TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

equanimous_samsara Archive

View 5 posts and 663 comments by equanimous_samsara on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

For anyone doubting how much of a MGTOW Schopenhauer was, he had the inverse of an undercut hairstyle: long back and sides, short on top. (obviously, a joke)
/r/MGTOW18/03/19 06:53 AM
1

Gamma radiation pill
/r/MGTOW18/03/19 05:09 AM
1

You are their boss. The real boss in any corporation is the shareholders, and for P&G that would be majority institutional investors and mutual funds. Basically their boss is other corporations. Individual stakeholders of P&G: less than 2%. Regular people are not the boss, they're the cash cow.
/r/MGTOW18/03/19 01:10 AM
60

None of these companies give a fuck. They just want your money and they'll say anything to get it.
/r/MGTOW17/03/19 07:12 AM
10

Nah go bother someone else
/r/MGTOW12/03/19 08:32 AM
1

Yeah, but you're not a lawyer. Law is not always intuitive and common sense as one might expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 08:07 AM
1

Because the next question will be "why am I not hot" and there will be only one person responsible for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 08:05 AM
1

That seems like it would be ok under OPs question. The contract could have terms for a payout as long as the baby is born. After it's born they could figure out the custody of the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 07:59 AM
3

A bribe might work if you are willing to raise the baby with someone else. Kind of like hiring her to be your surrogate. I think I would hire a lawyer and try to get something like that done up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 06:18 AM
4

Men are faced with the bitter reality that they must hit the gym , better their fashion, techniques, overall entire appearance to have a sliver of a chance with the average woman You have a choice. You can decide whether having a sliver of a chance with the average women is worth any of this to you. A lot of men are making it seem like an average woman wouldn't be worth all of this to them, but they continue to do it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 12:48 AM
5

It's only more dignity lost, not only does he get to catcall her he also gets to beat her husband's ass as a bonus from his inability to control his own temper. One might say, adding injury to insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 10:26 AM
3

"He'd start a fight" eh I call bullshit. Everyone's a tough guy until they get face to face with a guy built like a 250 pound linebacker. He'd start a fight is half the story, and next comes "he'd be lying in a hospital bed with two black eyes".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 09:58 AM
4

tl;dr ree
/r/MGTOW11/03/19 06:37 AM
1

I think there's proof that it worked in tiny populations of a couple of hundred to varying degrees before marriage became an institution. Obviously there were still tons of problems in those too, it's not like it was a utopian solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 09:45 PM
1

I just like busting your balls poppy_blu, editing right after posting something is obviously fine I do it all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 09:36 PM
1

It's probably necessary for organized human civilization in the long term, but not for society. All animals can have a society, but after a few hundreds of years of declining marriage I predict we'll end up with a sort of technologically advanced tribalism. I'm not making a value judgment on this though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 09:34 PM
1

You originally said "chi level ad-hominem" didn't you? Please lie, it will be even more satisfying.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 09:20 PM
0

A for effort though. Wish I could say the same for you, you don't know what an ad-hominem is and won't even bother to take one minute to look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 09:13 PM
0

Our Lord Father forbids the coveting of another's spouse. It is a crime against His heavenly command.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 08:23 PM
3

All men come from a place of thirst Some men do have more pussy at their disposal than they know what to do with it. Not me, other men who are in a tiny minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 08:18 PM
-2

I'm pretty sure most women on PPD look like chicks we wouldn't ever want to bang (and vice versa, to be fair).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 07:55 PM
4

After college I used to have a literally be a hermit with a tiny social circle of 1 guy friend and 1 female friend (my roommates) and women didn't care. At the time I was even experimenting with drugs that I hadn't done in collidg. If you're decent looking you'll meet them in random places and end up with their phone numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 07:49 PM
0

Teach women not to murder babies
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 07:40 PM
28

photos of men doing the excited cuck face next to the nintendo switch that their wife "let" them buy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 06:56 PM
0

but I don't see how the desperation of automatically wanting sex from literally any woman is strong in anyway It's the opposite of desperation. If want something and your mentality is "this might be the only place I can get it" you will be willing to wait a very long time. If you know you can just walk next door and get it, you won't wait you'll just move on to the next one. Because they have other choices. Waiting is a scarcity mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 05:06 PM
3

The men who everyone is approaching will be able to spot a cockthirsty chick easily and comment to his friends that "she really wants the D". The men who aren't being approached/who have to approach 100% of the time will have a ridiculously high threshold for "too eager" and will say there's no suh thing. But you also won't be approaching them very enthusiastically, if at all. And once again, the world is balanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 04:54 PM
1

boop :) better luck next time
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 06:04 AM
1

shhh shhh it's ok
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 05:58 AM
1

you keep trying to make this about me, not going to happen. just let it go
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 05:55 AM
1

lol thank you for the laughs. This conversation has made my day
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 05:39 AM
1

Whats love got to do with anything? If this guy has invested tangible things, who cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 05:34 AM
1

Your husband is the luckiest guy in the world, or at least that's what I'd tell him if we ever met.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 05:21 AM
1

Nothing wrong with being a happy hoe. I hope you find many men who will exchange their resources for sex with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 05:10 AM
1

I'm not upset. You gave the textbook definition of a prostitute and it was great.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 05:03 AM
1

As a woman, if you are not getting resources or assets out of a guy, you are not getting any sex out of me I mean I normally don't go around calling women prostitutes, but if the shoe fits https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxsfEio0L8Y
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 04:54 AM
3

No I'm sorry but that's not how it works. It takes a real idiot to realize a sunk cost but be willing to follow through with it. If being "willing to do it" means it's not a scam, then nobody has ever been scammed because everyone was willing to do it at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 04:48 AM
0

I'm ok with it. The smart men realize this strategy and don't let themselves get scammed like that. The dumb men are willing to pay the price, so let them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 04:40 AM
0

Sure as long as women don't care that they were a sunk cost investment for the man who they supposedly love, you're right. Overall I agree that it's a problem for men, marriage (and to some extent, LTRs) are already considered a bad deal for more than one reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 04:32 AM
0

No woman should be with any guy if he isnt benefiting her. The problem is that very often men don't find benefits in a woman beyond sex. Otherwise this strategy wouldn't be necessary at all. The whole idea of sunk cost is that you stick to something that you wouldn't have. The truth would be horrible for a young girl's self esteem but what can you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 04:27 AM
2

Yes, that's also possible. But that's not what I believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 03:19 AM
9

The strategy is based on turning a man's actions into a sunk cost. If a man waits long enough, he will consider his time and effort a sunk cost and be more willing to commit to her because he already spent all this time and effort. Sunk cost is a good strategy for ensuring payout on something that isn't that great. A woman making a man wait is insecure about her value outside of sex. I think this is the optimal strategy for most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 03:16 AM
2

Female fish are prey though. I agree that female fish might seek out better looking mates, less chance that they will have hookworm infections.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 12:14 AM
1

Both can be true for you as an individual as long as you weren't denying that it's (at least partially) for men. I presume you personally weren't pushing that narrative, so for you it can make sense. It was the other women who succeeded in forcing this "not for men" empowerment view, and many men believe it (not me though). Now that enough men listened to them, it bothers certain women that we don't recognize all the effort and money that goes into their beauty standards. Both can be true for an…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 08:58 PM
1

LTRs are way way way way too difficult to crack, especially for what's OFTEN expected of men (make and keep the woman happy). You can't deal with your own dissatisfaction and you know your internal state experientially. All of us fail at harmonious relationship with ourself, beginner mode (myself included, but this is not an admission of projection). How could one deal with another human that isn't you, with their own history, their own quirks, brain chemistry and you have to communicate with th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 09:59 AM
0

Females have no interest in advertising their periods of fertility, given that males would pick up on these patterns, reducing paternal confusion and causing an increase in aggressive behavior towards her offspring from other males.[2] Such hidden fertility has been coined concealed ovulation, and is part of extended female sexuality. These baboon hoes ain't loyal 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 08:20 AM
3

Females are share high status males. Normally males fight (sometimes kill) competing males instinctively. For whatever reason, nature seems to have a raging hardon for this particular setup going way back.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 07:14 AM
3

If we assume everybody has been telling the truth, then the "empowerment" opinion won out and it's led many men to the sobering conclusion that women don't consider them much or at all. Sorry to the few women who kept quiet and now decided they don't feel empowered by it. Men share no responsibility in this, we're not the ones who pushed it. Personally, I've always held the suspicion that these empowerment narrative is full of shit and the majority of women still do it for men. But for me to bel…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 06:47 AM
1

I'm probably just meditating too much and dispensing insight where it isn't wanted. My mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 05:11 AM
0

Your hunger doesn't originate in a cow, the way life originates in a womb. Otherwise, you'd be correct. Would you like to know where hunger originates? In the womb also. What's responsible for all the hunger in the world? Wombs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 04:55 AM
0

What is the evolutionary reason for this? For example during sex the sex moaning thing is to let neighboring chimpanzees know that she is in estrus.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 04:31 AM
1

Your kid will eventually become a MGTOW and blame you for not showing him the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 04:29 AM
0

Interesting how this objection is never raised when a woman triumphantly proclaims the significance of her womb as the "giver of life".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 04:05 AM
1

The truth can be unsettling, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 03:56 AM
1

wow what a devastating critique
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 03:26 AM
3

[Question For Otters] how do you emotionally experience very dirty/cloudy fishtanks?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 03:10 AM
5

Without the womb there would be no life, sure, and there would also be no death. The moment a human is conceived, their death is destined. It's sealed in fate because birth and death arise simultaneously, death is dependent on birth. Death is dependent on...the womb. The doom of the tomb is mended in the womb.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 02:25 AM
1

wombs are creepy if you think about it philosophically
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 02:21 AM
2

Ya wanna sleep with da fishes, see What do I look like, a wiseguy?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 01:13 AM
2

don't realize that most women don't just sit there and do nothing. That's what happens. At one point, there was a very dishonest narrative going around about women's beauty habits being for anything except men. Instead of being the buzzkill and correcting it, women doubled down on it and pushed this view onto each other and onto men who dared insinuate any different until it became popular opinion. It's not for men, I do it for me! I like the ritual! It makes me feel like ME! Because it's FUN! T…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 01:05 AM
1

I never said ALL people are fish. Some people are fish, some aren't. It wouldn't make sense to say nobody's a fish, otherwise we wouldn't see so many.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 11:49 PM
3

We can't just let it die. This is a fish analogy so if it died it would start to smell very bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 11:34 PM
2

Good point. There are even some people who have the last name of Fish. Are they really fish or are they just pretending to be fish so that they can blend in?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 11:30 PM
1

May you gain your freedom and fuck all your neighbors (college age) daughters.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 11:07 PM
2

let's give it up for Lester Burnham, ladies and gentlemen. Bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:56 PM
1

oh, my sides
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:47 PM
1

Oh. Ok thank you that's a good answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:46 PM
1

my wife was a total fuckin mynx when we were dating and is now a stereotypical frigid wife who lies back and thinks of england. LOL good job
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:44 PM
2

You're still not answering it. I was asking whether it's deterioration of a positive habit in general, or selected for certain habits and justified for other ones. My follow up question would be what qualifies to select a habit and justify others, but I sense we might never get there.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:36 PM
2

If you don't want to answer the question I'm ok with it. The question itself kind of makes the point I wanted to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:22 PM
4

You really can't think of other habits that slack after couples get comfortable in a relationship? I'm wondering whether the change of habit is the criterion for "false advertising" or whether it's selectively applied to certain habits but justified for other ones (which I suspect might be the case).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:18 PM
1

And I realized that I don't think guys realize exactly how much time (and money) we sink into beauty stuff that they don't realize As much as this will sound snarky, why are men supposed to care about this? Is it for men to give them their due credit and appreciation for upkeep?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:17 PM
3

Is gradually changing your habits in general false advertising, or only when it comes to being tidy?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 10:08 PM
1

nice try fagit
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 09:54 AM
2

00110000001100010011000100110001001100010011000000110000001100010011000000110001001100010011000000110001001100010011000100110001001100000011000100110001001100010011000000110001001100000011000100110000001100000011000100110000001100000011000000110000001100000011000000110001001100010011000000110000001100000011000000110001001100000011000100110001001100010011000000110000001100010011000000110000001100010011000100110000001100000011000100110000001100010011000000110000001100010011000000110000001100000011…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 09:53 AM
2

Trust that you'll be able to figure it out. Really, with charm you already have it made. Women will want you around because you have the gift of making them forget their flaws and feel good about themselves. High school girls especially. It's easy pussy for the rest of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:35 AM
3

Just charm the popular people, establish yourself in the group as the guy who provides X value, and prepare mentally for the crap loads of drama that high school girls cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:13 AM
5

I’m moving to a new school next year and I really want to start banging Ahhh, to be young.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 11:55 PM
11

Whether it's dysfunctional or not, I think this type of person is way more likely to participate here. It's a result of defining your boundaries and high disagreeableness trait, something you're more likely to find on this sub that encourages people to disagree with each other and define their boundaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 10:46 PM
7

if I got fit enough to get any persons attention (at face value, when personality isn’t even a factor mind you) how can I reconcile the idea that if I was who am now, I wouldn’t even be on this persons radar? Try this script: People get on my radar dependent on [those things] and I get on their radar dependent on [these things]. Humans are primates. There is no unconditional love between equal beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 10:36 PM
2

thats how women talk in real life gibs me dats nao. i wants dats. gibs
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:43 PM
1

That still doesn't explain why children would struggle in fatherless homes. Wouldn't they still be growing up in poverty even if the man WAS there?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:39 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYS1UFY05as
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:15 PM
1

I agree but I think these women would find out that Chads generally don't want to be friends with them unless they're keeping them in the back pocket for a fuck later on. That's kind of the same thing as a niceguy approach except that he has a better chance of getting laid. BUT hopefully I'm wrong because I'd way rather the niceguy shit stop and we can induct them into MGTOW where they rightfully belong. It's a vision of the future that would be a benefit to all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:14 PM
3

why not just cite the science
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:40 PM
3

I suspect they don't work that well and people are mostly pretending they do, but the alternative is to be single which for some people is even worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:34 PM
2

Infertility is absolutely a lack of talent, miscarriage might be caused by lack of talent or just accident. Thanks, I'm satisfied with this answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:47 PM
3

For some reason you're still avoiding the question. Are infertility or miscarriages due to a lack of talent or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:35 PM
3

would you explain infertility or miscarriages as a lack of reproductive talent?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:20 PM
4

My question was about your word choice of "talent" which you seem confused about.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:07 PM
10

The actual root of nagging is anxiety that she hasn't learned to deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:59 PM
8

many people ignore the talent of female reproductive ability Is English your second language? I can't understand why you're describing reproductive function as a "talent". Could you explain a little bit more what you think "talent" means, and how someone could be a "talented" reproducer?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:52 PM
1

Hm. Nah. I'm good right here thanks. Maybe you want to keep yapping about somethign
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:57 AM
2

Whew. Guess women just have no choice then. Oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:55 AM
1

You can cut yourself nearly free from most forms of media. Nobody's holding a gun to your head. It can take a lot of effort, but yes you can become immune to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:51 AM
2

Ok, go ahead and keep blaming everything around you and comparing your condition to men but only if it helps you feel more victimized. That's also an option.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:45 AM
1

Thanks for the offer, I didn't find it satisfactory. Let's move on now.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:32 AM
1

Why would I care what sets you off?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:20 AM
1

I'm not inrested in your explanation. Please stop trying to explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:53 AM
1

on every youtube video I watch, for example, Marni the Winggirl, or Kezia Noble, the top comments are always "Never take fishing advice from a fish The women who are spreading RP stuff are just regurgitating knowledge they've never had to figure out themselves or apply as a man. This is why you see this gut reaction to Kezia Noble, a gorgeous 10/10 bimbo who'se entire life from the age of 16 onward is completely removed from anything resembling a male dating reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:43 AM
1

that's nice
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:53 AM
1

not every woman's experience Right, that's why I said "a lot of" and not "every"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:35 AM
1

It starts with the first significant drop in fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:24 AM
1

Most MGTOWs seem to react the very same way when women do the same thing to them. Why do I need to defend other MGTOW? Maybe /r/MGTOW is full of incels nowadays, I don't frequent it that often anymore but I'd take one person's word on anything with a grain of salt. Anyway, back to the topic of "the wall" I think they could be doing a much better job of accepting it when it starts to happen namely by mental preparation instead I see a lot of denial, wishful thinking and desperate clinging.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:08 AM
1

If women were mentally prepared for aging, whatever exaggerations they read online wouldn't bother them so much. I'm a MGTOW and people exaggerate things about us all the time and conflate us with incels. I'm personally attacked when I express my views here and who cares, what do these people actually know about me? It's so easy to brush it off because they're never right. See if women had that view on aging they'd be all set.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:43 AM
3

Also will happen to most men, it is what it is. It will happen to everyone, yet most of the anxiety about the aging seems to come from women, and the sales data will reflect that fairly reliably. At worst you have dudes taking finasteride or shaving their head, maybe testosterone boost shots and moving on with life. So again, WOMEN, be honest with yourselves about it and you won't suffer so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:31 AM
3

Women should be aware what it will mean for them and to be honest with themselves about it. That way it should never be a problem, and other people saying things won't bother them so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:17 AM
1

Being resentful because you improved and then people like you more is perhaps the most self-defeating and stupid thing you can do. I'm not advocating for that. I'm saying that with his pattern of thinking and low status, I predict it will to lead to resentment. I'm suggesting what I consider to be the best alternative that hadn't been mentioned, which is to find someone first and improve as he goes, to protect him from resentment. It doesn't seem like he was considering this as an option, so I w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 03:49 AM
0

It's not the male equivalent at all. That trope is used by women trying to justify their bitchy attitude, not by women who are serious about improving their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 03:32 AM
2

Good for you. OP my advice is to find someone who already sees value in you (you already have some signs of this) and reward her faith in you by growing into who you will become. Or just listen to this dude, your life your choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 03:23 AM
1

The point of this post is to see if I even have any hope, to see if girls would look past my history if I turn my life around and become valuable enough. this mindset will lead to resentment once you realize how much you've done to get there and how much it's taken for granted by the women you end up dating. Good luck
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 02:17 AM
1

Follow the money and you'll have your answer. https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/23/17043978/uk-porn-age-verification-law-mindgeek
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 01:07 AM
1

I would have a conversation with my daughter if it turned out that way to explain that it's not her fault. Something like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO9epU3GCeY After listening to that, how could anyone feel bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 12:29 AM
1

If going to war is a quest for access to females, I don't see the need for all this public respect and honor. Lance Corporal Duffy was just doing it for pussy all along, ok great. Oh your buddy died? Too bad he doesn't get access to females, but more for you though right? hope the nightmares and flashbacks are worth it! The fact that there is so much public fanfare regarding military honor and respect, and what I'm saying here could not be had off the internet without making people incredibly of…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 11:58 PM
2

I hear Buttfuckistani girls are freaks though!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 11:05 PM
1

Historically going to war as a single young man has been the surest way to indefinitely cut off access to females and ensure you almost certainly never come back to reproduce. The cultural cues come in where men need to be deceived into taking a risk that no promise of female access could ever compensate. The politicians who sent them got their dicks nice and wet though, I can guarantee that. Very smart "risk" of them to send other people to war.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:44 PM
2

Good, I wasn't offering it to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:02 PM
2

No problem, since we all agreed their lives are worthless anyway I'm happy to send the cannon fodder into the line of fire all day long.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:01 PM
2

I have no interest in being a good corpse. Rather let your female approval seeking brothers and sons do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 09:54 PM
1

Self preservation is the most primordial instinct, one which runs counter to risk taking where life is concerned. If risking your life really is an instinct (arguable), there are undeniably cultural cues that attempt to maximize sacrificing your life for the "greater good" and minimize the instinct for self-preservation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 09:35 PM
2

You feel entitled to my "disposable" life
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 09:24 PM
2

Hopefully the "huge rewards" were worth it for all the men who fought in Vietnam. You know, like becoming a homeless person with PTSD who everyone spat on afterwards. That's how people treat their supposed heroes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 09:05 PM
1

Yes, so what. Was that an offhand remark or a response to the previous comment? We were talking about bombs dropping, so unless his grandfather was Japanese and survived the amphibious bombing of the Iwo Jima coast by the Allied forces, I don't see how it follows.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 09:00 PM
3

but men are brave by nature lmao. those who aren't are defective Women are weak and helpless by nature so they need men to believe that otherwise they're shit out of luck if things go bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 08:30 PM
4

I won't try to stop you. Again everyone thinks they're badass until they have a gaping chest wound and tourniquet around their blown up leg. Heres's a fun tidbit: according to military surgeons, the most common thing heard from injured soldiers right before death is calling out for their mom in a panic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:44 PM
1

My ansewr is that I don't object to protecting your own daughter. I don't think you'd save your child or wife because of wanting to live up to an expectation. I think this is actually something instinctual (though I'm not sure), unlike the other things I listed which often requires concepts, rationalizing, and social conditioning to enforce the behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:39 PM
8

I have no desire to be a high status corpse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:36 PM
1

"Men are brave" stereotype. Men are typically the ones taking stupid risks to save others in hazardous situations. Stay long enough on /r/watchpeopledie and you'll notice a pattern. I suspect this comes from a type of conditioning that boys receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:33 PM
0

do you see what I quoted?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:17 PM
0

who in the west expects you to protect strange women at the risk of your own life? Hopefully nobody, because I'm not doing it either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:15 PM
1

People will marry when being married brings value to their life. Oh that's why no one's getting married now, I don't think men are interested in doing this very much anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:40 PM
2

How is he actually "lucky" though? I mean non-sarcastically, what makes that guy lucky?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:10 PM
7

That's great, so what?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:08 PM
1

How is the sarcasm not obvious
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:07 PM
3

I really think you're misreading the conversation we were having. The "other men" were also getting sex from her, the "winner" is just the sap who marries her according to /u/blessedrainsinafrica.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 01:59 PM
2

lol winner of sex? Are you referring to all the guys who fucked her first?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 01:41 PM
7

Don't kid yourself. Everyone thinks they're Rambo until the bombs start dropping on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 01:38 PM
2

So women aren't getting married out of their own choice? Fuck. What are men supposed to do. Should men just marry themselves or would that just be weird and pathetic?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 01:09 PM
3

winner of what? And what were the other men unsuccessfully vying for that makes them "losers"? I don't necessarily disagree with your conclusion, but again the way you frame everything just looks like you're trying hard to troll. It's not even subtle.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 11:30 AM
9

It's only after she's truly lived it up, had the most blissful sex and forgotten more guys than she can remember can she ever settle down. By then you (yes you) will have just got your promotion in the engineering department, the boss loves you and most importantly, she loves you too. This just makes it look like you're trying to provoke anger in men using a kind of half-mocking tone. The whole post, actually but especially that part.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 11:12 AM
14

Totally agreed, it's Aubrey Plaza now.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 10:19 AM
5

The stereotype that men risk/lay down their lives for people they don't know. The Hero stereotype is a death sentence with a handful of lottery winners. I don't want to be associated with people who do that, because if I am then it will be expected of me. The danger about any stereotype is that it becomes expected of you, whatever it may be.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 09:51 AM
19

I wish men would stop expecting other men to protect women at risk to their own safety or life. My life matters to me more, if some woman's in danger, sorry I'm getting the fuck out of there. Same for risking my life to protect the country -- no. You fight, I'm getting the fuck out and I'm taking whoever actually I care about with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 09:45 AM
1

You look like you argued with them all the way to the lobby as they wheeled you away from the jagerbomb party and dozed off resigned and pissed off.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 06:44 AM
2

As I've gotten older and wiser, I've really just mellowed out coughtohardcoreteengangbangporncough
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 05:25 AM
1

Stop using psychiatric jargon that you don't understand. a defence mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 05:02 AM
1

I don't care to make anything about you or about me. Ok so "women can smell a weak psychological disposition like that from miles away. It's no wonder you're alone." was about someone else and not me? I'll take your word for it, honestly I don't care either way. "let's talk about men and women's expenses and experiences." It would be admirable if only these experiences didn't become worthy of conversation exactly when women seem to have a problem. Nobody seemed to care much about it until recent…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 04:44 AM
2

Keep trying to make this about me, I don't care. As far as your argument, it's still a trashy gold-digger mentality and you're doing nothing to defend it because you pretty much know you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:44 AM
2

You could take it seriously because it's a good fucking point It's a weak point because it's inconsistent, not because it's made by a woman For men, people limit the costs to the date itself. But for women, suddenly the costs are outside things? that's inconsistent and therefore, a weak point. If we were counting outside costs for both that would be a start, but that hasn't been the conversation up until now. We want men's dating costs to be the date only, and women's dating costs to be everythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:34 AM
1

are you done yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:28 AM
2

By this logic men could claim ancillary things like gym membership as a dating costs. Men wear clothes too you know, why don't those count as dating costs for men? Men have to get haircuts too, why don't those count as dating costs for men? Men often need to have a car to date, why aren't we counting your car payment and gas as "dating costs"? The reason is that we know it's bullshit, but for some reason we have to take these opinions seriously when women say it, god knows why.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:18 AM
1

lol you keep trying my girl, I'm already sick of your company. You don't even bring the quips
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:04 AM
1

Better to walk that road alone than with a retard by your side. Good luck to the guy who has to suffer that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:58 AM
1

Lol good, I don't care. I'll let you know exactly what I think of what you write. If I think it sounds retarded I'll say it regardless of what you think of my word choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:51 AM
1

haha you seem upset, ironic with a flare like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:40 AM
1

Nah I just like to make people justify their retarded sounding statements, which you just did marvellously. If that counts as a gotcha, then I guess so. Especially if you read that and you go back and read the original, you can see the major differences in what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:36 AM
1

YES. Jesus Christ. Anybody with a modicum of experience gets that women aren’t leaving men because they cried one time That's not even what I said. I said that some men will claim that the woman DID leave him as soon as he showed weakness. Sometimes by different women. But I get why you're trying to twist that around into "women won't leave if you cry once, duh". And I get why you're getting all impatient. Nobody likes to get called out on their bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:24 AM
1

Because the statement just looks retarded to me so I'm trying to clarify rather than just say outright that it's a retarded statement. Are they saying this because they just haven't been in a relationship and don't know any better? Doesn't seem like it, but that's what the original statement sounds like. Sometimes people with some experience will say that a women will leave you as soon as you show too much weakness. Maybe you just haven't seen it. I'm trying to give you benefit of the doubt, not…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:14 AM
1

People online who have never been in a relationship [...] hear this and spin it into crazy hyperbole This is what you said. I guess you meant people who have never been in a relationship, and also people who have been in a relationship sometimes do this?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:09 AM
2

I'd say more of a foreplay joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 01:29 AM
1

Yeah the second one. I was replying to finelow's "weird to ask boob size up front". Or penis size for that matter from a woman. Save for autists with no sense of nuance, people find cheeky ways around taboo subjects of discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 01:24 AM
1

It's a primal human thing. To max-out their biological fitness, most women need at least a little promiscuity unless they can secure a highly competent man long-term (rare). On the other hand, men's biological fitness is severely reduced by promiscuous women. Nature selects against those men, so men have evolved to hate promiscuous women. It's an instinct that pre-dates birth control and casual sex and modern dating. In male dominated societies, sluts are stoned to death (or ostracized). In fema…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 01:18 AM
2

I know you weren't. You have every right to enter in a conversation but I'm not going to change the subject just for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 11:52 PM
3

According to the official rulebook, it's the balls that can't touch. That's why God made women's balls inside their body in the form of ovaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 11:49 PM
1

ok, but that doesn't mean they never had a relationship. That's someone who had a relationship and was ignorant of prior issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 11:36 PM
1

I'd still rather verify than go by this adage. The squat test also reduces the chances of her being fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 11:34 PM
1

A feminine man would apologize for his behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 11:23 PM
1

let her feel how much stronger you are than her, rather than obsessing about her clit. Agreed. Plus a clitoris basically is a very small unformed penis so if you obsess over it you're kind of gay and defo a turnoff to women
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 11:14 PM
1

What makes you think it's only from people never had a relationship? If this were true, then we wouldn't see rants about women who left immediately after some unfortunate event left him vulnerable (depression/illness/unemployment/etc). Is it that you've just not come across much of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 11:07 PM
1

Commitment is a turn-on, and that only grows with age What do you mean by commitment is a turn-on? Do you mean it's sexually arousing to you? How do you define commitment?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 09:30 PM
1

Back when I was still dating I used to ask girls if they squat to weed out the girls with small asses. It worked reliably enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 09:25 PM
0

The real question is the aggregate outcome. People online who have never been in a relationship (cough many male red/black pillers on PPD cough) hear this and spin it into crazy hyperbole because they have no real life, foundational reference I'm not sure what you're saying here. What sort of hyperbole would they make, for example?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 09:11 PM
1

Yeah I can read a post title and reliably guess when it's a wokein post. I'm glad mods are kind of hypocritical and only banning incel posts and not femcel stuff, because it's funny to read her thoughts and not respond to them seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 01:20 AM
2

Women in their 30s are hot, period. To you they are, to me they're not. There isn't a "women in their 30s are ugly, period", nor is there a "women in their 30s are hot, period" either. However, there are tendencies, and physically men tend to favor markers of aging. There's plenty of evidence to back me on this!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 01:31 PM
1

Her having aspergers wouldn't discount her but other things would: not being physically attractive or having an N count 2+
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 12:40 PM
1

less likely to discuss our feelings in a group setting, more likely to kill things for survival or fun, and build modern civilization
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 12:19 PM
3

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE NOT ALL!! jk we are all like that in general
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 12:10 PM
1

She's not asking it because you have cool hair or can play the guitar. The question itself is a hidden judgment of you, probably a negative one. Bitches are cowardly like that. I'd just her say it, force her to spell out her judgment. A: "I dunno. What makes an emo person the type that don't want children or get married?" B: Well...they're kind of (she will make her judgment of emos/you here. If she's smart she'll try to avoid the question) A: "so just to clarify, you think emos are (judgment) s…
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 11:48 AM
1

Her: are you emo? this is basically her saying "justify yourself" and you went right ahead and did that.
/r/MGTOW02/03/19 02:18 AM
10

Words have meanings From the Oxford Dictionary cuck - a weak or servile man (often used as a contemptuous term for a man with moderate or progressive political views). Your 18th century definition is quickly becoming a secondary one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_change#Semantic_changes "Words' meanings may also change in terms of the breadth of their semantic domain." Stephen Fry explains how you can stop fussing and learn to love the cuck Anyway as far as the question goes, does buyin…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 04:40 AM
0

thank you for the correction, I edited that into my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 10:07 PM
5

Being a slut is advantageous to women in 2019 Agreed. It's 2019, women need to learn to be happy with getting dicked down by low value men and nothing else. And stop with all this commitment bs in 2029.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 10:10 AM
9

my next guy will be vetted harshly. No more benefit of the doubt, no more believing men are mostly good What exactly is wrong about what this guy is saying...anyone? Switch out "men" for "women" and it describes the standard MGTOW mentality. It's part of the reason that rather than inflict our jaded view upon women on a date, we drop dating altogether. Very little benefit of the doubt, very little confidence in the idea that women are mostly good. So women breathe a sigh of relief upon hearing t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:38 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_matrilineal_or_matrilocal_societies
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:05 AM
1

It would only need to reflect the population of people dating, not the population in general. Even though it requires a voluntary signup, facebook would look more like the general population, but wouldn't be very helpful in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 08:54 PM
6

[victimhood rant] CMV
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 03:38 AM
2

Agreed. And just to be clear, we KNOW men do it too. We're not saying women do it but men do not. Just saying this to prevent this predictable retarded PPD rabbithole.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 03:35 AM
5

Online dating sites have a large enough sample size that the mean appearance of dating site men will approach the mean of real life men. I know there's a stats person here, so correct me if I'm misinterpreting this. It just looks like you're picking through the sales bin to you and your friends, probably because the app forces you to acknowledge, one by one, what the vast majority of men look like for at least one second. It removes the attentional blindness of real life where you can spot the c…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 03:30 AM
3

Now I want to re-watch Children of Men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 07:03 AM
1

This guy needs to stop caring and start becoming a sociopath. I have family members who are engaged and part of the fun is egging them on to get married. I even got one of my best friends get marriage counseling to save his marriage, now he's having a child and having to grow up overnight. Dropped the video games and online gambling, bought a suit to sell used cars. It's interesting to watch, and they're not me so who cares
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 03:13 AM
1

why do some girls do keegles?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 12:20 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death-grip LOL I can't believe someone took the initiative to write a wikipedia article on this. see also: Dildo
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 10:37 PM
1

Two dates isn't enough to tell, but if she really is an almost perfect unicorn why would you break up with her? do you really think other girls are going to be like that?
/r/MGTOW21/02/19 08:58 AM
1

Ok, RP idea is that it is because you look alpha No it's not, this just makes it look like you're building a shitty strawman for BP to knock down.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 08:01 AM
1

Omg how many ties can we have this same boring comment on this same boring question
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 03:58 AM
5

Is this the mythical mgtow who we never hear from again or the common mgtow who can't stop telling us that he's out, he's done, any minute now...? I'm going to give benefit of the doubt and assume you've figured out by now what it is that MGTOW claim to be going their own way from. Then, why equate MGTOW with some sort of self-imposed exile from having an online presence and maybe even a presence of any kind in society? I don't exactly blame you, if I were blue pilled, the mocking rhetoric of "s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 01:42 AM
2

Whenever someone suggests something like this, I take it upon myself to do it. So even though museums aren't really my thing, tomorrow afternoon I'm going to a random museum.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 10:45 AM
3

I get the sense that there's maybe some personal stuff going on so I won't be too forceful. I just wanted to clarify that what I quoted previously is potentially destructive, but I get that you're trying to help RPs out of the goodness of your heart by trying to get them to accept responsibility. Assuming that's the case, I admire you for it, and I wish you luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 10:24 AM
3

You see what I quoted? That is not "taking responsibility". First of all, learning from your mistakes often requires taking action which that quote lacks, it's just "everything is my fault". Second of all, you don't need to blame yourself to learn from your mistakes, and there's a good chance blaming yourself will hinder that. This isn't just conjecture, as I said there is a fair body of scientific research that demonstrates this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 10:14 AM
2

The reason why every woman you get in a relationship with seems hostile/noncommittal is because you choose to keep dating those women without noticing the red flags first hand. The reason she isn’t doing everything you ask for is because of your behavior. The reason why college seems like a scam, is because you just couldn’t pull yourself together to succeed. That's not "taking responsibility". This is a self-critical explanatory style, it's pretty dangerous and it will fuck you up and probably …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 10:06 AM
9

You could take everything you wrote and apply it fair number of people in almost any group. In fact, there's a good chance you could be describing a non-RP on this sub and you're going to accidentally make them feel like shit when they read that. Of course I bet many TRPs are, but how are they special when it comes to this?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 09:01 AM
2

What is a forest without trees?
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 08:12 AM
2

Their "audience" is people dumb enough to fall for the bait and read the article. It's possible, but not likely. Even with a broad audience, a content marketing department normally has a target reader based off demographics for who they tend to market their content and ads to. Since it's called the Charlotte Agenda, the target customer probably lives in the city of Charlotte. Given that the articles in the Dating section could be considered very female-centric, it would seem the target customer …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 05:49 AM
2

I'm not into it but it is interesting how this magazine explains this event to their audience in this way. Often, you have to know what your audience resonates with, which poses the question of what audience it may be, and why does this message resonate with that audience. HMMMMMMM
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 04:20 AM
4

why do you like the sound of a cat being gutted alive heeeyy yawwwlll hwaawaaws it gwaaan
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 03:41 AM
1

Sometimes being lazy makes you work harder than you had to
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:55 AM
1

ok, and do you see how the way you phrased it sounds like a statement of fact, rather than your perception? At this point I'd say "assumption" would be more precise.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:50 AM
1

...you're right, sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:39 AM
1

ok seems like it's good
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:37 AM
1

what about now
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:36 AM
1

Wait, accusing someone of being autistic goes against the civility rule? can you confirm that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:34 AM
1

fixed
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:31 AM
1

please see my edit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:25 AM
1

Since you're speaking for them, which 3 lean red?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:04 AM
2

Since you're now speaking for them, which ones? edit: yeah atlantic68 doesn't lean red, he shit talks RP all the time edit2: praisethesun799 shit talks RP too often to be RP also speaking for others seems like something a weird edgelord mod would do. Not you in particular, but just like, in general
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 02:02 AM
3

Just yesterday I had to call 4 people out who were throwing the term around. I'm not saying they're insulted for being autistic, but that autism is used as an insult. Does this makes sense? I'll call them out by name because I don't give a fuck, they were /u/kandyapplez, /u/atlantic68, /u/praisethesun799, and /u/yvaN_ehT_nioJ maybe they could explain the procedure behind their diagnoses to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 01:57 AM
3

Are we already pointing fingers? On PPD I frequently see so-called nopillers, purple, blue pillers declaring people "on the spectrum" with certainty, again just buzzwords of shit they don't understand. I'm sure there are examples from both sides to be found, but to accuse only TRP would be disingenuous or uninformed at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 01:45 AM
2

Autism, due to its various issues, renders me unsexy. Hate to break it to you like this, but autism has become a euphemistic way for adults to say "you're a moron" while sounding like they have some academic credibility. Ironically, I would wager a good number of them wouldn't hesistate to self-identify as kind-hearted and tolerant people. Sorry your disorder is used as a slur, but there it is. On top of everything else, the added stigma doesn't bode well for your dating. Good luck!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 01:30 AM
1

ok I need to just set you on ignore or something
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 01:09 AM
1

If these women's partner were actually fulfilling their romantic needs like it's often claimed, what reason could there be As I said in my OP, women seek to fulfill ROMANTIC NEEDS from of ROMANCE novels that they can't get from their unfilfilling marriages. It's right there in the OP, you're more than welcome to go back and read it if you don't believe me. Nice chat, please go find someone else's time to waste.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/19 12:56 AM
2

That's interesting. why do you sometimes prefer porn to your gf? I never have
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 11:06 PM
1

Oops, it seems you're the one who brought it up. And now I'm the one who will end it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 11:00 PM
1

We're all sexual creatures. Such an insightful platitude. I know it's moot. That's why I'm bringing it up -- it's subject to debate. I hate to be so literal, but that's what moot means.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 10:55 PM
1

Why is such a large portion of the women who masturbate to erotica older and married? You've accidentally led yourself into your own trap. Just stop. I'm almost embarrassed for how badly you've "debated" this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 09:19 PM
1

In case you were wondering, married women also make up a large audience of erotica readers. But honestly, there's no real debate going on. Just stop. You don't have information, you're just trying to justify things and doing a horrible job of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 09:07 PM
1

Argue with yourself about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 09:01 PM
1

The compromise is that the other can compensate for lacks they can't/aren't willing to provide. If they were willing and able to a satisfactory degree, the compromise would be unnecessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 08:29 PM
1

It's female porn! ... Romance novels aren't porn!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 08:28 PM
2

What's funnier, and actually true, is that the term has been thrown around so much that it's likely a number of these people will give birth to children with autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 07:42 PM
1

Wow interesting. We were talking about women masturbating to romance novels though -- they probably do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 07:19 PM
1

So this is what people mean by a fulfilling marriage. It's not really fulfilling, they just compensate for everything that isn't fulfilling about it. I had already suspected that was the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 07:13 PM
1

or for work, or for education, or for research etc Almost nobody reading romance novels is doing it for these reasons. Your hamstering that romance novels are equivalently compared with general fiction is weak logic. Almost nobody reads romance novels for work, education and research. The generalization is a very reliable one. Also this post is not about why you read books, unless you're a middle aged married woman who reads romance novels, it's irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 07:07 PM
1

Right, women crave more romance than their husband offers, so they get it from romance novels. How do people call that a fulfilling marriage though
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 06:40 PM
1

I do read, I just don't read fiction. Pretty much everyone who reads fiction is doing it as a form of entertainment, I'm not sure what's so controversial about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 06:37 PM
1

It's pretty obvious the "you probably have autism" thing is really an attempt to punish certain uncomfortable topics are brought up, but it won't work. It's factual in the same way that it's "factual" that lots of BP have bipolar disorder. Maybe we should start describing certain PPD posts as bipolar rants, I'm sure you would love that. Maybe we should also try to ridicule people who we suspect might have anxiety or depression.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 05:48 PM
0

When women want to get off, we read erotica, watch porn, or go to our personal spank banks. Romance novels are not for that "Because it's female porn. Exciting, thrilling, sexually arousing" and I know that masturbation and sexual arousal are fairly closely linked.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 05:17 PM
1

If you have a fulfilling marriage, you won't have a romantic lack that you need to remedy with a romance novel. So, why do married women make up such a large audience for romance novels?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 05:04 PM
1

very few people in America are actually truely oppressed. Yes that's my point. The "political climate" explanation for lack of female empathy is not rooted in reality. My second point was to suggest there's probably no confirmation bias happening. Bias of what?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 03:35 AM
1

I think the lack of empathy on woman's part might be the cultural climate we live in You could be poor cis white male who thinks the cultural climate is against him, you could be a wealthy queer black female and come to the same conclusion. And everything in between. And in a certain way, they'd all be right. confirmation bias toward noticing only women who are not empathetic. No, I do notice a small segment of men and women who are empathetic but it would be wrong to generalize that this is how…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 03:23 AM
2

I have a month and a half of paid vacation and I don't want to spend it on PPD. If you see me responding to posts here, especially if I'm being snarky which is usually, feel free to publically shame me on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 02:07 AM
2

Apparently neither are the guys on PPD who have a getting pegged fetish
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 01:53 AM
1

I'm not saying it's bad. I'm saying that people use entertainment to fulfill parts of their lives that are lacking. I'm not making a value judgment about entertainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 12:30 AM
1

Knock yourself out
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 12:28 AM
1

Depends. Are you reading it to learn about history or are you reading it because the thought of being gassed alive excites you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 12:25 AM
1

If they were only speaking for themselves you'd have a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 12:11 AM
1

What they do say is to men who insist that 90% of men who are married are just beta losers married to alpha widows who hate them is that there are definitely people happy in the marriages You've never seen anyone say it but you've seen someone say that garbled mess, huh
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 12:09 AM
4

it's the new "you're gay"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 12:02 AM
1

You really think it takes is a sex life of some kind for men to be satisfied lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 12:00 AM
2

To clear up confusion, I said I'm not interested who you think Nofap is for because that's not the topic. This is usually what happens after an ad-hominem, you start discussing something wildly different from focus of the OP. I'm fine with answering it, and I'm fine with you denying that it's an ad hominem. Is there anything else to discuss?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 11:34 PM
2

Please look up the definition of ad-hominem. I'm sick of teaching PPD what it means. Only if they are not also getting sex. If they have to vrs choose to. Some young guy who never had a GF and feels like a loser sure. You're making a definitive statement without evidence. Nofap is for guys with problems, not guys in general. I'm not interested who you think it's for. That's not the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 11:05 PM
4

Even though this is an ad-hominem, yes I did and still do on rare occasion. And I suspect most men who jerk off do and especially if they jerk off to porn. They just deny it and repress it. Nofap will make you aware of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:47 PM
0

Where are you that you encounter so many middle-aged women who boast to you about how fulfilling their lives are? PPD for one, about their own lives but more frequently they speak for everyone using some variation of "most people are in happy relationships". I would say that people enjoy escapism, regardless of how satisfying their lives are. You're bringing it off topic again, but I would say that the purpose of escapism is hard to reconcile with the meaning of fulfillment. Please stop shifting…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:27 PM
1

ok i fixed it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:20 PM
3

this belief with some men that if a woman lusts/loves you that she won't even think about other men or sex in any way or read a whole 400 page book per month about another man and probably masturbating to the thought with deep sad longing but yes, it's weird how some men believe their wives wouldn't do that
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:18 PM
0

Yes, they settle for a fat unromantic slob who doesn't fulfill them so they read romance novels.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:08 PM
1

ok at least you're consistent. It seems we just disagree on principle.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:03 PM
1

Facebook marketing data. It's an audience of 15M people, 87% are women, 72% are married engaged or in a relationship, and the 35+ age group makes up 61% of the audience. The data clearly skews older and paired. Please just take my word for it, I don't want to spend the time to make screenshots.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:00 PM
1

Ok, this seems like an attempt to derail the topic of conversation but I'll answer it for one comment. So, basically, you think that nobody should read fiction. Nobody who boasts about having a fulfilled real life, and they were using fiction to fantasize about a more exciting/more dramatic/more whatever life. Again, why would they even want to escape their self proclaimed very fulfilling real life to fantasize about something else? To bring it back to the original topic, maybe women who read ro…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:49 PM
2

I didn't say every single existential need, I said romantic need. If a fulfilling marriage doesn't mean satisfying your partner's romantic need, why are married men (and women) normally expected and encouraged to keep the romance going in their marriage? Would you say the same things about a fulfilling marriage to a married guy who watches porn? It doesn't mean satisfying your partner's sexual needs? Don't treat your partner as the sole source of sexual intimacy?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:42 PM
1

How is it possible for the average woman to be in a happy marriage with a fat slob with no romance in them?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:31 PM
0

It seems you mistakenly think I was asking "why do women like romance novels?". That's not what I was asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:25 PM
1

I would equally question whether men who read Tom Clancy novels are truly perfectly content with their boring careers, especially if a large portion of them did and the novels involved fantasizing about doing exciting things for a living. If their job provided enough excitement and was actually fulfilling, why would they do that? Good thing men aren't constantly trumpeting about how they have such a satisfying career so people just leave them alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:23 PM
1

I agree to some extent. As I said in another comment I think it's because men might have more natural capacity for anger, aggression and cruelty than women do. Men with wit will cut down women in a more biting way and in larger numbers than women. The things men say tend to be taken more seriously both by men and women. I think the female presence online is smaller on certain platforms you're referring to. I think most of this is a result women forgetting their place alongside men and actually c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 03:11 PM
0

ok, let me quote the article directly for you: Eleven percent of virgin marriages (on the part of the woman, at least) in the 1980s dissolved within five years. This number fell to 8 percent in the 1990s, then fell again to 6 percent in the 2000s I paraphrased it as "women with 0 partners have the lowest rate of divorce at around 10%" actually it's quite a bit less now at 6% but I was taking a generous estimate. Let's continue Even in the aughts, women who had two partners had, at 30 percent, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 01:47 PM
6

I disagree that the lack of sympathy produces the problems you list. Sympathy is feeling sorry for someone, pity, without needing to understand how they could feel a certain way. Solipsism and the lack of empathy and understanding of how another person could feel that way, is causing problems on both sides. As a guy, I sense a very unempathetic tone from women towards men in general, online and offline. Literal "I don't get how guys" type shit for things that aren't even illogical or contradicto…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 11:54 AM
1

LOL, well women will cite studies that say that the average N count is supposedly around 4 or something. Of course, studies like that women prefer to take at face value rather than to explore other variables and possible explanations, and immediately discredit anyone who starts asking questions. If anything, women are addicted to unattainable fantasy Chad dick, which is why the romance novel industry is the #1 biggest literary genre in terms of revenue. The female population alone drives more bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 11:33 AM
0

Do you know what an ad-hominem is? the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument it looks something like this: So you trying to get into that 5%? As a man - what do you offer? Hm sounds familiar. Since we're maybe in a pot calling the kettle black situation at best, can you quote where I'm prompting you, personally to defend your own character like this? No? Ok great. While we're at it, this is the definition of a st…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 10:06 AM
1

The negative reaction to this notion from women on PPD in general. And women outside of PPD who will, statistically hear the bell tolling for their failed marriages eventually. And the simpleton men who marry promiscuous women. All these kinds of people seem to get jilted when this topic is brought up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:51 AM
1

If someone suggests that their sexual choices might be a culprit for their marital failures, of course this is bound to upset them. This is because women tend to value happy successful marriages, and a majority of women won't get it. Especially this generation of women who I consider to be just a disaster. There is no personal implication, if that's what you were asking. I normally have the grace not to do that unless it's done to me first.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:44 AM
1

Since I already linked an article and you're not making any effort to state what makes the observations invalid about what I actually stated, the circles thing sounds fun now. we can begin with this: by number of partners but only in women when did I make this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:32 AM
1

k
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:21 AM
3

Ah yeah. It sucks when only a small percentage of people are considered worthy of something they value, doesn't it? That's life. Don't worry it's fairly even; men have their own version of this too, in case it wasn't evident from all the "whinging and complaining" about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:20 AM
2

I met a traveler from an antique land who said two trunkless legs of stone stand in the desert. In the sand, half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown and wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command tell that its sculptor, well those passions read, which yet survive stamped on these lifeless things the hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed. And on the pedestal these words appear: "I am homo sapiens, hominid of hominids. Look upon my works, ye mighty, and despair". (bastardization of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 09:01 AM
1

As I said, I'm done.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 08:50 AM
2

oh hold on, you didn't answer the simple yes or no question.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 08:33 AM
4

How is a direct yes or no answer a deflection to a yes or no question? what a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 08:29 AM
4

just the ones who actually understand science and know the "studies" Does your "understanding of science" also allow you to make definitive sounding claims like these without any evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 08:28 AM
1

graet. look at my edit, I'm done, we're just bickering.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 08:19 AM
1

I didn't realize you dropped the previous line of thought and shifting completely to women having abortions in general. Ok, that makes it easier for me. A significant portion of women who have an accidental pregnancy are against abortion and won't do it. This still shows that birth rates are linked to sexual frequency. Look, there is no way to get around this fact unless you believe in the stork myth or spontaneous generation. Give it up, go take a class or something just stop wasting my time. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 08:14 AM
3

My answer is no, I'm not trying to get into that 5%.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 08:08 AM
2

"smelly hoe bag" is not even an insult, and I was pretty generically using that term, not calling anyone that in particular. Also it's worth pointing out that women mods on PPD engage in the same behavior, and defend each other when called out on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 08:05 AM
1

Ok, remember this was your original claim birth rates have nothing to do with intercourse frequency And now you've been reduced to arguing the edge case of nymphomaniacs who have an accidental pregnancy and decide to get an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 07:57 AM
1

Can't dispute that. If you want an attractive virgin to marry, you almost have no choice but to convert to some religion like Mormonism or Islam. Are you atheist?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 07:49 AM
3

No I paraphrased the article wrong. The data did make a distinction between zero and one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 07:13 AM
1

ok, within the range of frequency excluding zero Still not correct. Birth rates are dependent on sexual frequency. There is a CAUSAL relationship between sexual frequency and birth rates. Unless she is infertile, even a nymphomaniac having protected sex increases her chances of impregnation the more frequently she has sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 07:08 AM
11

I'm willing to bet the women who dispute it most are those who have no self control and get fucked by random men the most. It's like a porn addict dude trying to dispute the studies about porn addiction leading to low confidence and ED. "I call BS there must be other reasons, plenty of other guys fap all day and have no problems" he says. The women hearing this just think that dude is pathetic, and rightly so.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 06:45 AM
0

This conversation is done. Oops, you're still talking.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 06:37 AM
1

LOL It was done before you even asked the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 06:31 AM
2

The variables matter when you're solving systemic problems, not personal ones. When making personal life decisions, such as deciding whether or not to get a degree, whether or not to snort cocaine, whether or not to have unprotected sex, and whether or not to marry a stinky hoebag, these variables matter much less.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 06:28 AM
7

So, tell me again how pair bonding is fucked up by how many people someone has slept with; especially if their intent is to literally just have sex? ok: https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability/ Even though they still divorce sometimes, the women with 0 partners have the lowest rate of divorce at around 10%. The first couple of extramarital partners shoots the divorce rate up to 25% and hovers around there until you start getting…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 05:42 AM
0

Your math is terrible. What you are proposing would take hundreds of years, not 2 generations. According to what? Maybe policies would be enacted in an attempt to curb the falling birth rate. Countries facing population death spirals haven't been able to put a dent in these problems using legislation, much less solve them. Also, the children who are born would be far more likely to be born in stable relationships ok they would be more stable, but I don't care because this isn't the topic of disc…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 12:19 AM
1

because incompleteness is one of the characteristics of reality
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 11:48 PM
0

people would still marry and have kids this is a strawman, I didn't claim that people wouldn't marry and have kids women's libidos were unhealthy. this is a strawman, I'm not judging the "health" of women's libidos Here is a definition of a strawman according to wikipedia, which you could easily google yourself: "giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent" Birth rates of babies born to unmarried/unpartnere…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 11:25 PM
1

I got sold a false bill of goods There's no excuse for getting simped by women anymore. Own your decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 09:03 PM
1

That's pretty dumb. people would still marry and have kids. Women have very healthy libidos - they just don't go after random men, because it's too risky Nobody claimed that people wouldn't marry and have kids, nobody claimed that women's libidos were unhealthy. But I agree that made up strawman arguments would be pretty dumb if anyone was actually making them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 08:21 PM
1

birth rates have nothing to do with intercourse frequency How could someone make a bewilderingly mindless statement like this. If birth rates had NOTHING to do with intercourse frequency, then you would be able to adjust intercourse frequency to 0 and expect birth rates to remain unchanged.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 07:53 PM
1

Some people can't help but make everything about themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 07:49 PM
44

Birth rates would plummet way below replacement rates, end of humanity after 2 generations. However, I don't see women complaining about the intensity of male libidos, only the male libidos of undesirable men. Really women just really just hate the nuisance that undesirable men are to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 10:50 AM
2

According to a legend about the Buddha, while he still hadn't attained enlightenment. he meditated non-stop until he nearly starved to death. A hypergamous village woman saw and brought him some rice and he barely survived thanks to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 09:19 AM
1

Men bring it up, not women. Women don't just randomly blurt out their sexual history unless something is leading up to it. As far as downplaying things, if downplay something enough that it makes a difference, then it is more likely that the truth will be discovered.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 09:10 AM
2

should a son not be praised for doing things for his OWN mother? Fuck no. Doing things for your parents should be the child fulfilling their reciprocal half of the child acknowledging their parent's benevolence, not motivated by approval. There needs to be some gear-turning of mirror-neurons in their head that inspires it as the fair and right thing to do. It is 100% up to the parents to teach them the benefits of reciprocal kindness, which is when "doing things" for another person is warranted.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 06:59 AM
0

Based on advice given by the red pill, a man who is a doctor or successful lawyer should have such a large selection of women going after him, that he will only date and marry the cream of the crop: an 18-24 year old playboy bunny look alike who is underweight and has big breasts. ok TRP, I want to feel right about something today, so here is an outlandish claim that you never made but I'll accuse you of it anyway. I know 3, count'em THREE people who prove this completely fabricated claim wrong.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 05:08 AM
2

My first was 18. 9 year age difference. I should have liked to wait longer to find the right one but at the time it seemed like it would be such a great experience, and I was thinking taht it would be awesome to brag about with my friends. It wasn't so great though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 08:59 AM
1

Attention, as in "being noticed?" Then sure they do. But that doesn't mean someone wants you to stop them or talk to them. I meant attention, notice, recognition from men, positive regard from men. It's in this context that is typically denied, not from this straw man about harrassment. I'll take the oft repeated word for it -- women want to rip hair off their face and slap paints on and wearing dumb shoes, for reasons other than men, the cliche being that it makes them feel "confident" and "pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 08:25 AM
2

But women don't do these things for male attention, right? Every time someome even tries to suggest that to make a point, it gets slapped down with a thousand alternative reasons, least of which seems to be men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 07:28 AM
1

cold feet and you're not a wool sock
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 10:42 PM
2

Accusing PPD of a right wing conspiracy just seems like such a paranoid soyboy thing, I can't relate.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 06:54 PM
4

and she is so very much into me If you actually believed this, you wouldn't be worrying about the orbiter co-workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 06:49 PM
13

The male experiences of rejection are evened out by other facets of the female experience, such as neglect. Look at /u/wokein, half her posts on PPD posts are rants about about men not wanting to approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 09:28 AM
2

Okay! Enjoy being a bundle of wood sticks for the rest of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 07:12 AM
2

No shortage of pedantic weenies whose demands aren't taken seriously by anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 07:07 AM
0

no
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 07:02 AM
1

And it's a great example. So can I call you a cowardly simpleton, or is name-calling something that only mods have the privilege to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 05:39 AM
-3

Calling a father responding to his kid normally and supportively a “cuck” is such a weird edgelord thing I’ll never relate to. Who cares what you relate to. If you want to call me a weird edgelord just do it and spare us the passive aggressive bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 05:19 AM
3

It's interesting how she does the breathing stuff, looks like she's about to learn something about managing her own emotions. And then the cucked Dad (?) has to step in right in the middle, and coddle her with a pity voice, and put on Fraggle Rock and make her a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Daddy has the power to take away the sad, problem solved. Some men just can't help themselves, they need to rescue every little girl from every minor peril.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 05:11 AM
3

and defining it as being the prize or being chased. Up and coming musicians, actors and athletes are the prize and chased aggressively by women. Does that make these people "women"?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 03:31 AM
4

Look at the top posts on MGTOW. They are clearly not solution oriented True, but they're also not whining and victimhood though. The top posts on /r/MGTOW are mostly memes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 08:29 PM
5

Boring. We don't talk about females on /r/MGTOW
/r/MGTOW14/02/19 11:21 AM
1

I want a virgin with with decent curvy child-bearing hips. For the kids, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 10:43 AM
1

well that was fun
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 03:17 AM
2

bitch
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 03:15 AM
0

Because it's a backhanded insult to everyone on PPD who isn't you. What makes everyone else here a judgmental shut-in who overthinks this stuff but not you? As it has once poignantly stated by an unkown author, "Bitches be like "bitches be like" but they be the bitches that be like." I think this sums it up fairly well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 03:08 AM
2

From my limited time alive, women's standards have always seemed "unreasonably" high, but in a way it's like saying a string is unreasonably long. They're really only unreasonable to me because I would never go out of my way to meet them. If other men are rising to and meeting those standards, then they are reasonable *for them*. The women who are unreasonable are the ones who have standards that no man wants to meet, we call those women "begging choosers". Everyone else getting the man they wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 03:02 AM
1

Some MGTOW will readily accept AMALT, a version of male nature that would paint men in what could be considered a fairly negative light. I've yet to see a feminist ever admit anything about AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 11:25 AM
1

No, I don't want to be anyone's boyfriend, so why would I approach her? If I'm "lucky" she'd say yes, and instead of being rewarded you just proceed to the next stage, where it's on me to make everything happen while she passively agrees or puts obstacles in the way. Then you proceed to the next stage, where it's on me to make sure we build closeness and attraction. What makes any of it worth it? It's good for an ego boost, not much else. At least with online dating you can meet up, fuck, and be…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 10:37 AM
1

This sets the bar incredibly high for what a unicorn counts for a man, beyond what I would consider a practical line of thinking. Imagine that instead of being cute, smart and sane girl, the bar for her being a unicorn was that she would fuck ugly or obese men (controlling for money and status).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 09:38 AM
1

If your options are someone who's unfortunately crazy but at least looks decent, and someone who makes your dick go limp when you look at her acne face and obese body, what choice is there really? It's either be a celibate, or take your chances. Having sex with someone who doesn't meet your threshold isn't really an option, women seem to understand this almost instinctually, but for some reason men seem to think they are above this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 08:23 AM
2

I'm not sure what you mean by that? What is dysfunctional in this case?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 08:13 AM
1

Looks is a threshold. If they don't meet the looks threshold, then value and character don't come into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 07:37 AM
3

Do betas treat women better? No diffdrence anymore. With TRP, betas realized there's almost no benefit for them to treat women nicely. Now the options seem to be alphas that don't treat you well, or betas that don't treat you well, with not that much in between. Millenial women might as well just go for the alphas for as long as you can and try with all your might to hitch one of them long-term. If that fails, just make a happy life alone and forget about setting your sights more realistically a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 06:41 AM
2

If you were never spending money on them and you still aren't, I don't see the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 09:50 AM
2

omfg ok
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 07:26 AM
6

If the advice were applicable, it would also mean you should treat your regular friends like you treat women you're attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 07:25 AM
4

Women aren't yet past paying for a $10 meal but we're supposed to expect them to foot the wedding bill now? Maybe you just want a modest wedding that isn't ordinated by Elvis, and they don't want to pay for 100% of it while the husband refuses to contribute anything. It's not too hard to imagine.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 07:15 AM
5

If she didn't want the huge magical wedding why would it be important to her? This question suggests that a wedding could only be important to a woman if it's a huge magical ceremony. Do you really believe that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 07:09 AM
9

I didn't say she wants a huge magical wedding, but that would naturally become the point of comparison and perceived unfairness when you propose the cheap Vegas wedding especially if it's important to her. You can't expect a human to not act like a human, we seek fairness for things we consider important regardless of whether someone else calls it petty.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 07:04 AM
6

I'm glad I have this much power over your relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 06:21 AM
13

what would you do if your husband demanded that you make equal or more amount of permutations of this question than you have of any other question?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 06:03 AM
11

This type of thing is petty until there's something that really matters to them. For example, the budget for a wedding would be a major point of contention. Imagine you paid for a huge magical ceremony for the previous girl, and now you're making more and she is even willing to split the cost but instead you just want to get her Big Day done by an Elvis impersonator in Vegas for $70 because it's cheaper.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 05:49 AM
3

Well then I'd just make up some lame bullshit hamstering and then act all surprised when she doesn't buy it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 05:40 AM
2

resentful of her being less attractive than other women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 05:34 AM
19

what would you do if your wife/ girlfriend demand that you spend equal or more amount of money on her Wouldn't that be expected? Why would I suddenly spend noticeably less money on her than other women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 05:30 AM
2

Studies suggest we come down harder on women, not less If you read the study by Korn Ferry Institute, there is no comparison being made to men aside from taking a few years longer to make CEO and being in "slightly more roles".fairygodboss editorialized the figures to fit the narrative of added scrutiny for being female but if you look at the figures there are no data collected on men to compare them against.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 05:15 AM
13

If you believe that the effect something has on you is dependent on the path taken to arrive there -- then by definition it does. Arguably, women acquire a high N count in a diametrically opposite way than men do (by yielding repeatedly, rather than pursuing repeatedly). It's the same thing among men. A high N count would have a different effect on a man who pursued repeatedly than a man who yielded repeatedly (if this would even be possible). In the end I think both men and women end up identif…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 04:57 AM
13

I don’t think it’s fair that men can’t have standards Whether man or woman, if you want to play this game, stop expecting fairness and learn to tolerate bullshit and hypocrisy. That's the only way you get anywhere. If you can't handle bullshit, consider something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 04:21 AM
2

Men and women have just devalued themselves for each other. Women have lost value in the eyes of men. Men have lost value in the eyes of women. If you look at behaviors only, you will see that neither side considers the other side as worth much anymore. We are worthless to each other, except for the top echelons, but no one will admit it because then no one could complain. You are mainly describing how women have lost value in the eyes of men, and how men will ridicule expressions of self sacrif…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 04:09 AM
1

that these same men that ridicule this behaviour is because they don't engage in it themselves. What they are actually doing is chasing girls on instagram, tinder, porn, twitch, which THOUSANDS of men are doing at any second, and they blame this on 'feminism'... It's so funny how you're going along the right track and then you take a sharp left turn into a concrete wall and completely destroy your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 03:16 AM
7

you expected logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:47 AM
1

That isn't satire, it's tongue in cheek humor (or at least an attempt at that).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 10:15 PM
3

No such thing as a free lunch
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 10:01 PM
5

ok what about this https://www.mdpi.com/journal/socsci/special_issues/Physical_Attractiveness_Evaluative_Disparity_and_its_Social_Implications_Western_Countries_01_24_2009
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 09:58 PM
9

Oh no please TheSuperStink, we urgently need your response!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 09:47 PM
3

Isn't it all looks. If you define top 20% of women based on mostly looks, then it's neither easy nor hard. Assuming normal weight, it's a fixed trait you just have it or you don't. You can't work hard and become more good looking, just like you can't work hard to become top 20% of tallest men. The one hack around this is plastic surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 09:42 PM
2

If you insist. Just stick it in the microwave before you try to pleasure her mouth with it.
/r/MGTOW09/02/19 08:00 AM
2

The penis of a virgin Sorry to say but that's a bratwurst dog. If your penis is one of those, you should maybe get it checked out by a doctor or just give it to a hungry homeless person.
/r/MGTOW09/02/19 07:55 AM
1

Nah irony is great too
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 07:05 AM
2

Awesome, more school shootings.
/r/MGTOW09/02/19 04:59 AM
3

Cool, I'm onboard with all of that and I still don't think I got an answer to my question. How is the remark that it's a free country relevant? Maybe I missed where wokein advocates banning it somewhere?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 04:20 AM
4

How is "it's a free country" an appropriate response here? Neither Smogs nor wokein are suggesting that it be prohibited
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 04:01 AM
12

women weren't having easy sex on tinder with short fat guys we were fed LIES!!!/s
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 02:13 AM
2

None of those are about the price of hookers being too expensive. What a joke of an attempt. You're starting to bore me Then why do they always comment about how "women will change once there's enough of us"? Why do you always comment about how your pussy "smells like aged feta cheese"? But seriously, unless you're willing to make a post in /r/mgtow suggesting this to prove me wrong, I'm done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 09:46 AM
1

It may not mean much from an internet stranger, but I respect you for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:54 AM
5

I just had to work hard for it this means you were conventionally unattractive, or a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:40 AM
2

they'll whine about how "expensive" she is No a few men are against giving women money for sex on principle, but the ones who aren't don't complain about the prices. Sorry to say, you're talking out of your ass here. She doesn't need the guy. The guy needs her. That's why so many gold diggers succeed, because they know how thirsty men can be when they're shallow. MGTOW are not at the negotiating table with women, unless we're talking about how many dollars she is getting to take it from behind. …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:36 AM
2

Whether it's a self fulfilling prophesy or not. It shows that if MGTOW tolerate a woman, it can only be the most shameless carousel riders who are willing to be entirely transparent and let the market determine the true value of her time. Not the self-declared worth of the typical carousel rider, which hides behind omission and plausible deniability.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:14 AM
7

Maybe I'm still ugly but I think I'm pretty average I'm going to sound like a huge asshole and I'm only saying it because I think it's the only mindset that doesn't lead to cognitive dissonance over the long run -- if you're having little/no success as a man or woman, you are conventionally unattractive. We don't decide how attractive we are, neither does what our friends tell us. It doesn't mean you can't change it, it doesn't mean you won't become more or less attractive because this is guaran…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 07:56 AM
5

This is only reflected in data collected on online dating sites. For example, on OKCupid black women are the least contacted women. Often this is attributed to men's bigotry, colorism, and men being weak and easily intimidated. However, women contacting asian men even less is just a preference, and one that must be respected at all costs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 07:36 AM
2

MGTOW will often comment on how prostitutes to be the only honest women. Generally they won't berate her for all the other men she's having sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 07:08 AM
3

Men don't have false rape allegation fantasies. I'll let you draw your own conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 05:59 AM
1

No need to deflect shaming for promiscuity might be considered a pretty big impact for women. On the other hand, men have to deflect shaming language around sexual incompetence (incel, virgin, etc), so you have a point that ultimately this "privilege" makes no difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 12:04 AM
-1

ok I'll give you that. Still a pretty short list for both.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 09:58 AM
3

True TRP doesn't exist. Successful men who ditch LTRs and commitment for fun rewarding relationships with women exist. They're not on /r/whatever
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 09:57 AM
9

The only glaring male privilege I'm aware of is not being called a whore if you manage to fuck a lot of women. The only glaring female privilege I'm aware of is ridiculously easy access to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 09:47 AM
4

they can't accept a woman for who she is, as a sexual being who is worthy of being loved If women don't love a man, it's the man's fault for not working on himself and becoming an awesome guy. But if men don't love a woman, it's the man's fault because he is unable to love women who are inherently worthy of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 09:31 AM
2

Don't be a boring and safe person, make her (a boring and safe person with a vagina) feel something.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 09:23 AM
1

Judging by how often this is said How often what is said? I was asking if there is a more general misconception or if you actually see people mentioning these specific sort of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 09:32 PM
1

I wouldn't expect you to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 09:31 PM
1

whoosh I was saying your statements were so true that they are indisputable
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 12:04 PM
4

do not get offered sex just by walking to their car Is this addressing some wider misconception, or do you think men literally believe things like this
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 12:00 PM
1

This is purple pill DEBATE. You're not supposed to just post a long string of facts, that leaves no room for debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 11:50 AM
0

It's like pulling teeth. For some reason she hangs a certificate for her DDs on the wall but honestly they don't look that big.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:53 AM
6

tfw she tells you to show emotion but you know she will mock you for it later with her frens https://media.giphy.com/media/DkAg2gPUqsKAg/giphy.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 05:43 AM
1

I fail to see why getting pumped and dumped is a problem. Stop prioritizing emotional connection. Easy peasy, problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 05:33 AM
6

this comment is hilarious given the username
/r/MGTOW05/02/19 07:59 PM
2

I know what he means, but the wording is off. It isn't their view of the world that is too perfect. The way you imagine how the world should be is too perfect (or idealistic) compared to how it actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 01:40 AM
1

Reported for being unfunny!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:48 PM
1

Im just saying the idea that you can spot these men and remove them from your own dating pool is a tad naive. Her argument was that mostly the desperate cis men would opt for trans women, which I can see as valid for now and the near future. And, it's not hard for women to spot desperate men. I think it will become nearly impossible to tell without demanding a form of ID, and very easy for normal guys to play-dumb if it means an easy lay. Of course, this is just speculation. Could be that surger…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:44 PM
9

It's not even that complicated. It's because niceness signals approval from the man towards a woman, as opposed to meanness. But this is insulting for a woman, for obvious reasons. Men just expect it to mean something special because they're naive. If the reality was that people were abusive assholes to women, one man being nice to them would have a completely different effect. Too bad for niceguys, that's not actually the world we live in. This also explains why these same men will often misint…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:20 PM
1

Still making women, in their 'short comings', the focus. It might make it the topical focus of the sentence, but that's not making them my point of origin. Ultimately, I'm remarking on the shortcomings for their inability to satisfy me AND I'm recognizing myself as the source of emotional well-being. That's clearly me in the point of origin.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:45 PM
1

You're just saying women aren't YOUR mental point of origin, but neither are you. What was it that made you think I'm not my own point of origin? You never explicitly said what it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 12:32 PM
1

You are asking women to fill that emotional emptiness because you yourself cannot do it. You mean like this? "I want a more fulfilling life that certain woman add" If you think about it, you do your own homework of taking care of your own emotional fulfillment, then there's no lack. What lack could women possibly have to fill that you want them to add? On the other hand, once you realize that the need cannot be filled by them, you liberate them from any of your demands, and you liberate yourself…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 11:24 AM
1

It's not realizing you can't have what you want, it's realizing that what you want can't be found there. It's a very important difference. "I want a mommy" and "I want a more fulfilling life that certain women would add" is a false dichotomy. Those aren't the only two possible options. And I consider this dichotomy to be a red herring from the original topic. I'm still fairly certain that even if you thought "I want a more fulfilling life that certain women would add" with the mindset that "My e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 11:07 AM
1

Do you think this belief would improve someone's mindset: "My experience is not full unless women like me"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 10:39 AM
1

These dudes have a great chance at having a full human experience with women that will like them the hidden premise here is that one's experience cannot be considered full unless it involves women that like him.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 10:28 AM
1

To be fair, the next highest rated non-disabled guy, I wouldn't rate him male model material either. In fact, none of the top rated guys are being top rated because women find them attractive but because their bios or photos evoke feelings of pity or hope for realities outside of their control. I don't know how much better it is that these guys with almost no hope are being the top-rated posts for men, rather than just decent looking guys who just haven't "found the right person". Contrast that …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 09:42 AM
3

eye contact blow jobs I've always liked to make her tear up during blowjobs but this is next level
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:54 AM
1

I could have sworn you were a guy. This is Q4W so I'm just giving you a hard time for my own amusement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:50 AM
1

I'm not comparing them as morally equivalent, I'm saying they're both roundabout ways of judgment. The effect of judgment is the same in both. This should be obvious Dear Lord please forgive them for they know not what they are doing
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:46 AM
2

I am not so sure about that Currently, thirsty men will message a pig woman with chest hair on pof asking for sex, according to one scientific study performed by the Institute of Bodybuilding Forums. In fact, we passed that milestone of male thirst years ago. As far as androids, that would just make it an even more weird place. It would just make things even more "no difference" for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:43 AM
5

Because pity. Without the wheelchair, that guy would be lost in a sea of glossed over 1 vote m4f posts
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:31 AM
5

When have you ever heard a woman claim that it's actually men who are playing life on hard mode, and that we should be proud of ourselves for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:23 AM
1

You can go a great length with a shitty personality but good looks. What would you say if I unironically, with a straight face cited Al Pacino as my proof that the inverse is also true yall will waste so much time just for the hope of mr right taking you into their life, I'm a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:19 AM
1

It's because I figured that women viewed other women as competition in things outside of the social pecking order and men. I suppose I was wrong about that, maybe trans women will never be considered women in the FSM as you said, and non-loser men might never consider them women, and everything will be fine. I'm being won over to your view, if not at least considering it as a realistic possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:15 AM
1

NO
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:10 AM
1

What the heck? I was agreeing with you
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:58 AM
-1

Of course. I didn't mean to imply that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:53 AM
1

hmm I think I hear a non-woman talking in my Q4W post...not sure though
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:52 AM
4

Straight men don't fuck transwomen because they look weirdly man-ish and have a penis, and they would never live it down if anyone found out. But believe me, the thirst in men is so strong that if they looked naturally femenine like a woman, sounded like a woman (not a fake girly voice) and it had a pussy, many men would fuck that in the blink of an eye. The future is going to be a weird place.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:49 AM
1

different kind of woman, fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:36 AM
1

LOL I'm actually very satisfied by the answers. Women admitting that trans women are not real women is greatly satisfying.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:32 AM
1

As a woman, I would only consider women to be my competition in regard to men. ok, but do you consider trans women to be women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:27 AM
1

I'm not interested in addressing anything here with you. Feel free to participate in my next Q4A thread though!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:19 AM
1

Well if it would be appropriate to hit a man in some situation then I think it's appropriate to hit a woman. I admire your dedication to equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:13 AM
3

Again, I consider many things in my life to be a competition with men, which don't involve women. In business, in social situations, in status. Many men are into BJJ, I know I'd be kind of mad if there were members of another hypothetical sex getting surgery and pummeling me. It would ruin the fun. One might argue that these competitions are ultimately for women, but being a MGTOW I have to strongly disagree. I can't answer what I think you should feel you should compete with women about. Maybe …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:09 AM
1

If the trans woman qualifies for either of these, then sure, why not? fair enough Belligerent made me think of a drunk person stumbling around being dumb. That's not what belligerent means. Belligerent just means hostile and aggressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:01 AM
1

My mindset is that almost everything I want, I am competing against other men for it (and sometimes women). The way I see it, women compete with other women over more than just men. But if you don't really think so, it would be impossible to convince you that you will be competing with trans women. Maybe your mindset is just different.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:57 AM
0

>Avoid hitting people at all costs The cost of avoiding someone who is being belligerent is your physical wellbeing, and possibly your life. Do you really mean this in such an absolute way? >Sure. They don't really exist anyway. Scholarships for women don't exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:52 AM
1

You're welcome
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:47 AM
1

you people cannot stop rehashing these stupid conversation Let me know when you make a good post.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:46 AM
1

Seems pretty consistent. The only thing that surprised me is that you assumed I meant sexual competition for men when I didn't actually mention it throughout my post. I wonder why.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:43 AM
-2

Why don't you have strong feelings about the combat sports question? Is the cognitive dissonance too much to deal with?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:40 AM
1

This is a question for women though. If you don't consider yourself to be a woman, you shouldn't be making a top-level comment -- that's what automod is for.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:31 AM
1

Yes, this seems to be the mainstream male opinion. I fall under this one too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:23 AM
7

I'd rather be judged just like men are judged right now. By looks AND personality. And if you don't have one you're either "nice but" or "cute but". And if you have neither you're a potential rapist. Why not? Take pride in playing the game on hard mode. If someone playing easy mode thinks they're better than you, you can laugh at them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 05:40 AM
2

It felt like smacking her face with the side of my huge cock and her smiling up at me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 05:03 AM
2

INTPs have some of the highest IQs This is an empty statement. There are hundreds of millions that fall into each Myers Briggs personality type. By the law of large numbers, all Myers Briggs personality types have some of the highest IQs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 04:38 AM
3

I was playing along with the troll and it went right over your head. I'm not joking about the diversity quotas though. Even though women aren't oppressed anymore, there a are already calls for diversity quotas in board rooms, representation in high paying jobs, leadership positions and so on. Won't be long before there are demands for equal representation in for Nobel Prize winners in the sciences.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 04:23 AM
1

it shows a lack of empathy (someone enduring sex with him and the fact that trafficking exists) You might as well just call him "a piece of shit". That's how you're describing him. But how hilarious would it be for me to be all like "Aww, is this a thing? :(" Let's try the same logic with abused women now: "I don't think an abused woman deserves to be alone but I certainly wouldn't date her. Not because I'm prudish, but because it shows a poor mental condition (someone voluntarily entering a rel…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 04:14 AM
2

fewer female Nobel Prize winners in sciences, fewer female inventors, fewer females extremely wealthy (unless they are inheriting it, usually from a wealthy male). It's not so much of a problem anymore though. We now have diversity quotas to make up for the IQ gap. Eventually it will be required to be 50-50 for everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 04:01 AM
1

It's a waste of time to think how things "should be, if only".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 02:48 AM
2

Imagine you post a realistic selfie, then the next day you post an augmented one and it gets 10x more likes. How would that not make anyone feel horrible? Makeup is the instagram filter of real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 08:25 PM
2

No, but for a very long time I was taking women at their word, without reading between the lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 08:16 PM
2

Hence, why when a women claims she can't find a "good" man, she isn't talking about a man with good quality/character.that would make a good husband/father to her kids. True, if anything a virtuous character tends to be secondary, assuming he meets the threshold of the "combination" of money, status and physical attractiveness. That's really how it seems to be. Oh well. This is exactly what I was referring to in another user in this post, you might have said it even better than I did The secret …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 06:36 AM
3

Tall (6ft plus), college degree, employed with blah blah you just fucked up. Cue the women who are just dying to shoot back with "well I don't need my man to {something you listed} and I think he's good. In fact so does everyone I know, so you're wrong!"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 06:27 AM
2

I see what's going on, we're mismatching definitions here. I'm just defining "good" by the arbitrary measures of what women will consider good. That's why I'm putting it in quotes. Women finding a "good" (as arbitrarily defined by them) are hard for them to find, as you said, it will be the thin, pretty girls snatching them up.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 06:16 AM
3

Really, an average woman though? Overweight, kind of plain/ugly looking. You think they have that many chances to land a good guy who would commit to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 05:59 AM
2

I volunteer to mod. I like the community and think self-education one of the best ways for a MGTOW to benefit his life. I read several books per year, mostly non-fiction. If I'm chosen, I'm willing to contribute my personal short write ups, reports on books that MGTOW might like, outlines, etc. (for free because I already do this for myself). I can also help get the ball rolling on "book of the month" discussions. ​ Books I read last year: Thinking Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman A Comprehensiv…
/r/MGTOW03/02/19 05:38 AM
9

The secret wish about "good man" is that he is also attractive. Part of what I used to hate about women were secret wishes like these, but it's possible to find humor in it enough to enjoy the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 04:43 AM
4

I didn't actually say guys didn't want good women, but that they don't really have the luxury of getting easy lays enough to scope out which of them are good and which of them aren't. Overall, I suspect the average guy has roughly as many options to get laid as an average woman gets a chance to be with a "good guy". Which is not that many options, for either of them. If you're a dude trying to get laid AND find a good woman who is actually attractive, you'll need a massive dose of luck given tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 03:58 AM
1

Agnostic but leaning towards belief in God. Not into any Christian, Islam, or Jewish belief. I don't believe in true love as you define it -- between individuals. I consider true love to be something only God could know. For me it's on the same level as omniscience, if it exists it's a divine-only quality not a human one. No, but I'm not interested in LTRs. I don't believe in an eternal soul of humans. To me that is also something only God could have. A spirit of humans might be something like i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 03:45 AM
5

That's just math, unless you believe there are more "good" women than "good" men. I believe that there are significantly more women looking for "good" men than the other way around, which makes it harder for them. But men have a hard enough time just trying to get laid. All in all, I think it balances itself out, but I realize I could be playing into a certain form of just-world fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 03:16 AM
38

To just get fucked it's not much effort. To find a "good man"TM to be with, I think women need to put much more effort. You could say they also have it easier, but it doesn't seem convincing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 02:49 AM
1

It's a good point, MGTOW's rationality begins with truly not needing female approval, whether you decide to keep having sex with women or not. But, TRP (who only act as if they don't need female approval) and standard strategy requires this, I'm explaining it in that context.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 02:14 AM
4

Yeah, at some point you really do become about as apathetic about women as you are about other things you once cared about (another one is politics for me). I can still discuss politics and women but the emotions are mostly absent. I rarely participate anymore in this sub, mostly just come here for the still hilarious memes.
/r/MGTOW02/02/19 06:18 AM
2

Resulting in them being called insecure, misogynistic, rude. It's completely rational of women to do this, and it's irrational for men to call women out. Certain women might love it when they're slim, young, and chaste, and attractive men express that they don't like fat, old whores. But these women maximize their social capital when they protect other women, and "call out" the men who express their preference. Why would she risk group exclusion for standing by one man, when there are 10 other e…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 03:48 AM
0

I might have gotten the wrong impression of what you were saying. Then again, it's not much of a "choice" if your distaste for social situations is stopping you from what you truly want. In a way that is what I'm questioning, particularly below: I'm saying that they have less experience because they CHOOSE to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 01:57 AM
1

This post contains a hidden premise that if introverted women are having fewer experiences with Chads, it is simply because they are "Not Like Other Women" based on the choices they make, and therefore All Women Are Like That is wrong. The truth is that introverted women are having fewer experiences with Chads because a) they are unable to or b) they are making a calculated decision to limit their N count for when it matters, just as extroverted women sometimes choose to do also. in short, all w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 01:48 AM
12

She wants reassurance that you won't leave her, but not doing this makes a man concerned that she might leave him. Can you see the irony here? Well if you know what's really going on here, it won't be ironic. Reflect on this: if she never asked you, when would the idea occur to you to offer her your commitment? That's the only time it's worth it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 05:55 AM
2

lol this is so funny. So what does being a virgin have to do Asian people again? Keep digging that hole
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 02:42 AM
2

The current culture creates the notion of perfect women educating men on how to better. most men seem to be ok with this, as long as they can prove they can be better and be rewarded with pussy for it. Women won't change until the men who actually matter (i.e attractive men) say "that's bullshit". And that won't ever happen because they also care about getting pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 02:38 AM
1

Nope, and how is that even relevant lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 02:21 AM
0

Hmm, then again...then again I don't fuck single moms that had multiple football sized masses shoved through there so I don't need kegels?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 02:18 AM
2

Isn't that what being a man is all about? There is no single "what a man is all about", but it can be if that's what you want. Some people think what a man is all about is martial arts, or working on a fishing boat, or becoming the best corporate lawyer. Who can say? As long as you know what you're getting into and it doesn't change your view, go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 02:13 AM
-1

Sometimes I notice women discuss kegels as a solution to tighten up their loose pussy, so it's probably more the girth of the things they shoved up there that stretched them out. #factbasedgynecology
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 02:02 AM
0

I'd judge it as RPed to refuse marriage with anything other than a virgin woman, but this comes down to your principles. If you 100% must get married it's way better to take the risk with this one, instead of a chick who has had several partners. But don't be naive about it. No one truly knows if she might have had a stretched out pussy that she got surgically rejuvenated. Single asian women hitting their 30s are often willing to try anything. Consider whether marriage is absolutely necessary to…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 01:37 AM
1

The way it goes is that women all fuck Chad, and but the betas willing to step in as providers and family men aren't there anymore. I'm not sure why a used up whore not getting a bailout for the rest of her life is a revenge fantasy, but there it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 08:56 PM
4

Here the real customer should be (partly) man Who you're marketing to tells you who your customer is. If what you're saying were true, you would see marketing of female products targeting their so-called male customers, aka "ask your girlfriend to get this lipstick". The fact that we don't see that kind of marketing at all, ever, indicates that men are not the customer at all, not even partly. I bet you most men wouldn't be able to name 3 makeup brands in their girlfriend's arsenal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 07:45 AM
2

of course it's bullshit it's just a joke. I was a young skinny dude and I never got much easy pussy. But compared to old fat guys I can see why they would think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 04:45 AM
7

A woman making a big deal out of this is waving a huge red flag and is doing you a favor. It's a sign that she will assume maliciousness and be a pain in the ass over minor inconveniences. Leaving the toilet seat down to see her reaction should be her first shit test
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 04:30 AM
10

Sometimes they have whiny attitudes about wishing they could hav a gf and attack MGTOW about "coping" which obviously isn't taken well here. On the other hand, their memes can be really good. I'm on the fence about them.
/r/MGTOW27/01/19 06:12 AM
2

I was poking around happy bachelors forum the other day, but it doesn't seem like you can register or even browse the site. Is it inactive?
/r/MGTOW27/01/19 03:35 AM
1

Deep Peace - Bill Douglas Do The Evolution - Pearl Jam
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 10:23 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nRb9-12Qig
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 06:03 PM
1

It's shocking because deep down we feel cheaters are not good, but we all consider ourselves as good. But if you admit what you mentioned, there's a very unsettling contradiction. It would mean either we all pieces of shit or this is all amoral. And if it's amoral, then even if it were to happen to us, our feelings of betrayal would be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 06:53 AM
7

He's correct. If the variability is wide, the average human height has little to do with it. When the average male height becomes 7 feet tall, the 6 foot tall guys will be sad about being short. Short males will exist as long as there are visibly noticeable height differences in men, which means probably forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 05:31 AM
8

I am an average male, and my experience up until now has been little else than average male experience. But you're making my point. If women thought like men, they would be happy as fuck with their awesome situation. We would have good reason to resent how easy they have it. The fact that their situation doesn't make them happy, is amazing to me. It's almost like they're also supposed to be dissatisfied no matter how good it gets for them. Is it really not that mindblowing?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 05:16 AM
11

Why does everything uncomfortable about women have to be framed almost like a personal grievance? Yes women are primally attracted to taller men. This is not good news for them. Even worse, it's not something they can consciously change. Think of it this way: in the US men taller than 6' is around 20% of the population. About half of them are ugly/weird looking, that leaves a majority of women who like tall men vying hard for 10% of men. Of those 10%, assuming they're all available, a good numbe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 04:54 AM
3

People can't choose what they find attractive. For example, I like nice round ass and a small waist. I can't help it, and it wouldn't change anything if someone called me a "fart sniffer" I would still like a shapely butt. Calling women gold diggers doesn't stop them from being the way they are, it just makes some of them deny it or repress it. It's built-in, almost instinctual. As the African American philosopher poet Nayvadius Damun Wilburn (known as Future) so eloquently states, "We never gon…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 12:32 AM
4

Ah, I tried to edit in the Chuck E Cheese part to make it clear I was being facetious. Guess it didn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 10:33 PM
3

This is probably true of women of average and below average personal financial success. As other posters have mentioned, there's a growing number of women with high degrees working in highly specialized fields. More often than not these high powered career women prefer humble men, like construction workers, guys who work at Chuck E Cheese, store clerks at Walmart and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 10:22 PM
28

The label "gold digger" is a pejorative term, but women having a strong preference towards wealthier men isn't leading us to anything new. It's has always been the norm, and even more so in tougher economic times. Average men don't compete with hypergamy, they just become settle down provider cogs of the hypergamy wheel after average women are done having their fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 10:05 PM
1

I don't really think there's much truth that a guy approaching makes him a loser, and I say that from a MGTOW lens we tend to have some of the most extreme judgments against men approaching women. If you really think there's a lot of truth to it, we're less at odds with each other than you might be with wokein, since she's criticizing that view. I'd be happy just moving on tbh, there isn't much to debate between us
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 09:15 PM
1

Sure, but hardly anyone thinks they're losers because they're approaching. As you said, whether he'd be considered a loser or not depends on context. Saying we that we do, as in ‘If you have to approach you’re a loser!’, is a mischaracterization of both sides on PPD. OK so you are saying that women DO initiate and DO feel attraction without the guy making the first talk/move, right? Sometimes, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 08:44 PM
1

For this particular discussion: debating wokein's false view that men on PPD judge others who initiate as "losers", and also the false view that women don't feel attraction nor initiate for high value men who haven't yet approached them. Both of these are demonstrably false. The point is to show that they're false. Also the idea that these realities are somehow "a difficult pill to swallow" -- no they're not. We already know we have to talk to women to get laid, nothing hard about accepting that…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 07:01 PM
2

Here's another truism: people will discuss whatever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 06:34 PM
2

You're right, it's a truism not a platitude (edited that in). People in social situations start talking to one another. It's that simple, unless you're a shut in. Great, and this claim adds no useful information to the discussion. It's obvious people in social situations talk to one another, it doesn't need to be said. You might as well say people in a swimming pool move their arms.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 06:28 PM
3

People in social situations start talking to one another. why do you bother with truisms like these? Are you claiming that women initiate equally to men they're attracted to? Because if so, I think /u/wokein might have a bone to pick with you on that. No one sane is eyeballing the whole room and then walking over with some stupid pickup lines Another strawman
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 06:22 PM
4

The most "beautiful" women are only a very slight standard deviation above average and the most "ugly" women are only a bit lower. Holy god this is so not true. Take away women's makeup and you will see the actual huge variability in women's beauty and feminine facial features. Without makeup, it's roughly the same for men and women because it's the same gene combinations, just different expressions of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 06:13 PM
4

They probably think women think like pornstars In making this statement, you're falling into the same trap of imputing how they think. Regardless, it seems like a tangential subject to your OP
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 06:02 PM
5

It's not that hard to swallow it unless you really had something vested in it being another way. Men don't really have to swallow a pill when it comes to learning that women generally don't approach, it's pretty obvious they don't. "If you have to approach you’re a loser!" is a strawman I think the real hardest pill to swallow is the fact that we're going to get old and die someday, it kind of makes this whole "what's attractive to women" talk kind of silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 05:55 PM
3

the vagina is moist hehe the small dick hole lmao men pass shit onto women more per penetration yeah, this guy (10+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 04:58 PM
5

If it were transfers from prior generations, the distribution would be roughly equal for hetero men, but it's not. The "hoes running around in uni" is a strawman. I only state the facts: there is no sex recession for women, and their chlamydia rates rising to record levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 04:35 PM
19

No sex recession for women, except for their record cases of Chlamydia they're doing great! you go girls
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 03:38 PM
2

This is pretty great to read about someone going against the grain, I respect that. Sounds like it's going well, so I'm glad it's working out for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 12:54 AM
1

I know it happens all the time, but as far as the numerical proportions... you kind of proved my point. 1000 : 75
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 09:01 PM
1

I have one friend who is an ultra chad who gets DMs to fuck chicks he doesnt even Same here. I'm sometimes amazed at how graphic these thots can be in their DMs. They could write porn headlines for a living.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 08:56 PM
1

I know it happens all the time, but as far as the numerical proportions out of a set of all approaches, women asking men out will be a tiny fraction. One bottleneck is the low frequency of guys that are hot enough to inspire initiative from women, and another is the low frequency of women who have the confidence to follow through on that initiative.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 08:43 PM
4

She's more likely to date/sleep with losers if that's the main type of guy approaching her. And if she's the one doing the approaching (rare), then you have to ask yourself what's keeping "good men" from taking the initiative to ask her out. The only way this makes sense is if a woman is shooting down good men's advances out of low self esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 08:08 PM
3

Lovely bit of hamstering here
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 04:37 PM
4

You have it hilariously backwards. It's not the prizes who compete for contestants, it's the contestants who compete for prizes. If women are competing for you, you're a prize. If men are competing for you, you're a prize. Most men are treated and behave like contestants, because they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 04:18 PM
1

damaskrose did. We're in her chain of comments so I thought you were defending it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 03:37 PM
19

You got off the coke carousel
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 06:25 AM
1

To say most women are married by age 27 could be considered misleading when it's really about half and half.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 06:13 AM
4

Huffing nitrous oxide while posting on PPD is bad for you!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 05:40 AM
3

Last guys finish nice Shy face is insulting. Facesitting hussy: nil. (anagrams)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 05:31 AM
1

What a shame
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 05:11 AM
2

The point of the anecdote isn't to provide evidence that women eventually wise up to playboys by a certain age (I honestly didn't think I needed any), but to emphasize that I'm not basing it entirely from what I've seen online (which is becoming a common tactic to dismiss what someone says on PPD lately). I could have left it out completely and the point would be no different, but then I'd be leaving myself open to that tactic. On the topic of anecdotal contradiction, it's just a lazy way of jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 04:57 AM
1

I did say it's an inflection point, not an asymptote. There will be variability in how long everyone waits to get married, but even if you had met him at 27 and married him 5/6 years later, it falls pretty close to the window I laid out. Even those at the end of the window at 33, might be getting married at 38 (although I'd expect they probably wouldn't wait so long in that case)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 04:51 AM
2

The answer presupposes that removing the desire to be with someone would lead to a worse/more flat quality of life than being with someone. So obviously everyone's saying no.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 03:22 AM
8

But then you would just poop out a bullet a few hours later. How does that change anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 03:13 AM
2

The people who really do need a class are off doing other things. You need a little self awareness to wonder if you might be lacking in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 03:03 AM
3

Which part sounds more like hell to you, the people or the self awareness?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 02:55 AM
3

People interested in self-awareness (allegedly).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 02:43 AM
2

AF/BB is fake sounds like an interesting CMV topic, not sure how one would convincingly defend it though
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 02:21 AM
3

They were geeks and nerds and yes, still assholes. I really wonder about some of the strange assumptions here. Even if it were purely on assumption (which it wasn't), it would seem stranger to assume that it was actually asshole betas that were causing drama and heartbreak in their lives. Regardless, I don't care so much about which particular group but rather the timing of the change in attitude from "done with those guys", whichever ones "those guys" may be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 01:58 AM
1

Fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 01:14 AM
9

lol "my weird little meditation group"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 12:34 AM
2

Why is that, I wonder. Might as well cast a stone on it also.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 12:24 AM
3

How about you turn the mirror on yourself. There is literally no one in this whole thread mocking anyone, you're just being a whiny
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 12:11 AM
4

Most women are already married by that age. https://flowingdata.com/2017/11/01/who-is-married-by-now/ Thanks for bringing that up. 27 seems to be right around the inflection point where the majority goes from never married to married once. I'll leave it up to you to interpret.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 12:03 AM
1

You probably get enough of d bags on Reddit mocking your retarded comments, so I can totally understand not wanting to pile it on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 11:52 PM
2

Pleasant chat, thanks for your thoughts old bean.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 11:40 PM
2

I think most who have it, have it before they pair off in their early-mid 20s. I'm not sure if you agree that the cutoff for abandoning these bad choices tends to be your 30s, but it seemed like you did. Regardless, I have no problems agreeing to the above, it's worth mentioning even though it wasn't the core of my argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 11:37 PM
2

Don't think I'm agreeing with you that most women have this realization at 27-33; I don't Thats not even the case I'm making. I was saying that the women who do have this realization seem to have it at around 27-33 at the latest. As you said, the ones who don't past a certain age, probably never learn.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 11:23 PM
1

it just so happens that later is that cluster of ages around 30 Seems valid. Would you say it's mostly coincidence that it happens to be right around the time their SMV starts to decline?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 11:18 PM
1

Maybe so! I think it's a good point. It could simply be coincidence that it's right around the ages that RPs consider "the wall". Somewhat of a tragic one because RPs won't want to have relationships with them. Or maybe serendipitous, since women say the don't like RPs anyway! Win win I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 11:14 PM
1

That isn't a selection bias. I'm not saying all women (or most women) undergo this shift, I'm saying that of the women who do have this shift in mental attitude, it seems to be at around the ages of 27-33. I used the example from my life to illustrate that it isn't just a Tinder observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 11:06 PM
1

Why don't women ever seem to learn that they don' like Chads at the age of 45? or 60? Is that selection bias also?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 10:47 PM
1

Could you expand on this? Selection bias in what sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 10:37 PM
0

Even better, I would urge her to date that nice Blue Pill boy who dotes on her. Reverse psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 11:11 PM
4

Of course you don't. Go ahead. I'm not your dad or your psychotherapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 11:02 PM
5

In this case, it would ensure that you don't compartmentalize your identity, which is a defense mechanism that tends come with all kinds of psychological problems. That's a much worse thing to suffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 10:59 PM
3

Even if you got away with it. Better to accept the consequences of your bad life choices than to live a lie, but it's your life. And you have every right to continue making more bad life choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 10:36 PM
9

It won't help. People find out and then you get the reputation of being a lying whore and once that happens you're not fooling anyone. Here's what might help: if you really value relationships like you say you do, don't get fucked by 20+ men and only then try to settle down. It's really not that hard. Alternatively, only fuck the men that you approach and initiated (LOL yeah right).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 09:59 PM
4

Take it from me, a guy who has fucked many times You're some random person on an internet message board online making claims of experience and wisdom. If I take what you say with a grain of salt, especially on unsolicited advice, please don't be offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 05:45 PM
1

Only two political ideologies that are permitted Socialism or National Socialism?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 05:33 PM
2

Is that the only thing he has going for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 04:43 PM
2

>Women get with and stay with the beta guy Yes, beta guy will stay with them and provide these things, RPs just use them for initial attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 03:25 PM
2

What an astute observation
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 03:19 PM
2

He did do that
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 02:31 PM
5

One of my favorite and most insightful quotes from that crazy genius Theodore Kaczinski: "Technology has been creating new problems for society far more rapidly that it has been solving old ones. Thus it will take a long and difficult period of trial and error for the technophiles to work the bugs out of their BraveNew World (if they ever do). In the mean time there will be great suffering. So it is not at all clear that the survival of industrial society would involve less suffering than the br…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 07:03 AM
4

Gender relations would improve, men would think they're in paradise, everything else would go to shit, and men would be blamed for it then gender relations would be bad again except it's 10 times worse because now you have 10 women nagging you at the same time to fix it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 05:30 AM
1

Reflection: I know I should be meditating more, but I don't want to because it would increase my compassion for the mindless thots on PPD. Reading another person's thoughts to yourself can be just about the most irritating thing of all. But they're just thoughts, so what's the big deal anyway. What do I have to gain from correcting another person's wrong thoughts if I don't actually care about them?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 05:04 AM
3

I was doing some thinking lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 03:51 AM
0

Feminists lie about it and claim it is really egalitarianism I don't think even male feminists would be dumb enough to actually believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 02:03 AM
1

It's amazing how many problems not getting married solves. Now I can add "lesbian Chinese lady won't divorce rape me" to the list. Sorry to hear about your relative, what a trip!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 01:09 AM
3

Accepting LMR is something that I completely disagree with TRP on. When I'm meeting someone, I always always always have the conversation about "never do anything unless it's a hell yes". It's really something I believe. Often they agree emphatically and say they're the same way. If she's not dumb as a rock, she'll realize that she has no LMR option. She will know that "Wait / I never do this / I don't know if I should" will mean no to me. Probably also why I haven't slept with as many girls as …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 12:56 AM
2

That's meaningless to me. You don't need to convince me, I said I'll just take your word for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 12:49 AM
1

I'll take your word for it. She'll know deep down if you're telling the truth anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 12:14 AM
3

Had a chance and took it? As a man, you have to make your chances. I'm never going to "have" 20 chances that I can take just like that. But I'm not mad about it, it's fair game. I have to work for it but at least no one calls me a whore the more people I fuck. Others get to pick and choose until something strikes their fancy, but the more they get fucked the more of a whore they are. The world is fair in my eyes. There are men who approach, pursue, initiate sex and then on top of it certain peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 12:10 AM
4

Yes, I would.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 11:47 PM
8

I feel sad for you. I'm like a robot when it comes to women trying to shame me, it just doesn't register. My count is 7, I'm a guy (obviously).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 11:40 PM
9

If she was a slut with 20 other dudes and she's willing to give it to you too, you tell her what she wants to hear and then you PnD her ass. 20N count girl is worthless in a relationship, but she'll try to switch to the good girl act so she can trap you. Get what you want from a whore without getting suckered into a relationship with her. I didn't want to say it because it sounds like you're maybe going through something, but there it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 11:32 PM
8

That's the only answer you're going to get.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 11:24 PM
8

Yes, it's NEITHER of what you listed. It's because you freely gave other men more and better things, but you want new guy to be satisfied with less. Here, watch this it might help illustrate what I mean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg basically the men are saying: I want the grape too, fuck your stinking cucumber
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 11:20 PM
15

It's a different thing thing entirely having a sexual freak with a high N count and then suddenly deciding you "don't do those things anymore". There's a much bigger problem here than her morals or her likelihood of cheating. Mainly -- that you were willing to provide better quality of intimacy to other men but for him, you won't. You'd have pretty much the same reaction if a guy had a reputation for doing sweet things for his gfs, and being romantic, taking them out on special occasions. But wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 11:12 PM
1

That's not always a bad thing. But if you make the conscious decision to fight an uphill battle, at least own your decision rather than moaning about it every step of the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:39 PM
5

It's true that more women meet their own requirements, but you're only thinking of your requirements as if they were universal. Any eligible man out there who meets your requirements, I can almost guarantee that you are failing in the looks requirement that he probably has of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:36 PM
1

You seem to be doing great in other areas. Maybe try not focusing on what men like, or marriage anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:33 PM
15

The expression 'rule of thumb' apparently meant that a man could not beat his wife with a stick thicker than his thumb And then there are some in the Age of Information who are still being long-distance trolled all the way from the 18th century. "A modern folk etymology holds that the phrase derives from the maximum width of a stick allowed for wife-beating under English law; this belief may have originated in a rumored statement by the eighteenth-century judge Sir Francis Buller that a man may …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:17 PM
1

No paternal gene.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:07 PM
6

The point being that you could max these requirements and it wouldn't make much difference in making eligible men wanting to marry you. If I'm coming across like an asshole it's because you sound like you need a serious red-pilling on how we men actually are, without the bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:05 PM
4

Right, and she was also smart to stay focused on her career instead of trying to find a marriage oriented man to start a family with. Who says you can't find fulfillment in your own material success and influence?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:40 PM
55

How could anyone expect feminism, an ideology that's biased in favor of women to not have biases in favor of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:06 PM
5

Reminder: 7 is also a number. Sorry to break it to you, but for the most part yes 7s and up are what men are busting their ass for, not 4s. If she's cute, men with their shit together will often to overlook stuff like debt, no emergency fund, not having a car or a well paying job. These are mostly FEMALE requirements of men. Sometimes occasional drugs isn't a big deal to them. According to many PPD threads, they'll overlook high n counts because after all, "it's only a problem if you're insecure…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 08:19 PM
8

So why did other women snatch one up, but not you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 08:08 PM
1

I'm not really trying to discredit anything you were saying. It just reminded me of that comic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 08:07 PM
6

If you were her friend you would tell her the truth -- it's her looks. Just do it in a nice way so she doesn't cry.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 07:57 PM
4

engineers AND family men!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 07:45 PM
2

4) is above a 4/10 in looks This is what's fucking you up. Eligible guys don't want to be stuck with a 4/10 (nor a 5/10 and often not even a 6/10) for the rest of their life unless they get in their late 50s and they're terrified of dying alone. Just give it a few more years or decades, they'll come around.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 06:41 PM
1

I'm ok with it. It's fascinating to watch the shit we humans do. Wish I had David Attenborough to narrate it for me. Or maybe Bob Saget.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:52 PM
4

I was just having fun with the bluepill cliche that men shouldn't get married if they're "paranoid" about the consequences of divorce. But overall I agree, there's nothing in marriage for men (and less and less for women these days).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:42 PM
2

Is that the reason they're getting married? How about you actually think.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:32 PM
16

I know SO MANY women who meet the above criteria, Men who have their life together get married, otherwise they're sleeping around because they don't give a shit if a woman meets her own criteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:01 PM
1

This is why I don't vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 04:07 PM
2

don't y'all men want more for your kids than the basics? All y’all men are proving why women get custody. Honestly if we're divorced the kid isn't mine anymore. I'd want to just bash their brains on the side of a tree like a chimp and throw the lifeless body back to the mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 04:04 PM
4

I doubt anyone expects shaming women online will work on women in real life. Here's where the real effect comes in -- men (and women) talking to each other online, comparing notes, and then going out in the real world and interacting with the opposite gender with all of this in mind. I know for one I have siblings, nieces, sisters in law, aunts, my friends SOs, women in my daily life etc. I go on /r/MGTOW and /r/PPD and I see these people in a completely different light. When my niece was seeing…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 03:39 PM
17

If you're so paranoid that your husband will cheat on your with multiple women, maybe you shouldn't be getting married in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 09:37 PM
2

Loving this New Age approach to Honey do's and Duty Sex for married people
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 09:30 PM
4

If all else fails just drink ipecac
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 09:12 PM
7

Is that what you imagine typically ends up happening? Social media cures plain Becky from feelings of inadequacy?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 08:45 PM
1

Is it, for ugly women? Could be, I was just making the point that regardless who it's from, the end result is pretty much an inflated sense of self worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 08:27 PM
5

It's not new, but social media has become an additional channel for these unattractive women to receive a false sense of reality. Before you'd have to call them on the phone or see them in person. But today, social media allows you to send the same fake message to 10 of your ugly friends from the comfort of your home -- hence, oversaturation as OP put it. I don't see anything wrong with it, I'm just observing what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 08:20 PM
8

Even below average women are getting 100+ likes from other women, which inflates her worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 08:17 PM
1

That one counts for me
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 06:06 PM
3

Among the famous people in entertainment that got metoo'd, there were at least some that were handsome weren't there? I didn't follow it that closely, but it would be enough proof for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 05:55 PM
1

Breaking news: Men are being caught cheating with sex dolls https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfj6Zrnfi74
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 04:40 PM
1

Whew, I'm sure glad we have the government to help us figure out this complicated maths!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 01:18 PM
1

waking me up to the true nature of men, dispelling my idealism, and forcing me to change my ways. Yes, I don't call it the female redpill I call it the wall. It does do everything you listed here, especially understanding the true nature of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 12:45 PM
0

I've heard tell that you must insert how you are MGTOW into every comment on PPD Yeah MGTOWs on PPD don't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 12:35 PM
1

It has never been a problem for me, but literally the only time someone uttered "be a man" to me was from my female roommate who expected me to tolerate her mess. It was so bizarre that I bust up laughing. Later I found out that was the phrase her mom used to control the older brothers and she had probably learned it from her.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 12:26 PM
1

That's wonderful, but my point stands
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 12:06 PM
1

for those who doubt, here is the proof https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkRoCE8J0Mc
/r/MGTOW20/01/19 02:39 AM
3

She would be a ... *head explodes* She's a player if she was the one seducing the women, the ones who waited to be seduced would be sluts, possibly even hoebags.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 02:01 AM
3

I'm not saying that all "nice and average" guys get friendzoned, but it's demonstrably true practically all friendzoned guys are nice and average, if that make sense. It's like not all rectangles are squares, but all squares are rectangles sort of thing. Girls just don't friendzone attractive men or jerks. For RPs, if you're not average and you're not nice, at least you're guaranteeing you will keep yourself out of the friendzone. Being average and kind of a selfish jerk won't necessarily get yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 01:35 AM
1

I've always felt like my chances with a girl were far more defined by how physically attractive I am to the girl and how funny/interesting/confident I am ... I can't be more than 6 and probably am 5.something) ... No I don't just have low standards Something's not adding up here. But regardless, it just sounds like you've managed to make what would amount to a mediocre situation for most men, but you're satisfied with it. In the end that's all that matters. I'm sure there are many others out the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 12:33 AM
2

Agreed, I've always considered people who blame society's problems on an ethnic minority that's been persecuted throughout history to be a bit out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 12:19 AM
2

Not sure, it's something I've seen conspiracy theorists do. edit: apparently anti-jewish conspiracists
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 12:12 AM
2

Does this mean the middle class won't erode but it will consist of families because it always has?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 11:36 PM
2

Things would balance themselves out. For example even though birth rates would plummet, diaper companies would remain in business from women shitting themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 11:10 PM
2

Well we are speculating on the future so I suppose it could swing either way. I imagined it would be a MGTOW Jihad against the Cult of Thot, but for what it's worth it was a tongue-in-cheek comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 11:00 PM
3

So a thot jihad? Hmmm
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 10:47 PM
1

Cool. I'm more curious what Atlas has to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 10:36 PM
3

Not upper class automatically means lower class? Are you predicting a complete erosion of the middle class in the future?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 10:32 PM
1

I wonder if they brought out all these perspectives intentionally to lower the population (((they)))
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 10:26 PM
3

I never said boomers had a monopoly on being clueless, half of millenials are retarded too join the club.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 10:17 PM
3

spoken like a true boomer
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 10:11 PM
1

No shit
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 08:58 PM
0

Most women are not crazy bitches, but men are having enough of these experiences such that "crazy ex-girlfriend" is a familiar trope. Can you try putting 2 + 2 together by yourself please?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 08:53 PM
0

I guess it's just that most women really are crazy bitches then. Because assuming most men can vet effectively, and assuming most women are not crazy bitches, this complaint would be bewildering to anyone hearing it (hint: it did not begin in the 1990s with the modern internet)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 08:14 PM
5

most men do have standards and do vet Be honest. Most men are thirsty chumps they don't have the luxury of exercising standards, otherwise they would be doing it. Women don't exercise standards because they have "better self control" but because they know a guy who meets her standards will eventually show up.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 07:59 PM
1

I'm only asking you to consider what you already know, that we men aren't attracted to women in their entirety. But as soon as you begin to label certain widespread feminine behaviors as unattractive, the way women so casually do of men, it begins to feel like self-sabotage. Why? Because while a woman can swear off men with all kinds of unattractive qualities, it's not practical for us to do so. So instead, knowing our situation, we end up pondering this as if it were a sort of existential or me…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 04:34 PM
2

If you loved women, you would love this. It wouldn't vex you, it would delight you. The real problem is unwise men don't reflect about precisely what it is they find attractive in women. They think, well I like female forms and feminine mannerisms, so I like women. And then when certain realities about women manifest in their life they get confused, they ask questions like these.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 04:15 PM
0

Again, you just don't know how to get an emotional reaction out of someone. It has everything to do with what's important to them, and nothing to do with the thickness of their skin. This is beside the point, if you think a person flaunting their bitchiness is a "graceful" response, congratulations I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 10:50 AM
2

in the end, sexual dissatisfaction is one degree of separation from what is really just emotional dissatisfaction. There's no way to say you're fully emotionally satisfied, but sexually dissatisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 02:49 AM
2

Almost 40 minutes? Where's the important part?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 12:20 AM
0

Defiantly agreeing with honest criticisms leveled against you is graceful? It's because you're not communicating with rhetoric that bitches understand. To them it just means "I think you're a bitch", very easy to brush off. Try "everyone is starting to think you're a bitch, even (person they like)" you'll often get a more honest response out of them. tl;dr you don't know how to talk to bitches
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 12:19 AM
0

I think if you offered a girl a thoughtful, specific reason why she's a slut or a bitch, her response wouldn't exactly be a graceful one either. Point being that what you label a person to be, can be just as important as how you label them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 10:27 PM
2

Seems reasonable, but you never made a case for why it is good or what makes it a good thing. Just that it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 10:01 PM
5

Seriously, what a pointless question.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 07:37 PM
1

I'm a guy and guys can't have these kinds of requirements, so yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 07:31 PM
1

I'm 5'9 without heels, so yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 07:27 PM
1

Ok then what was the "old way" that you were approaching this? Did you mean a new way for the people who did watch it to approach it?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 04:43 PM
1

Huh, voice over? The audio is just the 1987 Def Leppard classic "Pour some Sugar on Me"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 04:04 PM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjqDsR7dQ1g How are you going to approach this in a new way if you don't watch it?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 03:22 PM
0

This doesn’t describe any of the women I run with Attractive women that men really want to get with can afford to behave in ways that makes men call them shallow bitchy whores. It seems this is the default, just like being a selfish, arrogant womanizer tends to manifest in guys with limitless options. I can believe that the women you run with aren't like that at all, but with that information I can deduce that they are just average looking. They're probably being overlooked by RPs except the mos…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 03:15 PM
8

I can certainly see why you feel that way. Thank you for sharing your innermost thoughts and I'm glad we could make this connection of understanding your perspective. I'm here for you if you need to talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 10:40 AM
1

she is getting waxed, her hair done, planning her outfit, applying makeup to get ready to see you. Since I can presume she's doing these things especially "for me", I should have to subsidize her pussy and asshole waxings too because she was just getting it ready for me later that night. Who wants dessert?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 10:25 AM
0

Having toxic femininity acknowledged by the public as a concept is only practical if you're hoping to regulate female behavior. Regulating female behavior should be left to traditionalist men who think they need a female partner and a family, God help them. MGTOW don't really need the society's agreement about anything, be it AWALT, toxic femininity, or whatever else. It would be of no practical benefit to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 12:34 AM
1

What benefit would women in positions of power have from talking about toxic femeninity?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 12:19 AM
2

Not sure which is the correct definition, but it's just bizarre to me that the people immediately rush to regulating their behavior as a means to help men. It's as if to say whatever problem you're facing as a boy or man, it's because other men have turned you into toxic person and that needs to be fixed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 05:10 PM
1

We could both agree that it did have the immediate effect of alienating men. As far as the overall results in the long-term, we'll see.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 03:13 PM
2

It's brilliant marketing. It was not a mistake -- they did their research and they detrmined that outrage and being polarizing was the right response, and there's a very good chance that the "backlash" was exactly what they had been hoping for. PG might see 0.00001% less revenue but they know people are talking about Gillette again for weeks and going viral like this will pay off long after this blows over. They learned well from the Pepsi commercial that pissed people off too, and from Chick Fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 12:27 PM
1

Am I the only one who read this in a female Borat voice?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 11:01 PM
2

For what it's worth we also make fun of them with memes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 10:56 PM
3

Theres a bluebird in my heart that wants to get out but Im too tough for him
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 09:56 PM
1

That's a game of Russian Roulette of its own.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 09:53 PM
1

Not necessarily "breaking frame" as long as he's honest about doing it mostly for her sake. If he's smart about it, he would know exactly what he's getting that makes it worth it for him. Even though don't subscribe fully to TRP I do lean red, and I think they encourage being overall dominant only because TRP as a sexual strategy takes into account that women into being dominated are the significant majority. Even if it's not a one size fits all solution in every single case, observations and pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 09:05 PM
3

you don't always have to fuck her hard, in fact sometimes that's not right to do
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 05:40 PM
1

No interest in kink as it is right now. I've mostly considered primarily as a way for women to explore their sexual fetishes. Whatever kink you have as a woman, you will find hundreds of willing male participants but it's not at all the other way around. I bet even if you posted a poop eating kink as a woman you'd get some guys convincing themselves it might be fun. As for the men, they're either lucky to have an overlap, but I suspect a lot of them are trying to make a compromise, you see this …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 04:50 PM
5

When you mention "wanting to help and not lead" it comes off as wanting the perks of being dependent/submissive, and also the perks of being a fellow leader who is on a level position relative to them. Not to say it's not possible, I'm sure you can find someone who will tolerate that, but in their mind they will know.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 01:35 PM
5

It's not individual to a great extent. What you mean is that you found the most attractive East African and South Asian boys attractive. Then, you found the most East Asian men attractive. And now you're more open to attractive men of other ethnicities. This isn't beauty standards changing, it's the ethnicities of conventionally attractive men that you were flitting between. Not that there's anything necessarily wrong with it. There's been somewhat of a push to declare unhealthily obese women at…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 11:40 PM
5

It won't be the 70% of the already undesired men who will be competing with Chadbots. It will be the human Chads, and they'll be laughable competition for them. Human Chads are physically attractive AND have a story behind them, this is why women read erotica and don't watch porn nearly as much as men do. The world is truly fucked when we make sexbots that appeal to Chads, also, much much easier to accomplish than sexbots that appeal to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 08:57 PM
3

yeah what if Russian roulette got you a bunch of trivial legal perks that you don't actually need? that would definitely sweeten the deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 11:00 PM
2

I used to do it with SOs and still am thoughtful with family. Don't get me wrong, it is nice to see them happy, but most of the actual value comes from it making them more endeared to you and having your thoughtfulness recognized. If we don't get these things in return, we call that person "ungrateful".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 02:03 PM
3

Makeup is a mask for insecurity and feelings of inadequacy. The way it's used in the west, where it's hard to tell apart where the makeup ends and the actual face begins. It is deceptive and misleading. Fair game though. The women who use it to compensate the most also suffer the most as they get old. I bet you it's not a fun lesson.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 05:46 AM
3

Psychiatry is an actual medical practice though. This is psychology which has almost become a a form of liberal arts lately.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 12:40 PM
1

It's from here "Samrara is without discoverable beginning. A first point is not discerned of beings roaming and wandering on hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving ... which is more: the stream of tears that you have shed as you roamed and wandered on through this long course, weeping and wailing because of being united with the disagreeable and separated from the agreeable -- this or the water in the four great oceans?"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 12:33 PM
1

The number one thing that helped me was to stop watching porn, the second was probably negotiating to work from home.
/r/MGTOW13/01/19 11:40 AM
4

Pleasant, but not particularly masculine. He's 6 years older. I made it clear I wasn't looking for hookups. He was ok with that. He seemed concerned that I wouldn't like his body or amount of body hair. Your account of this is hilarious, but good luck trettles
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:12 AM
0

Actual cheating or admission of it. I would recruit my friends to help test a girl's loyalty as soon as she wants to make it serious. Get your good looking successful Chad friends to do it, not some hook nosed uber driver in a tank top.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:06 AM
2

Poor alpha? Isn't that guy the former mayor of Washington DC though?
/r/MGTOW13/01/19 08:53 AM
3

The map is not the territory therefore everyone lives in a bubble. Some even argue that there is nothing that exists independent of these bubbles, but that makes for one hell of a slippery slope (no pun intended)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 07:34 AM
1

My account got banned by reddit admins for making fun of Jeff Bezos' divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 07:11 AM
6

> This is based on conversations with very drunk men lmao it's even funnier now
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 07:09 AM
15

How much of PPD is a result of someone having an argument with their SO and they just come here for their emotional outburst, I wonder.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 06:51 AM
2

Why not just be consistent and treat all people as cheaters, liars, and manipulators (because they all are to varying degrees).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 05:17 AM
1

I think there's a user named tretties or something who's a big fat self-proclaimed femcel
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 09:18 PM
2

What could go wrong?
/r/MGTOW12/01/19 08:36 PM
1

the top posts are more commonly memes now, with not as many stories on the main page as a couple of years ago. I think it's good to remind us not to take any of the shit in the world too seriously.
/r/MGTOW12/01/19 08:27 PM
2

what are the distinctions then, leaving out your weird cultural assessments I already referred to their definitions as evidence of their distinction. If you really want to argue that they're the same, the burden of proof is on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 06:46 PM
2

why are you making a distinction between prostitute and entrepreneur. no ones gives a shit about your boring eastern values here Obviously because there's a massive distinction to be made between them by definition. My values have nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 06:34 PM
1

my point was that showing your tits for money doesn't make you an entrepreneur, it makes you a prostitute
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 06:27 PM
1

"And what do you want to be when you grow up honey? A big tittied twitch thot? how wonderful! I'm so proud of my little darling, she gets that entrepreneurial spirit from her momma!"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 06:21 PM
1

hey if you enjoy getting half naked for thirsty simps to give you money, I can't judge. But yes, I do, because that's not a career.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 06:13 PM
3

Seriously wtf is up with these mindless livejournal style rants lately?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 05:47 PM
4

I do have an old best friend though who wants to try things with me. I havent tried to "game" her into anything though Equally meaningless. TRP isn't for women to get their lesbian best friend to say she wants to "try things" with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 05:19 PM
1

The US has a lot of web cam entrepreneurs, twitch entertainers, and instagram models which are jobs pretty much women opt to do almost like a hobby. This is literally the only place where I've seen quotes flying around when it comes to women's careers, and for good reason, in my 20 years of living in the USA.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 05:09 PM
9

Td;lr Women come in a variety of forms. Improve your game ... ive only had one partner so far (male) ​ If you haven't had any significant success dating women, your advice to men on how to do this is not credible.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 04:59 PM
2

Because weird men are like robots. They walk up to women and say "would you like to pursue sexual congress bleep bloop [Y/n]?". They're not like us humans who like cheesy sexual innuendo. Just kidding, pussy is in a bubble. People are getting fed up, flirting is becoming less and less common because it's a risky fucking hassle and not worth it except for pre-selected men. A golden age of technologically induced solitude is coming, pray to God you have no male children, they'll be beyond fucked i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 02:43 PM
2

But then how are we supposed to call people weird while remaining Politically Correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 02:27 PM
3

>The only people obsessing over this shit so basically, PPD regulars
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 02:21 PM
2

Totally understandable OP, this is why nobody wants a broke man, and why nobody wants an old woman. People need to start getting used to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 04:29 AM
4

I don't think they deserve sympathy, but I also don't think they deserve judgment. I just kind of shrug my shoulders and think to myself "well that's how it is then".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 02:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter