TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ernestbelfortbax Archive

View 168 posts and 128 comments by ernestbelfortbax on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
429

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights09/10/13 04:35 PM
407

Newsernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:53 AM
251

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:25 PM
172

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:32 AM
153

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:06 AM
151

Outrageernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:30 AM
149

Feminismernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights06/11/15 11:44 AM
145

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:55 PM
145

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:14 PM
130

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:15 AM
126

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights27/09/14 05:51 PM
120

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights14/02/13 05:53 PM
103

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:22 AM
102

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:17 PM
87

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:22 PM
83

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:50 PM
83

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:50 AM
82

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:09 PM
81

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:42 PM
79

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:17 AM
71

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights15/02/14 11:38 AM
70

Newsernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:16 PM
69

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:39 AM
68

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:46 PM
67

Red Pill Theoryernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 12:01 PM
65

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:37 AM
63

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:36 AM
62

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights26/08/13 09:09 AM
61

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:14 AM
56

Men's Rightsernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 02:31 PM
50

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 09:29 AM
49

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights24/12/13 09:22 AM
47

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:44 PM
43

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights07/06/13 07:08 AM
41

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:34 AM
38

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights30/11/13 08:58 AM
37

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:26 AM
35

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights25/01/14 08:32 PM
35

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:40 AM
33

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights16/09/13 09:47 AM
33

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:28 AM
32

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:45 AM
32

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights09/05/13 06:05 AM
32

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:09 AM
31

WBBernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:25 AM
30

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:23 PM
29

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:43 PM
28

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights31/12/12 01:05 PM
28

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights29/11/13 03:44 PM
27

Outrageernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:07 AM
27

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:11 AM
26

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights08/03/14 11:13 AM
26

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:12 PM
26

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:57 AM
25

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:56 PM
24

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights11/03/13 10:05 AM
24

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights27/07/13 08:42 AM
22

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights29/11/13 08:14 AM
22

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:24 AM
21

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights21/01/14 09:03 AM
20

Men's Rightsernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:19 PM
19

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:30 AM
18

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:34 AM
18

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights23/02/13 10:57 AM
18

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:56 AM
16

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:11 AM
16

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:11 PM
16

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights27/07/13 07:00 AM
16

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:56 AM
15

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:51 PM
14

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights11/04/14 10:05 AM
14

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:17 AM
13

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:47 PM
13

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:14 PM
12

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:38 AM
11

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:01 AM
11

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 04:06 PM
11

Off Topicernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 05:39 PM
11

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:30 PM
11

Misleading Titleernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:51 AM
10

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights27/11/13 10:23 AM
10

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights09/02/14 08:23 PM
9

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:30 AM
9

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:11 AM
9

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights09/11/13 02:54 PM
9

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:39 AM
9

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights20/10/13 09:16 AM
9

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:25 PM
8

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights07/03/13 11:04 PM
8

Activism/Supporternestbelfortbax/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:38 AM
8

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 11:12 AM
7

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:39 PM
7

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights05/08/13 08:33 PM
7

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights19/10/14 09:09 AM
7

Blogs/Videoernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:05 AM
7

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:12 AM
7

Men's Rights Newsernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:18 PM
6

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights02/02/13 02:26 PM
6

MR Blogs/Vlogsernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:31 AM
6

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights28/01/14 11:24 AM
6

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights18/11/13 08:06 AM
6

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights07/01/13 12:03 PM
6

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 11:00 PM
5

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:20 PM
5

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights16/01/14 08:59 AM
5

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights16/06/13 09:13 PM
5

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:30 AM
5

MR Blogs/Vlogsernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:55 AM
5

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:23 PM
5

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:56 PM
5

Men's Rights Newsernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights13/04/14 09:56 AM
4

Newsernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:28 PM
4

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:14 AM
4

Social Issuesernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights23/10/17 02:49 PM
4

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights02/11/13 11:09 AM
4

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:15 PM
4

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights20/02/14 09:10 AM
4

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:08 AM
4

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights24/01/14 09:58 AM
3

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:41 AM
3

Outrageernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:32 AM
3

Men's Rightsernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 07:08 AM
3

False Accusationernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights05/08/15 10:21 PM
3

Raising Awarenessernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights21/10/14 10:54 AM
3

Men's Rightsernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill12/12/14 12:06 PM
3

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:25 PM
3

Anti-MRAernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:34 AM
2

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:12 AM
2

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:56 PM
2

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:13 AM
2

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights07/02/14 01:27 PM
2

MR Blogs/Vlogsernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:10 PM
2

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights20/11/13 04:49 PM
2

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:04 AM
2

Blogs/Videoernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:20 PM
1

Discriminationernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:46 AM
1

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:36 AM
1

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 09:59 AM
1

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 08:50 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:44 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights12/10/13 07:58 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:24 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:07 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/seduction09/08/13 09:41 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:15 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 03:31 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 10:30 PM
0

Men's Rightsernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 10:23 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:54 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 10:41 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights05/10/13 09:38 AM
0

Analysisernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights30/01/15 11:04 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 11:25 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:54 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:59 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights26/02/13 11:52 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 09:26 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:39 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:28 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:47 PM
0

Rant/Ventingernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 05:48 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights10/02/14 09:30 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:58 PM
0

Men's Rightsernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 06:07 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:57 AM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights24/08/13 06:53 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:11 PM
0

ernestbelfortbax/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 07:32 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you don't know who Neil Lyndon is, he's one of the fathers of the men's rights movement and the author of 'No More Sex War' published back in the mid 1990's. *Snowflake feMRA Victimhood Trigger Warning - Lyndon is old school MRA so doesn't 100% agree with the sexual victim equality seeking modern Honey Badger movement, and therefore makes light of his boyhood 'abuse' at the end of the article.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 02:52 PM
3

http://theantifeminist.com/femihag-fury-at-male-masturbator-that-ecourages-rape-and-paedophilia/
/r/MensRights06/11/15 11:45 AM
4

http://theantifeminist.com/academic-argues-prostitution-should-be-legalized-due-to-lack-of-sex-for-modern-men-femiservative-disagrees/
/r/MensRights07/08/15 09:59 AM
-1

And is your comment unironic? Seriously?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:22 AM
3

Well I wouldn't be castigating the 'honey badgers' if I was an 'avfm stooge' would I? I haven't been here for months. Has A Voice for Men officially broken ranks with reddit men's rights now? Perhaps it's the thread starter who is disowning Roosh at what might be a pivotal moment in the fight against feminists and sjws who is the divisive stooge here. And personally, I don't have any problem with the term 'manosophere'. Why should a MENS rights activist have any problem with term 'MANosphere' fo…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:20 AM
-6

Roosh is an MRA, whether he describes himself as one or not. An MRA is somebody who uses activism as a means to promote the welfare of men and boys in a feminist dominated misandristic society. You guys think what he's fighting for in Montreal is not an example of this? http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-49574.html And 'honey badgers' screeching that 17 year old boys having sex with their teachers are 'rape victims' are the real mras? Dear oh dear.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:16 AM
5

16 year olds will soon have the vote in the UK (already do in Scotland) : http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-33082124 If she's old enough to vote, she's old enough to be banged..hard. Funny thing is those jealous old cows likely have sympathy when a middle-aged cougar is locked up for seducing a 14 year old boy.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 09:54 AM
2

You seem to suffer from a form of solipsism, as well as aspergers syndrome, and extrapolate too readily from your instance that you personally need a scientific proof of something, to the belief that others will as well. Can you provide a link that demonstrates to me why most mras on this subreddit will require such a proof? [citation needed] Most real mras here are aware of the 1in6.or website and will have seen it linked regularly and approvingly as a valid resource throughout the MRM. My ques…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:53 PM
2

I distinctly recall reading him claim that the real figure for rape was something closer to the 4 digits. Here he attacks the idea that 1 in 4 woman have been raped as patently ridiculous : http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/ill-decide-if-you-were-raped-not-you/
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:45 PM
2

nope, mra's have long been arguing that rapists are a small number of sociopaths and psychopaths Hold on a moment. You're claiming that the 1in6 women raped figure is true and yet you want to believe that only a tiny number of men rape women. YOU are being contradictory. I wouldn't disagree that rapists are often or even always psychopaths. That doesn't alter the fact that rapists choose fertile young females as victims, predominatly. Can you link to these 'mras' who have argued that rape is abo…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:34 PM
2

And lots of ugly people get raped, rape is people with personality disorders dominating and controlling people, its not about reproduction. O.k....but at the end of the day, this is a men's rights subreddit, not a radical feminist subreddit. I'm an Mra. I don't what you and the aspie are. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/08/20/study-rape-victims-have-a-higher-pregnancy-rates-than-other-women/
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:29 PM
2

Every one of those dozens of posts linking to 1in6 was linking to the site approvingly as a valid resource. It was once debated here whether to put the link in the sidebar (and I believe it was for a time). Simply by linking to it as a valid resource you are validating the 1in6 statistic, the very fucking name and url of the fucking site you fucking aspie fucking moron. And every resource and statistic should be doubted by association, just as anything that comes out of a feminist's mouth should…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:27 PM
0

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/08/20/study-rape-victims-have-a-higher-pregnancy-rates-than-other-women/ "As to why rape victims would have a higher rate of pregnancy, the Gottschalls put forward a few theories. They look at previous research, which suggests that men are more attracted to women who are fertile and ovulating. In consensual sex, women can decline sex at a time where there might be a high likelihood of pregnancy. That's not the case in rape. "Rapists do not wai…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:22 PM
1

Anyone could be linking to 1in6 for any number of reasons, not just for that one statistic. Seriously, fuck off.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:21 PM
2

So what your aspie mind appears to be saying is : 1/I'm non-scientific because I can't provide empirical testifiable under lab conditions proof that most mras appear to believe and support the 1in6 stat. Even though I've pointed to hundreds of examples of it being linked to here, as well as on the homepage of the largest, by far, men's rights site. 2/ despite this, you personally believe the 1in6 stat, as an mra. Only that's the way I can interpret your aspie objection to my comment describing t…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:41 PM
2

So a search result that reveals that this mens rights subreddit has posted the 1in6.org as a resource dozens of times doesn't qualify as a citation validating my original suggestion that the 1in6.org? Please put your aspie head back in the sand. Oh, and thanks for a junk science citation that has been widely used by radical feminists since the 1970's to justify their war on 'rape culture'.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:32 PM
1

Who gives a shit exactly what you think? You seem to like wasting your time and my time aspying around in the comments here. You can tell from the post titles that the 1in6.org is being linked to positively.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:25 PM
0

Some rapists do it for sexual pleasure, for others it's pretty much solely a power based assault. This is a men's rights subreddit. Either you're an aspie and not worth discussing with or a feminist troll. Only feminsts believe that 'rape is about power'. It's pretty disturbing if you're the type of 'new mra' that GamerGate has brought along.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:16 PM
1

Learn to read man.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:10 PM
1

Aspie medication needed.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:08 PM
2

What????
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:07 PM
2

How about you read the comments here before commenting yourself? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=1in6.org&restrict_sr=on
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:03 PM
1

The author of that AVfM article is a psychotherapist who makes a living out of treating male 'victims' of abuse. Has AVfMen asked him if he shares Jim Hopper's views on 'recovered memories' of abuse?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:02 PM
-1

Ahh...o.k., so it's absurd that peak fertility females get assualted in those numbers when they are mixing and even living with horny young males 24/7, but if you include all the rapes they suffer when middle-aged and ugly then the 1in 6 stat is believable? Hmmm....
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:00 PM
2

I've never heard of anyone believing the male 1 in 6 and not the female 1 in X though. Paul Elam is the chief editor of AVfMen and the most famous MRA on the planet. He's gone on record as stating that he believes that the real figures for sexual assault on women are something like 1 in 1000+ At the same time he promotes the 1in6 males abused stat and accepts donations on the basis of it in order to 'spread awareness', an aim that is regularly lauded on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 11:58 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=1in6.org&restrict_sr=on
/r/MensRights30/01/15 11:55 AM
2

Well I see it here on this reddit, at AVfM, and other MRA sites regularly. On the front page of AVoiceforMen, the following article regularly shows up in the 'MHRM Classics' box : http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/boys-raped-more-often-than-girls/ The 1 in 6 statistic/study shows up in the 3rd sentence. The writer fully validates the definitions and findings, apart from disputing the fact that 1 in 4 girls are sexually abused and only 1 in 6 boys are abused (he accepts that 1 in 4 girls are a…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 11:54 AM
3

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/10/prison-overcrowding-increase-sex-offenders-behind-bars http://www.theweek.co.uk/uk-news/52139/fewer-women-should-be-sent-jail-says-justice-minister http://theantifeminist.com/the-number-of-british-prisoners-aged-over-60-years-has-risen-by-130-between-2002-and-2013-a-shift-attributed-to-an-increase-in-the-convictions-for-historic-sex-abuse/
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:18 PM
1

The (German) film adaptation of Hoeullebecq's novel 'Atomized' is red pill, just because the novel is a red pill classic (not a particularly great adaptation though). Heartiste on Houellebecq : https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/choice-quotes-from-michel-houellebecq/ Also Roosh (writing about a different Houellebecq novel, which has also been adapted into a film,unfortunately in French without subtitles) : http://www.returnofkings.com/1146/the-father-of-the-term-sexual-marketplace
/r/TheRedPill12/12/14 12:02 PM
2

Was Lena Dunham really a greater sexual hypocrite in 2014 than even David Futrelle? http://theantifeminist.com/david-fraudtrelle-paedocrite-of-the-year-2014-poll/ Last chance for red pillers to vote in the 2014 David Fraudtrelle paedocrite of the year poll!
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 10:32 AM
2

http://theantifeminist.com/author-john-grisham-questions-the-sexual-holocaust/
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:55 PM
3

You lot are a bunch of half-wits if you really think this story is good for men's rights. It's hard to determine from the poorly written news article, but as far as I can tell, all she has been found 'guilty' of is 'supporting' 'paedophilia'. i.e. she might disagree with the feminist age of consent laws that send thousands of men each year to be brutally raped and beaten in prison (and with their numbers growing almost exponentially as the feminist legislative creep and hysteria continues). Nowh…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:07 PM
12

The lack of interest around here in the feminist lynching of Sam Pepper is quite tragic. http://theantifeminist.com/david-futrelle-lynching-sam-pepper/
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:55 PM
3

The MRM is still pretty poor at identifying and targetting potential sources of support. Some of the comments here are quite depressing : "If he wants kudos, he can earn them like the rest of the MRAs have, by not looking for praise before he even starts." Err...no, if a figure with a huge social media following has expressed any kind of anti-feminist/men's rights sentiments, then you target them like crazy and try to bring them into the fold. Somebody like that could double the size of the MRM …
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:32 AM
1

http://theantifeminist.com/david-futrelle-lynching-sam-pepper/
/r/MensRights27/09/14 05:52 PM
1

"I dont know the context of Futrelles comments, but I dont think finding something of artistic value is in itself the problem." The context was the film being rented out in a gay sex shop alongside the other gay pornos, to which the local police understandably took exception to and raided the establishment, which prompted a furious David Futrelle to call for said police to be arrested themselves. I'm obviously missing something here, but even if this film has some kind of 'artistic merit' amongs…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 08:16 AM
10

http://theantifeminist.com/stephen-fry-speaks-out-against-operation-yewtree/
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:54 AM
3

It's gonna be tricky for me to prove that he isn't influencial, but perhaps if he is so powerful you can demonstrate all the great and powerful action that has been taken on his say so. Well, we will find out in a weeks time how influential he is, given that he is orchestrating the effort to have feminist protestors disrupt the conference and use violence and intimidation against attendees, as they did at a previous event at which Warren Farrell spoke. In the meantime, perhaps we should tell the…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 09:36 AM
1

The media would have quoted a stuffed bear if it told them Elliot Rodgers was an MRA. And he did tell them, and they quoted him, and the legislation to have us all thrown in jail is probably already now in the works. Further, how is any of this relevant to RP? Ermm..well as hinted above, he's trying to have /theredpill and the entire manosphere banned and all of us classified and monitored as potential terrorists and mass murderers. That doesn't change the fact that he has no credibility, and fo…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 08:48 AM
1

Ermmm...he's near explicitly inciting violence against the delegates and attendees of the forthcoming Detroit conference, in particular Warren Farrell for a comment he made (and was misquoted on) nearly half-a-century ago (and for which he is directly accusing of being a paedophile). He had nothing to do with Elliot Rodger being described as an MRA by the mainstream media (who were happy to quote Fraudtrelle)?
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 08:16 AM
5

I don't think he claims that it is 'easy to pick up women'. He's trying to show that approach anxiety can be overcome, and he's completely honest about the fact that good looks matter tremendously. Hence his name - 'Good Looking Loser'. However, he does maintain that most men can considerably improve their looks through effort, and whether or not you agree, he does give a lot of advice and info on how to attempt it, including cosmetic surgery and steroids. I don't think there is any other PUA gi…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 07:24 AM
1

Pick-up could be illegal everywhere in Europe within a year or so - the sexual harassment treaty has already been signed, including even in Russia and Ukraine. http://theantifeminist.com/wolf-whistling-and-sexist-remarks-could-soon-be-illegal-throughout-europe/ http://theantifeminist.com/russia-makes-pick-up-illegal This is why those PUAs who mocked the men's rights movement for trying to fight feminism through activism (other than through hate fucking), whilst pretending to want to restore trad…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 07:19 AM
19

Lets ponder on the theory that if we fucked only prostitutes would women actually stop acting like schizo freaks on LSD cocaine? Yes. Prostitution lowers the sexual market value and bargaining power of women, thus feminists criminalize it (or rather men who pay for sex with prostitutes) - and most women support this. It's the same with feminist attempts to ban porn and to raise the age of consent. It also explains rape hysteria as an attempt by feminists to deter young women and men from engagin…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 04:03 PM
5

I wonder how claiming that 1 in 6 boys are raped (mainly by homosexual men), whilst at the same time calling (correctly) bullshit on the feminist claim that 1 in 4 women are raped, is going to change this situation? And it's not just a question of false allegations : http://theantifeminist.com/men-too-scared-to-teach-for-fear-of-being-falsely-accused-of-child-sex-offences/
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:44 AM
0

These guys are friends of the PUA 'SquattinCasanova'. See him try something similar here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYdSv5PkfCI They were taught how to do this from an Asian PUA, lol!
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 12:24 AM
12

It is not widely known, but the practice of handing out white feathers was carried out extensively even in the Second World War, leading to the suicides of at least two teenage boys : http://theantifeminist.com/white-feathers-during-world-war-ii-caused-the-suicides-of-two-teenage-boys/ Bernard Sills was just 17 when he recieved in the mail two white feathers framed in the shape of a question mark together with the word 'coward'. The young cadet had volunteered to serve but was discharged when it…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:18 AM
3

So who is this guy? Are people afraid of possible legal action if he is named here or something???
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:03 PM
3

" He said: "For men, a good reason their sexual motivation to remain constant would be to guard against being cuckolded by another male." But women, he said, have evolved to have a high sex drive when they are initially in a relationship in order to form a "pair bond" with their partner. But, once this bond is sealed a woman's sexual appetite declines, he added. He said animal behaviour studies suggest this could be because females may be diverting their sexual interest towards other men, in ord…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 09:59 AM
-2

You're giving examples of extreme fetish porn (which, btw, is illegal even to look at in the UK now with up to 3 years in prison). Looking at most porn will simply raise men's aspirations a notch - and that's a good thing when most Anglo-skank fatties are still in a position to expect betas to be chasing them. "Personally my sex life improved a lot when I cut back on porn." You settled for a chubby?
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 10:27 AM
3

http://theantifeminist.com/backlash-at-last-over-the-witch-hunts-cps-under-pressure-as-nigel-evans-cleared-of-rape/
/r/MensRights11/04/14 10:06 AM
11

The Suffragettes encouraged women to hand out white feathers to men (and even underaged boys) in civilian clothing during world war 1. Most of the millions of men maimed or killed in that war didn't have the vote either. They praised the men who gave up their lifeboats on the Titanic. They actively and successfully criminalized male sexuality by campaigning for laws on prostitution and raising the age of consent. Divorce laws were already rigged in favour of women, as was the entire justice syst…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:52 PM
8

You could start by reading Ernest Belfort Bax, the first supporter of men, writing over a century ago : http://ernestbelfortbax.com/ (not my site by the way)
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:50 PM
20

Realising that you stuck your cock into the ass of a tranny is probably punishment enough for any man.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:21 PM
3

This is men's rights activism at its best.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 11:14 AM
11

All men are potential paedophiles because feminists have re-defined paedopihlia to mean even the normal sexual attraction towards girls in their mid to late teens. You will never be able to stop the demonization of men as potential paedophiles without challenging the ridiculous feminist re-definition and inflation of the term 'paedophile'.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 11:11 AM
10

This shows a couple of useful metrics, including subscriber growth : http://redditmetrics.com/r/TheRedPill See also, to contrast with the decline of the men's rights movement : http://theantifeminist.com/killing-the-cause-mens-rights-movement-dead/
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 10:37 PM
5

http://theantifeminist.com/jo-woodiwiss-why-do-women-identify-themselves-as-victims-of-childhood-sexual-abuse/
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:52 PM
2

The criminalization of male sexuality by feminists.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 11:41 AM
1

Equality under the law What about equality behind the law too, given that feminists make many laws and many others are made by men eager to chase the votes of women? What's the point of equality under an injust law that is targetted at men?
/r/MensRights15/02/14 11:40 AM
2

http://theantifeminist.com/william-roache-found-not-guilty-abusing-girls/
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:39 PM
-14

So how does the MHRM think spreading the idea that 1 in 4 men are paedophiles, but that 1 in 12 women are paedophiles, will put a stop to this exactly? 17 year old horny boys will start alerting the police when cougars walk within 50 meters of them in the park? And that's it? Equality of injustice for all! Not that even that will ever happen in a million years.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 12:04 PM
9

I think you people are missing the point somewhat. The Judge clearly stated in his summoning up that insults such as 'blonde bitch' were part of the reason he was jailing the pair. Criado-Perez has told a man on Twitter to 'fuck you, you insensitive prick', which is the equivalent of calling a woman a cunt. Apparently, she has a history on Twitter of making such abusive insults. She also claimed that at one point she was recieving more than 50 rape and death threats an hour, and reported them al…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 11:11 PM
6

Maybe, but note the title of this post. It doesn't mention arrested, it mentions being jailed. And the Judge clearly communicated that merely insulting tweets contributed to their sentence of imprisonment. BTW, men's rights bloggers get similar threats nearly every day from feminists and manginas.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 10:25 PM
3

It might well be the case that they may not have been arrested in the first place if they hadn't sent a couple of tweets interpreted by the police as rape threats, but in the final summoning up, the judge included tweets that were clearly no more than insulting, apparently deeming them to be illegal and contributing to the pair's prison sentence. That is disturbing. And some of those tweets were no more menacing or insulting than tweets that have been made by Caroline Criado-Perez.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 10:22 PM
5

Nope, their 'insults' were used in court as evidence and presumably contributed to their jail term for 'malicious use of communications' (or some such). The tweet 'fuck off and die' was prominantly reported in the media as an example of why there were in court facing jail. http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/the_jailing_of_two_trolls_its_now_a_crime_to_be_insulting/14566#.UuOcQMx_5Os.facebook
/r/MensRights25/01/14 10:15 PM
2

http://theantifeminist.com/rachel-broady-femihags-and-paedocrite-conspiracy-nuts-already-slandering-mcalpine/
/r/MensRights20/01/14 11:40 PM
-6

You can also stop promoting the absurd idea that 1 in 6 boys have been abused. This statistic, that comes from radical feminist junk science studies, has the unfortunate consequence of implying that at least 1 in 4 men are paedophile child abusers, as well as the obscene belief that nearly all homosexuals are child abusers. http://theantifeminist.com/1-in-6-boys-has-been-abused-1-in-4-men-are-paedophiles/ Promoting this belief will lead to more men in prison as sex offenders who will likely be r…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 09:02 PM
0

Not at all. If people like Paul Elam can claim that those of us MRAs who think that feminist laws such as these are wrong should be 'raped in prison', then I can say that people like him, who actually firmly support and validate these laws, should burn in hell. I also recall that you (if you are the same 'pigman') once claimed here that Human-Stupidity himself, and other mras like myself who are unafraid and honest enough to say that these feminist laws are evil, should be 'slowly tortured to de…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:24 AM
-1

And I would state categorically that any 'supporter of men' who does not think that this is about as insane and injust as it gets, never mind a valid men's rights issue, is not only a complete fraud, but deserves to burn in hell.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:02 AM
-5

So how exactly does the MHRM promotion of the feminist idea that 1 in 6 children are abused help to stop this? I'm confused.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:07 PM
2

To be honest I've never read up on feminism driving age of consent to be raised. Normally that's conservative lobbying groups, or Christian groups. No, you're quite wrong. Firstly, virtually all age of consent laws in the Western world were lobbied for and set by feminists (in the USA and the UK by suffragettes). Secondly, in Europe it is still almost exclusively feminists driving the frenzy of new law making and further draconian punishments. For example, the NSPCC, probably the most powerful '…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:17 AM
2

Mores change. The point is you idiot that these mores were changed by feminists and they did so for selfish-sexual reasons and its resulting in the criminalization and demonisation of hundreds of thousands of men. Also, HS was replying to your lie that the attractiveness of teenage girls lies outside of normal male sexuality. You're supporting the feminist re-definition of male sexuality, and the criminalization of any men who fail to go through their entire lives according to it, and then you t…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:08 AM
2

Your problem is that leading MRAs arent picking up and fighting your pet issue. No, as I've always made clear, I have no problem with other mras not discussing this issue, I do have problems when AVfM and r/mensrights, and other 'MHRM' hang outs, actually validate the feminist child abuse industry when a feminist leglislative creep and witch hunt is taking place that appears to have no end. there is not even a single blogpost opposing or trashing you Fidelbogen came on my site the other day and …
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:01 AM
2

The present feminist age of consent (16 or 18 in the anglo world) is also one of the most particularly backward of feminist laws, being set in the Victorian/Edwardian eras, by exceptionally puritanical suffragettes in bills that commonly also criminalized homosexuality. For example, Alan Turing was convicted under a law passed in the same bill that raised the age of consent from 13 to 16, and the bill was lobbied for mainly by feminists, the same ones who were handing out white feathers to 15 ye…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:33 PM
2

Also, all reddit posts get femitroll downvotes, so its probably about equal up and downvotes.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:30 PM
2

This smells like coat-tailing to me, and there is no need for the MRM to tolerate it. Just to make it clear - these issues are so obviously related to men's rights and accepted obviously as mens' rights issues by every other mra before the moral panic of the last decade (from ernest belfort bax, David Thomas, to Angry Harry), that it is not credible that you can actually believe that there is no relationship to men's rights (other than equal application of the laws). Even the Economist magazine …
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:19 PM
2

Will the downvoters please state their reason? It's probably as much that the article you linked to contains explicit attacks on the MHRM/AVfM as much as that people don't think that these are men's rights issues. People might be downvoting because they reject the accusation of 'treason' etc. And of course, the people who comment here will be the people who feel the need to imply that anyone who discusses these issues are paedophiles, and that in turn will lead to others too fearful to leave com…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:11 PM
2

Agreed that no 41 year old should break the law and sexually involve themselves with an underage person, and that is why, for example, I am firmly against the recent pardoning of the child sex abuser Alan Turing. However, out of interest, why do you (and others) support the feminist age of consent, when you do not support any other feminist law that sends tens of thousands of men to jail?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:06 PM
2

I also do not, or rarely, discuss the usual issues (domestic violence, father's rights etc) because there are countless blogs and sites doing so, and almost zero discussing the legislative creep of feminist anti-sex law making.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:01 PM
2

Who are you referring to here? If you are talking about me, then I have said no such thing. Also, my site is devoted to the feminist criminalization of male sexuality - mainly that refers to pornography, prostitution, sexual harrasment, and the age of consent. Sorry, I simply have nothing to defend or to justify (nor to hide) - feminists putting thousands of men in prison and/or on the sex offenders register every passing year with new and crazy sex laws (as well as the ever more draconian punis…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:55 PM
2

Well that's the thing, whenever I hear "Sex positive", I instantly assume feminists. I've never had an MRA claim to be sex positive, because I think it's just assumed. Well we can re-claim the term. It simply means being positive about sex rather than repressive. Feminists claim to be 'sex positive' yet support the jailing of hundreds of thousands of men under backward and puritanical sex laws (as, sadly, do most 'mras', and particularly 'mhras'.)
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:52 PM
2

Take a look at AVfM's view of a new UK law extending the definition of domestic violence, especially the list of 5 points why this is a bad law : http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/domestic-violence-industry/tough-new-domestic-violence-laws-proposed-for-britain/ All 5 points apply equally to feminist statutory rape laws. Your point above surely could apply equally to dismissing domestic violence laws as a non mrm issue - ie: 'They can be a men's rights issue, but the issue is that, regardle…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:49 PM
2

http://theantifeminist.com/1in6-org-equality-of-injustice-stupid/
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:58 PM
2

'Sympathetic' feminists validating their value system and the mras here swallow it again without critique....
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:36 PM
2

Two other points you need to think about : Firstly, the majority of those '1 in 6' victims were 'abused' by homosexual men, including 17 year olds having willing sex with men in their twenties. Secondly, if you validate the feminist figure of 1 in 6 males sexually abused (mostly by other men), then you by necessity validate the feminist figure of 1 in 6 females sexually abused (by men). Somebody please explain to me how anyone can think this is good for men or for men's rights, in the context of…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:00 PM
2

The 1 in 6 figure comes from a radical feminist junk science study that attempted to link masculinity to sexual violence. It also includes 'non contact' sexual abuse, whatever the hell that feminist defined term means. Yeaa, it doesn't matter that over 1 million American men are on the sex offenders register with no end in sight to the feminist legislative creep - so long as society cares about the 17 year old boys 'molested' by cougars and left traumatised for life!!! And if they're not traumat…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:52 PM
6

When obesity is the number 1 health problem in the West for young girls, why do feminists promote 'fat acceptance' and 'fat is beautiful' campaigns, and yet wish to skin alive a male author for suggesting that anorexic girls are loveable?
/r/MensRights20/11/13 10:23 PM
7

http://theantifeminist.com/angry-harry-what-is-stop-violence-against-men-day/
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:14 PM
2

You're not making any sense. Why is pointing out that somebody is a hypocrite a logical fallacy? In this case, the motive of Church, the person making the argument, is entirely relevant. Church's only 'argument' seems to be that because she no longer can make money from her body, it follows that she was 'exploited' when she could make money from her body. And she has a clear sexual motive in making that 'argument' now that her looks have gone (doing so will potentially lead to restrictions on se…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:42 PM
-1

Seen at http://angryharry.com - the father of the men's rights movement
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:09 PM
0

I'm not an expert, but doesn't America constitutionally protect freedom of expression? This is why, for example, the USA does not have 'virtual child pornography' laws - at least not on a federal level - whereas they have been forced upon most countries (including Candada, and consisting mostly of locking people up for owning Japanese hentai and manga cartoons). It is also why the USA does not have 'hate speech' laws. There has actually been a lot of resistance to these moves to censor. Unfortun…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:20 AM
0

Feminism is a self-interest group that arose when middle-class women began to feel sexually and economically threatened by the free sexual market that secularism and Industrialisation brought. Winning the vote was openly seens as a means to control male sexuality. Second wave feminism exploded with the contraceptive pill which allowed men to sleep around with no consequence, and is reaching a new intensity with the attempt to counter the new sexual 'threats' posed by the internet (chiefly pornog…
/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:28 PM
5

It's great news. However, I can't help noticing that it tooks us several months at least to go from 70k to 80k, when we seemed to be gaining nearly a thousand subscribers a day for a little while before that.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:16 PM
-1

Excellent job, but why not include the 95% of prisoners being male figure? I assume because that figure is interpreted by feminists as '95%' of criminals are male, but a similar thing could be said (and is by femis) regarding the homicide gender breakdown (most murderers are men). It's becoming increasingly stupid to ignore the prison gender breakdown when increasingly laws are lobbied for and even passed by women (especially sex offender laws), and when feminists have even been successfully cal…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:39 AM
-1

But yes, it made me feel as if i had wasted my time when i read the article and found that it is far from a fait accompli. So i second the motion, it needs a Misleading Title tag. The EU is about to vote on making it illegal for 700 million people to express anti-feminst thought and you've wasted your time reading the article. Oh sorry, we'll wake you up in a year or two when this proposal has been made into law. Oh, actually, myself and half of the people on this reddit will not be able to do t…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:03 AM
-1

Lol!
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:59 AM
0

If you Google 'including women and children' you get over a quater of a million results in Google News alone : http://theantifeminist.com/including-women-and-children/
/r/MensRights24/08/13 06:54 PM
-5

She forwarded on his 'sexually harrassing' messages, including references to anal sex, to his mother, and (presumably very) elderly grandmother. Two days before Christmas. So is she not guilty of sexually harrassing his relatives?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:45 AM
1

http://theantifeminist.com/steve-moxon-its-anything-but-inappropriate-to-point-out-a-girls-sexual-experience-and-predatory-nature/
/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:24 AM
0

This guy obviously suffers from extreme approach anxiety. I wouldn't describe him as a baller at this stage.
/r/seduction08/08/13 10:48 AM
1

When it's clear that you almost suffer a panic attack just from situational openers with laid back solo girls, I would advise you not to even think about approaching two sets. Just accept that you are not going to get laid for a few months and think long term and concentrate solely on defeating your AA first - asking directions etc.
/r/seduction08/08/13 10:46 AM
0

http://theantifeminist.com/steve-moxon-and-jeremy-forrest-did-what-wrong-precisely/
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:11 AM
1

http://theantifeminist.com/john-pilger-feminist-betrayal-class-war/
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:17 AM
2

http://theantifeminist.com/king-mangina-to-make-it-easier-for-police-to-force-children-to-accuse-men-of-abuse/
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:34 AM
-1

But for the people who you aren't arguing with -- the onlookers -- it pays to appear more reasonable. How do you know this? Can you point to any study or real historical example of this being the case? And please don't give me a personal anecdote or your own history. You concern trolls seem to assume a rational view of human nature and society in general, but the fact that such a pernicious superstition such as feminism has managed to overturn a social order that existed for thousands of years i…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:54 AM
-3

I wouldn't like to see a male MRA being called an "ugly creep with a kneckbeard" either, so why should I want to see the same thing directed at anyone else? Attack people's arguments, not appearance. But you can't seperate feminist's appearance from what they are doing. They really do hate men and really do lobby for law after law criminalizing men because they are ugly and unattractive to men. I don't normally approve of criticising somebody for their sexuality rather than their arguments, and …
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:42 AM
0

http://theantifeminist.com/age-of-consent-should-be-13-says-prominant-barrister/
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:25 PM
11

And before anyone says the article does not single out boys, it is understood that it is boys, and it is boys (including pre-teen boys) who are being regularly now put on trial for sexual assualt for what appears to be nothing more than mutual fumbling.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:16 AM
5

Concern troll post of the week.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:45 PM
1

The 1 in 6 statistic comes from a feminist junk science study, which included 'non contact forms of sexual abuse', and which had the explicit misandristic radical feminist aim of 'proving' a link between masculinity and violence. http://theantifeminist.com/1-in-6-boys-and-men-experience-sexual-abuse-a-step-in-the-right-direction-for-mens-rights/ Any supposed 'mra' who thinks that promoting and validating the feminist abuse industry wont end up making life worse for the vast majority of men and b…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:40 PM
2

LOL, I think if a female was amongst those being executed for mere robbery there would be a little more attention being paid to this. Men are being stoned to death for adultory, their heads sawn off because they belong to a different tribe or religious sect, arms pulled off for theft, hanged or even tortured for homosexuality etc in Islamic nations all the time.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:35 AM
3

Excellent - I agree. The article is actually satirical..or fairer to say a sort of experiment to see whether anything with 'protecting boys from sexual abuse' in the title would automatically get upvoted here. I'm happy to find that it didn't.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:51 AM
1

That's not to say you wouldn't still accidentally run across some boner-destroying kiddie porn though. Yea right, the ideal age for legal porn is 18, but a pic of a naked 17 year old 'kiddie' would automatically kill a man's boner (unless he was a paedophile). http://theantifeminist.com/teen-is-the-most-common-word-porn-average-age-milf-33/
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:35 PM
1

I'm mixed on this decision, on the one hand killing freedom is terrible, on the other hand as a porn producer I could make a fucking killing (I'm in Canada, so have to establish channels for getting it in country, but I have enough resources to do that). Be sure to get rich quick, because you're an idiot if you think it won't be long before Canadian femihags are demanding the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:22 PM
3

I honestly don't know what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:51 PM
-3

Not only that but you're a woman. Who the hell do you think you are to come on a men's rights forum and tell MEN what male sexuality is and isn't? You are an example of the sickness that is killing our cause. Please fuck off and apply to join the staff at AVFM.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:51 PM
-4

I just did a google search of your username, and one of the first sites that came up was this : http://www.ihatemen.org/2012/06/20/mras/ where the radical and openly man hating feminist quotes you in defence of her 'arguments'. Why the hell do the moderators here allow trolls like you to pollute this place?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:41 PM
-3

Since when has male sexuality involved beastiality Not much, except that, as I pointed out, it will be the occasional male pervert caught banging a sheep that will be prosecuted, not the likely thousands of women who let their pet dogs lick their private parts. I believe Eivind included bestiality as an example of how feminists are introducing never ending sex laws, as well as abusing the word 'rape', based on radfem sex power theories. Wanting to hump animals is pretty perverse, but as long as …
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:39 PM
-1

What?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:22 PM
-2

99% of cases of sex with 'unconscious women' are men having sex with their sleeping partners - usually finishing the job when the woman has fallen asleep half-way through. But this is called rape now by feminists.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:22 PM
-1

Because this subreddit can only handle so many 'cougar teacher raped her 17 year old student by sucking his cock' stories that get 1,000 upvotes. A little variety is good, once in a while. Why are you pretending to be a men's rights supporter, and what have you ever done to promote men's rights in your life (apart from throwing shaming language around in here)?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:34 PM
2

He thinks that the use of the word 'rape', which historically referred to the illicit taking of a female sexual resource, should not be used any longer when it is clearly a term being abused by feminists to hurt men. And yes, he does believe that men can be physically abused in a sexual manner, just that it would be better to avoid the word 'rape' alltogether (for men and women).
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:31 PM
-6

Only man haters don't want people to have sex with animals! You seriously think that women will be prosecuted under these bestiality laws? And yes it was manhating feminists who introduced that law, as well as the numerous others that he mentions in the articles. I know this is a difficult concept for some of you here, but feminists continously criminalizing male sexuality under radical feminist theories of sexual power ARE men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:27 PM
3

It's not a new registration, or the whois would have a new created date This is false. The whois start date begins from the date the domain was first registered (i.e. by rad fem in this case). I looked at the whois a couple of hours ago and it was stating 'pending delete' - then the entry updated in front of my eyes (that means I was the first person to look at the who.is entry since the new registrant took over). It seems pretty clear that an Indian blogger has registered the domain 'on the dro…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:30 PM
1

David Benatar - 'The Second Sexism' was published last year. http://www.amazon.com/Second-Sexism-Discrimination-Blackwell-Philosophy/dp/0470674512 Neil Lydon - 'No More Sex War' is another classic published around the same time as Myth of Male Power, but by a British author. http://www.amazon.com/More-Sex-War-Neil-Lyndon/dp/0749315652/ David Thomas - 'Not Guilty : The Case In Defense of Men' also published 1993 by another British author. http://www.amazon.com/Not-Guilty-Case-Defense-Men/dp/06881…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 10:56 PM
-2

http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=%22paul%20elam%22%2C%20%22eivind%20berge%22&cmpt=q
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:57 PM
-5

We strive for complete equality before the law and nothing less. And you are an imbecile sir, if you cannot see that it is feminists who are making these self-serving laws and that the MRM supporting them will only lead to the ruining of thousands of more male lives. Countless more men are raped in American prisons for serving offences that are crimes under feminist lobbied for laws than are 'raped' by women in the outside world. This is the real men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:50 PM
11

http://theantifeminist.com/1-in-6-boys-and-men-experience-sexual-abuse-a-step-in-the-right-direction-for-mens-rights/ The 1 in 6 claim comes from a particular study that included 'non-contact forms of sexual abuse' - whatever the hell that means. It was also carried out by feminists attempting to 'explain' how 'masculinity' causes men to be so much more violent and evil than women. I find it deeply disturbing that such a study like this, or rather a misleading statistic based upon feminist junk …
/r/MensRights24/12/12 09:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter