely built civilization. For someone who claims to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:16 AM
1

Wow you worked an assembly line while the men actually did the heavy lifting. Amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:10 AM
1

It’s not about an interest with most men. Most men need to get to their 30s before they have enough resources where women will even look their way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:10 AM
0

Do you live in reality? Are we even on the same planet? You have got to be kidding me
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:08 AM
-1

That is literally what you were doing in the previous thread
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:06 AM
2

You haven’t though. Your replies are literally just “nuh uh” and then you act like you’ve completed some daring intellectual feat. You think you’ve gone into detail with replies like “lol k” and “there is not”? What detail. Jesus Christ
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:05 AM
1

Try creating humans on your own and see how that goes for you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:02 AM
2

I don’t remember asking you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:02 AM
1

Well I mean when you put it in the retarded way that you put it in it does sound stupid. Anything can sound stupid if you strawman it enough I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 09:02 PM
1

There is always government handouts for everyone. You are describing a fantasy. You aren’t carrying the burden. You’re going to college to become HR reps and consultants. You are learning the jobs necessary to actually keep society upright. You don’t need the promise of sex but you do need the promise of security. And when you don’t have that you will give up any and all rights you have to receive it. You’ve been doing it since the dawn of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 09:01 PM
1

They are there they just aren’t prominent now. And that was very deliberate. What I’m saying is that the same thing happen for men and you are so openly hostile to that idea it makes me wonder what your motivations could be.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:49 PM
3

Women can be talented. But they usually aren’t as good comedians because being funny is what happens when you need to find alternative ways to get people to like you because looks aren’t enough. And as most women on this sub have reiterated, most men aren’t good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:47 PM
1

It’s no longer a handful of men. This trend has economists worried and countries that are already experiencing low birth rates are implementing policy trying to get men to participate in society more. Ignoring this is just as bad as saying climate change isn’t real. Again, you think that men need all the things you need, we don’t. We can live simply off of government handouts. We don’t need to work to live. Working is what we do when there’s a social contract in place that incentivizes us to wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:44 PM
1

Okay your replies are basically “nuh uh” at this point. You’ve been backed into a corner and are resorting to 6 year old tactics. Hold your L and have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:39 PM
1

I love what you define as a threat. So when someone plays a documentary about climate change or predicts that your favorite team will lose do you see that as a threat as well? Or is it only where you can victimize yourself on Reddit over it? Men have always had the expectation that we will be independent and that we will find ways to make the lives of those around us better. What you have is fake independence. It’s independence built on top of male labor while not contributing anything back. And…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:35 PM
1

Most of the pictures of traditionally attractive women have moved to OF to further exploit men. And you’re using an extreme example, to pretend like society isn’t more open minded to non traditionally attractive women now compared to 20 years ago is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:30 PM
0

That’s because those guys are usually funny and talented and aren’t there for their looks. There’s a reason men are usually the better comedians
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:28 PM
1

That isn’t a threat it’s a prediction. Climate change isn’t a threat either it’s just what’s going to happen if we don’t change our ways soon. Men in general can live more simply than women. It’s why so much marketing is designed for women because women need all that shit to feel ‘independent’. When your lights and plumbing and internet don’t work because society is descending into chaos I hope all that stuff will save you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:26 PM
1

You’re right. We’ve been told to uphold our gender roles and when we ask “why?” nobody has a good answer and there lies why there are so many crises with young men now. If women aren’t trophies for being a good citizen then men aren’t tools for your exploitation, hence why so many young men are checking out of the workforce. Men aren’t born with a natural desire to look good either. Boo hoo. That still isn’t a gender role. And yes, there is very much a social contract. You expect men to perform …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:22 PM
-4

The last like 10 SI swimsuit covers have been non traditional models. There are dozens of non traditionally attractive actresses in Hollywood now. You think they’re still a token? Don’t make me laugh. Also I love how this ignores my main point in that we should be conditioning women in the same way we’ve been conditioning men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:16 PM
1

It will work when society reaches a tipping point. You can’t leave that many men out of the dating pool and expect them to contribute to society. We are already seeing this. Men are more checked out and aren’t doing as well as women on virtually any metric you could measure ‘doing well’ by. As much as women don’t like to admit it society is built on the backs of male labor. And when that labor disappears society is gonna have a really big problem. At that point women will have to accept that som…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:13 PM
3

Create the same cultural norms that existed previously that prevented women from acting that way. No Becky, you can’t be a slut for the best 20 years of your life and expect a decent guy to get with you. You should have been family oriented and disciplined from the start.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:50 PM
3

Women have been attempting to do this to men with varying success for decades. You’ve been putting pictures of 300 pound women in front of us and telling us that this is what beauty is now. And it has worked to an extent. I don’t see why we couldn’t condition women in the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:48 PM
7

Weren’t you just going on about how you should die alone if you demand equality in a relationship as an unattractive man? Lmfaooo
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:46 PM
3

And your solution is what exactly? Go for a woman way below your league while the women in your league hover around Chad until he gets bored with them and they become bitter 35 year olds who now think they’re entitled to a husband and kids? WOW what a great plan lemme get right on that
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:44 PM
6

You talk about “having what you want” in one breath and in the next go “I’m not prey to be caught”. Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:35 PM
2

You’re thinking about this from a woman’s perspective and that’s why you still aren’t getting this
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:34 PM
2

Men complain about submission because we’ve been conditioned our entire lives to fulfill our role as men and the reward for that used to be a submissive wife. Now it’s just a bunch of feminists who spend all their time demeaning and degrading us. So ya, we have something to complain about. Trying to look attractive to the other sex is not a gender role, both sexes have to do it. And you think I’m looking for an abundance of people that are exactly what I want? Are you kidding me? Have you been r…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:32 PM
2

Having to be the perfect victim comes from a rejection from the feminist notion that sex can be in one second perfectly fine and in the next a crime based on the feelings of the alleged victim. Everyone who is sane knows how batshit that is and if feminists hadn’t centered what is considered rape around explicit consent then people wouldn’t be inquiring as to the victims actions and state of mind. And I never made a differentiation between male and female victims. You’re strawmanning arguments a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:26 PM
5

Top 10% men will fuck average women if they’re around. They won’t marry them. Being able to be in Chad’s harem for awhile doesn’t mean you can pull him. This is what women like you seem to miss.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:15 PM
7

Very likely actually. Your idea of what an average man and average woman look like has been severely warped by social media. It’s why women only swipe on the top 20% of men on dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:07 PM
8

Except that’s bullshit because men approach unattractive women all the time. Unattractive women lack the capacity and introspection to evaluate themselves properly and think they’re hotter than they are and can therefore treat men in their league like shit. It’s a product of a culture that tells women that they’re all 10s. Newsflash: you’re not.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:01 PM
4

The top 20% don’t have to. They barely even have to take women on dates. They can keep them in perpetual situationships where the woman feels like she’s in a relationship despite not being in one. Women use men for things all the time. You don’t like to admit it but you do. I can’t tell you how many dates I’ve been on where it was clear after the fact she just wanted something for free. Your logic only works if you throw out all relevant context.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:54 PM
5

I think you’re misinterpreting why men don’t like to pay. Because women want 50/50 relationships in all other aspects but are fine leaving these gendered roles when it benefits them. If women went back to their traditional roles men wouldn’t have such an issue with ours. And here we go, blaming it on trying to date out of our league despite all the evidence suggesting the opposite. You’re just projecting now. And empathy has nothing to do with policy or action. It’s simply the ability to put you…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:50 PM
4

Ah so we don’t get the luxury of comparability and if we still want to date anyway despite not being afforded this luxury then it’s our own fault. The more empathetic gender strikes again. This is why women struggle to find good men as they age
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:22 PM
5

Assertiveness from an unattractive man just comes across as assholish to women. You are so blinded by your own virtue signaling that you have no idea that you probably treat unattractive men considerably differently than men you find attractive. It’s like it’s not even possible for you to think about what it would be like to be an average guy. You cannot fathom a perspective that is not your own
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:20 PM
4

The statistics do not bear that out. It’s women who are batting out of their league going for the top 20% of men while the rest of us are seen as tools to be used, dangerous, or invisible. The average man’s preferences don’t even factor into his dating because they’re a luxury afforded only to women and top 20% men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:18 PM
3

They are though. That’s how that stat works. It’s been debunked so many times I’ve lost count. And yes, both insurance companies and potential prosecutors will be asking arson victims those very same questions. You act like making inquiries into a potential crime is something unique to rape. Also if every other crime has much higher false accusations compared to rape, then it’s probably an indication that whatever the statisticians are counting as a false accusation for rape needs to be expanded…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:15 PM
4

Nobody said anything about seeking out highly desirable women. That’s an addition you made because deep down you know how hard it is for an average guy in a dating world where only the top 20% of men receive any attention or affection at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:08 PM
6

Comparability comes second to being able to date in the first place. It’s a luxury for women who have become the gatekeepers to sex and relationships. The average guy does not get to think about compatibility when dating. Your perspective is so shortsighted that you cannot even fathom what it’s like to be an average guy in the dating world
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:06 PM
3

You say this, but when the only date you’ve gotten in a year walks out the door because you ‘stood up for yourself’ all that virtue signaling won’t matter one bit. This is why women can’t be taken seriously when it comes to issues like this. Your virtue signaling and complete lack of perspective makes any advice completely useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:03 PM
5

When 80% of women stop going for the same 20% of men you might have a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 06:00 PM
3

That statistic is BS. It assumes that any case that doesn’t see a guilty conviction means that the man is a rapist that got away with it. That would include people like Shawn Oakman and the Duke lacrosse players who have proven over and over that they are innocent. You have to stop spreading that BS. Someone’s house burning down is fundamentally different than rape. Rape is something someone doesn’t to someone else consciously. Fires start on their own by mistake or act of god constantly. The co…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:59 PM
29

They simply want control over who gets to be a woman. Because if anyone can become a woman than anyone can rise from the lower class of men in their perfect society. This is why they don’t care about FtM trans people, moving down is whatever. It’s moving into their caste as a filthy moid that they take issue with. It’s why feminism as an ideology must be purged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 05:53 PM
8

Women are notorious virtue signalers and liars. It’s not as simple as just asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:46 PM
5

Again, this is all really easy to say when you’re a part of the gender that has officially become the gatekeepers to sex and relationships for the past 2 decades. If your dating prospects were only yielding 1 date every 6 months I’m sure you would be singing a different tune.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:44 PM
3

There are people that go years into marriages before someone reveals their true self to the other person. You think I’m gonna truly understand someone that deeply based on a few video calls? Gullible is written on the ceiling btw
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:41 PM
14

If your words matched your actions even half of the time you’d have a leg to stand on here. Unfortunately many men feel the way we do because we’ve seen women’s actions be dramatically different from their words a few too many times.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:34 PM
2

Most people lack any introspection. But I’d rather learn to catch fish from a fisherman than watching the virtue signaling fish.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:33 PM
2

Reality is my answer. When you have rad gems influencing mass shooters at this point then feminism has gone down a very dark path.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:28 PM
10

Birth rates are so low precisely because women have largely broken free of the gender roles they don’t want. It’s men who can’t break free of gender roles, mostly because women don’t want us to
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:25 PM
7

The issue is that you don’t exactly know what kind of person you’re dealing with the first few dates and most men get so few chances that it’s not worth potentially blowing your chances by dying on this hill. It really is on women to change the dynamic here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:23 PM
2

And your argument was what exactly? “Nuh uh” was essentially what your 4 paragraphs of gibberish boiled down to
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:12 PM
3

My alternative is to not judge someone based on the words of a woman that could have any number of motivations for why she’s saying those things. And don’t go telling me that you do the same thing. Feminism teaches people to ‘believe women’ insinuating that people should make a character determination about a man based on the accusations of women. That is exactly how you get situations like Shawn Oakman and the Duke Lacrosse players. It’s toxic and it needs to end
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:10 PM
1

Reality
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:07 PM
4

That is absolutely not true. Women are just as vengeful as men and they know that an accusation of creep or misogyny can potentially ruin a man’s reputation. There are huge amounts of women that misuse that power every day
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 02:40 AM
6

Feminists on balance, are in fact demonizing men for a number of things including but not limited to their approaches. You act like this is a small problem and then turn around and ask why there aren’t any decent men around.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 02:36 AM
4

Feminism is increasingly becoming a femcel community. The two are almost indistinguishable at this point
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 02:33 AM
9

That is a lie
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 02:37 PM
5

It is a term of commodification. Women are as looks based as men are when it comes to dating, probably even more so given dating app data. You commodify us way more than we commodify you. Our commodification is more out in the open since we are expected to be the initiators. Yet you still complain. Just amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:06 PM
–

Man the point just keeps flying over your head
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:04 PM
–

Where men and women are pretty much equal i.e. Western Europe
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:04 PM
5

Then start approaching yourselves. You commodify men by getting to reject any dude with impunity and then wonder why men are getting more desperate or checking out entirely. You are just completely unaware of the effect of your actions on other people. It’s truly astounding
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:43 PM
–

I never said they aren’t having babies at all. My argument was that things do not equalize between men and women in terms of government handouts just because women have less babies. So clearly women bearing the brunt of child rearing is not why the disparity in government help is so large. Don’t strawman
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:41 PM
–

Even in countries that are pretty much equal women are still the main recipient of government money. We’ve tried this experiment in western and Northern Europe. Women are simply not interested in repairing the social contract and that’s why men are becoming more unproductive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:39 PM
3

If you don’t want to be approached out of desperation then the solution is obvious. Start approaching men. But women by and large have refused to do that and then wonder why men think this way. Sometimes you create the monster you hate so much
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:28 PM
4

Women will do nothing to end the social norm that men are supposed to approach, reward only the men who approach, and then wonder why men think about dating in terms of scarcity. You really can’t make this shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:27 PM
–

In developed countries like New Zealand you are having babies less and less. Another part of the social contract women have broken. You’re still immensely tax negative even in places where the birth rate has fallen dramatically.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:19 PM
–

Most women are relying on men’s resources though, just indirectly. Women are the main recipients of government money. This is why libs are so worried about all the unproductive men. You can’t have a functioning society if a large segment of the population that used to be immensely productive suddenly disappears. The whole thing starts to fall apart
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:16 PM
–

As a leftist red pill I could not agree more. I still think the right is wrong and is just as bad for men if not worse, but leftists and libs cannot keep treating young men like shit and then expect them to back them. That’s absolute lunacy
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:05 PM
3

Oh so you want a simp or a sugar daddy then. Hope you’re hot
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 03:45 PM
2

That’s fine. But if he commits you better submit. That’s how transactional relationships work
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 01:21 PM
7

The problem is these women pretend like their goal isn’t something casual when they’d absolutely spread their legs the same day for the first guy they thought was top 10%.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:10 PM
0

There were many good breadtubers back in the day. They just don’t make videos anymore. Contrapoints and Hbomberguy come to mind. Hbomb was almost singlehandedly responsible for delegitimizing gamergate as a movement by appealing to guys in that movement and pulling them away from it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 08:54 PM
3

FD is a lost cause. He the part of the left that needs to be delegitimized if we’re ever going to be politically relevant again
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 08:51 PM
2

The fact that you think this whole thing revolves around getting laid is precisely why I’m not going to take any of your remaining comment seriously. You’re so off base that nothing you’re saying is worth responding to
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 08:49 PM
8

Yep. Super quiet. That’s why they’re posting about it all over social media
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 01:05 PM
5

Anytime men actually try to take those actions we are shouted down by women or societally pressured to stop. Don’t believe me? Google what happened to the first guy who tried to set up a men’s shelter in Canada. Checking women’s privilege either irl or online is a form of praxis that’s part of the movement. The other stuff can’t happen until the women that criticize it aren’t taken seriously anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 06:14 PM
8

It’s less convincing others that we made the right decision and more defending ourselves from both the feminists on the left and the tradcons on the right. I don’t care if you think what I did was wrong, but I’m not going to let you build a narrative about me that simply isn’t true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 06:08 PM
4

Those are some real cool gender roles you got there. I’m assuming you’re fully prepared to be domesticated the rest of your life once this ‘real man’ appears to you right? Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 12:44 PM
2

If you think this is remotely a reality for the majority of women I don’t even know what to tell you. It doesn’t even make sense mathematically. There are only so many rich men to go around. If the all get divorce raped then they won’t be rich. So only a fraction of women will even have a shot at this. And as a lawyer who manages estates for some rich people I can tell you most rich dudes have pretty ironclad prenups. It’s middle class guys that get divorce raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 12:39 PM
1

You forgot to finish that story. Go ahead and tell us what happens to that woman after she turns 50 and now the consequences of her previously vain actions are starting to catch up to her. Go ahead. I’m waiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 12:27 PM
9

I went to one. Didn’t happen. It’s mostly women milling about in groups the same way they do at clubs and bars and rejecting any dude who comes their way. The problem isn’t not having the ability to meet, it’s women having astronomical standards
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 06:05 PM
17

Or because getting rejected 20 times in an hour in person is far more humiliating than getting rejected 20 times in an hour on an app.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 02:24 PM
–

I have never experienced those things. That’s why I get targeted with the ads. I still wouldn’t get an ai girlfriend because I cannot suspend my disbelief that much. Most other guys like me are the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 07:58 PM
–

As a guy who has been the the target of a lot of ai girlfriend ads I can tell you that this kind of stuff is only going to work for guys so detached from reality that they can suspend their disbelief and forget that they’re talking to a robot. And the guys that can do that are already doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 04:19 PM
0

That’s the part you are inferring because you don’t want it to be true. The study does not say that. You’re saying that
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 11:30 PM
4

What statistics could even measure that? You’re asking for something you know couldn’t possibly exist
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 11:27 PM
1

Is that what you think you’re coming off as? Hahahahahahah
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 05:30 PM
0

That’s literally what you’re doing. You don’t get to classify everything that the people you don’t like are doing as whining while in the same breath whining about them. The irony is so thick you could cut it with a knife
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 05:23 PM
1

How does it matter? What is the functional difference in this context between marrying down a little and marrying down a lot? The whole point was that men are more likely to marry down period. How much is irrelevant. So explain how it’s relevant or take an L. Or would that be too much for your female brain to comprehend?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 02:56 PM
0

Pointing out reality is not whining. What you’re doing is whining. We get ridiculed no matter what you do. That’s kind of what women do, whine and complain and ridicule us.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 02:53 PM
1

As long as you recognize that the fact that you’ll never be put in a position to have to make that choice is an immense privilege that is far beyond any privileges that men might have
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 02:51 PM
1

No. If you suffered even a fraction of the problems men suffer you’d be in a psych ward. So congrats, you have an idea of what it’s like to be a man. And it caused you to need to go to a psych ward and medicate yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 02:49 PM
2

So you can’t point out reality if you’ve adopted a certain personal philosophy? That’s the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 04:53 PM
1

It isn’t about ‘controlling your flesh’ whatever the fuck that means. It’s about the social expectation from women that we will either approach and accept any consequence or deservedly die alone. Control your flesh this holiday
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 04:50 PM
1

Oh so you almost experienced an amount of loneliness an average man feels. Congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 04:47 PM
1

Again, you draw distinctions that don’t matter. Marrying down is marrying down. How much down is irrelevant. You’re just trying to muddy the waters because the stats aren’t with you
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 04:46 PM
2

They claim that because women treat us like commodities. The red pill is a reaction to the way women have been acting. When you treat us like commodities and wait at the finish line, we will take multiple prizes once we’re there. If you don’t want that, don’t wait at the finish line. Simple
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 05:54 PM
1

I’m pointing out that both positions are social policies. The fact that I call my position a social policy doesn’t mean yours isn’t too. And punishing women for behaving poorly in relationships is a social policy that meets the needs of men. I don’t even know what your gripe is here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 05:52 PM
2

That’s why you get in early and build trust with him. Buy low, sell high.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 04:08 PM
6

That’s precisely why you should be investing in someone early so that you have built loyalty and trust when your looks begin to fade.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:39 PM
8

I love how you frame this as men “waiting” to date younger women as if that option is open to 20 something men who aren’t in the top 20% of men. Very clever. Not gonna work, but very clever.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:35 PM
1

A bunch of guys opting out of relationships is also a social policy. I’ve chosen the social policy I want. The specifics I’ll leave to experts. And that is not the definition of a social policy. Hitlers Germany had many social policies that were not helpful to anyone except people already in power. That is simply not the correct definition
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:38 PM
1

Yes but male doctors are significantly more likely to marry down. That’s what the stats say. You’re going in circles
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:35 PM
2

I’m not a social scientist. I don’t know the details. But it’s clear that’s the easiest direction to go in to solve this issue
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 06:41 PM
1

An upper hand is something you can willingly give away. It’s like solving poverty by asking a homeless guy to become a millionaire instead of having the rich give away their wealth. One option is much easier than the other
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 05:58 PM
2

I am not sacrificing my own life to achieve what will probably be nothing. A much easier solution is to just implement more social policies that punish women for being shitty in relationships in the exact same way we have for men. I’m not gonna be a guinea pig
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 05:56 PM
3

Of course. But we’re talking about stats not possibilities you’re defaulting back to ‘well it’s possible’ in the face of statistics. That’s not a convincing position
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 05:54 PM
3

Sure but that’s more of a product of who you’re around. Doctors are around nurses more. But data shows if a male doctor met a high school drop out he really liked he would still marry her. The reverse is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 04:09 PM
1

That would be good. But if a single man adopted that philosophy while most men didn’t, he’s just taking himself out of the gene pool and dying alone
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 04:07 PM
1

It also doesn’t change the fact that there is nothing a single man can do about it. Plus if we weren’t the supplier of options our species would cease to exist. Women are lucky we aren’t as picky as them
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 04:06 PM
1

The more chances you get the more comfortable a situation you will likely end up in. You’re assuming that having more chances doesn’t do anything for you. It does.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 02:15 PM
1

You have a choice as a woman. I do not. It is a false choice. It doesn’t stop being one because you don’t believe it. You’re gonna have to do better than that
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:44 AM
3

You’re making a lot of assumptions about a theoretical man you haven’t even talked to in this hypothetical. Weird behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:43 AM
2

Men are not a hive mind. There was no counsel of men that decided this
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:40 AM
1

This is why you disregard anything a bluepiller has to say almost automatically
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 09:38 PM
2

You can’t post this while women also advance the trope that men are intimidated by a woman who earns a lot of money. So we are both intimidated and attracted at the same time? I think not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 09:36 PM
2

I can read between the lines
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 09:22 PM
2

It’s a false choice. Die literally alone or die metaphorically alone
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 09:21 PM
6

Weakness? You have no idea the depths of loneliness men experience. It would break you within days. Dying alone is the only real option at this point. Men don’t get an actual choice
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 09:20 PM
2

Women get bottomless choices. Men don’t
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 09:15 PM
4

No. It isn’t. You’re just pursuing the wrong men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 09:11 PM
2

One or two? Yeah I’m gonna discard that comment right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 09:10 PM
17

That’s craaazy considering I hear women say they don’t trust men that aren’t in a relationship already constantly and the number 1 go to insult for women online is ‘incel’, a direct attack on a man’s ability to attract women. Women judge our very being on our relation to them. It’s not optional for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 02:34 PM
–

Most men will tell you there was a patriarchy at some point. And you act like women don’t use emotional manipulation to get the things they want in a relationship constantly. It’s so ingrained in you from centuries of patriarchy that you probably don’t even notice it. It’s a power struggle for you too you just don’t call it that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 02:32 PM
7

There is no alternative to bad behavior for men. It’s either put up with women who don’t treat you well or die alone. It’s not a real choice
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 02:30 PM
4

Once is already more than enough
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 02:28 PM
1

That’s fine. As long as you acknowledge that dating is 10x harder for men along with that stance
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 02:27 PM
5

That is just not true
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 01:14 PM
3

That’s just not true
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 01:13 PM
3

‘Soft gender roles’ meaning you get to do whatever you want and he is basically your labor slave
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 01:11 PM
9

Explains a lot
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 01:33 AM
4

Pretty much the entire Democratic Party. They centered abortion as an issue which was a huge mistake and blamed men in general for the loss after people had been sounding the alarm for months that they were handling the campaign poorly. I’m pro choice, but centering your campaign around an issue that 98% of the time boils down to women being able to fuck without consequences was a terrible campaign strategy and the democrats deserved to lose. And instead of looking inwards finding what they did …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 08:19 PM
9

I voted against Trump and feel very alienated from my party and have been for quite some time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 05:09 PM
2

Im not saying his philosophy is always sound, but it doesn’t advocate for absent fathers. His criticism of the left is completely incoherent I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 02:45 PM
–

So some people are hypocrites? What an amazing discovery you’ve pointed out. Truly ground breaking stuff right here
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 12:51 PM
9

Jordan Peterson has never advocated for being an absent father or not paying child support. I don’t think you understand his philosophy at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 11:07 AM
14

That is certifiably insane
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 01:25 AM
1

Who you have respect for and who you’re attracted to are often 2 different things for women
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 06:45 PM
1

You keep believing that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 04:57 PM
1

Good for them. If you wait at the finish line, as women increasingly are doing, don’t be surprised when just being able to date you isn’t good enough anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 04:29 PM
1

Plenty of mid women are gold diggers. Being beautiful isn’t enough anyway. If you want to wait at the finish line then the price for doing that is submission
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 03:15 PM
1

Again. I don’t like this way of thinking. I think it’s toxic. But we are already talking about women who think men shouldn’t date until they have a well established career. They’re already toxic. So yes, they are just looking for men with money and treating them as though they are goldiggers when they literally are and demanding submission isn’t that outlandish an ask. Your problem is you think I agree with his premise. I don’t. I’m merely trying to show what the tradeoff would be if the premise…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:53 PM
1

That isn’t the expectation of your partner though. If my partner wants me to be super successful and make a ton of money as a base requirement of being with them I am going to expect something in return. That something is submission.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:53 PM
1

Mine had content. I was letting him know the reason for the report. If I’m gonna get reported for shit like that on this sub I’m gonna report others as well. If you don’t like it then don’t comment
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:21 AM
2

So an insignificant amount in the grand scheme of things. Got it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:20 AM
1

I’ve seen some women say some truly horrendously terrible shit on this sub. Usually it’s the pink pilled ones or the self identified feminists
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:18 AM
2

More contentless rhetoric
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 02:05 AM
1

And that’s fine. But if women start believing that en masse they better be prepared to totally submit to the successful career guy that they do end up with, maybe even have to share him. That’s the compromise for only seeing those types of men as dating options
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:42 AM
1

Of course it is. You don’t go to 4+ years of college to get the same level of respect as the burger flipper at McDonald’s these are entire generations they’re educating. You are just wrong and repeating yourself isn’t making you any more right
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:35 AM
6

Clearly it isn’t enough to move the needle significantly either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:32 AM
0

Reported for content less rhetoric
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:31 AM
5

No. They aren’t. I don’t know what else to tell you. You don’t go through 7+ years of extra schooling just to have a job. Holy fuck you are either wildly stupid or still in middle school or trolling. It’s one of those 3
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:30 AM
2

wtf are you talking about. Everyone considers being a teacher or researcher or lawyer as a career. You have such a one dimensional view of what counts as a career I’m beginning to think you haven’t made it out of middle school. Public defenders and prosecutors are lawyers btw. They had to go through law school and pass the bar just the same as the lawyers making 400 grand a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:06 AM
2

Those jobs aren’t high paying though and have varying degrees of status. That’s the point I’m trying to make to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:02 AM
3

Then that’s even worse. Top 5 worst takes on this sub ever. Congrats
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:59 AM
2

So teachers, firefighters, public defenders, prosecutors, many researchers, and a bunch of other necessary jobs just aren’t careers to you because they don’t make enough money? That’s like top 5 dumbest shit I’ve seen on this subreddit if it’s not a troll and I’ve seen women say some really insane shit on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:56 AM
-2

Plenty of careers are not high paying. If you want a guy who makes good money you better be prepared to fully and completely submit to him, or else you just want to be treated like a princess for no reason
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:49 AM
2

If you’re going to think this way about men you cannot be surprised when the men that busted their ass to become economically attractive demand total submission from their girlfriend/wife. You want 1950s, you’re gonna get 1950s.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:42 AM
14

Women have shown repeatedly that they do not care about that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:39 AM
0

So men are the ones obsessed by reacting to it, but women somehow don’t care even though they’re the ones talking about it and engaging with it. Okey dokey then
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 11:42 PM
1

Okay so no actual economic argument then? Just some smooth brained interpretation of history? Gotcha. Moving on then
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 11:41 PM
-10

It isn’t about arguing your way into their pants. It’s about making sure the actual reasons for the things that they’re doing are out in the open so that men aren’t being gaslit en masse
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 05:49 PM
1

That’s a real nice story but you have yet to explain why those imported goods won’t just cost more for consumers. You aren’t making an economic argument, you’re giving a shitty history lesson. Holy fuck, you really don’t know what you’re talking about at all do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 05:43 PM
–

Funny, men are told not to be friends with the women we date first.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 03:29 PM
1

You’re just saying those things. You’re not actually explaining how that happens, you’re just saying that’s what’s gonna happen and expecting me to believe you. It’s the argumentation style of someone with an IQ of 60
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 03:25 PM
1

You haven’t discussed the actual economics of tariffs though. Holy fuck you just live in your own little midwit world don’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 02:30 PM
1

You aren’t discussing policy. You’ve hurled insults and made up stories about me. That’s literally all you’ve done other than blame consumers for buying things and shielding the people who actually sold out the manufacturing sector that you pretend to care so much about from any blame. You are the worst kind of coward, a retarded one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 01:41 PM
1

And who pushed those free trade policies? Who had the most to gain? You’re so close. If only your brain wasn’t smoother than an ice rink.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 11:36 AM
1

Ya and who’s to blame for that? If you were capable of more than level 1 thinking your opinions wouldn’t be such dogshit
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 03:55 AM
-2

First of all, my grandfather worked in a Pittsburgh steel mill. Fuck all the way off clown. Second, I love how you’re blaming the consumers for buying stuff and not the capitalists that sold them out. How very bootlickery of you. Third, you still haven’t made a true economic argument that breaks down how tariffs work in the way you think they do. You’ve just been getting emotional and complaining about my nonexistent ivory tower and then listing a bunch of cities in the Midwest. Make a real argu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 02:01 AM
1

You haven’t described at all how that creates a different outcome than what I said. You just played a semantic game and pretended like you made some great point. Like the person that just posts a screenshot of a googled definition of a word and decides they’ve won. Make an actual argument smooth brain
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 08:59 PM
0

That is what they are. They are taxes on imports. Taxes that cause companies to raise prices on said goods so that the consumer effectively pays for them when they pay for the good. You don’t get to sit here and tell me I’m wrong and do nothing else. If you’re so confident let’s hear your economic dissertation lil buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 08:04 PM
0

If you think China is going to stop their labor practices because the prices of their products got passed on to Americans I have news for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 07:17 PM
1

Ironically, giving Ukraine to Russia is exactly what he wants to do
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 03:14 PM
4

Take it up with the women calling them that then.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 06:34 PM
9

Men that observe that kind of thinking about women are referred to as incels and that is precisely the double standard I believe the OP is calling out
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 06:30 PM
1

Black Lives Matter was taken pretty seriously I reckon
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 01:45 PM
1

Plenty of 21st century political movements started online. So yes, it is serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 04:41 AM
1

The millions of likes on tiktok beg to differ
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 08:48 PM
2

It’s as big as it’s ever been. Still playing games
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 06:35 PM
3

It was discussed. It was not taken seriously by any significant amount of American women. You’re still playing games
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 02:14 PM
5

When you’re starting a whole movement that’s about not interacting with men in any meaningful way, you’re blaming only men. Stop playing games
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 11:03 AM
1

The part you’re missing is that a lot of liberal and left wing men are also a part of the loneliness crisis, are also getting shit on by feminists constantly, and also didn’t care that much about voting for abortion when the democrats seem to think that young men only care about porn and video games. That’s a serious issue. The republicans used to be a party run by men who didnt know how to talk to women in the 2000s. Now the democrats have the same problem in reverse, they are a party run by wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 11:01 AM
6

More rural states are constantly voting in policy that makes things worse for them. It’s no wonder there’s a rural urban divide here. Almost like rural areas constantly vote against their own interests and urban areas should stop sending aid to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:07 PM
5

Lefty red pill men are rare but I am one of them
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 03:28 PM
2

It doesn’t. I’m negating what he said. Follow the thread
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:57 PM
-1

Cool. Now do New York and New England
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 01:50 PM
11

He hated he saw Trump as the bigger threat and he was right. I don’t know how someone could blame him for making what he honestly believed was the right choice and putting his ego aside
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 01:45 PM
7

And again in 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 12:19 PM
–

Having sex is not the same as being a total slut for a decade+. If you can’t see the difference I don’t know what to tell you
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:54 PM
–

I’m not denying that, but women allow that because there are a lot more promiscuous women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 05:10 PM
–

Pair bonding is a very specific psychological concept. What you are describing is porn addiction. It’s like saying pneumonia and the flu are the same. They are in the same ballpark, but not the same disease
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 04:27 PM
–

Of course. Everything red pill men say about promiscuous women is also true of promiscuous men. Promiscuous women just get talked about more because there’s more of them
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 04:05 PM
–

No it doesn’t
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 04:02 PM
1

It was a leading question. I’m not stupid. I know exactly what you’re doing. You’re arguing just to argue now and I’m done with you
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 02:00 AM
1

You Literally said not everyone spreads their opinion like fact. This is getting ridiculous. You’re arguing just to argue at this point. I’m done.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 02:00 AM
1

I’m not the one claiming otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 01:16 AM
1

You sure as hell are
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 12:20 AM
1

I have never said that. Holy shit you just read what you want to
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 12:20 AM
1

Everyone spreads their opinions as fact
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 10:35 PM
1

The .002% that choose yes
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 10:34 PM
1

Also red pill men having opinions about women that you don’t like is not the same as you spreading literal misinformation about human biology for you cope post. Knock it off
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 01:57 PM
1

Many men don’t have a time limit. Men have had healthy children at 80. Women have a literal time limit where they will not have any more children because they do not have any more eggs. Nothing like that exists for men. Stop spreading misinformation
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 01:56 PM
2

That’s not true either. There are some risks to kids born to older men but to pretend like every kid born to a guy over 40 is fucked up is fucking ridiculous. Women really gotta stop spreading misinformation on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 09:50 AM
2

No. It doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 01:38 AM
7

The biological clock relates to a literal clock that goes on with women. Just because it’s more uncommon with older men does not mean we have a clock
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 06:04 PM
1

It wasn’t invented by a journalist. It’s literal biology. This is such cope
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 12:10 PM
8

Most of your arguments are actually about a woman’s biological clock. Not men’s. Men only have a biological clock in relation to the women in our perceived dating pool. Misleading post
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 12:04 PM
1

I want to upper echelon of women because I’ve worked my way into the upper echelon of men. That isn’t hypergamy. Hypergamy is dating above your level. I am neither fat, balding, old, or broke. This is some revenge fantasy you’re working up right now
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:57 PM
1

Keep going. You’re only digging your hole deeper
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:55 PM
1

No I want you to show me when I, or anyone else that has ever complained about anything on this sub, complained about being rejected by an insta model as you just claimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:39 PM
1

I never personally attacked you. You’re so detached from reality at this point it’s astounding
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:38 PM
1

When did I complain about getting rejected by an insta model? You are losing your grip on reality here
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:36 PM
1

Nice googling. Now you’re gonna get reported for personal attacks because you can’t actually back up the ridiculous things you’re saying
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:35 PM
1

I am a part of that group definitely. But I’m describing a common experience just using the first person. The fact you don’t possess the reading comprehension to understand that is simply not my problem
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:34 PM
1

Also if it happens all the time I’m sure you’ll be able to find at least 3 examples from this past month to link to. Go ahead and
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:32 PM
1

I don’t think you know what cognitive dissonance is. You’re just trying to throw the terms I’m using back at me thinking it will make you sound smarter. This is pathetic
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:32 PM
1

Because first person is the best way to convey that experience. But I was talking about any guy who’s in that situation. That’s where the reading comprehension comes in.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:30 PM
1

Literally nobody is complaining about getting rejected by insta models. That is a situation you’ve made up entirely in your own head to ease the cognitive dissonance you’re feeling
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:29 PM
1

That statement could be about any guy who’s in the same situation. You’re telling a story about this one guy you know. How you can’t tell the difference shows a fundamental lack of reading comprehension
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:28 PM
1

Which ones. Be specific and I’m sure you’ll see the clear difference
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:20 PM
1

I’m not using anecdotal experience and the only people I’ve ever seen use anecdotes on here are blue pilled women. That’s the main problem with this sub. Data is treated the same as ‘this one guy I know’ and that’s why nothing productive is ever done.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 03:29 PM
1

Im not deflecting anything. You just made an untrue personal assumption out of nowhere to deflect from the task at hand. Garbage move
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 03:28 PM
3

But it is far more pronounced with women than with men
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:10 PM
1

“Let me tell you a story about this definitely real guy as an anecdote that’s supposed to disprove statistical reality” most common woman move on here
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 01:30 AM
1

You responded by making a personal assumption that wasn’t even correct. Typical woman move
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 01:29 AM
1

The statistics disagree with you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:53 PM
1

Every post on here is about the current dating climate. You’ve just completely derailed this by making it personal. Typical woman move
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:52 PM
1

That’s his personal preference. I’m talking about general trends that you see in large groups of people. Men are far more likely to date down in income or status than women are. That’s just a fact
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 10:18 AM
1

It’s about the current dating climate. You’re making it personal
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 10:16 AM
1

A major dating app had to change its entire structure because women simply do not want to be the drivers. The occasional time you decide to is not indicative of the whole
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:25 PM
-1

Except men are always the ones having to do the driving, so it’s only our sexuality being impacted by this
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:44 PM
1

That is absolutely terrible and that is precisely the attitude that needs to change
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:43 PM
1

Which has become impossible in the modern day
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:43 PM
1

Who just did? Because I never claimed that
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:01 PM
1

Yes. I have. Now stop making this personal
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:00 PM
0

It isn’t in response to men. Men will date any woman of any status, women will not. Women are the hypergamous ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 02:38 PM
1

They will and do all the time. Because they are hypergamous
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 02:31 PM
0

I’m not saying they should, but that women are. That’s just the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 02:25 PM
1

It isn’t punishing, she’ll just have to be able to handle the fact that if she wanted a high value man she should have gotten in earlier, now she has to share
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 02:24 PM
1

You already don’t. You’re hypergamous. Do you not live in reality or something? Are you stuck in a Disney movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 02:14 PM
1

I don’t need to know every woman on earth to reach my conclusion. I can see trends in a population and make decisions accordingly. If women, in general, want to make me struggle to be worthy of them, then I’m not going to limit myself to just one once I reach that point. Fairs fair
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 01:56 PM
1

Then it’s on women to make sure that happens. Solve your hypergamy and stop giving me the incentive to sleep with as many women as possible
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 01:52 PM
14

I’m not ruining the dating market. It was already ruined by the hypergamy of women. I’m just taking advantage of that hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 03:30 PM
5

Sounds good if that’s your perogative but I’m not changing any social attitudes by myself in this lifetime so I’m gonna reap as much of the reward of being successful as I can
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:11 PM
1

It’s the inability to create pregnancy, whether that’s through erectile dysfunction or vasectomy or whatever it’s all the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:05 AM
29

If I have to struggle and go through endless metamorphoses just to be able to be worthy of women, why should I limit myself to just one once I reach that point? If you wanted monogamy you should have helped build me up, but you made me struggle. Now I’m reaping the rewards
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:50 AM
1

They become increasingly irreversible with time. So my comment is incredibly relevant. Fuck off
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:47 AM
1

Impotence is another word for the inability to get someone pregnant. Stop litigating the definitions of words because you don’t like my point
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:46 AM
1

The literal dictionary definition of impotent is not potent, i.e. potency being the ability to get someone pregnant. Stop litigating the definitions of words because you’re losing and take you L
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:45 AM
1

That seems like a you problem. Opinion discarded
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:43 AM
1

Impotence is the inability to reproduce, inability to have sex is secondary. Stop litigating the definitions of words that are clear just because you have no argument. I’m so tired of people resorting to this on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:43 AM
1

Your first definition is literally what happens when you get a vasectomy. You stop being potent. You lack the ability to get someone pregnant. That’s literally the whole point. Did you really think that was going to help you? LMFAOOO
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:41 AM
1

So you admit that women have more control throughout the entire process. So men should have more control. It’s not rocket science
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:50 AM
1

The whole point of vasectomies is to cause impotence. That’s literally the whole point of them, to not be able to get someone pregnant. Holy fuck. You clearly don’t know what you’re even talking about anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:49 AM
0

It does not do more harm than a vasectomy. That’s the most ridiculous take I’ve seen yet. The pill doesn’t make you permanently impotent, therefore it isn’t worse. End of story
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 11:55 PM
2

If you’re gonna open with that comment I’m not gonna dignify you with a response. Go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:24 PM
1

So don’t risk your health and use a condom or be abstinent. You’ll still have the opportunity to have kids in the future if you want, unlike the guy who gets a vasectomy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:22 PM
1

The woman has as much say ahead of time as the man does. You keep minimizing that incredibly pertinent fact
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:21 PM
1

It’s very different. Spreading that lie could ruin a man’s life, not that a blue pilled feminist would care.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:20 PM
1

The fact that they were even mentioned as equal things in the same comment is the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 08:07 PM
2

You realize that even vasectomies are not a surefire way to prevent pregnancy right? My cousin had a kid after he got a vasectomy. You’re acting like this is some definitive birth control better than condoms or the pill
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 08:06 PM
1

What do you think child support is if not the forced labor using the bodies of men to support a child they had no say about? Knock it off with that bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 08:03 PM
–

That’s why I said ‘typically’. Learn to read next time. Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 07:59 PM
1

Ya but only one parent gets to decide if it’s born. That’s the part you keep missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 07:59 PM
-1

Then why are you mentioning it as if it were a casual thing like condoms or the pill? Stop doing that
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 07:56 PM
0

When did I shoot down anything other than vasectomies? You’re making shit up. Knock it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:49 PM
0

It is akin to getting tubes tied. It makes you impotent, how that occurs is irrelevant. I love how you downplayed the only relevant part. Nice try
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:48 PM
2

So women get to have sex carefree but men have to “control their sperm”. How about control your eggs
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:46 PM
1

Or just use regular forms of birth control and don’t castrate yourself. Jesus Christ, this is like telling a 22 year old woman who wants kids later to get her tubes tied
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:45 PM
1

Those are women who know they never want them, not women who are just delaying them. You are proposing a vasectomy as a regular form of birth control. That’s dangerous. Stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:43 PM
-4

What? There are a million other forms of birth control. It doesn’t have to be making yourself permanently impotent or abstinent. That’s fucking ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:41 PM
1

So saying that men and women should have an equal opportunity to opt out of parenthood is incoherent babble now. Gotcha. Really showing up for that 19th amendment rn
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 06:40 PM
-2

That isn’t how you, or other women talk about it though. It’s akin to getting your tubes tied not being on birth control, yet women still talk about it like it’s just another form of birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 04:56 PM
-6

You can be open to having kids in the future and just not want one now. But if you get a vasectomy you run a very high risk of being permanently impotent. Stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 04:54 PM
1

They don’t permanently inhibit your ability to have children in the future. Stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 04:53 PM
0

It depletes your ability to have children in the future in a way abortions typically do not. Comparing the two is affirmatively insane
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 04:52 PM
-13

Women have got to stop proposing vasectomies as an option for birth control for young men. That is a horrible option. Stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 03:38 PM
1

So apparently I’m dumbing stuff down for you and you are still not understanding. What a self own
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 12:50 PM
2

He’s still with them because he’s too old to fight them anymore. They utterly screwed him twice and those of us old enough to remember it won’t forget it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 12:49 PM
2

Bernie Sanders was screwed twice by the democrats and when he sued them in court their argument was literally “we are a private party we can do whatever we want” and they won because they were technically correct. And you think the best path forward is to reform from within? LMFAOOOO
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 11:58 AM
2

Wow it’s like I’m talking to a wall. Nothing I say registers with you even a little bit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 01:41 AM
1

Using a poverty argument in favor of abortion is just straight up eugenics. One of the worst arguments you could possibly make in favor of it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 01:41 AM
1

I remember Jill Stein. I made the same arguments against voting for her as you are now. I was foolish.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 01:39 AM
2

It isn’t a waste. It’s showing the democrats that they have to actually give a shit about the things I give a shit about if they want my vote. That’s how democracy is supposed to work
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 01:20 AM
0

So men are forced to act ahead of time with the information but women can do whatever they want at any point in the process. No thank you. I prefer equality
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:24 PM
3

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:23 PM
0

I agree. But they have to come together. I refuse to have rights for one group but not another
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:08 PM
2

You opt in when you have sex. The same way you opt into the lottery when you buy a ticket
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:07 PM
0

What does that have to do with what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:07 PM
1

Democrats don’t have a strong track record of doing a lot of good stuff at the same time. If they win on abortion they are going to act like they’ve won politics and stop there
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:06 PM
1

Ah so suddenly it isn’t a physiological issue as women have claimed it to be and now it’s suddenly the man’s fault because women would no longer be able to quietly fix their fuck up. Funny how that happens
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:04 PM
6

Ya and women made the decision to have sex too. Why do they get to correct a potential mistake afterward but men don’t? You aren’t understanding you’re just assuming what my argument is
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:03 PM
3

You already have more bodily autonomy. You just don’t want to accept the consequences of your actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:01 PM
3

It isn’t one persons body though. You’re forcing the other person to use their body to perform labor to make money for the child. Don’t play this stupid game. If women can opt out of parenthood then so should men. This isn’t hard. In fact it still isn’t equality because if the man wants to be a parent the woman can still do an abortion whereas if a woman wants to be a parent she can just have the kid. Even with financial abortion men don’t have as much choice as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:00 PM
2

I only support financial abortion if actual abortion is legal. If it’s not then financial abortion shouldn’t be either. You’re conflating a whole different topic with this one to distort the arguments here anyway. Stay on task
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 05:58 PM
1

Good thing that wasn’t my explanation. Learn how to read and then get back to me you condescending piece of shit. Just because you made a list of what you think is going on doesn’t mean that’s actually what’s going on. I even explained how that list was bullshit and yet you still peddle it as though it’s fact. This is getting pathetic fast on your end
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 05:56 PM
3

Yes it absolutely is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 05:54 PM
4

Financial abortion isn’t legal anywhere. What’s your point
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 05:54 PM
7

Which is why financial abortion should exist. It levels the playing field again and gives men and women equal autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:08 PM
1

Because they want to be able to fuck without consequences
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:08 PM
4

But it isn’t essential now is it? At least that’s what women on this sub keep telling men that are feeling lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:07 PM
2

You think I’m making my voting choices over a subreddit? You really think you have that much influence? Brainrot
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:06 PM
2

Women on here talk all the time about how they can’t cum from PIV sex and how it isn’t that enjoyable. Time to suck some dick I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:57 PM
2

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:56 PM
10

Huh. Crazy how we don’t require that of women. Yet again all responsibility falls on men and women are just some passive victims in all this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:08 PM
4

There are plenty of ways to ensure that the woman does not get pregnant again, if they aren’t comfortable with that then yes, they shouldn’t have sex until after menopause
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:07 PM
6

Of course it is. It’s why I’ll vote for Claudia de la Cruz or Cornell West before I vote for Harris. But to pretend like the republicans aren’t the party of hate is absolutely laughable. THEYRE EATING THE DOGS
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:02 PM
1

I have many times. The fact that you want to continue playing these games instead of saying something productive says a lot. And you are grasping a straws now. You don’t have a good argument for what I’m saying about dating apps so you have to cling to the fact that not every relationship starts online. That’s pitiful. Do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:00 PM
5

The woman got to decide whether the child even was born in the first place. That’s what financial abortion is. Deciding before the child is born that you will not support it and letting the woman do what she wants with that information. No. Your logic is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:50 PM
1

It isn’t. It’s a preference that is so ancillary to a relationship calling it a judgement is laughable. Stop playing word games. And dating apps are the main way most people meet. Women fully control dating apps. The idea that their judgements aren’t at the forefront of dating in 2024 is absolutely laughable
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:48 PM
10

So men have absolutely no agency or autonomy after they bust a nut but women get to make every major choice along the way. I am now even more in favor of financial abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:44 PM
7

It did extend to parenthood for the woman. She literally got to decide whether she wanted to be a parent or not. Jesus Christ this logic is terrible
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:43 PM
1

So it’s far more a judgement for women than for men. Women are the ones gatekeeping sex and relationships for the most part. Their preferences are requirements, men’s preferences don’t matter because most men are just taking what they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:33 PM
3

I’m pro choice. The fact that every woman who has responded to me immediately thinks I’m pro life just because I pointed out that’s what the movement has mostly become is kinda insane. It’s why I’m gonna vote third party instead of the democrats
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:31 PM
2

No it isn’t. There’s literally options on dating apps for women to filter for those things. No such options for men. If it was just a preference you’d see their behavior on the apps change dramatically.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:29 PM
5

She literally asked me a question do I thought she actually wanted a conversation. Yet again women on this sub get away with being absolutely terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:27 PM
0

That’s not what I’m saying at all. I’m saying that if you don’t want to have kids, there is a very easy way to not have them. The fact I have women losing their minds at the thought of not having sex is kinda incredible. I have no sympathy for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:26 PM
3

Again, I’m pro choice. But for some reason women think it’s like impossible to not get pregnant if they can’t have abortion which is just buck wild
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:25 PM
4

No, I won’t because I actually have principles
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:23 PM
2

You can do that even without access to abortion. I’m pro choice by the way, I’m just pointing out a very obvious fact
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:17 PM
6

I never said sex was shameful. But unwanted pregnancy is entirely preventable. You’re painting me to be some religious right wing nutcase when in reality I’m a leftist agnostic. I’m literally just pointing out that pregnancy is entirely preventable. Also I’m pro choice, but it’s near the bottom of my list of things I care about in this election which is entirely at odds with the party I have been voting for since in came of age. You think you’re talking to some right wing debate bro. You’re not.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:58 PM
2

A preference is not the same as a judgement. Holy fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:52 PM
2

It’s very much required. Women are even allowed to filter for it on dating apps which are by far the most common way people meet nowadays. Get outta here with that bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:43 PM
1

That isn’t judging. Judging would not dating women based on how big their boobs are. That is a judgement call. It’s literally in the name. But guys aren’t doing that. Take your L and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:43 PM
2

Also reported for content less rhetoric
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:42 PM
3

So no response? Another L for women wanting to fuck without consequences. You just completely ignored what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:41 PM
0

Imagine talking about contraceptives in response to my argument that unwanted pregnancy is preventable. It didn’t even once cross your mind that maybe you could just keep your legs closed. Incredible. And I’m pointing out that this isn’t the men’s issue that you’re trying to make it out to be. You don’t get to brush off my response just because you don’t like it. And it’s pretty simple how the disparity gets worse with legal abortion. Women have more opportunities to sleep are around with the to…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:40 PM
4

Are they nice? Yes. Are the required in any way? Absolutely not. Saying otherwise is just a delusional lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:36 PM
2

A declining birth rate isn’t an existential threat first of all. It’s perfectly fine if population winds down to a level that is more sustainable. Second, even in places where every opportunity has been given to support women in having more children, like in Germany and Northern Europe, women still are not having children. Access to abortion and help from the government is not what’s going to bring the birth rate back up even if that is your goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:34 PM
-2

And that’s horrible, but rare. Compared to the actual existential threats we’re facing it pales in comparison. It’s not close
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:28 PM
0

Women already get to choose that. Unwanted pregnancy is entirely preventable. And this isn’t about men getting to fuck whenever we want because women control access to sex and a good portion, even a majority, of young men aren’t having any sex at all. That doesn’t change simply because abortion stays legal. In fact the disparity probably even gets worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:26 PM
3

Unwanted pregnancy is entirely preventable. And if you can’t think about issues beyond how it will immediately impact you then you really shouldn’t be voting
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:22 PM
2

That is just such an absolute lie and the fact that you even posted it shows how divorced from reality you are
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:17 PM
26

Pretending that the democrats are the party of hate while republicans go on deranged rants about immigrants eating dogs is certainly something. And this is coming from a guy who has many criticisms of the democrats. But that is not one of them
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:11 PM
-6

The fact that abortion is even a big issue in this next election shows how out of whack people’s priorities have become. We have existential threats of income inequality and climate change that threaten all of humanity and the democrats are building a campaign centered around women being able to fuck without consequences. We are so cooked
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:07 PM
1

Pure emotional baggage is usually not the reason though. Older women typically bring more baggage like a past marriage or a kid that is perfectly reasonable to not want to engage with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 08:31 PM
0

So you found one post that only semi addresses the thing you’re mad about and a random comment. You gotta do better than that
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 03:12 PM
6

As a now divorce lawyer, it really depends on how much headache the parents choose to cause to the child and the other parent. An amicable break up is absolutely the best way to go if possible, but a divorce and years long custody fight can just make things worse for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 03:06 PM
–

You are just making shit up. You live in a fantasy world where the worst is assumed from every male comment. You are either a troll or not living in reality. Either way, seek help.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 02:44 PM
5

Man I’d love to live in whatever male centered reality you’ve made for yourself so you can keep making these clear schizo/troll posts. That sounds like a dream.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 02:18 PM
6

Oh jeez another post about how women’s lack of accountability/problem they created for themselves is actually the fault of men. Time is a flat circle on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 01:33 PM
3

All this study is a reflection of is that women take their husbands for granted and pay for it in the long run. I don’t think you read it at all because it doesn’t help your case. I don’t even think you read the abstract.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 03:15 PM
4

My job is to defend my clients which are usually women because women are more likely to get a lawyer in a divorce. You’re just spewing bullshit at this point
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 01:33 PM
3

As a divorce lawyer I can tell you the actual story is almost always more complicated than that and usually not in the woman’s favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 01:28 PM
9

Yes because men actually understand the commitment they’re making as more than just some words you said awhile ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 07:21 PM
1

Knowing what I know now and having the experiences I’ve had, yes. I don’t owe women anything and that includes my commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 07:15 PM
–

Don’t play dumb. You can be in a generally abusive situation without being in active danger all the time. Let’s not play these games.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:29 PM
1

I’m not moving the goalposts. You’re just strawmanning. Knock it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 10:22 PM
–

Man if you turned this logic on women and the stupid things they do for chad this would not be a pleasant experience. So how about let’s not generalize an entire gender because women are going to lose the “I was manipulated” wars. You do much more victimizing of yourselves than men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 11:32 AM
1

That could be one potential solution yes
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 11:30 AM
1

No. That isn’t my position. Read what I said again. Jesus Christ you’d think the women on this sub would be better at reading since they brag about being better educated all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 11:29 AM
–

55 is not a slight majority and it is growing with no sign of stopping. Many law schools are 60+% women. There are a number of reasons that the actual practice of law is more male dominated, the headliner being that many female lawyers marry male lawyers and decide they don’t need to practice anymore and can still live a comfortable life. That isn’t exactly systemic bias at work. If anything it shows systemic bias towards men by locking us into our gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 02:15 AM
–

I’ve answered this like 3 other times in this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 01:22 AM
–

I’ve already answered this for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 01:22 AM
–

I love how you compared law school to law firms as if those are the exact same things. Look at the enrollment by gender in law school and get back to me. Nice try though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 01:21 AM
–

Teacher attitudes towards boys, lack of gym and recess, no child left behind, curriculum that isn’t conducive to male learning. The list goes on.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 01:20 AM
1

You keep comparing the present day to like 100 years ago when there were many times in between then and now where boys were doing much better in school. Your whole position is predicated on a strawman that is ridiculous on its face
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 01:18 AM
–

I’ve answered this for like 3 other people in this thread. I’m not doing it again
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 01:16 AM
–

In a system designed for women they are. Crazy how that happens
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 12:01 AM
–

That isn’t what I said. Reread what I actually said. You’re reading what you want to read right now. Take a breath and try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 12:00 AM
–

Many teachers automatically see boys as a potential problem and police their behavior more rigorously, no child left behind rigidly enforcing a curriculum that reinforces uniformity instead of creative thinking which hurts boys more, reduced recess and gym classes that allow boys to get their energy out. The list goes on.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 10:43 PM
-2

I think you’ve seen one too many genX memes
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 10:37 PM
–

Were* good job you’re starting to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 10:23 PM
–

That is not the biggest change and it is historically illiterate to think that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 10:22 PM
–

Not for the sole sake of women, but many things that are much more beneficial and conducive to girls learning than boys. It’s a rigged game for boys at this point and women are shocked that boys can sense that and no longer want to play
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:11 PM
–

There’s no effort because they’ve never been shown a reward. I’ve literally been through 2+ decades of schooling through law school. I’ve seen the bias against men quite a lot
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:09 PM
–

It’s designed for people who can sit still and be quiet. Women are overwhelmingly those people
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:07 PM
–

It wasn’t this way always. Many changes have occurred. You are historically illiterate
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:06 PM
–

Okay resentful hag
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:05 PM
–

It’s actually crazy and completely historically illiterate that you think our education system has not had any structural changes in 50 years. Actual fucking bonkers stuff going on in this thread right now
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:04 PM
–

Again, I’m a democrat that lives in a blue state. You can knock off the snark or I can start dishing it back. And I guarantee I’m better at it than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:02 PM
–

That was literally the solution that was being proposed. You’re just mad I pointed out how absolutely insane that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:01 PM
–

The solution was “yell at your male children until they’re too demoralized and begrudgingly go along with what you want”. That isn’t a solution and if the genders were swapped you’d be pointing this out just like I am right now. Opinion still discarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:58 PM
–

Look at all the men agreeing with me. I’ve been a lifelong Democrat. For as long as I’ve been alive not a single one has attempted to speak directly to me as to how they’ll make my life better. It’s no wonder they’re bleeding young men to the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:56 PM
–

So now we know you’re just saying this out of resentment instead of offering actual solutions or even making a good faith attempt to diagnose the issue. Opinion discarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:37 PM
–

So we spend the last half century designing an educational system for women and men are giving those reasons you mentioned for not participating. Geez I wonder why
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:32 PM
–

We already do. Despite the fact that the left has made a single attempt to speak to us for decades at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:30 PM
9

“This will favor women in some situations, like housework and child rearing, but go against them in others.” Stop playing this stupid game and either put up or shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 08:50 PM
5

I’m not moving the goal posts. That was YOUR original claim, that women take heat on those subs that is unique to them. I asked you to find evidence. You did not do that. Quit whining and go find some or buzz off
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 08:39 PM
10

They would shit on a man for reacting like this too. This isn’t exclusive to women. Try again
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 07:11 PM
33

Then find a post that goes against women in the ways you’re talking about because I’ve yet to see it on that sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 04:07 PM
1

Yes. Much better. I’m sure the ladies will fall in love with me after I start doing that
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 10:53 AM
1

That was literally your example. It’s crazy that you expect men to do all the ‘creativity’ at the risk of diminishing their social status or even their personal freedom in some circumstances
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 10:03 PM
3

I never even gave those as an example in the first place. Are you getting me mixed up with someone else?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 03:52 PM
2

No
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 03:34 PM
1

Ya let me just start throwing food at women I’m sure that will go super well. Your perception is based on attractiveness which is something men do not control. I don’t know how it could have come off that way it was pretty clear from the beginning
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 03:34 PM
4

They are in incredible position of power in the media which has the most influence here. And this isn’t about porn, it’s about the demonizing of male sexuality which, while religious conservatives do engage in on occasion, is not done with the constant vitriol that the left does. And I’m a leftist. Also I have no idea why you thought that I thought that workplace harassment was demonization of male sexuality. You’re just going off on tangents now and arguing with ghosts.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 03:31 PM
-1

Are you confusing me with someone else? Like genuinely I want you to go back and actually read what I’ve been writing. You sound like a lunatic
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 01:46 PM
-1

I’d argue the very active teachings of feminists and the media at large are having much more impact than the extremely passive background noise of religion on male sexuality but that’s just too rational a thought I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 01:45 PM
1

Because people, not just women, tend to have less ability to bond with people in a meaningful way when they’ve been with too many people. That isn’t shaming women’s sexuality, it’s shaming a culture that doesn’t value relationships. Stop being dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 01:41 PM
0

You are describing situations that are not situations normal encounters would happen. Most people are not on Instacart or whatever. The fact that some attractive men fumble does not take away from my point in the slightest. I didn’t say “men don’t care what you think” I said the guys who’s behavior you’re trying to police don’t care what you think and the only guys it’s actually having an effect on are guys who were never in that position in the first place. How in the ever loving fuck you manag…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 01:38 PM
-2

What the fuck are you talking about? I’m not arguing for any of that. Your reading comprehension is in the toilet big dog
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 01:33 PM
1

Most people are not religious anymore. You’re gonna have to come up with a better scapegoat than that
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 01:32 PM
-4

When trying to talk to a stranger appearance is usually the only thing you have to go off of initially not the other way around. Whether it’s creepy or safe is entirely based on her perception of the man, the very thing that is being complained about by the OP. You are ‘policing’ the actions of men who don’t care what you think and turning that ‘policing’ to men who don’t do that and demonizing our sexuality as a result. How do you not see this?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 12:27 PM
11

5
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 12:23 PM
1

Yeah and that’s an issue. Whether our very existence and sexuality is seen as annoying at best and criminal at worst is based on things we cannot control. And women don’t seem to see the problem with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 12:21 PM
-3

And who is doing that teaching? It’s women. Women are the ones constantly reinforcing that male sexuality is bad and needs to be contained. It’s why feminists say things like “men should start in prison and earn their way out”. You are the problem here
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 12:18 PM
1

I actually don’t remember the names of the drugs I took 6 years ago shockingly
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 01:00 AM
3

The patronizing continues. I was literally on 3 different ones. They’re all the same. Knock it the fuck off
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 12:33 AM
3

I was on them for awhile. I know exactly how they work. Don’t patronize me
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 12:14 AM
-10

Then you cannot value men based on looks either. If you’re still only swiping on the top 10% or noticing the top 10% of men you are a massive hypocrite
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 05:23 PM
6

Yes. Death is better than being a zombie. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be trying to find solutions that don’t involve turning men into zombies. I’m sorry you’re incapable of holding two thoughts in your head at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 04:53 PM
1

Because that’s not what it’s saying. Again, you don’t buy insurance expecting something bad to happen. So if you’re against it based on hurt feelings, that’s just emotional manipulation
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 04:52 PM
2

Right. Accidents can happen to anyone. Paternity fraud can happen to anyone. Insurance isn’t against something, it’s for something. That’s how insurance works. Nice try, thanks for playing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 11:23 AM
3

I agree to a degree. Although some peoples lives suck so bad that suicide is a logical option albeit still not a great one. Still better than zombifying yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 11:21 AM
4

That’s a baseless assumption you’re making without any evidence that you have to make otherwise taking antidepressants would look horrible in comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 07:31 PM
4

I absolutely know how both work. Antidepressants work by messing with your weight, libido, and other metabolic functions, and make you unable to function without them. The same as any other addictive drug. You might as well just get hooked on alcohol or porn at that point. It’s better than becoming a zombie.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 07:29 PM
2

Plenty of guys have depression and don’t drink so no, we are not. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 07:23 PM
7

I firmly believe in helping mental health. But the solutions offered by women don’t work for men (and many times aren’t solutions at all). No. I refuse to tranquillize myself so that I feel a little less sad sometimes. That is not what healthy people do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 07:22 PM
0

At least we aren’t medicating like addicts just to be able to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 07:20 PM
0

Your buying car insurance is due to your baseless paranoia stoked by watching videos on the internet of car crashes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 07:10 PM
3

People don’t buy car insurance expecting to get in a car crash either. Paternity tests just like car insurance are the lack of need for trust, not lack of trust itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 07:10 PM
3

Sounds like she wants someone to abuse and manipulate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 06:48 PM
1

Okay so next time you feel off and want to go to the doctor don’t do it because it’s probably nothing and whatever disease it might be impacts only a tiny minority of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 06:47 PM
5

Taking a mind tranquilizer is not successfully coping with loneliness and the fact you think it is is incredibly telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 06:24 PM
2

No you aren’t. You tranquilize yourself with anti depressants and wine. That is not better than simply feeling lonely all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 06:23 PM
3

It also just makes up cases if you ask it to cite case law for something that doesn’t have any case law backing in the legal world. It’s got a looooong way to go
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 01:05 PM
–

There are plenty of women who aren’t socially adjusted and they still do just fine. Even that is a requirement that isn’t required of women
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 10:42 AM
5

I mean, both are true. Because the problem isn’t men, it’s women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 06:39 PM
26

No he’s demonstrating how much virtue signaling you do
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 07:40 AM
1

Again you just make shit up. You immediately jump from contributing to being the sole breadwinner. There is an ocean of stops in between that but you continue to construe things only as black and white with no in between. Obviously the intention of the question was asking about who should be the main breadwinner, not the sole breadwinner. This is so unbelievably simple someone at a third grade reading level could comprehend it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 12:06 PM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/09/20/americans-see-men-as-the-financial-providers-even-as-womens-contributions-grow/ This is the study you should have been referencing since you’re so ‘science pilled’ but instead you cited one that doesn’t say what you were trying to say it was, and one that did existed and was even from the same source. I’d change that flair if I were you. This is sad
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 08:07 PM
1

The sources aren’t there. Not a single external link anywhere. I’m not gonna take you at your word.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 05:09 PM
1

Really? ‘Providing contentless rhetoric’ as if that isn’t the very thing you’ve been doing this entire time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 05:08 PM
1

Ya because you’ve been citing sources this whole time. You think I’m supposed to just believe you because you label yourself ‘science pilled’? Lolololol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 11:55 AM
1

You aren’t doing analysis. You’re telling a story. Stop misusing that word
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 11:53 AM
1

No. Because women still want their man to make more money than them, be more educated than them, and be in better shape than them. Every study on this confirms women’s preferences for hypergamy. That’s more pressure, not less
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 11:53 AM
1

Right it is made up of communities. I’m talking about trends across all communities and you’re talking about one and that’s the difference between us
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 01:41 AM
2

But not in a derogatory way. Just because it’s easier to talk about fertility using women because women always know how many babies they have. How many times am I gonna have to explain this to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 01:34 AM
–

No it isn’t. It’s simply easier to measure population trends by babies per woman because women always know how many children they have whereas men don’t. It’s really that simple. I cannot believe I’m having to explain this right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 10:57 PM
1

The most at risk jobs are the nonsense office jobs that were made up exclusively to please women. Those email daycare jobs are gonna be gone in the next economic downturn.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 10:55 PM
1

It’s not about communities. I’m talking about societal trends. You’re talking about some guys you know because the actual societal trends are against you. That’s what people who don’t know how to argue do when their back is against a wall
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 10:53 PM
–

You keep replying to me in this cryptic format like give a fuck what you have to say. Knock it off
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 10:52 PM
1

77% are not sole breadwinners. They still want a breadwinner, just to also have their own money on the side. Again you misinterpret your own statistics and draw conclusions that aren’t there. That’s not how you do statistics at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 10:51 PM
1

And your proof is what? A meme? This is getting a little ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 10:49 PM
1

Ah here comes the deflection after I point out how utterly ridiculous your position is. It’s always the deflection.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 08:00 PM
–

It means main financial provider not sole financial provider. That’s why if people are referring to a sole financial provider they say sole breadwinner.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:59 PM
1

“The people I know all have wives” that’s craaaaazy but I do not care about personal anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:56 PM
–

The fact that men are not the sole breadwinners anymore as much is not an indication of women’s attitudes towards men. That is not how someone who claims to be ‘science pilled’ should be interpreting statistics at all. If I tried that in my statistics classes I would have gotten a D- just so they wouldn’t have me in their class again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:55 PM
1

You are describing the small percentage. You just decided that something most of these men weren’t even doing in the first place was the problem and if they just stopped doing that thing they already weren’t doing then their life would be better. Like self help from a narcissist
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:52 PM
–

That’s just cause it’s the easiest way to measure population growth or decline, not because it’s making a moral judgement about women. Come on you can do better than that. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:42 PM
–

That’s crazy because blue collar people are increasingly less likely to get married and more likely to get divorced. People are beginning to pay attention to male loneliness because it’s impacting more than just neurotic redditors. It’s impacting the very people who you think have wives that make them lunch every day. That’s why trades and CDL people are begging for new recruits and can’t find any, because what’s the point when you could just be a neet? Also crazy how you think this is stolen va…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:40 PM
–

Again, the fact that women are comfortable contributing doesn’t mean they don’t hold an expectation that their partner be the breadwinner. How can you not hold two ideas in your head at the same time?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:34 PM
–

And it’s men’s fault for being losers who can’t get a woman to spread. I can do this all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:33 PM
–

There is every expectation that men be the breadwinners.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:31 PM
1

No. Because you only describing a small percentage of lonely men. How are you still not getting this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:31 PM
–

You think that money is going to be enough to keep doing dirty and dangerous jobs? How naive
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:30 PM
2

Again, you only describe a piece of the puzzle while pretending it’s the entire puzzle
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 06:02 PM
-1

The fact that women have decided to help in the breadwinning does not mean there isn’t an expectation for men to be the breadwinners. Two things can be true at once
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 06:01 PM
0

It absolutely would happen. Societies are built and maintained with male labor. If men just quit everything would go to shit fast. Women know this and use it to their advantage. Cucks like you just want to pretend like women can do no wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 05:54 PM
2

Again, explains some of the problem but not even close to the full picture. You’re oversimplifying a really complicated issue and then pretending like men are stupid for not knowing the solution. That’s the kind of thing people who don’t like to think about stuff very much do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 05:48 PM
2

That may explain some, but far from all of the loneliness epidemic. I keep trying to explain this to you and you keep delivering this monologue you’ve decided is the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 05:12 PM
2

If men refused to adhere to traditional norms society would collapse and women know this which is why they’re comfortable locking men into our traditional roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 05:10 PM
-1

But they aren’t seen as losers and trash for not doing so, just selfish
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:45 PM
6

Women achieved those things in large part because they changed men’s minds. Women have demonstrated time and again that they do not want to share the burden of what men have to put up with. The situation is different
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:44 PM
-1

Women chose to share the burden. The choosing is precisely what they were fighting for. Men on the other hand have not been afforded the same choice and a few women claiming they value emotional openness on the surface has not changed that
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:42 PM
1

I’m saying that you think you think guys like that are the cause of the loneliness epidemic when a lot of guys haven’t even heard of them and even less are actually following their advice. It doesn’t mean everything they say is worthless though. Holy shit, two things can be true at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:40 PM
0

That is not what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:29 PM
2

Im not the person you responded to. I’m just telling you how he was using the word
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:28 PM
3

You’re assuming there’s more chances and that’s where you fall flat. There are not more chances there’s no chances for many men. That is what you are not understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:28 PM
5

Forcing no. But there’s arguably more societal pressure on men to do those things at this point than women. Women got to change society’s expectations for their gender roles. Men have not been afforded the same opportunity by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:26 PM
1

You’re assuming that guys are following the advice of those guys. That’s your big mistake. It’s always been you big mistake on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 04:23 PM
7

Performance is a legal term that just means holding up your end f the bargain. It’s not a literal thing
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 03:40 PM
3

This guy is gonna see a horse get whipped and have a mental breakdown.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 03:39 PM
3

That is the most ass backwards logic I’ve ever seen
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 01:20 PM
5

It’s not something you get out of. It’s a post you made so you don’t have to think about men in this position anymore because thinking about it makes you uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 11:50 PM
13

No you are not. You have no idea the depths of loneliness guys who have never even had a gf go through.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 11:49 PM
9

There are things that are necessary for survival that you have to try at. Pleasing an entire gender that looks at you like trash is not one of those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 11:46 PM
2

Whether it’s a net negative is irrelevant. It’s about saying what you need to say to get it in the first place. You’re assuming he cares about whether it’s a net negative for her
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 09:03 PM
6

Considering the amount of women on this very thread saying that merely being falsely accused is a dealbreaker, your comment contradicts reality. If you think this stops at dating you are woefully naive
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 10:27 AM
2

And since when has a woman ever been falsely accused? She’s saying this shit just to virtue signal. She either hasn’t thought about it or doesn’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 10:24 AM
2

It’s virtue signaling. That’s all it’ll ever be. Women act like we don’t have eyes and ears and don’t observe their behavior. My bedroom is usually a little messy cause I’m going through a hectic time in my life right now. The women in my family give me shit for it and tell me no woman will want me for it. Meanwhile I watched my college roommate, who trashed our room regularly and didn’t even know how to do laundry when I met him, meet his wife who didn’t care about any of that and still fell fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 01:19 AM
2

Dating app data and every social science study proves the opposite of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 01:15 AM
1

I already know what they are and what they believe. I’ve had enough interaction with them in the past that I don’t need an interview now to know what they’re about. And that’s not even taking into account whether they’d even answer those questions honestly
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 11:01 AM
6

Whenever her looks begin to fade a little bit and the realization that she won’t be young forever begins to set in
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 08:39 AM
19

I don’t see this very often. Women are content to use the apps to share chad until they hit a certain age and settle for average guys. I feel like those TikToks are psyops or something I’ve never heard a real woman I know complain about this
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 02:37 AM
0

Ya because they’re just gonna tell you they’re female supremacists. David Duke isn’t going to tell you he’s racist either but he’s sure gonna show you a lot of per capita crime statistics. Come on now, you cannot be this naive
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 01:28 AM
0

Again, a difference of opinion on a few minor things does not take away from the overall goal which is female supremacy. Disagreements on the road there are not things I care about
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 01:26 AM
1

Radfems believe in female supremacy and so do liberal feminists. They just disagree on the form it should take and how quickly it should manifest. Radfems are just slightly more extreme, liberal feminists with the mask off.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 01:18 AM
-2

Having a hard and fast rule does not make that rule rational. That’s not how logic or rationality works
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 01:34 PM
1

There is not a single thing that is rational about radical feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 12:01 PM
-2

They are increasingly converging to the point that unless the sane women begin to call out the radfems and make more of an effort to separate themselves from them, then they are essentially the same group of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 10:20 AM
1

Yes. Many people are just dicks. What’s so hard to grasp about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 01:38 PM
-3

I have never seen a bigger misunderstanding of male thinking in my entire life
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 01:29 PM
1

I never said most. Why do you need to keep doing this?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 01:20 PM
1

Lots of people are just mean. They don’t have some tragic backstory that explains why they are the way they are. They’re just dicks. It’s crazy that you make excuses for them
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 02:06 AM
1

No I said women have to do it too if the trend is to turn. Stop playing pointless word games
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:31 PM
2

No I said women have to do it too if the trend is to turn. Stop playing pointless word games
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:31 PM
2

No im saying women need to start doing the thing men have already been doing for quite some time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:21 PM
1

If abuse is so rampant as feminists claim it is, then actually the average man in a relationship is probably far more angry and abusive than the ones who aren’t. But you don’t want to talk about those averages.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:20 PM
1

Plenty of guys do feel like they’re getting what they deserve and are still angry. How many times do I have to say this? It’s like talking to a wall
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:18 PM
3

No, you have to have the same accountability as men. I love how you think that makes you a leader though, very telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:17 PM
5

Who’s saying that that’s not what’s happening? See how you just had to make up a whole scenario in your head for the woman to not be in the wrong? That’s the type of stuff that needs to be purged from society
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:53 AM
2

We aren’t talking about average now are we
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:51 AM
-1

Laughing in your face, throwing drinks in your face, pointing you out to her friends so they can laugh at you, just general behavior of someone who feels like they’re dealing with someone less than them. It’s actually crazy you even felt the need to ask that question
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:50 AM
2

I don’t have to. Those guys usually aren’t angry
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:48 AM
3

Considering that the acts of other random men we get held accountable for are rape and SA you’re going to have to be the ones who turn that trend around. Cry me a river
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:48 AM
-1

It isn’t one exception. Plenty of guys just find reasons to pick fights and be angry. You have to account for that. Blaming my pointing it out on Occam’s razor is actually hilarious though
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:46 AM
0

You really aren’t getting this. There are men who will still find reasons to be angry even when none exist. This isn’t from some nebulous lack of sex or whatever. You have to account for those guys too or else your answer doesn’t make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 01:44 AM
–

This reads like a revenge fantasy and not an actual question of substance about anything. I see through you troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 01:33 AM
3

No I’m saying that if the theory is that men are angry because they aren’t getting sex then you have to explain the men that are getting sex and are still angry. Similarly, even if we assume your nebulous explanation, you still have to have an explanation for the men who are getting what they want, whatever that may be, and still hate women. Stop playing these games.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 01:31 AM
1

What do you think would change exactly if they were private agreements vs. state sanctioned? Because I can tell you from a legal standpoint that the answer is nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 01:28 AM
6

Men are held accountable for the acts of random men all the time. Sorry that the prevailing narrative that women have created is that they are better off without us.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:57 AM
1

You’re never going to get the government out of marriage contracts because someone has to rule on them and enforce them. This is just a big misunderstanding of how the law works
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:53 AM
4

They have a lot of anger towards women and they also get laid a ton. Explain that instead of pretending I don’t know how to read. Knock it off
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:47 AM
1

The problem with linking all of this to evolution is all the examples we have of culture shaping attraction throughout history. Linking all of this to genetics gives women a cop out that they should not be afforded.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:46 AM
8

Then explain the men who get sex constantly and still hate women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:43 AM
3

Oh you sweet summer child. You seriously think that’s all they do? Are you serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:42 AM
4

Then explain all the abusive men in relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:41 AM
4

There are plenty of men that have sex with women all the time that still hate them. So no, that’s not the problem, not even close. It’s a female fantasy that they think they have that much influence over us.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:40 AM
2

No. It really isn’t. Haven’t you read Shakespeare?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 09:42 AM
13

Ya no I empathize with them less now
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 03:16 AM
1

That wasn’t my point. That’s your problem. You misunderstood my point. That’s what I’ve been trying to tell you this whole time Jesus christ
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 01:39 AM
1

You didn’t have a point. You only misunderstood mine. I’m not dignifying that like it’s something worth responding to
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 01:24 AM
1

It has everything to do with it. If you don’t understand how this very obviously relates to the topic at hand your reading comprehension is in the dumpster and I’m not going to help you
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 12:42 AM
2

But you continue to forget that biology is not the only determinant of attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 10:49 PM
3

You have no understanding of logic. Logic stands on its own because it makes sense on its own. No sources are needed for something to be logical. Sources often back logic, but the logic stands regardless of the existence of sources. That’s pretty embarrassing for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 10:09 PM
1

So find him attractive then. You are not a passive actor in your own life you know
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 08:58 PM
1

It is far from a random guess. It’s basic logic
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 08:58 PM
2

Cultures have defined attractiveness as much as biology. There’s a reason why there are African tribes where people intentionally grow really long necks because it’s attractive to the culture they’re in. Attraction can and should be controlled and molded and we are doomed as a society if we don’t try.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:41 PM
2

Im saying women need to redefine attractiveness and they will have a better time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:37 PM
-5

The orgasm gap happens because women tend to only be attracted to the upper echelon of men but sleep with men they aren’t attracted to for other reasons. Teach women to lower their standards and the orgasm gap will close.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:14 PM
–

It’s gaslighting to assume that people aren’t trying to improve themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 02:57 PM
1

It isn’t black and white though. And you have no idea what a no true Scotsman fallacy is. TRP doesn’t mandate anything, it’s literally just a description of the dating world that differs from the mainstream and is backed by actual data. It tracks what women actually do and not what they say in dating and reports the differences. You’re just mad that it exposes the lies that women tell both men and themselves. You’re just as, if not more shallow than men are. There is no moral judgement there, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 04:07 PM
2

Okay so your make-up-a-guy was actually based on a few Reddit posts and not one. Totally comprehended the point I was making. You nailed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:56 PM
3

Then criticize the comments. Don’t make up an entire personality to get mad at.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:56 PM
0

Okay so you’re going off of personal experience of a few people you’ve decided are representative of TRP and decided that’s what it is. Good to know you’ve already convinced yourself that’s what TRP is so there’s no use even trying to engage with you. I guarantee you already decided what TRP was before and found men to observe that exhibited behaviors you don’t like and decided that they must be redpill. Most common post hoc fallacy there is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:55 PM
1

She didn’t give him actionable advice she decided what he was like and then criticized him.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:50 PM
1

No one said do it at the expense of other qualities. That’s something you made up out of cognitive dissonance. There is no self selection going on. It’s literally just people who observed reality and didn’t delude themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 04:58 AM
5

The gaslighting continues apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 04:56 AM
6

It’s crazy how much you’ve decided about his personality based on a Reddit post. Real make-up-a-guy stuff going on right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 04:28 AM
0

No, we really don’t. And the facts back that up when push actually comes to shove
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 04:20 AM
–

So let me get this straight. You’re mad that men are initiators in a social era where men are expected to be the initiators. And you simultaneously think that the solution is to limit men’s initiation. That would be the end of dating and relationships. The actual solution is to hold women accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 09:26 PM
2

But you don’t. Society at large does not blame you for trusting men that’s patently absurd
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:19 PM
1

You don’t know what to do if you aren’t treating people as dangerous? Do you not know how to exist in society or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:16 PM
1

Not treat every man they come across as a violent criminal for starters
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:20 PM
1

Okay so if you’re not forcing then you’re not really doing anything because a non normie child is not going to do normie shit willingly
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:18 PM
1

You want me to describe every action someone could take in between treating someone like a violent criminal and giving out free hugs to strangers? Are you autistic or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:12 PM
1

Just because you think your thoughts are nuanced and use the word doesn’t mean they are. If you want your child to be around normies then they have to do normie shit. If they do other stuff that usually opens them up to endless bullying or peer pressure to not be who they are. Maybe they’ll like normie stuff, I know I did. But if they don’t you’re just forcing them to be around people that are actively harmful to them in many ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:43 PM
0

If it isn’t forced and just encouraged then you’ve accomplished nothing. If you want them to be around normies all the time then they have to do normie shit, which in the grand scheme of all activities is a relatively narrow set of things. And I said “outside of straight up abuse” please learn how to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:39 PM
5

That’s the only thing most men get to experience anyway. You new here or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:19 PM
1

If you agree with niche-maxing then the whole point of your post goes right down the drain.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:14 PM
1

This is forcing people who may not be comfortable around “normies” to be around them and potentially face horrible bullying situations while denying them outlets for their own creativity and happiness because they aren’t “normie” enough. I cannot think of a worse way to raise a child outside of straight up abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:07 PM
1

The whole thing started because you were scrutinizing my online friendships. You can’t say it’s telling within the context of talking about online friendships and then say it has nothing to do with online. That makes absolutely no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:01 PM
1

In civility? You’re out here saying that women should have a license to treat men like predators but I’m uncivil for calling it pathetic? Get a fucking grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:57 AM
1

I’m comprehending just fine. You’re saying interpersonal bonds must be weaker because they’re online. Why else would you hone in on that very small part of my original comment for 10 more comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:55 AM
1

Crazy. That’s the same thing right wingers say about the black crime rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:54 AM
2

I have never written comments that treat women like some evil entity and you can’t point to a single comment where I have. You’re just making shit up cause I called you out. It’s pathetic, knock it off. Also we don’t allow men to treat women poorly based on bad past experiences with women so I have no idea why you’re trying to justify it here. Bad past treatment is not a license to be racist or homophobic or antisemitic or anything else why is it a license to be a misandrist? Not that you’re gon…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:50 AM
1

But it isn’t. My friendships weren’t weaker because they were online. That’s the part you keep missing despite that I’ve been telling you for a dozen comments now. You just won’t listen because you’ve already made up your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:46 AM
1

It is teaching though. It’s the same reason why right wing outlets only talk about crimes from black people. Did those crimes actually happen? Yes. Is talking only about those crimes all the time a clear effort to paint those people in a certain light? Also yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:44 AM
1

No. Jesus Christ. There’s an ocean of actions that could be taken in between treating all men like violent perverts and hugging random dudes in the street. Come on now. The strawmans today are something else
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:42 AM
2

Unless your experience is terrible with the majority of men, it does not justify the current treatment of men. That’s absurd
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:40 AM
2

Says the feminist troll. lol okay
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:02 PM
1

Who said anything about a conspiracy? I’m not saying any of this is done with malice. Most of it is unconscious or justified at times. I’m just saying that if women are going to say that the ends justify the means, that they still have to own the means. What a goddamn strawman. But reporting you would be absolutely useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:49 PM
1

No. It isn’t. And the fact that you couldn’t even explain why you think it is just proves me even more right. You know what you’re doing, I know what you’re doing, so just cut the bullshit already.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:47 PM
2

No you don’t. You hate me just like you hate all men and you’re here to troll. A moral person would be ashamed of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:46 PM
2

I love how the last sentence of your argument completely undermines the rest of your point. All that gets written about is the bad acts of a few men that women read about and unconsciously teach themselves that men are bad. You’re admitting it isn’t experiences but a coordinated effort by media and schooling to paint men in a certain light. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:45 PM
2

People absolutely are influenced by what they’re told. Not to mention that women have this tendency to “make up a guy” and then use that frame of reference when approaching men. They didn’t observe anything in those instances, they had already decided that guy is dangerous after a glance. Not to mention that study after study has shown that women are more likely to think ugly men are more dangerous despite there being no correlation. There absolutely is a movement against men, headlined by thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:41 PM
2

Aaaaaaand there it is. You were never here for a good faith discussion. You wanted to be proven right and when the opposite of that happened you decide to troll. The women of this sub need institutionalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:35 PM
1

It isn’t telling of anything. It’s a way for you to deflect and hone in on an aspect that is completely separate from male loneliness. I already explained how the manner in which male friendships develop is not the issue but you want to hone in on an irrelevant aspect to further deflect. It’s like rule 1 of what to do when losing a debate as a woman on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:34 PM
1

“Blaming my issues on women” it’s women who are the ones scrutinizing my existence and denying my experiences, so yeah, they are gonna receive blame for that. You can’t even manage a substantive response at this point because the responses aren’t what you were expecting. It’s pathetic. If you’re gonna be this openly misandrist just go join FDS or ask feminists or something. That’s such a coward move.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:19 PM
1

The answer to both those questions is yes. It isn’t insecurity. There’s a new incident every week where some woman calls the cops on a guy walking around in her neighborhood and it turns out he lives there. The fact that you’re even fighting me on this is insane and demonstrates a truly ridiculous amount of privilege. You asked. I answered. Now you’re scrutinizing the answer and telling me I must be wrong anyway. Empathetic gender my left ass cheek
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:51 PM
–

There were a couple. But our relationships mostly existed online where the rest of our friends were. It’s incredible to me that that’s the part you decided to zero in on while completely ignoring the majority of what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:42 PM
–

And so the solution is for men to simply become more feminine? That’s the only logical conclusion that can be derived from that comment and there are bottomless reasons why that would be a bad idea. The much simpler solution is to stop teaching generations of women that men are evil and want to hurt them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:38 PM
–

Reported for more contentless rhetoric
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:35 PM
1

The looks we get, the fact that we feel like we need to have a purpose wherever we go so that women won’t suspect us of anything. I literally want to get a dog so I can justify walking in my park because a lone guy going for a walk gets posted on sites like Nextdoor by bored women who think men are out to get them. It’s crazy to me how women go around believing they treat both genders the same. You absolutely do not and if you cannot see it I can’t help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:31 PM
–

Affection and sexual attraction are two very different things and while the latter is nice, the former is what men really want. It’s pretty easy to cultivate when you stop telling generations of women that men are big scary evil monsters
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:28 PM
–

Reported for not providing a substantive response.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:26 PM
–

We do. How many times are women going to pretend like there isn’t a difference between those types of love? You understand it perfectly fine when it’s yourselves but when it’s men making the distinction suddenly we have to explain it to you like you’re 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:25 PM
–

The people at my high school were shitty to me. My friends online gave me an outlet and a community that created purpose and drive. The issue is not that the forums for creating friends are worse, it’s that half the population now sees us as nothing but a threat to be managed, especially if you are not conventionally attractive, and that is extremely isolating.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:24 PM
-2

It’s because they aren’t. You can only get so far when half the population sees you as a scary monster. This isn’t even about friendships, it’s basic respect at a fundamental level that women lack for men. We can see the masses online telling us they prefer the bear and they treat us accordingly irl regardless of friendship or not. You can try to justify the ends of that, but the means are that you create a generation of lonely isolated men and you are absolutely the main cause of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:21 PM
–

Yes, teaching women that men are people worthy of love and respect and not some scary monsters you’d prefer to get mauled by a bear instead of be around
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:17 PM
–

That’s what I’d say if I was inventing a cop out too. Well done.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:15 PM
–

Me when I invent a cop out to excuse my shitty behavior and deny my role in an increasing societal problem. Very well done. You would have fooled a much dumber person.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:07 PM
–

There is action. Just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it has impacted male relationships. Also that’s such a cop out even if my first sentence weren’t true that doesn’t mean women are excused from their shitty behavior towards men that make it worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:05 PM
–

Man you have to be unbelievably privileged to even think that’s the solution. This is why men don’t believe women when they say they care about men. You can’t say things like this and also think you care about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:57 AM
–

Clearly your outlook is less representative of the treatment of men if the stats are showing an increasingly prevalent male loneliness and mental health crisis.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:43 AM
1

I love how men a constantly coming on here saying women are extremely cold to them and that makes them feel bad, but not acting that way is some extreme laborious hurdle for you that doing it means you’re accomplishing all our problems for us. Women are truly delulu
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:39 AM
–

Me when I don’t have an actual rebuttal so I just make up a guy I don’t like and assume it’s the one I’m talking to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 03:16 PM
–

Ah yes, even when women are playing games and using men, it’s men’s fault for allowing themselves to be used.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 03:13 PM
–

Ah yes, even when women are playing games and using men, it’s men’s fault for allowing themselves to be used.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 03:13 PM
1

Also they didn’t swipe on all men. It’s was the same 10% over and over again. You cannot read studies correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 02:47 PM
1

Wait you mean fewer men would be considered top 10% and the majority would be average? Just like…a bell curve? Crazy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 02:46 PM
1

But it does. That’s why women only regularly swipe on the top 10% of men on dating apps. But those are the statistics you don’t want to pay attention to
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 04:24 PM
1

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTNm6uTcW/ You’re wrong and this video perfectly explains why you’re wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 01:34 PM
–

Again, a subjective deviation here and there does not take away from the general bell curve of attractiveness. That bell curve doesn’t change just because everyone puts in max effort to be attractive. That’s not how statistics works
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 06:19 PM
1

Just because some people have preferences does not mean there isn’t a general trend. It’s just gaslighting to insinuate that isn’t the case
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 12:38 AM
1

If everyone is handsome then no one is handsome. Women always create a hierarchy. If all men devoted their time to becoming better looking, women would still only chase the top 20% of men, they’d just be even better looking than before.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 02:38 PM
3

There’s not being attracted and then there’s finding them ugly to the point you wonder why she’s with him. If you can’t see the difference then you’re either stupid or being intentionally obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 10:30 AM
1

Love how you immediately took it to the other extreme. Very good debate skills right there
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 10:29 AM
2

If you’re constantly reinforcing that women are the prize, as they do, then simple logic dictates that the men they date are not the prize
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 10:27 AM
1

This isn’t about being horny and you know it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 10:24 AM
6

Okay have fun approaching insta models with that mindset. Hope it works for you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:52 PM
5

Women are liars and virtue signalers. Something we already innately know by existing in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:46 PM
22

Women say shit like this and then wonder why so many men are taking themselves off the dating market
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:45 PM
7

But they want those things because it makes people want to be around them. It’s still fundamentally intertwined with your second description
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:31 PM
14

It’s crazy that bluepillers are at the point of justifying shitty female behavior towards men because men have the audacity to have a sexuality. Crazy stuff these past few months. Bluepillers are really at their wits end trying to defend their positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:17 PM
13

Blue pillers absolutely say this all the time. They quickly delete the comments and posts because they realized they let the mask slip but they still do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:15 PM
28

That’s exactly what they want. Lull them to sleep by telling the same false stories over and over again until one day they just die I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:13 PM
8

I mean, that’s kind of what people are thinking about when they say “the prize”. Nobody thinks of themselves as a shiny trinket.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:12 PM
16

“This thing that they are directly saying for the purpose of directly uplifting women and putting down men doesn’t mean it’s plain meaning because I’ve decided it doesn’t”- you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:07 PM
1

Yes. I do. As do many of my friends. And it’s not like I’m just friends with ugly weirdos who say creepy things to women either before you go there.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 02:29 PM
1

How many more times do men need to tell you it’s our regular lived experience to finally be believed? It’s not just a video you can look up online, usually guys have multiple stories of instances like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 09:32 PM
1

You didn’t say “burden of proof” you said “high burden of proof” that is referring to the burden needed in criminal cases. Preponderance is all that would be needed here. You are obfuscating the issue and lying about what you said. Just take the L man
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 04:26 PM
–

Revenge feminism could absolutely take the form of de facto discrimination and effectively has in many areas and your refusal to address that is basically just a concession at this point
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 04:24 PM
1

That wasn’t the protest. The protest was charging someone with a violent crime based on only an accusation. You don’t even know what you’re defending
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 01:42 AM
1

When you defended the feminists in Spain. That’s what the feminists in Spain want. You tried to twist it into something it wasn’t but that’s still the idea you tried to defend
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 12:02 AM
1

Okay so if you’re only talking about family law then stop talking about prosecution and pretending like you need to prove these things beyond a reasonable doubt. That isn’t the standard. And no, you can’t use examples covered by fault based divorce to prove why no fault is okay. That doesn’t make any sense. You have to prove it using examples covered only by no fault. That’s a logical fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 12:01 AM
1

Okay so no argument. And I don’t know what you constitute as a personal attack but your threshold must be pretty low
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 11:51 PM
1

You are saying that women’s word should be taken at face value and enough to arrest just like feminists are claiming in Spain. Don’t pretend like you weren’t defending them
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 11:49 PM
1

So what you’re telling me is you still don’t understand de jure vs de facto discrimination. Please educate yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 08:00 PM
2

And you should be able to divorce them based on those grounds
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:59 PM
1

So if you agree that laws and legislation aren’t the only things that determine discriminatory outcomes then surely women making up almost 2/3rds of many colleges is de facto discrimination. Unless of course you actually don’t understand these concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:58 PM
1

Except you’re saying that police should be able to make arrests without probable cause anyway, the whole point is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:57 PM
1

I’m saying that in a car theft they won’t automatically arrest anyone you accuse of stealing a car without probable cause. You’re saying police should make arrests without probable cause in cases of rape, or in the alternative, are saying that a mere accusation from a woman should give the police probable cause. Those are both extremely dangerous propositions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:55 PM
1

You’re still under the impression that you’d need a conviction of some sort to show abuse. You don’t. You need to show abuse to a reasonable degree of certainty to a family court not a criminal court. And yes, you do have to defend that spouse. You’re defending no fault divorce which means you have to defend the lowest common denominator not the highest. The lowest common denominator here is boredom. Other levels of abuse or neglect would likely be able to be proven as a fault based cause for di…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:50 PM
1

Of course it’s made up it’s a proposal. I don’t understand what that has to do with anything
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 05:49 PM
-1

There hasn’t been a law that closed off universities from women in over a century. Not everything happens because a law makes it that way. I thought people learned the difference between de jure and de facto discrimination in school but I guess not. There are plenty of email daycare jobs that exist primarily because someone convinced an executive in some company somewhere that it was a good idea, not because it’s actually necessary. It’s insane that you think everything works just like in your h…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 05:31 PM
-2

Not in America. Especially because I don’t think that the current Supreme Court would think it passes intermediate scrutiny. Hell it might actually need to pass strict scrutiny because it’s a restriction on movement. But without a conservative Supreme Court? Idk. And in Europe where laws can be more easily implemented? It is definitely a possibility given that simply ‘looking weird’ on public transportation is basically a crime now in some places in Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 05:12 PM
1

I’d be okay with that if they weren’t allowed to leave with half my assets. You want to start over for a stupid reason? Then actually start over and don’t make me finance your fuck up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 05:09 PM
2

What do you think is happening right now? Men are being disenfranchised from higher education, Genz women make more money than genz men in many major cities, male jobs (that are necessary for society to function) are being disenfranchised while female oriented jobs (made up bullshit) are being created. All in the name of “the future is female”. You’re simply blind if you don’t see the trend
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 05:06 PM
1

Except you don’t get charged just because you’re accused. You don’t understand the legal system whatsoever and that’s your main problem in understanding his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 05:02 PM
0

Comparing a car theft to a woman just randomly accusing men or rape and expecting to be believed is certainly a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 05:01 PM
1

Ah I see we’re playing “make up a guy”. A pastime on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:57 PM
-7

Feminists want to do all of those things. I’ve seen feminist leaders online calling for men to be raised in prisons until we prove that we are safe to be in society. It’s what you want, some of you just suck at hiding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:55 PM
-1

There are plenty of leftist feminist women who think it’s a good idea. This is how these ideas become popular, you first introduce them as half jokes and then over time people start to actually want those policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:54 PM
1

Sure, mental gymnastics for the bluepillers, strict adherence for the redpillers. Same as always.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:50 PM
1

So you’re just for the abolition of marriage altogether then? Because that’s an entirely different position than being for no fault divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:48 PM
1

Whether something is abuse is left to a trier of fact. There’s no set of actions that are considered abusive and some that aren’t. You simply don’t know the legality of what you’re talking about. You assume in your second complaint that the person leaving is because the other person is behaving badly. If they were really behaving that badly you’d have a ground for a fault based divorce anyway. You’re literally just describing a fault based divorce system. You can’t defend on those grounds. You h…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:47 PM
1

In a court of law, with evidence. The same way you’d determine any other factual issue when attempting to achieve some legal outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:40 PM
1

First that is not an accurate statistic at all. Second there are a bunch of reasons that number is so high most prominently that women have been known to lie. We saw this just a month ago in the Terrance Shannon case. Third, the standard of proof is much lower in civil court than in criminal court for reasons that I hope would be obvious to you but I’m having my doubts given that the arguments you’ve put forward have been dogshit so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:39 PM
1

No, it isn’t. Marriage is nothing more than a costly joke if the only reason you need to get out of it is boredom. Yeah because catching someone in the act is the only way to prove something happened. You have the legal knowledge of a 4 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:57 PM
1

So your complaint is that the person actually has to prove the things they’re accusing another person of? That’s seriously your complaint?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:54 PM
1

They are the only valid reasons for getting divorced. Divorcing someone because you’re bored of them is not a valid reason actually. And yes you should have evidence of the things you are accusing someone of in order to accuse them of it. Patterns of abuse are typically pretty easy to show especially in 2024. The things you’re complaining about are non issues
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:13 PM
5

Ah. Rulebending when we feel like it I see
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:10 PM
0

I’m addressing the fact that you seem to think no fault divorce enabled people who were being abused or neglected to divorce. That’s incorrect. The only thing no fault divorce did was enable women who were bored of their husbands to take half their estate and bounce. If you’re unhappy because you’re bored of your spouse that’s a you problem and divorce should not be the remedy. That’s a total lack of accountability that is being actively rewarded by the legal system
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:07 PM
2

Something that is forced or coerced would make the marriage void to begin with. You aren’t addressing the actual issue here
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:32 PM
0

People in the situations you described would be able to seek a fault based divorce though. That’s what I don’t get about people who think no fault divorce is good, every time they cite a reason for it it’s a reason that would get you a fault based divorce anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:30 PM
1

People in abusive relationships should not have to stay in them. But that’s already what fault based divorce is for. You either have a good reason for divorcing someone or you can’t divorce them. That’s what people mean when they say abolish no fault divorce and that’s why I’m okay with that idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:28 PM
2

Yes. Women do it everywhere on Reddit and then turn around and think they’re great for women because they won’t need men anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:48 PM
2

It’s not a conspiracy at all. It’s literally the same subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:47 PM
-4

There’s nothing to talk about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 11:26 AM
3

It’s called working hard and getting a good job. We don’t have the cheat code like women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 12:12 PM
-2

Then prove it
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 03:20 AM
8

Actually the most simple answer is that those women did some mental gymnastics to justify their hypocrisy as many women and feminists do on Reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:40 PM
18

Considering it came from the same subreddit I’d like to see some hard proof that that’s the case
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 10:36 PM
–

Sure Jan
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 07:03 PM
-1

Your assertion that only people who talk about misogyny on this sub get punished. Involuntary commitment level talk there.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:29 PM
-7

Lololol that’s real rich. Blue pillers can say virtually anything they want to redpillers and not get even a slap on the wrist. That is certifiably insane
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:14 PM
-2

That is the dumbest rule on this sub by a mile and virtually never enforced when blue pillers do it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:12 PM
–

True. I just saw a post from r/womenofscience where a bunch of female academics were essentially glazing each other over how terrible men are and insinuating that men that aren’t as educated as them are essentially subhuman and if any man had said any of the things these women are saying he would be fired from his job and ostracized from his field for the rest of his life. The double standards are insane and not really calculable. There aren’t studies being done about this, nobody is trying to q…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:34 PM
–

Yes. Women’s sense of entitlement knows no bounds
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:09 PM
1

In fact, your definitions literally back up what I’m saying. If you actually take all factors into account women are far more hypergamous, almost exclusively hypergamous in fact. The Disney fairy tales of the princess dating the commoner are just that, fairy tales. The same is not true for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:06 PM
1

I’m not disputing that many factors go into female hypergamy. But they are more hypergamous. Women tend to only marry men making as much or more money, are as educated if not more educated, and have as much social status if not more than them. Men don’t care about that stuff. Therefore men are not as hypergamous. Wanting to date someone hotter than you but being okay with someone at the same level is not hypergamy. You still aren’t getting this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:04 PM
–

You’re a minority among women then
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:01 PM
–

It’s called permanent alimony. It lasts indefinitely. What you’re talking about is called durational alimony or even rehabilitative alimony. There is also alimony in futuro which is essentially the same thing as permanent alimony.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:38 PM
–

You’re describing a type of alimony. There are other types that are more permanent and a spouse may still receive even if they worked
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:00 PM
1

Even then the woman doesn’t need to be hotter than his wife. Usually the guy is hotter than the husband though. That’s hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 01:53 PM
1

Sure but men are also far more willing to date down in attractiveness than women are. Hypergamy is not simply liking people hotter than you it’s only wanting to be with those people. People on this sub really need a lesson in what hypergamy is and what it isn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 01:51 PM
–

They cheat when they feel like they aren’t getting enough sex and someone else will give them sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 11:25 PM
–

I didn’t say 15-20% of men are in relationships. I’m saying 15-20% of men are being actively chosen by women. Plenty of men are settled for. Also stop making this personal. I don’t know why so many women on this sub have to make everything so personal all the time. This is why men have discounted your opinions and called you emotional for centuries. You have a general lack of ability to not make things personal when arguing with someone. Knock it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:17 PM
–

Men are not more notorious for hypergamy. Every shred of evidence shows the opposite actually. Just because someone cheats doesn’t mean they think that person is better. That’s how women think because they’re hypergamous. That isn’t why men cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:13 PM
1

You think they were average. They were not actually average.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:12 PM
-4

Then you are going after the wrong men. Stop being hypergamous
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:50 PM
1

That is exactly what radical feminists want. And I don’t have an alt account. I don’t need one. You’re probably just really good at pissing people off since you can’t stay on topic, only talk from personal experience, and launch insults when things don’t go your way.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:49 PM
–

https://phys.org/news/2019-04-bare-faced-women-infidelity.html also those statistics are likely heavily skewed as women tend to be better at hiding infidelity so to say that men cheat more is nonsensical
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:41 PM
–

I don’t think you know what hypergamy means. It isn’t sleeping with as many people as possible as you seem to think it is. Also, I do not care about how personal anecdote and you’re going to have to cite those statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:39 PM
1

Women going to law school is proof of my point. They want to be lawyers not plumbers and they envision a society where they can all be lawyers and doctors without acknowledging that those things are just part of what makes up society. Unless women are also prepared to be linemen and learn how to mix concrete you can’t build that male-free utopian society that you’ve been indoctrinated about. Also I really don’t care about your opinion of me. Like realllllly don’t care. In fact, personal attacks …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:35 PM
1

What does that have to do with anything I said? You just keep moving from topic to topic like a crackhead with adhd
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:24 PM
2

Sure thing 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:20 PM
1

First, I just graduated with a law degree. Knock off the petty bullshit, I’m more educated than you. Second, the fact that you personally did not learn about a specific author or movement is not indicative of what is happening in a general sense. I cannot stress enough how little I care about your own personal experience in a debate like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:18 PM
2

Okay so you happened to pull a chad. Congrats. Where should I send to edible arrangement?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:13 PM
5

Sure it’s unlikely. But I’m not writing her off based on it. I’m not a woman, I don’t assume the worst of a potential partner and then make up fake reasons in my head to leave them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:12 PM
1

Yeah and in college they learn about dworkin and the other radical feminists and start advocating for gynocentric societies. Gynocentric societies that don’t include men yet are also somehow built with male labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:07 PM
2

Except when they can’t*. Most women want to be wives and have kids at the end of the day. But chad can legally only have 1 wife. That creates quite the dilemma for you, and women faced with this dilemma often choose to settle instead of be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:05 PM
1

What? Women learn about them BY being in college. That makes negative sense. And where did that second paragraph come from? wtf are you talking about? Neuroticism in action
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:02 PM
5

None of those things are exclusive to women that are virgins though. There are agoraphobic women with literal boyfriends because that’s just how easy it is for women nowadays. The continued virginity likely speaks to self control more than anything you listed
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:01 PM
1

They aren’t fringe. In fact, they are increasingly popular among younger generations of women and those women are developing even more extreme ideas about men. You can’t just brush them off cause they undermine your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:54 PM
1

It doesn’t. Those men cheat because all the women want to be with them. You are hypergamous but you also don’t want to share and then you blame average men for the acts of your own hypergamy and chad’s freedom. The fact that many women are forced to settle because at the end of the day we still live in a society with monogamous values for the moment isn’t the gotcha you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:53 PM
–

Andrea Dworkin Catherine McKinnon Sheila Jeffreys Carol Hanisch. Literally all of them wrote about creating societies free from men yet somehow also built on male labor. You don’t know the history you’re pretending to know and it shows
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:47 PM
8

Cool. That’s what I want. We’d be on the same page.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:43 PM
4

Then I’m sure those things would come up in the vetting process. Nobody said I have to give a diamond just because there’s still a hymen
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:42 PM
1

No it’s not. And I don’t care. I don’t value people based on how much sex they have. I’m not a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:41 PM
4

That’s something I’d have to snuff out in the vetting process. I’m not offering her a ring immediately because she hasn’t spread her legs for chad for the last decade of her life. The situation is not that dire…yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:37 PM
–

Yeah, it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:36 PM
–

I’ve studied far more history than you have. Men don’t like feminists because they want to create a gynocentric society built on male labor. They literally write manifestos explaining all of this shit. Clearly you’re the one that doesn’t know history
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:36 PM
–

Crazy how women when give choices are all choosing the same 15-20% of men. Plenty of men have perfectly normal lives and are perfectly normal guys and still struggle with dating because they aren’t in that top tier. The idea that women are just in picking a partner based on how nice and outgoing they are is pure bullshit that has been disproven over and over and over again. Stop peddling that crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter